Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Dr Fauci Criminal Referral | Covid, Fauci, Vaccine Conspiracy Podcasts

Episode Date: August 10, 2023

Senator Rand Paul is forcefully advancing a criminal referral against Dr. Fauci, taking the once-revered "top scientist" to task for allegedly committing perjury before Congress regarding Covid-related matters, including gain of function research. In addition to dissecting the far-reaching consequences of this pivotal criminal referral, I delve further into a web of pandemic lies, vaccine intricacies, and disconcerting patterns emerging within the realm of public health. This episode will Chad by himself, let's see how this goes! All of this and more on this episode of Dr Fauci Criminal Referral | Covid, Fauci, Vaccine Conspiracy Podcasts

Hello, you made me want to overdose, because I'll let you close, and you let me go like I was nothing. If I flat line in my bed tonight, you're the reason why I don't it will be better than this. And I'm out of trying anything to forget that you're waking up with them tomorrow. Damn, that's a real hard bill to swallow. Hello, Anna, welcome to investigate Earth bycast. I'm your host, Chad, and today we do not have Sherry with us. It's actually just going to be me on this episode. Sherry is busy with some stuff today, but we are probably going to be back for an episode later on tonight.

It is right now 10.6 a.m. August 10, 2023. Welcome to the show, guys. The name of that song, by the way, is Overdose by Eddie and the Getaway. Go check them out. Great band. I believe they're also independent as well. So it kind of reminds me like a Chris Dottry, but I think they're going for the country thing. So I don't know. Country is not really the same as it. it used to be anymore. But anyways, welcome to the show, everybody. We have a good one. Now, the topic we're going to be talking about today is twofold.

So we're going to be talking about the faulty criminal referral that Senator Rand Paul has referred to the top D.C. Prosecutor in D.C. Now, although that sounds promising, right, for especially the people that blame faulty for a lot of the COVID pandemic, the vaccine rollout, the potential side effects, deaths, whatever. but you know we know how things work in Washington we know how corrupt they are we know how things never get done we know how the Biden administration continually just kind of uses the department agencies prosecutors and whatever for their own little police or army so don't get too many hopes up but we're going to specifically talk about that and we're also going to be talking about some of the latest studies and findings and things we're finding out about the vaccine

is this thing killing people? We have excess mortality. We have cancers. We have a lot of things that are happening that wasn't happening before the vaccine. And we're going to have some clips that we're going to play for you guys on all of that. And so welcome to the show, everyone. We hope all of you are doing fantastic. We were actually, or I was actually going to do this show this morning.

But, man, we had one hell of a thunderstorm. I mean, it was literally lightning like every 10 seconds. It was hitting house to house. I mean, all around. So I made sure to run in here and unplug everything so that we didn't lose everything. But guys, now, we have covered this topic for, well, really since the pandemic began. So about three years. And in 2019, towards the end of 2019, we did an episode on Event 201, where we talked about Event 201 and what Event 201 was.

Now, for those of you that do not know what Event 201 is or was, and have not heard an episode with us talking about Event 201, what it basically was was a quote-unquote simulation, a pandemic simulation. Now, this was run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This was partnered with the John Hopkins University. And so these two entities came together to basically simulate a worldwide pandemic with a virus, I believe in this particular simulation.

they simulated a virus that came from pigs somewhere in either Africa or South America. And part of this simulation, quote unquote, was to figure out how to control the media, essentially, to where they pushed mass vaccination, they pushed basically fear. They also, part of their simulation, they worked with social media companies to silence or censor any dissenting voices as far as the protocols for the pandemic or the vaccine protocols or rollouts. And so when you watch the video, which by the way, we do have on our Facebook page, if you go and look at our Facebook page, Investigator's podcast, you will find the video of Event 201.

Now, we didn't make the video, nor did anyone else. This video was on their own website, Event 201. And so in this video, it literally lays out exactly what we have been experiencing the past three years since COVID began. It was almost as if this was a practice. This was a scrimmage of what was to come. Now, obviously, there's been a lot of speculation and conspiracy around the entire pandemic. And then once the vaccine came out, obviously there was a lot of speculation and conspiracy around the vaccine for good reason. And then we started having mandates and we started having forced a vaccination. And although the government tried their very best to do this forcefully to everyone,

they knew just how far out from the Constitution that would be. So instead, what they were able to do was they were able to force mass vaccination on federal employees and military, basically military and federal, pretty much the same thing. But they forced vaccination on all of their federal employees, all of the military, with the very few exceptions. And then they figured out what they would do is that, they would basically blackmail or not even necessarily blackmail, but they would force these massive companies across the United States into mass vaccination of their employees.

So there were tons of employees during this pandemic that lost their jobs because some refused to get vaccinated. And then there were others that had to get vaccinated because they could not simply forward to a lose their job. And so they went ahead with vaccination anyway. Now, in this time, August 10th, 2023, now I don't know what your situation is out there. I don't know if you guys listen. Some of you may be vaccinated. Some of you are not. I know Sherry is vaccinated.

She has two vaccinations, which is crazy. But we had talked about it and given what she was kind of doing at the time, you know, I told her it was up to her. I think a lot of that, you know, her mom kind of persuaded her pretty well into getting it. and this was kind of in the very beginning. And so some of you out there that got the vaccination, you probably regret it. And maybe you don't. Maybe you've had no issues, and that's awesome. And we hope it stays that way.

And then some of you out there that may have lost your job because you refused the vaccination, I'm sure potentially you're looking now and being thankful that you did not receive the vaccination, that for many reasons. And we're going to talk about some of those reasons today. We're also obviously going to talk about Dr. Falchie and the criminal referral, some of the things he said in the committee meetings or under oath in front of Congress, in front of the Senate. And we're going to talk about what this could lead to if someone actually decides to prosecute him, which I am very doubtful of. But, hey, we've got to have hope. So we're going to talk about all those things.

But let's get into real quick the criminal referral and what it actually says, why this criminal referral, as being pushed to the D.C. prosecutor by Rand Paul. So Paul accuses Falsci of committing perjury during his testimony before a Senate committee in 2021. Now, the center has also made an official criminal referral to A.G. Merrick Garland. Now, we know A.G. Merrick Garland, he's been big over the whole Trump proceedings

as far as the indictments. We know, and many people believe, that Merrick Garland, the AG, is being politically weaponized by the Biden administration in many ways. and we're seeing this on not just the Trump front, but we have seen this when it comes to parents going to school board meetings and fighting for their kids,

fighting against the indoctrination. A lot of these school systems are putting in front of your kids. Merrick Garland was one of the ones that was leading the charge on trying to make the parents out to be terrorist or criminals. So A.G. Merrick Garland has also been referred this criminal prosecution of Dr. Fawkes. Now, the Department of Justice has not responded to Paul's request whatsoever, which is no surprise there. You have to remember that this is a weaponized Merrick Garland. This is a weaponized Department of Justice.

And this is basically, and I said this yesterday to someone. You know, there was someone that was supposedly, allegedly, threatening President Biden or threatening his life in Utah, at which time the FBI showed up at this guy's house and killed him. Now, we don't know the circumstances or whatever the case is. If I had to guess, what actually happened in that scenario was the FBI probably broke his door down in the middle of the night. This guy probably thought that someone was breaking in his house for good reason because they were. And a gunfight ensued. That's just a guess. But either way, when you have armed men breaking into your house at any time of the day,

you face a gun battle that you're probably not going to win with 15 or 20. FBI agents. That's just the way it goes. But what I was saying is, it's just like the Department of Justice, the FBI, many of these agencies are being weaponized, and they're almost like the mafia hit squad for this administration that is currently residing in office. Now, Republican Senator Rand Paul is recommending the top prosecutor in Washington, D.C., pursue an investigation and possible criminal charges against Dr. Anthony Fulci for allegedly lying under oath about COVID-19 origins.

Now, this says allegedly, this is daily mail, but let me just tell you, I mean, for anybody that watched any of these hearings, and by the way, I'm going to play a short clip of kind of some of what ran Paul's exchange with Falchie was under oath, and I want you guys to decide for yourself. But anyways, Paul sent a letter to DC U.S. attorney Matthew Graves Tuesday demanding an investigation into Falchie for allegedly committing perjury during a congressional hearing in 2021. when he said that COVID did not come from a Chinese lab. And this is quote, Dr. Falci testified that the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gang of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Irology. In a subsequent hearing, I warned Dr. Falci of the criminal implications of lying to Congress and offered him an opportunity to recant his previous statements, writes Paul in the letter exclusively obtained by the Daily Mail. In response, Dr. Falci stated that he had never lied before. Congress and did not retract the statement.

Dr. Falky's testimony is inconsistent with the facts that have since come to light, the Senator continues. The move comes just weeks after he submitted an official criminal referral to the Department of Justice, an aide to Paul confirmed. Now, perjury is a federal offense that carries up to five years in prison, and it quotes, before Congress, Dr. Falschi denied funding gang of function research to the press. He claims to have a dispassionate view of the lab leak hypothesis. and in private he acknowledges

gang of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to his colleagues. His own colleagues have acknowledged Dr. Falky's inconsistencies, continues Paul's letter to graves. Now, a congressional hearing, however, is not the place for a public servant to play political games, especially when the health and well-being of American citizens is on the line, Rand Paul said. The DC U.S. Attorney's Office confirmed receipt of the letter,

but declined to comment further to the Daily Mail. Now, Paul previously wrote Attorney General Merrick Garland on July 14th and July 23rd calling for an investigation into whether Falchie lied under oath over his knowledge of dangerous virus research that was taken place at the Wuhan lab in China. In July of 2021, Dr. Falci testified how his former department has never and does not ever fund gang of function research. Now, I want to briefly, and like I said, this is not a very long clip, but I think it's very important for comments. I think we need to rehear this. It's about five or six minutes long, but I do think we need to rehear this exchange between Paul and Falci. And then we're going to discuss some of the things about Ganga Function, how much potentially Falci was involved in this. Was this a big conspiracy from the beginning? Because we've heard of departments like DARPA, which is part of the United

States government. It's almost like a shadow part of the government or a clandestine section of the government. Darpa typically operates in the bio-weapons or weapons of war area. So it was very strange the fact that DARPA had anything to do. And by the way, this is all proven and backed up by many files out there already. You guys can look up for yourself, but just look up DARPA and COVID. I wouldn't probably do it on Google because you won't find anything. They're going to hide that. But why would it DARPA have anything to do with this begin with. We're also going to talk about a couple doctors briefly right after this exchange that had this gang of function research going on with the coronavirus, which would then turn

into COVID-19, inside of the United States before the Wuhan leak to begin with. So let's go ahead and play the quick exchange between Rand Paul and Dr. Fauci. This pandemic, and that should cause us to explore all possibilities. Instead, government authorities, self-interested in continuing gain of function research say there's nothing to see here. Gain of function research, as you know, is juicing up naturally occurring animal viruses to infect humans. To arrive at the truth, the U.S. government should admit that the Wuhan Virology Institute was experimenting to enhance the coronavirus's ability to infect humans. Juicing up super viruses is not new. Scientists in the U.S. have long known how to mutate animal viruses to infect humans. For years,

Dr. Ralph Barak, a virologist in the U.S., has been collaborating with Dr. Shee-Zengli of the Wuhan Virology Institute, sharing his discoveries about how to create superviruses. This gain-of-function research has been funded by the NIH. The collaboration between the U.S. and the Wuhan Virology Institute continues. Doctors Berrick and she worked together to insert bat virus spike protein into the backbone of the deadly SARS virus and then use this man-made supervirus to infect human airway cells. Think about that for a moment. The SARS virus had a 15% mortality. We're fighting a pandemic that has about a 1% mortality. Can you imagine if a SARS virus that's been juiced up and had viral proteins added to it

to the spike protein, if that were released accidentally? Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding? of the NIH funding of the lab in Wuhan. Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect that the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute. Do they fund Dr. Barrack? We do not fund. Do you fund Dr. Barrack's gain of function research? Dr. Barrett does not doing gain of function research, and if it is, it's according to the guidelines, and it is being conducted in North Carolina, not in China.

You don't think inserting a bad virus spike protein that he got from the Wuhan Institute into the SARS virus's gain of function. That is not. You would be in the minority because at least 200 scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group saying that it is gain of function. Well, it is not. And if you look at the grant and you look at the progress reports, it is not gained a function, despite the fact that people tweet that.

So do you still support sending money to the Wuhan Virology Institute? We do not send money now to do Wuhan virology. Do you support sending money? We did under your tutelage. We were sending it through EcoHealth. It was a sub-agency and a sub-grant. Do you support the money from NIH that was going to the Wuhan Institute? Let me explain to you why that was done.

The SARS COVID-1 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected in China. Or perhaps it would be responsible to send it to the Chinese government that we may not be able to trust with this knowledge and with this incredible. incredibly dangerous viruses. Government scientists like yourself who favor gain of function research in China, you're saying things that are not correct. Government defenders of gain of function, such as yourself, say that COVID-19 mutations were random and not designed by man. But interestingly, the technique that Dr. Barrack developed forces mutations by serial passage through cell culture that the mutations appear to be natural.

In fact, Dr. Barrack named the technique the noceum technique because the mutations appear naturally. Nicholas Baker in the New York Magazine said, nobody would know if the virus had been fabricated in a laboratory or grown in nature. Governor authorities in the U.S., including yourself, unequivocally deny that COVID-19 could have escaped a lab. But even Dr. Shee in Wuhan wasn't so sure.

According to Nicholas Baker, Dr. She wondered, could this new virus have come from her own laboratory? She checked her records frantically and found no matches. That really took a load off my mind, she said. I had not slept for days. The director of the gain of function research in Wuhan couldn't sleep because she was terrified that it might be in her lab. Dr. Barak, an advocate of gain of function research, admits the main problem that the Institute of the Virology has is the outbreak occurred in close proximity. What are the odds? Berrick responded, could you rule out a laboratory escape? The answer in this case is probably not. Will you in front of this group categorically say that the COVID-19

could not have occurred through serial passage in a laboratory? I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I'm fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China. However, I will repeat again, the NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Iran. You support it in the U.S. We have 11 labs doing it, and you have allowed it here. We have a committee to do it, but the committee is granted every exemption. You're fooling with Mother Nature here. You're allowing super viruses to be created with a 15% mortality. It's very dangerous. I think it was a huge mistake to share this with China, and it's a huge mistake to allow this to continue in the United States. And we should be very careful to investigate

where this virus came from. And there we go. So I think one of the big takeaways here, especially with this back and forth between Iran Paul and Dr. Falci is Iran Paul himself. And I think this is what we all know now, is that Dr. Xi from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the United States basically collaborated in this gang of function of coronavirus turning into COVID-19. I mean, I think that's one of the biggest takeaways here. Not to mention Dr. Barrick, which is in North Carolina, I believe UNC Chapel Hill, is where he does a lot of his research of gang of function with the coronavirus and did prior to the pandemic ever happening.

There was also a university in Texas that also was doing gang of function research. in Texas and then I guess helping the Wuhan Institute of Irology and trying to make this pathogen more transmissible to human airways. One of the ways they did this, by the way, and there was a special about this, is they started to, they basically had mice. They turned these mice's lungs into human-type lungs. And so what they would do is they would shoot these spike proteins into these mice with humanized lungs, which is weird enough as it is. And then once they figured out over the course of months, potentially years, because they've been working on this for a while, they would shoot it in and they would see, okay, is it working? Is it not? If it

isn't, then let's go back and try to make it more transmissible. Let's kind of bring this virus along. Let's screw with the T cells because, you know, humans have T cells. And this is, and quite a few other receptors that this virus really did have a heyday with. It was able to latch on to this. The reason why this virus was so deadly in certain people, especially in the lungs, is because this gang of function was being done in Wuhan, and they were trying to figure out how to make a zoonotic virus, a bat virus, which did not affect people at the time.

they were trying to figure out how to make this deadly, how to make this thing infiltrate your lungs and make it extremely hard to get rid of, especially for some people. Now, the fact they turn mice into humanized mice with humanized lungs, specifically for gang of function to where they want to try to figure out the best way to make this virus the most deadly to people

should be concerning to all of us. I mean, I don't care what anyone says, any scientist says, there's no way you're going to tell me that you're doing this for research in case this happens. Let me give you a little example. A zoonotic virus, such as the coronavirus from a bat, if you ask scientists, if you actually look at the research, there are studies out there on the internet that talk about this, how long would it take a bat coronavirus to then basically go through the progression to be able to. to infect people at such a deadly rate, even the 15% potential mortality rate, how long would that take? Well, a lot of the research says it would take up to 100 years, maybe even 500 years, for that to evolve into a human virus. So what gang of function did was they said, okay, well, instead of waiting 100 years or 500 years or 1,000 years, even potentially,

we're going to make this thing happen as soon as possible. This is not for research. I mean, the reality of what we just have went through in the past three years to where it killed millions of people, although we don't truly know how many people it killed because we know that government agencies inflated numbers. They, you know, people would come in with a car from a car accident or a stabbing or any of these things, cancer. And they would die from one of these things. And yet, as long as they tested positive on the PCR test for COVID, well, they died of COVID. They didn't die of cancer. They didn't die of a brain tumor or a stabbing or a shooting. or a car accident, they died of COVID.

We know this happened. And you want to ask yourself, well, why would they do that? Well, the reason they did that was because they were getting incentivized for people to die of COVID. They were getting paid much more money. They were up to $60,000 if someone was in the ICU and sometimes even more if they died. We look at what happened in New York. New York was a complete shit show during the pandemic.

You had hospitals with almost everyone that was coming in with COVID was dying because they were putting everyone on a ventilator. In the very beginning of this, this was a huge push to put everyone on ventilators. Dr. Falci was a part of that push. If you remember, Trump stood up there and said, we're going to start making these manufacturing companies turn part of their warehouse or part of their facility into manufacturing for ventilators. And this was something that Falci was on TV every single day saying,

ventilators, we need the ventilators. We need the ventilators to. we need the ventilators to save the world. But you know all the ventilators were doing was killing people. I mean, New York was a prime example. There's still a video on the internet that I want you guys to go look up. You probably have to go to rumble or somewhere, but it was a whistleblower nurse from a very prominent huge hospital in New York City.

And this nurse was being interviewed in a hotel room. She wanted to come forward to someone and say something based on what she was seeing. And what she was seeing in these New York hospitals was people coming in with not that bad of oxygen levels, blood auction levels, and they were being forced or put on ventilators, at which time about a week or two later they would develop severe pneumonia like many people do on ventilators, and they would die. So some of these hospitals had like a 95% death rate from COVID because of the protocol, because of what our government, what Dr. Falci and the other mad scientists were telling these hospital systems to do. Now, we know that this was not just happening inside of the United States. What Dr. Falci and the other doctors that used to stand on TV up there at the podium every single day, what they would tell the United States public and the United States health system,

it didn't just affect the United States. This affected health systems around the world. There was people from around the world, governments around the world, countries, that would look up to the United States health, especially Dr. Falci, and to figure out what they should best do. And so a lot of these other countries around the world implemented the same protocols that were killing hundreds of thousands, if not potentially millions of people,

or well, really hundreds of thousands of people inside of the United States and millions of people around the world. So this was also something that Dr. Falci did. Now, we knew from the very beginning there were many doctors across the board that were saying, look, this ventilator thing's not working. Almost everyone we're putting on a ventilator is dying. It seems like it might actually be a detriment to them rather than they help to them. But what did they do?

Anyone that spoke out or said, hey, we shouldn't be doing it this way. They were either threatened to lose their medical license or they were reprimanded or whatever. Or they were just completely taken off the COVID floor altogether. then you've got to think about the pre the preventatives right any preventative that came out any studies that came out the show vitamin d was successful quercetin was successful including clear nasal spray and so many other things hydroxychloroquine ivermectin we know that every single one of these things or any study that came out about any of this was censored it was not shown the government or The woke, you know, propagandist, administration scientist were basically trying to come up with anything to disprove or discredit any of these studies, which was showing very promising results for many people that was on these regiments.

The frontline COVID-care doctors, Pierre Cori and those guys, they were a group of doctors that really went out, put their neck on the line, was trying to push information as far as pre-treatment protocols, as many people as they could. But all they did was face backlash. They faced scrutiny. They faced their medical license being suspended. We interviewed Dr. Peter McCola in Atlanta, you know, a few months back. This was something that we talked about as well. And I encourage each of you to go back and listen to that episode with Dr. Peter McCola. He had been sued by his university. His license had been threatened to be revoked. Any doctor that had any common sense during the pandemic was censored, silenced, and sometimes even lost their license. So what this whole thing starts to sound like as you start hearing kind of how this thing went was a very planned and

coordinated pandemic. You know, that's why they call it the pandemic. I know a lot of people in the beginning, when someone would say the word pandemic, everyone would laugh it off. Like, oh my God, you're a big conspiracy theorist. You're crazy. But the reality, but the reality is a real. You're a reality is, guys, is that we're looking back, we're starting to look back now and we're starting to ask ourselves, how much of a plan really was this? How much of a plan was this? Now, I do want to play another short clip, and this is basically just Pfizer documents that are proven that the COVID vaccine as the deadliest drug ever rolled out to the human public. Now, this was Dr. James Thorpe that said this, and this was back in 2021. And I want you to hear what he has to say about,

about Pfizer's own documents. Check this out. February 28th, 2021, the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-marketing data was available in the company. It was devastating. It was proven to be, according to Pfizer, the deadliest drug ever rolled out to the human public ever. I've been saying that. And for two and a half years, not one person has challenged me. So you know that, and I know that, 1223 dead within 10 weeks. And then horrible obstetrical data. Cardiac anomalies, cardiac malformations, early death of the fetus, also premature delivery

and death of the newborns, massive increase in newborns going to the neonatal intensive care unit, substantial abnormalities. Okay, so there you go. That's basically just covering what Pfizer's own documents said and saw from the very beginning. Now, this isn't surprising. Let me tell you why this isn't surprising whatsoever, because I believe this was Australia, where there was a video of the Australian government. They were questioned Pfizer reps.

And this was actually not very long ago. This happened recently. And there were a couple of things that I found very important that came from this hearing. And one of the things was, is they asked Pfizer representatives. representatives how their vaccines were causing myocarditis. You know, what is the cause of myocarditis? And what myocarditis essentially is is an inflammation around the heart. Now, although, yes, people can potentially get myocarditis from viral infections in rare, very rare cases,

it has happened, but nothing like we're seeing today. But Pfizer had no answer. Instead, they skirted the actual question and said, oh, this, is so very rare. Myocarditis is so rare. I don't even know why you're asking us, basically. But the reality is, is that myocardus is not so rare. We don't know how many people are actually developing myocarditis. And even when during the vaccine rollout and we started hearing about people and even young people, especially young people, getting myocarditis, you know, all of the representatives, the Pfizer reps, Fauci, everyone else was saying, oh, this is not a big deal. And even

in the worst cases, you know, you can get over it pretty quick. It is not serious. You know, whatever. That was what he was saying, and he said this every day. Anytime anyone question it, it was like, you're not allowed to question this. You are not allowed to question why there are young people having heart conditions now. And so they did their very best to cover this up. Now, the reality of what myocarditis actually can do is it can scar the heart. It can cause permanent heart damage. It can cause sudden cardiac death. It can cause a host of issues for the rest of these people's lives. And just so happens is that the people that were most affected by this myocarditis, at least in the beginning that we had heard of, because I think it was just so prevalent,

was young people. It was anyone that was over the age of 15 to 21, they said, but we were seeing a mass increase in myocarditis. Now, the reason why Pfizer was able to sit in front of Australia's board and say, hey, this is very rare. Okay, the reason for that is because even if you're 15, 21, 30, 40, 50 years old, you go to your doctor, you go to the hospital because you're having chest pains, even today, and you feel like you're having a heart attack, right? Well, even if your heart attack is caused by the vaccine, it's never going to be written down on anything unless you just have a very brave and courageous doctor out there that is willing to put that into record. You know, you would have to have someone like, you know, Dr. Peter McCola or Dr. Pierre Corey or someone that

actually is not afraid to tell the truth about what is actually going on and the real dangers of what we're seeing today. Think about Damar Hamlin with the Buffalo Bills. He collapsed and died on the field. Yet his entire condition was covered up and they said it was because of a massive hit to the chest. Although if you watch that video back, didn't look very hard. It actually looked like the hit came to the shoulder rather than the chest. And this is a hit that football players get every single day, every single game they play, every practice, they get hits like this. This is not normal. You look at Bronny James. Brony James had a cardiac arrest on the court while practicing for USC California or USC. And this happened not long ago. But yet you heard it

for about a day, don't hear anything else about it. They're covering up, shutting it up, and throwing it out the window. They don't want you to investigate. They don't want you to ask questions about why an elite athlete to an elite athlete, by the way, the elite son of an elite athlete had cardiac arrest on the court while practicing, right? But this is not just Bronny James and Damar Hamlin. This is people all over the country. Now, I downloaded an app called Newsbreak, right? Because I kept seeing these ads for Newsbreak and especially in local news and, you know, you typically have a lot of local news stations that, you know, like I think here we have probably three or four, right? Plus all the newspapers and all the rest. And so

what Newsbreak kind of does is it kind of puts all of the news for you in one place, right? So I downloaded the app and because I just wanted to see news. Well, the interesting thing about news break is it also gives you very important news, especially some of the app. And so, you know, celebrity-wise, and I don't know why, but in especially celebrity deaths. So I downloaded Newsbreak app. I've had it for about two or three months now. And the one thing I started to notice, a very disturbing trend, was that when I would receive push notifications, okay, oftentimes I would receive push notifications about a wreck that happened in my area or a fire or an armed robbery that happened or whatever the case is.

But I quickly noticed that I was getting push notifications from Newsbreak about actors and celebrities that were dying. I would get almost, and I still do, it seemed like about two a day. And yet, if you go and watch TV or your local news, you never hear about these deaths. You don't ever hear about them. And for whatever reason, Newsbreak does push these

because I guess there are certain, you know, outlier news agencies that are actually reporting on this. I don't know why they're reporting on this so much, probably because they're, although they can't say what it's from, I think they're trying to at least raise, eyebrows as far as how many celebrities are actually dying today. I mean, it's literally like one or two a day. I'll get a push notification.

And that's mind-blowing. It's like every day I'm like, and by the way, I go in research how these people are dying. I go in research. Was it a car accident? Was it suicides? You know, a few of them are. But then when you start reading about all of the heart attacks from 30-year-old actors, from 40-year-old actors or singers or whoever, and you hear about all of these,

or blood clots, right? think about Jamie Fox. Jamie Fox had some kind of blood clotting issue that put him in the hospital, almost died, and yet they kept that entire situation quiet. I know Dr. Peter McCola, I believe maybe had talked to Jamie Fox after the fact, but I know that Dr. Peter McCullough has been public and said, I hope Jamie Fox comes out and is honest and forthcoming about what happened to him. because the problem with this situation is

is that I don't know why these celebrities that are facing cardiac arrests or heart issues are not coming forward. I think part of it could be they pushed the vaccine so hard because they are so big influential people. They pushed it to so many people. So maybe they're ashamed to say

that there's a potential link to the vaccine. Or maybe they're being paid off. Maybe they're being threatened by, you know, someone, the government, whoever, coming through and saying, look, you say anything, you're done. We will make sure you never work in Hollywood again. And, you know, if you guys listen to our Illuminati or any of our New World Order stuff, we know that the big elites around the world,

the big pharma elites and reps, the World Health Organization and World Economic Forum, and all of these entities that kind of house these elites that kind of control everything, including our government and your government, wherever you're at, these guys are the real ones that are in charge. These guys are the ones that decide whether you work in Hollywood or have a platform or not. I mean, there's a reason why one side of the conversation as far as politics for the past four or five, six years have been censored and silenced. I mean, since we've started this podcast, we've been commenting and talking about censorship.

And we started seeing this five years ago. And it's only gotten worse. Really, there's only allowed to have one side of the conversation on the internet and the other is silenced and censored. And the reason for this is because it's the big elites that want to control the agenda and control the narrative. And there's nothing changed. And that is the reason why you're not going to have these celebrities that have heart issues or have blood clots or any of this stuff come out and say that that's what is from because they're never going to work again. They're

going to be censored. They're going to be silenced. They're going to be outcast. And that's just the way it is. So I also want to get to the all-cause excess mortality. And by the way, we do have something a little funny. I have something a little funny after this little part because I want to give you a really good example of how the media is controlling the narrative of heart attacks and heart disease and especially among young adults, but just anyone. And I've got a 20 part little thing. It's a 20 reasons why it's a new little special we're going to start doing. But this is literally all just pulled from news outlets and articles from around the world. And, you know, and it's a new little special. And And we'll try to make it a little funny in light of the very serious subject that we're facing.

But one of the things that we are seeing now is all-cause excess mortality is spiking like we've never seen before. Now, Dr. John Campbell, he is a YouTube doctor. I mean, he's a very, very good doctor. He was one of the doctors during the entire pandemic that was trying his best to read every available study that was actually being put out. the ones that they did put out, even though most of these studies were skewed. Most of these studies, or a lot of these studies, seem to have been corrupt or just wrong. And, I mean, with so many of them so wrong, including the ones that I used to hear him read, and me not as a doctor, I knew a lot of this was BS, at least as far as how they were construed in the studies.

But at the very least, Dr. John Campbell, older gentlemen, very, you know, trusted doctor among his peers. and over in Europe, this guy did his best to try to keep everyone informed. And then when the vaccine came out, he tried to do his best to break down the studies that was coming about, you know, who was it affecting, who was it helping. He tried to look at any, you know, side effects or deaths or any of that stuff. But he would just, he really didn't have information to give. But this is Dr. John Campbell, very short, very, very short audio clip, breaking down the increase in all-cause mortality.

And I want to let you guys picture this. He's going to show a graph, which he will explain, so you don't have to see it. But there's a graph of COVID-19 deaths, and then there's a graph that is above this, and it's red, of all-cause excess mortality. And I want to explain what that means, but this is what we are seeing currently. And I want you guys to listen to this because it's very important. Here you go. To now, before we discuss it further.

So here we have estimated excess mortality. Now the data is going from as we see January 2020 through to the end of 2021. The grey are the reported COVID deaths. And the red-colored line is the estimated excess mortality. And of course we can see that even by this official WHO data, that the excess mortality can in no way be attributed for, be accounted for, deaths from SARS-Coronavirus 2 from COVID. I think that graphic is pretty clear.

And encouraging to see this from the World Health Organization, I think. Now, here's another graphic that put out here. 14.9, basically nearly 15 million estimated excess mortality, but the COVID deaths only accounting for, well, say only, but accounting for 5.42 million. and if anything in most places, the COVID deaths tended to be overestimated rather than underestimated because of COVID, killing people with comorbidities. All right, so let me just break that down briefly. We had in a year from 2020 to the end of 2021, 5 million COVID deaths, although as Dr. John Campbell just said, we don't know if all 5 million of those COVID deaths were actually because of COVID or whether it was something else.

else. The big problem we have here is 15 million excess mortality. Okay. 15 million. Now, if you don't know what excess mortality means, let me just give you an example. If you look back from, say, 2010 to 2018, say, right? And you see the average amount of deaths every year from 2010. So let's just give a random number. Let's just say it's 50 million on average from 2010. And maybe 2011 has 52 million. And maybe 2012 have 49 million. And then maybe 2013 has 48 million. And then you have 51 million. Whatever. You get the point. But usually it stays around that 50 million mark. You'll have fluctuations of a million or 500,000 or whatever the case is in all cause excess mortality. And sometimes you'll have and I'm not saying 50 million all-cauls excess mortality.

What I'm saying is that if you have 50 million people on average that die a year and then you all of a sudden have an excess mortality of, say, 500,000, well, that's something to look at. You've got to see why was 500,000 more people dying this year, or, you know, what was causing this? Why was there such a big increase and what was the cause of it? A lot of cases, you can kind of narrow it down. Maybe there was a really bad flu season.

And so maybe you had 60 or 80 or 80 or, 100,000 people that died. And so you can contribute that to the flu or whatever the case is. But in this case, you had this average that was always pretty average. I mean, I've looked this up from, I believe, 2010 to 2019. And in 2019 and 2020, you know, it was about the same. You had these COVID deaths that were contributing to, what, five million? But then you had this all-cause mortality that increased by 15 million. something we've never seen before, ever, ever, since we've been taking record of all-cause mortality. And so, but the problem with this is, is that it can't be contributed to COVID because that is accounted for in the $5 million. It has to be something else.

And it just also so happens that this all-cause mortality of an increase of $15 million came out after the vaccine rollout. So you do the math for yourself. You know, I don't think that's very hard to figure out. And governments around the world should be looking at this and panicking. I mean, they should be panicking about this data and statistic alone. Now, before we get into the top 20 cover-ups of the media is doing as far as this heart condition goes, we also have to talk about something else. Cancers, okay?

Cancers have increased. There is absolutely zero question about that. The data is showing it. This is something that Dr. Ryan Cole, back, it was probably six months or so after the vaccine rollout, Dr. Ryan Cole, I believe, headed up a pathology lab to where, you know, they would get, you know, cancers or, you know, this lab was basically the one to say, okay, yes, this is cancerous, no, it's not cancerous, whatever the case is. And so in his lab, six months after this, he started seeing an increase in cancers. insurance companies started seeing increase in cancers, and it wasn't just any cancer.

These were called turbo cancers. But Ryan Cole was saying this six months after the vaccine rollout came out, and no one listened. Rather than they said he was a quack. He was a conspiracy theorist. No one should listen to him. They should pull his license. And this is what Dr. Ryan Cole went through, and he's went through it ever since. But now we're starting to see that this is actually the case.

I know that Sherry has many people she knows that have. new cancers. I know she has a very close friend that has a very rare cancer that is spreading like wildfire, and we pray for that person. I'm not going to go into who it is. I know people personally that has developed cancer as of recently, and a lot of these cancers are turbo cancers. But there's 12 unbelievable stories, right, in an article that I had read recently of two or three COVID-19 vaccinated family members, and they developed an aggressive turbo-canceries. And they developed an aggressive turbo cancer at the same time. And it's happening. Turbac cancers are skyrocketing, and some families will have two, even three members develop aggressive turbo cancer at stage

four. Now, guys, there is no stage five. Stage four is the end goal or the end of the road in a lot of cases with cancer unless it can be cured. When multiple family members come down with cancer and COVID-19 vaccine-induced turbo cancer is suspected, always look for the presence of at least one of these. That's usually leukemia, lymphoma, brain cancer, and breast cancer. Presumably, if multiple family members went to get their COVID-19 vaccine at the same time, they may have received a bad batch or a hot lot, as some would say. A toxic pharmaceutical product with poor quality control

and may have had too much MRNA or may have been contaminated with DNA plasmids containing the carcinogenic SV40 promoter. Now, the immune system damage and organ damage that those family members might then experience from a bad vaccine batch or a hot lot may be similar and may give rise to turbocancers and multiple family members. Now, this is something we are seeing. This is something that we are starting to see a lot of. If you just look at cancer data and look at, and by the way, I advise everyone to go follow

doctors like Ryan Cole. Go follow the frontline COVID-care doctors, Dr. Pierre Corey and Dr. Peter McCullough. These are all very good sources. They're all people that have been fighting for you and me and everyone else against the pharmaceutical and big pharma, because big pharma does not care anything about us. But leukemia, lymphoma, brain cancer, breast cancer, these are all things that we are seeing a huge increase in. Now, what it talks about the bad batch, or maybe some of these vaccines put too many spike proteins in. We know that a hearing just recently, they talked. about,

Moderna, basically admitting that the Moderna shots were two or three times the spike protein that Pfizer's was. Even though we know Pfizer's was also causing myocarditis and periocarditis. So we have no idea necessarily what the implications may be

for the Moderna vaccine, but we do know that apparently they were two to three times more spike proteins in those vaccines than any other. And this is very concerning. Now, I want to get to, before it gets too late, I want to get to this. And then we're going to close with just something in vaccines in general. And I want to make a point there as well. But they have been doing everything.

I mean, I'm talking about everything recently to combat the massive, I believe, epidemic now or pandemic of heart attacks. the mainstream media has been doing everything. And journalists have come up with many reasons for the rise in heart damage. I mean, they've talked about showering even. And none of these news agencies, even once mentioned, the possibility of a vaccine potentially causing some of these heart attacks and these massive heart attacks. So we're going to go over my top 20 reasons of why you might get a heart attack after the vaccine,

other than the vaccine. And this is from actual credible news sources, okay? Number one, the weather. But yes, you heard it. Both summer and winter temperatures, according to mainstream journalists, are to blame for increased number of heart disease and blood clots. And it seems we're just in for a heart stopping season to matter what the weather. Sky News says, cold snaps could cause strokes and heart attacks, doctors warn. And it says, ice is likely to be a hazard for much of the week.

The med officer says, while people with a pre-eastern, existing condition and elderly are urged to be extra careful. That's just the sky. Telegraph. Your blood thickens and then clots. What extreme heat can do to your body? So not only was these two mainstream news outlets that was reporting this about the weather giving you heart attacks, right? It was followed up by over 600 articles that were pushed at the same time.

Number two, artificial sweeteners. According to a study, artificial sweeteners are responsible for an increased risk of heart attacks. Guess that's just another bitter finding in the world of sweet science. The Guardian said, artificial sweeteners linked to increased risk of heart disease study finds. This was also followed up by over 250 mainstream articles that said the same thing. Number three, climate change. Yeah, I know.

Unbelievable. Baby's hearts are not damaged by the Vax, but by climate change, another study finds. CNN health says climate change could hurt baby's hearts, study says. It can hurt babies' hearts. Not only did CNN publish this, but so did over 400 news outlets that publish the same thing. Number four, gardening, they say. Nothing is better for the immune system than eating dirt. And now suddenly, exposure to soil is supposed to increase the risk of a killer heart disease.

And whoever believes that probably also believes that the gene therapy is safe and effective. The sun says green fingers, urgent. warning to gardeners as soil increases risk of killer heart disease. Over 150 news agencies also reported the same thing. Number five, exercising. No surprise here they're saying exercising can cause a heart attack. A study found that exercising can double the risk of heart disease for white man. Too much exercise can kill you, the daily mail says, especially if you're a white man.

Study finds 7.5 hours a week of fitness doubles your risk of heart disease. Another study. And by the way, that should not really be surprising you guys because, you know, they didn't even mention taking care of yourself or exercise or vitamins during the pandemic to potentially save your life. It was only vaccine or death. That was what it was. So no surprise here. They're going to attack exercise and not blaming on the vaccine. Number six, being too happy.

Got a heart attack after receiving the clot shot. Maybe you were just too happy. And by the way, which lunatic scientist even testing confirms such crazy hypothesis? is. The mirror reported, being too happy could cause you to have a heart attack. Scientists warn. The new research shows that not only of those experiencing emotional distress can suffer a heart attack, but so are those that are happy. So you can't be sad or can't be happy. Number seven, eating eggs. Eggs are among the healthiest foods one can eat, and perhaps that's why there's an attempt to convince us otherwise. This is junk science. The Express says blood clots, the popular breakfast

food that can enhance the risk of blood clotting. That's from the Express. That was also reported in over 50 articles. Number eight, lack of masking. CBS News Medical Expert, quote unquote, Celine Gounder, she, her, especially, and she also has a Ukraine flag in her profile, suggests a lack of mask and missed vaccines

cause heart attacks in youth. That's literally what she's saying. This was February 20, 20, 23. I mean, it's absolute assent. to even think that these people actually write articles like this. Number nine, falling asleep with a TV on. 100% of the study participants were probably double-jabbed and boosted. And by the way, if this was the case, I would be dead because I always sleep with a TV on, usually, until the middle of night.

Now turn it off. But New York Post says, fallen asleep with the TV on could bring early death study shows. This was June 28, 2022. This is also followed up by many other news agencies reporting the same thing. It's called Propaganda, right? It's called Operation Mockenberg. still in effect. Number 10.

Shake in the duvet or your curtains or your pillow. The next time you shake out your pillowcase, be aware that you're putting yourself in mortal danger. Shaking duvet too vigorously while making your bed can increase your chances of a heart attack. Scientists warn. This is followed up by many articles as well. Number 11. Given birth in early 20s. Caution of biological women in the early 20s.

Think twice, even thrice before choosing to get pregnant early. According to eugenics, aiming to depopulate the earth, having babies at a young age is very life-threatening, and you should definitely not do it. New York Post says, Mom, who gives birth in early 20s at higher risk of heart attack, stroke study fines. This is reported by 350-plus news outlets, more propaganda to not only discourage women from having babies, but also explaining when they do get pregnant and have heart attacks, it's because they're pregnant, not anything to do with any vaccine they could have taken. Number 12. Mental illness. Supposedly not only do happy people have an increased risk of getting heart attack, but so are people that are really sad. CNN Health also reporting here. A mental illness in your 20s and 30s could mean a greater chance of heart attack and stroke.

This was May 8, 2023. It was followed by 400 plus articles around the world that echoed the same thing. Number 13, taking a poop. Monitor how often you take a dump each day, as it could impact your cardiac health. Express reports. Heart attack. How often you go to the toilet daily. signals risk of future heart attack. This is also followed by two or three hundred supporting articles. Number 14, weekend lions or sleep-ins or if you sleep in a little too late, sleeping in on the weekend is supposedly the ultimate heart killer. This says mirror.

Weekend lions could actually be bad for your health. Alarming study finds. Research found people who went to bed and woke up 90 minutes later than usual on weekends had gut bacteria linked to heart attack, strokes, and obesity. This is followed up by 200 plus articles as well. Number 15, being sarcastic. Oh, great. Now, even sarcasm gives you a heart attack.

Well, that's just the heartfelt news I was waiting for. Mail online, how being sarcastic could kill you. Scientists reveal heart attack survivors will hostile traits are more likely to die from a repeat event. This was in 2021. Number 16, living in rural areas. Regarding this study, living in rural areas will increase the chance of getting a heart attack. Probably too much gardening, consumption of organic chicken and eggs and pooping. Might do it.

Where do you live? Risk of heart failure is much higher in certain areas, says new study.