Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Geoengineering Conspiracy Podcast | Blocking The Sun by Bill Gates

Episode Date: July 7, 2023

Over the past few years, especially during the pandemic, we have heard a lot of crazy things. But what could be crazier than blocking the sun through geoengineering? This is yet another Bill Gates-backed plan that could be catastrophic for crops and life on Earth. Why would they want to do this? Could there be a more sinister reason, like control? We discuss all of this and more on this episode of Geoengineering Conspiracy Podcast | Blocking The Sun

And welcome to And welcome to Investigared of your bullshit. I'm tired of your voice. I'm getting tired of Wait no choice. And welcome to Investigator, the podcast. I am your host, Sherry, alongside my gorgeous husband, Chad.

And you look so relaxed right now, Sherry. You look amazing. Sitting in your new gaming chair. I feel like I'm on the clouds. Yeah, you are. You're in cloud. Guys, we've got new chairs. So if we do go to sleep,

mend ways through this, just, Oh, and you're not going to hear any squeaking if I move at all. Look, I am shaking my chair right now. There's no squeaks. There you go. But guys, welcome to the podcast. It is 832 p.m. here on the East Coast of the United States, July the 6th, 2023. And we are back once again.

Last night we did the episode on Antarctica. We kind of geared that more towards the UFO, UAP topic, and discussion, which I think was only necessary, considering Antarctica has so much to do with. with potential UFOs and Europeans and maybe even might be a key to figuring out this mystery. Although I think our governments around the world already know this already. I think there's why there's treaties and many other things in place on Antarctica. But we're going to be having a part two on that very soon. Also, we have another great UFO podcast coming up in the near future as well,

where we might have a really good guest. So stay tuned for that. But tonight, we are going to specifically be talking about geoengineering. Okay, and the Biden administration, their plans on moving forward with this. They want to block out the sun. And not only do they want to block out the sun, which, I mean, what could go wrong with that? But they want to block out the sun, but they're also exploring, obviously, other areas of geoengineering. Now, for those of you that don't know, we've done many episodes, although we didn't title them geoengineering,

but if you think about our episode on HARP where we had Alana Freeland on, where we're talking about the HARP system. and for those of you do not know what harp is, you can check it out, Google it real quick, whatever, or the best way to do this and really get to the center of what harp really is, go back and listen to our harp episode with Alana Freeland, the potential of what that thing, that system can actually do,

how much harm and danger, how much catastrophic damage it can do. This is a system that is in Alaska that has since supposedly, quote-unquote, been, I guess, degraded or taken offline. But regardless, no one believes that, although we have heard about other similar systems in Antarctica. If you guys have not listened to our last episode we just did,

we talk about some geoengineering or at least some type of directed energy weapon that is potentially in Antarctica. Go check that out. We've talked about a lot of this stuff, right? I mean, we've never really done an episode on Kim Trails, and we will do that eventually. Kim Trails is another form potentially of geoengineering. There's a lot of stuff, right?

It's just harder for me to believe in the chem trails because they're all saying, you know, I guess supposedly all these jets are letting these chem trails going. And every time you see a jet, and if you see a line, it's a camtrell. But we have seen that since we were kids. Yeah. And being in aviation and knowing what that actually is,

you know, those are basically exhaust. because of... Fuel. Well, no, but just because of the heat of the engine and you're up at it's such a high altitude, and usually it happens above 30,000 feet. It's typically where you'll see these con trails is what they're called.

And it's just basically from the heat of the engine and mixing with the extreme cold of the upper atmosphere, or not upper atmosphere, but, you know, 30,000 plus feet. But listen, I'm not saying it don't exist, because I do believe that this is a very, very, big potential, and we'll talk about that on a further episode. But, you know, is a good way to hide

chemtrails with airplanes, obviously, because you would have most airplanes we've always seen, which has contrels, which has this, you know, this is something we're used to seeing. So if you have airplanes also releasing chemicals in some way, whether it be some type of military aircraft, some type of government contracted aircraft that are actually releasing chemicals up in the upper atmosphere, you would probably see this. The thing about the thing about Kim Charles is that there's a lot to kind of unfold and unravel with that. But we will get to that in a future episode. Tonight, though, we're going to specifically be talking about geoengineering, okay?

And what exactly is geoengineering? Now, guys, recently, some of you may have heard of the potential plan, and Bill Gates has been behind this, now seems like the Biden administration is starting to get behind this as far as blocking out the sun to stop climate change, right? And so climate engineering is another word for, geo or climate engineering, is the intentional large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system specifically to counter climate change via climate-altering technologies and measures.

These technologies fall into two camps, carbon geoengineering, and solar geoengineering. So these are the two big, you know, camps, as they call it, in the geoengineering space. Now, we've heavily debated, right? I mean, especially the right and left. So if you're conservative or if you're liberal,

and I don't even like using the word liberal, if you're a Democrat or you're a Republican, it's been highly contested, highly debated as far as can people make any kind of impact in, climate change or is it a natural reoccurring phenomenon or a solar type, solar or carbon type every 100 year, 200 year cycle? Yes, that happens.

And is there anything that people can do? And how much are people really contributing to climate change, if any? Now, Sherry, you remember we had the episode, the podcast where we, you know, specifically and dove deep into climate change. You guys should go listen to that episode right now. you would be like, holy crap, this is what these people are bitching about. Yeah. And this is over like hundreds of years and this is how much we're changing it because of humans on the earth.

It's like minute. Yeah. You know, you can't even really measure it. And I guess scientists, they get very specific down to the millimeters. Yeah. And not only that, one of the things we found out as we research climate change. And guys, to really fully understand the bullshit, that we basically unraveled with climate change.

You got to go listen to that episode. But what we kind of found was, if you look at science today, right, everyone has always heard of science. And everyone's always heard of scientists. And everyone's heard of doctors and they've heard of immunologists, more so the past three or four years than ever. Right. Immunologists or epidemiologists. These people that are supposedly experts in their field of viruses or epidemics or whatever. Right. They're filled of study.

They're filled of study. But then you've got to think about, too, is like, okay, so what happened during science, with science during COVID? Well, we know that science was very heavily manipulated. And it was manipulated on a scale that it was so obvious to the mass population of people that it couldn't really even be hidden anymore. So what did they do? They instead tried to silence every dissenting voice. Anyone that said contrary to what their agenda was, they tried to silence them, kicked them off the internet, block their accounts, and especially the ones that were, you know, had

large platforms, had a lot of listeners, had a lot of readers, whatever the case may be. They tried to silence and discredit all of those people that said anything against what their quote-unquote science was towards how they were going to treat COVID, how they were going to prevent COVID in the future, how they were going to administer these, you know, these experimental vaccines on people, and how they were 100% perfectly safe. Nothing could ever happen. And you're never going to get COVID. All of this is what brought people's attention to the science debate.

And so when they started saying that science is not to be debated, and this is the science. Dr. Anthony Fauci himself came out and said, I am the science. I am science. How dare you say anything about science? Because I am the science. I am God science. Well, you did not do it in his voice, though. Well, I can't do it in his voice.

But either way. So we started to see that, hey, you know what? Science seems like obviously it's being manipulated, especially the past three or four years. Well, let me explain something to you guys. And this is not a spoiler because there's so much and so deep diving in our podcast episode where we talk about climate change. But climate change, it seems, based on everything that we had researched and found and uncovered during our climate change episode, that climate change has been very heavily

manipulated itself. there has been many liars in the scientific community to where they over-exaggerated or just simply made up numbers to make the argument for climate change and to also make the argument towards we have to do something intervention-wise to do this. Now, all of these lies that we have seen over the past 10 and 20 years, you think back to Al Gore and Al Gore was big on climate change. This was his thing. He wrote a book about it. He did all these things. All of these lies that we had heard and seen and thought of, in a large part, by the way, about climate change has been leading up to where we're at today,

which is the possibility of our government and other governments blocking out, quote, unquote, the sun. And you're going to see these more so from governments that are trying to gain and maintain more control more than ever. And we're going to explain this in just a little bit. But for those of you that don't know what's really going on with their argument with climate change, this is what they're really talking about. They're talking about gas and oil. like cars that use gas and oil, anything that uses gas and oil. They're even talking back to the point of livestock, tooting or farting.

Yeah. They're saying that we should not. Yeah, they are saying we should not eat meat because they are admitting too much of this gas into the atmosphere. And we're talking about livestock. Which is absurd. Yeah. I mean, we also have to understand how much wildlife is out there. It's doing the exact same thing, right?

I mean, they're admitting the same gases, the same, you know, whatever. But what they really want to do is control the food. That was their first step. Exactly. But this is where all this, you know, limit your meat intake to once a week or whatever, eat bugs because they have protein. This is where all this stuff is coming from. And obviously, with the gas and the oil, that's where they're going with the battery operated cars, trying to emit those pollutions from going into the atmosphere.

but we don't realize what else is going on in the world. I mean, there's a lot of things that we're polluting based on everything we're doing. Yeah. I mean, even recycling plastic is putting a lot of pollutants in the air. But all of these factors combined cannot justify changing the earth and changing the sun or trying to protect the earth from the sun. Yeah. And here's just a little factoid, even though you guys can further, you know, investigate this or research us for yourselves. But I had heard that one volcano eruption is equivalent to all of Earth's carbon release even over a year, right?

So one volcano eruption is equivalent to the carbon release of everyone on Earth for like at least a year. And it could have been even longer. Right. So we see these things happening quite often. But these volcanoes are actually a trigger for a positive thing with the geoengineering because they're saying when these big volcanoes come and erupt, they have these humongous clouds that protect the earth from the sun. And this is where they're kind of getting their geoengineering from because there was a huge eruption of a volcano. And the clouds prevented the sun from coming in. And we actually were, like, cooler by one or two degrees in temperature during this eruption of this volcano.

You know what else creates clouds and blocking the sun is a nuclear winter. So maybe that's what they're going on. Hey, you know what, World War III wouldn't be that bad. You know, if just we had an all-out nuclear war to wear all the mushroom clouds from these nuclear bombs just block the sun, then we solve climate change, guys. Yes, there will be like 80% of the population dead. but we will not be because we will be under the ground in our little bullshit-ass, the swamp quarters, I guess you can call it, all the deep state elite quarters where they have all of these places underground, they don't give a damn about you. They don't care about any of us, anybody is listening unless you maybe happen to be in a CIA or something. But for our government officials listen, maybe you'll get a spot down there in the basement.

But more than likely, they don't care about any of you. And they would really care less if 70% of the population was gone or not. I think we've kind of seen this. But studying, you know, this type of cloud, the volcano-type clouds, is one way that they're trying to prepare to do this solar geoengineering. Yeah. And we'll talk about it more in a little bit. For sure.

First clip we're going to play you guys is it's a Fox clip, even though I don't really watch Fox anymore whatsoever, but there are some good points here. It starts out with the Simpsons clip on Fox. And so we will see what they have to say. Here you go. The sun, since the beginning of time, man has yearned to destroy the sun. I will do the next best thing.

Block it out. Yeah, it may seem funny on TV, but that outrageous concept may soon become reality. As the Biden administration signals its fight against global warming may actually involve blocking sunlight. The White House posting research claiming, quote, solar radiation modification would enable better informed decisions about the potential risk. about the potential risk and benefits of SRM as a component of climate policy alongside the foundational elements of greenhouse gas emissions mitigation. Our next guest warns this is simply government's way to control your weather. Mark Morano, publisher ofclimatedepo.com, and he joins us now.

Okay, Mark, you know, my take this morning was maybe this is one of those or else. You know, get on board with everything else, so we're going to block the sun. But I guess it's a little bit more reality than that. Tell us about it. Well, this is actually Bill Gates funding this as well through Harvard University. This is retro 1970s. In the 1970s, they believed that our fossil fuels were creating aerosols, blocking the sun, creating man-made global cooling. So they came up with the same kind of geoengineering solutions back then. They wanted to put black soot on the Arctic to melt it. There was one proposal to use nuclear energy to help loosen the Arctic ice caps because they thought they were growing too much.

And John Holdren, back in the Obama administration, also supported this kind of geoengineering, if you will, of the climate. This is radical, risky, unproven, unknown effects, but they're doing it as a sort of lever over us to say now in the Biden administration, kind of like, yeah, we know this is dangerous, we don't know the effects, but darn it, people aren't buying electric cars fast enough. They're not embracing Green New Deal policies, so we have to risk our entire planet with this insane kind of research. It's basically weather modification. China's been doing it for years. It's another form of what the U.S. government has even been doing. The ABC News wet meteorologists bragged about the cloud seating they're doing to increase rain or snow and storms. They will control the government will control the weather, and you will be happy. That seems to be the new motto. I was just talking to Will about the cloud seating. He's not sure if people, leaves it. And I said, listen, this is something they've been trying to do for a while.

But on that same topic, if they don't get to block out the sun, they're going to try other maybe more practical ways, like electric vehicles pushing those on us. A poll out shows 59% of us opposed phasing out gas cars by 2035. 25. 21% support Biden's policy on this. What's your take on it? Well, this is, you know, I don't think we need a poll to show us these numbers. The American people have voted. Less than 7% of cars are, electric vehicle sales in America. And that's despite massive subsidies, massive tax credits, mandates the banning gas-powered cars led by California

and 18 other states with trigger laws. They have done everything they can to promote electric cars and they're more expensive. They have less range. And all they do is increase our dependence on China. It takes fossil fuels to make a car. It takes fossil fuels to recharge the electric cars. It makes no sense.

And what they're doing is intentionally creating car shortages by these gas-powered car bans. to force us into mass transit. Yeah, there you go. So this is what he was saying. I mean, they want to and are already controlling the weather. The cloud seating. This is something that is actually going on today.

Now, listen, guys, you know, even when we did harp, and we've talked about harp in the past two or three years ago, and, you know, weather modification. And when we talk about that, it was such a big conspiracy theory. Oh, my God. The government is not controlling our weather. It's always been a big, huge conspiracy theory. but here we are.

Here we are. They're starting to admit it. They are also now admitting to wanting to geoengineer the sun as far as blocking the sun rays out. This is something that is happening right now. This is not a conspiracy theory anymore. This is a fact. This is what has already been happening. The cloud seeding, as they just said on Fox News, is happening to where they are creating clouds

or at least being able to control the weather. And in reality, guys, this is all about control. And we're going to talk more about this. But we have to understand that on this podcast for three or four years we have talked about, especially since COVID, we had talked about what are the ways that the government or the New World Order or the one where government, the elites, how can they control you? Well, number one, they got to control food, right? I mean, you have to control the food supply the people. Now, where have we heard this at? Well, the World Economic Forum every single year in Davos, Switzerland, with Claus Schwab and so many of these other assholes that are the elites in Davos that say that, you know, what?

What can we do? Well, we want people to eat bugs. We want people to eat crickets. We want to be able to eat things that are not meat and not sustainable because they want to be able to control the food supply. They want to take away your God-given right to have animals, to kill animals, to live off of the land. This is what they want to be able to control. And I know for at least in the United States of America, China is buying all of our farm land right now. Oh, absolutely.

Yeah, they are. I mean, China's been buying it. They're still buying it. They're buying large swasa land throughout the United States. And so food is one, right? So what's the other one? Well, it's money, right? So you got to control money.

You got to control people's spending. And so spending is a huge thing that they have been really taken the head on right now as far as the CBDCs. You know, it seems as if they're intentionally devaluing the U.S. dollar in the United States. They're doing this all over the world with the euro, with the pound, with all these other currencies. They're intentionally devaluing the money. they are causing extreme inflation, and I say causing because they are. They are also raising extreme lengths of interest rates pretty much everywhere. They're then saying it's because of inflation, although it's really making inflation worse.

It's making every single thing worse. It's doing nothing more than devaluing a dollar. It is, and it's making it harder to buy your own things nowadays, but that's exactly what they want us to do. They don't want us to have the ability to buy anything that we own. Yeah. Because they want to own everything and we basically rent it from them. Yeah. Now, as this guy says here on Fox News, he talks about, you know, the, you know, people are kind of voting with how much they're buying electric vehicles versus gas, right?

I'm one of those people. I will never buy an electric vehicle if, you know, I'll ride a damn horse if I have to before I buy an electric vehicle. This is just me. It's cool to, like, say, hey, I got a Tesla and it's nice and whatever. but the reality is too, we have to think about why they're pushing electric vehicles. Now, if you believe that this government, the one that basically killed, I believe, millions of people, potentially during COVID on purpose and so many other of their mass lockdowns, their early treatment of COVID, almost knowingly knowing that this was killing the shit out of people,

they wanted to depopulate, they wanted to further control people, they wanted to put all these vaccine mandates while they protected the vaccine manufacturers, saying you can't sue them. They knew that eventually people were going to sue the actual businesses that actually mandated this to their employees because the businesses are going to be the ones that are hit hard. Right. The drug companies, they're not going to get. And they always are. I mean, this is just the way it goes.

But the reality, too, with this is that electric vehicles, there's a bigger problem than just people don't want to buy them. But why are they pushing them so much? Well, I believe they're pushing them because electric vehicles have many. it's basically a computer that drives and it has wills. And so if you want to cut off people's ability to travel, if you need to do so, it is very easy to do this in electric vehicles. There have been rumors and things that we have heard, especially with the major car manufacturers.

I'm not 100% sure on Tesla, but I believe Tesla even has potentially agreed to some of these things. But the ability to, I guess for the government or law enforcement, to be able to cut your vehicle off or control your vehicle from a centralized location. This is something that is definitely probably more so why they want everyone to have as many, as much electric vehicles as possible so they can then control your travel because you need, you need to control food, you need to control money, and you need to control travel. And these are three things that they are working so hard on to get this pushed through.

Geoengineering is just another way. And geoengineering is the best way to control food. Yeah. But we got to put housing in there too because they want to control your house. housing and where you live and how you live. Oh, absolutely. So let's, I kind of want to just show you or talk to you guys about, this is a Forbes article, Solo or SOR, solo, solar geoengineering, why Bill Gates wants it, but these experts want to

stop it. So the earth is warming rapidly, as Forbes said, as a result of human-caused emissions is what they say, which is all bullshit. So what should humanity do about it? Well, one of the more controversial suggestions is that we shouldn't simply prevent so much heat reaching Earth in the first place. Proponents of the so-called solar geoengineering, such as tech billionaire Bill Gates, say techniques intended to block a portion of the solar radiation reaching the planet ought to be

considered. Gates himself has put his money where his mouth is, back in a Harvard University experiment to look at the effect of spraying particles, spraying particles, into the atmosphere to, in theory, create a global cooling effect. So we want to talk about this, you know, by the way, This is kind of crazy because you talk about chemtrails. Well, yeah, and exactly. And when you read it further, this is exactly what they're going to do.

They're going to use jets. But these jets, they have to have a ton of them, and they're all spraying at once constantly. And we're not talking about a one-time deal and you're done. We're talking about centuries. We're talking about years and years and years, spraying these chemicals into our atmosphere. Or whatever it is. To try to cool. And what these chemicals are doing, they're like forming these clothes.

clouds to make them brighter to reflect the sun away from the earth. Yeah, so, and so you're right. It goes on to say it sounds very much like a plot of a science fiction movie in particular, namely, Bong June Ho's 2013 film Snow Piercer, in which scientists release are aerosols into the sky in a desperate bid to stop rampant global warming. Let's just say the plan doesn't work out as intended. Now, concerned that science fiction could end up becoming science fact in all the wrong ways, and an international coalition of researchers and campaigners has called for an end to solar geoengineering plans. In an open letter, the 16 initiators of the solar geoengineering non-use agreement, all scholars in their own right argue that there are three main grounds for preventing the use of such technologies.

So first, they point to the unknown. risk deploying solar geoengineering tech could backfire potentially catastrophically. And this is quote, the risk of solar geoengineering are poorly understood and can never be fully known.

The scholars say, impacts will vary across regions and there are uncertainties about the effects on weather patterns, agricultural, and provisions of basic needs of food and water. Next, they say that the technologies could be used by governments or corporations to prevent

work on other less risky methods to combat climate change, such as reducing the use of fossil fuels. The speculative possibility of future solar geoengineering risk becoming a powerful argument for industry lobbyists, climate denialists, and some government to delay deocarbonization policies, the author writes. And lastly, they ask, who would get to decide how solar geoengineering is used, and how would such a decision be fair? The current global governance system is unfit to develop and implement the far-reaching agreements needed to maintain fair, inclusive, and effective political control over solar geoengineering deployment. Thus, they need one government. Yeah.

They say, noting that, for example, the United Nations. Security Council, dominated by only five countries with veto power, lacks a global legitimacy that would be required to effectively regulate solar geoengineering deployment. It's kind of the Sherry's point. Well, how are we going to decide who gets to control what and so on and so forth? Because this thing is not going to work unless it's happening all over the earth simultaneously at the same time. So Frank Beerman, a professor of global sustainability governance at Utrecht University, and one of the letters initiators, summed up the signator's stance by saying, solar engineering is not necessary.

Neither is it desirable, ethical, or politically governable. The letter goes on the call for five measures to be adhered to the international community. No public funding of solar geoengineering, no outdoor experiments, no patents for solo geoengineering tech, no deployment of such tech, and no support for solo engineering for international institutions. And there are more than 45 heavyweight academics, law professors, writers, all of these people have signed this letter, including an award-winning author Amatov Ghosh, Sheila Jasanoff, Fons Haim. professor of science and technology studies at Harvard Kennedy School and Raymond T. Pira Humbert, Halley Professor of Physics at the University of Oxford. So there are many, many scientists that are

100% against this. I mean, even on a political scale, the fact that you can't get these scientists on, because most of these scientists are in liberal-backed institutions, they're all about all of the things that you have probably heard and seen over the past three years during COVID. They're going to be behind any of those mandates, any of those things are completely stripping away people's rights and gaining more control by the government. But even this, these people are saying, okay, we got to stop because this is getting out of hand. This is getting ridiculous. But this is exactly what they are going to do.

And honestly, they're probably already doing it, right? I mean, there's been a lot of people on social media, Twitter, Facebook, all of these other platforms that have constantly, especially the past a year or two, been sharing pictures of these, it almost looks like, I mean, think about the contrails in the air, right? what people call Kim Trails of the airplanes. And they will share these crazy pictures. It looks like of a... A contra that looks like a cloud almost.

No, but it looks like a graph. So it looks like 10 airplanes that went through exactly straight. And then going the other way oppositely. And then as these airplanes do this, over time it spreads out a mass cloud layer. Right. And it forms a cloud layer.

And that's one type. Yeah, this is going back to the geo seat or sorry, the cloud seating, right? We know that this is already happening and people are starting to point this out saying, what is this? And this is something that I've been seeing on social media for quite some time, a year or two. But I've been hearing people talk about these cam trails for years and years and years. I'm like, okay, whatever. No, I mean, but the reality is that a lot of people believe that camtrels are to either hurt the people, you know, or poison them or whatever,

which is also very possible, right? Kim Charles has always been this big conspiracy theory, but now we're hearing about Cloud Seed and we're starting to see the geoengineering. What they want to actually do is spray stuff out of airplanes. It all sounds very, very interesting. But guys, I do want to play a brief, sorry, I need to make sure that this is off before we place.

But I do want to play. This is a geoengineering clip to where they talk about geoengineering might do more harm than good. and it's a short clip. We've got a couple of clips to play to you guys. And we're going to talk about what is the real reason that they want to do this. Check this out. Climate change took its toll on 2017, making it one of the warmest years on record,

and the U.S. most expensive disaster year ever. As the warming trend continues, researchers are exploring if solar geoengineering might slow it down, but they're finding it might actually do more harm than good. Solar geoengineering involves reflecting more sunlight back into space, so the planet cools down. Scientists think if it's done together with reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, it might offset some of the effects of climate change. One of the most popular and feasible methods involves spraying sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere to form a cloud that would reflect solar radiation.

This is similar to what happens during large volcanic eruptions. Models have shown this technique might not only help cool the planet, but could also reduce melting of sea and land ice, slow down sea level rise, and make it easier for plants to absorb carbon dioxide. But the risks might outweigh the benefits. Some models show if we start sulfur seeding and then abruptly stop for some reason, the planet might actually begin rapidly heating up, far faster than if seating hadn't been used at all. The warming could be disastrous for ecosystems, especially fragile ones in the polar regions. Other studies have found sulfur seeding might also lead to substantial ozone depletion, reversing the slow natural repairs

to the ozone hole above Antarctica. So before we go spraying aerosols into the sky, we might want to seriously weigh as many risks and benefits as we can. Scientists won't know all of geoengineering's implications until it's underway. And I think they're already doing this, guys. I mean, this is what we go back to. This is something that has been a, it's like a sci-fi movie, but this is happening. Now, what are some reasons that they would want to spray I mean, this particular audio clip you guys just heard talks about how it could help actual crops. But the reality is there are many scientists, especially agriculturists, that say that this could destroy crops. This could completely eliminate and destroy farmers' ability to farm for their people.

This could completely destroy, at the very least, what it could do was how farmers are able to mass crop thousands of acres to, to be able to supply the ever-grow-in demand of people's needs of food, this could drastically, at the very least, shrink that by, say, if you could grow 1,000 acres, typically, in mass seeding of crops, it would drastically reduce that seeding, it would drastically reduce the pollination effect, it would drastically, or not the pollination effect, but I guess it is somehow the pollination.

I was reading this. And then also, it could also drastically decrease how much use, yield you have from your crops in general. So therefore, it is drastically shrinking your food supply, whether it be corn, whether it be vegetables, whether it be any of the stuff that we typically eat, what it sounds like to me is that these people want to control or eliminate the ability for the people to be able to control your own food supply. We've heard this for, I don't know how many years, we saw letters of the U.S.

government sending to farmers. Farmers were pleading. They were going on TikTok. They were going on Twitter. They were going on Facebook. although many of their videos were banned and they were saying it was misinformation and a lot of the same warning labels and all this stuff as COVID. They were doing this and they were getting this stuff and this is just what happened. It is.

But the problem with all of this is when they're making fake clouds, what happens when these clouds deliver rain with all these chemicals and stuff? I think that will change the atmosphere completely. And then when you're making fake clouds, you don't really actually have the sunlight you need to grow your crops. Yeah, I mean, the problem here is that they want to control the food supply. And what better way to be able to completely eliminate or at least drastically destroy the amount of food being able to be yielded by these farmers? And why would you do that?

Well, the question is, it's not even a question. They already told you why they would, why they would do this. this. I mean, the World Economic Forum says we've got to bring more people to bugs. We got to get away from farming. We got to get away from, you know, cows. And you got to think about also the effect it would have on cows and their ability to feed the cows and their ability to, I mean, you know, just even with the corn thing, I mean, the amount of corn that is used in feed for animals is drastic. I think if I'm not mistaken, there's more corn used for feed in animals than there are for people. And you have to think about this whole aerosol thing, spraying aerosol

into our environment. This is the whole reason why they were saying our ozone layer was going cabot is because we're using aerosols. They were even talking about hairsprays at one time. We shouldn't even have aerosol hairspray anymore because it's depleting the ozone layer. Well, now we're talking about taking multiple planes at the same time and releasing aerosols with chemicals

into our atmosphere that will create clouds that are supposed to stay there to deflect sunlight back into space. But what happens, it makes no sense to me. Like, how could you make chemical clouds and think that's safe? I mean, it's the same way they made a vaccine and gave it to everyone. That's exactly the same way. And by the way, do you know who else was behind the vaccine?

Bill Gates. Yeah, exactly. Do you know who is behind this geoengineering bullshit? It's Bill Gates. And it's not just Bill Gates. There are multiple elites. a lot of the same people that go to the World Economic Forum every year that want to set up this new world order, to want to set up this one more globalist government that governs all of the world.

They want this more than anything. We've heard it even when we hear this clip about, well, how can we govern this? When we were reading the article, Forbes article, how can we govern us? What is the best way to do this? Well, we have to come up with some type of one world or some type of system is the only way we could really make it fair. And this is all in the name of climate change. We've got to save our world. But guys, I go back again to our climate change episode to where this climate change is mostly bullshit.

Does climate change happen? Yes. Has it happened over since this earth happened? Yes. I mean, go back to our Antarctica episode. There are samples being drilled and samples taken out of two mile ice that shows that there were, Antarctica was a tropical plant or a tropical continent at one point in time. Unless there's like a hollow part where you go in.

But, you know, we don't know that. Either way, they believe that Antarctica in whole was a tropical climate. So Bill Gates' whole thing about this big cloud thing, though, he got it from volcanoes. And this is where he's spending all of his money right now is to imitate these volcanoes with these fake clouds. This is only one way that our government's working. I'm not sure about other governments around the Earth, but I know our government's working on. This is just one way out of three that I know just for solar. Now, we haven't even mentioned ocean, and we might have to get that in another podcast.

Now, we're going to do ocean right now, actually. We're going to talk about the ocean. And I want to play a clip for you guys to explain geoengineering oceans what they say to slow global warming. And then once we talk about, or once we actually play this clip, then we'll talk about what could possibly go wrong with this as well. Here you go. Oceans are some of the most efficient CO2 absorbers out there. Sucking out 25% of our emissions, year. Ocean-based carbon capture is the idea that we can remove carbon dioxide from the

atmosphere by accelerating natural processes. Keeping even vaguely in line with our global warming targets means cutting our emissions. But even that won't be enough. So we'll need to go further. And for that, carbon capture would have to scale up fast. Within the community, that's starting to develop carbon removal technologies, it's becoming a bit of a consensus that will likely need to gig. or billions of tons of of carbon removal annually by 2050. This is an absolutely enormous challenge.

There's about eight gigatons of coal produced annually. This is one of the most handled materials in the world. So if we're going to scale the carbon removal industry, it needs to become something along the lines of the coal or the oil and gas industry. Propaganda. ... is among the growing number of scientists who believe that ocean-based carbon removal

could have a large role to play here. Certainly the ocean carries a very high potential for sea removal, but we have very little understanding at the moment of what the potential risks and side effects of that are. We're now here just south of Bergen in Norway, where we had a 55-day experiment, which we just completed now. Wolf and his team are running a study funded by the European Union, testing out a method called Alkalese. enhancement, which essentially is changing the water's pH in the hope of boosting its CO2 absorbing powers. pH is a scale which shows how acidic something is.

It goes from acidic at the lower end to alkaline at the higher end, in case you forgot your high school chemistry. Oceans have become more acidic as they absorb more carbon dioxide. The team submerged 10 mesocosomes. Those are giant, 20-meter-long test tubes filled with water from me. the ocean. Then they added different concentrations of chemicals found in natural rocks like lime or volcanic olivine to change the water's pH and make it more alkaline. So we simulated alkalizing seawater in our mesocosms trying to see whether there's any harm done to marine life and to test whether it takes up more CO2. And let me go ahead and pause.

here. Like, regardless of the fact that, I guess, the ocean has become more acidic and how they're saying we're testing us to see if it harms ocean life. The reality is, is that it would harm ocean life. As these fish evolve, right, as they adapt to their surroundings, anything you do that changes completely the pH level. And this is something that if you've ever owned a fish, if you've ever owned a freaking fish tank. You used to have these

little things you could buy at the pet store and you would put it in the water you would see the pH level is it would have a blue to green level and it would tell you what your alkalinity versus pH was or versus acidity. And so this is something that has to be

very closely monitored and kept at a medium for fish and it's only mostly based on what the environment that they grew up in too. Now if you if you could based on what I've read before

because I've done this with fish stuff if you could evolve fish and put fish in a more acidic environment and you evolve these fish over the course of three or four different I don't know hatchings or whatever

and eventually you have these fish in an acidic environment and then you went in to their water and changed their water to a more alkaline environment it would kill them based on shock this is what happens and there are certain fish that need a more acidic environment

versus alkaline. This is exactly what we're talking about. But now these mofos want to go in and figure out how to make the water more alkaline. Is this for climate change, or is this once again to therefore be able to kill more shit?

I mean, this is what it sounds like. Based on my research and my knowledge of snorkeling around coral reefs, this is true. There are a lot of coral reefs that are getting bleached out for some reason. They're turning white.

They're not colorful anymore. There's a lot of coral reefs dying. I don't know what it's from. If it's from pollution or whatever, blah, blah, blah, blah. If it's, you know, the stuff coming into the ocean. Carbon. Carbon or whatever. But there is no way to control the entire ocean on Earth to make that, you know, the pH level a same amount or whatever.

there's no way you can control the entire ocean the ocean is way huger than like land on the on earth yeah 70 well the yeah the earth is made of a 70% water I believe 70 or something like that I mean and it look it goes back to

this is this is going to be a massive problem this is going to be something that we are going to be moving into as we go forward I think closer to 2030 we've we've heard about agenda 2030 and the globalist and elites, a lot of this geoengineering and what we're hearing now

is probably more than likely what a lot of the meetings are being held at Davos, Switzerland, during the World Economic Forum. They're sitting around trying to figure out how to better control the food because they've got to control the food. And to be honest with you guys,

you know, Anthony Fauci, for example, in the AIDS epidemic, or whatever you want to call, I guess, pandemic because it did go worldwide. But it really started in Africa. Right. And so this AIDS thing and this vaccine and all this other BS and some of these medications that were created, many people believe that Anthony Falsci potentially had the may have even caused or accelerated AIDS in the AIDS virus and HIV virus, much like we see and have seen during COVID. And, you know, obviously Anthony Falsci has since quote unquote retired, which is what they really what they want to do was, you know, usher him off into the sunset. There's not a lot of people talking about Anthony Fawci right now.

He's kind of like out of sight, out of mind type deal. But Anthony Fulci has been behind a lot of sinister BS when it comes to really bioengineering diseases. Right. I think he was heavily influential in this bioengineering of diseases in Wuhan. I believe it was probably created based on, not probably. Anthony Fulci, Dr. Barrick, and some of these other ones in the United States from Chapel Hill, Texas, then Falschi and his NIH. I believe the gang of function was not only set up, prepared, and engineered by Americans,

which was a huge, huge conspiracy theory when this whole thing first started. Even a China blamed them or blamed the United States on releasing this or whatever the cases. But regardless, I think the United States and Anthony Falsci and his team were hugely behind the engineering of COVID itself in China, to even get it to China to say, hey, this is what we have. But it's the same thing. It's the same thing.

We're seeing this in geoengineering. You've got people like Bill Gates. You have these other scientists. They're going to F our planet in that way on top of what we've already seen with COVID. Well, anytime you put the word engineering into something, if it's geo, biochemical, whatever, then you've got a real problem. Because this is when you are pretty much playing God.

You're trying to change something that is not supposed to be by engineering it to be something else. And this is what we're doing with the geoengineering. Now, we've not even talked about the two other ways that we are trying to protect our Earth from solar. And so we're doing these geoengineering to protect. protect from the sun. We have two other ways that they're trying to do right now.

And I think we have a video on that. Yeah, we will. Or an audio. Yeah, we're going to play that. And guys, also talking about engineering. You know, I don't know if you guys or girls have heard recently about the lab grown meat. Have you seen that? Well, lab grown meat is happening right now.

And the science of turning cells into steaks and nuggets is what they're saying. Companies are making cultured meat. And they're attracting billions of dollars of investment. And so it tastes like chicken, quote. That's a common review of upside foods, new trial product. Perhaps that's not surprising. It is, after all, chicken at the cellier level, but the filets are not from a slaughterhouse.

They are grown in a bioreactor in an urban facility in California. So they are now growing meat from cells. And so this is not real meat. This is not from an actual chicken. This is not from a cow. these are lab grown meats. And you've got to say, well, why would they want to do that? It's all back to climate change again, because we talk about this, this, you know, methane gas release,

so how they want to get rid of cows and they want to get rid of chickens. Right. And, guys, that's not because of climate change. Climate change is because of control. This is why they want to do it. They want to eliminate cows. They want to eliminate chickens. And think about all this.

We heard about the mass extinction of many cows, not extinction, but killing of cows. Right, through fires and heat, supposedly, and all these things, 10,000 plus cows, 100,000 cows. And chickens. We've heard this. We've seen it in Oklahoma. We've seen it in Kansas. We've seen it in Texas. We've heard about these facilities, these chicken facilities, these poultry facilities that are burning down right and left, these egg production facilities or these egg processing facilities or whatever the case is.

These places are burning down right and left. And so you have all of this, what appears to be arson, what appears to be intentional killing off of our livestock. And now you're hearing of them making meat in a lab based on cells. And it's all towards their engineered overall goal of 100% complete control of food, money, water, everything. They're going to control everything, guys. And I'm telling you right now, this whole blocking out to something, It goes, there's so many layers. I mean, there's so many layers to this.

But just the blocking out to sun thing, it goes back all the way to lab grown meat, 100%. Now, there's another video I want to play or audio that I want to play to you guys. And this is geoengineering solution or time bomb. It's a very short audio, but we will play this. And then we'll talk about it on the backside. Engineering. Solution or time bomb? And what is it anyway?

Well, some scientists believe with global emissions, still on the rise, we can engineer our way out of the climate crisis. This sounds extreme to you. You're not alone. Some of the ideas going are really out there. I mean, really out there in space. You see, scientists are considering sending a giant mirror or fleet of mirrors into orbit

to reflect sunlight back into space, and they hope that will do the trick and cool the Earth. It's radical, pricey, and technically tricky. Another idea is to spray salt water into cloud. above the sea, make them thicker and brighter to reflect the sun. This could be used to cool specific areas like coral reefs or hurricane-prone zones. But perhaps a geoengineering idea with the most traction is to dim the sun, turn the switch down. They'd do that by mimicking the way major volcanic eruptions block sunlight and cool the climate.

For geoengineering solution, aircraft would spray hundreds of thousands of tons of fine harmless aerosols into the Earth stratosphere to block sunlight and weaken the strength of the sun's rays. But there are lots of worries with this one, because it wouldn't stop carbon dioxide from building up in the atmosphere, and it could also take the onus off nations to reduce emissions in the first place. Dimming the sun could also have unintended consequences on ecosystems or even widespread crop failures. And then there's the security threat that rogue governments could use this method to destabilize other countries. But research into all of these is ongoing.

And what that says to me is just how worried scientists are about the climate and where we might be heading. And how important it is to do the one thing in our power today, slash emissions as fast as possible and stop global warming in the first place. Oh, yeah, let's slash emissions. Yeah, but his whole point before that makes complete sense of, well, this is, no, it doesn't, well, what I'm saying is these are the three ways that they're trying to, create solar geoengineering.

Yeah, so all of these things are bad, right? I mean, mirrors in space, right? I mean, which is going to be the most ridiculous idea. But, mind you, yeah, but mind you, if you have these mirrors in space that are reflecting our sunlight away from Earth and going back into space, you've got to have them all over Earth. If you just have them in America, it's not going to do anything.

you can't really do that either because they're going to they're going to orbit you know that's the way that goes and but regardless you know we have to think about this it goes back to the age old conspiracy which is kim trails i mean you know this has been latched onto for many years and people have accused the governments of of doing this what they call kimtrails uh over the population of not just united states but many places around the world um and now they're basically admitted it I mean, and it's almost like they're admitting it in lieu of climate change. They're saying, well, we might be doing this already, which it sounds like cloud seed and they're already doing this. We've kind of already heard this before. And I've actually seen posts on social media and many other places to where a lot of people say it's cloudy all the time, it seems like, nowadays. I mean, I'll give you an example. Here it has been, like seems like most of the summer. We've had maybe a few days of sun.

And I know there are places that are not like this, but regardless, there are people that are complaining of this in many places. There are many people's pictures and videos of showing this what looks like a, like a braiding of con trails or some type of trail based on the back of airplanes that eventually spreads out as a cloud layer, which is cloud seeding. Right. And this is happening. And now discussing it with you, I have to probably redact what I was talking about. about controls in the beginning, like I didn't really believe it because I've seen it my whole life since I was growing up. You see jets. You see them flying. You see the trail behind them. That's always, you've always seen that. So it's something I'm used to. But now that I'm

re-listening to everything and talking to you and discussing, it does make sense that this could potentially be happening right now and we don't even know it. Well, I think it is. And I think a lot of a lot of organizations, whistleblowers as well, that have already come out. You know, Fox News is talking about cloud seeding. This is something that is in getting into mainstream media now. This is not something that is no longer conspiracy theory. This is something that's happening, everybody. And I want you to be aware of this.

I want you to understand this because, you know, what are ways that you can prevent this? Well, look, I always go back to self-sustainability. And how are you going to self-sustainable if they start trying to geoengineer what you can and cannot do? The only way you'd really be able to do that is to, to be able to basically create your own sun to grow your plants, which is going to be very hard. Artificial sunlight, I guess.

Yeah, like if you're going to grow weed or something. Lores at lights. Well, yeah, I mean, if you're going to grow weed, same thing. You grow plants or whatever. Right. But, you know, it's something that you've got to think about nowadays. I mean, because of the wacko elites, and I say elites, but these crazy psycho, power-hungry globalists

that want to control every aspect of our lives. Guys, this is the world we live in. And I think the reason why you're saying that and you're so like about it is because we have really, we have dive deep into the whole climate change thing. Yeah. And when we dove deep and we researched all this stuff,

most of it's BS. It's all BS. This is a way to control you. When you actually see what's really going on with the climate, human destruction is not really happening in the environment. If it's doing anything, it's by millimeters. Yeah, I mean, it's very minute. And yeah, you're right.

I mean, it pisses me off because we know, at least based on past science, like past science that they have shown. And I encourage each of you again to go listen to our climate change podcast. But we basically showed in that episode that most of climate change's entire theory is bullshit. Most of it is BS. Most of it is completely lies. They altered and exaggerated and misled people on numbers even 20 years ago. This is something they were doing intentionally.

It was found out they were doing this intentionally. And if you don't think they're doing it intentionally now, based on 20 years. Years ago? Yes. I mean, come on, man. Well, it's even like recycling. I have been watching these programs about recycling. I've been big into recycling because I want to save the earth out, the earth, blah, blah, blah.

You know, put the plastic in a container. Put the cardboard in a container. I hope you're going somewhere with this. But I'm just saying all the plastic that we're recycling is going nowhere but into the trash. I wasn't, I wasn't saying I hope you're going somewhere of this. What I meant was, I hope you were going to say. place I was going to say this. Because, yeah, they had their little numbers, one, two, three, four, and five.

But you only can recycle one and two sometimes. No, but Sherry, do you remember when we did recycling, right? So we had the recycling thing and then we had the garbage? Yes. You remember when they would just, they would pick up their recycling, put it in the garbage, and then throw it in the back of the trash truck? We're like, what the hell? We spent all week trying to go through all this stuff and even like compact it and put it

where we could recycle it to help, you know, the earth. But honestly, guys, recycling plastic, you're not recycling crap. You might be in some cases. No, really, you're not. And look, the amount of people on this earth, plastic is an issue, right? I mean, it is. I mean, and look, the whole idea of just the amount of people we have on this earth, which, by the way, you know, they want to make you believe it's too many people.

And they don't want to have as many babies and all this stuff. But actually, Elon Musk and many other, not just Elon Musk, but. scientists, population scientists, which are our actual population scientists out there, you know, there are many of them, there's a debate, right? It's the same thing with COVID. It's the same thing with all of this. Same thing with ancient civilizations and pyramids and history. You have a debate going on right now, which is, you know, you have the elitist,

the ones that are paid by the globalists, they go to World Economic Forum, that say there are too many people on this earth and that we got to do something. We've got to stop, you know, the production of kids or, you know, reproduction. and then you have this other faction of scientists that say, we are not overpopulated. We need more people in this earth. We need more of this. I mean, think about when you fly over, you know,

and I've said this before, it's a good analogy, though. The amount of open land in the country in the United States and many other places, the amount of open land, which a lot of that's farmland, a lot of this is that and this and this. But there is still a large swath of land that is wide open. Yeah, but we don't really want to change them into industrial. No, we don't. No, we don't. Or housing.

You know, we need places where creatures of this earth have a place to live. Yeah, but eventually they don't care. I mean, we already know they don't care about creatures of this earth. We know that, for sure. They don't give a damn about that. I mean, but they don't. They, the elitist, do not care. They want to get rid of our cows.

They want to get rid of all this stuff. They don't really give a shit about extinction of animals and all this. They don't care. Nor did they care about the extinction. of people. They want less people. And this whole depopulation agenda is real. It is, it is happening 100%. If COVID didn't show you that, I don't know what will. I mean, you know, the depopulation agenda has always been a conspiracy theory as well. But Bill Gates himself has been on the video saying we got to depopulate his earth. And this is right before COVID even came out. And he was like one of the

major players of Event 201, which was a synopsis of what would really happen. They brought world leaders from around the world to simulate what would happen if there was a pandemic. And this happened months before the real pandemic. No, I did. Absolutely. I, you know, and even the pandemic, this is something I will say, and I'll leave you guys with this, you know, COVID is not the end for pandemics.

There's going to be something much greater, much worse. And I feel like it's going to happen much sooner than we even realize. I think they got to get that control back. You know, 2024 election in the United States is coming up. Although I don't feel like they have to give a shit about people voting because I believe that shit's already unlocked now anyways. They already know what's going to happen regardless. I've said that many, many times. So don't be surprised that there's no pro-American president that gets in office because it's not going to happen.

I don't care who runs. It is not going to happen. This is already in place. They've already figured this out. There's nothing going to be done. If you believe that the 2020 election was rigged or not rigged, whatever, but you're about to see it again in 2024, I believe 100%. And that's why they don't care.

They'll run Biden again because who gives a shit? They have it on lock anyway. They want to make Biden out to be, like they want people to believe that he is not Sino. And the reality is he is. I mean, he's not there. He has zero idea what the hell is going on. you know like when my sugar's been low before and i and my confusion in my mind take that

and then times it times 10 that is by nothing all the time i mean and that's unfortunately there's a lot of old people that get senile and get you know dementia and stuff like yeah he has it you know but they did find cocaine in the white house or to wet or well in the white house in the west wing uh so maybe they're trying to hop him up on cocaine yeah to make it more goes out. I have no idea. To make a more alert. Like, oh, I'm here. I'm Joe Biden. Yeah, I'm here, guys. And then the cocaine runs out by the end of the speech. It's crazy, man. It's crazy to where we're living in. But guys, we wanted to touch on this, this geoengineering, this potential of blocking out the sun. Make no mistake. This is about them wanting to control the food. They are doing this with controlling the money with CBDCs. Think about all of the legacy things we've always known as. you know, for example, money, our dollar. They're fading that out.

They're bringing in this digital currency. Think about crops. They're going to try to fade this out with the help of geoengineering. You know, the whole harp episode, I encourage each and every one of you to go listen to harp, Alana Freeland, and what harp does and what it can do. Also, then go listen to Antarctica. If you've not listened to that and the potential directed energy weapon and what it can cause, even in Antarctica, there's so many things that we've talked about over five years at

100% connect, and this is all just exactly, it's like we're finally saying, we can say to somebody, well, here it is. It's the puzzle pieces coming together to make the puzzle. But I have to give you hope in this. I don't think they're going to be able to accomplish this unless they have a one world government. It will be impossible to accomplish this. And it's going to take not only months, but years, if they really want to try to do this, solar geoengineering.

So we have to have faith that we believe we can stop this stuff in what they're doing. Yeah. And hopefully we can. But if we can't, we just got to do what we got to do, guys. But listen, we got lots of good episodes coming up for you guys. We are so excited

to share a lot of this stuff with you. We got some good guests coming on. But this is all for geoengineering. We will touch base back on this as more information comes out. And until next time, guys, we love each every single one of you. Reach out to us on social media.

Tell us, hey, tell us what's up. We would love to talk to you. Till next time, peace out. Peace out, guys. Oh, shut up. Oh, shout up up. Such a dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb. It's almost funny.

Oh, shut up. Sleep all though I know.