Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - George Orwell 1984 in 2022 | Conspiracy Podcasts

Episode Date: August 25, 2022

The George Orwell book described a time in which many people would not believe they could live through, however, we are here folks. On todays podcast episode, we talk about how the 1984 book is sounding a lot like it should have been the 2022 book. On this conspiracy podcasts.

Tell me something I haven't heard before. Because I'm restless and I'm dying to no more. Show me something. Show me something I haven't seen before. Because I'm tired of the same boat's the same show. It's time my friend. Hello, hello. And welcome to Investigator at the podcast.

I'm your host Chad alongside my wife, Sherry. Hello. Hope everybody is doing fantastic out there this evening. It is August the 25th, 2022. It is 7.19 p.m. here on the East Coast United States, South Carolina. We love each and every one of you from all around the world. Now, for those of you that have read the book 1984 by George Orwell, you should appreciate this episode. We're going to talk about 1984.

We're also going to talk about kind of how it is relating to what is going on now here in the United States, but also just how it relates to around the world. Now, this podcast is going to specifically talk. about kind of what is going on in the government of the United States, but we're also going to cover what Orwell and what he was trying to portray, what he was trying to get a cross in his book, 1984. There's a lot of people actually. There's a lot of graphics and memes and everything out there that says, you know, there's, there's like a slash between, uh, over 1984 and they just cross it out and put 2022 under it because it's like 1984, well, 22 and, and probably going forward

was envisioned by George Orwell, but I think he just got it a little too early. Yeah, was it? It was his prediction earlier than now or something? 1984. Oh, 1984. Duh. Sorry. Oh, my God.

No, I was thinking that he wrote the book in 1980. No. A lot of people actually thought that. Now, George Orwell, I believe, wrote the book in the 50s. Oh, wow. So the predictions were for 1984, but it's happening now. Gotcha. Yeah.

It was one of George Orwell's, well, probably the George Orwell masterpiece was 1984. And I'm not that much of a ding-dong. but we have done this podcast before, but I just wasn't thinking. Well, we haven't went in depth about George Orwell as much as we probably should have. So we're going to talk about it tonight. I don't know what's wrong of your mic. I'm just trying to like adjust it a little bit. I haven't adjusted good.

It's all good. Bro. Hope everyone is doing fantastic out of this evening. Man, there is so much news. We actually, we kind of wanted to do, I mean, there's a lot of news going on right now. There's a lot of crazy stuff. We got a lot of stuff. we actually really want to do this new UFO UAP podcast episode.

But we have a guest that's going to be joining us for our UFO UAP podcast. He's one of the greats in the UFO UAP realm. So just been kind of trying to wait to get a confirmation to get him on. Because he is a doctor, Jaquoise Valet. If I'm saying his name wrong, I apologize. But anyways, he is,

we're in talks with his people, his public relations people. I mean, he's world-renowned and well-known around the world for his UFO, UAP deal,

his research, his books, his everything he's written. He's crazy, crazy famous. If anybody knows, like, if anybody knows about

the UFO-UAP stuff and you're like, kind of in that realm, this guy is the guy. I mean, we hear of Jeremy Corbell, we hear of Bob Lazare, we hear of all these people,

but if you want, want like the OG, their original gangster, as they call them. Or the goat. The goat is Jack Whiz. I'm probably saying his freaking name wrong. But anyways. Jack Wiz. But yeah, so we're going to have him on soon enough.

But until then, I didn't figure it would be right to do another UFO. Even though we do have awesome, like some really exciting news that's come out about the UFO UAP thing. But I would rather wait to have him on to talk about that with him. Gotcha. Anyways, there's that. There's all kinds of stuff. There's a Trump Mar-Alogo stuff. There's affidavit, which is basically going to be released and looked like you gave a four-year-old a black magic marker.

Marker. It's marked out everything. Everything. You've got to figure out what is saying. It's like, hey, here's your job today, kid. It is every word you see. Just put black over. Fill in the blanks.

You can put, you can, look. Your thing is you can leave thee and but and and and nothing else. Yeah. And you're going to. filling the blanks with what's supposed to be there. And we're going to grade you to see how you do. Yes. Yeah, that's like the new school program I think they have in.

It's like how teaching gets how to redact government documents like to where you can't read anything or know anything about what's actually going on. Right. Like the whole purpose of like the affidavit being released was to actually have transparency because it was causing an uproar with the public. Regardless of what side you're on, whether you're on the left or right or somewhere in between, the reality is that when the FBI and the federal government raid a, former president's home and or anyone's home for that matter especially on the high profile

case like this there should be transparency and there should be something that you know you're at least you should you should you should at least know what they're going now they're saying all the stuff oh well we have to we we got to maintain oh yeah the integrity of our of our investigatality too well confidentia yeah but look you don't have all these like files that could jeopardize our company our world yes but that's all yeah i i i don't believe that but you know we'll see i think there's a reason they don't want to um i think more so the reason they don't want to publish affidavit and actually let you see what's in there is probably because of the lack of what's in there i don't think it's because of the depth of what's in there

i think it's because of the absolute lack of what's in there is what they're so scared of the public see and how much do you want to bet and the uproar that they have something about our president asking for this somewhere in these documents do you think president asking what no i'm i guess not in the documents they're getting, but I'm talking about Joe Biden saying that he didn't Oh, I don't know that they would, I don't know they would put that in affidavit. Yeah, that would be stupid. But no one's, but no one's dumb enough to think that Joe Biden didn't know about it. Yeah.

So, yeah, we've got a lot of, I mean, there's a ton of news that's going on. Obviously, we're going to talk about the George Orwell, uh, 1984 in a comparison of 2022 today. But, you know, there's just so much stuff going on, guys. I mean, um, one of the things we wanted to do. do was we wanted to we actually are probably going to start doing this we're going to have at least one episode per week more than likely that we just it's like a breaking news episode where we talk about all of the most important news and we'll touch on each subject for five or six minutes and then we'll move on what were you saying we need to do that because a lot of times like today we're like

there's so much going on in the news oh my gosh my throat There's so much going on in the news, and it's hard to talk an hour about one... Well, it's not hard. One current event. What are you talking about? It's hard. Well, I guess... Well, yeah, we get off topic a lot because we read so much other stuff, I think, is what you're saying.

Yeah, I know. But it's not hard to talk about one particular, especially what we're going to talk about today. Actually, a lot of times, you know, we'll look at the clock because Sherry, I think, got us into that. Because, like, all in the beginning of this podcast, back in the day, we used to, Sherry, like, we've been going an hour. We've got to go. And I'm like, Sherry, like, most of the podcast. podcast go for like two and three hours. But anyway, so yeah, we can talk about episode.

But yeah, the problem is we talk about so much. So for tonight, though, just for the first 10 minutes, we will go over a couple of things that's in the news. And we're going to have a more in-depth in the news episode once a week. But we will talk about some of the things. Now, Mark Zuckerberg, which we may possibly do a separate episode on this, but I don't know if it's technically warranted. but Mark Zuckerberg did go on Joe Rogan today

and he admitted that Facebook censored the Hunter laptop story after the FBI request. Joe Rogan specifically asked him, well, because basically what Mark Zuckerberg was trying to say was, well, the FBI came to us and said, you know, around these elections, you really got to be looking out for content that is dangerous or misinformative. And so Joe asked him further, because they were talking about the Hunter Biden laptop story, they said, well, did they specifically ask you to censor the Hunter Biden Laptop story? And he says, well, maybe, but I can't remember. I mean, come on.

So that's yes. But, I mean, the revelation alone that the FBI came to Facebook and said, you need to censor this story. Or else. If nothing else, and look, like we said, we've talked about there's great FBI agents out. There's great agents in everywhere. but the agencies themselves in many ways are corrupt. And if nothing else, the FBI coming to a social media platform, number one, it's unconstitutional, it's illegal to do this,

when the government works hand in hand with big tech to censor either political parties or otherwise. But that's what they were doing. They were trying to hide a story to manipulate an election. And yet the entire time during Trump's presidency, they talked about how supposedly Russia was, was colluding or was trying, or not even the collusion itself. They were trying to talk about how Russia

was trying to sway the election results and with misinformation. But yet the FBI themselves and the federal government was doing it themselves. It's kind of like, and we've talked about this before, it's like the old adage. If you accuse someone of cheating, you're probably the one that's cheating.

Which means you accuse someone else, like Russia, of interfering with an election, that means you're doing. it. And this is a classic case of the government pointing a finger when really it's all the fingers pointing back at them. And Mark Zuckerberg kind of admitted that today in itself. Now there's a lot more to what Zuckerberg said

and kind of went into. Personally, I think Joe went way too soft on him. You know, Joe, of course, gives Twitter and Facebook all of the credit in the world for just doing everything they can. And it would be so difficult not to do this. I mean, that's a bunch of bullshit. This is a new Joe.

There was a new Joe after a... There was an old Joe before all the crap happened with him where he had to go and apologize. Yeah, and after that, it's... Yeah, now he's not the same dude. But, you know, if you look at any of his, like, highlight videos where they comment... Where they comment about, like, you know,

the... He'll post, like, certain highlights on YouTube. And so if you go read the comments, I mean, there's people everywhere talking about, like, you know... Just like the Mike Baker guy, the ex-CIA guy that came on and was kind of explaining to Joe. supposedly what's really going on in the world and all this shit. And like everybody could see right through this Mike Baker guy.

He basically was, he did an amazing job at talking for 20 minutes in this particular clip about nothing. Meaning like he did an amazing job answering questions with no answers, but yet tried to pretend like he was giving answers. And you know that what really reminds me of is Peter. White House Press Secretaries. Peter Docee asking questions. And they never give him a straight up answer. They just go around the answer. And then finally, we're not going to spend any more time.

Next person, please. Yeah. You're exactly right. Also in the news, there was two people that pled guilty to stealing Ashley Biden's diary. And that diary was, you know, she went on in that diary to say that Joe Biden, her dad, had inappropriate showers with her at an older age. You know, then you go back to Hunter Biden How he had his dad in his phone as P-D-O-O-J-O-O-Pet-O-Pet-O-Pet-O-Pet-Fo.

And it's funny, I actually saw a meme It's like, man, isn't it weird how like Joe Biden's kids Can't keep up with any of their shit, their laptop, their diary? Like, someone's always finding their stuff. And it's funny that they call him Pito Dad and here they have all these pictures and photographs of him kissing random children. Yeah, and smelling them and like getting them to

like, you know, rub his hairy legs. I mean, that kind of gives you a confirmation of maybe that really is happening. I don't know. No, I mean, it probably is. I mean, look, I mean, there's a reason why we're never going to see the flight list

and the client list of old Epstein. We're never going to do that. I mean, we want to know what documents Trump took can have FBI raid his house. Oh, maybe he has some of that. But yet no one gives a shit. Maybe.

Who knows? But look, you know, there is my theory on that, too, is, you know, Trump did supposedly come out and say that he had things in that that would completely exonify him on a lot of things. Not just the Russia thing. I think the Russia thing in the Durham report kind of does that for him. But there was things I believe Trump was holding against other people is what I think. And because he always needs to be a step ahead, I think. Yeah, and I think, well, I think if you're smart enough and you know the position you're in, you're probably going to do that.

But I could be wrong, but that's what I've heard. And then also in the news, in the news, you know what's also strange as we, this will be, if there is no tropical storm as of a few days from now that forms, this will be, I believe, the first tropical, or the first tropical storm or hurricane free August in 60 years. Wow, 60 years. Which is weird. I know that's like not crazy news, but it is also kind of weird because... But it is because you wonder what's going on. Like, is the government doing something? Well, we've talked about like the weather stuff.

Like with the weather or what? Yeah, who knows. And I don't think it's global warming. Yeah. No. I mean, look, go back to our global warming episode. Because a lot of people are going to play fingers at that. there was someone that reached out to us like, I don't know, two weeks ago.

And guys, I've been bad at getting back in messages this week, so I'm sorry, in emails. But there was someone to reach out to us two or three weeks ago and said, what are some of your best podcasts that you think I should listen to because I just started listening? But the global warming podcast, I believe, is one of my favorites because of how much just complete bullshit, like the global warming green agenda is. And I think if anything, we proved it more than I've heard anyone prove it. And we just proved it on facts. It's not opinions.

We literally read verified stat and factual information on what happened and how scientists manipulated temperatures around the world. And they've been doing this for a while to push agendas, which obviously see how these agendas are affecting our everyday lives now. Exactly. And that's why I'm wondering, too, why are we not having hurricanes? is there a way that they have the ability to be well we've we've done a podcast yeah we've done the we've done a podcast tonight you guys can go back and listen to that um also john mackafee he was the guy that was over mackfey virus scanners and all that stuff back the day no he was kind of you know he was a big tech guy you know it was a come to a surprise to me probably i don't know when it was like a year ago maybe

when they said that he killed himself because he was in a prison somewhere um and and and then he was also wanted on tax evasion charges in the United States. And I also watch shows about him being like on murder charges and stuff, murdering people. Yeah, he's kind of crazy. Yeah. But his ex-girlfriend is in the new Netflix documentary says he's not dead. He's actually in Texas. And it's like she talked to him a couple weeks ago or whenever it was or a month or no, maybe she said like two months after he supposedly died.

Right. And the guy that he's talking about is he came out with all that security for your computer at first, then Maccavy or something. Yeah, Maccavy, Fire Scots. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, McKee. But you can look, you can look it up. There's all kinds of like murder shows about them too.

Oh, yeah, for sure. Yeah, he's one of those, he's one of those definitely weird ones. So yeah, so let's talk about that's just some of the news, man. We keep going on forever. There's crazy shit. But one day probably next week, we're going to do a podcast where we connect, you know, we just talk about all these stories.

We go a little bit in depth on each of them, and we'll probably pick like, I don't know, seven or eight of them, go in depth on them, talk about them, discuss them, may you bring some people on to talk about him. I think that'll be fun. Because rather than just having one particular, now, as far as tagging and getting people to find those episodes, I don't know how I'm going to do that yet.

I'll probably just have to pick a couple of topics. And then just... And I think that's the problem with us is because it's hard to tag things when you're wanting to talk to, like, talk about... A bunch of stuff, yeah. But, yeah, but with marketing, you've got to know how to tag things to get people to find them.

And so anyways. So let's talk about George Orwell in 1984. A lot of people say it was his masterpiece, and it was. 1984. It was probably one of the most influential books of the 20th century. It is, you know, it's transformative. It's something that you probably, I've actually watched the movie 1984. I've read the book 1984, even I don't like reading books, but I have.

have read the book. I've watched a movie. And it is. It's something that, you know, I guess if you were probably reading it back then, you know, it would be something like a sci-fi thriller. And it was. I mean, it was essentially a fantasy fiction or a conspiracy, well, they would call it a conspiratorial fiction now, right? Or, you know, if someone wrote a book about 2030, for example. I mean, anything you say about what's probably going to happen based on all of the great evidence and the key factors that is leading towards a New World Order and a Great Reset and a totalitarian government and New World Order and One More Currency.

You know, if you talk about that now, you are a conspiracy theorist. You know, a lot of people gave George Orwell a lot of flak for even writing the book. But a lot, you know, the way they kind of handled it then was good read, crazy, but good read, you know. And so it was just like, George Orwell is one of those things. Like, how many authors do you see that write a book so long ago and then they've never been more famous than they are now? So many years later.

You know, I mean, it's nuts. And so his book, it was basically the party seeks power entirely for its own sake. And they weren't considered or interested in the good of others. they were only interested solely in the power and pure power. Power is not a means, it is an end. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power, George Orwell said in 1984.

Those are great quotes. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now, let me just take this, I mean, just to break the last sentence, the last quote down from George Orwell. the object of power is power and one of the things that he made clear in both his writing and a movie and subsequent things after the book

the object of power of power or the object of power is power is the simple fact that no matter what they tell you why they want more power it's not valid because it's bullshit they want more power because of power they don't want more power because they want to save you from a global pandemic

They don't want more power because they know more about what you need than you do for your family. They don't want more power in the school systems or the big tech or anything else because they know what's best. They're trying to stop misinformation. They're trying to stop disinformation. So therefore they need more power to control this. The government needs to give more power to big tech and therefore big tech has to relinquish more power to the government because it's for your own. good. No. It's simply how George Orwell said. The object of power is power. It is nothing else. And that is something that no matter what you look back on history, whenever power has been gained, power has not been relinquished without war.

And the unfortunate thing is it is very hard to gain power back. It's very easy to give power up. And that's something that we've seen. And, you know, one of the things that, is everybody always talked for so long about how, oh my God, this is 2022. Government ain't going to take power from us. Oh, my God. Are they crazy? This is never, there's never been a bigger power grab in the world history than there has been through this pandemic.

And so people may wonder and ask themselves, well, why would anyone do a global pandemic? Well, you're seeing why. They need power. They need all these things. It's not a coincidence. It's not like we had a bunch of elite, technocratic, bureaucratic. combination of groups of people such as the World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization and the UN and Bill Gates and Melinda Gates Foundation and George Soros and all of these people

we didn't have these groups of people meeting and simulating global pandemics and how they were going to better control people after this because it was it was on their own website yeah before they actually happened years before one once in 2015 again in 2019 I believe. Yeah. Event 201. Then you had the 2015 one. And, you know, all of these events were essentially a way for them to figure out ways to work with each other, whether it be media, big tech, elites, politicians, governments, etc., on how they were going to do this.

And the reason they simulated these things was because they would give scenarios. For example, if you are a police officer, especially after Yuvaldi, you're going to probably go right now because of your brother. But you're going to go to trainings probably now because there's going to be police departments everywhere that says, hey, we got to get in training to better figure out how we're going to stop mass shootings and schools. And we need you to know how to react to mass shootings in the event they occur. Not only can we figure out and try to figure out ways to stop mass shootings, from ever happening. But most importantly, we have to, you know, there's probably no way we're going to prevent mass shootings completely.

But there's got to be ways that we have to figure out how to react to those. Well, in these events, the event, two and one, the government and their pandemic simulations, which were eerily, eerily, eerily, eerily similar to COVID-19. They did this, but what they did instead was they simulated throughout the entire process. They even talked about vaccinations. They talked about how they were going to control misinformation and disinformation. By the way, the word misinformation and disinformation did not come up in the pandemic. It came up in Event 2-1. Misinformation and the word disinformation started at Event 2-1. Actually, it started, I believe, in 2015, the first global pandemic simulation. And then in 2019,

they coined the term misinformation and disinformation when they were talking about how they were going to get the media and big tech on board to censor. To censor it. or anything that was against vaccinations or against what the government's word was on what was happening. They had this plan. When you're going to unleash a pandemic, a pandemic of the magnitude that we've seen, you have to be ready. I mean, you're not going to go to a football game on Friday night as a football team and not practice the week before. You have to be ready for that shit.

And so you might look at the pandemic and say, well, there were so many lives lost. So obviously, it didn't practice hard enough. No, they did. That's exactly what they wanted to happen. If they would have practiced for the right reasons, we would have saved millions of lives, even if it was just a coincidental virus that escaped. The problem was that they knew, number one, that this was a respiratory virus, that they then knew that if we just push everyone on ventilators, it's going to kill them. We need to incentivize people. We need to incentivize people. People is in hospitals, companies, big companies. Number one, we need to make sure that we can use the pandemic to get more and more hospitals bought out to where they're monopolies, to where we have an entire region of hospitals that are bought out. And you have a central organization that is above all the rules and everything else because it's a lot easier to control something that is centralized, right? If you have a bunch of different hospitals doing their own thing, it's hard to make things happen the way you want them to happen, even though they still did it to doctors that are not within. systems that were private practices. They were threatening to take their license and

threatening all this. So you see this. It worked out perfectly for them because they knew that respirators were actually killing people. They knew that early treatment would save lives, which is why they refused to do it, which is why they, if you even mention early treatments or vitamins or any medicines that actually worked in other

places around the world, you were banned or censored or even had your medical license taken. This was all a perfect plan. This was part of what their plan was an event two one in all these places. And so when we talk about George Orwell, power is power. They knew exactly what they had. They wanted to gain the most amount of power.

And they used public fear against a virus that they wanted to make sure that you believe that you were going to die if you got it. And even with the asymptomatic thing, for example, there was many doctors that came out and said asymptomatic is a bunch of bullshit. Like the whole asymptomatic thing. Thank God. Because I don't believe that. No, because it's not true. How can he be A7? And spreading it to everyone.

Yeah. It's not true. It was never true. It was never true. So how is George Orwell and what's going on today kind of shaping what is going on today? Like how does it compare? And by the way, guys, I'm sure a lot of this is going on in your country, Canada or, like, for example, the UK. This is something that we didn't mention.

But UK is going through a massive energy crisis. There's going to be a lot of people that are. that are going to be cold as hell this winter because they can't afford their electric bills and the lack of energy they have because they were so dependent not only on Russia. I think the big Russia thing is an excuse. But UK and other places are shutting down their main power sources. I mean, and, you know, they're having to depend on old outdated systems. And so now this looming, like, cold, dark winter for the UK is coming.

There are people that are going to be without power, without heat. And this is a crisis that's going to unfold in the UK. And we probably need to have another episode on that. But it's just something else part of the global plan that makes this happen. So, anyways. So through the communications of the White House in the United States, the Democratic White House in Washington, you know, this whole campaign to make you believe what is not actually happening. Or to make you believe what is happening.

happening is not happening. Maybe that's the better way to explain it. They're basically attempting to, on a daily basis, to convince the public that there is no recession at all. There's no recession. None. In fact, they actually even went as far to change the definition, and we'll talk about that. And they want to make you believe also, inflation has been vanquished. It's gone. Zero percent in July. Zero. Yeah, I saw that in the news that, well, I didn't see it was zero. I saw they said it was decreasing, but I don't see that. Biden said it was zero.

You can't even buy potatoes for less than $10.10. Well, they used to be like $3. And then even if inflation is still alive, targeted new federal legislation will kill it, they say. Oh, we need to do for inflation to spend billions of more dollars. I mean, doesn't that make sense to you guys? Yeah. Or who are you getting this advice from? The guy that can't even complete a sentence is telling you that this is going to work.

That's crazy. And they're going to relieve all these college funds and all this stuff too. Yeah. On top of it. Oh, yeah. And they did that today. Yeah, I mean, that's, you know, or yesterday, whatever it was. 10,000 a day.

Yeah, but it's billions of dollars. Yeah. Now, by the way, now the guys that never had college payments or never had, you know, college loans because you know what they did? They went and busted their ass and worked their ass off to get where they were. But now you may not have a college loan, but now they do. And they didn't even ask for your freaking college debt. But now they're going to have it because that's what taxes do.

This is not free money. This is going to be more inflation and more taxes. Exactly. And they asked the White House lady, the speaker girl, where is that coming from? She would not answer it. But you guys know where it's coming from. It's coming from us. even though we didn't get any tax breaks or any free breaks of having free college,

we're now paying for everyone else's free college. And people that don't even go to college are paying for their college. Yeah, I mean, do you know how much? I mean, how is that fair at all? Well, look, there's a reason. And I'm not going to talk much more. My throat is it. Do you hear it?

Yeah. Sorry, guys. I'm so sorry. Sorry. It's not like, you know, but I mean, there's a reason they're hiring 87,000 IRS agents. Yeah, exactly. They're going to make sure your ass pays for all this. stuff they're just blowing out of their butt.

So as strange as all these claims sound to anyone with even the most casual grasp on reality, it is a testament to the post-factual world we now occupy that the Biden administration is able to attempt, let alone succeed in, putting out such monumental fantasies.

And that's really what we're in. We're just in a fantasy world. I mean, literally we might as well be living in I mean, it's like you just bought a new in utopia. No, no. It's just like you just bought a new VR headset and you go into this section of the metaverse is called clown world. That's where

we're at. And you have this dude as president that is just saying random bullshit you can't even understand. I mean, that's where we're at. So basically, this campaign began late in July when the Biden team attempted to redefine the word recession. While the left has always tried to redefine words, think

racism or gender. It has never attempted it so spontaneously was such a technical definition. So typically they let new definitions germinate in academia or policy think tanks before trotting them out to the public consumption. That was the playbook that helped change the meaning of the word inflation from its original understanding as an expansion of the money supply to its current definition tied solely to rise in prices. But the inflation campaign unfolded over decades and did not require the public to completely surrender its critical capacities. So about this economy has been 30 years, you know, and taking about it essentially 30 years in the making, and we've never had inflation like we've had now in the past 30 years.

And yet we've had, but we have had recessions. And it was clearly defined recessions in that time period. And yet now it is one of the worst times in history for us. And supposedly we have no recession. So the whole problem with this is why recessions may be necessary to purge an economy from excesses and malinvestments caused by artificially low interest rates, what government responses should be to recessions or why things were better or worse than a particular political party claimed them to be. But in that time, I don't think we ever encountered anyone who quibbled with the accepted technical definition of recession as two consecutive quarters. of negative GDP growth.

That is what the technical definition of a recession is. Two negative quarters of GDP growth. What would be the point? Recessions affected both political parties. Why change the definition with the original definition may suit you down the road? But that's what the Biden administration did when they claimed that a second quarter GDP report,

which showed a 0.9% annualized decline in GDP, following a 1.6% annualization decline in the fact first quarter did not mean we were in a recession. So that's basically been the textbook definition for literally forever, like since America I don't care what the textbook definition of anything is. All I know is I feel it when I go to the store and I get my pocketbook out and I get my credit card out and I'm spending way, way, way more money on things that I used to buy. Yeah.

Oh yeah, we all are on everything. And it's not just housing cards. It's not just gas. It's everything. It's everything. You know, and the thing is, Biden is trying to put a happy spin on it, which is, you know, I guess what sitting presidents tend to do, but he could have said, well, while technically it is a recession, the current period shows many signs of strength that are not typical in recessions, leading us to believe that we are in a much better shape than a GDP headline suggests, and that a recession will be shallow and over quickly. But, you know, even though we would have probably all disagreed with that

as well, it would have not have at least been changing the definition of recession, which, by the way, they did change. They actually change it in Wikipedia itself. Like if they go and print a new dictionary right now, I guarantee you it'll be a new definition in the dictionary. Yeah, exactly, because they repit, oh, God, I cannot talk tonight. They reprint what they want you to believe. Yeah. And so what's even worse is that the very next day after the Biden administration first floated this idea,

that two negative quarters are not a recession, the point was repeated by Fed Chairman Jerome Powell at his FOMC press conference in July of 27, or July 27, 2022. If nothing else, this proves just how ridiculous claims of Fed independence have been over the years. The sad part is, is that outside of the typical sources of right-of-center views, the media just ran with a new definition.

The best variation of this, or I guess, definition of this, was when the Associated Press headline that ran after GDP numbers were announced, U.S. economy shrinks for a second quarter, raising recession fear. Up until two seconds ago, that would have been reported as the official start of a recession. But the Associated Press said, this is raising recession fear, meaning we might have a recession sometime down the road, although what they literally just said in the headline is a recession. Now, what I find funny about this is the AP, which is, you know, You know, it's hilarious to me.

When someone, especially far left or left, I guess, in this day and age, when they come to me, it's like, they'll post an article from AP and they're like, oh, this is AP. Oh, oh, no, this is AP. They don't lie at all. Well, I mean, we know for a fact they're lying about recession. And obviously, AP has something to do with our United States government if they're lying for the government. I mean, because they are. Because if you're a real legit journalist, you're going to, you're going to report the truth. The truth. Yeah. And they're not doing that.

What is a recession? Yeah. And they're not doing that. And they didn't. And they haven't. They didn't with COVID. They haven't with any of it. But yet you know, that's what I, that's what I'm saying. The AP Associated Press, the BBC, there's so many different companies. And I'm not saying any particular ones did any, you can

make your mind it for that. But what I am saying is, it's not, you have to remember here. It's not just the United States government. It's behind all this. It is the World Economic Forum, the big elites, the people that control the money flow through all of these massive news organizations, which is, you know,

basically the New Age MK Ultra mind control. And so you can't say, oh, AP's not lying, or BBC's not lying, or even Fox or whoever. I mean, you know, Fox has plenty of shows. They still, you know, it's almost like you're watching

CNN or whatever. Even though CNN is clean the house, I'm curious to see how far, you know, they just fried, fried, well, fried him, Brian Stelter. You know, that dumbass that was on there. They're getting rid of quite a few people because Discovery, whoever bought them.

And so they're trying to say they're going to get back into real news. Yeah, we'll see how long that last. But I did find it funny. Well, hopefully it does. Hopefully it does. I mean, hopefully. It will get real. But we'll see.

Because I'm just telling, like, before all this stuff happened with the Fox, CNN, MSB, whatever, all these news networks, when things first started happening and we had cable CNN. CNN was the first place I ever went to. Yeah. And they were real news back then. Well, there was a lot of people that were real news back then. You know, I mean, real news as you could get. I mean, I think there was less government media cooperation. I think there still was.

But I don't think it was as blatant and as hardcore as it is now because I don't know. I mean, they still reported stuff. But yeah, I mean, I guess if you look back, even on certain events in history, it was always, they would always run whatever story they were gathering. And trust me, those stories were gathered from somewhere. But so in George Orwell's 1984, the totalitarian state of Oceania, where the action takes place, is always at war with another empire, sometimes against Eurasia and sometimes against Estania. But when the antagonists switched positions, as they often did, it served the government's interest that the public forgot that any other enemy ever existed. It required citizens to say, we have always been at war with Eurasia. Even if that war just started yesterday, in the same vein, a recession has never been defined as two consecutive quarters of negative growth.

It's the same kind of similar situation. And so the easy rhetorical victory, the Biden team decided to keep the ball rolling. by claiming that there was zero inflation in American in July. That's what we talked about. And that may come as a surprise to a select group of Americans, say those who have shopped at stores in the past month, but the claim went largely uncriticized in the press whatsoever. To tell the Whopper Biden had to talk only about month-over-month inflation

and ignore the year-over-year data, which still shows a hefty 8.5% inflation rate in July, and it was barely down. from the previous month. So it's just a continual cycle of bullshit. And if there is anyone out there that is going to a grocery store and has great prices, please inbox us and let us know where you're going. That's what I want to know.

But the best piece of double think comes with the Democratic Party's passage of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. In a long history of misnamed pieces of legislation, this title might be the most egregious. nothing in that massive bill was conceived with the aim of reducing inflation and nothing in the bill will actually accomplish that goal whatsoever. There are experts that have looked over this bill and there is literally nothing in this bill that has anything to do with reducing inflation. Nothing.

I mean, it's one thing if you make a bill, you title it something and then you put a little thing in there that you may or may not ever do anyway. They just didn't even give a damn to even try to put anything in there to reduce inflation. Because in reality, they know this bill is just going to increase inflation.

You know, our massive spending in Ukraine continually is just another future inflation. I mean, everything we do. And Sherry, we've talked about this a year ago. We had episodes on, we were talking about food, shortages, pricing, all of these things that are going to hit us.

And they're going to hit us harder later than it was a year ago, right? But we'll tell you again right now, a year from now, it's going to be far worse. And actually, man, I don't even want to look past 2024 because what would make this better? Like, that's the question. And I don't know, because I don't think, I think the problem is that the powers that be that are who are in power of the world, the New World Order of World Economic, They're never going to relinquish power without a war. That's what I was going to say is getting these people out of power, not necessarily that administration or the president, but that people who are in charge of them, these secretive people, these groups that are in charge of everything.

Yeah. They're the ones that we got to get rid of. Yeah, you're right. And I'm not saying that in a bad way, but I'm just saying they're ruining our country. they're ruining the entire world. Now, on some level, you know, I guess you have to, you have to, some people say, admire the audacity. The Democrats took a bunch of terrible ideas they couldn't pass

in the build back better bill, either in the original $3 trillion version or the slimmed down $1.3 trillion version. Think about that, trillion dollar bills. And jammed it into a new bill. package, which they re-branded the Inflation Reduction Act. It didn't bother them that all the elements of the bill were conceived before inflation was considered a major national priority and were not designed with the inflation reduction in mind

whatsoever. They know that inflation is a high-priority to voters, so they want to look like they're doing something about it. But in reality, they're doing nothing. And see what Joe Biden's going to do, and the Democrats are going to say, well, this is one of Joe Biden's big accomplishments, the Inflation Reduction Act. Whether or not is, I mean, because we know. it literally has nothing about inflation and it's actually going to make it worse

but he's going to put that on his resume going in November he passed the inflation reduction act bill yeah even though it's not really helping us at all whatsoever it's going to make it worse and the bill which passed the congressional houses with a single Republican vote

proposes $764 billion of new revenue including new taxes and greater enforcement on existing tax laws so this was really like you This was the 87,000 IRS agents. This is making sure that you are going to pay your shit no matter what. So who's...

Who's what? Who's going to tell him he's putting the money in the wrong place? Like he's hiring all these people to go after his people, right? Yeah. He's just not going the right way about anything. If he's a president, he's got to be protecting his people, but he's going after his people. Well, of course it. I mean, they're at war with their people. Bullshit.

You know, so the new tax law is greater enforcement and savings resulting from lower prescription drug prices paid by Medicare and 517 billion in new spending with the difference going towards federal deficit reduction. And unfortunately, the variety of health care, environmental and social welfare spending combined with the new taxes and beefed up IRS will hamstring the country's economic vitality and tend to increase both budget deficits and inflation. And as a result, the plan will do far more harm than good. So the content says $265 billion allow on Medicare more leverage and negotiating lower drug prices. $222 billion minimum 15% corporate tax for companies with more than $1 billion in annual income. As with all such provisions, I don't know what those damn dogs are barking at, but they're going crazy. I'm going to go get them because I can't even talk anyways. Don't go get them and bring them up here because that don't make it worse.

They're looking for basically increased tax revenue through greater enforcement. This is the most controversial aspect of the bill. So this nightmare's provision essentially says it doubles down the size of the Internal Revenue Service and adds 87,000 new agents specifically to increase the number of taxpayer audits. While the Biden administration is pretending that the agents will only go after the ultra-wealthy and the large corporations who are limited in number and who can. afford to hire accountants. In truth, a typical target will likely be small businesses and members of basically the middle class. I mean, that's essentially. The added fear of the IRS scrutiny

will cause these business owners to spend more time and money on accounting and legal fees, and you name it. The bill will spend money on energy, security, and climate change. This is $369 billion. And this is the, you know, it's the crazy portion of the bill where the government will shower funding a variety of Democrats' climate change pet projects. And a lot of these investments will be on inefficient energy sources that public doesn't want and which we're unable to meet our energy needs. And so if we're looking at what's happening in the UK right now, the UK is facing a energy crisis coming into the winter.

And we've got $369 billion coming into this bill in the United States that probably is going to do the same thing for the United States. This all leads back to one place. It leads back to more government dependence. It leads back to more Big Brother. It leads back to more, you have to pay us this or you don't live. It leads back to all of this. And as I just talked about, it's going to lead towards placing major money in places of energy that we don't need

and we actually need the actual opposite of that. I mean, and it's going to kill us. We already see what's happening because of all the pipeline shutdowns. We've seen what's happening with all that. But now all this funding is going for all these alternate sources of energy, which is going to screw us in the future. And yet, you know, what does the government in the New World Order and a Great Reset say? Oh, don't worry.

It's just like they say about, it's literally just like they say about eating bugs and not eating meat. Exactly. No, you'll eat bugs and you will like it. This is really what they're saying. Like, they want us to eat bugs and not eat meat. They want to cut meat down to one day a week. Yeah, but they really want to use bugs. And they say, you know, you will not own anything.

You will not do any of that. You will not eat what you want to eat. You will not work where you want to work. You will do as we say and you will like it. Exactly. Now, what other countries does that sound similar to? Well, it's about to be all countries because they're, like I said, we're moving towards a new world order. No, I do think there are other countries that do eat bugs for some reason.

Well, yeah. I don't know why. Well, a lot of the reason why. I don't want to eat bugs. But listen, a lot of the reason places people eat bugs, there are some countries eat bugs for delicacies. Yeah. It's like a... Or even like eggs, fish eggs, for example.

Or whatever. Caviar. Caviar. But, you know, the primary reason that most of the population of whoever does eat bugs is, it's because they starve. If you look at the places that are eating the most amount of bugs, it is places where they have no food.

I mean, these are people like Ethiopia and all these places. Yeah, and tribes, they don't have an abundance of food, so they have to eat bugs. I mean, that's exactly what the World Economic Forum wants. They don't want you to have abundance of food. They don't want you to have abundance of anything.

They want you to have to just nibble on your little cricket and just wait for your next. Oh, my gosh. That's so sad. Cricket? Yeah. Well, trust me, crickets are a big. I mean, crickets are a big one.

But yeah, they want you to not only just depend on the government for welfare or whatever. They want you to depend on the government for your next cricket mill. I mean, that's literally how demented and fucked up a lot of these people's minds are. And it's true. I mean, it's real. Yeah, it is true. Anyway, so basically the government apparently takes inflation head on, as they say, except that it doesn't whatsoever.

I mean, that's kind of what we're talking about. And, you know, the best way to fight inflation is to reduce government spending. That's what we know. And thereby leaving more investment capital in the private sector. And they're doing literally the complete opposite of that. Just like they did the bill, like I mentioned before, that they're going to relieve people that went to college that make $120,000 or less. they're going to relieve their college funds. Yeah.

Well, you know... Where's that money coming from? So, you know, even with the new tax stuff that is in this bill, you're going to hurt small businesses. You're going to really hurt the companies that need the money the most. They're already paying more now than they ever have. I mean, if you go to anywhere, that's why the stuff's higher. It's higher because gas price is higher because of the cost of everything.

Right. And not all businesses have a ton of money. No. Most businesses don't. There's a lot of businesses are barely surviving at this point. Yeah, and look, the economy... It's not like they have a ton of money where they can just give money to everyone. Yeah, the economy is highly dependent on small business.

I mean, it is. I mean, it's, you know, if you look at the amount of people that are in the workforce in small businesses, it is a shit ton of people in small business workforce. And but the thing is, it also creates an independent middle class, which is what the World Economic Forum and New World Order want to get rid of. They want to get rid of the middle class. So if you can get rid and tax and beat to death the middle class business owners, which is most of these small businesses, then you get rid of the middle class. Because then you no longer have the businesses and you no longer have the workers that work there.

So you're either going to be being supported off the government or you're going to happen to be rich. And so this is a great way that they can do this. And they're trying to pretend like they're going to go after that ultra wealthy. That's bullshit. We all know it's bullshit. They're going after the middle class citizens. Yeah. And we all know that.

Like, do they think we're that dumb? Yeah, I mean, it's not, and it's not accidental that earlier this month, the Labor Department reported that worker productivity fell 2.5% from a year earlier, the largest yearly decline since 1948. At the same time, despite deceptively low rates of unemployment, the actual number of people in labor force continues to shrink. And these trends come as a direct result of misguided government and policies and regulations and distinctive work that increase the burdens on,

a business, which is exactly what we're talking about. And I just want to ask people all around the world, are they experiencing the same things that we're experiencing? Now, when we go into a restaurant, we don't even know if we're going to get served. We don't know if there's enough employees out there because the people that were employees, they're getting paid to stay at home. Or if you go to anywhere, we don't know anything about anything if they're even going to be open.

You might go to the dollar store and it might be closed until tomorrow because there's no employees. You might go to the grocery store and it's closing earlier. Anything. I've never seen that in my whole entire life since I've been alive until now. Now you're seeing like little posters on the door saying, we had to close early, we'll be open at AEM. Or we cannot serve you because we don't have servers today. Or our meals only can consist of one thing. and not, you know, the 20 things that we offer on our menu because we're out of everything.

We don't have cheese. We don't have lettuce. We don't have this. We don't have that. Like, everything is so different now. Yeah. You're right. And I don't know if that's just here in America or if that's all over the world.

Well, it is. And to what you're saying, you know, George Orwell said something. He quoted in saying, to the future or to the past. to a time when thought is free, when men are different from one another and do not live alone, to a time when truth exists and what is done cannot be undone, from the age of uniformity, from the age of solitude, from the age of Big Brother, and from the age of double-think, greetings. So 1984, kind of to what you're saying, it portrays a global society of total control in which people are not allowed to have thoughts that in any way disagree with the

corporate state. And keep in mind, I said corporate state. Now, we've always talked about governmental state, but you've got to think about world economic form. You've got to think about the New World Order. These are corporate governments, essentially. I mean, these are not governments. These are corporate entities that are worth probably more than our governments are. And I know that they control our governments. But there is no personal freedom. And advanced technology has become the driving force behind a surveillance-driven society, which is what we're experiencing now.

Snitches and cameras are everywhere. People are subject to the thought police who deal with anyone guilty on thought crimes. The government or party is headed by Big Brother who appears on posters everywhere with the words Big Brother is watching you. Oh, and they definitely are because I can

be even talking to Chad we're not by phones or anything. We could be talking about going to an amusement park, for example. Yeah, and it shows up. And then it shows up on my time like all these coupons or whatever. Yeah, I mean, it's not just that. I mean, there's reports which we knew this.

We knew Edward Snowden said that, you know, that's why he's running from our government because he told the truth about the government spot on you. But it's so true. But the FBI, you know, this brought up a lot of question. There's been a lot of reports come out of how much the FBI. They literally listen to pretty much every American's phone conversation, everything, put in an algorithm, and then they classify these in different places. and so you're being watched all the time

you're being listened to if you say the wrong thing if you if anything that they could twist and they don't have they don't need a lot you could say something jokingly you could say something where it's not even jokingly

you could talk about even possibly the Constitution and they're gonna if they want to or they feel the need to they can screw you now to January 6th thing is a great example there were people that were not even in the Capitol building that are in jail right now

that have still yet to see a judge They are being completely And their political prisoners Is what they are in a lot of ways We don't even know the true aggressors in January 6th Because there was a lot of state actors in there There were a lot of people that were

That were plants That were undercover people That they planted there Because look This January 6th committee is never going to end This is why they did January 6th This is why they made sure That they invited people in

They made sure it looked as bad as possible They only released camera shots of of the bad stuff, but they don't release anything of showing them letting everyone in. Yeah, they did not show them going down the red carpet with the two little ropes in them just walking down. And people pretty much, I guess, the security guys or whoever they are that come this way, come this way. You know, it was an orderly walk in the building on the red carpet. Yeah. But they don't show that.

So this dystopian world we're living in, we've arrived. and you know it was dreamed up not only about Orwell but also such fiction writers as Adlas Huxley Margaret Atwood and Philip K. Dick If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear, George Orwell said. And you can't do that anymore. Like you cannot tell people what they don't want to hear. It is if you tell someone something that they don't want to hear,

our government or tech or whoever, classify that and deems that as dangerous misinformation. I mean, we are where George Orwell said we were going to be, but he just... But I don't think they really realize what that's doing to our future generation. We're raising up... I don't even want to say the word, but you know what the word is. Yeah, but it's not even that. That's what... Because of this.

It's not even that. I mean, they want population control. They want all kinds of control. But, you know, much like... But they use everything in... their little webs to get exactly what they want. Now, much like Huxley's A Brave New World, we are churning out a society of watchers who have their liberties taken away from them,

but rather enjoy it, because they are distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing. This is talking about the people that are out of work and they're getting paid to stay at home. Yeah, not even that's that. I mean, they feel like they're fighting some kind of cause. And it's like, oh, yeah, take all these liberties away.

We're fighting with you. Yeah. Even though these people supposedly used to be against the government, but literally they're cheering on for their liberties and rights to be taken. And this is what was, you know, it was what was said in the Brave New World, the Huxley book. And much like Atwood's The Handmaids Tell, the populace is now taught to know their place and their duties, to understand that they have no real rights, but will be protected up to a point if they can form. Exactly.

And to think so poorly of themselves that they will accept their assigned fate. and not rebel or run away. Exactly. You're going to be who we want you to be, when we want you to be, where you want, we want you to be. You have no decisions in your own life. And in keeping with Philip K. Dick's darkly prophetic vision of a dystopian police state, which becomes the basis of Stephen Spielberg's futuristic filler minority report, we are now trapped in a world in which the government is all seeing, all knowing and all powerful. And if you dare step out of line, dark-clad police swat,

teams and pre-crime units will crack a few skulls to bring the populace under control. And we're seeing this on a daily basis. We're seeing people's homes being raided because maybe something they, they, like even, for example, the FBI symbols in terms that they're released, or they didn't release, but the whistleblower released, that talks about 2A, which is Second Amendment. They talk about anything, do not tread on me sign. These are things that they consider domestic terrorism. And if they classify any group or people a domestic terrorist,

then what they're essentially saying is, you have no rights anymore. Because I don't know if you know what the United States classified as terrorists. Terrorists have no rights. And so when they say domestic terrorists, you no longer have rights. And so they want to classify this with a large group of people in the United States. I mean, a large group.

There's a lot of other groups, I think, that they're doing that too too as well. I'm talking about an entire political effect. affiliation is what they're trying to classify this in. It eerily does remind me of Hitler and what his viewpoint on a certain portion of society was. Well, the way he fell about Jews. Yeah, exactly. That's what I'm saying. Yeah.

But it's just a little different now because it's now based on ideology. If you have an ideology for freedom or your country or government or, like, loving the fact that you are less government, but the government does what it's supposed to do for you. but you love your country, you're patriotic. You're now considered a terrorist. If you believe in your constitution or your freedoms or your human rights, you're a domestic terrorist. And that's what the government sees you as. And that's so sad because I fully feel like if the government defined me who I am,

they would define me as a domestic terrorist, although I love my country and I believe in my country and I'm trying to save my country from this bullshit. Well, you know, we've got to think too now. You know, the government and all these big tech technology companies that are employed or shared by the government, you know, they've got facial recognition. Our iris scanners that scan your eyes, massive databases, behavior prediction software, and so on. It's all incorporated into a complex interwoven cyber network aimed at tracking our movements, predicting our thoughts, and controlling our behavior. And really they're essentially making this, they're kind of, what hell is the word? Not clothing.

What the hell is the word I'm thinking of? They are kind of rear. That doesn't sound right either, rear ending, even than they are. Well, what they're doing is it's kind of like this. It's the same thing is if you didn't take the vaccination or you did take the vaccination. or they're classifying sets of people. You're classifying people based on what they want. They're doing all these things to make it sound like it's a good thing because of marketing or because of this or because that.

There's a reason why we do care about our privacy, like what you give up on your cell phone and all that stuff. It may sound like, oh, it's just going to marketing companies. Oh, no, that's bullshit. That's why I'll see my ads. But the reality is all of that information that we give up on a daily basis on our cell phones and our apps and everything that we do, is all being tracked into our behaviors, everything we do, everything, our moves. And that way the government can completely control every move we make and every decision we make. Absolutely. Thoughts and everything.

Because we just changed phones recently. And I'm just telling you, when I'm downloading these apps or getting new apps, it's like, do you allow this app on this? Which iPhone does do a little better? Does it allow it on your location? Does it, you know. Does it, do you allow this app to track outside of this app? Yeah. I'll always say no. Yeah, I do too. You know, surveillance cameras are everywhere.

Government agents listen to our telephone calls, read our emails. Political correctness, a philosophy that discourages diversity has become a guiding principle of modern society. And that's literally what it is. It's, you know, we fought so hard in the United States and around the world in many countries for diversity. And now it's like you're not allowed to be different. You have to conform with one set of people or your race. racist or your white supremacist or your or your homophobic or your anti-trans or your I mean sadly it's almost getting to a point where you're anti-petophilia which duh right but like but like seriously

like at some point in time yeah when is it enough and by the way I'm not I'm not comparing antipilia to the other what I'm saying exactly but that's not like right but what I'm saying is it's Yeah, that's not. Like, that's not okay to be different in that one. And that's not going to be okay for us ever. No. No, but there are a large group of people on the left that are trying to normalize pedophilia. Yeah, they think it's okay for adults to have sex with six-year-old children. Yeah, they call that a sexual orientation is what they're trying to make it.

But look, here's the thing. And this is, yeah, this is a thing. You, it doesn't matter what way you go sexually as you're an adult. If you're an adult with an adult, I don't care what the fuck you're. doing, leave it to you. We don't, I'm sorry, I should not even cause. Sorry. But that's none of our business. Yeah.

It becomes my business when you want to have sex with a six year old. Or 12 year old or whatever, or 13 or 15 or 16, you know, anything illegal. But the thing is, is like, and here's a thing that, you know, it's, it's, we are, it's okay to be diverse unless you're pedophile or, you know, whatever. or a criminal or a murderer, a shit like that. But to be black or white or to be gay or not, or to be whatever, who gives a shit? But just don't try to say we have to conform with your views

because it is the thing to do, just like we're not telling you, if you're an atheist, that you have to be a Christian. You know, people always talked about Christians, you know, like there are certain Christians that will, like, no matter what you say, even, like, they'll preach, right? I mean, I've always said, like, especially on this podcast, I'm a Christian, I believe in what I believe, even though, even though my Christianity and my beliefs and my faith and stuff has come in a long period of time. I mean, I used to supposedly just have to have faith when I was growing up because I went to church every time, even though that wasn't my faith.

That was someone else's faith being pushed on me. Right. And so going to church every Sunday or being raised in a church environment, it may make you programmed to believe that God exists, right? But the reality is... It goes back to your free will. Yes, it does. But the reality is at some point in time, you're going to battle with your free will. And everyone does.

Right. But, you know, you have to take all the information that you possibly can gather around the world and around your senses and your environments and your things that you do. You know, the one thing that has made me more Christian and believe in God more than anything is this podcast and everything we've researched. Right. But it's not people that are going to you and saying, Chad, did you read this Bible verse

God loves you I can't believe you didn't do that oh if you don't read this Bible verse then you're going like you're going to hell or or you're racist or you're a white supremacist or whatever the case like they're literally nowadays trying to lump in

Christians with white supremacists I mean it's kind of what they're trying to do I even see a push to the mainstream media and government are trying to push the black community away from Christianity They're really trying to do it hardcore.

And they use Jesus as a white person of how they're doing that. Yeah. And I'm not putting black community into one thing, but a lot of black people I know are religious. Just like a lot of Spanish people I know are religious. Well, there's a lot of, yeah. But what I'm saying is they're trying to push the agenda the other way too. Yeah. I mean, I've seen it.

I've seen it on social media. I've seen it on my own timeline. I've seen all that. So, you know, George Orwell also said people sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. And so the courts have basically shredded the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. In fact, SWAT teams battering down doors without search warrants

and FBI agents acting as secret police that investigate dissenting citizens, are common occurrences in contemporary America. And bodily privacy and integrity have been utterly unviscerated by prevailing view that Americans have no rights over what happens to their bodies during an encounter with government officials who were allowed to search, see, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and or arrest any individual anytime for the slightest provocation. You know, and the thing about this is, I find it,

so weird how we went from a left narrative that pushed anti-police, right? All police are corrupt to now the left is on board with police and corruption. And by the way, I'm not saying I'm against police. I am for police, like 100% law and order, all that stuff, right? But I've said for four years, I've said it always on this podcast when we talked about anything, justice system or police, justice system. we have a decent justice system. People want to give the justice system we have too much credit.

Now, is it better than others? Yes, it is. But that still doesn't make it good, right? I mean, just because you can say, well, the United States justice system is better than others, there's also still a shit ton of people in prison innocently. There is still, we see what's happening with things politically here. We saw the FBI raid on Marlaga.

We saw it January 6th where people were just there protesting, which was what people were allowed to do. and burn down cities and everything else the summer before. But even if you were at the Capitol building, you were either at the very least fired, but more than likely you're in jail. And we just see this justice system, this federal justice system that is turning.

Now, there are great police departments out there. There are great law enforcement agencies out there. And it all starts with the leadership. But there are also a lot of corrupt-ass law enforcement agencies. And just as much as there are, are anything else. So my point is to this is that they're going after a police state. And this is something that we have always feared.

Police state has always been bad. It's been a, you know, when you hear martial law or police state, that means a federal government is taking over its people. And we are getting closer to that, not as much with local law enforcement, but more so with federal. And, you know, I hear people that take up for FBI agents on that stuff. the way, I take up for FBI agents. But the reality, too, is at some point, the good FBI agents have to realize and see what their leadership is and opt to get out.

Now, unfortunately, when good FBI agents get out, all they're going to do is reclassify and hire people that are bad FBI agents, that are going to be more trained to be corrupt. But that's what's scary is what you're saying is because there's different states that believe in different things. there are states that are pro-police, there are states that are anti-police. And there are sheriffs that are bad and good sheriffs. Yeah, but no matter what, the federal police or the federal whatever

can overturn anything that a state can do. Yeah, and that's what's freaking scary. But even that, you have a judge's decision that kind of determines your fate on a lot of shit. I mean, and it's like if they're political, especially if this has something to do politically,

I mean, the unfortunate problem with this system is, is that we appoint politically appointed judges. And so when you, when, so if your case or whoever, or maybe you're tied in, you got money funding to this particular judge or whatever the case is, there is no such thing as justice or law and order. That's just corruption. And we see that everywhere. We're seeing it in the Murdoch murders.

And what's happening in Hampton's, South Carolina. We're seeing it. I mean, look it up. We've done a couple of podcast episodes on it. That is just corrupt as hell. They're all involved within, you know, kind of the local jurisdiction of law and order type shit down there. But yeah, it's crazy. The thing is, Big Tech is basically now married to big government. I mean, that's what we're looking at. Oh, absolutely. We see that every day now. And that has created the big brother in which George Orwell was talking about then, even though he couldn't even imagine it would be this good. And we are now ruled by corporate elites, New World Order, World Economic Forum, whose tentacles

have spread worldwide. And that's where we're at. And that's where we are. And this is not just the United States. This is worldwide. This is everywhere. And the government now has its own disposal of technological arsenals. I mean, we're not talking about things such as drones or bombs anymore.

We're sending those to other countries. and we're also striking other countries all the time. But now we have technology, an arsenal of technology, I guess is what I would say. And it's so sophisticated and invasive as to render any constitutional protections. No one is really safe in their own home. No, absolutely not. With these technologies. Because they are listening to all conversations.

And keep in mind, all of this, and especially in the United States, is spearheaded by the NSA, which has shown itself to care little or nothing about constitutional limits of privacy and then on the other side of this you know you have the marriage of government, military, corporate interest and it's all aimed at keeping Americans under constant surveillance

and the reality is we know that the NSA, CIA and all these companies or not companies, organizations, federal agencies we know they've always done corrupt BS. I mean if you listen to any of our podcast, JFK, MLK, you name it. They have a thing for K people. It's not even just listening to us.

Believe it by like watching your own shit. Yeah, I'm just saying. You see it in your own everyday life. Yeah. I know, but what I'm saying is that we present the evidence about what is what happened in this situation. I know, but I'm just saying anybody can see it in their own lives. I'm not saying that what you're saying is wrong. No, I know.

I'm saying look at your own life and see they are definitely listening in what you're doing. There is no doubt in my life. But what I was saying is, is that they, we've always known they're this bad behind the scenes, but now they're making it in the government and around the world. And they partly did that with the pandemic. They're making it to be normalized that you shouldn't have any constitutional rights or rights as human beings at all. They want to make that in the public. They want to talk about these campaigns, disinformation, misinformation, misinformation,

silencing you, banning people, sending people to jail for things that they don't agree with, the raiding former president's homes. I mean, shutting down convoys that just wanted freedom to not have an injection, a experimental injection, put in them. And then, what did the government do in Canada? Well, they stopped their damn payments.

They clogged up their bank, or they completely cut off their bank accounts. They also took their cryptocurrency. I mean, everything they could do, if you want tyranny, that was that. And it's money, power, and control. There is no shortage of motives, fueling the convergences of mega,

corporations and government. And the only people that's paying the price is us. And unfortunately, we're not probably, it's not going to get better. We talk about this all the time, but Orwell understood what many Americans and people around the world are struggling to come to terms with, is that there is no such thing as government organized for the good of people. Even the best intentions among those in government inevitably give way to a desire to maintain power and control over the sinister at all cost.

and the more power they can grab, the better. And so George Orwell said, the further a society drift from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. And so that is literally one of the best quotes that George Orwell ever had. I think we're seeing that more now over the past two years than we've ever heard it.

The people that do speak the truth are getting banned. The people that are speaking of truth are getting in prison or in jail or they're literally losing their medical license or they're losing their ability to even talk. and George Orwell said this so freaking long ago. In the 1970s, 1970s. No, no, no, no.

It wasn't 74. It was the 50s. It was 70 years ago. 60. 60s. It was 70 years ago. Why do you always bring up freaking dates when I don't know. Dang it.

Sorry. It was, um, it was 1950 is when you said it. It was 1950. I was close. I said 1960s. Yeah, but you always like bring up dates like I'm supposed to remember this when I'm trying, when I'm on another. thought process.

But this is where we're at, guys. I mean, you know, there's so much we said. There's so much more about what George Orwell said in his writings that we could go on for forever. I mean, there really is. George Orwell was, you know, he knew what was coming. And there was many that knew. It wasn't just him.

There was more. And, you know, if I wrote a book right now based on everything we know now. What would your title of your book? I don't even know what it would be. I mean, I don't know. The future of like 2025. Well, I will tell you this. You know, I don't want to write a...

I don't even want to say this because, like, it... I don't know. It just sounds like, it sounds like depressing, I guess I say this. I know, but... But listen, no, but listen, if I wrote a book, you can't write a book based on where we're heading now without, I believe... And unfortunately, I just see in some way, shape, or form, there's going to be a lot of bloodshed more than we see now.

And I think that America is going to see it firsthand. I think America... First before any other country. No, no, I'm not saying that. I'm just saying, I think Americans will probably see something that this generation is not used to seeing, such as maybe other countries that have been in war-torn countries. I think that America is going to see it and it's going to be a wide awakening. And maybe the whole world's going to see it. I mean, maybe the whole world is going to get involved in this.

I just don't think I don't think unless I just massively underestimate people fighting for just their own basic human rights and liberties I just don't see I don't see a way forward

I know Sherry can you let me finish one second I don't see a way forward with just the government just stripping everything from everyone without I mean because like eventually

they're just going to kill people I mean I think we already kind of seen this but I just think that I just don't see a way forward without bloodshed or a war of some kind and I don't want that. Obviously that's bad. Of course we don't and we've kind of been calling that for like probably

two years like if this is going to happen oh my God they're not going to let that happen but we continue like the people that are against the government controlling them are letting it happen still. Yeah but I don't see anything

You can't speak about that I don't I know, but I don't see anyone standing up. Well, because they can't. The government has rendered people that could possibly do any. I mean, and I'm not even saying, like, I'm just saying even protesting. If you're on the other side of what the agenda is, like, if you're on the side of the agenda, like, you can burn down cities. You're good.

You can do whatever. And then if you defend yourself, like Kyle Reddinghouse did, you know, you're going to be tried for murder. Exactly. And thank God. And luckily, luckily, he did not get convicted. Because, I mean, I'm surprised that they didn't have some corrupt bullshit in there. But, you know, they were trying to make Kyle Redinghouse an example. If you defend yourself against our crazy ideologies, then we are going to put you in prison for the rest of your life or kill you.

Yeah. So who is going to lead the standup against this tyranny? I don't know. I mean, I don't know. And that's not for us to decide. I'm not saying it is. But I'm just saying we've been talking about and talking about it. And people say, we're not going to let this happen.

This is done. We're not doing this anymore. Well, listen, I think, I think that the time will come that, you know, we, we as Americans still have to believe in our system, you know, and, and unfortunately. Our system is betraying us. I know, but unfortunately, like, that is, that is, that is, that is one of the hugest arguments with the, with the 2020 election. That's why there has been, you know, banning of anybody that says it was rigged or there was any, any voter fraud, even though there's been voter fraud in all elections. But, I mean, you know, you go watch 2,000 mules. You go really dig into this.

Even people that did private type stuff that just shows how corrupt this shit was. But what I'm saying is the reason why they ban anyone that says this was fake is because they know that if people start to realize that they no longer have a vote or this is all completely rigged and no matter what you do as American citizen with rights and a right to vote, the dictatorship, Because then that would be tyranny. I mean, if you have a group of people that makes you believe you're voting for someone, and yet it is not that way at all. And they have this picked, right?

Then technically what you're living in is tyranny. So I think. I believe that's what's happening. I know. I get it. But you're right. I do. But I think until we really see it.

But people do see it. I know. I get it. I just think that. with the way the world is and with social media and the way that big tech is and big tech is sleeping with the government. Well, people can't say anything. There's no way for people to gather together.

Sorry. I know you're shutting me down with it, but I'm just saying that's the problem. I know. Because I know there are people that don't want this happening all over the world. But we also just can't be the arbiters of or what I'm saying is there's no point and even for us to talk about that because that, just that all that's going to do is just yeah um i mean we think people are listening to us on our cell phones we do have a podcast that it reaches shit tons of people around the world so that's what i'm saying you know eventually um who knows i don't know what's going to happen but is it's you

know if if tyranny comes and people's complete rights are taken away then people do what they got to do um whether it be i don't know i mean because if you can't vote for anybody and people are just going to you know say that you're not allowed to do this or this or this and we are coming after you and you know whatever that's for people decide um we're just we're just here to tell you what's happening and just kind of giving you comparison to georgia well then and what's going on now uh you know it's all a smoke show is all it is and that's unfortunately what we're in nowadays but i don't know i don't know what the answer is but like i said i think you got a if you're a believer of god you got you got to trust god yeah god has everything written that's what one of my really good friends

told me. Well, he does. Everything is already written. And that's why I talk. So if you're listening, and this was a terrible podcast for me because I could not even talk or breathe is so sorry. It's all good. But yeah, it'll, I don't know. Like I said, if you believe in God, believe in God.

Trust your, keep your faith. And make sure that, you know, you just follow what you believe in and what your mind tells you. Guys, we love you. Thanks for listening to another Investigator of the podcast episode. We hope you enjoyed it. And until next time, peace out.