Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Julian Assange Free After Plea | WikiLeaks Conspiracy Podcasts Breakdown

Episode Date: June 27, 2024

Julian Assange is finally free after over five years in a London prison and seven years in exile. This comes following a plea deal with the United States government, allowing Assange to return home to Australia. In this episode, we delve into the notable revelations by WikiLeaks and explore why the US government was so determined to imprison him. What secrets were "they" hiding, especially regarding Clinton? All of this and more on this episode of Julian Assange Free | WikiLeaks Conspiracy Breakdown

She said I'm a free man, free to do just what I like, but I just don't seem to like what's new to me. Now I'm no one's man. And these streets that I've been walking, they make me feel like nothing. I tell my friends it's here. Hey, a way we've got. Hello and welcome to Investigator Earth Podcast. I'm your host, Chad, alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry. On tonight's episode, we're going to be talking about Julian Assange.

He is now free after more than five years in a London prison. seven years in exile running from the United States government because he just exposed other people's crimes. He did not commit crimes himself. He exposed other people's crimes. Not only has he been in prison and in exile for over seven years now, he was never actually charged with a crime until recently. And then recently, he took a plea deal with the United States government in order to get him out of prison and back home in Australia to his family. So not only are we going to talk about Julian Assange and his journey to freedom, we're also going to talk about what was the most damning leaks that WikiLeaks ever put out and who did it involve? Because the thing about Wikileaks and

Julian Assange is this not just about one particular party or person, but it did just so happen that the government really went after him hard when he started talking about one particular politician in general. And that is Miss Hillary Clinton. And once the Clinton emails started coming out and exposing how corrupt the Clintons along with a lot of the people around her were and then also some of the CIA documents also known as Vault 7. That's when they thought, oh shit, we got to go after him now. So we're going to talk about all this tonight on the show, guys. Welcome to the show.

It is June the 27th, 2024. The name of this song is Freemann by Cata featuring Phil Waters. I felt like that song was fitting. Julian Assange is finally free. Tonight, by the way, we have a pretty. busy day, Sherry. You actually did an episode this morning by yourself. You interviewed someone. Yes. My first time by myself. I can't wait for you guys to hear it. Yeah. And then, I was so nervous. Yeah, we're doing an episode now. And then tonight we have the live presidential

debates, which we will be hosted on X and Rumble. So if you guys hear this between now and about seven hours from now, six hours from now, go check us out on X and Rumble. We will have an awesome live stream. Very excited about that. So let's start with AP News Report. Julian Assange is now free to do or say whatever he likes. What does the future hold for Julian Assange? Now, New Zealand, he has run for office, published hundreds of thousands of leaked government documents online, and once lobbied to save his local swimming pool. One of the most polarizing and influential figures of the information age, Julian Assange is now free after five years and a British prison and seven years in self-imposed exile in London Embassy. Now, what's next for the WikiLeaks founder remains unclear?

Assange 52 landed in his homeland of Australia this week after pleading guilty to obtaining and publishing U.S. military secrets in a deal with the Justice Department prosecutors that put an end to an attempt to extradite him to the United States. That could have resulted in a lengthy prison sentence in the event of conviction. And it quotes, Julian plans to swim in the ocean every day. He plans to sleep in a real bed. He plans to taste real food. And he plans to enjoy his freedom. his wife Stella Assange told reporters Thursday at a news conference that Assange did not attend. Her husband and the father of her two children would continue to defend human rights and speak out against injustice, she said,

and he can choose how he does that because he is now a free man. And all friends and acquaintances of Sanj interviewed by the Associated Press this week emphasized that they did not know his future plans and underscored the toll taken by his ordeal. In prison, he spent 23 hours a day in solitary confinement. following years of self-exile inside an Ecuadorian embassy in London. And it quotes, I just want him to survive the ordeal and be happy. I don't care what Julian does next, said Andrew Wilkie, an independent Australian lawmaker who met Assange before the hacker launched WikiLeaks

and was one of the first politicians to lobby for Australia to intervene in his case. But some also found it hard to imagine Assange would eventually return to the preoccupations that had long captured him. And it quotes, I suspect, though, that he doesn't, if he doesn't switch it off, and it's hard to see him just disappear into a bench shack forever, added Willoughke. Now, obviously, if you're a son, Sherry, and basically because you made a safe haven for journalists and people with sensitive information, especially information that was exposing

corruption, and then you get put in prison for that, you get put in exile, essentially, and you don't even get charged with a crime, not really until the Trump administration, they upgrade charges actually put out charges on Assange, where many were waiting on Trump and the administration to actually pardon Assange. That never happened. They've called on many presidents in the past to pardon Assange. But I think the problem was, is that once we get into the story about who wanted to have Assange killed, it makes a little more sense who was obviously in Trump's ear during Trump's administration not to pardon Assange. And listen, Trump's been asked this question quite a few times in multiple interviews, will you pardon Assange? And he said, well, you know, he always kind of played it left or

right. He didn't really ever give a definitive answer. But one of the things that seemed that he was always saying was, well, I think there's some things that we just can't let go because of certain reasons that not everyone knows the real reasons behind some of the stuff that we know. And all that really was was Mike Pompeo in his ear because Mike Pompeo is the one that wanted Julian Assange assassinated. And that's what we're going to talk about in a little bit. And I think that's just crazy that we even know that, excuse me, or you know that for sure. And I asked Chadby for this podcast, shouldn't you say allegedly? But he said, no, it's been leaked that he actually wanted him dead.

And I was like, how could something like that be leaked? Well, I guess it was through emails. And I'm just flabbergasted that they actually wanted to kill this guy. Yeah, it's nuts. Just so we know, what is WikiLeaks? Wikileaks was a nonprofit organization created to protect whistleblowers and journalists who have sensitive materials to communicate to the public. They believe that transparent governments leads to better governments and less

corruption. Now, obviously, this was led by Julian Assange and Australian, and WikiLeaks was started in 2006 with the goal of opening governments to help prevent criminal corruption. No information is leaked that could harm innocent civilians or those not involved in corruption. Now, throughout the time of WikiLeaks, they did not have one single leak that was ever proven faults. and something WikiLeaks prides itself on and always did. And so if the leaks were ever faults or anything come up that, hey, there was something or a discrepancy in a leak,

everyone implicated in them would have immediately and aggressively denied their claims rather than simply change the subject and speculate in Russia did it. So they would change their stance. They would make sure that whatever was leaked was right and it was correct information. They would verify, re-verify and re-verify again. Keeping in mind a lot of what WikiLeaks, I'm pretty sure predominantly what WikiLeaks, leaks actually had was not something that they themselves were going out and hacking the United States government and obtaining this information. It was people that was coming to them with information, whistleblowers, journalists, people that were connected to whistleblowers that

then journalists brought to WikiLeaks. And so obviously a lot of people have been very concerned about what was the plea deal and will this affect journalism in the future. Why do we even have to plea if Julian Assange technically never did anything wrong? They got him for some type of espionage acts, which we'll get into. But the reality of it is, is that it is a old BS law that how they tried to utilize this in Julian Assange's case is ridiculous. What happened here was that he implicated the wrong people, the people that really control our government, such as Hillary Clinton, such as people like Mike Pompeo, such as the CIA, which we'll get into. But I want to play a short clip here because I think this is a pretty good way to start, right?

This is a clip, and it kind of highlights some of the war. stuff that Julian Assange exposed, especially during the Iraq war. This is also when the CIA and government really started looking at him and saying, all right, we got to keep an eye on this guy. We got to make sure that we don't let out certain pieces of information. Check this out. 20 years ago, the U.S. and UK invaded Iraq. Today, Tony Blair is free to go on television. It's made a huge amount of money. The same with George Bush. At the same time, Julian Assange languishes in Belmarsh prison because he told the truth about this war. Light them all on.

There is something deeply wrong with a society with those kind of priorities. When you look at the people who brought us the war in Iraq, the people who used everything at their disposal, the state machine, parliament, the media, when you look at what all those people did, nobody has

faced any of the consequences. Even when the Chilcott report reported, Tony Blair sat up his own press conference paid for by the immense wealth which he now has, the many houses that he has. He was made envoy for peace in the Middle East. He was given a knighthood last year.

Whereas all the people who told the truth about the war, the people who marched, what happened to them, the Muslim community penalised by the prevent system for telling the truth and for standing up for their rights. The people like Julian Assange in prison in Belmarsh for all these years for telling the truth. I remember Tony Blair, the day of February 15th

when we had so many people marching in London. He said even if a million people marching in London, That's not as many as Saddam Hussein killed. Well, the war in Iraq ended up killing more people. He talked about human rights. This is about democracy. It's about getting rid of a dictatorship. After he stopped being, Prime Minister,

what did he spend his time doing, advising dictators? The truth is, all of these were lies. All of them were things where they said, we are going to make things better, and actually they made it worse. And not just in Iraq. In the last 20 years, armament worldwide, amount of money spent on military has doubled nearly two trillion dollars are now spent on arms every year,

making the world a much more dangerous place. We've now got conflict, not just between dictator in the Middle East and the biggest imperial power in the world, the United States. We've now got effectively a proxy war in Ukraine between two major imperial powers and both of them with nuclear arms. We've got the much more real possibility of war with China, Again, this will be a nuclear war and therefore the devastation of humanity. So exactly the opposite of what we were told 20 years ago has turned out to be the case. It's a more dangerous world. Iraq's a much more dangerous place.

We have far more refugees than we had then. Taliban in Afghanistan back in control. Terrorism has grown. And indeed, where did ISIS and al-Qaeda come from? Well, in Iraq, they came from British-occupied Basra province, where they were formed in prison where many Iraqis were in. prisons. And the shameful thing is that the people who created the war are still being given awards, are still making huge amounts of money. And in the case of Tony Blair is still being

invited onto the BBC to give his views on absolutely everything, instead of being in the Dock at the Hague, which is where I think most people in Britain would like him to be. From the very beginning, from the time he went to Bush's Ranch in the spring of 2002, Tony Blair, was absolutely fully committed to every aspect of the war in Iraq. He lied about the existence of weapons of mass destruction, which had never been found because they didn't exist. And there were all sorts of people who said so at the time, including the UN weapons inspectors, who you might think would be people who did have some particular knowledge about this. This was all dismissed by Blair, by Alistair Campbell, when they devised a dossier. And this is the man who promoted the dossier. It was over the evening standard that day.

can attack Britain in 45 minutes. I think a period of silence from Alastair Campbell would be welcomed by everybody instead of which he seems to be in podcasts and on couches all over the TV studios. This tells you something about the lack of integrity and the lack of morals of so much of our media coverage. I think the media role was very, very important. And again, that hasn't really been held to account at all. If you look at the broadcast media, particularly the BBC, it was an absolute disgrace. I remember Andrew Maher, who was the political correspondent, who just after the war started, said Tony Blair had won this argument. He said that they would be able to take Baghdad without a bloodbath and that in the end the Iraqis would be celebrating. And on both of those

points, he has been proved conclusively right. And it would be entirely ungracious, even for his critics, not to acknowledge that tonight he stands as a larger man and a stronger Prime Minister as a result. 20 years on this is so important because it's not just about the past, it's not just about the present, it's also about the future. And this question of war is going to become a bigger and bigger question over the next two or three years. The project for a new American century was essentially about trying to redraw the world on pro-US lines. American hegemony had to be maintained and had to be extended. Many of Bush's key advisors were people who were part of that project. They could see that China was a rising power.

It's a rising power economically. It was also becoming a major military power. China is today the second biggest military power in the world. It has long been a permanent member of the UN Security Council, and it has long been a nuclear power. So the project saw the threat of China as a very real one. And they wanted to change the politics of the Far East of the Pacific in terms of the rise of China

and to strengthen the United States in that region. also wanted to redraw the politics of the Middle East, and that particularly meant boosting Saudi Arabia and Israel, as their two closest allies in the region, against Iraq and against Iran. And that's a policy that's continued. The Middle East itself, there are very few democratic governments, and that is to do with the way in which imperial powers decided on a particular form of government, which really didn't care about democracy. They were concerned with having regimes which were closely connected to them politically, economically and militarily. And that's what's been created. Yes, Saddam Hussein was a dictator. He was a dictator who was put into power

through the acts of the United States, but he was by no means unique in that region. Saudi Arabia, for example, has been engaged in a war against Yemen for seven years. No question about regime change. The murder of a journalist carried out at the behest of members of the Saudi war. or family. Nothing is done. You know, we're talking here about extremely undemocratic states. The British government and the United States governments are perfectly happy to work with those people as long as they keep the area secure for oil profits. That's the bottom line. We had many, many Iraqis in this country who campaigned with us against. All right, so I'm going to stop it there. So she makes some great points there, right? And obviously, when you start talking about the wars,

you start talking about what some of Julian Assange exposed, more specifically about the Iraq war, how many civilians that the United States government was killing. And in some cases, knowingly killing. He was leaking video from some of our gunships that was showing some of these encounters, some of these gunships blasting civilians. And so when this stuff started coming out about the United States military, this is when they really started to give him a look and really started to want to do whatever they could to get rid of him. Now, obviously, as you listen to the power structure around the world,

this, what happened to Julian Assange is what happens around the world in dictatorship countries, communist countries, which is if you say something or go against the government or expose their corruption or expose their criminality, then you are more than likely going to languish in a prison. They will do whatever they have to do to make sure that you cannot speak or speak out anymore. That is a dictatorship communist country. The reason why America, one of their reasons, why America is so sought after for so many people is because of freedom. But not only is that freedom afforded to all citizens, it is 100% afforded to journalists.

And without journalists and without the journalistic freedom that we have in the United States, the government would run wild. I mean, a lot more wild than they already are. Now, obviously, our media here has been compromised. That is pretty obvious. You have CNN. You have MSNBC. Basically, all networks are pretty much propaganda networks.

for the United States government. We've always heard about that, right? We've heard about it in Russia and China and North Korea. You can't have anything on television that is anti-government or even questions or criticizes government. And so what we're seeing, though, in the United States, and especially with the Assange thing, I think not only Snowden but Assange, when Assange kind of presented other people's crimes that were inside of the government and not just people's crimes, but also organizations' crimes.

for example, what the CIA was doing and how much they're able to actually spy on Americans and not just Americans, but people all around the world, that is when the government far oversteps the freedom of journalists or freedom of press, which is exactly what they did. And then even with this plea deal, a lot of people are wondering, okay, well, if you pled guilty to something based on his journalism, then what is that going to open up in the future, right? Because you've always heard of case law. Case law is used all the time. once a president is set in any way, shape, or form, they can then go and use that president

for future cases, right? So if you are a journalist and you expose corruption in the future, how many journalists are going to be weary of either getting information from a whistleblower that maybe they have classified information, but it doesn't matter once they are actually given the information, as long as they're not the ones that stole it, and you're a journalist and you're using it for journalistic principles or purposes, it is fair game. It is fair game. It is fair game. to report and especially on corruption, right? But what they were trying to do with Julian Assange, the same thing with Snowden, is that they wanted to set a president, they wanted to say, hey, journalist or anybody out there, if you think that you're going to expose us, then this is what's

going to happen to you. We want to fear you into not speaking up. We want to fear you into not getting out the real and factual information. And it really started with the war, especially with the Bush administration, Tony Blair. You know, we remember the weapons of mass destruction that was supposedly in Iraq when we invaded Iraq. And that's one thing that Tucker Carlson often says, you know, that's one thing I went along with. I deeply regret. And, you know, I've, he's said that a million times since. But keeping in mind, at the time, Tucker Carlson actually worked at CNN. And Tucker Carlson, during that time, actually went over to Iraq. And he was in this very hostile war zone where when he got over there, he's like, holy shit. Like, this is not what I was expecting.

and the more and more, I guess, he learned about the situation in Iraq, the more and more that things started coming out, he obviously knew that he was lied to, he was pushed to lie to the American public. And I think that the result of how much you're seeing Tucker Carlson out there right now on this mission, on this journey to expose as much shit as he possibly can, I think he's trying to pay back a little bit for what he knows that he was a part of for so long. And so now you have journalists like this that are going out on their own.

and I think that, you know, even for Tucker, I remember when he went to interview Putin and the State Department was essentially threatening Tucker. You know, if you go interview him, oh, you might, this might happen or this might happen. And there was some real fear in Tucker's camp during that time because he didn't know if he'd be arrested on site when he stepped back in the United States or just for being a journalist. And that's what it is today, unfortunately.

And it's just so sad to see all this corruption and it runs wild. out everywhere because you would even think during this Iraq war when they were saying there was weapons of mass destruction and the UN inspectors go in to inspect these weapons and say, yes, they are here. And, you know, out of anyone who would think these UN inspectors would be ethical and be truthful. Well, see, that's the thing, though. Some UN inspectors, it was almost kind of like a haze, right? They wanted to say, oh, yeah, we believe they're here because of this and this reason. And although I'm not 100% sure that any UN's weapon inspectors actually ever put eyes on, obviously they didn't of weapons of mass destruction. So that's obviously a lie.

But, you know, the United States and NATO used the UN in a lot of ways to convince the world. Oh, yes. See, it's not just us. The UN is saying this as well. Yeah. And you would think the UN would be so trustworthy. No. But obviously, not even the UN is trustworthy.

Like, who can you trust? Yeah. As far as government. Yeah, for sure. So here's some of the things. I want to talk about here's some of the things that WikiLeaks exposed. Number one, Obama lied. He knew about Hillary's secret server and wrote to her using a pseudonym coverup happened intent to destroy evidence. And so obviously this was a big thing because Barack Obama always said, oh, I didn't know anything about the servers that were basically acid washed, destroyed, hit with a hammer, you name it. There's no telling what is actually what was on these servers, right? But here's an email. It says, Jen, you probably have more on this, but it looks like HOTUS just said he found out HRC was using her, and that's Hillary Clinton, by the way, was using her personal email when he saw it in the news. We need to clean this up.

He has emails from her. They do not say state.gov, right? So obviously he has emails. He was corresponding communicating with Hillary. This is a big thing that, you know, obviously if you're the president of the United States, you're communicating with at the time, you're, I believe, secretary of state. And God knows what they're talking about. Obviously, it was something they did not want.

want to get out through Freedom of Information Act, which is the exact reason they were using personal emails, right, and personal servers. They do not want whatever they were talking about to get out. Here's another one. It says, I can't state how huge this is. It's a cover-up involving the president of the United States. There are a lot of emails implying this, but this email states it very clearly so anyone can understand.

The email proves obstruction of justice and shows how they lied to the FBI and likely perjury of Congress. This, at the very least, proves the intent of chiefs of staff. have to do something. You know, and so they're literally saying, hey, this is really bad. We get to fix this, right? So Obama used executive privilege on their correspondent. Cheryl Mills, who was given immunity, states that they need to clean up the Clinton

Obama emails because they lack the state.gov. And additionally, Obama, on video publicly denied no one about the server. He also claimed on video that he had learned about the secret server through the news like everyone else. And so the corruption goes obviously all the way of the top. Obama is lying to the American public like he always did. And Hillary Clinton set up her own private server to hide her pay for play deals, discovered throughout those leaks, and to prevent freedom of information acts, right?

Now, Paul Cambetta was hired to modify the email headers that referred to a very, very VIP individual, i.e., he was hired to change the name of who it was from. And so if you read Stone Tier and Cambodda story, it's easy to see that this is exactly what he was attempting. He wanted to change header information on already sent mail to show state.gov instead of Hillary's private email address. Multiple people informed him of this infeasibility and illegal in legality of it. So somewhere in the next six days, it was decided that simply eradicating them was the only option left, right?

So the FBI said they could not find intent of trying to break the law. Therefore, no recommendation of prosecution was found. This email proves in plain language that there was intention and knowingly broke the law. So you've got to ask yourselves, why would they both be communicating to a secret server to each other. Why not through normal proper channels? What were they hiding? And we don't 100% know, but there's obviously tons of speculation about what they were potentially talking about with this. Now, Hillary Clinton dreams of completely open trade and open borders. This was something else that was found, right? And it quotes, my dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade

and wide open borders. This was stated at one of her $225,000 paid secret speeches to Wall Street that she tried to desperately hide. This email contains those speeches in those attachments. Now, border protection is important. Borders add safety and sovereignty, obviously, to a country. Borders help prevent illegal immigration, which limit crimes, drugs, human sex trafficking. The border allows more Americans, including African Americans and Latinos, to get jobs. It also costs the working class an exorbitant amount of money in higher taxes, leads a higher

national debt. And Mexico protects their southern border with a help from $75 million that they got from the Obama administration. and then even more money after the Obama administration. But as you look now and especially consider in these $225,000 speeches that Hillary Clinton was getting and these transcripts of her speeches, which really talked about, we want open borders and open markets and open this and open that. This, I believe, under the Obama administration and the Hillary Clinton, Secretary's state term,

this is when the open border policies and all this stuff really started to hatch a plan. I think this is when the globalist really started to move in. I think 100% Hillary Clinton has been tied to that and a part of that ever since. Yeah, and her husband as well, Bill Clinton, he was all about open trade. And that was one of the biggest things he did while he was in office is to have open trade. Yeah, absolutely. Well, during the third debate, Hillary tried to pivot away from this damning topic by stating that she only meant energy. And that's what she talked about when she was debating Trump.

So now Hillary Clinton took money from and supported nations that she knew. new funded ISIS and terrorist. And this is a quote, the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are proven clandestine financial and logistic support of ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region. That was one of the emails. Clinton should know better than to raise money from folks who primary concern has been supporting the NIAC, a notorious supporter of the radical Islamic Mullahs. The Clintons have thrown principal out the window in exchange for cold hard cash, putting money

ahead of principle. Now, Hillary's chief of staff admits in the second link that foreign interests sway Hillary to do what they want her to do, money for mandatory appearances. She also admits that the friend of Hillary list is available and rentable to people who want to influence, but that's not too sensitive to talk about an email. So this leak shows Hillary Clinton shows Saudis and Qatar are funding ISIS, which is an enemy of the state, quote unquote, apparently. And after knowing this, Hillary accepted tens of millions in donations from these terrorist

funding governments. And of course, they're getting something back in return. So she, and, you know, keeping also in mind, she also supported. arms deals to these countries, right? So Saudi Arabia and Qatar commit horrible acts under Sharia law, including throwing gay people off buildings, persecuting Christians, Jews, atheists, and making it legal to rape and beat women. And they are the leading funders of the Hillary and Hillary and Bill Clinton Foundation and

her campaign through the Clinton Foundation. And they were one of the biggest donors. So what was she really doing over there with these governments with tens of millions of dollars in funding? What was she giving them back? I would love to know. But it could have something to do with. arms, we don't know. Now, Hillary has public positions on policy and her private ones.

And this is a quote. But if everybody, if everybody's watching, you know, all of the backroom discussions and the deals, you know, the people get a little nervous to say the least. So you need both a public and a private position. And this is what she talked about. Now, this leak is a big one because anything she tells us that she can do or will do should be considered questionable. Whenever Hillary tells the public position, a goal or whatever the goal may be, what will she do for America? There is no way we can obviously ever have been sure about what she was actually meaning because obviously she had a private position in that theory or ideology or whatever the case was.

Now, this is one of her private paid speeches also, the $225,000 speeches, to Wall Street. And behind closed doors, she is telling her Wall Street donors one thing and the American people another thing. So this is literally what she was doing. And it was out in the open except for they keep these meetings very secretive. you've got to pay $225,000 to even get in. It's probably some type of like satanic weird money laundering, trafficking. I don't know. I mean, these are all opinions, but who knows what they're really doing behind closed doors.

Now, they were also paying people to incite violence and unrest at Trump rallies. This was found as well. So we can get to the Podesta emails, and this is kind of where it starts. But the quote here is, engage immigrant right organizations, or also known as dreamers, have been bird dogging Republican presidential candidates on DACA and DAPA, but they've learned to respond. There's an opportunity to bird dog and record questions about Trump's comments and connect it to the policy. And it goes on to say, it doesn't matter what the freaking legal and ethics people say, we need to win this, motherfucker. This is what she said.

She also goes on to say, I mean, honestly, it's not too hard to get some of these assholes to pop off. It's a matter of showing up to want to get into the rally in a planned parenthood. t-shirt or Trump is a Nazi, you know, type shit, you can message to draw them out and draw them to punch you. So this was obviously planning of inciting violence, which obviously is inciting a riot, which is illegal. 100% illegal. She should already be in prison for that. And she was doing this to sway the public perception of Trump.

And they would use the media to go out and make sure the media was there to say, oh, look at these people doing this and look how much they hate Trump. And then look at these pro-Nazis or these. these pro whatever. This is in the emails that she actually emailed. This is a wiki leak. This is no question about it. 100% proven. So anyways, birddogan is a term coined by the high-level Clinton stabbers who openly talk about it in the video. They boast about inciting violence at the Trump rallies, paying for every protest, manipulating Americans through the media to think that the Trump is dangerous and tricking people into thinking Trump supporters are violent and bad. This was

their main intention, main goal. They laugh off paying off mentally ill and homeless people for years. to incite violence against conservatives, truly despicable, and they pretended to be Bernie supporters while they were protesting. So this was all this massive ploy. This is what they do. We're proving it right now. They also admit to start in the Chicago riot where the police were seriously hurt and admit to shutting down the freeway in Arizona, partnering with Black Lives Matter. There's even proof that Hillary paid people to shut down the Chicago rally, which is right here. And this is the daily caller. Activist who took credit for violent Chicago protest was on Hillary payroll. So this was a payroll, right? And this is an activist who bragged about disrupting

multiple Donald Trump campaigns events in recent Project Veritas video was on a Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign payroll, a search of federal election commission FEC records reveal. So that is 100% proven and not bullshit, which is crazy. Now, obviously, in citing a riot is illegal under 18 U.S. Code 2102, they also think that 50% of people in Iowa and Wisconsin are racist as they state in the video. Robbie Mook, Clinton campaign manager, mentions that Priority Super PAC in a leak, which is implicated in the video.

Bob Creamer, who was fired, claims in the video that the campaign knew about everything, and Bob Creamer visited the White House 340 times and personally met with Obama 45 times. So obviously, great Project Veritas investigation during that time as well, but also proven through emails in various other ways, talking about people were on her page,

payroll. I mean, no longer a conspiracy theory, right? I mean, and the reality is not a lot of people talk about that, right? We've seen so many riots. We've seen the Black Lives Matter riots. We've seen the Antifa riots. And all of these things, when anyone puts it on the internet, that it is, it is, you know, crisis actors or these are people that show up and they're instigators or they're paid by this or this or this. It's all labeled a conspiracy theory, especially by Facebook and Instagram. But obviously, this proves that that happens without a doubt. And it proves that Hillary Clinton in particular is definitely involved in it.

Now, Hillary's campaign wants unaware and compliant citizens, right? And it quotes, as I've mentioned, we've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics, and in general conspired to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong, but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. this problem demands some serious, serious thinking and not just poll driven demographically, inspired messaging, right? So let's break that down for a second. What that is saying is we need compliant and unaware citizens.

We need people that do not understand what the hell is going on behind closed doors, and we need them to comply. And in this, it says, obviously, the unawareness remains strong, but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. And so when she talks about this problem demands some serious, serious thinking, obviously whatever that serious, serious thinking was is now being implemented. And then what's going to happen another three to four years is that serious, serious thinking they're going to do after this wave, it's going to be even worse, right? And so this is where this corrupt administration and especially party, but, you know, there's corrupt people on both sides of the party. But in this

particular case, the Democrats in this particular case, very, very corrupt, they want a dictatorship. They want to rule the people. They do not want to work for you. They want to work over you. They want you to work under them. And they want to be your slave master. They want to be your, I don't know, shit, Jim Crow, whoever, right? The Clinton campaign is literally conspiring to keep the population unaware of what is going on. And they admitted it in every email. Very scary, 1984 level thinking. I mean, that's what it is. The book 1984 very much outlines that. And if Hillary is the right choice for president and a truth is on her side, then they should have encouraged their supporters to be aware and do research on both candidates

and what actually went on. But they never did that. Instead, Hillary Clinton's campaign, spite on Donald Trump's campaign, she used various sounds like three-letter intelligence agencies to also do that, potentially FBI, probably CIA. She has connections to everybody. She is one of the main ones that runs Washington. She runs the deep state in a lot of ways. And we can't forget about the Russian collusion. The whole thing she made up that was not even true. Well, that was probably part of the serious thinking later on down the road. Now, top Hillary aides mock Catholics for their faith.

To be, again, this is a pretty crazy. So this is what was said. To be a Catholic is an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations. Also says, no one knows what the hell they're talking about. She also says, end of the middle ages. dictatorships. Now, top Clinton age, John Halpin and Jennifer Palomari mock Catholics for their faith. They complain about the large number of Catholics in prominent positions. This was one of the few

emails to actually make it to the mainstream media, which is Fox, and Palomary, when confronted about this revelation, didn't apologize. Brian Birch, Catholic Vote.org, presented, or sorry, president released a statement proclaiming, Hillary Clinton has already called half of her opponent's supporters of a basket of deplorables. and irredeemable, and now it comes out that her campaign spokeswoman dismissively questioned the sincerity of Catholic Americans faith. So obviously she's calling out Catholics here. This revelation was brought up by Al Smith dinner of Catholics.

Now, Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered up, asked about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress. These are all also in the emails. Quote, they do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public facing just to the committee. And it quotes, that's, of course, includes the emails Sid turned over that Hillary Clinton didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted him, or didn't turn them over. It also includes emails that Hillary Clinton had that Sid did not. It also quotes, think, we should hold emails to and from POTUS. That's the heart of his

executive privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but it seems like they will. This is also a quote. We brought up the existence of emails in research this summer, but were told that everything was taken care of. That, of course, includes the emails Sid turned over that Hillary Clinton did not, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them or didn't turn them over. Now, the State Department was, number one, coordinating with the Clinton political campaign. Number two, colluding with the press to spin it positively. And number three, doing so before they released it to an equal branch. of government. This was, the Clinton campaign was always a step ahead of the committee investigating them.

And that is all on record. All WikiLeaks also exposed. Now, Nick states just to state, he goes on to reveal that the state colluded with him about which emails are being revealed to committee and that the state plans to plant a story with the AP Associated Press. So this is all a very coordinated thing, right? This is obviously how government works. And I just want people to fully understand. understand the kind of back inner work into this. So this obviously shows intent to withhold emails from a subpoena, also illegal. And these are various reasons why she should be in jail. But anyways, bribery.

King of Morocco gives Clinton Foundation $12 million to have a meeting with Hillary. Six months later, Morocco gets weapons. Is that interesting? Yeah. So, quote, condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If Hillary Clinton was not part of it, meeting was a non-starter. CGI also wasn't pushing for a meeting in Morocco, and it wasn't their first choice. This was H.R.C., Hillary Clinton's idea.

Our office approached the Moroccans, and they 100% believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approximately $12 million both to the support endowment and to support the meeting. Quote, she created this mess and she knows it. HRC said she's still considering. And this is after her candidacy announcement, keep in mind. So a very important email on that it basically demonstrated. administrates Hillary's poor judgment, her idea in the face of influence money, and foreshadows how Clinton administration would be indebted to bad actors in criminal regimes from the very

beginning. And so the same issue that we had this quotes, the same issue we discussed mentioned by Robbie Mook in the email, is a veiled reference to Morocco's many human rights abuses. Now, her campaign staff is rightly concerned about the optics of the Clinton Foundation, Clinton Global Initiative, accepting huge sums of money from a regime that frequently violates international law and acts in a way that you'd expect the Clinton Foundation to publicly rebuke, although they did not. And it seems like $12 million is just too much money to allow morals, ethics, and the best interests and values of American citizens to intervene. So the intercept explores how Morocco is exploiting Hillary's weakness for huge donations and her desire

to be president to support their own geopolitical interests themselves. So State Department tried to bribe the FBI to unclassified Clinton emails or FBI documents. right? So this says the first part is redacted, but it says redacted indicated that he had been contacted by Kennedy under Secretary of State who had asked his assistance in altering the emails classification in exchange for a quid pro quo. And it says redacted believes state has an agenda which involves minimalizing the classified nature of the Clinton emails in order to protect state interest and those of Clinton. Redacted advised that in exchange for marking the emails Unclassified, state would reciprocate by allowing the FBI agents to place more agents in countries where they are presently forbidden.

Not only did the State Department, the Undersecretary himself, no less, make an attempt to bribe the FBI to declassify several emails from Hillary Clinton's private server, but they did it by trying to tempt the FBI and to allowing them to act in sovereign nations where they are presently not even allowed to operate. I mean, this is how all this shit connects. So it isn't a smoking gun. This is a smoking cannon, right? I mean, this is huge. And it goes on to say, I'm not sure how this does not bring the State Department to a screeching haunt, but obviously it has not. This shows a cavalier attitude towards protecting our nation's secrets. And these are the people Hillary Clinton would have hired had she had been in office, right?

But keeping in mind, even though Joe Biden is president right now and think about who his president was that he served under as vice president, Obama. Obama, which is obviously also connected to Hillary, I still think, number one, Obama, and I think that Hillary have mass influence in this administration right now that's going on right now. I wouldn't be surprised if Obama has more than Biden. Yeah, absolutely. You know, it also says Latinos are needy. Latino outreach is Taco Bowl engagement. So it quotes, needy Latinos in one easy call, quote, attaches a script for a new video we'd

like to use to mop up some more Taco Bowl engagement and demonstrate the Trump actually isn't trying. And so according to Hillary in her campaign, whites are deplorables. Blacks are super predators who need to be brought to heal. And Latinos are needy and the Taco Bowl engagement. So, you know, but Trump is the one

that is obviously racist. Yeah. Now, Clinton campaign was also in direct communication with the DOJ regarding Hillary's investigations. Now, the DOJ folks inform me, she quotes, and this report that Clinton's campaign was in direct communication with the Obama

Department of Justice on the email investigation shows a level of collusion, which calls into question the entire investigation into her private server to begin with, obviously. And on June 29th, head of the DOJ, Attorney General Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on a private plane for 30 minutes. The meeting occurred hours before the House Select Committee on Benghazi released its final report to the public. Sneaking around during investigation with the husband of the one being investigated is pretty highly unethical and downright shady. And on October 28th, Attorney General Lenn declined to comply with Congress regarding the secret Iran ransom payments. The top law enforcement official, the United States Attorney General, declined to cooperate

with an investigation by Congress. Let that sink in. Now, Bill Clinton received a $1 million birthday gift from ISIS funding Qatar. While Hillary was SOS, Qatar receives arm flow increases of 1,482%. Right? So here's a quote. We'd like to see WJC for five minutes in New York City to present one million check that Qatar promised for WJC's birthday in 2011.

This is William Clinton, you know, Bill Clinton. Just another example of breaking the law. Also remember from earlier, Hillary knew that Qatar funded ISIS. And so why is the country funding ISIS given money to Bill and paying for Hillary's campaign? I mean, what are they getting in return of this, right? That's obvious question. And in accordance with the imamination's cause of U.S. Constitution, you may not accept anything of value from a foreign government unless specifically authoritative.

authorized by Congress. This rule applies whether you are on or off duty. Any unit of a foreign government, whether it is a national, state, local, or municipal level is covered. It also applies to gifts from international or multinational organizations comprised of governments, representatives. It also may apply to gifts of travel or per diem for foreign universities, which are often considered as part of the foreign government. And spouses, independent children of federal employees are also banned from accepting gifts from foreign governments. But yet she did, and obviously the reason why that is banned is because of bribery. It is because you are compromised if you are doing deals with other countries

basically under the radar and without Congress approval. I mean, Congress is elected because of the people. They are dared to protect American interest. And so when you have these shitty, shady politicians is going around, you know, racking in millions of dollars from dirty actors or bad actors in a lot of cases, what the hell were they doing and what were they doing? and what were they getting in return, right? What, you know, we don't know.

And we also got to remember, too, even though we've never done a full extensive podcast on 9-11, but just remember that Saudi Arabia was highly linked and tied to the 9-11 incident, right? To the 9-11 massacre, tragedy, terrorist attack. And that was, you know, that was a terrorist attack that we just happened to, quote-unquote, miss and didn't, you know, just didn't catch it, even though we knew about it. Hillary campaign praised for shooters and news,

stories to be white. So this is also something. And this should not surprise you. So this is quote, damn, better if a guy named Syed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter. That's what it says. Oh my gosh. I mean, seriously.

This is, I cannot believe this is what I'm hearing right now. Yeah. And so this was the San Bernardino terrorist. And, you know, it's not really surprising. Now, rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders, D&C favored Hillary. So this is where it gets interesting. Quote, wonder if there's a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never, ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess.

And specifically, DWS, DNC chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they'd either ignored or forgotten something so critical. So this was already when Hillary was starting to get Bernie Sanders out of the equation, out of the picture, right? And it quotes, Bernie is someone who has never been a, a member of the Democratic Party and has no understanding of what we do. Quote, he isn't going to be president.

And quote, F or K.Y and WVA, can we get someone to ask his belief? Does he believe in a God? He had stated, sorry, he had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps who would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist. I mean, see, it's all just a game, right? They don't give a shit about what whoever it is.

If she outperforms this polling, the Bernie camp will go nuts and alleged misconduct. They'll probably complain regardless, actually. So these emails were written by several leaders in the DNC, and they are not supposed to take sides yet they clearly did months before any votes were cast. And then after the DNC leaks, their leader, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was fired, but immediately joined the Hillary Clinton campaign. So think about that for a second. Now, remember, Debbie Washington and Schultz was placed in the top of the district. DNC once someone else stepped down, none other than Tim Kane. And in a later leak, people learned that Tim Kane was promised vice president a year in advance. So the pieces were put in

place to get Hillary nominated, right? This is all a big game and a DNC. They even tried to attack his belief system. Hillary's campaign had been helped and manufactured since the very beginning, and there were statistical anomalies in primaries. In states with only electronic voting machines, Hillary grossly outperformed exit polls. But, But when there were paper ballots or paper trails, exit polls matched the results. So this is when they learned. Yeah, I think this is when they started this shit. Now, Bernie Sanders activist and process service, Sean Lucas, served with the DNC Services Corp and chairperson Debbie Washington Schultz at DNC's headquarters in a fraud class action suit against the Democrat Party on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters.

He was found dead a few weeks later on his bathroom floor. Oh, my gosh. And that's, you know, people talk about the Clintons, murder all these people. Yeah, their kill count. Yeah. Their alleged kill count. Just put that way. Ricking the primaries against Bernie Sanders'

Hillary's team. So this is also, it's quote, Bernie and his people have been bitching about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary. We want Bernie supporters to go home happy and enthusiastic and working their asses off for Hillary. Why not throw Bernie a bum? His people will think they've won something from the party establishment,

and his functionality doesn't make any difference anyway. They win. We don't lose. everyone is happy. And it quotes, I am doing the opposite, repeatedly writing friendly and positive pieces about Bernie as an HRC supporter or Clinton's supporter. And when the time is right, I will have money in the bank with him and his people as a liberal to urge them to come out and force to vote for Hillary Clinton. And it quotes, frankly, I thought it was dumb for McCaskill and Guterres to be attacking Bernie. We're going to need his voters to turn out in November for HRC. He won't be nominated. So, so essentially, this person who wrote the Super Delioux. delegate rules advised the Clinton campaign how to create an illusion that Bernie's people won something so they would work harder for Hillary after she was nominated. And more shocking is the fact that they admit that the superdelegates are undemocratic. This guy flat out admitted that he rigged the system and is proud of it, right? And there was also a man who was acting as a mole for Bernie

and writing positive negative things about him than using the reputation to sway Bernie supporters to Hillary. So there's all some kind of like sciop shit inside of their own party. And so lastly, see how to rig the debate schedule to be more favorable to her. One-on-one debates would have been better for Bernie Sanders, so they wanted to avoid that at all cost. They also wanted to limit the number of debates and start them late to minimize the impact of debates, right? And so Hillary is also on audio insulting Bernie Sanders supporters by calling them basement

dwellers. She likes to assault a lot of people, doesn't it? Oh, yeah. She's like, you know. Basement dwellers? Yeah. I mean, that's why it was so funny when Hillary and Trump were, you know, in debates with each other.

I mean, Trump usually dominate a lot of that. Hillary was hateful and neglectful above the law, contemptuous to her security detail and blatantly disregarded security and FBI documents. This is, you know, basically talking about there's a first thing that highlights all the parts, but seriously, there are way too many to include in just a quote. So just the sheer and utter lack of care for protocol security and the well-being of others, this is the person who people want to be in charge of national security and classified documents. Another scary note is the mention of Huma Abidene, Hillary's longtime assistant, possessing much more power and overriding security and protocol on Hillary's behalf. Abedin has been strongly rumored to be Hillary's chief of staff if she would have ever been elected. Clinton Foundation also schemed with Big Pharma to keep the price of AIDS drugs high in America and cheaper generic versions out. So this was also something.

And, you know, we can, there's podcasts for days that we could do about where AIDS. come from, who was involved in AIDS, or someone faulty. Quote, since President Clinton's comments were made, we have been contacted by a number of advocacy groups who are now intended to wage a public campaign to bring in generics and lower drug prices. We do not feel we can participate in this without jeopardizing our work around the world. We can not oppose what they might do, but we can also be publicly, we can't be supporting it either.

We think that publicly pressure in the U.S. and European AIDS drug companies to lower prices and bring in pressure to allow generic AIDS drug companies. drugs into United States will have limited, if any, success and could seriously jeopardize our negotiations to continually lower prices in poor countries. We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them. Don't worry, drug companies. We're not going to pressure you to lower it. As long as you give me $12 million.

That's all we need. So we suggest that we approach the innovator companies that can currently sell products in the U.S. with the idea of making donations to help clear the ADAP list, right? And then the companies will likely favor a donation approach rather than one that erodes prices around the world. I would guess that they would also likely favor a situation or a solution that involve their drugs rather than an approach that allow generic drugs from India to flood the U.S. market at low prices or one that set a president of waiving patent laws on drugs. We can't allow that. Right. So, I mean, it's just, it just tells you, like, we could get lower drug prices, but pieces of shit like the Hillary Clinton's of the world and all these other politicians are like, oh,

No, no, no, no, no, we can't do that. Now, it doesn't necessarily say why they didn't want to do this. It tries to say why, even though that's not why. I'm sure there's a shit ton of money involved in that. Everything leads to money. Everything does. It does. And when the Clintons are questioned about the obvious sketchiness of their foundation,

they routinely cite AIDS work. But the AIDS work is carried out by CHAI or the Clinton Health Access Initiative, which is a completely separate organization. Now, the CHAI freely admits there is an implicit agreement with a drug companies not to pressure them to lower domestic prices. Bill Clinton made comments to added pressure, CHAI receives a great amount of positive publicity for their AIDS work abroad, and the comments jeopardize the program. Here at CHAI admits it in their interest for U.S. AIDS drug prices to remain high so that

they can continue getting credit for keeping them low abroad, which is all bullshit. But CHAI is not content with simply fleece and American aid sufferers, since CHAI doesn't want pressure on pharma companies to linger, they were posed to torpedo other AIDS advocacy groups by creating a smaller watered down domestic program with the pharma companies before those other advocacy groups began their assault in January. So they were just going to suit, they were going to come in before these advocacy groups could come in and actually advocate for lower drug prices and make a big deal for them. So they would basically just shut them the hell up, right? That was, that's what they want to do. And this is the type of people they were.

They also, CNN leaked primary debate questions to Hillary through ahead of DNC. Democrats created fake Trump grope under the meeting table, Craigslist employment ad in May of 2016. We're going to just go through a few of these because there's a shit ton of them. Hillary's camp excited about a black teen's murder to help her agenda. That was another one. Rigging media polls through oversampling. They did that. What else have they done?

Hillary is still privately against gay marriage, even though she comes out. and says, oh, yeah. Acknowledging radical Islam is a real threat and a serious problem for our future. What else? Admitting terrorists will infiltrate the Syrian refugee program. I mean, even though they didn't do shit about that, but we know terrorists will come in. But who cares? Hillary sends U.S. intelligence and war planes to Podesta's hacked email.

So there's so many about the hacked emails, right? Hillary also took money from foreigners for campaigns, which is obviously illegal. Hillary says climate change activists should get a life because I mean, come on. There you go. So she really doesn't even believe in climate change. Well, look, and the reality of the climate change thing, we've had many episodes about climate change, how they've bullshitted numbers for years and years and years and years. Yeah, it really is not. There is no climate change because of humans.

No. I mean, there is obviously climate change. The climate will always change. And it changes over years and years. It changes on its own. Yeah. And there's cycles. You know, we've been through, who knows how many cycles the Earth has been through.

But there's proof around the world that we have been through cataclysmic cycles over the, you know, over thousands of years. You know, when you have tropical rainforest that is underneath Antarctica or once was underneath Antarctica, that should tell you. And typically that comes from pole shifting. But it does not come from people buying gas cars or gas stoves. And eating meat. Yeah, and eating meat.

It's all bullshit. And obviously Hillary thinks so too. I know. So she obviously thinks that climate control doesn't exist or they don't need it, but they're just bullshitting. Oh, yeah, absolutely. I mean, they're, they need it to control. And they know that. But, you know, they're just.

They don't really believe it. No, absolutely not. And Hillary is also pro fracking and calls it a gift despite what she publicly says. So, you know how Joe Biden, when he came in, basically shut down all the oil pipeline, shut down the drilling. He shut down pretty much everything for America. But they are all really for fracking. The problem probably is they're not getting money from.

U.S. so they're going to get some backheaded money from overseas in the oil. They already control a lot of the oil overseas anyways. I mean, most people don't know that, but they do. So referring to a shadow government that protects Hillary, which is the FBI docs. Now, I'm going to quote this, quote, H offers career enhancing seventh floor, positions in which you can have a direct substantive impact in achieving our foreign policy goals. There was a powerful group of very high-ranking state-finding state-finding. officials that some referred to as the seventh floor group or also known as the shadow government.

These are all quotes, by the way. Obama slams crazy conspiracy theories while the FBI owns docs. Their own documents literally say a shadow government. This is the FBI's own documents. So they admit they actually have a shadow government. And Obama and Hillary say it in a conspiracy is a, oh my God, one second. Obama and Hillary say it is a conspiracy theory to believe in a rigged. system after saying that the system is rigged.

They say it's a conspiracy theory to believe in voter and election fraud, yet we have video proof of high-level Democrats talking about how they commit voter fraud as well as voting machines, changing votes from Trump to Hillary, leading the counties admitting to the errors and using safe paper ballots and electronic voting machines owned by companies and elites paying Hillary Clinton money with past ties to election fraud. And there is proof. And by the way, I'm going to release this link that I am getting everything from, just kind of an itemized list.

And I know so far as a lot about Hillary Clinton, we're about to switch topics on this because I could go for probably the next six hours with Hillary Clinton stuff. Yeah. But the thing is, with Hillary, it didn't really work for her. She did not become president. But for Biden, he did the same thing. And it worked for him. Yeah.

Because I guess they got better seeing how it didn't work for Hillary. Yeah, absolutely. And, you know, just this one, the list of reporters that Hillary wind and dying, including the biggest journalists and pundits of CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, and the New York Times, and a lot more. And this was all off the record. So obviously, you knew why she was probably going to meet with them. She was not just on behalf of her campaign. I think they have a very coordinated system of how they control media.

And they probably do it with that old seventh floor group of the shadow government. Democrats were using American lobbyist money to launder foreign donations illegally. Now, that was also proven. also have the New York Times colluding with Hillary and a loud quote edits, right? So they would edit quotes that sounded bad or came out whatever New York Times. Don't worry, we got you. Racist remarks about blacks and Muslims. She's done that, for example, Muslims, blacks, and it says something else.

And Roma something, for instance, fair, badly, almost irrespective of circumstances. It also quotes the professional never do wells. That's what she quoted them. They're professionals that never doing well. They said most blacks and Muslims will fail no matter what the situation. And remember, Hillary's on video call them black youth super predators having no conscious, no empathy, and they need to be brought to the hill. And I'm sure this girl did not find her comments amusing in that situation.

But the same woman whose mentor was a KKK recruiter who was endorsed by the KKK, Grand Dragon William Quig, who belonged to the only whites golf club at the same time, Trump was leading the fight to include blacks and Jews into the golfing clubs and who shamelessly painted to the black people with her hot sauce comment and fake accent. And so viral references to needing a podium to lean on for two-minute speech, making speeches shorter or her not being able to walk around because of her health, supposedly. And Democrats using American lobbyist money to launder foreign donations illegally. Also, the racist remarks. Yeah, we got that.

And then Hillary's poor health, collapse in memory loss, drug research. so many things about, I mean, there's a ton about that. Tipped off by the State Department regarding Benghazi emails. Hillary's staff admitted she is tainted and really vulnerable on corruption and bribery. Hillary's camp using propaganda, she said. Hillary bragged about being invited to Putin's inner symptom. John Podessa's password was literally password, but it had an et and a zero. So anyways, that's, there's so much more.

I'm going to put this on our X account, the entire details. there's just so much BS there. Now, I want to get to something real quick because we've got to talk about what I think is some of the biggest leaks, which is how the CIA really does spy on Americans. But before we get to that, I want to get to something else. The CIA made secret plans to kidnap or assassinate Julian Assange after WikiLeaks published sensitive hacking tools and even plotted to shoot plane tires if we tried to flee the embassy in 2017.

And I think I do have an audio clip of that or for that real quick. and then we're going to dive deep into what this actually means. All right, guys, I did want to find this clip. This is the Tucker Carlson clip with Roseanne Barr when he specifically talks about this. And then we'll break it down what he's actually talking about. Here you go. I saw Julian Assange in London. I wanted to ask you about that.

Wouldn't put people in prison. No. Except for a very good reason. And they talk about the truth. Talk about the truth being illegal. Look at it. He's paid for it with dozens of people. Well, Assange has never been accused of lying or of fraud or of making.

or of making money in some criminal scheme. Assange has been accused to telling the truth, period. And they are torturing him to death in front of all of us. No one's doing anything about it. And that Mike Pompeo is a very, very sinister person. Isn't he? The worst. And I always thought that, and I've told Trump that.

Never should have allowed him to run CIA or state. But Mike Pompeo tried to have him murdered. And that's a criminal act. He's not even charged with a crime in the United States. And Mike Pompeo was CIA director. This came out. Pompeo didn't deny it. I never heard this.

Yes. Oh, absolutely. Oh, my God. He tried to have Julian Assange murdered, poisoned in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. And that's a fact, okay? And it's been established and, okay? Yes. Why is Mike? So, and what Tucker's talking about here we're about to get into.

So, CIA officials under the Trump administration, had deliberately or deliberated killing Julian Assange in 2017, according to a report citing former officials. Now, former CIA director Mike Pompeo led the crusade after WikiLeaks began publishing sensitive information in the Vault 7 documents, which we'll get to. Pompeo's plan intensified that year when the United States government heard Assange might attempt to escape Ecuador for Russia. The CIA tried to justify their plans by classifying WikiLeaks as a non-state hostile intelligence service. Now, Trump recently denied that he ever considered having Assange assassinated, but the WikiLeaks founder is still in prison in London, which he is not now, but this article is a little older. and they were he when he was in prison obviously he was waiting for extradition. Now, CIA officials under the Trump administration allegedly made secret plans to kidnap or even assassinate WikiLeaks founder Julian Sange after the website published sensitive agency hacking tools online according to a report on Sunday.

Now, the publication of the tools by WikiLeaks in 2017 was considered the largest data loss in CIA history and senior agency officials reported requested sketches and options on how to kidnap or assassinate a son. in response. Now, the claims are made in a newly released Yahoo News investigation that included interviews with 30 former U.S. officials. Now, former CIA director, Mike Pompeo, allegedly led the crusade against Assange in 2017. And when WikiLeaks continued publishing classified government documents under the name Vault 7, Pompeo's plans intensified that year when the United States government heard Assange might attempt to escape Ecuador to Russia, prompting the CIA to plan a number

of scenarios for intercepting him. One proposal allegedly involved shooting out the tires of his plane if Assange attempted to flee to rush it from London. Assange had his asylum at the embassy revoked in April of 2019 and was arrested by British police. He was currently detained in prison while he was fighting his extradition. Now among the proposals reportedly suggested by the agency officials are scenarios that appear to be straight out of a James Bond movie. They included possible shootouts in the streets of London, crashing a car into a vehicle transport in him. him or shooting out the tires of a plane taking him to Russia. In the lattermost scenario, U.S. officials allegedly even asked their British counterparts

to aid in the mission by carrying out the shooting. A former senior administration official told Yahoo News that the British agreed with the plan. So the British was going to go along with this. Well, doesn't that sound like Princess Diana a little bit? Yeah, you never know. Now, the CIA's war against Assange was concurrent to the Justice Department's debate over extraditing Assange from London to the U.S. for prosecution. And so obviously the WikiLeaks first drew Fury from the U.S. government in 2010 after published in thousands of pages at once secret reports and documents generated by American military and intelligence agencies, including detailed descriptions of CIA hacking capabilities.

And so for that reason, we're going to get into the CIA hacking capabilities and what they actually mean. Now, this is Vault 7. As mentioned earlier, Vault 7 is what WikiLeaks classified this as. Now, we're not 100% sure why it was classified as Vault 7, but we do know that's what it was classified as. And so these are going to be the top 15 discoveries and implications that we have seen so far anyway from Vault 7. I don't think that we'll get anything else. But number one, that the CIA equals virus and malware factory. So the CIA is not just a rogue agency that runs illegal drugs and weapons.

fascinates people, starts wars, and conducts overseas regime changes, it has also spent untold millions or even billions of dollars develop in what is probably the most sophisticated cyber warfare hacking spying department on the planet, equalling or even surpassing that of NSA. Now, WikiLeaks reveals that the CIA has its own hacking division that is run by the CCI or Center for Cyber Intelligence, which by the end of 2017 had over 5,000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, Trojans, viruses, and other weaponized malware.

Such is the scale of the CIA's undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had to utilize more code than they used to run Facebook. Now, the CIA had created, in effect, its own NSA with even less accountability and without publicly answering questions as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency

could be justified. So Snowden's leaks were already bad enough, but then showing that the NSA was an agency above the law that monitored and surveilled and spied upon just about anyone it wanted since most people on the planet are within its reach in one way or the other. But now we have confirmation that the CIA is engaging in exactly the same kind of activity or perhaps even worse. And could there be any possible doubt left by anyone that the MIC or the military intelligence complex runs the U.S. government and the world? And I think that's no question there. Now, they also learned about bypassing encryption. Now, this is also very important.

I know there's a lot of apps out there that supposedly say encrypted or I know even Facebook. I mean, obviously, Facebook Messenger would literally be the last thing I would ever trust. But I've noticed on Facebook Messenger now it says end-to-end encryption enabled. And so this encryption thing is just this keyword. And I almost think that these social media companies are specifically doing this to almost bait people into saying shit so that the government can figure out what they really want to know. And so they're trying to give a false sense of security in today's age. And they're using social media companies to do this.

And they're probably even using apps that are specifically built and designed for encryption or whatever the case may be, including Telegram, by the way. I would never in a million years think that Telegram is really truly encrypted, end-to-end, safe and is unhackable because what I'm about to tell you, it proves absolutely it is not. So, you know, all these companies promise encryption and some even charge more for the services. But it doesn't matter. Vault 7 leaked documents show that the CIA is getting audio files before they're even getting

encrypted. The CIA can hack into your phone, compromise your operating system, and suck up your messages before they're ever encrypted and sent. It doesn't matter what the precautions you take are, encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, and many more are completely vulnerable and open to this as well. So what the CIA's way of doing this is, and I'm sure they probably have a, easy system that can infect all phones instantaneously to be able to get all information. And more than likely, they probably already have it on phones if I had to guess.

I mean, I would be surprised if the CIA or some intelligence agency has not worked with phone companies or some chip manufacturers or some someone already be able to easily or more easily do this, right? I don't know that. I mean, I'm just saying it's an opinion, but I've often thought about that. They also bypass computer operating systems. The CIA can hack your computer. In fact, every part of your computer can be bypassed,

including your operating system per WikiLeaks. Now, this is a quote, the CIA has developed automated, multi-platform malware attack and control systems covering Windows, Mac OS, X, Solaris, Linux, and more, such as EDBs, Hive, and related cutthroat and swindle tools. Number four, smart TVs become spy TVs. So it was obvious to many at the time of their introduction that smart TVs are basically spy TVs.

But now we have the proof. In the Vault 7 documents, the CIA has a program called Weeping Angel, i.e. read them and weep. That it developed with this MI5 and BTSS or British Security Services. It details how the CIA can hack Samsung smart TVs and then place them in fake off modes so that an unsuspecting owner falsely believes their TV is off. When really it is on, recording all the sounds in the room and transmitting them via the net, to convert CIA servers. So obviously, I'm sure they already have also this capability on all TVs by now. I would not, I mean, that's including probably even fire sticks or Roku devices and you name it.

I don't think there's anything that is unsurvelled at this point by the CIA in any way, shape, or form. But I'm just going to play devil's advocate for just a minute. What if I was just a normal person that didn't even care? Like, I'm not hiding anything. Who cares if they're if they are hacking my stuff? And are they hacking everyone? Like I'm sure they've probably hacked our stuff. Oh, yeah.

They've listened to us. And as a matter of fact, I was going to do something funny to say, like the Ouija board, if you are here government and you can hear me, can you just write government on our screen right now? But you're asking a question about like, well, why does it matter if we're not doing anything bad? It matters because of privacy. Well, and it matters for so many reasons. I mean, how bad this government is getting, how much they apparently want to dictate and be dictators and be communist, don't give a shit about their people.

You know, when they want to lock people down and listen, guys, there's a big story coming out right now about detainment camps that are being set up by FEMA. I know now we've heard conspiracy theories about that in the past, but I'm telling you, there's something big that potentially may be happening with that. I don't know what they're getting that ready for. I know there's been the rumors that say, oh, it's for, you know, mass illegal immigration to house some of these people, but it doesn't sound like it. Once you kind of dig deep into that, it sounds like they're getting ready for something

big. And maybe that is getting ready to put a lot of people in camps that either don't agree with what they're about to do or what they're already really doing. But the answer to that question is, it doesn't matter if you're doing anything wrong or not. Everyone deserves privacy. That is our right as Americans, 100%. Our government should not be spying on us in every way, shape, or form. You know, with the Patriot Act, for example, after 9-11, it was one of the worst things that ever happened in a lot of ways because it kind of gave the government an excuse. to spy, even though they already were, but it gave them an excuse and they used 9-11 to be able to basically pander to the people and say, look, guys, all we're doing with this

Patriot Act is we just want to make sure that next time we catch these terrorists. So, you know, if we have to do this, we have to do that, you know, it's only for your own good. But all it really did was create an excuse for them to spy on you because they were already doing it anyway. But obviously it would be impossible to spy on every American, every person. And every person in the phone. Absolutely not.

Unless they have like keywords or something. Is that how they spy? Like if you say a certain word, it triggers something? Well, they have a software, I think, is called a Pegasus system. And the Pegasus system is like one of the most advanced hacking systems on the planet. It can hack anything in any way, shape, or form. I mean, this is a far, far advanced system. And, you know, you got to think about AI, right?

AI is so good at doing anything. I could, if I had AI and I had, say that I put through AI right now, five million pages of stuff. And I told AI after I input five million pages, millions and billions of words. And I tell AI, hey, AI, can you give me the synopsis of page one, page four, also find these words, see if it says this. Tell me if it says this. Tell me if there's a sentence that even resembles this. It would do it in probably 30 seconds to a minute, right? So that's the AI we have access to. Most people don't realize, though, the military and government have had AI far longer than we have.

I mean, we've used it in some of our weapon systems. We use it in our laser guided bombs in some cases as far as the telemetry data, all the stuff. There's a lot of stuff that's been based on AI for a very long time. And I think the government's had it for a very long time. But yeah, they could easily do that. And they probably are, right? And I think that's how supposedly now they foil these attacks, you know, oh, well, we found out through some bullshit. I mean, they were listening.

They knew, right? And I guarantee you, if you typed out a message on social media right now or your text message, you sent it to somebody that was a terroristic threat, like a, you know, whatever the case was, you would have someone show up your house at some point in time in the near future. Well, then how did some of these terrorists get away with attacks then before? They use various methods of communication, including face-to-face. I mean, a lot of these terrorists are not dumb. They know not to use telephones in a lot of cases.

Well, I mean, even like these kids that go and shoot up schools and stuff, for example, I mean, after they've done this, they go back and look at their social media and say, oh, yeah, look at this. Look at, you know, look at all these pictures of him portraying this way or that way. If that's the case and they're spying on everyone, why would they have known that they were going to do that? Well, I mean, but a lot of times those shootings, you know, you got to think a lot of times of school shootings, they don't usually say they're going to explicitly go and kill everyone. Sometimes they do. but oftentimes they'll find it in a notebook or they'll find it in something else they don't usually do it on social media and look there have been times when they've done it on social media but you know and people are just like okay whatever dude and it's like and maybe the government

didn't necessarily want to stop these some of these shootings right i mean this is what you have to remember most of the time those you know the systems that are in place by the FBI and the CIA and NSA they're not operated by our local sheriff's departments or even really really some in some cases are state law enforcement officer or agencies. So yeah, and you got to think, you know, gun control is all we hear about anymore is gun control. They desperately want to take away Americans guns because they know that it's going to be very hard to tyrannize people when they have guns. And so why would you try to stop every shooting if you're the government? You wouldn't because you're going to use that situation.

And we've got people that have been made famous because of school shootings like Hogg, David Hogg. and now all he is about pro-Biden, pro-this, anti-guns, screw Republicans. There's various others out there, but they don't want to stop everything. And I think we've learned that many, many times. I think we just recently learned it overseas, too. But yeah, so they have this microsy software. Bill Gates is the agenda man for the New World Order, and clearly he sold out a long, long time ago.

Anyway, someone on X has been particularly vocal, calling for Gates to come clean and it's not going to happen, obviously, and admit how much he helped the CIA and the M.I. in general by helping them build back doors into their software. And as these documents prove, the CIA turned Microsoft software into spyware using exploits that were built into the system. And it quotes, the CIA also runs a very substantial effort to infect and control Microsoft Windows users

with its mallware. This includes multiple local and remote weaponized zero days, air gap jumping viruses, such as hammer drill, which infects software distributed on CDs, DVDs, and other USB devices. infectors for removal media such as USBs, systems to hide data in images or in a covert disk area's brutal kangaroo it's called, and to keep its malware infestations going. Many of these infection efforts are pulled together by the CA's automated implant branch, or AIB, which has developed several attack systems for automated investation and control of CIA malware, such as Assassins and Medusa.

And you guys got to keep in mind when you guys buy a Windows computer, and by the way, this is all alleged, But at the very least, this apparently did come through WikiLeaks, but I want to just say some of what. That's why I did not even want to say the guy's name on X because I don't like this guy. But obviously. Well, we've just had, we've had some stuff back and forth a couple of times. When you buy Windows computer, though, do you know how much bullshit comes on your computer? I mean, it's just loaded with spyware. Yeah, it's already loaded.

Yeah, usually it's loaded with spyware. I mean, usually if you don't do something to get rid of a lot of that stuff, your computer is slow. and it's going to get slower. And, you know, I've always had that theory. Like, I think they literally put something in the computer that after a year or so. It starts getting a slow. Yeah, so you have to go buy a new computer. Yeah, because they don't want a computer last forever.

They're never going to ever make any more cells, right? Same way, like, if you cured AIDS or you cured cancer or you did any of this stuff, they're not going to make money. And we know everything revolves around money. But I've often thought, like, there is no telling what type of software that is actually running in the background of Microsoft computers that, already gives the CIA complete and utter control of your computer or of its information. And so that's why a lot of people like Apple in a lot of ways.

Supposedly Apple is, you know, they have denied subpoenas from the government, supposedly, and done a lot of this other stuff. But that could all be a big front just to bring more people to Apple and then they have some type of backdoor deal. We don't know. You can't really trust any of these mega corporations because most of the mega corporations are big time donors to the people that want to. to control and lock you down.

So you got to remember that. If they didn't like these people so much and they really did care about your sovereignty and your freedoms, why would they be donating to the people that want to take those freedoms and sovereignty away? That should answer all your question. Now Skype was also vulnerable. Vault 7 revealed that conversations on Skype or converted the text and then uploaded to CIA Cloud.

So that was a big one. iPhones and Android are all both vulnerable. Both Apple, iOS, and Android systems are vulnerable. Snowden already told us this. 7 reconfirms that iPhones and Android are easily hackable, and the CIA has been creating all kinds of mallware to spy on practically every piece of electronic equipment

that you can possibly own. Edward Snowden once said, if you're writing about the CIA WikiLeaks story, here's the big deal. First public evidence, USG secretly paying to keep US software unsafe. And so Snowden already kind of knew that was going to happen. He knew that the CIA and probably NSA were going to manipulate

software and companies to be able to spy on you more easily, so it's not quite as hard. So that kind of shows that breaking zero-day commitment by hoarding vulnerabilities. So WikiLeaks notes that Obama had promised a technology industry after much lobbying that the U.S. government would disclose any vulnerabilities as soon as it had discovered them, thus the term zero-day. Yet the CIA stockpiled these vulnerabilities because it wanted to retain the advantage of knowing how to hack into systems and devices, which endangers the dangers. everyone else's that uses them. So, you know, there was a big lobbying about, hey, we got to

find out about these vulnerabilities. And Obama's like, oh, we promise we'll let you know the vulnerabilities. All those, see, I was like, yeah, give us all those vulnerabilities. Because we're going to use them against you, assholes. And then we're not even going to tell you what the vulnerabilities are, right? So in some ways, it also sound like for a while at the very least, these software companies, some of their, you know, programmers and engineers, they were honestly trying to figure out some of their vulnerabilities. And maybe in some ways, Some of the engineers or some companies in some places wanted to kind of work with government officials to see what the government could or could not do. And it sounds like the government was like, yeah, screw you, right?

And, you know, we'll find the vulnerabilities, but we're definitely not going to tell you about them because they want to use those runnabilities. And so it quotes, yeah, zero documents show that the CIA breached Obama administration's commitments. Many of the vulnerabilities used in the CIA's cyber arsenal are pervasive and some may already have been found by rival intelligence agencies or cyber criminals. As an example, specific CIA malware revealed in year zero is able to penetrate, infest and control both the Android phone and the iPhone software that runs or has run presidential Twitter accounts. The CIA attacks this software by using undisclosed security vulnerabilities possessed by the CIA. But if the CIA can hack these phones, then so can everyone else. who has obtained or discovered the same vulnerability. As long as the CIA keeps these vulnerabilities

can sell from Apple and Google, who makes the phones, they will not be fixed, and the phones remain hackable. So they were literally fighting against the vulnerabilities and fighting against the companies in some cases to let them know, hey, what are the vulnerabilities? And they're like, no, we're not going to tell you. Hijacking all sorts of vehicles for assassinations.

So this was some of the other thing of all of the discoveries. This one is pretty explosive. Literally, Vault 7 exposes that the CIA has the ability to remotely hijack all kinds of vehicles, including cars and planes, which means it can carry out undetectable assassinations. So they can literally hijack a vehicle without even being there from somewhere else, right? And drive the vehicle or do whatever you need to. And so this casts a new light on the suspicious death of Michael Hastings,

whose car ran into a tree at high speed. It also makes one wonder about the deaths of JFK Jr., son of John F.K. Jr., and former U.S. Senator Paul Wellstone, both of whom died in suspicious accidents. So, and we've talked a little bit about that in a previous podcast before about how much they could actually probably control some of that. Were you going to say something? No, I'm just thinking this whole thing is just so crazy. I know. But it is so believable as well, you know, as long as you have your eyes open and understand that this mirror facade that they want to portray that the government is good.

You know, that's, I guess the people are sheeple that are asleep. and these people like us that are awake, it's like, oh my gosh, this really is true. What it should tell everybody is like literally everything around you is a spy, a spy opportunity for the government. I mean, everything. I mean, you know, I've often thought about this too with how advanced our satellites are. You know, I once said it's like if you wanted to say something away from government for any reason whatsoever, you would have to go in the middle of the woods almost now. But I don't even know necessarily that you could do that because I don't, I mean, I know this sounds crazy.

I don't know how good our satellites are, but who knows if our satellites could somehow penetrate a specific sound wave to where it could actually hear from space in a certain region or area. Who knows? I don't know. And also, we don't also know cell phone towers, transmission towers, all these different things. We don't know what's on those.

It's almost like we're on a prison planet, right? I mean, we are in a lot of ways. We are kind of in a prison. And we're just, they're pretending like you have freedoms. They're making you feel good about it. it. Oh, yeah, guys, you've got freedoms. Don't worry. But you're kind of in prison at the same time. And it just makes me think about a lot, a lot more as far as like airplanes are concerned. For example, Ashton Forbes investigating them missing Malaysian flight.

Yeah, yeah. Could they have hijacked that flight? You know, and, you know, Ashton does believe at something to do with the government. Yeah. Even though he believes they potentially teleported it. Yeah. Who knows? I mean, at the very least, we're starting to find out more and more stuff. I mean, obviously a lot of this stuff has been known or speculated by a lot of people for a very long time. And that's why I want to do this podcast because obviously we're glad that Julian Assange is free. We don't know what he will do in the future. But I think it's important to highlight some of the work that WikiLeaks did by exposing what really happened. This is not conspiracy theories that we have been reading here.

And we could read for days on some of this stuff. These are actual facts that WikiLeaks uncover that is all true. I mean, which is the craziest part. So this quote, CIA hackers operating out of the Frankfurt Consulate or the CCI are given diplomatic black passports and State Department cover. So this is when using the U.S. consulate in Germany as a spy and hacking base. And so you can imagine on press the Germans are with the U.S. now. But remember when it was revealed that Obama was hacking with the cell phone of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Now we learned that the CIA in flagrant violation of international law has been using the U.S. consulate in Frankfurt, Germany,

as a base for its spying and hacking activities, and many of which in this case required a close physical proximity of targets. So they were hacking through a consulate and they were hacking phones. And so the CIA hackers, as I said, operate now of this. This is what one of the things said,

your cover story for this trip. Question, why are you here? A, supporting technical consultations at the consulate. So a number of the CIA's electronic attack methods are designed for physical proximity. These attack methods are able to penetrate high security networks that are disconnected from the internet, such as police records databases. And in these cases, a CIA officer agent or allied intelligence officer acting under instruction physically infiltrates the targeted workplace.

The attacker is provided with a USB-containing malware developed for the CIA for this purpose, which is inserted into the targeted computer. The attacker then infects and exfilarates data to removable media. Now, they also have ways to do this through Bluetooth methods. They have ways to do this through Wi-Fi and Open Air, right? And it makes me think about how much they could really manipulate, right? I mean, how much could they really manipulate? And how much of software. I mean, you think about how much it seems like this administration that's in office right now is so connected to the DOJ and the CIA and FBI.

I wonder how much they can manipulate, like, voting or just. like any software that has to do it would vote. I wonder if they would have any way to do that. I don't know. I mean, I'm just asking the question. I don't know. Very weird. Also, CIA electronics supplier collusion.

Another aspect to consider with the CIA collusion with electronics manufacturers and suppliers. We know the CIA owns the MSM, Hollywood, the communications industry, etc. But WikiLeaks reports that the CIA's mobile device branch created technology to infect and control smartphones. So they created technology that was already. infected to them been put in smartphones. So do they possess any backdoor in the software and hardware for all smartphones? That's what we don't know. But we at the very least know the CIA made chips or pieces of some of the phones that we all use that were already infected.

And you think about that too. And a lot of our stuff for our phones comes from China. Yeah. So I bet China has a way of doing that too. Oh, I'm sure they do. I'm sure they do. And yet we're supposedly so worried about TikTok. Yeah, which is absolutely ridiculous.

And then a couple more, Project Umbrage, the framing of foreign nations like Russia, right? So remember all the Brouhalla about the Russian hacking, the U.S. elections? Well, it was all lies and propaganda. But many people fell for it. Now look at this. The CIA has been a program called, they actually have a program called Project Umbrage, under which it manipulates code to make it look like it comes from somewhere else, like another nation.

So you could call it a false flag cyberterrorism, right? So they could shut something down. They could shut an entire power grid down and then say, oh, look, guys, it's Russia attacking us, right? Now, you could call it a false flag, cyberterrorism, whatever. But in other words, the CIA clones the hacking procedures of Russia to create false flag hacking attacks and then says it with a straight face that the attacks are conceivated. consistent with what we would expect from Russian hackers.

That may be technically truthful, but what's, but the deceit part is, is that they're actually making it look like it is from Russian hackers when we're doing the hacking. However, only because the CIA has first internationally mimicked those techniques with a motive to frame an innocent party or country, as YouTuber Joe in general writes, and it quotes, the CIA's remote devices branch gathers and maintains a large library of attack technique stolen from malware, produced. in other countries, including Russia. One particular attack technique is the ability to leave behind fake digital fingerprints.

Sorry. That make it look like a CIA, sorry, to make it look like a CIA initiated cyber attack was done by someone else. And so at this early stage, it is unclear if this is the WikiLeaks interpretation of one thing that the CIA could do, or if there's a specific place in the document where the CIA mentions this use of Umbrage. This is huge. the ability to create a digital false flag calls into question any time in recent history that the CIA has accused another country of hacking.

And we've been doing a shit ton of that lately. And you know what it makes me think of? You know, we often talk about like what will be the false flag? What will be the thing they do to garner more control of the people? Could it be a power grid attack? Could it be an attack on our, you know, food supply and all this stuff? But it really, I think, you know, with how, How advanced, obviously the CIA is and how much intel and knowledge they have of other

countries hacking methods. And how much it seems like over the past year or two, we've been warned and warned and warned over and over again. Russia is going to hack us. The Chinese are going to hack us. We've had power outages across the country. We have had 911 outages across the country. We have had phone outages across the country.

We've had various things out, and it seems like every one of these supposedly has been hacking or some other country potentially hacking us. But what if it is the CIA hacking us? And then they're telling us, guys, we've got to really be prepared for a complete and total grid failure or a complete and total cyber failure. What would happen to the world and all this stuff? Man, a digital cyber attack or false flag would be massive. And it could be it could be just as useful to the government as the pandemic. It could be as useful as any other catastrophe like 9-11,

like Black Lives Matter riots, like any of this stuff. So we always got to be thinking on that step ahead as well. But guys, there's so much more about WikiLeaks. I mean, we could do a million different episodes to talk about WikiLeaks and all that it exposed. I think the biggest takeaway here is that, Julian Assange was he created a haven for journalists and whistleblowers to be able to go to to release sensitive information that exposed corruption and more in particular criminality, especially on people that are supposed to be there for us. They are supposed to be elected for us and work for us, the people. And as we see, 90% of those people do not give a shit about what we want as civilians or as.

human beings. I think we're seeing that across the world. I think we're seeing it in Canada and Australia and Europe and it's something that Julian Assange has done a lot of work to expose. And that's why the government so desperately wanted to go after him. And so I'm glad he's free. Yeah, but I want to bring up this point. Why now are they letting him be free? Well, and I think it goes back to Biden. Yeah. Well, and here's the thing is because, you know, they on CNN, for example, CNN stories reads it as the Biden administration agrees to a plea deal with Julian Assange. That's what it says. If you read a lot of other ones, it says the U.S. government agrees to a plea deal with Julian Assange. But CNN and in particular MSNBC and these platforms are obviously pivoting to the Biden administration

agrees for Julian Assange. Yeah, exactly. Right before the election. Yeah, and, you know, the biggest mistake Trump made on the Julian Assange thing was Mike Pompeo. Yeah, and not pardoning him. Yeah. And I just don't think, you know, regardless, there's definitely things I do not like about Trump that he did. And this is one of them. The fact that, you know, obviously you're new, right?

You're new coming into Washington, D.C. And if you're going to campaign on cleaning up Washington, D.C., I hope that he takes a look. If he gets in office this time, he's going to have to take a look all the way around him, not just at Democrats, but also Republicans. but also Republicans. Yeah, in his own party, in his own cabinet. And a lot of people that he thinks he can trust. I mean, there are very freaking few people in either party that you can actually trust. And I think he knows that because he even came out and said there were some people that I trusted and I was wrong.

Yeah, absolutely. Well, there's a shit done of people that he trusted that he was wrong. And to be honest. And that's the only time he's ever admitted to be wrong about anything. Yeah. Well, I mean, including Fauci and Dr. Burke. And, I mean, there's so many of them. But, you know, if you're new in Washington, you're trying to bring these people in.

But, man, you're going to have to completely do it different. Now, that's to say if Trump even gets elected. I think they already have a plan for Trump. I don't think it's going to be him back in office. I don't think they will ever let Trump get back in office, no matter what the people of the United States wants. It does not matter. I do not think they will let him near the White House. And I am very excited to see what's going to happen after November.

So, but guys, we did want to come on here and just at least give you some of our thoughts on this. We are probably going to touch base on some more WikiLeaks things in the future. I wanted to go over just some of the most damning ones, especially with the Clintons, just to kind of give you an idea of what the reality actually is. These are not conspiracy theories. These are not things that people think, right? There is actual things that happen behind closed doors that prove so many conspiracy theories correct. Now, there's some other stuff, right?

we have not even gotten to the Podesta emails as much and all of this involvement, right? And I think we'll probably do another episode on that. So whenever you see a WikiLeaks episode, no, it'll probably basically be part two of this. But there are some ties to a lot of stuff, right? I'm not going to say what some of those things are. But, you know, people have very long time speculated that Hillary or Podesta had any involvement or some type of involvement in PizzaGate. And, you know, obviously the media has worked very hard to try to shut down that PizzaGate ever actually ever existed. We're not going to allege or say either way, shape, or form.

But what we can say is that I'm sure if you guys do enough research, you'll find out a lot about it. And could any of the WikiLeaks things showed anything? We'll get into that probably in a future episode. But we have to run. We got to get ready for tonight's live debate, which should be pretty entertaining at the very least. We got a great-even happens. Yeah, I know, right. We got a great panel of guests.

I did just see as of 30 minutes ago, Trump obviously has been pushing for a drug test. Biden has officially denied, or not denied, officially refused a drug test. So, yeah, he's going to be hyped up on something. And it ain't, and it ain't wine. And I guarantee it ain't weed either. It ain't wine. It ain't weed. Oh, Lord.

Anyways, guys, that's going to be it. The name of this song, playing us out, is a niece, free me. Felt like we had to go with a free theme for Julian Assange. Julian Assange, we're so glad you're out. You're a patriot, even though you're not from the United States. you're a patriot to your country in the world and humans. And this is what we got to do, people, man. We got to stand up to the corrupt government.

We have to stand up and speak out, even if that means threat of arrest or even murder for us. Until next time, guys, we love you. Peace out. Peace out, guys. Keep some space from you. So you can. I won't be enough to keep you to be free because I enforce the boundaries around my energy. I won't surround myself with people.

I that choose to be free to. and be careful with the people that you give your energy to. They say they love you, but they hurt you. So make them wait, give them space, tell them patience is a virtue. Enough to keep some space from you. From toxicity, and I'll be the happiest me that you've ever seen, and I'm a rise from the ground like a rose from the seed. I feel beautiful whenever I protect my energy.

Sometimes you got to make space from fake people to breathe. So when you see me, I'm happy this being me, and when you see me, Because I