Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - MAHA | RFK Jr Confirmation Hearing | Poison Food Industry

Episode Date: February 1, 2025

In this episode, Sheri and I are joined by Sam to dive into the recent Senate confirmation hearings for RFK Jr.’s nomination as the new U.S. Secretary of Health. We break down the heated exchanges between RFK Jr. and several senators, highlighting the intense moments that dominated the hearing. Plus, we discuss RFK Jr.’s unwavering mission to take on the toxic food industry and his bold plans to reform it. This is an episode you won’t want to miss! We also talk Bill Gates ;)

Hello and welcome to Investigator with podcast. I'm your host chat alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry. On tonight's episode, we're diving into the battle over RFK Jr's confirmation as Secretary of Health and Human Services. Now, the hearings are done, but the real fight is just getting started. The Senate hasn't scheduled a vote yet, and there's a reason for that is because RFK Jr. represents a direct threat to the system, not the political system, but the corporate-run machine that controls our food, our health, and ultimately our lives. For years, RFK Jr. has been warning about the toxins hidden in our food, from pesticides to glyphosate, which is still being sprayed on crops despite its linked to cancer,

the heavy metals found in baby food, to the ultra-processed garbage lining our grocery store shelves. This very industry that makes billions off these poisons are the same ones lobby. and to keep him out of power. This isn't just about the confirmation. This is about the hole that really controls our health. The food industry pumps us full of chemicals. And when we get sick, big pharma is right there to manage our illnesses. Never cure them.

Just keep the cycle going. And let's be real, do you really think the Senate with all of his corporate donors is eager to confirm a guy who wants to expose that? So tonight we're pulling back the curtain. We're going to break down what RFK Jr. is up against. who is really trying to stop him and most importantly, what they don't want you to know.

Guys, welcome to the show. And by the way, besides my beautiful wife, Sherry, we have our beautiful friend Sam joining us tonight. Sam, welcome to the show. Hello, thank you for having me. I'm very excited to have this conversation. Yeah, absolutely. Sam, you would actually, you message us and said,

look, if you guys do RFK confirmation episode, definitely want to be on that. I'm glad to have you on. I know this is something that you've been pretty involved in. and kind of, I guess, it's kind of put it on your forefront of things that you actually really care about, which is our food and how things are controlled and even big pharma. Did you think it was going to be easy for RFK during these confirmation hearings? Absolutely not.

They cannot stand him because he is a huge threat to the establishment. And my big wake-up moment was when my daughter was a baby and I started researching vaccines. And so I have been following this man for like eight or nine years. I have probably heard him speak for hundreds of hours. I knew exactly what they were going to attack. And it was so frustrating because I know what he would have normally said had they actually let him speak. Yeah, for sure. Absolutely.

And guys, if you want a preview of just some of what RFK heard that day, we're going to play some clips and break some of these down with some of the exchanges. between the two various committees that he actually set in front of to where they grilled him. I mean, you would think that R of K was Falsy, right? You would think that RFK was the guy that literally just led us through the past four years of the COVID pandemic where he was a part of the reason why the COVID pandemic happened in the first place. And it's so funny as even if you look back to the congressional hearings with Anthony Falsci

and you saw people like Rand Paul and some of the other Republicans that were desperately just trying to find the real information, the true information about what happened in Wuhan, was Anthony Falchie and the NIH? Were they actually funding heavily gain of function research? How involved were these people? And this is what the Republicans wanted to know because guess what? That's what most Americans wanted to know. If you were losing the family members and loved ones or your family got stuck in a hospital and you were not even allowed to see them, right before they died, there should be people in our government asking those questions to the people that are directly, potentially responsible or at least have some responsibility in that pandemic. But no, what did the Democrats do when they were questioning Fauci?

They acted like he was a hero. They acted like he was a freaking George Washington or Jesus. I mean, that's what the Democrats acted like. But what do you know? When RFK comes in and his literal platform says, I want to make our. food healthy. There's a reason why that in the UK and Europe and all across many countries around the world, they do not allow this shit in their food. But yet for some reason, as rich as the United States of America is, we have some of the worst, most toxic food in the freaking universe.

And that's just something that obviously the Democrats can't get behind. And there's a lot of reasons for that. But I do, I do just want to play. If you want to just kind of hear a brief, a very quick breakdown. This is what RFK basically heard. the entire day, listen. You're saying. There's a there's a preview. That's what RFK heard all day. It was just a bunch of yelling. You had a Poconis up there that was grilling him and asking him tons of questions. You had Bernie Sanders.

Sam, what do you think? I mean, obviously, RFK is, you know, he is potentially going to be confirmed. We do not know that yet. But isn't it funny as we were talking about Fauci and the difference in Fauci and RFK? And he's a Democrat. Yeah. And he absolutely, he's been a lifelong Democrat. And yet now all of a sudden, Democrats hate him. Yeah. I mean, to your point, the difference between the way that Fauci was treated in. the hearings versus the way they treated RFK, you really would think that RFK had committed some terrible sin against our country, which, you know, their point, the point they tried to make is that he has because he is killing children with his anti-vaccine, you know, stands on things. When in reality, we have Fauci who God knows what he has even done, but that we'll never know

now potentially because he's been pardoned. Yeah. Yeah, we're likely never going to know what Fauci's deep involvement was, and there's a reason why they pardon so many of those. But you know what I will say is that if the Trump administration or whoever is going to be in charge of potentially prosecuting people that had or contributed to COVID-19, you know, there's a lot of players out there still on the board that they did not pardon. I mean, you're talking about people like Ralph Barrett. You're talking about people that are connected in the NIH that was under Dr. Fauci, although it may be. not can you know they may not be able to do anything too faulty obviously with that pardon but the very least the american people will at least know the truth once and for all and i think that's what people

really want um you had talked about you know your your your kid and kind of your your journey with that and vaccines and i know we've talked a lot about that as well and obviously vaccines are majorly different now right when i i remember when i was a kid i'm i think that my schedule of vaccines may have been like 10 back in the 80s, 10 to 13 maybe total, I believe. And now it's somewhere close to 80 if you actually go throughout the entire schedule of vaccines. And then if you look at even in the mid-90s, I think that the autism rate was like one in 170 and now it's 1 in 35.

Am I correct on that? Something like that. It's 1 in 36 on average now. And there's actually, I believe I included a clip I sent you where. RFK has actually asked about the numbers from essentially when he was a child. And he said there's really only two studies. One is like one in 10,000. The other is one in 1,500.

But regardless, huge difference between that and 1 in 36. And just as a teacher alone for the last 25 years and seeing children from 25 years ago to now, there is a huge difference in the classroom as far as kids or students or pupils on the spectrum. Yeah. 20 years ago, you saw it very, very rarely. And if you did have a child that had autism, you treated it, treated them with care. And we had specialized classes or rooms. You know, we had specialized things going on.

But now it's so regular that it's not normal to not have at least three or four autistic children per classroom. Yeah. And how do you think that affected your teaching too? Oh, it definitely affected. exit because, you know, depending on what, you know, how far on the spectrum they are or what, you know, what the behaviors are, it could go from kids cussing you out to having to give extra specialized attention to that one child versus the other 23 in your classroom. I'm glad you can share that personal experience because one of the arguments that is often

made is that the reason the numbers are so much higher now is because they have changed the diagnostic criteria. And so there are more kids now that are just being diagnosed somewhere on the spectrum. But it's really been the same number the entire time, whereas that is not the experience that people share who have worked with children for decades like you have. Right. And yeah, there was a huge difference. I remember 20 years ago when I had my first autistic child, I was really nervous because I was like, I have not been trained on, you know, how to teach a child with autism. No one's training me. I don't know what to do. I don't know how to do this. But I guess eventually as the years came and went, it was more and more and more children and

you just self-trained yourself, basically. Well, did they offer, did the school system as the autism became more prevalent? Did they offer any specialized training? I'm telling you a lot of times in my classroom, especially the last five years, I would have at least five children that were not even diagnosed with autism, but it was obvious they had it. And they just go through regular ed. There is no specialized anything to help them. Yeah. Yeah. And I'm sure that's tough on other kids as well. And then also, you know, how was the kind of reaction between autistic kids and kids that were not autistic? A lot of times it's very sad because autistic children have a harder time to be social than children without autism. And it's harder for them to play with each other, talk,

discuss. And, you know, a lot of times in classes, you're doing a lot of group discussions, a lot of group work now, because that's the big thing is to do projects together in a group to make you be able to function as an adult and work in groups. But when you have children with autism, you know, it, like a lot of you know, many of them cannot even give you eye contact and they don't want to talk to other children. They kind of just back up and, you. and they want to be isolated and not in these big conversations. It's very uncomfortable for them. Yeah, for sure.

I want to make a really quick point, if I can. Yeah. I am not on the train of vaccine calls autism. I am on the train of we don't know what causes autism and we probably should look into it. And one of the things that I really wish RFK would have been able to say in these hearings is that the EPA did a study. to basically look at when did we start seeing the spike in autism?

And they are not captured by the pharmaceutical company because they are in the environmental area, right? So they found that somewhere between, I think it was, 1988 and 1990 is when it just like exponentially exploded. And RFK has made the point many times that like that is right around the time you had the Vaccine Act of 1986 that, you know, Congress or basically they deemed the courts deemed the Supreme Court that vaccines were unavoidably unsafe. But then you also started having, to your point, Chad, like glyphosate's being used on everything.

That's when all of these like additives get into our food. You have the these big like processed food companies that are purchasing up or sorry, you have the companies that used to be in cigarette companies who start purchasing up all the processed food companies. You've got fire retardants and pajamas. Like he names a bunch of stuff that happens. happens right all in the same time frame. And he's just like, hey, why don't we just figure out what calls this? Because clearly something did.

Yeah, absolutely. No, I agree with that. And we're going to get to some of those videos too in just a moment. And by the way, guys, before we go any further, we're about to play some clips, some of the best clips from the hearings. We're going to start with Elizabeth Warren. But just make sure you guys go follow us over on our X or Instagram or TikTok. I mean, even though we're 2.5 stars, not 2.1.

It reminds me of Grand Theft Auto when you get like five stars. We're at like four right now on TikTok. But go follow us over on all the social media. We communicate and try to talk as much as we can on all of the platforms. We are most active on X. And by the way, Sam, you have an X. What is your X account? I don't really use it.

And I'd be honest. I don't know. Okay. Well, that's fun. I think it's like Sam IEP or something is maybe a username. So if you guys want to follow her or check her stuff out, go over there. She doesn't use a lot. But maybe we can get her to start using it a little more.

and the best way you can help us just by rating us good, wherever you are listening to your podcast right now. By the way, I want to go ahead and mention this as well. We have so many episodes coming out. We have, we've got to revisit the drones because Trump was asked and his team about the drones in New Jersey and they kind of brushed it off, but there's been a lot of stuff come out since then that we're going to have to break some more of that down.

We also are likely going to revisit the DC plane crash. There's a lot of unanswered questions. there's a lot of weird things that Trump's saying and as of right now anyway what is this the 31st they have right now they're refusing to release the manifest of the CRJ that crashed into the water don't know exactly why that is because I would think that all of the family has been notified by now but that's also very interesting and then just tonight we had another plane crash in Philadelphia as we were about to come on this podcast very strange because we thought at first, according to the video, it looked like a missile hitting a mall.

Not sure exactly they're saying right now that that is a med flight, a Learjet 55, I think. And Sam, you had actually, it was funny. Sam asked, and she said, what do you think could have possibly came out of the sky that fast? This before I kind of knew about it, I was like, maybe a Learjet because, you know, Lear jets are very fast aircraft, but also if they are falling out of sky, nose diving, you know, they are kind of a missile in some way. So there's so much stuff going on.

And obviously, everybody's tensions are still up. And when you see something like that in Philadelphia, you're like, are we getting attacked? Are we not? I would think right now with Trump administration being in office would be the last time that they want to attack or whoever. But whatever, we got a lot of new episodes coming out. That's all I want to say. Let's get to this Elizabeth Warren clip where the exchange between RFK Jr. And Elizabeth Warren heats up pretty good.

Listen. I'm asking about fees from suing drug companies. Will you agree not to do that? You're asking me to not sue drug companies, and I'm not going to agree to that, Senator. I'm not going to sue drug companies as much as you want. I'm not going to agree to not sue drug companies or anybody. So let's do a quick count here of how, as Secretary of HHS, if you get confirmed, you could influence everyone.

of those lawsuits. Well, let me start the list. You can publish your anti-vaccine conspiracies, but this time on U.S. government letterhead, something a jury might be impressed by. You could appoint a PC vaccine panel who share your anti-vax views and let them do your dirty work. You could tell the CDC vaccine panel to remove a particular vaccine from the vaccine schedule. You could remove vaccines from special compensation programs, which would open up manufacturers to mass torts. You could make more injuries eligible for compensation, even if there is no causal evidence. You could change vaccine court processes to make it easier to bring junk lawsuits. You could turn over FDA data to your friends at the law firm, and they could use it however,

it benefited them. You could change vaccine labeling. You could change vaccine information rules. You can change which claims are compensated in the vaccine injury compensation program. There's a lot of ways that you can influence those future lawsuits and pending lawsuits while you are Secretary of HHS. And I'm asking you to commit right now that you will not take a financial stake in every one of those lawsuits so that what you do as secretary will also benefit you financial. down the line. I'll comply with all the ethical guidelines. That's not the question. You and I,

you have said, you're asking me, Senator, you're asking me not to serve vaccine companies. No, I am not. My question is. That's exactly what you're doing. Look, no one should be fooled here. As Secretary of HHS, Robert Kennedy will have the power to undercut vaccines and vaccine manufacturing across our country. And for all of his talk about follow the science and his promise that he won't interfere with those of us who want to vaccinate his kids, the bottom line is the same. Kennedy can kill off access to vaccines and make millions of dollars while he does it. Kids might die, but Robert Kennedy can keep cashing in. Senator, I support vaccines. I support the child.

schedule. I will do that. The only thing I want is good science, and that's it. How about Finns say you won't make money off what you do as Secretary of HHS? But isn't it Elizabeth Warren, Sam, that actually makes money from vaccine manufacturers, and is that why maybe she's so pissed off in this exchange? So very much to unpack there. First of all, please, Pocahontas, tell me more, because these are all wonderful ideas and exactly

why I want him to be confirmed. All of those things. I hope he is able to do them all. But yes, so I think it was her that originally the question was, would he agree not to accept money from pharmaceutical companies for the four years of his term or however long he was in? And he laughed and was like, yes, he's like, trust me, I don't think any of them want to give me any money. And I'm like, this is just an interesting question from anyone. in Congress, and then to just continue to basically say, you know, it's interesting to me that a lot of the people that serve in these agencies and on these committees and so forth then move into the private sector to take positions. I mean, the freaking head of the FDA moved directly onto the Board of Pfizer in less than 90 days.

But he is already an attorney. He has been doing this for decades. So it's not as if he's taking this. position, and then he's going to transition into that like these people do. She's asking him to essentially not be able to work any longer. This is his profession. Yeah, absolutely. And don't forget that all these people are making amass money off of the pharmaceutical representatives. They're getting money from them for their campaigns.

Yeah, or for their legislative processes or whatever, whatever it is. I mean, and there's a reason why the Democrats fight so hard against someone that's potentially going to go against the vaccine companies. And, you know, she makes it very clear here. She says, you may even change vaccine information rules as far as, you know, putting true information in there about the vaccines. I mean, when she said that, I was like, are you talking about like actually giving people, you know, a clear and concise risk category or analysis of what you're taking?

Because it seems like nowadays, what they love to do is to put vaccines through this emergency use authorization as they did with COVID. And they've already talked about this also with the bird flu vaccine, the H5N1, which is actually, I believe, what causes the bird flu. And so what they want to do now, and I think they were already developing a vaccine for bird flu. They've already killed millions of chickens. I think, I don't know if we've talked about that on the podcast recently, but just in

the last quarter of 2024, this is the last quarter of Biden's presidency. They called or killed, they call it cold, 20. 20 million chickens, and that's not that that chicken amount is not people, you know, not chickens that is actually going to show up in grocery stores. They killed 20 million chickens at the risk of the avian flu. And so you think about 20 million chickens in the last quarter alone of 2024. That is a massive, massive number. So if you go to the grocery store right now, which we have been in the grocery store quite

often lately, and we do not have eggs, it's hard to find chicken. And if you do find it, the prices are going to be sky high. but also it's like, you know, well, I guess they used to try to burn down the chicken farms and they tried to burn down all these various, you know, Purdue farms and you name it. And when that wasn't working out to their benefit, well, they figured how can we, how can we kill more food, more chickens and disrupt the food supply even further? Well, we got to introduce a disease. And that way, we can start killing off mass amounts of chickens.

There was a farmer that literally just said he had a one. chicken out of, I think it was a hundred and something thousand chickens on this massive farm, one chicken tested like half positive, whatever. Then they did three other tests, all negative. So it was a false positive potentially at first. And it wasn't even a full positive. And they made him kill damn near every one of his chickens. All of them.

And this was the Biden administration. And I've always said, guys, if you can control the food, you control the people. And I think that if anything, what they want to do is control the food. And when I say control the people and control the food, It's not just the amount of poisons and toxins that are in our food and in our highly processed stuff that is in our grocery stores. It is also they want to control the food. They do not want meat. They do not want you to be able to go to the grocery store and get chicken or beef or whatever.

They've been on a battle and warpath for that for a while. Well, they want us to eat bug meal. Yeah. And that's the thing. Everyone on the left, you know, all over my Facebook lately, they're like, oh, well, I thought on day one, Trump was going to lower the price of eggs. well how can he when they're killing all the chickens before he comes in yeah and that's that's not trump's thing excuse me um sam do you think i mean and and and even with the chicken thing and all that stuff obviously i think they want to control the food i think they do control the food but i think one of the

things that they're having a harder time controlling is the meat production of the farms and so how do you do that will you introduce disease because they want full control over our foods and i think That's for a reason. Yeah, I mean, there's so many layers to it. I do remember Rogan did a podcast in the last year or so where he brought on a farmer who explained that the majority of the beef that is in the grocery stores here in this country is not actually produced here in the United States. If it's at least packaged here, they can say that it's a product of the U.S., but most of it is not. I can't remember where it comes from a few different countries. So you've got that part of it.

And then also you've got, you mentioned Monsanto and the glyphosate issue and all of that. You know, the way farming is done now is just, it first of all, doesn't make any sense in terms of how they're using the land. It's stripping all of the nutrients out of the soil. But basically, almost everything in this country right now, it feels like is run by big industry, you know, like big pharma, big food, big ag,

like everything is. And so all of those industries, they have just infiltrated Congress to the point where we don't really have a voice anymore. The only people being heard are all of these huge corporations. And so it's so ironic to me that any of these senators would, left or right, would sit and ignore that premise to any questions

that they're asking of any witness. and, you know, to her one point that she made of he would want to change the rules of the vaccine court so he could bring junk lawsuits. Well, first of all, the vaccine court is set up very, it's not in our standard court system because they granted immunity to the vaccine companies. And they created this entirely separate process outside of our traditional court system that handles this. And the threshold to get into it is insane. But if you think he's going to bring junk lawsuits, then wouldn't those not stand up in court? I think what you're really worried about is that he's going to have the facts and the information that is going to stand up in court. And it's probably going to expose a lot of your buddies that you're taking money from in these pharmaceutical companies for who they really are.

Yeah, no, you're exactly right. I mean, one of the things you said there was you could use data for your law firm in lawsuits. Like God forbid. Really? Like not conspiracies. She didn't say conspiracy. She did not say rumors. She did not say opinions.

She said, you could use data. You could get this data from our government and use it in lawsuits. Oh, damn. That's a great idea. If he wasn't thinking about that, he should definitely be thinking about it now. But it's so crazy. I've always said, like, this is what the Democrats do, though, in the left. And I don't want to say Democrats.

I want to say this is what this faction of political people on that side do. They want you to believe that facts are not real. No matter what facts you have, they want you to believe that that's not actually what you're reading. That's not the actual facts. And then when they couldn't kind of get a hold on that, well, what did the Biden administration do? They started changing how facts were reported. So even the FBI of violent crime statistics, for a large part of the past four years, FBI quit reporting most violent crimes in major cities. And so when the Biden and Harris administration would come on and try to tout that that they had lower crime rates in their presidency was all complete lies.

It was all based on what they ordered the FBI crime data center and various other centers to stop reporting. And they also quit, I guess, making it mandatory for these cities to report, especially Democrat cities, where there is high crime like Los Angeles and Chicago and Seattle and San Francisco. go. So they changed the way they report shit. And this is no different. I mean, even with studies, medical studies and all this stuff, I think we found that out during COVID, there was so much lie with so many studies. Like if there was a study that showed, hey, you know, vitamin D, quercidin, zinc, and C can actually prevent you potentially from getting COVID or clear nasal spray or whatever the case is. They hid those studies. They said, oh, well, that's not enough data. That's not enough that, you know, there's not enough people that were involved in a trial, but then they would push through these studies that was far less reputable studies.

But because it was shaping their narrative of what they wanted to accomplish, those studies always got mass published. They went on mainstream media. They had these quote unquote experts go out on mainstream media to talk about these groundbreaking studies that oftentimes was less superior studies or less reputable studies than even. the ones that a lot of these other companies and organizations and doctors were doing, but it was just on the wrong side. And so the mass manipulation of data, especially the last four years, has been a massive problem. And, you know, even as we're looking back at the COVID vaccine, we don't even know exactly

how many studies was really done on that. Like how many, you know, what was the actual validity of a lot of the studies that you guys did? And the more and more we find out, especially as far as pregnancy goes or children or any of that, we're starting to see there was basically none. And yet they released this vaccine because they did not give a shit because they were getting paid billions of dollars by the government and the deep state. It's a problem.

And we all know that they were working on the vaccine before COVID even came out. Yeah. That is a known fact. Well, yeah. I mean, you know, two oh one proved that. You know, the pharmaceutical companies are the ones who do the studies. So you don't have independent agencies that are conducting these studies. So once the studies are released for peer review, that's great.

But when you're not providing the raw data and you're manipulating a study ahead of time and then once you finally get a conclusion to your study, whether or not it's manipulated, who knows, more than likely it's always going to be in your favor, then you send that for peer review. They can't not give a true opinion if they don't know all of the raw data from any way that they ran the test, right? So these studies, you know, they can change the parameters of them and whatever way fits best.

Like that's what they will run with and that's the one that they'll ultimately end up publishing. Yeah. So that in and of itself is very problematic. Yeah. And there's no telling how many of these doctors as well as, you know, I mean, think about the peer review doctors. Yeah, the veterinarians, the eye doctors.

Yeah, exactly. Yeah, I remember even like, I think it was the what, the COVID-night. Ivermectin study about, you know, Ivermectin and the effects of COVID. And they said they wrote this, what, a 300 doctor letter. Many of them were dentists or veterinarians or whatever. And these were all the experts that were saying that this could be deadly to people, all this shit. And yet 100% not true.

I mean, Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs ever, ever prescribed. They knew that, but they tried to demonize the drug because it is the cheapest drug on the freaking market. And so what they wanted to do was at least get some time so they could create their own stuff. And they did that. I think it was Moderna and some of these other companies created these pills supposedly very similar, but they cost shit tons of money. And so the pharmaceutical company in general and big food and all that, they work together. Big food makes you sick.

Big pharma keeps you alive as long as long as they can to make as much money off of you as they can. They don't want cures because, you know, if they had cures, they would make no money. It's just like if you had a cell phone, I'm sure they can make a cell phone that lasts forever, but what would be the financial benefit for them to do that? But what's most sickening to me out of all of this and what came to light to me through Bobby Kennedy is this.

We are the richest country in the world, and we have the shittiest food in the world. And I guess I thought that and kind of knew that. But with Bobby Kennedy coming out and showing us all this stuff, like comparing us to UK, and what ingredients they have in their foods compared to our foods. And same with the vaccines. You know, we have all these extra things and the vaccines that don't really need to be in there.

Well, absolutely. And, you know, it's almost like we're a third world country. Yeah. Well, I mean, it's crazy because we're one of the richest countries, if not the richest country in the world. And yet our health care and our food is some of the worst. Not health care necessarily, but our food is as far as processed and chemicals and all that, it's insane. I want to play this quick clip. This is just Bill Gates talking about how we need to change cows,

and then we're going to move on to some more of RFK's highlights. Cows are about 5% of global emissions, which is pretty unbelievable. Wild. And if your goal is to get to zero, you don't get to skip the cows or the steel or the cement or, you know, any of those big areas. cows and other grass-eating species have a digestion system that emits methane. And methane is a very powerful greenhouse gas. And so cows alone account for about 6% of global emissions. And so we need to change cows.

So there's a whole class of solutions of making meat without cows. In terms of the cows, we actually have, we pursued many solutions. So one is to vaccinate the cows in a way that their gut bacteria that emit the methane, which is the second most important greenhouse gas, you can vaccinate them, and that species of bacteria isn't there. If all the categories, the one that has gone better than I would have expected five years, ago, is this work to make what's called artificial meat? And so you have people like Impossible or Beyond Meat, both of which I invested in. Is it healthier for you or just healthier for the atmosphere?

It's slightly healthier for you in terms of less cholesterol. It's, of course, dramatic reduction in methane emissions. My climate group, Breakthrough Energy, just announced literally today an investment in an Australian group called Ruminate that helps cows not be so much a source of methane emissions. So we have two paths to solving that. That's 6% of global emissions are cows who burp and fart methane to an extreme degree. You can either fix the cows to stop them doing that or you can make beef without the cow. And both of those will be pursued to see which one can lead to. the best product.

Yeah, so they just want to make your meat for you guys. They don't want you to actually eat real meat. They want you to eat their made meat, which is, by the way, like one of the most processed shit you can possibly eat. I mean, he's trying to say that it's healthier for you. It's one of the most processed things in the freaking universe. So we either vaccinate these cows and put RNA in it and vaccinate them. Or whatever. Yeah.

Or we make your meat with chemicals, which would you rather prefer? Well, they would prefer chemicals. It's like that should be an S&L skid. Yeah. I have not heard that exact clip before. I've heard similar ones. But I love how he's like, there's a whole host of solutions. Incidentally, I own the patents to all of them.

And then to Sherry's point, you know, the fact that they now have literally changed the definition of a vaccine to fit the agenda of the COVID vaccine that now, that now, you know, that now. now a gene manipulation factor is included as a supposed vaccine. Because to your point, Sherry, like to give a cow a vaccine for it to stop doing a standard operating process of a cow for all of time, that's not a vaccine. You're literally genetically modifying a cow. Yeah. Like, how are we, this is insane. No, that's what they want to do. I mean, they want to genetically modify everything.

And by the way, we're going to go back to Bill Gates in just a minute. But what we want to do first, we want to play some of these clips from the RFK hearing. Because after all, that is what we are here for. But don't get me wrong, guys, we got to go back to Bill Gates because he says even crazier shit in other clips. And not just that. We're going to go to a couple of other clips in just a bit about what RFK Jr. Has said about genetically modified ingredients in our, you know, even our vegetables, and especially corn. And then who actually modifies that?

Like, what is the company you might ask? And who is connected to those companies that modify that? And then also, who is like one of the biggest landowners in America and all this stuff? I don't know. We'll talk about it in just a second. But Sam, these videos, the first, you might want to explain it. Who is the lady in the blue jacket so we can kind of preface this? What is she kind of asking him, if you remember?

I believe that is Senator Baldwin. And she is questioning him about whether or not he is aware that there are, post-surveillance systems that are basically gathering information about side effects from vaccines. I got you. Which, like, is comical because he could dust her in giving any of that information. But, yeah, you'll hear. Okay. Well, let's listen to this clip from Senator Baldwin, I believe, is, that is who it is.

Question RFK. Check it out. I've been listening to the back and forth, the questions. And when people tried to pin you down on a point, you said, show me the data. or bring me the studies. And I want to suggest that that data is out there, and those studies are out there. And if you're going to review all the studies and the data, you're going to be doing that, if confirmed, for your first year of being secretary.

When we talked, we were talking a bit about vaccines at the end of our meeting, and you said, really, to me, that there's no post-approval safety monitoring. And that led me to believe that you're not aware of the significant and ongoing safety monitoring that occurs after years of rigorous studies showing vaccines to be safe and effective. So I want to give you the opportunity to set the record straight here. Are you aware of the measures in place throughout health and human services to ensure vaccine safety after approval? Yes or no? I'm aware of the VAIR system, which CDC admits, it captures fewer and 1% of vaccines. injury. So you are aware of the CDC monitoring. Are you aware of the FDA post-approval monitoring?

I'm aware of only two systems. Are you aware of the vaccine safety data link? Oh yeah, I'm very aware of that. Are you aware of the vaccine adverse event reporting system? I'm aware of the vaccine safety data link that CDC keeps under lockbox and will not let independent scientists look at it. Are you aware of the clinical immunization safety assessment project? As I said, Are you aware of these safe? I'm aware that they're broken, and I can explain to you how each one of those is broken if you're interested.

What I want to do is make sure we have gold standard science. We get the conflicts off the panels so that people, you know, this is Congress. What I listed right now are just some of the guardrails that are in place to ensure that life-saving vaccines are safe and effective. And this is after numerous clinical trials, rigorous studies, and review by an independent panel of experts that show vaccines are safe and effective, which is available to all the public. If you want to take a second look at the science, like you have said, well, it's here. It's available. And it's conclusive.

And saying anything else is undermining vaccines. To a different issue. I'm by the way repeating what Congress found. in the 2003 investigation. Kennedy, I want to move to. Yeah, I want to move. I don't want you to be able to say anything. Yeah, I just want to say everything and move on.

You're not allowed to talk here. I'm just going to say what I want to say. And by the way, guys, the number one keyword here is safe and effective. So if you don't believe what she's saying, then there's something wrong with you. Because, I mean, we've seen the past three years safe and effective is absolutely 100% true, right? You know, they talk about, they interview him as. as if they know what they're talking about. They have all of these super strong opinions on vaccines

and talk to him as if he doesn't know anything about them. Whereas I don't know if a lot of people picked up on this or not, but when she initially asked him, is he aware of the post-approval surveillance systems? He says, I'm aware of theirs, and he goes on to continue. And then she just keeps hitting him with, are you aware of this, are you aware of that? And then she says, are you aware of the vaccine adverse event

reporting system, that's Vairs. So you clearly don't even know what you're talking about. And you're talking to him as if he's an idiot. Yeah. And someone obviously gave her talking points. And like RFK said, you know, VERS is was massively just a joke. I know reported too. Yeah.

I mean, it reports less than 1% of vaccine adverse events. And you can ask many doctors ask Peter McCullough. We've asked him. And part of the reason for that is number one, you have to, you know, especially with how many doctors are under this kind of umbrella with these hospital systems. Yes. That also, if you're going to go to VERS as a doctor that is under these massive hospital systems and you are going to put your name into VERS and report something.

Yeah. And saying that you think this was vaccine related. Oh, that's not going to be good for you. You're going to have someone come and knocking on your damn door saying, oh, well, how do you know this? And we're about to rip your damn medical license because you think that this side effect was because of the COVID vaccine? And trust me, they did this with doctors.

That's why no one wanted to report this shit. Because who knows? Yeah, you become a real problem for them. Yeah. Like, who knows? And VERS is all set up, in my opinion, to just make it look like not much is happening. And so even when people were reporting that less than 1% of vaccine adverse side effects during the COVID vaccine rollout, you're only getting, you know, less than 1%

of that. There were people getting banned. There was doctors that were potentially getting their license. suspended their medical license by saying, guys, we know that VERS is only reporting less than 1%. This is a problem. But Sam, don't you think, I mean, and Sherry, don't you guys think that, you know, when you hear these people on these panels, it almost sounds like they are sent by the, you know, big pharma overlords to make sure that their, you know, stake in the American public health is

protected. Yeah, because they're being paid by them. Yeah. Yeah. And actually, you made an important distinction, I think earlier, Chad, when you said the left and then, well, you said Democrats, you're like, well, I'm not going to say all Democrats. It's really obvious when you watch these hearings, who is bought and paid for the most? Because there were actually some Democratic senators that gave him, first of all, just spoke to him like a human. They had questions outside of trying to accuse him of being a conspiracy theorist and telling everyone why he's killing children.

They actually, incidentally, strangely enough, they had questions that were actually going to help the constituents in their area in particular. That's a novel idea. And so you can tell that they are not the ones that pharma is hitting with all of this money. You know, Pocahontas, on the other hand, like, you can clearly see who's where her pocketbook is getting loaded up from, right? But yeah, it's just, it's all such a, it's just a scheme. and it's so easy to see through it. And I think a lot more people are starting to be able to do so. But it's really infuriating just to watch the way,

just how condescending they are. And you know that, like, pharma's fingerprints are all over this. Oh, yeah. And Sam, I got to ask you a question because you have a young child, you know, and especially after COVID and all that stuff.

And we're going to get back to a few more clips because there's some great ones on here. And then we've got to go back to Bill Gates. but with a young child, you know, how do you approach, whether it be medicine, vaccines, food, any of that stuff with your kid now, especially just in hindsight looking back at all the shit we know, kind of. Well, when she, so we adopted her and she had already had some of her vaccines and we stopped vaccinating her when she was nine months old. And it was because they pushed the flu shot so hard. It was like uncomfortable.

And I'm like, wait a minute. Like, what was it happening here? And so since then, she's not been vaccinated since then. We have rarely ever had to take her to the doctor. This child has had, I think, two antibiotics for entire life. And she will be nine in three weeks. If she does get sick, she normally kicks it like in a day or two because she actually has an immune system. You know, in terms of foods, it is really hard to find things.

that are inexpensive and something like quick to prepare that doesn't include a bunch of like process stuff. And it seems to be getting harder and harder. So that is an area that I will fully admit, like I need to have the time and make the effort and also have the budget to really be able to do better. But I tried just even with like over the counter medications. If she's running a fever, if it's a low grade fever, even if it gets up. to like 102. Unless she's miserable, I don't give her talanol or ibuprofen because a fever has a job and it's doing its job. It's helping to kill

whatever is attacking your body at that point. So that's been my approach to it. And I wanted to say something else about what you just mentioned about theirs. So 100% it is like just far underreported. They don't even really know how underreported it is. They certainly do discourage doctors to basically self-censor against reporting to it. Most people, if you were to go out,

I mean, maybe now that this is kind of in like the zeitgeist, people may better know that it's available, but like five, 10 years ago, if you were to go and ask 100 people if they knew what that was, they would not have any idea. They would not know it's something that they could self-report to. But I think one really big threat right now is that if RFK is over HHS,

For my understanding, we could take the data that is within, like, say, the Medicaid system that would show all of the Medicaid claims. And sort of like we were talking about in the episode with the fires where the insurance companies, they can basically predict like what's going to happen. Yeah. There are also health insurance. The company's also life insurance. They can look at like a widespread of data, especially using AI. And they can determine like if you're going to the doctor for this, this and this, probably within five years, you're going to be diagnosed. to X, Y, Z. So all of the kids that are on Medicaid are getting their whole vaccine regimen.

And we could very easily see when these kids are getting vaccinated and then what problems are occurring. And we probably could get the data for that from five years ago, 10 years ago, however long ago. And actually do a real analysis on that because one of the big things they argue is that it's unethical to do a study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated. Because if you don't vaccinate children, they're going to die. But like, okay, then let's just look at the ones that are in the system currently and what's going on. And then I'm sure you can also pull data of some that have not been vaccinated for whatever reason. It's out there.

And this is what he wants. And he wants the transparency. And this is what they absolutely fear. No, I agree. I 100% agree with that. Yeah. And there is many children that are not vaccinated for religious beliefs. And they could even do a study with those type of children that don't get, receive any vaccinations.

and the only way they can go to school is through a religious exemption of the vaccinations. Yeah. Well, and by the way, to Sam's point, too, about the insurance and all that stuff, there were many insurance owners that owned insurance companies or were data enlist or whatever that after the vaccine, you know, especially when they started seeing all these claims of these massive cancer claims with turbo cancers and various rare cancer disorders that they started seeing this. And there are obviously ways to be able to see a influx in things.

And people are seeing them. Oh, it's been a definite uptick in turbo cancer since COVID. And by the way, back and to VERS for just a second, it's not just that they are discouraged as well. But you have to think, you know, I had actually went back in a day on VERS to see how hard it would be to report something. It is a nightmare system. I mean, if you're going to, if you're wanting a doctor to try to report this shit, it is the biggest nightmare system to try to report something that I've ever seen in my life. It is the worst system in the world. On purpose.

By design. Yeah. Right. But I'm still interested to know like why our vaccine schedule is so heavy for children nowadays. You know, until they're up until they're 18 years old, I think they have to have 76 vaccines now. And I think they're trying to keep up with their own shit that they're creating. I mean, I know that sounds crazy, but it's almost like maybe they're trying to vaccinate for shit that they are creating. Well, there is actually vaccines too when they're 13 for sexually transmitted diseases so that they don't get them.

Yeah. And actually, there's a clip I sent you, Chad, of Senator Kane from Virginia, the guy with the glasses on top of the bed that's talking about Gardasil. But yeah, that's certainly one of them. That's been a really problematic one. Well, let's go to that clip next because then we're going to go to old Bernie. Bernie boy. but let's listen to what this guy says. Senator Murray asked you some questions about Gardasil,

and this is a vaccine that's manufactured in Virginia. There's other HPV vaccines. I'm going to enter into the record a whole series of studies from many, many nations that talk about the dramatic positive effect of Gardasil. Could I introduce those into the record, Mr. Chair? Those studies are on trial right now. Let me ask a question.

These are studies from Scotland. Sweden, the UK, Australia, the United States, multiple studies, and then I'm going to introduce to the record, I guess it's a blog post of yours. The verdict is now inescapable. Gardasil is killing girls. And I'd like to introduce that into the record as well. Without objection. You have a pretty significant financial interest in litigation against Gardasil. You have received contingency fees and payments for referring people to lawyers suing the manufacturer. And in your ethics vetting. I've never received any money from any garisil or any other vaccine laws. Let me read. Let me read a quote. This is your words. In your ethics vetting for this nomination, you said,

quote, pursuant to the referral agreement, I'm entitled to receive 10% of fees awarded in contingency cases referred to the firm. How can folks who need to have confidence in federal vaccine programs trust you to be independent and science-based when you stand to gain significant funding, if lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers are successful. I have given away all of my rights to antiphase in that lawsuit. I yield back. There you go. I mean, he gave them up.

Although, listen, I completely understand, like, if you are vested in fighting a vaccine or like a big pharma company to where they're, you know, producing this vaccine that is harming people that can be proven in court, you know. And by the way, we got to remember that if you receive, if RFK in some of these cases receive money from suing a vaccine manufacturer or a big pharma company, that means that the lawsuit won. That means they won the lawsuit, which is whether or not they settled outside of court because they knew that it was going to be very detrimental for them or they won the case outright.

So if RFK receives any money from any of these things is because he was right, his advocacy and his push against those companies is probably a shit ton of work. this has been a large part of his life for a very long time. And so I, you know, I would want a little money from, you know, law firms that are going to sue these companies as well. But, you know, he just, by the way, he just said that he cut off all ties for that. Yeah. But I remember when this vaccine first came out and my daughter was about to be 13 at the time. And I had so much pressure, peer pressure from everybody saying, you've got, you know, everyone's got to vaccinate their daughters with this. This is so important.

And my daughter's like, hell no, I'm not doing that. I'm not getting the vaccine. And thank God I didn't because, you know, back then I really was not aware of what the adverse effects of vaccines can actually do to people. But now I'm so thankful that I didn't make her do it. Yeah. That was a vaccine that got fast tracked, as they say, for approval. And I want to say originally it was designed for young women. And then they're like, ooh, I bet if we could get parents talked into this and we could put it on the childhood schedule and we get all the girls vaccinated. And then they did. And they're like, oh, you know what? We can also talk them into getting the boys vaccinated. And then they did that too, which is absolutely insane. Yes. And, you know, one important takeaway of this in particular clip is that when we think about lobbyists, you know, descending upon Congress like locust, you always think about them getting kickbacks.

you know, in some way or another from these pharmaceutical companies. But one of the ways that they get this is you hear him say right off the bat that Gardasil is produced in Virginia. So he wants that industry in the state. And he is willing to make deals with them. And he is certainly not ever going to speak out against them. In fact, he's going to go to the Senate hearing. And what is he going to spend his time doing?

Defending Gardasil. And as soon as RFK, when he's like, there's all these studies, and RFK tries to say they are in right now, they're on trial. And he immediately was like, no, no, no, let me ask a question. It's like, no, no, no, stop. You're about to say something really inconvenient to me.

You know? Like, this is how, this is a game that they play. He's not, this is very similar to how the commercials for the pharmaceutical drugs that we see on TV have nothing to do with actually advertising the drugs to us because we can't just go out to the store and purchase them off the shelf. It is all about just controlling the networks and the information that they're putting out. This is exactly the same. same thing. All of that shit that he just threw out there in this hearing, it really has

nothing to do with getting any kind of answers from RFK or bringing anything to light necessarily about him. It's just like his way of signaling to the pharmaceutical companies that like he's got their back. Yeah. And he's not going to put out anything that's going to harm them in any way. It just says, don't worry. I'm still in your back pocket. Yeah. You know what's interesting to me is like if you look it up, HPV has been around, I guess, for 100 years or wait, on. I think it said it's been around for a very long time, but I think it's somewhere around like, let's see, God, I don't want to say the wrong. There's a lot of different strains of it, too. I don't even remember how many. And then some of them are more prone to lead to cervical cancer than others.

But also cervical cancer is very treatable if caught early. And, you know, if we were to, say, start having preventative medicine be pushed in this country, opposed to just always treating things with vaccines or, you know, meds, perhaps we could invest some money for the preventative care that would catch those things early instead of just giving shots to all of these girls who are causing seizures, death in some cases, disability. Like, that has been one of the worst ones. I mean, there's a reason why it is on trial right now. Yeah, absolutely.

Yeah, so it's been around for, it says, hundreds of millions of years or, you know, millions of years, I guess. And but it's also interesting to how it's so prevalent. I would be curious to see if they put that damn shit in a lab as well, gain of function wise somehow. Like even with the monkey pock stuff, you know, supposedly that was sexually transmitted also. And all this stuff started coming out at the same time. And, you know, if you even look at bird flu, we know for a fact that Dr. Fulci and NIH has worked on bird flu as a gain of function virus. We know that.

It's in documents. It is in declassified stuff. they have gain of functioned the bird flu. And I think they did it to where it made it more transmissible from, you know, zoonotic or animals to people. And that's what they for some reason continually want to practice on. But if you think about it, any kind of animal disease going to a human disease has been manipulated by scientists.

Yeah, I mean, unless something eventually evolves over thousands of years and, you know, but you usually start seeing that come about. It just, it don't happen overnight. And that's why no one believed this Wuhan virus pandemic BS came from bats. You know, everybody basically knew, well,

there's, you know, if you have a bunch of cheeseburgers ever, like on the highway. And then, and then you see a McDonald's truck, you know, like a mile down the street,

but yet you say it's not from the McDonald's truck. It is from definitely somewhere else. It's from Sonic. It's from Sonic. I mean, how else are they going to sell us all of the treatments for the things that they're about to release upon us. Yeah.

Yeah, absolutely. Candice Owens, she's a little out there at times. But her story of kind of what, like, kicked her into research was the Gardasil vaccine largely. And she makes a good point. And you'll notice this about a lot of different things. Interestingly, sometimes I'll see commercials and I'll be like, oh, we're about to start hearing a lot about that.

That's about to be a real big problem. She's like, you know, she's like, I had never heard of HPV. She was like, my mom's generation never. really had. She's like, but then all of a sudden there's a vaccine for it and it's like, oh my God, everybody's got HPB. Vaccinate everybody. It's like they, you know, you have to create

a problem to then offer the solution. Oh, absolutely. There's zero question about that. And let me ask you guys a quick question. Isn't hepatitis B is sexually trans or is it, am I wrong? Yeah. Yeah, that's the one that is sexually transmitted as well as

by like IB needle usage. Yeah. So why don't, why we have vaccines for children for that? Well, that's a wonderful question, Sherry. And they actually talked about it during this hearing. There's a couple of medical doctors that went back and forth, Rand Paul being one of them,

and I actually have a synoclip to you about that. But I didn't show the exchange between him and the other senator that's also a doctor. I can't think of his name. But it's given on day one. Like literally you give birth to your baby, and immediately they give them a hepatitis B vaccine within like hours, maybe minutes.

And if you know the status of the mother, and you know that she does not have hep B, there is zero reason to vaccinate the baby. If she does, then in that case, I think that the risk doesn't outweigh the benefit. Like the benefits better. Let's go ahead and do it. It's also very easy for them to test the mother. We're in America. This is not like a third world country, at least not completely at this point.

So that is 99% of the time completely unnecessary. The easier thing to do would just be to test the mother. And once we know that, leave the baby alone. But instead, that became a super easy one to throw on the first. schedule and like the vast majority of babies that are born in this country think about that every single day every baby born that's a shot just dollars yeah absolutely yeah for no reason it reminds me a little bit of uh COVID when you know every single patient that came into hospital systems were definitely money and you know we had talked with a nurse the other day or someone um they were talking

about like no that's absolutely true they tried to deny that or whatever to where the hospitals didn't make more money they absolutely made more money and they absolutely made more money and they They made a lot more money, and they made more money if someone was dead versus on a ventilator versus COVID positive plus the test. You made a schedule of amounts of money, you know, based on the scenario of COVID. Now, I want to get to this next clip. This is a Bernie Sanders exchange, and we get a couple of them, but let's start with this one. Thank you, Chairman Cassidy. And I'm going to do what I very rarely do is actually follow up on a question for Senator Cassidy.

there have been, as I understand it, dozens of studies done all over the world that make it very clear that vaccines do not cause autism. Now, you just said, if I heard correctly, well, if the evidence is there. The evidence is there. That's it. Vaccines do not cause autism. Do you agree with that? As I said, I'm not going to go into HHS with any preordained.

I ask you a simple question, Bobby. Studies all over the world say it does not. What do you think? Senator, if you show me those studies, I will absolutely, as I promised to Chairman Cassie, I will apologize. That is a very troubling response because the studies are there. Your job must have looked at those studies as an applicant for this job. All right. All right.

So there was that first clip. And then we're just going to go ahead and go to the second Bernie clip as well. Listen. So let me ask Mr. Kennedy again. If we want to make America healthy, will you assure the American people that you will fight to do what every other major country on Earth does, guarantee health care to every single American? I'm going to make America healthier than other countries in the world right now.

Will you guarantee do what every other major country does? It's a simple question about it. And by the way, Bernie, the problem of corruption is not just in the federal agencies. It's in Congress, too. Almost all the members of this panel are accepting, including yourself, are accepting millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry. Oh, no, no, no, no. And protecting their interests. Oh, I thought that that would go, no, no, I ran for president like you.

I got millions and millions of contributions. they did not come from the executives, not one nickel of pack money from the pharmaceutical union. In 2020, in 2020, you were the single largest. Because I had four contributions from workers all over this country. Workers, this is not a nickel from corporate tax. You were the single largest except for pharmaceutical dollars. No, from workers in the industry.

1.5 million. Yeah, out of 200. million. All right. Oh, so it's just weird. It's weird to all these workers from pharmaceutical companies would just be one of his biggest donors. Is that strange?

This is my favorite exchange of the day. Isn't that weird, Sam? I mean, you know, just all these workers just all of a sudden loved Bernie Sanders so much that they wanted to fund the hell out of him. I think he was just saying like workers in general. I don't even know what his argument was. What was so funny, though, is he was like, oh, no, no, no. and then he's like, I thought this may come up.

Like, I guess you did. You know, you took $1.5 million. Yeah, that may come up. Like, why don't you go ahead and get ahead of that one, Bernie? And I don't even really dislike Bernie Sanders. Like, I actually think he, you know, I don't agree with him. I don't agree with, like, his socialist stance. I actually don't disagree.

I think that we do need health care in this country. And he is at least, more or less, you know, ran on the same positions for like forever. So he has a little bit more integrity in some ways. than others. But just what really made me laugh when I watched that because I watched it while it was on was that he started calling him Bernie in the middle of it instead of Senator Sanders. Bobby and Bernie. But what was interesting to me is when Bernie asked him about social health care, kind of like Canada,

he said, do you think this is something a part of your constitutional rights? Should you have health care? and he was trying to frame Bobby on this, this, um, interaction. Yeah, he was saying, is this a human right? Yeah, is this a human right? But then Bobby comes back. He's like, well, let's talk about, you know, free speech and free rights and rights versus what you do to your own body.

And he's like, if you're smoking for 30 years and they get cancer, why should we have to pay for that health care? Yeah. It's basically what he was coming back and saying, which I agree. to an extent. And I don't think we should have a social, like a social health care, because you look at people in England, you look at people in Canada, and they all have the socialist health care, you can't get an operation. And if you do, you're on a waiting list for like a year and a half to even get the operation you need. Yeah, it's really bad. And you got to also remember,

you know, is controlled by government. And so that's been my biggest thing. I mean, I don't get me wrong. If there was a good health care system that was free by the government and the government actually gave a shit about the people, I'd be like all for it. But I just feel like that they would have even more control then over the health care system. And if we saw anything from, you know, the government's pressure on a lot of these, you know, big health care systems to buy out the smaller hospitals, the smaller doctor's offices. The monopolies. Yeah. And they monopolized a lot of these areas across the United States. And they did that for a reason because they had more control. And so as long as you went with the World Health Organization's recommendations and the

CDC and the Biden administration, you were good. But as soon as you get off track with that, you are dead. You are done. And your ass is going to be, you're going to pay for it. And if you don't follow Bill Gates' recommendations about depopulating world, which means don't help the elderly. Don't help the sick because we need to get rid of them. Yeah. You know, the thing about the health care system, and this is sort of the point, that RFK is trying to make if they would ever let him talk, is that, like, okay, sure. Let's say that it is a right for everyone to have health care.

Like, let's instead get at the root of this issue, which is that we are all incredibly unhealthy. So let's stop looking at this as how can we treat all of the sick people all of the time? And instead, like, maybe let's try not having as many sick people. The entire system needs to be reformed. Let's start with the fact that, like, our medications here costs significantly more. in the exact same medications in other countries. To your point, you made it earlier, Sherry, all of our doctors now.

We had talked about this in another episode in the past. I was saying that there's no such thing as just a regular family doctor. They're all under these huge conglomerates. And this will end up, if we do end up with some type of government-funded healthcare system, it will end up just like the military industrial complex, where it is just basically a way to launder money and assume more control. So that's not the answer. I do think the answer is lies in what RFK wants to do.

I have no idea whether or not I think he'll be confirmed. And if he is, they're going to fight him every step of the way. But I actually, I really do believe that he is there to truly do what he is saying. I think that is what he wants to do with his life. He feels like that's his purpose. If we could get him in there and they would actually let this man work, I think it could be a huge turnaround in our country. No, I agree. I agree. Yeah. And I think, too, part of what RFK wants to do is, like you said, Sam, make us healthy again. And we're not healthy. We're the most obese country in the world. We have the most sickness and disease because of our obesity. And that goes back to our foods. You know, and it's almost like he wants to get back to preventative care versus care when you're sick.

Yeah, yeah, I mean, yeah, this preventative care, which is what they're obviously 100% against, I mean, go back to COVID again. They didn't want any preventative care. They wanted you to only know that you're either going to die or you're going to do what they say. And that's kind of what they think about everything, it seems. They don't really have a preventative measure. And it's interesting. I actually came across this very short video. I want to play it.

This goes back to Bill Gates for just a moment. And Bill Gates literally has, on his own channel, Bill Gates, does saving more lives. lead to overpopulation. Now, the interesting thing about this video is towards the end, they start to act like, well, no, we don't actually think so. We actually think of that if you save more lives with the vaccines and stuff like, you know, is kind of basically what he's saying. But just the fact that this comes off his channel, listen to what he has to say.

In this year's annual letter, Melinda and I take the toughest questions we get asked and give our answers. One that's come up for a long time is, as we make the world healthier, Is the population going to get so big that feeding everybody and maintaining the environment is going to be impossible? Here we can see a chart that looks at the total world population over the last several hundred years. And at first glance, this is a bit scary. We go from less than a billion in 1800, and then 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.4 billion where we are today is happening even, faster. So Melinda and I wondered whether providing new medicines and keeping children alive,

would that create more of a population problem? What we found out is that as health improves, families choose to have less children. And this effect is very, very dramatic. We find that in every country of the world, this is repeated. The population growth goes down as we improve health. So we've taken that chart that shows the global population growth, and we've actually extended it out all the way to 2100. And we can see that instead of continuing, it actually flattens out. Another way to see that is through this rate of population growth. And you can see that in the 60s, that reached a pretty high number,

over 2% per year, and it's now come way, way down. now 11 billion people still a lot but the good news is that the faster we improve health the faster family size goes down and so we can feel great about saving those lives so he's saying that as long as you take their medicines you're no longer going to have kids I mean well this is kind of what he's saying here it's like well bill I'm not sure who you're hanging out with it just on the regular is like, hey, you know, I've had this big concern of all the things that you're doing. Like, don't you think saving all these people is going to be really problematic for us? Like, who's asking you this? Who are these people? Yeah.

Let's just red flag that immediately. Yeah, I mean, anybody that talks about depopulation on this level, I mean, and Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum and the globalist are obsessed with this. and it even kind of somewhat goes back to the Georgia Guidestones. Now, we've never actually done a podcast episode on this, but the Georgia Guidestones essentially, which is, you know, there was these four, I think it was four massive rock or concrete columns. They had something on top of them. It got blown up. And I think part of probably the reason that Guidestone was blown up because it specifically talked

about overpopulation and depopulation. And this has been a big thing because it's not. the fact that they're worried about overpopulation in the world because if you talk to or hear and listen to other people that really know about population statistics and data in the world, there's a lot of those people that will say that is actually underpopulated. We have so much more land to grow on. There is vast swaths of land. If you ever fly over any of this land in the United States or even in Asia or Russia or

Africa, South America, the amount of land that is underpopulated, that is, you know, that, you know, outside of city centers is vast. And so I don't think that our problem is overpopulation. You've got to ask yourself, why are people like this obsessed with overpopulation? Do they know that they can control the population better with less people? Do they want to make more money off the medicine based on what they're trying to push and say, well, overpopulating is going to be a big problem for us. So we better, you know, not save these people.

But, you know, as we started to introduce some medicine, we realized that they were having less kids. It's like, really? I mean, that's pretty interesting. The thing about it is no one trusts people like Bill Gates. No one trusts people at the World Economic Forum. And no one trust basically anybody that is going so hardcore against people like RFK that is desperately trying to get in to make a big difference in the country, in this government.

And I always go back to say this. And it's like you always worry about people like this getting into government because you're like there's no way they're going to be successful. there's going to be massive roadblocks no matter what. But what I will say as far as this Trump administration goes, at the very least, I think they have a chance now, at least, if they can get the people confirmed, they have the House, the Senate, the presidency, they're going to cut bureaucracy. They're going to cut a lot of the funding to all this bullshit programs.

But there's, you know, just today, there was a report on Obama still running some type of backside scheme from the intelligence agencies to undermine Trump's presidency. and this is what is reported a couple of times today. So who knows? It's going to be interesting to see what happens with RFK. But let me remind you, and I don't think I have to remind you, but Bill Gates is not a doctor. Bill Gates is a computer dude that's going after population. Yeah.

Yeah, and it's funny because there's actually, there is a clip that I gave you that she asked RFK if he is a doctor. and that really just shows you the irony because, you know, Bill Gates has been out here talking about vaccines forever. But when COVID first hit, I was just amazed by the way they told people, like, do not do your own research. You know, trust the science. Trust your position. And yet he was one of the main figures that was all over corporate media, giving us all advice and guidance. And to Sherry's point, he is not, nor has he ever been, and likely we'll never be. doctor. Yeah. But it's fine for him to do it. No, he won't ever be a doctor. He don't need to be. He's a

billionaire. So basically, he can just fund whatever he wants to do to accomplish. He funded all the event 201 stuff, everything pre-pandemic, pre-plandemic. He planned all that stuff. Yeah, for sure. And by the way, I do want to just say, so obesity for, so examining trends in children's health in the United States from mid-90s to the present, there's obviously significant changes. and the prevalence of various conditions, including obesity, attention and deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, or ASD, and certain cancers. Mid-90s, approximately only 10% of children age 2 to 19, were classified as obese. Recent data suggests that of obesity among U.S. children and adolescents, age 2 to 19,

it rose to 19.7% affecting about 14.7 million kids. ADHD is from mid-90s. You had about 3% of children were done. diagnosed. Now, you have 11% of U.S. children age 5 to 17 have been diagnosed with ADHD. You also have about with the autism spectrum, one in 150 in the 90s, and now we're at 1 in 36, as Sam was saying earlier, childhood cancers, mid-90s, the incident of certain cancers and children was relatively stable, but recent data shows and indicates that several cancers are becoming increasingly common among young people in the United States, specifically

Americans born in 1980s and 90s are at a higher risk. for 17 types of cancer, including breast, pancreas, kidney cancers compared to previous generations. And then obviously also after the past four or five years, you saw this massive increase in turbo cancers where supposedly we don't know where those are coming from, but obviously a lot of people speculate. Now, not all these things are coming from COVID.

Actually, it came before COVID. Yeah. But we have to look. It's not just the vaccine schedules, but like RFK is trying to say, it's in our food. Yeah. You know, just recently, what was the, red dye three. Red die number three. Yeah. That they have finally banned in America and it's been

banned forever in other countries. And what RFK is basically saying, listen, if we can't ban this stuff, let's at least tell people what's in it so they can make a decision based on knowing the facts before they go eat the McDonald's French fries that have 18 ingredients versus three in UK. And by the way, too, that's actually, sorry, sorry, Sam. I was just going to, I was just going to Sam, I want you to comment back to this. The U.S. food supply contains a vast number of chemicals, both naturally occurring and added, but to enhance flavor or appearance of preservation.

Right now, there are over 10,000 chemicals that are permitted in food and sold in the United States. The environmental working group has listed a dirty dozen, but there are thousands of chemicals in our foods that are potentially killing us on a daily basis. Go ahead, Sam. Well, I was going to say that a lot of people, their criticism of him is that they think he wants to come in

and just ban vaccines, which is, again, very ironic to me. Same thing with the food. He actually doesn't want to ban either, but to Sherry's point, on both of those, he's wanting to give transparency so that, like with food, people at least know what they're eating. If they're still going to make four decisions in eating, which I often do, like fully will admit it, at least you know, you understand that like these foods literally make you addicted to continuing to eat them.

And then likewise, with vaccines, this is what he tried to say, I don't know, two dozen times probably over like seven hours of the two days, that he simply wants to provide raw data from studies that are done by independent scientists. I don't know if you heard him

when she was asking about the surveillance systems that track the adverse events. He was mentioning that there's one that the CDC will not allow independent scientists to have access to the data to be able to analyze. So raw data from scientists that are not corrupted, that are not receiving funding from anyone that has a vested interest in this. And then it's basically just informed consent.

If you go and have any type of medical procedure done, you are supposed to be given informed consent. Hey, if you have the surgery, here are the things that could help with your life. Here are the things that could be dangerous to you. Risk, benefit, you choose, your decision, whatever. Vaccines, there is zero of that. absolutely none. They don't tell you anything.

The only thing they tell you is get your kid vaccinated or you're going to kill them. There's no information presented to you. If you want to read about the actual information about the vaccine itself, you can look it up online. But the insert packet is in the bile. And not only that, if you don't vaccinate your kid, they can't go to school. In some cases. If there's an exemption they can, but there are some states,

like California, you can't even have a medical exemption. And I do hope that he will fight to remove that because that goes right in line with his entire position, which is that we should be free. We should have the right to make decisions, but not just decisions, informed decisions. But you can't take away, you can't be pro choice and not be pro choice, which is what the left has been trying to do steadily for years, and especially in the last like five years now. Yeah, absolutely. I agree. I've always talked and thought about that pro-choice thing. And it's like the same people raising hell about pro-choice are the same people that are saying that they command you to take the vaccine. And you should be mandated and lose your job if you don't do it. It's so nuts because that is, in my mind, that's definitely more detrimental to health the vaccine, a experimental vaccine, potentially than abortion or not abortion. I don't know. There's various topics to talk about that. But and also, in, in, In terms of like the industry of food, you got to think there's 10 companies, Nestle, Pepsi, Coca-Cola, Unilever, Danone, General Mills, Kellogg's, Mars, Associated British Foods, and Mondellez.

These dominate most of the brands. And so these conglomerates basically on a wide array of these popular brands across various food categories leading to a concentration of complete market power and influence over the food supply. And not only do they have that, you know, in their pocket, they have government effects. officials also on the behest of what they're trying to do or allow in their foods. We have talked about this, I think, on another episode, but even with Aspartame, one of the reasons that Aspartame was eventually pushed through and was allowed was because of Donald Rumsfeld. If you remember, Donald Rumsfeld back in the day, I think what was he under Clinton or Bush? Maybe he was Bush.

He just, once he got out of office, he was one of the people that helped push through Aspartame after many times they banned it and there was all these studies showing how detrimental it can be to people. But yet Donald Rumsfeld and his freaking pushing and backing because he was Secretary of Defense back in a day was actually what allowed Aspartame to work. Now with all those companies, by the way that I just mentioned, BlackRock is one of the world's largest asset management firms and it holds a massive investment in many major food beverage companies.

For example, as of December 2020, Black Rock owned approximately 8% of Pepsi shares. It also has substantial holdings in other industry giants such as Coca-Cola, Nestle, Kellogg, etc. And so you think about, we've talked so much about Block Rock being just this massive conglomerate and control structure of, you know, not big tech or, but I would say big business oligarch to where they control a lot of this. But as Sam said earlier, a lot of these companies are.

now owned by tobacco companies. Yeah, Philip Morris and others. And Monsanto, Monsanto. You know, Sam, do you know anything about Monsanto in a Roundup? You remember all the Roundup shit that happened? Probably what was that? Oh, I still see that on Facebook. I still see that.

You know, and Roundup was huge. And apparently was given all these people cancer. Yeah, RFK Jr. is who litigated those cases. It was a lot of people were getting non-Hodgans lymphoma from it. Yep. And they were, you know, adamantly denying it. And he took one case to trial. And I want to say that he had asked for damages.

It was a family that it was two people and their dog, which I really think is why the jury hit them so hard. All got non-Hodgkin flim phoma. They had been using it outside of their house, just doing like general gardening. But they had just been using it without gloves on because supposedly it was safe. And so when he litigated on that and when he took it to trial, I think he asked for like one billion in damages.

And I think that his firm, his partners were like, that's too much. Well, the jury came back and gave, I want to say like $2.5 billion. Wow. Yeah. So that's, I mean, even him being nominated, even if he's not confirmed, it has brought so much attention to a lot of issues that I think people will start to wake up even more than they already have. interestingly, especially the generation below us, they have become very

interested in this. And, you know, I think for them, it's also like all of these old people in Congress, like they're ready to rebel. But Chad, if you have the clip I sent you with Senator Mullins, he's in the white shirt. Okay. It's probably a good, it's relevant to what we've kind of been talking about here.

Again. But, yeah, you know, I don't know how we really can get in and solve this problem without radical change. I do think Trump will support him. I do think if he can be confirmed, I do think he can make some changes, at least in the right direction.

But like you said, everything is such a monopoly now. Like I always give an example to people, a date of somebody that worked for PNG, and a lot of people do not know how many brands are actually owned by PNG. So like, you see commercials for Tide, you see commercials for gain,

you think that they are competing with one another. Nope, they're both owned by PNG. You're just giving your money to them. And it's the same thing with these food companies. It's just this artificial choice that they are offering to you where you feel like you have a say. You feel like you have a choice, but really you don't. And honestly, I feel like our political system is too well. We are given candidates that for the most part, both being funded by the exact same people.

Yeah. Absolutely. And sorry, I think you broke up there at the last minute. I agree. I mean, you think you have a choice, but you don't really. I mean, it's all one big system. And, you know, quickly going back to Monsanto because we were talking about that and we'll get to that next clip. Monsanto, which is now part of Bayer AG, played a massive role in U.S. food supply, particularly in genetically modified organisms or GMOs, herbicides, and agricultural patents.

Now, we also know that Bill Gates is heavily involved or at least was in Monsanto. I don't know if he still is. And so they do GMO seed domination. Onzanto developed and patented genetically modified crops that are resistant to herbicides like Roundup, glyphosate, and pest. These include corn or BT corn, also known as Roundup Ready Corn. This is most of the corn that is in our grocery stores now. They are genetically modified.

Soybeans. These are called Roundup Ready soil. Sorry, not soil, but soy. Cotton, canola, alfalfa, sugar beets, wheat, which is going in a lot of our breads. And these GMOs make up the majority of crops grown in the United States. Over 90% of soy and corn grown in this country comes from genetically modified Monsanto seeds. And so they control farmers through this too.

Monsanto aggressively patented is GMO seeds. And they would sue farmers who saved and replanted them. And so this forced most farmers into buy a new seeds from Monsanto every season because any farmer that tried to reuse seeds off their plants, they would sue the sheep. shit out of them if they were not buying these new seeds. That's what's crazy. We went to Costco and we got this big tin of peanuts. You wouldn't think anything would be, you know, modified with peanuts.

No, these peanuts are genetically modified peanuts. Yeah. Like what the heck? Yeah, it says genetically modified food ingredients on the back. Absolutely. And so. That's not now. Yeah.

I mean, and so it's just like everything is genetically modified around us. Oh, salad is. You go look at the best. back of the salad ingredients if you get a packaged salad. Well, you know, they are going to put MRA and salad. I mean, according to U.S.C. Berkeley, that's what they've been working on. They figured out a way to put it in the sales of salad, the MRNA, to where when they eventually mass produced this, MRNA will be in our lettuce, in our vegetables.

This is something they've been working on for years. And we had an actual entire podcast on that. I think it was the MRNA and our food supply podcast, which is very interesting to listen to because it's coming. It's going to happen. They already talk about it. People like Bill Gates and all these others, they're just getting you ready for it. Yeah, I bet it's an impossible burger too.

Probably. But what I will say is that, you know, there are only like eight states. I think the last time I looked, eight states are trying to push through legislation to where if any of that meat is in their grocery stores, it has to be labeled clearly. And there's only eight states that step forward to to try to push in. in legislation. I don't know whatever happened with that. But obviously, you would like to know that what if you're eating meat that has

M RNA or any of that technology in it, that that's what you're eating. And it's not, you know, and the problem is I think most states in the United States do not know that right now. Could they put GMO and say instead of saying it's. Well, this ain't GMO, though. This is, we're talking about MRN. Yeah, it's totally different. Yeah.

Yeah. Which is, you know, a messenger RNA. So what are they really trying to do? I don't know. Let's listen to Senator Mollins. Hopefully this is the right clip, Sam. There you go. And by the way, guys, this is a sped up clip, so it will sound a little faster, but that's because otherwise it would be very long.

So let's listen. It absolutely blows my mind that all of a sudden it's such shame that Bobby's set up here his question science. Because I guarantee you if he was setting here and he was going to be the secretary of HHS underneath the former president, Biden, which I enjoy saying former president. I would bet you guys would be happy his back 100 percent and enjoy the fact that he's question science. And would probably support his position is 100 percent. But because he's now on the Republican side, you guys are like way off the rail. and how dare he question science? My God, if we didn't question science, where would we be today? We've always questioned science. Science is always involving and overchanging. Have a glass of wine a day.

It's healthy for you. Don't have a glass of wine a day. Have a piece of chocolate day. It's healthy for you. Black, dark chocolate is healthy for you. Take an aspirin today and Senator Rand Paul pulled out. I mean, where would we be today if we didn't ever question science? But I will say there's an issue that I have as a father of six that when my kids come out from getting their vaccines, they look like a freaking pincusion. I mean, 72 vaccinations? I think there's a reason we should be questioning this. When you start looking at the rise of autism, why wouldn't we be looking at everything? who wouldn't want to look at everything? Give me anybody in this room that doesn't know somebody that you're personally connected to that one of their children doesn't suffer from some severity of autism.

Give me one. And you guys are all saying that Bobby can't question it? I don't get it, guys. I don't understand your point other than the fact you just oppose him because he supports a president that you guys don't like now. I applaud him for going into the situation and saying let's question something. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing expecting different results.

Is it not true that you're supposed to question science? Is anybody going to question the fact that that's not true? Mommy, share the numbers again with me about autism. Were they at when you was a child or where they're at today's, my kids are children? There weren't a lot of studies when I was a kid, but the best studies, and really the only studies out there, there are two studies. One shows a rate of about 1 in 10,000, another about 1 in 1,500. And then, you know, there are other estimates in between.

Today, it is one in every 36 kids, according to CDC. I want to say one other thing. Relevant to what the point you just made, in 1963, my uncle awarded, John F. Kennedy, the highest civilian honor, to Francis Kelsey. Francis Kelsey was a young scientist at NIH who came in and objected to the panel having approved thalidomide for American children. All the scientists of that day, they were doing it in Europe, all the scientists of that day, and the scientists at the panelists, approved, greenlighted thalidomide. She stood up and screamed and fought and risked her job and risked her reputation,

and she blocked it in our country. Three years later, everybody knew that, recognized that she was a hero and a savior of our children, because we were not getting the kind of terrible diabolical deformities as they were experiencing in Europe. My uncle gave it the highest civilian honor because she questioned science and was courageous enough to stand up and say, I don't care what happens to me. This cannot happen. Irony is that she was a Democrat at that time and she questioned science. But now a sudden because you're working for Republicans, you're not a lot of question science.

Let's go back to this and say, let's just use a number of one in 10,000 your age. Now, we're a little bit different than age. I'm not going to say how old you are, but you look great for your age. I will say that one in 36, that's not a pandemic than what is. 1 in 36, and it used to be 1 in 10,000 have autism now? Can any of you guys, the straight face said that we shouldn't look at every aspect to what we're putting in our kids, be it from the food to the vaccines? 1 in 36. That scares a living daylight.

Yeah, he's exactly right. And I mean, imagine, you know, and autism is a forever disease. You know, it is something that you're always going to have. And if it goes from a massive number, potentially, such as 1 in 1,500. or more to 1 and 36, why the hell are we not doing everything in our power to try to figure out what is the cause of this and why has it skyrocketed unless there is some type of influence over that? Well, it doesn't make you as much money if you find out what's causing it.

It's much more profitable to just let it continue to happen, especially because whatever is causing it, that may be problematic to find out and it may hurt someone's pockets. Yeah. No, I agree. I don't know if you guys could hear me a minute ago when you were talking about the GMOs. I think something went wrong with my headset there for a second. But I wanted to make a point, and I think this is also relevant to what he was saying. The really scary thing about all of the GMOs is that if you think about when we were kids, you get an apple. I think every kid's done this.

You eat the apple. And then you're like, I'm going to go plant these seeds and grow an apple tree. And so you can do that. And then the apples that come from that tree are from the apple, the same one that you. you ate, the same type of apple. Now, we don't have independent orchards and farms and whatnot that are growing apples that you can then take the seeds from those apples and put them back into the ground and grow the same kind of apples. Everything is factory farming. So when they are introducing these modified and manipulated seeds, if no one is growing the original, whatever,

apples, oranges, anything, they will eventually. no longer exist, we will only be left with the genetically modified version. Yeah. That's true. And I think I fear that's what's going to happen. But I also fear that, you know, we have a lot of these, you know, globalist elites, these people like Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum that is desperately trying to kill out our farms. And earlier, you had talked about with the farmer that went on Joe Rogan in the farm, by the way, I believe, of who you're talking about is Taylor Ranch. I think so.

Yeah, and Taylor Ranch is, you know, they, if I'm not mistaken, as the same person, they used to supply a lot of the meat to Whole Foods, I believe. And then they started doing a lot of stuff different at Whole Foods, and now they don't, I guess, supply as much to Whole Foods. I don't know what Whole Foods kind of move to. Maybe it is either a cheaper meat or non, you know, whatever. But I always say this. And I know, and it even goes back.

to what I was asking you earlier about you have a kid now. How are you kind of approaching like, you know, the vaccines and what she eats and all this stuff? And I also understand that for a lot of people, it's very hard to eat healthy because, unfortunately, eating like, like shit is a lot cheaper. I mean, it is tons cheaper. I mean, you can go to McDonald's even though it's gotten more expensive, but you can go to McDonald's still and, you know, you go there, you have a meal.

It's what, 15 bucks maybe? Yeah, it's $15 when it used to be like, four. Yeah, but, but for a lot of families, you go to, but you can go into the grocery store and get top ramen. No, but no, I get that, but you know, but you can typically go in a grocery store and you're spending 80 bucks just to go in there for a meal. Maybe you get, maybe you get a bottle of wine, maybe you get some water, maybe get some dog food,

maybe get some, you know, you got seven or eight items and it's 80 to $100. And so a lot of families are just, you know, they're saying, well, let's just go to McDonald's or let's buy the cheapest shit in the store, and often the cheapest is the worst for you. And I always say, like, if you ever obviously have the money to reach out and look into local farms, to support them, but also support yourself and your help,

that's one of the best ways. And sometimes these farms with their steaks and hamburger and all that is not as expensive as people think, right? And sometimes, even in, you know, rare cases, you can get it cheaper. But also, you have to understand a lot of the meat in our gross stores are not from the United States. States. I think the number one supplier of ground beef, I believe in the United States is Brazil,

actually. And so Brazil, you know, they bring in tons of meat into the United States. And then you have other various farms. I think we even get beef from Africa and other places. But why are we not getting beef from local farms? Why are we not getting the good stuff? We burn them all down. Well, I think, I think that is, there's something up with that. and I hope that I hope more people at least just they listen to this show, they listen to people like RFK that is out there in front and trying to get confirmed and put in his entire career in life online as a massive figure in the Kennedy family by saying I'm trying to be confirmed to save lives in America. And I hope that people at least when you make certain decisions about what you eat or whatever, just think about that because there are dangers that exist. and they could exist faster than you think. Go ahead, Sam.

I want to point out something. This is like a side topic. I'm going to trump here. I'm going to weave this back in. So when the TikTok ban thing came up a couple of weeks ago, when it really got to like its boiling point, there's an app called Red Note that a lot of people jumped over on, which is sort of like Chinese TikTok.

It's not exactly, but they kind of reformatted it so it works that way. And a really interesting thing happened where for the first time, the people of America and the people of China were communicating directly with one another. And from everything that we're told about China and especially taught to fear them, and I'm not saying that we shouldn't, I'm just saying from everything I've ever been told,

you would think the takeaway that would have happened from that would be that we would hear about their culture and how they're living. And we would say, oh my God, I'm so sorry that you're going through that. I can't even imagine living in that atmosphere. And that they would look at us and say,

wow, if only we could be Americans, the best, greatest, richest country in the world. The exact opposite happened. They were floored by a lot of the things that happened here. They actually thought that things they believed to be true of us had actually been lies from their government as propaganda and were stunned to find out they were true. And kind of the other way that happened in inverse.

But one of the more interesting screenshots I saw was that someone saw a video of a Chinese person getting groceries and it became this whole thing of wanting to see their grocery halls. So then a lot of Chinese people started going into their grocery stores, and they even have like Costco there. I mean, it looks just like here. But they would show all of the fresh fruits and vegetables and how much it equated to in U.S. dollars.

And they could not believe how expensive it is for us here comparatively to get fresh fruits and vegetables. They were basically like, we always thought Americans were just fat and lazy. They were like, we had no idea. that it was so difficult for you to get like good nutritious food. And someone commented and said, yeah. And actually it costs even more if you want the ones without the chemicals.

Yeah. And like what a crazy thought that we have just become so accustomed to the fact that our foods have chemicals that were like, yeah, you have to pay extra if you want the ones that don't poison you. And supposedly the ones that don't poison because even. Right. Even a lot of the organic labels are there's a lot of times bullshit. But we just come to accept that. Like, well, we can pay less, but like it may fill us, you know. What?

And that's what I say. I mean, and I was talking to someone that's like a big farmer not long ago. I don't even remember who it was or, you know, they know this stuff. And, you know, they're saying that it's damn near getting impossible to even get seeds that are not GMO. And eventually, we're going to get to a point where you are not able to find any seeds natural that are not genetically modified. I think that you can still buy them online somewhere. I don't know if those are called heirloom seeds. We need to have my niece come on because that's what she does.

She does all of her own gardening and she reseeds with her seeds. Yeah. But, you know, the key, though, is just making sure you're not getting the genetically modified BS. Exactly. Because if you do, you know, your vegetables are still genetically modified. And the reality is, I mean, no one's really talked about that. How much does that hurt us or not? We don't know.

I mean, we don't know. I mean, any number of the things that we face on a daily basis in this world now because of shitheads, you know, out there that just don't care about, you know, public health at all. We don't know what's actually killing us. I mean, there could be one of 10 million things, whether it's one of the things we eat or one of the things we breathe or, you know, or whatever vaccine we take or if we take a medicine or, you know, and that's why there's so many people. like when I was sick for a month and then I didn't take basically any medicine that entire first two weeks. And then when I had this rib pain, I was like, shit, it hurts so bad. I had to take ibuprofen. But I am so, I do not like doing that because I just don't trust any medication.

I mean, you know, you can look up numbers of the amount of people even kill from over-the-counter pain medications. And it would probably surprise a lot of people. You know, actually getting the answers to these questions are some very, inconvenient truths to a lot of powerful people who spend a great deal of time and money influencing our government, our media, every facet of our lives, they control the information that we are given. And like I said, it's to the point that it has become so normal to us. Like, imagine if you went back 50 years ago to someone living in that time period and said, hey, do you want to buy these vegetables that are modified and have chemicals, or would you rather have these that are natural?

They would first of all wonder, what in the hell you're even talking about? But that would also seem so nefarious. But we've just come to, like, accept that as being normal. And it really makes me so concerned for my daughter's generation, but even more than that, for my grandchildren's generation. Because once you have people, generations that are dying out that remember how things quote unquote used to be, you lose. That's how you lose freedoms when you have a whole new generation of people who have never even experienced that their normal is so much different. I mean, we're living in an age. People keep saying this with this election. And I really think it's true. We are at some type of turning point right now. And whichever way we go, I really think is going to change the entire trajectory of history, at least for this country. Because if we continue down the path that we have been on for the last four or five years, there's going to be generations of kids to come that don't even understand what the what free speech ever meant yeah these kids will not know what real food is you know and it's really scary to think that

that can happen i mean this is how this happens over time yeah and i told nathan earlier on the phone as we were talking kind of leading in this because nathan actually just went out for the rfk confirmation hearings a couple of days ago in washington and he actually uh the last episode he had taken off from Reagan National. I heard that three hours, I guess three hours before that plane crash or whatever. But one of the things I was talking to Nathan about is, you know, this world is ever changing, right? And it's changing very fast. And how are we going to adapt to, you know, what we're looking at?

But I did tell him, I said, you know, I know that we've talked good about Trump and all this stuff. Trump's in now, right? Trump's in. And now it's our turn to hold him accountable because I, I do think that Trump was the best choice to come into office in this election by far. And I think a lot of other people also felt the same way, whether or not you agree with everything he thinks or does or thinks. And I'm getting to the point of what I'm talking about. But we're going to still hold him accountable.

I mean, the very big thing I already don't like from Trump is Project Stargate, which we had an episode on, which you guys can listen to, where they bring on Larry Ellison and Sam Altman. they're talking about MRNA and AI and all this stuff. And Trump's just like, you know, he's championing this very much like he did Project warp speed or, and I think it's a competition too because China. Yeah, but has their own work speed going on and he wants to beat China. Yeah, I understand that completely, right? I do understand that. But at the same time, these, these assholes like the people that are in his little circle now,

like the big tech oligarchs, they're going to utilize Trump's desperate want to dominate China in AI for their own benefits. And that's the scary part. Like what is Trump going to miss because he wants to do all of these amazing things in the United States? What is he going to miss? And I don't know. But on the contrary, he has been on TV every day since he's been president. He has spoke like. I get that.

He's been there. His press secretary has been out there. Everyone's out there that should be out there. We've heard from Trump more in the last, not even week. Almost two weeks, yeah, now. Then we ever heard from Biden. Yeah. And by the way, I actually like his press secretary.

I think that she is doing a great job. And I guess that she had learned and trained under Trump's old secretary. Michaela. Yeah, McAnney. Mac and Annie. Yeah. But yeah, we got to hold Trump accountable, though, right? And no matter what. And we got to hold himself accountable as well.

Yeah, but I'm just saying, and we're not just going to go forward blindly saying, oh, Trump is good. And so because he's in, everything's going to be perfect because that's not the case. No, it's not going to be. There's already things that don't like. And what I'm also afraid of, by the way, is that when and if RFK gets confirmed, because we do not know a public date on whether the. they're going to vote or when they're going to vote right now.

But I do worry very similarly to how all these big tech guys, the technocratic bros that are kind of going into Trump's circle now, I worry that the pharmaceutical companies are going to try to do the same thing. And I just hope that the relationship between Bobby, aka RFK, and Trump remains decent and strong. And I hope that they do not create some type of rift at some point in time. to get RFK the hell out of there. Because it is Trump's appointment. Yeah, well, they're trying to do that.

Very, you know, we see that. I don't know. I think that Trump knew what he was getting into when he appointed RFK. And he said a couple times in these hearings. He's like, I'm in a very unique position to do this job. And he is. And it's because he's litigated against all of these agencies. And so there was that press conference that Trump gave the other day who's doing something.

And someone asked about Elon, basically the risk. that he's got with Sam Alton. And Trump was like, yeah, well, you know, he hates one of the people that's involved. And he understands that. Like, he knew when he appointed RFK that like, or when he nominated him, that like, he's hate political companies. I'm going to be able to, and I think he's definitely anticipating it being an issue. Yeah.

I agree. I agree. I was going to play one last clip. One last clip. It's I'm debating, but I think this, I think this is important.

All right, yeah, let's just play a little bit this clip. This is the, this is the amount of land that Bill Gates on. This is as of

2023. Laura Ingram did a special on this. I want to play this and then we'll close it and wrap it up after this. But this is very important. I think we've got to talk about this.

And then we'll, we'll head out. Here you go. Listen. We're showing the land owned by Bill Gates throughout the United States. And a graphic here. It adds up to almost 270,000 acres.

That's a lot of land. It's not like Mr. Gates has necessarily embraced the values of our community, of our state of rural America. That was last month that we brought you the story of Bill Gates, are sneakily buying up 2100 acres of North Dakota farmland, and he did it under the cover of a trust. Now, it was the latest in what seems to be kind of a method. and seemingly calculated push that has now made him the largest private landowner in the United States. So let's take a look at where he's made these purchases. And as I read, please keep in mind

that the average farm size in the United States is 445 acres. So in Louisiana, he has 70,000 acres, 48,000 acres in Arkansas, 25,750 in Arizona, 20,500 in Nebraska, and more than 105,000 acres across 15 other states. Now, what's strange about this new purchase, though it coincides with another large purchase just 40 miles away that we told you about earlier this week. Fou Fang, which is a CCP-linked company, bought more than 300 acres of farmland in Grand Forks, North Dakota. That's just 20 minutes from a U.S. Air Force base. Now, of course, Bill Gates insists there's no connection between his land grab and China's in the same general region. But it's unclear to us exactly what Gates intends to do with all this land. As a result, one Republican lawmaker is now demanding answers.

Congressman Dussie Johnson of South Dakota is asking the House Ag Committee to Hall Gates in to testify immediately. And he joins me now. Congressman, thanks for joining us tonight. has the chair responded to your request yet? No, I haven't heard anything yet. And honestly, I don't expect that we will anytime soon. I get the sense from the Democrats in Congress that they are not anywhere near as concerned about the Chinese purchases and the purchases by Bill Gates as they should be.

So there to go. I'm not going to play the entire clip because it is a decently long clip, but let's make no mistake. He is the largest private landowner in the United States of America. and some of his land purchases coincides with the Chinese, the Chinese Communist Party purchases as well. And then you even go back to the pandemic and Falchie and the NIH and the gang of function and the involvement with Bill Gates, with the Bill Melinda Gates Foundation,

event 201 and his involvement in vaccines and then China. Like what the hell's going on? Like why does Bill Gates need hundreds of thousands of acres of farmland? Is he just trying to stifle and kill out the farmers? Or is he potentially using this land for more nefarious purposes? Yeah. And obviously he doesn't want cows because they fart and burp too much. Yeah.

Supposedly. Our best interested heart, I'm sure. Yeah, Sam, what do you think about Bill Gates? Do you think that he is, do you think he's like a mad scientist? I mean, is this kind of how you see him like a real live, genuine mad scientist? Definitely think there is a way you. can paint him that way, certainly. But I think at the end of the day, it's like anyone else, you know, you can only amass so much money before you're like, like, look at Bezos.

Like he got so much money that now he's like, well, let's build rockets. I mean, Elon, same thing. Yeah. And eventually, once you have all the money, the next thing you want is power. And he is exerting a lot of power in a lot of different industries, you know, he's controlling a lot of things. And I feel like that control started really gradually, like people didn't notice what was going on. And now when you look at the steak he has in these pharmaceutical companies, particularly with vaccines, now with our food, I mean, that's two huge parts of our life. That's literally, like, you are what you eat. Yeah. Bill Gates. I agree. You are for sure that. And we're just going to, I mean, let's hope that RFK gets confirmed.

Let's hope we make some radical massive changes and we do them fast. What do you guys think, though? Do you think he'll be confirmed? Yeah, I think so, yeah. What do you think, Sam? A couple, there were a few senators on both sides that I feel like we're really trying to interview him in good faith, but I could tell that they didn't know anything about him other than the smear campaign that's been ran on him forever and really ramped up one

he ran for president. But I think they were legitimately considering him, like, thoughtfully, you know? And again, some of them are on the left. So I think he's going to get the majority of the Republicans. I do actually think there may be a couple who vote against him. But I think there may be a couple of Democrats that will actually vote for him. Particularly the senator from Alaska, there was a couple of them that I could tell Like, they actually are really trying to give him a fair shake.

But there's just so much, you know, like disinformation, as they would say, that's out there about him. And, I mean, anybody that watched the hearing, like, there was no part of that hearing that the left actually, aside from a few of them, was really interviewing him to get information. You know, they accused him of having a fine made up about science already. Look at the way they, quote, unquote, interviewed him. I mean, some of them did not even ask him questions. They just took their entire time to yell at him, would not let him respond. Or if they did ask him a question, it was like super accusatory. And then he would get two or three words out and they would just hit him with another question.

It's like you're not asking things. You're just saying things in the form of a question. So, I mean, that's a no from them. They're not even interested in hearing anything. But it's going to be really, really close. I think it's going to be like down. Yeah. Yeah.

I think a lot of those, a lot of those people that were basically just yelling at him were just trying to make sure that they pleased their overlords, you know, and in, you know, how they reacted to him. And they wanted to make sure that no one was mad at them after the hearing. So you got to go out there and you got to viciously attack him and, and kind of destroy his character and do whatever you possibly can. And, you know, for RFK, it's kind of, it's kind of interesting at all that he wants to be involved in any type of government. considering all the deaths that have come and the kid from the Kennedy family. You know, it's, it's a, it's a weird thing. But it also should show like RFK being a lifelong Democrat, Trump trying, you know, and then he's working with the Trump administration.

So is Elon. I think Elon's primarily been more of a Democrat. I think there was a lot of people that were more Democrat up until they saw the last four years. And they said, we got to do something. We got to change something. You know, it doesn't necessarily mean that we agree with everything on this side. but we got to do something to change this. And hopefully we have radical changes.

Hopefully we have radical changes in our food, you know, because the reality is, is that if you're going to have to eat shitty food anyways or processed food, because you can't afford the better food, then hopefully someone in our government is looking out for you. And that's what RFK hopefully will do for the people. And the people that he's going to most affect are the people that cannot afford real and genuine whole food. and, you know, those are the people that he's going to save more than anybody.

And so the fact that these Democrats, the Democrats that are just yelling and screaming at him because he wants to make America healthy again, he wants to get out the chemicals, out of the freaking food supply. Those people are supposedly the ones that are always for the people that can't afford the whole foods. But all they want is they want those people. And they've always said this. They want the black community, the poor community.

they want everybody they possibly can. They want to enslave them. They don't want to help you. They just want to control you and your decisions and what you do and how you vote. But they actually don't give a shit about you. And I think that's very obvious with how they talk to RFK Jr. In this confirmation hearing. And we've got to remember these foods we're talking about.

They're highly addictive because of the chemicals they put in them. It's like going to McDonald's or Taco Bell. You want more, more, more because there's addictive chemicals in there. it's like being an alcoholic, but you're a foodaholic of junk food because the junk food tastes so good. And there's something chemically inclined in that to make your brain say, I need more Doritos or I need more fungions or whatever it is. So I think him exposing at least the chemicals in our foods and at least giving us a way to make a decision based on, okay, now we know it's almost like putting more. warning labels on alcohol. Yeah.

At least you know what's in these foods. Or tobacco or cigarettes. But I think they're going to try to ban it, ban a lot of the ingredients out right, hopefully. And we got to do that. But guys, it's already been two hours. We could talk about this forever, to be honest, because there's so much to talk about. There's so many more clips we could get into. And we might do, you know, some follow up on this in the future.

We've got a lot to talk about, though, over the next few days. I mean, we've got these airplane crashes, which we've got to get back into. We got the drone stuff. and a lot of, I mean, there's just been a lot of news come out about UFOs that I desperately want to talk about very, very soon. It'll probably be a Sunday night episode. So stay tuned for our UFO slash drone episode Sunday night. More than likely is when that release. And if we can possibly get to the DC plane crash, tomorrow night we will.

But if not, it'll probably likely be Monday night. So just understand that. Sam, by the way, is there anything else you want to say before we go? and I do want to say, for on behalf of us, thank you for coming on and talking with us about this. Oh, no,

I appreciate you letting me come on. I mean, I think my exact words were, like, if you're doing an episode on RFK, please have me on. The one thing I will just say is that people say this of Trump,

but it's true of RFK as well. This entire hearing was, you know, anyone that wasn't on the right and actually asking him questions, it was just in a constant attack on his character and his integrity. And he does not have to

take this job. I mean, as they've mentioned themselves, he can be making a lot of money litigating. He's a very good attorney. And people say the same thing of Trump. Like, he didn't have to run for president again. He has a great life, can go out and play golf and whatever else. The difference, though, is that he's married to

a celebrity, a beloved Hollywood celebrity. He is losing all kinds of friends, social connections. His own family has been turning against him. Trump at least did not suffer that part of it.

You know, his family is 100% behind him. He's not really losing anybody like that. RFK has really put a lot on the line for years now to even speak up about this stuff, but to really go front and center and put himself in front of the Senate and in front of the country and stand on the exact same positions that he has held that I've heard him say for over a decade now. I really believe this man has integrity, and I really do think that he will do what's right if they confirm him.

And I'm very, very hopeful that that happens. I agree. I 100% agree with that. And we'll see what happens. We don't have, like I said, we do not have a public date for a vote on him. I mean, listen, that side of the aisle is going to do everything they can to, you know, delay, to try to figure out who, you know, they're probably even trying to talk to Republicans to try to get those people not to vote for him. They're doing everything they can because you have to understand that people like RFK,

even Tulsi Gabbard you know Tulsi Gabbard was nominated as a national or sorry the director of national intelligence and there's a lot of people saying that she may not actually even make it through which it should be no surprise because you bring someone like Tulsi Gabbard very level

headed ex-military vet Democrat and woman and you know they all the things that they should love but when she is going to run the director of national intelligence and she's going to hold intelligence accountable, they got to do whatever they can to keep her the hell out of

there, very similarly to RFK. Anytime they want to desperately keep someone out of a position, you've got to ask yourself why. Yeah, and especially just like Cash Patel too. Yeah, especially people that are, that are, you know, well meaning, well informed and good intentions. And yeah, Cash Patel coming through with the FBI nomination for FBI director, I think he would be amazing if he gets confirmed, but there are a lot of deep state programs and agencies and organizations right now that are very scared because of the people that may be coming in to run them. And listen, it's going to be a very, very hard job for these people, whether it's RFK or Pete Heggseth or Phexeth will not be as bad, but you're talking about Tulsi Gabbard running

intelligence. It's just going to be extremely hard because they, are intelligence. They have their own structure of, you know, I guess I would say power and control outside of the nominated positions that a president is going to nominate. And that's why even if you look back to JFK, the fact that he got assassinated, most people believed by the CIA, obviously JFK would have appointed someone as a CIA director, but that doesn't mean shit because there is always a inside structure of power and policy

that the president or whoever you appoint to that directorship is not going to have anything to do with. So that's what's called the deep state, by the way. Just because you're president and you think you appoint all these people, they're going to lead these agencies, no. There's someone else leading those agencies. And that's the deep state. Those are the dark and clandestine groups or people behind the scenes that are actually running the agency. So that's all I want to say, but we wish the absolute very best for RFK and for all the other nominees. Hopefully they come in, do some good for the United States of America.

And guys, like I said, if you guys want to hear some conspiracy podcast, I will say this. We're going to talk about this freaking plane crash within the next few days because there's a lot of things that we get to talk about in hindsight. We covered that as it was happening. So we were just kind of going off the seat of our pants. but there's there's been a decent amount of developments lately on that you also had the philadelphia playing crash and then um and then you have uh man there's just so much going on i can't even keep track but with that being said sam thank you again so much for coming on uh we're gonna we're we're going to end this song everybody always ask what are you ending the song with this is i won't

stop now by nicky gee and uh so until next time we love you guys Peace out. Peace out, guys. Thanks, Sam. Thanks, guys.