Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - NATO Steering the U.S. Toward World War 3? | UK's Proposal to Deploy Troops to Ukraine

Episode Date: March 4, 2025

In the wake of President Trump's recent contentious meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which ended in a heated disagreement and the cancellation of a planned minerals deal intended to be a step toward a ceasefire with Russia, the geopolitical landscape has become increasingly volatile. The UK's Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, has proposed deploying a 30,000-strong European peacekeeping force to Ukraine, aiming to deter further Russian aggression. President Trump's reluctance to commit U.S. resources has strained NATO alliances, with European leaders now considering alternative defense strategies. Will this pull the United States into a world war on behalf of globalist such as George Soros?

and my friends are waiting in line sharing one last blue can we're going out yeah we saved up every pen hello and welcome to Investigator's podcast i'm your host chat alongside my beautiful wife sherry on tonight's episode we're talking about how hard has been a release in the episode the past couple of days um by the way we have a very special guest tonight which is by the name of parley parley welcome back to the show. Hey, Chad and Sherry. Always great to be with you. Yeah, man. So we've been trying to do this NATO, Ukraine, Trump, Zelensky, World War III episode. I don't know why. I felt like we've had a mental block for the past couple of days. And I know there's been things that Sherry and I disagree on in the past with episodes to where it's like we can't get an episode out.

We don't disagree on this, actually. Not at all. We've talked about the Russia-Ukraine conflict for a long time. It's just for some reason. We've not been able to get this episode out. But this is kind of a two-part thing. We'll see how this goes. But we at least want to announce tomorrow. We will have an episode immediately following Trump's speech in front of Congress tomorrow night. That is Tuesday, March the fourth tomorrow. And Parley, isn't Trump supposed to maybe announce some big things tomorrow night? Yeah, it's crazy to think with all the stuff that's been going on over the past few days with the meeting with Zelensky with the NATO reaction afterwards with now it seems like the U.S. is cutting off funding to Ukraine, which

who could have ever seen that going on with what has happened over the past four years? To now we see almost like different alliances coming around. It seems like, you know, Trump is talking to other leaders in Argentina and Italy and Hungary and maybe we're starting a new alliance now. And maybe, you know, there's been talk with people, even like Elon talking about getting out of NATO, whether that's just, you know, preliminary or whether that has any teeth to that, we'll see. But they're also, the White House is also teasing some kind of major announcement. I don't know if there's a specific announcement or if it's just him, you know, addressing everything

that it has been going on. I guess we'll have to see. But it is, they're building up to be pretty exciting. So we'll see what happens. Yeah, it's also interesting you're talking about potentially a new alliance. I mean, if you think about Hungary, that's Victor Orban, Italy, Argentina, I believe you, who is that, Millie or Milan? Yeah. What's his name? Yeah. It's Millie. Yeah. So all these countries that you're mentioning to where maybe we create a new alliance, a new NATO or a new type of pact, it's all these countries that have resisted the globalist movement. Hungary has been under pressure from the globalist forever because they were not allowing it and illegals to overtake their country in Europe and or at least, you know, in that section of the world.

And so you have Victor Orban that has resisted this continuously. And even George Soros and his foundation has tried to move into Hungary. He was there for a short time until Orban kicked his ass out of Hungary and said, you're no longer allowed in this country because what you're trying to do is you're trying to globalize our country, our sovereign nation. And we're not going to allow that. So it's very interesting, Parley. Do you think this could be a massive shift against globalism and against the New World Order?

And maybe is that what he's going to announce tomorrow? I mean, that would definitely be interesting. And I wouldn't put anything past Trump at this point. I mean, the reaction that NATO had after the meeting with Zelensky kind of surprised me. I thought they'd maybe try to lay low and just try to see what happens. But no, they kind of jumped all into it. and immediately had a meeting in the UK with Zelensky and European leaders, NATO leaders. And it almost seemed like it was a direct reaction to that meeting with Trump that went so poorly,

where they tried to flex their muscles and say, hey, all right, now we're jumping all in behind Zelensky. I don't think that's the place you want to be right now, especially when it seems like the U.S., I don't know if they have a deal. done with Russia, but it seems like they have at least some understandings, you know, already with Putin in Russia that could lead towards either a ceasefire or a permanent peace agreement. But it's just interesting the way everything has been developing. And it's just going so fast. I mean, this is politics on steroids. Now this Trump 2.0 version.

So I wouldn't put anything past Trump at this point. He could surprise this with something we're not even thinking about. And I love how they're trying to put Trump in a corner with $3 billion. When we put $350 billion into Ukraine, I just think that's funny. Okay, we're going to give $3 billion up. What are you going to do now, Trump? Yeah, exactly. Or how about Canada talking about how they have 63 planes and they can send over 10?

What are they talking about? You're going to send over 10 fighter jets, Trudeau? Okay. I'm sure Russia is shaking in their... boots. But listen, I do believe that this is a globalist versus nationalist. I think they hate nationalists. I think, you know, even if you think about how the deep state and the mainstream media wanted to define the term nationalist, you know what they define that term with? White. They put white in front of it. And if they put white in front of nationalists,

then they make that that nationalist term a bad thing. Yes. That's exactly what they do. You're like KKK or something. Exactly. So if you are pro-American, they also. relate nationalism with Nazism, which is kind of interesting considering that all the accusations that are going on against Ukraine at this time, where you all you have to do is search Ukraine and Nazi on X and look at all the photos of Ukrainian soldiers posing with a Ukrainian flag and a Nazi flag. And sometimes they're together in a Ukrainian Nazi flag. Like this isn't just one post here or there. There are a lot of posts on X. And that's what I was telling Chad is a lot of people don't know the history of Ukraine in general.

Like how Putin said that we're going against neo-Nazis when they first started this war. I'm like, what is he talking about? Ukraine Nazis? I've never heard of that before. But when you go into the history and go back and see what he's talking about, he was not lying. Yeah, they actually, Ukraine has statutes. statues inside of Ukraine, especially in pro-Ukrainian versus pro-Russian territory, to where they are Nazi generals or Nazi-type leaders that they worship in a lot of places inside of Ukraine.

And it even goes back to the clip, I think Parley, you sent me the other night where they talk about the Nazi influence on Ukraine. And in more specific terms, when Victoria Newland was speaking to the Secretary of State, I guess, employee or advisor, under Hillary Clinton. where they were essentially trying to dictate who would become the new leader of Ukraine, the Western leader. That was, I think, I believe in 2014. But all of this goes back to even when Russia invaded Ukraine, because if you think back

in history, since the 1990s, even Gorbachev, and when he would say, we're not going to move one inch east. And so they promised Russia this. And so what did we do in every single single. scenario after. We were like an inchworm. Yeah, we moved east. Absolutely.

And we did it very fast, actually. I mean, we moved as close to Russia as you possibly could with the exception of Ukraine. And this is what we did because we wanted to push Russia in this corner. And there's still a lot of, I guess, discussion on why we hate Russia so much. Because even with the Tucker Carlson interview, where he asked Putin, hey, we had heard, I guess, that you may have at one point in time wanted to join NATO. I know, and like NATO is pretty much against Russia. Yeah.

And so he had asked Bill Clinton. Yeah, he'd asked Bill Clinton. He said, you know, hey, what do you think if Russia wanted to join NATO? This is what Putin, a young Putin asked Bill Clinton. And he said, yeah, maybe, maybe, maybe. He said, I asked him later. He said, no, that's probably not going to happen. And of course, it's not going to happen because that's the entire reason for NATO is against Russia.

Exactly. So here's the thing with us is where are we at now? Like, you have the UK and the rest of NATO that is now saying they want to send troops to Ukraine. They're also pushing for a one month ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. This is what the UK stance on this is, right? So, you know, they said, well, Trump's not doing what he's supposed to do. He's the biggest world leader that could end this tomorrow and all this stuff. So now it's like the UK is trying to take charge.

But the reality of this is, is the only reason the UK and Europe wants to have a one-month ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine is because they also, if you, on the other token, say that they need one month to take troops and put them inside of Ukraine. Yes. And what happens when they do that? Because that is kind of a part of NATO. And America is a part of NATO. And once one of these people are killed on Ukrainian ground from Russia, it's a war. It's Article 5. Yeah. And do you actually think that Putin is going to negotiate directly with NATO at this point?

The only person that Putin's going to negotiate with is Trump. I don't think he trusts anybody else. And it doesn't make any sense that NATO can come up with these demands for a 30-day ceasefire. Okay, well, Putin would have to agree to that. What do you think he's going to just agree to that? I don't see that happening at all. He will agree to what Trump was putting forth because he trusts Trump, it seems like. It seems like they have some kind of working relationship of trust back and forth. But I don't think that Putin is going to negotiate directly with NATO at all. Now, Parley, without saying something that if there is someone on the left that is listening right now and their minds not explode because we don't want that to happen, if you guys are listening, please shield your ears or your brain from what I'm about to say. But Parley, we've talked about this.

We've talked about this in Telegram. Think about this. You have because of the Russia-Ukraine war in which the United States directly influenced, for sure, because even after since the 1990s, we said that we were not going to move one inch closer towards Russia, although we absolutely 100% did. And so instead, what do we do? Well, so under Biden Harris, and they knew the war was coming, Jeffrey Sachs, went to the White House, and we actually have to clip of that

and we'll decide if we're going to play it or not in just a minute. But he had went to the White House and said, listen, do not at all not entertain this security deal which Putin put forth and said, look, you guys have screwed us continually. You've said you're not going to move closer to us. You've done it in every way, shape, and form.

And so I'm offering you a security deal to where it says Ukraine's not going to be a part of NATO. You're going to quit meddling in. elections in Ukraine. And this was in 2022, I believe. 21, I believe, yeah. So it was after Biden Harris administration. He offered this security deal and the Biden Harris administration said, ha ha, screw you.

And you know what they did instead? They went to Ukraine. They met with Zelensky. Then they had a press conference on international television. And they brought Zelensky up with Kamala Harris. Yeah. And they said, hey, what our main goal is right now is to bring Ukraine into NATO. Yes.

It was like they were instigating this shit. It was like if you could instigate anything, that's the way you do it. Like put it in Putin's face. Yes. And Chad, did they even meet with Putin at all? No, not at all. Why? Why would you not do that?

Because they've never done it. They don't want any relationship with Putin whatsoever. I mean, at all. And all they wanted to do was instigate this war. And why? But we also have to think about how much money has come out of the United States. tax payer dollars, $300-something billion, and there is $100 billion of that money missing that we don't even know where it is.

Guess where it is? The people that push for this war over years and years and years finally got their payoff, in my opinion. And I'm telling you a lot of Biden's have that in their pocket right now. And not only that, but you think about the million soldiers or not even people that wanted to be soldiers have died in this war. Well, so, yeah, so there's 600,000 Ukrainians and probably 600,000. or 500,000 Russians. And that was a good point that J.D. Vans brought up in that meeting, whereas he didn't,

he brought it up, but he didn't stick to it. I wish he would have made it a bigger point of the fact that Ukraine is basically grabbing military age men off the street, sometimes while they're walking their dog, and they go kicking and screaming because they know they're being kidnapped and being sent to the front lines to die. That is basically what they're, what is being happened because they just don't have enough people to continue this war. So I don't know what the end game is here for Zelensky and Ukraine, besides involving NATO and getting their boots on the ground and turning this into World War III because it's pretty clear they don't have soldiers, enough soldiers to keep this war going. They're not going to win. I keep hearing about all the people in the media, even people like Glenn Black and Glenn Beck are trying to make the point that Ukraine has won and Russia is lost.

I don't understand what he's talking about. But Russia is going to win this war if it goes. on for, you know, a few more months or something like that. There's only so much that can be done throwing money at a problem. And even if you really think that putting NATO troops on the ground in Ukraine is going to help them win this war, besides turning it nuclear, it just takes it to another level and basically brings on Armageddon, there's no way that even with NATO backing them with troops that they are going to win this war.

It's not going to happen. Well, do you remember when Zelensky came out and said, Article 5 must be invoked right now because Russian missile hit Poland? And so they tried to push this narrative. And guess whose missile actually hit Poland? It was Ukrainian missile. We had pictures and videos coming out. It was a Ukrainian missile. And they literally tried to blame it on Russia.

Yes. They literally sent a missile inside of Poland to try to blame it on Russia to invoke our Article 5 to get the United States into a world war. This is how Ukraine wants to end this war. They want to end it with world domination, world devastation, I guess is what I probably should say. But this is not just a Zelensky thing and a Trump thing or a Biden thing. This is a globalist thing.

They want to disrupt sovereign nations, you know, such as Russia and the United States. But I think you also have to understand it is a globalist thing. And that's why they implanted. Zalinski. Don't forget Zelensky was an actor and a comedian before he became president of the country. Yeah, it's perfect. I mean, even though he didn't act

the greatest in the meeting the other day with Trump and J.D., but nonetheless, he was an actor and he did a lot of weird shit. But he's a part of the system, right? He's a part of the same system we have here in the United States. Parley, let me ask you, do you think that if we send, not we, but if the UK sends troops to Ukraine. What does Trump do in that situation?

Should we be pulling out of NATO and should we do it like now? Like maybe the announcement, the big news should maybe be tomorrow night by saying we are done with NATO officially. We're pulling out. NATO have fun. And maybe here's our new alliances. Peace out, bro. I agree. I don't see the benefit of, I mean, just what benefit do we get as a nation for being

part of NATO. I don't see one. We basically are their entire budget. We give them more money than all the other countries put together. So we fund all of it, yet they don't stand for our interests. So why are we in it? And whether that is actually withdrawing from NATO, or I'm not sure what kind of executive actions he could take because it was actually something that was passed by the Senate back in the day. So I'm not sure exactly what his actions could be, but maybe we just, as with everything the government does, they choose rules to enforce. Maybe we just don't enforce it. So if something happens where, you know, Article 5 would technically be invoked, we just say, yeah, we're just going to not do that. How about that? And just ignore it. Absolutely. I want to play a quick clip.

This is Alex Jones, and he was in his vehicle. Parley, you actually sent this to me. the other day. But this is what Alex Jones' response was when he heard about UK and Europe sending troops to the Ukraine battlefield, essentially. And they're trying to call them peacekeeping troops. But in the speech that I heard from Kyra Starmor, that's not what he said. He's saying, we're sending troops. He didn't say peacekeeping.

He didn't even mention that. But this is Alex Jones, very colored response to this. Listen. I am begging everyone, not just in America, but around the world to take. what I'm saying here very seriously and understand that what I'm telling you is what basically all the mainline military analysts, not just here, but around the world agree on, okay? If the war that Europe and the EU have started, NATO has been gone on for 15 years against Russia, totally encircling them, continues in every scenario and it's a nuclear war, okay?

That's why Trump's trying to stop this, okay? Because once Russia defeats the NATO proxy forces, which is done, NATO is going to invade officially. So today, Kierr-Starmer and Zelensky, all of them met with the European leaders, and they agreed the majority of them to send troops in the next month calling them peacekeepers to fight the Russians. That's not what peacekeepers do. Do you fucking understand me, okay? This is not a game.

Now, why would they be so crazy? Because the EU is collapsing, their birth rate, they're flooding them with illegals, massive socialist taxes. They said their business model is a 30-year war with Russia. And they think Russia will back down and just let them have a conventional war with them. And then the deputy head of the unelected EU commission said a month ago, and then we're going to break up Russia. I mean, these are psychotics, okay?

They're absolutely out of their minds. I mean, Kyrr-Starmor used to run the government pedophile cover-up operation for 15 years. Look it up. I mean, these are real demons, people. They launch COVID, for God's sakes, and got caught. So their backs are against the wall. The only move they have left, the only card they have, Trump talks about cards is war, is that control.

I remember like 15 years ago, France tried to pull out of the EU. And I remember the head of the EU said, there'll be war if you do. What they mean is we'll have NATO start a war with Russia. That's how NATO and the EU hold the world hostage is by using the threat of war with Russia to maintain control. We get hundreds of billions a year in military funding. They launder to themselves.

It's a bunch of crux. And Trump is trying to bring it to an end. This is so dangerous. So I'm going to say it again. Again, they had their conference yesterday and today, and they just announced in the EU, the headlines are all on ex-politico AP Reuters, just, oh, hey, peacekeepers, sending troops, and the enemy them get killed. Well, Article 5's invoked, and now the Ato's officially war with Russia. I'm going to try to use Romania now as the detonator. Now they're just going to do it themselves.

Total madness. Everything's aligned for total war. And Trump has said that. This is beyond insane. I'm going to be on the air. Coming up like an hour and a half, covering all of this. Just get your shit together, people, and get serious and get out of your normalcy bias. We're in the fourth turning right now. And normally governments and empires launch big wars during these crises, stay in power. But there's nuclear weapons now. We can't do it.

I don't know how I can get it through people. And I saw some of the conservatives. Oh, France are pussies. They can't fight. They're going to go attack the Russians and then drag the U.S. into it. Starmers said, going to go to war with Russia in a video I posted and as peacekeepers and then America will have to defend us.

They're dragging us into fucking nuclear war. God damn it. All right. So there you go. He was very colored there. And listen. I agree with him. You have to.

You have to be colored here because if you're not very vocal in what your opinion is on what is going on right now, then I don't know what to tell you. Parley and Sherry, I'm going to propose a question to both of you. And this is something that was going to. ask you earlier and I actually forgot. So that was my bad. But what happens in a situation to where Trump and this administration create an alliance with Russia? Imagine this. The United States pulls out of NATO. They say, we're done with NATO. And think about NATO for a second. I want to, I want to just kind of give you guys. But NATO is no benefit for United States. No, they're not.

But listen. Let me give you a picture of what I'm talking about. Okay. If you look at the NATO countries, aka the European Union, because outside of the United States is the EU. So if you think about the EU, ask most people to live in the EU how they think about the EU. Well, they think that it is controlled 100% by globalists by these NGOs that are invading the countries with illegals that are completely disrupting their sovereignty and every way of life that they've always known. That is what is happening in the UK and Europe, throughout Europe. Yeah.

We're seeing it in Ireland. We're seeing it in, in Germany. We're seeing it in England. We're seeing it everywhere. And they are completely disrupting their way of life. 100%. That is NATO, aka EU. A.k.a. globalist.

AKA globalist. 100% globalist influence. Yeah. So then you also got to think about countries like Hungary, parlay, to what you were saying earlier, and Italy and Argentina. You know, you think about these countries. These countries have resisted in large part the European Union push to bring them in. When Hungary refused the European Union, I guess, kind of injection, they were penalized.

They said, well, guess what? You're not going to get goods. You're not going to get anything you need for your country. And guess what they are going. Yeah, we're going to penalize you. F you. Yeah. So what happens, though, Parley, in your opinion, and we're not being Russia sympathizers,

but how big of an alliance with Russia and the U.S. United States be if we ever somehow work that out because they want you to believe that's the worst thing that could possibly happen. But what if it's not? What if it's like maybe the best thing that ever happens against the globalist? I think it's interesting to debate. The problem with it right now is that they're part of BRICS. And BRICS is that organization of countries that includes China, Iran, Brazil. I'm not sure who else is in there. Maybe there's Turkey in there. I don't know. I think Turkey's negative. Yeah. And they what, Turkey is. Yeah. And they have their own money form coming out.

They're trying to, yeah, they're trying to devalue the U.S. dollar, which, by the way, it's already screwed anyway. Right. So the only way that that could ever go anywhere is if Russia pulls out of bricks. And if they do that, they're totally screwing over China and Iran and all those other countries. So to make that big of a leap, they would have to have some security and some knowledge that, they're going to be good going forward because, I mean, let's face it, Trump is here for four years. We see the way that U.S. politics is swinging back and forth between different parties. If, I mean, it could be a great four years with Trump and the United States and Putin and Russia. But if Democrats become back in in charge back in the upcoming election in 28 or 29, whenever they take office again.

Right. that would totally flip everything on Russia. And they would almost, well, now they screwed over China and they screwed over everybody else to align with the United States. That wouldn't put them in a good position going forward. So it's nice to think. And maybe there is some kind of understanding that we could have there. But I hesitate to think that they would jump that far based on the way that U.S. politics swings. Yeah.

So it would almost have to be the United States becomes a dictatorship under someone. that is an alliance with Russia. Because otherwise... Don't say dictatorship. Because people are going to take you wrong, like a dictatorship of their own people or what? Yeah. I'm just saying that to Parley's point, he makes a great point, right? United States politics and especially considering you have all these states that are

implementing these new laws and new rules and all this stuff about illegals voting. They are undermining... Those are old laws. No, no, no. What are you talking about? laws being put in place. Oh, where they can vote. Sorry.

Yes, Arizona is trying to fight right now. The fact that Arizona is allowing people without IDs, even illegals to vote. Arizona is trying to fight that and courts are dismantling their fight. Yeah. California has already done that, by the way. They're moving towards this new system. We had worried about that in 2024. But now in 2028, who the hell knows what's going to happen?

And obviously, Russia's looking at this and saying, well, we have no idea what's going happen in 2028 in the United States because I think if Russia looks at it and many people around the world look at this, the influence of globalists around the world, and especially in the United States, if you look at George Soros and the amount of funding he has put into place with not just judges, but also the prosecutors and politicians and you name it, they are the biggest funders of the deep state in the United States. And they're not even United States citizens. This is a globalist movement. And so Putin understands this. He knows this. And that's why the alliance between Russia and the United States may never work, although I do think that it might be a good alliance

if you could ever do that. It would be a great alliance. But the problem is, too, that I hate to say this, but United States has made alliances with Russia on some kind of extent. And then we don't follow through with them. Yeah, we break it every single time. We have broke it every single time. We have broke it every time. We totally screw them over. Yeah, we have screwed Russia over so many times. And then everybody is like, oh, hate Russia, hate Russia. But look at what the United States has done to Russia.

Parley, let me ask you this. So you've heard, obviously, that, you know, I don't want to go UFO here. But just for a second. Advanced technology. We know that Russia likely is the leading dominant force in the world for nuclear weapons, at least from what we understand. Now, you would like to think that the United States is that dominant force of nuclear weapons, but we for sure know that Russia has hypersonic ballistic nuclear warheads. And I'm talking about a lot of them.

It's not just a few. And I remember when the United States actually tested one a couple years back. And all of those tests failed, except for one. And it was like, damn, the United States is testing these. and it was put out there that they failed this test. And Russia already had it. Russia has it completely. They've actually used hypersonic missiles in Ukraine.

Yeah. Not, not, you know, with nuclear weapons on board, but they had hypersonic missiles that were traveling at Mach 10 where to go from Russia to Ukraine in like... In seconds. Yeah, like a few minutes.

Yeah, basically no defense. There's no defense in the world that could stop these missiles. No, I don't think so. I really don't. And, you know, you hear Trump talking about, well, we got to get the same thing that Israel has, you know, the Iron Dome. I'm like, how the hell do we not have a defense system like the Iron Dome? Yeah.

And why don't we have the missiles like Russia? Yeah, but also like we have funded primarily the Iron Dome. Yeah, we ourselves don't have that. But he said he wanted it at. Oh, of course he does. But why do we not have it already? But also the Iron Dome would do absolutely nothing against those kind of missiles. So I don't really know what the Iron Dome would do.

Yeah, you're right. Because some people have argued this with me before about hypersonic ballistic nuclear missiles. Hypersonic missiles, they have technology, and we know this, by the way. Russia has technology to where not only can they travel at Mach 8 to Mach 9 to Mach 10, which is insane speeds, but they can also turn in a direction to avoid, I guess, some type of defense system very fast. I'm talking about in an inkling of a second. Almost like UFOs. Kind of, sort of.

There you go. But they can move off that path very fast. And it's because they have boosters on either side. And those boosters, which contribute to their mock speeds, can completely divert the path of that rocket instantaneously. So this is not like some type of crazy technology. It's just the fact that when you disrupt that flight path with a. with a booster system on one side or the other, you can turn instantaneously to avoid some type of

either detection device or missile defense system. And when you have this, you're screwed. And if this thing is coming over to the United States and it has a, it has multiple nuclear warheads on board. And then maybe you think about this, it's not just one. Maybe it's 20 coming over. Yeah.

They could destroy the United States before the United States ever has a chance to actually fire back. Sure. And I'm sure we can do that to Russia as well. Can, but I don't think on the scale that you think, and I honestly, I hate to say this, but I don't think the United States has that good of technology. No. No. I think Russia's, I think Russia beats us in the rocket system all day, every day. What do you think, Parley?

I mean, it's interesting to debate, but of course, if you ask Ashton Forbes, he probably says that we have technology that we're not even talking about or even thinking about right now. that could basically wipe everybody out. So it's hard to say how far down the rabbit hole this goes. But let's just say I don't want to find out. We should be doing everything we can to not find out. Yes, I totally agree with you. And how do we do that parley?

Like to stop the Ukraine-Russian war, what do you think it would be? Well, I just heard this video from Glenn Beck talking about it, where he's basically going through and just talking about how genius Trump is. And again, like we said, if you're on the left and you hate everything we're saying right now, we'll at least if you could hear the explanation that he talks about, where he is basically saying that Trump is playing 4D chess while everybody else is playing checkers, where he's saying, all right, Putin, we'll go ahead. we'll say you won.

We'll buy these rare earth minerals from you. So we'll pay you and you can declare victory. And then he's saying the same thing to Zelensky in Ukraine. And he's just saying, all right, so we're going to set up this rare earth minerals deal with you as well. You can declare victory. And then we'll buy the minerals from you too. So everybody's happy. Everybody's getting paid.

and at the same time, everybody can declare victory. Nobody's going home with their, you know, tail between their legs. And it really is genius. All right. So here's the video you're talking about, by the way. This is Glenn Beck talking about is Trump playing 4D chess? Listen. All right.

I want to show you a chalkboard or a whiteboard here on the 3D or 4D chess that President Trump is playing. Nobody gets it. This guy is a genius, and the EU just shot themselves in the foot. It'll work to America's advantage, I think, but you could have been a winner too as well. Let me show you. What are Trump's goals? Because he is marking everything off. He promised I did that, did that, did that.

Some of his goals end the never-ending wars. Put America first, reduce spending, reduce wage. and corruption. Tech and AI and box China. Make sure we're still a superpower. Okay. Let me just show you what he was doing and what he is doing with Putin and everybody else. He's offering a deal where Russia, because be honest, Russia lost. Okay, everybody knows that. Nobody's saying that, but it's true. Russia was supposed to be able to go in there for two weeks and take all of the Ukraine. Ukraine is not a NATO ally. Ukraine stopped them. Now, we helped, but it wasn't NATO, so you don't need that. Because really, if you can't beat Ukraine, you think you're going to beat Poland and all.

I'm going to stop this for just a second, because you already know what I'm going to say, Parley. I think this is what your point was earlier. Russia did not lose to Ukraine. Russia so far is losing to NATO. It is not Ukraine. No, I think it's not NATO. I think they're losing against the United States of America. Well, absolutely they are. I disagree with both of those.

I don't think Russia's losing at all. I think Russia never was trying to beat Ukraine. That was never there. If you listen to Putin when he talks, actually listen to him. This is the problem a lot with the left wing media. They don't listen to what Trump says. They take one little point that he said. and they make a much bigger deal about it than what he's actually saying.

If you actually listen to what Putin was saying from the beginning, it had nothing to do about taking over Ukraine and then going on to other countries in NATO in Eastern Europe. No, it was always about stopping this Ukrainian government, which was unelected, which was put in by the United States, which has been promoting, according to him, all these Nazi movements there in eastern Ukraine and going directly against a lot of native Russians that lived in eastern Ukraine. That was his whole point from the beginning.

It had nothing to do with actually taking over the whole country because when the war first started, they were basically moving, you know, without even being touched. They could have taken the whole freaking country right from the beginning if they really wanted to. That wasn't their goal. Yeah, I agree with that. And I guess my point to this is is that the only reason, though, that they have not. And by the way, I think that they maybe couldn't take the country, but maybe they could.

But at the very least, they had a much larger battle because of the United States, given billions of dollars and support and all this other stuff to Ukraine. That's the only reason they wouldn't take Ukraine if it had it been for the United States in particular. But regardless, Ukraine would have already been done. They would have had no chance at all without the support of the United States. But I do agree with Parley here that absolutely, if Russia wanted to take Ukraine, they could do it tomorrow. Yeah. And they still could do it tomorrow. Because they want them to be their friends too.

Well, I mean, you have to understand that 50% of the population of Ukraine are Russians. Yeah. And, you know, they speak very close languages. There is the Ukrainian language. There is a Russian language. and they're very, very similar. But as we've talked to people in Ukraine, you know, and Russians at the same exact time, by the way, is there's some things Ukrainians understand that Russians are saying and there are some things they don't understand. But there's a huge influence of Russian culture in Ukraine.

Absolutely. The only differences is that when the United States and the West moved into Ukraine, they wanted to start trying to reverse and disrupt the culture. And it's not just the United States. It is also on behalf of people like George Soros and the NGOs. They wanted to disrupt their Russian influence on Ukraine because they want Russia destroyed. Yeah, but we have to remember why Russia went in in the first place. Exactly. Russia went in in the first place because they are feeling...

Boxed out. Boxed out, basically. Yeah. We had moved eastward. We have brought everything in. weapons, bioterrorism, like labs, everything on the borders of Russia. Who would not feel boxed in and feel like they have to fight? And we've also literally went against every single treaty we've ever had with Russia.

I mean, the ballistic missile treaty, the security treaty. Even the nuclear treaty. Yeah, the nuclear treaty we did. And also, we go back to when Ukraine used to be the third largest nuclear power in the world other than the United States, Russia, and then there was Ukraine. And then somehow the United States, I believe, convinced them to give up their nuclear weapons. And they actually sent those nuclear weapons to Russia, which is crazy. But the United States is like, whatever, that's the deal we'll make.

If we let Ukraine give up nuclear weapons, we'll send them to you. But that was in the United States benefit because then the United States could, I guess, overarch their authority and power over Ukraine. they could then go install a new government and presidents, and then they have power and control over Ukraine. I want you guys to think about this for a second. Talking about Trump's deal with the mineral rights, I was looking on the map the other day where the map was.

Most of the mineral rights, a lot of them, not all of them, but they're on the borders. And you think about that. If we have mineral rights from United States of America, that means there's going to be Americans. there, right? I don't know. You're making the right point.

And that's why Zulinsky should have taken the deal without the security guarantees because the security guarantees don't matter. Because we're going to have American companies in Ukraine up against the Russian border. So there's your security guarantees. But we don't need to actually spell it out for you, Zolenski. All right. Use your noggin and know that if we're going to have American companies on the ground in your country, they're going to be secured.

All right. Thank you. Thank you, Parley. You took about thought. Just be left to fend for themselves. But I don't know if you want to get back to that video and just play out the rest of it. Yeah, we are. Because he goes into great depth on how everybody basically gets played as the winner here.

And nobody actually has to feel like they lost anything. Yeah, here's the rest of the video. All of NATO, that's ridiculous. Russia lost. But Trump is offering him away to let him claim victory. He can claim victory. The war is over. Plus, money doesn't talk, it screams.

We are after rare minerals. Rare minerals is going to do this for us. Tech A.I. We cannot exist without rare minerals. 70 to 90% of them come from China now. They got a lock on rare minerals. you're not going to be the world leader if we don't have them. That's why Trump said, maybe Greenland should be the 51st state.

No, no, they weren't interested. But if this falls apart, Greenland, look out, you could be the 51st state. He wants to box China. He wants to put America first and the war, reduce spending. Okay, what he's doing is he's offering to buy the rare minerals in the Russian, now Russian part. of Ukraine. Putin's going to like that. It ends the war, and he can say he won because he's taking money now. It also, on our side, weakens the relationship between Russia and China. That relationship, China's not going to be for all of that. And we've made an enemy, a frenemy. Putin, you can't

trust him. But better to have a relationship like this than to be saying that we might going to go into nuclear war. Here's Ukraine. Let Zelensky claim victory because Russia lost. So he claims victory. He gets a secure Ukraine. Why? Not because we put boots on the ground or he's become a NATO member, but because we want to buy his rare earth minerals as well. So that will help them with money, rebuilding, we'll send people in, companies will come in, they'll build the mines, they'll build all the everything. So Ukraine will make money, Russia will make money, we get rare earth minerals at a much cheaper level, and China is no longer involved at all. And it's, again, reduced our dependency on China. Also, it stops our money pipeline, which, gee, reduce waste and corruption.

Okay, the EU, you blew this, guys. It would have allowed you to let the EU claim victory. NATO did it. We won. We held him back. It would have stopped the war, restored their economy, secure their economy. And Europe, you'd be relevant again. Okay? Nobody's afraid of you. Boots on the ground. What do you? The French just going to, actually leave boots on the ground because nobody's going to idiots. So EU could have won as well. And here's what we get out of it. Tell me this is a problem for anybody. We are again a world leader by brain, not our military. No muscle in this. We're not coercing anyone. Everyone can win from this. You box China. You get the rare earth minerals. We're forward thinking for once. Less money to NATO. Europe is stronger. No war.

America wins with no losers. Let's see. Reduce spending. Put America first and the never-ending wars. Gee, yeah, Donald Trump's an idiot. This guy's a freaking genius. And this is the first time I've seen a president actually stand up for America first without hurting everyone else.

we all win. We do. And Parley, I agree with that. 100%. He is a... And thank you for saving me, Parley, because that's what I was trying to say. Yeah, I mean, I agree with him 100% except for once again, Russia has been fighting this entire war basically like holding themselves back. Like, if they wanted to win this war, they could win this war tomorrow.

Don't kid yourselves. All right. So I get it. He explained it well where everybody. can say that they won and everybody benefits. But again, Russia didn't lose this war at all. Yeah, I agree. I mean, and that's the crazy thing is like everyone wants to, especially in mainstream media,

they still feel like they have a stake in the game, right? The deep state feel like, how are we going to shift this narrative to where we make Trump look like an asshole and we make Zelensky and what our goal and our agenda is look like the saviors? like Winston Churchill. We've heard Zelensky be compared to Winston Churchill how many times? And I often go back to this. I've been reading a lot on the JFK assassination in which, by the way, guys,

we're going to have a episode coming out very soon. And we're waiting on those files, just like we still are waiting on the files of Epstein, which we have not got yet. And I'm still holding out hope for Pam Bondi and Cash Patel. I don't know what the deal is. I'm not going to demonize either of them yet. Don't lose hope.

No, we're not losing hope. There was a development there today, too. Did you see that? That they fired some people? Yeah. The field, shoot, I forget the title exactly. The person in charge of the FBI in New York was forcibly removed, basically. He was forced to retire or resign, however it was worded.

Well, they're going to have to because, I mean, when you have this, when you have the people now that is in control of the government for once, or at least in some way, shape, form. Obviously, we have still the massive deep state and all the people in place to bureaucrats that are still holding on the last little bits of power they have. But we, in large part, the reason why Trump's cabinet came into place is because of the people. You know, when they had only Cash Patel trending on X and they had Pam Bondi and Tulsi Gabbard and RFK and RFK's influence on the administration, you know, it is in large part being influenced by the people. And so, when this Epstein thing debacle happened and it did not go down as planned and everyone is holding Pan Bondi to the fire right now and it's not just Pan Bondi but also Cash Patel.

I also think Trump's probably pretty decently upset about it. But you know, then you also have people like Ian Carroll talking about the reason why maybe they're not releasing this because of the Israel influence. Who knows we're going to find out, which we're going to have deep episodes on this. But my point to this is as I've been reading more and more about the JFK assassination and LBJ and his influence and not just his influence on the assassination, likely he was responsible for JFK's assassination because JFK and Bobby Kennedy did not like LBJ. And the main reason for that is because, I mean, according to the book I'm reading,

he was responsible for like 17 murders. And it was all because of all the corruption he was involved in. But the interesting thing about that is, is that a lot of his hit squad, his death squad, him. The people that he put into place to kill all these people when he was doing nefarious shit was people that were involved in the government. They had top secret, top secret security clearances that were involved in intelligence agencies, although not very well known, but they were definitely a part of the government. And in the very least, a lot of these people worked for like, I would just say companies like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, all these defense contractors.

Sounds like deep state to me. Oh, absolutely. Does it sound like the Clinton compound? Well, it is. Absolutely. I mean, the Clinton is 100% of very similarity here. But when you go back to Lyndon B. Johnson, I think he's like maybe worse. I think he was maybe worse than Clinton.

But we also don't know who else was worse than them. And I even go back to Bush's and all this shit. I mean, we just don't fully understand how corrupt our government is. and the people that are put into place until you understand. And it's so scary because most people don't even understand this stuff. Yeah. So when you look at the Ukraine or Russia situation and you don't quite understand what's really going on here, you just at the very least have to understand at the very first part of this.

Our government is corrupt. They are put into place, I believe, by globalists for sure. And I want to get to this clip because I think this is very important. We were talking about the neo-Nazis. And the first part of this clip talks about a neo-Nazi involvement in Ukraine, but specifically, Victoria Newland and the Secretary of State Advisor under Clinton, this is their discussion towards the end of this clip about Ukraine, right? About Ukraine, how and who they were going to install.

And this was their discussion on the phone. And the first part of this is just talking about the influence of the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine. Listen. From the Maidan Revolution in 2014, the U.S. State Department and CIA staged a coup to overthrow the government in the Ukraine. The neo-Nazi Azov Battalion were used as muscle, and the regiment was supplied with weapons from the military industrial complex, and still are. The Azov Battalion and Regiment received backing from Ukraine's Interior Minister in 2014,

as the government had recognized its own military was too weak to fight off the pro-Russian separatists. and relied on paramilitary volunteer forces. These forces were privately funded by oligarchs, the most known being Igor Kolomiski, an energy-magnet billionaire and then-governor of the Dnipropotrovsk region. The fact that a Jewish oligarch is funding neo-Nazi paramilitary forces should give some pause for thought. In addition to Azov, Kolomiski funded other volunteer battalions such as the Dnipero 1 and

Nipro 2, Ada and Donbass units. Azov received early funding and assistance from another oligarch, Sirhi Taruta, the billionaire governor of Donetsk region. In 2015, Andri Diochenko, the spokesperson for the regiment at the time said that 10 to 20% of Azov's recruits were Nazis. The unit has denied publicly that it adheres to Nazi ideology, but Nazi symbols such as the swastika and SS regalia, are rife on the uniforms and bodies, of Azov members. For example, the uniform carries the neo-Nazi wolf's angel symbol, which is a black swastika on a yellow background. I'm going to ask you a question, Parley. You know, this is highly touted with the Azov Battalion and many Ukrainians about the Nazi flag. But isn't it strange how the left is so in support of Ukraine, but yet they also call the president of the United States Nazis, which is supposedly who they are so against?

Make it make sense, right? I mean, how does this make any sense whatsoever? You guys are actually sending billions of dollars to these people that clearly have ties to neo-Nazism. While at the same time, in politics in the United States, you blame Trump for being a Nazi. And you call Elon Musk a Nazi. I mean, again, not to get too political, but nothing they say makes any sense. to me right now. Yeah.

You know, these guys are leaving protests of BLM riots and, you know, like cop killings and all this shit. And then they're then going to a protest against the non-funding of Ukraine and neo-Nazis. Isn't that crazy? I mean, it's like, it's so asinine. It reminds me of like the LGBTQ or the, what is it called, queers for Palestine. That was also a huge movement.

I'm sorry. I got to laugh about that. No, but they're just going to. to get killed. No, it's true. Like, the queers for Palestine. Like, imagine that movement goes to Palestine and then they all just get stolen to death because likely that would happen in that region because they do not agree or believe at

all in LGBTQ anything. That just shows how misguided people are. And I just don't even know what it is. Like, are they misguided? Are they really that stupid? Like, I don't even, I don't understand. Make it make sense to me. Yeah.

And so more of this video we're going to play. Sorry, you're going to have to hear. about three seconds the way you just heard. But it'll get to the Victoria Newland conversation with one of our secretary of state officials under Hillary Clinton in just a moment where they're talking about who we're going to install

and how we're going to play all this out. Neo-Nazi wolf's angel symbol, which is a black swastika on a yellow background. In January 2018, Azov rolled out its street patrol unit called National Drugina to restore order in Ukraine's capital. Instead, the unit carried out pogroms, which is a violent riot,

incited with the aim of massacring or expelling, an ethnic or religious group, particularly Jews. In this case, they went after the Roma community and attacked members of the LGBT community. Maybe that's something to bear in mind for all the people flying the Ukrainian flag together with the pride flag in their bio, on social media. Ukraine is the world's only nation to have a neo-Nazi formation in its armed forces,

a correspondent for the US-based magazine called The Nation, wrote in 2019. How could the neo-Nazi movement get such influence in the Ukraine? Well, let's have a listen to a leaked intercepted conversation between Victoria Newland, lead US point person for the 2014 Maidan Revolution, and Jeffrey Piat, the United States ambassador to Ukraine. The call took place in January 2014, right before the protest movement started to escalate. What do you think? I think we're in play. The Quichco piece is obviously the complicated electron here,

especially the announcement of him as Deputy Prime Minister, and you've seen some of my notes on the troubles in the marriage right now, so we're trying to get a read really fast on where he is on this stuff. But I think your argument to him, which you'll need to make, I think that's the next phone call we want to set up is exactly the one you made to yacht. And I'm glad you sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario. And I'm very glad he said what he said in response. Good.

So I don't think Cleet should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. Yeah. I mean, I guess you think in terms of him not going into the government, just let him sort of stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead, we want to keep the moderate Democrats together. The problem is going to be Tony Book and his guys. And, you know, I'm sure that's part of what Yanukovic is calculating on all of this.

I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's the guy, you know, what he needs is Cleach and Tony Book on the outside. He needs to be talking to them four times a week, you know. I just think Cleach going in, he's going to be at that level working for Yatsnyuk. It's just not going to work. Yeah, no, I think that's right. Okay. Good.

Well, do you want us to try to set up a call with him? Here's the next step. My understanding from that call, but you tell me, was that the big three were going into their own meeting and that Yats was going to offer in that context a three-way, you know, the 3-plus-1 conversation or 3-2 with you. Is that not how you understood it? No, I think, I mean, that's what he proposed, but I think just knowing the dynamic that's been with them where Klichko has been the top dog, he's going to take a while to show up for whatever meeting they've got,

and he's probably talking to his guys at this point. So I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the three, and it gives you also a chance to move fast on all this stuff and put us behind it before they all sit down, and he explains why he doesn't like it. Okay, good. I'm happy. Why don't you reach out to him and see if he wants to talk before or after? Okay. We'll do. Thanks.

Okay. I've now written, oh, one more wrinkle for you, Jeff. Yeah. I can't remember if I told you this or if I only told Washington this, that when I talked to Jeff Feldman this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy, Robert Seri. Did I write you that this morning? Yeah, I tell that. He's now gotten both Seri and Bon Kimun to agree that Seri could come in Monday or Tuesday. Okay. So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and have the UN help glue it and, you know, fuck the EU.

No, exactly. And I think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does start to gain altitude, the Russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. And again, the fact that this is out there right now, I'm still trying to figure out in my mind why Yanukovych that. But in the meantime, there's a party of regions faction meeting going on right now, and I'm sure there's a lively argument going on in that group at this point. But anyway, we could land jelly set up on this one if we move fast. So let me work on Clitchco, and if you can just keep – I think we want to try to get somebody within international personality to come out here and help to midwives this thing.

And then the other issue is some kind of outreach to Yanukovych, but we probably regroup on that tomorrow as we see how things start to fall into place. So on that piece, Jeff, when I wrote the note, Sullivan's come back to me, VFR saying, you need Biden. And I said probably tomorrow for an add-a-boy and get the deeds to stick. So Biden's willing. Okay, great. So there you go.

There's Victoria Newland. And for those of know who she is, she's an American diplomat and former government official who served in various roles with the U.S. State Department, most notably, she was under a U.S. Secretary of State for Political Affairs under the Biden administration from 2021 to 2024. Before that, she served as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs under President Obama, where she played a key role in the U.S. policy during 2014 Ukraine crisis. She is well known for her involvement in the U.S. Ukraine relations, particularly for her role in the events leading up to and following the 2014 Maiden Revolution, where a pro-Western government replaced a pro-Russian leadership in Ukraine,

a leaked phone call, which is what we just heard, from that period in which she was heard discussing the composition of Ukraine's next government and using strong language about the European Union saying, fuck the EU, gain significant attention. She has been a strong advocate for U.S. military and economic support for Ukraine, particularly after Russian annexation of Crimea and its later full-scale invasion of 2022. So, this is just kind of, I guess, part of you actually get to hear them in a very brief moment in time talking about how they're going to structure the next government of Ukraine. And this is around the time that she was, or sorry, not she, but the CIA director went to Ukraine.

This is also when George Soros Foundation, the Open Society Foundation, was heavily involved in funding the, I guess you can call them protesters slash rioters. just like they did in BLM, just like the Open Society Foundation also influenced Antifa. They have influenced mainstream media. They have influenced media in Ukraine. They've influenced media in Georgia, the Open Society Foundation, which is one of the biggest NGOs in the world. What they do is they assist intelligence agencies by overthrowing government and spending billions of dollars on this propaganda campaign. And so they work with governments and people like Victoria Newland. And I also believe it was Victoria Newland that went in front of Congress and said, yes, we do have bio labs in Ukraine.

And this was the exact same woman. So she was heavily involved in this. But what do you take from that conversation, Parley? Was this kind of like just a, you know, me and you talking late at night if we're some type of important official in the United States government where we're figuring out how we're going to install a new government where we that we can control? Yeah, it's just it's scary. to think that this is how politics basically works behind the scenes where we never really get to hear any of this stuff except for when you have a clip like this that gets recorded and exposed. But it just makes you think throughout history how many times we've had conversations like this

behind the scenes that basically decide things. We try to think that, I mean, Democrats will yell to the end of days that were a democracy and you've got to protect a democracy. even though it's obvious that we're not a democracy. We are a constitutional republic. But either way, a democracy or a constitutional republic, you try to think that, hey, the people are in charge. They're the ones that vote and elect things. They elect people to represent them.

And that is how it's supposed to work. But then you see in videos like this, no, actually, in a lot of places around the world, especially when we're involved, the United States. Like just think for a second. We try to think growing up as a United States citizen in this country that we're the good guys. Russia's the bad guy. China is the bad guy.

Well, they probably think the exact same thing when they grow up in those countries, which they obviously do. They think that they're the good guys and we're the bad guys. And this sure gives a lot of evidence that they might be more right than we are. Yeah. No, I agree. I totally agree. And so as I was talking about the Open Society Foundation,

Bill Gates. They heavily funded the Maiden Revolution inside of Ukraine in 2014. And when I say heavily funded, they organized in addition to funding. So what does this mean and how does this relate to us? Well, think about this. There was cover, sorry, it was color and cover revolutions that were designed to destabilize governments, delegitimized leadership, and install preferred regimes using a mix of civil unrest, media and, and NGO-backed activism. So let's think about it from George Soros standpoint here in the United States. Mass protests and riots as a political weapon.

Now, Soros-funded groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter were key players in nationwide unrest seen during 2016 to 2020. Guess who was president then? Donald Trump, which is why I keep saying that just because Trump is president does not mean this shit is going to be over because that's when they fund these organizations and these groups. Yeah, and they're going to ramp it up. Absolutely.

they are. So in 2016 and 2017, protests against Trump's election, women's march and Tiva Street battles and attempts to delegitimize his presidency were all ramped up by Soros. 2020, George Floyd protests, which quickly escalated into organized riots, destruction of cities and calls for defunding the police a direct weakening of internal stability, all also funded by Soros. Parallel to former regime. So similar to how Soros-back groups fueled protests in Ukraine in 2014 and Georgia in 2003, the U.S. saw large-scale, well-funded, anti-government protests aimed at undermining the Trump administration. And these protests were pushed globally, painting the U.S. as a failing democracy,

another color revolution tactic used against foreign leaders. And so Soros and funding of the radical activist groups, he used the Open Society Foundation that directly fueled Black Lives Matter and Antifa-aligned organizations. He had spent $220 million. to the Black Lives led racial justice groups in 2020, including BLM affiliates. Groups like Color for Change, a major defund the police advocate received millions from Soros-back NGOs. And then you also think about BLM itself, funneled money into the leftist political efforts

similar to how Sorosback groups in Serbia in 2000 and Macedonia in 2017 over through nationalists. And then you think about Antiva's role. Antiva operates as a decentralized role. revolutionary force, much like Soros-backed youth groups in Ukrainian maiden protests. The exact same thing this just happened in Ukraine. This encourages street violence and destruction of historical monuments and ideological purges. They did this in Ukraine during 2014 as well.

They wanted to upend and completely delete everything the Ukraine ever stood for. And that's what they did in 2014, Ukraine. And it was all backed by Soros. Soros did the exact same thing with Antifa and Black Lives Matter. And then you think about media manipulation. They have to control the narratives. And this is crucial for a successful regime change. Just as foreign coups, corporate media in the United States is used to manufacture consent for political change.

Is their corporate media aligned with Soros, the DNC and intelligence agencies, spent four years trying to delegitimize Trump's presidency. They used Russiagate impeachment attempts and then later the 2020 election narrative. And then social media censorship. They used social media to silence political opposition. And then they started coming out with this fact-checking organizations that were tied to Soros and globalist foundations where they used to control the narratives to dismiss evidence of corruption. So everything we have been talking about, which now AI is telling you, is a fact. We've been talking about this parlay for years. I mean, when we talked about if you go to fact-check.org or all these other various platforms where they say,

this is a lie, this is a lie. Oh, you say something about COVID-19. That's a lie as well. That's because it's a liberal. No, but that's what I'm saying. Yeah. This has been a weapon by the deep state and has been heavily funded by George Soros. Yeah.

So do you see the, do you see the correlation here, Parley? Definitely. And I think it just serves as a lesson. I mean, we're giving all the examples of what happened in the past. Well, just everybody pause in the future now when something happened. and try to not jump to conclusions before we know more about what's going on, whatever that topic is. I mean, you can look back over what's been going on these past few weeks and everything.

Okay. Well, we see what's going on with NATO, United States, Zelensky, and everything. Well, let's pause because the mainstream media's narrative of what they say is going on might not actually be what is really going on. And I think we tend in this day and age to just jump to. conclusions right away because of evidence that we're told of people just claiming things without any kind of facts behind it and trying to make conclusions based on those claims that we don't even know where they got these claims from. And it just leaves us to always get to these situations where we're like,

oh, wait a minute, this fact that we thought was true was completely made up, had no basis. and now you're basing your opinions on things that you've heard that we're never even true to begin with. So everybody just needs to pause in the future. Maybe I don't even know, can we wait 24 hours to kind of like let things develop whenever things happen in the future? I guess we can't because everything is instant these days. But we always got to just take all the information that you're getting

kind of with an asterisk and let it develop. and let it be analyzed and let it be scrutinized and see what sticks because things don't seem to always end up the way that we first think that they are going. Yeah, I think part of my problem with this podcast is that when we first got into this, I was like so surface level of how screwed up our government and the world is. And in a lot of ways we still are because as I've been reading lately and just kind of getting into the dirty details of how dirty our government is and the, I would say, oligarchy and also the deep state and the globalist. It's insane to me. It's insane to me that people live in this

country and other countries, but I'm just talking about the United States, for example, right now that we're just okay and we just deal with this and we go to work every day and we live our lives. And all this shit has happening behind the scenes that 100% does influence our politics it influences our country and our future. And for some reason, they always want this narrative to be told that whoever the president is doesn't affect you. So who cares? It does 100%. All the policies do affect us, including what Trump is doing right now as far as his decisions on Ukraine is going to massively affect the United States.

And it could even be as deep as we don't get into World War III with Russia. We actually stop a World War III scenario. you know, what would happen if Kamala Harris was in office right now? I mean, we would be so close to World War III. We'd probably maybe already be in it. Yeah. Because they would keep puffing their chest. They would keep calling Russia the enemy.

And the reality of this is Trump's not going to do that. Yeah. He's going to come out and he's going to say, hey, we want to stop the war. Yeah. And we want to also maybe have a relationship with Russia. That's not a bad thing. That's what I was going to say. outside of the outside influences,

what do you think Trump's going to do with Putin? Well, I think that hopefully we find out tomorrow night. I do. And that's actually kind of why we were going to do this podcast, even though it kind of worked out to talk about what we wanted to talk about. But tomorrow night, we're going to record an episode. I know Parley, you're going to be there. I don't know about Sam.

I don't know if we've got a response from her yet. But we're going to have some people on tomorrow to kind of just discuss and go through Trump speech tomorrow. We'll probably start the episode, I don't know, 30 minutes prior to Trump speech. We will do our very best not to talk through the speech. We'll have to see how that goes. But either way, you guys can listen. You guys can listen to the Trump speech in its entirety without us.

But if you want to hear our opinions, we might interrupt here and there. But we're going to try to get through the speech without interrupting too much. And then after the speech, we're going to talk and kind of break down whatever he says. I'm very, very curious as to what Trump says tomorrow night. Because everything is, yeah, everything's going down right now. And so he has a massive moment in front of the United States and the world to say it like it is. And will he do that?

Do you think he's going to say something crazy parlay? Like, do you think we're going to pull out of something or just maybe announce a new alliance or do you think he's just not going to do that? Do you think you have mentioned Epstein, by the way, in the files? I think that is as far as for what Trump is talking about, that's probably so far in the back burner based on everything that's going on in the world right now. I don't know that we really need to talk about specifically Epstein and kind of a state of the union, even if this isn't a state of the union, it's kind of just a general address to Congress.

Maybe worth a mention, but there's just so many more important things right now than that. let's leave that to Pam Bondi and let her figure all that stuff out behind the scenes right now and hopefully we get to the bottom that soon. But yeah, it's just, it's crazy to think what he could be talking about. It has to be something to do with NATO relations, maybe talking about Russia in general, maybe talking about this new partnership with a few other countries that seem to be more aligned into our core beliefs. But it's check the polymarket.

website and I'm sure they'll come up with some great bets you can make tomorrow night to see what the topics are going to be because they seem to be on top of all those kind of things. So it'll definitely be interesting, that's for sure. Well, they definitely pegged the election. We did that live stream. I think it was a video live stream where we were talking about the polymarket and like who was going to become president. They nailed that shit.

I remember it. They did. It was insane. But guys, listen, that's going to be it for us. us join us tomorrow. It'll be a, I don't know, it's probably going to be like a three hour episode because Trump's probably going to talk for an hour and a half. We're going to be on 30 minutes before and probably 30 minutes after. So it might even be longer in three hours. But either way, we're going to break it down. We're going to see if Trump says something major

tomorrow night. Please join us for those that are listening before tomorrow night. Our episode will probably be out, I don't know, like 1130 tomorrow night or 12 maybe. It depends. on what time Trump gets done. But guys, I do want to say this. If you want to follow us, go follow us over on X, investigate Earth podcast or our Facebook or Instagram. If you want to help support us, the best way you can support us right now

is just by sharing our episodes with everyone that you possibly know and rating us five stars on any platform the listener podcast. Parley, do you have anywhere you want to send people to you? No, just my ex. It's already been linked before in episodes past. And I follow. so many people associated with the show. So it'll be out there.

But yeah, you can interact with me. You can send me messages. You can give me shit mail if you want. Talk shit to me. Bring it on. There you go. Well, we're going to close this out with I was here by maybe. And Parley and Sherry and I have definitely heard the hell out of the song in the past couple of days.

Yes, we have, Parley. But it's a good song. Guys, until next time, we love you. Have a great night. We'll talk to you and see you tomorrow. Peace out, guys. Blue shirt first but I'm thinking so I'm kissing him so I'm