Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - President Trump’s Inner Circle Moves to Military Bases: What’s Really Going On? Conspiracy Podcast

Episode Date: November 3, 2025

In this episode of the Investigate Earth Podcast, Chad and Sheri dig into breaking reports that President Trump has relocated members of his inner circle to secure military bases across the country �� and possibly even into underground command facilities. With secrecy surrounding these moves, questions are growing about what’s really happening behind closed doors. Are these relocations part of a national security measure, or is there something bigger being prepared for — something the public hasn’t been told? Join us as we break down the different types of military bunkers, the history of underground government operations, and what this could mean for Trump’s new administration and the future of America.Check Out Our Merch StoreOur New Song Break The Chains

and welcome back to investigators podcast i'm your host chat alongside my beautiful wife sherry on tonight's episode we're diving into something that feels straight out of a classified briefing reports that president trump has moved key members of his administration onto military bases with growing speculation that some may even be operating from underground facilities now this isn't just about optics or politics trump is already back in the oval office this is maybe about security survival or control so what's really happening is this a strategic move to shield his inner circle from potential third threats, foreign and domestic, or is it part of a larger conspiracy plan that public isn't maybe meant to see right now?

The time and end secrecy surrounding all are raising serious questions, and tonight we're going to break down the types of military bunkers there are, why they would be used, and what it could mean for the direction of this country under the new chapter of Trump's presidency. Guys, welcome to the show. It is November the 2nd, 2025. The name of this song is Earth, light it up because maybe that's what's about to happen. We don't 100% know. What we do know is that over the past week, there has been many articles that say that Trump has moved key figures of his administration on two military bases.

We're not talking about they're just hanging out there during the day. We're talking about they are literally living on military bases and likely underground. So we've talked about this in the past before, about certain military bases throughout the United States that do have what is called dums or deep underground military bases. and what these bases are essentially made for is there are silos under some of these bases, there are entire cities under some of these bases. And what oftentimes this is used for is when there is a threat of a nuclear or a world war. So it's something that you have to get key members of the administration into safe places so that if a nuclear war happens, then they are able to emerge at some point in time and still run

the country and then also be able to still fight back against a foreign threat like Russia or China or whoever. But there's also some speculation out there that maybe it's not about Russia. Maybe it's not even about China. There has also been some talk that there are bounties on some of the heads of Trump administration because of Venezuela, because of the narco terrorist or narco drug cartels. We've also got that. But then you also think about this. A couple of months ago where J.D. Vance and Trump and all of them announced, they said, you know what? We have to start deploying these rapid action forces. And this is essentially all across, the country in every single state, they want to be able to train up not only National Guard,

but also reserve soldiers to where they can rapidly, I guess, deploy in the event of a national crisis or emergency. And so what we're going to talk about on tonight's show is, like, what is this really about? Is this about a foreign threat? Is this about a foreign threat? Is this about a threat at our back door like Venezuela? Maybe China and Russia are utilizing Venezuela to be able to either operate in Venezuela or also attack the United States from very close by. Or in the craziest conspiracy of all these, Sherry, is there's a lot of people saying,

including your mom, like you talked to your mom today. And she's like, Trump's going to be a dictator. Yeah. He is a dictator. That's what everybody's saying. Yeah. She said, when are you going to get that through your head that he's actually a dictator, Sherry?

How do you not know this? Yeah. So we're going to talk about that. We're just going to talk about all those possibilities. You know, it's kind of interesting because we've had so many videos. you know, and we've talked about this with you guys before, but we've had so many videos over the past six months, I guess you can say,

especially since Trump has got an office over on Instagram that went viral. And so we're getting a lot of new listeners. We're getting a lot of new eyes, I guess, on our show. And just a lot of people are trying to figure out, like, I've got so many messages, Sherry, over the past couple of weeks. And the messages say, hey, I just have a question. Like, I listened to a few of your podcasts.

I even went back six months ago, a year ago. And I'm still confused what your politics are. That's literally what they're saying. And so some of these people I've actually replied back to. And I said, look, this isn't about politics. We are not about a political. We're not a political show. Now, if you listen back prior to the election of 2024 or even prior to the election of 2020,

you might think that we are a political pundit or we are political pundits. We are someone that just wanted so desperately to get Trump in. But at the time, like even leading up to 2024 and 2020, obviously with Biden and Harris and that whole situation, obviously knowing what Joe Biden has done in the past as once a senator, then a vice president, then a president, you know, the way we looked at this was, especially with the MAGA, you know, the MAGA agenda, which was make America great again. It was a great slogan. It was a great slogan for Americans because a lot of Americans felt disenfranchised. A lot of Americans felt like that our government no longer worked for the people. instead they worked for foreign nations. Instead, they worked for basically anyone else besides the taxpayers.

Besides the people that were actually putting these people in office and putting these people in power, most people just felt like that, you know what, we're putting all these people in power, but no one's actually working for us. And so when the MAGA movement came along and Trump came along, a lot of people felt heard again. They felt seen. And there were things that Trump would say, like, you know, they're only after me to get to you.

you know, if they defeat me, then they're going to come after you next. And so these were major moments of Trump's campaigns, Trump's first presidency, especially the way the media attacked Trump, especially the way the Democrats and basically everyone attacked Trump. This was something that a lot of people felt like that, hey, I have to do something here. And I probably need to vote for Trump. I think that's why you had such a landslide type victory in 2024 because people just felt like, look, we're very close to a totalitarian state, a dictatorship.

We're sending our money to Ukraine, billions and billions of dollars. We think that if we bring Trump in, we're not going to be sending money to Ukraine anymore. We're not going to be supporting Israel maybe the way that we are. We're not going to be in all of these other foreign wars. And we're actually for once going to really make America great again this time. And we're going to send, we're going to bring all the money back to America. Well, and I think some people weren't necessarily voting for Trump, but they didn't have a better option. what was your better option?

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris was, you know, the only other pick. And that's not a better option in a lot of people's eyes. So, yeah, I think a lot of people voted for Trump, but they weren't really voting for him. They were voting against Joe Biden. Yeah, absolutely. I 100% agree with that. And then you got to remember, you know, RFK was in the running during this time. RFK obviously was not going to become president because that's just not the way things work.

he registered as an independent. There has never been a independent or third party. To my knowledge, I could be wrong about this, that has won a presidency. Well, I know one for a fact that you used to really love was Perot. Ross Perot, yeah. Ross Perot. He was an independent. And he was, like, out there.

And a lot of people did like him. And I think with RFK, a lot of people liked him, too. But like you were saying, he's not going to really win as an independent. but I think also during his campaign, he did come out and say the Democrats did not do him right at all. Of course not. No, of course not. No. And so, you know, so RFK came in.

And then when RFK kind of took sides with Trump and that whole, I guess you can say the MAGA cabal, that is when likely you saw a lot of these people that are kind of on the fence, whether it was like, look, even though I don't like Trump at all, like, do I really want to vote for Harris? And so I think RFK swung so many votes. And it didn't swing, unfortunately, for the Democrats to Democrats that swung to Trump. And especially as RFK said, look, I'm going to work with Trump. I'm going to be, you know, I'm going to work with getting all of the poison and the chemicals out of our food.

This is what we're going to do. So they had a mass movement. And RFK massively helped them because he just brought on this whole other faction of people that would have never otherwise voted for Trump. But then you started having these influencers, including Ian Carroll, by the way, which was a, huge rising influencer on social media, especially on TikTok, to where, you know, at one point in time, I believe I'm not mistaken, but Ian was kind of like a Bernie bro. So was Joe Rogan back in the day. Oh, yeah, they both were. So all of these people were starting to kind of shift their leaning to the right and not even the right, but they were just a little bit more right than center.

And so they had to go with Trump. And this is what created this mass movement. Now, the reason why I'm talking and saying all this stuff is because there's a lot of people now that say, look, Trump might be a dictator. Trump is not being transparent about the Epstein files. There's a lot of people that do not agree with how close now we are with Israel. We thought that we were close with Israel and APEC and all that stuff during the Democrat presidency, like under Joe Biden or Obama or whoever. But it just seems like now that it's just like so tight-knit that a lot of people are worried about as well. But then you also have these hats and these shirts that are selling.

And Trump even, you know, jokingly talking about a 2028 run. So Trump, 2028 is what everybody's saying. And they're like, you know, maybe there could be a third term. Although constitutionally, that's not realistic. But what happens when people think that the 2020 election was stolen? Because if it was, that would have took his term away. And since it took his term away, he was before that, 2016. and then 2024.

But, you know, a president, it's hard to get everything you want to get done in four years. You need back-to-back terms in order to get what you want accomplished. And maybe that's some of people's reasoning. I don't know. I'm just putting it out there. Yeah, I mean, it could be. But either way, it's unconstitutional. Yeah, I know it is.

I mean, regardless, it is unconstitutional. Do I believe that the 2020 election was fair? No. I absolutely do not think it was fair. I mean, if you guys had listened to one of our, I guess two episodes ago when we talked about Venezuela and we talk about how kind of China and Russia and some foreign nations had influence over how we created this new voting system in America at all. A lot of it came from Venezuela. So that's also very interesting. And now we're, you know, looking to, you know, possibly attack Venezuela.

We don't know yet. But either way, I'm going to go ahead and in just a moment, we're going to read the articles that are out about Trump's administration, a lot. lot of his key people, Marco Rubio, Christy Gnome, I believe also Stephen Miller, which is his chief of staff, I believe. Tulsi Gabbard. Now, I don't know if Tulsi Gabbard. I saw it on the news. Yeah.

Either way, a lot of his top Pete Hegseth is another one, Department of War or Secretary of War, I guess you can say. But yeah, so we're starting to see a lot of this. And everybody's asking the question, why would they be moving people to military bases, but also potentially to underground. So there's all types of articles. One of the first, though, I found it pretty interesting was the Jerusalem Post. And it says some Trump officials leave homes for U.S. military bases amid political protest reports.

So we also got to keep in mind like how news is reporting it and what their narrative is on this, right? Like what is the narrative and what is the thing that they're trying to tell you of why this is happening? What are they saying? And so it says senior White House officials are swapping their traditional homes to live on military bases as the political climate grows more threatening is what they're saying. And it says several senior Trump administration officials are living in or will soon be living in military base housing in the Washington area. The Atlantic reported on Friday. It says according to the report, several U.S. administration officials including Stephen Miller, Marka Rubio, and Christy Nome have moved into houses that hosted senior military officials on bases in the U.S. Washington area to shield themselves from protest outside of their homes and political violence.

It says, however, the number of Trump officials who have moved on two bases is now impacting housing for the nation's top uniformed officers. So this is not just three. We're talking about mass amounts of the Trump administration are kicking out generals and whoever, the top of the top people at the top. They're kicking them out of their houses and they're putting in the Trump cabinet, the Trump administration, basically everybody into these housing. It also says U.S. Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, requested earlier this year to move on to Fort McNair but was denied based on the lack of availability.

Oh, okay. So she was denied. Okay, so I was wrong, but I was partly right. So isn't it, isn't it interesting though? Think about this for a second. Well, and she was a Democrat. Yeah, she was. But either way, think about this.

So Tulsi Gabbard, the last episode we did, where we talked about the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. and there's a big fight, it seems like, from Tulsi Gabbard, D&I, also Joe Kent, and they're fighting with Cash Patel, the FBI, and it sounds like maybe just the Trump administration in general over her and D&I and basically that office want to investigate foreign influence or foreign, I guess, connections to the Charlie Kirk assassination. When you ask like, who is the foreign, well, obviously a lot of people have rumors of Israel and, you know, whoever, but either way, Tulsi, Gabbert, it just so happens that she is one that is fighting on the inside.

I've been seeing over the past two or three weeks that everybody wants to cancel Tulsi Gabbard because they're like, oh, no, no, no. Tulsi Gabbard's a rhino or not even a rhino because, I mean, she was a Democrat and then kind of came over to the right. But everyone's saying that you're not MAGA, you're not this. They're saying the same thing, by the way, about Marjorie Taylor Green. And we'll play that clip in just a moment. But it says the threat level against administration officials has changed recently,

including Iranian-backed attempted assassinations, which I, which is complete bullshit, because you're hearing this from the Jerusalem Post. Yeah, but there's literally no proof of that. No, there's not complete bullshit. There's zero proof of that. There was proof of that. I promised you, Chad, I saw the whole documentary, or it wasn't a documentary, but it was a piece. What's on the Daily Wire?

No, but it was a piece about this guy that went into this hotel room and he had all this Iranian money. He was from Iran and he was using code words. and he was talking to undercover law enforcement. And he was trying to get Trump assassinated before he was elected president. Okay. Well, and hello. Do you not remember that?

I do. Well, I remember that's what they were trying to pass off as who tried to kill Trump. And that went away because most people called bullshit on it. But either way, it goes on to say, however, there has not been a record of this many political appointees living on military bases ever reported the Atlantic. It also says, in a robust democracy, what you want is the military to be for the defense of the country as a whole and not just one party. Andrea Lawrence, Associate Professor of International Studies and Political Science at John Hopkins University, told the Atlantic. Stephen Miller will reportedly soon join the growing list. Katie Miller, his wife and mother of his three children told Fox News she was confronted outside of her home by an unfamiliar woman who she believed engaged in a form of protest that crossed the line.

And she said, I'm watching you, quote, the woman. said to Miller, as reported by the Atlantic. This occurred on the day after political activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated. The Miller family had faced protest for weeks beforehand, including someone putting up posters in their neighborhood calling them Nazis. Both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Heggseth, live at Fort McNair, known as General Roe, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll shares a home on Joint Base Meyer Henderson Hall with another senior political employee of the Army.

and then it goes on to say another senior white house official who was not named for security purposes had to swap living in a private home for a military base following kirk's assassination according to the report so do you start seeing like a lot of this stuff is kind of revolving around the charlie kirk assassination and it goes on and says while the political officials duke it out for the largest houses on the base three and four star level generals and their young families are now crunched for housing in notoriously difficult washington area housing market. The Atlantic citing an official familiar with the matter reported that in some aspects, this would be cheaper for the federal government than providing personal security to officials, which requires agents to rent a secondary location nearby. Robert Gates, Defense Secretary under President George Washington and Obama, Jim Mattis, Trump's first Pentagon chief, lived in naval housing at Potomac Bay annexed near the State Department. So they're trying to just say, well, it's just because rising political, I guess,

threats, right? Well, if anyone would be threatened, I would think it would be Stephen Miller because of how out there he is, especially on the news, because he just does no filter at all. When he talks, he goes crazy. Yeah, he does. So I want to go ahead and play a quick video. This was actually when it was announced on Fox News, on Fox in the morning. I think it was Saturday.

I think it was literally yesterday. And this is what they had to say about it. Listen. Meanwhile, back in Washington, we talk about a sign of the Times. Um, administration officials increasingly are facing so many very serious and violent threats that they find that the only option they have is to actually move their families and themselves onto military bases. Um, here's the, the list of some of the notable acts of political motivated violence. Uh, of course, you had June 22, the plot that

was thwarted against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. You had the Paul Pelosi was attacked in October of 2022. Obviously, you have the assassination attempts on President Trump, both of them. You have the arson at Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's home. Yeah, and you have, of course, the Charlie Kirk assassination. And I think the Charlie Kirk assassination was such a shock to, especially to anybody who is in public life, that you could go with security to a university and simply have open debate and you get shot in such a horrific way in front of college students.

I really, I'm still not over it. I'm just surprised how in the liberal media it's just kind of just gone away. Here, a lot of conservatives, and of course it's Fox News, we have not forgotten. We will not forget. But it has just gone off the pages like, oh, just another day. but the people who are not forgetting, especially are those in the public eye. And so one of them is Stephen Miller. This is the Atlantic saying Stephen Miller joined a growing list of senior Trump administration

and political appointees at least six by our count living in Washington area military housing, where they are shielded not just from potential violence, but also from protest. It is an ominous marker of the nation's polarization to which the Trump administration has itself contributed. I don't know where they got that from that. Some of those top public servants have felt a need to separate themselves from the public. These civilian officials can now depend on the U.S. military to augment their personal security. But so many have made the move that they are now straining the availability of housing for the nation's top uniformed officers. So the Atlantic really worried about housing for officers. They don't seem to care about the fact that military aren't

getting paid during the shutdown. But okay. So it's good on the Atlantic for pointing this out, but they do miss the point, Rachel. I mean, look, this is, I cannot remember a time in my adult life that the threat of political violence was higher. And that is very sobering. And to see, you know, we've had in the past some defense secretaries, Bob Gates, Jim Mattis, live on military bases. That's not unusual. But now with people like Stephen Miller, moving into the military, because of threats on his life, it is akin to in 2023, the mayor of Tijuana had to move on to a Mexican

military base because the cartel was openly saying, we are going to kill you. These are the threats that Stephen Miller and Katie Miller and their children are getting. And it's really a moment that seems unprecedented in terms of the political violence in our country. I think the kid... I want to stop there because, you know, there's something that we keep hearing on all these articles. If you guys going right now, you look up Trump officials move to military bases and or you just go and listen to any video clip from any news source, especially on the right, especially like News Nation or Fox News or any of the others. They always talk about Charlie Kirk, right?

And they bring it back to Charlie Kirk assassination, right? And if this was, for example, Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson, he's a, he's a lone gunman. he's just this crazy psycho that, you know, decided that he was going to go and kill Charlie Kirk one day at UVU out of the blue. Maybe he had been indoctrinated is what they tried to tell you and all this stuff. If that was just the case, it seems like for some reason maybe some of this is maybe going back to the Charlie Kirk assassination. And it's weird because how this administration is covering up, it seems like, in my opinion, they're covering up stuff, right? when you have D&I, Department of National Intelligence, you have Tulsi Gabbard, the director,

which is trying to get into the foreign potential connections to the assassination. You have everyone that is talking, if they even question it like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens and whoever else, like is there foreign involvement? They're all being canceled right now. Literally Tucker Carlson. They're trying to be canceled. Tucker Carlson is near extinction.

He's not going to be extinct. Well, they're trying. And listen, it's possible because now he's going to get Maga, which kind of has all the control of all the social media, very similar, like how Biden and Harris did it kind of during their term. But now Tucker is kind of, you know, speaking out like Candace is. I'm sure that at some point in time, people like Candace, people like Tucker, people like Nick Fuentes, they're all going to be banned censored and silenced again. And it's going to be because of something like whether it's anti-Semitism, whether it's this, whether it's that. They're going to silence these people. But well, people like Alex Jones has been silenced and he still speaks.

Yeah, but he's not, no, he's going to be silenced. No, but here's the thing. Alex Jones has changed his tune. He's not speaking the same stuff Tucker Carlson and Canada soans are. No, absolutely not. He is taken up for the Trump administration and making sure that he toes that line where he does not dare accuse the Trump administration of this or that or this or that anymore. And we're actually going to have a clip from Alex Jones in just a bit because I think Tucker or be not Tucker, but I'm not Tucker, but I think Alex Jones knows where the line is.

Yeah, he's been there and done that. Yeah. He knows where the line is and he says, look, if I start actually speaking an opinion based on the MAGA movement, then I could also be Tucker and maybe even worse. Because unfortunately for Alex Jones, he's in a very bad position. The only way that he gets out of this multi-billion dollar lawsuit that they put on him because he questioned the Sandy Hook shooting, the only way he gets out of that or survives this at all going forward is likely the Trump administration.

And keeping also in mind from what we understand, I guess the Trump administration or people within the Trump, I guess, camp has helped Alex Jones already, right? To kind of find out some information about the onion, which was trying to purchase Alex Jones stuff, which actually links back to a Democrat-led kind of, I guess, NGO or non-government organization. But what this kind of tells me is that the way all the articles are. talking the way that the clips you're going to hear are talking they keep mentioning charlie kirk after the charlie kirk assassination we're now moving all of our high level officials into

bunkers on military bases so if you're telling me that's because tyler robinson is a long a lone freak that was with a bisexual transvestite dude which was lance twigs is uh was Tyler Robinson's boyfriend's name, then what you're saying is is that you're moving all these people and a lot of that is because of Charlie Kirk. I actually think that there's a lot bigger things behind the scenes that they know.

And I think that they are in a very, very, very desperate and bad spot. And I also think that's why there are certain people that are really going against the Trump administration right now because they're saying, look, you guys are not acting like MAGA. You guys are not acting like Make America Great again or America first. You guys are not acting like you did in 2016 or even in the campaign

leading up to 2024. You're lying to us. You're telling us lies about Epstein. You're you're fighting with D&I about Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. And so why are you doing that? And so when we talk about like, is there a bigger thing behind the scenes that is going on? They're very well could be. But then also you watch Trump on TV and the way he talks about certain things that a lot of people don't agree with right now. It sounds like he's definitely not under, you know, necessarily under a threat of life that he either says this or doesn't. It seems like he's willingly saying a lot of things.

So it's a very interesting situation that's going on. And I don't necessarily think it's necessarily about Russia or China. I think this is much deeper. And I think that they are in a, they are in a pickle, the Trump administration. It could be. but it could be that what if they did think Tyler Robinson was a lone wolf and he was the only one. And if he was the only one that went after Charlie Kirk, there are other lone wolves out there that they are being threatened by. They just said Stephen Miller, his whole family, his children are being threatened in their neighborhood.

They're calling him Nazis. You know, they don't feel safe where they are. So it could be just that at that surface level. But I do agree with you that maybe they know something that is deep. Maybe Candace Owens is on the right track and they just don't want people to know that. That could be a possibility. But I think everything at this point is a possibility. I agree.

I agree. Yeah, we cannot throw anything out right now. Two days ago, Cash Patel posted this morning, the FBI thwarted a potential terrorist attack and arrested multiple subjects in Michigan who were allegedly plotting a violent attack over Halloween weekend. More details to come. Thanks to the men and women of FBI and law enforcement, everywhere standing guard 24-7 and crushing our mission to defend the homeland. Okay.

So that was that. And then I was like, okay, well, let me find out about this terror attack. And because it's not that I didn't believe it, but then I started seeing some of these posts. Yeah, I saw something, but there was nothing else about it. No, it was very weird. But so I got this post from AP and it says, Michigan lawyer says a Halloween terror plot that FBI director Cash Patel described never existed. So the reason why I want to get into this, because we've got to start thinking about sciops here.

If there is a sciop going on, if there's something that we are not seeing, we have to look into some of these things. So it says a Michigan defense lawyer, and yes, he is a defense attorney, is disputing FBI director Cash Patel's allegations that his 20-year-old client and four other young suspects were planning to carry out a terror attack on Halloween weekend. Now announcing their arrest on Friday, Patel said more information will be coming soon. however, the FBI and Michigan authorities have offered few details about the case. Spokesperson for the state and national FBI and U.S. attorney in Detroit did not immediately respond. The investigation involved discussion in an online chat room involving at least some of the suspects who were taken into custody. According to two people briefed on the investigation who could not publicly discuss the details. They spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymy.

The group allegedly discussed carrying out an attack around Halloween, referring to Pumpkin Day, according to one of the people, the other person briefed on the investigation confirmed, and I just lost that real quick, confirmed that there had been a pumpkin reference. However, the lawyer in the case, Amir Macled, who represents a man from the suburb of Dearborn, who was still detained on Saturday, said federal authorities have given him, haven't given him many details about the investigation, but after reviewing the matter, he concluded that there was no terror event ever planned. He said he doesn't expect any charges will be filed and that he thinks this is some type of false flagged.

He described this all male group of U.S. citizens as gamers and said they range an age from 16 to 20. And he says, if these young men were on forums that they should not have been on, things of that nature, then we'll have to wait and see. But I don't believe that there's anything illegal about any of the activity that I have seen so far. So it's just strange, right? I'm not saying that this wasn't a foiled terrorist attack. But we also have to start looking. I'm starting to see Cash Patel come out and saying, look at this domestic problem. Look at this domestic terror attack.

Look at what we're starting to see. Domestically and not international. Yeah, we're going to have to start really clamping down on some of this stuff, whether it's social media. Because as you just heard again, social media. That's what they're trying to put it back to. Well, someone was talking in social media group and we found it. We intercepted it, which is, by the way, for anybody that ever uses any app that they think is encrypted for any reason whatsoever.

Just understand that the government listens to and sees every single thing you do no matter what it is. And so the only reason that would be bad unless you're a criminal would be one day that the government decides to be a dictatorship or a tyrannical state. And then they can just access any dissenters and then just come and kill you, right? That's why privacy matters. It's not about like, well, I don't ever do anything bad. I'm not terrorists.

Okay, great. but if the government ever turns to a totalitarian state, you want privacy, which is why we can't erode our freedoms and our rights because that's the only thing we have. And the only way that you could ever dissent against a totalitarian government that is going to oppress the people and enslave people or kill people, their own citizens potentially, is privacy. And so we've completely lost that 100% in this country. But if it goes to that, there's not going to be anything like that.

so you're going to be shit out of luck on all forms. Yeah. All right. So and then you have articles like the Hill. Pentagon orders quick reaction force of 500 troops per state. And this is according to the multiple news sources, actually. National Guard is building a quick reaction force or QRF of some 23,500 troops trained in crowd control and civil disturbance that can be ready to deploy to U.S. cities by early next year. And according to a leaked memo reported by most of the most of the report.

multiple outlets Wednesday, the October 8th memo signed by National Guard Bureau Director of Operations Major General Ronald Burkett orders the Guard from nearly every U.S. state, Puerto Rico, and Guam, to train 500 service members, states with smaller populations such as Delaware will have 250 in his force, while Alaska will have 350 and Guam will have 100. It says a previous Pentagon memo issued on September and revealed by the Guardian had mandated that the Washington D.C. National Guard created a specialized military policy. police battalion within it dedicated to ensure in safety and public order in the nationals capital as the circumstances may necessitate. Now, the latest document also stipulates that the Pentagon will send military trainers to the states and territories, so the QRFs will be operational by January 1st, 2026. Each state will also be given 100 sets of crowd control equipment to be used to support this requirement, such as tasers, pepper spray, batons, and shields.

the Pentagon did not respond to your request for comment from the Hill. And the Trump administration has concretely moved to the U.S. military to push his political agenda domestically via sending National Guard troops into largely Democrat-run cities under the claim of helping fight crime. And it also goes on to say that President Trump in August 25th, executive order mobilized the DC National Guard to the nation's capital over the objections of city leaders. And Trump at the time claimed that the city's crime was out of control, despite data showing that the rates had dropped over the past two years.

That's what the Hill's saying. Now, to me, when you think about the QRF or quick reaction forces of the National Guard, and this is a big thing where they're going to start training at least 500, and I almost guarantee you, even though the leaked memo, and it was probably intentionally leaked, I would say there's probably going to be more people that are trained than 500 per state. But this does worry me. I mean, it does.

It worries me to the point because I understand that there are cities and places in this country that are overrun with crime in a lot of cases and in many cases because of, you know, what we've talked about for years as far as the outside involvement of people like George Soros, putting these far left globalist prosecutors in office, putting judges in power in places to where they could, you know, burn down the cities and, you know, literally businesses that people have worked their entire lives on. and then they have these riots that are heavily funded by the globalists, by these NGOs like the Open Society Foundation and many others that attend the World Economic Forum.

And I understand the fact that like we cannot have globalist organizations overrun in America to, you know, essentially put in their own agendas and also just, you know, powerful forces that beat, like especially judges. Right. And even during the time that Trump was not present. and Biden Harris was president, that's how a lot of the charges probably were brought on Trump. That's how a lot of anybody that was, that, you know, essentially the left or the globalist went against, they went against them based on the judges that would take the cases, the prosecutors,

the, the, the, the, the, the, the teacher Jameses and Alvin Braggs and the, and, and all of these people. But it's like, the problem is for us as citizens is that I'm starting to kind of see this shift the other way, right? So it's like Trump said, hold my beer. Oh, you thought that you were going to be like authoritarian in some way and you were going to like put your people under fire. Well, let me just show you some shit.

I'm going to train the military to go into every state and every city if we need to. And I'm going to create my own police force, which technically is a police state. Regardless of however you look at this, you know, when there's been thousands of podcasts about police states. And, and I mean, we've talked. talked about police states before. It is a worrisome thing to talk about. It is something that we don't want as a as a country, as a state, as any of that is a military

police force. We just don't want that. But you have to look at the Democratic led states right now and what's going on in those states. For example, in Portland, Oregon, where the ice facilities are being blocked by all these protesters and the police are being told to stand by or stand down, to stand on corners And instead of enforcing the laws, they're told to shake hands and make, you know, make light talk with people and not do what their job is, is to protect and keep the community safe. They're not doing that because they're being told to stand down.

And if the police force in Democrat ran cities are standing down and not doing their job, then somebody has to come in behind them to know and be trained how to do that job. And I think, too, that they need to be trained in this because you can't just send out the National Guard and say go to work. People have to be trained in what they're doing. And that goes for law enforcement too. How much training do they go into when it has to do with protesting and stopping, you know, federal agencies from doing their jobs and crowd control and all that? Like how much training is going is involved in all this? Yeah, I don't. Yeah.

I mean, no, I, I 100%. understand what you're saying. Look, I get the premise behind it and you make a good point. But, you know, also at the same time, you know, there is like devil's advocate to this. And I will play devil's advocate for a second. And I 100% like I said, understand what you're saying. And I think most people probably listening right now, especially people that support Trump are going to feel and think the same way. All I'm saying that we must look out for and be careful of is that in the event that not even necessarily Trump, Trump's getting old, right? I mean, he is definitely getting old. He's in his 80s already. But he's

nothing like Joe Biden. No, he's not. But he sleeps less than we do, and he worked way harder than we do. I know, but what I'm saying is that you're probably not going to have, even if Trump wanted to run, you know, three years from now, likely it wouldn't be Trump. But the problem's not with Trump as a dictator

or a king. Somebody else coming in. It's someone else that he puts in place or whoever the case may be. And then when there is an uprising of the citizens that finally are like, no, hell no. You didn't tell us about Epstein. You remember that? Oh, and now it's this and this and this and this and this. And then he's like, well, guess what?

Now you have military and they're going to fight back against you. You're not going to be able to do whatever you want to do. You're not going to uprise against their government. Now, that could be complete bullshit. I don't think Trump would do that. But we always have to be careful. We always have to be just looking out to make sure that doesn't happen because I understand. Look, I'm definitely not anywhere close to a Democrat.

I have, I am Republican, conservative values and beliefs as far as pretty much almost everything. I mean, there's definitely some things that I could, you know, get on board with, I guess you can say with some of a little, a little slight left-leaning stuff and all that. Well, no, not even abortion stuff. I don't really necessarily 100% get on board with that 100%. But it's also, I'm kind of like with abortion thing. It's like it's not my body.

It's not, it's- Oh, okay. You're not Nick Fuentes then. No. That's a good thing. No. So, but my thing is like the government is, needed law and order is needed but there has to be aligned to that there has to be a line of how

much control the government has over what we do with our bodies well and that's not hurting other people that's why he gave it to the states instead of the federal agencies yeah yeah you're right and that was probably a good thing to do so if you don't like the way that your state does it go to another state if you can right that's the big thing but yeah so there was there was also this video which i wanted to play and then we're going to get into this other kind of narrative and angle on this, right? Like, from what we have understood, from what we are being told at least, that there has been bounties put on some of the top officials' heads, allegedly from Venezuelan, I don't

know, drug, narco-terrorist. That's what we're hearing. I don't know. What we do know is that Trump has blown the shit out of some boats, allegedly from Venezuela. So we don't 100% know the facts on the, you know, the bounties that have put on, you know, the Trump's head or whoever. But I do want to play this. real quick. This is about the quick reaction forces, and it kind of goes a little bit more in detail,

and then we're going to get to another video in just a second, but we'll break this down as well. Right now at the White House, we want to give you this update here. A lot of headlines being made right now is the Pentagon is moving forward on orders from President Donald Trump to build a National Guard quick reaction force in each state for domestic use through two U.S. officials that have confirmed that to Fox News. So we want to continue to break that down. What does that look like and what will it feel like in so many of the major cities and states? So let's bring in our next guest to help break that all down for us. This is Christopher Nyway, my military policy analyst.

Thanks so much for joining us on live now. And yeah, I think first off, a lot of people have the question of, okay, what will this look like? Absolutely, Mike. Well, you know, by time in the Army and the military police corps, a lot of training with the National Guard, the Reserve, and the active component revolves around in many cases combat field work, but then there's also garrison and in this case civil disturbance or what we call civil D, which is essentially preparing for riots, crowds, a variety of scenarios. So a QRF or a quick reaction force is really something that many folks that have trained in this

area are used to. It's not uncommon for the president to want to make sure they're ready for these capabilities. And one example of many is just in crowds, there tend to be problematic actors, things like snatch and grab techniques where the civil riot police grab someone behind the line, remove problems. It's all just kind of par for the course. And I think it's good that they're showing that they're ready for any situations that may escalate. They want to focus on de-escalation. Yeah, absolutely. And let's talk and go back to 2020. We saw a lot of different protests happening across the country, especially in the summer. Will the response sort of look like that, or will it be even escalated even more?

Well, I think a lot of it is preparedness, force, and numbers. I think we've seen in areas in whether or not to the extent some of these resources extend into places like Chicago, there have been areas like in the past, for example, on the Gold Coast where folks smashed up stores. I think when you're looking at this presence, it tends to prevent things and keep things a little bit more contained. So in terms of escalation, I think it depends, but you definitely want to be over prepared.

It's like that term in golf, you'd rather be, you know, hit the ball too hard and knock it in, then come up short. You want to make sure you're ready. It's hard to scale up after the fact and that show of force will ideally reduce, reduce some of those tensions to those areas. And it's just training, training, training,

preparation, preparation, preparation, preparation that never up, never in, as they say in golf. So we want to make sure we're prepared and have those resources available. And I want to stop here for a second. because look, you know, some of you might be thinking, Chad's, Chad's just over sensitive to what's,

what's going on. But I understand, well, I, I, I once understood, I thought. I think we get where you're coming from. I know, but what I'm saying is, I, I feel like this is just my brain. And you guys can tell me if this is your brain. I felt like since doing this podcast for eight years,

that I had it figured out for mostly. Like, for the most part, I felt like I had what was actually, actually going on figured out. And I got to say, especially over the past, I don't know, I would say at least a couple of years, but especially the past year. Like,

I feel like that I've got something wrong. And I'm not 100% sure what exactly that is. And I don't know if any of you feel like that as well. Like, I understand that like both parties is two wings of the same bird, right? That's what we always hear. It's like

they're still flapping. They're doing different things necessarily, different motions or motions not really, I guess, centripical of each other. But either way, they're a part of the same bird, like whatever that moving force is. They're propelling the force. Maybe this wing does something a little bit different than this does, but that bird's still moving forward. Now, what that bird is and, you know, is it a, is it a vulture or is it an eagle?

By the way, you're taking my t-shirt design away from me right now. Well, no, but I'm just saying like, you know, I guess what I'm saying is I felt like for a while I had it figured out until especially this term. And I'm not saying I'm against Trump or anything. I 100% want the best for our presidents no matter who they are, including Biden, including Trump, including everybody, because that's who's leading our country. But I just feel like I've missed something. And look, we definitely get messages where people think that they have. everything figured out because they're on this particular side and or that particular side. And, you know, it's like if we don't talk about Epstein fast enough or if we don't do this fast

enough, they're like, oh, yeah, you guys are just not talking about it because you're hiding it. I'm like, no, because like we got other stuff to talk about also. Like, it's not that we're not talking about that. But my feeling is, is that I've missed something. And the big question is, and I want, this is a question for the audience. This is a question for you guys. Like, what have I missed?

I want you guys to send us a message wherever you follow us. Or if you don't follow us on social media, which shame on you if you do not. Send us an email, investigate Earth podcast at protonmel.com and let us know your thoughts. Like, what am I missing? What exactly is it? I mean, I understand, like I said, that both parties can be corrupt. Both parties can be, and I think are corrupt. I mean, I think Republicans and Democrats are both, like I said.

Yeah, I agree. three, two wings of one bird. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. But I just think for me, it was just like, you know, the Epstein thing has done something big for me. I don't know what it is. Yeah, I think that's when it turned you off. It took the wind out of my sales a little bit from my, you know, I was going forward.

I was like, I think we got this figured out. We're going to get this done. And it's not like I, the problem is I don't believe their narrative on the Epstein files at all, like zero percent. I know they're lying. I know they are without question. So I know they're lying to us now. Why would Mike Johnson come out in front of everyone and say, listen, we are still working on the files.

There's 100,000 files to go through. Yeah, no. He said there's thousands of victims. Yeah. And there's thousands of victims. And we have to be aware of the victims. He just said that like two weeks ago. But why would he say that if it was all a hoax?

Yeah. You know, it's just stuff like that. that like get your party straight and have the straight answers and the same answers because your answers are not lining up with each other. No. I get that. And the problem too is like if you have people like Thomas Massey, you know, or or Marjorie Taylor Green now, which was a huge supporter.

And I want to talk about Marjorie Taylor Green for a minute. And because we're going to get to a clip of her in just a moment. But Marjorie Taylor Green was one of the biggest supporters of Donald Trump as president of anybody. I mean, that's literally why people hated Marjorie Taylor Green until now. Now they hate her for another reason, which has nothing to with Trump. Now they hate her because they're saying that she's not MAGA, right? Oh, well, she's not MAGA.

And so if you look up, I just want to read a couple things. Well, while you're looking it up, I'm going to say the Democrats are taking to her and they really like her. It's kind of like when Tulsi Gabbard crossed lines. Well, it's the same thing with the dude in Pennsylvania. I can't think of his name right now. the guy that looks like Star Trek. He ran against Oz, Dr. Oz. Oh, I have no idea.

Federman, Federman. Yeah, it's kind of the same thing. Like, he's kind of, in my mind, he's almost crossing lines. Like, he got ditched because he sat down with Donald Trump and had a conversation with him. And he got in big trouble with his party because he had a conversation. He said, we're sitting down and talking. That's what you're supposed to do, is you're supposed to talk and discuss things. You're not supposed to be at war with each other.

Yeah. And even on X, like if you look up Bill Mahery, Marjorie Taylor Green, right? So Marjorie Taylor Green recently went on to Billmore, the actual show that's on TV. I can't remember what it's called. But anyways, she went on. And so if you look that up on X, this is what I'm talking about as far as coordinated post. The first one says, oh, look, the new darling of the radical left, Marjorie Taylor Green, was invited on Bill Maher last night.

Shocking. look at radical leftist Bill Marr praising Marjorie Taylor Green for going against President Trump and she's sitting there soaking it up like a schoolgirl on a prom date. Here's another one. Bill Maher praising Marjorie Taylor Green for going against President Trump and she's sitting there soaking up like a school girl on a prom date. These are different accounts, different people. Yeah, and not to mention she was on the view too.

But listen, absolutely. But that's not what I'm saying. You got to hear me out. Okay, sorry. These are different people, different accounts, saying the easy. exact same thing. Gotcha. And these posts have got huge numbers.

These are what is called paid influencers. This is what it is. Here's another one. Cat turd. Oh, wow, cat turd. Marjorie Tader Green went on Bill Maher and threw every one of us and Trump under the bus so she could be popular on the left because she wants to be a star. Then she went to this person's Hollywood party and bragged about it.

There's no words to describe how much I despise Marjorie Tather Green. This one. Disgusting. Look at the radical leftist Bill Maher, praising Marjorie Taylor Green for going against President Trump. And she's sitting there soaking up like a schoolgirl on a prom date. How many posts is this? School girl on a prom date. But how many posted this so far?

And these are the top post for this topic. Go to the next one. Congressman Marjorie Taylor Green went on Realtime Bill Maher. And he even knows Marjorie Trader Green isn't MAGA anymore. She admits it too. In case you missed it, Marjorie Taylor Green told Bill Mark. she believes UFOs aren't extraterrestrials at all, but fallen angels. She says even members of Congress are being deliberately kept from leaving or learning the full truth about what they really are.

According to DaFara, some blah, blah, blah. She might be right on that, though. Yeah, I think she is. She also, this one says she issues, she reads a list of issues on which Marjorie Tether Green has broken with President Trump on. And she says, Marjorita Green is not MAGA at all. Dump her. And he says, Trump built a movement. Here's another one.

Marjorie Tether Green rode the MAGA wave into Congress. You don't get to attack Trump. And so this has just been constant, right? This is, and as we're reading stuff, what I have to let you guys or try to convince you to see is like when you look up certain things and there is post after post after post. It's the same thing. Literally almost identical text. those are paid influencers. They are getting paid by a pack

and they are being influenced and they're influencing you because you may not necessarily see it the way we try to look certain things up and look at the top post. But if you're just scrolling your timeline and you see this person say something and then maybe the next day

you'll see it again. You'll see another one. Then all of a sudden your mind starts thinking, oh man, you know what? Marjorie Taylor Green. She isn't MAGA. She's a leftist. But they did the same thing

in regular media During COVID, everyone was saying the same thing and they were getting paid to say the same thing. So people are getting paid to say the same thing. That's clear. Yeah. What is clear to me, though, is why is she going on, I get Bill Maher. I mean, Vice President J.D. Vance went on Bill Maher, for example. But why is she going on the view?

Yeah, I don't know. I mean, I don't know why she's going on the view exactly, right? I have no idea about that. what I can say is that is all the same thing. You know, I think that Marjorie and I think Thomas Massey and the couple of other outliers that have been brave enough, I will say, to challenge the Trump administration on the Epstein stuff, right? That's a huge one.

It is massive. And if you challenge the Trump administration, especially as a Republican, on Epstein or Israel or any of that stuff, you are going to be canceled. you are going to have every single paid influencer period coming out against you. And, you know, I hate to say it. I've seen Ashton Forbes saying the same shit about Marjorie's Heather Green, Tucker Carlson, Dave Smith, Nick Quintez, Ian Carroll. They're all doing the same thing. They're all mass attacking the people that are going against the narrative on the Epstein files.

And a lot of these people two years ago would have said, oh my God, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are pat files. They're hiding the Epstein files. And now all of a sudden, oh, now that Trump said is a hoax, oh, you guys are psycho lunatic psychopaths like Marjorie Tether Green that really believes the Epstein files still exist. This is literally, and people believe this shit. The reality of what the world is in social media today, guys, if this is not proven it to you that you are being influenced by liars, you're being influenced by people that are literally taking a paycheck to influence you into complete bullshit.

They want you to forget about the actual truth and the facts. They want you to forget about all this stuff. And the reason why, if you go on social media right now, that there is a mass coordinated effort to cancel Tucker Carlson, cancel Marjor, Taylor Green. Obviously, they've been trying to cancel Nick Fuentes forever. Right. But there's a reason why that is because even people like us or other podcasters that once this stuff goes down the rabbit hole and it gets to the point where they actually do accomplish

canceling people like, Tucker Carlson. Then we have a problem. We are done. Yeah, we have a definite problem because it cancels freedom of speech. And my problem to this whole thing is everyone has a right to freedom of speech. No matter where you stand on the line. If you're on the line, if you're against the grain, with the grain, it doesn't matter.

Everyone should have a right to say what they want to say. Yeah, I agree. And when people come out and say, we got to cancel this person, we got to cancel this person. I'm looking at that person. I'm saying, why are they wanting to cancel him? I need to listen to him more closely. And as I said in the last episode, like all of these people, you know, misfit, cat turd, Ashton Forbes, I mean, just name all the rest of them. You know, what's the other one?

Conservative Barbie, Insurrection Barbie, whoever, all of these major influencers on social media, they're all pointing at the people that are actually questioned things on the Trump administration that we know they're lying about. and they're all calling us woke right, like I said in the last episode. But you're literally calling for the cancellation of these people because they have a different opinion than you. And it's not a different opinion than you because a lot of these people don't even have an opinion on this shit. They're just getting paid for this. A lot of these people never even got involved.

Some of these people never got involved in politics. Now all of a sudden they're experts on politics and they want to cancel you for shit that you say and your opinion. This is just what I'm sick of, right? And, you know, even and I'll be honest. Like our podcast that when when Ashton came on and I don't want to keep going back to that, but when Ashton came on and was going to debate Ian Carroll and I didn't really say a lot, but then we did release an episode where we kind of, we had to essentially respond because,

you know, he's basically calling anyone that has ever believed in any conspiracy theory, conspirators. And they're all idiots. And they have zero IQ and all this stuff. Obviously, I had to respond to that. Well, wait a minute, because our name has conspiracy in it. Well, exactly. But I had to respond to that.

And even when I responded to that, there was a couple of people. Like I guess some of his loyalists that came out was like, you know, F you guys, I'm never listened to you again. I can't believe that you guys would do that. I'm like, dude, you are so off base with like all I'm all we're trying to do on this podcast. And I say this as much as I possibly can is that we're trying our very best to just tell you guys the best version of the truth that we think is the truth what we see it right now and the other big problem with that is is so hard to tell what the truth is so it's it's like extra hard to

do podcast now because you've got to go through 18 million layers and then you got to take all of that in and then you have to be able to evaluate like okay what do I think is the most likely bullshit what do I think is the most likely to be true and is somewhere very thin line in between And you're peeling that onion back one layer at a time and trying to figure out who's being paid, who's being influenced, who's not, who do you trust, who do you not trust? And it's, you know, you've heard of reverse psychology. But I think in this day and age, it's reverse, reverse, reverse psychology. It absolutely is. If you know what I'm talking about.

It's like a reverse or reverse or reverse. Like, and then you're like, oh, my God, let's back up to the first reverse and figure out that. and then go to the next reverse and try to figure that out. It's like trying to figure out. I don't even know, but it's just crazy. Yeah, yeah, a puzzle. But it's like, it's like a really hard puzzle. And I hate puzzles.

But, you know, unfortunately, we have to do this. We have to do this now at this point because, you know, things used to be easier. I will say, things used to be easier. And I'll be 100% honest with you. I think things are easier for us as a podcast before Trump has got an office in 2024. now it's just even more confusing and now it's just like oh shit like what are we what how like okay basically i just explain what we feel like what anyways um so i want to play this and the reason why i want to play this is this is alex jones piece on the deep underground military

bases or essentially the uh administration moving their top i guess um appointees to military bases and Alex Jones, you know, Alex Jones is called a lot of stuff in the past and all that, but also, as I said earlier, Alex Jones is somewhat compromised a little bit. I personally believe because, you know, you have this multi or I guess at least one billion dollar lawsuit on you. They're going to end Alex Jones what you probably knew of it eventually, but he is dependent heavily on this administration to bail him out of this. And they, like we've said already, they have before.

So you got to be careful also listen to Alex Jones. I'm not saying Alex is trying to intentionally lie to you. But we're going to just hear this clip out. And let's let's break down how Alex Jones responds to this clip as far as Bill Maher, asking Marjora Taylor Green about the people being moved to military bases. And let's see what Alex says about this. And maybe we can start breaking down like, where do we think Alex is with this? Yeah, but I already think that your opinion of Alex Jones has changed a little bit.

I can just tell from our conversation. But it's not changed nearly to the point of some people, what I will say. I mean, I have moved a little bit of my goalposts, you know, like as far as Alex goes, a little bit. But so far, he's not been off the reservation as far as the way I've talked about some of these influencers and people out there. But let's listen to this clip. Here you go. I read this week that a number of the members of the administration are now living on a military base. What? You didn't know this?

No. Oh, yeah. Stephen Miller just moved there. Christy Noam lives on a military base. J.D. Vance. Oh, no, no. Chris, Rubio, Pete Hagseth. I mean, for people who love America so much, they seem to be scared of it. I'm one of those people they call a conspiracy theorist. When I hear things like that, I'm like, what do they know that I don't know? Well, I don't think it's in the paper.

Well, thank God. This information is breaking out there. First, sort of advising the White House before Trump was even back in when he was president-elect, that they had to be ready for the left to try to launch national uprisings and the culmination of the Cloward and Piven plan known in its modern parlance as the Podesta plan, and that they had to understand that they have hit list names they want to go after using drug, cartels, hit men, Antifa, communist, and others to wipe out not just top people in the Trump administration and top advisors, people that have courage, but also key law enforcement leaders,

key corporate leaders and others, and media leaders, thought leaders around the country. Well, now you've seen what General Flynn broke in March here, and I also got it from a very a respected a national investigative journalist off record, even before I got it from Flynn. We didn't know at the time that Flynn was actually right at the top of the list. After the Trump family, I was right under him. He didn't want to put himself in the story. Remember Flynn came on and warned that there were major bounties through the drug cartels, particularly of Venezuela, the real muscle of the Democratic Party, TDA and others,

as well as MS-13 to be the muscle of that operation. since then they've arrested and indicted a whole bunch of people and gotten the documents off their cell phones, you name it, of up to $50,000 bounties just on ICE and Border Patrol, even mid-level leaders. And so all of that's now been proven. All of that's now been documented, just like I told you back in mid-September, the Cash Patel went into the White House, had a big meeting with Tulsa Gabbard. and said, we're not looking at any accomplices, foreign or domestic, even though there's evidence of them. That all broke Thursday, the New York Times, Washington Post, everywhere else, and indeed that did happen. So when I tell you, we have these sources, we have them most of the time, like in the case of Flynn, he called me up, and he's normally very hard to get on. He reached out to us. He said, and he came on right now.

And they had NSA intercepts that were also provided to Central Command, and Army Special Operations. By the way, I want to stop for a second because I really hope that they're not trying to blame Venezuela on Charlie Kirk. Or because it's almost sounded like that's the narrative they're starting to try to push. That's not what I heard. What I heard is that the drug cartels have bounties on the Trump administration. And political influencers. Yes.

But that's what I'm saying, right? we've had this big talk about, you know, a lot of stuff leading, you know, like who was involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination. Now they're starting to say, hey, look, you know, Venezuela has these bounties. We're intercepting this stuff, even though we're never going to actually show you what we actually have. We're going to just take people and put them on podcasts and all these shows and tell you that, hey, it's the narco drug terrorists that have these bounties for the Trump administration high-level officials.

But it would make sense, though, Chad. In the last four years, we've opened our borders to all. of these cartels to all these gang members that are here. I get it. I get it. They're here. They're domestic now. It's way easier to make an assassination when you're here on the soil of America versus not

on the soil of America, right? Yeah. It would be harder to attack. It's easier to attack within. Yeah, I know. I'm just saying. I just hope that two months from now, we're not trying to blame narco-drug terrorist for Charlie Kirk's assassination.

I just hope. But we'll see. Let's listen to a little more. Of these globalists on the phones, known names, Flynn won't say who, and neither with my other sources, but Democrat strategy is talking about killing us. Well, you see them on the news saying they want to kill Republicans and we need to be violent and all the rest of it. You see them pushing that. Imagine what they do behind the scenes and saying, we're going to use the drug cartels to kick this off. So everybody's asking, oh, first we learn it was six, and then a dozen, and now 50, and now 100 Trump administration officials, like Stephen Miller and his family, living at hardened military bases.

That means bunkers in the Maryland, D.C. area. And that's not for a nuclear war, boys and girls. Stephen Miller's not in foreign policy. They have those bunkers as well for the State Department and Pentagon officials. No, they've moved into those above ground facilities that are above large underground railway bunker complexes that are partially declassified. They have sites like CIDAR and Maryland and others that little sub-bases railroad to survive during nuclear war. So the fact that they have activated the COG system, that's a continuity of government system, shows you how serious the threat is of the pedestal plan. and all these movies that are out right now, I should follow Hollywood more

because that's really the propaganda arm, even more than the news, because they know the public doesn't buy corporate media anymore, but they do kind of get programmed by movies and TV shows. There are at least eight current movies and TV shows out right now, fantasizing about mass murdering conservatives, white people, and Christians. And we've got articles about that today, one battle after another, and assassination culture.

here's that article, one of the articles right there today. So when you see Bill Maher even talking about it last night with MTG, this is the first story I'm going to get into because it ties in and is the gateway to understand everything else that's happening that's so massive that we're going to be hitting today. Not dozens, not 100, hundreds of Trump administration officials that we know have bounties on their head by name have moved into military-based bunkers. Now, I'm right up at the top of the list under the Trump family and under Flynn.

We got the list. All right. You've seen all these other government lists that come out where I'm in the top 20 as well. Arctic Frost, the latest, crossfire hurricane. I'm always there because they know I'm reaching millions of people. and when they're going to pull some false flag or some dirty trick, they don't want me coming up here with credibility and analysis and talking to tens of millions of people.

Now, I don't have a military base bunker I can go to. But I'll tell you this, and I told you this a few months ago, I'm not living at my house, but we do have some things there and people there, and we picked up good intel. I'll just leave it at that. And I've been on there 31 years. I've never left my house.

So if that just gives you an idea, of the temperature out there just so you know. And that kind of helps me understand why Trump wants regime change in Venezuela. Because Venezuela is hand in glove with the Democrats laundering their money, helping still elections. And I want to pause for a second because, you know, Alex makes a good point here, right? You know, he's not living in his house. There's a lot of stuff that. But what's scary is he's been living in his house for 31 years.

and now he had to move out. Yeah, but he's had security like 24-7. Yeah, but now he's moved out of his house. Yeah, but I mean, that's something that, you know, even us that we do for because, you know, you don't know. I mean, when you reach a lot of people on a podcast and you talk about things that are as factual as you can possibly be, but you've got to be careful. And we are careful.

We try to be careful based on past things, based on podcasts, based on whatever. We're very careful of how we live, where we live. how it is it is shown on the internet so on and so forth and so unfortunately in this day and age you have to be like that right you you have to be like that because there are a lot of crazy people out there there are a lot of people that do want to kill uh people like alice jones people like who whether it's republicans or just political activists or or not even just activists in general just people that are trying to speak to truth i mean charlie kirk for example i mean that's obviously a huge one but you got to be

careful nowadays. You can't live the same way. If you are going to go out there and you're going to speak and you're going to talk and you're going to be in front of a lot of people, no matter where it is and who you are, you've got to be careful. You've got to be a lot more careful than anybody else. You can't just assume that everything's fine and you're safe. And it goes for everyone. I remember when I was growing up as a little child, we had locks on our doors, but do you think we ever used them? No. We never locked our doors. We never locked our car doors. We never locked anything. Like I had no. I had fears back when I was a child. But now today, like even when my daughter was growing up, I had more fears than when I was a child.

You know, I had to go watch her and make sure, you know, stuff was even happening 20 years ago. But now you think in the last 10 years, how scary it is for everyone. Yeah. But I mean, yeah, for sure. Yeah, just for everyone, absolutely. But specifically what we're talking about here is the people that are actually out there talking, and they have a they have an audience they have a platform they're saying things that a lot of people are getting very angry about them saying and this has happened time and time again i mean even nick quintes

i mean he had someone show up at his house with a gun that had just murdered two people before he showed up at nick point has his house and luckily nick didn't answer the door in that particular instance because he did answer a door one other time he maced a person he got actually arrested for mason the person that showed up at his door inside his house he was inside his house he got arrested but then what I think if I'm not mistaken, the girl that showed up that he maced, I think that happened before. And it was some kind of crazy like white chick or something. Yeah, but either way, I think it was before the guy showed up with the gun that was going to kill him.

If Nick would have answered the door, he would have been killed. Yeah. Or even going to the door, he could have shot through the door. Yeah. Like you just never know. So you got to be careful. Yeah. You got to be careful.

And you got to do things. You got to make moves that are very different than a lot of people. it's is it's um it can be weird right and and you got to be careful who you talk to who you communicate with who you're friends with who you're not friends with you know how much do you say to people online how much do you not even you know obviously we have a telegram right we have a telegram where we talk to you guys and and for those that don't know i mean if you guys want to follow us and go chat with us on live telegrams we do lives pretty often uh but we're on there and we just have live audio telegrams where you guys can talk to us we talk to you but we still got to be careful

on telegram. I mean, even with, you just never know who's going to come in your telegram and be like, hey, what's up and try to find out information or, uh, we get a lot of emails. There are people that seem like they're trying to be cool,

but then it seems like also they're trying to find out information or trying to sway you or say something in a particular way. Even people that are that reach out to us that want to come on the podcast, uh, because of a certain thing like a certain angle. You got to be careful of those because then are you going to let people on your podcast that are just trying to, to manipulate and sway your audience in a certain way.

Yeah, and there's some people that come on the podcast that they're afraid for people to even know what city they live in. You know, it goes as both sides. Yeah. And we've had a couple of people, I would say a few people on the podcast, I would say a few people that have been on our podcast that are government employees and not just government employees, but they're high level government employees. I'm talking about like some of the top level employees that have been on this podcast.

but there's probably two of those people I trust. Two of those people I trust like without a doubt that they're not coming on our podcast. Yeah, they're not coming on our podcast to spit a narrative. I actually think it was the opposite. I think they're coming on our podcast to disqualify some things of what mainstream media and the global consensus is or the national consensus is because they've been in the government. They understand what the game plan is. They understand the playbook.

They've seen it. They've seen the playbooks. They know what the playbook. is they've used it before and in some conversations offline like off the podcast where we've had with some of these people where they're like dude this is out of our playbook like we have learned this we have studied this we have we know exactly how they're doing this and so when I'm saying that to you guys that like even even now I'm like the most confused ever but there's definitely been times when we've had people high level people through connections and whoever that have

come on but not just come on We've talked to them outside of the podcast and it just blew my mind. It didn't blow my mind because I wasn't surprised. But just to kind of have confirmation on some of this stuff was the most mind blowing. So that's all I'm saying. And for people like Alex Jones and what he's saying here in this piece, don't think Alex Jones does not have like crazy connections in the government on every single level. And the thing for Alex is going to be hard for him going forward right now as well is who do you try? trust and who do you not?

Like who is giving you information? And if you used to trust those people, can you still trust them? And or are they going to get you in some more shit? Because I think that for the Sandy Hook thing, there were government officials from what I've been told about Alex Jones and stuff. There were insiders in the whole Sandy Hook thing that reached out to Alex telling him certain things that then set him up for this billion dollar lawsuit to where then now Alex Jones in my opinion if you ever want to control an Alex Jones it is the most opportune time to do that

because you are you have a billion dollars over your head and so as long as someone a government agency or entity comes in and says look Alex we can make this go away eventually but you're going to play by our rules and you're going to make sure that you don't talk about this you don't go into this like we want you know that's that's all i'm saying unless he could file unless he could just file for bankruptcy and start over well he's already done that yeah and you only get that once i think yeah he's already done it but now they've still have that billion dollars because of some stipulation on you know i don't know i don't know why that's crazy no there is yeah they still have it over him and i think he did file for bankruptcy but there's so many stipulation

especially when you got something like a billion dollars and you have have a political motive and you have all these other things, they're going to, they're going to just circumvent whatever these rules are. Yeah, it just doesn't go away. No, it doesn't. No, it absolutely doesn't. So, um, and in most cases, it doesn't unless you have these high level people in, in power that helps you, then it can go away. And so we kind of know a little bit about that. We do kind of heavily. I'm not going to say politically motivated what we went through, but it kind of was because of the people of the group that was ahead of, I guess, our thing, which is literally the reason why we decided to create this podcast

because of what we went through back then. I can only imagine for people like Alex and others that have this lawsuit or this thing. And Candace is about to have the same thing. Oh, yeah. Well, she's already been sued by wife. Bridget McCrone. Likely, Turning Point, USA will drop some multimillion dollar lawsuits on her. They're going to shut her the hell up.

That's what you have to do. to why she went on vacation. You might as well spend the money now. Yeah. I mean, they're going to shut her up. And I think Tucker, Tucker's playing a little safer.

And, because I think he, he knows. Like, if you want to silence someone into oblivion and you want to destroy everything they've ever worked for or had, all you can do is sue them. And you just got to have more money,

more powerful lawyers and, and a certain faction of people on your side. And you can make this shit last for years and years and years. But during that time, So you might be able to get some motions that are restraining orders. You know, that's basically what they are. But you're screwed. To where it says, to where it says, you no longer can talk about this ever again.

Right. Or at least until this lawsuit's over. And maybe even after that, which is why we can't really go into the stuff that happened back in. It could be a lifetime. Yeah, we still can't. You know, it is what it is. And the way the game is played is extremely dirty. Well, the game is who has the most money.

Yeah. I mean, you always got to follow the money, but also you got to follow the power. You got to follow the influence. You got to follow who funds who because, you know, even with Trump and, you know, Trump, yeah, he's a billionaire. But think about it. He has a lot of political donors. So does every president that gets in the office. They all have political donors.

That's how they become president. If they don't have donors that are influencing them or expecting influence, they are not going to be president. And that's just the way it goes. So I just want to talk about that for a second. We're going to listen to a little more of this clip. and the main hit teams with the different drug cartels

and so Trump learned five, six months ago and he already knew he was on a hit list, but his whole family, his key people, his most hardcore folks like, you know, Steve Miller and stuff that are further cracking down on drug cartels.

Marco Rubio, top of the list. So, so you understand, they're the ones that put the bounties out on us. So when you see Trump put a $50 million bounty on Maduro and you see Trump start blowing up the drug boats, Trump's not the type of guy when people start doing stuff like that. And they've busted them, they've caught them, they've caught them trying to come and kill people. And it just barely blips in the news. So I have the drug cartels with a gigantic bounty that I've been asked not to say how much it is on me.

And I'm just so relaxed about all this. I don't make a big deal about the family, the crew, anybody. It's just now you need to know. I mean, it was already announced by Flynn back in March. So this is a man's world. This is a man's game. This is the real world here. All right.

All right. So in, and I'm going to keep the first piece I played of Alex. I need to write this down because sometimes I always forget. Because Alex, when he was, he actually played a clip of Marjorie Tethergreen on Bill Maher. And then goes into similar topics that he's talking about. Yeah, well, he's ADHD like you.

But I did want to talk briefly. And too, you know, Alex Jones had that employee that got murdered. Yeah. And we did a podcast about it. Yeah, we did. They never could necessarily tie that employee, I guess, to like a political hit, but it may have been. Yeah, it could have been a message.

It could have been a message to Alex. And, you know, Alex may never say that. I mean, he kind of did after the fact. Sometimes stuff like that happens and there is a message to it. It's kind of like an underlying message. Yeah. To where your brain as Alex Jones or us or. if that, you know, happened to us.

It's like now you got to start thinking differently. Mm-hmm. And you got to start. But Alex has never gone after that person like Candace has gone after whoever she's going after either. So they must have not been the closest of friends. I don't know. Who knows? But so I want to talk before we get off about the standard defensive infantry bunkers,

all the different bunkers and what they are. So now the standard defensive and infantry bunker. are they're kind of familiar small to medium structures designed to protect troops or assets from artillery bombs or small arms. Are you talking about bunkers underground or what? Well, it can be both. It could be above ground that are concrete structures or it can be below ground. Then you have missile silos, underground launch or strategic weapons facilities.

And we actually, you can find some of these in places like Nevada and Utah that have been decommissioned. Now they're literally making multi-million dollar apartment complexes or just. underground structures to where they're selling entire levels of these things. They're completely remodeling them underground and they're selling them for like million and a half dollars and people can go move in them and they're below ground. But so these things are deeply hardened underground structures used to store, launch or support strategic weapons.

So, you know, maybe you're talking about intercontinental ballistic missiles. The underground missile silo has remained the primary missile basing system in the United States. And so these are generally part of the nuclear deterrence or strategic strike forces on a base, and they may be off limits to most personnel, isolated, or heavily secured. Then you also have command and control or continuity of government bunkers. And this is likely what we're going to see some of these Trump officials that are actually in right now. And these are facilities designed to ensure decision makers can survive and operate during major attacks, nuclear, conventional, CBRN, or chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear.

for example, strategic bunkers are fortified underground structures designed to protect essential personnel equipment and operations, and a high-level official org group might be relocated to such a facility if there's concerned about an attack and up-eval or other extreme scenarios. These facilities often include living quarters, workspaces, secure communications, and supplies. Now, the key features on these are deep underground or heavily shielded multiple independent life support systems, power air filtration, secured entrances, redundant communication links, possibly remote, but likely not an obvious place that you're going to see them. Even on a military base, you would probably not even see the entrance to these underground structures. And this is probably the most relevant type when we're talking about the news reporting about

officials moving to the military bases. And so if so, this is like a command and control bunker. And it would make sense for staging, continuity. or secure operations, especially if they know something that we do not know, right? And then you obviously have like the storage, munitions and ammunition bunkers, which obviously you guys can kind of obviously take from whatever you want to about that. That's for munitions and ammunition and probably missiles. And then you got civil defense, hardened shelters, fallout shelters or bases.

We're talking about places that maybe the elitist build, Bill Gates, you know, the founder of Facebook. you know, all of these people are building these underground bunkers. We know that they have some in Hawaii. We know they have some in Utah. We also know they have some in Sweden, Switzerland. A lot of these global elitists have these underground bunkers. And they've actually started building these over the past eight years. We actually talked about this during the Biden Harris administration.

I think it was the first year of the Biden presidency that Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg. And I think it was also Jack Dorsey. a lot of these elites went and started moving into these underground bunkers. And not only where they build him, we're talking about places that were worth, you know, $200, $300 million in some cases, if not more. And so we've started to see this eight years ago. And now the Trump administration is saying, hey, there's something going on. They supposedly are saying it's political violence and the risk of that, you know,

Alex Jones is saying it's the bounties that are on their heads, but is it something that we don't know? Because that's more likely the scenario than not. I don't think it's just the uprising in political violence. I think it's something bigger. And I don't exactly know what that is. But guys, I want you to tell us what you think it is. Like, what is the most likely scenario in that case?

And before we get off here, I do want to say, we do have all our social media, but we also have a merchandise store, which Sherry did just design some cool. Christmas merchandise. That is Investigator store.com. So on social media, go follow us there. We also have a telegram and we're going to play out our song from Revolution Code.

I want you guys to go follow us on Spotify, wherever you listen to music. Go download the song, go share it with people. This song is literally about good versus evil and when Christ will come back or in the very end. And I think we're close that he's going to break the chains from the totalitarian evil state that we live in. And I'm not saying the state. I'm talking about the world as it is.

And so this is Break the Chains by Revolution Code. That is us. Go follow us. Go find us. Go share it. And guys, until next time, we love you so very much. We will be back very soon. Peace out, guys.

Peace out. So our name. Chame.