Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Russia Terror Attack & Crimea US Missile Attack | World War 3 Conspiracy Podcast

Episode Date: June 24, 2024

On this episode, we have two explosive stories that could signify a turning point in global geopolitics.First, we turn our attention to the Crimean port city of Sevastopol, where Russia is reporting a mass casualty event. The Kremlin claims that a US long-range missile was the weapon of destruction, raising alarms and tensions to a fever pitch. What does this mean for the already fraught relations between the superpowers?Meanwhile, in Russia's Dagestan region, a wave of terror attacks has left the nation on edge. Who are the perpetrators behind these heinous acts, and what are their motivations? Could the CIA have any connections to these attacks? As these flashpoints ignite across the globe, we ask the pressing question: are we on the brink of World War 3? 

and welcome to Investigator with podcast. I'm your host, Chad, alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry. On tonight's episode, we have two explosive stories that can signify a turning point in global geopolitics. We're going to talk about the Crimean port city of Sevaston Pool, where Russia is reporting a mass casualty event. The Kremlin claims that a U.S. long-range missile was the weapon of destruction, raising alarms and tensions to a fever pitch. What does this mean for the already fraught relations between the two superpowers? And meanwhile, in Russia's Dagestan region, a wave of terror attacks have left. the nation on edge. Who are the perpetrators behind these heinous acts and what are the motivations?

Are these flashpoints igniting across the globe leading us to World War III? That's what we're going to be talking about on tonight's episode. Welcome, guys. It is June the 24th, 2024. Yesterday was a very, very busy news cycle, especially in Russia. If you look at X accounts and social media, there were memes all across the internet that talked about CIA was really busy yesterday. In particular, you might ask yourself, why was the CIA busy yesterday? What the hell is I have to do with anything? But you have to remember that ISIS and seems like these guys were tied to, at the very least, a subsection of ISIS. ISIS seems to be going against countries that, you know, the United States don't necessarily like.

Like Iran, like Russia, like China. These are ISIS's new enemies. And you may ask yourself, why would ISIS hate these countries all of a sudden? Well, I don't know. It could be because. maybe there is some conspiratorial truth about the CIA's connection with ISIS. So we're going to talk about the actual attack. We're also going to talk about the missile strike on Crimea that left five dead over 100

injured. Obviously, the first reports that came out about this said that it was an intentional attack on civilians. Russia, their own ministry of defense actually came out and said that's not actually the case. And we'll talk about how that happened. But yeah, it's been kind of slow news really the past a month, the last episode. episode we did, Sherry, was obviously about Israel and the IDF knowing about the October 7th attack a month or maybe even a year before the attack happened.

And then now we have Russia, right? Our biggest enemy, Russia, they're just being shit on in a lot of ways right now. I'm telling you, because even three months ago, they had a major crisis at the concert hall when all those people were shot up. It was terrible. And I'm just wondering, is it the same people that are doing the same thing? things? Is it these terrorist groups? Is it from ISIS? Yeah. Well, the interesting thing, too, guys, before we even get into the nitty gritty of this, you know, you got to think about this, though, ISIS in particular, we've had two terror attacks in three months in Russia. The first

concert hall attack was at the hands of multiple ISIS, you know, terrorists. They also had fully automatic weapons. It sounds like these terrorists in this particular situation in Dagestan also had fully automatic weapons. There are some rumors can, I guess you can say conspiracy theories out there that potentially some of these weapons were NATO weapons. We don't know for sure. But when we talk about the connection between ISIS and how ISIS and the CIA have worked together in the past, especially for whatever the CIA or the United States government

wanted to accomplish abroad, they oftentimes use terrorist cells or organizations like ISIS. And let's just be honest, the reality of it is, is that our war in the Middle East, in the beginning, especially after 9-11, was in large part what really created a lot of these terror cells like ISIS, ISIS-K, the Taliban, I believe, was before ISIS. And so it was kind of like an offshoot of the Taliban, which is where ISIS kind of came about. And so most people are like, why would the United States government in any way, shape, or form? our intelligence agencies have anything to do with a terrorist group that I thought we were fighting for the past 20-something years.

Yeah, fighting against, not with. Yeah, 24, almost like 23 years, I guess, really. And what's crazy about ISIS is they don't belong to one country. They're kind of scattered everywhere. And they love to take credit for terrorist acts that even maybe they haven't done. Yeah. And that's what's really crazy about them because maybe they didn't. Maybe they didn't.

But they love to take the credit. Yeah. And so I think it's kind of important. important, before we even start talking about the actual attack briefly, we got to talk about who ISIS is. ISIS is also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. They are a terrorist organization that follows a fundamental extremist interpretation of the Sunni Islam, formed in 2014 from a splinter cell of an al-Qaeda in Iraq, ISIS rapidly

gained control of large areas in Iraq and Syria, declaring a caliphate under its rule. Now, the group is notorious for its brutal tactics, including mass executions, kidnappings, terrorist attacks worldwide, and ISIS aims to establish a global Islamic state governed by its strict interpretation of Sharia law. It has been designated as a terrorist organization by numerous countries and international organizations. And one of the things also that we have to think about when we talk about ISIS and Islamic extremism, we have to talk about what they really, what are their founding principles? Some of the founding principles and why some of these extremist groups, especially under the Sharia law and Islamic State, they believe the Quran

is in particular that the Allah and the sword are the most important part, right? And the sword in the Quran basically is a very violent interpretation of the Bible, right? So we've done episodes, Bible episodes to where, you know, and we haven't even made it to the New Testament yet on our Bible series that we're trying to figure out the Bible, which I can't wait, at least until we get to the New Testament, because this is depressing in the Old Testament. It really is. But the thing is, like the Old Testament, when you read the Old Testament, it's like, wow.

Yeah, this is wars and famine and like murder. Murder. Murder. Murder. Murder. Yes. And refugees and starvation. Yeah.

And the reality is according to the Bible, right? According to even the Old Testament when you talk about. And listen, I'm not a Bible scholar, guys. So I'm not trying to preach here. I'm just saying when you read the Old Testament in particular. particular when God comes down and tells the Jews, hey guys, Canaanite, your new land, which is now Israel, we want you to go kill every living thing in this land. And we want you to make no mistakes. We want you to not make friends with anyone living there. And if you do not do this, then you're

screwed. Guess what? Well, the Jews at that time, the first wave of Jews that were fleeing Egypt during Exodus. And when they got to the promised land, they did not kill everyone that they were supposed to kill, which was literally everyone in in Canaan. night, which is now Israel. Instead, they made some relationships and some friends with people. So what did God do? He cast him out into the badlands, right? For 40 years until a new generation of more brave soldiers, more brave people would come along and actually finish the job that God wanted them to do, which was kill all these people, right? I'm just reading, I'm just telling you from the Bible. So even the second generation still made friends. They still started, I guess some

of them started worshiping other gods and all this stuff. So then, according to the the Bible, God came along and said, you know what, since you still are not listening to me, I'm going to destroy you until you finally listen to me. I will destroy you in some way, shape, or form every single time, whether it be the Romans or the whatever, right, the rulers, whoever I'm going to bring in. So when you start talking about the Bible, and although, yes, we're about to talk a little bit about ISIS and Islamic State Terror, you have to at least go back to our own Holy Bible, right? In our own Holy Bible, when you hear the word holy Bible, You think it's like, well, you think it's so nice and loving.

And, you know, we have a loving God as all the preacher saying, listen, I'm not saying we don't. I'm just saying that God was not necessarily as loving to whoever the hell was in Canaan, which is now Israel back in the day according to the Bible. And these are some of my biggest things I've always had with the Bible. And like I said, I'm not a Bible scholar. There's definitely interpretation there. I'm just telling you before we get into the terror attacks here,

what some of their belief systems are, the CIA connections. I at least had to tell you my thought on the Bible that I read. Right. And we have to remember in the Old Testament, the Bible also said that Ishmael was born of Abraham and he was a stepson. And he was basically the one that broke off into the Muslim religion. Yeah, yeah. And that was because he was a stepson, that was not the religion that God wanted them to have. Yeah.

And I think that's where all the war came about. Yeah. I mean, apparently so, right? According to the Bible, that's how the whole thing started, right? But this is not a biblical episode. Let's get into the terror attacks, actually, specifically when we talk about, actually, wait, before we get into terror attacks, I got to announce something real briefly. Yes, and this is so exciting.

It is exciting. So, obviously, some of you probably know about the debates that are coming up this Thursday. It'll be June the 27th this Thursday. We are starting a live stream at 8.30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. We will be live on X and Rumble. We may be live on YouTube, but we actually right now have it as Chad and Sharia and plugged. I think we're actually going to go with Investigator's Inc. as the name over there. So if you do happen to find us, go subscribe to our YouTube or you can follow us on X. You will see the live stream. We have a lot of great guests.

Right now we do have Ashton Forbes, Derek Gibson from Black Patriot of Trump. We have Dave from Alien Attic and Conspiracy Mothership. We have Nathan Jones from Clear, Clear CEO and founder, potentially Jake Angelie Chansley, the QAnon Shaman. Also, Ian Carroll may also stop by. We've got a lot of people that are going to be a part of this live stream, this live debate. We will actually have the debate main screen. We're going to be on the side, probably laughing and laughing her ass off. We're going to probably have to mic or mute her mics everyone so long.

They might have to test me like they're testing Biden. Well, we're going to probably have some drinks. Yeah, they're going to test me for a corona light. no. Yeah. But we're going to have some drinks, guys. But listen, if you want someone to watch the debate with and you just want some of our commentary here and there, we're going to be live 30 minutes before the debate.

The debate starts at 9 p.m. Eastern Standard Time against Trump or sorry, Trump versus Biden. And then afterwards, we'll probably have an after show as well. The debate will last 90 minutes approximately and we'll probably be live for another 30 to 45 minutes after. Just breaking it down, seeing like, you know, I don't know, who won this shit show, uh, which I mean, damn. It depends on how many drugs maybe Biden has. It also depends on how much shit Trump talks.

We don't know, but it's going to be funny at the very least. Yes. And it also depends, too, because it's going to be on CNN. Yeah. And CNN hates Trump. Yeah, they don't. So it's already going to be in Biden's favor. Well, you got to think.

I mean, CNN, Jake Tapper, which is one of the moderators of the debate, you know, he is the one that said that Trump is Hitler. He compared Trump to Hitler. So just keep that in mind. But guys, before we get into that, I think that's all we got. Just follow us on X. Make sure you tune in to our live stream on Thursday 8.30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. It'll be fun.

Cannot wait for that live show. So the Dagestan attack highlights Russia's vulnerability at home amid Ukraine war, according to the Guardian. So Sunday's terrorist attacks in Dagestan left at least 19 people dead have highlighted Russia's growing difficulties in managing a tide of Islamic terror at home as the security forces are engaged in the war. Ukraine. Now the attacks carried out by four gunmen in Dagestan's capital of shit. Hold on I actually have it. Mokahatcha. Nope. Definitely did not get that right.

And two in the seaside city of Durban appeared to catch Dagestani officials by surprise. At least 15 police officers were among those killed and the attackers also burned down a synagogue, which I think you said there's two synagogues which obviously for people to know, synagogues are Jewish places of worship. Temples. Yeah.

Burt down two synagogues. set fire to a church in acts, two churches, okay, in acts that Russian officials are clearly concerned could lead to a tide of inter-ethnic violence at home. Now, the mostly Muslim region of the North Caucasus in southern Russia is one of the country's most restive, and the growing social unrest and violence there could indicate that the Kremlin is struggling to maintain order at home amid Vladimir Putin's singular focus on his generational conflict with the West. Now, as I'm already reading, by the way, this paragraph, this is propaganda already. Now, I'm reading it from The Guardian, but I've seen very, very similar stories in other ways.

What they're trying to do by this media, right? Global media, international media, and mainstream media here in the United States, they're trying to tell you that Putin does not have control of his own country. He is failing. He is vulnerable. They're trying to basically, you know, demonize Putin, but also make him look very weak. And so articles like this will do their very best to try to do that. And there's a reason for all this.

So what I'm saying we'll get to in a minute. Now, the attacks, which included a drive-by shooting, targeting traffic police, were reminiscent of regular terror attacks that plagued the city in the 2000s. No group has taken responsibility, but analysts have suggested that they could be tied to Islamic States' North Caucus branch. And actually, we know probably actually who was responsible. That will get to that in a minute. coming just months after the Moscow Concert Hall attack where ISIS-linked

militants killed 145 people and last year's anti-Semitic rioting at a Dagestan airport, which we do remember that. There was a Dagestan airport where a lot of these I guess they called them Muslims they were surrounding the airport around a, I think in particular

an airplane that had a bunch of Jewish people. Yeah, a Jewish airplane. Which for some reason, by the way, it was a fleeing airplane from Israel, I believe, that was sent to a place that was mostly Muslim. So that was also very strange. Why would they even do that in the first place?

Yeah. Who knows? But the new attacks will raise concerns about a growing pool of radicalized young people in Russia, and in particular in the North Caucasus, and I'm probably saying that wrong too, where societal tensions on multiple fronts appear close to a boiling point. Now, Valentia Mityaiko, the head of Russia's Federation Council, called for residents of Russia and Dagestan to demonstrate their maturity. and avoid an emotional reaction, despite the enormity of what happened, not to take the easiest

wrong path of escalation and inter-ethnic and inter-religious tensions and animosity. To prevent this from happening, Russian officials have quickly moved to try to portray the attacks as a provocation by outside forces, such as the United States and NATO, despite ample evidence of homegrown terrorism in Russia stemming back devastating wars since the 90s in North Caucasus. And I'm definitely saying it wrong again. Uh, and quotes, of course, we understand who is behind the organization of these terrorist attacks, said Sergei Melikov, the head of Dagestan. We understand what the organizers were trying to achieve. He added as he claimed sleeper cells had certainly been prepared, including from abroad.

Two of the attackers were reported by sons of the head of Dagestan's Sergo-Galensky district, uh, Magomed Amaroff, who was detained for question. His records have been removed from the site of United Russia and the country's ruling party of which he was a member. Russian media reports on Monday said he had told investigators that he knew several members of his family had been radicalized years earlier and the identities of a number of the assailants were known to police in advance. Dagestan, a mostly Muslim Republican southern Russia with a diverse population, high levels of unemployment and struggles with Islamic radicalism has long been one of Russia's most turbulent regions. It was the site of protest against mobilization for the war in Ukraine in 2022

and was one of Russia's hardest hit regions during the COVID crisis of 2020. And last October, an anti-Semitic mob directed via social media stormed the airport in search of Jewish passengers arriving from Israel. Video posted online showed hundreds of young men, some carrying Palestinian flags or placards, denounce in Israel, rushing on the tarmac and climbing on the idylland plane, attempting to break through windows. Mops in several cities also besieged hotels after telling the owners that they believe they were sheltering Jewish guests inside.

Let's start. Gosh, there's so many places, right? There's so many places to start. I think we should start since you ended with the airport and the Jewish people that they hate. We have to talk about this small city. And this is a very small city where this happened where there was only two synagogues right, left. Yeah. One of them that they burned down was,

175 years old. The other one, I'm not sure how old it was, but there was only two remaining in the city because it's, you know, it's predominantly Muslim. Yeah. And then the other two churches were Orthodox Christian churches, which I think Muslims are against those people as well, obviously, because they not only went and burned down one of the churches, but they went in there and actually killed one of their famous preachers, priest. Yeah, Father.

Yeah, Father. Sorry. Yeah, Father Nikolai. He was a 40-year priest in the church, 40 years, right? And he was very, very popular in the area. He was, I don't know. I mean, I don't want to necessarily compare this guy to like a Billy Graham or a Joel Osteen or any of that.

But he was very popular for that region and in much of Russia. So to slit this guy's throat, it just goes back to, yes, Islam extremism. You'll see a lot of this. I mean, they used to cut people's heads off during the Iraq. And Iraq. I, yeah, Iraq and Afghanistan war. They would cut journalists' head off. They would burn them in cages alive.

I mean, these are very, these groups are very barbaric groups, right? So, yes, I mean, definitely something. But the interesting thing was even going back to, and we got to start here, I guess, even going back to the airport incident where the Jewish people that were fleeing Israel went to an airport where it was predominantly Muslim, even in this place, right? Why would they send an airplane to this region to then be surrounded? by Muslims, how did Muslims know that the Jewish pageers were on there? And it almost seemed like a setup.

It almost seemed like a setup to where not necessarily, I mean, you could look at it both ways, but it almost seemed like it's set up to where Russia's bad, the people in Russia are bad, they want to kill Jews. And so here you go. Here's all the footage evidence of this, right? Oh, I see what you're saying that maybe it was, you know, the Israeli government that sent them to make them look bad, to make Russia look bad. I mean, that's a theory, right?

Because Putin, I mean, I know Russia is predominantly Christian. They do have small cities like this city that are predominantly Muslim, and I think it's more in the southern region of Russia. But it's predominantly Christian. And I know they do still have a few Jews, but I feel like they're highly, they highly like the Jewish people there because, you know, going back to the Holocaust, you know, not only were they searching for Jews, but they were searching for communists in Russia. So it was against both of them. So they're both kind of on the same team. Yeah. And by the way, I'm not saying that's the case.

I'm just saying it was very weird when the airport situation happened. I will put it that way. Then also you have a lot of this anti-Semitism, all this. Now, it also kind of makes sense of you have largely predominantly Muslim communities that also in some ways in some places mixed with Jewish people, even though I don't know how many Jewish people are in Russia. I didn't think there was a lot, but maybe there's some. But nonetheless, at the very least, you have the situation now where ISIS or a faction of ISIS went and burnt. down a synagogue, making it very obvious that, hey, we are here to kill or to demonstrate how we want to kill Jews, it seems like, right, by burning down a synagogue. And then they also went to

these cathedrals, these Christian churches, and slid a guy's throat and then also fought with police outside of there. Obviously, the church services were not in service at this time, or else who knows what would have actually happened during this situation. You would have thought, though, if they really hated Jews or Christians that much, why would they not wait until a day that the church is completely packed and pulled this off? That doesn't make a lot of sense. It doesn't. Just even like the concert hall, they had all these people together in one huge building. And I think there was only six terrorists that killed all those people.

And in this circumstance, you know, they only got like 20 people, which is a lot is too many. you know, one is too many. But 175 compared to 20. So what was the real reasoning behind all this? Yeah. But you also got to remember. So the guy that was over this district, right? His two sons were two of the terrorists, right?

Yeah. This was a, he was on the Russian council, right? He was basically in the government. He was, I guess what you would maybe consider, he was over this region of Dagestan. And so maybe how you would want to compare that is either, I don't know, some people have compared it to a mayor, maybe a governor or something of that nature. But obviously, he was high up, pretty decently high up in the Russian government. He has two sons, which he, which he knew about was Islamic extremist for quite some time. And then he also had a nephew that

was also involved in this situation. And anytime, obviously, I think about politicians being involved in any way, shape, or form, this guy was, he actually resigned last night. He was questioned by security forces. Don't exactly know where he is today. might be dead or being tortured more than likely because if I'm if I'm going to guess Russian security forces or the FSB or whoever it is now they're more than likely going to desperately try to figure out if he has some type of ties to someone since he is a politician who are your ties to we got to go back briefly before before this the concert hall attacks right which was in March this was the first terror attack in Russia this year

and when we go back to that attack, what we have to also remember is that there was two terrorists that was trying to flee to the Ukrainian Russian border. They also, one of them, apparently, was at some point in time a Ukrainian military soldier, right? And also somewhat involved in ISIS. Apparently, ISIS took credit for that. The mainstream media went with ISIS. That was it. But the storyline as far as they were trying to flee to Ukraine and he actually used to be a Ukrainian soldier never got covered. No one gave a shit about that anymore.

That was hush us. That was quieted. But the reality is still this. He was still fleeing to Ukraine. Two of them were when they got intercepted on the way to Ukraine. Now, you could be saying obviously that Russia is just trying to put this and put it any way they can on Ukraine or the United States. But the reality too is, guys, is we have to remember if we're thinking at all that CIA potentially could be involved in anything like this. You have to understand that CIA's job is to do things like this.

The CIA technically, although, yes, you probably heard a lot over the past few years about the CIA's involvement in domestic affairs. The CIA's main goal is actually to get involved in foreign affairs. They are to get involved supposedly to create situations or to stop situations abroad before they get on. into our homeland. But typically, actually, what CIA does is they do things that overthrow governments. They do things in the benefit of either the military industrial complex or whoever is the bigwig elite forces that are really playing the hands around the world. That's really who the CIA is really for.

They're not necessarily for you American citizens because you American citizens are under the microscope of not only the CIA, but also the FBI and all the other intelligence agencies. IRS, everyone. Yes. You are the ones that are right now suspects in every single crime possible, right, if you're an American citizen. But the reality of this is, let's not get too deep into that. We have to understand that if ISIS had anything to do with this, do they have in any way

shape or form connections potentially to the CIA. And we got to talk there first. I want to play a clip because I think this is very important. And I will explain who this guy is in just a minute. But Scott Ritter is who this clip comes from. And Scott Ritter has talked a lot about certain situations like this, like other terror attacks, like the Russia-Ukraine situation, like all the other wars that are going on around the world. And so Scott Ritter was a former U.S. Marine Corps, I think he was in for 18 plus years. He was a UN weapons inspector.

I mean, huge big-time job. I mean, his job was to go in and inspect weapons and make sure that things were going this way or that. That way, obviously he was heavily involved in NATO or not, sorry, that's a UN weapons inspector. I meant NATO weapons inspector. Sorry, guys. I meant United Nations weapons inspector. And he was an intelligence officer in the Marine Corps. But he had posted this video the other day.

And he actually, we're going to get to a piece from him in just a little bit as far as something that he kind of outlines. As far as the real potential of World War III and what's really going on right now with all these. fires burning around the world. But more particularly, I want you to hear his take on what happened between both the missile attacks and the Dagestan terror attacks. And then we'll get deeper into this situation as we go. Here you go. It's Sunday.

And normally this is a day I like to take off and dedicate it to my family. But the events unfolding in Russia, I think require at least some brief commentary. I'm referring to two events, actually. One, a Ukrainian attack on Savastopol using U.S. supplied attackem's missiles. And the second, a terrorist attack in Dagestan, it appears to have all the hallmarks of Western involvement. Let there be no doubt these are two direct attacks against Russia by proxies of the United States. States and of NATO. And it's more than just a proxy engagement, given the necessity of preparation, intelligence support, etc. This is a direct attack on Russia by the United States,

by NATO, and by non-NATO European entities. All of the parties that have made a decision in the last several days and weeks to expand the scope and scale of their participation in the Ukrainian-Russian conflict. Now, some people are saying that the Ukrainians deliberately attacked a beach in Sevastopol. The evidence shows that this most likely is not the case, that five attack missiles were fired, four were shot down. The fifth one being shot down, dispersed either cluster bombs or fragments from the destroyed missile onto the beach, killing a number of Russians, wounding many others. But that doesn't matter.

The Ukrainians made a decision to use attack missiles equipped with cluster munitions against a city, a civilian city. This is an act of terrorism. This is in keeping with the Ukrainian action. that have transpired over the course of the past years, where Ukraine since 2014 has been bombarding Russian civilian sites, cities, villages, towns for the sole purpose of inflicting death and destruction on Russian civilians. This is an act of terrorism, and given that the attack missile cannot be deployed by the Ukrainians without extensive intelligence support by the

United States. This is an act of terrorism by the United States against Russia. The same can be said about the attacks in Dagestan. These are deliberately designed to disrupt the civil life of the Russian Federation. Dagestan is part of the Russian Federation. And it's also designed to engender a split between the Muslim and non-Muslim segments of Russian society. This is a tactic that goes back to the first Chechen War and the second Chechen War, where the CIA and other European intelligence agencies sought to split Chechnya away from the Russian Federation. That effort failed, and the effort in Dagestan will fail too. But it doesn't absolve the parties involved of their guilt in launching what is a direct assault on the Russian Federation. Now, the

question is, what will Russia do? Historically speaking, the Russian Federation has shown an ability to absorb provocations of this nature and remain focused on the task at hand, which, of course, is achieving the goals of the special military operation, the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine. But at some point in time, there will have to be a response, and what is an appropriate response. That's up for the Russian Federation to decide, but that there be no doubt that if and when the time comes for the Russian Federation to respond to those, all of those responsible for this horrific series of attacks, that the perpetrators held to account will not just be the Ukrainians, but those who have provided the Ukrainians with the weapons and the intelligence and the training

to carry out these dastardly, cowardly attacks. We live in a lot of the United States. We live in very dangerous times. We live at a time when Russia, the United States, and NATO have all been beating the nuclear drum. We don't need a nuclear war. But that's the direction we're heading if we don't stop this insanity. And by stopping this insanity, this means stopping the United States, stopping NATO, stopping Europe from continuing to facilitate these terrorist attacks by Ukraine against Russia. So there you go. There's Scott Ritter. And I want to point out something here very briefly that, you know, we have to understand that Scott Ritter is a former 17-year intelligence officer with the United States Marine Corps. He was a UN's, a UN weapons inspector.

Obviously, this guy, whatever he did as an intelligence officer in the Marine Corps, you have to understand that you don't just go to the UN as a weapons inspector because whatever you did in the Marine Corps, even, you know, because you think about intelligence officer in Marine Corps, there are various facets that you could go down that line of what you actually do in the military. Obviously, he probably had, you know, his specialty was more than likely intelligence in some type of foreign weaponry or weaponry movements, wartime scenarios, gathering information or intelligence from foreign adversaries. More than likely, this is something that he had to do.

And it sounds like Scott Ritter, although if he want to demonize him right now, but you got to look it his credentials. His credentials do not lie. And so when they start trying to demonize someone like Scott Ritter, like Dr. Peter McCullough, like Dr. Robert Malone, like all these people that are desperately trying to tell you what's actually going on, you need to listen to these people because these people are the ones that are on the front lines. They are seeing what's really happening. They're trying to tell you from their actual expert scientific opinion what this scenario is. and it to me it's no different than someone we had had on the podcast before where you know prior to our podcast episode with this person you know some of the stuff that we kind of talked about i was like

wow that's insane that you know there are actual people around in the government in any way shape or form or have been in the government before that really know what's happening but yet they're not allowed to say it because they'll either disappear be killed or otherwise so when we sit here and think about this Russia terror attack, some of you might be thinking, oh, it's just a terror attack. There's nothing to it. No, that's not true. That is not true.

And we got to connect some dots, which we're about to do right now in just a minute, to how the CIA potentially connected and is in connection with ISIS on a daily basis. Isn't it weird, though, how he talked about, Sherry, their training and methodical, you know, the methodical process of this to where you had two cities about 70 to 80 miles from each other, simultaneously being attacked with fully automatic weapons and in a pretty decently coordinated way. And yet also these at least two or three of the terror suspects were the sons of one of the main guys under the Russian Federation. Yeah. And that made no sense to me.

But as I think about it and I think about how ISIS is, they want to train people within their countries. It's just kind of like I was thinking about Timothy McVeigh when he was the Oklahoma bomb. You know, we want to train people within the countries because that's the way we can get in and we can do the job that we want them to do. Yeah. So that makes sense that it was, you know, this politician's sons that have been radicalized by Islam. And, you know, Islam, the radical Islam has connections to CIA. Yeah. And so what if CIA comes this guy in Dagestan, one of the politicians in Russian, but hey, guys, we'll give you this much money or we'll do this or whatever.

However, they worked a scenario out and, you know, he just happens to know or maybe through intelligence, they know that his sons are radicalized and they think they can get something accomplished in this way, shape, reform. I mean, and you got to remember when you think about CIA, it's like, it's like most people think they're in like a uniform with badges and guns and all that stuff. They're not. These people are infiltrated within communities, within countries, within regions of various places around the world. They may be husbands, wives. you might also think about CIA as being white. A lot of CIA are not. They're either Muslim and descent that are American-born Muslims or Muslims that are born abroad that are brought to the United States that then are trained through the CIA and then sent back over abroad because they don't want you to have to have a cover story.

That's the one thing they always say about the CIA officers is that it's best to not have to have a cover story. We just want to go ahead and take your story of what it is and then make you a CIA officer, right, or a CIA operative. And I don't necessarily know or think that these guys thought they were CIA operatives. No, no, not these guys. No, no, no, no. I don't think so. And I wanted to go back to, even in the terrorist attack in March, there were six guys. And we all saw what happened to them.

I was on live news. You know, they got captured. Some of them were killed on spot, which a lot of these guys in this one got killed. And I'm not sure if they even detained anyone or if they killed everyone. But in March, when they did. get a hold of these terrorists, we all saw how tortured they were. Yeah, they were beaten the shit. Yeah, they were beating the shit.

They went to court. One guy was unconscious. And after the court date, we didn't even see anything that happened in court. And we've never heard anything about those guys, you know, since then. Yeah. Being that said, why in a million years would you even say, oh, okay, I'll take a million dollars to do this when you know you're going to be killed? Well, oftentimes, though, that's why the CIA is pretty decent at. what they do is because number one, they know that anyone that has the ideology of ISIS,

you don't really have to offer them any money. They can offer them some type of mindset. Yeah. They can give them a mindset scenario. They can give them whatever they got to give them, right? They can infiltrate these little groups and they can save themselves that they are ISIS, right? I mean, you don't understand probably how many ISIS members are actually CIA operatives that are in ISIS that are there to either influence direction towards certain groups or where they're going to go attack and how they're going to be put. into place.

And this is what we're about to get into. And I want to also say this, this piece, which I have to use, because I think he does a fantastic job of just given a little bit of the connection between CIA and ISIS and how all this stuff was created. His name is Kit Clarenberg. He does have a substack. I encourage all of you to go read it and subscribe to him, very talented. But how CIA and MI6 created ISIS.

So within just 24 hours of the horrific mass shoot. shooting in Moscow's Crocus City Hall on March 22nd, which left at least 137 innocent people dead and 60 more critically wounded. U.S. officials blame the slaughter on ISIS-K, which is day South Central Asian branch. For many, the attribution's salarity raised suspicious suspicions. Washington was seeking to decisively shift the Western public and Russian government focus away from the actual corporates, be that Ukraine and or Britain or Keeves for or most proxy sponsor.

Full details of how the four shooters were recruited, directed, and armed in finance, and who by and yet are yet to emerge. But the Kremlin claims to have unearthed evidence that Keeves SBU were the ultimate architects, which the agency denies. Charging the Russian authorities knew about the attack and could have prevented it, but didn't to happen, in order to ramp up their assault on Ukraine. It has been reported that killers receive funds from cryptocurrency wallet belonging to Tajikistan wing of ISIS.

Whatever the truth of the matter is, it is certain that the four individuals responsible had no clue who or what truly sponsored their monstrance actions. Contrary to the group's mainstream portrayal, as inspired by fanatic, extreme religious fundamentalism, ISIS, are primarily guns for hire. At any given time, they act at the behest of an array of international donors bound by common interest and funding weapons and orders reach its fighters circulatory and opakly. This is almost invariably layer upon layer of cutouts between the perpetrators of an attack claimed

by the group and its ultimate orchestrators and financiers. Given ISIS-K is currently arrayed against China, Iran, and Russia, in other words, the U.S. Empire's primary adversaries, it is incumbent to revisit their parent groups or origins. Now, emerging seemingly out of nowhere just over a decade ago before dominating mainstream media headlines in Western public consciousness for several years before vanishing again. At one stage, the group occupied vast swath of Iraq and Syrian territory, declaring the Islamic State, which issued its own currency, passports, and vehicle registration plates. Now, devastating military interventions independently launched by the U.S. and Russia wiped out the demonic construct in 2017. The CIA and MI6 were no doubt immensely relieved. After all, extremely awkward questions about how precisely ISIS came to be were comprehensively extinguished.

And as we shall see, the terror group and its caliphate did not emerge in the manner of lightning on a dark night, but due to dedicated determined policy hatched in London and Washington implemented by their spying agencies. Rand is a highly influential Washington, D.C. headquartered think tank. R-A-N-D. It's bankrolled to the tune of almost $100 million annually by the Pentagon and other U.S. government entities. It regularly disseminates recommendations on national security, foreign affairs, military strategy, and covert and overt actions overseas.

Now, these pronouncements are more often than not subsequently adopted as policy. For example, a July 2016 R-A-N-D paper on the unthinkable prospect of war with China forecast a need to fill Eastern Europe with U.S. soldiers in advance of a hot conflict with Beijing, as Russia would undoubtedly side with his neighbor and ally in such a dispute. It was therefore considered necessary to tie down Moscow's forces at its borders, and six months later, scores of NATO troops duly arrived in the region, upstantly to counter Russian aggression. Now, similarly, in April of 2019, R-A-N-D published Extending Russia,

It's set out a range of possible means to bait Moscow and to overextending itself so as to undermine the regime's stability. Now, these methods included providing lethal aid to Ukraine, increase in U.S. support for the Syrian rebels, and promoting the regime change in Belarus, exploiting tensions in the Caucasian influence in the Central Asia and Moldova. Caucasus, by the way, which is what we were talking about earlier. Most of this came to pass thereafter. So in this context, R&D's November 2008, unfolding the long war makes the disquieting reading, it explored ways the U.S. global war on terror could be prosecuted once coalition forces formally left Iraq. And under the terms of a withdrawal agreement inked by Baghdad in Washington that same month, this development by definition threatened dominion over Persian Gulf oil and gas resources,

which would remain a strategic priority when the occupations. was officially over. Now, this priority will interact strongly with that of prosecuting the long war, Rand declared, and the think tank went on to propose a divide and rule strategy to maintain U.S. heterogy in Iraq, despite the power vacuum created by withdrawal. Under its copsies, Washington would exploit fault line between Iraq, various Salafate jihadist groups to turn them against each other and dissipate their energy on internal conflicts, while supporting authority of Sunai or sorry Sunni governments against a continually hostile Iran.

And it quotes, this strategy relies heavily on covert action information operations, unconventional warfare, and support to indigenous security forces. The U.S. and its local allies could use nationalist jihadists to launch proxy campaigns to discredit transnational jihadists in the eyes of the local populace. This would be an inesmensive way of buying time until the U.S. U.S. can return its full attention to the region. U.S. leaders could also choose to capitalize on the sustained Shia-S. Sunni conflict by taking the side of conservative Sunni regimes against Shiite

empowerment movements in the Muslim world. So it was that the CIA and MI6 began supporting Sunni nationalist jihadist through the West Asia. The next year, Bashar Assad rejected a Qatari proposal to route Doha's vast gas reserves directly to Europe via a $10 billion, $1,500-kilometer long pipelines span in Saudi Arabia, Georgia, Syria, and Turkey. As extensively documented in WikiLeaks released diplomatic cables, U.S., Israeli, and Saudi intelligence immediately decided to overthrow Assad by fermenting a local Sunni rebellion and started financing opposition groups for the purpose.

This effort became turbocharged in October of 2011, with MI6-Reed. directing weapons and extremist fighters from Libya to Syria in the wake of Muammar Gaddafi's televised murder. Now, the CIA oversaw their operation using British intelligence as an arm leant's cutout to avoid notifying Congress of mechanisms. Only in June of 2013, with then-President Barack Obama's official authorization, did the agency's cloak and dagger covenants in Damascus become formalized and later admitted under the name Timber Sycamore.

So at this time, Western officials universally referred to their Syrian proxies as moderate rebels. Yet Washington was well aware its surrogates were dangerous extremists seeking to carve a fundamentalist caliphate out of the territory they occupied. And in August 2012, U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA report released under the Freedom of Information Laws, observes that the events in West Asia were taken a clear sectarian direction with radical Salafing. groups the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria. These factions included al-Qaeda's Iraqi wing AQI and its umbrella offshoot Islamic State of Iraq or ISI. The pair went on to form ISIS, a prospect the DIA report not only predicted but seemingly endorsed. So it quotes, if the situation unravels, there is the possibility of establishing the declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syria.

This is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want in order to isolate the Syrian regime. And ISI could also declare Islamic State Thruist Union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create great danger. That's what the actual report said. Now, despite such grave concerns, the CIA continued to dispatch unaccountability, vast shipments of weapons and money to Syria's moderate rebels. Remember moderate rebels, although definitely extremists. well-known this aid would almost inevitably end up in ISIS's hands. Moreover, Britain concurrently ran secret programs cost them millions to train opposition paramilitaries in the art of killing while providing medical assistance to the wound of jihadist. And London also donated multiple ambulances purchased from Qatar to armed groups in the country.

Do you remember when Obama was in presidency? He was a president. And he refused to call ISIS a terrorist? Yeah. remember that? Well, he also refused to call, you know, you remember when Ferguson, Missouri happened and all that stuff and you refused to even denounce them that was, you know, burning down their cities, which is the start of the process of why everyone wanted to all of a sudden start burning down cities in the United States. But going back to the terrorist thing, that makes sense now. How can you call something a terrorist that you're funding?

And that's exactly kind of what we were doing. Yeah, exactly. Because I think at the time, too, and to your point, yeah, you're 100% right. you know, to your point, right, you know, at the beginning stages, it was ISI, is what they would call it, or IS. And there were these, all these little groups. ICE. Yes. Yeah.

No, it was IS. Oh, okay. Yeah, it was IS. And then it was ISI and then somehow eventually it got to ISIS, which somehow maybe took some weapons from all the people that the United States government, CIA. And in my sits was obviously funding. But no, we had nothing to do with ISIS. ISIS was created, you know, I don't know. I don't know where the hell they came from.

I mean, that's literally how the CIA says this. I mean, it's like, it's like to say that you killed seven people, but then also there was an eighth person killed at one of these places that you also killed seven people, but then you're like, I don't know who the hell did. That was definitely not me. I did kill those seven. I did not do that one. Right.

You know what I mean? It's crazy. That's kind of the way this shit looks. So, anyways, leaked documents indicate the risk of equipment and personnel from these efforts being lost to Al NERSA, ISIS, and other extremists. extremist groups in West Asia was judged unavoidably high by British intelligence. Yet, there was no commitment strategy for countering the hazard at all, and the operations continued a pace.

Almost as if training in arm in ISIS was precisely what the desired outcome of the CIA and MI6 was. There you go. Just so you know, and you might want to rewind that and listen to it again, but you have to understand. It's a lot of information. It is a process of how ISIS was created. Right.

And they used various Sunni and Shiites. They took the Sunni side and the Shiites, you know, were on the other side. And yet they knew that this group of rebels, good rebels, were extremists. They knew they were Islamic extremists. Right. But they were going against the Taliban, I believe. No, no, the Shiites. It was the Sunnis and the Shiites. They were armed the Sunnis.

And then they went all over social, or not social media. They went all over mainstream media. And I, because I remember the Sunni and Shiite wars. Yeah, I remember that. what mainstream media wanted to tell you that, oh, you know, the Sunnis are, they're just trying to protect this or just trying to do this. But really, all it really was in most cases in this situation was it was the United States, CIA and MI6, and potentially even Mossad. I've saw stuff with Mossad as well from Israel to where they were intentionally arming these extremist groups.

Right. And then as these extremist groups began to get more popular and bigger, they would arm those other groups as well. It was a continued arming. And then also on top of that, there was a lot of training that was involved. They actually sent from many WikiLeaks reports and all this other stuff, which is part of the reason why Julian Assange is screwed forever, you know, because if he created WikiLeaks and allowed some of these, you know, classified documents on the web. But it talked about how CIA operatives and other intelligence agencies in the United States actually went over to train these jihadists. They trained them, fundamentally trained them, trained them on weapons and everything else.

You also got to think about, was it such a mistake when Joe Biden pulled out of Afghanistan like you did and left billions, billions of dollars worth of equipment to the Taliban? Oh, my gosh. Yeah, and we were thinking, what a dumb thing for you to do. But maybe it wasn't dumb on his part. Maybe they did that intentionally. Yeah. Yeah, because you got to think, I mean, the weapon.

caches that were there, the helicopters, the Humvees, the amount of ammunition, the mortar rounds, the RPGs, the, I mean, you're talking about giving a terrorist organization everything they need to start an army and a worldwide coalition against whoever they want. Right. And do you think Iran is against us? Oh, absolutely. Yeah. Then why would we give them millions of dollars right before October 7th happened? It's another thing. I just don't understand

and how this stuff works. Like, why do we get people that are against us money? Well, it's because you're not thinking about the sciop of it. You're not thinking about the reverse psychology. It's not even reverse psychology. You know that if you give a terrorist organization or a faction or a group of people on one side of the fence, even though you're supporting this side of defense, but if, you know, if you're supporting this side of the fence, you know, wholeheartedly, right?

And unequivocally, then it's not going to be much of a war, right? You need war. You need shit to happen. So you need to help each side. So you're going to have to fund the other side so that, you know, they can at least fight for a while. And then, you know, it could be this massive thing to where United States and NATO gain more dominance and power. And the military industrial complex is paid. Tons of money.

Tons of money. So it is a funding and an operation on both sides continually. And most people just don't understand that. And when you think about who you point fingers to, you have to think about the superpowers of the world. And I'm thinking United States, Israel, Europe are the main ones. Yeah, absolutely. No, they 100% are. I mean, look, NATO isn't control of this world.

But the reality of the situation is that you think NATO is control of the world and two nuclear weapons come out. And that's what we're headed to. I mean, you know, we had this situation. And I want to go ahead and read, I guess, the official report. So we had these missiles. There were five missiles in total that were headed towards. the Crimean, well, that's actually right outside the Crimean beach. There was a military complex, supposedly that Ukraine was targeting.

And so what you have to understand about some of these things is, and I want to make sure I'm 100% correct on this, so I need to pull this up. But the actual weapons that were used, right? So they're called attackums, right? And what attackums are is an army tactical missile system. It is a series of short-range, road mobile, solid propellant-fueled, surfaces service ballistic missiles developed in the United States. They also have long-range missiles available.

The missile first saw use during a 1991 Persian Gulf War, and there are several variants of attackums or ATACMs, including the Block 1, Block 1A, Block 1A unitary, and the Block 1 has the inertial guidance system that provides an unknown level of accuracy, but the short range combined with the saturation of the area from the missile's submunitions, provides a strong likelihood that the target will be successfully hit. The Block 1A has an extended range of up to 300 kilometers in a single warhead with either 160 submunitions or a unitary warhead. Now, the ATACM missiles are launched from a M270 MLSR or multiple launch rocket rocket system or the High Mars, which is a high mobility artillery rocket system launcher. The missiles are guided by an inertial guidance system with GPS updates, allowing them to hit targets with precision, and they can carry a variety of war.

Warheads including high explosive blast fragmentation warheads and submunitions. Now, obviously they've been used in several conflicts, including the Persian Gulf, Iraq War, Syrian Civil War, and they are designed to provide tactical support to ground forces by striking targets deep behind enemy lines. So you essentially have this one subset of weapons that are short range. You have another set of weapons of the attack arms or ATACMs, which are longer range weapons, right? So 300 kilometers and further. And so the various, so the very stark and vast differences of these two weapons systems and what appears to have been used on Crimea Beach or supposedly on this military complex was the longer range version. And what this longer range version needs is it needs satellite guidance to an extent. At the very least it needs GPS guidance, but it also needs, you know, you're going to have to have some retail or it's a retail recon and intelligence happen beforehand.

And that comes from United States. It absolutely did because at the time right before this attack happened and even 24 hours before the attack happened, there was a drone that was in the area that was circling right outside forever. They also had some other apparently U.S. Air Force aircraft that were in the region that were also, I guess, supplying some intelligence or reconnaissance missions. Informative missions, I guess you can say. And so this is Russia's statement. and I want to let you guys know before we get any further. This is Russia's Defense Ministry statement. It says today at 1215, a terrorist missile strike by five U.S. made ATACMs, operational tactical missiles equipped by cluster warheads, was deliberately delivered at Sevastopol.

The alerted air defense units intercepted four U.S. made ATACM missiles. The explosion of the fragmentation warhead of the fifth U.S. made missile in the air led to high, number of casualties among peaceful residents of Sevastumpool. The American specialists input all flight tasks in the U.S. made ATACM's operational tactical missiles on the basis of data of the U.S. satellite reconnaissance. This is why Washington is mostly responsible for the deliberate missile strike at peaceful residents of Sevastampu by delivering the weaponing to Ukraine as well as the Kiev regime from the territory of which the strike was launched.

such actions are not going to be left unanswered. Right. So they're definitely going to do something to America, I would think. But when I was first reading this and I was going on X and thinking about everything was going on, the first thing we thought was these missiles were directed at this beach. It was directed at the civils. Oh my gosh. Civilians.

Savillions. Today, junior. I'm kidding. Sorry, guys. Civilians. I was like, what in the world is America doing? Do they just want to start a nuclear war now? Like, why in the world would you ever do that?

Well. And then when I started realizing that there was five missiles, they got four of them down. And then the one that they hit, it was like the debris of the. Yeah. Yeah. Some of the munitions debris. Yeah. But I still feel like we're at fault because we should have never given Ukraine that ability to even shoot those missiles near civilians.

But you have to understand, you know, you say yes, obviously we should never done this. We should never done a lot of shit. Right. I mean, we should have never probably did a lot of provocation things that led to the war and the invasion, in my opinion, from Russia to Ukraine. Now, there's obviously going to be people out there. It says Russia is bad. Ukraine, good. Russia, bad, Ukraine, good.

United States good, too. There are people like that. I mean, they have a very construct mindset. I mean, you can find many of them on X and Facebook. You'll, you'll identify them pretty fast, especially Americans. They won't have an American flag in their profile, but they definitely will have a Ukraine flag. And the reality of the situation is, guys, is that the United States and NATO, it seems to have constructed a lot of what is actually happening now between Russia and Ukraine. We've talked about this on so many episodes.

We're not going to go back into that of why more than likely Russia would have invaded partially, partially anyway, to Ukraine. But you have to remember, we've said this over and over again. this is a proxy war. There is zero question and no doubt that this is a proxy war between United States and Russia and they're using Ukraine as the proxy. And so obviously we're going to be helping out with weapons and missiles that we're sending them because some of these missiles, like the ATACMs, they require United States guidance and satellite technology in order for them to actually strike their targets.

And so literally, it's like the United States is fighting through Ukraine 100%. And I don't think people understand that when you say proxy war. But guys, I'm telling you, this is an actual proxy war. It is. And at some point in time, someone is going to face the consequences. I'm just telling you, unless the United States backs out of this shit and says, look, we got to stop this. We cannot do this anymore.

This is obviously a big threat to, well, the world, the United States, everything else. Because you have to remember as these were tax start to ramp up and as things start to be more escalatory between the United States and Russia. And the more that the United States starts to help Ukraine in obvious ways, right? For example, this missile attack. Or, you know, there was a U.S. soldier, apparently, that got kicked out of the military recently because she went on social media. There was actually a few of them.

There was a girl and a guy that went on social media and said, people are saying, you know, are you afraid when they send over United States troops to Ukraine to fight for Ukraine or the United States. And both people said, we already have soldiers on the ground there. What are you talking about? Like, I'm ready to go. Like, we're, we're ramping up to go, right? I mean, and most of the general public does not realize that, yes, it sounds like there actually are United States soldiers in fighting positions and roles on the ground against Russia. And I think when the turning point really happened is when Biden first gave Ukraine the okay to start putting these missiles into Russian territory, which was a couple weeks ago.

And now it's just becoming more and more obvious of what United States is doing. Now, why would United States prompt Russia maybe retaliate? Well, it's because they want this, right? I mean, this is what I think. I mean, I go back to this. I mean, oh, canceled the 2024 election, guys. We're at all out war, World War III. And, you know, there's probably people out there that are saying, oh, my God, that's crazy.

Like, well, they would not do some crazy shit like that because of an election. But I think it's a lot more than just an election. I mean, this is not just about Republican versus Democrat. It's not about Joe Biden versus Trump. I mean, it really isn't. It is much deeper in that. I mean, the whole world depends on this. And also the world power depends on this.

Will the global elites play their final chess move this year, 2024? Because if they do, we're about to see it. And I think that these moves we're seeing right now, which are on a chessboard, you know, we see the attack in Crimea, which is an obvious. obvious, a long-range missile interception, by the way. That's actually how the citizens on the beach were injured was a interception from Russia anti-missile systems onto our attack of missiles is what essentially caused this fallout. But nonetheless, as Russia is saying, it's the United States fault.

It doesn't matter. You're freaking sending them into our region. And it's still a terrorist act. Yeah. But, you know, obviously people are going to think that Russia invading Ukraine is. is also a terrorist act, right? I mean, that's a terrorist act. You're invading a country that you're not supposed to.

It's not your land. Obviously, there is 100% that side as well, right, until you actually start digging about a lot of stuff. And then you start thinking a little differently. But if you just see it from the surface level, you're obviously like, no, but Russia invaded Ukraine. So shut the hell up, dude. Well, and as a matter of fact, Crimea was part of Ukraine before this war started. Yeah. Well, I mean, and that's the thing.

Yeah. And it is Russian territory now. I think it has been for longer than since the war. started. I mean, I think it's been for a while. Yeah, yeah, I think it's been for quite a while. Or maybe that's kind of where you have to remember that territory. Yeah, you have to remember the, the, the, the, the, the Ukraine war has been going on for long before this particular instance, right? I mean, it happened back in, what was it, 2014, 14 and 12. I remember that Patrick Lancaster, which we've invited on the podcast a billion times. He is on the Russian side, apparently. He is an ex-U.S. military soldier. He is on the front lines with the Russian military. on that side of things. And, you know, I've invited, and the only thing that, you know, I've invited him on this show many, many times because I want to hear his side.

And his side is that, you know, there's a lot of things that Ukraine's doing that are unbelievable. And I have not actually seen a lot of his post on YouTube anymore, not probably because he's killed, more than likely because YouTube killed him. Right. But not because Ukraine killed him. YouTube's more likely to kill you for saying something that they don't want. me to say than the other side of a military. But I've invited Patrick on. And, you know, I've watched some of his videos where they talk about Ukraine potentially shelling their own people and blaming

on Russia. There are entire neighborhoods of people that say, no, I know for sure. It was Ukraine that hit us. I saw them. I, you know, whatever, they came, invaded our neighborhood, shelled the shit out of us. People died. There were people in the streets that died. I don't know how true any of that stuff is. But that's part of why I wanted to have him on, right? because there's so many things that we just don't know. There are so many chess pieces that we don't know. But going back to this, how far will the elites that want to establish a global dominant system, a global governance, a one world government? Most people don't think that's really a thing that's going on behind the scenes.

It is. And I think really, in reality, I think that's one of the biggest things going on behind the scenes. We want a one world currency. We've been pushing for that forever. We want to devalue the dollar. We want to devalue everything. We want to get to some type of central bank digital currency while at the same time we want to implement plans like the World Health Organization Pandemic Treaty to where it gives the global powers more power over nations than the nations themselves. The UN and the foreign security councils and all this stuff is starting to ramp up more and more and if they have to use either World War or a massive global pandemic, they will do it.

And so if you want to understand and see how global governance will be implemented, just look at the pandemic. Look at the pandemic and how all of mainstream media, all of our government, all of YouTube, social media, you name it. They took all of the advice and everything who they censored, who they didn't, based on the World Health Organization and what they said. That is not a United States elected official. That's not a politician that you elected in the office. That is a global organization that are controlled and dominated by the world elites that meet at Davos, Switzerland, every single year. And so you saw what they tried to do during the pandemic. And they're still working on trying to be able to do that again because they know that another pandemic is going to come.

They're either going to do a pandemic or they're going to do World War III. And you, right now, they're like, you test me. Which one do you want more? Pandemic or do you want World War III? Because we're going to have one of the two. And you're exactly right. And they're trying to break down countries within, too. Yeah.

But my question is not the whole picture, but the picture of what we have in front of us now, now that if the Kremlin, which I do think thinks, United States is part of these attacks, what do you think they're going to do? Do you think people in America should be worried? Do you think people on military bases in America should be worried? I mean, they were threatening us just last week or just kind of posing their submarine out there in. Off the coast floor. Yeah.

Well, I mean, look, do I think anybody on the U.S. mainland needs to be worried? No, unless it is by coordinated terrorist attacks by, you know, whoever, whoever Russia might get to do that. But the reality I don't think is that Russia has those capabilities. You have a lot of, a lot of people around the world that hate America, though, that are coming across the borders, that more than likely won't be coordinated by Russia. Maybe. I mean, who knows?

It depends on the money and how they can get it in. But this is going to be a battle back and forth. And especially if Russia has, you know, valid beliefs or some type of connections or intelligence that says that any of these terror attacks had any connection to the United States or NATO, then 100 percent they're going to start funding, coordinating terrorist attacks inside the United States, especially considering the United States has a freaking wide open border. It's like the easiest thing for any country in around the world that hits America to do right now. And again, I asked, do you think people in America should be concerned? 100% thing that Americans should be concerned. not necessarily from like a missile coming from Russia because Russia knows if that happens then

then it's over yeah it's pretty much over you know Russia said something the other day they said well the United States by the way everyone's trying to fear monger that we just want to attack the United States with nuclear warheads just out of nowhere you know and they said but you got to remember the United States is the only country to ever drop a nuclear bombs so just keep that in mind but they also have said but just because of that

if we're going to be pushed into a corner we're not going to we're not going to just lay down and die. You know, we will use nuclear if we have to. And you're not going to destroy Russia. And so should Americans be worried? Yes, I think so because, you know, you have a wide open border. You have countries right now you are completely 100% making enemies with. And not just in Ukraine and Russia.

You also have the Israel situation, which you are wholeheartedly behind. You have Palestinians and in many other terrorist organizations around the Palestinians, like Hezbollah and the Houthis and Hamas. They all hate us. But they also understand that there are going to be some Hezbollah, you know, fighters. Most of them will stay there in Lebanon in that region to probably fight the inevitable war between Israel. And Israel just recently said today, by the way, they said that they are prepared to use weapons that are unthinkable. you know, for those wondering, if you want to know if Israel is nuclear capable, Israel is actually

never confirmed or denied whether they have nuclear warheads, but the likelihood of them actually have a nuclear warheads are pretty high. Most people believe they do. And so hopefully that's not a threat of nuclear war. But, you know, who knows? But nonetheless, there's going to be a lot of those Hezbollah fighters, Houthi fighters, and a lot of those guys from that region that are 100 percent. going to get on a plane somewhere or somehow get to Mexico or somewhere around the border and they're going to come across the border. And I'm not saying they are going to. I'm saying they probably already are here.

And it's just going to be a matter of time before this is coordinated. And we have another 9-11. Could be worse than that. I mean, it could be on large scales. It could be multiple attacks. It could be over the course of a period of time. It could be various things. You know, you often think that, well, I know our intelligence agencies will protect us because

they know everything. But what if maybe that's somewhat somewhere the conspiratorial plan. Right. I would think Russia would go after more of like military bases around Russia or where they're fighting. Yeah. Or Europe. Right. Yeah. I mean, look, that's what I'm saying. Or even NATO. If you're specifically, yeah, if you're specifically talking about Russia, right, and what they want to be very provocative or they want to be very vocal about their response, especially if it comes to responding to the United States in particular, then they got to go actually from Russia with some type of missile attack, with some type of hardcore attack to where it hits a,

and it would probably be a base in Europe. But you got to remember, NATO says, NATO is Article 5. You do anything on any NATO territory where it's Article 5, which means NATO is enacted and you're done. That's what NATO and the United States says. But the United States can do it all day, every day through Ukraine. And so at some point in time, Russia, they have this mindset right now. It's like, you know, okay, so we're not allowed to respond, supposedly, to anyone on any territory, even if it's not even the United States, if it's NATO territory, we can't respond to that.

But you guys can continue to give these weapons to Ukraine and just continue to hit inside of Russia. And it's probably going to ramp up, by the way. Yeah, that ain't going to happen. And eventually, it's going to come down to all hell is going to break those. And I also think that's why Vladimir Putin recently met with Kim Jong-un. Yes. He has been meeting with President Z from China. We also have the Taiwan situation with President Z.

You know, Taiwan also very, very cozy with the United States. And so, you know, obviously China does not like that. So China wants to invade as well. Yeah, Putin is definitely building relationships. But also Putin is also known as a war criminal as far as we're concerned. You know, that's what they said when this war first started. Every president in history is. You know, since he is considered a war criminal, he doesn't give a crap, so who cares?

He's going to do what he wants to do. But the reality is that Benjamin Netanyahu technically is considered a war criminal. And honestly, every president we probably ever had is probably in some way a war criminal. Not necessarily back in the day, but especially like in the 21st century and all that. I mean, you think about Obama and his drone strikes. You think about President Bush and all the lives that he costed. regardless of however you look at the 9-11 situation and all that. Trump really, I mean, yeah, he probably killed some maybe a few civilians.

I don't know, but there was really not any wars during that time. No, it was peaceful as far as I know. Yeah, I mean, there were obviously some drone attacks to where they hit certain leaders and so on and so forth. Yeah, and he did kill like a major guy. I can't remember who it was now. God, I see those memes, man, when it talks about Obama came out, you know, in the podium when they killed some terrorist leader or whatever. and he said tonight our allied forces created.

And then they have the side by side with Trump. It's like, we killed him like a dog. We had dogs kill him. They came in. They killed him like a dog or whatever. And he just like the way. Yeah, he was crying, little bitch. It's the funniest shit.

If you guys have never seen that meme, it's like, holy shit. This dude just don't give a shit. And it's actually. Shane Gillis that does that skit and is one of the funniest things ever. I was like, damn, that is pretty funny. So, I don't know. What's going to be the result of this? I just wanted you guys to at least know that, yes, there is a connection between ISIS and CIA and Mossad and M.I.6 and all the above, basically.

And even if you look at, like, for example, I like sometimes use an AI. I like using AI because I want to know what AI says about certain things because AI, because AI, pulls from various, you know, basically everything, unless it is manipulated, right? And if it's manipulated, you can't necessarily trust it. I use X's AI GROC. And if you use GROC, it usually does the best to try to explain all the facets of what it, you know, what may be, what may not be. Here's the downsides of this argument.

Here's the upside. But the CIA's involvement in creation of ISIS is a complex and controversial topic. It's important to note that the CIA did not directly. create ISIS. However, some argue that CIA's actions indirectly contributed to the rise of ISIS. And it says Al-Qaeda in Iraq, the precursor

to ISIS, was the terrorist group Al-Qaeda in Iraq or AQI, founded by Jordanian Islamist Abu Masab Al-Zakari in 2004. AQI was a major player in insurgency against the U.S.-led forces. U.S. military withdrawal in 2011 was the withdrawal

of troops from Iraq leaving a power vacuum that allowed AQI to grow and evolve into ISIS. Some argue that the U.S. militaries would draw, created the conditions that allowed ISIS to thrive. U.S. support for Syrian rebels. And this is, I think, the real key here. In 2012, the CIA began a covert program to arm and train Syrian rebels, which are

also known as Islamic extremist, right? Islamic extremist fighting against the Assad regime. This support inadvertently helped the growth of extremist groups, including ISIS, who were also fighting against Assad, right? Oh, wow. That's just coincidence. we didn't mean to do that at all. Camp Buka.

Now, the U.S. military detained tens of thousands of Iraqis at Camp Bucca in southern Iraq, and where in prison jihadis were able to radicalize new recruits and plan future operations. Abu Bakar al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, was reportedly radicalized and recruited at Camp Buka. So we had this camp with all of these people, and somehow this group just formed from this camp that we were supposedly over and were, you know, and then, you had these major terrorist leaders that popped up and all this stuff. And then, you know, well, we just didn't, we didn't mean to create this massive group out of 10,000 people that we were in prison in prison, supposedly.

And then disbanding the Iraqi army in 2003, the U.S. occupying authorities disbanded the Iraqi army, which led to widespread unemployment and discontent among Sunni Muslims, driving them into the arms of radical groups like AQI, right? And then U.S. military actions, some argue that U.S. military actions such as drone strikes and bombings may have inadvertently helped ISIS recruit new members by causing civilian casualties and angering local population for obvious reasons, right?

And then you have the U.S. intelligence failures. Critics argue that CIA and other U.S. intelligence agencies failed to recognize the threat posed by ISIS and underestimated as capabilities. Whatever. It's bullshit. I mean, most of what they're saying is true, but you've got to read through the lines of what is saying.

What is saying is, they created ISIS. And it's saying that although mainstream media I wanted to tell you, oh, yeah, yeah, well, yeah, we did have 10,000 people here. And yeah, we did have these groups. And it did have to be ice. Oh, yeah, we did arm these people. But they're rebels at the time. They weren't like hardcore groups.

And, you know, it's bullshit. This is all planned coordinated. And I very much believe that we still, to this day, use them around the world. And we've done it for a very long time. If you listen to Scott Ritter where he talks about, look, we've done this shit forever. we, you know, Crimea, so many various situations where we do this. And it's not just in Islam or in the Middle East. It's literally in Africa.

We've done it in Africa in many countries. We've done it in South America for many countries. Look at what just happened with the president in Brazil. The one, you know, remember the one that was against the vaccines, the one that said, no, we're not giving this shit to our people. And we're, you know, and he was also very friendly with Trump and all this shit. He was very popular amongst the people. And then what happened?

They tried him on like. so many felonies they wanted to prosecute him he fled to florida they installed this new democrat president that's pretty much like joe biden not that you know not that you know inept but what i'm saying is the same policy mindings and the same global loving of the global system right they have that same dude in it's just like they installed them in the united states to what some people say very similar to brazil and we're starting to see this around the world and so i don't know it's going to be a shit show of a 2024 presidential election is all I can tell you guys. And you better get ready.

Listen, we're doing a live stream Thursday night on X and on Rumble 8.30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time with a lot of great guests. I think it's going to be fun. We're going to have a lot of fun. And speaking of a 2024 election, we're definitely going to have a live stream on that night. Holy shit. We'll be there until probably, I don't know, five days because they're going to lose ballots and they're going to, then they're all of a sudden going to find them overnight at 3 a.m.

and, you know, we'll be there for all that shit. Yes, absolutely. That'll do it for this episode. We did want to touch on this. We got a lot of good stuff coming. We want to talk about some alien megastructures. We are finally going to have maybe a day off tomorrow. But we want to talk about some alien megastructures.

We get a lot of good podcasts coming up. So make sure you follow our podcast. Make sure you share this episode if, you know, listen, the only way we really get out there, to the people is by you guys, by you sharing it, by you liking our stuff, by you rating us good. You are our backbone. We love you guys so very much. And until next time, guys, we love you. Peace out.

Peace out, guys. Hey, you know what we should do? Actually, screw this song. This song pisses me off. We're going to do this song.