Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Russian Warships Off The Florida Coast | World War 3 Alert?

Episode Date: June 12, 2024

In this episode, we discuss the alarming development of multiple Russian warships deployed off the coast of Florida as part of a training exercise. These warships are equipped with hypersonic ICBMs, raising questions about whether this is merely a show of force or if there are active plans for a future attack. Alongside the Russian warships, numerous US destroyer vessels are also in the region, closely monitoring every move as the Russian ships are expected to eventually dock in Cuba. Could this be the prelude to a World War III showdown between the United States and Russia?

Salku X, we're again. 5 numeroa, 5. 5. Vhietta. Arvauxia. Poveria.

Palkintona X-Pengue, Sacko, Towsin'omax. 10-weekquo-a-artka-Rottings in power. Pover. P.E., A.

A-letykidist. Hello and welcome to Investigator. I'm your host, chat alongside my beautiful wife Sherry on tonight's episode. We're going to be talking about panic mode at the Pentagon as Russian warships and nuclear-powered submarines still refused to leave the coast of Florida. This comes after Russian warships conducted Atlantic drills en route to Cuba with new hypersonic missiles on board. Now according to the AP press, Russian warships conducted drills in the Atlantic. The military said Tuesday as they were heading to visit Cuba, part of

Moscow's efforts to project power amid the tensions with the West over Ukraine. Now, the Russia's defense ministry said the Admiral Gorskov, Freigate, and the Kazan nuclear powered submarine conducted the exercises that was intended to simulate a missile strike on a group of enemy ships. The ministry said the drills involved computer simulation of an attack on sea targets more than 600 kilometers or 320 miles away. The Admiral Gorskov is armed with new Zircon hypersonic missiles. The weapon has been designed to arm.

Russian cruisers, fry grates, and submarines could be used against both enemy ships and ground targets. Russian President Vladimir Putin has touted Zircon as a potent weapon, capable of penetrating any existing anti-missile defenses by flying nine times faster than the speed of sound at a range of more than 620 miles. The Admiral Gorshkov and the Kazan are accompanied by two support vessels on their visit to Havana with Cuban officials, said reflected historically friendly relations between Russia and Cuba? Now the Cuba Foreign Ministry said Russian warships will be in Havana between Wednesday and June 17th, noting that none will carry nuclear weapons and assuring their presence does not represent a threat to the region. The Cuban statement followed a

U.S. announcement that Washington had been tracking Russian warships and aircraft that were expected to arrive in the Caribbean for a military exercise. And it's not the first time Russia has sent us warships to the Caribbean, but this week follows Putin's warning that Moscow, could respond to Ukraine's Western allies allowing Kyiv to use weapons to strike targets in Russia by given similar weapons to adversaries of the West worldwide. So obviously this is a very, very fastly, fast developing story. You have recently Putin declaring the United States an enemy. You also have recent Western weapons being used by Ukraine inside of Russia, striking some of their intercontinental ballistic missile sites or early warning systems.

And, you know, RFK Jr, I responded to one of his posts. I said this on, I believe it was our the Manhattan Project series, which by the way, guys, I encourage all of you go to, all of you to go check it out. We have a part one, part two, but a lot of what we're going to be talking about may have actually come from the Manhattan Project, including the hypersonic capabilities of missiles, obviously the nuclear bomb, which is what, you know, many are speculating are we headed to world war and more specifically a nuclear war and obviously now we have Russia right off the coast of florida i mean some people in florida have been able to see these warships either with binoculars or by sight um yesterday which when we were originally

going to do this episode i was just looking on marine tracker and i was looking at all of the ships that was in the region uh i actually took screenshots of this but we had um canadian warship three three two that was in the area right off the coast of Miami. We had warship from the U.S. also right off the coast of Miami. And we had a U.S. government vessel U.S. and many other Coast Guard ships along with Navy. We also had many aircraft that were also in the area. The P8 Poseidon was deployed. There's so much going on here. But before we get into this story any further, I just want to play you since finally mainstream media is starting to cover this. What mainstream media in particular News Nation had to say about this developing story. Here you go.

Thank you so much for joining us. I'm Nicole Burley at our News Nation headquarters in Chicago. And we start this Wednesday with the United States closely watching a fleet of Russian warships, which are traveling off the coast of Florida heading for Cuba. The Pentagon deploying Navy vessels in a sign of readiness as that Russian fleet entered the Havana Harbor. It marks the largest show of force by Russia so close to the continent. U.S. in years. And this all as tensions remain high over the war in Ukraine and support from Western countries. Let's bring in correspondent Kelly Meyer live for us at the Pentagon. So Kelly, what is the latest there at the Pentagon?

Yeah, Nicole. I was just catching up with some of the officials here at the Pentagon telling us that this isn't quite that unusual. But as you mentioned just there, this is happening during a time when we are supporting Ukraine and its war against Russia as President Biden. Biden is taking off for the G7 summit in Italy to meet with world leaders. So this is coming at an interesting time. But this has happened in previous administrations. But this could be the first time it's happening during this active war between Russia and Ukraine and potentially the first time happening during the Biden administration. So this is something that the Pentagon is watching very closely. We are waiting for an update from them in the next hour or so. This is as the U.S.

is tracking those Russian warships as they are just 100 miles. away from the Florida coast. So it's a move here that could be echoing of the Cold War era. And it could be seen as Russia flexing its military muscles. As we said, President Biden is taking off for that overseas trip with world leaders. Russian President Vladimir Putin is not on that guest list. So this is as the Russian Navy ships, they moved in just this morning to the Havana Harbor. The first ship was a fuel ship and then a tug. The Russian Navy ship, as well as a nuclear-powered submarine, waded offshore and arrived by mid-morning. Now, Cuba says, as this visit is standard practice. But Havana is just 100 miles from Key West. That's home to a U.S.

Naval Air Station, the U.S. Navy tracking those Russian vessels and deploying air assets to circle overhead. We actually just got this statement in from the Pentagon here, essentially saying that they also sent the U.S. Navy's second fleet, fourth fleet, U.S. Coast Guard in the Atlantic area and Canadian Joint Task Force, all there conducting routine operations throughout the Atlantic, and that They're going to continue monitoring this situation, Nicole. All right. So, Kelly, you mentioned the president there. What is the White House saying about all of this? Yeah, so again, this is something that the White House is watching very closely, as we said,

President Biden taking off for that meeting with world leaders. And he's actually said we're learning to meet with Ukrainian President Zelensky on Thursday, on the sidelines of the G7. They're going to hold a press conference as well. We're also learning that they will be announcing a new security agreement with Ukraine tomorrow. So this all coming as the president is encouraging world leaders to continue to stand up to Russia, as we're seeing Russia now entering the Caribbean, near going into Cuba and the U.S. Navy monitoring this very closely, but saying right now it poses no threat.

All right. So there's News Nation talking about it as of today. Finally, mainstream media is starting to cover this. Mainstream media has not even touched this. And they've mostly been downplaying the significance of Russia. warships right off the Florida coast. Now, yes, we do know that Russia has, you know, strong ties and is a very big ally with Cuba. Obviously, if we remember the Cuba missile crisis, basically when the United States moved missiles in Turkey and then Russia moved their missiles

into Cuba. And honestly, this is probably worse, because if you think about the situation with Ukraine, Russia and the United States, and in particular NATO, they have been forcing Russia back into a corner for quite some time now. There's been so many people out there that say, oh, my God, yeah, Russia is the one that's the victim here. Now, listen, I'm not a Russia's sympathist. I don't think that Russia is the greatest country on the planet by no means. I do think personally, Russia is a dictatorship.

I think that Putin jails his, well, he either gels or kills probably. His opponents. His political opponents. And obviously, if you look and see what's happening in the United States, it seems like we're following the same path. And so it's almost like there is a war to be the dictator of the world, who will be the first, who will be the leader of the New World Order, what country will really lead the globalist takeover, which is what they, I believe, really want to do. I think in particular, you know, Vladimir Putin, on many occasions has said that they do not want any part in the

New World Order. They do not want any part in the progressive, woke craziness is going on. although if you look at some of the things war crimes and everything else included by Russia and I also believe probably on behalf of Ukraine I know the United States has had many war crimes as well but nonetheless I do think that there is a tug of war battle right now between nations that want to remain themselves they want to you know remain sovereign or or at least pro nationalist to their country and then there is obviously this big push to globalize everything. They want a one world currency. They want a one world government. You know, you have the World Health Organization with the pandemic treaty that they're trying to

pass through. And although that recently failed, there is a battle for power right now. And they're trying to take down. And it seems like they're doing a very good job of taking down the United States from within. And yet these countries that seem to be against the globalist movement, like Russia, like China, and like some of these others, these are the countries. if you pay close attention is who the West and the United States, NATO, that's who they hate. That is their enemy. Anyone that the United States or NATO or the globalist governance can control, they're fine with. As long as you join their club and you're controlled by them.

But otherwise, you're going to be an enemy. Yeah, and guess what? They will not let Russia join their club, nor have they ever let them. You know, it was interesting when Tucker was interviewing Vladimir Putin. He's like, I never wanted to be adversaries with U.S. We wanted to work together to build, you know, our weapons together and collaborate together. He's like, we never had a problem with U.S., but the U.S. has always had a problem with us. Yeah.

And that's the thing. The U.S. has always been against Russia, always. Yeah, and they have never. Yeah, and they have not played fair with them. I'm just saying. Yeah, I mean, even back, you know, on the Manhattan Project series, guys, and I encourage all of you get to listen to it because when we're talking about hypersonic missiles, we're talking about nuclear. The entire reason nuclear is even possible nowadays is. because of the Manhattan Project is because of Oppenheimer and Albert Einstein and many of the other

scientists that worked on the program. Part two of our series actually talked about where potentially maybe we got some of that technology from or that know-how. Many people believe that it was from advanced non-human intelligence, whether it be aliens or whether it be some other interdimensional thing, how much our technology and especially weaponry exploded in particular after the Roswell crash and after many other crashes that seemed to be UFO crashes. This is when our weaponry exploded. This is when we started seeing more and more sightings in the sky of UAPs slash UFOs, whatever you want to call them.

But I want to read something to you guys quickly. The U.S. proxy war against Russia and China is increasingly seen globally as a disaster made by American and NATO lies. Now, the proxy war in Ukraine is an imperial adventure that has been financially ruinous and has destroyed Ukraine and is driving dangerous all-out war with Russia and China that could turn into a nuclear Armageddon. It has become patiently obvious to the world that the conflict in Ukraine is a dirty and desperate geopolitical confrontation, despite massive Western media efforts to betray it as something else noble. The usual charade of chivalry and virtue is disguised naked Western imperialism.

The death and destruction in Ukraine is nothing but a proxy war by the United States and its NATO partners to defeat Russia in a strategic gambit. But the unspoken objective does not end with Russia. The U.S. and its Western imperialist lackeys are driven pushed for a confrontation with China, too. As if taken on Russia is not reckless enough, the Western powers want to double down on their warmongering with China. This is all because the underlying impetus is for Washington and its Western minions to promote U.S.-led dominance of the global order. Russia and China are the main obstacles to that path or would-be dominance. And hence, we see this manic drive for aggression stemming from Washington, the executive power of the Western order.

It should be obvious that while the U.S.-led NATO axis has stoked the war in Ukraine to ambiguous heights, the same axis is wantonly inciting tensions with China. This observation alone should be enough to condemn the criminality of Western powers. This week saw the NATO powers deliver depleted or depleted uranium weapons to the Kiev regime, while the United States announced that it would be docking submarine nuclear warheads in South Korea, a move that infuriated China, which pointed out the, Washington was violating decades-old commitments to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula. And of course, such perverse provocation cannot talk today, sorry, is par for the course as far as Washington is concerned.

It is done deliberately in a conscious effort to exacerbate tensions and escalate militarism. Peace and security are the athumous for the U.S. and its minions who whole ideology is to aggravate war to gratify corporate capitalist addiction. A system that is increasingly bankrupt and dysfunctional, and hence the insane desperation for craving war fixes. So it's been pretty obvious, obviously, that this is a proxy war between the United States and Russia, and they are using Ukraine to do this. We're going to get into a little bit and just a bit about what actually calls the war between Russia and Ukraine, because so many people only see this is one way. So many people only see that Russia wanted the land back. They wanted the Ukraine region, so therefore they invaded Ukraine. There was nothing else to do with this.

It's just Russia won the old Soviet Union back. That's what Western propagandize the media will tell you. That is what NATO media will tell you. Anybody basically in Europe will tell you the exact same thing. But is there underlying causes? Well, we've talked on this podcast many times before, but I quickly want to play a clip about Russia, now calling the United States an enemy.

And all this really matters. I just want you guys to hear it out. Here you go. Now let's take a look at the U.S. It has a new problem on its hands. Russia has now officially called the United States an enemy nation. This came from the Kremlin spokesperson, Dimitri Pesco. Let me read out the translation of what he said.

And we are an enemy country for them, much like they are for us. Again, that was the Kremlin spokesperson, and this is the first time he said enemy, because it's not something to be said lightly. Now, you know that Washington and Moscow have never seen eye to eye. They've been on opposite sides in a number of conflicts, most recently in Ukraine, but through two years of the Ukraine war, Moscow went out of its way to avoid calling the U.S. an enemy state. Just look at Peskov again.

Barely three months ago, he said that the U.S. was not the enemy, that Russia did not have any anti-American sentiments. But that has changed now. Why? Perhaps because of last week's escalation. Last week, the United States gave Ukraine a green light to strike Russian territory using American weapons. Ukraine has already begun doing so.

They're using American weapons to strike inside Russia, and Russia is furious. Putin says Ukraine is striking Russian territory with the help of Western specialists. The missile strikes against Russia are done by the Western specialists. We have no illusions about that. What must we do in response? First of all, we will improve our air defense systems to destroy the missiles. Secondly, we think that if someone thinks it is possible to supply such weapons to a combat zone to strike at our territory and create problems for us, why do we not have the right to supply

our weapons of the same class to those regions of the world where there will be strikes on the sensitive facilities of those countries that are doing this against Russia? You heard what he said. Basically, Putin has threatened to turn the tables, to send Russian weapons to Western enemies, long-range weapons that could strike sensitive facilities in the West. So Putin has basically said, right, he said, since you guys are going to send your American weapons to Ukraine to strike inside of Russia, what do you think that we're going to do? Well, we're going to do the same thing. Part of me have wondered this, right?

So as we were sitting here monitoring the marine traffic yesterday, we were monitoring the flight radar where they were deploying PA Poseidens in the region also, which essentially was looking for the submarine or submarines. We do not officially know how many either battleships or submarines are actually in the region because more than likely mainstream media will not tell you any of that. The United States government will never tell you any of that. And Russia will never tell you any of that. What we are seeing off the coast of Florida right now, although they're trying to downplay it

and say that this is, you know, this is just typically normal. You know, Russia has a good relationship with Cuba, so no big deal there. But if you realize everything that I have said or we have said or talked about so far, It has been Cuba that is coming out trying to reassure the United States that there are no nuclear warheads on any of these ships or submarines. Why would Cuba be the one that it keeps continually making sure that the United States does not think there's any nuclear warheads on board any of these things? Well, it's because we've tried to invade Cuba before. We were actually going to invade Cuba at one point in time. And it was called Operation Northwoods where we were going to essentially cause.

Well, no, we were going to carry out terror attacks on our own. people blame it on Cuba and then invade Cuba. So we were willing to basically kill her own people just to blame it on Cuba so that we could then take over Cuba. And so there's no doubt that the United States would not do that again. Would Cuba be a strategic play in this chess game of power? And would it be beneficial, for example, the United States to take over Cuba if the Russia situation starts getting more cozy with Cuba? Because you have remember when the war happened with Russia and Ukraine. I think this is where we get to talk a little bit about this. Why did the war actually start with Russia and Ukraine? Now, we know that the United

States has been talking about Ukraine joining NATO for quite some time. Actually, just a month or two ago, the United States came out and officially said, hey, you know what? We're going to bring Ukraine into NATO. We are definitely going to do this. We're going to make sure this happens. And they're saying this, considering the fact that that was one of the reasons that Russia said that they invaded Ukraine because of how cozy the United States was with Ukraine. We knew that we had biological facilities inside of Ukraine, I think, as much as 13 biological facilities. Now, even, I think it was the underpre, or who was it, the undersecretary or whoever it was in the United States in front of Congress had come out. she had to actually acknowledge this. And she said, yes, we do have bio facilities inside of Ukraine.

These are research facilities, is what she said in front of Congress. Obviously, Russia was calling these things, not research facilities, but bio-weapons labs. So if this was bio-weapons labs, would you want that on your border if you're Russia? Also keeping in mind, did we have weapons already inside of Ukraine? Were we planning on moving weapons inside of Ukraine? and in particular, if we were, you know, fast, fast pace going towards bringing Ukraine into NATO, would Russia have a good reason to strike Ukraine or to invade Ukraine, to stop that, or to halt Ukraine joining NATO? Now, if you guys remember back in 2014 when the CIA basically went over, and I think they had went over in 2012, 13 and 14 in the lead-up to basically the overthrow or the coup against the government then,

which at that time had a pro-Russian president inside of Ukraine, a duly elected president inside of Ukraine. Everybody seemed to be decently happy with this guy. The big problem with him and the United States was that he did not just roll over for the United States and NATO like the presidents that preceded him, including Zelensky. Zolensky is a clown. He is literally, he's an actor. A comedian, I think. comedian, he does weird-ass dances on television, all this stuff. Well, we had the CIA director and some other CIA guy that showed up right before the

massive riots before, essentially, they overthrew the government. It was a coup attempt, not attempt, it was a coup that actually happened where they basically installed a pro-Western president in office, and then since then, now they have installed Zelensky. Now, I'm not saying for sure they installed Zelensky, but at the very least, it seems very suspect. Obviously, many people still question a 2020 election inside of the United States. Why and how did Biden, supposedly the most popular president in history, how did he become elected inside of the United States when he could not even do, I mean, you know, he would show up

to these quote unquote rallies where there were like 10 tables and like 12 people there, but yet you had president or former President Trump that had these rallies that was just massive. We're talking about, you know, sometimes 50, 60, 70,000 people. And so people still question to this day the 2020 election. But you look very similarly to what happened inside of Ukraine. And you've got to ask yourself who is really at play or who is really behind the scenes of this whole global power grab is what it seems like is happening right now. And I think that Russia really has a problem with it when we have installed a president that is more for the West than for Russia. Because in years past, Ukraine has always had.

presidents that are kind of pro-Russian and they kind of go with what Russia says, but they're their own country. And there's no immediate, you know, things that are different from each other. They're willing to do what Russia says as long as they stay their own country when they had those type of presidents. But when we take them out and we put in pro-Western presidents, it changes a lot. And I also think, too, even since 2014, Putin, his real reason, are one of the real reasons why he has come into Ukraine and started a war here is because he feels like there's a lot of neo-Nazis there, including the president Zelensky. Even though President Zelensky is Jewish and his father was a Jew in the World War II, I think,

he thinks that, I'm talking about Putin, thinks Zelensky is pro-Nazi. Yeah. And by the way, you know, inside of Ukraine, there are many pro-Nazi statues of, you know, Nazi leaders in Ukraine that are. I believe, at least to this day, pretty much hailed by, I don't know necessarily people, but at least some leaders inside of Ukraine's governance. Also, you got a thing about the Azov Battalion. The Azov Battalion has been reported to have basically be a Nazi unit inside of Ukraine.

That's why they, at one time, the West had stopped weapons in the very least to the Azov battalion for that specific reason, because I think even the West knew how blatant obvious it was of the Nazi ties in this particular. group. And you ask why Putin doesn't like the Nazis. Well, you have to go back to World War II. Not only were they killing Jews, but they were also killing communist. Especially in Poland, there was a lot of people that were taken from Poland and all over that region that they were killing them just like Jews. Most people don't know this. Most people think about the Holocaust. They think about Jews only, but it wasn't. It was Jews and communist.

Yeah. And I mean, even the Manhattan Project talking about, you know, when when, when Oppenheimer was basically grilled, and they were talking about what was his ties to communist. And, you know, the United States has always hated communists. They've hated communists as much as Hitler probably hated Jews. And so this was something that we've always had. We've always had this strife between Russia or the Soviet Union and the United States. There's always been this massive, you know, power struggle. There's always been this competition.

And I think even to this day, I believe it goes back to the technology that was able to be harnessed during the World War II era in whatever that was. We got to remember that during World War II and proceeding into Operation Paperclip where the United States went over and at least took half of German Nazi scientists, which created NASA. Also, many Nazis created the CIA or what the CIA is today. But also, a lot of those scientists also went to the Soviet Union and Russia. And so you might ask yourself, well, how powerful really is Russia?

If we went and took that many scientists that has been a big part of why we have been able to develop so many amazing weapons and weapons that we can't even imagine right now, do you think that Russia also has this capability? And why would the United States hate Russia so much? And I think it's because Russia is probably more powerful than we think. The United States wants you to believe that Ukraine is out there almost about to win this war. And, you know. Russia is about to win the war. Yeah, sorry. Well, no, no, I know.

I'm saying mainstream media wants you to believe Ukraine. Sorry, go ahead. Is winning this war. And Russia is just getting destroyed. They've said this for so long, although now they're starting to come out and say, well, you know, Ukraine is, you know, that they are having some defeats on the front lines. And, you know, they're not really able to progress and all these things. The reality is, is that Russia could destroy all of Ukraine if they really wanted to. We know, number one, that Russia is probably the number one nuclear power in the world.

I'm talking about number one. I'm not talking about two or three or maybe they're behind China or the United States. No, Russia is the number one. They have more nuclear missiles or warheads than any other country in the United States. We also know that Russia is ahead of the game above anyone in hypersonic delivery systems, also known as ICBMs. And so when you think about hypersonic, what does that mean? Well, we just talked about it in the article earlier. Hypersonic typically is nine times the speed of sound.

So you're talking about a missile system that is. so fast, it would be very hard for any anti-missile system to pick up. These missile systems apparently can also turn on a dime and go left or right, also at hypersonic speeds, which, in my opinion, is incredible. And when you have something that can do this, these weapons, you have to understand, these weapons could be shot from Russia inside the inside of the United States and almost from any target or any silo inside of Russia and arrive inside of the United States somewhere, within 10 minutes of when it was launched.

And I'm talking about 10 minutes from Russia to the United States. And it would have been very hard during that process to not only be able to pick it up, be able to track it or be able to shoot it down. And they could be launching many of these. I think they have well over 1,000, I think it was 1,200 nuclear warheads, hypersonic capabilities, possibly more. Some people even speculate over 3,000. So imagine shooting off 1,000 nuclear warheads, hypersonic capabilities to the United States.

Are we going to be able to pick of all those? No, we're not. No. And at that time, I think the world would be over. But let me ask you a question. You know how we launched the atomic bomb in Japan in two areas? I think it was a hydro bomb and an atomic bomb, one of each in each area. If Russia were to do that on Ukraine, would they have the radiation come to them, I guess?

No, because they have what's called tactical nukes. So tactical nukes are different because, you know, it depends on the platform. It depends on the size. It depends on the capabilities, right? So you have nuclear warheads that can and are used for an all-out electrical failure, right, type system to where it would destroy all electrical systems completely. It could minimize some of the radiation effects of that. And this is a very big possibility. Also, it depends on where the weapon is detonated.

If the weapon is detonated a mile or two above the country or a city in particular, then that would have greater effects. If it was detonated, you know, four miles or whatever, or even potentially just in our stratosphere, that would have huge effects on a larger area. But it also could affect Russia. And more than likely would affect the United States at some point, you know, from the currents, from the actual jet stream, more than likely inside of Alaska coming down through Canada. But you have these things called tactical nukes where they, where these nuclear bombs basically go off right before they are. I mean, typically a tactile nuke says that it would go off within 500 feet of ground level. So you're hitting this thing. It is set to explode within a 500 feet altitude from the city you want to completely destroy.

So you could do this above the capital city of Ukraine, Kiev. Yeah. You could do this above wherever you might think the government's officials are and wipe out. out every single person in that area. Now, it would be devastating too because if Ukraine ever want, or sorry, if Russia wants to ever take over Ukraine, they don't want to destroy Ukraine. They don't want to destroy all of Ukraine because they want it so they can build it back. Yeah.

You also have to remember that they have a lot of natives, a lot of Russians inside of the Dombas region, inside of the eastern regions of Ukraine, which, you know, that's been another big topic of debate. Russia has always said that the Dombas region, which essentially voted to separate from from Russia, or sorry, from Ukraine, they were getting shelled on a daily basis by Ukraine, according to many, many reports. And so this was also another play for Russia to say, hey, we're going to go in, we're going to protect the people of Don Bass and the other pro-Russia areas of Ukraine or the

separated regions of Ukraine. And, but we do know, at the very least, it seems like the Ukraine was shelling those people because Ukraine either believed maybe there were spies there, Russia might have been utilizing those people to move in well. weapons, whatever the case was. We don't know the whole story behind that. But at the very least, Russia also has to think about that when using nuclear warheads because that's directly east, I believe, of where they would be hitting inside of Ukraine. And then you also got to think about this. They have a lot of soldiers right now inside of Ukraine. So if you ever see a mass soldier pullout

of Ukraine, then you know something's about to happen. But talking about the ties with Russia and Ukraine. I know they're big ties. I mean, they're neighbors. And I've seen in many cases when you go inside Ukraine, not only do they have signs in Ukrainian, but they have them in Russian. And there's a lot of cities in Ukraine that only speak Russian. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, there are. I mean, there are definitely big regions of Ukraine that speak Ukrainian. We've talked to many people about this, actually, or Russian. I mean, yeah, there are regions of Ukraine that also speak Russian, have signs in Russian. There's still very much a big part of Russian culture that is inside of Ukraine. And realistically, what really happened was we had this, in my opinion, this pro-Western government that came

in that was corrupt. They hated Russia. They were being pawned and used by the West to do nefarious things behind the scenes against Russia. And I think this is where the strife really started to escalate between Russia and Ukraine and in particular United States. Guys, we have to understand that Russia is not going to continue to let the West, in particular the United States, to push them back in a corner. Putin has said this over and over and over again. And although Putin recently just said that, you know, the Western media keeps, you know, propagandizing that we're going to blow up the United States in a nuclear warhead.

He said, by the way, the only country this ever... used nuclear warheads is the United States. Exactly. So, you know, that's propaganda. That is a scare tactic. They want you to think that we're the evil people on the block. We're not. But he said, we are also not going to not use nuclear weapons if we are ever at danger

of losing our sovereignty, our country and who we are. And so, you know, you have to understand. This is, in my opinion, a very big struggle right now between the United States and Russia and it's getting very dangerous. And I think, too, Putin is just playing it. He is. He's playing a chess game now. He's like, if you're going to do this to our country and you're going to put your forces over here

and actually bomb Russia inside of Russia, you know, using Ukraine as the middleman, then we are going to start putting our stuff everywhere and see how you like it. And it does not feel good to be an American knowing there's Russian ships right off the coast of Florida. It doesn't feel good, especially there's a nuclear, well, it's a nuclear. Well, it's a nuclear-powered submarine that is below. And I don't even know if we know where it is or not. Well, who knows? I mean, I know that it did dock, I guess, in Cuba Harbor, but now it's moved out again.

And we don't even know if that's the only one. Now, also, they just deployed, speaking of nuclear submarines, we, the United States Navy, recently deployed the P.A. Poseidon off the coast of Florida. And I'll tell you what the P.A. B.A. Poseidon, if you've ever heard of the 787 Dreamliner, which is made by Boeing. I'm actually surprised this thing is actually still in the air, since it is Boeing. But the PA Poseidon is basically this new-aged aircraft,

this Boeing platform that they turn military. And what its main job is, is it has sonar and various capabilities to detect nuclear submarines or submarines in general underwater. It is one of the best aircraft we have, at least to our knowledge, of an aircraft that can actually look deep underwater and tell where a submarine is, how many submarines may be there, so on and so forth. There's really no telling how many actual aircraft we have flying, but the Zero Hedge article says U.S. deployed subhunter P.8 Poseidon off Florida coast, the shadow Russian flotilla. OSINT analyst says a KC-135R strato tanker circling near the group, probably refueling a P-8 Poseidon or two. off the southern tip of Florida.

And so the Russian Kazan K-561 submarine in the visit to Cuba is said to be the quietest Russian underwater fleet in the world. Potentially, it may be the quietest submarine in the world, period. So the P8's obviously going to use this for training because they're going to see if they can actually detect this thing underwater. I would love to know if they are actually detecting it once it dives. Because, look, part of this is where you say training missions, Russia wants to say this, the United States wants to play. play to say this. This is basically war games right now. This is like a simulation slash rehearsal for a World War situation. Russia is going to gain a ton of intelligence off of what is going on right now.

They're going to gain intelligence by the U.S. response. The United States is going to gain intelligence by what the submarines do, how they act, how deep they are, how quiet are they? Are there any submarines that they think slipped by the P.8 Poseidens or some of our other underwater vessels? Now, keep in mind, we also have submarines. as well. And we have submarines that have sonar capabilities and

our submarines are more than likely, probably more powerful at detecting underwater craft than even the P.8 Poseidon. We got to remember that there are listening devices, not only in submarines, but the United States has listening devices in oceans. That was one of the ways that the United States Navy said they knew about the Titanic submersible. They knew its fate a week before they ever even announced it. They heard the actual implosion of the craft

one week before the media actually finally announced that the Titanic submarine was lost. But it was actually heard one week before. Wow. Well, I'm just saying I don't think our technology is as great as we think it is because do you remember, I think it was maybe six months to a year and a half ago, where Russian submarines came on the coast of California without us knowing we did not even know until they were there. Yeah. I mean, according to media, we didn't know. I mean, and it's not even just that. I mean, if we, if this administration lets Chinese spy balloons literally transverse the entire North American continent, I mean, from Alaska, down through Canada, all the way across the United States and then finally shoots them down off the coast of freaking South Carolina. It's ridiculous. We should have never allowed that thing over the, over internet or sorry, over U.S. airspace, period.

Yeah, and guess what? China is probably showing all that information to Russia right now. Oh, I'm sure. Because they are, to me, in my opinion, is Russia and China against the rest of the world. Yeah, absolutely. Pretty much. Well, yeah, I mean, right now they're kind of brothers against the world. I mean, that's literally how you're looking at this situation, although they definitely have their differences. They are, they do have one major thing in common.

They hate the United States. And they hate NATO. And you have two of the most powerful countries that all the United States and NATO are doing is bringing these two closer together. And then you think about China's economy versus the United States economy. Well, we did have a good economy. When Trump was in office, he was making us energy independent. He was making us a lot of things that we desperately needed. So we did not have to depend on, especially nations that hate us, including the Middle East,

the region, not necessarily a nation there, but Middle East region. But you even got to think about how much we depend on Iraq and Iran for oil still, Saudi Arabia. We even still depend on literally Russia for things. And yet they are our enemy. We obviously depend on China as far as economically. I mean, almost everything we buy in the United States. is from China now. Not only that, our cell phone batteries, car things, lithium, I mean,

there's so many things. And also, China is responsible partially for the fentanyl crisis that has happened inside the United States. Absolutely. But the reality of this, too, is that when the United States government continually allows China to buy up farmland right next to military bases in the United States, you got to start asking yourself, when is it a coincidence, or are we just that stupid? Or are we doing that on purpose? And also, are we, are we? also allowing the U.S.-Chinese spy balloon to come across the United States undetected, even though it was detected. But we just allowed this thing to not only come across it.

Yeah, not only come across the United States, but they also literally went above some of our nuclear facilities. I mean, and we didn't do anything about it. So at what point is it becoming on purpose? Are we asking the New World Order oligarchs and the people that are really in control this world? Are we allowed to shoot down the Chinese spy balloon? are we allowed to do this?

And they're saying, no, you're not because we're allowing this. There's something going on. There's a much bigger play. We always talk about it. Globalist and New World Order want to take over this world. They are using the United States first to destroy them. And how are they going to do that? Well, they're going to infiltrate.

And they're going to infiltrate by way of Russia. They're going to infiltrate by way of China. And they're going to disable America. We are already on our knees right now. America is on our knees. And it's only going to take one death blow to completely take. us out. That's how close we are. Well, and it's just crazy. Do you think we did not blow up the spy balloon because we were afraid it had explosives on it? No, hell, no. Why would we let them do that?

I don't know. And another thing, you're right. They're coming in in so many ways. You think about immigration and how many Chinese nationalists are coming into our country right now and they're undocumented. Yeah, I just saw a whole busload of them in our local grocery store here in South Carolina, what, four days ago. I mean, it was probably 70 of them. get off a bus. They were all younger Chinese dudes. And I, you know, I could hear them talking. They were all talking Chinese.

Obviously, they are here for some reason. And I think, honestly, these people are, these Chinese, probably military is being deployed all across the country. And I don't think they're trying to really escape China. I think China is sending them over here. Absolutely. Because you don't just leave China. That's not how that works in China.

You know, you got to get a visa from China. basically the same thing as a visa. You have to explain where you're going when you're in China. You don't just come to the United States in China and expect to be all good because China is either going to look at you as a spy or that you're part of a United States government, whatever. When there are mass amounts of people leaving China military age men, that is coordinated. That's pretty obvious. And not only that, you know, when a lot of these reporters are seeing these Chinese military age men in northern South America before, you know, none of these guys typically even have to go. the same routes as a lot of the people coming from South America and other places.

Yeah, special routes. They got boats. They got very expensive tents. They got, it's basically like a coordinated war effort. And this is something that is going on right now. I think just yesterday there was a report that we arrested, what was it, 11 people, terrorists from ISIS that came across the border. And we arrested them. And they were fully vetted, too.

Yeah, supposedly. And then the only way we knew about it was they were overheard on some type of phone conversation where they were talking. And the only reason they know that, by the way, everyone, is because they're listening to all of your shit. It's not just these people that are terrorists. They're listening to every one of your freaking phone calls. And just so you know, I mean, that's one of the things Edward Snowden talked about,

and that's why he's still on the run. Now, according to Newsweek, multiple open source intelligence analysts have said that the U.S. has deployed air and naval assets off Florida, eastern coast to shadow Russian warships. This come as Russian warships are expected to arrive in Cuba this week, which they have now officially. the analyst Tuesday posted updates show in the Coast Guard Stoned Coast Guard vessel, the USS Truxton and USS Donald Cook Destroyers, and the Royal Canadian Naval Freigate,

HMCS, Ville, D, Quebec, traveling southwards down the Florida coast, purportedly following the Russian ships headed to Cuba, and above them, at least one U.S. Navy P.8 Poseidon appeared to be conducting surveillance. The OSINT analyst on X weren't clear which of Russia's four ships groupings made up the Grancrov or sorry the Gorskov Frygate but the nuclear powered submarine Kazan the fleet oil tanker Paschene and the rescue tug Nikolai Chiker were transiting in international waters off the coast of Florida and still they posted flight tracking data that showed at least one

Bowen P.8 Poseidon circling above now I can guarantee you there's not one Bowen Pied Poseidon that was circling above there was probably many you also probably had fighters out there you had everything. And are they not employing missiles right now for practice? Yep, we're going to talk about that in just a second. So yeah, so there's tons of posts on that. Now, the Russian warships obviously arrived in Havana. That was today, but then they went back out.

They were still off the coast of the United States. And they're expected to stay through June the 17th, maybe longer. This deployment signals Russia capacity to operate globally, while still fully engaged in his third year of war in Ukraine. and this is about Russia showing that they are still capable of some level of naval power projection. A U.S. senior official told McClathy and the Miami Herald adding, we should expect more of this activity going forward. And meanwhile, Jake Bro, a former U.S. Air Force nuclear and missile operations officer,

stated on X on Sunday that Russians on the Kremlin State TV yesterday declared that Mexico was their military ally. And they are wanting to place their missiles on Mexico territory so Mexico can attack the United States. So here is the key development here, guys. We had heard earlier, we've been talking about this, the whole podcast about as we are sending missiles and we are sending weapons continually to Ukraine, which is right on the border of Russia, obviously, and Russia has a major issue with this. Now Russia is calling Mexico their military ally and they want to actually deploy missiles and weapons into Mexico's hands. So you might think, well, Mexico would never do that. Mexican government depends on the United States and all this. Guess who they're actually going to put these missiles and weapons in the hands of?

They're going to put these weapons and missiles in the hands of the cartel. I knew you're going to say that. No, they are. And that's what's crazy. That's who runs the country. So if you think about, they have our southern coast right there. If they get Mexico and Cuba. Obviously, Canada's on our side, thank God.

Yeah. Otherwise, we're in big trouble if they can surround all of America. Yeah, but, you know, strategic. strategic purposes-wise, Canada that they don't need. You know, they can be right off the coast of Alaska. They can be off the coast of California. They can obviously be off the coast of the Atlantic, off the East Coast. They now have Cuba, which they've always had Cuba.

And then if they get Mexico and actually deploy weapons into Mexico as a proxy war type situation, because Putin already said, why can we not do the same? Yeah, let's play a game here. Yeah. If you guys are doing it, we're going to do it. And if they put long range or mid-range weapons in the hands of the cartel, Will the cartel strike? I don't know.

But at the very least, what I can tell you is this. In the event, the Russia decides, hey, you know what, we're going to send some weapons over the cartel. And we're going to let them use these weapons against America. Mexico will probably not be a country very long. They will be destroyed. And that will just be the way it is. The United States will attack Mexico. They will take out all the cartel.

They will bomb it like you're seeing freaking Israel bomb Palestine. It might even be worse. There will be potentially. millions of civilians killed in that situation, all because Russia gives them weapons. But one thing the United States is not going to allow is Russian weapons on military or on Mexico soil. But that is what Putin's talking about. I think he's the very least threatening it for the United States to say, guys, we can do the same shit. So you just keep giving Ukraine these weapons.

So are we going to have the Hamas protesters be pro-Mexican now? Absolutely, they will. For sure, well. I mean, we could be getting blown up in the United States and they'll still be protesting for Mexican. hating America. And I'm just saying, in my opinion, all these protesters that hate Israel, hate America, they need to see their way out of America. Yeah, absolutely. And you've got to understand all this is the result of the Biden administration's weak foreign policy, which has sparked turmoil around the freaking world. I mean, since Biden has been in, there's been more wars start and

continue than we've seen in a very long time. I mean, this is a terrible foreign policy decision making and has become a liability for Biden's campaign before the November election. and the majority of Americans don't want World War III. I mean, that is one of the biggest threats and fears to the United States homeland and is certainly on a lot of people's minds, especially when you hear about these Russian warships off the coast and all this. Guys, I want to play something real quick. As Sherry mentioned earlier, we had a,

when they're talking about the Russian warships off the coast of Florida, what are they doing? Well, they're actually firing missiles, guys. I mean, this is no bullshit. This is, they're actually, actually firing missiles. missiles. And so I want to play a quick clip here. If I can find the freaking thing. Give me one second. I want to play you what it sounds like for these ships. Here you go. And guys, what you're hearing there are four long range missiles that are being fired from a warship off the Atlantic

coast. This is a very, very serious situation. I mean, yes, they're training, but they're literally doing it in the Atlantic. They are firing these massive missiles from a ship. And this is a when it starts getting weird. This is when it starts getting crazy. There's no doubt that we are facing a time like we've never seen before. I don't want to fearmonger. I don't want for anyone to freak out and be like, oh my God, we're all going to die today or tomorrow or whatever the case is. But we have to understand that we are in a situation that, you know, to me, it makes the Cold War seem naive or seem weak. This situation is far worse than the Cold War ever was. You know, this is the Cold War we got to remember was.

about us moving missiles into Turkey. But we're talking about we are literally supplying the neighbor of Russia with long-range, mid-range missiles that they are using to hit Russian targets. And so this is a very heightened situation that we're going to obviously continue to monitor. And I could say we coulda, woulda, done. But I'm just saying if we had another administration in right now and not the Biden administration, I don't think any of these wars would have happened in the first place. I swear to God.

I'm talking about President Trump. I know some people don't like Trump. I happen to like him. And I'm just happening to say that this Russia-Ukraine war would have never even happened in the beginning if Trump was a president. And he talks about that in his rallies today. And I don't even think the Hamas-Israel thing would have happened. But because they know we have such a weak administration in the United States and we really

they can't do anything about it and we are like pretty much chicken shits. This is a time for them to do what they've always wanted to do. Because we don't have powerful power anymore. Powerful power. Powerful power hungry people. I don't know. Anyways. Powerful people.

Yeah, powerful people in office anymore for sure. Yeah, this is actually what Trump had to say. I need to make sure that I have this clip. All right. So here is what Trump's had to say about the Ukraine-Russia war. prevent and very easily World War III, very easily. Before I even arrive at the Oval Office, I will have the disastrous war between Russia and Ukraine settled. It will be settled quickly.

I will get the problem solved and I will get it solved in rapid order. And it will take me no longer than one day. I know exactly what to say to each of them. I got along with very well with them. I will prevent and. Okay, so that's what he had to say. He would prevent a war in one day. Now, Woody, I don't know, but we know at the very least Trump was one of those presidents

that he had a decent work in relationship with Vladimir Putin. Seemed like they at the very least respected each other. I mean, you got to remember that President Trump was someone that went over to North Korea, the first ever president to actually step across from South Korea to North Korea and shake Kim Jong-un's hand. Obviously, the Western media, United States. media and Democrats all said that he was a ploy. He was, you know, he was over there being best friends with a North Korean leader because

he's just like him. And he's a, you know, he's a, he's a Russian agent. He's compromised by Russia by having a working relationship with the, obviously, the biggest nuclear power in the world. This is what we have to have. Yes. Don't you think that would be the smart thing to do is have a working relationship with a country that despises each other. Yeah, exactly. And that's what they don't want, though.

You have to understand. And when you have a president that goes over, starts building relationships with these nations that really are a threat to the world. I mean, you talk about Rocket Man, as they call him, which is Kim Jong-un. You talk about the biggest nuclear power in the world, Russia, even China. I mean, you know, President Trump put all these tariffs on China. He made China respect the United States finally. He started bringing back jobs from China back into the United States. There were various things that he did for global governance for, or I guess really for our own economy. And also, he was peace through strength. And he was someone that other leaders around the world saw him as maybe a threat. They definitely saw him as someone that didn't screw around.

They saw him as someone that wasn't going to get in bed with them like the United States does or at the very least, probably would not get in bed with Ukraine. Now, obviously, we don't know everything about Trump. We don't know what his ties really are to this or that, you know, there's big speculation recently, especially if you look at, not going to get in this whole thing, but if you look at some of the, you know, speculation or stories on Israel and how much control potentially Israel has over U.S. politicians and in particular A PAC and all these other things, he, one of his biggest donors recently was a Israeli businesswoman. I think it was a businesswoman. She is mega rich. I mean, sent tons of money to Trump's campaign, but she did have

something, and she tied that with. She said, we always want you to be pro-Israel. We want you to never kill A-PAC. We want to make sure that we continue to have this relationship with the United States. And that has been seen by some as, you know, hey, there's the, there's the control already from Israel to the United States, especially on the side of Trump. There was Dan Bilzerian in a space the other day on X actually said that in front of Don Trump Jr. Don Trump Jr. did not say anything when Dan Bilzerian was talking about this, about like, we do not need people controlled our politicians, no matter who you are. Doesn't matter if you're Israel, doesn't matter if you're France or China or whoever. We do not need our U.S. politicians influenced by massive amounts of money

to influence our policy and especially our foreign policy on, you know, who we take care of, how much money we send them, how much that government controls. us and vice versa. And that is a big issue of why people have issue with Israel or they have issue with other countries that also control politicians. And we're talking about Ukraine also. I mean, even though we're sending them tons of freaking money, the amount of control and power that all of these things backhandedly have is a major issue. And that's why many people are just done with every other country besides ourselves. And they say America first, we got to quit caring about all these other countries around the world because our country is failing. We need to

support our own people. We need to support our own homeless people, our own drug crises, our own economy and you name it. We are failing nation. And yet we're sending billions of dollars to all these other countries while at the same time being controlled by other countries as well. So it's obviously a big issue. There's so much to this story. I do have a couple more things because, you know, Russia even said, hey, we're going to send migrants to work in Ukraine, which was pretty interesting. And I want you to check this out. Here you go.

Sending migrants and students in battle under duress seems like an incredible, actually, you know, topic. Is there a precedent for this? It does seem like something you would hear like hundreds of years ago, maybe. This tactic started with the Wagner mercenary group. You'll recall during the Battlefall Backport that they started to enroll prisoners.

And amongst those prisoners, there were also migrants and foreigners. What is happening now, as Russia's losses mount, is that they're expanding that tactic. So they've expanded it to at least 21 countries. Some of these individuals will be joining the military for monetary reasons, or they're being paid to join the military. Other tactics that they use,

they look in databases for people who in the past applied for work in Russia. They are being lured to Russia with the promise of a job and then being forced to join the military. And thirdly, which is what our story focused on, young students and workers who are already in Russia and have visas, Moscow is threatening them with deportation. And obviously, once they are in Russia, it's very hard to resist those threats.

So, Alberta, does this really signal how much pressure Russia is under to find people to sell on the battlefield? Absolutely. And the issue of manpower and the lack of manpower, the more the war grinds on has become a sense. significant issue, not just for Russia, but also for Ukraine. Recent estimates by the British Defense Ministry say Russia has lost about 500,000 people since the beginning of the war. Currently, that rate is at a record high. Last month, the UK says Russia lost about 1,200 people on average

per day. So Russia has to find people from wherever it can, because it's also worth remembering that Vladimir Putin has tried to resist a full-on mobilization of the population. So he's trying to get people to volunteer to join the army and to get people from wherever he can. So there you go. And by the way, I'm this going to sound like, oh, God, I'm going to get Aden Alive for this one. But maybe we should start doing that. Hey, if we want to go to war with Russia, if the United States, this Democrats so desperately want a World War III type scenario and you also want to open our borders up to any and everyone

that want to come in and you keep encouraging these people to come in, why don't you be like, hey, you know what? Yes, you can come in. But you got to join the military. And we're sending you to Russia because we're trying to start World War III. I wonder how many people would actually start or stop coming across our border at that point. Because I guarantee you, they're going to be like, I don't know if I want to go to war. But to your point, that is a conspiracy theory of a reason why we're letting all these immigrants in is to take out our military and to put the immigrants into the military to make us more divided and conquer the United States within so that we can have a new world government.

Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, I mean, there's 100%. And there's been talks already about potentially putting in a lot of these immigrants from all over the world into our own military to Sherry's point. That might signal maybe do the fact that, you know, just the other day, Biden once again threatened Americans with F-15s when he was at this gun conference. And he's sitting there talking in front of the or on the camera. with barely you can understand what the hell he's saying. But he's sitting here saying, oh, yeah, yeah, you think when we get out of line to government

that you're just going to come up, you better have F-15s. I mean, he's literally saying, oh, when we get out of line, because he knows they're going to, and he knows they already are. He's just saying, you better have F-15s because if you don't. And by the way, according to Second Amendment, we should also be able to own F-15s with missiles. Yeah, let's get one and put it in our backyard. Yeah, we can park it in the front. I mean, the HOA will just send us more letters because we have a golf cart already.

Yeah, we get the letters all the time for that golf cart. But F-15 will probably be fine as well. Oh, yeah. What are they going to do? Talk shit. Oh, yeah. Go ahead and set us a letter because you know what? We're going to put our F-15 on you.

Yeah, I know, right. Yeah, you better have F-15, H-O-A. That's all I know, because we do. And it's in the freaking driveway, bro. Anyways, so I want to play one last clip, guys, because obviously we're talking about nuclear warheads. And I know this episode has kind of been all over to place. We're also preparing for an episode tonight.

which we've got to get ready for. So, but I want to play this clip, and it is a few minutes long, but I want you guys to understand the gravity of the devastating true scale of nuclear weapons. So without further ado, here you go. December 7, 1941, a date which will live in infamy. On July 26, 1945, the Allies called for the unconditional surrender of the Empire of Japan. The ultimatum stated that if Japan did not surrender, it would face prompt and utter destruction. The Japanese government ignored the ultimatum.

By that summer, the Allies Manhattan Project had successfully developed two types of atomic bombs, the uranium-based little boy and the plutonium-based Fat Man. The top-secret mission to drop the first atomic bomb involved six B-29 bombers heading toward Hiroshima. The Anola Gay carried the bomb. The great artiste was tasked with measuring the explosion. The third, unironically called necessary evil, was to take photographs, while the others flew approximately an hour ahead to act as weather scouts. At 815 on August 6th, Hiroshima time, the Anola Gay released Little Boy.

As it descended from 9.4 kilometres, it detonated 580 meters above Hiroshima, unleashing the energy equivalent of 15 kilotons of TNT. A one-kiloton explosion is equivalent to detonating 1,000 tonnes of TNT. So this was equivalent to 15,000 tonnes of TNT. It devastated everything within a 1.6 kilometre radius, with fires spreading over 11 square kilometres. Or, as the Chicago Daily in 1945 put it, four square miles wiped out. The Anola Gay was 18.5 kilometers away when it felt the shockwaves.

Three days later, on August 9, 1945, another B-29 named Boxcar took off from Tinian Island. This time the primary target was Kokura, with Nagasaki as the backup. The plan was nearly identical to the Hiroshima mission. Boxcar was accompanied by other B-29s tasked for instrumentation and photographic support of the At 1101 over Nagasaki, Boxguard dropped the Fat Man bomb. It exploded 47 seconds later at an altitude of 503 meters above a tennis court in Nagasaki's industrial valley, releasing the energy equivalent of 21 kilotons of TNT. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in the deaths of between 129,000 and 226,000 people. Mostly civilians, marking the only time nuclear weapons have been used in armed conflict. Japan surrendered to the Allies on August 15th, just six days after the Nagasaki bombing,

effectively ending World War II. These events sparked a nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union, forever changing the course of global politics. Today the most powerful nuclear weapon in the US arsenal is the B83, a variable-yield thermonuclear gravity bomb, Its destructive capacity can be adjusted from a low kiloton range to a maximum of 1.2 megatons of TNT,

which is roughly 80 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. The B83 was the first American nuclear weapon specifically designed to prevent accidental detonations, incorporating insensitive explosives in its trigger lens system for enhanced safety. This bomb is also considered for applications such as the new, nuclear bunker buster project, previously known as the robust nuclear earth penetrator. The non-nuclear component of the B83 is designed to penetrate soil, rock or concrete to deliver a nuclear warhead to an underground target. The B83's design has also been explored for potential use in asteroid impact avoidance strategies.

This would involve deploying six of these warheads, each set to the maximum yield of 1.2 megatons on space vehicles tasked with altering the trajectory of any near-Earth asteroids that pose a significant threat, effectively knocking them off course to safeguard the planet. While the B-83 is currently the most powerful nuclear weapon in the US arsenal, it was significantly outclassed by an earlier device. Castle Bravo, detonated on March 1st, 1954, holds the record as the most powerful nuclear device ever set off by the United States. The footage you're seeing comes from the actual detonation at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands,

conducted under Operation Castle. The fireball generated by the explosion was over 7 kilometres wide and reached temperatures hotter than the core of the sun, approximately 100 million degrees Celsius. The Castle Bravo device was encased in a cylinder weighing 10,700 kilograms. and measuring 137 centimeters in diameter. It was a Cobra Deuterium-Treatium gas-boasted atomic bomb developed by the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. Upon detonation, Bravo created a fireball

almost 7.2 kilometers in diameter within seconds, visible from over 400 kilometers away. The explosion carved out a crater 2,000 meters across and 76 meters deep. The mushroom cloud soared to a height of 14 kilometres and a width of 11 kilometres within a minute. It reached 40 kilometres in height and 100 kilometres in width in less than 10 minutes, expanding at speeds exceeding 580 kilometres per hour. The extensive blast contaminated over 18,000 square kilometres of the Pacific Ocean.

Castle Bravo's explosion yielded 15 megatons of TNT, equivalent to 1,000,000. and times the power of the Hiroshima bomb. The blast was so intense that it rendered the bones of nearby individuals visible through their flesh and skin. Initially anticipated to yield close to six megatons, the actual output of 15 megatons was far greater than expected, making Castle Bravo the sixth largest nuclear explosion in world history. The ignition of nuclear fire sparked a fierce competition for supremacy in nuclear warfare, primarily between the United States, the Soviet Union, and their respective allies during the Cold War. Prior to the first use of a nuclear weapon against Japan, Soviet scientists were already

exploring the potential of nuclear arms and conducting their own research in the field. Officially, the Soviet Union was unaware of the Manhattan Project until July 24, 1945, when U.S. President Harry Truman briefed Stalin at the Potsdam Conference. This was only eight days after the successful detonation of the first nuclear weapon. Despite their alliance during the war, the United States and Britain hesitated to share details of the Manhattan Project with the Soviets, fearing that knowledge of the project might reach German spies. Additionally, there was concern that the Soviets, as allies, would demand technical details of the weapon. Truman was initially surprised by Stalin's calm reaction when he informed him about the nuclear weapons,

mistakenly thinking that Stalin might not have understood the information he was told. However, Stalin had been aware of the Manhattan Project for some time, even though the project had been so classified that Truman himself as vice president had not been informed about it until he ascended to the presidency. In the immediate post-war years, the United States maintained a monopolist, on the specific knowledge and raw materials required for nuclear weaponry. But in secrecy, the Soviet government was working on building its own atomic weapons. This effort culminated in the detonation of the first Soviet atomic bomb on August 29, 1949. Known in the West as First

Lightning, this device was more or less a copy of the Fat Man bomb. In the mid-1950s, the United States held an unchallenged superiority over the USSR in nuclear. capabilities, and the Soviets lacked effective means to deliver nuclear warheads to the US, making a realistic retaliatory nuclear strike unfeasible. Acknowledging the Soviet Union's strategic disadvantage in nuclear arms, the leadership under Nikita Khrushchev felt compelled to respond to what they perceived as U.S. nuclear blackmail. This led to the development of the Tsar Bomber. Originally the Tsar Bomba was designed as a three-stage hydrogen bomb.

with a potential yield of approximately 100 megatons of TNT, roughly 6,666266 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb. However, it was thought that this would have resulted in too much nuclear fallout, and the aircraft delivering the bomb would not have had enough time to escape the explosion. To reduce the fallout, designers replaced the uranium-238 fusion tamper of the third stage and possibly the second with a lead tamper. This modification prevented fast fission from the fusion stage neutrons, ensuring that about 97% of the bomb's total yield resulted from thermonuclear fusion alone. This made the Tsar Bomber one of the cleanest nuclear bombs ever created, producing relatively minimal fallout, compared to its immense yield.

This was crucial, as any fallout would likely affect populated areas within the Soviet Union. Nikita Khrushchev, the Communist Party, Party's first secretary publicly announced the upcoming test of a 50 megaton bomb during the 22nd Congress of the Communist Party on October 17, 1961. Before this formal declaration, he had casually mentioned the bomb to an American politician, leading to its premature disclosure in the New York Times on September 8, 1961. The Tupolev-95 aircraft, tasked with carrying the massive Tsar bomber, departed from Olenia Airfield and set course for the USSR Ministry of Defense's state test site

on Novaya Zemlya, manned by a crew of nine. Accompanying the TU-95 was a Tupolev-16 laboratory aircraft equipped to monitor the test. Both planes were coated with special reflective paint to reduce heat damage during the explosion. Despite these precautions, the crews of both aircraft were informed that their chances of surviving the test were only 50%.

The bomb weighing 30 tonnes and 2.1 metres in diameter was so large that the aircraft had its bomb bay doors and fuselage fuel tanks removed. An 800 kilogram parachute, covering an area of 1,600 square meters, was attached to the bomb. This parachute was crucial as it allowed the bomb to slow its descent, giving the release and observation planes enough time to distance themselves about 45 kilometres from ground zero.

thereby maintaining their survival odds at 50%. Two hours after takeoff, the bomb was dropped from an altitude of 10,500 metres above the Sukoy Noes test target. It detonated at 1132 Moscow time on October 30, 1961, at a height of 4,200 meters above Mityushika Bay. By the time of the detonation, the TU 95 had reached a distance of 39 kilometres from the blind. zone. Despite this distance, the shockwave caught up to the aircraft at 115 kilometers away, causing it to drop approximately one kilometer in altitude. Miraculously, the crew managed to regain control and safely land the aircraft. Initial estimates reported the nuclear yield of the Tsar bomber at 58.6 megatons. Despite predictions that the Tsar bomber's fireball might touch the

ground, its own shockwave bounced back, preventing this from happening. The fireball, spanning eight kilometers in width, reached almost as high as the release plane's altitude, and was visible nearly a thousand kilometers away. Observations were made from as far as Norway, Greenland, and Alaska. The mushroom cloud soared to an astonishing height of 67 kilometers, nearly eight times the height of Mount Everest, placing it well above the stratosphere and into the mesosphere at its peak. The clouds cap expanded to a width of 95 kilometres, while its base stretched 40 kilometers across. The blast wave circled the globe three times. The Tsar Bomba remains the single most physically powerful device ever detonated on Earth, marking the most powerful nuclear bomb test

and the largest human-made explosion in history. However, the Tsar bomber was never intended as a practical weapon. It was a singular demonstration designed to exert psychological pressure on the United States. By the mid-1960s, both the United States and the Soviet Union had amassed sufficient nuclear firepower to completely destroy each other. Each side developed the capability to launch a devastating retaliatory attack, even after absorbing a full initial strike, primarily through submarine-launched missiles, this capability, known as a second strike, underpinned the policy of mutual assured destruction, or mad. This doctrine held that any nuclear attack by one side would result in the total annihilation of both the attacker and the defender, theoretically

deterring either side from initiating conflict. It has been almost 80 years since the first nuclear detonation at the Trinity test. And we are still living in the shadow of these mighty weapons that could very well prove to be our great filter. So there you go. And I wanted to play that because I think it's a great piece. Science Time on YouTube is the channel that did it and is titled The Devastating True Scale of Nuclear Weapons, if you guys want to check it out and actually see the imagery in the videos

there. Truly fascinating how massive and powerful these weapons are. I wanted to just give you guys an appreciation at the very least of what we're dealing with. And when we have politicians in play right now, when we're on the cusp of something major happening between two world powers such as Russia and the United States. And obviously, this has been going on for quite some time. We have been in this battle of nuclear supremacy. We've been wanting to see who would destroy who the best or the biggest. And even the last bomb that they were talking about, Russia never really, you know, it was not ever feasible at that time anyway to be able to actually use that on the United States and that capacity.

But we have to understand that 80 years ago and 70 years ago and how much technology has advanced, they have nuclear weapons that could probably do that and bigger in a much smaller scale. I'm talking about probably something the size of two or three basketball sizes could be that powerful now. And it could also be delivered on an intercontinental ballistic hypersonic missile to where it could be here in 10 minutes. And I can't remember what president said this, but they said if you thought nuclear weapons were bad, you don't even know what we have. Yeah. Trump said that. I mean, there's been quite a few people that said it. And Trump continually says it. It's almost like Trump knows something.

you have to remember Trump's grandfather was MIT. He was some type of scientist. I don't know exactly 100% all that his grandfather did, but I think Trump has a lot of ties family-wise inside of the scientific side of the community, also the war side of the community. And then, you know, keeping in mind, too, guys, is that beyond just nuclear power, you know, that's one of the things that Trump continues to mention. And he says, if you guys think the nuclear is bad, you think nuclear war is bad.

We got things that are a million times more powerful than that. I mean, and it would be something that would completely destroy the world. And the problem with this scenario is that you have people in place that if in the event that something happens to where they are pushed far back in a corner to where they feel like that their nation is truly threatened to where they're going to be destroyed themselves, that is when you have a very bad scenario play out because that is when they will launch a, a nuclear attack in hopes that maybe they could destroy the other side, because especially if they think they're already going to be destroyed. Yeah, they're already going to be destroyed. So why not do it? Yeah.

You know, if you're going to come after me, I'm going to come after you and we're going to just end this world right now. Yeah. And that's the bad thing, right? And just so people know, you know, it's not just, for example, if Putin says, launch the nukes, right? That's not exactly how it works, right? they actually have cabinets, they have various systems apparently in place that it has to go through, right?

Now, I don't know necessarily it is that, if it is that, I don't know, I'll put it this way. I have heard that it is harder for Russia through their systems to launch nuclear attacks than it is for the United States. Often, obviously, you hear that the president of the United States has the nuclear football. He actually has a briefcase to where he can launch nukes from anywhere in the world. that nuclear suitcase or football is what it's called. Can you imagine a president that has dementia with a nuclear suitcase? But here's the thing too. Supposedly the United States has checks as well.

It has to go through various people before that is approved unless probably the event that a nuclear attack is imminent on the United States. At that time, there's probably less people to have to approve certain things. But nonetheless, there are always all these people that are in the chain of command of our nuclear power are always there and ready at all time. So they go on shifts. And there's never not someone that is literally, that's all they do. They are ready in the event of a nuclear attack.

And then they are part of the chain of command. And it goes down through the chain of command. Now, I'm sure some of that chain of command gets stricken, depending on the scenario, say that if we know for sure that Russia has launched a nuclear attack, then it probably could be dependent on the president. I don't even think necessarily president has to make the ultimate decision. I think there's some general or joint chief of staff or someone that actually can make the decision even above the president in certain scenarios. And this is the military side of things. So nonetheless, though, and I've been saying nonetheless, sorry.

Regardless, we have these two nuclear powerhouses that are literally right off the coast of each other now. You have the United States and Ukraine and the proxy war and the weapons in Ukraine. that are now hitting inside of Russia. You have Russia now threatening to give Mexico weapons. There's no telling, by the way, what they're actually deploying right now in Cuba. And Russia is now calling us their enemy. Yeah. Where they've never done that before during this whole crisis.

And you know what I'll be very interested to see is I'm going to be interested to see what plays out with this Cuba thing. Is it just going to be training? They go home, nothing to see. Or will there be some type of deployment of some type of. system that they're going to set up in Cuba while they are there. That will be a big power play. It'll be a big move by Russia if that happens. But I also think that Russia knows and definitely probably Cuba knows if that happens.

United States has to take a big look of whether they invade Cuba at that time. What will happen with that? Will that also spark another war? The problem is we need a new administration and office. We have to get something going on to where we save the United States. we could probably save people in Ukraine, we could probably save people in Palestine and Israel. We can save a lot of people's lives if we have the right people in power or in place. And, you know, there's a lot of things that go about that rather than just electing a president.

We've got to get certain bureaucrats out of their unelected positions to where they control so much of the military industrial complex. We got to get people out of power, especially in the biopharmaceutical complex, which is in control of our medical system. I just saw a poll today that it shows the top health care systems in the world. I think the United States is like eighth to last among all countries in the entire world for their health care system. I believe it. Because we have health insurance and we still have to pay buccos of money just to go to the doctor. Yeah. And it's not even just that either.

I mean, besides the money, it is just the poor health care. The, our health care system has went to hell. And most of that is because of bureaucrats. Most of that is because now, we would rather make money than to cure people that goes with cancer, that goes with everything. And it went with freaking COVID. It's like, hey, guys, if people die, you get more money. If they don't die, then you get less money.

You get no money, actually, if they don't die. And we're incentivizing bad decisions. We're incentivizing non-cures. Right. We're incentivizing killing people over curing people. And that is the same way we're doing it with the military industrial complex. If we incentivize companies to prevent wars rather than to start wars and keep wars going, the world would be a lot more peaceful place. And the biofarmacetical and the military industrial complex are both the same.

The problem is that we have created this massive industry of killing. And it's on both sides. It's in the health care and it's in the military and it's in the war. And so when you incentivize this, you give all of these billions of dollars to both industries. You're going to have more people die. if you incentivized organizations or groups or companies to stop wars, damn, then we would have no wars. You know, if we paid out tax dollar money to these companies that could prevent wars on a monthly basis and they get paid billions of dollars if they make sure wars don't happen. I mean, we would never have wars because the money would be on the other side of it, right?

Right. But the problem is the money is on the side of killing people, devastating nations, sparking wars. And unfortunately, that's where we're at. And unfortunately, we have shitty-ass administration politicians and global governance leaders around the world that meet up in Bilderberg groups. They meet up in the World Economic Forum every year. And they decide how they're going to continue to screw the population and people. Yeah. And they're screwing up the population outside of America and also inside.

You've got to look at our justice system and what's going on right now with our even our justice system. Oh, absolutely. It's so corrupt. Oh, it is. I mean, and listen, I mean, there's been the black community. There's been many communities that have raised hell and big. about the unjust justice system for a very long time. And I've never disagreed that the just system wasn't fair to black people.

I think it hasn't been fair to black people. I think it hasn't been fair to a lot of people. Obviously, yes, there are black people that commit crimes or white people that commit crimes. But I think in general, though, I think we're just starting to realize that the justice system has always been corrupt. It's been corrupt in certain areas or cultures or people. But it can always move to other people if need be. And that's the result of what we're seeing now.

moved to politics and it has moved to our frontrunner of the presidential nominee, which is or the Republican nominee basically, or will be, which is Donald Trump. And we're living in a shitty, shitty time. But guys, there's hope. You know, there's. We're living in a shitty time. But, hey, there's hope. Yeah, there's definitely hope.

You got things like alcohol, beer. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding, guys. No, but the reality is. But I also think, I think we should not fear. right? We should not fear anything, but we also have to make sure that we do our best, the best we can anyway, to put the people in power or place that can maybe prevent some of these things. We got to be vocal about it. We have to share our thoughts and opinions and beliefs. We got to make sure we call these assholes out on a regular basis. And I think, you know, like platforms like X and like platforms like Rumble, that allow people to have open discourse and call out these assholes and these people that are doing these things and making sure that it is in a public, even though mainstream. stream media don't want to cover it. That's why I still tell everybody, I don't care if you've ever used X or not.

I still encourage people to go use X. I encourage people to try to watch more Rumble videos. I encourage people to try to support the people that are really actually maybe trying to up in or to uphold free speech and to try to expose the bullshit that is really going on. We have to support those people that do that. And by the way, we do have an X account, Investigator's podcast. Also, as we said earlier in this episode, we are shooting a, YouTube video tonight.

It's actually going to be an interview. It's going to be really good. If you want to watch that interview when it comes out, I think it'll probably be Saturday or Sunday. We're going to start doing a lot of really cool things on YouTube as well. In addition to this, you can check us out at Chad and Sherry Unplugged on YouTube and be watching for that interview. Sunday. Yes, probably Sunday.

But I think it's going to be really cool. And I love this guest. He's going to be amazing. You'll love him as well. And without further ado, we're going to get to the song. We started with. It's so sick of love. I don't know.

It's a new song. So why not play it again? Till next time, guys. We love you. Peace out, guys. I'm tired of. But I never cut it was you.