Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Trump Assassination Attempt | 2 Shooters Confirmed? Plus Biden Double

Episode Date: July 25, 2024

In this episode, we delve into audio analysis and the latest reports suggesting that there may have been at least two shooters involved in the attempted assassination of President Trump in Butler, PA. Several audio and weapons experts have presented evidence indicating the presence of at least two different shooters using different weapons. Was this a massive inside job and cover-up? Was Thomas Crooks merely a patsy? We also explore the possibility that recent videos of President Biden could be sophisticated deep fakes created by intelligence agencies.

Hello and welcome to Investigator's podcast. I'm your host chat alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry. On tonight's episode, we're going to be recapping and doing a little bit of breaking down the Christopher Ray testimony in front of Congress. Also, some of the new theories that have come out about the Trump assassination attempt. And we're probably also going to be speaking a little bit about all of the conspiracy theories surrounding why President Biden is not going to run for reelection in 2024. there's also been a lot of speculation of whether or not the Biden that we saw the other night, given the speech from the Oval Office, is even actually really Biden. There's a lot of weird stuff going on.

Obviously, Kamala Harris is now running for president in 2024. And it seems like no matter what news outlet you put your TV on, they're going to have a Kamala Harris, quote unquote, rally in high school gymnasiums. But they're going to have it everywhere. And even Fox is covering this very heavily. You know, we were just watching something right before we came on, which was very interesting to me. But it shows Benjamin Netanyahu meeting with Kamala Harris at the White House.

It almost shows it like she is the president now, right? And more than likely, she's just the new useful idiot. She is the new puppet of the deep state. And as Biden has, there's no way he could continue to carry out even appearing to be president because of how Sinau or whatever he has gotten. So even the deep state finally had said, look, I think that there's no way we can make the people believe that he's even at all compable to do his job. So that's why they took Biden to New Hampshire,

did whatever the hell they did. If they even actually took the real Biden, they brought back a version two Biden. I don't know. There's all kinds of crazy conspiracy theories. And this one will be fun, at least towards the back end. And then we're also going to play something for you guys to kind of tell

you about how the CIA and deep state actors can get away with actually carrying out a double. So whether it be a facial double, whether it be a body double, or all of the above. I mean, they've been doing this in Hollywood for years and years and years. And what most people don't understand, if you don't think that the government can do that and yet Hollywood can do it, well, that's just not accurate. And in most cases, actually, what the deep state and what the government will do, especially CIA, they will actually hire a lot of these people that come from Hollywood to come into their agencies so that they can do these body double and face double things. So anyways,

that's what we're going to be talking about on tonight's episode. Guys, hope you are having an amazing July the 25th, I believe it is now. We finally got a little bit of rain today. Thankfully, it is rain. It has just been going around us every single day. And it's like, where the hell is the rain? But we're doing an episode. We took a couple days, a little break. There just been so much going on. And honestly, between the Trump assassination, all the various theories about Biden not actually being Biden, all of this stuff has just been almost information overload. So this is 2024, guys.

We are in July. We're almost to August. And then we only got a few short months until the election. And the way the media is starting to hype up Kamala Harris, the way they are basically running a coup. against the current administration, the Biden administration, very, very obvious. Obviously, it's more than likely a deep state slash intelligence agency coup to make sure that they pick who they want

because they need to be able to use someone just like they did Biden, and there's no perfect candidate for them other than Kamala Harris in this situation. But we'll see if someone else comes out of the woodwork as well. Well, I just think it's odd that they're already automatically putting her as the candidate for president. There's not been any kind of elections or saying, oh, okay, let's see who would be the best person. Yeah. It almost feels like it's a Soviet Union, China type, you know, communist-type thing going on here. I thought that in America, you have a freedom to vote on who you want to run for president.

And right now, all they're doing is giving all of Biden's money to Kamala and she's taking over. Not only is she taking over for campaigning, but it seems like she's our new president already. Yeah, and what you're talking about is just plants, right? Russia does it. You know, they still do it. China does it. North Korea does it. So many communists and dictatorship type countries do this.

And so, you know, if you go back to 2020, whatever you believe about 2020, was 2020 a stolen election? Was it not? But if you just look at the writing on the wall with actually what's going on with a Democrat nominee for president or what will. be more than likely the Democrat nominee, which will be Kamala Harris and how they're doing this. They're not even letting the Democrats or anybody actually select their nominee. They're just planting a nominee. And I have news for you guys. Spoiler alert, they're going to also plant the president in 2024. So no matter what, I still want you guys to get out and vote if, if, I mean, I think that we have to vote this year. No matter what, I mean, don't just assume someone's going to win.

Don't just assume they're going to steal the election. Do everything you can to ensure they can't. and I know there is a lot of political pundits out there right now that are saying, look, we're going to have someone at every polling station. We're going to have someone at every location. I know Stephen Crowder actually has a software that they just released that people can actually report things that they see so they can send someone there to investigate. There's a lot of people doing that. And I think we're going to have to do that if we want any chance of this not becoming another stolen election. Now, guys, as we get in this, we're obviously going to be talking about the Christopher Ray testimony. there were some tidbits in his testimony that was really, really interesting.

I think it kind of drives the conspiracy narrative even further. This was the inside job. Maybe Crooks was not alone. There's all those things we're going to talk about. Before we get into that, there was a very interesting news piece on Fox News the other day. And it was when Senator Ron Johnson came on and he started talking a little bit about some guy that showed up. A mysterious guy in a gray suit. I think we had talked about it on the last part.

He was from ATF or something. Yeah, it was a mysterious ATF agent that, you know, now he's gone dark. Don't know who this person is, no idea who he is, probably never will know who he is. But I want to just play this clip for you guys. Very interesting. Listen to what Ron Johnson has to say here. A letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Director of the FBI, Christopher Ray, about this epic failure of security. Can you walk us through what you'd like to see and your pretext?

preliminary findings of your investigation, which has now become bipartisan. Is that correct? Correct. I spoke with the chairman Blumenthal, the chairman of the permanent subcommittee investigation. I'm the ranking member. He completely agrees with me that we must start doing transcribed interviews with all the witnesses now while memories are fresh. So that's really good news from my standpoint. My staff immediately started reaching out to local law enforcement. We've gathered a fair amount of information. Again, we're just scratching the surface. But a couple of things that we found out, for example, the Secret Service did not even attend the 9 o'clock security meeting with local law enforcement. Pretty well put in charge the Butler County law enforcement to coordinate things. Law enforcement wasn't even on the same channel.

So that was just to be clear, Senator, that was a 9 a.m. meeting on July 13th, the day of the shooting. Correct. Secret service wasn't there. better for site visits weren't even there. You kind of turned over some of the outer perimeter stuff to local law enforcement. They weren't even on the same security channel. So the sniper and SWAT teams weren't on the same channel as the patrol officers, and they were on the same channel as Secret Service.

So they had to relay things. One of the things we found out is that we've got a more detailed timeline. This picture is now on the internet, but a picture was, photo was taken by the local sniper team in the AGR building at five. 514 of crooks. So again, we had pictures of this guy. Why wasn't he intercepted? There's so many, so many unanswered questions here. The pictures were taken at 514 and he was shot at 611. Correct. Okay. And again, we've got a more, so I'm going to be issuing a preliminary report. Again, it's preliminary. It's just scratching the surface. We're primarily going to release that report to solicit more eyewitness testimony.

If you took video, save it, you know, make a backup copy, copy. You know, we can glean things in terms of audio and in terms of, you know, where the shots came from. You know, was it one rifle? Was it more than one? I've seen some pretty interesting video on the Internet by experts that certainly calls into question what the FBI is telling us about a single shooter. Again, we're only just beginning this, but it is so important that people who saw things that have information, preserve it. They memorialize what they saw because memories change over time. They can be influenced. So again, it's good news on a bipartisan basis. Chairman Blumenthal and I are

dedicated to taking transcribed interviews with law enforcement and public, just members of the general public that were at that rally. No matter how insignificant your piece of information might be, it might lend to provide the full story of what happened because the American public needs to understand what happened here. So I know that, well, I tweeted out yesterday the fact that you're doing this bipartisan investigation, and I put on your email, you have an email that you want people to send information to, and I know that you'll treat that later. But I got to get to this. After the shooter was taken down by Secret Service, the local law enforcement, and I know this from some of your preliminary comments, your preliminary findings,

started taking pictures of the dead body, right? Can you tell us what happened then? Correct. So that sniper team that was in the AGR building, they're the first ones that went up on the roof. They were the first to encounter the dead assassin at that point in time. Later on, other people joined them, and somebody told them to send the pictures they had taken to an ATF agent, which I think is very strange. And we called up that ATF agent, that individual said that he was with ATF, and now he's gone dark. We've also reached out to the Secret Service agents in charge on the ground. All we're getting there is the runaround. So we are getting information from local law enforcement, and we appreciate that.

But unfortunately, federal law enforcement agent, they're just saying, well, go through your congressional liaison. Again, that's going to be unacceptable. I wish I could rely and have faith in the FBI and the Secret Service to do a truthful accounting of this. But that's not been my experience with the Russian collusion hoax. And for years, deal with federal law enforcement, we need completely. separate and independent investigations, and it has to start now. So are you questioning whether or not there was a second shooter? Is that what you're a question, or if the shooter had a different gun?

You know, I saw an extremely convincing video online. I know it's all over the place. You know, there were three distinct shots early on, followed by another five in more staccato, more rapidly fired, and then the final one, which we believe took the shooter out. How do you explain that? I don't know. I'm not an expert. But the individual putting that video out says it clearly shows that there are at least three different weapons fired that day.

Again, I don't know. But we can't trust the FBI and the Secret Service to do an honest and open and transparent investigation. That's just a very sad fact. So we've got to rely on other sources independent to really find out what the truth of the matter was on Saturday, July 13th. So let me go back to what happened after the shooter is dead. you just mentioned somebody goes up. So this is the guy in the suit who walks up the ladder, goes to the roof, and tells the locals, send those pictures to this cell phone. Who was that person?

Well, again, I'm not sure that was the guy. I think another county law enforcement gave the number to the other county law enforcement, the snipers, to send the text. Some guy in a suit walks up the ladder. They believe you secret service. I'm not sure really gave credentials, but that's part of it. Again, Maria, this is so preliminary. I'm issuing this. I'm providing this information and much more detailed timeline to prompt others to come forward.

We need to complete this picture. We have a lot of puzzle pieces to fill in here. Is it odd to you that the locals were being told to send the pictures to the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms agency, ATF? Where does ATF coming? It's very odd. The oddity starts with the fact. that local law enforcement were just tasked with securing the perimeter, told to go cover

that AGR building, not really told where to set up. So they set up on the second floor. They went to that AGR building at 10.30 in the morning. So they were stationed well in advance. You know, they noticed this suspicious character at 510. They took a photo of him at 514. The president was shot at 6.11. So again, an hour is passed. Again, they don't communicate. They didn't have communication, same channels with their law enforcement patrol officers. They weren't in communication with the Secret Service other than going through the Butler County communication center. So again, it's everything you would assume about secret service protection of a former president was not true. It didn't happen. It's just baffling to me.

Should baffle the American public, that's why we need to find the answers and find out what actually happened here. And so that's the problem, guys. is that nothing about the situation was correct. Nothing about the situation was done properly. Nothing about the situation was done by, I don't know what you want to call it, but by methodical processes that the Secret Service or especially they're working with local law enforcement, the fact that the law enforcement was not even on the same channels as anybody else.

So there were three or four different agencies there. There are reports that ATF agents were. also there, which is strange. You had some guy in a great suit walking around telling people what to do. You also see another guy in the recent released video that comes up on the roof where Crooks was. It's the body cam video, I believe, of local law enforcement snipers that were up there. And the funny thing about that is, is it blurs out Crooks, right?

And so I will be very curious because Senator Chuck Grassley actually is the one that foiled the body cam videos of the snobes. snipers, it went on the roof after Crooks was down. And the only thing you can see, they basically blur the entire body. But there is a time at some point in time up there that they say there are one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight casings here. But then there's also reports, Sherry, that the casings were on either side of him. Yeah, well, they said that in the same video.

They said there's casings on both sides of his body, which I found really odd because I was thinking as you're laying down shooting when the bullets kind of all well yeah they things go the same way yeah they would tip yeah they would typically eject um one way or the other but so that's also very strange but then you have at 514 they took a picture of crooks 611 is when trump was actually shot and then based on uh expert video single shooter two shooters various guns potentially up to three weapons were used and we will get to that video in just a second or that audio anyway and then you have a local LEO that was taking picks of the body. They were told to send pictures to an ATF agent.

And so the senators called this number that the local law enforcement were given. They called this. The guy verified he was ATF and then he went dark, meaning they had no trace of this guy anymore after this. And so they, and then you also have this other guy that was in a gray suit going around, you know, demanding everybody. The very interesting and very strange thing about this is you have local law

enforcement, some guy in a suit that's coming up telling them to do something without even presenting credentials. And they're just assuming that this is CIA. I mean, not CIA, but Secret Service. Right. Because in the beginning, you know, at the 9 o'clock meeting, nobody even showed up to the meeting to tell what was going on or what's not going on. You would think social and secret service was not even present to tell anybody what to do. And none of the channels were on the same channel.

And there were so many different departments there. You had Secret Service. You had the PSP, the police. The PSP. Yeah, the Police Department. You had the emergency service unit. That was a whole other unit. And nobody's on the same channels.

How could they get anything done? But the number one thing is that 9 o'clock meeting, if Secret Service is in charge of protecting President Trump, they should have been at that meeting. Yeah, absolutely. I completely agree. I want to get to this. Two shooters confirmed. analysis and let you guys hear what this person says, and this is one of the videos

that Ron Johnson was referring to just a minute ago on Fox News, crack, right? So that's what we're going to hear. You're going to hear first in this tape. First, you're going to hear three very clearly distinct crack thumps. And then things get a little confusing, right? It gets a little fast. And so how do you count and all of that? Somebody who ever put this video together did the counting.

Thank you for that. However, I think there's some room for interpretation here as well about that. So, without any further ado, this is that audio. Take a look at what happened. Hang on. I'm going to hear one more. There was that last one. Okay, one more time.

Take a look at what happened. Listen to this. Can you hear that? That's one, two, three. Okay. And then hard to unravel what's happening there because we have echoes. We've got them over stacking each other. So there's two supersonic cracks that come in, and later the thumps of the gun come in, the crack thumps.

So it gets a little tricky to unravel, so let's do that and go there. Okay. First up, I want a big shout out to Mike Adams at Health Ranger. He was out with this within minutes for those first three shots. Clued me into the idea that we really didn't need to take a look at the other one. So way to go, Mike. Thank you for picking that up and doing that. All right.

This is the audio file. I pulled it into a program called Audacity, right, off of that video. And I find on here nine separate shots, okay? So I find three, then a grouping of five, and then one last one out there. Number nine, I think, this one, this is the sniper shot that would have, I think, looks like it took out crooks just above the left eyebrow. If you want to go look at those or, you know, the gross pictures, right? Obviously, he's all bloody and dead. They have that close-up picture of his face, right?

and you can actually see a hole right about here over the left eyebrow. So we have those first three shots, then we have the five, and then that last one. I'm not going to worry about the last one as much, but we're going to have to look at these first sets very, very carefully here. So here is video number one. Just to orient ourselves, I count off of this video 15.8 seconds from the very first to the very last shot. So the AP article that said, oh, you know, crooks took a shot and was neutralized by snipers within seconds.

What they meant was 15.8 seconds, unless I have this story wrong. Next, we're going to look at these first three shots here so you understand how we can analyze the rest of them. And so here's the shot. This is the sonic crack. So that's the bullet is the blue arrows. And then the report is going to be the black arrow. So that's the crack thump. Crack thump, crack thump.

And of course, it was the first bullet that nicked Trump's ear. And again, let me get my thing here. Here's what it sounds like. Okay. So now I've just isolated the sound. There it is. Okay. Whoops, sorry.

One last time just to make sure we're hearing this right. There's 0.22 seconds between the crack and the thump and knowing a little bit about the type of the bullet that was used. in the caliber of it and the air conditions and things like that, you can estimate the distance of the shooter and how far away the shooter was. So that 0.2-2-second gap between the crack and the thump is very important because it helps us identify that a gun is being shot from that distance. If there were any other lengths, like if we saw a crack thump, crack thump, crack,

we would clearly see that that was two separate weapons, assuming the first and the last crack thumps were the same distance apart. So if there's any variation between the crack and the thump, that's when you say, oh, that's a different weapon. So that's one way. The other way is just the tenor. There's just the sound of the weapon. Does it sound different? Now, this is interesting.

This woman here had put up a video on TikTok. I really wish we could get the unaltered, I call it unmolested. I don't need all the words put on there. And it's not a consistent video, so there's edits in there. So I can't, if it ran from beginning to end, we could tell more. But I'm suspecting that we can tell a lot from it. So we're going to bring it up here because this is one of the videos, only videos that I know about that shows, I think, the first stand victim getting shot. So here we go.

Inside of Trump. I'm over on the far right or far left of Trump. These are the same bleachers. Watch the top left. These are the same exact bleachers. These are to the left of Trump. They came those shots. Okay.

What I've done here is, so I just want us to look at, I just pulled out that one tiny section. You can clearly see a bullet careening off of this railing up here, and it does it with enough force to atomize and vaporize. And so I think this is an important clue. We'll see. So let's just look at that over and over again. Do you see that? Again, do you see that and again. So you can clearly see this shot happening.

Now, this gentleman who's right, and get my laser pointer back, this gentleman right here is in a very, very distinctive American flag shirt of some kind. You can see him hunch over there a little bit, and I'm pretty sure that that shot that you see careening off the rail struck him first. And the reason I think that struck him first because we showed this before is from this video that's after the fact you're on the right side of the stands. You can see he's being brought down. And you can see here he's holding,

I'm getting my laser pointer back, he's holding his right chest. Guys, I fast-worded that just for a minute because I know you guys could not see what he's talking about, but he's specifically talking about a bleacher set that is to the left of Trump. This is where the bullet actually hits one of the railings and vaporizes technically,

although it obviously does put shrapnel into the person that was standing right next to the rail. I wanted to let you guys hear that at the very least because going into this next section, this is what he talks about here. And by the way, this guy's channel is peak prosperity. I think he does a great job at breaking a lot of the shots or the shot sounds down. but we're going to now get into some more of the audio of the shots. Here you go. All right.

So this is plausible for the first shot then. Okay. We see here if this is, if the shots came from the rooftop shooter first, then comes here, comes across the podium. Trump would have been standing right about there and could have struck somebody standing in the back right

where that gentleman was with a flag shirt who got hit. So that's entirely plausible, but except it's a little bit more consistent with a rising shot, because if we put the podium at about three and a half feet, four, let's call it four, we'll put Trump at six foot three, but take three inches off. So 10 feet, 10 feet, that bullet goes whizzing by his ear. But if that's, if, if, this is why we need all the trajectories, that's why we need all this mapped out. That's why we need an absolute accounting of every single shot taken. And if that was the first shot that struck that gentleman, okay?

And that's why if I had that unmolested video and I could piece it in, I could tell you exactly. So hold this as just a bunch of conjecture until we have more. But if that gentleman was struck by the same bullet that took Trump's ear, that means that thing must have been on a rising trajectory because Trump's at 10 feet. And then further back, this guy, his chest is probably at 13, 14 feet. It's up and it's higher in the air. that would have been more consistent with a shot fired from lower down that was then rising instead of a shot fired from the roof, which would have been declining in coming down. We're going to, I'm giving you this because this is going to be in a few slides, you're going to see why I'm making a point about this.

Yeah, and I want to pause here just for a second and just to explain what he's talking about. So where the shots coming from, which is where the building that crooks was killed at or killed on top of, right? you had crooks that was killed on top of this building you also had access to windows below that right so what he's saying here is is that obviously if this guy was hit at at least four for sorry at at least 14 feet so if trump is standing technically at about 10 foot off the ground you had this gentleman that was in a stand that was struck by the first bullet which is about 15 feet somewhere around there so yes it absolutely 100% makes sense that that would be an upper trajectory bullet, meaning that the shooter would have been shooting from a lower position

than where Trump actually was, and therefore the bullet was going from a lower position to a higher position. But the way everything has been told is that Crooks was on the roof. He shot Trump from the higher angle, whereas the bullet is going downward. And so that's what we've all been told. But this theory is very interesting. Let's continue. So the audio from video one, when we look at it here, the first three shots we can make complete sense of.

Tunk, tunk, tunk, okay, fine. Then there's a fourth shot that arrives, and it does so with a bullet and a report at 0.212 seconds, close enough for government work here or, you know, rough analysis. Here's another bullet and a report, so that's the snap crack. There's echoes. We see there's echoes. So the bullet makes it, and then the sound is echoing probably off of the, you know, one of the buildings. We have a lot of flat surfaces back there. So the microphone is here.

Supersonic crack. And the crack makes it to the microphone and then it echoes off of something. And so we see the crack and an echo. We could probably very, very accurately estimate how far away that flat surface is off of that echo. And then you get the report itself. Crack thump. Crack thump. So shots four and five, I'm still pretty good with shots four and five in terms of being able to make sense of them from from six on man it gets all kinds of weird all kinds of weird and i'm not going to take you through the weirdness from video one to try and resolve what's happening with those other shots we're now going to turn to video two this really clarifies everything and makes the entire case so we'll listen to it up through the

shots which is about 20 seconds of tape yeah i won't take you through all the screaming and everything and by the way, not for nothing. But screaming, I don't understand people who just start screaming and then just don't stop in an event like this. So listen past this. It's a little, it's, you know, there's a lot of, a lot of screaming going on. But you can clearly hear shots one, two, and three. And then you can hear the other string of shots to come out. We're going to analyze it.

I'll break it down. We'll take a look at it. However, I do want to pre-stage this a little bit for yourself, decide for yourself, do strings does one, two, and three, did they sound the same at all compared to the other ones that you hear? Okay. And remember, we already have the analysis from audio experts elsewhere saying there's a difference between weapon A and weapon B. And I can show you that the rounds fired from weapon B were also aimed at the stage. Okay, so this is important. Two weapons. One fires a string of three, another fires a string of five or six, depending on how we count, and off they go. And they were also

out hitting the crowd and headed towards Trump. Okay? This is important because now we do not have a lone gunman anymore. Okay. So listen up. Here we go. And then that one more. That's the six I'm unclear on.

Let's listen to this again. Muffled and then, right? That's what I hear. I want to stop just for a second because to me what that sounds like, obviously is another weapon that is definitely not the same weapon as the first three shots. And the other thing is there is an echo immediately from the actual shot. So almost makes it sound like potentially it was being shot from inside of a building where that

echo from inside the building was echoing out, which is where you hear almost that canister sound that's coming out, right? But obviously, everyone that has ears can tell those sounds are very, very different. Absolutely. And they're taped on the very exact same phone. Yeah, for sure. Let's get in a little more of this, and then we'll move on to, especially some of the things Christopher Ray said in his hearing, but let's move on. A lot of screaming. Okay, so let's analyze this now. Let's go into this with a little bit more depth. So video two, the way I score it, there's about 16.0 seconds from first to last shot, so very consistent with what we're experiencing on the first audio. So that's nice. They kind of line up pretty well. and here's the whole audio from all that screaming and the shots from video two.

We have in blue the first three shots here. We have more shots here from a second weapon. I'm not sure about this one. It has a very different sound that we heard. And here's the final last shot, which I believe is from, oops, sorry, don't have my thing. You don't know what I'm pointing at. This is the five that make a very distinct sound.

Here's one with a very different. And these are just audio files, by the way, guys, is all he's showing. So it's just showing a blue waveform, just depict. where the sounds are, what they look like, don't really look that much different. You don't have to see this to understand what he's talking about. Back in it, that's the sixth shot in the string.

And then here we have the final last one, which I think is the sniper weapon, which is probably the one that put the bullet just over the left eye of crooks on the roof. So we're going to take a closer look at the blue, the red, the blacks here, and listen to these things. But once again, let's just listen very carefully.

And we'll go back and forth until you're certain of this yourself. Here's just the first three shots from that video. I haven't done anything. No audit. I haven't done any enhancements. This is both both of these video, uh,

audio pieces are exactly pulled straight from the video itself. Nothing else. I haven't boosted any. I haven't done any filtering. Raw files. Okay. So, and, and by the way, every instinct in me was to try and minimize all the screaming.

But I was like, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, that just, like, what did you do? And then there's questions. These are raw files. Here's one, two, and three to start. Okay, listen to that again. And one more time. Okay. Now let's listen to the next string.

Ooh. Yeah. Hear that? So, sick sounds different to me, but here's a fun, here's an interesting thing. One, two, and three, besides being muffled and further away, it doesn't have echoes. Here we have, this is a shot here, this one, this peak. Darn it, I don't have my thing up again. Here we go.

So this here's a shot. This is an echo. very clearly an echo, in a shot in an echo, and a shot in an echo. So this is actually critical evidence, because you hear that there's echoes coming off. So that also allows us, again, to analyze where was this gun? But first up, we just have an absolutely different sound between the first three. There's no echo. It's much further away.

It's more muffled. It's just not in the same place at all. but these next ones very different sound totally different weapons okay full stop we have two separate weapons plus we have no echoes

coming off of the first three and then we do have echoes coming off of the next set and that last one that's different and that's not the sniper shot the sniper shot is another 10 seconds later so I don't know what number six is here but we're just going to bookmark it for now

and go on so all right so that's basically the analysis guys you hear obviously the here right and although he does say that the that these that's what is it the four or five and six shots are are closer they may be right I mean it does sound closer right but at the same time depending on where that gun is being fired from and I believe if I'm not a hundred percent mistaken I think he was playing that from video too which is kind of further back from where the stage is so it wasn't right up on the stage where this video was actually taken but that still

potentially could have been, you know, in line with if someone would have taken a shot from the building inside. And we knew, you know, we also knew that that building supposedly had this sniper team in it all day since 1030 that morning. Right. And they also had a sniper team on the second floor that was overlooking the building that supposedly Crook shot from the roof on, right? They could have seen him and shot him with a pistol. Yeah. But right before Crook started shooting. for some reason they got called on the radio and they said you guys need to go find him so then they go and look for this guy meanwhile this guy's getting on the roof it's almost like perfectly coordinated with whoever was was doing this yep and i'm assuming that someone of probably higher stature or you know or i guess you can say higher rank told whoever was in the overlooking room everybody go look for him you do not stay in there don't even leave one guy in there everybody go go look for him everybody go look for him you do not stay in there don't even leave one guy in there everybody go look for him. I think they said they had three people in that building at a time. You

couldn't have left one person? Yeah, and that's a big no-no that they were talking about during all the committee meetings. You never leave a post. You always have one, someone, staying at that post. Yeah, no, you're exactly right. Now, there's a lot of weird stuff, but Thomas Massey, I think he did

an amazing job asking some questions to the FBI director, Ray. I want to play that for you guys, and I want you to hear what some of the question was from Representative Massey. It is good to have Mr. Massey back with us today. Some of us had a chance to go to Kentucky over the last few weeks and visit with Thomas and his family and hear all kinds of wonderful stories about Rhonda. Amazing, amazing lady, gentle spirit. And we're glad to have Mr. Massey back

with us. And the next five minutes belong to you, Congressman. Thank you, Chairman. Director Ray, how many counter-sniperes were present at the rally that day and which of the counter-sniper's took the shot that took out the would-be assassin? I don't have the number of counter-sniper. I know it was the Secret Service counter-sniper who took the shot that eliminated the shooter. We've conducted a number of interviews, including of him. So was it one of the two that we see in the videos on top of the roof, or was it a different location that was shot?

I'm afraid I don't have that at my fingertips here. Okay. You mentioned that the would be assassin bought a five-foot ladder. You have a credit card evidence of that. But it looks like... By the way, that was the first lie because obviously the FBI director, Ray, knows exactly who took the shot. And he knows exactly what still image and video image that Massey's referring to here. Now, and listen when he's talking about the ladder, too.

Remember, this is a whole big thing going on because first they said there was a ladder. Now they're saying there's not a ladder. They even had the ladder in their possession. And then when the people were going up the ladder right after he was dead, they went up a ladder. Yeah, because they were like, how do we get up here? Oh, here's a ladder. Okay, we'll just climb the ladder.

Yeah. And so I think this is the clip that he specifically says, I think he says no about the ladder in this clip. I believe this is a clip. Here you go. The scene, there was a larger ladder that he might have used. Do you know which ladder he used to get to the roof and do you have possession of that five-foot ladder? and the other ladder, and do you know how the taller ladder got to the scene? So this whole business about the ladder is something we're drilling into more.

We do have possession of the five-foot ladder that he purchased close in time to his attempted assassination, that we've traced the purchase of that ladder from a receipt, a bloodied receipt that he had on him at the time his body was recovered on the roof. We do not yet know for sure how exactly he got up on the roof. We're looking at various forensic pieces to try to kind of piece that together, so more to come on that. Do you know where the five-foot ladder was found or retrieved? It's near the roof or was it still in his vehicle?

Neither. I don't have it in front of me, but I know that it was not on scene, and I know that it was not in his vehicle, but we can circle back to you and give you that. Is there any evidence at all that he may have been in contact with somebody else before this occurred that may have had any prior knowledge

or may have helped him plan this event? Well, needless to say, that is a question that we're intensely focused on because that would obviously be incredibly meaningful. So far, underline, so far, we have not found any evidence of any accomplices or co-conspirators foreign or domestic. And you're using geolocation data to see if his cell phone was near another cell phone, I presume? Right. We're doing lots of different kinds of cellular analysis, geolocation stuff, looking at his accounts.

He, from everything we've seen, which is consistent with what we've learned in interviews, a lot of people describe him as a loaner. That does kind of fit with what we're seeing in his devices. You know, his list of contacts, for example, is very short, you know, compared to what you would normally see from most people. So it doesn't appear to be a whole lot of interaction between him, you know, face-to-face or digital with a lot of people. Okay, thank you.

That doesn't mean there's not any, and that's why we're drilling into. We're trying to talk to anybody who's had any engagement with him whatsoever, digital, you know, in-person, classmates, co-workers, right, etc. Yeah, he probably had a list of no contacts because it was probably a phone that was given to him that was set up through somebody or some agency, who knows. But I do want to share a quick news as well that just recently, the gun club that he went to is a 1700-acre gun club. And I'm talking about crooks.

The gun club that he went to is predominantly used by the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, ICE, various other federal law enforcement agencies used this 1,700-acre complex. Now, I'm not saying there's anything weird about that, but it is strange, at the very least. And it's also strange that he had a bloodied receipt in his pocket with this ladder, but the ladder was not there. Was it set up? Was it put there for a reason for him, you know, to fool people? I don't get that at all. Yeah.

Yeah, it's absolutely ridiculous. And yeah, I mean, I think that the receipt was put there more than likely to fool people. I even think that if you listen to the body cam footage of when law enforcement goes to the ladder and then they climb up the ladder. And then as they're sitting there saying specifically how many rounds there were, how many cartridges there were, you know, I'm thinking either they were put there, either he specifically put them there because maybe that was part of his task. Hey, listen, when you get up there, make sure you put these shell casings on the ground or nearby, which is maybe why it would explain why the shell casings were on both sides of him. Maybe he had put the casings he was supposed to put down on one side of him, not thinking that when he shoots, the other casings are going to go the other side, right?

What I would love to know is if he is the one that shot the first three shots, for example, I would love to know where the casings were when they were found, where there are three cases on the right side and whatever on the other, you know what I'm saying? Five on the other side or whatever. Where would it be? Right. And so that is the very interesting thing. Now, there was also something that Chris Ray, I think his name's Chris Ray, the FBI director, said in a statement, I want to play this because this has to do with the shots fired by crooks and how Ray responds this is very interesting.

This just came in. We have Chris for Ray here saying this. And this is astonishing to me. Just astonishing. Did crooks fire eight shots? We have recovered eight cartridges on the roof. Did you hear that? Did crooks fire eight shots?

We have recovered eight cartridges on the roof. Okay. If you don't know this, that's fine. But for everybody who knows anything at all about guns and bullets, and cases and cartridges and who's in law enforcement, who's a career law enforcement person. This is simple. I can't believe what he just said.

We can't even get precision on the most basic of answers. Hey, Mr. Ray, how can we trust you to be running a comprehensive investigation when you can't even, like, get the basics right, okay? The basics are a cartridge consists of several parts. You have the bullet on top. You got the case itself. You got the powder, right? You got the primer, you know, you got some things.

That's a cartridge, right? These are cases, right? This is spent brass, spent shells. It's brass, right? So he should have said we recovered eight spent shells or eight cases from the roof, not cartridges, right? So Edward Baker pointed this out to me right away. He said, FBI Director Ray, we recovered eight cartridges on the roof.

Well, his heart sank because they're involved in the cover up. Listen, a quick pro tip for the FBI in case you. And I want to point out that's not even what I was thinking when he said this, right? But what I specifically heard him say was more so on the lines of, did he shoot eight shots? And he said, we recovered eight cartridges on the roof. Yeah, he did not answer that question. Right. So if he didn't answer that question, that leads me to believe, number one, he didn't want to be caught in a very easily lie to prove if the information ever gets out, right?

And, you know, and although, yes, he did say cartridges versus casings is, you know, I'm, I'm assuming he probably meant casings there, but nonetheless. But it was just interesting that he didn't say that the eight casings came from his gun. Yeah, it's very weird. They just found them. Yeah. So, like, it just gets weirder, right? I mean, everything, it just continues to get weirder.

But also, then Chris Ray said that potentially Trump actually was never shot at all. And so then Newsweek, the fake news media outlet, because I call them that they, they, they, have the most ridiculous stories all the time. They ran with a story, but this was Jim Jordan questioning Ray, and this is what he had to say. All eight bullets to go is, I guess, of my question. I don't have that in front of me. I'm happy to circle back and get that to you. It's assuming we have that information yet.

As I said, I think with respect to former President Trump, there's some question about whether or not, it's a bullet or shrapnel that, you know, that hit his ear. So it's conceivable, although as I say here right now, I don't know whether that bullet, in addition to, you know, causing the grazing could have also landed somewhere else. But I believe we've accounted for all of the shots and the cartridges. So there you go. And he said cartridges again, though. But it is strange, right?

He's now saying, well, we don't know if Trump was actually shot or not. So, you know, I mean, let's just forget about this whole thing, guys. I mean, he didn't actually even get shot. so no worries at all. Now, obviously this is getting more and more interesting, especially when you hear the shots and you hear the very, very, very distinct differences in the shots, right?

I mean, to me, 100%, the first three sound completely different than the next three, right? Yeah, and the story is totally laid out for you. It's just interesting that three shots sound different than the five shots. At the same time, the guys on the second story building were told to leave. and it sounded like the shots could have been coming from the building.

Yeah, you're absolutely right. Now, I want to play you guys another clip. There's some people that hate her, some people who love her, Marjorie Taylor Green. She went on Alex Jones to talk about the deep state coup to try to kill Trump. And we got to talk a little bit more about that on the backside. There's so much showing cover here. The police in Pennsylvania, according to the police commissioner, they did not have a timeline either. So yesterday, Kimberly Cheatel said that she doesn't have a timeline of events.

And then today, the police commissioner from Pennsylvania said that he does not have a timeline of events, which is so ridiculous. The timeline is out there. It's easy to figure out based on all the video footage. People have the timeline. And here's what we do know. We do know that this guy, Thomas Crooks, was on everyone's radar 59 minutes before President Trump was shot. We also know that 18 minutes before President Trump took the stage that emergency services took a picture of Thomas Crooks and they sent that picture to the Secret Service. That's what the police commissioner revealed to us in our hearing just within the past hour.

I asked him specifically in my questioning, I said, who did they send this picture to? It was 18 minutes before President Trump took the stage. He said the picture was sent to Secret Service, and they were given a phone number to call and let them know about Thomas Crooks. And then Thomas Crooks was able to get his way on top of the AGR building, and he was on the roof. and then police right there on the scene one of them was hoisted up. The police commissioner said one of them was hoisted up

and he peered over the roof and I saw it as an eyewitness, saw Thomas Crooks there with the gun. This was also before President Trump took the stage. The question that everybody should be demanding to know is why was President Trump ever allowed to take the stage? I just came out of the Homeland Security Committee hearing where we have been questioning the police commissioner from Pennsylvania,

just asking all the questions that we possibly can. He told our committee that he does not have an official timeline. That's the same answer that the former director of Secret Service, Kimberly Cheedle, told us yesterday that she did not have a timeline. However, we have a timeline. Our oversight committee, we were given a timeline yesterday. Timelines are widely available. ordinary people have been able to put together a timeline, and it's easy to do based on all the

video evidence. The very serious nature and questions that we have is the communications between the local police and Secret Service. And it seems to be there's a lot of problems there. We also want to know who was in charge of the advance team for Secret Service. Kimberly Cheatel refused to tell us that yesterday when I questioned her. And then the other thing that I asked her was there a stand-day, down order given. And I think that was the appropriate answer to ask. No matter what the mainstream media says, no matter what the Democrats say about us, no matter the labels that they give us calling us conspiracy theories,

you want to know something, the government has failed the American people so badly and continues to do so on a daily basis. It is right to ask them these questions because looking from the outside and not having the information, it is easy to come to conclusions that this was a safe. up. And no one believes that this 20-year-old Thomas Crooks was able to pull this off by himself. And if he did this by himself, then the logical conclusion is that Secret Service is such a failure. And there were so many failures from the advanced team all the way through the day of the rally that they aren't capable of protecting President Trump's life. And that should scare everyone.

So it's either one or the other. And we deserve answers to our questions. All right, guys, that was Marjorie Taylor Green that was just speaking about, you know, is this a conspiracy? Was this a setup? Or is the Secret Service just that incompetent? Well, it was just interesting that she said 18 minutes from when the cops saw crooks on the building. And he actually said he pointed the gun at him as well. 18 minutes before Trump came on stage. Why did they not call him off then?

Because Trump was talking to Fox and Friends the other day. And he said, this happens all the time with weather. You know, if we have, you know, lightning or thunder or something, they'll say, Mr. President, do you mind if we wait 10, 15 minutes to bring you on? He said that happens all the time. So why didn't it happen then when they had 18 minutes before he went on the stage to say, Mr. President, we need you to stand down for just, you know, a few minutes until we get this under control? Another thing I want to talk about, too, is when she was talking about him being a 20-year-old and how could he be a lone, you know,

gunman, you also have to look into what else is going on with this whole thing, especially the three overseas accounts they found in his name. One in Grand Cayman and two other, I can't remember where they were. But it was like over a million dollars worth of money. How does a 20-year-old have a million dollars in accounts that are overseas? I didn't even know he had the money over there, but I think it was, and I think they had said they were encrypted accounts. So it was very hard to even access to see what they were, how they were encrypted, why

they were encrypted the way they were. obviously he was funded by someone more than likely that says hey you pull this off or you help us be a part of this we'll give you all the money you want we'll make sure you'll get out of there you know no no strings attached although obviously you know that's never going to happen when you get in a situation like this but i just think he was a useful idiot that day and i think he was just a patsy or a he was a pawn for their assassination attempt and fortunately he or whoever missed because obviously it was more than one shooter well and this is interesting too when you say one more more than one shooter is when they said they shot them he also or shot crooks they said they had one detained yeah and they kept saying that who was the person that was detained because we've never seen anyone that was detained well there were also reports that there were someone on the water tower right you get to that video you guys can go check out the water tower video i'm sure the easiest place to probably find that is on x but you know right around the time of the shooting right when the shooting starts when that first three shots ring out you see a black

figure because the top of the water tower has like it almost looks like a cap on top of it and so it i would say that cap is probably somewhere in the neighborhood of like 10 to 15 foot cap and so as soon as the first three shots start ringing out you see a black figure because it is very blurry because it's you know you're you're having to zoom in on the water tower area in a normalized picture or or video i guess i should say that's not even focusing on that water tower and then you start to see this dark figure come out from that cap to the side. And I don't know if, I mean, I don't know who it was. I don't know what it was.

But at the very least, it doesn't necessarily sound like that would have been the shooter for those fourth, fifth, and six shots because that's a much further distance away than where the building was the crooks was shot on. To me, sorry, to me, it just sounds like whoever potentially that second shooter was was more than, likely in that building or somewhere around that building. Was it a team that was put in place that was supposedly secret service or supposedly some other team and they weren't actually even law enforcement at all. Maybe they were an intelligence. The ATF guy. Maybe they were intelligence agents.

We don't know. I mean, we, and I don't think most people understand how complex things like this they can do. I mean, it's not kindergarten for them. It's, and, and although it looks like a complete mess and like a cluster because they were, expecting Trump to be dead. And I say they, whoever's responsible for this, they were expecting Trump to be dead now, right? And although if Trump was dead, at least they accomplished that part, regardless of how it looks, and it may look very messy, right?

But we got to remember about the JFK files, right? We still don't have all the files from JFK. Still don't. And will we ever, will we ever actually know what happened to JFK, more than likely not? Because what they want you to believe is it was this one shooter, Lee Harvey Oswald. And then Lee Harvey Oswald was then killed by Jack Ruby, which never made sense to me either. Jack Ruby obviously was implanted in this situation to kill Lee Harvey Oswald because I think the problem was for Lee Harvey Oswald and the CIA was that Lee was wanting to talk. And he was about to go off and say this is bullshit, whatever.

So they had to kill him, right? There was no way they could get around that. And we also, I mean, you know, in situations like that, we don't know. what they're promising these people. I mean, we don't know how much brainwashing they've already put them through. And these people may believe they're going to go off and live on an island and, you know, live the rest of their life millionaires. And maybe that's why he had so much money potentially in his accounts because they're like,

look, we're going to go ahead and give you the money. And as soon as this is done, we're going to make sure your ass is out of there and you're gone, right? And another thing, too, about that that was very strange is the two different vehicles that he supposedly was driving. Was he driving the van or was he driving another vehicle? because there was a van that was parked way off. Well, he had a bicycle. He had a bicycle, but then there was also two vehicles that they had pointed out.

And one was a regular car and one was a van. And I believe the van was the one with all the explosives. So whose car was whose? And did he drive two cars and a bike? I mean. Yeah. And if I'm not mistaken, the van is what actually had the explosives in it. He had on him from what their initial reports.

Yeah, was the alpha firing system, which is a firing system that is used for, pyrotechnics, fireworks, stuff like that. And so it's all very strange. There's no way this guy did it himself. There's no way he didn't have help. And there's no way that it's one shooter. I think that we've made that very clear at the very least throughout this process. I think we've got four episodes on this now.

And by the way, I do encourage all of you to go back and listen to all of our other episodes on this particular incident, the Trump assassination attempt. I want to play another quick little clip. Ray says that there were at least two instances where FBI officials or someone expressed that maybe they were sorry that Trump actually didn't get killed that day. Check this out. And this was in the hearing. In 2016 and 2015, top FBI officials infamously texted about, quote, their insurance policy to make sure Trump was never elected or inaugurated as president. Have any FBI agents texted email or expressed disappointment that Trump survived the assassination, assassinations?

attempt or otherwise editorialized about the assassination attempt? I don't know about any agents. There have been at least two instances, I think, or one instance of an individual who posted something that I consider outrageous and totally inappropriate and unacceptable. And that individual has been referred to our inspection division, which is the arm, our sort of internal affairs investigatory arm that does the disciplinary process. Okay. Will you report back to this committee?

Any other incidents? I'll do my best to share information. No, he will not just so you know. There's your answer for that. But I mean, it's also not surprising. The FBI, they are trying to make it a woke agency. They've been trying to do this since Biden has come in. They tried to do it under Obama.

And that's what's so funny is how everyone is talking about Trump's project 2025 is going to be the worst thing to ever happen to America. the reality of what Project 2025 actually is is a goal to try to actually achieve things while Trump is in office if he gets elected president to where it takes out a lot of the deep state actors and Democrats and the far left extremists that are in bureaucratic positions, agencies, so on. It's exactly what the Democrats have done under Obama, under the Biden administration, but it's not even nearly as extreme as what they have done. I mean, and look at our military. They're trying to, you know, we have military commercials now that have pride flags in them and trans stuff and all this craziness. And this is what they're doing to all of our agencies.

That is what is so damn crazy. Now, while we're, while we're pretty much done with some, most of the updates anyway for the Trump thing, I did want to point out one other thing, right? A lot of people have been talking about whether or not Biden is dead. Is he still alive? he did finally address the nation the other night and when he addressed the nation he looked taller he looked a lot healthier for some reason he walks completely different he walks pretty good actually and there was a lot of people that zoomed in on his hands and his hands

look nothing like 80 year old hands number one i mean they look they look like pretty good hands uh his you know they said it was live it wasn't because you can see on his watch i think his watch said like six o'clock or something and The speech happened at 8 p.m. Eastern time. And so just another lie, right? I mean, the government always lies to us. Why would they stop now? There are also some zoom-ins on some of the background of Biden's speech.

It shows distortions in the window. There's all kinds of stuff. And obviously, if we think about AI and how much it's advancing. Now, we've already talked about how long has the military and government had AI. Well, I can tell you it's a lot longer than what the public has had AI, right? They've had access to AI and far more advanced AI for a very long time. But it doesn't always just have to be AI. It can literally be a physical, you know, a physical body double or a face prosthetic, whatever the case may be.

And we're going to get into that clip in just a second. Yeah. And it's interesting because all three events when we've either heard or seen from Biden, and he's not been the same person. When he came on Kamala's. He looks different. When she was at the headquarters and he came on on the phone call, there was a lot of speculation that that was AI. and people even put it in some kind of AI device and it was like 85% sure.

906% or 96% sure that was AI and it really wasn't him. And then when we see him getting into the car to get to board the plane, the first time he gets in the car, he looks like he's about dead. And barely can even get into the car and they're trying to scoot him over and everything. But then when we see him three days later, he gets in the car. He's perfect. No, it was no, it wasn't three days later. When was it?

No, when he looked dead, yeah, when he looked dead, I think it was. the same day. Oh, maybe it was the same day. But what I'm saying is when he got out, he was fine. He got out. He, uh, people were trying to get him over to come talk. He would refuse to talk at all. He yelled something, but couldn't hear his voice. And he walked straight up that plane without any trouble. Yeah. And he walked. And then saluted and waved. He was not like the same bind and we've been seeing. Yeah. Well, I mean, but the reality too is that, you know, he, his gates different, right? I mean, someone's gate is unmistakable. That is one way that you can pick someone out of a crowd,

how they walk. And it's very hard to get rid of that gate, right? You can try and you can do it, but you've got to be on it and you've got to practice it all the time to get rid of your gate. I mean, it's very similar to a voice or how you say certain things or, you know, the way your eyes look and all this stuff. All of that are tell, tell signs of who you are. That is part of you.

And a gate of how you walk is very, very particular, especially when you're senile. And the number one thing you always see with Biden is he's shuffling his feet. Right. I mean, it's just like a lot of older people do that. And it's like my mom because she has bad knees. So she's very stiff and she shuffles her feet. But he was not shuffling his feet this last time.

Mm-hmm. It was very interesting. No, you're right. So Ian Carroll released a video recently. It's a short video, but I want to point this out because Ian always does a great job. We've had Ian on the show on X many times. And I do encourage all of you to. to go follow Ian Carroll on X, go follow him on TikTok.

Also, while you're there, follow good old investigator with podcast. If you, if you wouldn't mind, we are on X in Facebook. We also have a telegram chat to where we chat with all of our people. We just had an episode with three of our listeners just the other day. It was a really fun time. We want to do more of that in the future. But here is a recent piece of work from Ian Carroll talking about the CIA has had technology for over 40 years to basically.

bottle or body double or prosthetic face someone and you would never know the difference listen to this you guys ready for another wild conspiracy this is one of those ones that just can't be true but it's obviously true oh this one's inspired by joe biden being missing for five days resigning from his campaign through a ex post that was not on stationary and with a weird signature no one really knows what's going on there dig into it for yourself and then he appears um first public appearance in a while he's apparently not sick anymore he's looking great and And everyone's commenting on how he like, his back looks hunched. He looks like he's really sick or something.

But I was noticing something really different. See if you can notice what I'm noticing here in just a second. All right. He's walking up the stairs. All right. He's walking up the stairs. He's like, he's charging. And now listen, I'm not implying anything.

I'm just saying this is a thing in the real world that you should be aware of as you watch what's going on today and making your own assessments about reality. The CIA has been using Mission Impossible skin masks like on your face for like 40 years. Tony Mendez is famous for pioneering that work. This is from Legacy of Ashes, one of the best sourced histories of the CIA ever written. Here's another one from Surprise to Kill Vanish, written by Annie Jacobson. This is a direct accounting from Billy Woff, a special forces slash CIA operative that was wearing a dink of disguise back in 89 to disguise himself as like an African dude. He talked about how his mask didn't fit very well back in, like, 89.

If you haven't already seen the footage of the CIA's ex-discise chief, talking on TED Talk stages and stuff about when she briefed President H.W. Bush in the White House Oval Office, wearing one of these disguises and he didn't realize it. I got some news for you. The office I worked in was like the Q in James Bond, one, I mean, one that has to stand out. I went to the White House. Mm-hmm. And I briefed George H.

W. Bush, the president, at the time, while I was wearing a full face mask. So we're sitting like this close together, and I'm telling him that I'm going to show him the best disguise that we have. And he's looking for a bag like, where is it? I said, well, I'm wearing it. And I'm going to take it off. My husband was Tony Mendes, and he was played by Ben Affleck and the movie called Argo. aliens and robots yes sir you're telling me that there is a movie company right now that is funded by the CIA

yes sir are there many actors in Hollywood who also moonlight as agents do you think I think there probably quite a few yes I think probably Hollywood is full of CIA agents and we just don't know it and I wouldn't be surprised at all to discover that you know this was extremely common

they didn't mention it in the movie but Tony had deep connections to Hollywood, to the tradespeople out in L.A. That did a lot of things we were interested in doing. Well, L.A. did have some ideas, of course. That's what they do for a living. They introduced us to a new concept. They said, what you are calling an operation, we call a performance.

That's what we do. We put on performances. And before we start working on that performance, we have to initially, we have to define. the stage that the performance is going to take place on, then you have to know who your audience is, who are you playing to, who are you trying to fool. Then they showed us some tools that they used. The one that really caught our eye is what's called a stunt double mask. You all know how they're used when the movie star is so famous, or so good looking, that they can't risk damaging him.

We liked the idea of stunt double masks. They're quick on, the quick off, They dramatically change your appearance, and we started using them and found them to be valuable to our operations. But that audience piece of it did not allow you to get close enough to one of those masks before the illusion fell apart, and you saw it was a mask. So we went back to our disguise labs out at Langley, and we invented a whole new genre of masks. masks that are so good, that are so realistic that you can actually get up close and have a personal contact with someone for an extended period of time, they're good enough that you can brief the President of the United States in the Oval Office wearing a mask. And he isn't sure if it's you or if it's someone else. Those masks were the beginning of a whole new generation of work that we did at the CIA.

Once we could make these masks that fit you so well, then we discovered we could make a twin. We could make another you. There could be two of you. We could actually make five or six of you, but usually one extra was all we needed. So again, I'm not making any claims that one thing is real or one thing is not real. I'm just saying that those things exist and they can be used in the world today by intelligence agencies or anyone else that has access to that technology. So just factor that into your equations when you're thinking like what is the most likely possibility here is what I'm being told by the mainstream outlets likely or even possible at all? Or are there other possibilities that may be unlikely, but perhaps are more likely than whatever the hell is happening on your TV?

Joe, I know you're still on the call, and we've been talking every day. Yeah, so Kamala almost just said recording. So when Joe called in, by the way, on that whatever it was, campaign rally, whatever she wants to call it, You know, it just did, you know, it sounded kind of like Joe, but when you actually put the audio clip into the AI recognition software, it says it's 96% likely. It is AI. And so as you heard from Ian and the clips, the girl that was talking was the director of disguise for the CIA. And so that is who was talking. She knows very well how to disguise people.

And that was when she briefed the president, that was what back in the early 90s, late 80s, early 90s. So you're talking about how far has disguises even came from then to now. And so are we actually looking at Joe Biden or are we not? That's something we don't know. We just don't know. We have no clue. But this whole thing is very weird. He resigns from running for president.

Then he supposedly has COVID. Then he looks dead. And then he looks like he's walking perfectly fine. He doesn't address. Which I thought, yes, he did slur his words a little bit here and there. but they probably did that on purpose. But what is very, very interesting about that is just two or three days before that, he refused to resign.

He refused to do anything. He said he was going to run and he was going to win. And him and Joe were 100% sure that they would be Trump. He was all in. And then all of a sudden he resigns. And I feel like after the assassination attempt on Trump did not work, then they've decided to do not say, or whoever, decided they had to get rid of Biden somehow.

Yeah. And that's why all this is going on. For sure. Yeah. It's, I mean, it's bad shit crazy times we're living in. And I've said it again. I'll say it. I've said it before.

I'll say it again. It's a shit show. You better get ready, guys. We are just getting into August. We have some months to go before all hell, I think, breaks loose. You have the FBI director, Ray, saying that we are at a very heightened alert for potential terrorist attacks, whether it be foreign and domestic. He's saying that they're Iranian unit.

that are in the United States. There are other counterintellite, or not counterintelligence units, but other terrorist groups from other parts of the world that are also in the United States. But I wonder how they got here. It's probably the border that's been wide open

for four years is how they've got here. We've been calling this for so freaking long. We said, if you leave the border open long enough, everyone and anyone that hates America are going to be here. And I think we're starting to see it already. I think some of it is being disguised as pro-Palestinian protests,

anti-Israel protests. But when you're literally taking flags down from Washington, D.C., burning them, and then putting up Palestinian flags, also having ISIS flags, also saying Allah Akbar and shouting death to America and all this shit. These are a lot of the people that they're going to activate and use for terrorist events or even potentially some type of civil war, some type of civil unrest. November is not going to go off without a hitch. It's just not going to happen.

But I also want to ask you, who was in charge of the border this whole time? Yeah, well, not Kamal Harris, according to Kamala Harris's campaign. wasn't she in 2020? Yeah, she was the borders. She was the one that was put in charge of the border. And then once, you know, the media and everybody went after a year later and says she hasn't done a damn thing about the border. That's when now they're like, oh, well, she wasn't in charge of the border. Yeah, but apparently not because she didn't do a damn thing.

Although we know she was. And there are literal tweets of her saying, yes, I'm in charge of the border. I'm the border. I'm the borders are. People are posting those now because that's all she's doing is going out of there saying, Oh, no, we had nothing that. We never said she was that. We never said that.

It's absolute shit show is what it is. But guys, we're going to end this with Andrew Schultz and his video. It's a very good video. You don't have to look at anything. You've got to hear what he's saying. Andrew Schultz is a comedian. Probably many of you know who he is. But he summed up what is going on kind of right now eloquently, I guess you can say

and very funny. I think it's pretty damn funny. And then we'll close out with. even if my heart breaks. By loving caliber, guys. Until next time, we love you. Peace out. Biden is out and Kamala is in.

The election went from drool runnings to cool runnings faster and a female cop can fumble her firearm. Move over our FK. This November, we've got a new throat goat and apparently her headshots don't miss. Kamala Harris, or as we call her, Warhawk Tua, the half-black, half-Indian. Parents met at a 7-Eleven robbery

is officially the Democratic nominee. Surely the Dems, the party that calls Trump the end of democracy. Surely they allowed the voters to choose, Kamala, right? What? No? Wait, there's no right to choose? Guys, this is a presidential election, not a woman's body in Oklahoma. Now, I don't want to seem like a flat-earthing dinosaur denying,

believe-all-women conspiracy theorists, but it kind of feels like the Democrats dragged Biden's lifeless course through the campaign long enough to avoid a primary so they could place whoever they wanted as the nominee. And that's about as democratic as North Korea's got talent. Sidebar last year's winner Ching Chong Chessnut is 46 rats. Congratulations, Ching Chong. That's a lot of rats.

We'll look forward to seeing how many you eat next year. What I'm saying is they used a vegetable to install a plant. And honestly, we would have been happier with a fruit. But the reality is it doesn't matter. Last week, Trump became invincible, literally. He was leading before, and now he's not. number one with a bullet. At this point, if the Dems wanted to beat Thrifty Cent, they'd have to run George Washington. And Kamala could work for him. Paid. Paid. Now, why is Trump invincible? Because

he has the power of Hulkomania, obviously, brother with a hard R. And also, because this pimple-lipped, pug-faced in-cell, we'll call him a trench bulldog, tried to make Trump's brain public domain. Fortunately, even a bullet couldn't make Donald open-minded. Now, getting a shot off at the president must be an incredibly difficult thing to accomplish. I mean, not as difficult as finding binoculars to fit his eyes. Jesus, he looks like the sloth from Ice Age, but he must have designed a pretty ingenious plot to circumvent the Secret Service. And, oh, what's that?

Wait, you're saying that Herpy Potter was just walking around with a loaded gun like he was on an Alec Baldwin set? He was carrying a fucking ladder and a range finder. He propped it up on a building that had cops in it, positioned himself on the roof with a perfect sight line to the president, and no one did anything. anything? This Mickey Mouse security detail was so goofy it made Donald Duck. Oh, boy. Who was in charge of the Secret Service? A lady? Wait, what? Seriously? Well, of course she didn't have anyone on top of the building. Women only care about shots on a roof when there's a pool party. Now, I don't want to seem like a big foot

tracking, moon landing denying Jews don't control the weather conspiracy theorists, but it doesn't exactly feel like a 20-year-old fetal alcohol face McLevin should be able to infiltrate the most advanced security detail in history. I mean, the only other thing he's penetrated was his palm. Did Kim Cheeto hire Epstein's NyQuil Nightwatch? What the fuck is going on here? This just doesn't feel right. And that's the problem.

Nothing feels right. We have officially entered the post-truth age. We can't trust the media. We can't trust the government. We can't trust the pharmaceutical industry. We can't even trust the food we eat. So who can you trust? Me.

Your good friend, Chelsea. This episode has been brought. to you by Pfizer. There's no promo code. There's nothing to fill out. They're already inside you. But before we bitch wine and complain, just remember like it or not, this is what we asked for. We wanted

fast content that makes us feel good. We want politicians who lied to us. We want sugary food to fill us up and pills to slim us down. We don't want what's good for us. We want what's convenient. So we made our bed. Might as well get comfy.