Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - USAID Corruption | DOGE Exposes Deep State Bank Account

Episode Date: February 6, 2025

In this episode, we delve into the shocking revelations surrounding USAID’s agenda and the questionable use of U.S. taxpayer dollars. An audit involving Elon Musk and DOGE has uncovered staggering expenditures, ranging from funding gain-of-function research linked to Fauci’s NIH to various global programs focused on transgender initiatives and DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion). This appears to be more than just reckless spending—it’s being described as a financial pipeline for deep state operations. As the truth comes to light, political tensions are escalating, with many Democrats reacting strongly to these exposures. Tune in as we break down the details and discuss the implications of these revelations.

and welcome back to Investigator's podcast where we peel back the layers of deception and expose the truce hidden in plain sight. I'm Chad, joined by my beautiful wife and co-host, Sherry. On tonight's episode, we're diving headfirst into a story that's unraveling faster than the mainstream media can cover it up. For decades, the United States Agency for International Development, better known as USAID, has paraded around the world under the noble banner of humanitarian aid, building schools, funding health programs, supporting democracy. But what if I told you that behind this carefully crafted image lies a darker, more sinister reality?

What if USAID isn't just an aid organization, but a front for covert operations, regime change, and even funneling of taxpayer dollars into hands of terrorists and corrupt political networks? Thanks to the Department of Government Efficiency, also known as Doge, led by none other than Elon Musk, we're starting to see the cracks in USAID's pristine facade. Classified documents uncovered by DOGE investigators suggest that USAID has been operating as a shadow arm of the deep state, manipulating global events, funding extremist groups under the guise of development projects, and even channeling money into shady bio-weapons research overseas. This isn't just a speculation

or speculation at all, this is hard evidence that's been hidden from the American people for far too long. And here's the kicker. When Doge officials tried to expose it, USAID didn't cooperate. They shut down their website, wiped their social media, and even suspended their own security officials to cover their tracks. What are they hiding? And more importantly, why?

Tonight we're breaking it all down from the missing billions of taxpayer dollars to USAID's alleged role in the stabilizing foreign countries. governments and what this means for America's future. Is this the smoking gun that proves our government agencies have been weaponized against us, or is this the tip of the iceberg? Buckle up because what we're about to uncover might just change the way that you see not only USAIDs, but the entire global government system built to control us. Hey guys, welcome to the show.

It is February 5th, 2025. And on tonight's show, we're going to break down and talk about USAIDs. by D and Doge and Elon Musk and his team that is absolutely exposing corruption. This is something that most Americans for a very long time knew was happening. But if you said any of this stuff, you were a conspiracy theorist. And yet, now you have Doge that is exposing things that we never thought would ever be exposed by any administration in our lifetime. And now we're seeing this.

And there's a reason why the Democrats are absolutely melting down. Oh, they're not just melting down. They are crying. They are screaming in the streets and pretty much saying they want war. Doesn't it kind of seem like an insurrection to you in a way? I mean, why don't we go after them for being insurrectionists? But listen, they're going after Eon-Lon Musk, too. Like he's this most terrible person in the world.

But it's almost like they're shooting the messenger. All he's doing is opening up the files and seeing where all this corrupt money is going to. Don't shoot the messenger. Shoot yourself because you're the ones that I've been doing all this and taking all the money and stealing it from American taxpayers. Yeah, so Sherry's messages, yes, shoot yourself. That is funny, though.

But no, absolutely. You are 100% right. And actually, we have a video that we're going to play in just a little bit that really exposes that as far as they're trying to shoot the messenger. And it's because it is exposing their crimes. You know, all the people out there right now that are just screaming on camera. And these are actual either congresspeople, senators, you name it, in the government, they are screaming at people.

They're screaming in the camera saying, oh, my God, this is an insurrection. What Elon Musk and Doge is doing, he has no authority to do this. But the reality is that Donald Trump gave this department authority to go and look and audit all of these agencies to see what was going to be, uh, either, you know, validated versus not validated. What are we actually spending taxpayer dollars on? And I think for obviously most people in America, this is something that, you know, when you pay taxes, it sucks.

And there are, there's an entire show that you could do on the IRS and the fact how you get to pay taxes. Taxation is theft. The whole nine. But the reality is that if you do have to pay taxes, the American people should 100% know where taxpayer dollars. are going. That should be obviously very transparent.

And so what Elon Musk and Doge is doing is making this very transparent. So. And this transparency is ridiculous. Finding out what they're actually doing with our tax dollars is absurd. I mean, I'm talking about pottery classes in different countries or a, um, well, there's a trans opera. Yeah, trans operas. They're even using some of our tax dollars to help transgender in the Taliban.

Yeah. It's just crazy. I would never, ever think that in a million years. That's where our money is going to. There's actually a video with ISIS members that are doing interviews in this tent. And in the tent behind them, it says USAID. So this is where our taxpayer dollars has been going. Not only have we funded terrorist organizations, we have also alongside the NIH and Anthony

Falsy, we have funded gain of function research on the behest of the United States taxpayer dollars that eventually came back to kill many Americans, millions of Americans, with the pandemic of COVID-19. And not only that, you look at a lot of these weird companies all around the world, funding all of this crazy research. I'm talking about like rat hibernation research. And so they'll spend like $60 million for this. But if you look at the actual salaries going out of this, you know, this organization or

this funding, a lot of these. salaries are somehow usually connected to leftist politicians, whether that's their cousins, their daughters, whatever, and all it is is money laundering. That is what it is. So we got a lot to talk about on tonight's show. We're going to get into a lot of great videos. We have a lot of stuff for you guys. Welcome back to the show. Guys, I want to go ahead and say this because I often do not say this at the very beginning, but we are on social media. Please go follow us on our social media's X is where we are most active, Investigator's podcast. Go follow us there.

If you do not have X, I do suggest you actually get X if you don't. But if you do not and you don't want to, we do have Facebook. We do have Instagram. We're going to start posting more regularly to those platforms. And we do have TikTok for now. So without further ado, I want to get into our first video because Sherry, as you were saying, there has been, and I want to go ahead and say this before this video. this girl does have, you know, she has some foul language, but she makes a lot of great points.

And Elon Musk actually re-shared her video. Right. And so I want to make clear who this creator is because the person actually shared her video is not her, but I want to make sure you know who she is. Her name is Ellie May, and that is E-L-L-I-E, and then M-A-Y-N-S-E-E-E-T-E-E-E-M-A-N-S-E-E-E-E-M-A-N-S-E-E-E-M-E-A-W-E-E-E-W-E-E-E-E-W-E-E-E-E-W-E-E-E-E-W-E-E-E-E-E-R-E-E-E-E-M-E-E-S-E-E-E-E-E-T-E-E-E-C-L-E-E-R-E-E-E-R-E-E-E-L-E-E-R-E-R-E-E-R-E-R-R-E-L-E-E- fucking worse. Just 100%, no turnabout rate, nothing. It is just going downhill for the Democrats, dude. Can you please tell me? If someone, right, robbed a fucking bank, okay, let's just, let's talk about a hypothetical before we get into the real shit real quick. If someone robbed a bank,

someone watched a security footage, saw who robbed the bank, told you who robbed the bank, you caught who robbed the bank, are you going to be mad at the person that robbed the fucking bank or the person that told you you were being robbed? Okay, that's what's going on with Elon Musk right now. For those of you that don't understand, okay, Elon Musk was hired for the Department of Government Efficiency. What does the Department of Government Efficiency do? What is its main number one goal?

To make sure that our government is running efficiently, dumbasses? And here you are literally trying to shoot the fucking messenger because he is showing you that a lot of our money is being wasted. shit that is not needed. What type of fucking transgender opera do you need overseas? What type of all of these DEI inclusivity programs do you fucking need to be spending our money on overseas? And instead of being mad at the people that are stealing our fucking money and spending it 100% irresponsibly, you're mad at the man who told you you were being ripped the fuck off. You are a fucking cult member. Plain and simple. There is no saving for.

you. Okay, every single time you guys continue to peddle these lies, you are screaming more and more and more that you're a cult member. And the more and more you do it, the more and more the moderate Democrats are going to fucking leave you. Keep going. Keep fucking going. Show your utter stupidity. It's what you've been doing for four years. Keep it up. The rest of us are happy that we found out what we already knew that we were being robbed. It must be shocking for you to deal with facts, but they're going to keep coming out. Our government has wasted billions upon billions. billions of billions of fucking dollars for shit that is not important to American citizens. And you're mad at Elon Musk and not at your fucking representatives?

What are you fucking retarded? You have to be. So there you go. And that was her point. Ellie May makes a great point here. And what I don't understand with this whole thing. And we're going to get into what actually USAID does, who they fund, where the conspiracies with this is, because there are tons of them, by the way.

I mean, with everything. I mean, we're talking about mainstream media and how they have basically tried to brainwash the American public and overthrow governments and create terrorist organizations and fund the pandemics and utilize George Soros and Anthony Balchi and all of the conspiracies we've always talked about. Guess what? The USAID was their pocketbook. This was the funding where we always ask, where was this money either going to or going from. Not only did they use American taxpayer dollars via this fund, but they also potentially receive funds from globalist organizations or people such as George Soros, the World Economic Forum, you name it.

Whoever wanted to completely upend the American sovereignty, the values that America had, USAID was at the head of this. And now you look at these dumbass leftists, these extremists on the left, and you look at these people going out into public on camera, crying and screaming and just going crazy, literally calling for war because Elon Musk is exposing their illegal funds from American taxpayer dollars. And yet, like she said, you would think that they would like try to, you know, kind of chill out for a little while.

Right. And because they know what Donald Trump just had, he had a massive election. He won the popular vote, Congress, the Senate. everything and yet you're going to double down, triple down on what your thing is, which is basically screwing the American people. That is what you're going to triple down on is by coming out and saying, you know what, this is an insurrection because he is exposing the shit that we're screwing you guys on. Okay.

So Nancy Mace from South Carolina make an extremely important point today. She asked, does funding the Taliban to make them transgender help American people? What is your answer? No. Does funding a transsexual opera help American people? No. Does any of this that we're funding overseas help American people? If the answer is no, then we should not be funding any of this stuff.

Absolutely. Now, you're 100% right. And 97 to 98% of what USAID does does not help Americans in any way, shape, or form. And the reality of most of this is, is that even when it looks like they are trying to help the world in way of like humanitarian relief, especially when you start talking about the Clinton Foundation and how they worked with the Clinton Foundation in Haiti. And obviously, if you look at Haiti, Haiti's doing amazing. You know, they had gang takeovers. They're eating the cats and the dogs and the humans. Yeah, you get, you know, you remember barbecue, the guy that was, you know, kind of the leader of Haiti after they,

basically overthrown Haiti. But you have to remember that the Clinton Foundation was in Haiti many years ago. I think it was probably about 10 years ago to 15 years ago. Clinton Foundation went to Haiti. They had a lot of minerals and natural resources in which that the Clintons would have massively profited off of. They went down there, got funded millions and millions of dollars to go there. By the way, on the behest of the U.S.

USAID. And what did they do? They did nothing. Haiti did not improve. It actually got worse. And this was after the Clinton Foundation moved in there. And the Clinton Foundation is not just in Haiti. They are all over the world. And they work close quarters with USAID. Actually, it was not long after the Clinton Foundation and Obama and during that whole term, where the Clinton Foundation announced they wanted to start this humanitarian effort and aid. that's when USAID was created. So if you actually want to know and go back to where did USAID come from, what came from the Clintons and the Obamas where they figured out a way essentially to funnel money back to them

and back to their, you know, I don't know, colleagues or NGOs. That's how they created it. They created an organization a NGO because that's kind of what the USAID is. It's not a government actual agency. It is an NGO that's very closely connected to the government. And it was started not long after the Clinton Foundation started saying, hey, we got to go out there and help the people around the world because we care so much about the people of the world. I mean, we don't give a shit about our own people.

But we really want to help other people, especially in countries that they can't do anything about. And then we can also hide how we're going to funnel money to here and to here and to here. This is where the problem started. and we're going to get into that. And I would understand if we had some kind of aid for people that really needed help, like we're giving them food and water and basic essentials, like housing, you know, things you need to live. But when they're doing things that are so woke, that is just a waste of money and is not helping those people or us, it's ridiculous. Well, I think what they, I think actually the reason why, you guys got to remember, these people don't also give a shit about

wokeism. I mean, I want people to understand that. They don't care about transgenderism. They don't care about LGBTQ. They don't care about any of that shit. They don't care whether you're poor, homeless. You have a, you know, a hostile regime that you are living under in some random country like Haiti or whatever the case is. None of these politicians give a damn about that. That's the number one thing you have to think about. So then you have to ask yourself, well, if they don't care about that whatsoever, then what is their purpose? Well, their purpose is to utilize and use these countries by, you know, utilizing these, I guess, missions to try to say, hey, we're going to fund this, we're going to fund this, we're going to fund this. And to the American public,

it's like, well, that makes sense because they're crazy. They're funding some type of woke, transgender, this, this, this. But the reality is all they're doing is funneling money. They are laundering money back to themselves, just like they did in Ukraine. Right. You know, just the other day, by the way, in an interview, Zelensky said, we only got about 48% of the money out of the billions and billions of dollars that in the United States of Senate. We've got about 48% of that. So where did the rest of the money go? It was all funneled back to politicians.

And not to mention the money that they did receive, they did end up selling a lot of the weapons to terrorist groups. Yeah. Yeah. All the black market stuff, absolutely. So here's what Americans thought USAID was doing. They thought promoting global development, USAID's primary mission, according to what they wanted the American public to believe, is to promote sustainable development and reduce global poverty. The agency claims to work in over 100 countries to help improve living conditions, build economic opportunities, and strengthen communities.

Also, they support democracy and governance. USAID has positioned itself as a champion of democratic values. it provides assistance for free and fair elections, rule of law, anti-corruption efforts, human rights advocacy, and independent media development. Also, they care about humanitarian assistance in response to natural disasters, conflicts, and health crises. They give emergency food aid supposedly, medical supplies, refugee support, disaster response teams.

And then you've got to think about the global health initiatives. I mean, you can't forget this, right? because they really care about global health. So they also have funded HIV and AIDS, or also known as PEPFAR program, malaria, president's malaria initiative, tuberculosis, maternal and child health, because they really care about kids, obviously, and COVID-19 response and vaccine distribution. Then you've got to think about economic growth and trade. USAID promotes market-based economics by supporting small business and development, trade partnerships, agricultural productivity and infrastructure projects. Then they also care about environmental protection and climate change,

and education and workforce development, women's empowerment, and gender equality, and peace and security. They care about all these things. Make no mistake. This is what the USAID wants the American public to believe they do and what they actually care about. But what is USAID actually doing? U.S. AID is a cover for covert operations.

Now, the Doge investigation allegedly uncovered classified documents within USAID's headquarters that suggests the agency functions as more than just an international aid organization. And the evidence points towards USAID being a tool for regime change operations number one. Funding and logistical support have been traced to groups involved in destabilizing governments unfriendly U.S. interest. This isn't new to conspiracy theorists, but the documents reportedly show direct ties to recent coups and uprisons where USAID funneled money under development projects that were cover stories for covert activities. You also had got to think about terrorist financing. The biggest bombshell claims from Doge suggests that USAID's financial records reveal

misplaced funds ending up with extremist groups. This aligns with long-held suspicions that the USAID plays a double role publicly promoted democracy while secretly enabling conflict to maintain U.S. influence in strategic regions. And we've got to think back to this. We've always talked about the fact that the United States potentially created ISIS or ISIL or ISIS K. You name any of the terrorist organizations, this has been a massive conspiracy for so many years. But as we're starting to find out with USAID, it looks pretty obvious now. that USAID was actually the one funneling these projects,

which is why they desperately wanted to keep Doge out of USAID. They were actually trying to literally stop Doge employees from coming into the building where they had to utilize police to gain access under the president's authority. So it makes sense why they would not want Doge into this facility. Because what it sounds like is that USAID in some ways has taken shape over the CIA to funnel and command and mission orient based on either coups or whatever terrorist funding like the CIA used to do. And there's the same thing I guess would like, for example, Area 51. When everyone thought the Area 51 was the place that they were working on advanced technology,

reverse engineering programs from UFOs or UIPs, well, most people believe now that they have moved those operations. same thing with CIA. CIA was just too obvious anymore. So what did they likely do? Well, they started using funding from USAID and taxpayer dollars, and they were funding this in disguise by saying, oh, well, this is humanitarian missions, this charity missions. We're trying to help this, we're trying to help that. And it's nothing more than the CIA utilizing a new NGO, because that's what I believe USAID is, as a cover and a front. They also did bio-weapons research. Senator Joni Earth recently highlighted USAID's questionable funding connections to foreign labs, including those linked to gain-of-function research.

Doge has reportedly found additional proof that USAID acted as a financial conduit for risky biological experiments disguised as global health initiatives. And guess what? It's not just in Wuhan. It looks like a lot of this funding also went to Ukraine. You remember how we've talked about on this podcast many times or what I thought originally there were 13 bio-weapons labs in Ukraine. I think there was more than that now, maybe 30 plus. And it sounds like USAID was also funding those labs. So I just wanted to point out what USAID made the American people think they did is actually not at all what they did. It was all a cover.

And so you got to ask yourself, why are the Democrats going out there two mainstream? media in the public, threatening war with the administration now, and they are freaking out because everything that we've all already known that how corrupt this government was, we just didn't know exactly how they were funneling money, where they were utilizing it, how they were making some of these things happen. We didn't understand that, but we're about to understand this. And the USAID is just the tip of the iceberg. This is not the whole big conglomerate thing.

also think there's a reason why they are slow peddling cash betel's nomination and vote because once cash betel gets an fbi i think we're about to find out a lot more other than just usa i'd and that is separate of doge now i want to i want to play this quick clip because this explains it a little better if there's uh basically any clip that we should listen to it should be from mike bins explaining how the deep corruption is involving u s a i d the cia and established Democrats and Republicans all knew what USAID was doing. It was their money laundering piggy bank. This is what it was. I want to play this clip for you guys right now. This is Mike Benz on Newsmax as he explains this pretty thoroughly. Listen. He's the executive director of the

Foundation for Freedom Online, Mike Benz. Mike, thank you for joining me this evening. Brother, we're hearing some pretty disturbing accusations about some of where our tax dollars have gone via USAID. Give us the facts. Well, that's because USAID is one of the most disturbing organizations in the entire federal government. It may rank number one, in fact. USAID is under the cloak of being a humanitarian aid organization designed to advance U.S. foreign policy is assigned the dirtiest tasks that the state department can't get caught doing, and that used to be done directly by the CIA. but USAID is able to act as essentially a covert operations division in the way that the CIA used to,

except it's not even bound by the requirement of a presidential finding to authorize a covert operation that the CIA does, which is why what you've seen for the past two decades is that most of the international scandals involving SpyCraft have had to deal with USAID rather than CIA. And if you understand the CIA's history with money laundering, you'll begin to get a glimpse at the of the problem with U.S.Aid and why they won't let either congressional oversight or Doge see their books. So they literally have struck gold of the gold of corruption, the massive bank vault that holds all the dirty details and secrets of the left and of the machine, maybe left and right, anybody complicit in basically selling out the American citizen and their tax dollars for

the various actions, and it sounds like including the CIA. What is the CIA implicated in more details in what they've done? Well, I mean, just to your point about first about the Democrat-Republican side, it's both while the USAID employees contribute 97% to Democrats, the more pernicious concern, so far as I'm concerned, is actually the blob Republicans, the internationalist Republicans who profit off of exploiting the American Empire for their own private gain. For example, Bill Crystal, the famous Never-Trumper who, you know, likens MAGA people to terrorists, he is a part of an organization that receives millions of dollars from USAID. And so to the barricades, you know, he goes to defend USAID.

You find Liz Cheney was spawned out of USAID. USAID sister group, the National Down for Democracy, has a Democrat, organization and a Republican organization. And that Republican organization, the International Republican Institute, gets about $100 million a year just for a Republican profiteering off of U.S. foreign policy. And the problem is far deeper than wokeness. And I want people to really understand this. When the National Endowment for Democracy, the constant companion of U.S. aid and functionally interchange, it was born out of a U.S.A. memo in 1982 to get birth to the National Endowment for But when they overthrew the government of Bangladesh four months ago in September 2024,

these are leaked documents that were published in the gray zone just three months ago. The internal baseline assessment that the IRA submitted to the State Department was that the only groups that they could muster to form an opposition group against the sitting government were gay and transgender groups, were two racial minority groups within Bangladesh. and youth and student groups who predominantly listen to rap music. So what do they turn around and do IRA in tandem with USAID? They funded Bangladeshi rap groups. They funded transgender dance festivals. And they funded the local universities in order to push radicalization messages to overthrow the democratically elected government. But that was Republicans. That was the International Republican Institute,

not the Democrats. And my concern is if this were just a partisan issue, there'd be no problem shutting USA down. Because right now there's going to be. a legal fight over whether you can shut U.S. aid down by executive order. This is one of the main contentions right now that Democrats are vowing to fight. But if you couldn't do it through an executive order, you could do it through an act of Congress. The problem is it's going to be much harder to do it through an act of Congress because Republicans there, internationalist Republicans who do foreign policy for personal profit can form a majority coalition block with Democrats, that is, they can defect over to the Democrats and show.

shoot down an attempt to legislate USAID out of existence. And the problem again is because they either directly or indirectly or their sponsors or donors are on the take. Wow. Wow, wow, wow, wow. Yeah, we have hit the motherload here. I really hope that it's something that President Trump can just issue an EO and say it's done. I hope also that as they begin to uncover the details of all of these schemes that go back 20

years, as you say, I hope that the individual. individuals involved, get exposed, and literally America gets to see exactly who's been on the take for doing what. And maybe that'll push, maybe that'll push the ability for President Trump to sign executive order and shut it down. What do your thoughts? Well, in terms of what, the amount is totally eye-popping and overwhelming. The analogy that I've been giving for the past two years is that many people think they live in the world they think they live in, but in some respects, it's a carefully constructed Truman show made up of movie characters around them produced by USAID. And what I mean by that is USAID has infected the institutional architecture of every aspect of American society and world society.

They have infected the media by USAID-sponsored media. They've infected social media by galvanizing, advertiser boycotts and pressure to change social media algorithms. They've corrupted the prosecutors by USAID's work with prosecutors, prosecutor groups, and media groups to create predicates for prosecutors to take action. They've corrupted the unions. They've corrupted the public health institutions. They've virtually every layer from academia to civil society to the private sector, to the media, to the government is flowing through with unaccountable USAID bribe money

to advance what's said to be U.S. foreign policy interests. But because Donald Trump ran on a foreign policy vision, dramatically different, from the legacy establishment. They used U.S.A. as the tip of the spear to kill the domestic drivers of foreign policy, a.k.a. take out the guy who's running for president and his movement, and you won't have to worry about anyone challenging our foreign policy vision. Wow. I got to go. This is amazing. I need to have you back on really soon, Mike.

But really quickly, if you can tell me, 15 or 20 seconds, has every past president for the last 20 years known how unknown about this corruption with U.S. and just chose not to do anything about it? Well, most of them are on the take. Joe Biden was the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which directly oversees USAID. USAID was funding Burisma. USAID gave money to Burisma at a formal partnership agreement with Burisma.

Barack Obama's mother worked for USAID. The Bush family runs right through it. Bush's, you know, Vice President Dick Cheney, Liz Cheney worked for USAID. they're all in on it. And this is the reason that the Trump revolution was so revolutionaries, because it defeated both sides of the U.S.A. snake. And now we're going to see just exactly how the snake bites back when it's cornered. There you go.

And that's very interesting. I mean, it explains a lot of things. It makes things clearer for us. And so when you look at kind of our politics and our government structure, you know, potentially why the media and left went after Donald Trump so hard. You have to understand how influential and how structured USAID was in every single thing that the American public heard or saw or thought they knew. USAID had an hand in everything. And so where we always looked for FBI or the CIA and the deep state and the bureaucracy, even in CDC and obviously NIH and all these publicly facing organizations that were not government, but they were bureaucrats.

But we just never ever talked about U.S. aid. And you know who else is going crazy about this is the NIA, which is the National Education Association. They are going bonkers over this because they receive so much money through this, whatever you want to call NGO or USAID. Yeah. Well, I mean, but you also have to look at, you know, look at how education has went over the past, I would say, at least 10 years, right? I mean, we can go back further. But even education, for example, Trump just made an announcement today and he was talking about this extensively where there is a top 40 most. I guess prevalent nations as far as education goes.

So whoever the top countries are, the United States was ranked 40. Yeah, we're at the bottom. And we spend the most money per capita per student than any other country. And we're at the bottom. Yeah. And so you also wonder why, you know, our education system is completely woke now. They want to, you know, incentivize these schools to preach this woke ideology, right? This, this, what is it called?

Critical Race Theory. and all the stuff they did, but you also have to understand where a lot of the funding was coming from, the U.S. aid and all the programs they had behind this. That's one reason why Trump wants to get rid of the federal education system and give it back to the states so that they can better spend the money and not waste all this money. Yeah. That they're wasting. You think about when you have a federal system, you've got to pay all those employees and they're not just making what normal people make. They make bukus of money. and all that's being wasted on salaries instead of students.

Yeah, for sure. Yeah, I mean, especially a lot of these school systems to where they have the unions, you know, as Chicago, for example, a lot of those teachers are making $80,000,000 a year. They're making ridiculous money that, you know, they are unionized. But, you know, most employees of the federal government or at least even the bureaucrats and the organizations, they contribute to the Democrat Party. And there's a reason for that because they have. incentives behind contributing to the Democrat Party.

Liz Cheney was funded by USAID. So you think about Liz Cheney in the January 6th committee and that entire committee. And you think about all of the presidents that knew about the U.S. aid corruption leading up to Trump. And so you wonder why, well, why did George W. Bush go against Trump? Why did all these Republicans go so hardcore against Trump? Because they all had a vested interest in the corruption. They knew about it.

they were a part of this, this corruption. They had their vested interest in it. I'm sure they made tons of money off of USAID. And so when Trump came about, they were like, okay, this guy is a billionaire.

I don't think he cares as much about making money and profit in the government as much as he cares about his legacy. And that's a very bad thing for us. Because he is going to come in and he's going to try to be a disruptor. And we cannot have a disruptor. Because guess what we've done with this.

disruptors before. We have either murdered them or put them in prison or tried to, even though there's not been a lot of prison. They usually just killed disruptors in the past, and they tried to kill Trump. You got to think about this. Multiple times. This is twice at least they tried to kill Trump. Supposedly, also there was another attempt that they're trying to blame on Iran, which I don't necessarily even believe Iran had anything to do with that, because as Trump just said yesterday in a press conference, he said, you know, by the way, when we're talking about, when we're talking about the assassination attempts on behalf of Iran, just make no mistake that I have left instructions to what to do if Iran takes me out. And it's not because of me. I'm just saying

that if they do, they will be annihilated. They will no longer exist. And I also think that obviously Iran knew that. Iran 100% knew that if they took Trump out, they would be annihilated. But they didn't know that necessarily before Trump actually won the election. because if they could have got Biden or a Democrat back in, they would have been safe because the Democrats love Iran. They love a lot of the organizations. I mean, they made a lot of the terrorist organizations over in the Middle East. They gave billions and billions of dollars to Iran multiple times because the CIA has propped up Iran for a very long time. And if you look at the, you know, the, I guess what, since the late 70s to 80s where this new authoritarian government,

came into Iran. It used to be a democratically elected nation in Iran. People were very happy. They elected who they wanted to become president. And then about late 70s, early 80s, that's when the new administration came in, which I'm sure the United States had something to do with that. And which is also why that the United States continues to fund billions of dollars towards Iran, because this is what the United States does. Even John Bolton on an interview the other day talking about, yeah, I've been a part of coups for sure. I've been a part of planning them. And but, you know, this, you know, USAID, he was trying to basically take up for USAID or USAID.

I should quit saying USAID, but it's USAID. There's probably people like, it's USAID, asshole, quit saying USAID. But yeah, so all of this stuff completely makes sense. And as he also said, internationalist Republicans are also a part of this. So if you want to make this some type of act of Congress, can't. this go through to where you dismantle USAID on or through an executive order or does this need to be an act of Congress? And the one thing I will say is that with as public facing as this controversy with USAID is

right now with Doge and Elon Musk and all this stuff, which is why many people voted for Donald Trump, if there are Republicans, if it tries to go through Congress and there are Republicans that sides with Democrats on this issue. issue, they're no longer going to be in their office or position on the next election term. They will be primaryed. There is no question about that. And people have finally woken up enough to where they're like, you know what? Our taxpayer dollars are going to all of this stupid bullshit that is funding all of our politicians, money laundering and all this stuff.

And we're paying our, we can barely survive because of our taxes. You work your ass off so hard. And by the way, for those that do not own small businesses or just businesses in general, you know, taxes are a bitch when you own a business or if you make a decent amount of money. They are a bitch. And they're a bitch to people where you have to pay out all this money every single check that you work your butt off for. And yet every single dime that you work your ass off for, you wake up every single day, work nine to five. You miss so much time with your family and all this shit.

And then you're still having to pay the government. all this taxpayer dollars. And yet now you're starting to realize that all these taxpayer dollars are going to all of this crazy shit. Mostly, by the way, funneled back to the politicians through various family members or whatever through money laundering. And if it does. This should make everybody sick. If it does go through Congress and there are Republicans that go on the left side or the liberal side or the Democrat side, then we know who to look at as a Republican. Oh, absolutely. It's kind of funny because, you know, Chuck Schumer came out on the House Florida other day and said, if Elon Musk and Doge can shut down U.S. aid, then what's next?

Let me just play you what he says, because it's so funny because I'm sure Americans are like, hell yeah. Like, we should absolutely do exactly what Chuck Schumer is saying. Listen, this is very short, but listen. I also know this is just the beginning. If Doge attacks USAID today, then you can be sure they'll move on to another target tomorrow. who knows, maybe it'll be the postal service or the IRS or even the Social Security Administration. No way. We cannot shut down or go after the IRS. Yeah, we desperately want to save them. Well, Trump is already getting rid of all their jobs in the IRS, by the way.

Yeah, I mean, 80,000. He's wanting to potentially send. To put him at the border security. Yeah, absolutely. But this is nuts, right? So also, USAID exposed, your tax dollars at work. Now, the new press secretary for Donald Trump, Caroline Levitt, just recently, I think this was yesterday, came out on White House grounds. And this is what she had to say about the recent findings on USAID.

Democrats are fighting to save. These are some of the insane priorities that that organization has been spending money on. $1.5 million to advance DEI in Serbia's workplaces. 70,000 for a production of a DEI musical in Ireland, 47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia, 32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru. I don't know about you, but as an American taxpayer, I don't want my dollars going towards this crap,

and I know the American people don't either, and that's exactly what Elon Musk has been tasked by President Trump to do to get the fraud, waste, and abuse out of our federal government. We can keep going. $20 million for Iraqi Sesame Street. $2 million for Moroccan pottery classes. 11 million to tell Vietnam to stop burning trash. 27 million to give gift bags to illegals before we deport them.

Millions to help Afghanis grow crops instead of opium. That program was such a success that opium production doubled. We also gave Afghanistan 300 million to build diesel fuel power plants, but they couldn't use them because diesel was too expensive. 200 million on a dam that was too unsafe to ever be used. We could have used that dam in California. 250 million on a road that was never used. We literally built a road to nowhere.

Oh, and we gave Syrians 9 mil for humanitarian aid, but someone messed up and it went to al-Qaeda. A million for bat research in Wuhan. That equates to a million dollars for each dead American. USAID was funding fashion week in Paris. France isn't even paying its NATO dues and we're paying for their fashion week. USAIDs a $40 billion deep state social justice slush fund. And the president says it's a little fishy.

Elon Musk, how often are you talking to him? And have there been ideas that he's brought to you that you've said, oh, no, wait a minute, this is going a little too far. Well, many ideas. but look, he's done a great job. Look at all the fraud that he's found in this U.S. AID. It's a disaster what the people, radical left lunatics. They have things that nobody would have been believed that the whole thing with 100 million spent on,

you know what, with money going to all sorts of groups that shouldn't deserve to get any money with the money. I'd like to see what the kickbacks are. How much money has been kicked back? Who would spend that kind of money? USAID is an American intelligence cutout. They've been caught staging coup after crew across Latin America, funding paramilitary groups and getting kicked out of countries for subversive activities.

The deeper we investigated USAID, the more it looks like a dark money Democrat super PAC. And if you take all of the executives from USAID, the Clinton Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the World Bank, the WHO, you get a Venn diagram that would tickle Kamala Harris. Burisma got a contract with USAID through Hunter. It was so shady that the Obama White House was like, nice try, and canceled it. Hunter's firm was reppping clients who were trying to cash in on USAID disaster relief in Haiti. And by the way, the Clinton Foundation worked arm in arm with USAID in Haiti, and a billion dollars disappeared.

Haiti is still Haiti. USAID was pouring billions into the hands of open borders groups. We were literally funding the invasion and buying them gift bags as they left. So we're buying gift bags for the people were deporting. That's part of USAID as well. And this was none other than a bank account for the deep state. This is what it was. And, you know, if you go look at CIA or whatever the case is, no one would have ever thought

USAID would be the bank account. And yet it is. And there was even one Democrat that came out and said that the taxpayer dollars are going straight into their pockets. I want to play this quick clip because, I mean, you can't get any more obvious or moronic than what this Democrat said. Listen. We're going to tell Elon Musk.

Now listen to me. Get your hands out my pockets. Say it with me. Get your hands out. Get your hands out my pockets. Get your head. Get your head. Get your foot off the Constitution.

Take your foot off my neck. Can you believe this? I mean, like, literally, can you believe that she's saying keep your hands out my pockets? Yeah, the taxpayer dollars, which is, you know, this USAID, this is our money. Oh, you're taking our taxpayer dollars that we are using for whatever the hell we want. all of our kickbacks, our mansions wherever, our millions of dollars, are all this bullshit funding. Keep your hands out our pockets.

That's what she said. Out of the politician buckets. No, it doesn't matter. These people are psycho. And these are the people that some people elect in our country. These are the people that some people elect. And it's not just her. There are many of them that have went completely apes shit crazy over the USAID, I guess,

what you would call audit, right? And for every American taxpayer, you know, the fact that there are these politicians that are in front of cameras on mainstream media right now in Washington, D.C., and they're demanding that people take to the streets to protest their money that they work very hard for being spent on them and their bullshit policies. And yet there are not people in the streets in front of cameras protesting what Elon Musk is finding. is insane to me. That is insane to me. But also, you have to understand, we have lived through a time, especially over the past four years, to where the government has tried their very best through mainstream media, social media, and everything else where you've been censored, you've been silenced, you've been told if you speak up or if you say the wrong thing, then you are going to be labeled domestic terrorists. You look at the UK in Europe. You look at like social media posts.

People are being arrested if they call out immigration or if they call out certain things as far as the people that are invading their country in many ways illegally, by the way, these people are being arrested for what they're saying. The people that are invading illegally and even the people that are committing crimes in these countries, they're trying to take over these countries. They're not being arrested. They are being protected. And yet the citizens of their own countries in UK and Europe, they are being arrested. If you speak out against the shit, they're being arrested. And by the way, if Donald Trump would not have been president, would not have been elected this term, we would be facing the exact same thing in the United States or America. You would have been, and look, Zuckerberg would have never come out and said on Donald or on Joe Rogan podcast.

Oh, you know what? We're patriots now. We're not going to censor anymore. We're not going to do this. You know what would have happened? Zuckerberg and Facebook would have doubled down. They would have tripled down and they would have censored and gave up any information to the FBI or government. that they wanted.

If someone posted something and the say, I don't know, Kamala Harris administration when it said, look, here's a new, here's the new thing, anybody that says anything about our open borders or just letting people wide openly in or they criticize this administration, we're going to start arresting them. So Facebook, Zuckerberg, this is what you're going to do. Anything that your algorithm sees, you're going to hand it over to us and then we're going to arrest those people. Guess what Zuckerberg wouldn't have said, absolutely.

But now because Trump's in and he knows what is what, you know, the hell that they may pay if they go against the Trump administration with all of the cabinet picks, the Senate, the House, everything and the overwhelming mandate of the American people, they have no choice but decide and try to act like they are now pro anti-censorship. They are pro-free speech. And that's all bullshit. We are all being lied to screw Zuckerberg, screw Bezos, screw all of. screw all of the other big tech oligarchs. They're all full of shit. And they're only here to try to manipulate and use Donald Trump and also just not be screwed under his term. Because, you know, for them, they're like, we only got four years.

We got to deal with this for four years. Hopefully we can figure out a system to get one of our, you know, one of our dudes, one of our guys back into where we can censor and silence whoever the hell we need to again. And this is just the case. This is how it is. Unfortunately. Well, the Democrats don't really have a. leader in place right now, and that's part of their problem, is they have no one leading their side, and they're just all in, up in arms and what to do. But talking about Trump's new cabinets,

I believe Mark Rubio is going to be the one in charge of going through this. Secretary of State, yeah. Yeah, this U.S. aid and figuring out what to do with these people. No, absolutely. No, he is. There's absolutely no question he is. And listen, you know, going back, we, we, We got to talk for a minute about Falschi, right? Because we've talked about Fawci on this show for so many, so many years. I mean, it's been what, did we say four years since COVID now? Four or five years, I guess. So four or five years since COVID happened.

And so Falsch's N-I-A-D and U.S.A-I-D sent over $40 million in U.S. taxpayer support, quote, unquote, to a scientist in Wuhan who was working on the back coronavirus emergence. research, who also who also just happened to become patient zero. He was the number one patient for COVID-19. And the completion date for that funding was, guess what? 2019. It started, I believe, in 2014. So this is $40 million from NIAID and then also USAID.

So USAID alongside the Falschi NIAID was heavily funding Wuhan Inst. Institute of Virology, one of the main scientists that was behind the bat coronavirus and the gain of function that was going on. And so I want to play this quick clip. It's a few minutes long, but this is an important interview by Rand Paul, where he documents what he calls an orchestrated Wuhan lab leak coverup and how Anthony Falci and the CIA are obstructing Congress from investigating years of dual use and bio-weapons funding. This is USAID, NIH, HHS, and they're withholding documents because they funded the lab in Wuhan, not just once, not just twice, but for a decade.

And he talks about, we have Anthony Fauci on record saying this, even in the gang of function research infects a scientist as the pandemic occurs. This is the exact scientists that they were funding in Pacific to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. I want to play this from Rand Paul on Fox News. Listen here. expected to grill him on overseeing funding of gain of function research at the Wuhan lab, as well as discrediting the theory the virus originated from a lab leak. Join me right now is Kentucky Senator Rand Paul. He is vowing to hold hearings on the origins of COVID in the upper chamber if Republicans retake control next year. Senator Paul is also the author

of the new book, Deception, the Great COVID Coverup, available right now. Senator, thanks very much for joining us this morning. Thank you, Maria. Oh, you've been an incredible truth-teller throughout all of this and you've studied all of this now for several years. What can you tell us about what you've learned, what you've taken away from the entire COVID experience? Well, you know, the problem is, is that the Chinese have destroyed any kind of reputation they had. I mean, we can no longer believe any kind of pronouncements from them, which makes us suspicious. You know, right now there's a host of disease affecting young people, respiratory disease and pneumonia in China. And they tell us, well, there's nothing to see here. And maybe that's true. But they've destroyed.

any kind of foundation we had in trusting them, and they still haven't come clean. You know, in early 2020, when COVID came out, they said, oh, we're not having human to human transmission, and we don't seem to be having an extraordinary amount of flooding in the hospitals or deaths. All of that was untrue, and they knew for at least three or four weeks. They also knew the sequence of the virus, and they kept that secret as well. I think they also knew that three of their workers got sick at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in November 2019. I think they knew all of this, and I think they absolutely know it now. And the only way they can restore trust is to own up to it. Look, I don't blame

that completely for this. I think it was an accident. But a cover-up is not an accident. If they were to come clean and say, you know, we're punishing the scientists who did what they weren't supposed to. I think then that we could restore some trust. But right now we have really no trust with the Chinese government. Well, what about the accountability here and why the Biden administration does not push for it? I mean, right now as we speak, there are American investors, continue to underwrite the CCP by buying those companies that are tied to the Chinese military. It seems this administration is not willing to pull the economic lever, and that is shut off the capital markets to Chinese communist companies that may have been involved in that

cover-up or tied to the military. Well, we still continue to fight the Biden administration every day just for unclassified information, and they resisted every turn. We've had to basically withhold nominees and withhold legislation to try to get anything from the Biden administration. And I'm not sure what it is, either it's sympathy or believing that relations with China are so important that the truth can be obscured. But there's also a certain about a culpability in the Biden administration throughout several different departments. USAID, NIH, HHS.

They're withholding documents because they funded the lab in Wuhan not just once, not just twice, but for a decade they were funding. And we have Anthony Fauci on record as saying that even if a pandemic occurs, even if a gain of function research infects a scientist, and a pandemic occurs that the knowledge would be worth of risk. And I think most people who had a loved one die from COVID, either here or around the world, would disagree and think Anthony Fauci made a disastrous judgment call. But he also took the research, and it didn't go before the normal scrutiny. There's a safety committee that was supposed to review this, and Anthony Fauci allowed this research to be done at his signature, at his conclusion,

at his approval, without the approval of the safety committee. and for this he really should go down in history perhaps is one of the worst people in public office ever and responsible for probably more deaths than any other individual in the medical world. Well, I mean, there was so much censorship of so much information that was vital for Americans to see and understand about COVID and about the vaccines, but they censored it. Can we even trust health officials in this government? Well, you know, it was directed explicitly by him. We go over this in the book because he commissioned scientists who were saying in private that they thought it was a manipulated

virus, manipulated in a lab and came from a lab. He convinced them in public to say the opposite. He commissioned and edited a paper that said that absolutely this did not come from a lab. Well, privately, all of these same scientists were saying, in all likelihood, it did come from a lab. So there really was an orchestrated cover up on this. We also now know that he was visiting the CIA in early 2020. We know that the CIA scientists, seven of them, voted six to one to say it came from the lab, and then they were reversed by superiors. We need to know whether Anthony Fauci influenced the superiors, or perhaps the opposite. Did the CIA influence Anthony Fauci?

But we also need to know how often he was visiting and what he was there for. Our understanding is that he wasn't recorded on visitor logs, but he was appearing frequently at the CIA. You have to realize that he was not a scientist in charge of a cure for cancer. He was also in charge of a lot of bioweapons money and in charge of a lot of things that had dual use, and they won't reveal any of this to us. They had weekly meetings on dangerous dual use research concerns and gain a function, and not one item of any of those meetings has been released to us, despite us asking for it for over three years. So they knew that the pandemic was going to occur. I mean, listen, I know a lot of politicians want to play nice,

even today, even today, Republicans and both sides, they want to play nice by saying that, well, this was an accidental release and this was this and this was that. But you have to understand that what we're finding out about the N-I or N-A-I-D, what we're finding out about all of the bullshit that they funded and especially alongside Anthony Falsh and NIH and all this stuff and how much they funded $40 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. And then how much they try to cover this up, including Falsi lying in Congress. lying continually in Connerers to the point where they were changing the definition of gain a function on their webpage as as you know Iran Paul and others questioned Anthony Falky in Congress

and said well did what you do in Wuhan and your contributions to Wuhan and Institute of Ruralogy was that gain the function and he says this is not the definition of gain the function I'm sorry that's horrible that's definitely not good but that's exactly exactly what he said. That is not the definition. He said it is. And then they went back to the website and he changed it. Yeah.

And they even change it in the dictionary. Like if you go to Wikipedia, what it said about gain of function was changed because Anthony Falsy and NIH changed what gain of function supposedly meant. But what they did was gain a function. They intentionally created a virus that was more transmissible to people and more deadly to people from a back coronavirus. virus. And as we've talked about a million times on his podcast, zoonotic viruses that come from animals take potentially thousands of years, if ever, by the way, to transmit and be deadly to

people. And even with the bird flu, for example, the bird flu is not a necessarily a next pandemic or X virus, what they call disease X. But we do know for sure that NIH and Anthony Fosci was also involved and gain the function even with H5N1, I believe it is, the bird flu. Right. We know that they were also involved in that. So how long will it be until the bird flu is released and will it be the last year of Trump's presidency? We know that this funding started in 2014. It ended in 2019, which is when the virus was released.

If you go to the Event 201 website, which I think I'm about to play that video about Event 201 because I want you guys to actually hear on their own website. because I posted this video on Facebook on our Facebook page. And I just want you to hear what Event 201 talks about this, this, what I would call Plandemic, but what their, I guess, simulation of a pandemic type virus like the coronavirus. I want you to hear what they talk about in this video. I think we should play that now.

Let me just make sure I can find it real. All right. I found the video. This is the Event 201, a Global Pandemic Exercise Video. And so I want to play this and it is like about, I don't know, it's a few minutes long, but I want you to understand when we're talking about the entire concept of NAAID and what they funded alongside Dr. Anthony Falsci, you have to understand what they were planning months before this actually happened. And Event 201 was funded by the Bill of Melinda Gates Foundation alongside.

John Hopkins University. This was not the only, I guess, pandemic simulation they had. They had one in 2015, 17. And then more specifically, it was in 2019 where event 201 came around. And just I want you guys, if you're out there working right now, you're working and you're doing it. I want you to just listen to everything they talk about on this event simulation or pandemic simulation.

And this is one reason I do disagree with Ron Paul. He said that he believes. it was an accident. I don't even believe it was an accident. No, I don't. I think it was released on purpose. Otherwise, why are they having all these pandemics or simulations that are almost exactly like what happened to us with COVID? The only difference with their simulation is it came from South America and it was a pig instead of a bat. It was either South America, Africa. I can't remember. But we're about to find out. South Africa. Well, here's the video. Listen to this. I know this is, well, it is actually in complete relation to this podcast episode. Listen to Event 21.

There's been a lot of people say, you talk about the video all the time, you never play it. Here it is. It began in healthy looking pigs months, perhaps years ago. A new coronavirus spread silently within herds. Gradually, farmers started getting sick. Infected people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu. like signs to severe pneumonia. The sickest required intensive care, many died. Experts agree unless it is quickly controlled, it could lead to a severe pandemic, an outbreak

that circles the globe and affects people everywhere. The mission of the pandemic emergency board is to provide recommendations to deal with a major global challenges arising in response to an unfolding pandemic. The board is comprised of highly experienced leaders from business, public health, and civil society. We could be looking at double the number of cases in one week and 16 times as many in a month if we are not able to stop the spread. That would be on the order of half a million cases and it would continue to rise exponentially. In three months, we could be approaching 10 million cases. We're at the start of what's looking like it will be a severe pandemic.

and there are problems emerging that can only be solved by global business and governments working together. Here's like a fake news update. We have known about caps like viruses in animals and people for decades, but have not been successful at developing a licensed vaccine. And sure, there are new technologies that may help, but it's going to be difficult. I am not optimistic about having a vaccine in time to be relevant during this pandemic. So the policy crisis in question for this board in this meeting, meeting is this. How should governments, business, and international organizations allocate and distribute pandemic antivirals and medical supplies to the people who need the most?

What we've seen work very well in the HIV field is in fact procurement through the Global Fund. So having a centralized mechanism, so financially able to procure on behalf of affected countries, is critical. I think the second thing, the second thing is it's going to be very important that for the business sector, for manufacturers of antivirals, that we have clarity around what the need is and where the need is and who are making the decisions. I think that given that the countries most affected are those that are low and middle-income countries with unequal access to technology to finances, the UN has a worldwide footprint, universally recognized and universal membership.

A global stockpile would certainly help ensure more rational and strategic allocation, but the reality is that we don't have the logistics capability, even within the UN, to bring that together in one place and run it. So this is where I think a collaboration between the international organizations, like the World Health Organization and the private sector, which runs these... By the way, I want to stop for a second. the guy that's talking right now is a guy that is representative of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. And he's talking about how we have to have the World Health Organization really help this out.

And for those who do not remember during the pandemic, if you said anything that was, you know, misconstrued as against their agenda on YouTube, social media, or otherwise, you would have a World Health Organization tag and oftentimes you would either be censored or banned. I change for many purposes every day. understand where the supplies are, make smart decisions about how to allocate them to the people who need them, in the places that need them the most, and then work with the industry to move those supplies from where they are today to where they need to be. Just to underscore the point that cooperation among supply chain providers or businesses that have huge supply chains can add a lot of efficiency to the whole process. The question is, can you, through this international mechanism, really promote commitments,

to doing this as quickly as possible and give people a sense that actually if they contribute more, that they will have a better chance of protecting their own populations in their country's security and health. So to be completely clear, most of this production would already be committed in contracts. It is almost unheard of that people are producing product without having a forward commitment for the consumption of that product. So the first thing needs to be done, because this is not something that the countries currently control, unless countries are going to bring about emergency situations and co-opt an existing supply chain.

I think it's not likely. I agree that countries are not going to buy countermeasure to put into a global supply without retaining a large portion of it for themselves. Another fake news report. Here you go. Public health agencies have issued travel advisories, while some countries have banned travel from the worst affected areas. As a result,

The travel sector is taking a huge hit. Travel bookings are down 45% and many flights have been cancelled. A ripple effect is racing through the service sector. Governments that rely on travel and tourism as a large part of their economies are being hit particularly hard. How should national leaders, businesses and international organizations balance the risk of worsening disease that would be caused by the continued movement of people around the world? against the risks of profound economic consequence of traveling trade bans.

If there's some sense that there's a UN institution that can do all of this, then I worry we're suffering from a delusional disorder on the power of the UN. It's really important to get those industries and their trade associations and an efficient leadership established, which is decentralized, but has a collective responsibility and accountability. and that needs to be supported by the public leadership. What is essentially, what is non-essential travel, we have to clarify this. Otherwise, if we go down to 20% bookings over a long period, the company will run down.

That's the fact. You know, there's a whole complex set of issues in a highly interdependent world on supply chains that are just in time. We need to think about how much flex there is in that just-in-time supply chain system and make sure it keeps running. I think it's going to take specificity, and it's going to take knowledge that only the private sector has. The UN can play an important coordinating facilitation role, but the companies know where those commodities are, where they move, how to move them. And that's where a type of public-private collaboration that we have not generally had in these crises needs to be put together pretty quickly. Fake news report. We are not out of money yet.

But the fact is we are trending in a dangerous direction and something needs to change. So the policy question for this board now is how should financial resources be prioritized? Are there notes that we cannot allow to fail? What is your sense of priorities? We don't have money to pay for all of these urgent problems. So at the moment we want the fund, right? You need the money. So where's the money?

So government can supply some money. A lot of, you know, private sectors, you know, some are city here, you have some money. But now you need a really coordinated, centralized effort. The hotels will be experiencing, you know, crippling losses during that. And we know that the hotel business in itself makes up 5% of the GDP. Governments need to be willing to do things that are out of their historical perspective. For the most part, it's really a war footing that we need to be on. We shouldn't underestimate the power of entrepreneurship.

We need to escalate that, whether it's through, you know, the government's helping with tax breaks or, you know, subsidies of that nature, to increase manufacturing of those types of products. It can happen quickly. A Marshall-type plan, you know, don't mean to say that exactly, but a Marshall plane that can go into effect can stimulate change very quickly. Countries are reacting in different ways

as to how best to manage the overwhelming amounts of dis and misinformation circulating over the Internet. In some cases, limited Internet shutdowns are being... By the way, do you guys want to know where dis and misinformation came from? It was the pandemic exercise, event 201. And by the way, this is extremely important to understand. We're dis and misinformation that we have heard for so long during the pandemic. If you want to know where this came from, this was from these simulations, 100%.

So listened to this. This is probably one of the best parts. Because if you want to know how censorship and all that shit came about during this past four years, here's where it is. implemented to quell panic. How much control of information should there be? And by whom? And how can false information be effectively challenged? And what if that false information is coming from companies or from governments?

I think it's very important that we make sure that there is concise communication with all healthcare facilities where these patients are being treated so that there is a mass panic. We're at a moment where the social media platforms have to step forward, and recognize the moment to assert that they're a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They, in fact, have to be a participant in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate information. Because to put the genie back in the bottle of the misinformation and disinformation is nigh impossible. One thing we haven't spoken about, and I'm wondering whether it's time to talk about this,

is a step up from the part of the government's on enforcement actions against fake news. I personally do not believe that trying to shut things down in terms of information is either practical or desirable. And we do have, I think, a couple of strategies that are available to is one of which is the flood strategy, second of which is relying and informing and equipping trusted sources of information with the facts, so they can then pass that on. But we also need to actually think about a technological answer to this. The outcome of the CAPS pandemic in event 201 was catastrophic. 65 million people died in the first 18 months.

The outbreak was small at first and initially seemed controllable, but then it started spreading in densely crowded and impoverished neighborhoods of megacities. From that point on, the spread of the disease was explosive. Within six months, cases were occurring in. in nearly every country. The global economy was in a free fall. The GDP down 11%. Stock markets around the world plummeted

between 20 and 40% and headed into a downward cycle of fear and low expectation. Businesses were not borrowing, banks were not lending, everyone was just hoping to hunker down and weather the storm. Economists say the economic turmoil

caused by such a pandemic will last for years, perhaps a decade. The societal impacts, the loss of faith in government, the distrust of news, and the breakdown of social cohesion could last even longer. Damn, they were right. They are prophets. These, I'm just saying, these people are prophets, right? They are biblical prophets. They knew exactly what was about to happen. And as we said, the disinformation, misinformation, false information, as they call it, that was one. 100% predicted because they're very smart, right? And they have all these techniques and tools like Bill Melinda Gayst Foundation,

John Hopkins University. They're very, very smart. Obviously, we know we should trust these people with everything. And they know everything because they've never been wrong about anything. And even as they talk about social media platforms and how they're going to counter this mis and disinformation, well, that is they're going to tell the social media platforms, you are no longer a speech platform. you are now a broadcast platform for the government, for the world health.

You're going to be a broadcast platform. You're no longer about people saying what they're doing or what their thoughts are or opinions. It is now your job to broadcast to the people what we want you to broadcast. This is a control mechanism. It is a controlled 100% system to where not only do you get it in mainstream media, you now also get in every single platform that you utilize. they already planned this. They knew this was going to happen.

They understood how they were going to do this. And they also talked about the enforcement of fake news, how we were going to utilize enforcement of how we're going to. And by the way, this event 201 video is only a about 10-minute segment. And I think this went on for like four days. And so there were very private meetings for hours upon hours of how they were exactly going to silence. and censor people that dissented, they were going to figure out ways to have the government

entities control the platforms to where they could not and would not allow people to dissent, including doctors. It even goes back to say that we got to make sure that we are providing the crucial information to hospital systems to where the doctors are giving the correct information to their, you know, I guess, yeah, to their patients. a.k.a. like, not you as a doctor actually talking about what you believe what they should do. It is what we say that you're going to tell them they should do. And part of this pandemic or simulation, they also do bring up vaccines and how are they going to distribute the vaccines?

And what are they going to do with the people that refuse or go against the vaccine? This was a whole series in this event 201 as well. For sure. Yeah. So I want to get to just. a couple of quick clips of the Democrats losing their minds over USAID and Doge coming in and exposing all their bullshit. This is Elizabeth Pocahontas Warren mentioned Elon must name over a dozen times on a total meltdown for the discovery of the USAID money laundering system, which set kickbacks to radical Democrat leftists. This is Elizabeth Warren because we can definitely trust her. She's an Indian. Listen.

John Musk is seizing power from the American people. Months ago, Elon Musk spent $280 million to buy an election for Donald Trump. Elon Musk is here to collect on his investment. Yes. He is here to seize power for himself. we are here to fight back, has grabbed control of America's payment system. This is the system that makes sure that your grandpa gets his Social Security check on time. This is the system that makes sure that your mom's doctor gets paid for her Medicare exam.

Elon Musk wants the power to turn that on, to turn that off as Elon Musk decides. By the way, I'm going to pause this for just a second. Anyone listening, if you're a mom or your dad, your older mom or dad references Elizabeth Warren's speech in any controversial or adversary opinion to anything you say about USAID, please tell your mom or dad that the mother. they are completely retarded. It has nothing to do with their search of security. It has nothing to do with their doctor's appointments. No, she's like, we're here to fight back for the American people that we are fucking over. Like, really did?

I mean, and this is like comical at this point, right? But that's why we have to play this. Let's listen to a little more of Pocahontas. Power to say that your grandpa, who frankly is a cranky old guy. and sometimes this is Elon on X doesn't get a social security check on time. Musk wants power to say to your mom's doctor, you're not doing it the way I would, so the doctor doesn't get paid. Elon Musk wants the power to decide whether or not every road repair in America goes forward.

whether not every head start center in America opens, and whether or not every military base anywhere in the world operates according to Elon. Elon Musk wants everyone in America to be at the mercy of Elon Musk. all right there's so there you go i mean that's elizabeth warren and listen regardless of however you feel about elin musk she's a moron and it doesn't matter how you feel about like whether elin censor some people on x or whatever is it whatever the reality is Elon and doge is exposing their corruption how they are screwing american people over and their tax dollars and they are pissed because it is going to expose their corruption that is all that she's She is pissed about.

And you know that she's out there telling these lies, unless she just doesn't understand what U.S. aid is or what it stands for or where the money is going to. It's not going to American people at all. This is supposed to be aid for foreign countries all over the place, not for Americans. Oh, no. She's saying this road, Sherry. And she just comes on there and talking about doctors and Social Security has nothing to do with that at all. So she either has no clue what she's talking about or she's lying to the American people. Of course she's lying in the American people.

That's all they do. But the thing is, so many people that are out there listening to her believe this crap. I know. That's what's crazy. They believe it. Because they do not do their own research. Yeah. And they don't know what it even is.

You're exactly right. Yeah, you're exactly right. I mean, look, if you don't know the reality behind USAID and you don't know, you don't know what the reality of where the payments are going and how us money laundering and how it's kind of like a clandestine dark agency bank account for either the CIA or the deep bureaucrat, you know, I guess we would maybe say Democrat agency. You know, if you don't know that, you don't research this. You don't understand how this money is being actually spent.

Then, of course, if you just randomly hear Elizabeth Warren on mainstream media as a 60, 70, 80 year old. And you're like, oh, my God, Elon Musk is horrible. We got to, we got to, we got to just do something about Elon Musk. Screw Donald Trump. That sounds just like my mom. Exactly. That's exactly what it is.

But that sounds exactly like my mom as well. I mean, there's no difference here. Now, I want to also get to this clip. This is Marka Rubio, the new secretary of state commenting about this, right, with the USAID future under Trump. And this is what Mark Rubio had to say. Listen. The head of Doge, Elon Musk, called USAID, a criminal organization and added that it is time for it to die.

Do you agree with that? They have basically evolved into an agency that believes that they're not even a U.S. government agency, that they are out there, they are a global charity, that they take the taxpayer money and they spend it as a global charity, irrespective of whether it is in the national interest or not in the national interest. One of the most common complaints you will get if you go to embassies around the world from State Department officials and ambassadors in the like is USAID is not only not cooperative, they undermine the work that we're doing in that country. They are supporting programs that upset the host government for whom we're trying to work with on a broader scale and so forth. So they're completely unresponsive. They just don't consider

that they work for the U.S. They just think they're a global entity and that their master is the globe and not the United States. And that's not what the statute says and that's not sustainable. Can it be reformed or does it need to die? Well, that was always the goal was to reform it. But now we have rank insubordination. Now we have basically an active effort. Their basic attitude is we don't work for anyone. We work for ourselves. No agency of government can tell us what to do. So the president made me the acting administrator. I've delegated that power to someone who's there full time. And we're going to go through the same process at USAID as we're going through now at the State Department. I think there are some, this is not about getting rid of foreign aid. There are things that we do

through USAID that we should continue to do. That makes sense. And we'll have to decide, is that better through the State Department or is that better through something, you know, a reformed USAID? That's the process we're working through. There are things that are happening at USAID that we should not be involved in funding or that we have a lot of questions about, but they're completely uncooperative. So we had no choice but to take dramatic steps to bring this thing under control.

And so I, and with what Marco Rubio says here, I think that he doesn't fully 100% get it. I think he kind of does, but he doesn't fully. And if you kind of understand exactly what USAID is, it is a very, very corrupt organization. It is an organization.

And it's a global organization. He made that correct. They care about the global procedures. And they even undermine the United States in countries around the world. I think he does understand what it is. And I think there are parts of it that could be good.

That could be distributed. like he said, through the State Department and get rid of the U.S. aid completely because, for the most part, it is corrupt. But there is good aspects to parts of the program, I believe. I don't think it's 100% corrupt. I think there are things that are good that comes from that, and we need to keep the things that are good. I mean, we just don't need to get rid of all foreign aid altogether, but we need to look at it line by line like we're going to do with everything else, the FBI, the DOJ, you know, all. of these different systems, we got to go in and we've got to basically audit like we're doing this. This is a process and we take the best of the best and we get rid of the worst of the worst.

Yeah, absolutely. I agree. 100%. And here's a little more of what the Democrats are chanting outside and into mainstream media. You mean to tell me a man worth over $400 billion is going to decide what happens with my grandma's social security check. elected Elon Musk to nothing. And yet, Elon Musk is seizing the power that belongs to the American people. We are here to fight back. When we open up the Senate every single morning, we don't pledge allegiance to the billionaires. We don't pledge allegiance to Elon Musk. We don't pledge allegiance to the creepy 22-year-olds working for Elon Musk.

We pledge allegiance to the United States of America. And so I want to make sure that my mother gets her security, to her social security check, not because she pledges allegiance to Elon, but because she pledges allegiance to the United States of America. This is the most corrupt bargain we've ever seen in American history. Elon Musk gives $250 million to elect Donald Trump. And Donald Trump turns over the keys to the United States government to Elon Musk

and his billionaire friends and his cronies. Are we going to let that stand? No. No, no, we're not going to let that stand. We know who we work for. We know that we work for the American people. And what we're not going to do is stand around what ain't pulled this bull's-s-s-shit that they're trying to pull it right now. We are going to be in your...

They don't even know, by the way, what democracy means. So when they say democracy, they don't actually know what it means. And guys, they want these keywords, these tag words. This is Social Security check. We don't want Elon to take away your grandma's Social Security check. This is all just a... It's gaslighting. That's all it is.

They want the older people to think that this administration is going to take away their Social Security check. They're going to do all these various things that's going to hurt the American people. And then they also talk about, you know, Elon Musk is not elected. And he is yet going in and finding our bullshit and her corruption. I can't believe this. But think about how many bureaucrats that actually controlled the United States government over the past four years, Anthony Fauci and various other special councils.

And you name it, the CDC, the. the NIH also go back to the federal employees or employees that work for the federal government that are 90% funding the Democrat Party. And yet people were up in arms about Project 2025. When the Project 2025 thing came out and Trump distanced himself from that, it's a very interesting concept about Project 2025. And I want to stop for just a second. Talk about this just for a minute. Project 2025, almost everyone knew that buzzword during the election. Leading up to election, everyone was talking about Project 2025.

And what was Project 2025? It was where the Trump administration and the administration itself would come in, dismantle the bureaucrats, the elect or not the elective, the non-elected employees that worked for the bureaucracy agencies or organizations that made a lot of very definitive decisions for the government, which was about 90% Democrat. All of those people that work in these bureaucratic agencies were 90% Democrat. So what the consensus was leading up to the election was,

Project 2025 is going to get rid of all those people and replace them with Republicans, conservatives, which is exactly the opposite of what it has been. So it was all Democrats. So what they were saying is it's going to be a totalitarian dictatorship if they do the opposite of what we already have. So what that should tell you is that what we already have is a dictatorship totalitarian administration to where the deep state, aka the bureaucracy, is making most of the decisions. They're all mostly Democrat and going with the agenda.

And what they wanted to fear the American public into believe in about Project 2025 was that it was going to be the opposite, which was all Republicans, 90%. versus all Democrats, bureaucrats. And whereas all 90% non-elected officials in bureaucracy as Democrats or Republicans is bad, because it is, it should always in a lot of ways, not be political. If you're in bureaucracy, you are in a organization that is for the public and you're working for, on the behalf of the government, in a non-political position. That is what it should be. You should not be based on your politics, what you believe, or any of that other shit.

But that's never been the case with bureaucracy. That's how a lot of the control mechanisms of our government come into play, the regulations, the medical reforms and the medical regulations, everything that you hear and understand, like most of what we actually live in today is based on bureaucracy. It's not even necessarily based a lot on government laws or any of that stuff. A lot of the organizations and bureaucrats that are either far left, which all of them have been, or left-leaning. So everything obviously

is going to be geared towards that Pacific thing. But when they talked about Project 2025 and they said, oh my God, this is going to be a dictatorship. Donald Trump has, he has championed this project 2020. And Donald Trump even had to come out and say,

I don't even know, I don't know shit about project. He said, I've not even read this thing and I'm not planning on reading it because this is not coming from my mouth, basically. He said, I'm going to do what I am pledging to do

and what I'm telling the American people, I'm going to do. And that's exactly what he's been doing. Yeah. And so I guess my point here is, is that exactly what the Democrats were warning the American public on about Project 2025 is exactly what they already have in place. And so for Donald Trump and his team, they are going to have a very big uphill battle because 90% of all the bureaucrats and all the organizations and even including USAID,

we were already seeing that how that funding goes and what they were funding. that is just one organization. That is one entity. Imagine all the other entities. There's a reason why they are slow walking this vote for Cash Patel and the FBI. The FBI, I believe, there's so many good agents. There's so many good agents in the FBI. And many of those agents have to do what they have to do

because they work their ass off to get in the positions they got into. And so then when they had these leaders of authority that come in over them, well, if you don't do what you're told to do, then you're going to be fired. And then your entire life, maybe that's your dream to be an FBI agent is gone. And so hopefully, I hope that a lot of these FBI agents now are going to be like, oh, you know what, thank God the Trump administration's in. And I do hope the Trump administration really evaluates all of the agents to see, like, who actually was just following orders and trying to make sure that, hey, you know,

I don't want to be a part of this, but I'm doing my job, right? But there are definitely influential. We just heard yesterday. There were 5,000 FBI agents that participated in January 6th investigations. 5,000. I think out of what, 30,000 or something or I don't know exactly how many, but 5,000 out of 30. They implemented into January 6th. I do have a couple more because getting a little bit of a long episode, but I do want to play Jamie Raskins.

I believe it's Jamie Raskins. Have we played this video yet? I don't think we have. This is just a quick clip of what Jamie Raskins said. Now, for those that do not remember who Jamie Raskins is, Jamie Raskins is a guy that said when the storming Trump mobs come on January 20th, we're going to turn them away and we're going to invoke civil war conditions and say that you're not allowed to come here because we are not allowing President Trump

to become president. This is the same dude. This is what he has to say about USAID. Don Musk. Elon Musk. You didn't create U.S. aid the United States Congress did for the American people. And just like Elon Musk did not create U.S. aid, he doesn't have the power to destroy it. And who's going to stop him? We are. We're going to stop him.

Elon Musk, you may have illegally seized power over the financial payment systems of the United States Department of Treasury, but you don't control the money of the American people. The United States Congress does that under Article 1 of the Constitution. And just like the president who is elected to something cannot impound the money of the people, we don't have a fourth branch of government called Elon Musk. And that's going to become real clear. This illegal, unconstitutional interference with congressional power is threatening lives all over the world. I'm hearing from my constituents who work for U.S. aid and U.S. aid contractors in Maryland, in Washington, all over the world.

And they're telling us that this is a killer in terms of their cutoff of HIV and AIDS preemption. It's a killer in terms of anti-malarial education. It's a killer in terms of all of the efforts to shut down global viruses. Now, I don't know what Elon Musk's intentions are. I don't know what Elon Musk's motivations are. I don't know what his purposes are, but they've got nothing to do with what has been lawfully adopted by the people of the United States of America through the Congress. of the United States. We're going to defend USAID all the way. And I want to say finally this.

I've heard some murmurings in support of this outrageous, scandalous, illegal maneuver that they just need some time to do some studies for evaluations. Well, I've heard from multiple constituents working in USAID that they have removed all evaluations from the USAID website. And And they have shut down immediately. As of right now, all of the evaluation is taking place of U.S. aid efforts all over the world. This has nothing to do with evaluation. This is about termination and obliteration of the major foreign aid programs of the United States of America, all of which together total less than $40 billion.

We have a Pentagon budget of 900. No one cares. No one cares anymore about what he's saying. Listen, I will put it this way. There is a congressman that has introduced on the Democrat side articles of impeachment for Donald Trump today. So they're already starting this. Yep. And so if you guys thought this was going to be an easy four years, it's definitely not.

And so we're going to close this with some people that were out there and they were yelling and screaming. and Elon for prison. They got all the things. One person stated that if no resolution is reached by March 6th, 2025, they will order the secession from the United States and the joining of Canada as a member. I wanted you to hear this real quick. Listen. Definitely a dude.

Sorry. Oh, damn, that sounds just like Alex Jones, actually. Sorry. But looks like a chick kind of somewhat. Sounds like a guy. Definitely a dude. Definitely a guy. That's all I'm saying.

Who knows? Listen, USAID is nothing more than a front for funding of our taxpayer dollars going to the deep state and the bureaucracy that is the CIA cover for doing whatever their dirty work is around the world, but also more specifically against the American people themselves. And yet you have to look at the people that are coming out and support for. USAID and more specifically against Elon Musk that is exposing corruption against the American people that are paying their hard-earned tax dollars every single week when they work. This is where your money is going.

And that should piss off every single American more than anything in this world. When you work your ass off and your money is going to all this craziness, but more specifically probably being kicked back and funneled back to the politicians in which the, the, that they are protesting this finding. And this is just, I believe, the tip of the iceberg. USAID is just one of them. That's why they're definitely trying desperately to slow walk the confirmation of Cash Patel and many others. This is going to get spicier.

And in more specific terms, the Democrats are trying to call their goons out. They're trying to call out their little soldiers. to do crazy things, probably extremist type things. And just the past four years, if Republicans would have ever done this by going on mainstream media and saying, we got to fight, we got to go out there in the streets and we got to, you know, we got to fight this, you know, basically call them for war. I mean, they even said war in some of these videos. But yet they said that what Donald Trump did during the inauguration speech on, what was, January 6th,

And they said his speech was an excitement of an insurrection. But yet what they're doing right now is not. What they're doing right now is not an excitement of violence or a uprising. That's absolutely what they're doing. They're literally calling for violence. They're calling for a war in the streets. And so we'll see how this all plays out. What I will say is that it seems like Donald Trump is not screwing around at the very least.

Yeah, we got a new sheriff in town. We absolutely do. And so we're going to close this with the song that we, well, that we started with, which is, it's a new day by Holy See featuring Vicki Vox. And it is a new day. Woke is dead. Get over. Keep crying.

Peace out. Peace out, guys.