Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - World War 3 Podcast | Russia Ukraine War | US Drone Shot Down By Russia Fighters

Episode Date: March 15, 2023

There was a US drone that was potentially downed by Russia fighter jets over the Black Sea today. Could this be a major escalation of war between Russia and the United States.... Is this another step closer to World War 3 or a Nuclear war? On this episode of World War 3 Podcast | Russia Ukraine War | US Drone Shot Down By Russia Fighters, we discuss what you can do to survive in the event of a nuclear war or nuclear fallout, and we touch on the potential cause of the conflict to begin with.

Out here on the street, I'm losing my. You've gotten to me, and that's my main summer day. Hello and welcome to Investigate Earth Podcast. I'm your chat alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry. Say hello, Sherry. Hey, guys, we're so glad you're here. Welcome to the podcast. Hope you're having a fabulous day today.

Hope you are having a fabulous day. It is March 14th, 2023, about 7 p.m. here on the East Coast of the United States. And the name of that song is I'm going underground by Flex Vortex. And we're going to talk a little bit about the possibilities of you maybe having to go underground at some point in time with what is going on this world. Now, if you're on Twitter or know anything about Twitter, World War III has been trending so much. I mean, literally the past year or two, especially since the Russia-Ukraine war conflict. And so this podcast, we're going to talk about again World War III, but especially because, of the latest escalation or potential escalation in U.S. or NATO involvement against Russia.

And so that is a U.S. drone crash. And from what we're hearing right now, it was two Russian fighter jets that intercepted a U.S. drone, a very, very expensive drone, by the way. These drones are multi-millions of dollars, some of our most advanced drones. and they intercepted this drone over the Black Sea, which for those of you don't know, the Black Sea is right under Ukraine and right above Turkey. Now, Turkey, obviously, we know Turkey is a NATO member. And we also know that if Russia ever even accidentally does anything on a NATO ground,

Article 5 will be triggered, which then puts NATO having to defend NATO, right? So this is just a very, very close area. Black Sea is not a huge place. It is, it is big, but it's not as big as, say, the Pacific or Atlantic. So you have this conflict going on in the air with Russia fighter jets and U.S. drones. And so this happened today. This happened March 14, 2023. A lot of people were obviously very worried and concerned about could this be an escalation in the involvement with the United States or NATO versus Russia? and that is something we definitely have to take into consideration. But on this particular episode, guys, we're going to talk about a lot.

Now, we've covered the World War III topic a lot. We've covered the Russia-Ukraine topic a lot. And, you know, our stance on the Russia-Ukraine situation has been back and forth. I got to be honest, for those of you that know what we talk about on this podcast, and also for those of you that know that most of what the mainstream media has said to us, especially the past three to four to five years, most of it has been a lie. And so when the Russia-Ukraine war started and then the months after the Russia-Ukraine war happened, we had this mass.

It was almost as if it was a coordinated attempt to get everyone on the side of Russia, everyone against, I mean, sorry, everyone on the side of Ukraine, everyone against Russia. and they really wanted to pump as much money into the Ukraine as humanly possible. Now, there's also another thing we're probably going to cover a little bit today, and I was thinking about this, and I actually talked to you about it, Sherry, too, a little bit, that, you know, we want to do a separate podcast on the potential CIA involvement in the 2014 Ukraine elections. Now, a lot of people have wondered.

there's always people searching for why did this war really happen we've talked about many various scenarios of why the russia ukraine war even started right we've talked about the the bio labs that were in ukraine we know that i mean even our own government in the united states admitted that we had what they considered um i don't know what their actual term for it was but they basically tried to downplay that it was like some kind of little you know just a little lab that we're just doing whatever. But it sounded like it was probably not a very good lab, probably chemical warfare that was being done in there, or maybe even something similar to Wuhan. We don't know. But then we've also heard many reports that, you know, we potentially have nuclear

warheads or arsenals inside of Ukraine on the Russian border. And at the very least, we know that we have weapons inside of the Ukraine. And Ukraine not being a NATO country, which is why Russia was always against Ukraine being a NATO country to begin with is because of the fact that Russia and United States have always been at odds. I mean, obviously, you remember the Cold War with USSR. This is not Russia and Ukraine, I mean, sorry, Russia and the United States do not play nice. They're not best friends. They're not friends. They don't want,

Russia does not want anything the United States on their border, which is another reason why Ukraine is held out for a long time of being a part of NATO because of the threat of Russia right there, you know, at them. Now, for a while, Ukraine and I kind of want to say this, Russia allowed Ukraine to operate how they did and do their thing. And then as the United States started to become more involved and more engaged in Ukrainian politics, these are things that we don't often talk about nowadays. You don't hear mainstream media talking about it. You don't hear any of this. But what we can talk about, and we're going to talk about on this episode, is the potential see.

The CIA overthrow of the Ukrainian government in 2014, when at that time they did have a, what the mainstream media wants to say, as a pro-communist official in office. Then they basically overthrew him. He ran out of Ukraine because of a lot of things that happened during that whole timeframe. And we're going to talk specifically about, well, okay, you say CIA involvement. Okay, what sources do you have? Well, we're going to talk about those sources. We're going to talk about why that is a very, very good possibility. And we're going to do all that on today's podcast.

But do you want to just tell you guys, too, Truth World Order, we just posted a new article on truthworldorder.com. That is our members-only platform or, and look, you don't have to be a paid member necessarily. You can be a free member. We will release some things that are for paid members only, but we're also going to release a lot of stuff that are just for members, you guys. And the reason we have this platform is, you know, one of the ways that people can talk and people can seek information right now is podcast. But as we have been seeing lately, and we've seen this the past couple years, the globalist, I would call it, the deep state. And these people are coming after every source of information that is not aligned with the narrative, that is not aligned with their world global speech. and so we have to create our own platforms to where we can try to get as many of you guys over to these platforms in the event that, say, Spotify or Apple, which Apple already does it to us, most other platforms podcast-wise do it to us.

Spotify is the only one that lets anybody hear our stuff hardly. If we talk about anything controversial, you'll never find us on a lot of the platforms. I mean, some of them you do, but not very many. So for this reason, we created truthfully. World Order. We're going to have the ability to post podcast in the event we ever get censored or banned or you never see us again. That is a place you want to be signed up. And then also, you know, just as a free member, you can also see articles. We just post a new article, a breakdown of the potential UFO interdimensional time traveler theory and how that would work. And it breaks it down very well. So I want you guys to go on there and read that. But make sure you sign up. If you want to support us, you can by sign up for a monthly plan. If you don't want to do that, you can sign up for free. So I want to let you know.

And mainly our number one social media site we use now is Twitter. So if you want to follow us there, investigate Earth Podcasts. Please go follow us. And that's all I got to say as far as housekeeping matters. Well, that was a great job, babe. Okay. But anyways, so there was a U.S. drone crash over the Black Sea today. And It was a moment of fraught with danger. I mean, there's a lot of stuff going on. Now, according to BBC, the encounter between Russia jets and a U.S. drone, which resulted in the drone crashing into the Black Sea, appears to be the most significant publicly acknowledged U.S.-Russia confrontation since Russia's all-out invasion of Ukraine more than a year ago.

And as such, it raises a lot of questions and represents a moment fraught with danger. The United States National Security Council NSC John Kirby says there have been other international. intercepts even in recent weeks, but that this one was different. And so could this have been an accident? Well, based on the actions of the Russian pilots, it's clear that it was unsafe, unprofessional, and was the verdict of the Pentagon's press secretary of Air Force, brigadier general, Pat Ryder. He said, I think the actions speak for themselves.

Does the behavior of Russia's pilots allegedly dumping fuel in the path of the drone, and then colliding with it represent a significant escalation? So what we are hearing is basically they dumped fuel. The fighter jet got in front of this drone, dumped fuel on it. And then somehow, I guess another aircraft, which I'm not exactly sure how this exactly would work. Some, I guess, supposedly interfered with their propeller, which doesn't make sense. I don't know how you're going to do that without. Sparked an explosion because of the fuel?

Maybe. I mean, that's possible, I guess. But how did we even know that they poured fuel on this thing? I thought that was very strange. Strange that we even know. that's how this happened. But according to Russia, they said that there were two Russian pilots around the drone, and it was, you know, controlled by an unmanned pilot.

And they said it just started flying and going crazy and crashed, is what Russia is saying. So they're not accepting any responsibility of this crashed drone. Yeah, well, we're going to talk about the latest, latest on Russia, what they're saying. You know, they're going to continue to come out with different things. as they learn more. And we're going to talk about what, I guess, some of their responses are. You said that's, I guess, one of their responses.

And I think they've had probably seven responses now as they continue to get more information and otherwise. But, yeah, I mean, okay, so you spray fuel in the path of a drone, fine. You know, I don't know, though, that that would cause an explosion. I don't know that that would cause a propeller, propellered aircraft to burst into flames or any of that stuff. I mean, there's a lot of safety. mitigation things that don't allow that to happen, typically.

But could the United States be downplaying or both sides be downplaying what actually happened, right? The United States may not want to come out and say Russia intentionally shot our drone down. And also, they may not 100% know what happened right now. That could also be the potential. But what we do supposedly know, according to the United States, and I say that with quotes, It was in international waters. And so this was... International air.

Yeah, this was an area that both Russia and United States can operate. It's not in anyone's airspace. That would be a whole different thing if that was in someone else's airspace, especially in NATO country. But what we do know is that this was in international airspace. So other than how the drone went down is the biggest factor here. It's not about where it went down necessarily. I mean, I did mention the fact that the Black Sea is north of Turkey, and Turkey is a NATO member. And, you know, anytime you have any kind of military operations going on that close to a NATO country, especially with Russia fighter jets patrolling this area, you have the potential risk of escalation or some type of event happening on NATO soil.

But here's the weird thing. You know, the fact that Russia jets are patrolling the Black Sea area, right? And I think they're probably specifically patrolling the Black Sea area, especially considering that NATO country is right below there, which is Turkey. So Russia knows that United States is going to be having, you know, drones, whatever, KC-135, refueling aircraft, fighter jets probably potentially patrolling there. it is just a it is literally a recipe for disaster because you're surrounded by NATO countries and then you have Russia fighters that are operating in the Black Sea and the reason I said the Black Sea is not like the Pacific Ocean or the Atlantic Ocean it's a small it's like a lake of oceans basically I mean it's a big lake but it's still not huge so when you have international

waters such as the Black Sea and then you have the potential of conflict between NATO countries, United States in this particular case, and Russia, which is also patrolling this, the southern, you know, they're patrolling in the south of Ukraine. They're probably specifically looking for United States assets or military operations in that area. I think they probably found this drone doing that. And actually, they have kind of come out. Russia has said in a couple of statements about what they thought was happening. And we'll touch on that in just a second. But according to the Pentagon, the whole incident. incident lasted about 30 to 40 minutes, and during that time, General Ryder said that there was

no direct communication between Russia or American militaries. U.S. officials say that they believe the Russian SU 27 jets involved, likely suffered some damage, indicating that a collision was not deliberate. It says, I do not know that the State Department is raising our concerns about the incident directly with the Russian government, he added. What, if anything, does the episode mean for the future of American drone operations over the Black Sea, and for the vital surveillance such operations provided to Ukraine. And it says if the message is that they want to deter or dissuade us from flying or operating in an international airspace over the Black Sea, Mr. Kirby told broadcaster VOA,

then that message will fail because that is not going to happen. Not surprisingly, Russia will like to make it as hard as possible for Ukraine's allies to carry out such work. And Washington is being tight-lipped about what has happened to the drone. And after the collision, U.S. remote pilots were forced to bring it down. to the Black Sea. General Ryder would not say where it landed or whether a Russian Navy was trying to recover it. Audio recording circulate no social media seemed to indicate some type of Russian recovery operation was underway, but this has not been confirmed. And clearly Washington would not be

happy if such sensitive surveillance technology fell into Russian hands. And for Joe Biden, determined to support Ukraine for as long as it takes, said that this is a delicate moment. it's not just Western weaponry that is helping Ukraine to withstand Russian invasion. It's also a vast quantity of real-time intelligence on every aspect of Russia's military operations, including the movement of vessels in the Black Sea and the launch of missiles aimed at targets across Ukraine, which is going to bring me to my next point. The next point here is that from what I've read and kind of research, Russia heavily depends on the Black Sea for operations inside of the Ukraine, right?

And so even though we think about this as an incident that involved a downing of a United States drone, a very, very expensive drone at that, I think a lot of these attacks could be taken place from Russia inside of Ukraine, whether it be from ships or whatever. But these drones that are obviously over the Black Sea are obviously also providing a very intricate. data to Ukraine military as far as where Russia is, what they're doing, what, how they're doing things. And to me, that's just another whole other step of involvement in the United States War between the United States, between the United States and Russia. Yeah. Yeah, but yeah, the proxy war between Russia and Ukraine and, or the proxy war between United States, Russia, Ukraine. Sorry, I'm getting confused. But that alone, it just tells me that this whole situation is getting on a hand pretty fast.

Now, the Kremlin is blaming the United States for the crash drone. They're saying right now that the drone was flying with transponders off towards Russian borders. And so this was an update. After nearly two hours since the story first broke in international press, the Kremlin, which is the Russian government, has issued its version of events concerning U.S. drone crash in the Black Sea Tuesday. The Russian Defense Ministry said nothing about the Pentagon's allegations that a Russian SU27 aircraft dumped fuel on the MQ9 drone

but instead blamed the pair of Russian jets erratic maneuvering for the collision. Quote, U.S. drone MQ9 fell into the Black Sea on Tuesday morning due to its own sharp maneuvering. Russian fighters did not come into contact with it and did not use weapons. the Russia defense ministry said according to Russia media, the statement is as follows. As a result of sharp maneuvering around 930

Moscow time, unmanned aerial vehicle MQ9 went into an uncontrolled flight with a loss of altitude and collided with the water surface. The Russia fighters did not use airborne weapons, did not come into contact with the unmanned aerial vehicle, and returned

safety to their home, safely to their home in the airfield. And so the Russian fighters had been scrambled in response to the drone being picked up on radar. The ministry clarified that on the morning of March 14, the airspace control of the Russian aerospace forces had recorded the flight of the U.S. unmanned aerial vehicle MQ9 over the Black Sea in the region of the Crimean Peninsula in the direction of the Russia state border. However, the ministry further noted that UAV had been flying with his transponders turned

off while headed towards Russian border. And so interestingly, the Kremlin is accused in the Pentagon of ignoring military-to-military protocols related to the war in Ukraine, established in order to avoid inadvertent NATO-Russia clashes. The flight of the drone was carried out with the transponders turned off, violating the boundaries of the area of the temporary regime for the use of airspace, which is established for the purpose of conducting a special military operation, communicated to all users of the area. of international airspace and published in accordance with international standards. So given the Russian side has confirmed there was no shootdown, both sides can collectively, I guess, breathe a sigh of relief for now. But the reality is, is that according to Russia and the international standards, especially around this war, Russia is saying, look, if you don't want to cause conflict,

these are the things that we're going to do. United States is established that as well. You have to have transponders on. You cannot have secretive covert operations that you're trying to, you know, especially fly towards the Russian border or otherwise. And what they're saying is this drone did not have transponders on, which is not surprising whatsoever, right? But there's something that we've talked about a lot. And we've got to get into this a little bit. It's almost as if the United States is itching for a conflict with Russia.

They want to do something. It seems to invoke some type of clash. within Russia to where they can they can I guess what is the word they can justify military action or involvement in the war with

Russia and this is something a lot of politicians, senators and so on are coming out and saying guys we got to stop what we're doing we have to stop funding Ukraine like we are number one I mean we understand look regardless of whatever the case is, we don't want innocent people to die, we don't want all this stuff. But, you know, when Zelensky came out a couple weeks ago and said, if you don't keep giving us money and you don't give us what we need in this war, then your sons and daughters in the United States are going to fight and die in this war, right?

And this was something that was widely put out across all media. And there was a ton of backlash on the fact that Zelensky of Ukraine, the president of Ukraine, the president of Ukraine in a freaking country that we have zero to do with, quite honestly, is mentioning United States son and daughters to die for the war that they're involved in? Well, I think what he's meaning is if Ukraine loses this war, it's still going to establish a bigger war, like a world war. Now, if Ukraine loses this war, then Russia takes over Ukraine. Yeah, and they're saying that they won't stop.

No, they will. They will because they have no choice. Well, that's what Zelensky's idea is. Yeah, that's what his point is. His point is that if they take over Ukraine, they're going to keep going until they take over the world, that Russia wants power over everyone. Well, we know that Zelensky, for example, when that bomb or whatever, that inadvertent missile or whatever it was that went into Poland, I think it was, or wherever. He was one of the first one to say, it's Russia. We know it's Russia.

Invoke Article 5. Let's get this going. Because the Sunlessi does not give a damn about, you know, world war or peace or whatever. Because you got to think his country is being attacked and he don't care. Right. He either has his country or he doesn't have his country. They have nothing left.

So they have this is what they're fighting for and they have no other options. It's not like, you know, they're in Poland. Yeah. This is the end for them. Now, I do. Of course he wants to fight with all and everything he can. get and he's going to try to get other countries to put in as much as they can because he's fighting for the end. It's either they keep their country or they don't. You're exactly right. Now, I do want

to go to a point here real quick. And we got to go back to 2014 for a minute because I think there's a lot of stuff that people just don't realize about what probably is happening or how we got to where we are in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. We got to go back. Let's go back to a Forbes article. This is a Forbes News article. In 2014, this is the date. The date is April 16th, 2014.

And the article is actually titled Why CIA Director Brennan visited Keeve, which is the capital of Ukraine. And it says in Ukraine, the covert war has begun. So Ukraine is not

this is what the article says. Ukraine is on the brink of a civil war, Vladimir Putin has said, and he should know because the country is already in the midst of a covert intelligence war. Over the weekend, CIA director John Brennan traveled to Kiev. Nobody knows exactly why, but some speculate that he intends to open U.S. intelligence resources to Ukrainian leaders about real-time Russian military maneuvers. The U.S. has thus far refrained from sharing such knowledge because Moscow, or Moscow, is believed to have penetrated much of Ukraine's communication systems, and Washington isn't about to hand over its surveillance seekers to the Russians. And so it says if you have any doubts that the battle

was raging on the covert ops front, just considered today's events in Plotinko, where Ukrainian soldiers from the 25th Airborne Division handed over their weapons and APCs to pro-Russian militiamen and pretty much surrendered. So the big thing about this article is, is that CIA director went to Kiev, Ukraine, in 2014. Now, what is also very interesting about Ukraine in 2014? Well, there was an election in 2014 in Ukraine. And the election basically overthrew a president and elected a new president. And so there was these huge rumors that were circulating that this was a CIA coup to overthrow Ukrainian-elected government.

And so there was a news article that also came out not crazy long. This was actually December of 2014 where Oliver Stone says that Ukraine's revolution was actually a CIA plot. Now, I'm going to go ahead and tell you that this article is probably going to betray Oliver Stone as just this piece of shit. Now, Oliver Stone is a huge, I think he's a director. He was the director of JFK, which is a huge movie. and other classic movies that made the claim on a Facebook post on Tuesday

after interviewing Ukraine's former president. Now, he interviewed Ukraine's former president, which is a guy that was overthrown. And on Tuesday, he claimed the overthrow of Ukrainian government president of Victor Unicovich earlier this year was the result of an American plot.

And Ston, who was known for his left-wing politics, left-wing politics, made the claim be a post on a his Facebook page. In it, he revealed that he had spoken to the ousted ruler for four hours in Moscow for a new English language documentary produced by Ukrainians. Stollin did not provide many details on a documentary, but said it seems clear that the so-called shooters who killed 14 policemen wounded some 85 and killed 45 protestant civilians were outside third-party agitators.

And many witnesses, including Yunukovic, I can't say that name, and police officials believe these foreign elements were introduced by pro-Western factions with CIA fingerprints on them. Oh my gosh. That sounds very familiar to what's been happening here. Absolutely. So Stone compared the maiden protests, which started in late 2013, as part of backlash to the then-president pro-Russian anti-European policies, and which eventually led to his overthrow to protest incidents in Venezuela in 2002 and earlier that year. Create enough chaos as the CIA did in Iran, 53, Chile, 73, and countless other coups and legitimate government can be toppled,

Stone wrote. It's America's soft power technique called regime change 101. So in Stone's telling the deal that the then-president agreed to that would keep him in power was tossed aside. When well-armed neo-Nazi radicals force, Unukovych to flee the country within repeated assassination attempts. Now, by the next day, a new pro-Western government was established and immediately recognized by the U.S. as in the Chavez-2002 coup. In actuality, Ukrainian parliament voted to remove Unikovych, the president, from office.

Four days afterwards from the Russia city where he had fled after the vote, he insisted that he remained in charge of Ukraine even as new elections, called. So there was a huge thing. Now, everyone went after Oliver Stone about the CIA's potential involvement in the rebellion, uprising, and an overthrow of then the Ukrainian government. Now, this, now this president was a democratically elected president. He was pro-Russian. But when he was elected, there wasn't a lot of strife at that time between Russia and Ukraine. And I'll tell you why. He was a pro-Russian guy, right? And although he said, like, I'm going to be your leader and whatever. And he was elected, I'm also going to ensure that we are going to stay out of NATO and out of the European Union. He was very stock on. He is not joining, nor is you. You

Ukraine joining the European Union or NATO. And it was probably a deal, I would assume, of Russia and this leader, however it may be democratically elected at the time. I'm sure a consensus that's like, okay, now that you're elected,

as long as you don't eff around with Russia and you don't join NATO and whatever, we're good. We're good. You can have your country. We're going to keep ours and we're good. Yes. So when when he was elected,

president, this guy, the West couldn't handle that because the West needed a very close border and potential arms thing with Ukraine. And they could not have that with a pro-Russian president. They just couldn't have it. And so this is when the CIA potential coup started. Now, there's another article. Why did America overthrow a democratically elected government in Ukraine? United States and European Union supported the overthrowing of a democratically elected government in Ukraine in February 2014. In particular, the USA conducted all the planning regarding the overthrowing of the government. U.S. politicians facilitated most of the funding in the Ukrainian protest. So hear that again, because I want to emphasize this.

Sorry. U.S. politicians facilitated most of the funding in the Ukrainian protest. Okay. Now, if we think back of the things that have happened in the United States over the past four years, you've got Black Lives Matter protests where they riot and burn cities down. You've got Antifa, where they riot and burn cities down. And guess what? Soros and many other globalists and also that are connected with the deep state and the globalist

fund these campaigns. We know that for a fact. So I would almost certainly would love to see the funding and the lineage of where the money came from and went during that 2014 uprising of Ukrainian protesters, right, which probably came from all countries around the world, much like what happens in Black Lives Matter and Antiva. We don't even know. A lot of these people are not even from the United States in these riots and protests. Exactly. But it causes whatever it takes to do whatever it takes to overthrow things. CIA has been great at this for years in so many countries.

And it just so also happens that George Soros is also very good to overthrowing governments with his money. And I am sure that the link between Soros and the CIA and other government organizations and entities are very well and closely connected with globalists. So we're starting to lay out of how some of this Russia-Ukraine thing happened to begin with. But moreover, the United States State Department handpicked and installed new politicians in the country at the expense of what democracy or political stability, the involvement of the United States in overthrowing of a democratically elected government could be explained in a realistic perspective of international relations. This owes to the fact that much of the concern in this involvement was focused on serving the interests of the United States. The aspect can be seen in U.S. disregard of the destruction and many deaths that occurred during the civil conflict in Ukraine. So upon the overthrowing of the Ukrainian government, there was much celebration in the United States media and political circles. The majority of people in the United States held these as, I don't know what that word is, but while I'm not.

ignoring the fact that the neo-Nazi militias instigated the instability. Now, there's something I got to tie in with this as well, because we've heard a lot of theories about neo-Nazis, Nazis inside of Ukraine. We've talked about this since the Russia-Ukraine war started. And Putin was big on that, calling them all Nazis. Nazis, yes. But Putin was not just calling them Nazis. the mainstream media was actively fighting against any term or phrase or theory or anything that pointed to any Nazis in Ukraine. But this is in 2014. This is in 2014 where it was kind of known and the media wasn't really fighting back against how much neo-Nazi

I guess military men and just military group people in Ukraine were neo-Nazis. And it wasn't really fought back against them. It was almost acknowledged as if this new regime was neo-Nazis, right? But nowadays, they're not neo-Nazis. They're loyal people of democracy and all this stuff, right? But when we focused on the events that triggered the overthrow, It is apparent that were it not the interventions of the United States, Ukraine could not have been in its current state of devastation. By the end of 2013, the economy of Ukraine was in disarray.

Despite the then-president requesting the U.S. and EU to support the country and bailing it out of the economic devastation, the government seemed not to be concerned on these problems. It was because of this that the government of Ukraine chose to accept. an offer by Russia and its economic billout. If the government of the United States was concerned on the well-being of the state, it could not have allowed these things to happen. Rather, it could have employed other forms and strategies of solving to perceive problems in the country. And so while the politician in Washington pretended to advocate for democracy, this was all hypocrisy, as the motive was different. It should be considered that the government, which the U.S. was so keen at destabilizing, was a democratically elected one.

With a disregard to the peace and stability of the nation, U.S. politicians were encouraging riots, glorifying violent pushes, as well as destabilizing constitutionally established structures. This was something that United States politicians, media, and everything was doing in 2014, on behalf of the Ukrainian people, quote unquote, making everyone believe that the Ukrainian people should riot and stand up against this regime. And that's what they wanted. Right. Yeah, they knew that they did not have control of Ukraine.

and they wanted to have control Ukraine without necessarily having to be in NATO. And I think a good point about George Soros, other people funding these type of things, even if the real Ukrainian civilization don't believe in this effort of protesting, they're going to bring people in to protest as Ukrainians, even though they're not Ukrainians. Yeah. Because that's what they want to be seen. And this is the way to overthrow the government. Absolutely.

Yeah, we're at a place right now where, you know, the CIA, we knew that the director of the CIA Brennan was meeting in Kiev in 2014. Then we know that the government was overthrown. There were massive riots, massive protests. There was what I would probably call very similar to what we've seen in the past three years with the pandemic and others. And we talk about this a lot. Well, even like Black Lives Matter, even January 6th. Yes. It was infiltrated by FBI.

and all kinds of things. Yeah, absolutely. And George Soros buses and, you know, all kinds of things. Well, the Black Lives Matter for sure, the Antifa stuff. You know, there are things that are not hard to do anymore, right? I mean, with ways of, you know, there's something that we've seen on Twitter and other social media where the amount of bots that can just drive a narrative, you know. And it's funny because they always want to blame it on one side.

They always try to blame bots on influence an election to potentially, I guess, elect a Republican or conservative or pro-constitutional president of United States. And it's like that theory that says, like, if you are accused, or if the person accusing you, or sorry, if there's someone accusing you of cheating, you're the one cheating. You're probably the one doing it, right? Or something, right? The person that's accusing is cheating. Yeah.

Yeah. And so it's like with the government that has been saying, oh, the Trump administration, the Republicans are this, they're doing this to. influence an election. Now, it's really just them doing it, and they're trying to shift, the blame, shift the focus, and they do this very well. But what happened in Ukraine in 2014 for the uprising was mass formation psychosis. It was propaganda. It was every single thing that they turned to, they saw that this was an unjust, whatever the United States and the West had to do by using big tech and other platforms and globalists and the World Economic Forum.

And I'm sure all this stuff is met and decided and planned. During these meetings, those private meetings at Davos, Switzerland, in the World Economic Forum, because they are the ones that control pretty much the world, whether people realize they're not, these private meetings are the things that they talk about, this stuff, the Ukraine thing, the overthrowing of governments, how we're going to overthrow Russia, which is what they really want. And it's vice versa. But what was really interesting to me is if this really is the case and this is really what happened, And this is how this new presidency came into form.

I don't know, and I don't want to put you on the spot. But do you remember when Trump first became president and there was something about giving money to Ukraine, but he was almost like bribing them first before they got their money that were supposed to give them? Well, no, that was Biden. No, Ukraine did. No, it was, it was Trump. And Trump was supposed to give Ukraine all this money. Well, I don't remember that.

Yeah, but I remember this. There was a phone call. Specifically. There was a phone call. and he almost like did some kind of bribe or whatever. But the reason why I'm saying that, of course, the Biden administration, they're huge in, you know, bribing Ukraine with money. They have a bunch of money laundering stuff going on there.

So my wondering, like just listening to all this is this new establishment that we've put in place, is this based on bribes? They're getting all this money and they're put in position. and they're getting paid to do this by us? Well, yeah, I mean, I think that's part of it. But as we talked about the FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried crash of F-T-X and how much money, Sam Bankman-Fried and F-T-X was the second biggest sponsor or, I guess, funder of Democrats, right? Right.

Number one was George Soros, which is a overthrow of governments around the world. And also George Soros is highly responsible for the most part of all the very left, extreme left, leaning DAs, prosecutors or whatever, inside the United States that are letting out murders and rapists and whoever else to try to destabilize a country. But number two was Sam Bankman-Fried, which was just what we have called before a fall guy for the Democratic or Deep State Party. And so Sam-Bankman-Fried then got Ukraine on board with this FTX thing, which we talked about in the FTX sandal. And then there was very many reports of all this funding. that was going to Ukraine was being also reversed into FTX, some of that, and then put back in the

pockets of especially a lot of Democrats and potentially some Republicans. Yeah, money laundering, pretty much. And plus we are with our taxpayer money. And we have been funding Ukraine. I don't know how long we've been funding them, but I know at least since Trump has been in office and probably before that. And Biden, you know, we fund them before this war even started. We give them money every year for whatever. Yeah.

And, you know, is this partially a bribe on top of what you're talking of? about the George Soros, the FTC stuff, all the money coming in and out. You know, we all know that's how Hunter Biden made most of his money is in Ukraine. Not just Ukraine, actually. There's a new report. Yeah, there's a new report that I think it was, what, $3 million that Hunter Biden got from China, Communist Party. There's a new report about that. I mean, look, and we've said before this administration or whoever's actually in charge

now is controlled by China. And China's heavily involved in the New World Order and the globalist stuff. Well, and I'm just saying to me, I still feel like it's Russia and. China partnering in this whole thing. Well, here's the thing. I would say that. But I know that the president is coming. I don't know if you've read this.

He is going to Russia next week. Who? President Z or whatever is there. No, no. He's already been to Russia. He's already met with Putin. Now he is going to me with Zelensky. Yes.

Yeah. And he's trying to supposedly stop this war or help end it peacefully. But I just don't believe that because I feel like China is on the side of Russia. Well, here's the thing about the Russia-China situation. If we want to take this from a perspective of let's like ignore the stereotypes of what the media tells you about what is really going on with the Russia-Ukraine war, let's ignore the fact that Russia is invading Ukraine. And that's what the media wants you to say. And they are. I mean, they are invading Ukraine.

What reasons of that we don't 100% clearly know. But I think we've made a good statement about why. Yeah, potentially, yeah. And so let's ignore all that stuff. But let's think about, too, that, you know, Russia is, at the very least, there's one thing that stood out to me a lot about this. And I could be wrong. But Russia has been a very huge advocate against globalism and the New World Order and the World Economic Forum and there's been many statements made about Putin about this and this and this. But then obviously you look at the war in Ukraine and killing innocent people and you say, how could someone be against?

against in any light the New World Order or people or like even Putin's talked about, you know, transgenderism is bad and they're trying to get it do away with religion and some of these things. And some of the thing I say is, you know, there's no country that is that is right. I mean, the United States has killed millions of innocent people in many wars. And I'm not defending Russia here. We don't know what the what the case is. But we do know that China and Russia both, although China, I believe, has heavy involvement in globalist-type things, but I also think they are very also powerful enough to where they can resist it and ensure that they're not going to be a part of that system. At least they think so. But Russia knows that NATO and the West is right at their back door. I mean, it is surrounded by the Western countries. countries in a big, very powerful, you know, geography.

Yeah. And alliance. And that's a very trippy thing. And especially if you believe in any shape, form and fashion, if you research a little more about the CIA embalment, we're not going to go crazy deep in that. Today, we probably need to do a whole other podcast on the ends announced of how the CIA involvement in the coup in Ukraine happened in 2014. But if that is the case, then we got to rethink why the Russia-Ukraine war happened. And not just the biolabs or the potential weaponry that was in Ukraine before the Russia invasion happened. We got to think about if the CIA implemented a coup, which they Russia themselves said, then we got to know that, right?

And we have to put that into perspective of what happened. Well, Putin's statement the other day or today, I think, was, you know, he said, we are fighting this war for Russia. If we don't gain access to Ukraine, our children aren't going to be safe. And, you know, he's doing it for his country somehow. That's what he says. Is what he keeps saying. Something about his statehood of his country. But still, I don't understand his reasoning.

Well, and a huge thing here, too, is that the United States always wants to use the phrases and the things. and the justifications of so many things of why we need to defeat Russia, why we need to overthrow the president, and why we need to do all these things, because it's a communist country or it's a, you know, it's a dictatorship. Well, guess what? Like, the United States is very close to that as well. And that's what I'm saying. But the United States just wants to be the most powerful communist country.

Exactly. I mean, that's so funny. And or they want to be aligned more heavily with the globalist. I mean, it's one of the two. So they're fighting against a. country that they don't supposedly want to be like, but this is where they're going, because they do want to be like that, but they want to be the best in the most powerful country that is a communist country, meaning the United States of America.

Now, I will say this, and I'm going to say this, and we sometimes get a lot of flack on this, but we got to say it because it's what's being said. I watched a news report, or not a news report, I watched a underground reporter that's over there, not Patrick Lancaster this time, even though I, Actually, I saw another Patrick Lancaster video recently, and he said something similar to another reporter that's on the ground, which is a United States reporter. He's not conservative. He's not Democrat. He's libertarian.

He believes in the rights of all people. But he goes in Ukraine, and he interviews people after the attacks that happened in Ukraine. Well, Patrick Lancaster did that about a week ago, I believe. And he interviewed some businesses, and there was a school he interviewed. And he interviewed the people inside of the school, the headmasters or, you know, the principals or whatever. They're a young place that just got blown up. I don't know. But these people are saying that's Ukraine that are hitting these schools.

Then this other reporter I saw that said that these schools that are civilian schools inside of Ukraine are being hit by Ukraine. I mean, these are the principals, the teachers, the everybody's saying it was Ukraine. They hit us. So we still have that that we're dealing with, that narrative. There's a lot of reporters on the ground that are going just asking the people, the people on the ground, these principles, these whoever, the residents that are saying this is Ukraine that is doing this in a lot of cases that are hitting these schools, hitting these things. And then they're blaming it on Russia, but although we know this is Ukraine, because right after the fact that they would come in and like there was there was some injuries or whatever to happen. And there were Ukrainian soldiers that came in and right after this. No, no, not trying to help them.

They were trying to kill them. Yeah, I mean, there were reports that these people were coming in and surveying what they did. You know, so a lot of people think a lot of this stuff, especially civilian stuff, could be Ukraine. We don't know. We don't know that. So we're not going to say. And it's interesting that you said that because this is, you got to think about that. This comes to my mind too is when you said that, you know, we're not sure if it, who side they're from. Well, we have to remember there's a lot of independent groups coming in and fighting as well on both the side of Russia. And, you know, groups from our country and other countries all around, there's groups coming in from everywhere.

You know, for example, Russian, I think they have the Morgan group or whatever. This is a private, independent group that are using prisoners from Russia to come in and fight. Could it possibly be this independent group? And that's why Russia is saying, no, it's not, you know, not us. I mean, well, they'd have to be wearing Ukrainian flags, which they could. I mean, you know, they could. Well, I've seen reports of that of. of actual Russian soldiers pretending to be Ukrainian.

Yeah, I mean, that would be a smart move to do in some shape, forms of fashion. And I'm not saying that I know, and the same thing, Ukrainian soldiers could be wearing Russian soldiers stuff. We don't know. Yeah, the wars are not like they used to be. I mean, you remember, like, back in the day, wars were so proud. You were proud to be a part of your country. How dare you ever wear the other country's flag? But you'll do now anything to get away with stuff.

Yeah, exactly. So we don't know. I'm sorry, I'd be sneaky to it. Yeah, you would have to, yeah. I mean, in any situation, you've got to use any tactic possible to succeed. And so, yeah, I mean, who knows, you know, are these Russians or are they Ukrainians? But I think the root thing of this whole deal is, you know, why did it start? And regardless of why it started, there are tons of people that are dying.

I mean, think about the latest statistics. I think it was 3,000 civilians in Ukraine. Well, what we do know is Russian military casualties have exceeded 100,000. 50,000 Russian military. This is just what they're saying. And we think that Ukrainian military casualties are in excess of 100,000. So, I mean, you know, you're looking at 250,000 people that's amazing. People that have died.

And we don't even know necessarily the civilian casualties right now. That's harder to get a hold of. Yeah, that's something I just read. Yeah, 3,000 is probably a way low number. Okay, let's just think about 250,000 people. Where is a place where you would see 250,000 people altogether to kind of put, wrap our minds around how many people. Well, it's like two football stadiums.

Two football stadiums full of people. Huge football stadiums, yeah. That's how much it would be. Yeah. I mean, that's a ton of people. You know, lost human lives over war. No, it is. And I just hate that.

You know, on both sides. I don't want to see anyone die. It's awful. And the reason we do these episodes is because we want to know how, I mean, how we could really stop this. I don't know. But I think that just continually funding Ukraine, to, you know, defend, and I get you want them to be able to defend,

but like at what point are we going to look at how this happened or how it started? I think that I still believe that the West is heavily involved in a huge part of why this war even started to begin with. Well, and they're also in a huge part as far as sanctioning Russian millionaires over there. Million errors, I can't say that right. You know how they took all their young. dots and all those stuff. Well, a lot of those are billionaires.

Well, now they're starting to liquidate all that stuff. I'm talking about, like, I think I read $400 billion worth of money. Oh, I'm sure, yeah. That they're starting to liquidate and sell now. They're not just holding it anymore. They're selling it. Yeah, they're going to sell it. And then they're going to give it back to Ukraine.

And, you know, because they don't care. I mean, that's the biggest problem right now, like in the United States. And not just United States, any NATO country. If you're in U.K. or, I mean, or wherever you are that's a NATO country. You know, you're screwed. I say UK, but what I'm saying is the nine, I think there's nine NATO countries, I believe. I could be wrong. But all I'm saying is all their stuff is just going to be put back to Ukraine.

It's not going to you. It's not going to your country. They don't give a crap about what's going on to your country. Our countries are dying and just falling and crumbling while we're just giving everything we have to Ukraine. And potentially, we started that. And we really want to overthrow Russia. We've had this vendetta against them for a very long time. And we could go into the whole New World Order globalist thing about why that might want to be done.

And we've talked a little bit about it. If Russia really is that against globalism and potentially even China. And we're starting shit with China now, especially with Taiwan and all that stuff. These are two countries that seem to be against it. China's a little more involved in it. Maybe that's a tactic that they're using. but let's get on to the next part and I want to play this part

and guys I encourage you to listen this is a it's an insert of how to survive a nuclear fallout and I know that sounds nuts to even be playing this but I think we need to play this

and I hope there's no freaking ads in this video because I didn't download it and if there is I'm going to pause and skip the damn ad because we're not getting paid for that either but listen but this is done by city prep and YouTube channel. I want you guys to check them out since we are playing their

video. I thought he made a ton of great points. It's a very well done video. And I want to play this, and I want to play this because as escalation and tensions rise in this war situation, we could have sat here and read out all the things you could potentially do to survive a nuclear attack or survive a nuclear fallout. But these are things that we need to be thinking about. I mean, these are things that we need to start thinking about whether you're in a city or the country or whatever. There are things that you have to at least very, very well know of what you need to do. Like what if 10 minutes from now right now, you guys, whether you're driving in your car, a lot of you're driving in your car going to work, or whether you're at your work, or whether you're not at home, but you live in an apartment building. Or you live in the country.

Or you have access to do things that you could prevent things or at least prolong your life in the event of. of an all-out nuclear attack. I want to play this to you guys. I want to play this because I think it's very important to play this. And then we'll talk a little bit about it after it's done. But I do think you guys should hear it's very interesting too. And maybe this information, in the event something does happen like this, right? These are things that you can go back to in your mind saying, all right, here's what we need to do to ensure that our family, my kids, our dogs, our potential food supply can survive a nuclear attack because it is possible whether we want to freaking admit it or not it is a possibility for sure and it's more possible now than we've heard

from in a long long time so let's play this and we'll interject as we go but let's play this and then we'll talk about it we'll talk about it as we go throughout the video here you go the threat of nuclear explosions has changed over the years the concept of mutually assured destruction between two superpowers has given way to several more nuclear-capable countries, tactical bombs, airburst, surface burst, hypersonic missiles, high-altitude detonations, improvised nuclear devices, and dirty bombs. The exact origin of a dirty bomb may not be known, so retaliatory strikes might not even be possible. Nevertheless, the radiological threat could kill you in the days, weeks, and months

after detonation. Even a small nuclear fission bomb can instantly vaporize anything at its center, have a blast radius that collapses most buildings. within a 20-mile radius and a thermal radiation radius of 48 miles even without wind. After that, prevailing winds can carry radioactive ash hundreds of miles. Just one crude, 150-kiloton bomb, like the one the North Koreans tested in 2017, detonated on a ship in the Long Beach Harbor, would spread enough deadly radioactive ash over an 1,800-mile area to give everyone in the affected area ARS, acute radiation syndrome. Everyone in a 450-mile radius would have serious radiation exposure complications that will likely lead to death within a few hours or days.

If the bomb were equivalent to the largest ever detonated, the deadly ash would spread from Los Angeles, California to Billings, Montana. If the blast doesn't kill you, the resulting fallout would. You don't want to survive the initial blast only to die a horrible death from radiation poisoning. This video will discuss steps you may take after a nuclear event to increase your odds of survival. by reducing your radiation exposure. The Google Career Certificate changed my life. There's an ad. I knew it was going to happen. But yeah, so there, and while this ad goes, I'm sorry,

there are things that you can do to prevent your radiation exposure. That is the number one thing you're trying to do to ensure your longevity of life after a nuclear explosion. It is the utmost importance. And it's good to know because I thought when a nuclear war happens, you're pretty much dead. Now, you can. There are things that you can do to increase your chances of survival. And let's continue this video because the ad is now off. So here you go.

Video will discuss steps you may take after a nuclear event to increase your odds of survival by reducing your radiation exposure. Download the start preparing survival guide to help you prepare for any. disaster. I'll post a link in the description and comments section below or visit cityprepping.com forward slash get started for a free guide to help you get started on your journey. And that link doesn't work by the way. I've already tried it. Get inside, stay inside, tune in. If you have some warning of the blast, you'll want to immediately get inside the nearest building and stay away from any windows. The deeper and lower you can get in a building, like an underground parking structure, the more likely you will be to survive. If you're

outdoors and the detonation occurs, lie face down at the lowest point you can find. If you're in your vehicle, get to the floorboard. After the shockway passes, get inside the nearest shelter location. Avoid touching your eyes, your nose, or your mouth. If you have a mask, wear it. If you can cover your mouth with a cloth or a towel when you are outside, do so. Understand that your clothes are likely contaminated will need to be disposed of as soon as possible. You also need to wash down as quickly as possible to remove any radiation from your skin. If you have pets that have come in after the blast, they'll need to be wiped down and then wash as soon as possible. The fallout would be lessened if the detonation is in the air or at a high altitude.

If it is a surface blast, thousands of tons of dirt and debris can be thrown several miles into the atmosphere, substantially increasing the amount of fallout. Now, I do want to mention something right quick, because I've studied this extensively. He talks about this disposing of your clothes, you know, especially if you're outside during the blast or whatever. But he also talks about washing off. right? The one thing you don't want to do in a nuclear attack is wash off with soap or any kind of soap whatsoever. Soap and things and chemicals that are inside of soap can actually adhere to radiation into your body and allow it to trap radiation inside of your cells. So in a

washing type thing where you're washing yourself down with anything, you want to actually, number one, start off by washing with cold water because cold water does not open your pores as much as warm water. And you don't want to use soap or any of that stuff. And then after you have extensively washed and scrub, don't scrub too hard with some kind of lufa thing, especially if you have soap still in it. You don't want to break skin or scratch any shape, form or fashion. Even wounds that you have.

Radiation enters your skin more so through wounds than just skin itself, especially if you have radiation particles or whatever on you. You just want to make sure that you wash with cold. water first to not allow those pores to completely open from the very beginning. You can then, as you wash and as you scrub lightly over your entire body, that's when you would want to then increase it to warm water to be able to, you know, to do that. But I wanted to point that out because he didn't mention that here. So here you go. The heat of the blast cools, unstable atoms from nuclear fission will mix with the debris particles from the blast.

These radioactive particles are the fallout that creates a dangerous. long-term effect of the blast. Think of these particles like campfire smoke. They may be odorless, but have you ever been in proximity of a campfire and walked away from it without smelling like smoke? It only takes a few particles to create cell damage. The harmful ionizing radiation of inheld particles can result in cell damage and eventually cancer. Lesions and radiation burns may erupt on the skin in areas where fallout particles have settled. After the shockway passes, your goal is to be inside before the fallout reaches you. The highest radiation levels will come with the fallout. Once the shockway passes, you may have between 10 and 15 minutes to find shelter

or protect yourself from the fallout. If you plan to move to a safer location after the blast, you must do so within these 10 to 15 minutes. Assuming your home, immediately close and lock all windows, turn off all fans and HVA systems. Close any fireplace stampers. You can use plastic sheeting and duct tape to seal off windows and doors and all airway entry points into your building, especially facing the direction of the blast zone. After a nuclear blasts, windows can show. shatter. Seal them off and continue to seal rooms to the middle of your structure, where you'll need to hunker down. If you expect people to come home, seal off an entry room where you can have them strip down and begin the decontamination process by wiping down and light washing before

moving to a more thorough shower. You need to shower off anyone who is outside immediately. Use soap, but do not use conditioning products as he's combining the radioactive particles to your hair and skin. Move to the center of the building. Radiation. I do got to say he's wrong there, because I actually read the official thing what they talked about there, but they recommend not using any soap whatsoever, including conditioners or soaps or any of that stuff. It can all adhere to radiation, and it's not worth it.

You can wash off particles with water itself. So just keep that in mind. And also, you know, keep this too in mind. There was a very popular TikTok video is How to Survive a Nuclear Blast. that had like 5 million downloads or views. And one of the things he says, if you're within a three to five-mile radius of the blast,

the first step you need to do is bend over and kiss your ass goodbye because you're not going to survive. It's just not happening, probably, right? And that is true. The closer you are to the blast, the less likely you are to survive unless you just happen to so be underground

during the blast to where you do not have any of the effects of the actual. explosion, the aftershock, and the intense radiation that's going to, you know, basically encompass that region. But I wondered being underground, would that include a basement? It would, yeah. As long as that basement is sealed off because you are protected by cinder blocks, typically,

the earth as well. But, you know, you just have to ensure that that basement entry is sealed off completely. But, yeah, basements are the number one place. I mean, honestly, if you look at the government's guidelines on how to survive and nuclear blast, even in a situation where you're not within 10 or 20 or 30 miles and you're in the fallout range, you need to be in a basement. And there's a lot of homes, especially in the South, like, for example, in the United States, whereas sand and stuff like that, you don't have a lot of basements. You're on slab homes. You do not have basement dwellings. And honestly,

like, it sounds nuts, but I've told Sherry this so many times. Like, I, regardless of where we are, I want to build an underground thing. I mean, it, Regardless of whatever it is, I mean, an underground some type of shelter, as much work as that may be or whatever, it gives you peace of mind at the very least. Yeah, that you can just go downstairs and you're sheltered. And yeah, because something that I don't know if this video is going to tell you or not, and I'm just kind of going through this, but some of this video does not tell you or not. But the first 72 hours after a nuclear blast are the most crucial. those 72 hours within that blast are your chances of survival go from

minuscule if you're outside or you're in contamination with the air and all that stuff to after 72 hours typically fallout will progress further east of you especially with the jet stream and all this stuff and that's just from the air contamination now you still have the contamination of potentially food

of you know wildlife life, all of these things that are going to probably die or have contamination themselves. That's all still very real, right? But I'm just saying from you and your initial exposure, your physical exposure to the blast, 72 hours is key. And so your most important time in a nuclear blast is the first 72 hours. And you better have Noah's Ark underground just so you can keep the animals going. There's a huge thing about that.

I mean, yeah, you have to have food supply. You have to have something where you can be able to survive a long period of time because there's something we've talked about before. A lot of people, this is like, what we're talking about here, by the way, is one nuclear blast, right, potentially, or two. But as we've talked about in other episodes, and I think it's important to talk about, when you have a all-out nuclear war, which is going to consist of potentially hundreds, if not maybe thousands of nuclear warheads. And if that happens, then you have what's called a nuclear winter to where the sun does not reach the earth. you basically go into almost an ice age. You're not going to be able to grow things. You're not going to be able to harvest things.

You're not going to be able to probably hunt because animals are going to die or be radiationally exposed. The only things that could potentially save you as fish potentially, especially in oceans maybe, that they're not as affected. But even eventually fish will be affected in radiation through fallout into the ocean. Although that is, from what I've read, I guess, can be. filtered more so, I guess, from salt water and the ocean and how all that works. So yeah, I mean, you do have a better chance if you can have some type of underwater type situation, but you're still going to have fallout, especially in small ponds, lakes. You have a better chance than an ocean-type fishing environment.

But you have to think about a nuclear explosion war is going to affect everything. But you just think about if all these animals are exposed, how do you start reproducing animals again. Well, you would have to have to have a system to where, because, I mean, you got to think about this too. I mean, with something that severe, like an all-out nuclear war, even animals that are giving birth, right, that are giving birth to new animals,

say a week after detonation, two weeks after. So these new animals may not be may not have been exposed to the radiation potentially. Somehow they get birth and they may not be exposed to the initial blast, but then they're going to be eating plants and all this stuff during their little growing up period, and they're going to die

from the radiation that the plants are affected by, right? So the cancers and all this other craziness is going to happen. It is a very long period of time in a all-out nuclear war to where things could even start to get back to normal. I mean, and if you have an all-out nuclear war, you're talking about many years, years and years and years for anything to potentially, I mean, you've got to look at nuclear things that have happened, like Chernobyl and all these places that still have toxic radiation. Right. So many years later.

And so imagine a global nuclear war that happens is it fries the earth. But in the event, though, that you do, you know, that it's just an attack with one bomb or two or three or whatever. You have a better survival rate. Yeah, you do. But let's listen to a few more minutes of this. On the outside of the building, especially on the side facing the known blast area. If you have a basement, that is the safest bet for you to be. If your structure is damaged or someone's need for medical attention is great,

you ideally want to stay inside for the first hour. The more layers of dirt, still, and concrete between you and the outside world and the less radiation can reach you. Radiation levels will be at their highest during the first hour. Listen to the emergency radio for more information. The likelihood of cell phones, cell towers, and small electronic devices being fried out is very high, but a typical transistor type radio may still be operational.

Anyone, including you, who enters your home out to the blast as occurred, should strip off their outer layer of clothing and shoes outside and immediately shower with a thorough cleansing. Avoid over scrubbing, which could lead to scratching yourself and introducing radioactive material into your system. The clothes should be placed in a plastic bag and put away from your structure. Do not bring it indoors with you. If no shower is available, careful use of wet wipes and copious amounts of water

can wash all skin surfaces exposed to fallout. Blow your nose and wipe your eyelids, eyelashes, and ears with a moist wipe, clean wet cloth, or damp paper towel. When helping others, wear waterproof gloves, eye protection, and a dust mask. You are dealing with dust-like particles. Simply removing your clothes outside

can reduce almost 90% of radioactive materials from you. The human gut is sensitive to radiation. If a person has been exposed in their array vomiting, the probability of them having acute radiation poisoning, is exceptionally high. The likelihood of their death within the next few hours is also very high.

You'll want to bring any preps with you to the middle area of your home or your basement. Any food outside, like fruit trees or a garden, will no longer be safe to consume. You should stop using municipal water sources as soon as possible. Even though the pice may be underground and the water's safe for this reason

for a little while, radioactive fallout will make it to the system. Being inside is your best protection from fallout. The more concrete, still, and packed dirt between you and the outside world, and the lower your exposure to radiation will be. Stay or go. The radiation can have a half-life of several thousand years, but the fallout gamma radiation levels are highest during the first 24 hours after the initial blast.

Gamma radiation decays very rapidly. Fallout will give off half of its energy in the first hour and 80% of its energy in the first day. After this, further dispersing of the ash will further reduced levels. After two weeks, 99% of the fallout radiation has dispersed. That remaining 1% however can still be dangerous. Like snowdrift, accumulation points can stay fatally high in radiation. Precipitation and wind can reduce levels even further. You must begin to estimate and track wind direction and speed from the moment of the initial blast.

Based upon the estimated bomb yield, which will eventually be announced on the news, or can be generally surmised by the area of the blast zone and the wind speed and direction, you can use a nuke map calculator like the one I'll link to in the comments below to determine if leaving the area is essential and can be safely done. Staying inside for at least 24 hours after the initial blast can protect you from the most harmful exposure levels. Sting locked down for several days or weeks after rain is come and gone and wind is blown and shifted directions for several days can reduce the levels to dangerous but not fatal levels. If you are anywhere near the estimated fallout zone, your best option is to hunker down indoors for as long as possible. If you can visibly see the ash on the ground or rain down from the sky, you absolutely cannot be outside and move to the ash safely without a radiation suit

and an MBC or CBRN gas mask and filter. The most hazardous fallout particles are also the heaviest. They will fall to Earth and fastest and coat rooftops and other flat surfaces. If you see this occurring, your safest bet is to stay inside until those heavy particles have been blown or washed away. If you estimate that you're within the fallout zone or see smoke or ash in the air or falling from the sky, you must stay inside. The radioactive levels will be too high to leave the zone.

If you see the smoke and ash in the distance, and it isn't coming directly toward you, evaluate wind speed and direction from the estimated detonation point. If the winds can shift below the fallout field in your direction and the possibility of additional detonations is low, you need to determine if leaving your area is your best long-term survival option. If you're relatively safe from the fallout area but live within the region of the blast, at some point, radiation will spread to your location.

Whether that is from shifting winds or precipitation runoff, the radioactive particles are small and will have eventually. eventually spread to all areas in the radius of the blast. Know your typical weather patterns. If storms usually blow in from the west and the nuclear event is anywhere to the west of you, radiation will eventually reach your area. If you are west of the blast, weather typically blows in from the west, shifting winds and precipitation runoff may eventually bring radioactive fallout to your area.

Still, most of it will be moving further west and away from you. Your goal is to stay inside and as far from outside air sources as possible. You should assess if the attack is over. and if a second strike is possible, monitor all news channels if you still have electronic monitoring capabilities as the MPs are part of the initial nuclear fission blast. Eventually, you

will need to leave your structure if you're near the blast zone. I do want to make a point here because I think he's getting into the most part. I mean, in the United States, for example, or Canada or even the UK, anywhere that a foreign country, typically

Russia, who we're really thinking about right now, you know, they would more than likely attack the West Coast of the United States more than likely because it's going to be the closest and easiest proximity to a nuclear warhead and given depending on the amount of nuclear capabilities that they can put on the West Coast and potentially even in the middle of the United States. Well, they're going to have targets where, like I know there's a major target in Colorado, Colorado Springs that they go, they already have their targets planned if we ever have a nuclear

war. Yeah, but you're talking about, yeah, disabling our nuclear arsenal. Right. But some of their, what they really want to do is they want to give the most fallout possible. Yes, they're going to try to also attack our nuclear arsenals, right, to where we cannot respond.

You know, that's something that's you know, and obviously a warpath game time thing that they're going to try to do. And I think that they would go after major cities too. Well, of course. Yeah, but to his point, anything to the west of you, you're going to have fallout eventually, right?

I mean, it's through the jet stream and through everything, through rain systems. And so they're 100% going to attack West Coast because they're going to hit West Coast to where they know it's going to go across the United States. If they can hit New York and bigger cities like that, they're going to do that as well. And we got to also keep in mind with Russia and China, but especially Russia, they have hypersonic. missiles that can turn and we don't even know 100% if we can defend against hypersonic missiles. We don't know what our capabilities in the United States are. I mean, they're probably classified. But they're definitely using them in Ukraine right now. Well, yes, somewhat. But to put a hypersonic missile with a nuclear warhead and use it on us,

we would have, when we've talked about us before, 15 minutes, from the time it leaves Russia to the time it gets to the United States. About 15 minutes before it hits our, I mean, that's insanely fast, but that's how fast these things travel. And not only do they not travel in a straight line, I mean, they can, but they can also turn almost not necessarily on a dime, but they can shift direction to where it makes it harder for the United States to defend against this attack. It would just be an all-out cluster. There's no question. And Russia knows this. And I think the United States knows this, and everybody knows this, that if Russia launches a nuclear attack on the United States or anyone, there's no way that we're going to be able to defend against all of them.

There's no way. There will be a nuclear strike on the mainland of the United States. There's no question about that. There's no way that we're going to defend against every missile that they launch with whatever our defense system is. It's just almost impossible. Now, at what point do the aliens get involved? Do the aliens that we are seeing?

Do they stop this? Who knows? I mean, that's what's strange about that UFO thing. And for those of you listening to this podcast that don't know anything about the UFOs, please go listen to our UFO UAP episodes. There's no question UFO and UAPs exist on, and I think they're here. But more so, they're very strange curiosity around our nuclear weapons systems. You know, we've talked extensively about that. And we know the military knows that.

We know all of that. Why is their curiosity so much around nuclear? It's because they know the potential disaster that these things can cause the earth. And, sorry. And, you know, we've even heard. We've had, I guess, analogies, not analogies, but theories that these UFOs could potentially be actually living under the ocean. Military pilots are reporting it. So many people are reporting it.

So many people are important. So if these UFO things that we're seeing, they're traveling at mock or light speeds, they're going from zero to like 5,000 miles per hour instantly, are they a part of our past or future? Are they actually an extraterrestrial that are living underwater and that the nuclear threat also affects them in this way, shape, or form? But you know what is also interesting is,

and this is not a UFO podcast, but I do have to touch on this, on our UFO podcast, if you listened to our last podcast episode, just go back one. We talk about the UFO thing, and Tucker Carlson comes on, and he talks about a Stanford brain doctor, or, you know, surgeon, I guess. He's very extensively knowledgeable in human brains.

And the fact that the families and the government and all that used this guy, which is the top brain guy in the world, to assess military deaths from potential UFOs and their close encounters with UFOs based on the power or system that powers these things. And from the long-term reports saying that these systems were more than likely causing brain damage because of radiation.

And so it's weird that there's a connection. It seems like the more we find out, the more we know, the more whistleblowers, the more all this stuff that we find out about UFOs and UAPs that were seen in the sky, there's some type of heavy radiation involvement in their power, in their propulsion, whether it be their own gravity field versus our gravity field. But is that why they know and are so curious about our nuclear arsenal? It could be.

Because nuclear causes radiation, right? And so they know the very real dangers of nuclear power. Right. And they know that they are being used and put into place as weapons. Although their system is not used as weapons, it's used for power. But they know that us here are using these things and have the potential of these things as weapons. And I'm not a scientist or anything, but I'm just thinking, too, the sun is a major player. It causes probably the hugest radiation we have on Earth is from the sun.

So we got to think about that I don't know if we learned about nuclear power Through the Sun I have no idea It is one massive nuclear reactor Basically is a sun It's a huge reactor I wanted to ask you a question real quick before we If we're going to finish this I don't know

Yeah we are In Israel they have that thing The shooting thing The Iron Dome Yes Would that stop nuclear weapons? No probably not I mean no because the Iron Dome

In Israel It is basically they call it an iron dome Dome, but they just have a weapon system that is provided mostly by the United States and is a very advanced weapon system, anti-aircraft, anti-missile system that is set along the outskirts and boundaries of Israel. And it essentially is a radar guided system to where anything that is even coming close to their airspace is shot down and it has like a 99% accuracy rate. So it's very hard to get things penetrable through the Iron Dome. But in the event of a nuclear weapon, it does no good.

Why? Because the Iron Dome only is utilized up to so many thousands of feet, right? So it will shoot down a weapon or a missile that is going to cause destruction on the ground, right? That is going to blow up stuff. It's going to hit things, right? But it wouldn't necessarily help with a nuclear type. blast because it may blow up the nuclear blast above or higher than what the nuclear wants to do. Which would be better for us. It would be for Israel. Yeah, but I'm just saying if we had an iron dorm,

which we do. We probably do. If any country had this, would it be helpful in a nuclear war. It would, but I mean, you're still going to have massive fallout anywhere to the east of wherever this thing blew up, right? And trust me, if Israel has an iron dome, the United States probably has something far better than that, but it's still untested probably in a lot of ways against hypersonic missiles that we know Russia has. And I would like to think that I guess the United States has heavily tested defense systems against hypersonic missiles. I would hope, right? But we don't know that for sure. That's all very secretive. You know, it's one of those situations that if a nuclear war breaks out and you have Russia that wants to try to attack the United States or any other country,

as a United States person, a citizen or someone living in the United States, you hope that all this secretive BS that we don't know about, Area 51, all these other military bases that have all this very secretive testing and testing ranges, you hope that whatever they have come up with is like far beyond anything that the Earth has ever known or imagined to where there's no possibility of a nuclear war that could happen in the United States because we're just going to disintegrate these things as soon as they come near us. but then you got a freaking Chinese spy balloon that like just randomly but just like nonchalantly goes across the whole country it's like some old dude and a lawn chair up there with a balloon just randomly and it could have a nuclear warhead seriously I mean it really could have we don't know and we let it go all the way across our country so that's not very promising yeah but what we do know is that this is something you guys have to think about okay all of you And I don't care where you live.

United States, Canada, anywhere there's NATO especially, those are really the ones that have to worry about this. Yeah, they'll be targeted, I would think, NATO countries. Yeah, but understand that the United States government and probably many governments, but I know the United States government has entire underground cities and connecting pathways across the United States underground. And they have places for all their elites, all their powerful, and all of their and all of their politicians, or not all of them, but the one that. that matter that are connected to globalists. I guarantee those are the ones that are going underground. And then you've got to think about Bill Gates buying up all this farmland. Many people are speculating and saying that he's building underground city himself underneath some of these places.

There has been reports of him having massive excavators in some of his land he's bought that is potentially built in underground cities for himself and his family and whoever he wants down there. Not his wife anymore because they're divorced. But I do think that we have to start thinking about this. I know not all of us I know a lot of you have reached out to us on a podcast like this and said well guys I live in a city I don't know what to do

like I you know what am I supposed to do well I think that what you're going to have to do is what most everyone's going to have to do unless you have an underground bunker but even then if you have an underground bunker you better have food you better have

supplies they're going to last you long enough to be able to sustain like the video says 24 hours I would say 72 hours And then you also have to think about one bomb is probably not going to be the last one. You're going to have to worry about this extensively. And if there's an EMP attack on this, which is an electromagnetic pulse to where it basically screws up all communication and radio wave signals and everything in our system, you're not going to have any way of knowing what is actually happening. So, you know, whereas it is a cool thing for the government to say, oh, just get in your ground until you further notice.

Further notice from who? Because if an EMP attacks, you're not going to hear or not. know anything. Unless you have those hand held radio things. But even then, even then, EMPs can disrupt that. I mean, what is that called?

You're talking about Ham radio. Ham radio, yeah. Yeah, ham radio. But even then, EMPs are going to disrupt everything. Any kind of communication or any stuff like that, if they want to take out every system in the country, which is probably what they would do it,

because communication is key in a wartime thing like that. They're going to try to take that out, and they would probably do that. So your best bet is just having plans for Think about these things. Do whatever you can to prepare for. And look, we're not trying to be like, you know, doomsday downers. No, but we're just saying this is how you could be prepared if something like this did happen.

Absolutely. Build a basement for $10,000. Oh, yeah. That's all you got to do, guys. Even if you don't have $10,000, start digging in your backyard underground. Start digging in your bank where your bank's not going to be there anymore and get your money out and build a basement. Well, look, you know, everybody has land, right? But if you want thousands of acres, just start digging underground and start digging out.

Yeah, and then you're going to have land wherever. That's why I told Chad one night. We were talking outside because we have a very small backyard. Yeah, we do. I was like, yeah, we need to start digging right here underground. And then just go underneath all those stuff. And we can just go all the way past our neighborhood, go to the school. We'll have a whole little city.

Yeah, we'll have the whole like under the ground's school area to ourselves. School. What do you mean? At the elementary school. Oh, yeah. I have to bleak that out. At the elementary school, we'll have that whole school underground and nobody else would be there. I got to.

As our underground town. That's true. Yeah, we could do that. But yeah, guys, just start preparing now. I mean, it's the thing that you've got to think about. We're not trying to make anyone, I guess, scared of this. Although, you know, it is something to be scared about, right? I mean, a little bit, but you've got to be more prepared.

And we have to understand that it doesn't seem like we're trying to go the peace route. It's like we're trying to instigate this. And we have to protect ourselves. We know the government, it seems like, does not give a damn about its own people. But just like the basic essentials, have plastic in your house, have a staple gun, have things that can prevent. Water. You know, prevent stuff from getting in your house, you know. Have water.

water, you know, basic supplies, canned foods, stuff like that. Yeah, just have that stuff and have a plan. It's just something to think about. And we wanted to bring this to you guys. Maybe if something happens, something you either heard or said tonight might just give you a better chance, right? And hopefully this doesn't happen. Hopefully peace negotiations come through.

Right. Doesn't seem like they're trying to be done right now. But I'd rather be safe than sorry. That's just me. Which is why we wanted to talk about this, guys. But listen, that's going to be it for this episode of Investigator Earth podcast. And until next time, guys, peace, love and safety from nuclear blast. And happiness.

Yeah, guys, go out and do something you love because you only got one life on this earth. You got to live it now. And until next time, peace out. Peace out, guys.