Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - World War 3 Podcasts | Putin Issues New Nuclear War Warning | Russia Ukraine War

Episode Date: September 21, 2022

A new threat has come via a national address to the Russian people by Putin. He has made a strong warning to America and the west of a nuclear war if America does not stop fighting Russia through Ukra...ine. We discuss all the new info on this episode of World War 3 Conspiracy Podcasts | Nuclear War Podcasts

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:07 Standing on the crater, like the prophets once said, and the ashes are all cold now, no more bullets, and the embers are dead, whispered, Tell the tale of the brothers go Desolation mess we made When it are watching From the circus
Starting point is 00:01:12 For the games to begin Gladiators Draw their song Hello Hello and welcome to to Investigative Podcast. I'm your host, Chad, alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry.
Starting point is 00:02:11 Oh, you're so sweet when you say that. And I say that every time, don't it? Yes, you do. But I say it every time. But yeah, you got to say something better than beautiful wife. Yeah, you got to do better now. All right, guys, welcome to another episode of Investigatorth podcast. It is 7.24 p.m. here on the east coast of the United States.
Starting point is 00:02:31 And this is September 21st, 2022. And we are moving in to, the fall season and it is uh this weekend we're supposed to get cooler temperature it's supposed to be like 78 Fahrenheit here um you guys will have to do the conversion on Celsius but uh it's been just crazy hot here and finally it seems like it's about to start cooling down so well not this week it isn't though no but Friday it's supposed to be like 20 degrees cooler that's gonna be awesome we're excited about that but welcome guys welcome welcome now so uh for those of you that have been listening like many of you have.
Starting point is 00:03:05 We said that the last episode probably was going to be our last audio podcast before our video on Rumble. But there's just been too much going on over the past 48 hours. So we felt like we needed to go ahead and do this. Although our video stuff is pretty much ready, but we were not ready to do it tonight. So we definitely wanted to come on. Talk about the new updates. This is the World War III, Russia-Ukraine War. Putin issues a new warning to the West and in America.
Starting point is 00:03:30 as far as what's going to happen if the West and America does not back off, if they do not adhere to the warnings of President Vladimir Putin. Putin has recently come out and said that he knows the West wants Russia destroyed. And Putin has been saying
Starting point is 00:03:54 pretty much this entire conflict that if in the event that he realizes or his government realizes that Russia is at a possibility of being destroyed, at a threat of destruction. That is when he would launch a all-out nuclear war and nuclear attack. And, you know, it's one thing for a president like Vladimir Putin to be homicidal, but it's another thing for him to be backed in a corner enough to where he's suicidal. And those are two very different things.
Starting point is 00:04:29 someone can be homicidal and kill people, and that's bad also, right? But when you're suicidal, you're going to take out a lot more people, especially if you have the powers behind you, like hypersonic missiles that are attached to nuclear warheads, that you can then launch 3,000 plus nuclear warheads around the world within 15 to 20 minutes. So it's one of those things that when we hear all this news on the news and everything else about what's going on. And, you know, so many people are living their lives every day. about this in other episodes, but we go to the grocery store, we go, we go play golf or we go play
Starting point is 00:05:03 tennis or we go do whatever we do. We're not really thinking about the possibilities of what may loom or what may be around the corner. And so that's what we're going to talk about in this episode. And I think this is an important episode because I think the tides are kind of turned in. We're going to say a couple of things that we've talked about before, but we're not going to stay on those things we've talked about before in this episode. But yeah, we, We just need to stress, if anything, like how volatile and serious that the situation has become with the Russia, Ukraine, America, the West, so on and so forth. So, yeah, by the way, before we get started, we're not going to take too long on the intro. But we do want to let you guys know we are going to rumble.
Starting point is 00:05:54 you know really Spotify is one of the last platforms that have not shadow banned us or whatever so I want to let you guys know make sure that you subscribe to us on rumble make sure you go over there make an account find us invest at earth podcast and we're going to start doing video live stream videos on rumble and we are going to be doing that basically our new podcast episodes are going to come out on rumble or yeah two days before our audio will come out on Rumble so or we'll come out here we're still going to be releasing everything here we've had actually some questions people said are you still going to be can we still get you on Pandora can we still get you on Tune in can we still get you on here yes you guys will be you know I mean if you're still
Starting point is 00:06:37 listen to us now yes but the best way you're going to you know just make sure that you see all of our stuff is Rumble so make sure you guys go follow us on Rumble Investor podcast and as soon as we go live we're going to announce it on our Facebook so make sure you describe. Holy shit. Make sure you subscribe to our Facebook and we're going to have a set schedule on our video Rumble podcast. Hopefully we will.
Starting point is 00:07:01 No, we are because we have to because we want people to join us and have the video aspect and everything. Oh, gosh. It's going to be tough, but we can do it. No, we're going to do it. We have to do it. I mean, that's, and it will probably be around 7 p.m. You know, we're not going to do it every night, but.
Starting point is 00:07:18 our video podcast. We're going to try to do like two a week, if possible, and we'll try to have that at 7 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, so whatever time that is for you guys, wherever you're listening. So thank you all for listening, by the way. We love each and every one of you. We love all the support you guys give us. We love the messages. Actually, we just called one of our listeners last night. We try to call it. Like, if people reach out to us, I'm like, hey, how about you just give me your number and we'll call you? Because, you know, especially if you have a question or you want to talk or, you know, sometimes the easiest way is just, I'll, you know, click their number, talk to him for a few minutes,
Starting point is 00:07:51 and, you know, just say, hey, I think that's important. Yeah, Chad is definitely one that likes to talk on the phone. You know, he also likes to text, but I think it's... I hate texting now. I don't like to text. Yeah, usually you do Siri. Hey, text Sherry. When are you ready?
Starting point is 00:08:06 Yeah, or whatever. But also, I will just, I'll try to do that as well on, on pretty much everything. Like, I'll usually, I will try to respond to everybody on Facebook or whatever, but I can't necessarily always get into depth on certain subjects. So just so you know, but we do actually read whatever you post. So if we don't always get back to some of the things, it's not that we didn't read it because we're reading everything. But it's just hard to on everybody.
Starting point is 00:08:32 So let's get to this. What happened today? Well, Vladimir Putin came out in a national address. And, you know, he, and by the way, this address was delayed from his prime time Tuesday delivery and ahead of the votes in four Ukraine regions to join Russia. And on Wednesday morning, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a partial military mobilization while vowing to use all means necessary to defend Russia and pledge to annex the territories already occupied by Russia, raising the stakes in a seventh month old conflict.
Starting point is 00:09:05 So this thing's been going on seven months. Yeah, we were talking about that. You said about six months soon. You were right on. Six or seven months, yeah. And that's crazy because I remember the first days that it started. I was like, oh my God. Yeah, that's crazy.
Starting point is 00:09:18 Those poor people. Yeah, and we've had many episodes on this podcast about why this is happening or why or how. And we probably won't go into a lot of the deep parts of that, but we more so want to talk about, you know, how big of a threat is this really? Do we really need to actually be worried about this? And, you know, what can we even do, you know, just to either protect ourselves or stop it? but the measure is sensible and necessary under circumstances, Putin stated, adding that he has already signed an order for the call-up to start immediately. In his speech, Putin accused Kiev for backing away from peace talks acting on direct orders from its Western allies.
Starting point is 00:09:58 Instead of negotiating, the Ukrainian government has beefed up its military with NATO-trained troops, many of whom are a neo-Nazi extremist, he said. Putin also accused the West of using nuclear blackmail against Russia, noting that if it's territorial and integrity is threatened, Russia will definitely use all means at its disposal to defend Russia territory, and this is not a bluff. He said that does include nuclear. Russian forces sent to Ukraine in February have secured a large portion of territory claimed by Dantes and Langans people. I'm probably not saying that, that right, republics, as well as parts of Ukraine and the resulting front line stretches over 1,000 kilometers,
Starting point is 00:10:38 according to the Russian president. But Putin also commented on the upcoming reference referendums and the two Donbass republics and two regions of Ukraine currently controlled to a large extent by Russian troops. The territory, which include Le Honsk, Dantax, Kierson, and Zeprofizidia provinces have announced on whether they will become part of Russia, with the ballot scheduled to start on Friday. Putin said his government will respect the outcome of the four referendums and provide security for the voting process. Some other notable highlights from Putin's address is that they're going to be.
Starting point is 00:11:12 The contracts for reserves last until the end of partial mobilization period, indefinitely. Governors of Russia regions decide who and how many people get sent to the front. So just to kind of let everyone know that doesn't know, Russia is basically calling up 300,000 reservists. I thought it was 300,000. Oh my God, I thought it was 3,000. No, 300,000 reservists. He is calling up. And actually this, according to Western media, I'll just put it that way, there are people fleeing by the droves out of Russia to try to get out there, especially military age men that are part of what they consider reserves in Russia.
Starting point is 00:11:52 You know, there's a lot of people that do not want to go and fight. They, you know, it's a brutal battle. And we're going to talk a little bit about what Russia themselves even said. You know, the battle in Ukraine is not easy. It's difficult. And this thing is just getting. out of hand fast and whether or not we want to believe any Western media. I mean, that includes the media that you might want to believe in some aspects,
Starting point is 00:12:19 whether it's Fox or a conservative-leaning media. The one thing that has been strange that I've found about this whole situation is even the right-leaning media or conservative media or whoever that you listen to that, you know, say that is not the left crazy lunatic politics stuff. A lot of them have been on board so much with so many things during this war, and it's also been confusing. But there's something that happened today, and especially on Fox News, you know, they had a few of Biden's counsel or, you know, basically members of whether it be Department of Defense or whoever. And they had them on, Secretary of States and so on. And they were interviewing various people in position of power that is over this kind of war.
Starting point is 00:13:09 war situation or at least appears to be over the America's participation in the Russia-Ukraine situation and it's kind of interesting because it was really one of the first times I saw like for example Martha McCowan with Fox News and a couple of these other reporters that are usually the daytime reporters that don't go you know they're not a Tucker Carlson or you know a very Hannity not politicized but on one side opinionated. angle or you know yeah um so they're not those people but more of like reporters they try to be i mean they're they're still you know right leaning i guess but you know it was something that they kept asking these people well you know why are we getting involved uh in this and and why are we
Starting point is 00:13:57 attacking now spots in russia and so they thought about it for a second they had to say well we're not attacking russia we're not doing this this is ukraine's war this is their war we're just supplying them, you know, all the necessary, all of the necessary weapons. You know, now, you know, Ukraine has weapons that reach Russia. They are starting to attack sites within Russia. And regardless of whatever you think of it, of why the Russia-Ukraine war happened, whether you hate Putin, or you see a side of maybe why he did it, or whatever, whatever your thoughts and beliefs are on it. The reality, though, is that when the West, such as America, sends them longer-range missiles to where these are advanced missiles, they're new technology or newer technology, and we're now sending this, and we're putting it in the hands of Ukraine, but not just Ukraine, we already know that the billions of dollars of not only money, but weaponry that we're sending to Ukraine, we already know that a lot of that is getting on the black market. And so it's like now you're sending these longer range missiles to Ukraine.
Starting point is 00:15:07 We already know we have a black market issue with the weapons that we're already sending to Ukraine, which means obviously someone over there in Ukraine is, instead of using these things, they are putting them on the black market, selling them to countries that offered the highest bids. And so now we're starting to send more advanced weapons to Ukraine. And not only is that a problem for a couple reasons, you know, number one, the black market. We don't know who that will become in the hands of, whether it be Afghanistan or Iran. Iran probably has a lot of that stuff anyway, but especially the smaller terrorist countries.
Starting point is 00:15:38 Those are the people that are going to be buying this stuff on the black market. These are going to be terrorist organizations that are going to be buying this to use it against the people that they want to use it against. Most of the time, they're on people. But also the other problem is that now you are given the capabilities to Ukraine to attack sites within Russia. and one of the things that Putin is already accusing the West on and Ukraine as of today he said recently, we're going to talk about this in a minute, but he said that they are planning and already trying to attack nuclear facilities, nuclear power plants inside of Russia. And so he's basically saying this will be a disaster.
Starting point is 00:16:19 And if this happens, we will have no choice but to use nuclear. And so, so, you know, six months ago when you would ask whoever the damn left the media quote unquote is that says oh yeah well these experts say there's a like a 6% chance of a nuclear war
Starting point is 00:16:39 you know and it's like okay that was six months ago but now you're giving Ukraine longer range missiles that can take out nuclear power plants and cause mass destruction in Russia if that happens and then you've turned this into from a defense standpoint of Ukraine and I'm not saying I'm not saying if Ukraine is completely in the right.
Starting point is 00:16:59 And I don't even necessarily think it's Ukraine's fault, regardless of how this shit happened. We've talked about while we think this war happened. A lot of that has to do with the West. But what I am saying is, and look, and if you're Ukraine and you've got put in this position or you got in this position unknowingly what the consequences may be of either biolabs or nuclear nuclear facilities from the west that is on the border of Russia, whatever the case may be, you're in it now. So to them, they're fighting for their life.
Starting point is 00:17:33 You know, Ukraine's fighting for their life. So if you get long-range missiles, what are you going to do? Who gets the damn? You're going to use them. Yeah. But they don't really understand the circumstances if they do use them. Well, they don't really care because they... Yeah, they're being blown up right now.
Starting point is 00:17:48 Yeah, Ukraine... You know, they're doing anything they can to fight this war. Ukraine already feels like it's coming eventually. because, you know, if you want to believe the reports of the West media, Ukraine is actually doing a pretty damn good job against Russia. And I probably believe that. And I'll tell you why I believe that, because, you know, when you're getting sent billions and billions of dollars from not just the United States,
Starting point is 00:18:11 but everybody that's in NATO of weapons and fighter jets and NATO troops, and you name it, you're being trained by NATO troops, you're being trained how to use these weapons, you know, it's going to be hard to win. And it's going to be hard, number one, because a lot of the Russian soldier morale has already shit. They didn't want to be a mess to begin with. And so now you have Russia troops, which morale's low.
Starting point is 00:18:36 They don't want to be there. They know a lot of them are going to die. And then you have Ukrainian troops that are there to fight for their lives. I mean, they're fighting for their country, their livelihood, whatever the case may be, right? So you have just two different morale. It's the same thing as how an interception can turn around a football game. Exactly. You know, if a team intercepts a ball and they're down, they've been down for a while, that can swing the momentum.
Starting point is 00:19:00 And the thing is, Ukraine, just based on everything that I've seen, kind of had the momentum all along, especially with billions of dollars to back them and longer range missile technologies. So the problem with this whole thing is going to be how much is Ukraine going to be, how much is Ukraine going to do. How far are they going to take this and how far inside of Russia are they going to take this? I think there's no question, obviously, Putin and his cabinet and everybody in the government believes that, you know, regardless of whether you live in Australia, UK, Canada, or U.S. or anywhere in Netherlands, we don't see it the way Russia does. Imagine if the same situation was happening, regardless of how this started. But if you believe your country is at stake for being
Starting point is 00:19:47 demolished or you know which is what I believe they probably feel you are going and it's just the same thing with the United States if the United States ever felt like they were going to be destroyed we would use nuclear war and the thing is is Russia is not only being threatened by Ukraine like you said but they're using everything that we're giving them so it's not really a war against Ukraine is really a war against the United States absolutely And so when Putin knows he's being backed in a corner Because of United States military weapons Training whatever not even just NATO
Starting point is 00:20:25 But these are two super power houses Fighting each other through a different country Yeah And when that happens Somebody is going to start getting pissed off like Putin When he knows he's starting to get defeated or whatever And I don't think that he would not do it.
Starting point is 00:20:47 I think he would do it. Yeah, I mean, there's always, you know, this entire war for seven months, there's been the question of whether he's sick or not. And that's a very good possibility. I mean, if he is sick, that, you know, that's not good either. You know, say he has cancer or whatever the case is, he has something terminal.
Starting point is 00:21:04 You know, that's not a good situation for the West or anybody because he is obviously going to be a lot more suicidal. Now, according to quote unquote, experts, the chain of custody as far as how a nuclear launch is to take place through Russia is not just Putin. Right. There's a cabinet and all that. Supposedly.
Starting point is 00:21:29 And actually, the United States is one of, the United States is actually one of the least chain of custody countries in the world as far as who can launch a nuclear warhead. That's kind of scary, too. Yeah, it's nuts. Because, I mean, if you have a lunatic as your president, then there's no chain of command and they can just put in their little code. There is a little bit, but it's just, if you look at the United States in comparison to some of the other nuclear powerhouses, United States is actually pretty easy to get a nuclear war kind of going.
Starting point is 00:22:02 So, and then, you know, there are some checks and balances there, but not as much as some places, according to experts, quote, but, you know, we know how experts did during COVID. So corporate media, you know, they also somehow missed, you know, Putin talking about the, he made a shock in charge at his press conference even this past Friday, where he said that we even seen attempts at perpetrating terrorist attacks in a Russian Federation, including, I said, I'm not sure if this was made public, attempts to carry out terrorist attacks near our nuclear facilities, nuclear power plants in a Russian Federation. I am not even talking about the Zafersine nuclear power plant. Putin was answering what seemed to be a candid question about Russia's restraint amid what the questioner called increasing strikes, raids, and acts of terror
Starting point is 00:22:51 even on Russian territory. He said, we are hearing all the time, very aggressive statements that the final goal of Kiev and the West is Russia's disintegration. Meanwhile, many think that Russia's response to all this is very restrained. Why is that, he said? Putin addressed the question. Russian frontally. He said, with regard to our restrained response, I would not say it was
Starting point is 00:23:11 restrained. After all, a special military operation is not just another warning, but a military operation. In the course of this, we are seeing attempts to perpetrate terrorist attacks and damage our civilian infrastructure. He said, indeed, we were quite restrained in our response, but that will not last forever. Recently, Russian armed forces delivered a couple of sensitive blows in that area, civilian infrastructure. Let's call them warning shots. If this situation continues like that, our response will be more impactful. Terrorist attacks are a serious matter. We see this in the killing of officials
Starting point is 00:23:41 in the liberated territories. We even see attempts at perpetrating terrorist attacks in the Russian Federation. And so this is basically the context in which Putin pointedly included as cited what we just talked about, attempts to carry out terrorist attacks near nuclear facilities
Starting point is 00:23:57 or nuclear power plants in the Russian Federation. He also added that we are monitoring the situation and will do our very best to prevent negative scenarios from unfolding. We respond if they fail to realize that these approaches are unacceptable. They are, in fact, no different than terrorist attacks. Putin also went on to warn about Western goals, a very aggressive statement is that the final goal of Kiev in the West is the disintegration of Russia.
Starting point is 00:24:21 And he said, they have always been seeking dissolution of our country. This is very true. It is unfortunate that at some point they decide to use Ukraine for these purposes. In effect, I am answering your question now. We launched our special military operation to prevent events from taking the this turn. This is what some U.S.-led Western countries have been asking to create an anti-Russian enclave and rock the boat, threaten Russia from this direction. In essence, our main goal was to prevent such developments. Following the U.S. orchestrated coup in Kiev in early 2014,
Starting point is 00:24:53 the December 2015 National Security Strategy of DIA said the following, the Kremlin is convinced that United States is laying the groundwork for regime change in Russia, a conviction further reinforced by the events in Ukraine. Moscow views the United States the United States as the critical driver behind the crisis in Ukraine and believes that the overthrow of the former Ukrainian president, Yucala, whatever his name is, is the latest move in the long-established pattern of U.S. orchestrated regime change efforts. And this is Lieutenant General Vincent Stewart, Director of DIA.
Starting point is 00:25:23 So this happened in 2014. This is kind of when the Zelensky thing came in. Yeah, and they're saying that we were starting back then in 2014 to figure out a way to get Russia through Ukraine. Even back then is what he's pretty much saying. Yeah. Well, I mean, and we've talked about that. I mean, I mean, even the, you know, we've looked at the differences in, you know, voting and voting integrity and all that stuff that happened in Ukraine. And then to look at Zelensky and then now what has happened with Russian Ukraine and now how much money the United States has sent into Ukraine and how, you know, how on the backs of Ukraine the United States and the West are.
Starting point is 00:26:02 It's like they hold Zelensky. Ukraine to like this high power of godliness. But it was also because we put them in power. We put this regime in Ukraine in power. And we orchestrated that probably to make sure that we could do this through Ukraine. It's almost like the same thing that's going on in America. You know, America, I think people were appointed as our administration. They're appointed by the elites, the people that are above.
Starting point is 00:26:35 our administration, above our presidents. And I think the same thing was happening in Ukraine. They appointed Zelensky, I had to say that, but they appointed him as president because they needed him for a specific purpose to be a president of Ukraine so that all this would unfold like it is. Like this is a perfect plan for the elite. Yeah. I mean, you can't, yeah, because you can't just, number one, you can't just overthrow Russian
Starting point is 00:27:04 president of Vladimir. Putin, the only way you can do that is to go to war directly with him, right? Or could you use a country that borders Russia to do this through? And this is a plan. I mean, from what you just said, this is a plan that's been going on for years. Now, well, 2014, that's when basically the regime change happened. You know, this is, you know, this is what Putin thinks. You know, I'll let you guys make up your own mind as far as, you know, look, we're just telling you what it is. But I'm saying if that happened in your own country and things were happening. Well, it kind of is already happening in our own country.
Starting point is 00:27:39 Well, I'm just saying if the tables were turned and somebody was invading our border, what would we do? Yeah, we got people invading every day. Yeah, exactly. It's not a war. But you say, what would you do and what if that happened? Well, I think, you know, I've thought about this in the United States. I think it's already happened in the United States. I think the regime change happened in the United States,
Starting point is 00:28:03 2020. That was their dictated regime change, just like in 2014 with Zelensky. Yep. And so if you give it any timeline, if this is a global elite plan, which I believe this whole situation is engineered by the elites, the New World Order,
Starting point is 00:28:19 the World Economic Forum. But if you look at this in a time frame thing, how long will it take from the time the regime change happens to a time where another country or some kind of crisis is going to happen to that country? Well, if you look at it now, that's, what is that, 1922, that's like eight, nine, ten years later.
Starting point is 00:28:36 I don't even think it'll be that long for the United States because, you know, at least Zelensky and then I guess tried to make Ukraine better. But, you know, the regime we have in the United States is just trying to destroy the United States in any way possible, whether it be through getting rid of all independence and letting everyone and anyone come through our borders. We're so supposedly worried about terrorism. But yet we let anyone and everyone across our borders. Yeah, I was seeing the statistics today.
Starting point is 00:29:03 or yesterday, like how many actual terrorists are getting through daily. Oh, it's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. And yet, Novak Djokovic, the number one tennis player in the world, can't even travel to the United States because he's not vaccinated. Are you kidding me? Yeah, but then we're letting all these people in every day. So the thing about this whole situation, too, is that this story, the story about terrorist attacks being carried out and going to be carried out within Russia. You know, the New York Times decided not to publish any story on this credible evidence, by the way.
Starting point is 00:29:37 It wasn't just by, it wasn't just Putin. It wasn't just his administration, but it was many other war experts that talked about this was happening. This was happening within Ukraine. And so, you know, number one, I think we already saw that with Daria Dugina, which was the daughter of one of Putin's. Allies, confinants, or someone, yeah. I think you'd probably have to say that was a orchestrated terrorist attack probably from someone. Yeah. You know, Ukraine, maybe. But, you know, who trained that Ukraine person, supposedly?
Starting point is 00:30:16 We don't know. But in New York Times, this lead front page story Sunday was written by its first string team of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the same people. David Sanger, Julian Barnes, Eric Schmidt, and Anton Travansky. And they reported copiously on Putin's Friday press conference, but chose to admit his charge regarding terrorist planning to sabotage nuclear power plants in Russia. The article explains how President Joe Biden is trying not to provoke Russia into escalating in Ukraine, despite Zelensky being flushed with success
Starting point is 00:30:45 in northeastern Ukraine. So it's just like the New York Times is a talking, is literally the talking piece of this administration. It is a state-run media. It is now state-run media. It's no different than China or North Korea. And so whatever New York Times, whatever CNN, whatever MSNBC and all these other companies say,
Starting point is 00:31:02 it is the mouthpiece of the government. And they're going to tell you what they want to hear, or what they want you to hear, but they're going to admit the very important pieces. Absolutely. Which is, you know, to me, when I look at the whole situation and if the roles were reversed,
Starting point is 00:31:25 I kind of understand why Putin's being the way he is. if that's the way it is. See, that's the thing. That's, that's, that's, that's, that's, there's, there's, I don't know, we're pretty clear on a lot of things as far as like what is happening, how it's happening, you know, during COVID and during, um, just everything. I mean, the world economic forum, new world order. The, uh, I mean, you name it. Any of the stuff, we're pretty clear on what, who's doing it, what's happening and why. And this Russia, Ukraine thing has been tough. It, it is, it. It is, it. It has been really tough to figure it out. On one side, you have a lot of reporters that are people that wouldn't really have a reason to lie, a reason to report otherwise, like Patrick Lancaster, ex-military vet of the United States. He is a reporter, has been around Ukraine for a long time. He's interviewing people in Ukraine, that Ukraine citizens themselves are saying it's Russia. Now, how much do, you know, could that be they're just misinformed or they just don't know or understand?
Starting point is 00:32:25 A lot of their citizens are saying that Ukraine is bombing their own. country. Exactly. You said Russia, but it's Ukrainians, according to his reporting, it's Ukrainians bombing themselves. Yeah. Yeah, that's not what I don't know what I said. Sorry. But, you know, and so we got to look at it too from this standpoint, you know, could Ukraine be doing that to influence the United States to give them more weapons? More weapons or even destroy Russia. Right. I mean, that's the reality is we don't know, you know, we're getting intelligence, quote, unquote, straight from Ukraine. We don't know what's really going on or what they're actually doing.
Starting point is 00:33:10 I mean, we don't know if, you know, like these hospitals and all this stuff that was bombed. And, you know, there was one video in particular and not just, and you know, the funny thing about this video was it was in hospital or a school or something. It was bombed in Ukraine. and then Patrick Lancaster shows he was one of the ones there at this time. Oh, the people that got stuck underground or whatever? Well, no, no, these people were in rubble. They were all dead. A lot of them were dead in rubble.
Starting point is 00:33:37 A lot of them had their hands tied behind their back. Like, they were executed. They were actually, it looked like they were executed rather than bombed, but like they had their hands tied behind their back or in front of them. And they were deceased. Yeah, they were all dead. Some women, some kids, it looked like in some, in some, in some circumstances.
Starting point is 00:33:56 And, you know, and then you've got, you know, not just Patrick Lancaster, but, you know, I went on to find multiple reporters on the ground. Now, that's the thing. I'm surprised Patrick Lancaster is able to stay on Facebook because I cannot find anything else about it other than him. But when you start digging one night, about four or five nights ago, which I didn't even tell you this, but I started just doing, I started looking and digging for, like, the hardcore stuff.
Starting point is 00:34:24 And actually, one of the places you can find hardcore videos about, like, if you really want to see some crazy shit that's really going on there, like up close and personal, Twitter is one of those places you can find the craziest videos of shit that you'll ever see. I mean, I, I know it sounds bad, so if you have kids, you know, don't let him hear this part for a second. But I saw a Russian soldier castrating a Ukrainian soldier. Yeah, while he was like tied behind his back and his mouth. Oh my God. And his mouth gagged.
Starting point is 00:34:59 And they cut his shit off. Oh my God. Like it was awful. That's terrible. That's why you got to be careful about if you look like shit you want to watch over there. Oh my God. Could you imagine? Because it's ruthless.
Starting point is 00:35:11 Well, I mean, it's ruthless over there. Like the Ukrainian soldiers, they'll have videos because a lot of them have body cams or whatever. And they'll show them like, you know, ambushing a Russian vehicle. and just effing them up. Like, and then, you know, flipping the car over, blood ever. I mean, it's crazy. I mean, those are the sites of war. This is what's happening.
Starting point is 00:35:30 That's the real sites that we don't see every day. Yeah. We just see the reporting what they're going to show us. Yeah. We don't get down and dirty. And when we see the down and dirty, like you're saying, this is real and this is really happening, no matter whose fault it is or what's, you know. It's awful.
Starting point is 00:35:48 Well, and then, well, so my point to this was, as I started digging and looking more of the uncensored type videos, right? And I even went to websites that were like overseas. And a lot of, some of the websites overseas like really show some crazy shit. They just don't care. They, over there, media shows everything. And so a lot of the stuff I was seeing is, again, more either American or UK or some other reporters that are blaming this on Ukraine.
Starting point is 00:36:17 And these are, these are reporters that are on the ground in Ukraine, seeing what's going on on firsthand. These are not, you know, the CNN, MSNBC, ABC reporters. These are, these are highly respected reporters with sometimes 500,000, a million followers, but they're just, they're just telling a completely different story. And, you know, it still makes you think, it's just like, you know, even with media that we do watch, you know. I think their sense or two. Well, well, they have to be. But, you know, that was the thing about. today is the questions that the reporters that don't typically get too political, even on Fox, Martha McCowan and some of the other ones, you know, were pointingly asking these questions
Starting point is 00:37:03 to our top guys, the guys that are in charge of this war, essentially. And they were pretty much making claims and calling these people out as if they knew something that they weren't saying on the news yet. And I've never heard even Fox News say this, because the entire time, you know, Fox and pretty much everybody's been on the side of Ukraine. I mean, except for the likes of Tucker Carlson would call out the shit they saw Hannity, whoever. But now we're starting to see some of the daytime reporters ask these questions about we are attacking parts of Russia.
Starting point is 00:37:37 We are having attacks inside of Russia. And it's like, and Martha McCowan looked pissed off when she was asking this. And then when their response was like, we're not doing anything. Yeah, we're not doing. Ukraine is doing it. But it was like she couldn't say, I guess, whatever, this new intel that they somehow know, no. It's like she is silenced on it. But she was pissed off that he was lying to her face.
Starting point is 00:37:59 And I saw this a couple of times today. Yeah. Yeah. And it was more so like a pissed offness to where like you MFers are about to get us in a nuclear war. And you're going to sit here on live television and lie your ass off. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, that's the way I took it.
Starting point is 00:38:16 Because really anybody that has their eyes open right now, we know. this Russian-Ukrainian war is not between Russia and Ukraine. No. And it's funny because when the, it's not funny, but when the war first started, I thought it was because Ukraine wanted to join NATO,
Starting point is 00:38:36 I guess, to be safe from Russia. And Russia is like, hell no, because, you know, you were a part of us at one time and you're not going to do that. And that was the whole fight. But then I started learning things
Starting point is 00:38:48 about how we had nuclear, what are they called centers or whatever we had like all these centers or whatever around their borders oh yeah you're talking about like silos yeah we had all these around their borders and so I kind of understood why Putin would be pissed about that
Starting point is 00:39:06 because if anyone had nuclear things around our borders we'd be all over that yeah absolutely you know one of the things too is you know a lot of people are saying they believe Russia TV viewers the people the citizens of Russia
Starting point is 00:39:20 You know, they're kind of being ready for a wider war or a more all-out war. And that even includes inside of Russia. And those that were watching yesterday's News of the Week program with host Dimitri Kessilov saw him offering a show to war preparation. He was basically, he's the top boss of all Russian state news broadcast and a Kremlin insider, and he's very close to power. And he set out to give Russian viewers a description of what the United States and NATO are now up to, namely a war. on Russia. Ukraine has pretty much slipped out of the picture completely when it comes to Russia media. Now, all the media in Russia, the state-run media, and like you said, this guy that is the host
Starting point is 00:40:02 of this show in Russia, the biggest show in Russia, is now basically turned his viewers' attention away from Ukraine. It's not even really like they're talking about there's a war with Russia, Ukraine anymore. This is a war with Russia and the United States, Russia and the West. This is continually now what the media is saying. At the beginning, it was a war on Russia, Ukraine, blah, blah, because of whatever. And now it's just continually, we are at war with the West. And they go on to say it is a war led by the United States against Russia,
Starting point is 00:40:33 which now features daily rocket attacks on more and more border towns on the Russian side, with destruction and death and immense flows of refugees from Karkov area and to Russia. Kislov, which is the show host, includes horror stories of Ukrainian retribution being carried out on collaborationist. These include teachers in Kharkov region who were teaching from the Russian state syllabus, who are now liable to execution. Their program reported that 10,000 people have been rounded up, claiming many of them will be slaughtered. The show also featured retired U.S. General Ben Hodges, who talks about the coming breakup of Russia, planned balkanization, the U.S. objective, which Russia now needs to plan against.
Starting point is 00:41:14 It showed Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zarakova, warning that if the U.S. gives Ukraine 300 kilometer range missiles, which, for example, can reach the main Russian naval base in Crimea, and I think they have now recently given these weapons, if fired from Odessa, then the U.S. becomes a co-belligerent, meaning now the U.S. is officially at war with us. They're involved in the war, and that's why he's wanting to escalate it. Yeah, the U.S. a co-belligerent. In other words, Russia becomes officially at war with the U.S. Right. It's no longer Ukraine. Well, Ukraine right now is the middleman. We all know that.
Starting point is 00:41:51 Yeah, but now it's like we've given these weapons that can reach Russia. Right. So state-run media is saying we will then be at war with the U.S. And they're saying we are just one single step away. And that is what Russia, you know, news is talking about. And then, of course, Putin's Friday conference was also showing including Putin's comments on terrorist attempts we talked about earlier. And this is all virtually all Putin's speech press conferences and commented that Putin was twitching this way. and that seemed very nervous.
Starting point is 00:42:20 President Biden and his sophomore advisors may not be smart enough to be equally nervous, and so catastrophe looms. And that is the reality of... We have to look at the United States, and by the way, guys, I hate to say it from all around the world, for all of our livelihoods in the entire world, in a lot of ways,
Starting point is 00:42:39 hangs on the administration that the United States has in office right now, which is really scary. And I wanted to ask you, did you see any of his speech at all? Oh, I did, but he's a dumbass. retraction or whatever he said back to Putin. Well, he basically just said, you know, I just heard him saying, he said nobody wins a nuclear war. But he, he basically just kind of made more threats. I mean, that's, that's essentially what, because he's just, they think that for whatever reason, that they have him in a position
Starting point is 00:43:09 of mercy to where it's like you have Russia by the balls. Exactly. And that's why when I saw like five minutes, I didn't, honestly, guys, I did not get to see the whole thing because I've been working. I've been busy, but the five-minute little things I've seen, he acted like, you know what? We have you, bro. You're in our court, like, you know, trying to scare Putin away. Like, Putin's not going to do it because he's scared of Joe Biden. Which is ridiculous. Oh, Lord. So let's talk about a nuclear war briefly. Yeah, that's what I was going to ask you. What would happen? What would happen? And we've talked about us before, but we'll just kind of briefly talk about this.
Starting point is 00:43:48 If you look at, say, A side, Plan A, Section 1, Phase 1, whatever that may be, whatever it may look like, say that this is the first phase of a nuclear war. It's essentially a localized nuclear exchange. And this could obviously, and would quickly escalate into a global catastrophe. Now, the first phase of a nuclear war, how something nuclear could for sure break off is that either Russia or someone else uses a local catastrophe. uses a localized or what they call tactical nukes. And tactical nukes are, when you ever hear that word, that is a precision-guided bomb with nuclear warhead on board, depending on how big that nuclear warhead is.
Starting point is 00:44:34 But it would be essentially to take out, say, a city or two or three. So kind of like an A-bomb? Well, no, I mean, it's, I mean, well, you're talking about atom bombs or stuff like. Yeah, but nowadays the technology versus atom bomb and like what you're thinking back in the day. Now, now, I mean, you can use a nuclear warhead to tactfully take out a city, but it's not. But the radiation would spread. Radiation would still spread, but it probably wouldn't be on the realm of what would have happened back in the day, right? And, you know, then you got like those different scenarios.
Starting point is 00:45:15 And this is a plausible scenario. This is, you know, based on all the available evidence that Putin's been talking about, Ukraine, the United States West, whoever else. And so there was a team of independent assessments of current U.S. and Russian force postures, nuclear war plans and nuclear weapons targets. And Glacer, he is a war game expert. The simulation was also supported by data sets of the nuclear weapons currently deployed, weapon yields, and possible targets for particular weapons, as well as the order of battling or battle estimating which weapons go to, which targets, in which order, in which phase of the war to show the evolution of nuclear conflict. He says, of course, we have no access whatsoever to classified information,
Starting point is 00:45:57 often use simple rules when allocating weapons to targets. The immediate fatalities and casualties that would occur in each phase of the conflict are determined using data from the nuke map. And you guys can find this an online tool that was developed by Alex Wellerston at the Stevens Institute of Technology. look up nuke map you'll find it um it is estimated that there would be more than 90 million people dead and injured within the first few hours of a conflict okay that's just the first few hours 90 million people think about this the united states has uh what 350 million people in the
Starting point is 00:46:30 united states so you're taking out a large chunk of the united states population 90 million people would die in the first few hours i'm just trying to think like how big is that like well it's a lot I mean, well, I think like South Carolina's, no. Texas? No. South Carolina is like $8 million. You've got like Florida's like 15. You've got, you know, some of these bigger, I mean, it's like a whole region.
Starting point is 00:46:51 It'd be like a whole region. It'd be like a southeast. Like southeast region of the United States. That's how many people. But the actual fatalities would be significantly increased by deaths occurring from the collapse of medical systems as well as nuclear fallout and other long-term effects, including possible global scale nuclear winter. And so you may have the initial. blast that would kill 90 million people within within hours.
Starting point is 00:47:14 Yeah, within hours. But then you also have to look at long-term effects. You've got to look at the collapse of medical and food and civil, just civility in general. And then you've got to look at long-term medical things. And then if it becomes a bigger catastrophe, if everyone's launching nuclear war, which would probably happen, you're looking at a nuclear winter, and we can talk about that too.
Starting point is 00:47:34 But you're even thinking about when COVID, when we got stuck with COVID, all the emergencies that were going on, we could not take care of the people that were getting COVID. So you could imagine people being in the zone of nuclear war. There's no way we could even take care of those people. No, you could. Or help them. No. Well, and it would be almost too dangerous
Starting point is 00:47:55 to do it anyway. I mean, anybody that's in the zone or that's affected by this, you know, especially you're not going to have people coming in helping. I mean, that's just not going to probably happen. But the simulation begins in a context of conventional conflict. So Russia fires a warning shot, say, from a base near the city of Moscow or wherever, in an attempt to stop
Starting point is 00:48:15 a U.S. NATO advance. NATO then retaliates with a single tactical nuclear air strike. The nuclear exchange quickly escalates in Europe, with Russia sending 300 warheads via aircraft and short-range missiles to hit NATO bases and advancing troops. With much of Europe destroyed, NATO launches around 600 warheads from U.S. land and submarine bases at Russian nuclear facilities, before its weapons systems are destroyed. Russia fires missiles launched from silos, road mobile vehicles, and submarines. In the final stage of the conflict, both
Starting point is 00:48:45 Russia and NATO target the 30 most populated cities and economic centers of the other side. So, Russia and the United States would target the most populated areas in each country. Using 5 to 10 nuclear warheads on each depending on population size
Starting point is 00:49:00 in an attempt to inhibit the potential for recovery. But the problem with Russia is they have, there are the whole world against them. So they have a lot of different. They don't have the whole world against them. They got China with them. Well, I mean, I'm just saying
Starting point is 00:49:13 they got North Korea with them. Obviously, we're going to be the target, like United States, but England. They don't have the whole world against them. I'm just saying, you're going to think of how big China is. All the NATO countries are going to be against him. Yeah, but they have a lot of friends that are nuclear powers too. Most of, I mean, a lot of NATO is not even nuclear powers.
Starting point is 00:49:32 So, you know, most of a lot of the NATO countries have our nuclear warheads there. that's a problem. But we're also got to talk about the hypersonic capabilities as well besides that. But according to Glaser, a global thermonuclear war on the scale
Starting point is 00:49:47 could certainly be considered a worst case scenario, although the title video hints the fact the sequence of events shown is simply part of the standard playbook. But once the nuclear threshold is crossed,
Starting point is 00:49:58 it may be very difficult to prevent escalation to an all-out nuclear war, and it probably would be. So yeah, I mean, but we got to look at like who would win that war. Well, nobody wins at war. And that is true. Nobody really wins because there's going to be
Starting point is 00:50:11 millions and millions and millions of people. It's going to, you know, just a nuclear winter, for example, would take years to recover from. I mean, I'm talking about you're not going to be able to grow crops because it's going to be dark a lot of time because of the atmospheric conditions of a nuclear fallout radiation and smoke and everything. I mean, you've got to think about how many nuclear war has. If you're launching hundreds and hundreds and thousands, it would destroyed the earth most of it. Well, that's why before, when Reagan was in
Starting point is 00:50:43 presidency, they used to call it the Cold War, because it was, you know, nuclear powers back then, and they said the Cold War, you would not see the sun forever. Yeah. And you can't really survive without a sun.
Starting point is 00:50:57 But you also have to understand that you know, the reality is to this whole deal, is that there's a reason why Elon Musk and very smart people want to get the hell off this planet some way and get to Mars.
Starting point is 00:51:13 Because it's like Elon said. You know, you can worry all day about a freaking asteroid that comes and hits the Earth. You know, it's funny because we have all these movies about Independence Day and Asteroids in the Earth and 2012 all this stuff. We don't
Starting point is 00:51:29 have a ton of movies about what would actually happen in a all-out nuclear war in the world. That I at least remember. And if you guys are No one or I can even think of one, to be honest with you. But the reality is, is that we are probably tenfold more likely to all be dead from blowing ourselves up rather than any outside circumstance, including global warming. And, you know, that's something I want to say. It's like you look at this administration and the globalist and the elites.
Starting point is 00:52:02 That's what they're worried about right now. No, that's all they're doing is the global warming. They are screwing so many countries. By the way, BlackRock today, I was reading up on this. You know, Black Rock is actually what it sounds like is pretty much the responsibility of why power and all that stuff is in short supply now all of a sudden. And power prices are going through the roof. It's BlackRock because they think if you do that, then it inhibits the green technology. It makes the green space better.
Starting point is 00:52:39 And the power crisis is an orchestrated event just like COVID was, just like everything else. The next looming crisis, at least right now, is the power crisis until they release some other shit. But the thing is, look how much all these countries are supposedly, quote, unquote, doing for green energy and all this other bullshit that really, if you actually think about green energy, and you really think about the concepts and you've got to think it all through, you really still got to use fuel to be able to even maintain green or batteries or anything else.
Starting point is 00:53:14 Exactly. And you just don't have the capabilities. It's not possible for us to transition to that. But my point is that if they care so much about saving the Earth, what, 200 years from now or some shit, but yet we're sending every possible weapon and trying our ass off to piss off a nuclear power in the world, but yet they care so much about green energy.
Starting point is 00:53:38 It doesn't make sense. Right. Because it's bullshit. And we also have to think of it this way. Think about it this way. And this is, we're going to end this here in a second. But listen, what does Russia, Ukraine and the United States have to have in common with COVID? Just think about this for a second.
Starting point is 00:53:58 And I want you guys to think about it for a second. because it's a very, at the very least, this is a major reason why we are continuing escalation with Ukraine. Now, there is such thing as, okay, so... Can I answer the question? Yeah, go ahead. Population control? No, but that, yeah, that'll be the end result.
Starting point is 00:54:18 But yeah, we talked about that. That'll definitely be the end result. But I'm thinking about money-wise. Think about this. Oh, a one-world government with currency? No, no, no. Who was the big benefitters of the COVID? pharmaceuticals, right?
Starting point is 00:54:31 They're the companies that what, make pharmaceuticals. They made the vaccines, right? There was more wealth transferred during COVID than ever before. Not only did they have more wealth transfer in the history of COVID to pharmaceutical companies and billionaires that were basically controlling the government anyway,
Starting point is 00:54:50 guess who benefits from war? It is the military industrial complex, which, by the way, I don't know if we've ever done an episode on the military industrial complex. I don't think we have. But the military industrial complex is essentially like the pharmaceutical companies, right? Military industrial complex is who these companies are that make all these weapons for war.
Starting point is 00:55:09 If they don't have war, they make no money. But the military industrial complex, if you think pharmaceutical companies are rich, start thinking about military industrial complex. They have more money than anyone. And they control more people and more countries and more politicians than anyone. than anyone. They want war to make money. Oh, absolutely.
Starting point is 00:55:30 They've always wanted war. That's why there can never be peace. It's because of profit. You cannot have peace with profit. And not the way this profit is set up. They are just, they are power hungry. They are limitless. They are uncontrolled.
Starting point is 00:55:44 And the military industrial complex is a major reason why the escalation of this entire situation keeps happening. Then we've got to look at just even on the other side of things. Like you look at the Hunter Biden, Joe Biden thing. And how much shit that Hunter Biden was. and we don't even know about. I mean, we're hearing some of the things that they're working deals and making all this money. And now in a natural gas company, we just found out a couple days ago. Yeah, and he was heavily influenced in Ukraine.
Starting point is 00:56:08 A lot of the dealings in Ukraine. In Ukraine, who knows what, and that was a gas company and Burisma and supposedly, you know, who knows what companies he was involved with when it comes to, I would love to know, but I would love to know some companies like, I'm not going to name names, but, you know, military industrial companies, the companies that actually manufacture these weapons. The amount of money that politicians bankroll on those companies is probably far more than you can imagine, even beyond pharmaceuticals and whoever else, right? So what I'm saying is that at the very least issue, I mean, obviously we know the globalist and elites,
Starting point is 00:56:48 they also control a lot of these mega companies that use weapons of war to control, and destroy whoever they want. I mean, we've seen it. You know, we've seen George Soros do this and overthrow governments around the world. We've seen many elites be involved in showing this. For sure. And so all of them have a stake in all of this.
Starting point is 00:57:12 And if you know anything about a stock market, you would know that when Russia-Ukraine war happened, well, I know the stock market. I'm in groups like the Wall Street Betts groups and all this. And guess the companies. They're Reddit guys or whatever. But guess the companies that they're going to invest in and skyrocket their stocks? Well, it's going to be the companies that manufacture missiles and all this other shit
Starting point is 00:57:34 because obviously stocks are going to skyrocket when there's a war. And then not only are these companies making billions and probably trillions off of the money that the government is buying from them for these weapons, but they're also making billions, if not trillions, on the stocks, right? Because they know their stocks are going up and they're making money. Same thing with same thing that happened during COVID. The only stocks that were skyrocketed was Pfizer and Moderna and all these other companies. There is more greed in this world now than ever.
Starting point is 00:58:06 Like greed is going to destroy this earth. And that's what's so sad is they're willing to have greed, destroy the earth. Like they rather have way more money and be rich and we're going to be destroyed. Yeah. So sad. But did just want to come on update you guys. guys and girls of what the newest is. This is something to be worried about.
Starting point is 00:58:31 I mean, don't worry about it every day, but there's nothing we can really do at the moment. I mean, short of buying some land and putting something underground and then having enough food, you would have to have enough food until the fallout ceased. So who do you think should be the most worried about a nuclear war? America. I mean, probably America because, I mean, well, everybody.
Starting point is 00:58:56 really, but America, because Russia is going to launch nuclear at America before, even the U.K. or Europe or any, that stuff. Do you think they're going to try to go after, they probably would not even launch one for Ukraine because it's going to come back to them. Yeah, well, I think if they launch a nuclear or any nuclear attacks, it'll be directly at the United States. And they'll also launch them at Europe and all that. But, you know, they're not. We would be the first target. Yeah, they're not going to risk launching in Europe first because then they're not going to be able to destroy America. You know what I mean?
Starting point is 00:59:25 because they know America's going to have weapons in the air, and it's going to be hitting them too soon. So it's just like your first shot, where's your first shot going to go? It's your kill shot, right? You want it to be America. So America is the big cities in America. And you probably want to try to disable Americans' nuclear weapons, but do they even know where they are?
Starting point is 00:59:48 Yeah, I mean, you know, you got to think, the Chinese are some of the biggest spies in the world. They're really good at it. I mean, United States is too. But the Chinese are also very good. And don't think that the Chinese-Russia collaboration on that shit is not happening. You know, they're sharing information. They're sharing intel.
Starting point is 01:00:07 They're buddies now because they kind of have to be, I guess, in this situation. So, yeah, I mean, they don't probably know where all of them are, but I don't know. I mean, Russia's got space programs, satellites. Trust me, I'm sure they monitor stuff just like we do. The only thing that really does protect. all-out war between countries is nuclear war. But once a nuclear war happens, once a nuclear war happens, then it's all over for everyone. Yeah, it is.
Starting point is 01:00:33 Unless one country could demolish the other. Right. If they just demolished us, I don't think it ever, like, affect England and places over there. Well, it would, to some degree, with fallout. But, you know, I just don't think it would, I don't think it would play that way, probably. But I don't know. I'm not an expert. But what I am saying too is that, you know, looking at the capabilities of, you know, at least from what we have heard and understand, you know, Russia has some very good capabilities as far as hypersonic missiles that can reach the U.S. in 15 minutes.
Starting point is 01:01:05 I don't even know for sure that the United States necessarily has the greatest capabilities of hypersonic. I think we have, you know, and I hate to say this, but when you have Democrat presidents, especially the president we have now, they defund our own military. They are weakening our military. They are weakening our infrastructure. They are weakening everything about us. If you just look at commerce and you look at our economy and you look at trade and foreign policies, we are weaker now than we've ever been. And part of that is we're weakening our military.
Starting point is 01:01:34 We're going woke military to where it's like, hey, if you're a transvestite, why don't you come be a general? Yeah, you can be a general. Or whatever. And you don't even got to have qualities or not qualities, qualifications. You can just, if you're a transvestite and you believe you're a cat or another species altogether or alien or a girl or guy, you can come be a general because we value you because that's pretty much the only reason. We are woken our military, which is awful. And then you see,
Starting point is 01:02:04 you see military videos out of Russia that are just hardcore. You see North Korea and all these guys, man, like breaking bricks on their chest and just doing crazy shit. Because that is like, hey, we're not woke. We will kill your ass. And our guys are dudes that are ready to die and kill bloody deaths, you know. And there's like, then you see like a new teaser for the CIA, FBI, Army. Hey, come get an inclusive experience at the FBI. Or join the army now. You can wear a dress or a thong, even if you're a guy.
Starting point is 01:02:38 You know, that's the shit we have now, unfortunately. And so, so I just hope our nuclear warheads are better than theirs because, and that's while we have a, and by the way, I'm not bitching about the guys that are still in military right now, which are badass, mother-frikers, because they are. They are still there. They are still there. But you know what? But what I'm saying is they're trying to-
Starting point is 01:02:59 But we cannot even recruit people anymore. No, it's hard. We don't even have enough people in our military anymore right now. Well, you look at Obama, and Obama did the same shit. I mean, he weakened our military. We had to build back the military under Trump. You know, Obama canceled all air shows, all of that shit. He canceled a Blue Angel air shows.
Starting point is 01:03:18 during his administration, everything. He canceled basically everything patriotism. And that's what the Democrats do. They want anti-America. They do not want America. They are like an outside source being influenced by somewhere else. I don't know if it's China or who it is, globalist, I guess. But then you get Republicans in or whatever.
Starting point is 01:03:35 The people that seem to love America, want America to be America. And so this is the situation we're in. But guys, that's going to be it, I guess. Do you have anything else, babe? It's going to be it for tonight. I did just want to give you guys an update. Thank you all for listening. We love each number one of you.
Starting point is 01:03:52 Hopefully that doesn't happen. That's worst case scenario. And hopefully the next time you hear our voices on video. So we love you. Go join our Rumble. Go check us out. Check us out on Facebook. Until next time, we love you.
Starting point is 01:04:05 And peace out, guys. Peace out.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.