Investing Billions - E112: Jake Paul: How to Build a Multi-Billion Startup
Episode Date: November 15, 2024Jake Paul and Joey Levy, Co-Founders of Betr, sits down with David Weisburd to discuss Jake Paul’s bold vision for the future of sports betting and how the company seeks to become the market leader ...in the space.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What drives you? What makes you so ambitious, Jake?
Challenges excite me. Seeing what I can accomplish and how far I can push my own self.
Becoming a world champion in the sport of boxing is my goal.
But on top of that, you also want to be a billionaire and build one of the largest sports gaming companies.
So you're already rich, you already have your boxing. Why start a sports betting company?
Probably one of the hardest things to do in the world is to create a billion dollar company.
So it's one of my goals just to say that I was able to do it.
Roughly half of billionaires attribute a lot of their success to psychedelics.
Do you attribute psychedelics as a source of your success?
100%.
No question about it.
Well, Jake, Jake Paul, Joey Levy, co-founders of Better, among many other things. Great to have you guys on the podcast.
Welcome to the Element of Partner podcast.
Yeah, great.
Great to be here.
Appreciate you having us on David.
Yeah.
Thank you.
Excited.
Thank you.
So as I was telling you before the show, I spoke to a mutual friend of ours and
NBA head coach, Mike Brown, who last year won one NBA coach of the year.
And he said, Jake, what you accomplished in boxing last three years
is one of the greatest sports he's ever seen in history.
How are you able to accomplish what you were accomplished going from amateur to
being an elite fighter in three years?
Wow.
That's like, well, that's a crazy statement coming from Mike.
So Mike, what's up?
Cameron, Eliza.
What's up everybody?
I miss you guys.
Hope you're doing well, but yeah, I don't know, man.
It's just, it's believing in yourself and self belief and not letting others
constraints of what they think is possible in reality, limiting your own
beliefs and it shows what's possible with extreme dedication for 16 hours a day and surrounding
yourself with the best people at the highest level.
And just manifestation, visualization, and truly believing within yourself that you can
do something and being a disruptor, coming in with a different skill set at the right time.
I mean, this is all about venture capital
and investing and all this stuff.
Everything's about timing.
And I came into the sport when it was dying on its way out
and to gave it this breath of fresh air.
And I saw the opportunity to do so.
And I saw how much help the sport needed.
And I saw a lot of room to make changes.
And that's really what's happened.
I like that answer.
But I was with you at Komodo after the fight.
Me and Jessica, you were kind enough to host us
at the last DS fight.
And you were still zeroed in.
You had just won.
And everybody was partying.
You had Dave Grumman. You had Purple. You had all these guys. And you were still zeroed in. You had just one and everybody was partying. You had Dave Grumman, you had Purple,
you had all these guys and you were still zeroed in.
I've never seen somebody so focused in.
What drives you?
What makes you so ambitious, Jake?
I would say challenges excite me
and seeing what I can accomplish
and how far I can push my own self
is a really fun game to play.
And just getting better every single day
gives me something to continue to work on
and having purpose and setting very, very high goals
for myself that are super far fetched.
Like becoming a world champion
in the sport of boxing is my goal right
so if I beat Nate Diaz that's great and all like yeah maybe celebrate a little
bit but that's a spec on what I want to actually accomplish in the long run so
yeah everyone's partying at Komodo but actually I'm gonna choose to remain
sober because that's gonna help me get to my goal faster.
And I just choose my moments where I wanna have fun,
but I just have so much to prove
and have two chips on each shoulder.
And just, that's a short summary of what drives me.
There's so much more, but yeah.
And also just following up on that.
So you wanna be world champion boxer, which by the way,
a year and a half ago, everybody was laughing at you
and thought that that was a crazy goal.
Now people are like, can he do it?
Can he not do it?
Which is a huge evolution.
But on top of that, you also want to be a billionaire
and build one of the largest sports gaming companies.
So you're already rich, you already have your boxing.
Why start a sports gaming company. So you're already rich. You're already have your boxing.
Why start a sports betting company?
You know, life is a game and we're playing real real life monopoly. And since I was 17
years old, I was surrounded. I went to Silicon Valley with my friend for about a week. I
thought it was the coolest thing ever. the challenges of these startups, getting to go around. I went to Uber, Google, Twitter at the time, and I saw all of these
people working towards these goals. And the feats that they were achieving, I think when I
went to Google, they were like, first experimenting with AI or like quantum computing or some crazy
thing. And I was like, I couldn't even comprehend it as a 17 year old from Ohio.
I saw these people changing the world, the challenges they were facing,
the levels they were surmounting to.
And I think that has been within me.
And I was, and I saw these people and I got to talk to these CEOs.
And I was like, they're really no different than anybody else.
Like if they can do this and achieve these huge things, then then so can I.
And to me, it's fun.
It's, it's literally real life monopoly.
You have to play all these pieces on the puzzle.
Um, and the, and the challenge of getting to that level, I think is
probably the hard, probably one of the hardest things to do in the world
is to create a billion dollar company.
So it's one of my goals just to see
and to say that I was able to do it.
When you were playing Monopoly as a kid,
who won you or Logan?
It was probably a back and forth.
I say I can't play Uno with my friends
because I just get so pissed off.
It's a common thing in startups,
Peter Thiel apparently when he loses chess,
he throws over the chessboard,
according to David Sachs and other venture capitalists.
But you mentioned visualization, working 16 hours a day
as a source of your success,
but ultimately you only have 24 hours a day.
You talk a lot about psychedelics.
I know from personal experience,
roughly half of billionaires attribute a lot of a lot about psychedelics. I know from personal experience, roughly half
of billionaires attribute a lot of their success to psychedelics. Do you attribute psychedelics
as a source of your success?
100%. No question about it. I think you have to understand yourself and go inwards and
work inwards and emotional intelligence and all of these things before you can really
master everything. Business is all about relationship,
team, understanding everyone else,
working together in this way.
Psychedelics actually gives you opening into that world,
those energies, how to be a part of a community,
love, push, pool, being a good leader.
All of these things kind of get opened
up and you allow you to see things from a different perspective.
And then just the amazing ideas that come from it, right?
It's like Steve Jobs created the iPod off of some acid because he was like, why can't
I bring the music with me?
Absolutely.
Steve Jobs even created Apple back in the day from his LSD experiences.
Sergey Brin and Elon Musk are on the record as being big proponents of psychedelics and
crediting a lot of that for their success. We have a show, we have some of the top venture
capitalists in the world that come on and they're funders and we have some very smart marketing
people. But Jake, I think you are one of the most underrated marketing geniuses really in the world.
And the reason I say that is because you found a way to be successful from platform to platform,
from Vine to Instagram to TikTok. That's almost unprecedented.
So I have to ask you this whole problem child persona, this whole fuck Jake Paul thing,
is this a marketing gimmick? Is this how you get fans? Can you spill the beans on that?
Good news travels fast, bad news travels faster. People like drama, they like controversy,
they like the things that are different. People want to see something that they've never seen
before. And to cut right to the top in news and gossip and drama, it's like ruffle feathers.
And then that was the strategy from day one to break it to be a social media star.
How did I first break into the mainstream media?
I had all of these ideas and it was roughly in feathers.
And I can play that character and be the bad guy and be the villain.
And that's kind of how people have painted me and that I embraced it.
And it was like, okay, cool.
This is where we're going to go with this. But it works way better in the long run than than just being the,
you know, person with no opinion one way or the other. And we see
that a lot of times now is like not choosing a side is is
choosing a side. So definitely very strategic and thoughtful
around all this. And it just perfectly aligns with boxing and, you know,
having opponents and, and shit talking and all in the world.
I mean, it's one thing, you know, I saw you,
it's one thing to say you like playing the villain,
but actually doing it.
I saw you come out and Dallas and everybody booing you.
And you just had the most stoic face and just said,
we're so internally focused. It was inspiring to be honest.
It's very cool to see kind of in practice. So let's go to Joey. So Joey, you did what? To be completely
frank, I had never met Jake. I've been really impressed by Jake in person. You know, I think
he has the same persona as a unicorn founder without all the social media and all the boxing.
I think you saw that too, but you put your money where your mouth is. You gave half of your company to, on a crazy bet on an influencer, however famous, but
ultimately a celebrity.
What did you see in Jake that made you really give up half of your company to him?
Well, first and foremost, I'm a big believer in when you build a business with somebody,
not to have this sort of wonky set of incentives where one individual who,
if you're truly a co-founder, I think co-founders should have equal amounts of equity unless there's
some level of extenuating circumstances where that doesn't make sense. So that's kind of how
I wanted to approach this from day one, where if I was going to have a co-founder in this business, because as you know, David, and I don't know if the broader better story is out there,
but I started my prior business, SimpleBet, to be a direct-to-consumer company and ultimately
do what we're effectively doing it better.
And I was on a mission to spin out direct to consumer from simple bet and go after better.
And initially I was gonna do it myself, right?
So, but when I met Jake and spent a lot of time with him,
and I think you touched upon this a couple of minutes ago,
it's not just the 70 million followers across social media,
which obviously brings a pretty tremendous unfair advantage from a customer acquisition standpoint.
But it's really the marketing genius that I don't think a lot of people candidly have
in this country or globally.
And Jake has the track record to really speak to that and just the level of focus and discipline. And I would say one of the things that
Jake and I really have in common is the level of ambition we have. Anything less than a $10 billion
publicly traded outcome for basically be considered a failure, I think, from our perspective. So
I think we just got along really well and have similar goals and objectives and have a very
complimentary skill set where,
I basically spent my entire adult life, the last 10 years of my life going after the same
consumer experience problem in sports gaming. And Jake's been spending the last decade of his life
focused on being arguably the most disruptive marketer on the internet. Sports gaming and sports media are increasingly converging.
I think we just have really complimentary skill sets to go after
an incredibly ambitious problem and company together and
really just an alignment of values that enables us to work well together.
Speaking of alignment, one of your investors told me,
I'm not going to share who it was,
but that originally Jake offered to be 60-40,
60 you Joey, 40 him, and you said no, 50-50.
Again, this is skin the game, this is alignment.
Tell me a little bit about that.
Yeah, like I said, I mean,
I think it's better to be 50-50 partners.
You know, I want, I think it's just for Jake
to have the same level of incentive that I do is critical to
the success of the company.
And I'd much rather own 50% of a 10 or $100 billion company than 60% of something that's
worth $100 million.
And I just don't think that you can do this to the level required, particularly with somebody like
Jake that has a tremendous level of opportunity cost.
There's a whole lot of other things that Jake could be doing than if we weren't both equally
tied as being the largest shareholders of this business.
Jake, tell me a little bit about that.
I see when I went to the Find Dallas and and everything, you're ducked down better. I know you guys also may have tattoos, which we'll go into later, but
you're so committed to the business and you're so aligned with it. How has that relationship
been with Joey and how's your relationship been in founding the company together?
It's been phenomenal. And like Joey said earlier, sharing that same level of ambition, it's either a thousand
miles per hour or not at all.
And I'm the first half of that sentiment where it's like, if I'm going to do anything, I'm
going to go at it 1000% and give it my best effort every single day, day in and day out and do everything I possibly
can to ensure this company's success on a minute to minute, second to second basis.
And that's the attitude Joey has, and that's the attitude of the team that we've built
has.
This is a do or die. And, you know, at the
end of the day, also this, a lot of this company's success, like my reputation is on the line
here, right? And I think Joey shares that as well. And so we will make this company
a $10 billion company. And I stand on that and it goes down to the finest details of
yeah like getting it tattooed or you know it being on every...
Also I think you tattooed it from two different sides for the camera angles. Is that right?
Yeah so it's on like the inner knee and on the outer knee so that like anytime people
take a photo of me while I'm fighting the logo.
A couple of things on that. One is Jake. It's not like you're saying I want to be a
billionaire in some vacuum. You're giving up millions and millions of sponsorship of space
on the ring of space on yourself on space on your body in order to commit and invest your equity
essentially in that company. So I think that's something that's undervalued. The other aspect
of that is you guys have not only do you both have tattoos, which I've never heard.
I was an early investor in Palantir
and they had this cult-like product and cult-like company,
but they never had tattoos.
So you guys are beating them on that.
But you also convinced employees to tattoo yourself.
Tell me about that.
I don't even know if we had any.
I don't think we convinced.
Exactly.
Everyone's just down because that's the culture, I guess, that's created.
This is people's lives within the company.
It's my life.
It's Joey's life.
I think one of the only ways to really have a breakthrough dominant company in this space,
which is very difficult, very intense.
There's big players involved, there's licensing regulations.
We have to eat, breathe and sleep this.
And I think since the first on early hires,
that was just the culture.
And now it's permeated throughout the rest of the company
and this is everyone's lives.
So let's actually go into the company itself.
So better.
So from a first principles basis, maybe Joey, tell me about what, what, what, do
we really need another sports gaming company?
There's a lot of sports gaming companies out there.
Why do you guys exist?
Yeah.
So I would say this is predominantly around the incremental TAM.
That's not, that's being underserved in, in sports gaming.
that's being underserved in sports gaming. So for example, FanDuel and DraftKings are worth about
20 and $15 billion respectively.
Yet they combined, they only have about 5 million
monthly active users, which is a lot for real money gaming.
But if you take a step back for a moment,
you'll realize that they're currently in
front of 100 million gambling age sports fans. And they'll be in front of nearly double that
200 million as more jurisdictions open up. And I think we can all agree that Vandal and Draft
King's don't have a brand awareness problem. They quite literally advertise like car insurance
companies, except they're probably not as funny as they are.
So they have brand awareness, but there's about a 95% incremental TAM opportunity.
And we think it's due to product. I mean, everything we do is better. Really, the primary emphasis of the company is to design sports gaming experiences that are simple and intuitive enough for people
to interact with them, even if they've never played fantasy sports before or bet on sports
before. And I think we've accomplished that particularly with the Better Picks product
experience, which we rolled out just two months ago on September 5th, ahead of the beginning of the NFL season.
And it's immediately become one of the fastest growing
products, not just in the industry today,
but I think in the history of the US sports gaming industry.
And we're excited to roll out,
be one of our sports book next year,
and really have a sports book business,
a fantasy business that is already very successful
and then ultimately expand into other
verticals. But really, this is about that incremental tam of the casual sports fan
who doesn't know what a minus 175 money line means, doesn't know what a plus five and a half
point spread means, doesn't know what a 49.5 O slash U means, doesn't want to interact with a sports book that is essentially an uninterpretable
spreadsheet like a movie.
As you know, David, I got involved in this category about seven years, really 10 years
ago with DraftBot, my daily fantasy business, but in the sports betting category, specifically
about seven years ago when I started a project that ultimately became Simple Bet, because
I was a Ivy League educated, daily
fantasy sports operator that when the first time I tried to use a sports book, I literally
did not know how to use it. It wasn't intuitive to me that minus 175 meant to bet 175 to win 100.
And it also struck me that it quite literally looked like a spreadsheet when I thought sports
gaming was all about enhancing
the consumption of sports and being fun and engaging and entertaining, you know, be analogous
to sort of another industry. We view the current products as kind of being the E-Trade, Fidelity,
Charles Schwab's, what those companies were today trading. Nobody's really built the Robinhood of
gambling from a UI UX perspective. And that's ultimately why we started,
why we started better and why we think there's a pretty substantial market opportunity for this
business. And Tam total addressable market, essentially how big the market is. A lot of
people passed on Uber originally, because they said the taxi market isn't big enough. And of
course, now Uber is bigger than the entire taxi market. I think all power
law outcomes, all outcomes that return 100X or the 10 billion, 100 billion dollar companies that you
guys aspire to fundamentally have to expand the TAM, expand the market or else they would already
be highly competitive. One of the main reasons that I invested in Better was because of your
customer acquisition strategy and how you're able to leverage media in order to drive down your cost. Can you tell me a little bit about that? I think this was one of your customer acquisition strategy and how you're able to leverage media
in order to drive down your costs. Can you tell me a little bit about that?
I think this was one of the biggest problems we saw in the industry was where are DraftKings
and Fandual and maybe some of these other companies, what's their biggest expense and
it's marketing? Billions of dollars out the door. So if we can come in and completely flip that, lower that expense tenfold and have better
brand awareness with original content, then we're going to be eons ahead of everyone else.
And that's where the two divisions of better media and then the sports gaming side come
into play where we've now created this whole content
network and ecosystem and talent and original content 24-7 that has grown the brand massively
to be bigger and more recognizable and more well known than some of these other companies
who have been spending billions and billions of dollars on the marketing. And what that
these other companies who have been spending billions and billions of dollars on the marketing and what that allows us to do is have brand affinity, more loyalty to our customers, people
may feel more comfortable with our brand and trusting the product.
And it lowers our customer acquisition costs significantly.
And we've seen that to date be super, super effective. And quite frankly, it's one of our biggest X
factors.
Are we talking about 20 30%? What goes on with your CAC?
It's an order of magnitude more efficient than the other that
meant sort of the average blended CPA that that we've
heard the other operators are currently experiencing. And, you
know, I think one of the things that you know a lot of respect for Barstool Sports and the
endeavor to go after the Barstool Sportsbook.
But one of the differences in our approach, I would say, when we decided to launch our
sports gaming business and Penn decided to pursue the Barstool Sportsbook brand is that
it's not just about the organic audience to product conversion,
but arguably the predominant value of media is that halo effect that it creates around your brand,
as Jake alluded to, not just brand awareness, but brand affinity.
Right. So when you do paid user acquisition, you have best- class efficiency. When consumers are scrolling on TikTok
and there's a better advertisement there, it almost feels like organic content because they're
already familiar with the brand, they're familiar with Jake, maybe they're familiar with Derek or
one of our other content creators, and they'll stop. They'll ultimately convert with best in class efficiency. So we've been able to strike a really nice balance, I think, between not just the organic
audience or product conversion, but leveraging the brand affinity we've developed predominantly
through original short form video to enable best in class efficiency on the paid UA side,
which is really scalable, right?
Because that's just money,
right? If you have a good unit economics formula where you're competent that for every dollar
in marketing investment you spend, you're going to get $8 in return for that, which
may or may not be what we're currently experiencing, then it's just math at that point.
And when payback periods are as tight as we're seeing them
at better, you actually have an interesting dynamic where you can gradually pull forward
marketing investment, maintain CAC efficiency, and actually accelerate your path to profitability
while also growing the business because the unit economics are so attractive.
Is better a media company with a betting arm or a betting company with a media arm?
It feels to me like it's more of a media company.
I would challenge that a little bit at least.
We're first and foremost a gaming business and if you look at how we monetize the company,
that really reflects that.
We are monetizing better media independent of better gaming.
And, you know, we do work with some great brand partners on that side of the house,
but everything we do first and foremost is to develop brand awareness and brand
affinity to enable us to have best in class efficiency on customer acquisition
for our suite of better gaming
products.
And the vast, vast, vast level of energy and resource allocation and focus is geared towards
monetization via better gaming.
And we're really starting to see that in a significant way with the BetterPix product
in particular.
It sounds like startup CEOs speak for not wanting to give away your secret sauce.
But well, we'll leave it at that. Let's talk numbers. So you guys are doing exceptionally
well. This is Q4 2023. Tell me a little bit about your numbers.
You might get a little bit more startup CEO speak just in the interest of not speaking
out of turn and disclosing anything.
We're under a friendly until this launches.
So, yeah, I will launch to a lot of people.
I'll give you some, I'll give you some ballpark, right?
So we launched Better Initially as a media brand
in August of 2022.
We then launched our sports book business in early 2023, predominantly with a beta product,
micro-vetting focused app to just start laying the foundations of our online sports book
business, establish our leadership position, responsible gaming.
For example, we're still the only operator to ban credit cards as a depositing method
and restrict the amount young consumers can
Deposit on a monthly basis young being 21 to 25 years old
because we truly believe that sports gaming is for entertainment value and people should
Technically not be able to gamble with money that they don't have only after laying the foundations of our OSB business and establishing our
RG leadership position that we want to get into the fantasy sports vertical,
which we launched on September 5th.
So we launched, we hard launched Better Pick
on September 5th, two days before the NFL season.
And sitting here, we're filming this on November 11th.
So just about two months after the launch.
And, you know, this is a high eight figure
revenue run rate business already, possibly
may end the year at beyond 100 million revenue run rate.
The company likely does not need any incremental capital on top of our existing balance sheet
to get to profitability.
Of course, we are exploring ways we can be opportunistic with prospective investments in paid user
acquisition, particularly given we've been able to maintain efficiency despite increasing spend
modestly week over week. And we're just about to crack the six-figure mark for active paying
users despite launching this just about two months ago.
So no specific numbers there,
but you have some ballparks that you could work against.
I appreciate that.
I'm starting to visualize a G5 jet for myself.
So I appreciate that.
And speaking of jets,
you guys want to be a $10 billion company.
I look at your competitors, $15, $20 billion company.
I see you guys as significantly better from a marketing standpoint. Is there a path to being a $100 billion
company here? Yes. It goes back to that, to the long envelope math that you just alluded to.
I mean, I think the fact that Fandl and DraftKings are so valuable, yet only have about 5% market
penetration really speaks to the opportunity here.
I mean, this could candidly be bigger than $100 billion business.
I described this at the top as kind of the Robin Hood of gambling from a UIUX
perspective.
And obviously Robin Hood has done a great job from a financial perspective and
has resulted in a lot of returns for its earliest investors.
But the Robin Hood of gambling will be significantly larger than Robinhood because Robinhood is
dealing with a finite amount of public equities that consumers are interested in buying and
selling.
But there's ultimately an infinite amount of moments of sporting events to enable consumers to bet on, to enable consumers to make player,
you know, statistical predictions
on a product like BetterPix.
There's other verticals within gaming
that we can pursue as well
without really requiring a lot of incremental OPEX
or CAPEX given we've made the foundational investments
in product, technology, operations, regulatory,
and government affairs, and then of course, marketing, media, and brand.
So we've made these foundational investments over the past couple of years, and we can
keep bolting on new verticals and new products like BetterPix without really meeting a significant
amount of incremental capital or time.
We should see some pretty interesting economies of scale with this business as we continue
to keep our heads down, stay focused, execute against our product roadmap, and rapidly grow
our revenue and customer base.
What drives you, Joey?
We met a couple of years ago.
I pretty much decided to invest after our first dinner.
You explained the gaming industry more clearly
than I had been hearing from people for five years.
But on a fundamental level, it seems evident what drives Jake.
But what drives you, Joey?
So I dropped out of Columbia University
a little bit less than 10 years ago
to pursue my first sports gaming startup.
And at the time it was Daily Fantasy, which was the only form of legal sports gaming in
the United States with essentially the same vision that we have now, which is that, you
know, at the time, FanDuel and DraftKings were also the market leader, but in DFS.
And I just felt like their product experiences were fundamentally built for the power user that was using models
and was researching for three hours a day and was a high volume user.
So I've always felt like sports gaming in this country has been built for the power,
high volume user, but there's tens to hundreds of millions of casual sports fans that have
not been delivered product experiences that are
simple, intuitive, and entertaining for them.
So I went down this rabbit hole about a decade ago when I dropped out of school to pursue
my first business.
And I've been down that rabbit hole since.
And I've had some success along the way and quite the level of financial success that
Jake's had.
But I've had some a little bit myself and
Simple Bet is a valuable business, which was my company before this. And the motivation is
less financial now and more just about winning the category. I mean, my entire adult life has been
spent in this category, being told for the better part of the decade that I was wrong about
my product vision, ultimately to more recently be proven right in a pretty big way across
a couple of different businesses now.
And really the motivation is to win the category now.
And neither of us are going to stop until that ultimately happens.
Yeah, I think it's very common for a first-time entrepreneur to focus on money, second-time
entrepreneur on building something really big. Well, I think it's evident where all three of us
are sitting in our office on Saturday. I know Jake, you came from training. Joey's in his HQ.
I'm in my office at One World in New York. So I think we're three of a kind. It's been an
absolute honor and pleasure to talk to you guys. Jake, I know you're training 16 hours a day. I really appreciate you jumping out of training to jump
on a call. And of course, Joey, you're the best. I'm looking forward. I'm inviting myself to the
December 15th fight. So I'm looking forward to seeing both of you guys there. Thanks for having
us. We'll get the tickets set up and I'll see you in Orlando. We got your tickets, man. All right. Thanks, David.
Take care.
Thank you for listening.
The 10x capital podcast now receives more than 170,000 downloads per month.
If you are interested in sponsoring, please email me at david at 10xcapital.com.