It Could Happen Here - It Could Happen Here Weekly 135

Episode Date: June 15, 2024

All of this week's episodes of It Could Happen Here put together in one large file. You can now listen to all Cool Zone Media shows, 100% ad-free through the Cooler Zone Media subscription, available exclusively on Apple Podcasts. So, open your Apple Podcasts app, search for “Cooler Zone Media” and subscribe today! http://apple.co/coolerzone See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Curious about queer sexuality, cruising, and expanding your horizons? Hit play on the sex-positive and deeply entertaining podcast, Sniffy's Cruising Confessions. Join hosts Gabe Gonzalez and Chris Patterson Rosso as they explore queer sex, cruising, relationships, and culture in the new iHeart podcast, Sniffy's Cruising Confessions. Sniffy's Cruising Confessions will broaden minds and help you pursue your true goals.

You can listen to Sniffy's Cruising Confessions, sponsored by Gilead, now on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes every Thursday. The 2025 iHeart Podcast Awards are coming. This is the chance to nominate your podcast for the industry's biggest award. Submit your podcast for nomination now at iHeart.com slash podcast awards. But hurry, submissions close on December 8th. Hey, you've been doing all that talking. It's time to get rewarded for it. Submit your podcast today at iHeart.com slash podcast awards.

That's iHeart.com slash podcast awards. Hi, I'm Ed Zitron, host of the Better Offline podcast, and we're kicking off our second season digging into tech's elite and how they've turned Silicon Valley into a playground for billionaires. From the chaotic world of generative AI to the destruction of Google search, Better Offline is your unvarnished and at times unhinged look at the underbelly of tech brought to you by an industry veteran with nothing to lose. Listen to Better Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever else you get your podcasts from. On Thanksgiving Day, 1999,

five-year-old Cuban boy Elian Gonzalez was found off the coast of Florida. And the question was, should the boy go back to his father in Cuba? Mr. Gonzalez wanted to go home and he wanted to take his son with him. Or stay with his relatives in Miami? Imagine that your mother died trying to get you to freedom. Listen to Chess Peace, the Elian Gonzalez story, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. to audiobooks while running errands or at the end of a busy day. From thought-provoking novels to

powerful poetry, we'll explore the stories that shape our culture. Listen to Black Lit on the Black Effect Podcast Network, iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. AT&T, connecting changes everything. Protecting changes everything. CallZone Media. Hey, everybody. Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let you know this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the week that just happened is here in one convenient and with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to in a long stretch if you want.

If you've been listening to the episodes every day this week, there's going to be nothing new here for you, but you can make your own decisions. It's riot time when it could happen here. This is this is the podcast that you're listening to. It's about this is this one's kind of about bad things. This is this is about a bunch of riots in the past. I'm your host, Bia Wong, with V.S. James and Garrison. Aloha. So one of the kind of, I don't know, the trends of 2024 is everyone looking at this year and going, this is 1968 again. There's campus occupations that are anti-war protests. There is a Democratic National Convention that is expected to be extremely hot. there is a democratic national convention that is expected to be extremely hot and so one of one of the things that we are doing in the run-up to the democratic convention is we are going to go do

some episodes about 1968 and we are eventually going to do episodes about like the columbia campus occupations and about the dnc but unfortunately in order to do that we have to well i say unfortunately this is actually not unfortunately this this mostly rules i don't know some of it's bad but in order to talk about this and this is this is the part of this whole thing that has been completely forgotten right you know there's there's become this kind of like i don't know state cult isn't quite the right word but there's become this sort of like professional institutional history of 1968 where all of these universities proudly have banners from 1968 protests. Everyone has been incredibly willing to embrace the legacy of the anti-war movement and the campus occupations.

And insofar as they tell people not to embrace things, it's this stuff about like, you know, you hear this constant screaming about don't repeat the 68 convention. But there's one part of this story that has is just gone, has been excised from the historical record. It is extremely clear that no one wants you to remember it whatsoever. And that is the Holy Week uprising. Do you two know? Have you two heard of the Holy Week uprising? Not before you started talking about it in our work meetings i'm familiar with it uh i've covered it in u.s history courses before not as that name i think people might be more familiar with it if you describe the events yeah so the other name for is the mlk riots which is a week i mean okay so it's okay yeah yeah okay

yeah so okay so and i should be clear about this okay so there are there are really two things going on here there is one the actually it's usually thought of as about a week but it's it's actually longer than that there's like a couple months of writing in various places over the assassination of MLK. The other thing that's going on here is a wave of urban rebellion. And when I say urban here, I'm not just talking about, you know, like Watts or Detroit or Chicago, like these like giant urban cities, which is how, you know, insofar as anyone ever talks about writing in this period is about these large urban centers. No, they are rioting in milwaukee the most intense fighting that we're going to talk about in this episode happens in york pennsylvania in this period for about uh it's about 1963 to roughly

by by 1971 72 it's kind of over there are a staggering number of urban uprisings. I'm going to read a quote from a book called The Great Uprising, which is about this sort of period. Between 1963 and 1972, America experienced over 750 urban revolts. Upwards of 525 cities were affected, including nearly every one with a Black population over 50,000. The two largest wave of uprisings came during the summer of 1967 and during Holy Week in 1968 following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. In these two years alone, 125 people were killed, nearly 7,000 were injured, approximately approximately 45 000 arrests were made and property damage topped 127 million dollars or approximately 900 million in 2017 dollars if you can even stretch

this out to like um can i just give you to spin i put on this in my history class and then and then we can we can continue yeah okay so the way i perceive this is the process of decolonization begins in the colonies and it comes back to the metropole. And we see this physical decolonization in places like Algeria. And then the impact of witnessing that returns to the metropole along with the theories that, if you want to say they decolonize the mind i think that that's an acceptable way and like this sort of struggle this um like and even the aesthetic right like the aesthetic of the battle of algiers is present in some of these uprisings like and you can stretch it out to like you know i like to talk about winded knee but the second occupation of winded knee in 1973 i think you could also see that as part of this decolonization struggle um at least that's my uh yeah that's my angle on it

yeah and i think there's definitely a lot of like i don't know there's a lot of inspiration taken there i think the way it's usually seen in the u.s is as this is the sort of i don't know it's kind of as it's seen as this kind of this is where everything went off the rails after the civil rights movement which isn't what happens yeah and the other way i think it's a scene and this is i don't know a lens that i is kind of useful to talk about this but kind of isn't is about the sort of quote-unquote long 1968 so you know we're gonna be covering a lot of 1968 stuff on this show you know so like there's obviously there's 1968 in france i think i think if you want to look at the origin point of the sort of like wave uprisings that are specifically 1968

and that aren't sort of like the the decolonization arc i think it probably starts in china with gen with the january storm in 1967 but on the other hand sort of and this is you know one of the things about this period is everything is happening so much at the same time right like we have a lot of experience about this but like you know as the january storm so the january storm uh is this part of the cultural revolution where mao kind of loses control and mao kind of incites a bunch of these like a bunch of workers in Shanghai to like take the city but then they actually take the city

and they run the party out they run the PLA out and for a brief period of time Shanghai has just been taken by its working class and is not being run by the party and there's this whole like you know massive series of struggles and kind of struggles but the thing about the sort of the way 68 is understood is you know massive series of struggles and kind of struggles but the the thing the thing

about the sort of the way 68 is understood is you know even some people will even include that but these riots specifically the holy week riots are almost never talked about as as part of this process which i think they obviously are and i think you know part of the reason we're talking about them now is that you can't understand the columbia campus occupations you can't understand the kind of politics that's going to come after that you can't understand the dnc you can't understand like the rise of black radicalism like none of this is comprehensible at all unless you understand these riots because this was the uprising that sort of kicked everything off it's also this is a very hard thing to write about because I've had the time of my life trying to put this together because

this thing should be like 35 hours and I don't have 35 hours, I have 30 minutes. So, that being said, let's get into why these are happening. So obviously, there is the Civil Rights Movement happening. You know, 1965 you get the Voting Rights Act, we've had some

Civil Rights Acts. But, comma comma if you are like you are a part of the black working class in 1960s america a society is still unbelievably racist like they're like you know like on a very basic level there's a bunch of people walking around calling you the n-word uh you are restricted to the shittiest jobs available assuming you can find work at all one of the biggest ones and this is something that this is something that was a very big focus of the kind of later civil rights movement that kind of has been erased from the historical memory was struggle over housing i'm going to read another thing from the great uprising sncc field worker uh john baptiste who took over for robinson and hansen described many of the homes in the Second Ward as nothing more than converted horse barns, corn cribs, and company shacks, which lacked hot running water, flush toilets, and electricity.

Separate and independent investigations by federal officials confirmed Bautista's claims. We were shown block after block of tottering single-family frame structures, often lined along dirt roads and generally with little or no setback, which is like they're they're like directly on the street right like you open your door and you're on the street crowded almost against each other and on small lots sometimes of no more than 50 or 60 foot depth reported one u.s department of housing and urban development official these dwellings were obviously obsolete and in disrepair

with tumbling porches and steps many were without inside toilets and in several instances the outside purview served more than one family hot water is rarely available and several are without inside water overcrowding is a common pattern so you know this is the kind of like this this is one of the centers of these struggles that these people are living in like 1930s barns and this you know there is there is a sort of staggering amount of anger about this um and and the other the other aspect of this is that you know okay so these people are living in like places that are not fit for human habitation also they're on average 56 percent more of their income goes to rent than white people pay to rent, which means that – and this is also – one of the things that's happening in this period is that there's a bunch of money for white people that the government is giving them or giving people sort of loans and subsidies and tax credits to go buy houses. None of this is happening for black people. So what you have is a situation where if you are black, basically all of your money is being absorbed into rent. There is no

possibility of you saving or saving to buy a house other than the sort of ramshackle shit that you're in. The conventional civil rights movement, your sort of nonviolent marcheses this hasn't done shit to deal with any of these problems you're also dealing with really really intense labor discrimination you know and i mean these are things like like there's this kind of like example in baltimore where you know you'll you'll have union locals that are literally all white locals right and they will they will cut these deals with management where they'll be like well management will hands like hiring and firing power over to the unions and the unions go oh great okay and this this is a negotiated thing between the two

the unions are like okay only unions can work at only union members can work at the shop which in theory is good but in practice what this means is because these are all white unions right they've they've now created a system by which you can by which you can just not hire black people ever yeah the uh the brianna woo method oh god yeah you know it's a reference to a terrible tweet that hopefully people haven't seen oh god yeah and you know the other things that are sort of happening here right is so in theory desegregation is supposed to be happening in practice that shit is not happening people are making people are doing these like you know like white progressives are giving these speeches about how like ah segregation is like ending where we're like integrating quickly

and it's not happening and all of this kind of you know all of this sort of fuel and also and obviously this sort of immediate spark of a lot of these uprisings, particularly in 67, is that as happens today, you know, you all statistically have lived. I don't know why I'm saying statistically. All of you have lived through this. All of you probably have been to at least one protest that is this, is that the cops just murder people. been to at least one protest that is this is that the cops just murder people and all of this sets off a set of kindling and is going to lead to a simply staggering wave of uprisings but first do you know what i won't lead to a simply staggering set of uprisings if you if you buy them it's the uh production and consumption of created needs as described by herbert marcusa

that's right james yes for more on that here's these ads so we are back all right so let's start actually talking about some of these riots okay so i've mentioned before that these riots are happening in a lot of places that are not like that are not typically considered and we're actually not going to talk sort of stunningly for thinking about this we're not going to talk about the watts riots which are probably the biggest and most famous of the riots in this period we're not going to talk about detroit either even though that was another really big one because you know you you can go out and you can find a bunch of people kind of talking about these we are going to start in omaha

where quarrel good things begin yeah like but again this this is something that's very important is that this is not just a sort of uprising of the urban ghettos, which is how it's very explicit. This is literally the language that is used at this time to describe what's happening here. But no, this is happening in, again, Cincinnati. And Omaha is interesting because it has one of the very, very common – one of the other big sort of rallying points in this era is price gouging so you know if you're if you're in one of these like like 90 99 black communities like the one like the one white person who was there is the shop owner and the thing the shop owner is doing is the shop owner is gouging you for food because you don't you know you don't

have any other options to buy food from so they're going to gouge you and they're going to give you like the worst products you can ever you've ever seen in your life. And so by 1966, people are just fed up with this. There start to be sort of protests, like specifically at these white stores. There's a bunch of people throwing rocks at the cops. Yeah, and so, you know, so, I mean, okay, the other thing that's very important to understand

about these places is that these riots don't just start out of nowhere, right? These are mostly places where there have been existing civil rights movements, and they kind of just ran into a stonewall. You know, one of the big things in this period, too, and this is something that, like, you know, this is what MLK and the Poor People's Campaign was sort of working on at the same time was, you know, these demands for job programs. And so people are, you know, marching around. They're doing like pickets. Omaha, like has Malcolm X come speak at one point. He's talking about like, you know, like you get these protests, people like marching outside of Safeway saying like, we want jobs.

And these protests start getting attacked by the police. And this is something that, you know, this is something that has been happening to these non-violent sit-ins i'm going to read a passage from the book then the burnings began from there omaha police wallace's quote-unquote goon squad and spectators began to beat the protesters out of the auditorium using batons and metal folding chairs reeling from the attacks african-american youth retaliated in the streets so like like they'll be in meetings with community with like like the mayor or whatever and these fucking mobs will start just beating people with chairs the goon squad you say yeah god reminds me of the uh we've

been running ads to free leonard peltier a all week, but the guardians of the Aglala nation literally call themselves the goons. I'm guessing they're not the people participating in this particular meeting. Many such cases in this era. And this gets to another aspect of these riots, is that a lot of them aren't

started by rioters. They're started by a bunch of white mobs showing up and attacking people and so you know in in omaha and this is something that we're going to see a lot uh that is something that kind of doesn't happen as much now is like they just the cops just fucking kill people in the streets when protests are happening um in omaha they like they just they murder a kid with a riot gun and this you know this sets off like ask sort of you know the the patterns that we're sort of used to seeing of like these sort of escalating riots and and this is a very kind of familiar riot right like i i think we've all we've

all had the like okay so the police attacked a bunch of people so it caused a riot kind of thing yeah so now a riot starts yeah yeah and this is this is a relatively non-violent riot which is to say that people are mostly throwing stones and molotovs um that is absolutely not true of a huge amount of the rest of these riots and particularly as we sort of get closer to holy week something something that is is very important about the 68 riots that is not true about any rise that we've ever lived through is that not only are people extremely well armed they are the state's monopoly on violence in 1968 is nowhere near as powerful as it is now people will just fucking shoot and one of the constant things you read about when you're reading about these riots is that is you know like every police account has

police like like screaming about snipers and like i didn't believe this right because i was reading this i was like okay whatever other police right they talk about snipers all the time you see this in radical accounts too where people will talk about like well yeah like the national guard and watts will be talking about how they're taking sniper fires they'll start shooting machine guns and like the ruse of build i got buildings right but no it turned like this was real people actually were like doing this and you know i i i was i was really sort of like like on the on the fence about this like was this what like was this actually happening and then the next thing i read was an interview with a guy who'd been a black nationalist

starts talking about how they uh they they they were using all of their dynamite stores and how they didn't have fuses for the dynamite so they had to like they had to plant the dynamite and then retreat across the street to shoot at the dynamite so the dynamite would go off it sounds like a fun exercise yeah it was it was nuts it was like like the kinds of stuff these people were doing um is is sort of just really it's it's it's really staggering this like you say the state just didn't have that same monopoly on violence. Like, there was, it didn't have that overwhelming, cops didn't have, like, the overwhelming force that they do now, that they didn't possess tanks.

And, like, it was a lot harder to trace gun purchases in the 1960s because not everyone used credit cards, so it made it a whole lot easier for folks to have and keep guns. Yeah, well, the other thing is, like, you know, and this is something that, in some of the know this is something that that in in in some of the this is something that played into some of the the naacp like chapters in the south that were just sort of like black working class chapters is that like so if you were if you

were an nra chapter you could just buy at a really cheap bulk rate a like surplus m1 garons from the us army and ammo and they would just sell it to you yeah you can still buy them at a pretty cheap rate through the cm yeah yeah but you could buy like like really large quantities of them as long as you were sort of like you know there there was this kind of like popular like popular like gun marksman culture that we don't like we have an in like our gun culture is kind of insane and this was like a very different thing from yeah definitely and you had like like rob williams was the um the uh are you familiar with rob williams yeah yeah he wrote a book called negroes with guns he was the uh he was the leader of the nra chapter right in monroe but then yeah also a member of the uh naacp which like the nra has has pivoted a long way from what it

was yeah yeah well and part of what's happening here is people are just kind of like picking up The NRA has pivoted a long way from what it was. Yeah, yeah. Well, and part of what's happening here is people are just kind of picking up whatever institution they have and using it to build a movement. It's a tool. Yeah. Yeah. So, all right. We're going to move on from Omaha and Cincinnati. So we're going to start talking about some of the, I you'd call like the uprising proper so i guess before we

fully head into this it should be noted that there's it's generally you know i talked about this before there's generally the way these riots were understood as a thing that is discontinuous from the civil rights movement and that's just not true um a lot of the civil rights movement like things that people now think of as like non-violent campaigns weren't like a lot of the civil rights movement like things that people now think of as like non-violent campaigns weren't like a lot of the stuff in uh uh oh my fucking god like a lot a lot of the fights in louisiana like are just straight up riots yeah and one of the important sort of bridge figures here is gloria richardson who's i wish we could do like an entire episode about her right now but that'll have to wait till later um she she's a civil rights activist in cambridge and her movements like you know like she is in a lot of ways that like kind of dedicated

non-violence but she's very explicit that we're going to do armed self-defense and a lot of the stuff that she leaves i mean this is you know getting back to like 1963 like the civil rights stuff that she's doing is extremely effective and a lot of it is just straight up riots um to the point where like there's there's a very famous uh thing for the civil rights era called the treaty of cambridge where like she and her people agreed to like stop writing and this the city agreed to just completely integrate but by the time he gets to 1967 they haven't done it and so the riots started off in cambridge again and you have this incredibly sort of hot, like, summer over the course of 1967. There's this, like, enormous wave of riots, and, you know, like, Cambridge is a famous one, but, like, Detroit's another big one.

And this, I don't know, this should have given people warning that there would be, you know, giant uprisings if anyone did anything to MLK, but apparently it didn't. There would be giant uprisings if anyone did anything to MLK, but apparently it didn't. And you know what else won't, I don't know, set off? I've already used the, you know what else won't set off massive waves of uprisings pivot. I really didn't prepare good enough pivots for this. What won't assassinate a civil rights leader? We can't promise that.

We really cannot promise that. No, companies would never do anything like that. What are you talking about, James? Certainly not the meal kit delivery service that we can't mention by name. All right, we are back so all right it is now officially time for holy so on april 4th 1968 mlk is giving is you know like he he is preparing to support a bunch of striking sanitation workers and they fucking kill him who the they is is kind of unclear mlk's family later sued the u.s government to make the government prove that they didn't have they weren't involved in the

assassination the government paid them one dollar instead so you know make of that what you will but what what did happen is that you know he he was he was killed by white people and this this detonates a fucking nuclear weapon in in the u.s you know reading accounts of me it reminds me of the the first week of the george floyd uprisings in 2020 i don't know if people remember this there's this picture of this guy in philly with an elmo like wearing wearing like an elmo uh like head yeah and he has his fist raised and he's standing in front of a bunch of things of fire. Like this,

this is, this is what that looks like. I'm going to read a quote from one of the people who was people who was there. I mean, I was sad when I first heard the news of King's death, but not, but not like the world around me,

the city was burning and I'm walking through the city and the city is burning. And that's what we wanted. This was our time. I mean, fire all around my house i mean my house almost got caught on fire when i was living because seventh street the whole block was burning and it was just we thought we were in a war again simple simple one of the interesting parts about

this is that a lot of civil rights leaders and this is not just true of like obviously the moderate civil rights leaders are trying to tell people not to riot but even like stokesley carmichael like comes out to the crowd and tries to go like please don't like don't riot don't do this and the crowd basically tells him to fuck off and does it anyways and the fact that they killed mlk who was you know mlk was i mean like even at that time like the sort of living human symbol of non-violviolence. He was also the symbol of cooperation, of this belief that you could do peaceful integration. cynical about by by 68 but the fact that they killed him it it is it is a kind of psychological blow that i don't think we've ever experienced like maybe like maybe if if you took like if you took like trump's election like on at the same time as a 2020 uprising. That maybe. Maybe kind of captures. What people are feeling in this moment.

And I want to read another account. I want to read an account. It's a sort of second hand account. By this priest. A Catholic priest. In a largely black area. This is from the great uprising. Yet other observers saw the uprising as a clear

protest against the persistence of racial inequality. Father Richard Lawrence, an activist priest whose Catholic parish served many blacks, recalled encountering one of his parishioners on the street after the revolt had begun. Father, you don't understand. I know you've been with the demonstrations and all that sort of thing, the parishioner explained to Lawrence. But you were born white, and you can't really totally understand. I mean, I've done this civil rights thing too, you know it. I've been there. I've been to the marches, I've been to the rallies, you name it. Nobody's listening. His parishioner continued, murdering Dr. King was just the last straw that nobody's listening. We can go on demonstrating as long as we want. No one will listen. I don't know what to try next, but maybe blood flowing in the streets is what it takes. Maybe some of his blood with some of my blood flows in the streets. Then maybe the man will listen. Maybe not, but I've got nothing left to try. I don't care if I got killed. I've got two kids and I'm not going to have them come up in the world I came up in. I'm just not going to have it. And this is, I think, a really important part of these riots,

is that these are people who had fought, who had fought for a decade. I mean, at this point, it's about a decade and a half of struggle. They've done everything. They've done strikes. They've done boycotts. They've done sit-ins. They've voted. They got the right to vote. They marched. They did civil disobedience. And the product of this is that they're living in a dilapidated house with a shitty job, and then they fucking killed MLK. And the country burns. The National Guard straight up is there are there are there are like there are just straight up military occupations in an enormous number of cities. D.C. is occupied by the 503rd Military Police Battalion, the National Guard and famously the 82nd Airborne. So like the regular U.S. Army is being sent into to like to like is being sent into these cities. these cities the level of sort of burning here too and this is the thing that's i think kind of the most famous part of these riots is they burn staggering parts of cities there were i mean just like unbelievable numbers of buildings are burned and people people sort of people people go out to fight people are people are shooting at the police. The police are shooting back at them.

I mean, there's, I wasn't able to find the footage. One of my friends was telling me about like, there's, there's footage from, from news people in New York of like a guy shooting outside of a window. And they have footage of like a police,

like SWAT team, basically. I think it's like still pre-swap, like a police, like team coming in, just killing him. And, you know,

I mean, Richard M. daly famously has has a who's the the mayor of chicago has a shoot to kill order you know his his words are quote shoot to kill any arsonist or anyone with a molotov cocktail and quote shoot to cripple or maim anyone looting any stores in our city jesus it's really fucking bad and you know this is something that's that's about about these these riots right like okay if you look at even the watch riot or if you look at 2020 if you look at like 2014 like the baltimore uprising in 2015 there were like people having a good time like this is always a thing in riots there's always like someone who's like having a great time

fucking no one i read like dozens and dozens and dozens of interviews of people from people from the holy week uprising every single person involved in this is having the absolute worst time of their lives that's like on every single side right that everyone is fucking miserable and you know but but part part of what's happening here too is these are these these uprisings are also about vietnam because you know a lot of these people either have been sent to vietnam or like their families have been sent to vietnam black people are dying at an unbelievable rate in vietnam and these people come back and they're like well we're gonna fucking die anyway so i'd rather die i'd rather go out fighting the cops than you know than than dying in vietnam

um and and also you know what i've been talking a lot about kind of like the the snipers and the windows but one of the most common ways people get killed well okay probably most common ways they get trapped in a burning building which is terrible um but one of the other really common ways is that these are these are gunfights you know we kind of saw this in 2020 but there's a bunch there are like white store owners are like popping out of their businesses to take pot shots at protesters and like they're you know one of the people that they interviewed was a guy who had been like walking past a store and the guy had pulled out a gun and shot him and he had he had managed to knock

the guy next to him got shot so he took out a bolt off and like burned the store down and this is a lot of the dynamics of this. It's not just that people are furious. It's not just that people want this world to burn. It's that they are very directly responding to the fact that white people also fucking lose their minds when this starts happening. when this starts happening and you you get this degree of sort of of urban conflict that kind of you know we don't really have this now not here yeah like like even even our riots are like largely non-violent like people don't shoot it out with the cops or each other in the same way that like you know like like it happens sometimes

like this is happening fucking all over the country like this is happening in like like like you know like like fucking small ass cities in the midwest there are people getting in gun fights right you know and so eventually okay so what the other very important thing about this that is that's really interesting and not marked upon very much is that okay so like obviously the police in chicago go fucking feral right the national guard commanders come in and like the general the national guard goes okay you motherfuckers you're gonna kill someone none of you are allowed to have loaded weapons you're not allowed to have loaded weapons and i mean these guys also like they have bayonets on their rifles this used to be a thing like they used bayonets as a form of like

like less lethal weapon they just fucking stab you with a bayonet and you know their bayonets were ordered to be covered and because of this the guard doesn't actually kill anyone during the 68 riots unlike the 67 riots where they fucking murdered a bunch of people and this was a really smart decision by the national guard people because if they had started actually shooting into these crowds like this wouldn't have been one week of really intense rioting that ends with the civil rights act which we'll talk about well it doesn't end with the Civil Rights Act, but it sort of gets that. This would have been apocalyptic

on a scale that I don't think anyone has the capacity to imagine. But instead, they kind of... There's these really intense riots. They kind of wind down over the course of a couple of months.

They wind down faster in a lot of ways than 2020 did but on the other hand that is not the end of these riots and the thing i want to close this episode on well we're going to talk about actually okay let's talk about the civil rights act first because it is a very very weird piece of legislation so like five days in to no uh seven a weekend to the riots congress passes the civil rights act of 1968 and this is a very very weird piece of legislation um i mean it's obviously there's something that's been like frantically like scrambled out because like this you know the like there are just straight up armed uprisings in a huge portion of the united states and congress's response so they passed the fair housing act um that's like that's probably the most famous part of this bill um it is very i mean

it it it has done it's not like a perfect piece of legislation but it has done a staggering amount of good right and it is in some sense a direct answer to the protesters demands right like it does it does improve discrimination of of sort of housing but it's also okay there's a bunch of stuff about the bill of rights applying to indigenous people that is good but we'll cover that i don't know maybe if we do an aim occupation episode we'll talk about that more later that's kind of outside the scope of this one but the other part of it is this absolutely deranged like conspiracy thing about like because like the so the line you know the the line here as it was in 2020 that this is all being caused by outside agitators. So part of this thing is what's known as the Riot Act, which is – it bans, like, quote, travel and interstate commerce with the intent to incite, promote, engage, or participate in or carry out a riot.

It's not used very much, but this is like straight up a conspiracy theory, right? So it's a conspiracy theory about what happened in the 1967 uprising in Cambridge. So like that, that uprising, like that's the thing that produced Spiro Agnew, who was like a Nixon's deranged VP who Nixon picked to be so deranged that no one would assassinate him because assassinating him would put Spiro Agnew in charge. But like Agnew, Agnew had been like like a liberal like he'd been a liberal republican but then there there were these riots in cambridge 68 in in uh 67 and the the narrative that comes out of it is what happened was a black power leader named h uh h rap brown came in gave a speech and then there was like riots right and this is this is the standard line for like 70 years uh what actually happened was that he gave a you know rap gives rap brown h Rep Brown gives a very militant speech, right? Like he does give a speech telling people to burn a school down.

Like he's saying you need to like five people. But then everyone just goes home as H. Rep Brown is, you know, they're like dispersing. This young woman asked to like be escorted home. She doesn't get beat up by the police. And so H. Rep Brown, 30 people like, okay. And so they try to go home and the police walk up to them and start shooting them with shotguns um h rap brown gets hit by a fucking shotgun blast and that that is the boy it was after that that the rioting started right so yeah so that's what actually happened but but the the memory of it is that it was like oh like these these like these black nationalists

came in they started this riot. And this literally is now law in the U.S. And this is very famously, at the end of this episode, we're going to talk about who this was used against. But before we need to do that, I need to make it clear that these riots don't end in 68, right? And in fact, I think the one that is the most intense of these is York, in York, Pennsylvania, which I promised you at the beginning of this episode we were going to do. And that is in 1969. Because again, like the conditions that cause these urban uprisings like haven't changed. So, you know, like the immediate flames of sort of like of the Holy Week uprising, like of this rebellion by MLK sort of, you know, eventually trickle out.

But there's just more of them so this this is another one one of the things you come across when you research this is that like every single the conventional like accepted public narrative about why these started they're all wrong this one so it's generally attributed to this black kid lying about being set on fire and like that did happen but this kid's like 14 right but what actually happened was that there were two black guys talking to a black police officer and two members of this like white power white supremacist street gang like walked up and shot them both and this kicks off a series of shootings brickings and fistfights between black and white people like all over the. And this is a kind of... This is also the other kind of riot in this period.

We don't really have this anymore. But there are places where just effectively straight-up race wars start. One of the things that happens here, this happens in a lot of cities, they'll just be a bunch of white people in a van driving around shooting at people out their windows. And we sort,

you know, like this happened in Portland. Right. But it was like, they were shooting paintballs. These guys are just shooting actual guns, like out their windows, any black people they see on the street.

Right. There's, there's a, so a crowd of like, eventually like protests start at a, but like this, this crowd of like pretty well-armed black people and this, and,

and, and like a line of cops are facing each other. And, you know, this is one of these, there's two sides to the story. The cops claim that the crowd just started shooting at them. Like everyone in the crowd claims that the cops shot at them first and they started shooting back.

And so there's just this fucking shootout between the cops and this giant crowd. There are like, there are reports of cops, like just set up on the rooftop of a factory, just shooting everyone they can find. White gangs are firebombing black houses. One of the... It's an incident that

should be infamous, but I've never fucking seen talked about anywhere, is a fucking police armored truck. There's a bunch of people who have come out to their lawn to figure out what the fuck is going on, and a police armored truck rolls up and just starts shooting them and so you know people and people start shooting back and there's a bunch of like like people eventually get sort of tried for this and one of the you know one of the things people talk about is like yeah there's like

20 guys in their houses like having a shootout with this armored car because the armored car is just fucking started murdering everyone and you know the sort of remarkable thing about this i mean one of the remarkable things about this is that literally the day before this happens all of these cops had been at a police training seminar about the best way to respond to civil unrest amazing and the police seminar and they are like correctly because this is actually if you are the police the best way to handle one of these sort of uprisings you know they're told they're told in no uncertain terms the best way to do this is do not confront the crowd do not shoot at the crowd uh like you know okay like do you like containment but don't go don't like walk up and fight them

because that will make people fight them back and then literally the next day they are having running shootouts with like the entire black population of this town and you know like york is a place that has had civil rights movement stuff before this it also has you know again like it has i mean just literal white power like street gangs who the police are i mean the police literally just call them the boys like that that's how that's how that's how tight these people are right but and this is the thing you know one of the notes i want to close on is that like a lot of the focus and i i get why people focus on this a lot of the focus from sort of radical accounts of this period is about you know because these riots these uprisings like these are this

is the crucible in which sort of black power is forged in and so there's a lot of attention paid to sort of like black power like people who are going to become black power leaders and people influenced by these movements like doing armed self-defense and that is true and that is important but also just regular ass people are also doing this right like the guys the the the the 20 guys who are having a shootout with a police armored vehicle they are just like some of them are vietnam vets but like they're just they're they're just regular people who saw the police fucking roll up like into like roll up on a fucking house and start shooting people there is a sense in you know in this period that the thing that guns are for are to protect you from the government, right? And people actually believe this. Like JFK – there's a really good article in Strange Matters called The Double Counterinsurgency that's about this that talks about how JFK literally gives a speech where he talks – again, who is a liberal – liberal gives a speech about how like yeah we need guns to defend itself against the tyranny of the government and yeah like if you are a black person in york in 1969 and you are watching the police

from an armored vehicle shooting people on their front lawn the response people had was okay we're gonna die here we're gonna die in vietnam and so i'm gonna i'm choosing to die here fighting the cops and that's i think that's important i think because a lot of you know a lot of what we're going to talk about next right are these student radicals and everyone now looks at these student radicals and goes these people were, these people were stupid, these people didn't understand what was happening, there was no way a revolution was ever going to happen. And they're wrong.

Those people are fucking wrong. What these people were watching, right, they were watching this. They were watching hundreds of cities going into open revolt. They were watching people having shootouts with the cops. People tended not to shoot at the National Guard because people

had enough military experience to realize that if you try to shoot the National Guard, you're not going to win because they have machine guns and stuff. People did it still. There are still numbers of this. They are watching armed uprisings in basically every major and minor, and not even major, every

minor American city has one of these and these people assume that this is the revolution and that you know like that this is the opening stage of the revolution that is coming and they weren't they weren't wrong to think that like it didn't happen but it's not that these people is like you know it's not these people were sort of naive or foolish they had the same rational reaction to what they were seeing that the FBI and the Nixon administration did

and I think that's the place I'm going to close so I think the next one of these episodes is going to be about the Columbia student occupations but the one after that well I might do basic in there but we are eventually going to get to the dnc apart and i promised you the the a thing about the people who were charged under the riot act yeah so the people who are going to the most famous people who are going to be charged with this like interstate riot shit are the chicago seven

seven people arrested at the democratic national convention so uh when we come back in however long it takes to do the rest of the 1968 so if we do before we get to that we we will come back to to this civil rights act uh fucking over a bunch of people's lives i'm gonna look forward to that Hey, I'm Jack Peace Thomas, the host of a brand new Black Effect original series, Black Lit, the podcast for diving deep into the rich world of Black literature. I'm Jack Peace Thomas, and I'm inviting you to join me and a vibrant community of literary enthusiasts dedicated to protecting and celebrating our stories. Black Lit is for the page turners, for those who listen to audiobooks while commuting or running errands, for those who find themselves seeking solace, wisdom, and refuge between the chapters. From thought-provoking novels to powerful poetry, we'll explore the stories that shape our culture. Together, we'll dissect classics and contemporary works

while uncovering the stories of the brilliant writers behind them. Blacklit is here to amplify the voices of Black writers and to bring their words to life. Listen to Blacklit on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hola, mi gente. It's Honey German, and I'm bringing you Gracias, Come Again, the podcast where we dive deep into the world of Latin culture,

musica, peliculas, and entertainment with some of the biggest names in the game. If you love hearing real conversations with your favorite Latin celebrities, artists, and culture shifters, this is the podcast for you. We're talking real conversations with our Latin stars, from actors and artists to musicians and creators, sharing their stories, struggles, and successes. You know it's going to be filled with chisme laughs and all the vibes that you love. Each week, we'll explore everything from music and pop culture to deeper topics like identity, community, and breaking down barriers in all sorts of industries.

Don't miss out on the fun, el té caliente, and life stories. Join me for Gracias Come Again, a podcast by Honey German, where we get into todo lo actual y viral. Listen to Gracias Come Again on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, I'm Ed Zitron, host of the Better Offline podcast, podcast or wherever you get your podcasts. and at times unhinged look at the underbelly of tech from an industry veteran with nothing to lose. This season, I'm going to be joined by everyone from Nobel-winning economists to leading journalists in the field.

And I'll be digging into why the products you love keep getting worse and naming and shaming those responsible. Don't get me wrong, though. I love technology. I just hate the people in charge and want them to get back to building things that actually do things to help real people. I swear to God, things can change if we're loud enough. So join me every week to

understand what's happening in the tech industry and what could be done to make things better. Listen to Better Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever else you get your podcasts. Check out betteroffline.com. On Thanksgiving Day, 1999, a five-year-old boy floated alone in the ocean. He had lost his mother trying to reach Florida from Cuba. He looked like a little angel. I mean, he looked so fresh. And his name, Elian Gonzalez, will make headlines everywhere. Elian Gonzalez. Elian.

Elian. Elian. Elian. Elian. Elian Gonzalez. Elian. Elian. Elian. Elian. Elian. Elian Gonzalez. At the heart of the story is a young boy and the question of who he belongs with. His father in Cuba. Mr. Gonzalez wanted to go home and he wanted to take his son with him.

Or his relatives in Miami. Imagine that your mother died trying to get you to freedom. At the heart of it all is still this painful family separation. Something that as a Cuban, I know all too well. Listen to Chess Peace, the Elian Gonzalez story, as part of the My Cultura podcast network, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Gianna Parenti. And I'm Jimei Jackson-Gadsden. We're the hosts of Let's Talk Offline, the early career podcast from LinkedIn News and iHeart Podcasts.

One of the most exciting things about having your first real job is that first real paycheck. You're probably thinking, yay, I can finally buy a new phone. But you also have a lot of questions like, how should I be investing this money? I mean, how much do I save? And what about my 401k? Well, we're talking with finance expert Vivian Toot, aka Your Rich BFF, to break it all down. I always get roasted on the internet when I say this out loud, but I'm like, every single year you need to be asking for a raise of somewhere between 10 to 15 percent. I'm not saying you're going to get 15% every single year, but if you ask for 10 to 15 and you end up getting eight, that is actually a true raise. Listen to this week's

episode of Let's Talk Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi everyone and welcome to the podcast. It's It Could Happen Here. It's a podcast about the world falling apart and people putting it back together. Today we've got a little bit of both. I'm joined again by Mick and Rose. This time we'll be discussing the treatment of migrants inside the European Union and specifically the treatment of migrants by the government of the Netherlands at a place called Terre Apple. Welcome to the show, guys. Thanks for joining us. Thanks. Good to be back. Thanks for having us. Thank you. It's good to have you.

I wonder if you could begin. We were talking about this before you recorded. recorded and i think it's very obviously the migration laws in europe are very different but so are the situations with like regard to shelter and um just like facilities with the u.s being so big we have them dotted all over the place so you were just explaining that this is the place where anyone who wants to register for asylum in the netherlands has to go is that right yeah so that's almost entirely right so everyone who arrives in the netherlands has to go is that right yeah so that's almost entirely right so everyone who arrives in the netherlands and wants to ask for asylum has to go to this village all the way on the north eastern border with germany and that's where the only registration center is for most asylum seekers i believe only people who do family reunification can go somewhere else. But yeah, we have like one registration center for the entire country.

And yeah, yeah. I mean, we have a tiny country, but it still became a huge bottleneck because it was the only one. So it didn't work out that well. Apparently, and that's why we're talking about it right so just so people understand where these people are in their asylum journey like they've entered the eu right and then they've traveled to the netherlands which is a country where they want to claim asylum is that right yeah exactly so basically they arrived at their final destination so most people that i met inter apple had already been traveling for weeks, months, sometimes years, depending on how much money and luck they had usually.

So yeah, they would have either crossed the Mediterranean Sea or gotten into Europe through Turkey or Belarus. And then they would have crossed many, many borders and many, many border guards and fences. And they would have gotten stuck in places for weeks or months before they could move on again yeah and people who would yeah actually go to the uh registration center in the netherlands that means they wanted to ask for asylum there and probably stay there right that would be their country of residence going forward so can you explain i mean i'm looking at pictures of it right now it's not hard if you if you want to look up pictures you can spell it t-e-r-a-p-e-l

but can you explain the conditions there because looking at it it's atrocious like from the pictures i can see yeah i mean i saw many pictures before i went there myself it's basically just a tent camp so i mean it's a it's an it's a shelter right so it's like it used to be an army base it it can hold 2 000 people it has loads of like small housing units where people live it has like a lot of offices for all the registration steps and like the yeah the immigration service the police the shelter organization like blah blah blah but so like one and a half year ago there was a lack of shelter in the whole country but specifically also in tarapul and yeah somehow the authorities decided that the solution would be to just leave people on the field that was inside of the register in front

of the registration center and so there was just a an informal camp like people were sleeping outside for weeks or months not even in tents but they would have like huge kind of banners or tarps that would kind of provide some shade so it was like mid-summer it was a very dry summer which for us was crazy lucky um the climate activists were not happy but we were happy yeah so yeah people were just like laying on the ground and that was yeah there were some that water there were like dixies for toilets that were obviously gross and so yeah what you would see if you google it you just see people lying on the field and and just being there for extended periods of time but when i personally went there the first time it was kind of worse than what i expected it to be because i think the level of neglect was not visible on photo or on video.

So people would come to us and tell us that they had like, show us really big wounds that were infected, or people would come and tell us like, Hey, I had a heart attack a few weeks ago. I need this medication or I have diabetes or whatever. So there was just this dystopian situation of this enormous facility that can hold thousands of people and then a big fence around it and then people with clearly like very serious medical

conditions just standing in front of the gate and the security guards just being like no maybe like a staff member will show up today maybe not but like we don't care how dangerous the situation is or something yeah just the fact that there was like no proper place to wash there were no toilets the food was like yeah i worked in camps across the borders uh across european borders and i've seen a lot of like horrible food but like in their apple they just decided to rent uh yeah like if you have like um uh a party or something you just rent this place that will just sell fries so they were just giving fries to people like every single day jesus yeah just i mean just just pre pre-packed food from the supermarket would be more healthy than just fries every day for a month.

Yeah, so just the level of neglect, lack of care, was just even more than what you can see on the pictures. Yeah, and a complete failure of the government to address their basic rights and needs. How long can people expect to spend in that situation then like they have to they have to go there right like if they want the asylum they have to go there yeah so like the the irony was that the only way to get shelter was to be there and then be without shelter for you wouldn't know how long like right yeah i mean sometimes it was hours especially for their women and children it was usually they would usually be let in in the evening but yeah men definitely days sometimes if they were not lucky weeks and it was just also so like unclear so people would just not get any information they would be there and then all of a sudden hear someone shout and all start running towards where the shout came from because maybe they would be let in.

Or, yeah, I don't know, like guards would just shout at them in Dutch and then be like, why don't you understand me? Or like it was all just like consciously like it's so unnecessarily chaotic and therefore also people pushing around, police getting intimidating and violent. And yeah, just this very chaotic and disrespectful approach to people. Yeah. It's worryingly similar to what we see in open-air detention sites here. They'll do that people are outside there too. They have an external shelter there too. We volunteers make the food, so it's better than that. Yeah, they'll turn up

in a bus. I've seen them turn up in a bus and just shout, run. And if you understand English, you run. If you don't understand English, you see everyone else running, so you run. And then they can only take 30 people and you've now had more than 100 people come stampeding across like just you know they've got to grab their bags and everything and it's yeah completely unnecessarily chaotic and cruel and then once they're let in what can they expect from that they're staying in like a barracks or something while they're while they're processed uh yeah so it was very, very chaotic. I think it took them like almost a year to actually process everyone

because they would just, if a municipality would say like, oh, I have space for 100 people, they would just randomly put 100 people in a bus and drop them there. And then a year later, it would turn out that they were never properly registered for something.

So, but yeah, I think like there was a night shelter not so far away from Ter Apple so that was always like late in the evening there would still be a few buses going to that night shelter that was just a big sports hall I think full of beds bunk beds or yeah like stretchers and yeah no privacy just like hundreds of people in one room the lights would stay on all night for safety reasons but of course that's also very cruel too yeah yeah and then if people would get registered they would be usually sent to like a temporary or like emergency shelter because there was such a huge shortage of regular shelters. So some people were living in sports halls without much privacy for like half a year or a year or some people are still there to be honest.

Wow yeah that's crazy, that's atrocious. Talking of atrocious, unfortunately we have to break for ads. We'll do that. okay we're back i hope you enjoy this advent and we're talking about terraple this uh i guess migrant reception registration center in the netherlands one thing i saw and when i was sort of doing some reading about this recently was babies babies born to mothers or people in the Terra Apple Asylum Center are seven times more likely to die in or around Perth. That is shocking. Yeah. So is there just no access to medical care?

Are people delivering babies in this asylum center? Well, I think the excuse of the government is that they didn't have proper care during the pregnancy because they were still traveling of course that is often the case like yeah yeah but still it's insanely high uh seven times more people dying and um especially when this super chaotic situation occurred like yeah we would have people in the field that we like were suspecting they were getting like hypothermia or you know some sort of yeah strong physical reaction to the tough conditions they were facing but they could be dropped in the night shelter kicked out again in the morning being back on the field staying on the field for a few nights again going for one

night to a night shelter being transferred to an emergency camp for two days being transferred to another emergency camp for three days and during this time there is no coherent medical care right yeah and of course it would usually be a little bit better for women and especially pregnant women so they would try to put them in a more stable place and like not move them around that much but trying is yeah they would not always actually manage to do that so uh there have definitely also been complaints of yeah of people and especially like pregnant pregnant women still being forced to move to a different camp like really close to the date that the baby was expected to come and yeah that

definitely doesn't help so i mean the care on the field was absolutely horrendous i think women were usually not exposed to it that much because we do yeah there's also this weird sexism in migration that men can always suffer more which is not always true especially if you're not filtering out the really thick man either because yeah all of them i was definitely a lot more healthy than a lot of the men walking around there but yeah at least in the case of like pregnant women i think they would be moved out pretty quickly. But yeah, it was chaotic. And then also you have like, of course you have a lot of people who speak Arabic or Farsi or Tigrinya,

but you also have people who speak a language that is only spoken in a province of a country. You know, like it's very hard to get proper translation for like all the possible languages of people that apply for asylum. Yeah. But yeah, I mean mean i definitely think the conditions uh especially when when there were so many people living in really bad emergency shelters or even on the streets did not help babies that's all

yeah or anyone i guess no can you explain then like this situation arose about about a year ago i think right so you were part of a group of people that were able to respond to help like at least i guess make it a little bit less terrible can you explain a little bit about about the group about what you're able to do yeah so i mean we just so i was already a part of migrate which is an organization that uh like i personally worked on the borders like providing food and clothes and stuff like that to two people on the move and migrates is more like also more an activist organization so organizing protests or campaigns and stuff like that um so we just like went to see what was going on

and then we very quickly yeah realized that it was worse than it looked but also that there were so many basic things that were not being done by the government that we were actually able to do so yeah we just asked around a lot for hours and hours like what do you need what's going on what is missing like what is what is your primary issue at this moment and one of the main things people were saying was like the food is fucking driving them insane like yeah um yeah just the lack of flavor but also just the lack of health and and yeah people would just get like diarrhea and stuff and then it turned out of course that there were already some people around that wanted to do stuff so we just had a big call and then it turned out that of course, that there were already some people around that wanted to do stuff. So we just had a big call.

And then it turned out that there was like this squat where they had a big kitchen and they were like, yeah, of course you can cook here. And then there was another like former squat where they also had a big soup kitchen. And then I was like, OK, this is like it was a big like media storm. It was a big thing for the Netherlands was this was happening because we have this like yeah idea that we are perfectly organized and blah blah and that like all the bad things happen on the border still like at the end like with the very clear role of our politicians but like somehow yeah there's not much talk about that so it was it was like on the front page every single day for weeks so So I thought,

yeah, like they, because the people that were already trying to do something, they were like, how can we get enough money for the groceries and how can we get volunteers? And then, yeah, I was like, we'll manage. If there's one thing I learned from the borders, like if you start doing something, people will come and and join um yeah and we first said like okay let's just cook two times a week you know one time in this squad and another time in the other squad and then it's like super doable blah and then basically we started and it's yeah there was just no way back so uh yeah we said okay, let's hand out food twice. And then, yeah, I just went like day and night being on the field.

And quite quickly, we moved to food distribution every day because there were so many people in the area that wanted to cook. There was like an Islamic group. There were churches. There were like, yeah, from all over the country, people were coming into action and yeah so first we did food kind of because people really wanted it but also kind of because we just knew how to do it because we had some people who had a big kitchen and some experience cooking in in large quantities and then quickly it became like colder and and rainy as well so we started to move towards sleeping bags and ponchos and just yeah big distributions and then we also started to hand out tents and then we got into a whole fight with the municipality and the police because they were

constantly like confiscating the tents yeah but yeah we just started with what we like thought would be feasible to do i guess and then it kind of escalated really quickly to yeah I was being kind of responsible for a lot of basic needs of everyone on the field and also us monitoring like informing journalists because like the government would be like oh no there's nobody there on the field right now and then we would just like five minutes be like no uh yeah so we also quite quickly like became a big like part of the whole political debate where like the government was saying one thing and we were saying another and like they were all all the time trying to pretend that nothing was wrong and everything

was fine and yeah yeah but i think it's it's such a common and sadly a common experience right just being like a the government is lying to you like you can see this with your eyes that you're being lied to and be like they're just going to leave these people if we don't do something no one will um something that we've had here we see as you say every border in europe more or less right like it's just a consequence of the way that like neoliberal capitalism has decided to deal with migration which is to make to be as cruel as possible and to make it as hard as possible for people i wonder like you've been organizing there at least in this place for like a year i think i want this to be instructive for people because

like we've been organizing here too and we've learned a lot are there things that you've learned that you think other people could take from the organizing or or like i don't make you you also are part of like organizing in in your like area if either of you have things that you've learned about specifically organizing to help migrants i'd love to hear them oh so many things i'm probably gonna forget some of the things i've learned well i think one thing that i've learned and that i've learned over and over and over again is that if you start doing something you will find people who will join and i think that's one of the scary things when you see a gigantic problem and even if you know a concrete thing that you can do about it, it's still, yeah, there

is a lot of things that you cannot do as a single human being. But I found this true in many countries across the world, that if you just start and you say that you're doing it, people will actually join. And I found that especially painful in Ter Apple Apple that we were on this field and there had been so much media attention and there was nobody there. Like everyone was speaking about it and no one was doing anything. And it was kind of depressing to witness that and to feel that nobody, it felt like nobody cared. Right. But as soon as we just started with the small thing, like, okay, you can donate the groceries,

you can come help cook, you can come help do the dishes, like concrete things that you can do. We were like, I think we got like a thousand people who wanted to volunteer with us, which was like way too much. We never got back to all of them because it was just insane.

Yeah, yeah. We did not need a thousand people to cook food for 200 people so like yeah yeah but we just started and i think yeah i think that was really helpful or i think that can be very helpful if you're thinking about doing something like start small but but don't be afraid that it will not kind of grow because people will join and people will make it into something bigger. Yeah. Also, a great lesson that I learned. Well, it's very basic and understandable, actually.

But like, try to make. Yeah, my experience is usually with like a mass distribution. So you have hundreds of people, you have food or blankets or whatever, something that people really need. And it's like so important to really plan the distribution well and to really inform and discuss with people. Because that's one thing that also happened in Tera Apple that at some point people were just dumping shit on the field and they were actually causing fights and causing tensions between people. Because you cannot show up with five sleeping bags when when hundreds of people are in desperate need of a sleeping bag you know like that's kind of inhumane in in i get that people have good intentions and i get that it could potentially mean that five people are less cold but like

yeah some sort of shelter is is a basic necessity so you cannot give that to a few and not to others so yeah i think like like the first time we did the distribution into apple i was kind of scared because people were spreading like was a lot of rumor about like oh it's so violent and these people are like blah blah blah and and of course i kind of didn't believe it because i worked with migrants for a long time and i know that they're human beings you know and they're not so like shockingly different than but I've also learned that you need to be they did not learn at all to trust anyone there because like people were lying to them people were telling them they would get shelter in the night but they would not uh people would say that they would see a doctor and they would not get to see a doctor so like the i think it's

really important if you want to help people that you take them seriously and that you build up some trust so for example we we went we the first time we cooked so much food we were like it's we cannot make it run out you know like we want everyone to get as much as they want and more yeah even if we have to trash because like these people for once have to get the feeling that it's like that we're there for everyone so yeah if you make if you do a mass distribution you usually make like lines and people have to like wait for their turn but we spend hours just telling people like hey we're gonna give out food there's so much food you know don't worry like it's chill and then also actually live up to that of course right make sure that there

is enough food yeah and and like try to make it like fun and this is like it's kind of awkward because you like I kind of feel awkward about putting people in a line and telling them to wait and you know like not because you're kind of being bossing them around but yeah if it goes well once and everyone just feels like hey here i don't have to fight to get to the front and here i can just chill out and we can make a chat with each other and we can just you know smile and like wish each other a good day then yeah i think it's also really important to try to make distributions kind of fun or at least as chill as possible and to like try to not make it another survival of the fittest moment because that is exactly what the state is pushing people into and that is what i don't want people to get into yeah i think that's very true like we've definitely learned

a lot of those similar things i I can't put enough emphasis on planning before you just show up and do a distribution. We had so many fucking chaotic... People are fucking hungry and they've had to fight to get fed for the duration of the journey, be that days, weeks, months, or years. They're doing what what like they they

understand to be the necessary thing yeah and there's it's absolutely not like humane to just recreate that that mode you know like it's amazing to be able to to create a nice atmosphere where people can relax and feel safe and feel finally treated like equally and somehow like fairly again even if it's just for a very simple meal but it's yeah i mean you you can already get moody if someone jumps in front of you at the supermarket you know like i can i can get moody with that but it's like that but then like way more extreme and for actual yeah things that you need to survive all the time like it's it's yeah it's hard to imagine i guess if if you've never really been in a survival situation but yeah it can be so much fun also maybe that's another good one because i i remember people were

feeling sorry for me a lot when i was working there like oh my god this must be so hard and I mean it was fucking hard sometimes like I have literally been standing there like pushing away tears and being like no I'm fine but I'm not fine at all but also it's fun like you're just joking around and you're making each other happy and you feel like you're part of something bigger and and you feel I think it's very empowering to be like the state is fucking it up and we can actually do it better yeah very much so like i think it it's very like affirming right like to be like we don't need uh like anyone telling us what to do we don't need anyone like trying to control us like we can we can take care of these people ourselves without creating mechanisms of control and like i think for me that was i like one of the reasons i really enjoy doing it is that that like me and my friends can care for these people and it's like i don't

know from my perspective like i've had conversations with hundreds of people from all around the world like we would do things like play music while people waited for food if we had a friend who was able to play music you know we had enough enough people we'd always recruit people from among the the migrants to help us with food distribution which turned out to be great because like they taught us different words in different languages and like uh you know i can say hot sauce in like 25 languages now and like it was the important parts yeah yeah right there real stuff but yeah it was very and then like i remember one night it was like in september it was so cold one of the colder nights it was in september and it was just about freezing and like there were very few of us back then and we uh my friend had some guitars and like drums and uh we like parked the van to block the wind

and everyone sat around and played the guitar and they played their different songs and like we had all these really happy moments yeah it's not like we sit around crying all the time like it's uh no not at all very empowering i think no i think it's important what you just said that also a lot of work can be done by people themselves so i remember a volunteer being like i want to give out the food whereas these guys were giving out the food every day and they had this whole routine and they were much faster and you know like and also it's not about you feeling good about you you know, like. Yeah. Yeah.

Not there to help you. Yeah. Like listen to people, like really spend a lot of time understanding what people need and what they want. And because it's really often not what you expect. And yeah, make sure that people can also do stuff themselves. And also like, for example, if we we would have tents but not for everyone or blankets but not for everyone instead of making like a very rigid decision of like you get it and

you don't it's so useful to just talk to people and just be like hey sorry this is the situation or yeah like there were a lot of fights because families were always allowed to go first but it was not really clearly communicated by the government's like hand facility and stuff but when we were just discussing with them like hey how can we make the distribution more chill they were like well can women and children and elderly people just go first and i was like yeah or you know i mean it's not really any of my business. How does this like, yeah. And then if everyone just understands it and it's kind of clear and understandable and explained, it's like so much more chill.

Whereas if you're just shouting at people and assuming that they will not understand or assume that they will be selfish, you are also forcing people into that role. Yes. And I think it's really beautiful if you can snap out of that and you can yeah you can just be somewhat equal even though like legally you are in a completely different situation yeah totally so so what you're telling me is that if you talk to people and treat them as human beings that has positive results for bad situations yeah this is a hot take a very hot take yeah breaking news yeah yeah

i i don't have nearly the amount of like field experience that rose has so but another thing that i think is really important to highlight is that it's it's not just it's not just the necessities i was part of uh i did first date at the no border camp near terrapol last summer and some of the activists there did a really admirable job they i think they did not go to their apple because it was too politically old at the time so they went to different centers where migrants were living and they handed out toys and they hired a bouncy castle for the kids to play on i don't know it was really it was really basic in the sense that it didn't need like massive massive funds or incredible amounts of organization that you need bureaucracies to

handle it was just people thinking of ways like hey how can we make these people happier or more comfortable or at least forget for like a few hours about like this situation they're in because uh our media likes to you know dive onto every time there's a fight in a migrant center right but it's rarely discussed that if you put a lot of people in a stressful situation on top of each other people will there will be tensions and there will be fights which is i think we don't cover that enough right no and also nobody really cares because i think it's it's one of the most beautiful things for me as well is that the solidarity that people show each other and like yeah you don't even see it half the time but people give each other like their waterproof jackets or uh i remember one

night it was a horrible night in fair apple and and we didn't expect people to be there and all of a sudden there were hundreds of people and they hadn't had food since the morning and then people in the camp they all get microwave meals and they kind of hate them but it's like they all have kind of a stash so they all like started to heat up microwave meals and bring them outside and they were actually way more able to provide food on such a short notice uh than we were and it was not the best food but like everyone had food and they were even sharing it with us and we were all just like so glad to be eating after 10 hours in the rain and in the cold. And yeah,

people, yeah. I don't know, carrying luggage for someone who has like, it's all the time you see people standing up for each other. And I think that is honestly an amazing thing. And maybe more tough situations bring that out somehow more as well like it's easy for most people in western societies to be very individualist and live very isolated and

yeah non-fulfilling lives but then if you are in this kind of situation in some ways it can also bring out the best in people yeah i think so like we were just talking about before we started how like uh yesterday i was out helping down by the border and uh i ran into two mauritanian guys who had carried a chinese man with a leg injury for two days like and they couldn't even share the same language and like that walk is no that hike is no joke like i do that with a big backpack full of water that's hard and and i do a lot of hiking but i wasn't carrying another human you know but it yeah it can actually yeah really bring out some incredible acts of kindness and

i wonder guys we're running close to the end of our like uh signed time if people want to help either to say they're in the Netherlands and they want to come and help or um if they want to you know help in a financial way or maybe they can do some remote sort of help maybe they can respond to the thousand volunteers via email for you yeah how can they do that uh yeah donations are always welcome we're currently not working in their apple but it doesn't look good so usually the influx is highest in in summer and and like early autumn and we have like a far-right majority in parliament since a few months so we're wouldn't be surprised if uh we have people out on the streets again also i think there's a very big chance that the shelters for undocumented people might close so we would have a lot of people on the streets then so we need a lot of

solidarity networks and a lot of things like a lot um yeah so like yeah financial support is always welcome but i think it's also really important that people think about what they can do in their lives and that it is also something that they can manage inside of their lives so like not everyone can drop everything and yeah uh move to the other side of the country or whatever but if you can host one person or if you can uh support someone else who's hosting like there are ways i think i think migrates does not have like all the options to volunteer but like we we really hope that there will be a lot of networks of solidarity that yeah we just need them across the country i think and i do think there's like a serious risk

of like more criminalization of aid workers we were also criminalized for handing out tents i got a letter that said that i risked like three months of imprisonment for handing out tents wow yeah jesus um but good democracy moments yeah we need that european social democracy model everyone's talking yeah we are just doing great yeah yeah and so like tents were constantly confiscated and stuff and it was intense there because people had to be there to get shelter which they legally were entitled to but it is a bigger trend so regular homeless people will also see their tents confiscated or smashed without them getting an offer to get into a shelter right so i think the criminalization in our case was a bit extreme

because most of the criminalization had to do with at least a very fake relationship with like smuggling or people crossing borders whereas like handing out fences like the most humanitarian basic thing that you can possibly do and somehow they still thought it was a good idea to criminalize that yeah i think we need to like prepare for the fact that our borders and our migration policies are gonna get more cruel and that the only thing that we can do to help is like really strong networks of solidarity and resistance, and that we might sometimes risk prison time, but that we still probably need to do it because the alternative is that

we're just letting people be destroyed in the system. I think that's very good. Mick, do you have anything to add? Where can people follow you, find more ways to support, ways to show solidarity? I think what I plugged last time like the abolish frontex campaign find your local activist group or start it because we yeah exactly exactly

even if you're just one person that's like yeah like through social media you can find a lot of people uh find your local squad uh they will be they will want to help yeah oh and maybe what you just said like uh there's every year a no border camp somewhere in the netherlands so that's also a good place to start yeah yeah yes uh uh you can find them on instagram i think i'm not on instagram i don't know uh yeah it's there that that that's that's definitely an option uh atmosphere is great there i don't i'm not on the social so you you can't find me if you want to i'm sorry and um well i'm also like rose what you said uh i do some stuff with like a first aid collective so

if you guys are if you are doing something and you you're like hey we could use some people with some degree of medical training reach out to me you have my contacts because that is the kind of thing i will most definitely well, excited is the wrong word. If shit hits the van, it's our Apple. We could really use some first aid as well then. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. Reach out. Uh, I will, uh, I will gladly come over there. Um, with all the medical supplies that are scattered around my room. Yeah.

That's, I think that's a good illustration though right to finish up like uh everybody has a skill that we can use like you might not think you do but you probably do like uh someone knitted hats for us you know if you're a person who likes to knit some we had people who didn't think they had much to offer and then came and just made sandwiches and they created a method for making sandwiches in bulk that like allowed us to make more sandwiches more quickly. Everybody has, even if you want to be the person who washes the blankets and that's a

massive task. That means somebody is warm at night. Yeah. That's an insane task. And also like maybe the, the more intimidating tasks, like I think it could be intimidating to be like, oh, we're going to, I don't know, hundreds of men

and everyone says they're scary and blah, blah, blah. But indeed, there's also so much things happening in the background, like collecting blankets, getting clothes, getting groceries. Like there's so many layers to it. And it can also be that you collect 10 blankets, but like hundreds of people collect 10 blankets, right? So it's also, you're always part of something bigger. And there's always, I think that it's always very good to think that like,

if you're faced with a big problem, it's very hard to get to the solution of it. But at the same time, it's very easy to do a tiny thing about it but at the same time it's very easy to do a tiny thing about it and i think it's much more useful to do that tiny thing than to be like oh i can never get to the real solution of this problem and in the end you will kind of get to it by doing that with more and more people and actually building up collective power and resistance yeah about the the collecting thing like yeah for example i know my parents still have like old toys from when we and my brother were younger if you're in an area with a refugee center you could always just give those toys to the people there if you've old children's books or something people can use that to get a grasp on the gibberish that is the Dutch language.

These little things also matter a lot. And it's something very impactful that you can do that doesn't take much of your own effort. It's very low threshold. Right, and it makes a huge difference. It makes someone feel cared for and welcome. That can make all the difference in the world. Can you just spell out the migrate website for us m-i-g-r-e-a-t.org.org perfect it's like migration

is great migrate migrate yeah i see what you did there all right thank you so much both of you thanks thank you for having us hey i'm jack peace thomas the host of a brand new black effect original series black lit the podcast for diving deep into the rich world of Black literature. I'm Jack Peace Thomas, and I'm inviting you to join me and a vibrant community of literary enthusiasts dedicated to protecting and celebrating our stories. Black Lit is for the page turners, for those who listen to audio books while commuting or running errands, for those who find themselves seeking solace, wisdom, and refuge between the chapters. From thought-provoking novels to powerful poetry, we'll explore the stories that shape our culture. Together, we'll dissect classics and contemporary works while uncovering the stories of the brilliant writers behind them. Blacklit is here to amplify the voices of Black writers

and to bring their words to life. Listen to Blacklit on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hola, mi gente. It's Honey German, and I'm bringing you Gracias, Come Again, the podcast where we dive deep into the world of Latin culture, musica, peliculas, and entertainment with some of the biggest names in the game. If you love hearing

real conversations with your favorite Latin celebrities, artists, and culture shifters, this is the podcast for you. We're talking real conversations with our Latin stars, from actors and artists to musicians and creators sharing their stories, struggles, and successes. You know it's going to be filled with chisme laughs and all

the vibes that you love. Each week we'll explore everything from music and pop culture to deeper topics like identity, community, and breaking down barriers in all sorts of industries. Don't miss out on the fun, el té caliente, and life stories. Join me for Gracias Come Again, a podcast by Honey German, where we get into todo lo actual y viral. Listen to Gracias Come Again on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, I'm Ed Zitron,

host of the Better Offline podcast, and we're kicking off our second season digging into how tech's elite has turned Silicon Valley into a playground for billionaires. From the chaotic world of generative AI to the destruction of Google search, Better Offline is your unvarnished and at times unhinged look at the underbelly of tech

from an industry veteran with nothing to lose. This season I'm going to be joined by everyone from Nobel-winning economists to leading journalists in the field, and I'll be digging into why the products you love keep getting worse and naming and shaming those responsible. Don't get me wrong, though. I love technology. I just hate the people in charge and want them to get back to building things

that actually do things to help real people. I swear to God things can change if we're loud enough. So join me every week to understand what's happening in the tech industry and what could be done to make things better. Listen to Better Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever else you get your podcasts. Check out betteroffline.com.

On Thanksgiving Day, 1999, a five-year-old boy floated alone in the ocean. He had lost his mother trying to reach Florida from Cuba. He looked like a little angel. I mean, he looked so fresh. And his name, Elian Gonzalez, will make headlines everywhere. Elian Gonzalez. Elian Gonzalez. Elian. Elian. Elian Gonzalez. At the heart of the story is a young boy and the question of who he belongs with. His father in Cuba. Mr. Gonzalez wanted to go home and he wanted to take his son with him. Or his relatives in Miami. Imagine that your mother died trying to get you to freedom.

At the heart of it all is still this painful family separation. Something that as a Cuban, I know all too well. Listen to Chess Peace, the Elian Gonzalez story, as part of the My Cultura podcast network, available on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Gianna Parenti. And I'm Jimei Jackson-Gadsden. We're the hosts of Let's Talk Offline,

the early career podcast from LinkedIn News and iHeart Podcasts. One of the most exciting things about having your first real job is that first real paycheck. You're probably thinking, yay, I can finally buy a new phone. But you also have a lot of questions like, how should I be investing this money? I mean, how much do I save? And what about my 401k? Well, we're talking with finance expert Vivian Toot, aka Your Rich BFF, to break it all down. I always get roasted on the internet when I say this out loud, but I'm like, every single year you need to be asking for a raise of somewhere between 10 to 15%. I'm not saying you're going to get 15% every single year, but if you ask for

10 to 15 and you end up getting eight, that is actually a true raise. Listen to this week's episode of Let's Talk Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to It Could Happen Here, the show about things falling apart. And often what's falling apart is kind of our general agreed upon sense of what reality is and that's kind of what we're talking about here today we're going to talk about the latest batch of new transgender conspiracy theories and to join me in this exciting journey is mia wong hello mia you know why is it that whatever we're covering transgender conspiracy it's not like conspiracies that trans people made up it's always conspiracies

about trans people's like like can we never get one that like not often i i can't remember the last time i had like a positive pride month episode which i feel kind of bad about but i don't know it's still an interesting topic and i've not seen this discussed as much as it should be and you know last week i really thought i was going to have, you know, a difficult work week researching Trump pornography. I thought that'd be like, you know, the low part of my month. But it turns out spending three days sifting through mass shooter data is actually much worse, much worse than looking through Trump porn. Can I recommend that you two spend your time listening to a bunch of writers talking about the absolute worst time of their life? Much better. All right, so let's get into it.

We're going to talk first about video games. I'm going to quote a tweet from a kind of failure of a far-right influencer, which is exciting because we're mostly going to be talking about successful ones. But there's this guy named Ben Ku, UK flag in bio, so opinion immediately discarded. But he has said a few days ago, quote, Activision's Call of Duty has added transgender bullets to the game in honor of Pride Month, so you can literally play as a transgender mass shooter unquote this tweet was almost ripped word for word by ian miles chung basically said the exact same thing except he said role play not play extremely funny i and i i did not realize the bullets themselves identified as trans but good for she her they them i guess um so we started to see this claim repeated through the anti-trans far-right grifter media space right libs of tiktok said that quote

call of duty is now enabling kids to role play being a literal trans terrorist and for some reason whenever libs of tiktok writes terrorist, she asterisks out the O's. I don't know why. But this started to pick up steam. There was an article in Glenn Beck's The Blaze, quote, Call of Duty Pride Bundle lets players simulate murder using trans flag adorned guns and bullets. I'm so excited for these people to find out about Counter-Strike. I'm so excited for these people to find out about Counter-Strike.

There are going to be literally so many, so many articles that just have the video clip of the thing it plays at the end where it says terrorists win. The Quartering wrote, Call of Duty is selling trans pride bullets, what every mass shooter wants. So what's going on here because this you know if you're not as online as some of us some other people are you know uh this is maybe confusing why why are why are they saying that trans people are all mass shooters now what's going on and you know if and also if you're if you're thinking it's kind of odd that there would be a call of duty update where you can literally play as a transgender mass shooter and shoot transgender bullets, you would be right. Because that never happened. It's false. No way. Not this time. We created it. Not this time. No, not this time. So let's get into what's really going on

with this Call of Duty Pride update. And then we'll discuss why so many of these far right influences are pushing this kind of trans terrorist story. So on June 1st, Activision did release an update for the terrible new Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3. It contained anime mecha skins and seven free weapon skins themed after various pride flags. Now, some would argue that the mecha suits are essentially also pride themed, but I digress. For this pride weapon camo pack, it will color your gun with the flag of your choosing. One of the said flags is the blue, pink, and white trans flag. Yet if you apply the trans skin to any of the regular guns in the game,

the bullets will not be transed. So what gives? Without the transgender bullets, how is anyone supposed to literally roleplay a mass shooter like Libs of TikTok and Ian Miles Chung say we can. So it turns out these quote-unquote transgender bullets were in fact not intentionally added to the game in honor of Pride Month and are most likely a bug that affects one single gun when one exclusive attachment is equipped. I'm going to quote from Kotaku, quote, modern warfare 3's M4 came with a special soul harvester weapon blueprint,

which includes a skin and a specific attachment for the M4 and quote unquote, tracer rounds, which are colorful ammo options that also leave traces of different visual effects like paint splatters or rose petals. This special blueprint was for people who spend $100 to purchase the vault edition of the game. Based on Kotaku's testing, it appears the quote unquote trans bullets only appear when applying the transgender flag camo skin on this specific weapon blueprint. It's unclear. This is a bug. At one point during

testing, the bullets in the cartridge were only the pink colors in the flag, or is just an extremely idiosyncratic reflection of how Call of Duty's complex shader system interacts across thousands of items and cosmetics. During testing, any other camo skin applied to the M4 Soul Harvester blueprint resulted in bullets in the cartridge changing the color to match that skin."

Now, I do think it's a little bit silly that there's so much uproar about these trans-colored bullets, but not as much about, like, just a trans-colored gun. Like, why is the bullet the the big thing and we all know that you can't play as a mass shooter in call of duty you play as a war criminal and most transgender war criminals are just drone pilots or work for raytheon if you want to play a mass shooter game you can just play gta5 or hitman where you play as cis men yeah yeah yeah i know but the russian terrorist airport level don't at me i don't care anyway there was a there was a great

article in former tucker carlson project the daily caller with the headline pride month finally comes for one of the last bastions of manhood and the opening tagline is gamers. They targeted gamers. Oh no. So anyway, what's really at play here with this trans mash shooter stuff? This is just another beat in the rhetorical strategy that conservative anti-trans influencers have been building over the past year and a half using a mix ofpicked data, bad stats, and often outright lies to convince people that there is an increasing epidemic of transgender mass killing attacks sweeping the nation. When discussing this Call of Duty pride pack, libs of TikTok said, quote, with the uptick in actual trans violence we've been seeing, it's alarming that Call of Duty would

introduce this. And a Blaze article read, quote, critics have suggested Activision Blizzard may want to reconsider given the recent mass shootings executed by LGBT radicals. There have been multiple mass shootings executed, attempted, or at the very least planned by transvestites and LGBTQ radicals in recent years. So this Blaze article begins by listing four alleged instances of these trans mass shooters. Two of these simply never happened as the alleged transgender individuals, a trans guy and a 56-year-old Oregon Nazi, were arrested after they made concerning posts online. And the other two, which did happen, these were shootings, except these were never actually done by trans people. It's a made up tale. It's a total fabrication. It never happened. It never happened. This one was invented by a writer. So although this transgender mass shooter narrative might not be real,

do you know what is real, Mia? Is it capitalism? It is. And capitalism is fueled, at least currently, by the products and sponsors that support this podcast. Okay, we are back. Now, trying to frame every new mass shooter as some like crazed leftist of some variety is an old tactic popularized by the likes of Andy Ngo, which is, you know, ironic considering the fact that political extremist related killings from the past 10 years are overwhelmingly done by individuals tied to

right-wing extremism. The ADL puts it at 75%, whereas leftist extremism, which is categorized as including anarchists as well as black nationalist groups, are responsible for just 4%. Most of the rest they categorize as Islamic violent extremists, including the 2016 Pulse nightclub massacre targeted against queer people in Orlando. Although one could argue that that is also right wing extremism. Yeah, like they are also right wingers. Like it's like, yes. It turns out the ADL might have some troubling, some troubling ways of collecting data, breaking news. Anyway, regardless of the actual facts, lying about the political demographic of

mass shooters is an old tactic employed by far-right content creators to gain clicks and influence the talking points of more popular media figures and politicians. And now, the past few years, we've seen a new iteration of this tactic, where in the confusion and chaos of the first few minutes and hours after a shooting, anti-trans influencers will do everything they can to frame an alleged or suspected shooter of being transgender, often using out-of-context social media posts, doctored photographs, photos of other people, or just pictures of like long or dyed hair to affirm that a mass shooter must actually be transgender. Now, even if this claim is like widely debunked later on, most of the people that follow these far- right accounts won't be hearing about that.

So all they need to do is use this brief window of chaos to seed the idea into people's minds. And if you do this thing frequently enough after each new mass shooting, then it's pretty easy to create a false perception of this increasing trend. Now, this style of propaganda has been largely spearheaded by Chaya Raitrek using her Libs of TikTok account. Here's another quote from her, quote, the modern LGBTQ plus movement is radicalizing young activists into becoming violent terrorist extremists. The uptick in trans violence is going to get worse, unquote. But this sort of rhetoric has been spread by many other online figures in this orbit, like disgraced BuzzFeed writer Benny Johnson and chronic poster Ian Miles Chung. Their rhetoric has been spread by sitting politicians, Donald Trump Jr. and Elon Musk.

Now, to clarify, people have been lying about the gender identity of mass shooters for like a long time. It's one of the oldest jokes on 4chan. But what's been going on the past two years is something different. And it requires a little bit more in-depth examination of this propaganda trend. Now, to get into more specific examples here, I like to break down a common meme format used to spread this type of false propaganda. It's usually about five pictures of mass shooters with text next to each picture that reads something like the Nashville shooter identified as trans, the X shooter identified as trans. So it'll just list all of these people that allegedly are mass shooters and allegedly identified as trans.

Now, police did identify the Nashville Covenant school shooter as a trans man. We have to take their word for it. They've released no other info on that. Typically, this is seen as like the first legitimate mass shooting done by a transgender individual. And for the past year, we've been waiting for more and more context to come out about this mass shooting and its possible motivations. So I'm not even going to really discuss this one right now. We'll just say, sure, this is a trans person who happened to do a mass shooting and leave it at that, even though it's, you know, not totally clear. I mean, I do, I want to add one thing briefly, which is that like trying to find out information from the police about a mass shooting is such a

crap shoot. Like they just, you know, they'll, they'll, they'll be like a initial flurry of press releases or whatever. And then they just will never talk about it again until maybe the trial. And sometimes you get something from that. Well, and in often cases for mass shooters who often die, there is no trial. They never get anything. Yeah, yeah. And if they're dead, like... But even keeping this Nashville incident as a legitimate mass shooting done by a person who happens to be trans,

when talking about this meme, the thing is, is that with these five pictures that are on this meme, most typically three out of the five people that have their pictures here aren't even trans. Not this time. It never happened. It's false. It never happened.

It's a fake. It's fiction. Now, most famously, we have the Colorado Springs shooter Anderson Lee Aldrich, who killed five people and injured 25 others at a queer club in 2022. Later on, his lawyer claimed that the shooter was non-binary, which I believe is a disgusting and disingenuous attempt to get out of the more than now 50 hate crime charges that the shooter is facing. And this opinion is shared not only by the DA, but also

all other legitimate extremism researchers. Prior to these claims in court, there was no indication whatsoever that the shooter was non-binary or used they them pronouns. However, they did own rainbow flag shooting targets, ran a neo-Nazi website that posted gun training videos, and was known by online acquaintances to frequently post racist and homophobic content. Now, I should clarify, when I say shooting targets, I don't mean that it's pride-themed shooting targets. It's that the people that you are shooting are painted like they are gay. So, there you go. Now, pictured next in the meme is someone with purple colored hair labeled as the Denver shooter.

This person is not trans, has never claimed to be trans. He just has dyed hair. He killed one person in a school shooting that he planned with a 16 year old trans guy. That's not even a mass shooting. Correct. We will we will get in. We will get into this later because the definition of mass shooting is getting stretched liberally here. Now, the third person pictured, who isn't trans, changes more frequently in different versions of the meme that you can find online.

One version includes someone referenced as the Philadelphia shooter. This is referencing a shooting spree that resulted in five people being killed. This shooter had previously posted photos of himself cross-dressing in women's clothes, and this was used by figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene to claim that the cis male shooter was actually, quote, another trans shooter. The family of this shooter referred to him as a, quote-unquote, biblical extremist, and he often posted bizarre Christian spiritual conspiracy theories and was an outspoken fan of Tucker Carlson. In another version of the meme posted by Chaya Rychek, she identifies the Uvalde school shooter as trans

and includes a picture of a trans woman holding the trans pride flag. This was posted in January of this year. Elon Musk replied to the tweet with two exclamation points. Now, in the hours after the Uvalde school shooting, pictures of two or three different trans women were used to falsely label the shooter as trans, with at least one of these trans women being from New York, the other from Georgia. Both these women received a great deal of harassment after the shooting. Arizona Congressman

Paul Gozar tweeted that the shooter was, quote, a transsexual leftist illegal alien, unquote, which is frankly amazing because every word in that sentence is wrong. We made this one up. It's a made up tale. It's a total fabrication. It never happened. It never happened. Now, the other person in this meme that is typically accepted to be trans is the Aberdeen shooter. Now, I'm going to just quote from the Washington Post here, quote, in 2018 in Aberdeen, Maryland, a 26-year-old shot and killed three people at a pharmaceutical distribution center before turning the weapon on themselves. The sheriff said the shooter had been diagnosed as mentally ill in 2016. A close friend reported the shooter, quote, suffered from bipolar disorder and struggled since early in high school with severe depression,

partly connected to their feelings of not being accepted when they first came out as a gay teenage girl and later as transgender, unquote. By most accounts, this is a transgender guy who began transitioning shortly before the shooting. Pronouns and stuff are unclear. They also worked at this distribution center a few weeks prior to them doing the shooting. This incident's typically not categorized as a mass shooting because only three people were killed, excluding the shooter. as a mass shooting because only three people were killed, excluding the shooter. Now, one of the more recent attempts at this transgender terrorist psyop was in the aftermath of the shooting at Joel Osteen's megachurch in Houston earlier this February. The shooter was a 36-year-old woman carrying her seven-year-old son, sadly both of whom died along with one other

person. Just hours after the shooting far-right accounts like lips of tiktok and end wokeness claimed that she was transgender pointing to documents where she used the name jeffrey now chaya reichek called the shooting quote another act of trans terrorism we need to have a national conversation about the lgbtq movement turning youth into violent extremists unquote didn't she literally say that exact thing with the last one yeah they don't even come with new tweets like they only they really just have the same five tweets in rotation marjorie taylor green called her quote a trans from el salvador unquote um missouri representative just holly marco rubio

and elon musk all posted about this quote-unquote epidemic of trans violence. These claims were boosted by Donald Trump Jr. and Ted Cruz. Fox News ran a whole story with a headline about the shooter being transgender. And guess what? She's not trans. She is a cis woman who gave birth to a child and has always identified as a woman. It just appears that she was given a masculine name at birth and later changed it to a child and has always identified as a woman. It just appears that she was given a masculine name at birth and later changed it to a more feminine name. The far-right content sphere created so much uproar that the police had to do a whole press conference about how the shooter was not trans. And after the police and lawyers clarified she was not trans, Fox News changed their claim, now saying on air that the shooter, quote, identified as

both genders and was, quote, a biological woman who sometimes identified as a man named Jeffrey, unquote, which just isn't true. Jesus Christ. But the thing about this one is that it wasn't just far-right influencers in Fox News who ran with this transgender narrative. MSNBC jumped on very early to say that the shooter was, quote, a Hispanic transgender woman who, quote unquote, identified as a woman, unquote. It's totally made up. Pure fiction. It's fiction. It's fiction. We made it up. MSNBC, more like MSNB shit. Great, great one, Mia. Great, great, great one. I'm not doing great this morning.

Do you know what's also doing great, Mia? Is that the products and services that support this podcast? They're pretty consistent. Yeah, they are still around. And here you can listen to their important messages. All right, we are so back. So there's so many more cases like the ones that I've talked about, right? The reason I started working on this episode in the first place was due to far-right accounts claiming that a man named Jared Rivieras, who killed his 70-year-old roommate and went on a mass stabbing spree last month outside of an AMC theater and a McDonald's in Massachusetts, was claimed to be a, quote, mentally ill trans terrorist by Libs of TikTok and a trans activist, quote unquote, who's a man who thinks he's a woman, which is a line Libs of TikTok loves using.

Now, Jared claimed to be an artist and a model, but was actually like this really weird, like grifter entrepreneur. He kind of reminds me of that weird Canadian cat killer, Luke Magninata, who like created a whole bunch of fake posts to pretend to be famous and created fake fans. It's very similar to this case. And later, this guy, Luke, in Canada also killed a gay man. Very similar cases, honestly. Jared here, again, he's pretending to be an international entrepreneur. He looks like this weird hipp like hippie surfer dude with long bleached hair. Jared's father is a wealthy Christian therapist who looks very similar. And anti-trans influencers have pointed to the word she on Jared's Instagram profile. But Jared's actual gender identity is really unclear. He's never pictured wearing women's clothing. He would

frequently post shirtless buff selfies. Jared has never claimed to be trans or a woman and has never used transgender language or iconography. Jared did file a name change request last April, but it was to change his last name. He goes by Jared. That same month, April, so two months ago, Jared sexually harassed a model at a Beverly Hills hotel saying that he wanted to have kids with her and proposed to her saying, I'm going to be a good husband. You're going to be my wife, unquote. This person simply, we have no, no reason to think they're

trans. They do this, they do like weird, like art stuff. And I don't't know they're like california beverly hills poison brained and it seems to they seem to have gone through some kind of mental health breakdown which resulted in them killing their roommate two dogs and stabbing like six or seven people in massachusetts but another trans terrorist sure why not in january of this year, an Iowa teenager opened fire at a school, killing one person and then himself. Again, the usual suspects were super quick to label him as another trans terrorist. Elon Musk saying, this is happening a lot. Something is deeply wrong. This kid largely seemed like a regular Gen Z liberal.

He listed his pronouns as he, they. He posted things like nominally in support of trans people. He used the hashtag genderfluid a single time in a TikTok video filmed with what appears to be a trans friend of his. He also posted on Reddit two years ago that he didn't want to transition because he didn't quote, want to look ugly. He never specifically identified as trans. This is just kind of a tragic case. I don't know what the

deal with this kid was. They seemed deeply confused and upset and killed someone and then killed themselves. It sucks, but it's not a mass shooting and it doesn't link to anything being a pattern

of transgender terrorism. That does not stop someone like Donald Trump Jr. saying, quote, the modern LGBTQ plus movement is radicalizing our youth into becoming violent extremists. Per capita, is there a more violent group of people

anywhere in the world than radicalized trans activists? Given the tiny fraction of the population they make up, it doesn't seem like anyone else comes even close. We have a lot of claims like this, which is why I need to start talking about statistics, my least favorite thing. Because this sort of messaging is repeated a lot.

We have this post from, I think, Benny Johnson or Donald Trump Jr. I can't tell which one, because unfortunately it got deleted before I was able to log who did it, so apologies for that. But it's a very similar sort of thing, saying there's been at least five mass attacks by transgender people since 2018.

Considering the group makes up less than 0.5% of the population, that's a massive overrepresentation. We'll get into that in a sec. Oh boy. Often when these people are talking about this trend of trans mass shooters, Often when these people are talking about this trend of trans mass shooters, they're focusing specifically on the period of time between 2018 and 2024. Because largely a lot of conservatives think that trans people were kind of like invented around 2018. That's when they first started to kind of like notice that people were trans, which is something we've talked about before in terms of like the arc of homophobia and transphobia in relation to like gay marriage and like a few other things. This is something

we've reported on consistently on this show. So they're very often only looking at data from select years. And as we've discussed here, they largely inflate the number of quote unquote mass shooters, as well as the number of mass shooters who they call transgender, they will often, you know, very loosely define what a mass shooting is when it suits them, and then very strictly define it when it doesn't. In the Blaze article about that Call of Duty pride pack, they say, quote, trans-identifying suspects' share of public mass shootings nationwide over the 2018 to 2023 period is reportedly well over seven times their share of the population, which links to a very sketchy right-wing crime stats website

that doesn't publish any of their data. So, sure. So there is a few different ways to categorize what a mass shooting is. There's no universal definition for what makes a mass shooting versus a mass killing. So different groups categorize things kind of differently. The mass killing database is a partnership between the

AP, USA Today, and Northwestern University, and it defines mass killings, quote, as the intentional killing of four or more victims, excluding the deaths of unborn children and the offenders, by any means within a 24-hour period. Their database currently lists 590 such killings since 2006. James Allen Fox, professor of criminology and law at Northwestern University, who manages the database, has said, quote, you can count the number of transgender and non-binary shooters on one hand. They're actually underrepresented, unquote. And again, it's possible that because of how successful the right has been at the PSYOP, when you're counting these number of transgender non-binary shooters

on one hand, that's also super overrepresented because they're most likely containing like the Colorado Springs shooter and a lot of these other people. Now, trans people on average are reported to make up about 1% of the US.S. population. But that number is steadily growing. We got to pump those numbers up. Those are rookie numbers. Now, it's also just kind of unclear what that number actually is. That's the current one from the U.S. Census Bureau and kind of an average doubt because a lot of stats of like people older than 25 say the numbers are like around 0.5, 0.6% versus people under 25, reportedly it's like 1.5%. So, you know, I'm just going to say around 1%. Now, under most criterias for mass killings,

only one incident, the one in Nashville, qualifies for inclusion. Another data source called the Violence Project has recorded data on mass shootings in the US since 1966. They more narrowly define a mass killing as four or more people killed in a public unconnected to other criminal activity. Their current database has 193 entries. A spokesperson for their organization told Reuters that the 2023 Nashville shooting, quote, is the first case of a trans perpetrator in their database per their methodology. Another more broad data collection project is called the Gun Violence Archive. I'm just going to quote from Reuters here, quote, the Gun Violence Archive, which began collecting data on gun violence in

the US in 2013, recorded more than 4,400 mass shootings in the last decade. Its definition of a mass shooting is four or more people shot, resulting in injury or death, excluding the perpetrator. Of those, quote, the number of known suspects in a mass shooting, which are trans, is under 10 for the last decade, which translated to 0.11% of the 4,400 shootings, unquote, which is about nine times lower than cis people per capita if we use the 1% trans population stat. And even using the more conservative mass killing data set, the rate of this sort of violence by trans people is far lower than what would match our population margin. I'm going to add in a short quote from the Washington Post to kind of add in some context here. Quote, the gun violence archive methodology would allow

for inclusion of the Aberdeen and Denver cases. With 0.6% of the population, one would expect at least 16 mass shootings to be conducted by people identifying as trans in the past five years. Instead, there are just three possible cases cited by most conservatives, unquote. So after looking over all of this data, it would actually appear that transgender people are less likely to commit a mass shooting than cis people, even by some of the more conservative estimates. The other side of this is that not only are trans people less likely to, you know, do this sort of violence, they are way more likely to be on the receiving end than cis people. Per the National Archive of Criminal Justice data, LGBTQ plus people are more than twice as likely to be a victim of gun violence than their cisgender and straight peers. According to the Human Rights Campaign, 29% of transgender youth have been threatened or injured with a weapon on school property compared to 7% of cisgender youth. So even for school shootings, you are so much more

likely to face gun violence at school if you are trans. Transgender, non-binary, and gender questioning people have reportedly higher rates of being impacted or knowing someone who's been impacted by a mass shooting compared to their cisgender queer peers. This is, you know, a data average, but it's usually around 22% to 19%. And this whole topic gets so much more like dark and grounded when you know that 320 trans people were killed last year according to data from the annual trans murder monitoring report which is like it's so dark that we even have something called the trans murder monitoring report also we need to mention this um because i don't think people this is really badly understood people who aren't trans but those

numbers are always significant undercounts because yes those projects are people scraping basically news reports or trying to find like the families of victims and there are a lot of people who get killed who the only people who know are their friends and those people fucking either aren't talking to the press or the press just never like covers it or you know the police give their dead name and never talk about it so they just are dead and everyone thinks they're cis yep and just in the united states last year, 33 trans people were murdered. And again, this is a vast undercount, like Mia said. Meanwhile, you have all these people on the right who will talk about all of these,

all these alleged mass shootings by alleged trans people. And one of their favorite lines, when they try to like affirm that a shooter is actually trans is quote, watch how quickly the story will now disappear. Unquote, which is just ironic for a few reasons. One, because that's how news works is that we move on to a new thing, but also it'll probably disappear as well because they're not actually trans. You know,

when you're in the case of the Uvalde shooter in the case of the make a church shooter from last year. Yeah, people move on, but also they're not going to keep harping on your weird conspiracy theory because it's a weird conspiracy theory. It's not true. Even if this is, even if they were right, which they are not, it also is just like, imagine in like 1920, you're like, we have a problematic rise in left-handed mass shooters. And we're like, well, yeah, because there's more left-handed people. There's going to be at least some level of correlation statistically. Again, these people act like trans people were only invented in 2018 and are just like slowly like

recruiting in numbers, which, hey, you know, at least we are kind of slowly recruiting. And like the actual goal of this rhetoric beyond just, you know, altering the fabric of reality is to just encourage violence against trans people. That is what they're doing. It's to see trans people as a threat so that you feel justified in doing violence against them. Just a few weeks ago, a very popular gun YouTuber made this joke where they were talking about, you know, getting ready to shoot a T-word. And they stopped and they were like, oh, sorry, I mean a school shooter, wink, wink.

So like, they're trying to use school shooter to be a dog whistle for trans people. This is all just to justify violence. That's all this is doing. And to some degree, it's working. Just last week, a trans kid was assaulted in the men's bathroom at school and reportedly one of their teeth exploded. This was a trans girl who was in the men's bathroom at school and reportedly one of their teeth

exploded. This was a trans girl who was using the men's bathroom like all of these freaks want them to, and she still got assaulted. I think it's super important when talking about this sort of unreality propaganda is that like these people like Libs of TikTok, Ian Miles Chong, they're not just like falling further into a delusional conspiracy theory. Same thing with Elon Musk, right? It's, it's, it's easy.

I think it's easy to be like, oh, they just actually like legitimately are like falling into this like conspiratorial delusion. And it's, it's not that. What it is, is they are actually intentionally crafting reality. It's not them like falling victim to this this unfortunate delusion. They are choosing which version of reality to believe in because it's the one that they want. And that's what they're doing. And they want it to be a reality where more people feel comfortable assaulting and killing trans people. That's the actual goal of this propaganda. We need to be very clear about this,

about what's sort of happening here which is one of one of the fastest ways to get a group of people to commit a genocide is by convincing them that they are all about to be killed right this is one of the things behind this behind the bosnian genocide this is one of the things behind rwanda is if you can convince a lot of people that their neighbors are about to fucking kill them that's how you get them to do the genocide because the thing that they believe is that like oh like this is self-defense like these people are about to kill us and that is the kind of reality tunnel being mobilized here is is a is a call is it called genocide and the other side of this that i think is so grim is that there used to be a time as a society where

you know we attempted to explain why there are mass shootings, right? This is something that I remember living through. If you go back to 2016, 2017, 2015, there used to be people other than these just genocidal fascists attempting to explain why these shootings were happening. The actual data on trans-mass shooters and how few of them there are is quietly devastating to a lot of the theories that used to be sort of bandied about, right? Theories that this was about sort of objection, the theory that this was about this, you know, like sort of de-industrialization and like the consequences that this has had on people and that there were, you know, it was this sort of like downward social mobility that was causing this violence, right? If any of that were true, there would be a fucking million mass shooters.

Because again, the trans, the trans poverty rate is like, it's, it's, it's around 30%, right? For the rest of the country, it is like a quarter as well. It's not quarter. It's like a third of that much, right? You, you, there should be, if, if it was just purely a product of like material conditions, there would be a lot more trans men shooters, but there aren't. Because again, the actual theory that fits this data and fits also the behavior of all of these people, all of these fascists trying to explain mass shootings as being about trans people, the thing that it fits is the theory that this is basically the replacement of clan rallies, right? We don't have, we don't have collective lynchings anymore. We have individual ones.

And all of these fucking people are trying to make sure that there's just more lynchings and that these lynchings are, you know, it's like, it's their, their sort of like armed follower fanatics go and shoot a bunch more trans people in a nightclub. And then,

you know, once that happens, they will disavow it by saying, Oh, Hey, this, this, this nightclub shooting was, hey, this nightclub

shooting was, this is actually done by a fucking trans person, and they'll keep doing this until they have enough political power to openly come out and claim that all of these people were their fucking revolutionary heroes in their new fucking pantheon of the fascist state. And there was that trans boy who was assaulted in the bathroom a few months ago and died days later in the hospital there's this this it keeps happening and i i didn't want this to be like a depressing episode i wanted this to break down a conspiracy theory i've been seeing more frequently talk about you know what's fueling it actually go over the instances that are included in it to kind of you

know debunk for lack of a better term, this sort of rhetoric. And just so you can be more aware of it when you see it. Because often you'll see this, you know, this meme with five pictures. You'll see a copypasta version of it. So just being aware of what this is, what this rhetoric is trying to do. what this rhetoric is trying to do and the unfortunate fact that trans people are far

more likely to be a victim of gun violence and mass shootings. Yeah, than cis people. Than cis people and are actually less likely to participate in such violence, statistically speaking. So yeah, that

is the episode today. Not meant to be depressing, just meant to be informative, but you know, statistically speaking. So yeah, that is the episode today. Not meant to be depressing, just meant to be informative. But you know, when it comes to me, those things often overlap. Many such cases. I hope you have a good Pride Month. Stay safe and stay dangerous. Hey, I'm Jack Peace Thomas, the host of a brand new Black Effect and a vibrant community of literary enthusiasts dedicated to protecting and celebrating our stories. Black Lit is for the page turners, for those who listen to audiobooks while commuting or running errands, for those who find themselves seeking solace, wisdom, and refuge between the chapters. From thought-provoking novels to powerful poetry,

we'll explore the stories that shape our culture. Together, we'll dissect classics and contemporary works while uncovering the stories of the brilliant writers behind them. Blacklit is here to amplify the voices of Black writers and to bring their words to life. Listen to Blacklit on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. to the destruction of Google search, better offline is your unvarnished and at times unhinged look at the underbelly of tech from an industry veteran with nothing to lose.

This season, I'm going to be joined by everyone from Nobel-winning economists to leading journalists in the field, and I'll be digging into why the products you love keep getting worse and naming and shaming those responsible. Don't get me wrong, though. I love technology.

I just hate the people in charge and want them to get back to building things that actually do things to help real people. I swear to God things can change if we're loud enough. So join me every week to understand what's happening in the tech industry and what could be done to make things better. Listen to Better Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever else you get your podcasts. Check out betteroffline.com. Hola, mi gente. It's Honey German, and I'm bringing you Gracias, Come Again. wherever else you get your podcasts. Check out betteroffline.com. artists and culture shifters this is the podcast for you we're talking real conversations with our latin stars from actors and artists to musicians and creators sharing their stories struggles and successes you know it's going to be filled with chisme laughs and all the vibes that you love

each week we'll explore everything from music and pop culture to deeper topics like identity community and breaking down barriers in all sorts of industries. Don't miss out on the fun, el té caliente, and life stories. Join me for Gracias Come Again, a podcast by Honey German, where we get into todo lo actual y viral. Listen to Gracias Come Again on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. On Thanksgiving Day, 1999, a five-year-old boy floated alone in the ocean. He had lost his mother trying to reach Florida from Cuba.

He looked like a little angel. I mean, he looked so fresh. And his name, Elian Gonzalez, will make headlines everywhere. Elian Gonzalez. Elian Gonzalez. Elian. Elian. Elian Gonzalez. everywhere. At the heart of the story is a young boy and the question of who he belongs with.

His father in Cuba. Mr. Gonzalez wanted to go home and he wanted to take his son with him. Or his relatives in Miami. Imagine that your mother died trying to get you to freedom. At the heart of it all is still this painful family separation. Something that as a Cuban, I know all too well. Listen to Ches Peace, the Elian Gonzalez story, as part of the My Cultura podcast network, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Gianna Parenti.

And I'm Jimei Jackson-Gadsden. We're the hosts of Let's Talk Offline, the early career podcast from LinkedIn News and iHeart Podcasts. One of the most exciting things about having your first real job is that first real paycheck. You're probably thinking, yay, I can finally buy a new phone. But you also have a lot of questions like, how should I be investing this money? I mean, how much do I save? And what about my 401k? Well, we're talking with finance expert Vivian Toot, aka Your Rich BFF, to break it all down. I always get roasted on the internet when I say this out loud, but I'm like, every single year, you need to be asking for a raise of somewhere

between 10 to 15%. I'm not saying you're going to get 15% every single year, but if you ask for 10 to 15 and you end up getting eight, that is actually a true raise. Listen to this week's episode of Let's Talk Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. or wherever you get your podcasts. Hello and welcome to It Could Happen Here. This is Shereen, and today we are going to be talking about the current quote-unquote peace plan that was presented by the U.S. in what they say is their attempt to end the genocide in Gaza. They call it a war, and I call it what it is, which is a genocide.

Earlier this month, Joe Biden announced what he claimed was an Israeli peace plan to bring about an eventual ceasefire in Gaza. But according to journalists and anyone with eyes, the new plan is almost indistinguishable from previous plans proposed by Hamas. We're going to get into the details of the U.S. plan in a little bit, but first I want to address the immense loss of Palestinian life that has led up to this plan. Because if the plan is successful, it would usher in a ceasefire to a genocide that has killed more than 37,000 Palestinians, which is a very low estimate, and the majority of these deaths are women and children. Not only have Palestinian children been brutally slaughtered for months, but Gaza now has the largest population of child amputees in the world. In November, children in Gaza hosted a press conference, in English, to beg the world for life.

It's June now. And all we've seen since then is massacre after massacre. that Arab men are not worth mourning, not worth saving nor protecting, that they are all terrorists or terrorists to be, who are simply killed as casualties in the quote fog of war. I also think that the mention of children is specifically used as a way to at least try to make the world empathize and fucking feel something about the lives that have been stolen. Parents literally hold up the limp and decapitated bodies of their babies, and it's broadcast worldwide. And yet the dehumanization of Arabs runs so deep that such graphic displays of horror and death are considered normal. No one bats an eye. It is insane that 274 Palestinians were slaughtered for four prisoners of war who could have been released in a prisoner exchange, exchanges and deals that Israel has repeatedly rejected. We will get into this more in this episode.

And people are celebrating this shameful military operation, which U.S. troops were a part of, and ignoring the Palestinians that were killed and murdered in the process. Further emphasizing that Palestinian life is not as important as Israeli life, by a huge margin. In a case you didn't hear the details about this operation that I'm talking about, U.S. and Israeli troops infiltrated a refugee camp in trucks disguised as humanitarian aid to Trojan horse their way into further massacring and maiming people who were already being forcibly starved. Are you hearing this? One more time, they infiltrated a refugee camp in trucks disguised as humanitarian aid. Israeli special forces were also disguised as Palestinian refugees looking for a place to live when they entered the buildings where they thought the hostages were being held.

Remember in January when there was also video evidence of the IOF pretending to be medical staff in a hospital and then shooting and killing unarmed doctors, nurses, and patients? Oh, and then there was the discovery of at least three mass graves at El Shifa Hospital, where bodies including many wearing scrubs were found zip-tied and buried in piles. Israel has been doing this for months and years and decades, and they've been getting away with it for months and years and decades. No one is hiding how they feel anymore. They are out here showing us with their actions. It's not ambiguous. It is not confusing. They are out here showing us with their actions. It's not ambiguous. It is not confusing. They are making it very simple. They are making it crystal clear.

Palestinians do not matter. And Israel's intention is to continue their ethnic cleansing of Palestine. What's happening in Gaza is not about the hostages, and it has never been about the hostages. If that isn't clear to you by now, you have not been paying attention. A few things about the hostages. Hamas has repeatedly offered since last year to release all hostages in exchange for Israel releasing all Palestinian prisoners. As of November 1st, according to Human Rights Watch, Israel held nearly 7,000 Palestinians in its prisons, and many of those held captive by Israel are not convicted of any crime. At least 3,660 Palestinians being held in Israel are under what is called administrative detention. An administrative detainee is someone held in prison without charge nor trial. Without charge. No crime committed.

I want to take a moment to bring up a report that came out recently that's not getting nearly enough attention. It's truly horrific and I don't know how people are just glossing over it. But the New York Times recently reported that Palestinians are being tortured and abused in Israeli prisons. Two journalists from the New York Times spent three months interviewing Israeli soldiers as well as Palestinians who were detained at one particular prison. I'm not going to pretend I know how to pronounce it. It's spelled S-D-E space T-E-I-M-A-N, Sed Teiman. I'm just going to go with that. But essentially, Israel is carrying out a policy of systematic torture in this army base. And this army base has been used as a detention camp for Palestinians from the Gaza Strip. This was all confirmed by a New York Times investigation.

Reports of abuse at this site had already emerged in both Israeli and Arab media, and this was followed by outcries from local and international rights groups about the horrific conditions there. Apparently, it was mainly used as a, quote, makeshift interrogation center, but now it has become a major focus for the accusations that the Israeli military has mistreated its detainees, including people who were later determined to have no ties to Hamas or any other armed groups. The investigation revealed that at least 1,200 Palestinian civilians were detained at this site in, quote, demeaning conditions without the ability to plead their cases to a judge for up to 75 days and additionally denied access to lawyers for up to 90 days.

Eight former detainees, all of whom the military confirmed were held at the site and spoke on the record, said they had been punched, kicked, and beaten with batons, rifle butts, and a handheld metal detector while they were in custody. Others said that they had been forced to wear a diaper while being interrogated, and that they had received electric shocks during their interrogation. electric shocks during their interrogation. According to the New York Times, most of these testimonies were corroborated by interviews conducted by officials from the UNRWA, the UN Agency for Palestinian Refugees. The agency interviewed hundreds of returning detainees who reported widespread abuse at this site, as well as other Israeli detention facilities, including the beatings and the use of an electric probe. An Israeli soldier who served at this site also disclosed to the New York Times that his fellow soldiers often bragged about beating detainees, and he observed many instances of such treatment. He was speaking on condition of anonymity to avoid prosecution, but he said a detainee had

been taken for treatment at the site's makeshift field hospital with a bone that had been broken during his detention, while another person was briefly taken out of sight and then returned with bleeding around his ribcage. I strongly urge you to read the New York Times piece in full. It details the most horrific things I've read in recent memory. I would be remiss to not mention at least a few of them, just so you understand the severity, but this report essentially proves that Palestinians are experiencing sexual violence and have experienced sexual violence in Israeli prisons. This is one example. Mr. El Hamlawi, a senior nurse, said a female officer had ordered two soldiers to lift him up and press his rectum against a metal stick that was fixed to the ground.

He said the stick penetrated his rectum for roughly five seconds, causing it to bleed and leaving him in unbearable pain. A leaked draft of the UNRWA report detailed an interview that gave a similar account. It cited a 41-year-old detainee who said that interrogators made him sit on something like a hot metal stick that felt like fire, and he said that another detainee died after they put the electric stick up his anus. Dr. Al-Hamlawi also recalled being forced to sit in a chair wired with electricity. He said he was shocked so often that after initially urinating uncontrollably, he then stopped urinating for several days. He said that he too had been forced to wear nothing but a diaper to stop him from soiling the floor. Ibrahim Shaheen, 38, a truck driver, he said he was shocked roughly half a dozen times while sitting in a chair.

Officers had accused him of concealing information about the location of dead hostages, which ended up having no connection to him at all. Another man, Mr. Becker, said that he was also forced to sit in a chair wired with electricity, sending a current pulsing through his body that made him pass out. sending a current pulsing through his body that made him pass out. Mr. Beckett also said, along with other detainees that corroborated this, he only received roughly three meager snacks on most days, mostly bread with small quantities of cheese or jam or tuna. The military said the food provisions had been approved by an authorized nutritionist in order to maintain their health. But according

to several of these detainees, that's not nearly enough, and they lost more than 40 pounds during their detention. Again, I urge you to read the report in full. It needs more attention than it is getting, but it is horrific, and this is proof of the vile mistreatment of Palestinians. And it's from the New York Times. If you need a source that you quote unquote trust more than Al Jazeera or something, which makes no sense. But for those who do, there it is.

Now let's go back to the topic at hand we were talking about the hostages and how hamas had offered many times in the past to release all the hostages in exchange for releasing palestinian prisoners and despite hamas's offers israel has never agreed to any deal which involves the release of all Israeli hostages. On October 9th, two days after October 7th, Hamas offered to release all the civilian hostages in exchange for the IOF not entering the Gaza Strip. But Israel rejected that offer, and many hostages have died since then, which could have been avoided if Israel cared. A few stats. 105 Israeli hostages were freed via a temporary ceasefire in November of last year. Four other hostages were released by Hamas. Three hostages were killed by IOF, quote, friendly fire because the IOF considered them a threat as they were waving white flags. During four Israeli, quote, rescue missions, one hostage was killed, one soldier was saved.

In what Israel called Operation Golden Hand on February 12th of this year, two hostages were saved, and at least 94 Palestinians were killed. And then on June 8th, what is now being called Operation Arnon, four Israeli hostages were rescued and at least 274 Palestinians were killed. In a statement released after the attack, Hamas said, in exchange for them, the four Israeli hostages, your own army killed three of your own captives in the same attack, one of them holding a U.S. citizenship. And it must be mentioned that the Israeli attacks on Gaza have also killed an unknown number of hostages in Hamas captivity, as well as the at least 37,000 Palestinians killed since October

7th. Relentlessly bombing a tiny strip of land where Israel knows its hostages are located doesn't really indicate that Israel gives a shit about the lives of the hostages. The hostages are pawns being used in a disgusting political game. And I have seen several unhinged and deranged comments about this latest operation, which again killed 274 Palestinians, including children, in the process of saving four hostages. The comments range in severity and psychopathy, but a lot of them are basically saying, how else were they supposed to get the hostages back? And Israel must rescue its people by any means necessary, and that this is what you get when you mess with Israel.

But after reading the previous numbers, it is an absolute fact that the only mass release of hostages has come through ceasefire and prisoner exchanges. More hostages have been killed by the Israeli army than rescued by them. A ceasefire deal means freed hostages without mass death. And so if Israel really cared about the lives of these hostages. Why on earth wouldn't they agree to a deal that can guarantee their safety? I want to take a quick tangent only to mention that the number of Palestinians killed in Gaza is most likely far, far greater than the reported number because the infrastructure that was used to document the death toll has been decimated, along with nearly everything else in Gaza. The number 37,000 also

does not include the thousands and thousands of Palestinians buried underneath rubble who are unable to be found nor retrieved. The health ministry's director of international cooperation in the West Bank, Dr. Yasser Bozia, says he works closely with ministry colleagues in Gaza. When he spoke with NPR in late January from his office in Ramallah, he said an estimated 10,000 people were missing and presumed dead under the rubble in Rzhe. But even that number was low. It's like a snowball, he said. It's only an estimation. The actual number is much, much higher. Bozia and doctors in Gaza say the death count published by the health ministry also largely excludes people who have died from a lack of adequate treatment,

disease, and other impacts from the war, like hunger. The death toll only includes people killed by the, quote, occupation bombardment, he said. The health ministry describes its casualty figures as those resulting from Israeli aggression. Bozias has a colleague in Gaza told him that the only way to really know how many people have died is to count the number of people still alive compared with the population of Gaza before October 7th. He said that because of the continued brutal genocide going on in Gaza, it is impossible to have the real number.

It will only be revealed after the violence has stopped. The death toll also does not make clear how many militants are among the dead. Israel says its forces have killed more than 10,000 fighters in Gaza, but Israel has also not provided any sort of evidence or detailed information to back up its estimate. In every interview every Israeli correspondent or spokesperson has given, they always give a number for the estimated fighters or terrorists killed in Gaza, but they're very unsure about how many civilians have been killed. And now to go back to the U.S. peace plan that is basically identical to previous peace plans proposed by and agreed to by Hamas.

What does this U.S. plan propose? This plan has three stages. The first stage proposes to involve a six-week ceasefire during which the Israeli army will withdraw from the populated areas of Gaza. Hostages, including the elderly and women, would be exchanged for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. women would be exchanged for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. Civilians would also return to all of Gaza, with 600 trucks carrying humanitarian aid flooding the enclave daily, Biden said. The second phase would see Hamas and Israel negotiate terms for a permanent end to hostilities. Biden said, the ceasefire will still continue as long as negotiations continue. In the third phase, a permanent ceasefire would follow, facilitating the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, including 60% of clinics, schools, universities, and religious buildings damaged or destroyed by Israeli forces. This plan is nearly identical to a previous plan that Hamas had already agreed to on May 6th, a deal which Israel ended up rejecting.

We will talk more about that deal later on, but for now, let's focus on the U.S.'s plagiarized version of this plan and who supports it. But first, let's take an ad break, and we'll be right back. Okay, and we are back. So soon after the announcement of the U.S. deal, Hamas Blinken arrived in the Middle East on his latest trip to the region, which he said will focus on Washington's Gaza truce proposal and the future of the Palestinian territory. Blinken met Egyptian President el-Sisi in Cairo on Monday, repeating U.S. calls for Hamas to accept the truce deal. to accept the truce deal. Speaking to reporters before leaving Egypt, Blinken squarely blamed Hamas for prolonging the quote-unquote war, saying that Hamas is an outlier in the region for not agreeing to the U.S. deal. He told reporters, Blinken arrived in Israel later on that

same day and met with Netanyahu. He will further hold talks in Qatar and Jordan this week. The State Department said Blinken reaffirmed the quote ironclad U.S. commitment to Israel's security during his meeting with Netanyahu. A curious note is that while Blinken portrayed the truce plan as Biden's proposal, when Biden made the deal public initially, he said it was an Israeli plan. This could be just a little slip because Biden is very old, or it could be a slip that just confirms what we've all known to be the case all along, that the U.S. and Israel are one and the same, especially when it comes to their political interests and military power. And while U.S. officials have insisted that Israel agree to this proposal, various Israeli officials, including Netanyahu, have vowed to continue

fighting until the elimination of Hamas. Just days before Biden announced his initiative, a top Israeli official said the military would fight in Gaza until at least the end of the year. On the other hand, Hamas has said that it will only agree to a deal that would lead to a lasting end to the war and the full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Hamas reiterated its position on Monday after its political chief Ismail Haniyeh met with officials from the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a smaller armed group, in Doha. Hamas said in a statement, The two delegations discussed the indirect negotiations and efforts to end the war, stressing that any agreement must include a permanent ceasefire, complete withdrawal from

the Gaza Strip, reconstruction, ending the siege, and a serious prisoners' exchange. Hamas previously called for an explicit commitment from Israel to a lasting ceasefire. And despite the lack of clarity in the Israeli position, Biden administration officials have repeatedly said that Hamas is the only hurdle to ending the war in Gaza. The U.S. blaming Hamas for prolonging what it calls a quote-unquote war, again not a war, a genocide, is ridiculous. Hamas has accepted previous peace deals. It has offered previous peace deals. Israel has been the one to reject them. And then the U.S. comes along and just repackages one of these previously agreed-on deals that Hamas had endorsed and has the audacity to then blame Hamas for

obstructing peace. Give me a break. Additionally, the U.S. truce plan does not outline plans for the future of Gaza after the war, but the U.S. government has said that it would not accept Hamas' rule in the territory. The Biden administration says it wants a, quote, reformed Palestinian authority, aka the PA, to eventually govern Gaza. But the Israeli government has ruled out allowing the occupied West Bank-based PA to govern Gaza, with Netanyahu likening Fatah, the dominant faction in the PA, to Hamas. Other support for the plan has come from some Israeli politicians, as well as the families of the hostages and the international community. Benny Gantz, a centrist member of Israel's three-man war cabinet and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's principal rival,

spoke positively of the proposal and asked his two colleagues in the war cabinet, Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Galant, to convene to discuss the, quote, next steps. Gantz had previously threatened to leave the cabinet by June 8th if no plan for Gaza beyond the war had been agreed on, and on Sunday, June 9th, he officially announced his resignation. Gantz's resignation does not immediately pose a threat to Netanyahu, who still controls a majority coalition in parliament, but it does mean that the Israeli leader becomes more heavily reliant on his far-right allies. Gantz said that Netanyahu was making, quote, total victory impossible, and that the government

needs to put a return of the hostages seized on October 7th by Hamas above political survival. Gantz is a popular former military chief, and he joined Netanyahu's government shortly after the Hamas attack in a show of unity. His presence also boosted Israel's credibility with its international partners. Gantz has good working relations with U.S. officials. Gantz canceled a planned news conference the night of June 8th, after the four Israeli hostages were rescued from Gaza earlier in the day, which again was Israel's largest operation since October. Another reminder that 274 Palestinians, including children, were killed in the assault. Another Israeli politician who supported the U.S.

peace plan was opposition leader Yar Lapid, who also promised to support the plan, pledging support of his party Yesh Atid, which translates from Hebrew to there is a future, if those from ultra-nationalists and far-right parties withdraw support. United Nations Secretary General Antonio Gutierrez also endorsed the plan, as have many of Israel's political allies, including the UK and Germany. So who doesn't like the plan? Much of the opposition to the peace plan has come from within the Israeli cabinet. Netanyahu said any initiative that did not include a, quote, elimination of Hamas's capacity to govern and make war was a non-starter. In his announcement on Friday, May 31st, Biden seemed to indicate that he regarded

Hamas's presence within Gaza to have been so downgraded that a repeat of October 7th was impossible. As expected, the ultra-nationalists and extreme right members of Netanyahu's right-wing coalition, which includes Itamar Ben-Gavir and Bezalel Simotric, threatened to withdraw from the government and cause its collapse if the proposals were accepted. So as far as Israel's politics are concerned, it seems like the outcome may end up depending on what Al Jazeera describes as, quote, parliamentary arithmetic. The far right and ultra-nationalist parties hold 14 seats, while Gantz's bloc only has 8 seats, meaning the far right has far more influence on a prime minister who wants to stay in power. As for Lapid, his 17

seats are offered as support only in what pertains to the peace proposals. This leaves Netanyahu reliant on the far right bloc. As far as the deal being accepted, that is still not clear, despite what the U.S. says. The families of Israeli hostages are putting pressure on the government to accept the deal, as are some parts of Israel's political class. But pressures to reject the deal are just as strong, and it will remain to be seen whether Netanyahu chooses his own survival or the return of the hostages. But if one thing is clear, it is that Netanyahu does not really care about the hostages, because the IOF under his command continues to bombard areas where the hostages can be held. And may I remind

you that the IOF have already killed Israeli hostages that they have mistakenly identified as threats. Speaking of threats, um, I'm kidding. There is no ad break and there is no threat. That's the end of part one. And if you want to listen to part two, tune in tomorrow, talking about the history of Hamas and how we got here. So yeah, see you then. Free Palestine. Hey, I'm Jack Peace Thomas, the host of a brand new Black Effect original series, Black Lit, the podcast for diving deep into the rich world of Black literature. I'm Jack Peace Thomas, and I'm inviting you to join me in a vibrant community of literary enthusiasts

dedicated to protecting and celebrating our stories. Black Lit is for the page turners, for those who listen to audiobooks while commuting or running errands, for those who find themselves seeking solace, wisdom, and refuge between the chapters. From thought-provoking novels to powerful poetry, we'll explore the stories that shape our culture. Together, we'll dissect classics and contemporary works while uncovering the stories of the brilliant writers behind them. Blacklit is here to amplify the voices of Black writers and to bring their words to life.

Listen to Blacklit on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, I'm Ed Zitron, host of the Better Offline podcast, and we're kicking off our second season digging into how Tex Elite has turned Silicon Valley into a playground for billionaires. From the chaotic world of generative AI to the destruction of Google search, better offline is your unvarnished and at times unhinged look at the underbelly of tech from an industry veteran with nothing to lose. This season, I'm going to be joined by everyone from Nobel winning economists to leading journalists in the field. And I'll be digging into why the products you love keep getting worse and naming and shaming those responsible. Don't get me wrong, though. I love technology. I just hate the people in charge and want them to get back to building

things that actually do things to help real people. I swear to God things can change if we're loud enough, so join me every week to understand what's happening in the tech industry and what could be done to make things better. Listen to Better Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever else you get your podcasts. Check out betteroffline.com. deep into the world of Latin culture, musica, peliculas, and entertainment with some of the biggest names in the game. If you love hearing real conversations with your favorite Latin celebrities, artists, and culture shifters, this is the podcast for you. We're talking real conversations with

our Latin stars, from actors and artists to musicians and creators, sharing their stories, struggles, and successes. You know it's going to be filled with chisme laughs and all the vibes that you love. Each week, we'll explore everything from music and pop culture to deeper topics like identity, community, and breaking down barriers in all sorts of industries. Don't miss out on the fun, el té caliente, and life stories. Join me for Gracias Come Again, a podcast by Honey German, where we get into todo lo actual y viral.

Listen to Gracias Come Again on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. On Thanksgiving Day, 1999, a five-year-old boy floated alone in the ocean. He had lost his mother trying to reach Florida from Cuba. He looked like a little angel. I mean, he look so fresh. And his name, Elian Gonzalez,

will make headlines everywhere. Elian Gonzalez. Elian. Elian. Elian. Elian. Elian Gonzalez. At the heart of the story is a young boy

and the question of who he belongs with. His father in Cuba. Mr. Gonzalez wanted to go home and he wanted to take his son with him. Or his relatives in Cuba. Mr. González wanted to go home and he wanted to take his son with him. Or his relatives in Miami. Imagine that your mother died trying to get you to freedom. At the heart of it all is still this painful family separation. Something that as a Cuban, I know all too well.

Listen to Chess Peace, the Elian González story, as part of the My Cultura podcast network, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Gianna Parenti. And I'm Jimei Jackson-Gadsden. We're the hosts of Let's Talk Offline, the early career podcast from LinkedIn News and iHeart Podcasts. One of the most exciting things about having your first real job is that first real paycheck. You're probably thinking, yay, I can finally buy a new phone. But you also have a lot of questions like, how should I be investing this money?

I mean, how much do I save? And what about my 401k? Well, we're talking with finance expert Vivian Tu, aka Your Rich BFF, to break it all down. I always get roasted on the internet when I say this out loud, but I'm like, every single year you need to be asking for a raise of somewhere between 10 to 15%. I'm not saying you're going to get 15% every single year, but if you ask for 10 to 15 and you end up getting eight, that is actually a true raise. Listen to this week's episode of Let's Talk Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Hello and welcome back to It Could Happen Here. This is Shereen. And today we are continuing our conversation from yesterday where we talked about the U.S. proposed peace deal for Hamas and Israel. That looks suspiciously like a deal Hamas had already agreed to just a few weeks before that and Israel did not agree to. We had ended part one talking about how the IOF literally killed their own hostages when they mistakenly thought they were threats. And I ended saying, speaking of threats, and I'm going to continue because that's what professionals do. So, since October 7th, Israel has described Hamas as an existential threat, saying that it needs

to destroy the group and won't stop the violence in Gaza until it does so. But I would argue that most people who are pro-Israel or Western Zionists in general don't actually know anything about Hamas other than thinking they're this big bad evil that has to be eradicated by the quote only democracy in the Middle East, which I hope by this point people realize is a sick joke. Hamas is suddenly being talked about on every news channel, and anything even remotely pro-Palestine is now labeled as pro-Hamas. channel, and anything even remotely pro-Palestine is now labeled as pro-Hamas, when most people in this country I would argue most likely had never even heard of Hamas before October 7th. Labeling something as pro-Hamas truly just means nothing. As far as Israel is concerned, the UN is Hamas. In May, Israel's ambassador to the UN, Gilad Erdan, said in an interview with Israel's army radio that the UN has, quote, turned into a collaborator with Hamas. Maybe even more than that, a terror organization unto itself. Wow. Israeli leadership has just continued to one-up themselves when it

comes to saying the most insane fucking shit. And then according to Zionists, the college campus protests that were calling for a literal end to genocide are also pro-Hamas. Earlier this month, a lawsuit was filed in Virginia by a U.S. law firm and an Israeli legal group who have teamed up to sue two organizations involved in recent college campus protests, the American Muslims for Palestine and National Students for Justice in Palestine. the American Muslims for Palestine and National Students for Justice in Palestine. They accused these groups of collaborating with Hamas to serve as their quote propaganda division in the U.S. Arson Avtrosky the CEO of the International Legal Forum who was working with this U.S. legal team of Greenberg Tariq and the National Jewish Advocacy Center he called the American Muslims for Palestine and the National Students Advocacy Center, he called the American Muslims for Palestine and the National Students for Justice in Palestine, as well as all the protesters supporting Palestine,

most of whom are students, as quote, the foot soldiers of Hamas. If I was going to go through everything that Israel and Zionists have labeled as pro-Hamas, this episode would never end. But I hope it's clear that this label and accusation isn't based on any real sort of evidence or proof, and it is only a way to scare people into blindly supporting Israel in quote defending itself, big quotes there, against this growing evil spreading across the globe and invading our campuses. When in reality, there would be no Hamas without Israel. Although Hamas eventually grew into being the most active armed resistance group in Gaza, it definitely didn't start that way, and it wouldn't have even had the power to grow the way it did

if it weren't for intentional actions by Israeli leadership that started decades ago. Before we get into a timeline of the recent Hamas peace deals that have led to this very similar deal that the U.S. proposed, all deals that, again, Israel has rejected, I want to make sure we at least have an understanding of what Hamas even is. Hamas, which is an Arabic acronym for Islamic Resistance Movement, would not exist today if it wasn't for Israel. American and Israeli politicians are always saying the same thing, how dangerous and evil Hamas is, without mentioning how Israel itself helped create Hamas. The TLDR of it all is that Israelis helped turn a bunch of fringe Palestinian Islamists in the late 1970s into one of the world's most notorious militant groups.

This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's a confirmed fact. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's a confirmed fact. Former Israeli officials such as Brigadier General Isaac Segev, who was the Israeli military governor in Gaza in the early 1980s, have openly spoken about this. After his tenure, Segev told a New York Times reporter that he had helped finance the Palestinian Islamist movement as a, quote, counterweight to secularists and leftists of the Palestinian Liberation Organization,

aka the PLO, as well as the Fatah Party, which was led by Yasser Arafat. Arafat, too, referred to Hamas as, quote, a creature of Israel. Hamas was officially founded in 1987 at the start of the first Palestinian Intifada, or uprising, against the Israeli occupation. But its beginnings actually started much earlier. Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood had been repressed by Egyptians in Gaza prior to 1967, but once the Israelis invaded and occupied the Gaza Strip, they chose to encourage this group of extremist Islamists. The dominant Palestinian political force in Palestine at

the time was the PLO, and it was deemed a threat to Israel, and so Israel sought to undermine its power. The PLO is a nationalist coalition which was centered around the secular Fatah party led by Yasser Arafat. By empowering Yassin and the Muslim Brotherhood, Israel thought they could divide the occupied Palestinian people and eventually rule over them by playing them against each other. Secular Nationalists vs. Religious Islamists In 1978, Yassin wanted to officially register his Islamic Association, which was basically the precursor to present-day Hamas. The Israelis jumped on the opportunity to help make this happen. Yassin built and grew a network of Islamist social institutions across

Gaza, funded largely by Israel. Avner Cohen is a former Israeli religious affairs official who worked in Gaza for more than two decades. In 2009, he told the Wall Street Journal, than two decades. In 2009, he told the Wall Street Journal, Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel's creation. Back in the mid-1980s, Cohen even wrote an official report to his superiors warning them not to play divide and rule in the occupied territories by backing Palestinian Islamists against the Palestinian secularists. He wrote in his report, I suggest focusing our efforts on finding ways to break up this monster before reality jumps in our face. Clearly, his superiors did not listen to him, and Hamas was the result. To be clear, Israelis had helped build up a militant strain of extremist political Islam in the form of Hamas and its Muslim Brotherhood

precursors and allowed it free reign in order to quiet any chance of progress in Palestine. And then, when it became convenient for their Zionist narrative, the Israelis tried to bomb, besiege, and blockade it out of existence. David Hashem, a former Arabs affairs expert in the Israeli military who was based in Gaza in the 1980s, said the, quote, original sin was Israel's support of Yassin in the 1970s. He said, when I look back at the chain of events, I think we made a mistake. But at the time, nobody thought about the possible results. Yeah, no shit. Yeah, no shit.

The only American politician that I know of who has ever referenced how Israel is responsible for Hamas' creation is Ron Paul. In 2001, on the floor of the House, Ron Paul said, Speaking of Arafat, not only did he himself tell an Italian newspaper that Hamas is a creature of Israel, he also said that the former Israeli Prime Minister, Yassak Rabin, admitted this to him, calling it a, quote, fatal error. Yassin was eventually assassinated by an Israeli airstrike in Gaza on March 22, 2004. Silvan Shalom, former Israeli Vice Prime Minister, said after Yassin's death that, quote, Shaykh Yassin and his organization, Hamas, are responsible for the killings of more than 400 Israelis. When actually, no, Israel is clearly largely responsible. David Long, a former Middle

East expert in the U.S. State Department under Ronald Reagan, told journalist Robert Dreyfuss, I thought the Israelis were playing with fire. This, of course, is not a unique development, as there have been dozens of instances of unneeded and malignant U.S. intervention in other countries for its own gain. And since then, Hamas has killed far more Israelis than any secular Palestinian militant group. Israel built up Yassin and Hamas as a rival to Arafat's Fatah.

Then they killed Yassin, and then they doubled down in making Hamas Israel's worst enemy. An enemy it would use to justify to the entire world that it was not only okay but necessary to control and massacre millions of Palestinians in the process of destroying this threat. Israel spent more than 20 years helping build up Hamas and then spent another 20 years trying to destroy it. All of this is to say that aside from the purposeful assistance from Israel in creating Hamas, All of this is to say that aside from the purposeful assistance from Israel in creating Hamas, that Hamas wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for the Israeli occupation. There would be no resistance, because without the ethnic cleansing and forced violent occupation,

there would be nothing to resist. In the process of bolstering this militant group, Hamas also became the main armed force behind the Palestinian resistance. And many view Hamas as the only group even attempting to defend Palestinians in the face of Israeli occupation. And the organization itself has changed over the years, especially in the last decade. It seems like Hamas was and is increasingly trying to establish a more favorable status quo for the Palestinian people. Hamas's leaders were shaped by the hard realities of a brutal occupation, which was marked by mass arrests of Palestinians, the expropriation of Palestinian lands, and control of their resources. More than half a million Palestinians were arrested and tried in Israel's military-run courts between 1967 and 1987, and over 1,500

Palestinian homes were demolished, and thousands of Palestinians were forcibly deported, aka ethnically cleansed. After Hamas won the 2006 elections in Gaza, its leader Haniyeh said the group accepted a state on the 1967 borders, as well as all the decisions taken by the PA and the PLO, but there were no takers. Hamas leaders also backed the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative that called for the following, the withdrawal of Israeli forces from territories occupied in 1967, the right of Palestinian refugees to return to the homes they had been forcibly displaced from since 1948, and the formation of a sovereign, independent Palestinian state in return for Arab recognition of Israel. independent Palestinian state in return for Arab recognition of Israel. But Hamas's offers were repeatedly dismissed by Israel and ignored by Israel's Western allies, including the U.S.,

despite Washington's claims of playing the role of a, quote, honest broker in the conflict. Tariq Bakony, author of Hamas Contained, The Rise and Pacification of Palestinian Resistance, told Al Jazeera, Hamas has always said that they are ready to offer a truce and to stop targeting civilians if the Israeli occupation removes its settlers. At least 750,000 Israelis live in hundreds of fortified illegal settlements and outposts across the occupied Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the vast majority of which are again built illegally either entirely or partially on private Palestinian land, and thus they violate international law. One of the more infuriating and frankly incredibly stupid talking points that Zionists have when it comes to talking about Hamas is the 2006 election where

Palestinians elected Hamas as their appointed leadership. I want to remind everyone of a few things. The Gaza Strip has a very young population. Most of the inhabitants in Gaza are under 15 years old. The largest population group in Gaza are children between the ages of 5 and 9 years old. This population wasn't even born yet, let alone old enough to vote, in 2006. And furthermore, leadership does not indicate your right to live a life, your right to not be killed. If you're in America and Trump is your elected president and you hate Trump and maybe other foreign entities hate Trump, do you deserve to die? No, you don't. The resistance fighters in Hamas are not the ones who wrote the original

charter. They're not the ones who established Hamas in the first place. They're young people that are joining the most active armed resistance to defend Palestine. It's their only option. And Palestinians have tried other non-violent forms of resistance against this occupation. In 2018 to 2019, there was something called the Great March of Return. It started on March 30th, 2018 and ended December 27th of 2019. Every Friday for those years, Palestinians in Gaza demonstrated and protested along the border fence between Israel and Gaza for a right to return to their homes and to demand an end to the Israeli blockade in Gaza. During this time, the Israeli army killed a total of 223 people. Over 3,601,000 people, including nearly 8,800 children, were injured. This is after a peaceful attempt at demonstrating, after a peaceful attempt at trying to resist

occupation. They're still shot and killed. They're shot with the intention to kill. Expecting Palestinians to be pacifists when it comes to resisting a brutal, violent occupation that has been now almost a century long is very small-minded and entitled and frankly wrong. is very small-minded and entitled and frankly wrong. Palestinians have the right to resist. Armed resistance is legal under international law when it comes to resisting and occupying power. What does this mean? Maybe you've heard that train of thought before.

Let me explain it to you. Let's go back in time a little bit. The General Assembly of the United Nations, the UNGA, which was once described as the collective conscious of the world, noted the right of peoples to self-determination, independent, and human rights. As early as 1974, Resolution 3314 of the UNGA prohibited states from any military occupation, however temporary. Hmm, curious. Israel has been doing that for decades now. In the relevant part of the resolution, the resolution not only went on to

affirm the right to self-determination, freedom, and independence of peoples forcibly deprived of that right, and particularly peoples under colonial and racist regimes or other forms of alien domination, but it also noted the right of the occupied to, quote, struggle and to seek and receive support in that effort. The term armed struggle was implied without precise definition in that resolution and many early other ones that upheld the right of indigenous peoples to evict an occupier. Again, the right of a indigenous people to evict their occupier. But the imprecise language was changed on December 3rd, 1982. At that time, the WNGA Resolution 37-43 removed any doubt or debate over the lawful entitlement of occupied people to resist occupying forces by any and all lawful means. The resolution reaffirmed, quote,

the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity, and liberation from colonial and foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle. And although Israel has tried, time and time again, to recast this ambiguous intent of this precise resolution trying to place its now nearly century-long violent brutal occupation in the West Bank and Gaza beyond this resolution's application, the declaration itself proceeds to be very explicit in its language when it comes to Palestine. Section 21 of the resolution strongly condemned, quote, the expansionist activities of Israel in the Middle East and the continual bombing of Palestinian civilians, which constitute a serious obstacle

to the realization of self-determination and independence of the Palestinian people. That's what I mean, and that's what many people mean when they say that Palestinians have the right to resist and armed resistance is illegal under international law. I want to bring that up because even if Hamas does not reflect the viewpoint of some Palestinians, Hamas is also the main armed resistance group that has been fighting against the IOF in defending Palestine, Gaza in particular, against Israel. And they have a right to do that. Clearly, as international law states. clearly, as international law states. Regardless, let's go back to talk about the history of Hamas and how they amended their charter in 2017. In 2017, Hamas formally amended its original 1988 charter. The new charter holds that armed resistance against an occupying power is

justified under international law. And while the 1988 Hamas charter had been widely criticized for its anti-Semitism, the 2007 document states that Hamas's fight is not with the Jewish people, but with the Zionist project. And as you should realize by now, anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism. The new charter also announced once again that it would accept a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders. This would recognize, in effect, a two-state solution, and therefore the existence of Israel as a legitimate entity. This was proposed even as Israel continued to insist that it can no longer allow Hamas to exist, and as Israeli politicians,

led by Netanyahu, repeatedly ruled out a two-state solution. Hamas political leader Khaled Mashal said at the time, The Hamas thinking from the very start was clear. We are not facing a religious war. Hamas, ever since its inception, realizes the nature of the struggle against the Israeli occupier, that it is not a struggle because they are Jews, but because they are occupiers. Israeli officials dismiss the new policy paper as lies. In a video, Netanyahu symbolically and dramatically threw the document into a trash bin, saying it was an attempt to deceive the world. Through its actions, which span across

decades, Israel has not shown any interest in a political agreement, whether with Hamas or other Palestinian political parties, like Fatah, which governs the occupied West Bank. Sari Arabi, a Ramallah-based political analyst, told Al Jazeera, The issue is not about Gaza. It's also not about whether Israel or Hamas started the war. There are daily killings and assaults in the occupied West Bank. There are attacks on the Al-Aqsa Mosque. There are prisoners and checkpoints. The people in Gaza are refugees. They were isolated and separated from the rest of the Palestinian people. And the vast majority of Gaza's population are refugees,

who were forcibly expelled from their homes and villages in the 1948 Nakba by Zionist militias. Many political analysts also blame Israel for the failure of the Oslo Accords, signed in 1993 and 1995, between Israel and the PLO, which was representative of the Palestinian people at the time. The agreements led to the formation of the PA, an interim five-year governing body meant to lead to an independent Palestinian state, comprising of the occupied territory of East Jerusalem and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. However, 30 years into its existence, the PA has failed to create a state in the face of Israeli occupation, illegal land grabs, and settlements. And then Hamas took control of Gaza from the PA in 2007. While there was initial support for the Oslo Accords among Palestinians,

the failure to reach a final peace agreement by 1999 and the growing settlement projects, particularly under Netanyahu, left many disappointed. In a leaked video in 2010, Netanyahu boasted about how he made sure the Oslo Accords did not succeed. The hopes of the Oslo Accords turned into despair as Israeli policies under successive governments continued to undermine the PA and its aspirations. Today, the PA has limited administrative rule over pockets of the occupied West Bank, while Israeli settlements, which are again considered illegal under international law, have grown rapidly. The settler population in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem has grown from 250,000 Israelis in 1993

to more than 700,000 this year. In his talk with Al Jazeera, author Tarek Barconi said, The Israelis wanted Oslo because that's how they maintained their colonization, by maintaining the facade of a peace process. Hamas was showing a mirror to the Israelis to say, if you're actually talking about the possibility of ending the occupation, then end it. That was their offer, instead of the 1993 Oslo Agreements, that they would stop armed resistance if Israel let Palestinians be in the eastern side of Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza. When we look into the history of

Hamas, we see that its political leadership has over the years proposed numerous long-term truces or ceasefires to Israel in exchange for the realization of a sovereign, independent Palestinian state. But Israel has rejected those offers, arguing that Hamas could not be trusted to adhere to any long-term ceasefire, and insisting that any proposal for a short-term pause in fighting were insincere and strategically aimed only at helping the armed movement regroup from losses. I've said this before, but it bears repeating. Every Zionist accusation is a confession. The reality is that Israel is the one who cannot be trusted to adhere to any long-term ceasefire, as we have seen time and time again. Here is a summarized timeline of the most recent peace deal attempts that have been proposed since October 7th, since the genocide in Gaza started.

In January 2024, Netanyahu rejected a Hamas proposal to end the war and release more than 100 captives held by the group, in exchange for a withdrawal of Israeli forces, the release of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, and recognition of Hamas governance over Gaza. And then on May 6th, Hamas said it accepted a Gaza ceasefire proposal, which was put forward by Egypt and Qatar. This deal would come in three stages that would see an initial halt in the fighting, leading to lasting calm and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Palestinian territory. It would also ensure the release of Israeli captives in Gaza, as well as an unspecified number of Palestinians held in Israeli jails. The framework of the agreement, in brief, is Israeli captives in the Gaza Strip, civilians or military, alive or otherwise, from all periods,

in exchange for a number of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel as agreed upon, and a return to a sustainable calm that leads to a permanent ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip, as well as its reconstruction and the lifting of the siege. Hmm, it seems a little familiar, doesn't it? But Israel, unsurprisingly, did not agree to this proposal. Instead, it bombed Rafah. Which made the Israeli government's message clear. There will be no permanent ceasefire. Israel's bombing of Rafah was justified by Israel as a way to disband Hamas battalions and seize control of the Gaza-Egyptian crossing, which Israel accuses Hamas of using to smuggle weapons into Gaza.

But humanitarian groups were quick to point out that a closure of such a crossing would only lead to further disastrous consequences for the more than 1 million Palestinians living in Rafah, the majority of them displaced from other areas of Gaza, who fled to Rafah after being told by Israel that it was a quote-unquote safe zone. Israel said at the time that the terms of the May Hamas ceasefire deal differed from previous proposals it had seen, but analysts believe that the wider issue is that Israel is not willing to agree to a permanency spire, even after Hamas releases all Israeli captives. Omar Rahman, an expert on Israel-Palestine with

the Middle East Council for Global Affairs, spoke about this in May, saying, The last couple of days have proved that Israel was not really negotiating in good faith. The moment that Hamas agreed to a deal, Israel was willing to blow that up by commencing their assault on Rafah. The goal was to destroy Gaza in its totality. And then on May 31st, the U.S. announced its own ceasefire proposal that Biden said would lead to a quote, lasting ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. He said the proposal involves three phases, the first of which would last six weeks, and would include a full and complete ceasefire, as well as the withdrawal of Israeli forces from all populated areas of Gaza. Again, this peace plan is almost indistinguishable from the one

that Hamas agreed to on May 6th. A quick reminder that only 25 days before this announcement on May 6th, Hamas had agreed to a ceasefire proposal by Egypt and Qatar that is almost identical to the one Biden announced on May 31st, and Israeli leaders rejected that initiative. On June 7th, Israel rejected the UN's resolution of its own hostage deal offer, which was a permanent ceasefire in exchange for release of all hostages. A reminder that the only mass release of hostages has come through ceasefire exchanges, and that a ceasefire deal means freed hostages without mass death. It boggles my mind that there are still people defending Israel and saying all this Palestinian death is for the hostages. Because again, if Israel cared about their lives at all, they would agree to a deal because that deal can guarantee the safety of the hostages.

But they do not care about the hostages. Every time Israel rejects a deal, they are telling you that. And yet their supporters are too entrenched in the lies and propaganda of Zionism to ever see clearly. So, just to summarize, the U.S. proposed a ceasefire deal, which was almost indistinguishable from previous plans agreed to by Hamas. And then, while seemingly waiting for Israel to accept the deal, the U.S. launched a military operation and committed more war crimes to murder hundreds of Palestinians, and they did this by hiding in humanitarian aid trucks. While deceiving the world and the Palestinians into thinking

that they were trying to formulate a ceasefire agreement, the U.S. helped Israel plan and carry out its massacres. This is what peacemaking looks like to the United States. A ceasefire deal is the absolute bare minimum and it is nowhere near enough. The removal of Netanyahu is nowhere near enough. He's being set up as the fall guy and scapegoat for Israel, skirting the responsibility of what the Israeli state has done to Palestinian people since 1948. The fight for Palestine is a liberation movement which demands nothing less than the full dignity, freedom, and security of all who live under this violent military occupation. It's a demand to end Israeli apartheid. And until that happens, Israel will continue to get away with the Nakba that started

in 1948 and continues today. The Nakba never ended. Israel will continue to get away with the genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people until Israel and its apartheid is dismantled. A ceasefire is the absolute bare minimum to achieving that. And that, my friends, is our episode for today. Please keep sharing and learning about what is happening in Palestine and don't stop talking about it. Free Palestine. Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week from now until the heat death of the universe. It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com,

or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can find sources for It Could Happen Here updated monthly at coolzonemedia.com slash sources. Thanks for listening. Curious about queer sexuality, cruising, and expanding your horizons? Hit play on the sex-positive

and deeply entertaining podcast, Sniffy's Cruising Confessions. Join hosts Gabe Gonzalez and Chris Patterson Rosso as they explore queer sex, cruising, relationships, and culture in the new iHeart podcast, Sniffy's Cruising Confessions. Sniffy's Cruising Confessions will broaden minds and help you pursue your true goals. You can listen to Sniffy's Cruising Confessions,

sponsored by Gilead, now on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes every Thursday. Hi, I'm Ed Zitron, host of the Better Offline podcast. And we're kicking off our second season digging into tech's elite and how they've turned Silicon Valley into a playground for billionaires. From the chaotic world of generative AI to the destruction of Google search, to the destruction of Google search. Better Offline is your unvarnished and at times unhinged look at the underbelly of tech brought to you by an industry veteran with nothing to lose. Listen to Better Offline on the iHeartRadio app,

Apple Podcasts, wherever else you get your podcasts from. The 2025 iHeart Podcast Awards are coming. This is the chance to nominate your podcast for the industry's biggest award. Submit your podcast for nomination now at iHeart.com slash podcast awards. But hurry, submissions close on December 8th. Hey, you've been doing all that talking. It's time to get rewarded for it. Submit your podcast today at iHeart.com slash podcast awards.

That's iHeart.com slash podcast awards. That's iHeart.com slash podcast awards. On Thanksgiving Day, 1999, five-year-old Cuban boy Elian Gonzalez was found off the coast of Florida. And the question was, should the boy go back to his father in Cuba? Mr. Gonzalez wanted to go home and he wanted to take his son with him. Or stay with his relatives in Miami. Imagine that your mother died trying to get you to freedom. Listen to Chess Peace,

the Elian Gonzalez story, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, I'm Jack Peace Thomas, the host of a brand new Black Effect original series, Black Lit,

the podcast for diving deep into the rich world of Black literature. Black Lit is for the page turners, for those who listen to audiobooks while running errands or at the end of a busy day. From thought-provoking novels

to powerful poetry, we'll explore the stories of a busy day. From thought-provoking novels to powerful poetry, we'll explore the stories that shape our culture. Listen to Black Lit on the Black Effect Podcast Network, iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. AT&T, connecting changes everything.