It Could Happen Here - It Could Happen Here Weekly 176
Episode Date: April 5, 2025All of this week's episodes of It Could Happen Here put together in one large file. The Library Funding Cliff Anarchism In Uruguay feat. Andrew, Pt. 2 RFK Jr. Breaks the Medical System Ho...w ICE Is Targeting Students for Deportation Executive Disorder: White House Weekly #10 You can now listen to all Cool Zone Media shows, 100% ad-free through the Cooler Zone Media subscription, available exclusively on Apple Podcasts. So, open your Apple Podcasts app, search for “Cooler Zone Media” and subscribe today! http://apple.co/coolerzone Sources/Links: RFK Jr. Breaks the Medical System https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/autism/114853 https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/28/health/fda-vaccine-peter-marks-resigns/index.html https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/31/trump-administration-hiv-research-grant-cuts https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-to-gut-vaccine-promotion-and-hiv-prevention-office-sources-say/ https://archive.ph/z2Fyx https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1839225/ https://www.axios.com/2025/03/29/rfk-jr-body-shames-west-virginia-governor https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/hhs-taps-anti-vaccine-activist-look-debunked-links-autism-vaccines-sou-rcna198214 https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/31/health/vaccine-grants-cancelled-pediatricians/index.html https://taggs.hhs.gov/Content/Data/HHS_Grants_Terminated.pdf https://archive.ph/48Ua1 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rfk-jr-wants-to-let-bird-flu-spread-on-poultry-farms-why-experts-are/ How ICE Is Targeting Students for Deportation https://apnews.com/article/columbia-university-mahmoud-khalil-ice-15014bcbb921f21a9f704d5acdcae7a8 https://archive.ph/20250316111414/https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/16/nyregion/mahmoud-khalil-columbia-university.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/15/nyregion/columbia-student-kristi-noem-video.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/25/nyregion/columbia-university-protester-chung-deportation.html https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/25/columbia-gaza-protester-yunseo-chung-lawsuit https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/24/nyregion/columbia-student-ice-suit-yunseo-chung.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/01/us/politics/cornell-student-momodou-taal.html https://apnews.com/article/social-media-immigration-applicants-handles-dhs-f67b480abebff7e451056be17572593d https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/exclusive-trump-admin-spies-on-social?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=7677&post_id=160081190&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1aiy5i&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email https://apnews.com/article/georgetown-trump-deportation-immigration-homeland-security-21fc205cebbbbba2ed260050df04702a https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/29/us/rumeysa-ozturk-tufts-student-detained.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/01/us/israel-gaza-student-protests-canary-mission.html https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/14/israel-betar-deportation-list-trump https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-administration-takes-aim-immigrant-students-rcna198346 https://apnews.com/article/immigration-detainees-students-ozturk-khalil-78f544fb2c8b593c88a0c1f0e0ad9c5f https://x.com/janashortal/status/1905759411248734353 https://dailyegyptian.com/120974/news/international-siu-student-has-visa-revoked-confirms-university-admin/ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SGz224raVR8mHMzC6q-6EUiNcBKD6BSK/view Executive Disorder: White House Weekly #10 https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-stokes-trade-war-world-reels-tariff-shock-2025-04-03/ https://www.theverge.com/news/642620/trump-tariffs-formula-ai-chatgpt-gemini-claude-grok https://www.reuters.com/markets/frances-macron-calls-suspension-investment-us-after-tariffs-2025-04-03/ https://x.com/USBPChief/status/1907398210064437404 https://x.com/ReichlinMelnick/status/1907488012239302953 https://x.com/ReichlinMelnick/status/1907411257927311619 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.11.0.pdf https://x.com/JDVance/status/1906934067607556440 https://t.co/dFXNSbOyiy https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/01/us/elections/results-wisconsin-supreme-court.html https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/02/business/tesla-sales/index.htmlSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Prohibition is synonymous with speakeasies, jazz, flappers, and of course, failure.
I'm Ed Helms, and on season three of my podcast, Snafu, there's a story I couldn't wait to tell you.
It's about an unlikely duo in the 1920s who tried to warn the public that Prohibition was
going to backfire so badly it just might leave thousands dead from poison.
Listen and subscribe to Snafu on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey all you women's hoops fans,
and folks who just don't know yet
that they're women's hoops fans.
We've got a big week over at Good Game with Sarah Spain
as we near the end of one of the most exciting
women's college basketball seasons ever.
The most parody we've seen in years,
with games coming down to the wire
and everyone wondering which team
will be crowned national champions this weekend in Tampa.
Listen to Good Game with Sarah Spayne
on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Imagine you're scrolling through TikTok.
You come across a video of a teenage girl,
and then a photo of the person suspected of killing her.
It was shocking.
It was very shocking.
Like that could have been my daughter.
Like, you never know.
I'm Jen Swan.
I'm the host of a new podcast called My Friend Daisy.
It's the story of how and why a group of teenagers turn to social media to help track down their
friend's killer.
Listen to My Friend Daisy on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 2020, a group of young women found themselves
in an AI-fueled nightmare.
Someone was posting photos.
It was just me naked.
Well, not me, but me with someone else's body parts.
This is Levetown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts, Bloomberg and
Kaleidoscope about the rise of deepfake pornography and the battle to stop it.
Listen to Levittown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts or wherever you get your
podcasts.
Hey, everybody. Robert Evans here. And I wanted to let you know this is a compilation episode. you get your podcasts. If you've been listening to the episodes every day this week, there's going to be nothing new here for you, but you can make your own decisions.
Hi everyone.
And welcome to the podcast.
It's just me, James today, and I'm joined by Jamie, who is a librarian.
And we are here to discuss the pending federal cuts on library funding and.
I guess years of attacks on library funding.
So welcome to the show, Jamie.
Thanks for joining us.
Hi, thanks for having me.
Yeah, this is really great for me because I have been trying to find a librarian for
a very long time to talk to us on the podcast.
I understand that lots of people have been like really concerned that we covered this,
but also very afraid for their jobs, which is a rough position to be in.
So thank you for coming on.
I thought we'd start with like there was an executive order on the 14th of March.
I think it was called something like further something, the federal
bureaucracy cutting, slashing, diminishing, whatever, you know, I don't really care.
One of the outcomes of this was, I believe the Trump administration moving
towards a complete closure of IMLS. Is that right?
So it depends upon how much Doge and Trump and company are going to listen to Congress, because
Congress has already funded IMLS, which is the Institute of Museum and Library Services, for this year.
So that money already exists, it's already been allocated.
And so in theory, they should be good for at least a year and then next year when the
budget comes up, again, it should be up to Congress because Congress created this institution
and Congress funds it.
But the executive order and the commentary on it does say that they would like to dissolve
it kind
of as soon as possible definitely next year so it's really up in the air about
how fast things would move what exactly would happen if it would be this year if
it would be next year whether anyone's going to listen to Congress.
Yeah we will find out I guess. So can you explain for listeners who aren't familiar
what IMLS is and what it does?
Yeah, so it's, as I said, the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
And so basically they're allocated money by Congress every year, and then they hand it out
to states, especially them who kind of break it down into other grants. They give grants to states
and libraries and institutions for things that museums and libraries do. So that includes things
like on the museum side, maybe you know putting together programming or doing
big digitization projects. I used to work at an institution where we had a grant
that did a lot of digitization of historic documents. And on the library
side they do all sorts of stuff,
especially for public libraries. They end up funding things like summer reading programs,
equipment, especially for internet access, you know, all this stuff related to job training and
those services that libraries offer. An interlibrary loan is a big one so that people can access
materials that their library doesn't hold but is held by other libraries.
And rural libraries and tribal libraries especially really, really benefit from this.
Every single state and territory in the country gets these funds.
Okay, yeah.
I was wondering about who funded interlibrary loans.
So they're the ones who facilitate the transporting of the books?
Yeah, well, depending on your library.
Some libraries will fund it from their operations budget, but if, especially for small rural or public libraries where that might be very expensive,
that is one thing that these grants go to is interlibrary loan.
Okay, yeah. So there are lots of very important services. And what would it mean if we didn't
have that IMLS budget at all? Like, what would it mean, especially if, like you said, those kind of
libraries that are financially, I guess, more marginalized in tribal libraries and rural areas and stuff.
So I first want to mention that the entire budget of IMLS for 2024 was something like
$266 million.
We're not talking about huge sums of money in terms of the federal government.
It comes out to about 75% per person in the country.
So yeah, we're not not gonna be saving on our taxes
if this goes away.
But that money makes a really big difference.
So even smaller states that maybe have a million people in it
might see a couple million dollars
of these grants per year.
And so what that would mean is that the things that,
maybe not all of them, but most of the thing
that these grants cover would not be there
so that means that there wouldn't be summer reading in some places that means that they wouldn't be
able to buy the hot spots that they lend out to people who don't have internet at home that means
that maybe there wouldn't be the class that teaches your grandma how to not get caught in a fishing
scam so all sorts all sorts of things those things just wouldn't be there because there's probably
not, especially in red states, other funds that are going to come to cover that.
Yeah, like I think I was looking online and the budget is something like 0.003% of the
federal budget is going to, it's trivial.
It's so small, right?
You could like take the, I don't know, the gold toilets away from the Navy and cover
it in a den, right?
Like it's so small.
Yeah, yeah.
And yet it has this enormous outsized impact.
You know, the statistics say that every dollar spent on IMLS returns $2 to the economy.
So it's actually, if you're going to measure it that way, highly beneficial, especially
to these more marginalized areas.
Yeah, maybe we should talk about that because I think if people like, maybe they just don't
happen to go to the library, maybe they don't, you know, realize they have services they
need or maybe they don't live in the US.
The library is not just a place where you can go and borrow the books, right?
Like, can you explain some of the services that libraries provide?
Like you mentioned some, but they really help people.
Yeah, so in, for better or for worse, public libraries in the United States have become
the social safety net of last resort, because they already exist almost everywhere. And it's
so hard to get, you know, not right now, but even in the past couple decades, other social programs
started in many parts of the US
that things kind of just get lumped into the libraries.
Now you get your tax forms there,
maybe they have a social worker on staff,
it's the place that homeless folks can sit when it's snowing.
So that kind of is like a little bit of side
from what we're talking about right here,
but I really do want to point out that public libraries
have become the social safety net in many, many places.
So that aside, you know,
offerings of aside from books and other media, including ebooks, audiobooks, movies in lots of
formats, magazines, newspapers, there are tons of classes about all sorts of things, especially
technology classes. It's a place that a lot of people, it's their only reliable internet access.
So, you know, in 2025, you can't do mostly anything without the internet. You can't get a job without the internet.
You can't maybe pay your bills without the internet. So that's a reliable place that people who
don't have internet for various reasons, maybe they live so far out in the country that just doesn't go there unless you have satellite, right?
Even now. Or maybe you can't afford it or whatever. Or there's
one computer in your house and there's six kids and someone has to do their
homework so what's everyone else gonna do? So then the computers themselves. And
then also the other thing that IMLS also does is those grants will sometimes
purchase research databases so if people, kids especially, are trying to do their
homework. Again, like children's and teens programming is another thing between homework help, social things, clubs.
So in a lot of places where there's not much going on, it's one of the places where young
people can go in the afternoon or on the weekend and not be getting in trouble either because
they're making trouble or the adults think they are because there's somewhere productive
to be.
There's somewhere that's inside supervised or something to do. And so that's the kind of stuff we
talk about in normal times when we're trying to fight for like weekend service or later
hours. But if we're looking at it in the lens of IMLS, the building might be open maybe
because maybe they have the foundational operationals, but then there won't be these programs, there
won't be these resources. There'll just be a bunch of books on the shelves. Yeah, it's like, I don't know, I'm
amazed how many of my friends and neighbors don't understand how my celebrity does. Like I'm forever,
San Diego housing prices are ridiculous and no one seems to want them to not be ridiculous,
or lots of us do, but we don't get to choose and so like we have a large house population
I'm always like helping my own house neighbors go to the library like giving them a ride or whatever so they can
Get like you say access internet services apply for benefits
Yeah, or just like sit and read the paper and know what's going on in the world
Yeah, and like not get harassed by the cops just for existing right which is the rest of their existence here sadly
Yeah, these are massively important to have I think most people like haven't no one because it's not really a big like fuck the library cops just for existing, which is the rest of their existence here, sadly. Yeah.
These are massively important.
I think most people like, have no one, like, there's not really a big like
fuck the libraries movement, you know, like I think people.
I mean, these things are hard.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I guess, yeah, I guess there's a whole like, uh, people should only read stories
if they conform to certain gender stereotypes.
Yeah.
Fuck those people.
Um, absolutely. they conform to certain gender stereotypes. Yeah, well, fuck those people. Absolutely fuck those people.
Talking of fuck those people, we unfortunately have to pivot to ads.
So, you know, here is some unfortunate advertisements.
All right, we're back.
Talking of people I dislike, actually, San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria, who was elected in
2020 and then re-elected shamefully this year, which is very disappointing.
One of his first actions was to propose a budget which increased the funding to the
police surprise and decrease the funding to the library so it would lead to them closing
for an extra day.
And this is our, quote unquote, progressive mayor, who has been anything but.
But this isn't a particularly uncommon scenario.
I've spoken since then to librarians around the country who, for the last at least half
decade, have faced funding cuts.
Can you explain why, why doesn't
the state see value in these services? I mean, I don't want you to like speak for, you know,
like the Democrats defunding the libraries to give the cops more money, but can you explain
like why there has been this ongoing assault on library budgets? So, you know, you're talking
about the last decade to half decade, I think we can really trace it back much farther, at least
30 years to the Clinton administration, actually, okay, I want to talk about the Democrats. But even,
you know, the roots farther back than that, because we have a neoliberal problem, right?
So it's basically the idea that all activity should generate obvious immediate monetary profit,
that everything should be run by a business, that everything should be subject to the market,
quote unquote. Yeah. And so that's where we are with libraries,, that everything should be subject to the market, quote unquote.
And so that's where we are with libraries,
is that even though I can sit here and say,
every dollar that the IMLS spends generates $2
of economic activity,
that somehow isn't even good enough,
because when the powers that be look at libraries,
they just see money being flushed down the toilet,
and that's the only way they can measure anything.
So if you look at it and you're just saying, well,
this is a place we spend money.
This doesn't create money.
This doesn't make more money happen.
The idea that everything should be run by a business
and everything should be subject to market logics,
that would say, well, if we're going to subject everything
to market logics, libraries have no value
because we're only measuring it in can this make the balance sheet, can this make number go up?
Yeah.
And even though libraries do make number go up, it's not obvious.
You can't make it obvious.
There's no direct line between what libraries do and number go up,
even though there actually is, for example, with IMLS.
So, you know, starting during the Clinton administration,
when the federal government changed
and how the federal government worked changed very much
under the guise of increasing service quality.
What they actually did was lay off a quarter million workers
and, you know, turn everything into contract work
instead of regular labor.
And that, I think, filtered down from the federal level
into states and municipalities so that those levels
of government, too, also started to look at how they ran
their government things, and in many places,
public libraries are arms of local government,
that those, too, should also be run like a business and be subject to market logics and therefore number does not go up, we don't
value this. And that's basically it, is that you know there it's hard now
that we've had 30 years of overt neoliberalism in our in our government
system and a couple decades more of less obvious versions of it, to make government,
which is now being run like a business, even in the best of times, value things that aren't
valued strictly monetarily. So there's no cultural value. And even if the monetary value isn't
extremely obvious, it somehow doesn't count. Yeah, I guess it kind of, I used to lecture,
I still do lecture at university actually, starting again next month.
But it's like we pivoted towards like everything has to be STEM in education generally because
Right, because that'll make money or something.
Yeah, I don't know why because like Bill Gates make the line go up.
And yeah, we lost so much that has not just intangible value, like you say, but actual tangible value, very, very obvious value.
But nonetheless, like you say, it's not easy to put on a graph.
So it disappears.
Right. And then, you know, even though cops also don't make money in a direct sense,
somehow we can still fund that.
So it really shows that, like, in the case of where you are,
the carceral solution is now the only solution we have.
And when we sit here as abolitionists and we say, well, let's get rid of all that stuff
and people say, well, what are you going to do instead?
Our answer is often, it would be so different that it wouldn't be necessary.
So we'd have prevention of the entire situation.
That's one of the things that libraries offer is prevention of the entire situation, making
vast laws of the carceral state unnecessary.
So there's a conscious choice there, especially when money is being taken laws of the carceral state unnecessary. So there's a conscious choice there,
especially when money is being taken out of the balance sheets
of a city government from the libraries
and put into the cops,
of this carceral choice of saying,
we'd rather everyone's life is shit
so we can throw them in jail,
then have everyone have a nice life
and no one would have to go to jail.
Yeah, and then they can come read a book instead.
And yeah, it would be nice.
It reminds me of one of the big projects
of the anarchists in Spain in the 1930s was to create popular education centers which included libraries,
right? And they funded these entirely, they were not funded by the state. The state was not
interested in making libraries in the 1920s, 1930s in Spain and they funded them from popular
subscription and from people's union dues. And they built these ateneos, which are now really beautiful places.
So it's one of the places I did my PhD in Barcelona.
And I wonder if there is, I guess it's very hard for us to conceive of a library without
the state in the United States, right?
And rich people putting little libraries in their middle-class neighborhoods is not the
same thing.
Right.
As much as they'd like to think it is, like, yeah, your little phone box library is not
replacing these services.
Is there a model for recreating this in a way that isn't reliant on the state which
seems increasingly hostile to it?
I think there's a couple models and it depends upon how far down the revelation you go.
So the example you gave of Spain, we have contemporary with that
and slightly more recent versions of that in the US.
So the Workmen's Circle and now the Workers' Circle,
they funded really wonderful cultural programs,
including libraries.
Unions often had libraries,
especially back when they used to have more buildings.
Like my union, I'm part of my union.
And aside from just like being where I work,
we don't necessarily
have a building per se.
Yeah.
So those things have always existed, especially in like the workman circle in ethnic communities
who are trying to preserve a culture.
And that's something that fit into 20th century capitalism.
And so if we go farther than the revolution, I read a really great pamphlet recently from
the 70s actually that was from the UK
And it kind of discussed libraries, you know
If we make it through the revolution a little bit as being operated as under a syndicalist model. Yeah where
Workers and patrons which is what we call them now. There wouldn't be quite quite that split
Then yeah would be able to govern and run these libraries.
There was a really great diagram.
So there's definitely been ideas for a long time
about what this could look like.
Yeah, I mean, I guess in the collectivized economy
of revolutionary Barcelona,
libraries still existed, Athenaeus existed,
and I'm sure it was along a syndicalist model
because everything was.
So yeah, I think that's a good thing
for people to look towards.
I want to stop and take one more break and then I want to talk about what people can
do to protect libraries.
All right, we are back.
So currently, I mean, this is like a funding cliff for the library system, right?
I suppose it's hard to say, but like, how long would it take before people stop seeing
these services if Doge was to start doging tomorrow?
I honestly can't tell, you know, I think, I think that people really doesn't, it's hard
to say now, right, because we do have the funding there.
It's just, will it actually happen?
Will the thing happen that has already been allocated?
I think we have a little bit of time, but I would expect if that congressional oomph
isn't expressed that, especially when summer reading rolls around, we'll really start to
see it because that's something that a lot of people depend on to keep their kids occupied during the summer.
And especially out in red states and rural areas, it's going to be very much like the
I never thought the leopards were going to eat my face kind of situation.
Which is sad because it's someone's kid who doesn't get to go to the library very often.
Right, right.
That sucks because it's going to be a lot of kids, especially
without those resources.
Yeah. I think about like how, like I wouldn't have survived my undergraduate without libraries.
Look, all my grad school books are super expensive, especially academic books. And like I relied
very heavily on interlibrary loan.
Yeah. And this is, you know, at the university level, to be sure, where books are very expensive.
Yeah.
But at the public and school library level, this is exactly why this is happening, is because there
is this ongoing narrative from the last few decades where people, especially queer kids,
say that the library saved their lives, young people of color saying, this is the only place
I could see myself in culture by reading these books.
So of course, of course this is happening because that,
you know, they want to take that away.
Yeah. Yeah, yeah.
Because it's a place where people can kind of exist.
Yeah.
Without that. Yeah.
So let's talk about like how can people engage to protect their libraries?
What can they do?
What are like some action items they can take? I unfortunately don't have great news. I don't think, you know, because of the way this
is working and it is so much about just like raw brute power that no one at the federal government
or even state governments for the most part seems to be able to counter. It's just like not something
they can conceive of. Yeah. Because they already are doing things that supposedly shouldn't be allowed, right?
We've already had the congressional funding,
this should have a congressional,
this is passed by Congress and yet an executive order
and Elon Musk can undo it, right?
If things were working, this wouldn't be happening.
Right.
So we are really kind of down the line a little bit
in what we can do and how effective it's going to be.
That said, there are things we can do. A lot of them are the things that liberals usually do, which is
like calling your senator over and over and over again every day and your representatives
and your state government too to make sure that your state government is paying attention
to what they're going to lose. There are certainly, you know, things one can sign on to for major library organizations. The ALA has been writing a lot and less
formal organizations than that. I think one thing that we can always be doing,
not just in this situation, but if you want to be supporting libraries, one of
the best things and easiest things you can do is go get a library card if you
don't already have one and use your damn library. There's probably something there that you want. Yeah, and that actually really does help because
libraries
Whether it's with something like imls or whether it's grants from foundations and or local funders, you know
Their local government
Are better able to make their argument for why they should be given money if they have good statistics to say
We had 10 more readers this year.
The number of books we loaned this year is higher than it's ever been.
People that are coming to our events in droves, that kind of success breeds success.
If they can show that to potential funders, they're more likely to get money.
So don't even bother to read the book.
Just check the book out, keep it for a week and give it back back You don't have time to read it. Make those numbers go up
Yeah, yeah
And you can even like it let's say you're not inclined to go to the library for whatever reason you didn't like going out
Or you worried about COVID or something like you can do most is online, right?
Like if you have Libby you can certainly you can borrow you can borrow ebooks and audiobooks from Libby
Libby, you can borrow ebooks. You can borrow ebooks and audiobooks from Libby.
Some libraries have streaming movies.
A lot of libraries have still either all online or hybrid events that you can watch rather
than having to go to the event at the library.
The one thing about some of those streaming services and Libby that I will caution about
is that your data is less secure.
If that's something you're concerned about, then it would be borrowing paper books.
Okay, that's good to know.
Because most libraries,
even in the kind of tech dystopian future we live in,
do a decent job or at least try to be good
about your borrowing data when you borrow hard copies.
But because things like Libby and the streaming services
are third party integrations,
those collect some amount of use data.
So it's absolutely great to use those, but I would caution that if you are a person who has a very high threat model
and you want to be careful about your data, go for the paper.
Okay, yeah, yeah. It's kind of nicer experience to read a paper book as well.
What about like, if people, I know lots of people who are librarians listen,
say email me, like is there a way that they can organize, which way the people are organizing,
either to prevent this or like as a way of harm reduction, right? Like as a way of reducing the
damage that the state can do to people's access to learning. Yeah, so there are a few more
radical organizations
that I think are worth paying attention to.
My favorite is Library of Freedom Project.
They're really wonderful.
Okay.
And more willing to say the thing without bullshit.
Yeah.
The thing that, you know, I would obviously urge every worker to do this,
but if your workplace is not unionized, start working on that.
Yeah.
That will always give you more power.
So you should start trying to organize your workplace? Yeah, definitely. Hopefully
Hopefully there's still time for people to do that
Who knows where that's gonna go, but you can at least try yeah, it's still legal now
Yeah, right. Why not? Why not start and like regardless of what happens like we're stronger in this together than we are apart. And the unions have done a lot to prevent fascism in the past.
And similarly, there are, depending upon what state you live in, there might be a state library organization that is active.
And that would be just a good way to make connections with other libraries near you and their librarians.
And maybe if you do lose some of your funding, you can put your heads together and use each other's resources
and have joint programming and things like that.
Mm-hmm. That makes sense.
Are people attempting, so I know some of the stuff IMLS have is like online archives,
are people attempting to somehow download that
in order to preserve it in the event that it goes away?
I don't know that that's really...
Is that not what's at threat?
That's not really what we...
Yeah, I think that there are other kind of data rescue
projects with the federal government that have better
data than that.
IMLS doesn't have that much data, so I wouldn't be too
concerned with that.
Okay, so it's more like along the workplace organizing side.
Yeah, it's definitely like trying to figure out to make how to make your and the
libraries around you keep going and offering their things to your communities
that they've been offering.
Yeah, definitely.
It would be pretty tragic.
Like there's a library not so far from my house.
I could come ride my bike to it and I go there all the time.
And it would be, be really tragic to be without that.
Yeah.
So yeah, please continue to organize your libraries.
Is there anything else that you'd like to plug or suggest people?
Like it's a pretty bleak time generally, and I think a lot of us take refuge, especially
in reading actually, because it's a way you can escape terrible things.
Is there anything else you'd like to kind of suggest for people as we dive deeper into
fascism every day at the moment?
I think in libraries and elsewhere it's just being able to offer a counter narrative, like not buying into the idea that the library is a money hole, you know?
Yeah.
It can only be valued monetarily. So when you hear that, maybe start going to your
library's board meetings. And when you hear those kinds of things said, get online for the comments and offer a different
narrative.
And you can do that all over your life in different ways.
When you hear that narrative that is monetary and neoliberal and harmful, offer a different
one.
Yeah, I think that's really good.
Like, it's so sad to think that we should have to quantify the value of everything monetarily,
but especially something like a library, like so many people have had such positive engagements
with them, which have nothing to do with the cash next to this or like generating revenue.
And that's what makes them valuable and what makes them special sometimes.
So yeah, hopefully people can advocate for that.
How would you find your library's board meeting if you wanted to?
If you have a public library near you, they should have a website and the website should
have an events page that includes board meetings, hopefully other information about your library's
board as well. And if you can't find it, maybe call up the library and ask. They'll probably
just tell you. They're really good at information there.
Yeah, yeah, that is the thing that they do.
All right, well, thank you so much for joining us, Jamie.
That was great.
It was really, really helpful.
Thanks for having me. Hey there, Ed Helms here, host of Snafu, your favorite podcast about history's greatest
screw ups.
It's the 1920s, Prohibition is in full swing, and a lot of people are mysteriously dying?
Assistant Attorney General Mabel Walker Willebrandt is becoming increasingly desperate in forcing
prohibition.
She was a lone warrior.
I mean, how could Mabel not be feeling the pressure?
Her bosses are drunks, her agents are incompetent, even Congress is full of hypocrites.
So if Mabel is going to succeed in laying down the law, she needs to make the consequences
for drinking hurt a lot more.
Which she does, arguably a little too well.
Find out more on Season 3, Episode 4 of Snafu Formula 6.
Listen and subscribe on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 2020, a group of young women in a tidy suburb of New York City found themselves in an AI-fueled nightmare. Someone was posting photos. It was just me naked. Well, not me, but me with someone else's
body parts on my body parts that looked exactly like my own.
I wanted to throw up. I wanted to scream.
It happened in Levittown, New York.
But reporting the series took us through the darkest corners of the internet
and to the front lines of a global battle against deepfake pornography.
This should be illegal, but what is this?
This is a story about a technology that's moving faster than the law and about vigilantes trying
to stem the tide.
I'm Margie Murphy.
And I'm Olivia Carville.
This is Levertown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts, Bloomberg and Kaleidoscope.
Listen to Levertown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
My husband cheated on me with two women.
He wants to stay together because he has cancer.
Should I stay?
Okay Sam, that has to be the craziest story
in OK Storytime podcast history.
Well John, that's because it's dumpin' week,
and this user writes,
my partner told me when we first got together
that he has cancer.
He's currently living with his mom
while he's in recovery
so that it takes the pressure off me
caring for both him and her baby
until he's well enough to move into our new home with us.
Is he good so far?
Well, last week we had an attempted break-in.
I asked my husband who was supposed to be at his mom's
to come over and change locks, but he wouldn't.
Then his mom told me he wasn't with her.
I went to Facebook and it took me less than an hour
to find the first two women he was cheating on me with.
Oh, what else is he lying about?
Well, one thing my paranoia just wouldn't let up
was about the cancer in his treatments.
I asked his mom about it,
who told me he doesn't have cancer.
She also informed me he was in rehab, not the hospital.
He suffered from addiction
and was trying to recover for me and our baby.
Did she leave him?
Well, to find out how the story ends,
listen and follow the OK Storytime podcast
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith.
And it's me, Harley Quinn Smith.
That's my daughter, man, who my wife has always said
is just a beardless, d***less version of me.
And that's the name of our podcast,
Beardless, D***less Me.
I'm the old one.
I'm the young one.
And every week we try to make each other laugh really hard.
Sounds innocent, doesn't it? A lot of cussing, a lot of bad language. It's for
adults only. Or listen to it with your kid. It could be a family show. We're not quite
sure. We're still figuring it out. It's a work in progress. Listen to Beardless
S***less Me on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey and welcome to A Good Happen Here. Today we're continuing our journey through
Latin American anarchism, where we last left off with a look at the anarchist history of
Uruguay. We talked about Uruguay's general history, its radical influences, anarchism's
period of popularity in the early 20th century, its radical experiments, and its cultural
influence. So today, James and I, because
James is here. Hello James.
Hi Andrew.
Today we're going to look at what Iroquois and anarchists have been up to from the 50s
onward. Paying special attention to the activity of the Federacion Anarchista Iroquois and
the idea of Especial Fismo. By the way as James just indicated I am Andrew, Andrew Sage
you can find me on YouTube as Andrewism but all that aside let's get into it.
The Federacion Anarquista Uruguaya or FAU was founded in Montevideo Uruguay in
1956. According to Paul Sharkey in the Federacion Anarchista de Uruguay, the FAU had very strong
working class roots, as many of the militants came from labour-heavy districts like El Cero,
which definitely shaped their outlook.
The FAU was also very much emphasised in direct action over electoral strategies.
It favoured armed struggle as a necessity in reaction to state
repression and economic exploitation. And the FAU had a very strong stance against Marxist
Leninism. Although some members sympathised with aspects of Marxism, many of them resisted
the bureaucratic and authoritarian tendencies that influenced that milieu. Unlike in many other Latin American countries, as you may recall us covering in the
past, anarchism persisted in mainstream relevance even after the rise of the Bolsheviks and their
influence globally, and of course the coinciding fall of the anarchists in Spain. According to
Oliver Zenzko's 65 years of revolution,
the FAU came about in a time when Uruguay's prosperity coming out of World War II had
come to an end, as its agricultural exports were no longer needed to feed the Allies'
massive standing armies. This economic downturn triggered major social unrest, which the anarchist
presence was able to spring upon. One such instance of unrest involved 150,000 workers going on strike in solidarity with their fellow workers
in a tire factory. During the strike and after, the FAU involved students, unionists, intellectuals,
community organizers and even a few exiles from the Spanish Civil War to build up a more
united labour movement.
So rather than having unions split along political, ideological affiliations like moderates, socialists,
anarchists, right populists and so on, there would be one big tent just focused on labour.
Now I personally think a big tent has its benefits and its drawbacks as with any other
strategy. I think
the benefit is obviously that it has the ability to mobilize a large number of people, but
I think the difficulty in the drawback is that having so many affiliations under that
big tent can mean that there's not really much of a shared goal left behind. Like yeah,
the anarchists want anarchy, the right populists might just want to secure some benefits and protections, and the socialists
may be interested in launching a party.
Sure, they all proclaim to have some interest on the side of the workers, but how that manifests
looks different from group to group.
But we'll see how that big tent approach turned out for the FAU. So they formed the National Confederation of Workers, or CNT, as that big tent in 1964.
But even before that, there was a split.
Not too much of a surprise.
After the Cuban Revolution, the FAU was actually divided between those who were opposed to
Castro and those who critically
supported the revolution. Those who were opposed to Castro eventually broke away from the FAU
in 1963 as Castro entrenched himself in the Soviet bloc, while those who remained in the
FAU were critical of Castro and his government but still supported the fall of Batista.
Of course, with the Cuban revolution came that very noticeable shift in American foreign
policy.
They saw that with all that happening right in their backyard, they'd need to take a
very different approach if they wanted to win the Cold War.
Such as Zayn Kalachya describes how in 1961, JFK changed the approach of the now infamous
School of the Americas from preparing for Soviet invasion to preparing for anti-communist
counter-insurgency against homegrown revolutions. So as a result, militaries across Latin America
became more right-wing and seized power for themselves to protect
civilians from the danger of their rights. In 1964, it was Brazil. In 1968, it was Peru.
In 1973, it was Chile and Uruguay fell. And in 1976, Argentina fell. As Ozenko noted,
in just over a decade, Uruguayan anarchists would become surrounded by right-wing
dictatorships which collaborated to round up and exterminate left-wing dissidents of
all flavors.
Not to mention, the economic situation wasn't exactly getting better.
According to Paul Sharkey, between 1955 and 1959, the cost of living doubled and wages did not keep pace.
By 1965, inflation was running at 100% and by 1967 at 140%. Madness.
Yeah. Well, just wait and see, Andrew.
Oh yeah, yeah. We are living in some interesting times.
Yeah. Yeah. you never know.
So the president that preceded the military dictator imposed a wage freeze and devalued
the currency.
That was his bright idea, his solution to the crisis.
So people's lives were obviously getting worse and the time had come for some decisive action.
So the CNT aided in strikes across sectors,
and even tried to call for a general strike.
As Zdenko writes, the FAU decided
that they were gonna take on a strategy
of urban guerrilla warfare.
So they tapped into a coalition of leftist groups
to robbing hood food from the corporations
to give to the poor.
Awesome.
Leftist head.
Yeah, but sadly the coalition couldn't last very long.
Differences in strategy would lead to the FAU doing its thing by building defense councils
similar to those organized in the Spanish Civil War.
Yeah, yeah, interesting.
While the other groups copied a Che Guevara style guerrilla army
approach forming the National Liberation Movement to Pomeros or the MLNT.
The existential debate among anarchists in arms is this that you've just highlighted.
Need we form authoritarian structures similar to those using for example the Cuban Revolution,
the Russian Revolution, these kind of status revolutions which characterized the left in
the 20th century in some ways? Or is it possible for us to go from our community defense and the
defense committees like the six-person groups that the CNT organized in Spain to a more egalitarian large formation,
like a truly revolutionary army. And like the split that you're talking about is a split
that almost every movement has.
Yeah. Although the MLNT wasn't necessarily anarchist.
Right. They were like following the Castro model. Is that right? Like the Che Guevara
kind of guerrilla warfare doctrine. Pretty much the Che Guevara kind of guerrilla warfare
doctrine.
Pretty much, the Guevara sort of model.
Yeah.
Although I'm glad that you bring up this point, because it's actually something that I was
writing about earlier today, in preparation for a video.
I think there's a conflation that anarchists need to be careful with between leadership in the sense of authority, as in
the right to command and control and that kind of thing, versus leadership in the sense
of guidance, advice, coordination, expertise.
Yeah.
I think that just as that you might have even, you might have an anarchist construction collective, right? And they're building a
house. You might have something like a foreman who is coordinating all the actions that all
the different builders and all the different treatment are engaging in to ensure that the
different parts of the house come together cohesively and seamlessly, that nobody's like
stepping on anybody's toes, that everything is being done in a proper timing. parts of the house come together cohesively and seamlessly that nobody's like stepping
on anybody's toes, that everything is being done in a proper time. That is an instance
where there would be coordination without necessarily having authority. It's just really
a division of labor to ensure that the task that everybody is there to accomplish can
be accomplished. And the person who is given that particular task within that
division of labor is doing so by taking on that responsibility. But just as they have
the responsibility, others will also have the responsibilities and that does not elevate
them above the other people in that association.
Right. Yeah.
And so kind of in the same way that you have that in a construction site,
I think that that is the kind of approach we need to take in a military formation,
where the person who is, you know, respected for their knowledge of military strategy,
or has the information or the expertise to be able to handle the planning of that approach, because we're all here to win, right? Yeah.
We're all here to defend our freedom and to defend the freedom of the people we love.
So there's no sense in splitting off into a bunch of different groups and failing at
our task when we can come together where necessary to engage in the coordination of our strategy
to improve the chances of our success.
And of course, there is a vulnerability in times of warfare that we do have to acknowledge of our strategy to improve the chances of our success.
And of course there is a vulnerability in times of warfare
that we do have to acknowledge because warfare historically
is one of the times that is the most ripe
for authoritarian seizure and control.
But because that vulnerability exists in those times
is when I think we have to be extra vigilant
of how that could potentially manifest.
You know, we don't sacrifice our cause and defense of the cause, you know what I'm saying?
Yeah, definitely.
Like, because it's easy to do that.
It's easy to be persuaded that this situation is unique and different and therefore we need
to accept some kind of compromise of the very essence of what we're doing.
The method that like the people I have spoken to, both those within formations today
and in Rojava and in Rojava, but also in Myanmar and those, for instance, in the iron column,
which was a five column in the Spanish civil war, they're probably most famous for leaving
the frontline to attack the cops because they felt like they didn't have enough weapons
and the cops had too many.
And what they did was they
created a concept of the minimum necessary discipline. Discipline being something that
one has for oneself, not the one thing that comes from above. And they had leaders who would lead
in times of combat, right? When we needed to make swift and decisive action, there wasn't time to
obtain consensus. They used consensus to arrive at those leaders.
Those leaders were able in times of urgency to make urgent decisions, but that didn't
confer to power or status outside of that moment.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's just like in an emergency scenario, you know, somebody is leading a surgery, for example,
or lead leading a rescue
operation, that doesn't mean that they're elevated above everybody else. It just means
that they have the knowledge and the skills to accomplish that particular task. And the
others of their own free will respect that knowledge enough to go along with what the
person is recommending.
Exactly. Yeah. And that doesn't mean that that person is inherently capable of bossing
you around.
Exactly. And I like the mention of discipline in particular, because that really is a distinction
because he will talk about, oh, you need to have military discipline. How are you supposed
to have military discipline without blind obedience to authority? And sure, we're not going to have, we're never going to
have discipline to the extent that soldiers are dehumanized and treated like cannon fodder,
as you would find in a traditional authoritarian military. But the discipline is derived from
solidarity, is derived from the responsibility people have for each other, the care people have
for each other within their formation, and the responsibility people have for each other, the care people have for each other within their formation and the responsibility they have for their own
actions as being part of that formation and for how their actions will affect those around
them.
Yeah, exactly.
I think that's something like you see it again and again when you read the column, the DeRutti
column newspaper, right?
They talk about discipline and how we have to have our discipline comes from our commitment
to our cause and to each other, not from any fear of repercussions or like quote unquote disciplinary action,
but from like the fact that we, we don't want to let our comrades down nor do we want to
let our cause down.
And like, uh, when people do do that, right, that there are, it doesn't mean that aren't
disciplinary actions, but it means that those are like, like you said before, you don't
break away from the core of what you're doing.
So they agree by consensus to include with the person who has done the thing that is
considered to be wrong, what a suitable punishment would be, or a suitable set of repercussions
would be.
So that it reinforces the idea of like consensus and like discipline coming from oneself rather
than from fear
of punishment.
Yeah, I think there is, of course, the potential for processes to potentially become, how do
I want to put this?
What I will say is, I think it's necessary, but even in engaging with those who have broken trust or who have seemingly split from the association
or have jeopardized the safety or security of the association that you find ways to deal
with those situations on a case by case basis.
That you're responsive to the particular circumstances that cause that action, that
particular outcome, rather than, as you would find in modern militaries, where you have
like a very clear, this action has this consequence, this action has this consequence, this action,
like a lot more flexibility is required, because we understand that, you know, we don't have
this matrix of crime that authorities do. We're dealing with
harm, they're dealing with crime. And so in dealing with harm, we have to approach each
of those situations in the context of their situations rather than in some sort of cold,
distant calculation. I think in approaching it in that way, people are more willing, I
think, to fess up or to take accountability for their harm because they know that there's
that relationship there that are going to try to work through it. That while there may
be many potential consequences to their actions, there's an openness to dialogue there rather
than a rigidity of this is what you did, so this is the outcome
automatically.
Yeah.
I mean, that is the latter is like a system that looks not at people, but at quote unquote
crimes, right?
And like, this is the opposite of a restorative justice system, which looks at people in the
situation say are in and not just the worst thing that they happen to have done.
We should return to South America and once again, diverted.
Yes.
Yes.
Although I feel like these digressions always gets, get to something essential
and brings out a little something extra to what I would have, you know,
prepared in advance.
So we have this split right? We had the FAU and then you had the MLNT and they did collaborate where there was common
cause but it wasn't a permanent collaboration.
You know and while this was taking place in the urban guerrilla warfare sphere, you had different
things taking place in the labour movement.
The FAU was dealing with the consequences of Big Tent organising, as they found that
the Uruguayan Communist Party or PCU had pretty successfully claimed significant influence
in the CNT.
So in response, according to Suzenko, the FAU created a rank and file alliance called
the Combative Tendency, which pushed for more militancy and less bureaucracy in the union
movement.
Through that alliance, the FAU was able to accomplish a lot more outreach and action,
but in return, the President of Uruguay introduced emergency laws executed by the military to counter the
unrest.
The revolutionary left continued to fight against the military's involvement in civilian
life and also formed a daily paper called Ipoka.
When the government was like, stop, don't do that, that's illegal.
And when the government says stop, don't do that, that's illegal.
That means they put boots on the ground and you know, read it the offices and
so the people fell apart and the groups involved went underground and
Like I said the military raided their bases
But then when the FAU was like, let's get the band back together
Unfortunately, the other groups were too scared to resurface, understandably.
And so because of that fear, the PCU kind of had a fall from Greece.
For a while, they were the big boys on campus in the CNT, but after the FAU kind of came to the forefront again in it was it all
it's bravery and stuff they kind of end up falling back and you see the PC you
had chosen to appease the military because they believed that a leftist
faction within the ranks the army might support their bid for power kind of like
what happened in the Russian Revolution yeah And so they really thought they were cooking something, but as the saying goes, the stove
was not even on.
The military saw them as pretty much insignificant.
So much so that while other leftist groups were facing severe oppression, the PCU was
actually pretty much left alone.
And so when the Union rank and file saw that and turned their backs on the PCU, they ended
up turning their focus towards the combative tendency because at least they were doing
radical and serious stuff.
And so the Unions were under attack from all sides, the police, the military, and even neo-fascist gangs.
And the FAU led combatant tendency was focused on defending these workers movements from those
threats. According to Zdenko, the FAU held a secret congress and formed their own armed wing,
the OPR 33, which unlike other guerrilla groups in the region, wasn't a top-down organisation.
Instead, individual cells had the freedom to decide how they carried out missions and
which actions they took part in.
The FAU still set the overall strategy, but it wasn't about becoming some kind of vanguard.
Some of the actions by the way, according to Sharkey, included bank robberies and factory
owner kidnappings.
It's like old school Spanish anarchism.
Yeah.
Well, there were some old school Spanish anarchists within their ranks.
Yeah.
So he really can't be surprised.
Yeah, true.
There's this wonderful line in Abel Paz's book about De Ruti that De Ruti was very fond
of children so he risked his life robbing banks to fund their education.
Oh, that's beautiful.
It's such a wonderful like that is beautiful.
I don't know. I just enjoy it very much.
The whole like you never know what direction that sentence is going to go in.
That is a quintessential example of that.
Yeah, I think. Yeah.
So, you know, you do what you have to do pretty much.
Yeah. Yeah. And like, I think it's really like, he wasn't maximalist for the sake of
maximalism. He was maximalist for the sake of like educating children. Yeah. It wasn't
it. He didn't see the violence as an end in itself.
Exactly. Exactly. It had a cause and a reason and behind it. Yeah. And the the FA was the
same way, you know, very reasoning was just that if the capitalist class is going to use force to protect their interests, then the workers should be able to use force
to defend theirs.
Yeah, yeah, Franz Fanon stuff.
And so they did what they had to do.
Meanwhile the PCU was stuck to their policy of appeasement, which actually had a detrimental
effect on the broader movement as the military kept growing in strength. And so the very anti-communist military's involvement in breaking up all the worker
activities emboldened their role in politics and then once they defeated the MLNT, with
the FAU struggling to resist, isolated by the PCUs in action, the military took on the
opportunity to coup the government, leading to the rise of Juan
Maria Borrero, the first president of the civic military dictatorship in 1973.
In the aftermath, the FAU made the tough call to move their operations to Argentina,
which hadn't yet fallen to military dictatorship. From there, they worked within the CNT to
organise a massive 15 day general strike.
It shut the country down for a time, but it wasn't enough.
And the efforts to keep up the fight were constantly undermined by the PCU, which still
insisted on negotiating instead of taking real action.
Meanwhile, the people were suffering.
According to Sharkey, between 1971 and 1976, there was a 35% fall in real wages and by
1979 inflation was running at 80% with wages limping behind at 45%.
So until 1976 the FAU continued to work between Argentina and Uruguay.
But after Argentina's coup, that was it.
The court decodes this end code directly. During the US's Operation Condor, dictatorships
across Latin America continued coordinated to kidnap, torture and murder leftists. Across
the continent, between 68,000 and 80,000 leftists were killed and more than 400,000 were placed in political prisons."
End quote.
Jesus.
And I think we need to sit with those numbers because it's very easy to hear numbers like
that and just think, you know, that's just a statistic pretty much.
We hear big numbers, our mind kind of goes statistic.
Yeah.
But to like think about the impact that would have for tens of thousands or hundreds of
thousands of people to be just taken out, whether killed or imprisoned, leaving like
a gaping hole of knowledge, of experience, of education, of radicalism.
Yeah.
A country may take decades to recover from something like that
It's a cultural death in a sense. Mm-hmm, you know, this is the political movement
But it's it's kind of similar to how
Drink cleanly some elders would be wiped out and with them all of their knowledge all of their
oral histories all their languages
Just wiped out in an instant.
Yeah.
This is different, of course, this is a political ideology as opposed to an entire culture and
ethnicity, but it's still just a massive loss of all that history, all that experience,
all that radicalism and information just gone.
Right, yeah, it's hard for a movement to recover from that.
Yeah, it's not like a genocide or like this colonial kind of, you could call it like a
decapitation, well it's like a decapitation of a movement I suppose. Well I would say it's more
than a decapitation because it's not just like notable figures that were taken out or particularly
influential thought leaders or anything, it's almost everybody. Yeah. Anybody who had that fight in them or had that radical knowledge or consciousness.
Yeah.
Anyone with any lived experience, all the things they'd learned or the mistakes
they'd made and learned from like a gone, the movement has to begin
almost from like a blank slate.
Yeah.
The history is basically raised in a sense.
So all that's left is really what they might have written down.
Yeah. Which is obviously only a small portion of what they might have had to share
with the rest of the world. Yeah, especially in a movement that's been criminalized and
pursued by the state, right? Like what they write down is what they risk the state discovering
so that they're only going to risk writing things down. Yeah. Yeah. And then, you know,
when you look at this, this, this, this didn't just happen in Uruguay, this happened all over the world. In some cases, this massive wipeout of the
anarchist movement took place even earlier, you know, in the 1900s, 1910s, 1920s. But
in all of these cases, that loss is something that we are still in a sense recovering from. We kind of had to slowly build back.
We still haven't ever reached in many places the height that anarchism was at
at certain points in its history, in certain parts of the world.
Yeah.
I mean, look at even like Spain still has very strong anarcho-syndicalist movement, right?
But like the best of the anarchists died in Aragon,
in Madrid and in concentration camps afterwards, or fighting in the Second World War. And like
it took decades for that movement to recover and it's still not as strong as it was. This
was one of the like high points.
Especially when the legacy is so much erased. You know, when you look at how histories
are taught everywhere in the world, you're barely going to get a mention of anarchism,
despite the massive role it played in shaping the 20th century, 19th and 20th centuries.
Yeah, this has been one of my constant things as a historian is that like, when people write
histories today, they write them from the perspective
of the inevitability of the state and like, I'm not alone in making this analysis, David
Graeber does it, Jim Scott did it too.
The idea is that people who exist outside of the state are behind and that they have
failed or chosen not to advance to the more advanced human existence that is the state. And Jim Scott does this in the art of not being governed, right?
Like if we look instead as people who have chosen to refuse the state, then we
understand anarchism as a choice that people would make knowing the options
available to them rather than a step backwards or failure to advance to the
state.
And we can look at the whole of history from that perspective and see it very differently, but most historians don't.
Exactly.
I'm sure you've encountered this where people just kind of assume,
oh well the anarchists lost, So that means the destined to lose
Yeah, they lost that particular fight. That doesn't mean the war's necessarily lost and
additionally
States have lost to yeah states continue to lose states state projects have lost continue to lose
You know the capitalist project capitalist businesses they lose they feel
Because you know, the capitalist project, capitalist businesses, they lose, they fail. That doesn't mean that the project is destined to lose or destined to fail.
Just means that particular iteration or that particular attempt was not able to succeed
in all its ambitions.
Yeah, and like, as historians, we shouldn't be making that judgment, right?
We should be attempting to learn from and document the past rather than to sort of categorize it into like
Failed and successful. Yeah, that too because the standards the standards of failure and success
often dictated by the
Standpoint of the status quo. Yes very much. So yeah, it's kind of like how
the Haitian revolution is spoken of
as the only successful slave revolt or one of the only successful slave revolts.
And the standard for success in that case is that they were able to establish an independent state.
Whereas other slave revolts in other parts of the world, including within the Caribbean, would have taken different paths. The Maroons, for example,
their former revolt was a withdrawal from the system that surrounded them, creating
a pocket of resistance, isolating themselves. Same thing in Brazil. We had the Quilombos,
the settlements that extracted themselves from the surrounding
oppressive structure and tried to survive to the extent that they could.
Not all of them lasted, but nothing lasts forever, you know?
Countries rise and fall.
And so I think if we limit ourselves to just the example of Haiti, particularly in the
context of success in a slave revolution.
I think we miss out on a lot of those other examples and opportunities for inspiration and guidance.
Yeah, I think you're right. I think like, it applies to lots of places. I think about it like,
you know, unfortunate to have this like background in history, but also to be with
people in their moments of revolution and to like spend time with revolutionaries
in Myanmar. And like one of the the analysis that you'll always see is that like this creation
of liberated spaces is a not enough or be like there are also places within the non-government
there and where there is still very strong control from a pseudo state, right? Like, but I think that overlooks the fact that,
yeah, there are not like, like libertarian states, but people are living their lives without gods
and masters, that they are like experiencing freedom in every moment. And they are liberated
in their own lives as they continue to struggle to liberate territory and other people.
That might be what success looks like.
Yeah.
Like they are able to be self-realized.
Yeah, just the psychological experience in itself, it cannot be under-stated or underrated.
Even if it's on that small scale of the individual, that's still valuable.
Yeah. And like, if we, if we acknowledge that, it's much harder to go back. Like those people
can't go back because they've existed in liberation, right? Like they've lived in a free way and
like, they will always know that that freedom is possible, that they can live without authority,
live without state power, that like liberation is a thing that can live without authority live with without state power that that like
liberation is a thing that can exist not just in our minds but in physical space. And like,
exactly, they will always know that like that's that's available. And if we can tell those stories,
so will other people. Exactly, exactly. Because that is something I speak speak about so often,
it's the need in the process of social revolution
to develop people's powers, drives and consciousness. You do that by giving people both theoretical
education and sharing knowledge in that sense, but also through experience. Because I have
used this phrase before, you can't put the gene back in the bottle. You can't go from experience and freedom to a situation of unfreedom and then
shrug your shoulders and think, oh, that's all there could ever be.
After you've experienced an alternative to the status quo, you're not going to
go back to thinking the status quo is all there is and all that could ever exist.
Yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
We have to remember that when we're looking at
these things, like we can wait. It's easy to look from where something ended and project that back,
but we have to understand how it felt when people were doing it too.
Exactly. So we're kind of, we kind of left on a somber chapter in the Uruguay's anarchist history,
because unfortunately it was only after the fall of Uruguay's
dictatorship in 1985 that anarchist militants were able to return to Uruguay
and re-establish the FAU in a fractured political and social landscape with
greatly reduced numbers. Some of the former anarchists involved in the FAU
created the People's Victory Party or PVP in exile, which had attempted to reorganise
resistance efforts but also fell into some Leninist tendencies. But the mainline FAU continued to
focus on grassroots organising, worker struggles and political education. It continues to be
engaged in Latin American anarchist networks, particularly with Brazilian and Argentine groups,
like the Federalist Anarchista La Coucha, the Federalist Anarchista Cabocla, the Federalist
Anarchista do Rio de Janeiro, and the Argentine organization AUCA. Despite its past radicalism,
the FAU has shifted towards a broader approach, integrating mass movements while retaining its commitment
to anti-authoritarian socialism.
Since then and up to today, their approach has aligned with the practice of Especifismo,
which it developed to rebuild their strength in Uruguayan political movements.
That approach has since been influential across Latin America and beyond, including North
America, Europe, Asia, Africa
and Oceania.
I've actually spoken about Especifismo on this podcast before and on my channel, but
to give a quick summary, Especifismo is an organizational approach guided by three key
concepts.
The first is the need for specifically anarchist organization built around a unity of ideas
and praxis.
The second is the use of the specifically anarchist organization to around a unity of ideas and praxis. The second is the use
of the specifically anarchist organisation to theorise and develop strategic, political
and organising work. And the third is active involvement in and shaping of autonomous and
popular social movements which is described as the process of social insucia.
Especifists reject the left-unity idea of a synthesis organisation of revolutionaries
or even multiple currents of anarchists loosely united because they feel it boils down to
a lowest common denominator politics. They feel that when this unity is preferred at
any cost, it leaves little room for united action or developed political discussion.
It can be described in a sense as an affinity group with a shared interest in the advancement
of a very specific political group, but they aren't just internally focused.
Especifismo is focused on building popular power as a means of revolutionary transformation,
rejecting both electoral and fancardist Marxist approaches.
So the Especifismo distinguishes between specifically anarchist political organizations
or affinity groups and broader mass movements. And they advocate for anarchists creating
the former and inserting themselves in the latter. Building up anarchist presence and
the presence of anarchist ideas in unions, in student groups and in community struggles.
So if you want a more in-depth exploration of Especialismo, I suggest reading the discussion
between Felipe Correa and Juan Carlos Mercoso called The Strategy of Especialismo on the
Anarchist Library.
And they talk about how the fragmentation of the working class under neoliberalism has
created some very distinct challenges that require fresh organizational strategies and less dog-bats
of creativity to simplistic class analysis. But they also speak for the need to coordinate
and discipline and strategically engage anarchist groups within social movements, retaining
their independence but engaging in their struggle. And they also end up in that interview discussing
the FAU's long-term strategy as a process of resistance,
rupture and reconstruction. Resistance meaning that they're strengthening grassroots organizations,
direct action and ideological development. Rupture meaning that they're breaking away from
catalyst institutions through revolutionary action. And reconstruction meaning that they're
establishing new social relations based on self-management and mutual aid. It's kind of similar to the way that I break down social revolution conceptually
as an approach that incorporates both opposition and the proposal of alternatives.
So I have been thinking about Especifismo lately. I made that video many years ago and
my anarchist understanding has shifted a lot, especially recently. In
going back and looking at how I would have analysed things previously, I think there's
some different directions that I might take certain things in. I think for example, the
idea of affinity groups engaging in social insertion is extremely valuable in shifting the conversation within
these mass movements. But I also think that there's a risk in the ways in which Especifismo,
if not properly understood or conceptualized, could end up opening ground for co-optation
towards some rather unanarchist outcomes. What I mean by that is, I think it's important when discussing Especifismo to be very careful
against the interpretation of it as some kind of vanguard, a strategy or way to dictate
a vision of anarchy.
I think that even if somebody's taken the Especifist approach in creating an affinity
group organized around a very specific form of anarchism. That group
should still be in conversation with different tendencies and engaging in an ongoing process
of critique and convergence of ideas. I believe this was the sort of motivation between Malatesta's
idea of synthesis and the S federation in anarchist history.
I'll still learn a bit about that.
But anyway, I'd love to hear about what the FVU and other anarchists need to acquire up
to here now.
You know, they can feel free to reach out to me.
I have a website now, andrewsage.org, and I wish them all power to all the people.
That's it for me today.
You can find me on YouTube and Patreon, and this has been It
Could Happen Here.
Peace. Hey there, Ed Helms here, host of Snafu, your favorite podcast about history's greatest
screw ups.
It's the 1920s, Prohibition is in full swing and a lot of people are mysteriously dying.
Assistant Attorney General Mabel Walker Willebrand
is becoming increasingly desperate
in forcing prohibition.
She was a lone warrior.
I mean, how could Mabel not be feeling the pressure?
Her bosses are drunks, her agents are incompetent,
even Congress is full of hypocrites.
So if Mabel is going to succeed in laying down the law,
she needs to make the consequences for drinking hurt
a lot more. Which she does, arguably a little too well. Find out more on Season 3 Episode 4 of
Snafu Formula 6. Listen and subscribe on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 2020, a group of young women in a tidy suburb of New York City found themselves in an AI-fuelled nightmare.
Someone was posting photos.
It was just me naked. Well, not me, but me with someone else's body parts on my body parts that
looked exactly like my own.
I wanted to throw up. I wanted to scream.
It happened in Levittown, New York.
But reporting the series took us through the darkest corners of the internet
and to the front lines of a global battle against deepfake pornography.
This should be illegal, but what is this?
This is a story about a technology that's moving faster than the law
and about vigilantes trying to stem the tide.
I'm Margie Murphy.
And I'm Olivia Carville.
This is Levertown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts, Bloomberg and Kaleidoscope.
Listen to Levertown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
My husband cheated on me with two women.
He wants to stay together because he has cancer.
Should I stay?
Okay Sam, that has to be the craziest story
in OK Storytime podcast history.
Well John, that's because it's dumpin' week
and this user writes,
my partner told me when we first got together
that he has cancer.
He's currently living with his mom while he is in recovery
so that it takes the pressure off me caring for both him
and her baby until he's well enough
to move into our new home with us.
So far.
Well, last week we had attempted break-in.
I asked my husband who was supposed to be at his mom's
to come over and change locks, but he wouldn't.
Then his mom told me he wasn't with her.
I went to Facebook and it took me less than an hour
to find the first two women he was cheating on me with.
Oh, what else is he lying about?
Well, one thing my paranoia just wouldn't let up
was about the cancer and his treatments.
I asked his mom about it,
who told me he doesn't have cancer.
She also informed me he was in rehab, not the hospital.
He suffered from addiction
and was trying to recover for me and our baby.
Did she leave him?
Well, to find out how the story ends,
listen and follow the OK Storytime podcast
on the iHeart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith.
And it's me, Harley Quinn Smith.
That's my daughter, man, who my wife has always said is just a beardless, d***less version
of me.
And that's the name of our podcast, Beardless, D***less Me.
I'm the old one.
I'm the young one.
And every week we try to make each other laugh really hard.
Sounds innocent, doesn't it?
A lot of cussing, a lot of bad language. It's for adults only. Or listen to it with your kid. Could
be a family show. We're not quite sure. We're still figuring it out. It's a work in progress.
Listen to Beardless, me on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
Welcome to Good Appen here, a podcast where I last left RFK Jr. on the proclamation that
if he was to take off his millions will die and all evidence suggests that I am going
to be right about this.
I am your host Mia Wong.
With me is Gar.
Hello.
He's making the meme come true.
He's making the millions, millions must die.
I, we're really, really, really truly only the white man could make
real unlimited genocide in the first world. It's great. It's great stuff. So this is going to be
a recap episode of not even all like some of the stuff RFK Jr has done since since he's gotten
confirmed as the fucking United States is
Secretary of Health and Human Services a
organization which includes so many things but like for example the NIH the CDC
FDA I believe yeah many many things so okay there are lots and lots and lots of different rounds of
budget cuts That are happening and grant cuts from a whole bunch of different departments and agencies. We're going
to start with the National Institutes of Health cutting a whole bunch of studies for vaccines for
new diseases. So, RFK Junior's thing was, well, we're not going to fund any COVID research because COVID is
over.
So no more research into COVID vaccine treatments.
We're not going to fund that.
Now obviously COVID is like not over.
Trivially obviously you catch it and it makes you sick and sometimes you die and sometimes
you get debilitating long-term negative house outcomes.
But this is the logic that they're using to just be like, no, fuck it, fuck it.
We'll cut all of the funding that we can find that does this stuff.
Now, the problem again, and so these cuts look a lot like the very beginning of the Trump administration,
where they were just going through and like, you'd get a list of grants that got cut in in the sense that like they're like control effing programs right and they're like
searching for keywords and then just killing all the block grants that do that well we'll get more
into this at the end of the episode with like a different set of cuts but one of the one of the
big issues with this is that it's it's killing coronavirus research in general. Like, all of it is getting massive cuts.
And so this includes, I think, CMBC, as you're putting on this,
killing a bunch of fairly late-stage research on things like,
you know, like actually having vaccines that could work across
the broad category of coronaviruses,
because obviously there are a whole bunch of different kinds of coronaviruses because like obviously there are there are a
whole bunch of different kinds of coronaviruses and there are certain sort
of vaccine techniques that can work to suppress like the families of them and
fucking I don't know maybe maybe maybe the Europeans or the Chinese will
figure out how to do that because it sure as fuck isn't gonna be us after we
cut all this fucking funding it's great so all right we're starting sort of, I guess, on the vaccine
beat here because there's so many different kinds of bullshit. One of the other really
big things that happened is Dr. Mark Peters, who was the guy who like did Operation Warp
Speed, which was Trump's like big push to get a COVID vaccine now. And this is something
I think is worth highlighting.
And again, this guy like worked under Trump, right?
A lot of some of these programs we're talking about later were Trump programs.
But Trump won.
I mean, like Trump did do some anti-vax shit and say some anti-vax shit,
but he wasn't like a hardline anti-vaxxer.
Definitely not. No. Yeah.
At many points, he tried to take credit himself for the fast response of the code vaccine, which, hey, as long as we get the vaccine, do whatever you want, buddy.
And the amount that that's been like memory hold and like you're trying to like just alter alter history regarding the code vaccine is a little a little head scratching.
the COVID vaccine is a little a little head scratching.
It gives me that like just slow growing headache that I'm experiencing every day nearly all the time.
Just not due to COVID,
because I've actually to my knowledge never gotten it,
but it is a headache of political origin.
Yeah, and I think one of the interesting elements of this
is something that I talked about more like
In the wake of like the immediate wake of 2020 like 2012-2022 There used to be a big split in the Republican Party between like the lab leakers and the anti-vaxxers
Because the thing about being a lab leak person is that like you can't be a trying to release the bioweapon person who also
Thinks that the vaccine is evil, or at
least you shouldn't be able to that those are like mutually. It took years, it legitimately
this this is enough cognitive dissonance that even like the Alex Jones types, it took years
for them to sort of like, develop a level of cognitive dissonance that allowed them
to do this, they did do it eventually. And what we're seeing right now, right is like,
Trump as a way of sort of shirring up his anti vaccine flank has just like handed control over all public health policy to these just like,
hideous anti vaccine, like cranks. And so Peter Marx, who was like, one of the
big guys from Trump one and you know, who stayed on through Biden who was like,
yeah, okay, I'm gonna fucking get this vaccine to work. He has been forced to
resign. And Marx also was the guy who was in charge
of vaccine safety in the US, right? And he's forced out and he said in a statement for CNN,
I mean, you can read the whole thing somewhere, but quote, it has become clear that truth and
transparency are not desired by the secretary. This is RFK Jr. But rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and
lies. So that's good. That's that's that's the guy who used to be in charge of our country's
vaccine safety going like, yeah, this guy wanted me to just fucking lie about vaccines constantly.
So that's great. That's fun. So before we get into the people who he's also he's bringing in to do
his like, unbelievably fake hack bullshit vaccine study stuff
We should talk a bit about the measles outbreak in Texas now the reason that this isn't getting more coverage is that this is going to get a
Really significant amount of coverage on this show in the near future when when those episodes are done
This is going to get significant coverage for now
What I think is sort of important about this is that so there's been an outbreak of measles,
which like there should not be outbreaks of measles. We have defeated measles. We have the
vaccine, you can take it. It's part of the MMR vaccine, you take it and then you don't get
measles. But there are massive, you know, like communities who are fucking not vaccinating.
And as like in large part because of the fucking anti vaccine shit that's being spread by people like RFK Junior and faced with this RFK Junior has done a bunch of unbelievably mealy mouth bullshit about personal choice to do vaccines, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
And then also did a whole thing about how he was going to have the government sends vitamin A to like combat measles, which is just
nonsense, right? Like, so this is obviously just a complete fucking fiasco. We're going to cover
this more as it goes on. Yeah, so stay tuned for more measles horrors. Yeah, what the other thing
we're not going to cover because it's going to be covered by these
products and services are these advertisements.
I would love to talk more about them.
We're still trying to get that hims and eventually that thems sponsorship, but we're getting
closer.
We're getting closer.
Getting closer. We are back.
Now what we are not coming closer to is finding a connection between vaccines and autism because
there isn't one.
It's all fake.
However, come on, people who I don't believe this include RFK Jr.
So RFK Jr. has been doing something.
Okay, it's genuinely a little bit unclear who exactly
is running this, whether this is like, like the Department of Health and Human Services
is like a broader organization or just the CDC, but he's trying to set up a bunch of
people to like, basically cook the books and try to publish some shit that shows a link
between vaccines and autism.
It's genuinely deeply murky and unclear as to who's doing what right now
But one of the people who's been brought in to do this is David gear who is oh god. Oh boy
I mean even by the standards of
Guy whose job it is to like cook evidence to make it look like there's a connection between vaccines and autism even by their standards gear is like an absolute fucking hack
So we talked about Angie Wakefield on this show and there is weirdly awake feel connection here, too
so wake feels the doctor who originally cooked up like a connection between the MMR vaccine and
Autism gear is from like a slightly different faction of these cranks
and this is the fashion this work that's like the most closely aligned with RFK janks. And this is the faction that's more that's like the most closely aligned with RFK Jr.
And this is the faction that thinks that like weird methyl mercury or whatever the fuck
in some older vaccines was causing autism, which like no, it wasn't.
But he you know, he and his dad, Mark here like did a whole bunch of work to try to sort
of establish this evidence.
I'm going to read this from NBC, just describing their work.
Quote, the Geers conducted research from a makeshift laboratory in their carpeted wood
paneled suburban Maryland basement.
So they're doing this shit from their basement.
Published several studies, many of which were retracted and promoted an unproven treatment for autism that cost families tens of thousands and dollars
and included injections of lupron a
drug used for prostate cancer and early puberty in
Children it's only approved for precocious puberty and comes with side effects including bone damage heart issues and seizures
approved for precocious puberty and comes with side effects including bone damage, heart issues, and seizures. They diagnosed kids with precocious puberty without proper testing and misled parents
into thinking they were signing up for an approved autism therapy. A 2011 Maryland Board of Physicians
investigation found the gears violated standards of care. So to back up for a second, right? A,
they claimed that mercury in vaccines is causing autism
B they claim to be able to treat it with puberty
here
Autism with a puberty blocker. Yes
Just an awesome extremely funny given like, you know all of the these people are like, you know
What trying to ban puberty blockers now give it to them. That's that's fine
We're gonna cure autism by giving all these autistic kids puberty blockers now. I'll give it to them. That's that's fine. We're gonna cure autism by giving all these autistic kids
Puberty blockers and making them trans
Sure sure let's go for it. Let's give that a shot
I'm sure I'm sure that won't create a whole new problem for them. Yeah, yeah that uh that bone damage thing isn't real
But that's fine. Yeah, unfortunately
this is one of the other problems with this is like
But that's fine. Yeah, unfortunately. This is one of the other problems with this is like
You get a lot of sources that are just fucking making shit up about these fucking diseases to be fair I also am probably I'm unfamiliar with this exact
Hubarty suppressant. Yeah, I don't think the bronze but in general. Yeah
Bonamish the bone density loss. Yeah blockers is
Mostly mostly negligible.
So again, this guy is like, I found the cure for autism and it's puberty blockers.
Very funny. You know, I do know a lot of autistic people that have gotten, how do I say this,
they've seemed more comfortable once they've transitioned, I guess I'll say it like that. Uh huh. Uh huh. Look, I...
Being on the right puberty blocker is better for an autistic kid than going through puberty
if you are trans.
Oh, yes.
But, come on!
This is...
Well, but this also shows how, like, the attack on puberty blockers for, you know, quote-unquote
trans minors is completely nonsense because these drugs have been used for cis children
to cease early onset puberty.
These are fully reversible.
Yeah.
These are used for cis children.
It's used by these like hacks and weirdos to quote unquote cure autism.
Yeah.
By these same people as an autism cure for the vaccines.
Oh my God.
Even though these are the same like drugs, these quote unquote like
chemical castration drugs, as Matt Walsh would put it, are, you know, now trying to be banned for trans children. So, you know, hypocrisy
always, always, always matters. It's always, it's always important to point out their hypocrisy
because that's how we win. So here, this is one, one more step towards victory.
Garrison, Garrison, listen, pointing out hypocrisy is important because morale is a terrain of struggle. It makes you feel good and that's a little bit important
Average john stewart post but okay, let's continue
So his father mark gear who he was doing a bunch of this research wish was short of his medical license now david gear actually amazingly
Who he was doing a bunch of this research with was short of his medical license now David gear actually amazingly
Amazingly was not sure to his medical license at Gerson Do you want to guess why he wasn't sure to his medical license? He didn't have one
Fucking have one
So instead instead he was prosecuted for doing this shit without a medical license
He also doesn't have a medical degree. He has like a gets like a liberal arts. Okay, okay that
He also doesn't have a medical degree. He has like a liberal arts degree. Okay, okay. That rules. These liberal arts students are giving our kids transgender hormones many such cases.
He's like the only person I've ever seen who actually genuinely did do like dangerous and unauthorized like fucking like medical
like unauthorized medical experiments on on children with puberty blockers like
he's the only one yeah this is the first instance I've like heard of like mass
unethical use of puberty suppressing drugs it's a fucking anti-vaxxer this is
the guy they're bringing in to like to cook up a connection between vaccines and autism
using like fucking bears data or whatever. So investigative journalist
Brian Deer, who is I think probably most famous to people who've watched like an
age bomber guy video as the guy who brought down distraight sex doctor to
Angie Wakefield. Deer like also wrote about this guy, like in his like
unbelievably dogshit study about
So so he publishes like an unbelievably dogshit study about like the the mercury and vaccines causes autism
Whatever the fuck and it gets basically like immediately obliterated the moment autism like activists discover it and they're like
Holy fucking shit like these people are evil. I'm going to read a quote from Brian Deer's article about it.
One of Miss Siddel's that that's the person who I like the the the the autism like advocate
activists who like discovered this stuff.
One of her complaints concerning the gears apparent institutional review.
The seven member IRB institutional review board consists of Mark and Dave Gere, Dr. Gere's wife, two of his
business associates, and two mothers of autistic children, one of whom has publicly acknowledged
that her son is the patient slash subject of Dr. Gere, and the other whom is a plaintiff in three
pending vaccine injury claims. So the IRB, right, this is like an ethical sort of review board
thing that you're supposed to go through to get your studies approved. So the IRB right, this is like an ethical sort of review board thing that you're supposed to go through to get your studies approved.
So the IRB for the study again is these two guys, his dad's fucking wife, two of the business
associates and the mothers of two autistic children who think that vaccines cause autism
and are like one of whom is in a lawsuit about it.
And the other one is taking the fucking puberty blockers to try to cure the autism So this is the guy who is being brought in to do the book cooking is a guy with no medical license
No medical degree
Who had to retract his papers because they were bullshit
Yeah, also and this is something that that's common between him and our fk juniors all these people they think that like
I mean, this is gonna be relevant when we get to the sort of HIV AIDS. Part of this is that these people think that
diseases are caused by malnutrition and not by, you know, like diseases. And they think
that you can treat them with just being healthy instead of like vaccines. And you know, this
is, this is their worldview, right? These people are sort of eugenicists. This is also
why they like, one of the reasons why they fucking hate autism so much
is that they're just, you know, just on a sort of political level.
Like that's just, that's just sort of, that's just what their ideology is.
Imagine how many skilled drone pilots they're gonna lose. It's really gonna backfire on them. Ah, I just...
Womp womp.
Or, or, we will see.
Speaking of womp womp, here's some ads.
Alright, we're back.
Let's hear more about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The second Kennedy to have a hole in his head.
But this one's from a worm.
Wow.
Okay, so let's talk about the last group of things here,
which is another series of massive budget cuts
that they're doing.
This is another thing where they have a giant
list of grants that they're fucking cutting. This is another like anti-DEI. And so, you know,
there's a lot of the things that I guess you would expect from one of these like you can only study
white people ones. So like, there are a whole bunch of programs in this list of like grants
that they're cutting that are like studying, you know, racism in medicine and like the the differing
medical outcomes between like people of different races because they're getting different levels of medical care and because of the the environments that they're
in.
And this is all stuff that like, you know, these people do not want there to be research
demonstrating that like racism exists in the medical system, because it's it's just extremely
bad for there just to be objective evidence that there is racism and that it's bad and that it kills people.
So another very bleak thing that I haven't seen much coverage of is that a lot of these
grants were funding research into trans health care and also the effects of like violence
against trans people and things like mental health.
There's you know, and this is also something that's devastating because like, like the state of trans medicine, it's like, we know
things that are safe and we know things that work, which is just letting people transition.
But also there's so much more stuff that we need in terms of like hormone regimes that
like work better, right. And things like that. And also like, you know, I'm just sort of
like basic health outcome stuff. And yeah, these people do not want anyone to know exactly how bad their fucking transphobia is affecting the people that they're inflicting it on. And so yeah, they're like, fuck it, we'll just get rid of all these people's funding. There's also a whole bunch of stuff that has to do with COVID. I'm just going to read the description of
one of the fucking grants they cut to give you a sense of like the shit that
they're cutting. Development of a handheld rapid air sensing system to
monitor and quantify SARS-CoV-2 and aerosols in real time, which is actually
would be an unbelievably useful thing, right? Like a system that could detect
fucking COVID like aerosols like in real time and tell you that there's fucking COVID
in the air? Staggeringly useful. They don't fucking want it. One of the big things that they cut is
like, you know, we're talking about this with sort of like cutting my programs that study structural
racism in medicine. They basically went on a like a county by county basis and found every single
grant, like state by state, county by county, city by city, every single grant that talks about studying the effects of COVID on non-white people.
You know, and they're doing this.
I think people have forgotten about this, but one of the things that R.F.K.
Jr. said, like, I think this is during the campaign, was he had this giant rant about
how COVID was like specifically targeted to leave Chinese people and Jews alive, which is great.
That is how he put it.
Someone should probably report that to Trump's anti-Semitism task force.
Yeah, yeah.
You know, hall monitor, whatever.
No one cares anymore.
Yeah, I mean, they're just, you know, so they're just trying to destroy all the stuff.
They've also just like in blocks, just like got rid of
every single fucking thing that was funding like any program that was like mental health
care as a block thing. They're just cutting all of it. So that's going to make everyone
extra even more normal than we already fucking are.
See, actually, I agree with this because this is the one thing where I think the lifestyle
choice thing does matter, because I just read yaoi when I'm sad and it fixes me.
And if everyone does that, I think we don't need any of these other mental health services.
What are you doing? You're manic, though.
Read more yaoi.
You can read a lot more.
It's a one-size-fits-all solution.
Because famously, the yaoi reading demographic, the most mentally stable and normal population.
God.
One of the other ones that's unbelievably concerning is again, like county by county
going through and cutting funding for like things that promote child vaccination.
They are systemically trying to cut off kids
from getting vaccines and they're trying to get rid of anything that opposes like their
efforts to try to convince everyone to like all parents to fucking not have your kids
get vaccines. They also cut a whole bunch of grants for rapid disease response, which
is great. We'll get to the exact reason why that's like so fucking terrifying in a second in the like very, very immediate term.
They also have killed an unbleak 145 grants for HIV. And this is a whole bunch of different HIV programs. They are killing funding for distributing and getting people to use PrEP, which is a pill that like massively helps prevent HIV infections, especially if you are a trans woman and you are having sex, like you should get on PrEP, which is a pill that massively helps prevent HIV infections, especially if you are a trans woman and you are having sex, you should get on PrEP.
Or a twink, I will say.
Thank you.
Yeah.
The uptake rates for trans women are specifically lower, which is the thing that we know because
we have these fucking funding and we're not going to have that shit anymore because they're
cutting all the fucking funding for these fucking research programs.
I sometimes do forget that there are trans women with different, like, lived, like, sexual
backgrounds than me.
Because coming out of Twink culture, it's like ingrained.
Like your co-host who permanently has only ever come out of lesbian culture.
Yes, no, because in Twink culture, prep is uh is ingrained pretty hard at this point
Yeah, well I say it's ingrained in a lot of places
But there's places where it isn't and those places are where things go very very bad very quickly
Which is why obviously they're they're yeah
Eliminating the fucking research for this because they want to fucking kill queer people like they think they think that HIV is a fucking lifestyle choice
RFK jr. Part particular things is because of poppers
Which is now leading to the poppers raids. Yeah alert everybody red alert
Yeah, it's it's getting pretty scary out there. So it's it's really fucking bleak
I mean they've cut you know
I mean they're trying to just fucking get rid of this because these people are just fucking unhinged virulent homophobes and transphobes and
Yeah, they want to fucking cut these programs because they think it'll hurt us
They've also laid off the entire office of infectious diseases and HIV AIDS policy staff
Is that bad? Oh, it's bad. Here's the first CBS
I yeah, so they do a child they're really other groups of the childhood vaccination. They also run the fucking national vaccine program, which nobody knows what's going to
happen to it now. Because again, the thing that was supposed to run it, it's just fucking gone.
So who the fuck knows what's happening with that now? They are probably going to just completely
destroy Trump's like giant Trump actually in his first term had a giant program to like end HIV that
like kind of did stuff because it was someone else's program that Trump just kind of implemented.
We're getting so close to the HIV vaccine.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And, you know, and so who fucking knows it's probably just completely fucked.
Yeah, this is going to have just unbelievably hideous consequences on millions and millions
of people and they that's not even that they don't give a shit it's that they think it's cool and funny and based when
people like us fucking die now on the other hands the rest of the u.s population is about to run
into the same fucking thing that all of these stupid ass bankers thought which is that oh trump
will just fuck with the queers and leave us alone no we're going to close in the same place that i
closed the last time i talked about fucking rfk jr which is the fucking bird flu which is that he wants the solution to the bird flu is he wants to fucking let it rip
and he just wants to just like
Be like oh we can just like take the birds to survive the bird flu and we'll just let the we'll just let it spread and
Just use those ones and those ones will be healthy now
So thing about this bird flu right is that it kills within three to four days
Immunologist Matt Coase in Scientific America's describes how this thing again within three to four days. Immunologist Matt Coase in Scientific America describes how this thing, again,
within three to four days has a 90 to 100 percent kill rate.
So, you know, you can't just do this, right,
because it'll just it just fucking kills all the birds.
He doesn't want to fucking vaccinate the birds,
which is the thing that, like, if you want to stop this,
but this this fucking pandemic from spreading, you need to do it.
Right.
And once again, I need I need to emphasize enough that when I when I talk
to virologists about this, they said that letting the bird flu rip through all the
fucking bird populations, right, just letting it fucking spread, letting it kill
everything until you only have the ones that like didn't die is if you were like
trying to cook up conditions, like field conditions specifically to try to get to
develop a mutation to spread to humans
this is what you would do is you just let it fucking spread uncontrolled and kill everything
so this is what we're doing at the same time as again anti-vaxxers are fucking running the running
our fucking vaccine services as we are cutting the staff of cutting cutting the grant funding
for for people who do response to rapid response to emerging diseases as we are cutting the grant funding for people who do rapid response to emerging diseases as we are cutting the fucking entire
policy staff for the Office of Infectious Diseases. They are
building a fucking pandemic. And all these fucking people think
that COVID was fucking cooked up in a lab and what they are
doing is like they are now doing the thing they are accusing
everyone else of doing, which is they are fucking attempting to
implement a policy to cook up a fucking play in a lab.
Except it's not going to be in a lab, it's going to be in America's fucking factory farms, and we are all going to suffer the consequences of it.
Well, I assume you saw the the the statement from Cantor analysts on Monday, the Wall Street investment firm.
This founder was like a really was a really big Trump donor was on the inauguration committee, but two of two of their analysts
put out a statement today calling to reevaluate RFK jr. As
Secretary of Health and Human Services calling out his quote-unquote apparent anti-science and libertarian agenda
Saying it will put people's lives in jeopardy to advance a discredited theory on vaccines
Look, I will say this like there are a lot of risks in the Trump coalition saying it will put people's lives in jeopardy to advance a discredited theory on vaccines.
Look, I will say this, like, there are a lot of rifts in the Trump coalition.
RFK Jr. and his people cannot fucking be allowed to run these institutions.
They need to be fucking run out now.
If we do not do this now, millions of people are going to die.
I have been saying this. I am going to continue to say this because
you can see in real time all of the things that are going to lead to all of these people fucking dying. And, you know, his position is not incredibly secure in this
coalition, right? Like, yeah, there are lots of sectors of capital who don't want the entire
fucking population of the United States to die in a plague.
Yeah, after Carl's grandson's resignation, tourist analysts also put out a statement advocating for vaccine use and specifically
against RFK Jr. and his vaccine rhetoric.
Biotech investors also spread similar anti RFK Jr. rhetoric over the weekend following
Mark's resignation.
So yeah, go fucking I don't know.
I don't know exactly which public official you pressure or who you go scream at to try
to get rid of this guy before you fucking gets us all killed. But go do that. I don't know exactly which public official you pressure or who you go scream at to try to get rid of this guy before you'd fucking
Get us all killed but go do that. I don't know go harass or like legislator or whatever or like find
Find the nearest person who can can can be yelled at who will convey this
Stand outside your local CDC office with a sign and protest the CDC
The hospitals are empty. It's fake. Oh god
the CDC the hospitals are empty it's fake oh god and on that note getting us yet another fucking one of those actually do they even do the misinformation
labels anymore unlike Spotify and shit and like YouTube oh of course not oh god
we lost we lost the elections not it's not happening. Uhhhh, wow. Truth and reasonable list lost the election, sorry.
Not we.
So, alright, yeah, this is the spitting catapult here.
Get this guy out of office before we all fucking die in a plague.
Again. Hey there, Ed Helms here, host of Snafu, your favorite podcast about history's greatest
screw ups.
It's the 1920s, prohibition is in full swing,
and a lot of people are mysteriously dying?
Assistant Attorney General Mabel Walker Willebrand
is becoming increasingly desperate in forcing prohibition.
She was a lone warrior.
I mean, how could Mabel not be feeling the pressure?
Her bosses are drunks, her agents are incompetent,
even Congress is full of hypocrites.
So if Mabel is going to succeed in laying down the law, she needs to make the consequences
for drinking hurt a lot more.
Which she does, arguably a little too well.
Find out more on season 3, episode 4 of Snafu Formula 6.
Listen and subscribe on the iHeart Radio app, Apple
Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 2020, a group of young women in a tidy suburb of New York City found themselves in
an AI-fueled nightmare.
Someone was posting photos.
It was just me naked.
Well, not me, but me with someone else's body parts on my body parts that looked exactly like my own.
I wanted to throw up. I wanted to scream.
It happened in Levittown, New York.
But reporting the series took us through the darkest corners of the internet
and to the front lines of a global battle against deep fake pornography.
This should be illegal, but what is this? This is a story about technology that's moving faster
than the law and about vigilantes trying to stem the tide. I'm Margie Murphy. And I'm Olivia Carville.
This is Levertown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts, Bloomberg and Kaleidoscope. Listen to Levittown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
My husband cheated on me with two women.
He wants to stay together because he has cancer.
Should I stay?
Okay Sam, that has to be the craziest story in OK Storytime podcast history.
Well John, that's because it's Dumpin' Week and this user writes,
my partner told me when we first got together
that he has cancer.
He's currently living with his mom while he is in recovery
so that it takes the pressure off me caring for both him
and her baby until he's well enough
to move into our new home with us.
So far.
Well, last week we had attempted break-in.
I asked my husband who was supposed to be at his mom's
to come over and change locks, but he wouldn't.
Then his mom told me he wasn't with her.
I went to Facebook and it took me less than an hour
to find the first two women he was cheating on me with.
Oh, what else is he lying about?
Well, one thing my paranoia just wouldn't let up
was about the cancer and his treatments.
I asked his mom about it,
who told me he doesn't have cancer.
She also informed me he was in rehab, not the hospital.
He suffered from addiction
and was trying to recover
for me and our baby.
Did she leave him?
Well, to find out how the story ends,
listen and follow the OK Storytime podcast
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith.
And it's me, Harley Quinn Smith.
That's my daughter, man, who my wife has always said
is just a beardless, d***less version of me.
And that's the name of our podcast,
Beardless, D***less Me.
I'm the old one. I'm the old one.
I'm the young one.
And every week we try to make each other laugh really hard.
Sounds innocent, doesn't it?
A lot of cussing, a lot of bad language.
It's for adults only.
Or listen to it with your kid.
Could be a family show.
We're not quite sure.
We're still figuring it out.
It's a work in progress.
Listen to Beardless, D***less Me on the iHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever.
You get your podcast.
Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is It Could Happen Here.
I'm Garrison Davis.
Today I'm joined by James Stout.
This episode is going to be about ice actions against students, scholars, and professors
around the country and this wave of deportations targeting people engaged in pro-Palestine speech,
protest, as well as some individuals who have been roped up in this new wave of deportations
who have not publicly engaged in Palestine activism. Let's start on the evening of Saturday,
March 8th. Mahmoud Khalil and his wife were returning home from dinner when plain clothes
ice agents followed the couple into their campus apartment building at Columbia University. Mahmood Khalil and his wife were returning home from dinner when plain clothes ICE agents
followed the couple into their campus apartment building at Columbia University.
A man wearing a Marvel graphic tee arrested Khalil for then unknown reasons and threatened
to arrest Khalil's wife, who is eight months pregnant and an American citizen.
When Khalil's wife brought his green card from their apartment, she says one of the
ICE agents placed a phone call, informing someone Khalil was a permanent resident, to
which the person on the phone replied, let's bring him in anyway.
You're going to be under arrest.
Turn around, turn around, turn around, turn around.
Stop resisting.
Okay, okay, he's not resisting.
He's giving me his phone, okay?
I understand, he's not resisting.
Put your arm around.
There's no use for this.
Don't worry about it. Don't be happy. Okay? I understand. He's not resisting.
Put your arm around. There's no need for this.
Don't worry about it.
You're gonna have to come with us.
I'm coming with you. Don't worry.
No, you're doing a good thing. No one's having a hard time.
You don't have to throw anything for it.
You guys really don't need to be doing all of that.
It's fine. Maybe it's fine.
How do we keep the devil from speaking?
Call Amy. She'll be fine.
Okay.
During the arrest, Khalil's lawyer, Amy Greer, spoke on the phone with one of the ICE agents,
who said that they were acting on State Department orders to revoke Khalil's student visa.
Greer reiterated to the agents that Khalil was in fact a permanent resident with a green
card, but the ICE agent just responded by saying they were revoking the green card instead.
Khalil's a graduate student who has been studying at Columbia for over two years.
Last year, Khalil emerged as a visible figure in the college encampment protests, becoming a public spokesperson and a lead negotiator on behalf of Columbia University
apartheid, Divest. Though never being arrested, Khalil faced harassment from right-wing Zionist doxing
campaigns calling for his deportation.
And when ICE did come for Khalil, disappearing him to a detention facility in Louisiana and
cutting him off from communication with his wife and lawyer, throughout all of this, he
was not charged with any crime.
Instead, ICE and the State Department are using a rarely used Cold War-era immigration
statute that gives the Secretary of State the power to exclude or deport any non-citizen
of the United States if there are quote, reasonable grounds to believe that an individual's entry,
proposed activities, presence, or activities in the United States would have quote, potentially
serious, adverse foreign policy consequences.
Yeah, that was the one that like, I remember at the time you and I were discussing this
like in our group chat and we were trying to work out like how the Secretary of State
could be revoking a green card.
And I think you found this or you found it somewhere in it.
The Trump administration has been very, very good at finding very obscure pieces of law
that it can wield against migrants, right?
No one in 2016 would have foreseen what they did with Title 42, which is a public health
law.
And they're doing something similar here.
I mean, they may have spent the last four years looking for these things, especially
when the campus protests began.
But this is entirely unprecedented as far as I'm aware.
And right after this happened, we discussed how this case was probably going to be used
as a testing ground for employing these tactics on a more widespread scale, creating legal
precedent.
And sure enough, Khalil's case was not an outlier.
This was just the first public instance of the Trump administration's directed targeting
of students they believed to be associated with protests against Israel and its actions
in Gaza.
And this wave of actions by ICE had actually already begun before Khalil's arrest.
The day before Khalil was arrested, ICE agents knocked on the door of PhD student Rajani
Srinivasan, who a few days prior was suddenly notified that her student visa had been revoked.
When ICE agents knocked, she did not answer the door.
The next day, ICE showed up again to her Columbia University apartment.
Srinivasan was not home, but upon hearing of Khalil's arrest just a few hours later,
she decided to quickly collect some belongings and flee to Canada.
Five days later, when ICE returned to her residence, but this time with a warrant,
Trina Vassin was already gone.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem praised this as quote-unquote,
self-deportation.
Yeah, they talk about this a lot.
Like, self-deportation is definitely one of their goals.
They talked about it before
Trump even came into power. Like that's what we're seeing a lot of these spectacle raids
and like spectacle deportations.
Scare tactics.
Yeah, exactly. The desires that people leave. Is she a Canadian citizen or like?
I don't believe so. No. Okay. It was just the fastest flight from LaGuardia.
Out of the country.
Out of like, you know, the closest she could be.
Yeah.
I wonder what her immigration status is in Canada now.
She is currently figuring this whole situation out still.
Okay.
Navigating her legal options both in Canada and the States.
Yeah, that would be interesting too to see what Canada can offer her.
And like, I don't think the Trump administration would go after like,
having her extradited back, because as you say, she's not accused of a crime, and they've kind of got what they wanted.
That'd be interesting to follow that.
There is no need for extradition, because none of the people that we're talking about today were accused of any crime.
Yeah. With the other cases of quote unquote self-deportation,
one of the issues is that people have had their passports seized and held,
like lots of Venezuelan migrants, so they actually can't.
Or it would be very difficult for them to just get on a flight and leave.
Which I think is in part why she made the decision to get out when she could.
Right.
DHS claimed in a statement that Trinivasan advocated violence and was, quote,
involved in activities supporting Hamas, a terrorist organization, unquote.
ISIS targeting her seemingly stems from being mass arrested while trying to return to her
apartment from a picnic with friends on the same day as the Hamilton Hill occupation.
She couldn't get home and was caught up in the crowd and was arrested among a hundred
other people.
She received two summons for obstructing traffic and failure to disperse, but her case was quickly dismissed.
Homeland Security claims that failing to declare these two summons is what caused her visa to be revoked.
Okay. Interesting.
That same week, ICE went after another green card holder at Columbia, a 21-year-old student named Yoon-Sow Chung,
a permanent resident who immigrated
to the United States from South Korea with her family when she was seven.
On March 9th, ICE agents visited her parents' home looking for Chung.
In that day, she received an odd text message reading,
Hi Yun-Sow, this is Audrey from the police.
My job is to reach out to you and see if you have any questions about your recent arrest
and the process going forward.
When are you available for a phone call?"
This recent arrest was allegedly in reference to being detained, among others, at a sit-in
protest at Bernard College on March 5th.
Chung was charged and then released with misdemeanor obstruction.
After receiving that sketchy text message, Chung got an email from Columbia Public Safety
reading, quote, The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York has
asked us to inform you that Homeland Security Investigation agents are seeking to make contact
with you in connection with an administrative warrant for your arrest.
Consistent with the university's practice, we wanted to share this information and their
request with you.
If you are represented by counsel, it may make sense for your lawyer to speak directly with DHS."
Chung's lawyer decided to call to Audrey from the police, who revealed that she was
actually an HSI agent, and that the State Department was revoking Ms. Chung's residency
status.
Now, rather than opting for self-deportation or turning herself in to immigration authorities,
Chung decided to go into hiding and fight the deportation in the courts while trying
to evade ICE detention.
When ICE failed to locate her, they enlisted the help of federal prosecutors.
To quote from the New York Times, quote,
On March 10th, Perry Cribbony, a high-ranking lawyer in the federal prosecutor's office,
told Ms. Ahmaud, Ms. Chung's attorney,
that the Secretary of State, Mr. Rubio, had revoked Ms. Chung's visa.
Ms. Ahmaud responded that Ms. Chung was not in the country on a visa
and was a permanent resident.
According to the lawsuit, Mr. Coboni responded
that Mr. Rubio had, quote, revoked that as well, unquote.
Yeah.
So this is the exact same language we saw with Khalil.
And it displays a general uncaring towards who they are actually targeting and what their
actual legal status is in the United States.
They think they're going after people with student visas, but when it turns out they
have green cards, that doesn't stop them.
They still continue to do it anyway.
On March 13th, ICE searched two residences on campus with warrants citing a statute for
harboring non-citizens, but Chung was nowhere to be found.
Like Khalil, the Trump administration is arguing that her presence in the United States hinders
the administration's foreign policy agenda.
But her lawyers note that Chung was not by any means a quote-unquote movement leader.
She was simply one of hundreds of students who joined in nationwide protests against Israel's actions in Gaza. Her lawyers write, quote, Ms. Chung has not
made public statements to the press or otherwise assumed a high-profile role in these protests.
She was, rather, one of a large group of college students raising, expressing, and discussing
shared concerns. Unquote. Chung had previously faced a university disciplinary process which found she was not in violation
of any university policy related to protests last year.
Chung's lawyers filed a lawsuit to prevent her deportation, claiming that ICE's actions
against Chung are illegal and unconstitutional.
This lawsuit reads,
Officials at the highest echelons of government are attempting to use immigration enforcement
as a bludgeon to suppress speech that they dislike, including Ms. Chung's speech.
ICE's shocking actions against Ms. Chung form part of a larger pattern of attempted
U.S. government repression of constitutionally protected protest activity and other forms
of speech.
On March 25, a federal judge granted a temporary restraining order halting efforts from ICE
to detain or relocate Chung.
The judge said that the government produced, quote, nothing in the record to indicate Chung
is a danger to the community or a, quote, unquote, foreign policy risk, or that she
was in any communication with terrorist organizations.
The judge said that there would be quote, no trips to Louisiana here, unquote.
This is in reference to the big ICE detention facility in Louisiana.
We'll be right back after this ad break. Okay, we're back.
Now, although Chung has at least temporarily halted ICE's efforts to detain or deport her,
not all legal recourses have proven successful.
This week, a U.S. District Judge declined a request to block the deportation of Cornell
student Mamadou Tal after the State Department revoked his visa.
On March 31, Tal released a statement, quote, given what we have seen across the United
States, I have lost faith that a favorable ruling from the courts would guarantee my
personal safety and ability to express my beliefs.
I have lost faith I could walk the streets without being abducted. Weighing these options,
I took the decision to leave on my own terms." Yeah, that's pretty bleak.
So, Tull has elected for the quote-unquote self-deportation option, at least for now.
I believe his case is going to continue, but he's not going to remain in the United States.
Yeah. I think he returned to the UK, right?
I believe so, yeah. He's a British citizen. Now, interestingly, last September, Cornell
University itself tried to revoke Tull's student visa for involvement in student protests,
but he successfully appealed and was able to continue his African Studies PhD remotely.
Yeah, I spoke to him a little bit back then, just via direct message, but I think at that successfully appealed and was able to continue his African studies PhD remotely.
Yeah, I spoke to him a little bit back then just via direct message.
But I think at that time, whatever his agreement was, it seems like there was a component of it that
at least he didn't want to talk about it in public, which is fine.
Everyone has the right to do that and he should do what's best for himself.
But maybe I'll try and follow up with him again now, see if he wants to speak.
Because he seems to have like...
He's been, of all of these people, the one who's been able to make the most statements and control his narrative to some degree.
Yeah, no, he entered this period of radio silence after he won his appeal last fall,
and then only started speaking publicly again once he began getting targeted by the Trump administration like the past month and a half.
I think he proactively filed that suit right like before.
Yes.
Yeah.
Now the scale that Mark Rubio and ICE are seeking for in regards to deportations is
seemingly going to be increasingly large.
On March 27th, Secretary of State Mark Rubio claimed that he has revoked over 300
student visas so far, saying at a press conference, quote, we do it every day. Every time I find
one of these lunatics, I take away their visas, unquote.
Now, there are a few ways the government is currently trying to find these quote unquote
lunatics. ICE seems to be targeting non-citizens who have been
arrested or detained at Palestine protests, even if their charges were
subsequently dropped. This is the case for Chung and Srinivasan, as well as
former student Lekha Kordia, a Palestinian who was arrested at
Columbia campus protests in April of 2024. She's currently being held in an
ICE detention facility in Texas.
Beyond arrest records, the government is utilizing the World Wide Web and social media to identify
new and returning visa applicants, and possibly current visa holders, that quote,
support terrorist organizations, unquote.
Social media screening of immigrants and visa holders has been slowly ramping up since 2014,
and accelerated during Trump's first term.
But a new directive from Secretary of State Mark Rubio, titled
Enhanced Screening and Social Media Vetting for Visa Applicants,
was sent out on March 25th and leaked by journalist Ken Klippenstein.
The directive cites two executive orders from Trump,
measures to combat anti-Semitism, and
quote, protecting the United States from foreign terrorists and other national security and
public safety threats, unquote.
The State Department is now requiring consular officers to conduct a quote unquote mandatory
social media review with screenshotting for students and student exchange visitors with
the intent of looking for evidence
advocating for, sympathizing with, or persuading others to endorse or espouse
terrorist activities or support a designated foreign terrorist organization."
This applies to FM&J visas. Student exchange visas, academic visas, and vocational visas.
The Directive also instructs officers to search social media for, quote,
conduct that bears a hostile attitude towards U.S. citizens or U.S. culture, including government,
institutions, or founding principles, unquote.
Which is kind of the most incredibly broad thing I've ever seen.
Yeah, I mean, that's leaving it at the complete discretion of the officer, right?
There's already been an instance of US Customs agents denying entry
to someone who had a quote-unquote anti-Trump
sentiments found on their phone.
Now, though this new directive is focused on denying or revoking student visas,
the Department of Homeland Security is seeking
to expand its social media data collection to U.S. citizenship, green card, and asylum
applicants. Basically anyone and everyone in the U.S. immigration system, no matter
their current status or what previous vetting they might have already gone through.
On March 5th, DHS issued a 60-day notice for public comment on a proposal for quote, uniform vetting standards and national security screening, unquote,
that includes the collection of social media information for
all non-citizens applying for immigration benefits like citizenship or permanent residency.
A statement from the US Citizenship and Immigration Service reads, quote,
these efforts ensure that those seeking immigration benefits to live and work in the United States do not threaten public safety, undermine national
security, or promote harmful anti-American ideologies, unquote.
Yeah, the anti-American ideologies again, it's just vastly broad, right?
It's like crazy Red Scare level stuff.
Yeah.
And I'm guessing this will be either like a literal control F of whatever they can find
of your public social media or some kind of AI assisted.
That's what it seems to be, right?
Former immigration agents have suggested that they're probably going to use some AI system
for this as they've already kind of used more primitive versions, but ramping up to this
scale and with like this increased focus and attention
on quote unquote AI is going to affect the way that they do this vetting process.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
Great.
So, though the government is trying to increase their social media screening, so far they
actually haven't had to do that much of their own research to identify targets for
removal. On March 17th, a Georgetown scholar named Bdar Khan Suri was arrested by Homeland Security
outside his home in Virginia where he lives with his wife, who's a US citizen, and their
three kids.
According to Suri's lawyer, masked agents, quote, refused to tell him the basis for the
arrest, handcuffed him, and forced him into an unmarked black SUV."
Later his wife was informed that her husband's visa was revoked based on social media posts,
and that Suri was sent to ICE detention in Louisiana.
Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Trisha McLaughlin posted on X that Suri was, quote,
"...actively spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting anti-Semitism on social media.
The Secretary of State issued a determination
that Suri's activities and presence in the United States
rendered him deportable, unquote.
Jesus.
Of course, any single post in support of Palestine
is going to be seen as, quote, unquote,
promoting anti-Semitism, according to Mark Rubio.
Suri's lawyer wrote in a court filing, quote,
Dr. Suri is an academic, not an activist.
But he spoke out on social media about his views on the Israel-Gaza war.
Even more so, his wife is an outspoken critic of the Israeli government
and the violence it has perpetuated against Palestinians, unquote.
Yeah, it seems like he was identified through his wife, right?
Correct. And we'll get to that.
Suri has no criminal record, and according to a colleague, he did not attend campus protests.
However, Suri's lawyer writes that his family have been victims of a doxing campaign,
with his wife stating that a website had, quote,
claimed falsely that my husband and I have, quote,
ties to Hamas, unquote.
The Homeland Security Assistant Secretary referenced that claim in a public statement
on Twitter, and this harassment stems in part from Suri's father-in-law being Ahmad Youssef,
a former advisor to Hamas.
A federal judge blocked Suri's deportation as immigration court proceedings continue,
but he still remains in ICE detention. What kind of visa was he on? He's not a green card holder. He received his visa
to continue doctoral research on peace building in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's
some kind of like academic or exchange visa. I don't think we know the exact
type that he has. Okay, yeah, that would be like it would be interesting to know
if like are they searching just through to know if like, are they searching
just through F1 visa databases or are they sort of, I mean, obviously not if they're
finding these green card people, but like...
Well, I think specifically in this case, they're searching social media. They're not searching
through their own databases. They don't care what kind of visa he has. They're looking
at the stock scene campaign that's been targeted at him and his family for like over a year and using that as the basis to deport him.
Right. And then being like, can we deport? He's not a citizen. So yes, basically.
Even though his wife is a citizen.
Yeah. It's children, presumably, therefore also citizens.
His wife, whose father is Ahmaud Youssef, they can't deport her because she's a citizen
or at least they can't deport her right now. who knows if they'll try to denaturalize in the future.
But this is the easiest person to target.
Yeah.
And I think that's kind of what they're going for.
Like a lot of this is, it's like the politics of owning the libs, right?
It's like the politics of being angry at your niece and nephew on
Facebook and wanting to humiliate them. Like it's not a particularly like coherent policy
other than like the Palestine protests made a lot of people on the right mad and they
don't like migrants and that now they're using this obscure legal provision as a cudgel against
everything they dislike.
Yeah. And using social media to identify people who have never been arrested,
never been charged with anything.
Yeah.
We're going to finish our discussion on these doxing campaigns
and ICE actions targeting students after this ad break.
All right, we're back. So right now, the two main vectors for ICE detention, whether you have a green card or
a visa, seems to be previous arrests or these mass doxxing campaigns.
Now someone like Mahmoud Khalil was never arrested or charged with a crime, but instead has been
the target of harassment from both a local campus doxxing account run by Columbia professors
and fellow students, as well as larger right-wing Zionist organizations like Canary Mission.
A few days before being arrested by ICE, Canary Mission posted a video naming Khalil as a
quote-unquote,
SIREN EMOJI, SUSPECTED, FOREIGN, NATIONAL, ALERT. So what is Canary Mission? Posted a video naming Khalil as a quote-unquote siren emoji, suspected foreign national alert.
So what is Canary Mission? If you're lucky enough to be unaware,
since 2015 Canary Mission has been collecting and publishing personal information of people they accuse of promoting quote
hatred of the United States, Israel, and Jews on North American college campuses and beyond unquote.
Israel, and Jews on North American college campuses and beyond." They have profiles for a few legitimate American neo-Nazis, but many profiles only cite criticism
of the Israeli government and its actions in Gaza as proof of alleged anti-Semitism.
And now there is increasing evidence that the government is using websites like Canary
Mission to target students, professors, and scholars for ICE deportation, essentially outsourcing intel
gathering from these pro-Israel non-government organizations.
A few weeks ago, Canary Mission uploaded a profile for Rumeza Oz-Turk, a Turkish graduate
student at Tufts University. They included a picture, her resume, and linked to an op-ed she co-wrote last year for her
student paper criticizing the university for its ties to Israel amidst the war in Gaza.
For this, the Canary mission claimed Ozturk, quote, engaged in anti-Israel activism, unquote.
Two weeks later, while walking alone to Iftar dinner for Ramadan, a plain-clothes ICE agent
approached Oztirk on the sidewalk.
As he grabbed her arms and wrestled away her phone, five more agents surrounded her and
pulled up their gator masks as neighbors began filming the arrest.
Within 24 hours, she was moved to ICE detention in Louisiana.
A statement from Homeland Security claimed that HSI, Homeland Security Investigation,
had determined that OzTurk, quote,
engaged in activities in support of Hamas,
a foreign terrorist organization that relishes the killing of Americans, unquote.
And Secretary of State Mark Rubio said, quote,
we gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree,
not to become a social activist that tears up our university campuses."
Yeah, I mean, again, like, writing an op-ed is, like, as central to the First Amendment as things can be, right?
Yeah, there's no evidence she was even attending campus protests, let alone tearing up the university, she co-wrote an op-ed. And you should not be deported for engaging in protest on a university campus at all.
Right? This is blatantly unconstitutional, extremely worrying.
The fact that this person just got a profile in the Canary Mission website for writing
an op-ed and then this is used as justification for her deportation is still like an even
greater escalation.
Yeah, like if we're talking about like this sort of like
liberal idea of the marketplace of ideas, right?
Like the way that the ideas enter the marketplace,
like you will find nothing more amenable to liberalism
than writing an op-ed in your campus newspaper, right?
That is the most like well-behaved,
straight down the middle, constitutionally
protected thing, way to engage in anti-genocide activism, pro-Palestine activism. So in a sense,
this one is particularly disturbing. It's a frontal assault on First Amendment rights for
non-citizens is what it is. Yes. On March 24th, Canary Mission published a new section of their website titled,
Uncovering Foreign Nationals, which lists the profiles of non-citizens who they believe qualify for deportation.
Jesus.
Another far-right pro-Israel doxing group called Bittar, which even the ADL lists as an extremist group.
Yeah. Which is wild. Bittar says that they have
given the Trump administration a deportation list of thousands of names, including citizens that they
expect to be denaturalized. People like Mamadou Tal and Mahmoud Khalil have been targeted by both
of these organizations. People will be familiar with, I don't know if it's Bittar or Bittar, but like you probably
have seen videos of them on campus trying to hand pages to people.
Pagers.
Yeah, like...
Making light of the pager attack Israel did.
I mean, making a threat, like...
Sure, sure.
Like, if you're going to come onto a campus and make a fucking bomb threat and accuse
someone else of terrorism, I mean, the hypocrisy is kind of the point, but...
Or even just like, you know, quote-unquote, celebrating the deaths of people, right?
Yeah, right. Like mocking this attack which killed children, which, you know, crippled people.
It's just disgusting. It's like, just abhorrent.
They seem to get a lot of attention online because they do the thing where they go up
to people and say deliberately provocative things and then film their reactions, right?
They're kind of IRL trolling.
The past week, ICE actions against students have seemingly accelerated.
Ali Riza-Durruti, a doctoral student from Iran studying at the University of Alabama, was arrested by ICE on March 25th in the middle of the night at his off-campus apartment.
Darudi's entry visa expired, but he was allowed to stay in the States as he still maintained his student status.
It's unknown why exactly he was targeted, he has no ties to protests, or any notable online footprint.
It could be his ethnic origin, right? He has no ties to protests or any notable online footprint.
It could be his ethnic origin, right?
Yeah, it could be his name, right?
Yeah, but we should explain the status thing a bit more for people who aren't familiar.
So like, your status is when you're in good standing with a university.
So normally that means you need to be enrolled in 12 credits per, you might be on semesters,
you might be on quarters, I don't think it usually matters.
But you have to, there's a minimum course load, it may be different for different systems,
I don't know.
You'd also need to be in good standing in terms of like not late on your fees, right,
your tuition fees, that kind of stuff, right, not in any, you haven't been expelled or excluded
from the university for any actions that you've taken, that kind of thing.
It means you are currently a student at the university, basically.
The only time this normally affects international students that I'm aware of, like as a person
who now teaches students, is like they can't drop below a certain course load when otherwise
they may wish to drop below a certain course load to either focus on, they might have like
a research position, they might be doing other stuff on campus like TAing, right?
Sometimes that TAing counts towards their course load,
sometimes it doesn't, but it can affect things like that.
But generally it would be the university
that would update that status, right?
That would notify US Customs and Immigration
if somebody fell out of compliance with that.
If I'm hearing right, that doesn't seem like that's what happened here, right?
No. Simply his entry visa expired.
So if he left the country, he then would have to get another visa to get back in.
But he can stay as long as he still has his valid student status.
So not only is ICE trying to revoke these visas,
but they're trying to essentially say that by revoking these visas,
they are also attempting to strip them of their student status, which is like a separate like step.
These things can get kind of very, very blurry though.
Yeah, like I don't quite know how that works in terms of like, are ICE supposed to be able to?
I don't think it hugely matters at this point.
Technically, the State Department does have that ability, but it's under the same like
foreign policy risk designation. Okay.
And they'll justify it by saying, well, his visa already expired. So we're just removing
him because his visa expired, even though that's not really how this works.
Yeah, and they don't have to remove him for that reason. But yeah, in this case, I guess
they're going for something else.
No, because the University of Alabama did not elect to rescind his student status. He was a
student in good standing. And thus legally allowed in the United States.
Yeah, like everyone else here, he hadn't done anything that would, under normal circumstances,
lead to him having any interactions with USCIS.
Under normal circumstances, did you have any interactions with USCIS? Just this last week, ICE detained a University of Minnesota grad student at their off-campus
housing.
The university released a statement saying that they had no prior knowledge of this incident
and had not shared any information with federal authorities.
This person's name is still not released.
Last week, a student at the Southern Illinois University had their visa revoked.
The school administration told their college paper that the university has no role in the
visa revocation process. The Illinois Governor's Office is working with schools across the state
to quote, ensure they are being vigilant about what's happening on their respective campuses.
The governor's team has asked universities to communicate with international students
about the general resources available to them
through the institution.
In addition, we have suggested that they
connect impacted students with legal resources
that have been in place for several years."
According to a statement
sent to the university paper,
the Daily Egyptian.
Tina Sickenger, which is
a very cool name, the school's director of international student
and scholar services, sent an email to the international student body of Southern Illinois
University advising them to carry photocopies of immigration documents with them at all
times, as well as proof of enrollment and records of US residences.
The email recommended that students quote,
use caution on social media and exercise discretion when participating in political demonstrations or protests, unquote.
Warning that though protests should be protected speech, quote,
such activities can sometimes be misinterpreted and may carry risks to your immigration status, unquote.
Unfortunately, I think this is the university trying to look out for these students.
Yeah, that's the best you could expect from them, really.
And they are providing legal resources to these students,
but they're essentially saying you shouldn't post anything or do any protests
because then ICE might come kidnap you.
Yeah.
Which is just a fucked up situation to be in.
Yeah. And they don't have any other ability to stop this right now.
I am curious what Pritzker is going to continue to do here though.
Yeah, I mean, none of what they've said is wrong.
It's kind of what you can expect from university,
the best you can expect from the university really.
It's like, hey, we've noticed it's happening.
So that is the situation noticed it's happening.
So that is the situation as it currently stands. I do have one final tidbit here just that
highlights the absurdity of this whole situation. On March 24th, a lawsuit on behalf of Israeli
Columbia students and relatives of Israeli October 7th victims was filed against Columbia
Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine,
Columbia University Apartheid Divest, and individual Columbia students, including Mahmoud Khalil.
The lawsuit alleges that these Columbia groups and students are the domestic propaganda arm of Hamas,
and even claims that these groups had advanced notice that the October 7th attack was going to take place.
Oh come on.
So the plan was kept secret among Hamas's own political allies in the region, but they
gave an Ivy League university in New York City a heads up.
Tip off.
They just let them know what was coming.
Completely absurd. Yeah, absolutely.
Like, the IDF completely failed to see this coming, right?
But not the folks at the Ivy League universities who were ready and waiting.
Hamas didn't tell the Houthis, they didn't tell Iran, they didn't tell Hezbollah.
Didn't tell Hezbollah, yeah.
But they told student activist groups in New York City at the Columbia University campus.
Yeah, absolutely ludicrous. Like, I eagerly await this this court case, I guess, to see what evidence they have of this.
The evidence is going to be like someone had a Palestinian flag.
Some of the quote-unquote evidence that they that they allege is that some of these like activist accounts had renewed activity in October of 2023,
before the attack happened, but this is just a simple coincidence.
Obviously, these people did not have a heads up that the October 7th attack was going to take place.
The lawsuit also argues that protest activity is not First Amendment protected speech,
but in fact, quote,
substantial assistance in the form of propaganda and recruiting services and in coordination with
a designated foreign terrorist organization. Again, alleging there's some kind of communication
between Hamas and student activists in New York City. Yeah, this is ludicrous. Like, one of the
reasons that maybe we're seeing this so much over the Palestine advocacy is
that Hamas is a listed foreign terrorist organization.
Many other groups, and lots of groups in that part of the world are, but it's just a bigger
stick to wave, I guess.
Material aid, or that no one has been actually accused of material aid to a foreign terrorist
organization as far as I'm aware.
But that is kind of the sort the stick that they're waving.
That is the thing that they're alleging.
I will end us with just this final note.
Now, while there are little signs that this would happen at a scale this large and this
focused under a Democratic president, a degree of consent for this type of targeting was
manufactured the past year as it relates
to Palestine protests, with some liberals and democratic politicians associating activists
as pro-Hamas terrorists.
And this is the consequence of that public perception building and the consent being
manufactured for that framing.
And now that the even more evil side is in charge, they can take that justification and run with it way further than what a Joe Biden or Kamala Harris would have done.
So it is far worse, but it's not in a political bubble. This has been like a growing project for the past few years.
There was no point at which the Biden administration really like effusively said, this is protected First Amendment speech. Yeah. We may not like it, but it is central to the Bill of Rights,
it's central to what America is supposed to be about.
They never defended the constitutionality of this speech.
Yeah.
Nor would they have intervened to stop the deportation of someone like Tull
if Cornell decided to revoke his status, right?
Right, yeah.
I don't think the Biden administration or a Kamala Harris administration would be directing
these universities to take that action themselves, nor would they be, I think, revoking student
visas at scale like this.
No.
But they would have let ICE do the stuff that ICE does if universities themselves elect to
remove student visas or unenroll these students.
And like a degree of complacency here is placed on the actual university administrations,
the university staff who have been vilifying these protesters for the past two years.
Yeah, and I mean, in some cases, right, like I'm thinking of one of Columbia,
like professors got away with things which are absolutely unacceptable, like 100%
Like professors have got to wave with things which are absolutely unacceptable.
And like a hundred percent in some violation of your agreement with the university as a member of the faculty, like doxing your students, photographing
students without their consent, following students around, like absolutely
unacceptable in any other context that you would be immediately shit can for that.
Like really, really the only reason you can lose tenure seemingly is being a fucking creep to students or stealing
a lot of money. And like universities did allow that for more than a year under the
Biden administration. And like we're seeing the consequences of that now.
It's also worth noting that since I've had to quote from so many government statements this episode, the Trump admin is continuing to correlate any expression of sympathy or
solidarity with Palestine as explicit support for Hamas.
Basically anything you say that's critical of the Israeli government, its actions in
Gaza are being interpreted by the Trump administration as anti-Semitism and support for the October
7th massacre. This is a false equivalency. What the government alleges should not be
automatically taken as the truth. These tactics have been used for years to broadly smear
pro-Palestine activists while also hurting anti-Zionist Jews. And I guess like finally,
we are not necessarily endorsing every single thing that every single one of these students has said.
We do not necessarily agree with the framing of every single sentence that they have said.
Yeah, I mean we don't know everything that they've said.
Yeah, exactly. This is like completely separate to that.
Yeah, it doesn't matter. Like we are defending their right to engage in constitutionally protected speech.
Correct. No matter what they're saying, no matter if they have opinions on Hamas that differ from ours,
no matter what they are saying at a campus protest, it should not result in ICE
targeting them and hunting them down and
forcing students who attend sit-in protests into hiding to defend their own rights and to keep their green cards.
This is like a completely absurd and blatantly fascist,
to use the now overused word, frankly.
But this is, this is what that is.
If this was happening in China, if this was happening in Russia,
in other countries, people would be very quick to call out.
I mean, it does happen in Russia, right?
Exactly, and people are quick to call it out.
Yeah, yeah, and the State Department of this country has happen in Russia, right? People... Exactly. And people are quick to call it out. Yeah, yeah.
And the State Department of this country has called it out, right?
Like, rightly.
Yes.
I don't agree with everything the State Department does,
but I do agree with them on that.
Like, yeah.
And I think this is like, I don't know, if you find yourself having a discussion about this,
I think almost everyone in America can find something that they disagree with the government on, or have disagreed with the government on.
And like this hurts every single one of us, right?
Like everyone's right to freedom of speech is challenged when someone's right to freedom of speech is challenged.
And like I think that is the way to approach this.
It doesn't really matter if the people whose speech is being challenged right now, their speech is, if
it's odious to us, if it's something that we don't agree with, like that isn't what's
at stake. What's at stake is everyone's right to say everything without government consequences.
Well, I think that does it for us today at It Could Happen Here. We will continue to
report on the targeting of students, scholars, professors, and immigrants
in general as the Trump administration ramps up its deportation efforts.
If you would like to contact us about these topics, we have an encrypted email address
at coolzontips at proton.me.
It is end-to-end encrypted, so if you use another encrypted email service or another
Proton mail account to send the email, only then is it encrypted. Hey there, Ed Helms here, host of Snafu, your favorite podcast about history's greatest
screw ups.
It's the 1920s, Prohibition is in full swing, and a lot of people are mysteriously dying? Assistant Attorney General Mabel Walker
Willebrand is becoming increasingly desperate in forcing prohibition. She was a lone warrior.
I mean how could Mabel not be feeling the pressure? Her bosses are drunks, her agents are
incompetent, even congress is full of hypocrites. So if Mabel is going to succeed in laying down the law, she needs to make
the consequences for drinking hurt a lot more. Which she does, arguably a little too well.
Find out more on Season 3, Episode 4 of Snafu Formula 6. Listen and subscribe on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 2020, a group of young women in a tidy suburb of New York City found themselves in an AI-fueled nightmare.
Someone was posting photos.
It was just me naked.
Well, not me, but me with someone else's body parts on my body parts that looked
exactly like my own. I wanted to throw up. I wanted to scream.
It happened in Levittown, New York. But reporting the series took us through
the darkest corners of the internet and to the front lines of a global battle against deep fake
pornography. This should be illegal, but what is this? This is a story about a technology
that's moving faster than the law
and about vigilantes trying to stem the tide.
I'm Margie Murphy.
And I'm Olivia Carville.
This is Levertown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts,
Bloomberg and Kaleidoscope.
Listen to Levertown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
My husband cheated on me with two women.
He wants to stay together because he has cancer.
Should I stay?
Okay Sam, that has to be the craziest story
in OK Storytime podcast history.
Well John, that's because it's dumping week,
and this user writes,
my partner told me when we first got together
that he has cancer.
He's currently living with his mom while he's in recovery so that it takes the pressure off me caring for both him and her baby
Until he's well enough to move into our new home with us.
Good so far.
Well last week we had attempted break-in
I asked my husband who was supposed to be at his mom's to come over and change locks
But he wouldn't then his mom told me he wasn't with her
I went to Facebook and it took me less than an hour to find the first two women
He was cheating on me with.
Oh! What else is he lying about?
Well, one thing my paranoia just wouldn't let up was about the cancer in his treatments.
I asked his mom about it who told me he doesn't have cancer.
She also informed me he was in rehab, not the hospital.
He suffered from addiction and was trying to recover for me and our baby.
Did she leave him?
Well, to find out how the story ends, listen and follow the OK Storytime podcast
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith.
And it's me, Harley Quinn Smith.
That's my daughter, man, who my wife has always said
is just a beardless, d***less version of me.
And that's the name of our podcast,
Beardless, D***less Me.
I'm the old one.
I'm the young one.
And every week we try to make each other laugh really hard. Sounds innocent, doesn't it? A lot of cussing, a lot of bad language. It's
for adults only. Or listen to it with your kid. Could be a family show. We're not quite
sure. We're still figuring it out. It's a work in progress. Listen to Beardless,
****less me on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever. You get your podcast. This is It Could Happen Here, Executive Disorder, our weekly newscast covering what's happening
in the White House, the crumbling economic world, and what this means for you.
I'm Garrison Davis.
I'm joined by Robert Evans, James Stout, and Mia Wong.
It is Liberation Day in America, everyone.
How do you feel?
I feel liberated.
Free at last, free at last.
Thank God Almighty.
We are free at last for being able to afford things.
I am so, so liberated right now.
Unchained from the burden of having money.
Yes, yes.
Well, as the Buddhists say,
freeing yourself from attachment
is really the path to Nirvana.
Trump really is our first Buddhist president.
He is.
Yeah, one thing they say about him, yeah.
That's right.
He may be the new Dalai Lama.
Who can say?
The Dalai Lama.
And he hasn't.
But...
Yeah, yeah.
And the priests who look for him after he dies when he comes back.
This guy's...
Unfortunately, they're probably on a fucking travel ban list now.
Oh my God.
I mean, pretty good chance they're in ICE custody at the moment.
If I understand Buddhism.
Well, I think we should just get right to the most pressing news, which is Line go down.
Line is on its way down.
Line in freefall currently. Yeah. It's funny because they chose,
they were supposed to initially, I think it was like going to be 3pm or something EST,
two or three was the initial time they wanted to announce this, which would have given the
stock market a couple of hours. On April 2nd, right? Yeah. Yeah. On April 2nd, it would have given it liberation day. On liberation day, there would have been a couple of hours. On April 2nd, right? Yeah, on April 2nd.
It would have given it-
Liberation day.
On liberation day.
There would have been a couple of hours for it to
take effect and they attempted to mitigate this,
I guess in the hope that we would all get over it overnight.
We would forget.
Yeah, we did.
Some other shit would happen.
Before the new prices even came in,
we'd be like, ah, now I'm on to the next thing.
But the Dow and the NASDAQ, all plunged.
Because it's clear if the president is like
deliberately shifting an event to not hurt the stock market,
that's gonna hurt the stock market, you know?
Yeah, it's good when you see a 90 degree angle
on the old stock market graph.
That's when you know someone's really crushing
in the economic department.
And so far, we were recording this a little afternoon on Thursday, the April the 3rd.
So just in the course of today, major stock indexes have dropped by about 5.6%, which
means about $2.7 trillion in market value, which will be the largest decline since March
of 2020.
Sick.
So we are, it is looking like this is going to be at the very least a stock market decline
in line with the one that came as a result of the global pandemic with the the noted
caveat that there's really no reason to believe it will get better at any point.
Yeah, you can't really vaccinate against you.
Now, I'm not qualified to give financial advice, but I think everyone should pull out your
401k right now go to the bank
Withdraw all your money all of your money your accounts right now
Put it into the worst tasting survival foods
Yeah, and you're gonna want to buy Kel-tex lots of Kel-tex in a caliber. No one else has
Five seven yeah, I'm seven three eighty. Yeah
Five-seven. Yeah, five-seven, three-eighty. Thirty-two ACP. I won the thirty-two ACP.
That's it. That's it. James, everyone buy thirty-two ACP handguns.
It succeeded in ending one world war and it won't let us down.
We call that doing a Hitler, but in a good way.
Someone here has to be vaguely responsible and say, don't fucking do that.
Do none of those things. Zero. Zero of those things.
Empty your accounts accounts get hard cash
Yeah, Mark Cuban told people to do that
Absolutely not mayor endorses Reagan coin as the exclusive safe source of your time
You're gonna want to put every dime you've got in
Pressed Latin them now. I know that that's the currency from Star Trek and does not exist nevertheless
I know that that's the currency from Star Trek and does not exist. Nevertheless, cancel your accounts.
Put it all in Latin.
I mean, it's going to exist in like what, like 40 years per the Star Trek timeline?
Exactly, get in on the ground floor.
If it's not already a meme coin 10 minutes after this comes out.
More stable than your 401k right now.
You can be rich just in time for money to stop being a thing.
There you go.
There you go.
This is why we're launching Cool Zone Coin Guys to keep you coolzone coin guys. I've been saying this for years.
It's redeemable from whatever money the Ferengi use when they exist.
We should probably talk about why the stock market is doing poorly. So I think Robert you can handle this segue.
Well, you know.
Wait, what is that? Oh my god. Is that Mia Wong's theme music by God?
Oh
God that was a great purchase you guys. I mean can we all agree?
Mm-hmm worth every penny. It really was. The best financial purchase we've made is the Tariff Talk theme song
We're gonna get so much mileage out of that thing. It's an unbelievable steal.
Absolutely, we're gonna be using this fucker for years
At least something good came of this when you're struggling to get by with your
family, just remember the song.
Yeah, yeah, this will keep you warm as you huddle around a barrel waiting for the new
police, which are just called murder police, to reach your shanty town. Anyway.
Let us talk tariffs. Power, sections of the left have long argued, is in logistics. It was
logistics that allowed the capitalists of the 1970s and 80s to crush the labor movement
by enacting the so-called spatial fix to the crisis of capitalism. By shifting production
from countries where workers' movements were strong to countries where violence against
workers was easier and workers were thus poorer and more exploited, CEOs could pit workers
against each other in an endless race to the bottom.
These practices became known as offshoring.
Infused with the international attack on unions and the power of workers heralded in the US by Reagan,
together they crushed the workers movement and implemented neoliberal austerity throughout the globe
through a regime that is colloquially known as free trade.
Now, there was of course resistance to this.
Maybe most famously the uprising of the Zapatistas in Chiapas in 1994 on the day that NAFTA went
into effect.
But for all of the victories and all of the spaces that were carved out, it is still the
CEOs, the bosses, and the capitalists who rule the world.
However, in the wake of their defeat, sections of the working class came to see their
own power as a product of the nation, of masculinity, of American jobs for American workers.
In this view, you didn't need to form a union, you didn't need to organize, you didn't need to
fight the bosses who exploit you. All you needed to do for the high-paying blue-collar jobs of the
1960s to return was getting rid of the immigrants
and bring jobs back home.
This American nationalist ideology was extremely useful to the ruling class.
It allowed them to turn the rhetoric of the old base of the workers' movement into a
fascist movement, which they could then use to smash any genuine workers' struggle and
then ride to power to impose more brutal austerity and more pro-capitalist reforms, to, in their
view, make it impossible for their power ever to be challenged again.
But a strange thing happened.
In the nationalism bred by the defeat of the workers' movement, the human personifications
of the capitalist bubble economy in Donald Trump and Elon Musk have come to see their
own victory as defeat.
They became convinced that the trade deficits,
which from a capitalist perspective,
simply do not matter as long as companies are making money.
Yeah.
Sorry.
Yes, they don't matter for shit.
Who gives a fuck?
What you are calling a trade deficit
is us getting things we want from people.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's buying stuff.
I saw a good post.
It was like, you don't have a trade deficit with your dentist.
You just pay them to fix your teeth.
Yeah.
I was told at one point in this nation's greatest living previous moment of crisis that what
we needed to do was go buy things to make it better.
Not anymore, but-
Nope. Nope.
Nope.
Because these people, Donald Trump and Elon Musk, and the cadre of weird white nationalist
fanatics that surround them, have absolutely convinced themselves that if you have a trade
deficit you are being ripped off by foreigners.
Yep.
Yep.
And so they concluded that we needed to put tariffs on fucking all of the rest of the
world in order to bring
American jobs back to Americans
a new national autarky for a fascist world
Now the ruling class all the capitalists all these fucking goddamn Goldman Sachs motherfucker
Financial analysts all of these CMBC dipshits all of these fucking all these motherfuckers at black rock and all of the global hedge funds
And all of these all these motherfuckers all the tech dipshits all the people fucking all these motherfuckers at Black Rock and all of the global hedge funds and all of these all these motherfuckers
All the tech dipshits all of the people who back Trump to a hilt simply assumed
That none of these tears would ever happen that it was all campaign bluster that he was lying out of his ass and you know
Obama again, I've said this before ran on abolishing NAFTA
So there was you know, and what the fuck ever came from that, right?
We of course fucking tried to tell them otherwise
We tried to tell them that they could not fucking control the right? We, of course, fucking try to tell them otherwise.
We tried to tell them that they could not fucking control the fascist beast, that
one day it would rise to consume them all along with us.
They didn't care.
They backed Trump anyways, because they thought they would get fucking tax breaks.
And now Liberation Day is here.
Don't forget crypto.
They were really bullish on that.
Crypto.
Yeah.
All of these motherfuckers, they really thought that Trump was going to fucking...
that literally all Trump was going to do was punish the transgenders, get rid of woke, and give them tax cuts.
Mhm. Yep.
And now the tariff walls have gone up, the old world is dead, the new world struggles to be born.
Now is the time of monsters.
Now we're in what I'm referring to as the Chinese century. I came up with this this this week on my own
Oh, yeah
Yeah, okay
Yeah, good. Now that's if that's of course named after Chinatown in San Francisco, which Garrison is very bullish about
Positive positive real estate developments there. You're big into real estate people don't know that Chinese real estate
Absolutely where you want to be right now.
Both in Chinatown and in actual China.
You put all your money into Chinese real estate,
the bubble can't pop a second time, can only go back up.
It does. There were so many like enemies on the verge of defeat
in like the traditional US geopolitical sense.
Like China's economy was doing great.
Russia could have been easily pushed to collapse and we were just like,
no, no, no, you know what's better?
We're gonna shoot ourselves right in the dick.
Which we've snatched defeat from the George of England.
We're gonna shoot ourselves in a dick with a bullet that Venmo's both of you guys.
It's great. We dug up the Cold War, resurrected it, and then lost.
Yeah, just to lose?
Yeah, yeah.
It's beautiful. You can't, yeah, it's beautiful.
You can't, yeah, it's sort of like Michael Jackson
coming back for Space Jam if he had immediately
like fucking thrown a basketball so hard
at a Bugs Bunny skull that it put him at traction.
I'm sorry, wait, did you just say Michael Jackson?
No, Jordan, didn't I say Jordan?
You just said Jackson, you definitely just said
Michael Jackson.
Leave it in, different movie, maybe better, you know?
He always performed well around kids, so...
Good God.
I love Space Jam.
It's a good movie.
I'm not going to run anymore.
Now Garrison, it's forever tainted now.
So, let's talk about the nature of what's actually going down with these tariffs.
Yeah, let's get to the tariffs.
Terrible. Terrifable. That's right, Garrison. Nope.
Yeah, so, okay. So let me just let me just read off some of the ones that are going to fuck everyone. Great.
54% tariff on all goods from China.
This is a 34% tariff that is being added on to the 20% tariff that was already on.
There is a 20% tariff on all goods from the EU.
46% on Vietnam, which is fucking devastating
because it's a huge amount of capital from China.
Also, speaking of the China panic, our strongest geopolitical ally
in the region, in terms of having a military, right?
Yeah, a country that we've been discussing going to war for quite recently.
Yeah, like we just, we have literally, is this is the funny thing about all these Vicky
I also want to point it this out the more closely allied with the US the more fucked you got by these
It's such a weird move. Yeah. Yeah, what 24% tariff on Japan? What is it?
Not like 80 or 90 percent on fucking Cambodia. Why yeah. Yeah. Yeah
So what we'll get to why in a
second I want to also cover so there's there's a 37 percent tariff on
Bangladesh which is going to be devastating for I mean a lot of the
textile imports 25 percent on South Korea so fucking rip you ever getting a
phone again 32 percent on Taiwan so rip the entire tech industry I fucking rip
Taiwan too these tariffs are going to devastate the international economy okay 32% on Taiwan. So rip the entire tech industry fucking ripped Taiwan to
These tariffs are going to devastate the international economy. Okay. I have been angry about this since the fucking election
People have been calling these tariffs attacks. That is just no it is not what's happening here. This is like calling it a tax
Is to completely underplay how serious this is this is not a fucking tax
This is the wholesale destruction of entire industries and some of these industries like fast fashion
Which you know has always been undergirded by the exploitation of workers in China to Bangladesh and also like in the US too
But like you know fuck those things whatever they never needed to exist fuck them
But like you know like you're probably not be able to fucking buy board games anymore because they're gonna be too expensive to produce
Oh, it's gonna shatter games like tabletop gaming. Yeah, yeah
Yeah, it's done like the economy as we knew it does not exist as if like this morning, right?
Everything that we've known about how this thing works is fucking done and some of these are just you know like unbelievably hideously cruel
So there's for example a 44% tariff on Myanmar Yeah, which you know is a country
Yeah
devastated by a horrific war waged for a brutal dictatorship and also fucking suffering from a catastrophic earthquake and we're like fuck you eat shit
44% tariff also embargoed no like we've seized their government assets in the United States
Yep, it is one of like
Diego Garcia for instance. Yes
Yep. There's one on like Diego Garcia, for instance.
Yes, there's one.
It's on the British Indian Ocean territory, which collective population is primarily US
soldiers.
Yeah.
Like Christmas Island is on there.
Yeah.
And there's one more that I want to talk about, which is that Sri Lanka has been suffering
from an unbelievably devastating series of economic crises and they're getting hit with
a 44% fucking tariff in a moment when like they already haven't had enough dollars
to fucking import fuel for their economy to function. So this is going to be
devastating not just for us but for a whole bunch of people across the world.
And so this is the other aspect of this too that's really fucking
brutal is that for the US right we don't need other countries money.
We don't need to have piles of any other countries money around, right?
We can just buy things in American dollars.
But if you are Sri Lanka, you need American dollars to buy oil.
Yes.
There are so many fucking things that you could only buy in American dollars.
And when these tariffs go up, when the prices increase, and when they can't fucking sell
their stuff, that means that they don't have dollars.
And that means that they can't get access to a whole bunch of the vital commodities
that they need to survive.
And this is just going to fucking devastate them.
And I think that's been an angle that I really wanted to make sure we talked about because
I haven't seen any fucking mention of it at all, even though those are the people who
are going to suffer the most from this, are people who are already completely on the fucking
edge whose economies have already been collapsed
you've already been so brutally exploited by these same fucking people and
They're just fucked. Yep. You know, we always say we know like to reefs, but we do like these ads We're back.
I don't feel great about that, but...
Now there is a funny part of all of this.
There is some fun here.
Oh good.
Which is, okay, so one of the big questions about the tariffs was? How were they gonna calculate the tariffs on all of these countries, right?
because they were saying that their tariffs were going to be a projection of like currency manipulation and like
Value added taxes like all of these like like subsidies to vital industries and you know
And the question again was like literally how can they possibly calculate the tariff rates of hundreds of different countries and taking into account?
All of these things right now
Making a couple of weeks ago was that they were gonna do brackets
What they actually appear to have done is ask?
It's entirely people have like reverse engineered the prompts. It's almost directly just a catchy probably shit
There's a couple different engines that gave almost identical responses,
but it's probably chatgy.
It's amazing that they're doing the same shit
as like my undergraduates
and the people are doing the same shit in the response.
I'm sure your undergraduate spends a little more time
trying to hide it, James.
Most of them are smart enough to like pad it a little bit
so that you can't put the prompt into chatgypt and find it.
And so my lowest effort undergrads.
I wanna give a lot of credit to the economist, James Sirarecki, who's the guy who figured
out their formula. So their formula, and this is drawing from something, I mean, I saw it
from, from James first. But like, so their formula is literally just you take a country's
trade deficit with the US. And it's also important to note here that they're not counting services.
They're only counting goods. Right?
Well, and again, if you're if you're missing the products and just getting in services,
that's half the economy, as I understand it.
Yeah, yeah. Especially for the US, which provides an enormous number of services, you know,
but these people are fucking fascist. And so they don't they don't think that like services
are fucking real, right? It's the same ideology that undergirds the whole thing about like service workers not being fucking real workers
Literally the only real job is that one video of a guy wrestling with an oil derrick. Yes. That is the only
Manager yeah, just doing that for the video and was doing it very wrong
You gotta rub some mud on you you gotta get it. Take some pieces of metal
Move them around to where they're not supposed to go
That's that's when you're a real laborer. That's working only jobs of things where you wear safety toe boots
and well
And that's and that's the thing though like because like their image of the world is is the fascist image of the world in the fascist
Image of the world like labor is just masculinity. Yeah. Yeah, and that's like that's why they're fucking doing it like this
And so, you know, and so so the fascists have asked chat GPT
How to do tariffs and what they got is again, so they take the country's trade deficit and divide it by their total exports
Yeah, you ask. Yeah. Now this is nothing right like in economic terms. No, that's not how you do anything
This is this is not a real thing
Like this is this is like trying to measure someone's height
by like dividing their favorite number
by the average radius of an apple.
Like it's literally nothing.
Okay, you know, what are we,
you coming after me here?
Look, I have one maintained.
Just because I do math a little differently, okay.
There is no scientific basis, Robert,
for measuring height by dividing favorite number
by apple radius.
We simply must accept the truth of science.
That's what you say, Joe Rogan, and I feel differently.
The dictatorship of chat GPT is just...
It's so bleak.
Yeah. Yeah. It's just they ask chat GPT.
It's a mix of they don't actually care or think this will affect them,
and also they legitimately think it's the smartest person in the world.
Yeah.
Yeah. It's smarter than world. Yeah. Yeah.
It's smarter than them.
Yeah.
Which is maybe a good thing.
But not in this instance.
Mm hmm.
Well, and you can tell the extent to which they were relying on this and didn't calculate
themselves because so after it started to spread that this is just how they were doing
it, after James Sirwecki like calculated it, the White House said, no, no, no, no, no,
hold on.
No, no, no, no, that's not right. We use an actual complex formula.
And so they released a fake formula. But think about the formula, right?
Is it the formula is just it is literally just trade deficit divided by total exports,
but they threw in two random variables as Greek letters.
But there's one on the top and there's one of the numerator one of the denominator and they're the same so they cancel each
other out. That sounds right to me.
See, that's how you know they're smart, is because they're using Greek letters.
Mm-hmm. Yep.
Mm-hmm.
Which Greek letters do they use, and which person's fraternity does it represent?
I don't even speak Greek letters, so they are, they must be smarter than me. You know what? I rescind my complaints.
This is how the economy dies, not through tragedy, but through farce.
It's both.
It is both.
Tragedy for us.
I think here's what Mark's called it.
A lot of people are gonna die.
You know, and I mean like my actual serious line on this is that
this is the great double bind of capitalism.
Is that we are all reliant, simultaneously we are reliant
for our survival on the same economy that will make us all homeless.
Right? Is the same economy that we need to fucking eat every single day, that
even in good times, this economy fucking strips from us the value of the labor we produce
and hands us back a bunch of fucking scraps that pay for not enough of anything that we
need. So even as our enemies, you know, tear apart the system that exploits us, we are
the fucking ones who's going to suffer. Neoliberalism, finally, has in Trump produced its own gravedigger
and our fucking job, and the job of every single one of us
and every single person listening to this show,
is to make sure that we also aren't the ones thrown into this fucking grave.
And this is going to require a kind of organizing
that is in some ways like, but in some ways unlike anything we've done before.
We're about to experience a level of unbelievable economic chaos
that we sort of saw during 2020, but during 2020, there was, you know,
as bad as everything got, the state stepped in and decided to do welfare reforms, right?
Like they gave people a bunch of fucking money.
It wasn't enough, but they did it.
Now, none of that shit.
We are the only people who are going to be able to keep each other alive
And that's that's what we have to be doing right now is we have to be keeping each other alive until
We are organized enough and we are powerful enough to fucking run these people out
They can't ever fuck us again like this we can resurrect
Neoliberal globalism we can restore free trade. That's right. That's right. Bring it back to the Clinton era. Oh, God.
One last thing we should mention is that, like, this has already united the entire
world against us.
Effectively, people, countries who have never worked together before in their
entire existence are working together.
And unfortunately, polls also show Americans can distrust or the tendency to
view, like, Canadians and the EU as enemies is rising both Republicans and Democrats
Yeah, so that's great. That's great. Cool. Cool. Cool. Cool. Cool. Cool
Yeah, and also, you know and like the thing to think the other thing that we have to do here and this is this is
Literally our responsibility on this podcast and also the responsibility of like fucking everyone who is having conversations with another person
Is that this is entirely Trump's fault. He fucking did this. Like, this is not fucking the EU or whatever the fuck,
whoever's doing retaliatory. Yeah, this is no one else ever wanted this.
Yeah, no, like the people who put Trump in power didn't want this. This is just him.
And so, yeah, the actual solution to this is all of us running this fucker out and not us getting drawn into his fucking bullshit wars with Canada or Greenland or whatever the fuck country he decides to invade in the next like year.
Is that all for tariff talk?
Yeah, that's all we got on the tariff.
I don't know what else to say. I mean, just looking at the numbers right now,
where the Dow Industrial is down to 1500 points
since the start of the day, so
things are looking very good.
All of the lines, like, if you look at
the way in which the line went down,
there's like, it's just this direct vertical drop on the third. Yep.
It's shocking.
No, it is a 90 degree angle.
It is legitimately, if you set the Google stock viewer thing to a one day view, the
drop is so shocking that it looks like it just started down.
Yeah.
It prompts you to turn your phone in the other direction.
I've never seen anything like it, but I guess no one has.
Yeah.
No, I mean, some of us, I guess people still alive in the 1930s.
Yeah, I guess.
Woody Guthrie has.
My fucking grandma, I guess.
Like...
Yeah, it's great. We did it in the 1930s.
It was bad then, and it's bad now.
Well, now that we got those pesky tariffs out of the way,
let's talk about the actual most important thing to happen this week in the news.
New Jersey Senator Cory Booker has broken the record
for the longest speech at 25 hours and five minutes.
Yeah, that's horrible.
Beating Strom Thurman's filibuster of the 1957 Civil Rights Bill
by 46 minutes.
We did it folks.
Excellent.
Outstanding, good.
I'm just checking on our Wall Street bets
and they're having a real one today.
That's pretty funny.
I will say, I will say the thing about the Booker one.
So if you were writing a parody of the Democratic Party,
you would write that Cory Booker did this and like did the did this filibuster
and then immediately turned around and voted yes for a cloture vote
to allow Trump to appoint another nominee. Yeah.
And that's exactly what they did.
Yeah. We can't even pair.
You can't pair into them. It's beyond parody.
I like it's astounding. It's astonishing.
It's not even a filibuster. He's not filibustering anything.
He didn't actively stop anything happening other than people not paying attention to
I got a response from someone being like well, you know, they didn't get to do anything on Monday
And I was like, yeah, they weren't really planning on it and things continued as normal Tuesday
Yeah, yeah, and you know and here's the thing about that, right?
Like do you know how many Democrats there are in the Senate?
Do you know how many hours you could filibuster them for if you were actually
Determined to fucking do this and on how many different things we had a rotating series of Democrats
Yeah, sure if you tag-teamed it. Yeah, but they're not they're not willing to fucking do it
No, they'd be stopped eventually the Republicans would do something fucked up to stop it, but at least you'd have tried
Yeah, yeah, and people would maybe take some fucking energy from that.
And even if you were gonna do this as a fucking show vote thing,
you could have voted no on the cloture motion to like fucking do the, to like appoint the next nominee.
They're just like, no, fuck you.
The fact that Chuck Schumer caved on the Republican budget from a few weeks ago
and secretly got a number of Democratic senators
to switch their votes to make it pass.
And no one did this for that,
which previously Democrats were talking about,
this budget bill, because it's the worst thing to ever happen,
because it is a bad bill.
Yeah, it's really bad.
And then they just caved last minute,
or specifically Schumer and the people he talked to caved,
and Schumer definitely would not have been in support
of Booker doing something like this for that bill, but now Schumer gets to applaud along as Booker delivers a
25-hour maybe like well-orated speech, but it was well-written speech like technically it was good
But that didn't matter. It's it's just this pure show of like symbolic theater
Yeah, what's the point?
It's like if a congressperson got out and conducted a perfect rendition of the Nutcracker symphony of the ballet portion of that on their own in front of the Capitol building.
Well, that's impressive.
It's spectacle.
You're clearly very good at what you're doing, but it didn't change anything.
It had no impact on the problems.
Right?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Like, you're good.
I'll give you that.
Cory Booker can deliver a fucking speech, but that was really not what I was looking for.
Fiddling impressively while Rome burns.
Thanks Cory.
Yeah, and every single moment that Trump is in power, the way that they fucking just rolled
over for him looks worse and worse.
He acknowledged it in the speech.
He said, I failed, and so did we.
We didn't rise to the moment and we let this horrible thing happen.
Even I got a little briefly, oh shit, maybe he actually recognizes like, no, okay.
Although, because it took him like 20 hours
to like break emotionally to the point
where he could like admit that to himself.
Acknowledge his deep, deep, deep failure.
Yeah, but like it took having your brain be shattered
by this like pretty impressive physical act
that like destroys your body, soul and spirit.
Anyway, I think that's all we have to say about that.
Let's go on an ad break and come back to discuss more...
sad... and actually also possibly good news.
Or at least bad for Elon Musk, which is good for us.
Alright, we are back. I think let's pivot to James Stout for an update on Venezuela.
No, El Salvador.
Well, no.
El Salvador, yeah.
El Salvador, the torture labor labor, prison James. Mm-hmm, of course we have to begin my segment today
by saying,
Gordogbuna teperosbeita Abdullah Ozilan,
whose birthday it is on the day that you're hearing this.
So if you want to plant a tree for Apo,
get out there and plant your tree.
Unfortunately, that is the only good news we have today.
Border Patrol has spent most of this week
touting the quote,
lowest number of border crossings in history. It was shocklessness to hear that this is
not historically accurate. Border encounters are way down. If there's one
thing that I have ever taught you it is that border encounters are not the same
as unique individuals because people are being sent directly back to Mexico and
will tend to return attempting a different route crossing the border, right?
Those are way down and they're the lowest since they began publishing monthly data in 2000.
But numbers were way lower in the 50s and 60s and before that. It's relatively immaterial. It's just
sort of a nitpicky point, I guess. Today, what I really want to talk about is the case of Mr. Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He was removed by the Trump administration
to El Salvador to Secot in a way that they have admitted was a mistake. So we have to
go back a little bit to understand Mr. Abrego Garcia's story and how we got here. He was
arrested in mid-March due to the United States government claim that he played a quote prominent
role in MS-13, MS-13 being the Salvadorian
gang, right? He'd come to the United States in 2011, he was fleeing gang violence. He was allegedly
arrested in 2019 outside a home depot where he was standing with other men looking for work.
However, the incident report for that particular incident gives other names but not his. At that point a Prince
George's County Police Department detective filled out a quote gang
worksheet and claimed that Mr. Abragog Garcia was associated with a member of
MS-13. The evidence he cited for this was a Chicago Bulls hoodie and the claim of
a confidential informant. The confidential informant claimed that he was part of a group within this gang
that was set up in a state that Mr. Abdel-Ghassi had never lived in.
The United States in 2019, ICE argued that he shouldn't be given bond
because of this alleged gang membership, right?
And so he wasn't given bond, but through an asylum claim, although he didn't get asylum, he was protected from removal, right? And so he wasn't given bond, but through an asylum claim,
although he didn't get asylum, he was protected from removal, right? So a judge ruled that he
couldn't be removed back to El Salvador, where he would presumably face violence.
When Mr. Abragó GarcÃa's lawyers tried to interview the police detective who had filed
this report accusing him of gang membership, they found no record of his rest and that the
detective has been suspended since then. The department in question also settled a lawsuit
with its own cops over racism in the department. JD Vance, who has a law degree, right? The JD is,
I guess, before and after his name. He has a law degree from Harvard, has claimed that Mr.
Abragol Garcia is a convicted member of MS 13. This is not true. I can't find any evidence that he has any conviction of any kind.
I'm going to quote here from a filing by the United States government.
On the 15th of March, although ICE was aware of his protection from removal to El Salvador,
Abragol Garcia was removed to El Salvador because of an administrative error.
So the government there has admitted in a court filing that they accidentally sent
this guy to the prison labor camp in El Salvador. According to ICE acting field officer Robert Cerner,
quote, he was an alternate as others were removed from the flight for various reasons. He moved up
the list and was assigned to the flight. So it appears that they had a large list of people they
wanted to put on this flight.
This is interesting, right?
It's an insight into their process
for filling that first flight.
Some people they clearly didn't feel
they had enough evidence for,
but somehow this guy who again has never been convicted
of having any membership of any gang,
they put on this flight, right?
His wife and child are both US citizens
and they have sued in court. That's why we're seeing this, right? They wife and child are both US citizens and they have sued in
court. That's why we're seeing this, right? They've sued for the United States government
to stop paying El Salvador for his detention and for the United States government to demand
he return. Vance has advanced a kind of unique legal theory in response, claiming that withholding
of removal only prevents someone being deported back to their home state. I mean, you could technically, that is what the withholding is, right? Like, if he can't
go back to El Salvador, because he will be at risk in El Salvador. So they can deport him to a third
state, but they deported him to El Salvador, or renditioned him to El Salvador, right? I want to
read JD Vance's post here. I'm not going to read the whole thing,
but I'll start with the second paragraph. In 2019, immigration judge, parentheses under the Biden
administration, for those of you who are familiar with dates, it's 2019, it was under the first
Trump administration. That was the Trump administration. Okay, moving on. Determined
that the deported man was in fact a member of the MS-13 gang.
He also apparently had multiple traffic violations, for which he failed to appear in court. A
real winner. It is telling that the entire American media is going to run a propaganda
operation today, making you think that an innocent quote father of three was apprehended
by a Gulag. Father of three is in quotes here, by the way.
Yeah. Yeah. And Gulags generally not capable of doing the apprehensions themselves. If
we think of a Gulag as a place, it is the police who apprehend the person, send them
to the Gulag. Moving on. Here are the relevant facts. I'm still quoting. The man is an illegal
immigrant with no right to be in our country. Obviously the judge determined that he was
protected from removal, quoting again,
an immigration judge during the Biden admin determined
he was a member of the MS-13 gang.
Again, that's not the case.
It's staggering the extent to which they can say a sentence
where every single individual word is a lie, like stunning.
Yeah, yeah.
The fact that so many members of the modern Republican party
have like memory hold 2019
and 2020 as being under the Biden administration is just insane.
Yeah, it's bizarre.
I think what they were referring to is that the initial hearing right where he was denied
bomb was in 2019 and then he filed his asylum claim and later was protected from removal.
But that's not what they're saying here.
But like even the way they talk about like the COVID response, they talk about
2020.
They talk about it as if Joe Biden was the president.
They're not going to lock us down again.
But you locked us down.
Yeah, who did that?
And then the last one, and I think it's most revelatory, because he's not a citizen, he
does not get full jury trial by peers.
In other words, whatever due process he was entitled to, he received.
The immigration court doesn't generally present the opportunity for a jury trial. Vance again holds a JD,
and he presumably knows this. What's more disturbing is the claim made by the United
States government in its filing in this lawsuit that the Abrago Garcia family filed.
Quote, because plaintiffs concede that Abrago Garcia is not in the United States custody. This court cannot hear these claims
So they're claiming that no US court has jurisdiction
Over the question of these people who are in El Salvador because they're not in US custody, right?
Which obviously if they stick the landing on this it suggests that like it is a one-way ticket to the prison labor camp
Right that you cannot challenge that in US court.
Um, and you ain't going to get very far in, in, in court in El Salvador.
Right.
So like what they're suggesting here is this is, this is a forever detention
that, that there is no habeas, right?
That that was the, they were asking for habeas corpus.
Can you explain what habeas corpus actually is for the listeners?
Yeah.
It means bring me the body, right?
In this case it is.
Yeah. You'll have to present body, right? In this case, it is.
Yeah, you'll have to present evidence in order to charge, like, convict people of things.
It's like the sine qua non of having a justice system, a criminal justice system, right?
Like, show something.
Yeah, you can't just be like, bad man, and then put the guy in jail.
The most basic thing is that, like, yeah, I mean, in literal terms, it means you have
to, like, actually take somebody in front of a most basic thing is that like, yeah, in literal terms, it means you have to like actually take
somebody in front of a court in order to determine
if they're like being detained for a reason, right?
Like a judge has to see them and say like, yes,
this is not an unlawful imprisonment.
There is a charge.
There is some degree of evidence that somebody did something.
Right, which they have not provided here, right?
Not that like you can prove they
did it, but like something was done and you are here for that for a reason. Yeah. Yeah.
So in this case, we don't have any of that. Mr. Abrigo Garcia is still, the way his family
found out he was in Secod was that his wife identified him by scars on his head when they
shaved it and a tattoo they saw. Jesus Christ.
Yeah, they had no idea. It presumably doesn't come up on the ICE detainee locator, you know,
that you're going to look up your family members on if your family members are detained by ICE,
it doesn't have El Salvador as an option. So yeah, this is where we're at. This is a case
I will be following, right, because I say it's pretty pivotal. If they can argue that the court
doesn't have jurisdiction, obviously, I'm sure at that point, that ruling will be following, right, because I say it's pretty pivotal. If they can argue that the court doesn't have jurisdiction, obviously, I'm sure at that point, that ruling will be challenged,
it'll run up the courts. Currently, it seems like the only court they're going to listen to is the
Supreme Court. But evidently, this is what they're going for. Like this is their argument here that
once you're in El Salvador, you're out of their hands, and they can't do anything. So sorry,
even though it was a mistake,
you're stuck there forever, which is pretty disturbing.
Yesterday, me and James did an episode
on ISIS targeting of students, scholars, and professors
that they believe are associated with pro-Palestine protests.
So we did an update on that story
that I did a piece on or a segment on last week
on executive disorder. So for a follow-up on that, that I did a piece on or a segment on last week on executive disorder.
So for a follow-up on that, you can look to yesterday's episode.
But we are going to close with, I guess, kind of a feel-good story because it makes Elon Musk sad.
He has had a bit of a rough week for Mr. Musk's businesses and his political projects, I guess.
Elon Musk's efforts to buy the Wisconsin Supreme Court have failed as the Democratic-backed
candidate swept the election, maintaining 4-3 liberal control of the Supreme Court of
Wisconsin.
Yeah, I mean, the gist of it is, like three or four days ago, all of my friends who are sconnies got furious
because Elon Musk wore a cheese head,
you know, like the ones for the Packers
that people from Wisconsin wear when they're at games,
while he got up on stage and gave a million dollars,
basically immediately before,
like a little less than a week ago,
a higher court ruled that it was not bribery for him to offer people a million dollars at random if they like
Voted or showed up at like, you know different rallies and stuff
Which is like what he's been doing right is making these basically fake offers of a million dollars
Because these two went to members of the local Republican Party like it was clearly set up
Yeah, the head of the college Republicans of Wisconsin.
Amazing.
Must spend 25 million dollars on this race.
He danced around on stage wearing a cheese head
and he gave out million dollar novelty checks
to quote unquote voters who won a contest
by signing his petition against activist judges,
which has been the new rally and cry on the right.
Everything that's going wrong, everything that's stopping Trump
is from these activist judges that we have to unseat.
He also gave $100 each to every person who signed that petition,
and on election day, Musk offered voters $50
if they posted a picture of a Wisconsin resident
outside of a polling place.
Yeah. How is that allowed? These are the same people who scream about like election interference,
rigging elections, buying elections, stealing elections. And like, what, like this is insane
stuff. You can go to jail for giving people a water bottle in line at polling places in multiple states. And Musk is allowed to give
people $50 for pictures posted outside of polling places. What the fuck is happening?
But luckily, the negative polarization against Musk and Tesla that's been increasing the past
few months has resulted in Judge Seuven Crawford beating the mega hat Republican judge who last
year went as Donald Trump for Halloween, beating this guy by 10%. This was a massive, a massive
reversal of the 2024 presidential election results in Wisconsin. There was a record high turnout for
this spring election, 40 percent higher than
the last Wisconsin Supreme Court
election, which was in
2023, which was, by the way, that was
that was also a high turnout election
to. Yeah, yeah.
Yeah. Like that that previous one, then
this one just fucking obliterated.
Like this, this was like just under
the results of like what you would
expect out of like a midterm election.
Yeah, yeah.
They shifted every single county in the state blue
compared to the 2024 presidential election
and on average by about 10 to 12 points.
Massive, massive shifts.
And this was before the tariffs, by the way.
Like, this was before the tariffs were announced.
No, this was pure personal dislike of Elon Musk meddling in Wisconsin politics.
Well, like and everything else has happened since January, but like it does seem like
Elon Musk's personal presence was a net negative and all the money he spent.
Luckily, the next day there was a Tesla sales report, which was one of the worst in the history of their company, 50
percent fewer vehicles being delivered in the first three months compared to last year
with Tesla stock continuing to plunge the past week.
Although with reports that that Musk might exit the inner circle of the Trump administration,
those stocks are kind of flipping back and forth
as he's expected to return to his companies.
Yeah, yeah, and who knows,
like a lot of that's clearly the tariffs.
Well, yes, and then with the tariffs,
this is a whole other issue.
Real double whammy for Tesla.
The reporting is that people around Trump
have largely soured on Musk.
Who knows how true that is?
There's always a lot of like reports
from the Trump inner circle that are like, I don't know.
He's always had a very leaky.
Yeah.
But, and I can see it being multi-causal, like Musk has failed badly in Wisconsin.
The kind of suspicion right now is that Schiebel or whatever his name is was down by about
five points relative to other MAGA candidates in the same election, which people are attributing
largely to Musk's intervention.
Well, and like they were testing out if he was like a stable, consistent, reliable political
operator or if what he did in 2024 was kind of like a one off event, if he's like a one
trick pony there.
And this this complete like devastating loss demonstrated that maybe this unstable drug addict, no offense
to drug addicts, but specifically for Elon Musk, who's railing ketamine all the time
and trying to run the entire world, luckily my friends who might indulge in ketamine don't
try to run the entire world.
You say that now, but you'll get older at some point.
They'll have midlife crises too.
But he was shown in a very public way to be an unstable political force. And yeah,
that's going to turn some of the people in the Trump admin against him. Yep. Anyway,
that's I think that's all I have to say about this Wisconsin race. Wisconsin race, sorry.
All right. Well, I think that's probably an episode.
Wait, shit, hold on. I just found the funniest fucking thing about this tariff
I think I've seen yet from fucking VFX.
Oh wait, wait, wait. One sec, one sec.
Tariff, don't like it.
Rockin' to Casbah. Rockin' to Casbah.
Tariff, don't like it.
Rockin' to Casbah. Rockin' Casper, Tariff don't like it Rockin' Casper, Rockin' Casper
Okay, we're back.
Apparently, the tariffs are not broken down by country.
This is a quote from this guy in VFX on Twitter.
They're not broken down by country, they're broken down by top level internet domain.
No!
It's why the island is populated entirely by penguins, dot-hm domain and why the Diego Garcia military base
Yeah, yeah, yeah like fucking McDonald's Island. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, and why why reunion?
Gibraltar are listed so I wanted to have a bro tomato on that yeah, like yeah, what love reunion is part of France
Why are we hitting these guys?
these guys okay that makes sense that that that is that that is what a 19 year old who never went to college my god but thinks he's he understands all
of reality would do okay great dictatorship of Chad GPT fucking
phenomenal my fucking god unbelievable look look okay the note I want to close
on is that, so,
podcast of Mike Duncan, the creator of the Revolutions podcast, a man who has spent literally tens of thousands of hours
writing about, like, every revolution that's ever happened. At the end of the original run of the series,
Revolutions, he makes this point, which is that all revolutions
work because they encounter, you encounter one of the great idiots of history a
man who is blessed with with the in in the
Inalienable ability to make the wrong decision at every single time and my god if we can't beat these motherfuckers
Like if that shit's entirely on us because we have been handed one of the greatest idiots of history that has ever existed in the history
of humanity and our fucking job now is to turn that into fucking a better world do something
Yeah, we'll see the problem is that there's a lot of greater idiots out there and they all they all do still have guns and
Mm-hmm and money one of the great tragedies of the world is that very very stupid people can still fire guns
We made him too easy, folks.
Yeah, I've seen that happen a couple times in the old conduct of my work.
Anyway.
Alright, well, we reported the news.
We reported the news.
Now, you go out there and, you know what, find someone who lives on the Isle of McDonald
near the Arctic and kick their ass today.
Fuck them up.
Fuck that island.
Do trade with a penguin.
Pay 10% more.
Yeah.
Send us a picture of you fighting a penguin and we'll make sure you get a hat or something.
Yeah.
We'll send you some merch.
We reported the news.
Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week from now until the heat death of
the universe.
It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.
For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonedmedia.com, or check
us out on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
You can now find sources for It Could Happen here listed directly in episode descriptions.
Thanks for listening.
Hey all you Women's Hoops fans, and folks who just don't know yet that they're Women's
Hoops fans.
We've got a big week over at Good Game with Sarah Spain as we near the end of one of the
most exciting women's college basketball seasons ever. The most parody we've seen in years, with games coming down to the wire
and everyone wondering which team will be crowned national champions this weekend in
Tampa.
Listen to Good Game with Sarah Spain on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
you get your podcasts.
Imagine you're scrolling through TikTok. You come across a video of a teenage girl
and then a photo of the person suspected of killing her.
It was shocking.
It was very shocking.
Like that could have been my daughter.
Like you never know.
I'm Jen Swan.
I'm the host of a new podcast called My Friend Daisy.
It's the story of how and why a group of teenagers
turn to social media to help track down
their friend's killer. Listen to My Friend Daisy on the iHeart Radio app, Apple
podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 2020 a group of young women found themselves in an AI fueled nightmare.
Someone was posting photos. It was just me naked. Well not me but me with someone
else's body parts.
This is Levittown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts, Bloomberg and Kaleidoscope about
the rise of deep fake pornography and the battle to stop it.
Listen to Levittown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
What's up?
I'm Laura, host of the podcast Courtside with Laura Corenti, a masterclass case study
of the business of women's sports.
I'll be chatting with leaders like tennis icon Alana Klaus.
I don't do what I do only for women.
I do it for everyone.
And I want the whole market.
And innovators like Jenny Nguyen.
I would say 50% of the people that come visit the Sports Bra
aren't sports fans.
They come to be in community.
They come to be part of this culture.
Courtside with Laura Karenty is an iHeart Women's Sports production in partnership with
Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment.
Listen to Courtside with Laura Karenty on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
you get your podcasts.
Presented by Elf Beauty, founding partner of iHeart Women's Sports.