It Could Happen Here - It Could Happen Here Weekly 179
Episode Date: April 26, 2025All of this week's episodes of It Could Happen Here put together in one large file. Elon Musk and The Martian Revolution feat. Mike Duncan The City Sold Your Water feat. Prop Nihilist Viol...ent Extremism Robert's Guide to The Next Six Months of Danger and Resistance Executive Disorder: White House Weekly #13 You can now listen to all Cool Zone Media shows, 100% ad-free through the Cooler Zone Media subscription, available exclusively on Apple Podcasts. So, open your Apple Podcasts app, search for “Cooler Zone Media” and subscribe today! http://apple.co/coolerzone Sources/Links: Nihilist Violent Extremism https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=%22nihilistic%20violent%20extremists%22&type=r&order_by=dateFiled%20asc https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/fbi-dhs-domestic-terrorism-definitions-terminology-methodology.pdf https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/fbi-kash-patel-antifa-blm-terror-groups https://globalextremism.org/post/trump-abandoning-efforts-to-combat-white-supremacist/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/28/fbi-kash-patel-investigations-far-right https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fbi-scales-back-staffing-tracking-domestic-terrorism-probes-sources-say-2025-03-21/ https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/fbi-dhs-domestic-terrorism-strategic-report.pdf/view https://www.dni.gov/files/NCTC/documents/news_documents/2022_10_FBI-DHS_Strategic_Intelligence_Assessment_and_Data_on_Domestic_Terrorism.pdf https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2023-07/23_0724_opa_strategic-intelligence-assessment-data-domestic-terrorism.pdf https://bxwrites.substack.com/p/exclusive-the-satanic-plot-to-assassinate https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/what-are-nihilist-violent-extremists?r=1aiy5i&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false Executive Disorder: White House Weekly #13 https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/justices-temporarily-bar-government-from-removing-venezuelan-men-under-alien-enemies-act/ https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.98.1_1.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.100.0_2.pdf https://www.dcnewsnow.com/news/local-news/maryland/prince-georges-county/hyattsville-police-department-details-2019-encounter-with-kilmar-abrego-garcia/ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/22/us/venezuela-immigrant-disappear-deport-ice.html https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/us-rwanda-relocates-iraqi-refugee-omar-ameen https://news.azpm.org/s/100806-us-citizen-detained-for-10-days-by-immigration-officials-may-not-have-known-what-he-was-signing/ https://x.com/DHSgov/status/1914393644766843386 https://bsky.app/profile/juddlegum.bsky.social/post/3lni7mlxow22c https://www.axios.com/2025/04/23/musk-bessent-trump-white-house-irs https://news.azpm.org/p/news-articles/2025/4/18/224512-us-citizen-in-arizona-detained-by-immigration-officials-for-10-days/ https://floridaphoenix.com/2025/04/21/feds-blame-u-s-citizen-for-his-arrest-under-suspended-immigration-law/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/04/21/doge-musk-trump-federal-employees-emails/ https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/elon-musk-donald-trump-doge-b2736753.html https://insideevs.com/news/753730/tesla-insurance-vandalism-elon-musk/ https://abcnews.go.com/Business/tesla-earnings-show-anti-musk-backlash-damaged-bottom/story?id=121008566&cid=social_twitter_abcn https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/22/busiest-us-ports-see-big-drop-in-chinese-freight-vessel-traffic.html https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/21/peter-navarro-the-economist-who-has-outsmarted-elon-musk-and-has-the-ear-of-donald-trump https://archive.ph/v8Vp1 https://www.axios.com/2025/04/23/trump-economy-tariffs-china-powellSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
In 2020, a group of young women found themselves in an AI-fuelled nightmare.
Someone was posting photos.
It was just me naked.
Well, not me, but me with someone else's body parts.
This is Levittown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts, Bloomberg and Kaleidoscope,
about the rise of deepfake pornography and the battle to stop it.
Listen to Levittown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Clayton English.
I'm Greg Glott.
And this is season two of the War on Drugs by a Cat.
Last year, a lot of the problems of the drug war this year,
a lot of the biggest names in music and sports.
This is kind of star-studded a little bit, man.
We met them at their homes.
We met them at their recording studios.
Stories matter, and it brings a face to them.
It makes it real.
It really does.
It makes it real.
Listen to new episodes of the War on Drugs podcast season
two on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcast.
I'm ready to fight.
Oh, this is fighting words.
OK, I'll put the hammer back. Hi, I'm George M. Johnson, a bestselling author with the second most banned book in
America.
Now more than ever, we need to use our voices to fight back.
Part of the power of black queer creativity is the fact that we got us, you know?
We are the greatest culture makers in world history. Listen to Fighting Words on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your
podcast.
Hi, I'm Sam Mullins, and I've got a new podcast coming out called Go Boy, the gritty true
story of how one man fought his way out of some of the darkest places imaginable.
Roger Caron was 16 when first convicted.
Has spent 24 of those years in jail.
But when Roger Caron picked up a pen and paper, he went from an ex-con to a literary darling.
From Campside Media and iHeart Podcasts, listen to Go Boy on the iHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, everybody. Robert Evans here and I wanted to let you know this is a compilation episode.
Every episode of the week that just happened is here in one convenient and with somewhat
less ads package for you to listen to in a long stretch if you want.
If you've been listening to the episodes every day this week,
there's gonna be nothing new here for you,
but you can make your own decisions.
Welcome back to It Could Happen Here,
a podcast about it happening here,
which is, you know, these days normally about the fact that
it's happening here.
But today, we're here to talk about a show
where it happens somewhere else, a place that
people aren't yet, but may one day be in the future.
We're talking about the Martian Revolution with the great Mike Duncan of the Revolutions
Podcast.
Mia Wong joining me on this interview.
Welcome to the show, Mike.
Thank you very much for having me.
So let's talk about this because I've kept up and been listening to revolutions for years,
and I started seeing messages earlier this year
that like Mike Duncan is doing this
fictional revolution podcast on the Martian Revolution,
and it seems to map really, really closely
with a lot of stuff that's happening right now
in the United States.
And I'm wondering kind of,
to what extent did you anticipate
that being an initial
reaction to this when you started really finally laying down like the text for these episodes?
I did not expect that at all. Not at all. What has been happening to me has been one
of the most surreal six months of my life in terms of what I am writing and dropping out
into the world and then I turn on the news three weeks later,
four weeks later, and I'm just watching exactly
what I wrote down in the show come to life.
It is horrifying and I hate it.
Yeah, welcome to the club.
Yeah, yeah, I mean, you guys have to change
the name of your show because there's no good about it,
man, we're just here.
It's just going, yeah.
You know, I've had the notion to do
this Martian Revolution series for years.
Like, I think I first came up with it back
during like the French Revolution days,
is when I was like, you know,
it would be a really cool thing to do.
It's like, once I've got all of these under my belt,
just like make up a fictional revolution
that kind of follows along like many of the plot points
of previous revolutions.
And so this has been kind of like years in the making.
And a lot of the sort of like plot points and ideas
that I wanted to do, you know,
I wanted it to be like a monopoly corporation
because I also wanted to do some like social commentary
and like what are the issues
that we're kind of dealing with right now.
And, you know, and then I'm like, okay, then there's this thing called the new protocols
that is going to, you know, help jumpstart the revolution.
And this is somebody coming in and just, you know, implementing whole new software programs
and hardware programs without any care for like what it does to people.
Then there's mass layoffs that are a part of this.
And then deportations are, you know, like all a part of the story
of how the Martian revolution gets going.
And, you know, this stuff was plotted out in October.
And I got to tell you, you know, maybe I was naive.
Maybe I had my head in the sand.
I thought she was gonna win, man.
Like I thought Harris was gonna win the election.
That's where my head was at in September and October,
going into November.
I was like, it'll be close, of course it will.
It's a toss-up, but I think she'll pull it out in the end.
It sure feels like it because they were running
a terrible campaign and they didn't have any field operations
and the whole thing just kind of seemed
like she was gonna win.
So for Trump to win and then start doing all of these things
that were just supposed to be fictional plot points.
Oh yeah.
That were reference, yeah, now I'm just like, are doing all of these things that were just supposed to be fictional plot points. Oh yeah.
That were referenced, yeah, like now I'm just like,
Jesus Christ, this is terrible.
Well, that's what's so interesting is because yeah,
so much of the initial, as you imagine it,
the opening stages of the Martian revolution
in your series are based on a a guy who is a quote unquote
like partly like an auto didact, right? Like a dude who is raised believing that his ideas
are good because they're his ideas. And he can kind of jump into any field of human endeavor
and make things work better than the people who have been studying and working in that
field for their entire lives. And he just starts changing everything based on his whims. Now, you don't
have him staying up until four in the morning on ketamine benders and then tweeting out his
ideas for how to change the government. But, you know, I guess I'd say like that's the
one the one thing that doesn't map onto right now. And I think this is this almost just
goes inherently with the act of crafting fiction. Even your bad guys are a lot more sympathetic
than our current ones.
Like, yeah, which I think is to your credit,
but like I've enjoyed the degree to which
the decisions that are being made
that are kind of making this Martian revolution inevitable
are the kind of decisions that you make
when you've been raised in these sorts of bubbles
where you are expected to just sort of be able are the kind of decisions that you make when you've been raised in these sorts of bubbles
where you are expected to just sort of be able
to run things because like that's the strata
that you come from.
And it maps directly to like what we're seeing right now
with these Silicon Valley guys
who have spent the last few decades
getting impossible amounts of money
and having that convince them
that they know how to do everything.
But it also maps back to like Versailles.
I find that compelling.
Yeah, and you know, the Timothy Werner character,
he's like sort of the figure against whom the revolution is going to start
after he comes in and starts doing all this stuff.
Like, number one, of course, as I'm releasing this,
people are just like, this is just a cardboard cutout of Elon Musk, right?
And which I would point out, the first thing is like,
actually no, because I very specifically wrote it,
so he was a good husband and father.
Yes, he loves his kids.
It's obviously not Elon Musk because he loves his kids.
He's allowed to be in the same room as all of them.
Yeah, yeah, they get along great and everything.
So obviously it's not, but honest to God,
like it wasn't meant to be just much,
but it was meant to be those tech guys, right?
Like this is meant to be thinking about the guys
who come in and they're like,
we're gonna move fast and break things.
And then what they break is like 120 years of like labor law.
And that's the only thing that is actually being broken here.
Like this is what Uber is and all of those kinds of like, all of that stuff that
came at us in the last like 10 or 15 years. And they think that yes, because they can code well,
or because they had this one ability to like, you know, market something in an effective way,
that that means that they are brilliant and can do everything and everywhere for everybody. And like,
we're going to reinvent this and we're going to reinvent that. But they have no idea what they're doing
or what they're talking about.
And you run into these people on Twitter all the time,
this phenomenon of people being good in one area
and then becoming sort of all purpose
general knowledge experts when it's like,
you don't have any idea what you're talking about.
And so there's a line that's in there
where it's like, where Werner,
the way that he thought is,
I'm smart, therefore the ideas I have must be smart.
And that is something that's not about Musk,
that's about like just people I run into
on Twitter all the time.
That's a phenomenon, that's a generalizable phenomenon.
No, I mean, yeah, we talk about that constantly
on the show, like we just did that four-parter
on the Zizians
that come out of like the rationalist,
Bay Area tech industry cult,
which is both influential in a lot of the people
who wound up working at Doge
and just to the general tech mindset.
And it's the human embodiment of that idea that like,
well, I know how to code, coding's difficult.
That means I'm smart.
This must mean I know how to run the schools, right?
This must mean I know how to replace Medicare, right?
And it's this kind of like reasoning from first principles without ever actually like
having to sit face to face with the consequences of your decisions.
And I think you do a great job of showing how that cascades into a calamity and in a
way that feels very realistic,
even though we're talking about Mars
and there's also like gravity generators and the like.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, it's, and what, you know, what Werner does here
is so much of what Doge basically started doing
when they start going into these systems,
they start changing codes, they have no idea what are the key things that are actually underpinning our society.
The most recent thing I saw that made me think of this is like they're shutting down all
the regional offices of the Social Security Administration and like all communications
are now going to be run through Twitter, right?
And one of Timothy Warner's things is the centralization of all decision making and
the centralization of really everything.
And in his mind, it would be more efficient if the company just had one brain and that
was his brain and every decision is made by the one brain.
And so he's got all this stuff and he's got to make all these decisions, except that is,
that's crazy.
That is not actually how you can run anything.
And it just creates all of this, like basically everybody, I forget if I wrote this in, no, I definitely did.
That like the dreaded like request pending screen
that people started getting, they would submit stuff
like a fuel requisition order
and it would just say request pending.
And like request pending would never go away.
It would just, that's what it would say.
And then you look at what they're doing now
and they are trying to centralize everything.
It's a generalized authoritarian power grab,
but they are doing these things.
Yeah.
One of the things that it reminds me the most of
from the other revolutions is I immediately went,
wait, this is our Nicholas,
where you have less of the reform package.
Well, like, yeah, the way that all of the power
gets concentrated and centralized into this
one guy who's a micromanager and then can't do it because no human could possibly have
done it.
But they're not, because of just their sort of affect of power and the way that they think
about micromanaging anything, they're incapable of letting their subordinates do things.
Yeah.
Yeah, it also scans with the loves his kids part.
Good husband.
Yeah, well, I mean, that's the thing is like,
everything that's in the show also
is like basically something that comes from history, right?
Like, and I am trying to do that.
And it is something that, you know, like Charles the first,
Louis the 16th, Tsar Nicholas,
these guys are all great family men.
Their kids love them and they love their kids, right?
Like one of the reasons the French Revolution happened
is because Louis' son died,
like on the eve of the estates general
and he was just not there because his son had just died.
That's a real thing that happened.
And the other stuff is like that sort of centralization
of power is a lot of like what I was trying to get at there
was actually like the reforms that went
in for the European colonial powers after the seven years war in the Anglo colonies and the
Spanish colonies and the French colonies. All of those governments sort of undertook
a reorganization of their colonial structures after the seven years war. It kind of like
reshuffled who had what territory and all of those moves were about sort of an increasing presence of the
Metropole in colonial life. And this is what triggers, you know, the American Revolution,
because there was going to be like two more customs officials in Boston Harbor. And so like we went
into revolt about this. Yeah. But this is also true of like the Bourbon reforms in, in, in Spanish
America is that kind of like centralization of a community and of colonies that had grown very used
to managing their own affairs.
And so they're coming in and saying, well, yeah,
this is ours and we here on earth should be making
these decisions for you Martians.
And the Martians were like, well, we've been making
these decisions for ourselves for like 70 years now.
That's where that stuff is coming from.
And then history is always the place that I can point to.
And then I have to watch it also on the TV.
Yeah.
Yeah, I've had that same experience of like,
I'm writing out kind of like this possible,
this story about what a future conflict,
civil conflict in the US might look like.
And I'm just taking from stuff that happened
in the last like 10 years in a lot of cases
that I saw in different countries.
And people are like, how did you like anticipate this?
And my answer is like, I didn't.
This is just stuff that happens all the time, right?
Cause people don't learn from history as a rule.
Like no one's ever learned a lesson from history
is the thing I've kept repeating to people
over the last few years.
As I continue to fail to learn lessons from history.
Yeah, we all do.
And no, well, like one of the things
that was getting kicked around the other day was like,
I came to this point where Werner
is gonna start firing people.
He's gonna start firing people
because he's changed the metrics
for how your employment status is being rated.
And he's firing just people essentially randomly,
like you are firing the head
of this department and now that department can't run anymore but he's like it'll be more efficient
and when I was writing it it was originally supposed to be like a kind of a more dramatic
10 percent across the board layoff yeah and as I got closer to actually trying to type that up
and write it down I was like this doesn't actually feel believable to me.
Like people are gonna really push back.
And I mean this sincerely,
like people are gonna push back.
That nobody would be so stupid as to just across the board
do a 10% layoff of something so critical
as Mars is to Earth.
Because in the story, Mars is absolutely critical
to how Earth is able to function with the resource
that they're able to get from there.
And so I changed it around and actually looked to
like the sullen prescriptions from Roman history
to kind of give it a different take where really it was like
you woke up every day and there was like
15 more names on the list, 100 more names on the list.
And there was something equally sort of dramatic
and cool about that without this like unbelievable,
you know, 10% across the board cut. And I wrote a paragraph in there being like, I know that people are gonna think that without this like unbelievable, you know, 10% across the board cut.
And I wrote a paragraph in there being like,
I know that people are gonna think
that this is like unrealistic,
but you just have to understand that like throughout history,
we have seen these things.
Like people do stupid stuff
and they stubbornly cling to it all the time.
Because that is something that happens.
And life as we know it is actually less,
like if I wrote up what was happening right now,
like if I was just got like a window into an alternate world
and we're living in a different world where Trump lost
and I brought all this stuff back,
they'd be like, this is implausible, like this is crazy.
They would never be allowed to get away with that.
They would never be allowed to do that.
They're not allowed to do that.
They would never be so stupid as to blow up
the global economy with a bunch of tariffs
that make no sense to anybody.
Who wouldn't want the dollar as their reserve currency?
Yeah, why would they fuck that up?
None of nothing that is happening right now
is plausible in a fictional storytelling setting.
Yeah, yeah.
You know, this also gets something
that I've been saying a lot in this show
that I wanna get your take on,
which is like, you know, one of the things
that you wrote about in your sort of like, I guess like recap series of your experience
going through the revolutions was about like how much of the stuff is driven by like the
great idiots of history. And my God, Elon Musk and Trump look to be like two of the
greatest history. And that doesn't like guarantee that it'll happen, but like, Yeah, they're there.
The great idiot theory of revolutions
is a very simple thing, which is just saying that
revolutions don't happen because some tyrant is in power
and they are intolerably oppressing their people.
People have been intolerably oppressed for a long time.
And Trotsky's got this quote that is
if peasant discontentment was the cause of revolution
then there would be a revolution happening every single day
because the peasants are always discontented.
So what it takes to really have a revolution
is for somebody in power to be kind of incompetent
and to start doing stupid things
that allow the situation to get out of hand.
And on top of that really piss off the other elites
around them because it's the mismanagement of the state
that allows the elites that are kind of necessary
for a full blown revolution.
Like you need their resources and you need their money
and you need them being close to a position of power
to be able to pop whoever's in there at the time.
And you gotta be pretty incompetent to like,
wreck an elite consensus, right?
Like that is in and of itself catastrophically stupid
if you're trying to stay in power.
Yeah.
And so yes, the great idiot theory
is getting quite a workout lately.
Yeah.
That's actually something else that I wanted to ask you
about in terms of, like you see this in terms of Mabel Door,
right, where Mabel Dorr, right?
Where Mabel Dorr is this kind of example of like the sort of local,
I guess like local colonial elite to some extent.
Yeah.
I almost saw her as like, yeah, a lot of these kind of American revolutionary figures, right?
Where you have this person who holds a fairly high position in the colonial state
as a result of, you know, their birth and the family they come into,
but also identifies more as a member of that state of the colony than of the colonizing state.
Yep.
Yeah. And I think this is something, this is a part of the revolutionary process that I think
is really, really badly understood on the left in terms of, in a lot of ways, a necessity of parts
of this elite flipping. And like the other example, I think most people kind of are more familiar with is
Philippe Egalité, like the Duke d'Or alone, like funding a bunch of these sort
of revolutionary groups that eventually kind of like get out of his control.
But can you talk a bit more about sort of the role of these sort of like elite
defections and how they end up sort of funding and enabling these
revolutionary movements?
Yeah, I mean, it's a mix of things.
And I mean, you got it.
Like Mabledore is meant to be sort of the colonial elite.
And she's also meant to be sort of the liberal nobility
in lots of different revolutionary settings.
And she is doing that.
And when she is, like when I talk about her,
like funding the Society of Martians
and like funding all these like philanthropic, you know, enterprises to help Martians and funding all these philanthropic enterprises
to help Martians.
That's a lot of Philippa Galatet straight up.
That's what the Duke d'Orléans was doing in 1786, 87, and 89.
And so that's the role that she's playing.
But if the elites are unified,
it is very difficult for any kind of
peasant or worker uprising to actually get traction
and succeed in overthrowing the state.
Peasant insurrections have happened throughout history
without any sort of elite support.
They have often accomplished great things,
but when you think about the great revolutions in history,
there really have always been people in the inner
corridors of power who are ready to get rid of whoever the sovereign is in that moment.
Yeah.
And you can advance all the way to the Russian revolution. And this is the prototypical,
like the workers have risen up and the army is mutinying and it is the people who overthrow the Tsar. And what that story misses is all of the people,
even inside the Romanov family itself,
who are like so fed up with what Nicholas
and Alexander are doing that they're just like,
we don't know what to do anymore,
but like, yeah, I guess he's gotta go.
You know, like we can't get him to see reason,
we can't get him to change course,
we can't get him to do anything. we can't get him to change course, we can't get him to do anything.
Like the situation is completely out of hand.
And without those people leaning on Nicholas
to force his abdication and also to say,
like we're not gonna back you up
if you try to bring the hammer down on all these people,
then that's when sovereigns are actually overthrown.
Yes, and I love that you bring that up because it gets to the failure to see that.
And this is especially common with people who kind of idolized the 1917 revolution,
but it's certainly not limited to that.
I mean, every revolution, you have people who are fans of that revolution or who
see it as a model for what they want to do and also ignore the realities on the
ground that like made it possible.
I think one of my favorite examples is the quote
that like you can't dismantle the master's house
with the master's tools.
Well, I don't know, in those pictures
of the 1917 revolution, I see a lot of Mosins
that used to be property of the czar, right?
Like it happens all the time.
And I think that we always need to be cautious
of like seeing just what we want to see
in revolutionary history as
opposed to seeing what was there. And the thing is, is Lenin understood this, right? Like,
Lenin understood what the game was and he understood what was going on. And you don't have to,
like if you're a revolutionary and you're sympathetic to the communists in 1917, you don't
have to say, oh, well, the elites were necessary
for this first revolution and we need, you know,
we need a break inside the ruling class.
We need divisions inside the ruling class.
That doesn't mean you have to say,
and what those people want out of overthrowing the Tsar
is what we want and what we're going to accept.
Right.
You know, obviously like the cousins of Tsar Nicholas
and the people who are in those inner circles of power,
they wanted him out of there just so they could run
the empire a little bit better.
They were frustrated with how poorly the empire
was being run.
They didn't want a social revolution.
But if you're going to take down that whole system,
creating a destabilization event at the very top
is necessary, but you don't have to support
the ultimate aims of those people.
It's just, it's an ingredient.
And this is, and you see this in the course of revolutions
and you see this in 1917, you see this 1789 and then 1792
where there is that first wave of sort of revolution
that overthrows the sovereign.
And then there is a second wave that overthrows
the people who did it first.
And so, you know, you can hold out hope for getting the job done without thinking
that elites do play some role in all of that.
Right. Yeah. Yeah, I think that's a great point.
[♪ music playing, fades out.
[♪ music playing, fades out. One of the things that I wanted to ask you about, sort of shifting gears a little bit,
was about how you were thinking about the deportations when you were writing it and
how you were thinking about the way that kind of this like generalized anti-deportation organizing
like turns into that and the sort of mutual aid networks that the Society of Martians
are doing like directly turns into this thing and that's something that I don't know it
feels very prescience in ways even though it was written out before a lot of this
stuff happens. Yeah the deportation stuff is just because of my own personal
political commitments over the course of my adult life, which is that we have an insanely cruel immigration system
in this country.
Oh God, yeah.
You know, and they say like,
oh, we've got this like open borders.
Like we do not have open borders.
It is actually really, really hard to like navigate your way
properly through the American immigration system.
That's true.
The system itself is broken.
And we did all of this,
we did the worst of the horrors with Trump, right?
Like obviously that is on my mind with family separations
and putting people in camps and abusing people
and rounding people up, like all of this stuff,
which happened under Trump, yes,
but it also happened under Obama for eight years
and it happened for another four years under Biden. It's just that we kind of stopped talking about
it because it wasn't Trump who was doing it. And there is a through line of cruelty inside of this
system towards immigrants. So that issue of deportation and like rounding people up and
evicting them, especially those who have
lived in this place their entire life. Like that's one of the points that I make. Like
the people who are being fired are like born and raised on Mars. Like one of the main characters,
Alexandra Claire, she is a fourth generation Martian and she just gets caught up in these like
stupid layoffs that that Timothy Werner is pushing through. And now the only choice that she has is to either hide
or get deported to Saturn,
and nobody's ever come back from Saturn.
We have no idea what happens on Saturn
because all they know is that nobody ever comes back
from Saturn.
And this is a thing,
like taking people who were born and raised in America,
this is the only place that they have ever known, right?
Even if they came here when they were like one,
like, okay, they weren't born here,
but like they here since they were one.
And then you're like, okay,
we're gonna send you back to Mexico.
They're not from Mexico.
They don't know anybody in Mexico.
They don't probably even speak Spanish half the time,
you know?
And doing this to people is cruel.
It is unconscionable what we do to people.
And so, yeah, like, so when I was thinking to myself,
okay, I'm gonna write this, like, fictional revolution,
and it's gonna be on Mars,
what are some of the things that I wanna do
that will make the revolution happen?
Yeah, some of this does, is like a little bit of like,
this is, these are Mike's political interests
and the deportation issue
and trying to highlight the horror of the deportation issue
and laud those who would hide those people and help those people
and bring those people food. Like the bravest people going are the ones who like go out and leave
water jugs out in the middle of the desert so people don't die, right? And the cruelest thing
is these guys who go out and then break those. Knowing that people are going to die of dehydration
and die of starvation, but just not care
because they don't care about those people.
That's one of the sickest things to me.
Like it's just that there's information coming out now
that there's that horrible video of that ICE agent
smashing the window of that woman's car to deport her.
And then the information's come out
that he is a deputized volunteer border guy.
And what's really happened, if you look at it,
is we've kind of recreated in a decentralized form
the Einsatzgruppe, right?
Like instead of having a centralized state
having to raise these organizations
that are going to be carrying out this kind of violence,
like it's largely become something that vigilantes
have gotten into on their own as part of like
just their special interest in hurting people at scale.
And it's such a uniquely, it's so uniquely tied to like this American individualism.
It's such a uniquely sick thing about the way things work here, that that's happening.
Like that wouldn't have happened, not that Germany is, you know, not that German culture
in the thirties was better, but it just wouldn't have happened
because it was a different kind of culture.
Yeah, for sure.
And then it's really important to remember
that this is not just a Trump problem.
Like what he's doing right now is like, of course,
like we are entering next levels beyond next levels
of what he's doing.
And even, you know, just this morning,
we've got an American citizen who has been held
and they are not being released despite the passport
and the social security card being shown to the judge.
And the judge is like, I don't,
I can't actually release this person.
That's sort of where we're at now.
But this has been an ongoing thing for 20 years
across both parties and both administrations.
And nothing really has like sort of churned my stomach more since Trump got elected than
all of the Democrats and people doing like sort of post mortems on the election and being
like, well, you know, we really should be tougher on the border and we really should
sort of like buy into this framing that there is this like invasion and we just need to do border enforcement better.
Like, and they're then even moving,
positioning themselves to a place where it's like,
Trump's not even doing a good job protecting the border.
And like, there was somebody, I forget even who it was,
but somebody, one of them senators like tweeted,
you know, this time last year,
Biden had deported this many people
and Trump isn't even deporting that many people.
And he was like trying to make this point
that like Trump wasn't following through
on his promises or something.
But it's like, do you even hear yourself?
Like, do you even hear yourself?
Yeah, yeah, it really is.
And I can't, you know, stomach the fact
that the Democrats are gonna take away from all this,
that the American people love cruelty towards immigrants
and that we need to lean
into that.
And then you see the polls before all the tariffs stuff and all this stuff is going
on and Trump is still sitting at like 50% approval and it's like, I don't know, maybe
they're right.
Maybe the American people really do just love this.
So, I mean, I think the other side of that, though, and this is part of the reason I brought
up specifically the resistance to it was that the other aspect of the kind of individualism of American culture was that it also meant that a bunch of people went out to the desert.
Like our coworker James spent a lot of time during the Biden administration,
like at these, I mean, just like the open air prisons they built in the middle of the fucking desert, like on the border.
And, you know, and like one of the stories that he covered extensively was that like,
probably most of these people would have died if it wasn't for like literally border volunteers,
like passing food and water to the bars.
And that's something that I was thinking about a lot,
looking at the mutual aid networks
and looking at the kind of mutual aid networks
that trans people are building up right now.
And like, I mean, okay, like,
I mean, there's always been a million mutual aid networks
because it's just impossible to survive if you're trans
without like getting stuff from other trans people.
We're not supposed to do anything alone, man.
We're not supposed to do anything alone.
We're not supposed to be doing anything alone.
That's honestly the most optimistic thing about your podcast is that like Martian society
develops this very communal because it's we're living in like an artificial habitat and if shit goes really wrong, everyone dies at once.
You have to have this more collaborative collective attitude towards safety and security that
is just so completely absent from American culture.
It's the thing that continually sends me into the darkest spirals is because there's no
fixing the fundamental underlying problems without fixing that.
Yeah. And like on Mars, you know, that sort of communal stuff is like, they're also living
in close quarters. So you can't really be somebody who needs to be alone, right? That's
the thing. And then also like in terms of like the early colonization of Mars, like,
yeah, you have to do this stuff together. And like, there's a, like, when I was doing, like, cultural, like, there's cultural background,
like, works and, you know, like, music that was going on that the Martians were creating.
And I didn't quite get into this, but there is a song that I've got, like, half written
called The Ballad of Lonely Joe, which is, like, it's like a Martian folk song about Lonely Joe,
who went off and tried to, like, do it himself.
But, I mean, he never comes back, and now Lon now Lonely Joe like wanders the red sands of Mars
because like he tried to go out and not do it like with the group and not do it with the community
because he can't survive alone on Mars.
But to your other point, like one of the things that I definitely wrote into the show is that
everybody on Mars has a skin chip in their hand and the skin chip in their hand is what like opens door.
It like literally opens doors
and it gives them access to the commissary
and it gives them access to restaurants.
It gives them access to food and employment.
Like everything goes through that skin chip.
And when the people get fired by Werner,
their skin chips just get turned off effectively
and it doesn't open doors anymore.
They can't get food anymore.
They are living inside of a society
that they literally cannot interact with anymore.
And so it took other Martians around them.
And so there's a thing in the show
called the No Doors Movement,
which is Martians jamming open doors
so that the people who have,
they were called the annulled
because their contracts were annulled.
But so that the annulled could get from here to there
without needing their skin chip.
Yeah, those are the kinds of things that are necessary
and those are the kinds of things
that are gonna protect people.
And I hope that those things are going on out there.
And I hope that none of us publicly state right now
what we may or may not be doing on out there. And I hope that none of us publicly state right now what we may or may not be doing
on that front.
Yeah.
Let's just go ahead and keep that where it's at.
I'm a big fan of the don't fed post on social media or in your podcast thing.
Yeah.
Just something you touched on there, I think is interesting about about the way
that I being forced to live together like creates this consciousness.
It reminds me a lot of when I was a student, I was an anthropology student. And one of
the things that we've read was this sort of classic of, I guess, I guess you call it like
structuralist Marxist, like anthropology from the 80s. It's this book called We Eat the
Minds and the Minds Eat Us, which is about these indigenous Bolivian tin miners.
And one of the things that always struck me about that was, you know, like because they're
all, they're all literally like sleeping next to each other, like in these rooms, you can
literally hear like the stomach of like the child next to you, like rumbling at night
because they don't have enough food.
And that like turns them into like one of the most militant sort of like working class,
I mean, for like a hundred years, they are like, like they're syndicalists and then they're
communists and like they're, they're one of those militant things.
And I, I don't know.
It's interesting to me that, that this is like this aspect of the society that, that
you've, you know, you've sort of drawn out of, of these historical revolutions where
a key element of it again is is this sort of collectivity and also there's this
Like if you look at like the trajectory of like the modern
American state and like the modern just the modern development of capitalism
it's been specifically trying to make that stuff not happen by like kicking people into suburbs and like trying to
Physically alienate people and I was I don't know
I was wondering how much you were sort of thinking about that kind of stuff when you were like writing the cultural aspects of this.
Sure, no, that stuff is all in my mind.
And like I said, like we're not meant to do anything alone.
Like humans are communal creatures.
Like you don't go anywhere in history,
like all the way back to the dawn of the species,
you do not find individual humans,
like living by themselves.
We have always done this as a group.
This has always been a group project.
And when you go back, this is something that comes out of,
I studied a lot of political theory in school
and the state of nature sort of works.
These thought experiments that Thomas Paine would do
or Rousseau would do.
It's like, how did we come together?
Why did we come together?
Well, let's first imagine an individual human wandering through the forest and they encounter another one. did we come together? Why did we come together? Well, let's first imagine like an individual human
wandering through the forest and like,
they encounter another one.
So they come together for defense and they come together
to share food and do some division of labor.
And it's like, no, there's no such thing
as a human wandering alone.
That's not a thing.
Like any outgrowth that comes from our description
of what human society is like,
whether it's defense or the division of labor,
begins with the fact that we are already a group.
There is a mother, there is a child, there is a father,
there are aunts and uncles and other,
like whatever the group is,
we are always doing this as a group.
And hyper individualization and hyper atomization
of our society is something that is trying to undo one of the most fundamental parts
of what it means to be human.
This is something that I thought about a lot too,
because when I started having kids and you know,
I have two kids and the model for like having a family
at this point is like you have a mother, a father
or whatever you have kids, but the point being
that they are a unit
that is unto itself and they live in their own house
and they have to supply their own food
and they are in charge of getting their own money
and everything that happens is just up
to that little nuclear family.
And the nuclear family is not really
how we've ever done it before.
There's always been a broad network,
a broad family friend network that has been a part of,
raising our kids and having our families.
And if something bad happens,
we don't just say, oh, wow, bad luck for them.
You support that person.
And that is something that we've really gotten away from
as a society, obviously.
And it's something that we've been pulled away from
purposefully, right?
Like the atomization isn't just a byproduct of incentives,
right?
Like it is a directed move.
I mean, you just got to look back to some of the shit
Thatcher was saying, right?
There's no such thing as a society.
There are men and women and there are families, right?
This is a directed change.
And I'm not saying this in like the conspiratorial sense.
I'm saying this at a, this is what a lot lot of people a lot of the worst people in our society believe
because it's convenient for them and they have pushed to make that belief more common and
Done so by funding think tanks and funding media organizations in part, right?
I was actually about to quote literally that exact thing
But the interesting part to me about the Thatcher line is that everyone?
I was actually about to quote literally that exact thing, but the interesting part to me about the Thatcher line is that everyone,
almost everyone who quotes that line only quotes the part about there are only individuals and then leaves out the part about the family. Yes.
Which I think is a really important connection to what you were saying where it's like,
their vision of the family is also still fundamentally this isolated group because they still need
some kind of collective because again, you can't just like leave a baby like
out in the woods.
It just dies, right?
But like they had to like create this version to be the like the political base of their
thing.
They had to create this one collective that would be cut off from everything else that
had normally made it a collective.
Yep.
You know, people think these days that that atomized nuclear family is like the law of nature, right?
That this is like, this is the way it's always been. And like, that's not true. It's just not true.
There's a great line. I don't have it right in front of me at the moment, but in Tocqueville's
Ancien Regime and the French Revolution, which is really a dynamite book everybody should read.
At the end of it, he lays it out.
He's writing this in like the 1840s and 1850s.
And he straight up says that like
what liberal capitalism is doing, which he was,
I mean, he's a conservative liberal.
Like it's not like he's on the left or anything,
but he's watching as the atomization of families
and individuals is happening.
And he's like, and that's how,
that's what tyranny thrives on.
Tyranny thrives when everybody is disconnected
from everybody else and everybody is in competition
with everybody else.
Because that's the other key part of it,
is your family is now pitted against every other family
in terms of like getting money, getting jobs,
like getting that, getting this other thing.
Like we're all scrambling out there in a competition
to get a little bit more, a little bit better,
or just have enough.
Like I feel this every time I have to sign the kids up
for like summer camp.
Like I'm at war with every other family in the neighborhood
because I'm just trying to get my kid into this camp
and some people aren't gonna make it and other people will and you got to be there, you got to have strategies about when to
log on to the thing. Because they're pitting us against each other all the time in all of those
little subtle ways. Yep.
I think that's what's optimistic kind of about the Martian revolution is like, you know, on the one hand, there is this kind of like collective society. But on the other hand,
you know, this is a this is a society entirely ruled by corporations, right? And it is it
is literally every single aspect of it is specifically designed to get to do this pitting each other like being people against each other and
Yet anyway somehow
They they you know even even if it is by accident, which is to be fair how a lot of revolutions start
They they do it
I think the the key thing is here is that we see throughout time like really extreme societies that try to mold people in certain ways
like really extreme societies that try to mold people in certain ways with the idea of permanently changing them.
And what happens in the past,
at least to every one of those societies,
is that the society dies and people go on being people.
Right?
Mm-hmm. Yeah.
Yeah, there's no year zero.
There's no creating a new. Right.
There's no new man.
Right.
That's not ever gonna happen.
That's actually ever gonna happen.
That's actually, I mean, just,
I wouldn't even have thought that I'm gonna tie this back
again to Tocqueville, which the reason I would recommend
Ancien Résime is because that is a book about how much
of the revolution was a continuation
of what was going on before it.
And not actually caused by the revolutionary break.
And even if you believe in the revolution and believe it was this,
I actually believe in the revolution
because it accomplished these great things.
But there was no year zero thing that happened.
A lot of this stuff like is just on a continuum.
And, you know, like, I don't wanna get in a fight
with somebody about whether human nature
is a thing that exists or doesn't exist
like as an abstract thing, because I'm not sure that it's true
but there sure are a lot of things that keep popping up.
We're interested in sex and we have to eat food
and we live in shelters and we make music
and there does seem to be some very human qualities
that exist across all time and across all space.
And if you just say to yourself like,
well, like, I mean, this is one of the things
I'm very sympathetic to anarchists,
but like there's a point with anarchism,
like especially the early stuff where their idea was
that if you smash the state and you destroy the state,
then humans will be allowed to flourish
in their natural goodness and communalism,
which is, you know, a little bit what we are moving towards right now,
but I'm not sure even that exists,
because if you crash the state out,
it's not the state that's necessarily making us this way.
There is stuff inside of human nature
that we created the state to begin with.
So the whole thing is like a very, it's a balancing act
that has gone way too far in a certain direction.
Yeah, and I think that's something
I always try to keep in mind.
Like, it's not that societies can't alter or improve aspects
of like how things are, right?
By changing the incentives,
by altering like the way things work,
you can reduce the prevalence of certain problems.
You can make things better in some ways,
but there's certain stuff that you're just never going to.
Like when I look at what the white supremacists
wanna do, right?
Well, you're never going to get people
to stop mingling with other kinds of people.
You simply can't.
It's never worked and it never will, right?
Like that's an impossible dream.
So I can just say like, that's a thing,
no matter how tightly you grab a hold of the reins of state
and how many weapons you deploy, you simply won't succeed
in the longterm at doing this, because it's just not
something we can do.
You can't stop people from mingling.
This is actually one of my points about immigration
and migration is that no matter how tightly you try
to control it, no matter, you could build every wall you want,
you can make it as hard as you want,
people are still gonna move here.
People are still gonna move away from here.
People are still gonna go from here to there
and from there to here.
And that is something that is going to happen
no matter what.
And especially if we're going into the 21st century
with all of its various climate disasters
that are facing us.
On route, yeah.
And it's gonna make, yeah, it's already making
some places less habitable
and other places will be more habitable.
And what's gonna happen is the people who are living
in less habitable areas are gonna wanna go to where
there are areas that are still habitable.
And so there's gonna be movements of people.
And the question before us in the 21st century is not,
can we keep people in the places that they are now and, you know, like sort of lock in rigidly to like these xenophobic nation states and that will actually stop those migrations from happening?
Or do we open ourselves up to the idea that this is going to happen and simply make it more humane and more more rational?
more humane and more rational. That's the question.
It's not whether the migrations will happen or not.
It's simply how cruel they will be when they happen.
And right now we are choosing maximum cruelty.
Yep.
Sucks.
Yeah.
It sucks.
It does.
Like that's so much of our present society is like,
well, yeah, this is the cruelest way
I can imagine this happening.
You know, like, and we are staring down is the cruelest way I can imagine this happening.
And we are staring down the barrel
of the worst case scenario, right?
That's the thing everyone's had to make peace with.
Even once Trump won, there was still a degree of like,
well, I guess we'll see and we've seen, right?
And we do just kind of have to guide off that
without pretending it's otherwise.
That's one of the few things that does give me hope is that the people who are insistent
upon pretending otherwise seem to be getting increasingly marginalized.
I mean, we'll see.
Gavin Newsom still hasn't been sort of choked off of access to the public.
But the statements he's been making recently about Abrego Garcia, it's just like, yeah, I just can't imagine this guy being the future
of the Democratic Party if this is just looking
at where popular discourse is right now.
Right, and there's a lot of them who would like it
to be the future of the Democratic Party
because they don't care as much as Republicans don't care
about the lives
of these people who are living on this earth,
who are living, breathing human beings,
who are just someplace else and living in a world
where like, yeah, the United States and Europe,
we suck up the world's wealth and resources.
Like we're the imperial center of the globe.
And people are like, oh, and even when people say like,
well, why do people come here?
And there's a kind of a standard
American exceptionalist notion, which is like,
well, they come here because they want freedom
and freedom is what America offers
and like the American dream and all that stuff,
like the entrepreneurial spirit, et cetera, et cetera.
But mostly it's because this is where you can come
and get the world's money.
That's, this is where it all is. It's sitting in my pocket, it's because this is where you can come and get the world's money.
This is where it all is. It's sitting in my pocket. It's sitting in your pocket, right? We are the ones who have all of the world's money. And so that is why they are coming here.
So you just have to fit that in your brain. And what is happening is this constant division
between Americans being more important than anybody else.
And I understand why that exists politically.
And even these questions of like citizens
versus non-citizens, like one of the things that got me
when I was reading Bakunin was like,
it was a throwaway line.
It wasn't even like a point he was making,
but he referred to something as mere citizenship,
which kind of struck me because I grew up very liberal.
Like I come from like the liberal suburbs of Seattle
and I had very liberal notions.
And citizenship in sort of the liberal imagination
is the highest thing that you can be,
be a citizen of a polity with rights.
There's a constitution,
you get to participate in the government.
Like citizen and citizenship are these words
that had great profound meaning.
And really kind of like knocked me sideways
to have them be like mere citizenship, right?
You've been reduced to simply a part of apolity
and your humanity has been taken away from you.
You're no longer being recognized as a human being,
you're being recognized as a citizen.
And if you're not a citizen, then you just don't count at all.
And it totally wipes out their humanity.
So not only do I not have humanity
because I'm simply a part of some polity,
rather than being me, Mike Duncan, a human being,
but it's erasing our human obligations to each other
to non-citizens.
And the idea, like, and you just see this very casually,
like right now, like all over the place,
it's just like, they're not citizens,
so they don't deserve due process.
They're not citizens, so we can just send them
to El Salvadorian torture prisons, and it's fine,
because they're not citizens,
and therefore they don't have rights.
It's like, what about, you know,
just being a person thinking about other people?
And one of the greatest, one of my very favorite,
and I know I'm steamrolling here,
I'll let you get a word in edgewise here in a second.
But I forget what the court case was,
but there was a court case out of Texas,
back in like the 60s when they decided
that the Texas school districts had to open the schools
to undocumented children.
And they said that because it says in the 14th Amendment,
persons, it doesn't say citizens.
And they were resting a lot of this on the notion that like,
it says person has these rights,
not citizen has these rights.
And this is what conservatives and MAGA hate, hate, hate,
hate this is why they're gonna try
to undo the 14th Amendment.
But to have the Supreme Court at one point in the past
be like, no, you have to do this because you owe an obligation
to them as a person, not just as a citizen.
That's like mind blowing.
I could not see the Supreme Court today
making that same decision.
But that's the kernel of something really good,
I think, for the future of humanity
rather than clinging to this citizen or non-citizen thing.
Yeah.
I guess, kind of for me, the most important belief I ever came to was the understanding that
like, I don't care about citizenship and I don't care about who is supposed to be in a specific
place, right? I think one of the most toxic ideas possible is that like your rights as a person are dependent on where
you were born.
Yeah.
That's just the thing I'll never believe.
And it's the fight we've lost the worst as the left or, you know, I should even say getting
beyond left and right because I really think those are not the most useful ways to look
at things.
It's like human beings, the fact that that battle, the battle to just see people as humans with inherent value as humans, regardless on their place of birth, the fact that that that battle the battle to just see people as humans with inherent value as humans
Regardless on their place of birth the fact that that has been botched so badly is
Maybe the greatest calamity of the 21st century
Although there's a few there's a few contenders. Don't get me wrong. Yeah, there's a lot
Well, it's so it's so deeply ingrained something I'm gonna talk about more like in different place
but like It's so deeply ingrained. This is something I'm gonna talk about more in a different place, but one of the things that's been driving me the most up the walls is,
so I've had to read every single piece of tariff coverage
that's been written by fucking all these analysts,
all of these media people.
And every single one of them only fucking talks about its impact on Americans.
Right?
And if you look at the Liberation Day turf tariff package,
the single country that is the most far from this is Sri Lanka
Yep
And if those tariffs go back into effect in like in like 50 days, whatever whatever like 80 days
Like the entire country of Sri Lanka is fucked. They're doomed
They're completely fucked and all of these countries, you know
these countries need US dollars in order to like literally to buy fucking fuel and then suddenly
Oh wait, hold on. You can't do exports to the US and like the entire, there's something that affects literally the
entire world, right? You can look at the tariff rates on every single country, like in the world
and everyone writing about it only writes about its effect upon the US because there's this just
like, like there's this, this, this pure sort of Ameri-centrism thing where like people and this,
I see this on the left too
It's like they fundamentally don't see anyone who's not in the US as human and the people in the US who are seen as like
people who seems like humans who you know, like think and feel and
Like act and like hurt in the same ways that we do
Like that's only a thing that happens if you're a very specific kind of American citizen. And if you're not, or God help you, you were born in like most of the, like the rest of
the world, which is again, it, it unhideous super majority of everyone on earth.
You just, you don't matter.
And yep, they don't.
Yeah.
Not, not, not in all this.
And like, I mean, to bring it back to the Martian Revolution, like one of the things that is happening right now,
like in the series, you know,
it's gonna be 30 episodes long
and I'm writing episode 23 right now,
but like we've gone through the revolution.
There's been, I don't wanna give away too many spoilers,
but obviously like they win, you know, at certain points,
otherwise it wouldn't be a very interesting story.
And there is a debate
right now among the victorious Martian revolutionaries about who should count inside of
the Martian constitution and this thing called the Republic of Mars that they have just declared.
They're no longer a part of a corporation. They're going to be this thing called the
Republic of Mars. And there is a guy who is passionately committed to Mars and to the
Martian people, and he hates Earthlings
and he doesn't trust Earthlings and there's no reason for him to trust Earthlings.
They have tried to screw them over a bunch of times and it caused nothing but pain.
But there are a bunch of Earth born Earthlings on Mars and he wants to exclude them from
the Republic of Mars.
If you're born on Mars, then you should get to participate and if you're not, then you
shouldn't have rights.
You shouldn't be a part of this project. I would love to just, I would love to deport you.
That's what, that's what he's going to be arguing. And then there is another side that has a more
universalist take on this. And my character, Alexandra Claire, who is like a D class,
she comes out of the Warrens, which you can just, that's basically like the working class.
You know, she's like, when Earthlings come here,
yeah, I don't like it when they bungle things
because they're new and they don't know what they're doing.
Like I'm as annoyed by the new guy as anybody,
but like they've suffered right alongside me,
like suffering the same conditions.
Like the fact that they were born on Earth
doesn't mean that they're not suffering right now,
that their contracts weren't annulled,
that they are not suffering from the new protocols.
Like, and you know, when during these revolutions, did they hold neutron guns in their hands and fight and die for Mars?
Yeah, they did. And so probably we should say that it's not Martian good, Earthling bad, but like, let's just open it up to everybody
and we will sort out like, you know, who's, you know, who's in on this and who's actually trying to undermine us.
Because, you know, there are loyalist fifth columnists
that they are gonna have to deal with.
Yeah.
Well, I think we're encroaching on an hour here.
So I think we need to probably call this for the day.
But Mike, I really appreciate your time.
You've been so generous and I can't wait
to see where you end.
I know that you're also can't wait to see where you end.
I know that you're also can't wait to see
where you land on all of this.
Right, right, right.
I've got all the plot points, you know,
I know where it's going, but just getting there is,
it's weird because sometimes when you write fiction,
characters are like, you weren't supposed to do that
and now I've got to deal with that.
And like, what are you, well,
she wouldn't do that in this moment. So I guess I was gonna have her do it, but I just can't believe that she would ever do that in now I've got to deal with that and like what do you well she wouldn't do that in this moment so I guess I was gonna have her do it but I
just can't believe that she would ever do that in that situation so I guess she
can't do it and I'll have to figure that out and that's my weekly struggle these
days yeah yeah that's the that's the struggle of releasing fiction before
you're entirely done with it yeah well I write I mean I wake up I wake up every
Monday morning with a blank piece of paper and have to have that week's episode done by Sunday night.
So I'm writing these in real time.
Yeah, well, I congratulate you on trapping yourself
in such an exquisite hell.
I'm enjoying listening to it.
I know everyone else is as well.
Oh, it's great, I love it.
All right, that's the episode, everybody.
Thank you.
Bye. Fight! My daughter, man, who my wife has always said is just a beardless, d***less version of me. And that's the name of our podcast, Beardless D***less Me.
I'm the old one.
I'm the young one.
And every week we try to make each other laugh really hard.
Sounds innocent, doesn't it?
A lot of cussing, a lot of bad language.
It's for adults only.
Or listen to it with your kid.
It could be a family show.
We're not quite sure.
We're still figuring it out.
It's a work in progress.
Listen to Beardless D***less Me on the iHeartRad radio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. This is Courtside with Laura Corenti, the podcast that's changing the game and
breaking down the business of women's sports like never before. I'm Laura, the founder and CEO of
Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment, your inside source on the biggest deals, power moves and
game changers, writing the playbook on all things women's sports. From the heavy hitters in the front office to the powerhouse women on
the pitch, we're talking to commissioners, team owners, influential athletes and
the investors betting big on women's sports. We'll break down the numbers, get
under the hood and go deep on what's next. Women's sports are the moment so if
you're not paying attention, you're already behind. Join me, Courtside, for a front row seat
into the making of the business of women's sports.
Courtside with Laura Currenti
is an iHeart Women's Sports production
in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment.
Listen to Courtside with Laura Currenti
starting April 3rd on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Brought to you by Novartis,
founding partner of iHeart Women's Sports Network.
You say you never give into a meltdown
and never fill your feed with kid photos.
You say you'd never put a pacifier in your mouth
to clean it
and never let them run wild through the grocery store.
So when you say you'd never let them get into a car
without you there, no it can happen.
One in four hot car deaths happen when a kid gets into an unlocked car and can't get out.
Never happens. Before you leave the car, always stop.
Look. Lock.
Brought to you by NHTSA and the Ad Council.
On November 5th, 2018, at 6.33 a.m., a red Volkswagen Golf was found abandoned in a ditch out in
Sleephole Valley.
The driver's seat door was open.
No traces of footsteps leaving the vehicle.
No belongings were found, except for a cassette tape lodged in the player.
On that tape were 10 vile, No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, and kept restricted from the public until now.
You feel in this too, a horror anthology podcast.
Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
What's up, y'all? It's your favorite cousin. I just came over, you feel me?
Y'all don't have no cousins that just kind of pop up,
just be at the house like a 90s sitcom
where you don't knock on the door, you just be walking in.
That wasn't my life, mainly because most of the cousins
on my mother's side lived on the other side of the country.
And then my cousins on my father's side,
since we lived in gang infested areas,
you didn't just pop up.
That was just not the safest thing to do.
But I'm doing that at your house.
And you know what happens when you have cousins come over.
Well, now a small percentage of y'all are black,
but a lot of percentages y'all grew up poor,
which means that you got whoopings, just like we did.
So, you know, usually when your cousin comes over,
somebody's getting, we all, somebody getting in trouble.
And it's usually you, cause you supposed to know better.
I never got more spankings
than when my cousins came over,
because we would just get into stuff.
And then since I'm the one that lived there
and I was cutting up in front of company,
I ended up getting into most trouble.
Anyway, this isn't where I'm working out trauma.
Although it is called, It Can Happen Here podcast.
So I feel like we all collectively working out trauma
of being Americans.
And lastly, on the rambling preamble, I got a dog now.
Well, my daughter got a dog.
And to all the parents that listen,
you know when your child gets a pet,
whose pet that actually is.
So I find myself doing a lot more chores
than I signed up for, but it's a pug.
And it keeps trying to eat the cat's food.
Therefore it's got liquid doo-doo. and I'm not a fan of that.
And since I get to work in my pajamas
because I'm just recording podcasts
and rap music back here,
seems to fall on me to scoop up this liquid doo-doo.
But that's only when she eats the cat's food.
Stupid dog, eat your own food.
Anyway, I'm here to talk about something
that you can do nothing about.
All right, y'all ready?
Here we go.
A brother like me who bleeds Los Angeles,
you cut me open and Pacific Ocean saltwater comes out.
You poke my lungs and smog pours out of me.
I could work for the tourist department of Los Angeles.
I love this city at an unhealthy level.
There are things about this place that is absolute trash.
Don't get me wrong.
There is a lot wrong with this city, with this place.
The ground shakes up under us.
We've been such a horrible steward
as to how to take care of this land.
I'm gonna include myself,
even though I am not the invasive colonizer,
but there are really only nine native trees to California,
two of which are not the palm tree
or the eucalyptus.
The plants that are here naturally are drought resistant
and fire resistant.
They don't burn that easy.
The ones that burn up real quick
are the sycamores and the palm trees.
And if you may have noticed,
Los Angeles hit a bit of a dry spell recently
and had quite the disaster.
Now, I'm slowly backing that thing up into what we're going to talk about right now,
which you should probably know if you have already read the show title when you clicked play.
But I'm going to back that thing up into it.
California catches fire every year in some location.
Now my mother, you know, mama, mama prop,
she worked 30 years for the LA County fire department,
you know, in the city of West Covina,
cause I'm a six to sixer.
And I have vivid memories of the different firemen,
fire chiefs. I think I talked about this in the LA on fire episode,
block is literally hot on the hood politics show,
which hopefully you guys are supporting
and listening to also.
But even my boy Chris, who's, you know, firefighter,
you know, been fighting the fires out here.
Everybody knew that one day this day would come.
And that let's just
say all of the bureaucratic failures had not happened. If the water was as full as possible,
the fire hydrants were fine. If everything was the budget, if everything was done perfectly,
this was going to happen. This day was going to come.
That it's a perfect storm.
We had a specific type of drought, lack of rain,
the Santa Ana winds, and then a fire sparking,
and that fire sparking in a densely populated urban area.
It was, every fireman I knew was like,
yeah, one day it's gonna happen.
And like I said in the last episode, yeah, like,
you know, we could find ourselves a time machine
and practice the indigenous practices.
Oh, actually as a small little beacon of light,
there's an area out at Dina that was actually given back
to the Tongva tribe many years back.
There was a first like actual land back, given back to the Tongva tribe many years back. There was a first like actual land back given back to the tribe.
And they started taking care of the land the way that their elders and ancestors
did and guess what that area didn't burn.
Anyway, in the midst of this disaster that we were having a desperate desperate
man who I completely understand is desperation.
On Tuesday night on January 7th,
while the fires were just rumbling through the palisades,
a man named Keith Wasserman,
who's the co-founder of a real estate investment firm,
desperately took to Twitter and said,
"'Does anyone have access to private firefighters
to protect our home?
Need to act fast here.
All neighbors houses burning will pay any amount.
There was another click of Rick Caruso
who almost in a multiverse situation is our mayor,
a billionaire developer who owns the Grove
and on the West side, just that if you ever watched TMZ,
whenever somebody's walking out of a place,
it's probably at the Grove.
And was a real estate magnate.
Anyway, there were videos of him driving through an area
that he had with his like private security
and private firefighters where it is smoke billowing
all around the place, but his situation was fine.
Why?
Because he had private firefighters.
They shaved his shopping center,
but he tried to unsuccessfully save nearby homes as well.
Which reminded everybody about the time that Kanye
and Kim tweeted about their house being saved
by firefighters and which made people be like,
wait a minute, you can buy a fire department?
Man, what the hell is this?
What type of shit?
Man, what?
We over here arguing over fire hydrants
and tanks running low,
and somebody just paid up,
where they get the water from?
How the hell you can just,
oh my God, what the hell water you using?
Nigga, that's not your water.
And what you gonna do, are you gonna? Nigga, that's not your water. And what you gonna do?
Are you gonna help out the neighbors?
Okay, so if I buy a fire department,
fire department show up at my house,
but the neighbor's house is burning.
You just gonna leave the neighbor's house?
You gonna tell them to call the city's fire department?
What the hell is happening?
How does this shit work?
Is there any other way rich people can be evil? What is happening right now?
Which is basically what happened
and how most of the regulars felt.
So this episode is not just about private fire departments
because that would not be a very interesting full episode.
It's about the question
that private fire departments
bring up, which is like, nigga, whose water is that?
Wait a minute, who owns the water?
Is the water private too?
And if the water's private too,
what else of my utilities are private?
And this is what I mean by there is nothing you can do
about it.
Now, if there is any of you that are built like Robert
and Magpie, then maybe you ain't gotta worry about this.
Maybe you could dig your own well and find the groundwater.
However, there are things called water land rights,
which I will talk about into this.
So even if you move off the grid to live on a mountain,
you find somewhere in the backwoods, you know, four acres away from magpie, wherever the hell magpie live, and you dig to find
some water, somebody own that water.
It already happened here, y'all.
Let's go.
All right.
This may or may not be a shock to y'all.
I know in the first, the block is literally hot episode I did way, way, way,
way back when I first joined,
when Cool Zone Media first launched,
when I first joined the team, my first episodes.
It was one of those things where it's like,
the thought has probably never crossed your mind.
And some of it's like sitting,
I'm talking to y'all who pay bills.
Some of this stuff is sitting right up under your nose.
Like Southern California Edison is one of our power companies.
But then there's PG&E.
This isn't the city of Los Angeles providing this.
That's a company.
In the same way that your internet come from a company,
what makes you think your power don't come from a company?
And if your power come from a company
and the internet come from a company,
why wouldn't your water come from a company? Well, I don't know what a company. And if your power come from a company and the internet come from a company, why wouldn't your water come from a company?
Well, I don't know what would make you think
that that's just a city municipality.
Well, because duh, because water fall from the sky.
What the shit?
I'm paying for you to pump it through the dog on pipes?
Boy, I mean, I understand that, that's a service,
but what the hell are my taxes for?
And you see, somebody like, I don't know if you notice, you can own the rain.
So the water that fill inside a lake, somebody bought the lake.
This is the episode that I'm going to tell you all right now.
So your utilities, most likely your city has sold your water
and your sewage processing to a private company.
And the bills that you pay in, your water bill,
is not going to the city for the service you are receiving.
It is paying the company back the money
that the company paid your city to get this gig.
Let me back up here. First, let me cover the private fire departments. the money that the company paid your city to get this gig.
Let me back up here.
First, let me cover the private fire departments.
Now, here's the thing.
Private fire departments usually are hired
by insurance companies.
So what they do a lot of time is like prevention.
They're coming here and clear out shrub,
make sure that your house is not like set up for failure.
You know, in California, I mean, people always talk about our strict laws and
building codes and it's like, well, nigga, do you see why every time you got a
bureaucratic law, like there might be a historical evidence as to why we need
that. One of which is, my nigga,
California ain't got a lot of water.
So if you gonna build a house,
you can't just have dry shrubbery up around your house.
Why?
Because you just basically put a box of matches
just around your house.
So yes, fam, like that's why you can't do that.
Why you not allowed to have a lot of trash in your house?
Nigga, I mean, what the hell you think?
Because this shit will catch on fire.
So these private companies,
private fire companies usually come through
and again, they hire body insurance companies normally
to come and clear shrubbery,
make sure that your lint, that your dryer is cleared out,
make sure your HVAC is good.
And usually they got their own little tank, right?
So they come in with their own little tank of water,
that's their private water.
They basically, they bring in their bottled water,
you know what I'm saying?
While the rest of us is using tap, right?
But eventually that little tank go run out, you feel me?
And then at that point,
you got to tap it to the fire hydrant, right? Now, what most of these companies will say is like, the guys were not monsters, dude. Like if, if the neighborhood is on fire, of course, we're going to help. What are you like, what are you talking about? Which I truly believe for this reason, if I'm paying to protect this house, but the neighbor's house is on fire, that probably means that the neighbor's house is going to cause my house to catch on fire.
So of course, it would be in my best interest to help put that one out.
According to the New York Times, they reported that, yeah, good 45% of all firefighters
working in the United States today are employed privately.
Now, a lot of those are like wildlife suppression.
Now there's such thing as called
the National Wildlife Suppression Association,
which represents more than like 300
private firefighting groups.
And a lot of them work more as like government contractors,
right, as far as like, again,
supplement for like wildfires, right? And like I said, the others are hired by private companies.
Yo, and peep this like a little two person private firefighting crew
with a small vehicle.
I mean, it could cost like three grand a day, like a large crew
of like 20 firefighters and four trucks can run $10,000 a day.
This is according to Brian Wheelock,
the vice president of the Grayback Forestry.
It's a private firefighting company in Oregon.
But most of the time, like I said,
these people don't really work directly with homeowners.
But that's not what's the interesting part
of this story to me.
The interesting part of this story to me
is the reality of the utilities that we live in.
Now, let me go ahead and run off some statistics to you.
I just want to go ahead and add to the dystopia
that we live in because we need to say,
we need to change the name of this show
to it has happened here.
I'ma link all this data to the show notes.
Now you're ready for this?
Water and wastewater service privatization
follows broader trends.
More than 40% of drinking water systems nationwide are private, regulated utility systems.
Of the 60% of the systems owned by local governments, privatization by contracting of operations management has grown rapidly since 2001.
Nationwide, the privatization of water, wastewater grew by 13% after growing 84%
over the decade in the 1990s. Right? So what that means is almost half of y'all are paying a private
company for your water. Now, let's make some distinctions here between public utilities and
private utilities. And, you know, what are we even talking about?
So public utilities are owned and operated by your local
state and federal governments on behalf of the citizens
and customers in that area.
So a public utility would be your municipal water,
sewage, sanitation services.
Like if you have a public electricity providers,
government ran public transit systems,
state-owned telecommunication companies,
public utilities, right?
Now listen, here's where it's interesting.
Have to balance serving the public interests
while remaining financially sustainable.
Since they are not profit driven,
any revenue earned is invested back into maintaining the infrastructure of the
operations, which seems like a big old duh.
We're not here to make money.
This is not our money making interest.
This is living, right?
It's a utility.
Like it's just, I'm not trying to make money off it.
I'm trying to keep the lights on, right?
But as we know, it costs to do those things.
So the temptation becomes easy to be like,
how do I offload this cost, right?
And make sure that this service is there.
Because as you know,
oftentimes public utilities don't be very good.
You know what I'm saying?
Flint still ain't got fresh water.
Right now, Altadena is in a situation
where they was like, look, don't even boil the water.
Like whatever coming out of your tap is just not good.
Boiling's not good enough.
Like do not drink this water, right?
Is the situation that they in and it's like,
well, where the money at?
Like, how are we going to fix this?
Now that's a public utility.
Now a private utility is utilities obviously owned
and operated by private companies.
So that would be an investor-owned electricity company,
like a private telecommunication,
private-owned oil, gas, and pipelines,
and private-owned waste management companies.
Now, their goal, because it's a company,
is still to make profit for their shareholders
while also delivering reliable service.
Now, they argument, their defense would be,
if we don't give you a good product, we won't have customers. So it
is in our best interest for our own money to give you a best
service. However, are you seeing the truck size hole in a logic?
Nigga, we don't have a choice. Do you have a choice as to what
water company provides the water to your house? Who will run the
sewer?
I don't have an option anyway.
So the key differences are very obvious, right?
One is the ownership and motives,
like publicly owned utilities serve the public interest
rather than pursue profits, right?
Private owned utilities are there for their investors
and to maximize returns.
Regulation and pricing.
Public utilities are regulated by the government- returns. Regulation and pricing. Public utilities are regulated
by the government-appointed commissions
that oversee pricing.
Private utilities are also regulated,
but usually more flexible in a rate setting.
Because what the hell you gonna do?
Yeah, you gonna call the water company
and be like, I ain't paying this bill.
They gonna be like, cool, no problem.
Service areas.
Most public utility service customers
are within municipal boundaries.
Investor-owned utilities often are defined
by regional monopolies with little overlap
or competition with customers.
Listen, if you ever moved into an apartment
and you was like, y'all, I'm trying to install cable,
and they was like, or your internet, it was like, oh, it's AT&T over here. I was like, oh, you know, install cable. And they was like, or your Internet.
It was like, oh, it's AT&T over here.
I was like, oh, but I have spectrum.
They're like, spectrum don't serve this area.
Nigga, it's the Internet. It's the air.
It's wires, this poles.
I'm not allowed to.
You can't come over here because it's a private company.
Now I'm in a situation where AT&T knock on my door every day
and being like, yo, we laying fiber optics, you know,
we laying new pipes down here up under your street.
We can move faster than Spectrum.
I done ditched them both.
And then Spectrum still email me every day.
Spectrum sent somebody, it's like,
we heard you left Spectrum, we're trying to figure out why.
I'm like, nigga, cause I don't want to use either of y'all.
But we're the area you serve. When I first moved into the house that I'm like, nigga, because I don't want to use either of y'all. But we're the area you serve.
When I first moved into the house that I'm in now,
like, I made a account on Edison and they were like,
oh, nigga, Edison don't serve here.
You have SoCal gas.
And I was like, who the hell is SoCal gas?
They was like, that's who, that like, who else gonna give me the gas?
I don't have no options.
I live in LA, this is who serves LA.
Infrastructure spending.
With public utilities, they might find it easier
to raise funds for long-term capital projects
and maintain infrastructure proactively
while privately owned businesses and utilities answer to shareholders seeking returns,
which impact investment decisions.
Meaning if I'm like, yo, somebody gotta clean this sewer
pipe because this water ain't good in this neighborhood.
It will behoove the city of Los Angeles to fix this.
And it will be easy for them because I am a Los Angeles
resident, this is a public utility.
If I had private water, they might be like,
how much money does that neighborhood give us?
You know, if we fixed the water up there in Palace Verde,
you know what I'm saying?
Like we gotta talk to them cause they, you know what I mean?
They kind of give us the bread.
So they're not incentivized necessarily
to fix my infrastructure, right?
And then the customer service focus, right?
Public utilities often focus more on customer satisfaction
and addressing community complaints
while private entities have profit motives.
I mean, I don't know what else I need to explain to y'all.
Right?
Now, let me show you how this works
and what the allure is for a public city council
to make this decision.
Are y'all hip to more perfect union?
It's another one of those podcasts folks
that just got more money than us.
They able to produce things that we had bred,
we would produce.
Anyway, they did one about investor owned water companies
and how they lobby to give them the contract
to run their sewage and water, right?
And it's a super dope study.
It's a good like focused study to show like
as sort of an example of how it could happen anywhere.
And they focused this one study on this city
in Pennsylvania, right?
And here's the ill part about all of this is that
how would you know this is happening?
I mean, are you really looking at the logo
on your water bill?
I mean, no, you just like looking at the costs, right?
And hoping that it don't be that much.
Now, again, if you rent an apartment, I don't know what utilities you got to cover, right? And hoping that it don't be that much. Now, again, if you rent an apartment,
I don't know what utilities you gotta cover, right?
Let's say you are renting an apartment,
you know what I'm saying?
Like a lot of times your utilities,
it's like they cover water and gas,
you cover electricity and internet.
And then whatever it is,
I'm not thinking about who the company is.
I'm just like, I'm paying the bill.
But if one day your bill triple, I mean, who do you call?
You're like, I haven't used more water.
I don't understand why it costs more now.
You might call the city, the city like,
oh, we don't even run the water no more.
And that's exactly what happened.
So in 2020 in New Garden, Pennsylvania,
they sold their water to get this, Agua, Pennsylvania.
in Pennsylvania, they sold their water to get this, Agua, Pennsylvania,
jerks, a subsidiary of essential utilities.
And they sold their water for $30 million.
And just for you to get a grasp on how much money
can be made by doing this, if you're a company,
that company made $2.05 billion in 2023.
And essentially, if you're the city, the city runs up,
you are, you have all kinds of problems.
You got people not paying bills on time.
You got all these different, you know, all this stuff.
You got to hire the workers.
You got to do all this stuff.
And this company runs up and was like,
yo, we'll take all this off your hands.
Not only will we take it off your hands,
we'll pay you for it.
So to the city and they say, look, I do a better job than y'all do.
Why? Because this is all we do.
You got all this other stuff. You got to take care.
We don't only take care of the water.
Look, we'll give you 30 million dollars for it.
That's free money.
And you ain't got to worry about it.
All you got to do when people call complaining about their water is just say,
please hold and transfer it to us.
You ain't got nothing to worry about.
And the city say, okay, that sounds good.
Now, are you going, you're going to change your prices?
It's like, why would we change our prices?
We don't need to change our price.
Matter of fact, we could probably charge less because we ain't got the same things
y'all got, well, at least for the first few years, kind of like the phone bill
when they like, oh, you sign up for this much money a month for the first three
months or your cable for the first three months,
or your cable for the first two years.
And then one day your cable bill come in
and it's just psycho.
And you like, I don't know why the hell
this costs so much more.
And they're like, oh yeah, the contract was for this long.
And then after that, it went back to regular price.
That's essentially what's happening.
That's why I was like, if your water bill go crazy,
who you gonna call?
Like, what you gonna say?
Like, they could just be like, yeah, it just costs more now.
So for the city, the city is like, look, it's free money.
We could put this money into other stuff we've been trying to work on and y'all
gonna get a better situation.
And again, no one looks at the logo on their bill.
So the utilities industries, right.
A few years ago,
I think in 2016, got this law passed
that made cities want to sell it.
It's called the Fair Market Value Laws.
One example is in Pennsylvania was Act 12,
which was in 2016.
And the concern is cities feel like they can keep up
with, dun, dun, dun, environmental laws
and keep up with city growth.
Cities are growing so fast.
So many people are moving in.
We're destroying the earth at a particular exponential rate
and the government wants us to not destroy the planet.
Oh, hum.
So I got all these laws.
I got, we just, he doesn't have the money for it.
He doesn't have the money for it.
What other time?
So when you're evaluating how much this utility
would be worth, you can include,
because of Act 12 in Pennsylvania,
the median income, the expected repairs and future revenue,
which means it makes that water worth way much more.
And a lot of times when you selling this utility,
the price tag, what these people be paying you
be six times the city's budget.
So think about this.
I just trying to make this real for you.
Let's just say somebody comes in and says, I'll buy your car.
You say word for how much and they say, I tell you what, I'll
pay you your year salary for this car.
The fam you go ahead. I for this car, the fam.
You gonna add, I add another car in there for that.
You know what I'm saying?
Hey, you know, throwing another six months worth of salary,
I'll make you some dinner.
Like it's kind of a no brainer.
You like, our entire year's budget, just for the water?
No brainer. But who pays the water? No brainer.
But who pays the company?
Nigga you, you paying the company.
What do I mean by that?
The company cuts the city a check.
Now the company gotta make their money back.
How they make their money back?
Nigga, yo bills.
What is you saying?
Of course they gonna make their money back now again.
They're incentivized to make that money back as fast as possible,
which means they're not going to spend more than they had already spent
30 million dollars to get the thing.
But then they'll promise to like fix their systems, their promise.
Like you, you, you, you sold the city saying,
I'm going to be able to spend some time to upgrade and do all this difference.
And they don't ever upgrade nothing because it's kind of a no brainer.
This is easy money to them.
In Philly, there's this area called the Chester water authority that went straight up bankrupt.
So like the city's water authority just went bankrupt.
So they was like, yo, we got to sell it.
They got offered $410 million.
Well, the city did. And the city says, nigga, Chester Water Authority, you ain't got the right to sell
because you are not a company.
You are part of the city of Philadelphia.
Chester Water Authority is like, my G, I mean, what the hell you want us to do?
How does this stuff become legal? Well, like same way any other stick come legal.
They just, you lobby candidates all the time.
And the only way to stop this is you got to sign up
to some sort of city council newsletter or something
to be able to walk up in there and protest the shit.
Nigga, good luck.
Now let's talk about specifically California.
All right.
I bring up specifically California
because of all the stuff about the fire hydrants
and water issues that we had recently.
Remember that the water that waters Los Angeles
comes from the North, right?
It comes from right up under Sacramento
through the California aqueduct that was put together
by this man named Mulholland.
So the Mulholland Pass, Mulholland Drive,
that was all based on this man
that made Los Angeles be possible
because he just went up there just like any other colonizer was like, I'll buy your water.
And they was like, water ain't for sale. He was like, yeah, it is. And went over their heads and bought the water.
Built a hole basically like when you was a kid at the beach and you dig a little thing in the sand to make the water go a certain way.
That's basically what he did through the middle of California to bring water to Los Angeles.
Now Los Angeles did have one river that was the San Gabriel River that starts in the top of the San Gabriel foothills and
comes into what we call the LA River, which is paved, which there is a movement to unpave that because that would probably help us with a lot of climate issues.
But either way, that was an actual river.
It was enough to support the native tribes here
because it wasn't that many people here.
And they had sense enough to not plant plants
that need the water that they ain't got.
They wasn't trying to build a city in the area
that ain't supposed to be a city.
Nigga, have you ever been to Las Vegas?
There should not be a city there. Y'all ever been ever been to Las Vegas? There should not be a city there.
Y'all ever been to the Inland Empire?
There should not be that many humans there
according to the earth, unless you pump water over there.
The natives were fine.
The indigenous communities figured out
how to live in the shit for thousands of years.
But you know, we had to do our thing.
Now, some vocabulary.
California got a thing called senior water rights,
which means whoever got there first gets the water.
Like basically it's my land, I licked it, right?
But they only got them rights
when it started from the gold rush.
So they was like, well, who was there first?
It was this white man,
not the people that already lived there,
but these white men.
So if you happen to have a farm, you know, up near North Fresno, if your family
been there longer than somebody else's family, then that water is yours. Right. That's senior
water rights. And then there's junior water rights, which is like the second person. So
whatever water you don't use, they get to use. Right. Now, why that is specifically important for California,
especially the Central Valley, is because Cali provides everybody's produce.
I mean, for the rest of the country.
The vast majority of the fruits, vegetables, nuts, and lagoons that you eat come from California.
We got to have water.
It would behoove of rest of America to make sure that Cali got water.
So those are water rights.
Now, the water that gets pumped down into our fire hydrants,
here's the situation, like that had to do a water pressure.
Now you could refer to the block is literally hot episode
where I go into detail as to what happened with that.
But there was this whole thing about the water being owned
by some billionaires.
Now I would love to run with that one,
but the fact is that's just not true.
It's not that simple.
Let me go ahead and fact check that.
So the wonderful co,
which is who they were talking about,
it's Stewart and Linda Resnick.
They do have a majority stake in a water bank
that can store up to 1.5 million acres, right?
Which is close to 500 billion gallons of water.
But the realness is that's like a tiny fraction
of the water capacity of California.
California's groundwater basins combined
can hold more than 566 times as much water
with a storage capacity of 850 million to 1.3 billion acres a feet across the California
Department of Water Sources. The state's surface resources hold more than 40 million acres on
top of that. So there's two types of water here.
There's surface water and there's groundwater.
Groundwater, obviously that's stuff
that you would dig in for a well.
That's a whole other thing, right?
Now it is true.
This family owns brands as like Wonderful Pistachios,
Fiji Water, Wonderful Land Halos,
Wonderful Halos and palm wonderful.
And that's a, you know, I don't know
if you're into pomegranate juice, but if that's your thing.
But anyway, let me quote from PolitiFact.
The water the Resnick's use gets stored underground
initially before the water is delivered to the roots
of Resnick's pistachios, almonds, pomegranate orchards.
Specifically it's stored in the Kern Water Bank
that is the most valuable water resource in the region
and critical to America's fresh food supplies.
The water bank, which is, watch this, the bank itself,
a public-private partnership with the Resnick's own
57% of the stake is 32 square mile recharge basin,
which looks like flood lands from the street
that essentially stores again,
the 1.5 million acre feet of water, 500 billion gallons.
The Resnick's storage arrangement is very controversial.
They've been banking on the water
by using public and private dollars
to corral public resource.
Because of their water rights and their wealth,
they are insulating themselves from this type of drought,
which of course, that's what rich do, right?
This is what Chas Miller says,
the director of environmental analysis at Pomona College.
Private capital has no problem with the drought
while the rest of us are looking at deep social divides.
Somebody bought the water.
But water isn't the only thing, like I said,
that somebody else owes.
According to publicpower.org,
utilities that were sold since 1980
have ranged dramatically in size,
although many had a small number of customers
at the time of the sale with the median
of fewer than 600 customers.
Less than 30% of utilities sold had more than a thousand
customers at the time of sale, right?
So back then it was a small amount of people, right?
Watch this, only five public power utilities with 10,000 or more customers have sold,
right? And four of those five sales occurred were approved since 2015. Now, the largest sale
of such electric department was the city of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, which had about 68,000 customers.
And when it sold to the Middle Tennessee Electric
Membership Cooperative in 2020, other utilities,
substantial size, include those serving the cities
of Vero Beach, Anchorage, Alaska, Eagle Mountain, Utah,
and altogether we are talking about 800,000 citizens today
have their electricity private.
Sales have occurred in 26 states
and almost all of Kansas was sold
and it was sold in the 1980s.
Now, why even make an episode on this?
And it's because of this last thing, corporate cities.
Now, of course, company towns is as old as companies are.
You had train things and stuff like that,
where a company moves in and it just made sense
for the company to make sure that they were providing
housing and saloons and stuff like that for the people that,
you know, lived in their area.
That it just made sense.
That was just, it was just good business, right?
You wanted to attract more people to stay in this area.
If you've ever been in Northwest Arkansas, city called Bentonville, it's
actually very dope to be in, but it is the headquarters for Walmart.
So if you're going to work in corporate Walmart, you got to be in, but it is the headquarters for Walmart. So if you're gonna work in corporate Walmart,
you gotta live in Bentonville.
Now the city's dope.
Is that a corporate town?
Not in what I'm talking about.
It is a company that said,
we're gonna dump a kajillion dollars
to make this city as dope as possible.
That's one thing.
I am talking about a brand making a city.
I wish I was making this up.
Google got one.
It's working on a community called North Bay Shore
in Mountain View, California.
That'll have 7,000 housing units
and another called Middlefield Park
that'll have 2,000 units.
Metta is building Willow Village,
dubbed Zuck Town in Menlo Park, California.
And they'll have 1700 housing units,
a hotel and plenty of retail.
Disney is developing a 1400 housing units
across 80 acres in Kissimmee, Florida,
right near Walt Disney World.
Elon Musk is building his city called in Snailbrook,
outside of Austin, Texas for employees of his constellations
of startups, including SpaceX, Tesla, and Boeing.
But the most ambitious is California forever.
It's supposed to be Silicon Valley 2.0.
It's this group ran by the former golden sax trader,
Jane Simark and is backed by investors
like the LinkedIn co-founder, Reed Hoffman, Chris Dixon,
and this philanthropist named Loreen Powell.
And it plans to create this new city in Solano County,
60 miles north of San Bernardino,
with tens of thousands of homes, large solar energy,
orchards with a million new trees
and a hundred thousand acres of new park space.
And they hope to build this community
will generate thousands of jobs in a walkable Paris
or West Village in New York.
And there was this reporting of this unknown group
that was coming up and just like, just buying farmland.
It was called Flannery Associates.
And for years, nobody had any idea who these people were.
They purchased 52,000 acres, spent $800 million, paying five times
a market rate. And nobody knew who they were. It's a little po-duck town, people selling
their little farms. And it's because these billionaires is building a city.
Now, I am telling you all this ultimately to introduce you to Kurdish Yarvin,
who is probably going to be a future Basterpod person
or either way, one of these shows is gonna cover this man.
Cause this man in a lot of ways is the patient zero,
the contagion number one of these new Republicans,
this new conservatism, this new extremists
that's been kind of been trying to tell everybody,
here's why it's so poisonous.
He's like, because not only is democracy dead,
democracy been dead.
And whatever you think you have now,
ain't a democracy to which all of us would be like, nigga, yes.
That's why it's so dangerous.
Cause I'd be like, yeah, he's like the system's failing you.
And I'm like, amen.
So his solution is a monarchy, but he made a monarchy like a CEO.
So this man says if the country was ran like a tech company, everything would be
cool, we would all be better.
And his example of that is, he would say,
okay, look at that laptop you're using.
Look at that phone you got.
Do you think you would have got to that phone,
to that laptop, the quality of that laptop you had,
if it was done by the city of California's
tech municipal department?
He's like, nigga, no, you got that because of Steve Jobs.
That's why you got that phone.
Cause that nigga was like, look, this is what we doing.
This how we doing it.
He would argue that Roosevelt over the new deal.
He was a tech bro.
He ran his mug like a tech startup.
He was like, look, nigga, this is what we doing.
We building freeways.
I don't care what y'all say, we building freeways.
He's like like if the country
Was ran like a tech company
Then maybe this country would work better and he's like and news flash
Whatever the hell you think you got now
Ain't working. Anyway, we might as well just lean into it
All I'm saying is I don't know what I'm saying
is I don't know what I'm saying.
Fam, it could happen here. So this is your favorite cousin swooping in
and signing off ruining another thing for you.
Don't catch me at the hood politics pop. Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith.
And it's me, Harley Quinn Smith.
That's my daughter, man, who my wife has always said is just a beardless, d***less version
of me.
And that's the name of our podcast, Beardless, D***less Me.
I'm the old one.
I'm the young one.
And every week we try to make each other laugh really hard.
Sounds innocent, doesn't it?
A lot of cussing, a lot of bad language.
It's for adults only.
Or listen to it with your kid.
It could be a family show.
We're not quite sure.
We're still figuring it out.
It's a work in progress.
Listen to Beardless, I'm the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
This is Courtside with Laura Corenti, the podcast that's changing the game and breaking
down the business of women's sports like never before.
I'm Laura, the founder and CEO of Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment, your inside source
on the biggest deals, power moves and game changers, writing the playbook on all things
women's sports.
From the heavy hitters in the front office to the powerhouse women on the pitch.
We're talking to commissioners, team owners, influential athletes, and the investors betting big on women's sports.
We'll break down the numbers, get under the hood and go deep on what's next.
Women's sports are the moment. So if you're not paying attention, you're already behind.
Join me, Courtside, for a front row seat into the making of the business of women's sports. Courtside with Laura Carrenty is an iHeart women's sports production in partnership
with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment. Listen to Courtside with Laura Carrenty starting
April 3rd on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Brought to you by Novartis, founding partner of iHeart Women's Sports Network. You say you'd never give in to a meltdown.
Never let kids' toys take over the house.
And never fill your feed with kid photos.
You'd never plan your life around their schedule.
Never lick your thumb to clean their face.
And you'd never let them leave the house looking like, uh, less than their best.
You say you'd never put a pacifier in your mouth to clean it.
Never let them stay up too late.
And never let them run wild through the grocery store.
We have one aisle clear.
And aisle three. So when you say you'd never let them get into a car without you there,
no it can happen. One in four hot car deaths happen when a kid gets into an unlocked car
and can't get out. Never happens. Before you leave the car, always stop, look, lock. Brought to you
by NHTSA and the Ad Council. In 2020, a group of young women
in a tidy suburb of New York City
found themselves in an AI-fuelled nightmare.
Someone was posting photos.
It was just me naked.
Well, not me, but me with someone else's body parts
on my body parts that looked exactly like my own.
I wanted to throw up.
I wanted to scream.
It happened in Levittown, New York.
But reporting the series took us through
the darkest corners of the internet
and to the front lines of a global battle
against deep fake pornography.
This should be illegal, but what is this?
This is a story about a technology
that's moving faster than the law
and about vigilantes trying to stem the tide.
I'm Margie Murphy.
And I'm Olivia Carville.
This is Levertown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts,
Bloomberg and Kaleidoscope.
Listen to Levertown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
This is It Could Happen Here, a show about things falling apart, and this episode is about the people
who want to make it, being the United States, fall apart even faster, allowing them to install a
white supremacist ethno-state, though it kind of feels like
that's pretty much already happening.
This episode is also about the people in government who categorize and classify wannabe terrorists
who want the country to collapse faster, and what these changes in categorization methods
can tell us about the future of the country.
I'm Garrison Davis, and today I'm joined by a very special guest, philosopher and comedian
Michael Burns of the YouTube channel Michael O'Byrne's and formerly Wisecrack RIP. How you
doing? Pretty good, you know, besides living in the world that you just described. Past that,
everything's going great. Yeah, that's kind of been the my mood the past three months, maybe
longer. There's a tad, a tad like liminality. But I don't know if that's just like living in denial
and trying to cope. But hey, you know, what's wrong with a little bit of coping? Especially if it helps
one simply survive these times. So you know, I encourage a healthy dose of, of coping or sort of a,
you know, mental bifurcation if that's what we need to do to get up in the morning and
get through it all. Yay.
Now, unfortunately, this episode that I have prepared today is not a super cheery one for
you, Michael, which is, which is maybe kind of kind of appropriate because the reason
why I have you on this episode today
is because the FBI and the Department of Justice have come up with a new terrorism classification
acronym, which name drops the Internet's favorite and sometimes least favorite philosophy, nihilism.
They're calling these guys nihilistic violent extremists.
Oh boy.
We will we will get into this.
Do you want to give like a philosophy 101 definition
of nihilism, a super well-known and universally
agreed upon term that always means the same thing
to everybody?
So yeah, it's not confusing at all.
And yeah, I mean, I think the root of it,
at least in like a modern philosophical sense is Nietzsche
At least that's a common reference point and when Nietzsche is talking about nihilism
Especially in a book like the genealogy of morality and a lot of other places
He is making the argument that sort of
Christian European culture and particularly a Christian European culture influenced by idealist philosophy
particularly a Christian European culture influenced by idealist philosophy
creates nihilism. The reason he says it creates nihilism is because people care more about
heaven than they do about earth. They care more about
the life they're going to have in eternity than the life they have in the here and now. So for him it's like this
devaluement of life that happens via Christianity, more speaking nihilism has a I guess more positive usage
Which is the you know?
disbelief in the inherent or necessary meaning in an overarching system like in like the existential sense
Yeah So you kind of have this this distinction and some people use of positive and negative nihilism and to be really crass and simple here
Negative nihilism is nothing means anything,
so I don't give a shit,
I'm just gonna hang out and do whatever.
Positive nihilism is there's no inherent meaning in reality,
but cool, now me and the homies can construct meaning
as we see fit, which is more like
the existentialist response.
We're gonna create meaning where maybe there wasn't
natural meaning in this old school platonic or Christian sense.
And I'm not sure how much the FBI agents who are doing these federal court filings have
read Nietzsche or the French existentialists and instead are probably using a colloquial
definition of nihilism, right? This like, oh, nothing matters. You know, this like apathetic postmodernist like idea to go, to go a little Jordan Petersony, right?
Yeah. I mean, I think there is this sense in which it is the kind of weird Jordan Petersony
alt-right philosophy version of nihilism, which just means like people that think the dominance
of the West is bad. And it also reeks a little bit of like big Lebowski nihilism
for-
Totally, totally.
You know, and of course in that movie,
nihilism is represented by a crew of I think Austrian
techno producers called Autobahn, who are also nihilist.
And they say throughout the film, like we are nihilist,
we believe in nothing.
We would just really, and obviously the Coen brothers
made that film, at least one of them was a philosophy major, so they know what they're doing.
That's kind of the really basic, not good enough version of this thing that it
seems like the FBI is operating with, like people who don't believe in the
goodness of the Western project.
Correct. And that's what they're really honing in on.
I will read an expanded definition of nihilist violent extremism.
This is from a federal court filing dated March 18, 2025.
Nihilist violent extremists are individuals who engage in criminal conduct within the
United States and abroad in furtherance of political, social, or religious goals that
derive primarily from a hatred of society at large and a desire to bring about its collapse
by sowing indiscriminate chaos, destruction, and social instability.
Nihilist violent extremists work individually or as a part of a network with these goals
of destroying civilized society through the corruption and exploitation of vulnerable
populations which often include minors.
This is where it's going to get into some kind of weirder stuff that we will kind of
explain later. They have like a second definition here, quote, nihilist violent extremists both
individually and as a network systematically and methodically target vulnerable populations
across the United States and the globe. They frequently use social media communication
platforms to connect with individuals and desensitize them to violence, among other
things, breaking down societal norms regarding engaging in violence, normalizing the possession, production, and sharing of gore materials,
and otherwise corrupting and grooming those individuals towards committing future acts of violence."
Unquote. And that kind of outlines some of the strategy of these groups.
The groups that they're kind of going to mention here,
I've been doing like freelance research on for about four years
now.
I've been trying to publish a few articles on these guys over the years, but it's always
tricky.
And we will get to kind of the darker corners of that in a sec.
But let's first kind of talk about what this new term, is itVEs, Nihilist Violent Extremists, what this is
kind of replacing in the FBI lexicon. Now it seems that this term is being used in place
of two previous FBI terrorism categories. This is from a November 2020 FBI bulletin,
quote, anti-government or anti-authority violent extremism.
This threat encompasses the potentially unlawful use or threat of force or violence in furtherance
of ideological agendas derived from anti-government or anti-authority sentiment, including opposition
to perceived economic, social, or racial hierarchies, or perceived government overreach, negligence,
or illegitimacy.
Whew.
Can I say something that stood out to me about those definitions? perceived government overreach, negligence, or illegitimacy.
Can I say something that stood out to me about those definitions?
The hatred thing I found really interesting, in like the very first definition you give,
that nihilism is defined as like in a motive state, because again, I think nihilism is
classically conceived is almost more like ontological or metaphysical, and by that I
just mean looking at these structures of belief in the world.
So rather than being like motivated by hatred or love or fear or whatever,
a more classically nihilist view is just again like,
oh I've been sold a bill of goods on what the meaning of existence is
or what the underlying principles of political reality are,
and now I see that they are maybe BS.
Not the hatred of society and wanting to collapse it.
Yeah, I guess there's just this negativity associated
with all that language, and of course,
I was, having never heard the definitions
that you were just bringing up,
the way in which it just quickly zigs and zags
to some very dark stuff in terms of radicalization,
it seemed like there was a reference towards
like pedophilia or something there. Child sexual abuse materials. Yeah, come up
a little bit. Yeah. Yeah. So it just getting from A to B there is more like getting from
A to Z or something. It's just not a connection that I think would be obvious to anyone who
has thought about read about written about nihilism as more of an intellectual or even
like a political and philosophical concept. Totally. Because there, written about nihilism as more of an intellectual or even like a
political and philosophical concept.
Totally, because there is like political nihilists in like the Russian tradition and more recently
in like the American anarchist tradition or the Greek anarchist tradition where they believe in this
like idea of like negation and trying to like negate government institutions.
Yeah, but which is still a far cry from believing in causing active harm psychologically,
physically, whatever, to human beings.
Like vulnerable populations, yeah.
Yeah, yeah, there's a sense in which it's painted as,
like if you knew nothing else,
and you were to read those definitions,
and you were just a scared suburban insurance salesman
or something, it would sound as if it was like a death cult
infecting the minds of children, like zombie-esque little super soldiers.
That's actually what they're going for.
And I have a lot of mixed opinions on this term, because I think this term is trying
to describe a group that does kind of defy classification, but I think the use of the
nihilist term is also not good.
So I'm kind of in a rock and a hard place here as someone who does a lot of extremism research.
Now the other term that the FBI is probably seeking to replace, at least in part, with this new nihilism definition
is racially or ethnically motivated violent extremism.
This is like your what term assists your neo-Nazis, the FBI defines it as,
This threat encompasses the potentially unlawful use or threat of force or violence
and furtherance of ideological agendas derived from bias, often relating to race or ethnicity,
held by the actor against others or a given population group.
Racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists purported to use both political and religious justifications to support their racially or ethnically based ideological objectives and
criminal activities.
This was the group that saw like a massive explosion in growth the past 10 years, really
starting around 2016 to 2017 with, you know, the neo-Nazi mass shooting epidemic, especially
around like 2017 to 2019.
This is the most lethal group and it grew exponentially during that period.
And we're kind of seeing some of these groups start to reform now.
Now, there's been some reporting that this anti-government or anti-authority violent extremism,
which I'm just going to say agave, which is the acronym, which does make me a little bit hungry for a glucose syrup, but it's fine.
Now, there's been some reporting that state agave is specifically like a Biden era term,
but it actually predates the Biden presidency and was in use under Trump.
In fact, a lot of the internal FBI reforms that are being reported on right now are actually undoing changes and counterterrorism strategies that started under the first Trump presidency.
But we'll get more on that later.
We're going to go on an ad break real quick and return to talk about a gruesome act of violence in Wisconsin last month. Alright, we are back.
I'm going to get more into how the government is using this term and what they are applying
it to, what they're applying the nihilist violent extremism label to.
Earlier this year, a Wisconsin teen male named Nikita Kasap killed his parents in an attempt
to gain the financial means and autonomy necessary to carry out a plot to assassinate President
Trump and accelerate the collapse of the United States.
I'm going to read a quote from a federal criminal complaint filed last month. Quote, on March 3rd, 2025, county sheriffs obtained a search warrant for CASP's cell
phone.
During the review, they identified material on the phone related to, quote, unquote, the
Order of Nine Angles.
The sheriff's review of the phone identified possible usernames for CASP, including Accelerationist
14 and Awoken, unquote.
Now, Michael, are you unfortunate enough to be familiar with the Order of Nine Angles?
I am not.
So this is a group that was originally based in the UK and now is primarily active in Eastern Europe,
though there are branches or spinoffs called Nexions in the United States.
This is a group that is kind of hard to define. People often call it a Nazi Satanist group.
I think it's more accurate to call them a like white supremacist occultic group who essentially try to
cultivate evil for the sake of evil. They're like a left-hand path occult group that has
orchestrated multiple terrorist attacks, especially through radicalizing
US soldiers. At this point, they're pretty mythic with their writing and tactics leaving
a strong lingering presence across the left-hand path fascist occult milieu. We also have a
reference to quote-unquote accelerationism here, which is similar to nihilism, is like
this philosophical term which has kind of been warped and changed via people's application of it in politics.
And specifically kind of the way that we're going to be using this word here
is this idea of trying to like accelerate the collapse of the country,
mostly to install like a white supremacist ethno-state after the country has collapsed.
This is how most Nazis use the term, even though it has a slightly different cultural background
with the work of Nick Land and Mark Fisher.
When I was growing up, acceleration just meant
accelerating the contradictions of capitalism,
but kids these days took it in all the direction.
Not a good one.
So this federal criminal complaint alleges
that Kassip was communicating with people
on the messaging app Telegram,
and these people were possibly in Ukraine and or Russia, and these people
helped him plan this attack. The FBI found TikTok messages on his phone where he discussed
the struggle of telling his friends that he quote unquote follows the O9A teachings, that's
order of nine angles, and he discussed a previous FBI visit to his home in 2023
In other exchanges on tik-tok. He shared information with a user named Nihilus
About how to find Nazi telegram channels. I'm gonna I'm gonna read through some of this some of this chat transcript
Nihilus hey, dude. Do you know any telegram groups where Niners?
That's oh nine a and Drex can interact
and exchange info?
Awoken.
That's Kassip.
Sorry, no, I'm mostly in NSWP telegram groups.
LOL.
If you do find any, it'd be nice if you tell me.
Nihilus.
What's WP?
Awoke.
Wikipedia.org slash national underscore socialism underscore white power. Nihilus. Oh, white power. W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W- Awoken, can you send me the link to the account? Awoken, it says I can't access the message. Nihilus, how can I do that?
Wait a second, Awoken, here's my Telegram username.
Accelerationist14, Nihilus, I sent a message.
So there you go, that's a...
Man, just...
There is some later Telegram messages
that are archived in this complaint as well,
where at Acc accelerationist says,
what country do you think will get the blame for this?
Meaning his planned attack.
An unknown user replied, Russia will be blamed for it.
This is the goal.
Accelerationist said, quote,
when the time comes for me to send my manifesto to you,
so you can spread it online, should it be a PDF?
Also.
Sorry.
Sorry. I just like that when the context of all that they're discussing file types.
And also, you won't anyhow change or modify the manifesto. The unknown user replies,
write it on a piece of paper and take a picture.
The FBI personnel performing the preliminary review saw images of a three-page document
titled Accelerate the Collapse.
The images are screen grabs displayed on a phone, and these images were created on February
28, 2025.
This document is the manifesto referred to by at Accelerationist.
The manifesto calls for the assassination of the President of the United States in order
to ferment a political revolution in the United States to quote unquote save the white race from quote unquote Jewish
controlled politicians. The third page of the document contains images of Adolf Hitler
with text that reads quote, Hail Hitler, hail the white race, hail victory. Now, from what
I can read of this manifesto, it's pretty basic. It's heavily plagiarized like most
of these kind of white supremacist accelerationist manifestos are. It's heavily plagiarized like most of these white supremacist, accelerationist manifestos
are.
It talks about how Jews control white countries and are promoting white genocide and degeneracy.
It talks about the need to quote unquote collapse Jewish occupied governments.
The manifesto states that his motivation for wanting to kill Trump was to sow chaos and
raise public awareness that quote, assassinations and accelerating the collapse are possible things to do unquote.
Not that possible since he's arrested and did not accelerate the collapse but
he also advocates that people unable to commit to taking direct action instead
make connections with other white supremacists and grow a network to take
over the country once America collapses. He recommends the writing of Nazi
accelerationists including James Mason, who wrote the influential Nazi book Siege, and
the Terrorgram Collective, a group of white supremacists from around the world who organize
on the messaging platform Telegram to share guides on how to do terrorism. He also recommends
the writings of former Atomwaffen members, an American accelerationist group,
writing quote, there is much to learn from the successes and mistakes of Adam Waffen.
I think it's worth noting that Adam Waffen was also either like infiltrated or partially
co-opted and inspired by some 09A teachings. This is kind of how the more bizarre and occultic
influence of 09A seeped more into the kind of general American
accelerationist Nazi milieu. This was like in like 2018.
Now Kasip advises that if the reader of the manifesto is already like, pilled, that you
should just skip the theory and just read practical how-to guides for terrorism and
bomb making, since quote unquote, there is no political solution. Huge amounts of violence will be required. Long past the days where we can vote for a Hitler to save us,
white revolution is the only solution, unquote. Which is, I guess I'm kind of desensitized to this
sort of stuff. In fact, I just find this slightly funny, considering kind of the victory lap that
Stephen Miller and white nationalists are currently having in the government where many of them do think
they can just vote for a Hitler to save us
and that Hitler may already be in office forever.
Well, that is what's so shocking hearing all this
is someone that doesn't know all these details.
I mean, A, I feel like the blinders just got taken off me
and I'm seeing the world anew.
But B, shocking that from a more normie perspective,
in my mind
I would think all of these types would be pretty excited about how things are going politically not trying to tear things down further
It's like you guys won, you know accept it even Trump is not extremely enough for a lot of these guys
Yeah, they really go places
Now Casper was coordinating with multiple telegram users likely in Ukraine and Russia on how to build a drone
Now, Kasap was coordinating with multiple Telegram users, likely in Ukraine and Russia, on how to build a drone that can drop an explosive and paid some individuals for some of the
required materials, and also had a plan to flee to Ukraine after his attack that he was
coordinating with Ukrainian Nazis on Telegram.
Tough look for Telegram.
It's always a tough look for Telegram. Not great. Not a great platform.
Pretty much only used by these guys.
Yeah, no, he was talking about how he probably needs to quote-unquote brush up on my Russian.
Oh yeah, definitely.
Before he flees to Ukraine after trying to kill the president.
You know, you download Duolingo after you do that.
That's right, that's right.
He had plans to meet up with 10 people with similar beliefs in Ukraine.
My mind is just so blown by all this.
I thought I thought I knew things. I know nothing.
Now, on March 10th, sheriffs interviewed a classmate of Kassop,
and the classmate told them that the Kassop would send, quote unquote, gore edit videos
The classmate told them that the cast would send quote unquote gore edit videos that includes flashing like gore like a body gore imagery and war images put to Russian music sent via Snapchat.
This is a common tactic done by these sort of like teenage extremists.
This is a whole like sub genre of video that has changed and altered inesthetic multiple times. Frankly, if you spend enough time on Twitter now, in the comments of blue-check neo-Nazis,
you can find some of these edits where they have techno, fast-paced, sometimes Russian
music set to glorified images of Rome or Nazi Germany or a large variety of stuff. But the gore genre is specifically unique to kind of the,
to the 09A, like a cultic Nazi branch,
because they think that like viewing these images,
like increases your power level of like evil, right?
It's a very video game view of like,
of like spiritual development of like,
you have to, you have to like raise your evil stat
by looking at gore.
And this will make you more able to commit big acts of violence.
Whoa. So just desensitizing yourself to them
just makes you a more violent person
and capable of doing these things yourself.
Correct. Correct.
And that's a big part of their praxis.
This is why they send this type of stuff
to a lot of kids on the internet,
because they hope that if they desensitize these kids,
it'll be easier to convince them
to then do acts of violence themselves.
Kasap told his classmate that he intended
to kill his parents by shooting them,
but could not because he didn't have access to a gun.
He later told his classmate
that he would befriend someone with a gun and then steal it,
and told him that he was in contact
with a male in Russia via telegram,
and that they were both plotting
to overthrow the government of the United States and assassinate President Trump.
Kassip told the classmate that when he saw 10 consecutive attacks in the news, it would
have to be him.
I've already transitioned to the sort of person who can now laugh at this because of the absurdity.
Oh my gosh.
And get those laughs in now because the next section is much more dark.
Oh no.
Because it's funny to laugh at a guy like this who mostly failed.
I mean, he did kill his parents.
That is bad.
Really happened.
Okay.
Oh no, he did.
He did kill his parents.
He did flee to a different state.
He wasn't smart enough though.
He at least tracked him on him and his parents' cell phone and their car who he still had with him.
So, again, not not a very good attacker, I guess.
But no, like this, this, this, this kid murdered his parents, sat in the house with their decomposing bodies for 12 days
before trying to carry out the rest of his attack on the United States.
So, yeah, though he did not succeed in his larger goals,
these people still absolutely do get groomed into doing violence.
And this is something that happens at a pretty frequent basis, honestly,
to the point where these types of things don't make giant headlines anymore.
They would have maybe in 2017.
But now a lot of journalists are desensitized to this.
And because it happens so frequently frequently it is less newsworthy
Which is a very unfortunate place to be in for a country
You know what else is unfortunate Michael? Oh, what's that?
having to pivot to ads actually
Necessary evil it's way better than killing your parents. Yes. Yes. I will I will go on record
I will go on record eat me get go on record. Eat me, Gita board. Sorry.
I love ads, actually. [♪ Music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A bit of music playing. A As a heads up, the next section will reference online exploitation and child sexual abuse material.
Alright, we are back.
Let's get more depressing, unfortunately, but I think we will find a way to turn this around.
Well, not like in an optimistic way, but in a way that it's like useful.
We'll learn something together.
So at the end of this section of this complaint that attempts to
describe Kacop's collapse-driven political ideology is the appearance of this new term
nihilistic violent extremists, right? Now, this was actually the second time this term has appeared
in court documents. The earliest appearance of this term was in a March sentencing memo for a
child sexual abuse material case first filed in November of 2024,
which was linked to the 764 child extortion and exploitation network.
Ken Klepinsdeen, who first reported on the use of the nihilism term,
missed this first appearance and attributed the origin to the Kassop case.
Michael, are you similarly unfortunate enough to be aware of 764?
This is another one where my brain is more pure than yours, I guess, at this point.
But it's about to get ruined. So let's do it.
Yeah, I mean, it has been for a lot of people.
Like, I've been doing like extremism research and I've been aware of these guys for about four years.
The FBI, I think, first did their public announcement warning parents about
this in 2023. 764 is a network of groups that operate either on Discord, Telegram, Instagram,
social media apps. They're kind of inspired by some aspects of 09A, but they are much
more focused on the production and distribution of child sexual abuse materials and trying
to manipulate a groom and blackmail and extort
minors into producing this material. A lot of it's done by other minors too. A lot of
this is teens targeting other teens with adults kind of helping this process along. It's a
pretty big problem. There's been some good reporting on it in Wired and The Guardian
the past few years if you want to read more.
Now this March sentencing memo for the 764 case describes 764 and related groups as,
quote, nihilist violent extremists who engage in criminal conduct within the United States
and engage with other extremists abroad.
764 network's accelerationist goals include social unrest and the downfall of the current
world order, including the United States government. Members of 764 work in concert with one another towards
a common purpose of destroying civilized society through the corruption and exploitation of
vulnerable populations, including minors."
Now I think this definition may be a bit too generalizing, but it's not incorrect. Like this is correct in what the explicit goals
of this group are, maybe not just every individual member
of this group.
But I think it would be a mistake to kind of dismiss
this definition as outlandishly grandiose, right?
It kind of, it calls into like mine, you know,
like conspiracy theory, like framing,
because it sounds very like
extravagant and complicated. And it kind of is, but it's also, it's also like simple.
It's people trying to automate the process of producing and distributing illegal materials.
But I do believe it is a mistake to completely dismiss this, both in terms of like the government
trying to ascribe political motive for the distribution of these materials, and also
the ideological justifications held by some members of these groups. Now, there have been two more 764 cases from April of 2025
that have used the nihilist violent extremism designation in court documents. Now, part of kind
of the struggle with this is like, Ken Klippenstein reported, quote, it sounds to me like some
demented philosophical justification for just being a pedophile. And like, it sounds to me like some demented philosophical justification
for just being a pedophile.
And like, it is,
but that doesn't mean the political motivations shouldn't be discounted.
Uh, because those motivations impact how they operate,
how these groups spread, which targets they pick,
and other political actions members might take,
like mass shootings, targeting racial minorities,
targeting LGBTQ
individuals. So yeah, this is kind of why I push back a little bit on this kind of dismissive
tone towards this larger, almost conspiratorial kind of matrix put onto groups like 764.
Now, part of the tricky thing with use of this new nihilism term is that it's being used to rope in a variety of
horrific incidents under a singular nebulous category. Right? So let's take the case of
Kassop here. Kassop, the guy who killed his parents in a plot to collapse the United States,
is a relatively bog standard like neo-Nazi accelerationist with seemingly no direct
ties to 764 activity besides an interest in 09A, which was just one of the inspirations that influenced 764 as it evolved into its own complex machine
about five years ago.
But Kasup openly admitted to being radicalized by Nazism and the white power movement online,
and yet, in his criminal complaint, contains an expanded version of the nihilist violent
extremism definition, which is literally copy and pasted from a child sexual abuse material sentencing memo from five days before.
So they just use this same thing, despite it not really applying.
Reading quote, individuals are targeted online often through synchronized group chats.
nihilist violent extremists frequently conduct coordinated extortions of individuals by blackmailing
them so they comply with demands of the network.
These demands vary and include but are not limited to self-mutilation, online or in-person sexual acts,
harms to animals, sexual exploitation of siblings and others, acts of violence, threats of violence,
suicide, and murder. So very, very dark stuff. The definition goes on to state how vulnerable
individuals are targeted and members of the group attempt to gain notoriety throughout the network
and spread fear among those targeted individuals for the purpose of accelerating the downfall of society and otherwise achieving the goal of nihilist violent extremists.
So, while that does accurately describe groups like 764, it doesn't really relate to the case of CASA.
It's tricky because a lot of these 764 guys are also Nazis, and a lot of Nazis are also pedophiles.
Some of these guys start off as like evil occultic pedophiles who associate with Nazism
because it's a pretty universal symbol of evil, and sometimes it's the vice versa,
where they start off as like an anti-Semitic right-winger, a Nazi, or a fascist,
who then associate with this weird pedo-occult stuff for a variety
of reasons, like spiritual, perverted pleasure, or tactical network building.
Usually, it's a mix.
Klippenstein writes, quote, The warrant alleges Kassip was in touch with the Order of Nine
Angles, a satanic neo-Nazi group that espouses accelerationism, a fancy word for the belief
that destabilizing the social order allows for radical change.
That is pretty heady stuff to ascribe to a 17-year-old and ends up having the feeling of an episode of altered carbon."
And I kind of like reject this dismissive framing like, no, these 17-year-olds are thinking about this.
They are getting convinced of this material online.
That is the motivation for it. This isn't like a science fiction thing.
This is real and it's pretty common among like extremists this age.
There's a lot of young teenage male extremists.
That's kind of their main demographic.
And this type of stuff is popular.
Like this is at least popular within this small group of extremists.
So so, yeah, it is a little bit heady,
but this is what they are genuinely thinking about.
It's not incorrect to, like, ascribe that to them.
Kassab openly admitted to this connection.
Well, and even speak to the flip side of that, you know, over the years making philosophy
stuff on YouTube, I've gotten in touch with people who reached out to be like, oh, I've
been watching stuff since high school.
When I was like 15, I was watching these like philosophy YouTube videos on heady ideas and reading stuff.
So like-
Me, I was one of these people.
Yeah, there's like young folks out there
who take big ideas very seriously
and they have more access than ever to these things.
So it doesn't, I mean, it doesn't shock me at all
that some teen could go down that rabbit hole
or even could start reading like a Curtis Yarvin
or Nick Land and going down those rabbit holes and stuff,
especially now that some of these people are, you know,
put on like the New York Times and stuff like that.
So, yeah, it seems weird to dismiss that.
I can understand the impulse to be like,
this just seems like a very stupid, evil teen kid,
but it seems just as plausible, like you're pointing out,
that there could be an actual engagement with ideas,
and it's important to recognize that,
because then you have to get at the root of that. just as plausible like you're pointing out that there could be an actual engagement with ideas and that's it's important to recognize that because
Then you have to get at the root of that exactly and like these people aren't necessarily like
Philosophical nihilists or existential nihilists
Yeah
But they could be interpreted as reacting to a general like passive nihilist culture with this form of like pseudo political nihilism
This attempt at like social negation like total systems collapse
But even still they aren't totally political nihilists since they have a very clear
System of hierarchy that they want the current world order replaced with though
These individuals may be seen as like victims of nihilism and like in like in like the Nietzschean sense
Now like my main problem with the nihilist violent extremism term is that it's so
The main problem with the nihilist violent extremism term is that it's so depoliticized and in a way that's rife for political abuse.
This term can be used to cover what the government deems as violence stemming from apathy, from
frustration with society, as well as anti-tech or anti-civilization politics.
And this is all coming from top down at the new Federal Bureau of Investigation.
For years, Cash Patel has closely associated with QAnon, has helped the legal defense campaigns
for January 6th insurrectionists, which included Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and 3%ers.
And now, as head of the FBI, he's investigating FBI agents who worked those January 6th cases.
Joe Kent, the new director of the National Counterterrorism Center, has made media appearances
with Nick Fuentes and neo-Nazi YouTuber David Carlson.
He hired Proud Boys to consult in his failed congressional campaign, and his friends with
Patriot prayer leader Joey Gibson.
Kent has repeatedly called for the FBI to investigate Antifa.
The co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, Heidi Baric, has said
that Patel's QAnon links
and Deputy Director Dan Bongino's public conspiracism and bigotry make taking the threat
of far-right extremism quote-unquote impossible for these two men. She says, quote, I think
it makes it very unlikely that the far-right will continue to be seen as the threat it
actually is in terms of hate crimes and domestic terrorism. All of this marks a huge departure
from the first Trump administration, where the FBI for the first time declared white supremacy the country's
greatest domestic terrorism threat. Facts about violence and its perpetuators probably
won't matter this time around."
These changes are already taking place. An old counterterrorism strategy guide was removed
from the White House website in January. A current FBI agent was quoted in Vanity Fair as saying, quote, The key is the Domestic Intelligence Operations Guide.
If they change that, Patel will be able to shift domestic terrorism investigations away
from the accelerationists and the right-wing street fighters and towards things like BLM
and Antifa, unquote. Patel has cut the domestic terrorism office staffing and reassigned agents and intelligence
analysts, with new senior FBI officials reportedly considering to disband the entire domestic
terrorism operations section.
In addition, the FBI has discontinued their previous domestic terrorism tracking tool,
where they take relevant investigations to identify and track trends for terrorism probes
across the country.
Sources for outlets like Reuters say that changes to the agency will reduce counterterrorism to identify and track trends for terrorism probes across the country.
Sources for outlets like Reuters say that changes to the agency will reduce counterterrorism
operations against far-right and racially motivated extremists and militias.
Jacob Ware, a domestic terrorism expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, told Reuters,
quote, there is a broader desire, I think, within the administration to at best ignore
data and put their head in the sand, and at worst to realign resources away from this battle."
A spokesperson for Ohio Representative Jim Jordan told Reuters that the termination of
the domestic terrorism tracking tool is a quote, great step in the right direction of
returning the FBI to its primary crime fighting mission.
Representative Jordan previously in 2023 ran a congressional panel that alleged the FBI
terrorism case-tagging tool was being improperly used to target conservatives after January
6th.
Three former FBI agents testified at the Republican-led panel, and two of those former agents admitted
to being paid by Patel, who at the time was not director of the FBI, he was just a right wing influencer
after being kicked out of the government after the first Trump administration.
We've also seen the Joint Terrorism Task Force largely shift their efforts towards
immigration enforcement, helping ICE with deportations, and the so-called wave of Tesla
terrorism. And like, the other thing is that this new nihilist violent extremism term isn't just replacing agave,
it's not just replacing the anti-government or anti-authority violent extremism,
because the agave term itself has three subcategories,
as referenced in an FBI document that outlines domestic terrorism activity from 2015 to 2019.
This includes militia violent extremists, anarchist violent extremists, and sovereign citizen violent extremists. And even in addition
to those three, there's actually a newer sub classification from 2023 called agave other,
which really isn't a great term at all. This is the problem with trying to use these like tracking
and tagging tools is that they can get very convoluted, but now they've seemingly collapsed all of these and are just using the term nihilism.
So would you say, like, when you bring up the Tesla example, is one of, to be very reductive
here, the big risks at play that someone who starts Tesla on fire or causes some damage
at a Tesla dealership, largely
for the motivation of trying to stick it to Elon Musk or something like that, gets classified
in a way by the FBI that is similar to some of the folks you have previously talked about
doing things that most rational humans could agree are deeply more insidious than like
setting a car on fire.
They can frame this as like a rejection of society.
The same way like there's been talk that they're going to try to use this label to explain and like set a car on fire. They can frame this as like a rejection of society. Yeah.
The same way, like there's been talk
that they're gonna try to use this label
to explain cases like United Healthcare CEO shooting,
the arson attack at Josh Shapiro's house.
They're gonna be using this term
to apply to kind of any act that they see
is like contrary to like society and civilization.
And anything that's stemming from frustration with society.
And that's a huge problem. And in doing so, they're shifting focus away from right-wing
militias who do the majority of actual lethal violence. When these reports from the past
five years talk about militia violent extremism, it talks about how there is an increased lethal
threat from these militias to law enforcement and government personnel
due to factors related to grievances from the perceptions of fraud in the 2020 election
government measures related to cova 19
And legislation to restrict firearms or expand immigration or manage public land
And these are the people that do the vast majority of planned attacks or executed attacks
This report for 2023 outlines two attempted bombings by militia violent extremists in early 2021, one by an individual targeted
against a data center thought to provide services to the FBI and CIA, the other by two people
against a state Democratic party headquarters in Sacramento, California, as well as the
quote unquote, dozens of militia violent extremists arrested for their involvement in January
6th. So even though we're going to take the gas off of groups like those,
as well as racially motivated violent extremists,
this definition can still include a lot of anarchist violent extremists,
which the FBI admits in a 2023 report,
are most likely to engage in non-lethal criminal activity
and just impact law enforcement operations.
You know, this makes me think of climate activism as well and the work of those in the climate
community that call for the destruction of equipment and not the harm of human life.
Totally.
And the irony, of course, that you could call someone disabling an oil pipeline, a nihilist
extremist when the act they're doing is precisely for the purpose of ensuring the continued existence of human civilization on a large scale.
That's the big issue here.
The Trump government still wants a term that focuses on what some people would colloquially
refer to as accelerationist terrorism.
And that does encompass some of the extremist violence from the weirder corners of the far
right, like in the case of Kasup, but as well well as leftist or post-left anarchist extremism. But in the administration's mind,
the previous terms for this were tainted by crackdowns on right-wing or patriot movements
after January 6th. And the nihilist violent extremism term is not replacing the term terrorism
necessarily, like the way Klippenstein suggested in his article.
The word terrorism appears frequently in these very documents that we've been discussing,
nor does the term terrorism have quote-unquote limitations in law, as Klippenstein said,
that like prevent its use in political prosecution. If anything, it carries kind of special powers of
punishment which can be over applied to increase sentences, sway juries, and strip rights. We've seen bills to label Antifa as terrorists introduced to this year, the
whole Tesla terrorism thing, and historically like the use of terrorism
has been used as a repression tool in Atlanta's Stop Cop City movement, which
similarly has like a climate focus like you mentioned. And what this new nihilism
term lets them do is it allows the Trump administration to signal to their base that they aren't going to be going after like right wing militia style groups anymore, not not anti government anti authority extremists. Instead, they're just going to target zany weirdos who want to destroy society. It's a looser, more flexible term that can be applied to a much wider swath of people. And like the kind of final thing I want to I want to note here is that for groups
like like 764, we really don't have a good term for them.
Like some people have defended this nihilist term specifically for groups like 764
since that was where it originally appeared.
And it is true that these groups kind of defy classic categorization.
Some of them are certainly motivated by racial bias.
In the case of Casup, who's like tied tied with O9A but not specifically 764, but a lot of these other 764 guys who are mostly in it
for the pedophilia still do have anti-government ideologies that they are roped in with.
Now I have seen a few alternative terms lofted by certain independent researchers that don't
really do a good job but are gaining influence under Trump's government.
There's this like freelance researcher named Becca or Bix Rites, who mostly operates on Twitter.
She's proposed the term Satanic Accelerationism, or SAC.
Not good.
And this kind of outlines my problems with this person's research.
Now because all of the legitimate extremism researchers have kind of moved away from Twitter
and are just on blue sky now, people like this have exploded in influence under Elon's shepherding of Twitter.
And this person just spreads satanic panic style writing that appeals to conservative Christian audiences.
She boasts about how many mutuals she has with these Nazi terrorists.
She posts on Rumble, she went on Infowars.
So that kind of tells you everything you need to know about this person.
And a big part of her work is trying to downplay
the right wing and a white supremacist influence in extremism.
She excitedly posted, quote, the FBI has coined a new term for this type of
individual, nihilist violent extremists.
This makes me so happy because it indicates that law enforcement are listening
to researchers on the ground and are no longer considering these groups
neo-nazis or quote-unquote white supremacist
So yeah
This is a big part of this push is appealing to these types of people who don't want their weird
Pedofreaks to be labeled as right-wing even though they all are pretty far right-wing terrorists in in most cases
even though they all are pretty far-right-wing terrorists in most cases. This researcher also falsely linked Kassap with a Ukrainian Nazi occult group called
MKU.
She later retracted this claim on Substack, but left the original viral tweet up online,
because hey, engagement.
Her Substack post reads, quote,
When I first heard the news of Nikita Kassap, my mind immediately darted to another O9A
and MKU-linked individual named Nikita. This turned out to be a mere coincidence.
I know because the other Nikita reached out to me personally to clarify. It's moments
like these that cause me to reflect on just how big this movement really is, and just
how close to the fire I am. Unquote. This is not how you do extremism reporting. This
is not how you do journalism. But. This is not how you do journalism.
But this does demonstrate kind of the problem with this term is that, yeah, groups like
this do need a different term.
Maybe like accelerationist violent extremists.
That's a term.
You could use that if you're going to remove all the other acronyms.
But certainly the nihilism label just kind of complicates things and allows for the targeting
of just a massive swath of the population that could become like
Political prosecutions that then get linked to these child sexual abuse material cases
Okay, that is my that's my
That's my script Michael. How do you feel about that info dump? I'm so sorry truly
You know you've and I can send it to it
You've extracted a part of my soul and put it into a cosmic toilet today
I know more than I've known before as a
Human as an American as a parent. I'm terrified on every front and you know, my my simple guy takeaway here is
Yeah, like the idea that this is going to both
Let some of the worst folks off the hook,
or at least make it harder to classify them with the groups they should be classified with,
while also making it easier to lump in forms of what many of us would consider more reasonable
political activism under that umbrella, is quite bad. And I think, of course, for me, due to my pet interest, you know, all of these instances
of continuing to like pervert and misuse philosophical terms to have meanings developed over hundreds
and thousands of years for these political ends is very upsetting.
Well, I'm excited to usher in the new wave of Kierkegaardian violent extremists who are
going to usher in the-
Don't get me on a list. Stop it. Ha ha!
I am actually sorry that this went on nearly double the length
of which I thought it had planned after such a depressing episode.
I'm going to ask a kind of an odd question.
What philosophy books do you think people should read in this political moment?
Because a lot of people are approaching me with like, how do I stay sane?
How do I stay? How do I like keep going when things feel so bad?
And for me, I've always turned to philosophy.
I've been recommending different books to different friends.
And I'm kind of interested in like what you have to say about kind of what philosophy
can like offer us in these times of like existential torment.
Yeah. I mean, a really simple one that I talk about way too much is
Cure Curgards, the present age, which you find in this book called Two Ages.
That's easy to buy. It's normally really cheap.
Or you can just read it online someplace that kind of describes
a society in which people get caught up in media and reflection
and the BS they are told rather than developing their subjectivity for themselves.
I think that one's really great. In terms of more contemporary stuff, I've been very Frederick Jameson-pilled recently.
Right, nice.
And I think, I mean, I've read Jameson before on and off, but recently dove in more deeply. And there's one,
okay, I have it at arm's reach so I can say the title correctly, that I've really been enjoying.
It's called An American Utopia, Dual Power in the Universal Army by Frederick Jameson,
edited by Slavoj Žižek.
And it's this large Jameson essay about what he sees as an alternative for leftist power
in America, responses from a bunch of other scholars.
I have found it very interesting, but for me at least, I find comfort in the fact that others
have accurately diagnosed and understood what is happening right now and at least give us
the tools to understand the thing so it feels less nebulous and mysterious.
We don't have to reinvent the wheel all the time.
Yeah.
And that's something I feel like some leftists kind of get trapped in.
Or it's kind of a two sides thing is what some people just get fully lost in, like the labyrinth of theory and the other people get lost in trying to constantly reinvent or like make for the first time stuff that already exists.
Right. And I think there's a really careful balance between like reading some stuff so that you can like know what's going on and not feel the need to
try to like you cause every you know philosophical evolution to come about
via your own thought. Yeah you don't have to be the one to do it someone else
already did it. You're not alone like other people have done this and you should still like think
for yourself and still compare but but people have thought about this type of
stuff before people have been in bad political situations before and it's
it's useful to know what they've thought.
And like this is like, you know, my work is mostly looking at like current events
and like trying to track like extremism and like what the government is doing.
And you know, more information always helps me choose how to navigate in the world.
That's why I do episodes like this.
And I think philosophy is just one other side of that.
Unless you have anything else to say,
do you want to talk about where people can find you online and your new YouTube channel?
Yeah, I have a recently launched YouTube channel that's just under the name Michael O. Burns.
And I think it's literally just YouTube slash Michael O. Burns. I'm quickly. Yep. YouTube
slash Michael O. Burns, where I'm going to be doing more stuff quite regularly like streams and video essays
Largely doing some of the stuff we're just talking about using
philosophy and concepts from theory and from theory to try to understand what's going on in both the political and like the social and
interpersonal levels and I'm working on a
Thing I'm excited about on a like depression and capitalism and mental health
So yeah, and I'm on all most of the social medias
I'm just Michael burns or Michael O. Burns,
relatively easy to find on most places.
Well, thank you so much, Michael,
for joining me in this dive through the darkest depths
of the internet and the extremism milieu
that is festering in America and abroad.
Thanks for having me. It's me, Kevin Smith. And it's me, Harley Quinn Smith. That's my daughter, man, who my wife has always said is just a beardless, d***less version
of me.
And that's the name of our podcast, Beardless D***less Me.
I'm the old one.
I'm the young one.
And every week we try to make each other laugh really hard.
Sounds innocent, doesn't it?
A lot of cussing, a lot of bad language.
It's for adults only.
Or listen to it with your kid.
It could be a family show.
We're not quite sure.
We're still figuring it out.
It's a work in progress.
Listen to Beardless D***less Me on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or
wherever you get your podcasts.
This is Courtside with Laura Corenti, the podcast that's changing the game and
breaking down the business of women's sports like never before.
I'm Laura, the founder and CEO of Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment, your
inside source on the biggest deals, power moves, and game changers, writing the
playbook on all things women's sports.
From the heavy hitters in the front office to the powerhouse women on the pitch, we're
talking to commissioners, team owners, influential athletes, and the investors betting big on
women's sports.
We'll break down the numbers, get under the hood, and go deep on what's next.
Women's sports are the moment.
So if you're not paying attention,
you're already behind.
Join me, Courtside, for a front row seat
into the making of the business of women's sports.
Courtside with Laura Currenti
is an iHeart women's sports production
in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment.
Listen to Courtside with Laura Currenti
starting April 3rd on the iHeart radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Brought to you by Novartis, founding partner of iHeart Women's Sports Network.
You say you'd never give in to a meltdown. Never let kids' toys take over the house
and never fill your feed with kid photos.
You'd never plan your life around their schedule.
Never lick your thumb to clean their face.
And you'd never let them leave the house looking like less
than their best.
You say you'd never put a pacifier in your mouth
to clean it.
Never let them stay up too late. And never let them run wild through
the grocery store. So when you say you'd never let them get into a car without
you there, no it can happen. One in four hot car deaths happen when a kid gets
into an unlocked car and can't get out. Never happens. Before you leave the car, always stop, look, lock.
Brought to you by NHTSA and the Ad Council.
On November 5th, 2018, at 6.33 a.m.,
a red Volkswagen Golf was found abandoned
in a ditch out in Sleephole Valley.
The driver's seat door was open.
No traces of footsteps leaving the vehicle.
No belongings were found,
except for a cassette tape lodged in the player.
On that tape were 10 vile.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no!
Ah!
Grotesque. Oh my that to this day have been kept restricted from the
public.
Until now.
You feeling this too?
A horror anthology podcast. Welcome to It Could Happen here.
I'm Robert Evans and this is a podcast about things falling apart, which they always seem
to be these days, and in particular,
this is an episode about what to expect out of the next six months to a year.
If you're not sure what else to do, try and spread calm.
I first learned this lesson back in 2016, hanging out with perennial libertarian presidential
candidate vermin supreme during the protests around that year's Democratic
convention in Philadelphia.
If you've never had the pleasure of seeing Vermin at a protest, he's essentially a rodeo
clown for riot cops, and his example taught me a lot about how to communicate to a group
of angry, scared people in tense situations.
Those lessons came in handy for me back in 2020.
But the George Floyd uprising is now almost five years in the past.
Trump is once again in power.
Very little seems to stand between him and the exercise of a kind of arbitrary dictatorial
violence that this nation has seldom seen within its own borders, but has often sponsored
elsewhere, including El Salvador, where Trump has sent hundreds of American residents and plans to send thousands, perhaps tens of thousands more.
The purpose of this essay is to provide my predictions for the next six months to a year.
What I'm writing here is speculative, but it is based on the best data I have available
and numerous conversations I've had with activists, current federal employees, former soldiers,
and retired
law enforcement.
There are a million places where I could start, but I feel like the most responsible place
to begin is by answering this question.
Is now the time to panic?
Last year, after Biden's disastrous debate performance, I put out a podcast essay titled
�Don't Panic.� It was my most shared episode of this podcast that year.
And I felt pretty good about the response.
Until Trump won again, and I found it briefly impossible to take my own advice.
Since January of 2025, the fascist takeover has only accelerated.
And I have lost count of the number of people who've asked me, is it time to panic?
The answer to that is still no.
But not because there's no reason to panic.
In fact, panic is a natural reaction to our present moment.
If your fight or flight reflexes haven't been triggered, well, they might be broken.
Even so, don't panic.
Because in combat, in disasters, in any dangerous situation you might find yourself, panic is
what will kill you as surely as anything else.
There's a concept in military theory I bring up often, something introduced to soldiers
undergoing training today.
It's called the Oda Loop.
It describes the process people go through while acting and reacting under fire, and
particularly while deciding how to act and react under fire.
It stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act.
If you can interrupt any part of that loop, you can stop your enemy from fighting back
effectively.
The basic principle of the Oda loop functions on the grand strategy scale, as well as it
does in a gunfight.
This is the point behind the Fled the Zone strategy orchestrated by Stephen Miller and
the other intellectual luminaries behind Trump, too.
The fire hose of outrage is to distract you from observing everything that's happening,
to keep you off balance so you can't orient yourself, to stop you from deciding and acting.
Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter helped to supercharge the bullshit
cannon.
AI accelerated the spread of lies on social media beyond all of our
worst nightmares.
And this has helped blind and divide the people who should have linked arms to stop this shit
before it got to the point that it's at today.
I want you to think of how many prominent leftists have fallen repeatedly for right-wing
propaganda, like that Russia would never invade Ukraine, or that Trump might actually be somehow
better for Gaza.
These and a million other things have blinded and hobbled potential resistance.
I might also bring up the whole MAGA communist movement, but the less said about those people,
the better.
Meanwhile, columnists at liberal legacy publications like the Times have fallen for every hyped-up bring up the whole MAGA communist movement, but the less said about those people, the better.
Meanwhile, columnists at liberal legacy publications like the Times have fallen for every hyped
up story about transgender athletes or woke kids on college campuses, and the danger the
illiberal left poses to free speech.
They've denied genocide and demonized those who protest against it, and too many elected
Democrats have taken their lead as the path of least resistance.
Many have pulled right for reasons far more sinister.
The fact that Gavin Newsom, governor of California, is hosting fascists on his new podcast while
mailing burner phones to tech CEOs points towards something dark, immediate, and deadly.
We live now in the culmination of a successful, decades-long plot to, in the words of Curtis
Yarvin, repeal the 20th century and turn this nation into a dictatorship where our lives
and our collective national arsenal are the personal property of some dudes who inherited
oil money or invested in Facebook back in like 2005.
The early stages of the plan, of course,
date back well before Peter Thiel or Elon Musk or Donald Trump.
They began when a coalition of would-be oligarchs
tried to overthrow FDR in what has become known
as the business plot and were thwarted by a Marine general
named Smedley Butler.
These men wanted revenge for the New Deal,
but they found seizing power at the top harder than they'd hoped. And so they
embarked on a slower, bottom-up approach. Hence the John Birch
Society, the creation of countless think tanks and the
generations-long effort to stack the Supreme Court. The war on
abortion was a concerted step towards this plan, an artificial
creation alongside the birth of the religious
right as a political coalition.
There was initially a small group of men at the center of the web, guys like William Rigneri
I and William Rigneri II, or Paul Weyrich.
But the engine of cultural and political change forged from the late 40s to the 1970s was
so successful that at some point it became self-perpetuating.
And when a gaggle of tech bros found themselves with more wealth than any humans had ever
held, the machine was there to mold them, and to be used by them.
It's all worked so damn well that many people I know have lost hope entirely.
We're fucked, goes the script.
They're gonna send us to the camps, and they can't be stopped, at least not without apocalyptic bloodshed.
Well, that's not necessarily so.
Now, people have already died as a result of this administration, a lot of them, and
that will continue to happen.
But a collapse into total carnage is not inevitable, nor is a future that offers us nothing but
a boot upon our necks.
Despite the money that went into building it, this is a new house made with cheap materials,
and there are already cracks in the foundation.
So my first prediction for the coming months is this.
The cracks will widen.
And we'll talk about that, but first, as we're obligated to do, here's some ads.
Trump and the men who swim in his wake signal only strength.
Honesty is neither in their interest nor a strong suit.
But Curtis Yarvin, chief prophet of the Neo-Reactionaries and Peter Thiel's pet philosopher, is in
a different position.
He knows people in power listen to some of what he has to say, and over the last few
months his profile has risen enormously.
I can take credit for at least a tiny amount of that.
Many normal liberals and elected Democrats now know who he is.
This exposes him to a danger that was not present for him during Trump's first term.
If the current fascist salient should be pushed back and this movement fails, there could
be and should be prosecutions, and he rightly fears that if this happens, he might follow
in the footsteps of Alfred Rosenberg, the Nazi high theoretician who was executed in
Nuremberg.
That's why, on March 6th, he published a messy, sprawling, seven thousand word essay titled
Barbarians and Mandarins in his trademark, nigh unreadable style.
It comes with the subheading, as soon as it stops accelerating, it stalls and explodes.
If you want to spare yourself the headache of reading through one-tenth of a novel of
Yárván's, at best, turgid prose. There's a good article by the nerd Reich that breaks all this down.
We'll link it in the show notes.
But the gist is that Yarvin thinks Musk and Trump have been too slow, have embraced too
many half-measures, and the whole authoritarian project is careening towards disaster.
Quote, unless the spectacular earthquakes of January and February are dwarfed in March
and April by new and unprecedented abuses of the Richter scale, the Trump regime will
start to wither and eventually dissipate.
It cannot stay at its current level of power, which is too high to sustain, but too low
to succeed.
It has to keep doing things that have never been done before.
As soon as it stops accelerating, it stalls and explodes.
Now the weeks since have seen massive and rising public awareness of
CICOT, the terrorism detention facility in El Salvador being used as a
concentration camp by the Trump regime. This might rightly be called a
new and unprecedented abuse. But there's a couple of issues here, at
least as far as Yarvin sees them. For one thing, the people targeted there have been migrants.
People who are in the US either illegally or in the US on visas that have been revoked.
People who have been accused of being part of Trinidad.
But not the people that Yarvin wants to see liquidated.
Because as he writes in this column, the thing that he thinks the Trump administration should be doing right now is quite literally gassing media personalities and politicians who don't
align with his viewpoint, basically literally killing the opposition.
And since he's shown to be unwilling to do that, the fact that he's shipping people to
concentration camps on its own isn't terrifying enough.
Now the other thing that's concerning Yarvin is that while the use of this facility in
El Salvador as a foreign concentration camp by the Trump regime is terrifying and is unprecedented,
it's also been met with a significant response, one that burges on unprecedented itself.
I'm not just talking about the protests, or of the recent Supreme Court ruling ordering
a temporary halt to such deportations.
I'm referring to something else that's happened, due to the sheer panic caused by the knowledge
that our President has a concentration camp and has been talking about shipping US citizen
dissidents there.
I'm talking about stuff like the fact that formerly conservative columnist Bill Kristol
is now calling for the outright abolition of ICE.
And the arch-neoliberal mealy-mouth David Brooks calling for a general strike in the
pages of the New York Times while quoting from the Communist Manifesto.
This is more than just a vibe shift, it's an open realization and acceptance by prominent
people who are neither radical nor revolutionaries that any action,
even the formerly unimaginable, might be necessary and justified to end this regime.
Now, make no mistake, first off, this is because a lot of these people are worried about their
own privileges going away under a dictatorial regime.
But that doesn't change the fact that this is a crack in the very foundation of the authoritarian
power structure.
Yarvin is scared, then, because we weren't supposed to be here now.
Harvard was supposed to have folded like Columbia, and then have been slowly and quietly liquidated.
The tame press was supposed to turn wholly for the regime or be disappeared, not quote
Karl Marx and urge people into the streets to do a general strike. So I don't find all this cheery because I
think David Brooks is going to become shithead Shay Govara. I am braced, however,
by the failure that this represents for the men above us who seek unchecked
dominance. Cracks are also visible in the recent history of Elon Musk, who has
watched the value of the stock that underpins his whole empire collapse.
He fought desperately to convince Trump not to go through with the tariffs that would
punish it further.
The result?
We see Trump assuring his inner circle that Elon is on the way out, while Musk himself
prepares to step back from Doge in the hope that it will somehow protect the remainder
of his ambitions.
These are all good signs, and the damage will continue to spread.
However, and this brings me to my next prediction, the empire's gonna strike back.
We are in for a hot summer, my friends, and there's no way around that.
I mean this in the literal sense that it will probably be the hottest summer on record,
although that fact will be true of every subsequent summer in our lives. But I also mean this in the sense that things are going to cook off in the streets
very soon. This is something the administration has quite openly been waiting to see. Trump
has made no secret of his desire to use the Insurrection Act, not only at the border,
but to send US troops into US cities to crush riots and punish leftist demonstrators. This
was a desire hatched in reaction to the George Floyd uprising, and it always seems
to be envisioned by the right as targeted against black-clad Antifa types.
The reality is that anti-fascists have not been a consistent presence on the ground around
the country for some time, at least not organizing in the way that they were back when Antifa
was a buzzword.
There are numerous reasons for this, but the biggest is that the fascist movement has moved
beyond waving flags in the street and getting into fistfights to try and scare people.
A lot of them are running federal law enforcement agencies and the military now.
Proud Boys just ain't a priority.
Not for those on the left who want to stop this, or, frankly, for the administration.
I expect protests around the country in the coming months for several reasons, but the
likeliest event to provoke severe civil disruption is a rise in food prices, and the rise of
everything else in price, as well as a collapsing economy courtesy of the President's tariffs.
There are already numerous signs of this, both in terms of the volume of shipping coming
into the United States, and early signs
of collapsing crop yields in the United States.
And this is where a study of history helps one out, because nothing but nothing brings
down regimes like rising bread prices.
And any attempt to crack down will be stymied by the fact that a decent chunk of the elites
who backed Trump before will be suffering too.
Obviously, the people closest to him are making bank off the economic upswings and downswings
over the whole tariff issue, but there's a lot of other people, people who supported
him, people who thought he had their back, who aren't quite close enough to power, and
they're watching Trump shoot their own fortunes in the kneecap because they built their money
on free trade.
I won't pretend to know where things are going to pop off or will be the hottest, but the
evidence shows the regime at least expects Washington, D.C. to play a central role in
what comes next.
Republican Congress members recently reintroduced a bill to repeal D.C. self-rule, and Trump
appointed Ed Martin to be the city attorney, a man who, in the words of USA Today columnist Chris Brennan, quote, lacks experience, but
loves revenge.
Now, the fact that Elon Musk and his Doge cronies left so many in the city and the surrounding
area unemployed after their purge of the administrative state means that there's an even higher number
of motivated, angry people with free time and experiencing organizing large, complex
systems who have nothing to do right now.
A similar set of circumstances brought us to the 2020 uprisings.
This was not just a product of the months of isolation or of the brutality of George
Floyd's murder, but of the sheer number of people who were out of work and who were finally
given a chance to take out their anxiety at an authoritarian president tightening his grip.
And today, that grip is even tighter, and the danger more real.
We have a president openly discussing his desire to put American citizens
in a foreign concentration camp.
Trump and his inner circle are hoping for protests that stay isolated to DC and
perhaps a few major blue cities, Portland
and the like.
This would provide an opportunity to send in the troops to utilize the Insurrection
Act to shoot people in the street and to send some ringleaders off to El Salvador.
This would be the riskiest option for Trump in some ways.
Pete Hegseth has not been a competent or popular Secretary of Defense, and asking U.S. troops
to fire on protesters opens up the risk that some junior officer might balk at that order, which could
create a cascading chain of disobedience.
Such things have sparked rapid collapse in other dictatorships throughout history.
There's also the chance that spectacular and comprehensive violence by the military might
succeed and thus strangle any protest movement in the cradle.
So we might call this the high risk, high reward option, and I should note that Donald
Trump has, more than a few times in the past, chosen the high risk, high reward option.
So I don't consider this unlikely.
But it won't be lost on Trump or his cronies that the violence which met the first protest
in 2020 provoked the largest domestic uprising in living memory.
People have not forgotten this, and some blue state democrats have even made, let's say,
confusing noises to that effect.
Case in point, Governor Bob Ferguson of Washington just signed a bill barring other state National
Guard units from entering Washington without his approval, unless they were mobilized by
the President. Now, as that last part might key you in on, this bill doesn't have a lot of legal force,
or any really at all, but it's a sign that even fairly milquetoast elected Democrats are
starting to consider the real possibility of a federal invasion of their states.
The President has discussed sending out of state troops into blue cities before,
largely in the context of cracking down on immigration in sanctuary cities.
This is all dangerous language, but going further than just language carries risk for
the regime, too.
I would not be shocked if we were to see the Texas National Guard, or whoever, whichever
state, occupying, let's say, Chicago, after federal law enforcement makes good on the
threats that have been made by members of the Trump administration to arrest governors who aid and abet undocumented migrants,
like J.B. Pritzker, and an act like that would surely spark mass protests in Chicago and
very likely elsewhere.
The fact that a move like that would have such a risk of sparking mass resistance, as
well as further legal challenges, might
keep the Trump administration focused on smaller fish and less dangerous outrages, at least
for the time being.
And if that's the route they choose, I think something different might be likely, and I
call this potential path forward.
The pressure cooker.
And we'll talk about that, but first, here's more ads.
When public unrest exploded in 2020, it did so after four solid years of buildup.
If you'll remember, the earliest fascist-antifascist street clashes of that period started before
the 2016 election.
These were largely focused around speeches at campuses by right-wing provocateurs and
dueling demonstrations in a handful of cities.
The first wave of such activity crested in Charlottesville 2017 with tragic results.
But the vibe it set and the people it trained continued to take part in street actions,
and many of them formed the infrastructural core of the movement that exploded onto the
scene after George Floyd's murder.
The last year of serious protests have focused more on the genocide in Gaza than anything,
and it's not coincidental that the first wave of deportations have heavily targeted
legal residents who took part in those demonstrations.
Since Trump took office and Doze started doing its thing, there have been more large-scale
demos that focus directly on the regime.
These have been quite manageable from the regime's point of view, and they have not
yet attracted the same kind of crackdown.
But that won't remain the case as people grow more desperate.
Any fool can see that the apparatus of repression constructed to punish genocide protesters
will be turned on Democrats, former federal employees, and people who are just hungry
and pissed about rising food prices.
However, this represents another tightrope scenario for the regime.
These demonstrations are large, and unlike student protests against Israel, the media
has proved less eager to marginalize the participants as extremists.
As time goes on and things get worse, folks who last year scoffed at college students
occupying campus buildings may themselves consider if perhaps it might be time to fuck
some shit up.
This will be an uneven process, with sudden leaps forward and pulls back, and it will
provoke an equally uneven state response.
There will be attempts to send so-called instigators and organizers overseas, to El Salvador unless
the public reaction to this, which is building as I type, continues to escalate to the extent
that it becomes unfeasible.
If so, there are ample domestic locations to detain, or even disappear, those the regime
considers dangerous.
First on the chopping block will be the people whose heads are currently closest to the blade,
organizers and demonstrators against genocide whose citizenship is not at all in question.
I expect if large, disruptive demonstrations do threaten the administration's hold, they
will also start to target Antifa again, which will start with the targeting of longtime
activists, many of whom would have been people arrested or at least heavily surveilled in
2020.
However, it won't end there, and it will quickly expand to elected Democrats, new people organizing
protests, folks who have never had anything to do with any of the kind of anti-fascist
actions that so captivated Fox News back in 2020. I will be
shocked if we make it more than another year without a serious attempt to brand Antifa a
domestic terror organization, and if that succeeds in a way that has legal force,
then the fact that there is no such organization won't matter. Trump's feds will do what we've
watched ICE do with Trenda Agua. They'll break down the door of whoever they wish, argue tattoos or possessions of certain literature or whatever is proof of membership, and then
those who survive the raids will find themselves in the most restrictive detention the regime
feels secure placing them in.
If things follow what I suspect is the likeliest path, we will watch this process ebb and flow
over the next several months. Each spring and summer protests will grow and peak in the hottest months, with new cities
and tactics being attempted regularly by groups constantly reeling from raids that are devastating
and terrifying but, due to the incompetence of an FBI whose investigative capacity has
been neutered, fail to really disrupt things.
As the weather cools off, exhausted activists will lick their wounds and make new plans. Scattered acts of disruption carried out by small groups or individual
cells will occur year round, but I expect large-scale demonstrations and clashes between
demonstrators and law enforcement to follow a pattern not so different from what Afghanistan
veterans knew as fighting season. Hot summers of mass activity, winters of raids
and experimentation to scout holes for the next year's offensive. And as time goes on,
the energy will build, the tension will build, and, of course, we might find ourselves reaching
towards something that explodes in the not-too-distant future, perhaps a year or two down the line.
Now, of course, none of this will occur in a vacuum or independent of the news churn
that we've been drowning in for years.
And this brings me to my next prediction, which is the coming of politics as unusual.
I apologize for coming back to the David Brooks of it all, but seeing a man who in 2017 wrote
that Trump had changed and we really needed to stop stressing out over
him, and then wrote a column attacking millennials for their tribalism, call for a general strike
is a sign, and it's not a sign that Brooks has gotten smarter, it's a sign that we've
entered radical times, and that radicalization spares not even the centrist.
If the worst case scenario occurs, and a few weeks from now US soldiers are gunning down
demonstrators while ICE officers cart elected Democrats off to Seacat, feel free to disregard
this passage.
But if the somewhat slower path prevails, I expect to see more politicians and news
editors chase viewers as they sprint left, or at least away, from the dissolving center.
We've watched this process occur on the right during the Biden years, and to a degree it
is still occurring out of a fear of reprisals under the Trump regime.
I'm finalizing the script on the day 60 Minutes producer Bill Owens stepped down over interference
from Paramount executives into his coverage of Donald Trump.
But the polls have started moving against the right.
Trump's public approval on immigration policy is underwater for the first time in years,
and his approval on everything else is, while not always at record lows, diving with significant speed.
The next several months of shipping data, as well as concerning early reporting on farm
yields, suggests a near future in which a lot less will be available for everyone.
We saw what a rising price of eggs did to Biden.
We've also seen Senator Chris Van Hollen go almost overnight from a marginal figure
in U.S. politics to one of the most famous Democrats in the nation, all because he had
the modest courage to fly to El Salvador and call the President's use of a foreign black
site what it was.
There will be more people like Van Hollen, who display courage previously unseen in a
moment of trial.
But much more than that, there will be opportunists, those who see the wind blowing and chase the
approval of crowds more willing to countenance radical action in the streets than they were
a year ago.
Most politicians, and most thought leaders in the old media, are reactive, and I'm not
saying that this will change.
Merely that what they react to will change, because of who is in charge now, and because
of the desperation of the times brought on by Republican policies, which is going to
paint a target on the backs of conservative leaders as large as the targets they've been
painting on the backs of dissidents.
And all of this means one thing, which is, we're approaching the age of weird terror.
So much has happened in this shitty, stupid year that I think we've all forgotten.
2025 opened with a military veteran blowing himself up in a cyber truck in front of the
Trump Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas.
His reasoning was based as much on the numerous head injuries he'd suffered in his service
as it was on his exposure to right-wing propaganda, which convinced him that the Democrats needed
to be dealt with.
But he saw things clearly enough to know that yet another mass shooting or self-immolation
or even a run-of-the-mill bomb wouldn't have garnered him or his manifesto any attention.
So instead, he picked a cyber truck and a Trump building, symbols of the two most viral
men of our very stupid era, and he blew one of those up in front of the other.
And by gummit,
we all did pay attention.
For a few days at least.
Late last year, an anonymous gunman, the government believes to be Luigi Mangione, was even more
successful at holding our attention, with an even stranger attack, a brazen and nigh-perfectly
executed assassination carried out by a man with a dazzling smile, and the wisdom to pick
the most universally hated target that exists today, a healthcare CEO.
We have all watched so many mass shootings at schools, at grocery stores, nightclubs,
everywhere imaginable, that they've lost the ability to shock us.
But targeted assassinations of people at the top of the food chain are so rare that they
can't help but draw eyeballs.
And sheer, rollicking strangeness, like we saw in Vegas, has a captivating power all
its own.
We will see more of both kinds of attacks in the months to come.
The arson attempt on Governor Shapiro's home, bizarre at least for the extensive damage
done, might be seen as another data point on this list.
But as new figures rise to prominence, within new protest movements, we will see attempts
to kill them. Furious and deranged Trump supporters armed with cars and guns and Trump-branded pocket
dives will do as they've been doing. And this part won't be new. What I do expect will be new is the
increased threat felt by the oligarchs at the top of the system as intelligent and patient young
people continue to plot ways to go after them in the places and times where they feel invulnerable. And I also expect that editors and journalists
will continue to learn that these actions draw eyeballs more than almost anything else.
And while all that's going on, the truly unbalanced among us will find ways to hitchhike off the
well-publicized turmoil coming our way and make their own confounding
statements.
There will be public suicides and attacks utilizing weapons and tools we can't yet
imagine, at least not openly on a podcast without receiving a visit from some friendly
alphabet boy or another.
I don't know what exactly to expect beyond the unexpected and the very, very silly.
And of course, as we talk about weird terrorism, I don't mean to discount the Nazi accelerationist
types here.
They'll keep trying.
But if they want to raise above the chatter and an even more crowded media ecosystem,
even they're going to find ways to get weird with it.
After all, an attack no one notices isn't likely to accelerate much of anything.
And I guess that's what I've got right now.
I've got 10 pages or
so on what I see coming. I didn't come up with a smooth, sexy ending for this like
a writer should because I'm tired and thinking about this isn't fun, but I did
a lot and there you are. I suppose the thing you're asking now is what the fuck
do I do about it? And you know, that's what we talk about a lot on this show organize with your friends get involved find ways to help people
take a stop the bleed class and
The love of God keep your eyes open Hey kids, it's me, Kevin Smith.
And it's me, Harley Quinn Smith.
That's my daughter, man, who my wife has always said is just a beardless, d***less version
of me.
And that's the name of our podcast, Beardless, D***less Me.
I'm the old one.
I'm the young one. And every week we try to make each other laugh really hard. Sounds innocent, doesn't it? This is Court Side with Laura Corenti, the podcast that's changing the game
and breaking down the business of women's sports
like never before.
I'm Laura, the founder and CEO
of Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment,
your inside source on the biggest deals,
power moves, and game changers,
writing the playbook on all things women's sports.
From the heavy hitters in the front office
to the powerhouse women on the pitch,
we're talking to commissioners, team owners, influential athletes, and the investors women's sports. From the heavy hitters in the front office to the powerhouse women on the pitch,
we're talking to commissioners, team owners, influential athletes, and the investors betting
big on women's sports. We'll break down the numbers, get under the hood, and go deep on what's next.
Women's sports are the moment. So if you're not paying attention, you're already behind.
Join me, Courtside, for a front row seat into the making of the business of women's sports.
Courtside with Laura Karenty is an iHeart women's sports production in partnership with
Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment.
Listen to Courtside with Laura Carrenty starting April 3rd on the iHeart radio app, Apple podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Brought to you by Novartis, founding partner of iHeart Women's Sports Network.
You say you never give in to a meltdown.
Never let kids' toys take over the house.
And never fill your feed with kid photos.
You'd never plan your life around their schedule.
Never lick your thumb to clean their face.
Never lick your thumb to clean their face. And you'd never let them leave the house looking like, uh, less than their best.
You say you'd never put a pacifier in your mouth to clean it.
Never let them stay up too late.
And never let them run wild through the grocery store.
Clean up on aisle six.
And aisle three.
So when you say you'd never let them get into a car without you there, no, it can happen.
One in four hot car deaths happen when a kid gets into an unlocked car and can't get out.
Never happens.
Before you leave the car, always stop, look, lock.
Brought to you by NHTSA and the Ad Council.
I'm Israel Gutierrez, and I'm hosting a new podcast, Dub Dynasty,
the story of how the Golden State Warriors have dominated the NBA for over a decade.
The Golden State Warriors once again are NBA champions.
From the building of the core that included Clay Thompson and Draymond Green
to one of the boldest coaching decisions in the history of the core that included Clay Thompson and Draymond Green to one of the boldest coaching decisions
in the history of the sport.
I just felt like the biggest thing was to earn the trust
of the players and let the players know that we were here
to try to help them take the next step,
not tear anything down.
Today, the Warriors dynasty remains alive,
in large part because of a scrawny 6'2 hooper
who everyone seems to love.
For what Steph has done for the game, he's certainly on that like Mount Russmore for
guys that have changed it.
Come revisit this magical Warriors ride.
This is Dubb Dynasty.
The Dubb's Dynasty is still very much alive.
Listen to Dubb Dynasty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your
podcast. Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. covering what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world and what it means for you. I'm Garrison Davis today, I'm joined by Mia Wong, James Stout, and Robert Evans.
This episode, we're covering the week of April 17
to April 23.
JD Vance has killed the Pope,
a second Pete Hegseth unauthorized signal chat
has hit the Department of Defense.
The White House announces that the Education Department
will start collecting on defaulted student loans. Beanie clad Tim Pool joins the White House announces that the Education Department will start collecting on defaulted student loans, beanie-clad Tim Pool joins the White House press pool,
and hippie Facebook moms rejoice with artificial food dyes being banned across America.
How are we doing, everybody?
Much worse after hearing that.
Fine, I guess.
I outlived the Pope! I outlived the Pope! Woo!
You have to live several more decades to like outlive the Pope officially I
Think he was 88 so
Thank goodness he did not die on Hitler's birthday because that would have been a whole other whole other
Yeah, I'm still one day off. I'm thinking back to my catechism classes and trying to remember like Pope dead on Easter good sign or bad
back to my catechism classes and trying to remember like, Pope dead on Easter, good sign or bad.
That's definitely a sign, like it's some kind of sign.
What do we, how do we take that?
Shout out to the Pistons for holding off
winning a playoff game just long enough for the Pope to die
such that Francis Reed's entire term in office
never saw Pistons playoff win.
Congratulations to the Pistons,
congratulations to the city of Detroit,
congratulations for withholding that from the Pope.
Did not mean love to see it.
Did Pope Francis have a strong opinion on the Pistons that he expressed at some point?
Because I may have missed that.
No, he knew they were in a Macklemore song, so therefore he hated them.
He was a huge Macklefan.
Yeah, a lot of people don't know this, but the entire time the Pope is lying in state,
they'll just going to be looping thrift shop.
So, yeah.
As Pope Francis wanted.
Yeah, that was his dying wish.
Do you know who else probably used to listen to Macklemore?
Not anymore, because he got too woke, but Pete Hegseth seems like a 2012 Macklemore guy.
Yeah, might have been, might have been.
He was sharing plans for Yimini airstrikes
with his wife, his brother, and a personal lawyer
in another Signal Chat.
I do the same thing.
Yeah, well.
Yeah, you've yet to act on your plans, it's a difference.
They are not interested.
Looping at the lawyer is the real God-tier move there.
That is so funny.
Because, I mean, it says so much,
both about what's going on in Pete Hedges Seth's brain
But of the quality of lawyer because any lawyer worth assault would be like please remove me. I'm not in this chat
Yeah, you need to get me out of this chat. What is wrong with you?
Are you are you texting me missile package information?
That's the thing though. We've gotten great evidence like this guy for Giuliani from all of the lawyers these like random cartoon dipshits
The right keeps finding that like they will just hand you a law degree like if you hand the state enough money
They will just hand you a law degree
And you can just like bullshit your way through the bar and you'll be fine like they give that shit out to anyone
You can tell a really good lawyer
in a room where illegal things are being discussed,
and I've had this happen several times
because they just leave, they bounce,
they get the fuck out of the room,
and that's a smart lawyer.
I don't know if you saw, but the state of California
was using AI to send its bar exam questions.
Oh, wonderful.
You don't even have to be someone.
I bet the AI would be able to tell you
don't text your wife, lawyer, and son classified information
about missile strikes.
But whatever.
Now hopefully if they start using AI more to get through school,
they won't have as many student loans to be collected on.
Yeah, there you go.
A practice that has been paused since March of 2020,
set to be resumed on May 5th.
And then, man, the Tim Pool thing was really wild.
Press Secretary Carolyn Levitt gave a glowing introduction
to Tim Pool's addition to the press room.
And Tim's first question to the administration
was asking why news media just lies so much about Trump.
Fantastic journalism here from comrade Tim.
Really probing question.
Let's pivot towards RFK and the concerning registry that has been discussed, which is
a word you never like to hear whenever someone brings up the concept of a registry.
It's usually bad.
Always bad.
So I'm going to talk in general about what RFK, the things that he has said, not just
about autistic Americans, but about people who are receiving psychiatric medication,
people who are addicted to opiates, people who are utilizing like stimulants, by which
I mean ADHD medicine, which if you have ADHD, that's not exactly
the way it functions, but that's the way he frames it.
Because these are all tied together, right?
I have some frustrations with kind of how it's been taken on social media that I think
are not causing people to worry when they don't need to worry, but look at maybe sort
of the wrong area to see the immediate threat coming from.
So first I'm going to start with like what has been said.
And before we get to the registry, we have to go back to what he was talking
about on the campaign trail, because prior, and this is prior to him endorsing
Donald Trump when RFK Jr.
was like an individual, like running for president on his own, um, under
his independent campaign, he started talking about wellness farms.
These were specifically in the language that he used, places that people who were addicted
to psychiatric medication, antidepressants, he names specifically antidepressants and
stimulants, as well as people with opiate addictions.
He has since talked about other drug addictions as well, could go to spend three or four years
working on a farm.
He always frames it as also like learning skills.
So it's this mix of, I want people to be able to work in this lovely bucolic agrarian setting
where they'll gain working skills.
And then there's also peppered in these very frightening phrases like they need to be reparented. Right?
Now, in addition to this, he's not just this is all focused on Americans who are taking
medications that he thinks are over overprescribed or purely unnecessary.
Right?
That's always the way like psychiatric medication.
He almost has a Scientologist attitude towards it, that this is all essentially unnecessary.
And obviously, all of this stuff comes out of there are elements of this that were true
at one point.
For example, back in the 90s, Ritalin was wildly overprescribed to kids.
But the way in which he's translated this now is that basically everyone on a stimulant,
everyone on an antidepressant is on it unnecessarily.
And in a podcast in 2024, he went further by kind of tying a lot of this to race specifically,
stating quote, every black kid is now just standard put on Adderall, on SSRIs, Benzos,
which are known to induce violence and those kids are going to have a chance to go somewhere
and get reparented.
So that's all deeply concerning.
It's like kidnapping children forcicibly like bemedicating.
I will say that's not how he has framed it.
So one of the things is people, I've heard it phrased as like,
RFK has admitted he wants to imprison millions of Americans in camps.
And like, that's not what he said.
The direct quotes about this are not framed as a mandatory thing.
It's framed as a replacement for other treatments that
people can choose to go into and choose to leave. That's what he said, right? Okay. Now,
perfectly reasonable when a when a guy in an administration like this is talking about
putting up camps to be like, well, I don't know if I believe him, but it's not accurate
that he said he wants to arrest millions of people and force them onto camps. He just
has not said that right? Yeah. Yeah. And I think it behooves us to be honest about what he said.
I think it also behooves us to talk about
where this idea comes from, right?
And what he's looking back to.
And again, a lot of the issue here
is not necessarily what RFK might do,
but the fact that he might not be there forever.
And if he starts establishing this,
this kind of program that
starts in an attempt to be something that is more, you can choose to be on these camps
or not.
There's certainly willingness within the Republican Party to force people into different kinds
of quote unquote treatment like this.
One thing I think of particularly is the way in which the right has liked to shift blame
for gun violence and mass shootings
off of the availability of firearms
and onto people who are on psychiatric medication, right?
And this is an area in which I could see someone
taking over from RFK or pushing past the things
he specifically has stated he wants to do,
because I think he does come out of a more
quack medicine goal here, putting people forcibly
in camps and colonies like this.
I mean, the idea of like re-parenting, I guess, is more-
Is deeply problematic.
Yeah, incredibly scary phrase.
But it is worth noting as there's a very good
Teen Vogue article on the matter called
RFK Wants to Send People to Wellness Farms.
The US already tried that, that talks about the actual
background that he is hearkening
back to.
Because his vision of wellness farms is not like the Nazi concentration camp, which doesn't
mean that it's not possible that things could wind up in a much darker direction.
But this gives you an idea of the history that he is specifically calling back to.
Quote, beginning in the 1890s and continuing through the first decades of the 20th century,
epileptic and feeble-minded colonies sprung up around the US.
The initial purpose of these colonies was to remove patients from overcrowded, badly
run asylums and poorhouses in favor of farm life where they would have access to the outdoors.
Under the colony model, patients generally lived in cottages, designed to be more home-like
than institutional.
Patients were also given jobs, and many were expected to work on colony farms where they grew their own food
Dr. William Spratling the medical superintendent of the Craig colony for epileptics in New York declared that the farm model meant nature the great
Restorer will have an opportunity to do her best
It didn't work supporters of the colony model argued that with time clean air sunshine and a restricted diet physical labor could heal patients
But that didn't happen data from the Craig colony, one of America's first epileptic colonies, illustrates this
point.
During the 1940s, thanks to funding and staff limitations because of World War II, conditions
in North American institutions were particularly grim.
The Institutions 1943-1944 annual report to the State Commissioner of Mental Hygiene shows
that less than 1% of patients were discharged as cured that year.
During that same period, over 200 patients attempted to leave the colony without permission,
and 5% of the total patient population died.
And so that's reason enough to be deeply worried, right?
The fact that without saying like, RFK wants to do what the Nazis did, RFK wants to do
what the America already did, and it killed a huge number of the people who were interned
in those camps and
I guess the thing I keep bringing up is that
When I think about what the threat model is more than fucking Auschwitz for people who want our NSSRIs
It's a Judge Rotenberg Center on every corner. It's it's camps like these where
Costs are going to be cut and there's not going to be good access
for any kind of independent monitors to make sure health and safety are being followed.
It's not that people are going to be shoveled into ovens.
It's that as a result of this system being incompetently applied to the most vulnerable,
and I'm not even talking about my worry at the moment being that everyone on an SSR will
be forced in, it's going to be poor kids. And RFK has already talking about my worry at the moment being that everyone on an SSR will be forced in it's going to be poor kids and RFKs already talked about that right like that's why he's focusing on the black kids right that's who they're going for.
We've had some people post up in the subreddit being like I know I'm going to go to a camp because I have autism or I know I go to go to a camp because I have ADHD and I'm telling you I'm not saying don't be scared of fascism.
I'm saying this is where to fight right now.
It's not RFK wants to send every adult on an SSRI into a death camp.
It's that they're going to try and be putting these kids instead of the different juvenile
programs that exist instead of any kind of functional medical program, they're
going to force them into facilities like this.
And it's going to become easier for facilities like the Judge Rotenberg Center, which horribly
abuses and tortures autistic kids, to spread and to get state and federal funding.
And that's the threat.
It's an extension of what we're doing and what we've done.
It's not a carbon copy of what the Nazis are doing.
Or did.
Speaking of the Nazis.
And we're back.
So, a couple of things happen in quick succession that is responsible in part for like why people
are so freaked out and rightfully so.
One of them is that RFK gave a speech on the back of new data that showed yet another rise
in the rate of autism diagnosis.
And as I said on a previous episode, it's because we're looking for it more, but he
made a statement about people with profound autism not being able to pay taxes
or write poems, you know, or that sort of thing.
And while he was specifically talking about people with quote unquote profound autism,
it's reasonable for people to assume like, yeah, but that's just kind of what he sees
as basically everyone, right?
And I don't think that that's an unfair assumption.
And then coming right up on the heels of that, there was an announcement from the NIH, the
National Institutes of Health, about RFK Jr.'s new effort to quote unquote study autism.
And basically what they're going to be doing is collecting comprehensive patient data with
broad coverage of the US population and kind of organizing it within the NIH.
This is the first time this has been done, but they are going to be grabbing basically
everything they can get their hands on.
And we're talking about a mix of medication records from pharmacies, lab testing records,
genomic data from people who like go to the, you know, department of the V basically data
taken by the VA data taken by the Indian Health Service, as well as data
from private insurers.
And they're also going to be buying data from smartwatch, from stuff like Fitbits, right?
Who does sell their data to anybody with like $20 hanging out the back of their pocket.
And as a heads up, if you are looking for a fitness tracker, you should look more into
this.
There are a few that have reasonably good data protection histories.
Garmin is one of them.
This does not mean it's perfect.
All of them will hand over your data if given a court order to do so.
None of them are going to break the law to hold onto your data.
But Garmin doesn't just sell willy-nilly to anybody who wants to advertise based on it.
That said, most of them do.
The last thing I'd write was something like 12 out of 15 different free fitness tracking
apps they checked sold data pretty widely.
About 80%.
Yeah, it's the vast majority.
The NIH is basically looking at taking the data that exists.
They're not talking about really gathering new data, but they are talking about collecting
everything that exists and putting it under one roof for the first time.
This is for a couple of purposes.
They want to be able to track the spread of different illnesses and different health problems
within the population.
These are their claims.
But also, they want to create a disease registry specifically to track Americans with autism.
This is because Kennedy describes autism as a preventable disease, which is not accurate.
The fact that this database and these other databases are being made should be very worrisome.
It's both important to talk about the fact that he is specifically signaling out autism
while also stating that's not the only thing they're looking into.
They want data on people who are on SSRIs,
who are on ADHD medication.
They probably want data on drug use, right?
There are a lot of things they are looking to be gathering
and none of it is shit that they should have access for.
Yeah, you can certainly see them expanding this out
to like hormone replacement therapy,
transplant or healthcare.
Yes, yes.
Yeah, and also like the apps attract like menstrual cycles,
right? Yes. People accessing reproductive healthcare. And also like the apps attract like menstrual cycles, right? Yes.
People accessing reproductive healthcare.
And again, the immediate plan, I'm sorry, I simply don't think that RFK Jr.'s master
plan is the mass arrest of everybody with autism in the United States and forcing them
into a camp.
I don't think that's what he wants in part because, number one, his base of support is a lot of
the parents of these kids.
I'm not saying those parents aren't already doing things to their kids that are harmful,
but those parents want control over what they see as their kids' healthcare.
They want the freedom to experiment with medications on their kids to quote unquote, fix them. And this data is going to be used both to provide,
basically to be massaged, to provide evidence
that different treatments that don't do shit do in fact work.
And I think I have suspicions of financial interests there.
I keep getting questioned like, well,
what do you think is going to happen when the autism cures
don't work?
Well, then they're going to put people in camps.
No, the autism cures already don't work.
This is an industry.
They make money off of this.
They make money off of drugging and medically torturing these children.
And as far that is the threat is that it is going to get easier to do at a larger
scale and it is going to be harder to fight, even illegal to provide good
information on what does and does not work.
And that is what's happening right now, as opposed to something we might be worried about
years down the line.
And yes, we should fight any time the government is trying to put populations of people into
a motherfucking database like this.
We should fight all of this tooth and nail.
I just think this is what I see as the danger.
Yeah, the risk think this is what I see as the danger, you know?
Yeah, the risk is this decentralized stuff.
It's a centralized acceleration for things that have already been happening, less so
than just like large scale direct sedative intervention.
Yeah.
I think a lot about like in the context of this, of like quote unquote wilderness therapy
programs, which Roberts covered these, but which have been abusing children for years.
And that is what I see when we talk about these farms. Again, my worry is not RFK wants
to forcibly put everybody into fucking Auschwitz part two. It's RFK wants 100 times as many
teen treatment facilities where kids who disobey or get in trouble with the law get caught
at fucking protests,
can be forced to labor and an amount of them will die
and all of them will suffer permanent mental
and physical damage as a result
of being put in these places.
Yeah, like behavioral improvement centers
that are, you could even be part of, you know,
like community service.
Yes.
Yeah.
It's extensions of what we do.
It's extremely American, you know? I American. That's where my head is.
Yeah, it's not great. So talking of where, I guess where my head is, is immigration, right?
That's what I tend to update us on. So I guess I've seen it characterized as like legal ping pong between the courts and the DOJ. It would be like if one side was playing ping pong with a regular tennis racket and
everyone was just pretending that they weren't, right? Like the DOJ is just continuing to
kind of flout these court orders. If we start from the top and go down, the Supreme Court
temporarily banned the government from renditioning Venezuelan men in the district of North Texas
to El Salvador. I think people maybe sometimes just got a
little misinterpreted on social media. Like you have to look at who the class was. And
the class was a group of Venezuelan men who were in immigration detention in North Texas
who were going to be sent to El Salvador. And that was who got the relief. The case
at the time was pending before the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. And the
Supreme Court said that once that court acted, the government could appeal to the Supreme
Court. However, they added the government should not, and I'm quoting here, remove any member of
the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this court, i.e.
the Supreme Court. To update on the case which we covered a lot here, the Abrego Garcia case. Judge Genis
ordered expedited discovery. Discovery is when both parties in a lawsuit amass information,
they're able to find out information. And in this case, the government more or less
ignored this. And it did so by sticking to its line that they can't bring him home to
the United States, saying that the requests were, and I'm quoting again here, based on the false
premise that the United States can or has been ordered to facilitate Abrego Garcia's
release from custody in El Salvador.
They're claiming they were ordered to return him, and somehow in their minds returning
him does not include ensuring his release. Like they're saying
that they're only obliged to transport him should he be released anyway.
Genis, in a court order, called this quote a willful and bad faith refusal to comply
with the discovery obligations. Genis also called the government's assertion to executive
privilege quote equally specious. The city of Hyattsville in this case also clarified
through a press release that, quote, at no time did any member of HPD identify or file
any reports classifying Abrego Garcia as a member of any gang. Despite this, the executive
branch is still going with that he's a violent gang member. They also doxed his wife this week by releasing a protective order that
she had once filed and withdrawn. When that was released it contained her address so she's
now hiding in a safe house.
They photoshopped a MS-13 tattoo onto his knuckles above a weed leaf tattoo, a smiley
face, a cross and a skull.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's what they're going with, I guess.
Specious is a good word.
Yeah, just hideous nonsense.
Yeah, no, absolutely obscenely ridiculous.
And then the other angle is just them just saying that you don't have a right to due
process, right?
Like openly, just like Miller has been saying this, JD Vance has been saying this on X.com, that like, these people don't
have a right to due process for them. They've come up with various arguments for that. It
also seems like two people sent to El Salvador no longer appear on any official list of detainees, which is concerning one of them, Ricardo Pradovasquez.
He's not among the 238 people we know were on the manifest for those sent to El Salvador.
He doesn't appear to be in Venezuela, which is where his passport is from.
And the fact that the government claims that they sent him, the government has said they
sent him on the March 15th flights, but he's not listed there.
He's not visible in photos has led to concerns that we might have sent more people to El Salvador than we currently know about.
He entered the country with a CBP one appointment, right, which of all the ways to enter is the one that the US government was trying to force people to use at that time.
Right.
He very like legally entered the country.
Yes, yeah, to be clear, he entered at a port of entry
with an appointment to claim asylum.
He appears made a mistake when delivering food
and ended up driving into Canada and was arrested
when he attempted to return to the United States.
He doesn't show up on the ICE detainee locator.
And essentially no one knows where he is, right?
This concern has been compounded by the fact that it also emerged this week that the US
has sent at least one detainee, Omar Abdul Sattar Amin, to Rwanda.
And the combination of these two things raises a concern that they are sending third country
nationals to detention in other countries that we are not yet aware of, right? Of course, the Rwanda plan was
something that the UK government hatched a long time ago, and the Kagame government in
Rwanda seems to see this offer, right, as a way of gaining legitimacy with governments
in the global north, especially given the widespread
criticism for its actions in the Democratic Republic of Congo recently.
From the Handbasket, which is like a kind of substacky outlet, they've reviewed memos
between the US government and the embassy in Rwanda. And I'm quoting from one of them
here, the US provided a one-time payment of $100,000
to support social services, residency documents,
and work permits.
Rwanda has also, according to the Handbasket,
agreed to accept 10 more third country nationals.
So the US is paying Rwanda a little bit more
than it's paying El Salvador, right?
It was paying El Salvador 20,000 per person per year,
but it's a one-time payment.
Nonetheless, I struggle
to believe that you could concoct a way in which it would cost Rwanda 100 grand to produce
a residency document and a work permit for an Iraqi national.
But yeah, this has obviously led to the concern that people are being sent to other places
that we don't yet know about.
Talking of people being sent to other places, a US citizen, Jose Hermosillo, was detained
by ICE after approaching a Border Patrol agent to ask for directions.
He was detained for 10 days.
DHS is claiming that he was arrested near the Nogales border and
that he approached a border patrol agent and upon doing so identified himself as a non-citizen
who was not in the country legally.
Which is what they claim.
Yes. So, Hermosio disputes this along with his lawyers. He says that he approached the
agent looking for directions having had a seizure
and been in hospital and when he got out of hospital was trying to work out where to go.
He is from New Mexico but he was visiting his girlfriend's family in Tucson. He told
the agent he was from New Mexico and the agent accused him of lying. In his account, DHS
has produced a transcript with, I'm not going to call it a signature because it just has
the word Jose written underneath it, right? Mr. Homer's CEO, according to his girlfriend,
has some learning difficulties and by her account, he wouldn't have been able to read
the English language transcript that he's alleged to have signed. So like whether or
not he signed, this is rather a material, right? He clearly, judging by her account, was not aware that he was in it.
Judging by this, like, this is not even a signature with a last name.
It's laughable to suggest that he, like, consentingly signed this.
Yeah.
But nonetheless, he was detained for 10 days till his family produced his documents in court.
Yeah, he was arrested, quote unquote, without proper immigration documents,
which you don't carry around when you're a
US citizen.
Yeah, you're not obliged to.
Papers please.
Like you don't need that.
His family brought his social security card and birth certificate to court.
Eventually the case against him was dismissed after being held by ICE for 10 days.
This reminds me of a similar case from this past week where a US citizen was detained
on Wednesday the 16th. This is a
20-year-old born in Georgia, Juan Carlos Lopez Gomez. He was pulled over while driving to
work near the Florida border. He doesn't speak much English or Spanish, he speaks an indigenous
Mayan language, but he gave his real ID card and social security card over to a state trooper.
He was detained and charged with illegally entering the state as a quote-unquote unauthorized
alien.
Similarly, the trooper claims that Lopez Gomez said that he was in the country illegally.
This is like some kind of communication error or these like law enforcement officers are
just like lying or trying to construct like language traps to make someone agree to a statement that
Admits that they're in the country illegally which allows them to be detained
He was put into a 24-hour ice hold the next day a federal judge verified his birth certificate
Which was brought by his mother but claims to lack the authority to release him though
He was released later Thursday night
And he was arrested under a new Florida law signed by DeSantis last month, which a judge
blocked earlier this month on April 4th.
This basically allows state troopers to act as their state's own border patrol, and it
penalizes immigrants who quote unquote, knowingly enter or attempt to enter the state after
entering the United States by eluding or avoiding examination or inspection by immigration officers."
Yeah, and like the common thing here, right, is that they're just, we've seen this, I mean,
there are a bunch of other cases that are like this too, where it's just like, they
see someone who's not white and they're just like, fuck it, we can grab this person and
then just lie about what they said.
It's like, it's not even-
Very basic racial profiling.
Yeah, but it's like, the thing is, it's not even like basic racial profiling. Yeah, but it's like this is like it's not even it's not even like racial profiling anymore
Like it's it's they're just attempting to blackbag
Like random non white people that they're just running across
Yes, and so of course you're like grabbing us citizens, right?
So just like grabbing random people but it's like they're just fucking doing this to everyone
This has happened in other states as well. There's been instance like this
Like the past few months, which have increased
in frequency since Trump has taken office.
Let's go on a break and return to Talk Tariff.
Okay, we are back.
How's the economy going? Do not like. Okay, Mia, what can you tell us about tariffs this week? Rockin' Casbah, rockin' Casbah.
Do not like.
Okay, Mia, what can you tell us about tariffs this week?
So we got a look inside the White House this week at how the tariff, the turf tariff suspension
happened.
Now remember, so there was there was the deliberation day tariffs a few weeks ago and then they
got suspended for 90 days.
So we're all still on the 90 day countdown clock on those being unsuspended.
But we got a view of how that happened from the Wall Street Journal.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessett and Commerce Secretary
Howard Lutnick basically waited until Trump advisor Peter Navarro was out of the room
and then it was in a meeting and then they cornered Trump and were like you got to roll these tariffs
You got you got to do this pause on the tariffs. Honestly iconic, you know, I I hate to say it but iconic
That this was also the first Trump administration ran and everyone appears to have forgotten that this is how all of this shit works
Well, cuz there was a there were all those stories for the first couple of weeks about how smooth and well-run it was and
everything slow
Yeah, and like this many people assume that there was like a plan behind this and like no no I am fucking vindicated
They really are just this fucking stupid. No there is not a grand strategy behind their sort of like tariff rollout, right?
There is a senile old man and his stupid
warring advisors and they're both fighting each other for basically for like, they're
trying, like they're trying to wait until the other person's out of the room so they
can grab control of the fucking puppet reigns. But this does actually lay bare something
that's sort of important about this, which is that like there is a huge fight inside
of the Trump administration between kind of Lutnick who's like the representative
of a bunch of different sort of sectors of American capital, right? Like he's, he's representative
of like your fucking like Walgreens dipshits, right? And like, he's also representative
of the finance people. And those people are losing their fucking minds over the tariffs
because it's again, going to destroy the economy. But Navarro is, you know, let's just like
a hardline sort of like anti-China idealogue. And Navarro is, you know, just like a hardline sort of
like anti-China ideologue. And Navarro is the person who's been driving the most intense
versions of these tariffs. And it's a real issue for everyone else in the administration
who doesn't want this to happen because Navarro is like the one guy in the administration
that Trump actually likes. And so they can't directly move against him because they'll
lose. Like Elon Musk tried this and like it got nowhere
and so you know what we've been seeing is is just like
Again, the the tariff policy here is just being set by who's the last person in the room with him
Yeah, so so we're probably still like about 60 days ish out from these tariffs going back into effect
I mean this basically means like
They'll be hitting in the summer, which is also just like absolutely the worst conceivable time for these tariffs
that take effect in terms of like, if you were just like deliberately trying to
cause a massive popular mobilization against you, this is what you would do.
They're not that they're just dumb, but like, you know, so, okay, let's move on to
the sort of big news of this week is the press
has been carrying stories about Trump backing off of the 145% China tariffs and the fact
that there's going to be negotiations and it's all going to get wound down.
And like, I'm pretty sure this is just kind of peer-lutnick shit to try to calm the markets
down.
The issue with this story is that there are no negotiations, right?
Everyone keeps talking about how the US is going to do a negotiated settlement with China.
There have not been any negotiations. There are not negotiations.
There has not even been a process to start negotiations.
Because, you know, the last stories we had about this was that like,
neither side wants to be the person to like start going to the table
Because like asking the other side for negotiations makes them look weak like
Trump has been asking china to ask him to start negotiations the chinese are refusing
And the second issue here and this is the more substantive problem with with a sort of negotiated back out is that
The trump navarro position hinges on the line
That the trade deficit inherently, like with China, is proof of Chinese market manipulation. And the
thing is, there's no actual way to systematically address that, right? Like
there's nothing that like either China or the US could do
that would reverse the trade deficit. So there's no sort of like, you
know, like yeah, like the obvious way out here
would be for like Trump to take some kind of weird symbolic victory and like China to be like,
we're doing a functional crackdown or some shit. But the thing is like, ideologically for someone
like Navarro and Navarro is the important figure here. Like Navarro just wants China destroyed,
right? There's, there's no actual negotiating process that he can do that will actually sort of like make this like negotiation shit happen and
have it actually like eliminate the tariffs the only thing that can happen
basically is a political battle inside the Trump administration where Navarro
gets pushed out somehow but again Navarro is like Trump's guy so I just
don't buy all of this all the fucking stories that are coming out and this
happens constantly every single time there's one of these things is all these stories being like well, they're gonna get rolled back
It doesn't actually mean this and that just happens right we have a hundred forty five percent tariffs on China
Now the last thing I want to talk about is what the actual effects of this has been and the effect is that has been
There's been a massive slowdown and a massive like shutdown in in exports from China to the US like in terms of container ship traffic, right?
We're talking about, I'm just going to quote from CNBC here.
So they're talking about optimizer, which is like a tracking system for ships.
And they said quote, year on year, the data shows a 44% drop in vessel scheduled to arrive
the week of May 4th to May 10th.
Now that's not actually necessarily a 40% drop in traffic because
there'll be more shit when like other boats get full. But you know, to put this into perspective,
right, during the worst for trade, the worst parts of the COVID lockdowns, the year on
year drop was only 20%. So and 20% is the number that's been that's been being spread
around the media for like what roughly the drop looks like for some companies is larger than
others and
again the tariff we still haven't even seen the actual shocks of the tariffs yet and
we're already seeing a decline in exports from China that is like again around the level of the lockdowns and if you know
I think like people remember like the kind of unhinged shit that that caused right and
That's something that you know is only going to intensify in the other part of this, right?
Is that the strategies right now for how this is being dealt with is moving through Vietnam,
moving through Cambodia.
But if you remember the rates from the original sort of like turf tariffs from Liberation
Day, right?
Like the tariff on Vietnam was like 100% or some shit.
It was like 80%.
I don't remember. I don't remember exactly what I thought in my head, but like there's no actual viable strategy
of just of ways you can route these goods through. And it's been especially hitting
the sort of drop shipping companies, right? Like people like Temu and anything that relies
on air freight just getting fucked. And so this is all just, you know, just sort of rolling
in the background is just this logistics crisis.
And it's also an echoing crisis.
And the thing I sort of want to close this section on is that like, so the big issue
with these sort of empty boats, right, and these cancellations of boat orders is that
in order for it to be profitable, because all of these shipping companies run on such
low margins, right, they only barely survive the pandemic by taking out a series of just like unhinged sort of
like weird collateral based loans.
And in order for these companies to be profitable, they have to continuously keep on completely
filling up ships, right?
If a ship is not full, it is not profitable for them to run it.
So you know, and if that's not happening, the entire system literally grinds to a halt
until there's enough orders to move things through.
So even the shit that there is demand for, right, can't be shipped because these shipping companies cannot afford to
unless the entire thing is full.
So the supply chain disruptions that we are going to see from this as this sort of escalates and as this continues and especially
in a few months if the Liberation Day tariffs go back into effect are catastrophic and we really like
It's just one of these ways you can hear the thunder you can see the lightning
But you the storm hasn't hit yet and it is going to and when it does I don't know
I was trying to do a poetic thing about how we're all gonna get fucking drenched, but we're fucked
It's going to be unbelievably bad and the only process right now inside of the administration
it doesn't involve like some kind of mobilization is like again is is Lutnik winning this fucking
intra-administration political battle with Navarro. So, whoo!
Well pre-order your Nintendo Switch 2 right now!
Yes.
In other news, the Minnesota Attorney General is suing the Trump admin over the executive
order about trans women participating in school sports, saying he will, quote, not participate
in a shameful bullying, and also says that this order violates the Minnesota Human Rights
Act.
So we'll see some more court cases over this in the weeks to come. I'd like to talk a little bit
about the student crackdowns for Palestine protests, kind of in a different way. We've
discussed ICE going after and detaining and deporting and taking away visas and green cards,
so unrelated to that side of it. On the morning of Wednesday, April 23rd, the FBI served multiple
search warrants in southeast Michigan, presumably related to Palestine protests and encampments
from the past year.
There's also some reporting of law enforcement activity in other states like Pennsylvania,
but I'm still waiting to confirm that.
The press secretary for the Michigan Attorney General confirms investigators executed search warrants for three homes. He said that people were briefly detained during
the execution of these warrants, but they were all eventually released. And he noted,
quote, there is no immigration enforcement angle to the execution of these search warrants,
unquote. So these these people aren't being investigated like ICE to get deported, necessarily.
This is seemingly for other protest activity.
A pro-Palestine student group says that these raids happened at around 8am.
Early this morning, police and FBI agents raided four residences of University of Michigan
pro-Palestine protesters, refusing to show warrants.
They seized all electronics and a number of personal belongings."
But let's close this episode by returning to my most Stephen Colbert, Skibbity Biden
segment, Stinky Musk, which is still the worst name I've come up with. Last Tuesday, Elon
Musk said that, quote, working for the government to get the financial house in order is mostly
done, unquote Though Musk is
moving closer to stepping back from Doge this May, around the time that his special government
employee designation is set to expire. Reporting from Washington Post claims that Musk is growing
tired of the vicious and unethical attacks from the left, and that is kind of dragging
on him. With other reports suggesting that Musk is annoying other cabinet members and administration officials
more than Trump himself, in fact, just this Wednesday, a few hours before recording,
Musk and Bessett were having a pretty intense shouting match in the White House.
Going forward, Musk says that he plans to work for the government about one to two days a week
for the remainder of the Trump presidency,
so that he can quote, make sure that the waste and fraud that we've stopped does not come
roaring back unquote. He keeps referring to his work at Doge as like being already completed
essentially, like we already found all of the fraud and now we just have to make sure
more fraud doesn't happen. We've previously reported on the alleged fraud that he claims
to have found and the false
numbers up on the Doge site, but it seems like this work really is winding down.
The Musk-Doge reply to this email with five things you've done this week or else be fired
directive has essentially sputtered out.
Senior officials did not comply with the core aspects of the directive.
It was never really enforced, and the Trump Office of Personnel Management later said
that this was voluntary, and that OPM officials may have never actually ever read those response
emails at all, though a small number of agencies are still requiring compliance with this mandate.
And in some fun news, Tesla stock just continues to decline, dropping to half its peak from
last December, and anti-Tesla
vandalism is potentially spiking the cost of Tesla insurance.
Tesla had a just disastrous earnings call this Tuesday, April 22, showing that Tesla
profits have fell 71% over the first three months of the year.
Total revenue has decreased 9% compared to 2024, with car sales
revenue dropping 20% compared to a year earlier. The Tesla CFO stated that, quote, the negative
impact of vandalism and unwarranted hostility towards our brand and our people had an impact
in certain markets, unquote. In a company statement before this earnings call, Tesla claimed that quote-unquote, a
changing political sentiment could impact demand for their product.
Musk announced that he would be shifting his attention back to Tesla, and that his Doge
time allocation will quote-unquote, drop significantly.
Musk talked tariffs on this earnings call, and tried to carefully not bash Trump while
stating concerns over the high tariffs, saying, quote, I've been on the record many times
as saying I believe lower tariffs are generally a good idea, but this decision is fundamentally
up to the elected representative of the people being the President of the United States.
So you know, I'll continue to advocate for lower tariffs, but that's all I can do." Any thoughts on Musk and Tesla here before we close?
Yeah, one thing I want to remind everyone that is genuinely good news is that the thing
about Tesla sales dropping is that it actually fucks them in two different ways, right? Because
again, most of their money is from these carbon credits that they're selling
But the thing is in order to be able to get the carbon credits
They do need to be able to sell cars totally and so and so each like subsequent cycle of people not buying cars is also
Destroying their carbon credit subsidies, which is like this sort of like spiraling like cash crisis thing
So you know look zero Tesla sales is possible. We can keep driving. A better world is possible.
We can destroy these bastards.
We can ruin this one guy specifically's life, and it's not even that difficult, so...
Yeah!
Well, we reported the news.
We reported the news.
We reported the news. Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week from now until the heat death
of the universe.
It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.
For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonedmedia.com, or check
us out on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
You can now find sources for It Could Happen Here listed directly in episode descriptions.
Thanks for listening.
In 2020, a group of young women found themselves in an AI-fueled nightmare.
Someone was posting photos.
It was just me naked.
Well, not me, but me with someone else's body parts.
This is Levertown, a new podcast from iHeart Podcasts,
Bloomberg, and Kaleidoscope,
about the rise of deepfake pornography
and the battle to stop it.
Listen to Levertown on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Find it on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts. We met them at their homes. We met them at their recording studios. Stories matter and it brings a face to them.
It makes it real.
It really does.
It makes it real.
Listen to new episodes
of the War on Drugs podcast season two
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcast,
or wherever you get your podcast.
I'm ready to fight.
Oh, this is fighting words.
Okay, I'll put the hammer back.
Hi, I'm George M. Johnson,
a bestselling author with the second most banned book in America.
Now more than ever, we need to use our voices to fight back.
Part of the power of Black queer creativity is the fact that we got us, you know?
We are the greatest culture makers in world history.
Listen to Fighting Words on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your
podcast.
My name is Brendan Patrick Hughes, host of Divine Intervention.
This is a story about radical nuns in combat boots and wild haired priests trading blows
with J. Edgar Hoover in a hell-bent effort to sabotage a war.
J. Edgar Hoover in a hell-bent effort to sabotage a war. J. Edgar Hoover was furious.
He was out of his mind,
and he wanted to bring the Catholic left to its knees.
Listen to Divine Intervention on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.