It Could Happen Here - Trump Kidnaps Venezuelan President Maduro

Episode Date: January 7, 2026

Robert, Mia, and James discuss the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. Forces, and what it means for the USA and the world.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is an I-Heart podcast. Guaranteed Human. Hi, I'm Ed Zittron, host of the Better Offline podcast. And this January, we're going to go on the road to beautiful Las Vegas, Nevada, to cover the Consumer Electronics Show, tech's biggest conference. Better Offline's CES coverage won't be the usual rundown of the hottest gadgets or biggest trends, but an unvarnished look at what the tech industry plans to sell or do to you in 2025. I'll be joined by David Roth at DeFector and the writer Edward Ongueso Jr.,

With guest appearances from behind the bastards Robert Evans, it could happen here's Gare Davis and a few surprised guests throughout the show. Listen to Better Offline on the IHart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever else you get your podcasts from. I actually drop better when I'm high. It heightens my senses, calms me down. If anything, I'm more careful.

Honestly, it just helps me focus. That's probably what the driver who killed a four-year-old told himself. and now he's in prison. You see, no matter what you tell yourself, if you feel different, you drive different. So if you're high, just don't drive. Brought to you by NHTSA and the Ad Council. I didn't really have an interest of being on air.

I kind of was up there to just try and infiltrate the building. From the underground clubs that shaped global music to the pastors and creatives who built the cultural empire. The Atlanta Ears podcast uncovers the stories behind one of the most influential, central cities in the world. The thing I love about Atlanta is that it's a city of hustlers, man. Each episode explores a different chapter of Atlanta's rise, featuring conversations with Ludacris, Will Packer, Pastor Jamal Bryant, DJ Drama, and more.

The full series is available to listen to now. Listen to Atlanta is on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. The show was ahead of its time to represent a black family in ways the television hadn't shown before. Exactly. It's Delma Hopkins. also known as Aunt Rachel. And I'm Kelly Williams or Laura Winslow.

On our podcast, Welcome to the Family with Tellma and Kelly. We're re-watching every episode of Family Matters. We'll share behind-the-scenes stories about making the show. Yeah, we'll even bring in some special guests to spill some tea. Listen to Welcome to the Family with Telma and Kelly on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. CallZone Media. Welcome. Welcome back to It Could Happen here, a podcast about it happening, well, in various places.

And given the nature of our digital interconnected society, it is happening here all the time. But if you're even casually aware of what's going on in the world right now, it is particularly happening in Venezuela right now. And joining me to talk about the U.S.-led and executed kidnapping of a world leader is my two favorite kidnappers. Mia Wong and James Stout. Glad to be here, Robert, joining you to discuss kidnapping one of my favorite topics. Yeah. My lawyers have advised me not to respond to this statement. Now, given all the people you've both kidnapped, how are you just rating this on a technical level as kidnappings go, you know?

On a level from, let's say, well, if I remember the name of that guy with the plane, this would have been a funnier joke. I forgot his name, though. D.B. Cooper? No, no, no. He was on a plane. He didn't have a plane. Yeah, that's a reverse kidnapping. He unkidnapped himself. He did unkidnapped himself. He did. Everyone on the plane. He did that plane. I was talking about Lindberg, Charles Lindberg. But the jokes, the joke's over. So let's talk about the international crimes our government's doing. Yeah. Did and doing. I'm drinking a white law. So I've got about the same legal jurisdiction as I have because there is no law. Yeah. When you're drinking white law. Yeah. Which I think is their legal law.

argument. I mean, yeah. So what happened is, while most of us were asleep last Saturday night, the United States using a mix of special forces like Tier 1 operators, this was like a Delta Force operation primarily, a whole bunch of helicopters that looked like a mix of Blackhawks and Chinooks, carried out a series of airstrikes on Caracas and kidnapped the president of Venezuela, Nicholas Maduro, and his wife, killing a significant chunk of their security detail, including 32 Cubans, who are acting as essentially like military advisors slash security for Maduro. Yeah, he has been taken back to the United States. He's been arraigned in New York. They're charging him with a variety of drug and gun-related crimes, including some weird

shit, like possession of a machine gun under U.S. law, which is really weird. I guess they're arguing that his control of the Venezuelan military, counted as a legal possession of an automatic weapon. Yeah, it's weird. Yeah, I'm guessing it involves using the machine gun in the furtherance of another crime because there are specific charges for like NFA violations related to drug things. Sure. But it still seems very weird to tag that on there.

Like when what you're doing is kidnapping a world leader, you can't just also be like, oh, and he's got a gun. Like, when he commands the armed forces of a country, it's very strange. Right. Yeah. This also, I think, pins into what's really, really weird about this. There's two aspects of this that are just, what the fuck. One of them is that the legal justification, this is given to Mike Lee from Secretary of State Marco Rubio,

was that the reason that there were airstrikes and illegal justification was protecting U.S. soldiers carrying out. U.S. law enforcement. The military was needed to protect the DEA agents who are actually conducting the arrest. Right. Is the legal justification. Yeah. The chances of some kind of due process violation are high. This all hinges on you thinking that the law is a fixed thing, right? Not an instrument of the state and an instrument of power. And I think that a more plausible analysis here is that the law is not a fixed thing. But like in this instance, right, if we, if we go with that line, like the DEA people were there to ensure

due process and to make the arrest, right? And in theory, I've read that they literally had someone Mirandize him. Right. Yeah. Which, I do want to put Southolting here, though, and this is something that CNN, like, when they were reporting on this, points out, this is insane because this implies

that U.S. law applies in Venezuela. Right. Which it doesn't. It absolutely doesn't. That's literally the point. The point of a state is that your law applies inside of your borders. The argument that they are making, because Trump directly and prior to this, had called into relevance the Monroe Doctrine, right, which is basically stating that everything happening

in the Americas is the purview of the United States. So this was initially, and they're still arguing that it is kind of a, what President Monroe was using as an excuse for intervening in situations where foreign colonizers were attempting to exert power in colonies they owned in the Americas, or had owned in the Americas, right? Yeah. And the U.S. was basically saying, fuck you, this is our backyard, right? Yeah. And I think the argument that they're making now is that that's relevant because Iran and Russia

and Cuba all have political and business interests in Venezuela, particularly Cuba. Yeah. But in a more broad sense, they're making the argument, and Stephen Miller has made this very directly that the Americas are all kind of our property and we're perfectly justified in intervening to take resources that we want because we shouldn't have to just accept that a foreign country has different opinions and how those resources should be used in the United States and that we have no like moral responsibility to listen to what other people want in our hemisphere it's our hemisphere yeah and we meaning the Trump administration should do

whatever we want. Yeah, and I think there's two kind of legal perspective here things that are important. One, I think there's that one, which is, yeah, the American, the American Empire is just saying, we are an empire and we can do whatever we want. But then there's also the, does the president have the power to do this unilaterally piece of it? Which, no, he, no, like, just does not. Like, this is, this is objectively an act of war. Right. And previously, right, a lot of administrations have done things kind of like this. Yeah. Right. But, like, everything has been under the fig leaf of the AUMF, right, the 2001 authorization of use of military force, which if you go back and read the document, the actual, like, AUMF, it's very clear that it's anyone who's related to 9-11.

Yeah, yeah. And so this has been used to do interventions in, like, places that have nothing to do with this, right? But this is not even that. This is just the president claiming that he can do acts of war. Yeah, and I guess the justification that they gave was the example they cited. was Noriega, right, in 89, in Paloma, right? But there was a war. There was operation, like, American soldiers died.

Right. And Noriega went to the Vatican embassy, and eventually, I believe he surrounded him. They, like, blasted you two at him, which is obviously a war crime. And he eventually left the embassy, right, and negotiated his exit, I guess. But that's a completely different thing to just bouncing into the residence of the president of another country at night. black bag like that's also debatably legal but yes it was a very a different situation yeah very very much yeah no it's also wrong it's clearly like we're not defending what what was done there yeah i know yeah this is even more blatant right it's like it's not defending what george w bush did in iraq to be like at least

they bothered to pretend there was a justification like they spent some time really cooking up a justification and some effort and there's none of that here they just don't give a shit anymore, right? That's that, you're not being like, and that means it was okay with Bush did. You're just pointing out it's even more mask off now, right? Yeah. Well, and I think it is different in that, like, the invasion of Iraq involved Congress. This is just Trump going, I can do this.

Right. And that's really fucking alarming. Yeah. That he just is like, yeah, fuck it. I can just do a war now completely by myself. None of you have any fucking power over me. I can just declare war a thing that is. explicitly in the Constitution, like, supposed to be Congress's job.

And I think that's really, that's another very alarming part of this, because this is, I think, by far, the most just Trump pure dictator shit that we've seen so far. And it's not being treated like that. Yeah. Because a lot of sort of, like, I don't know, like, there's a lot of people who wanted this, something like this to happen. And so they're kind of just not looking at the fact that this is just, this is just, this just pure dictatorship shit?

Yeah, I think a lot of people, because they didn't like Maduro, right? They're willing to look aside from the means as long as they get the ends they want, but the means are extremely serious here. Yeah, and I think we should acknowledge, like, stop for a second to talk about the Maduro of it all. Because my stance is that his legitimacy as president, his personal legitimacy, whether or not he's committed crimes, are all completely irrelevant, right? I have not in any of my public-facing statements. I've been in the past years ago talked about how I wish the protests had worked to remove him from office within sort of like the context of Venezuelans actually having their way, kicking him out and replacing him with something better.

But I have not brought up any of that in the context of what's happened recently because it doesn't matter, right? Like fundamentally, it doesn't matter if Maduro is like completely legitimately elected and the people's hero or a complete fraud and an authoritarian. that has nothing to do with whether or not the U.S. has any legal or moral justification for coming in, arresting this guy, and then saying we own the country. And we don't. It's dictatorship. It's fascist. It's deeply wrong. It's bad. Like, there's nothing else to say. If you find anyone getting caught in starting to be like, well, but, you know, Maduro did this. Maduro did that. That is either a person who is acting in bad faith or a person who has themselves been tricked, right? Because you don't need to discuss any of that. None of that is relevant to what we're talking about here, which is that the U.S., like, this is a violation of international law and all of the kinds of norms that we attempted to put in place after World War II to stop another catastrophe like that from happening. And it is only going to emboldened the worst instincts of both the people running the United States right now. They will continue

to try to do shit like this. And it's going to embolden the worst instincts of other leaders around the world. It is comprehensively bad for everyone. The comprehensive result of this is, again, that the U.S. has annexed, I guess. Venezuela, that Trump is claiming that he personally and his Secretary of State and his counsel of advisors are now, like, now control and run a country. Yeah. This is so evil. Yeah.

And it's very unclear who's going to be doing because Trump made that statement. Rubio walked it back a little bit and said that, like, well, we'll be working with the administration in place, which is, by the way, just the same administration that existed before, merely with the vice president taking on the role of president. Yeah, we should talk about that a little bit. Yeah, after that, backtracked a little bit, too, to try and be more in line with the boss. But it's very unclear what they actually intend and what they mean by saying we're running it, because from what I've read, it doesn't. look like Rubio is actually going to be managed, like, while he's been the guy taking point on justifying this, I don't think he's going to actually be managing any of this on a day-to-day basis. He's got a lot on his plate already. Stephen Miller seems to be the guy

who is trying to position himself to actually be the Paul Brimmer in this situation. It was the guy that the Bush administration put in charge of dealing with, of like, running Iraq after it was taken over. Yeah, the vice-froy. Yeah. And it's unclear what is Miller going to get that job? Will Rubio wind up doing it? It's looking more like Miller right now, but also to what extent will that job actually be running things? And we'll talk about that in a little bit, I'm sure. But the kind of cliff's notes of the situation is that there is evidence that came out right after the kidnapping that Maduro's vice president had reached out to the United States previously, like before the kidnapping, to talk about the possibility

of taking over the country after giving Maduro up or him having a managed exile. All of that was discussed. And at least per the reporting on it, she was turned down by the United States because they thought they had a better option. And that option seems to have fallen through, largely because the quote unquote, democratically elected opposition leader who won a Nobel Prize, pissed off Trump. It's unclear how accurate that is that by, you know, by accepting the Nobel Prize, did she get her kick herself out of the job?

That's what some reporting has suggested. It's unclear to me how true that actually is. It seems possible, surely. But at the end of the day, there was this offer made by Maduro's VP that was turned down by the U.S., and now it seems like, although we don't actually know what's happened to the background, It seems like she's who we're working with. So either they came back and said, you know, it will take the deal or something else is going on. But she has both made the statements publicly that, like, this is illegal.

The United States is run by a group of criminals and extremists. And also, but we'll work with them. So it does kind of seem to me like she may, in fact, be very much in bed with the Trump administration and just trying to, like, massage this. for her public, you know, because there's only so much you can get away with. I don't know. Yeah. Just to be clear on the timeline, Robert, the first reporting of that, like, Rodriguez option, we want to call it that.

Yeah. They call it Madurismo, he's out Maduro as well, was in October. Yeah. That was out before the strike happened. Right. And at least in the Miami Herald story, they suggested that he had been part of that. So this could be a different thing, but he had offered to step. down over years.

Right. Yeah, so I say it looked like there was a period of time where he was talking about like a managed exit. Yeah. I've been going to Carter or Turkey or somewhere like that. Yeah. Now Rodriguez has, of course, denied that. But what would you expect?

Delci Rodriguez. And, yeah, it's unclear. Again, we don't really know, did they just remove Maduro without having a plan and hadn't really finished talking with her or worked something out? It was the last thing she heard from them, them saying, nah, we won't take this option. Right. And then Maduro gets kidnapped. Did they work out a separate deal that just hasn't been reported on?

We actually don't know. And I could totally see her being a stooge for U.S. action here because it keeps her in power and it keeps her safe because Trump very recently threatened her. Like after she made statements calling his team a bunch of extremists, she backpedaled and said, actually, if we're willing to work with the U.S. Because Trump said, I'll do something worse to you than I did to him. Like, we don't know if they actually ironed out a set of responsibilities and obligations in back channels, or if we just remove Majuro and are like, all right, well, if we have to kill her, we'll kill her too. Like, it's unclear what actually happened there.

Yeah. Yeah. So we should also mention, so this is being recorded on the night of Monday, January 5th. You're right. Every kind of six or eight hours new conflicting information from Trump administration about what their plan is comes out. Right. Which leads me to suspect they don't have a plan at all because it keeps changing every couple of hours.

So, I don't know. But in case by the time this comes out, there is some kind of public deal that's been worked out. That's what's going on. This is all changing extremely rapidly. Yeah. Right. And you know what else changes rapidly? The economics of podcasting.

Yeah. Here's some of that. I'm Ed Zittron of the Better Offline podcast, and I want you to join me at this year's Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Nevada, starting January 6th through January 10th, 2026. We're doing 10 radio-style podcast episodes about the world's biggest tech conference, and we're going to dig into the latest and weirdest gadgets, gizmos, and horrible AI gear that the tech industry is desperate to sell you, all while covering the biggest stories in Silicon Valley as the AI bubble threatens the burst. I'll be joined by David Roth, Chloe Radcliffe,

Adam Conover, Corey Doctoro, Edon Gweso Jr., Robert Evans, and an incredible cast of the greatest talent in the tech media, with over 18 hours of interviews, commentary and bizarre stories, all told from the Better Offline Pop-Up Studio connected to its own open bar. Today I did five hours of back-to-back panels on artificial intelligence. It included a number of great moments, including an entire room full of people, laughing about people losing their jobs due to artificial intelligence.

Will we make it out alive? There's only one way to find out. Tune in starting January 6th through January 10th, 2026, and listen to the literal best tech podcast ever recorded. Listen to Better Offline on the IHot Radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you happen to get your podcasts. Are you desperately hoping for change in 2026, but feeling stuck? Just spinning your wheels in old routines and bad habits? I'm Dr. Lari Santos, and in a new year series of my show, The Happiness Lab, I'm going to look at the science of getting, well, unstuck, unstuck at work,

unstuck in your relationships, and even unstuck inside your mind. I am the absolute worst culprit when it comes to getting into these ruminative loops and just driving myself crazy. We'll look at ways to reignite your sense of purpose, rediscover your values, and get more creative. We'll also explore how to design a life that feels more fulfilling. It's sort of like the game of life. I don't know if you ever played that game. Oh my gosh, yes.

You take the car along and you try and get money, and you try and get degrees, and you try and get to the end where either you have a mansion or a ranch or a shack. And once you get to retirement, you're done. What about the whole path along the way? So join me to get unstuck in 2026. Listen to the Happiness Lab on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your shows. You know, we always say New Year, New Me, but real change starts on the inside. It starts with giving your mind and your spirit the same attention you give your goals.

Hey, everybody, it's Michelle Williams, host of checking in on the Black Effect Podcast Network. And on my podcast, we talk mental health, healing, growth, and everything you need to step into your next season, whole and empowered. New Year, Real You. Listen to checking in with Michelle Williams from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. The moments that shape us often begin with a simple question. What do I want my life to look like now? I'm Dr. Joy Harden Bradford, and on therapy for black girls, we create space for honest conversations about identity, relationships, mental health, and the choices that help us grow. As cybersecurity expert, Camille Stewart Gloucester reminds us, we're in a divisive time where our comments are weaponized against us.

And so what we find is a lot of black women are standing up and speaking out because they feel the brunt of the pain. Each week, we explore the tools and insights that help you move with purpose. Whether you're navigating something new or returning to yourself. If you're ready for thoughtful guidance and grounded support, this is the place for you. Listen to Therapy for Black Girls on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. This white claw is fucking foul. And we're back. James is drinking a bad white claw, which is very.

really, I think the information our audience is most interested in. You know, invasions of Venezuela come and go, the U.S. kidnaps people all the time. But James drinking a bad white claw. Let's actually really check it. James, what's the flavor you're experiencing right now? Let me get an update to that, Robert. That is a green apple. Green apple. Mm-hmm. Oh, boy. Yeah. Yep, it's foul. I wouldn't recommend it. You're in the market. Yeah, that sounds awful. Don't do it to yourself. Yeah, it's really the having Delta Force kidnap you from your house of beverages. Yeah, absolutely.

That's how they market. Actually, it's weird. That's that's on the can. Right, right. They must have got advance warning. Like the times in the process. Yeah, what did they know and when did they know it? We'll never know.

So, let's keep talking about Venezuela. Yeah. We should talk about who Rodriguez is. Yeah. So, Delta Rodriguez was vice president and now she is. president, or will be sworn in as president, I believe. She may have already been sworn in by the time you hear this. She was sworn in, I think, like, a couple hours ago per the last article I read.

So her father was a Marxist guerrilla. Her father kidnapped an American businessman, was arrested and then murdered, like, torture to death. Yeah. As part of the, quote-unquote, investigation into that, right? Her and her brother are kind of like a power block in Venezuela and politics. She has really become more relevant, I guess, nationally since Maduro. She did do some stuff with Chavez early on, but clashed with him personally.

And I guess, allegedly, I mean, I wasn't there. But Chavez didn't like that she wasn't deferential to him. And at one point, sent her home from her, but I think they were in Russia, and he sent her home from a sort of mission that they were doing their diplomatic mission. Since then, she is assuming number of roles in Venezuelan government from since 2013, right when Maduro came to power, to include overseeing intelligence. at some time, and she has now become obviously president, right? She has previously worked with, like, the Venezuelan.

I guess the analogy would be, like, Chamber of Commerce, which had previously been seen by, like, Chalbizmores, like a bourgeois entity, i.e., the enemy, right? She has shown willingness to work with business, so I do wonder if that factors into the US analysis, like if she's willing to work with what looks like the oil companies that they want her to work with, then they can overlook a whole lot of other. of stuff, right? Which has historically been how the US has approached places with oil. But, yeah, in terms of this, I think that's probably the sort of TLDR on her career. I think it is possible that she's willing to do some kind of chuvies more light, you know, whatever we're going to call this,

and have US extractive capitalism exist so long as the regime continues to exist. But the way that would work is still something that, like, I can't really get my head around for a regime, which has made so much of its rhetorical legitimacy for so long about attacking the United States. Right, right. Yeah, and that's kind of, I mean, that seems to be the, the quandary Delsey finds herself in, is she both has to refer to what's happened accurately as kidnapping and the actions of an illegitimate and deeply corrupt regime. And also, she can't act that way if what we all think is accurate. She's basically acting as a negotiated puppet of the United States.

She can only go so far. And I feel like she's trapped in kind of a doomed situation, which may be part of what our administration intends, is for her to be fundamentally doomed and fail and get cooed herself or, you know, we can replace her when there's protests against her legitimacy. Like, I don't know what exactly the game is here, but I think that may be something that was baked into the equation that, like, this is not a functional situation for her. And when she gets forced out, that's something we can take advantage of. Yeah, it's a reasonable analysis, I think.

I mean, we... Yeah. We should talk about the oil, right? because Trump has been talking about the oil. Right. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah, I know you said you wanted to mention stuff about, like, it's not what it might seem on the face of it, right?

There aren't giant lakes of oil in Venezuela. You can just slurp up and sell. Yeah, so, okay, it's sort of difficult to explain this all without really getting into the weeds of, like, how oil production works. But there's different, like, qualities of crude oil, and most of the Venezuelan stuff is extremely,

sour. It's really, really shit. It's extremely low quality. And when you have oil that's this shit, you can't, like, refine it into being good, right? Like, that's just, like, not how the process works. It just sucks. And so it burns badly. But there is a lot of it. And this also gets back to, okay, so the way that Trump thinks this is going to work is that a bunch of oil companies are going to come in. They're going to do a bunch of, like, infrastructure development or whatever, they're going to sell the oil and they're going to make $100 bazillion dollars, that's not really how this works. And this is something that James has pointed out too, but like, the actual value here

is less from actually extracting the oil and more from, A, having all of these oil deposits on your balance sheet, and B, there's a lot of value in just having power over it. Yeah. So, okay, so oil prices are kind of. They're set by a few things. Like, the price of oil is set by the bottom of the market, right? Part of your profit comes from how much more cheaply can you refine and extract your oil relative to whoever's doing it the most expensively, like whoever's doing the shittiest job

of it. But that a lot of it also is just power. That's what OPEC is, right? And OPEC's ability to raise oil prices has to do with its ability to have all of their member states controlling their oil and controlling the sort of flow and distribution of it. redistributing who is in power in OPEC is actually a massive deal. Even if the actual oil here isn't very good, the power over the oil is extremely important. So this doesn't work in the way that Trump wants it to work, which is like, you know, you take the oil wells and you pump the oil out of the ground and suddenly you have money.

but comma, it is good for the oil companies that would take over the oil? Yeah, he consistently confuses stock price for, like, the economy slash business success, slash other things, right? Yeah, I guess one way to think about it is that, like, taking control of this oil, you're not really making the money off of this oil, you're making the money off of the impact controlling this oil has on the rest of the oil you produce. Yeah, maybe if you're someone who sees international relations in terms of great power competition, you're trying to put. puts things in the Russia-China bucket or the America bucket. Yeah, and someone who sees trade is this like zero-sum game where one person wins and another person loses, you know, as Trump does. Yes.

And also, it is worth mentioning that, like, a lot of this oil goes to Cuba. Yeah. Which is really, really important for the Cuban economy, which sort of can't function without the stock of Venezuelan oil. Like, getting access to Venezuelan oil is one of the things that originally pulled Cuba. out of the just hideous economic crisis they were in in the 90s after the Soviet Union collapsed.

It's why 32 seems like a majority, or at least half of the security forces who died fighting the U.S. in this kidnapping attempt, were Cuban because access to Venezuela oil is an existential issue for the Cuban government. And it's also why

Trump stated, unfortunately, probably accurately, that they're not looking at regime change in Cuba because they think that the regime is going to collapse on its own. which it might. Like, this is an existential problem for the Cuban regime. But people who aren't aware, I spent a good amount of time in Caracas when I was much younger during my undergraduate years at university.

And I remember the only medical professionals I ever saw because people had left right after Chalismo, like, the only medical professionals I ever saw were Cuban. And to be clear, Cuban doctors are all over the world. What a Cuba's biggest sex war is, it's doctors. But, like, it was very clear at that time that, like, the, two states were intermatched, you know, like Venezuela needs things that Cuba has, like those special military advisors and those doctors, and Cuba needs things of Venezuela have, like, that oil. Yeah, and breaking that, the way people normally see oil is, oil is just like liquid cash,

and that's not true. It matters the actual materiality of the oil and how it works in the extraction process and what kind of oil is matters a lot. And this is a scenario where where the oil is going and who has control over it matters more than who's able to sell it, which is very weird, but is how this works. And Trump doesn't understand any of this. Maybe some of the people around him understand this, but Trump really just is in pure empire brain. They stole our stuff, which I assume someone who like wanted this told him, oh yeah, they stole a bunch of American oil and land. And now he's in just full empire mode. Yeah. I think the It seemed like someone has told him at some point they stole our stuff, right?

Well, yeah, and this is after the revolution, a bunch of what was like the property of U.S. and foreign oil companies was nationalized, right? Yeah. Because these companies had made deals with the corrupt previous regime and it was not really benefiting Venezuelans. Obviously, that oil money has gone on to benefit the current corrupt regime and still not benefited Venezuelans much. but there was a period of time under Chavez in which like there were actual social benefits and a powerful state was providing people with things, which is not to say it didn't have its flaws, but like there was a period of time in which there was a benefit to the average Venezuelan from the fact that their country was so oil rich and nothing about the current situation is going to change positively for the average Venezuelan. The profits are going to go from being siphoned for one group to another, but neither of those groups.

groups are regular Venezuelans. Yeah. Like, I think sometimes I will hear this. I have conservatively interviewed hundreds, if not thousands, of Venezuelan people in the last three or four years, right? At the border in the Darien gap in the U.S., remotely via telephone, et cetera. And, like, sometimes you'll hear that, like, Chavez was trying to do something good and it went bad or that, like, it was okay for a bit under Chavez,

and then the corruption got out of control, or even it was okay until Maduro it took parent and it was bad, but it doesn't matter, right, it's bad now. But like the things, the poverty I hear about from Venezuelan people is grinding and it is so upsetting. Like, I have the gratefulness for Venezuelan people. I've made a whole podcast thing about this.

But the difficulty they encounter in every aspect of their lives because of sanctions, because of corruption, because of hyperinflation, because of the low oil price, like a lot of things, right? their lives are miserable and this isn't going to change that. They're scared, right? When I speak to people in Venezuela,

are people with family in Venezuela this week since this happened? What are they doing? They are not contrary to what an AI video might have made you believe out in the streets celebrating. No. They're trying to get enough food to make it through the next couple of weeks in case they have to hunker down in their homes. Right. And it is hard to get food at the best of times for these people.

In case they're bombed and close the roads are bombed. case they're occupied like they're they're making preparations for being in a situation like gossens have been in for much of the last several years right yeah and that's not an unreasonable like who knows what will happen i hope it's not that but it's not an unreasonable thing to prepare for no it's not our friends when miamore and robert and i have interviewed people in miamma that's what they said they did after the coup as well because they didn't know what was going to happen and they figured they need to be able to sit somewhere safe and stay there. And so, yeah, this is not a liberation, like a sort of Jared Pollis of all people being

like, oh, yeah, liberation. Also, using the word liberation, generally Simon Bolivar, who's like the sort of founding hero of Venezuela is referred to as the liberators, so using that phrase about the ex-judicial kidnapping of the head of state. Right. You don't understand the resonance of that word in Spanish. That's fine. You don't speak Spanish.

Don't fucking use it. But if you're going to use it, especially in this context, like, it is crass in the extreme to see that from the American politician. So the other, I think, aspect of this is that, like, you know, if you look at this on a historical tale, the reason Bolivar succeeded was that, like, the Haitian Republic gave a whole bunch of people, a whole bunch of weapons to go liberate Latin America from the Spanish empire. And then, you know, if you look at what, like, what is the U.S.'s relation to the

the closest thing I've been able to I've been like racking my brain trying to find anything in history that looks like this that the U.S. has done and we've done a lot of bad things but the closest thing I can find to just we sent the army in to kidnap a guy

and deposed him was what we did to Aristide who was the former leftist president of now former leftist president of Haiti who we did in fact send in special forces with Canada to just like sort of force

onto a plane at gunpoint and remove from power yeah but also that situation was a little different in that at that point most of the country of Haiti was under the control of a bunch of like best squad rebel groups yeah which was the US's justification and this is just

we just ran into a country and took them but I don't know the historical residences of that are bleak yeah and Jesus Christ don't call it the liberation. Good Lord. Talking of liberation. Yeah, let's liberate our audience from having money that they can spend on these products.

I'm Ed Zittron of the Better Offline podcast, and I want you to join me at this year's Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Nevada, starting January 6th through January 10th, 2026. We're doing 10th-year-style podcast episodes about the world's biggest. tech conference. And we're going to dig into the latest and weirdest gadgets, gizmos, and horrible AI gear that the tech industry is desperate to sell you, all while covering the biggest stories in Silicon Valley as the AI bubble threatens to burst. I'll be joined by David Roth, Chloe Radcliffe, Adam Conover, Corey Doctor-O, Edongueso, Robert Evans, and an incredible cast of the greatest talent in the tech media, with over 18 hours of interviews, commentary and bizarre

stories, all told from the Better Offline pop-up studio connected to its own open bar. Today I did five hours of back-to-back panels on artificial intelligence. It included a number of great moments, including an entire room full of people, laughing about people losing their jobs due to artificial intelligence. Will we make it out alive? There's only one way to find out. Tune in starting January 6th through January 10th, 2026, and listen to the literal best tech podcast ever recorded.

Listen to Better Offline on the IHot Radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you happen to get your podcasts. Are you desperately hoping for change in 2026? But feeling stuck? Just spinning your wheels and old routines and bad habits. I'm Dr. Lari Santos. And in a new year series of my show, The Happiness Lab, I'm going to look at the science of getting, well, unstuck.

Unstuck at work, unstuck in your relationships, and even unstuck inside your mind. I am the absolute worst culprit when it comes to getting into these ruminative loops and just driving myself crazy. We'll look at ways to reignite your sense of purpose, rediscover your values, and get more creative. We'll also explore how to design a life that feels more fulfilling. It's sort of like the game of life.

I don't know if you ever played that game. Oh, my gosh, yes. You take the car along and you try and get money, and you try and get degrees, and you try and get to the end where either you have a mansion or a ranch or a shack. And once you get to retirement, you're done. What about the whole path along the way?

So join me to get unstuck in 2026. Listen to the Happiness Lab on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your shows. You know, we always say New Year, New Year, New Me, but real change starts on the inside. It starts with giving your mind and your spirit the same attention you give your goals. Hey, everybody, it's Michelle Williams,

host of Checking In on the Black Effect Podcast Network. And on my podcast, we talk mental health, healing, growth, and everything you need to step into your next season, whole and empowered. New Year, Real You. Listen to Checking in with Michelle Williams from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.

The moments that shape us often begin with a simple question. What do I want my life to look like now? I'm Dr. Joy Harden Bradford. And on therapy for black girls, we create space for honest conversations about identity, relationships, mental health, and the choices that help us grow. As cybersecurity expert, Camille Stewart Gloucester reminds us, We are in a divisive time where our comments are weaponized against us. And so what we find is a lot of black women are standing up and speaking out because they feel the brunt of the pain.

Each week we explore the tools and insights that help you move with purpose. Whether you're navigating something new or returning to yourself. If you're ready for thoughtful guidance and grounded support, this is the place for you. Listen to Therapy for Black Girls on the IHeart Radio app. podcast or wherever you get your podcast. All right, we're back. I guess there's a couple of things I wanted to talk about. One of them is I'm seeing a lot of people respond to this by pointing out folks like Matt

Walsh or other guys on the right who made statements about Trump being a candidate for peace and all these military interventions we're getting into being bad and are now celebrating what we're doing. and openly celebrating like colonialism as a good thing. And I'm seeing a lot of folks trying to dunk on these people for being inconsistent, and I can't imagine a bigger waste of your time. None of these people, you have to get it out from the habit of thinking that truth matters. All that matters to these people is power, and they have it, and they have the guns. And you pointing out that they lied to get there and that they're not honest,

they don't care. They're rich and they're getting richer and they're powerful and they're getting more power. None of this is about principles. It's about winning. And you just have to understand that if you want to have any hope of beating them because pretending that they're playing any other game than the one that they're playing is really dangerous. I don't think there's any profit in debating these people directly or confronting them directly about the inconsistencies of their belief system, I do think it's deeply profitable to talk about the fact that they lied and are liars and are dragging us into another war to regular Americans. And the evidence suggests that this is incredibly unpopular in a way that the Iraq war wasn't. People talk a lot about how massive the

anti-war protests were and how much anti-war sentiment there was. But a majority of Americans were broadly supportive of what the Bush administration did in Afghanistan and Iraq at the time that they started doing it, right? That doesn't mean that the protests weren't real. It doesn't mean that it's not significant that those massive protests happened, but most Americans were broadly supportive of what the government was doing. That's not the case with what we're seeing in regards to public opinion over what's happening in Venezuela. There was a two-day Reuters-Ipsos survey that concluded Monday, basically immediately after it was announced what, you know, we did in Venezuela, and 72% of Americans who responded said they are concerned that the U.S. might get too involved in

Venezuela. Only 25% said that they don't share that concern. 90% of Democrats share that concern as well 74% of independence, even 54% of Republicans. Only 45% of Republicans said that they were not worried about the U.S. getting overly involved, and only 19% of other voters. So this is really unpopular, historically unpopular for a military intervention. And the entire bet that the Trump administration is making is that because they're not doing what Bush did in Iraq, they're not knocking out the whole government and debathifying it, they're just kicking out one guy and basically keeping his regime intact. They're just making that regime swear feal to the United States.

And their bet is that this will work, right? that the Venezuelan regime will continue to keep the country functioning as well as it was functioning before, which is not great, but was not total collapse. And they can start extracting value. And honestly, I feel like that is, that's a major motivation for a lot of people supporting Trump, for a lot of people in his administration who have financial interests, for obviously the oil and gas companies he's trying to get on board. But I don't think money is even Trump's, and this is maybe an unpopular opinion, I think the primary reason Trump is doing this is that he wants, number one, to show everybody, look, I did what Bush did, but it worked,

I did it better. And number two, he wants to show everybody, look, I did what Obama did, and took out a big bad guy, right? That's where they're trying to craft Maduro, is this major enemy of the United States, this architect of the opiate crisis, this guy who's worse than bin Laden in a lot of ways, because Trump is still jealous of the fact that Obama got to take out bin Laden, right, as he sees it. And he wants his own version of that. Trump is doing this, I think, primarily for vanity purposes, right? I know that seems shallow and silly, but I really think that's most of what's going on for him. And I think if the end result of this is that things in Venezuela more or less continue the way they were before, he will call it a win. And a lot of

people might believe him. And I don't know, it doesn't even necessarily matter if any money actually comes into the United States over this. They'll just lie about it. You know, some individual Americans will make money. And I think that'll probably be enough for Trump to feel like he got a win and for his PR apparatus to notch this up as a win. And I think that's all he really cares about. And so I do think it's worth really hitting how criminal this is and how harmful this is. But ultimately, what's going to determine whether or not Americans see this as a calamity or not is how well this all works out in the long run. And that's a really tough thing. to even think about because you don't want it to work well because it will emboldened Trump

to keep doing this and the global harm will be greater. On the other hand, I don't want civil life in Venezuela to collapse, right? So it's tough. Right. Yeah, I don't want people to suffer anymore. I mean, just around the world too, when, like I heard Minan Huang called a meeting in Myanmar when he heard about this because he was worried. Right.

Like the paranoia of dictators is about to go through the ceiling, and that's going to result in people being tortured and killed. It's going to result in people torture. And it's going to result in more countries seeking to get nuclear weapons because they will accurately recognize that that is the only security anyone has. It is understated how much more dangerous what Bush did in Iraq made the world because of how it's made different leaders around the world. Think about the possession of nuclear weapons, right? Iran is fundamentally right in its calculus that getting a nuke will make the regime safer because it might be the only thing that can protect them. Now, things in Iran are not looking very stable right now either. Again, this is another situation where just decades of protest and the weakness of the regime might wind up working in Trump's favor because things are looking pretty gnarly for the Iranian regime right now.

And maybe Trump, Trump has made some statements since kidnapping Maduro about going into Iran. they very well may do that, but they also may not need to. Yeah, there's some OSIN suggesting they at least have preparations in place for doing something in Iran. Right. Which may be all they need to do, right, to obviously move things to point towards Iran. Right. But that is an action in itself. Yeah, that really, I mean, there's a lot that worries me there.

But I think they're going to keep fucking around like this as long as they feel like it will benefit them. And right now this feels like a win to them. them. Yeah. So this is going to function like a drug. They're going to start looking for another hit as soon as the high from this fades. Yeah. And as soon as they need a domestic distraction, right?

Right. A lot of this stuff. And the evidence we have so far suggests that people fucking hate this and will probably keep hating this. But it depends on whether or not this all fades out. And if the news is coverage actually, maybe it worked, right? Which will probably be based on really dog shit journalism. The Washington Post did a preferential op-ed already, I think.

Oh, good. Yeah, I'm glad they're helping out our democracy die in darkness. They're going to keep chasing this high, and it will wind up collapsing on them eventually. The question is how many countries will have to pay the price beforehand and how much worse will things get in the United States, obviously. Yeah. And what will the price be, right, when they lose an entire SF team or a bunch of cash guys? When Delta Force gets wiped out, when we have a bunch of helicopters down to a bunch of Americans captioned, what does Trump do then? Do we get a panic? This is kind of where I see like the potential, the scary potential for something like a nuclear January 6th, where like, do we get a panic response that leads to a horrific loss of life because Trump sees himself as being embarrassed? Oh my God, they killed a whole team. Like, I have no option but to kill a shitload of people to distract from the fact that I failed here, right? that does really concern me too.

Yeah, if that happens, you know, the response, even if it's not nuclear, right? Even if it's just conventional weapons on cities. Right, right, right. And, yeah, I shouldn't even bring up the nuclear thing, but like, it does concern me. Yeah, it's a dude has a nuclear football, right?

He's the one who gets to make the choice. Right. This is going to just get more, this is going to become integral to his sense of, like, self-worth that, like, no, I did this and it worked. In the conquering era. And if all his guys get wiped out, failing at one of these things, that's not going to go well for anybody.

No, it's not. We'll have a fun couple hours on Twitter, but it's going to be really bad, really fast. Yeah. I'll talk very briefly about a couple of implications domestically, sure. The main one is that the DOJ has already fired for an extension in the case which Judge Bosberg is overseeing regarding the Alien Enemies Act, right? Yeah. What this will mean for Venezuelan nationals in the United States, it is unlikely.

that this will mean something good, right? It is unlikely that they will have a country that they would want to return to, and it is possible that it's going to be used to force them to return to it anyway, to a country which is extremely paranoid about U.S. spies because someone in Maduro's very close entourage leaked the entire plan that Trump, many presidents would not have said this to the press, but Trump did, that they had the entire plans for his house, and that they built a replica of it to include they knew he had a safe room,

they knew it was steel, and they knew they could cut into it, cutting torches. Someone linked that information. That means that people coming back from the United States are going to be under scrutiny, right? And that is not good for them. And I don't see this regime stopping, sending people back because they're not an alien Elony anymore. I don't, I don't see that. And I can see the regime, if it does manage to install Rodriguez, it's something of a puppet leaning on Rodriguez to accept people removed from the United States, right? So that is extremely concerning. And it's not being reported on, right?

Because migrants are not front and center where a lot of American newspapers think about things. But I think for those people, this is petrifying, right? The country that you came to be safe is now bombing the country that you came from. It's also trying to kick you out. Like, you are stuck in the middle of this game. And all you wanted was a place to raise your kids where, you know, they might have a fair crack at a decent life. it's it's heartbreaking for those people yeah and i think that's probably all we've got to say for now i mean i guess i'll address briefly because people have asked do you see this as like an annex a

an unshlus you know the annexation of austria or of czechoslovakia of that kind of moment or is this more like the invasion of poland and i guess my answer is it's its own thing uh it doesn't directly graph on any of those other than that where it does very directly graph and what is relevant comparing it to is what happened to the Nazis and to Hitler personally as they started seeing success taking things militarily. They made some big gambols that were not known. One thing that gets underdiscussed when talking about what Germany was doing in that period of time is how many military leaders within Germany thought that the annexation of particularly Czechoslovakia was a horrible idea. Because in a head-to-head fight, it was not clear whatsoever that the

Wehrmacht could defeat the Czech military and their defenses. That was very much in debate. And a lot of Hitler's advisors thought it was a terrible idea because they didn't think they could win. And it wound up not really being a factor because everyone caved and nobody wanted to fight, which is the problem that we're having right now, right? It's that nobody actually wants to confront these people. The Democrats are himming and a hango whether or not they try for impeachment again or, you know, there's this fear of actually directly confronting these people. people that is part of what's emboldening them to keep trying shit like this. And what's very relevant to the Nazis is that if this works, and we're talking, if this works not in the long run, because they're not going to wait 20 years to see if this was a good idea, they're going to wait a couple of weeks, you know, maybe a few months. And if it seems like, hey, it worked,

Venezuela's not falling apart. You know, we've got, we actually got what we think is a good PR out of it. They'll try again. And they'll try again. And the Nazis tried again and again. they started making checks that their asses couldn't cash, right? And that is the thing that's relevant because that is something all fascists have in common, is this confidence that gets them very far in a lot of ways, because if they're willing to gamble and the other people aren't willing to confront them or fight or gamble themselves, then they'll win by default. But when that stops and people start confronting them, the shortcomings of the state that

they've built and of the militaries that they've built become increasingly evident. And I do think that's the road that we're on. I don't know where it'll end. I don't know if, you know, Trump could die of a heart attack tomorrow and maybe whoever takes over will be more cautious. I don't know what's going to happen. But I know that we've started down that road. Yeah. And that's not a good thing. Nope. I guess we should just say because people will be incredibly annoying on the internet, like saying that it is illegal and wrong to kidnap Maduro does not mean that we think Maduro is great just in the same way that it's saying the Iraq war is wrong

doesn't mean we love Saddam Hussein. Like, no. The two things can be bad people who tell you I should grow up. Like I said at the start, I don't think you have to. I don't think anyone owes you. And if someone is saying like, hey, you have to answer for these bad things Maduro did

when critiquing the US for this, I think that's bullshit. I think you should tell them to fuck off, right? It's not the issue at stake here. Maduro's personal qualities are irrelevant. event, as is always the case with this. What we're doing is illegal and bad. It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find sources for It Could Happen here listed directly in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening. Hi, I'm Ed Zittron, host of the Better Offline podcast. We're going to go on the road to beautiful Las Vegas, Nevada, to cover the Consumer Electronics Show, tech's biggest conference. Better Offline's CES coverage won't be the usual rundown of the hottest gadgets or biggest trends, but an unvarnished look at what the tech industry plans to sell or do to you in 2025. I'll be joined by David Rothett Defector and the writer Edward Onguoso Jr. With guest appearances from Behind the Bastards Robert Evans, it could happen here's Gare Davis,

and a few surprise guests throughout the show. Listen to Better Offline on the iHart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever else you get your podcasts from. I actually drop better when I'm high. It heightens my senses, calms me down. If anything, I'm more careful. Honestly, it just helps me focus. That's probably what the driver who killed a four-year-old told himself.

And now he's in prison. You see, no matter what you tell yourself, if you feel different, you drive different. So if you're high, just don't drive. Brought to you by NHTSA and the Ad Council. I didn't really have an interest of being on air. I kind of was up there to just try and infiltrate the building. From the underground clubs that shaped global music

to the pastors and creatives who built a cultural empire. The Atlanta Ears podcast uncovers the stories behind one of the most influential cities in the world. The thing I love about Atlanta is that it's a city of hustlers, man. Each episode explores a different chapter of Atlanta's wrong. Featuring Conversations with Ludacris, Will Packer, Pastor Jamal Bryant, DJ Drama, and more. The full series is available to listen to now. Listen to Atlanta is on the I-Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. The show was ahead of its time to represent a black family in ways the television hadn't shown before.

Exactly. It's Telma Hopkins, also known as Aunt Rachel. And I'm Kelly Williams or Laura Winslow. On our podcast, welcome to the family with Telma and Kelly. be watching every episode of Family Matters. We'll share behind-the-scenes stories about making the show. Yeah, we'll even bring in some special guests to spill some tea. Listen to Welcome to the Family with Telma and Kelly on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

This is an IHeart podcast. Guaranteed human.