Jocko Podcast - 211: TACTICS. Leadership Strategy and Tactics Review. Pt 2. with Dave Berke
Episode Date: January 8, 20200:00:00 - Opening 0:00:20 - Leadership Strategy and Tactics Review. Part 2, Tactics. 2:18:36 - Final Thoughts and Take-aways. 2:29:23 - How to stay on THE PATH. 2:50:41 - Closing Gratitude.Support thi...s podcast at — https://redcircle.com/jocko-podcast/exclusive-content
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is Jocko podcast number 211 with Echo Charles and me, Jocko Willink.
Good evening, Echo.
Good evening.
And also joining us again is Dave Burke.
Good evening, Dave.
Good evening.
And we are going to roll right back into the book Leadership Strategy and Tactics
because we only made it halfway through on the first attempt.
So the first part that we did make it through was called strategy.
does the strategy part and now we are getting into the tactics part section one part two section
one and it starts off with this section right here becoming a leader how to succeed as a new
leader once you have been selected as a leader it is time to lead what is the best way to do this
like many things starting off on the right foot is simple but not easy here are some fundamental rules
to keep in mind as you take command.
One, be humble.
It is an honor to be in a leadership position.
Your team is counting on you to make the right decisions.
Two, don't act like you know everything.
You don't.
The team knows that.
Ask smart questions.
Three, listen.
Ask for advice and heed it.
Four, treat people with respect.
Regardless of rank, everyone is a human being and plays an important role.
Team, treat them that way.
Take care of your people and they will take care of you.
Five, take ownership of failures and mistakes.
Six, pass credit for success up and down the chain of command.
Seven, work hard.
As the leader, you should be working harder than anyone else on the team.
No job is beneath you.
Eight, have integrity.
Do what you say, say what you do.
Don't lie up or down the chain of command.
Nine, be balanced.
Extreme actions and opinions are usually not good.
10, be decisive.
When it is time to make a decision, make one.
11, build relationships.
That is your main goal as a leader.
A team is a group of people who have relationships and trust one another.
Otherwise, it is just a disconnected, incoherent cluster of people.
12.
Lastly, get the job done.
That is the purpose of a leader to lead a team in accomplishing a mission.
If you don't accomplish the mission, you fail as a leader.
Performance counts.
These are straightforward rules.
They make sense on paper, but they can be hard to remember and implement in a leadership environment.
Review them often.
Look at them in the morning before meetings and when you are about to make things happen.
Review them before you go to sleep at night.
Soon they will become second nature.
But if you find yourself struggling, pause, reread these rules and ensure that you are following them.
So there you go.
Straightforward, because how many times has this question come to me?
Just took over a team, just starting, just got promoted.
It comes over and over and over and over again.
So these are very simple, very straight forward rules to abide.
by.
Review them often.
No joke, because I guarantee you of that list at any given time, you're not doing something
on that list.
You need to remind yourself, what did you need to do to be successful as a leader?
And you know what's interesting, even as you say that, Dave?
It's like, yeah, this is like, oh, I'm talking to the new guys, right?
I'm talking to someone that hasn't been in a leadership position.
I'm talking to someone that's just about to take over.
And when you're saying that, I'm thinking, yeah, yeah, he's right, not just about
the new guy.
about me 100% right about me. So yeah, this is becoming a leader, but you might want to just
take a look at these from time to time and see where you're at. Roll a skip forward a little bit
here. When you are not chosen, when you're not chosen to be a leader, there are times when you
will not be selected as a leader. Perhaps they promote someone else from within your team.
Perhaps they bring someone from outside your team or outside the organization to lead.
When that happens, you might feel frustrated or angry because you are not chosen.
Keep those feelings to yourself.
Instead of allowing yourself to become angry and frustrated, take the opportunity to do a good, honest assessment of yourself to see why you are not chosen.
After you have done that and after you have given yourself time to calm down.
You can even ask your supervisors why you are not selected for promotion.
Of course, this must be done with tact.
Don't say, hey, boss, why wasn't I selected for a promotion?
I'm just as good, if not better than the person you gave the role to.
How's that going to go over?
Poorly.
Yeah, poorly.
And yet, people do that all day.
Instead, say, hey boss, I wanted to get some feedback from you.
As you know, there was a recent promotion here, and I have.
eventually want to move up into a more senior leadership position too.
I want to know if there's anything I can focus on to do better.
So I'm more qualified and more prepared to lead when the next opportunity comes.
Can you help me out, boss?
I mean, think about what that does.
Somebody says that to me.
Man, I'm like, okay, this person's tracking.
This person is tracking.
Same thing with Jiu-Jitin'Belts, by the way, too.
Don't act up when you don't get promoted.
Didn't get the promotion?
Cool, let's get mad.
Yeah.
behavioral and would you and would you recommend that someone didn't get promoted to
whatever belt at a promotion day would you recommend they ask the the instructor
what can I do to get a whatever belt no yeah I say no I say just you kind of got
to know just get better at what you you know yeah there's a a little deviation
from the from the correlation of
Jiu-Jitsu in life.
That's a little deviation.
Because really with Jiu-Jitsu, we're 100% not asking about belts.
100%.
Yeah, actually, you know what?
So in a way, it's not even really a deviation because getting a promotion and being
in a very specific position, that's like there's a reason for that, you know?
And it's like there are many legitimate reasons for that.
I mean, especially with like the raise and like all the stuff, the belt, that's just
superficial.
But check this out.
What if instead of saying, hey, echo, I.
You didn't promote me to Purple Belt?
What can I work on so I can get promoted to Purple Belt?
That's one thing.
What if two days after the promotion, after I let Mike, after I calm down,
I was like, hey, Echo, I'm looking to improve.
Is there any holes you see in my game that I can work on?
Yeah.
And then you know what you have to do?
It's the same thing.
So actually the correlation is back on track.
Yeah, yeah.
Jitsu in life.
Because same thing.
When you ask, even the way I work,
did that right there. I want to be more prepared to lead. It's not even saying I want to get
promoted. I want to be more prepared to lead. We're keeping this thing soft. Keeping it,
keeping it indirect and tactical flanking. Yes, sir. Yeah, there's a piece there. I think the
correlation is completely intact. There's also a little piece here too that, look, if you're in this
position, you find out you didn't get what you were expecting. You shouldn't be too surprised. And if you are,
where you actually need to start is with yourself a little bit.
Before you go run into the boss,
even in a positive light,
take a step back and say,
hey, look,
this caught me off guard.
I didn't expect this.
I thought I was going to get that promote,
okay,
didn't work out.
Take a step back,
and you need to look at why you were caught off guard.
Figure that piece out first.
I'm not saying don't go to your boss
and say I want to get better.
You absolutely can do that.
That's not where you need to start.
And I think the correlation is totally dialed it.
It is.
And that even in the book,
I started with,
take the opportunity to do a good honest assessment of yourself to see why you're not chosen.
And then after you have done that, that's when you go if you can then deem it appropriate.
And then what's interesting, and this also makes sense on both fronts.
And when you receive that feedback, actually listen to it.
After all, you just asked for it.
As human beings, we have a strong tendency to get defensive.
Don't.
Instead of getting defensive, listen, truly listen.
and try to understand the perspective being offered.
Then take ownership of those shortfalls
and try to make improvements in the areas of critique you have received.
There's a whole thing that's been unwinding in my brain.
And you and I were talking about it echo the other day,
not on the podcast, but just in life.
There's this whole thing where the ability to detach
is what allows,
you to see your ego.
The ability to detach is what allows you to say, oh yeah, I'm not as good as I think I am or as what it looks like from my perspective.
So this is what made me think of this is the way you just said, if you're caught off guard, if you're caught off guard and you don't get promoted, clearly you aren't detached enough to see where you actually rank out with everyone else.
So this idea of, of ego, of the ability to detach and of cognitive ability that Dick Thompson talked about, those things are all this, this thing that's all wrapped up in one.
They're not not with they're wrapped up in one, but they're all related.
Yeah.
Because if you talk to someone that has a big ego, their ability to detach is tiny.
Yeah.
Because if they were able to detach, they'd be.
able to take a step back and see how out of line their ego was and they'd see how other people
are perceiving them that's the crazy thing about someone the big eagle they don't even see how other
people perceive them or like you said in our conversation the other day when they get told they
have a big ego they actually see it as a positive thing like you're damn right that's because
I'm over here winning and you say hmm interesting because no one likes you and that
means, yeah, you can blunt force trauma some stuff right now, but where it's going to end up
is not good.
So this whole thing of being able to detach, if someone has a big ego, it indicates that
they're not able to detach because if they could, they'd see it.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's almost like they're like, okay, I'm awesome.
I'm the man.
I'm awesome or whatever.
And you're like, hey, you have a big ego, right?
And to them, they're like, yeah, like, I'm awesome.
Of course I have a big ego like I just I'm recognizing my awesomeness like that's kind of the only way to see it like it's obvious that everyone else sees it and I'm just one of the many infinite people that recognizes it too well yeah I am one of those people yes it's like real obvious you know
And you should probably raise the flag that says I don't know how to detach
Yeah well you're talking about the cognitive component of that too that ego also does another small little problem was prevent you to do the thing that you just said was actually listen to the feedback and get better
which you can't do if you have an ego.
So the ego, when we say it infects everything, it infects everything.
And you say this in all the books that you talk about on the podcast.
I know you already said it.
I'll be repetitive.
You have to read every word of this book.
Everything, Jaco's skipping, you know, just out of necessity for time.
Everything needs to be read, even in the sequence, too, from strategy down to tactics.
And even what seems to be small components of that actually feed into this larger thing.
You have to read all of this.
when you get this every word.
Yeah, there's a lot in the words.
Yes.
There's a lot in the words that I'm definitely not covering right now
to give people kind of an overall feeling
of what is in the book.
And there's an audiobook as well, which I read.
So there's that as well.
If you're not really into reading.
Okay, I had to cover this too,
which is overcoming a grudge,
going to the book.
There will be times in your career when you will be the one promoted into a leadership position in placed above your former peers
This can be challenging, but when handled correctly, the challenge can be mitigated
Most of your former peers will accept the situation and get on board
But sometimes there are people who get bitter and resentful that they weren't promoted and they show that bitterness
There are some ways to mitigate a bad attitude from your former peers at first don't try and force your rank down their throats
Tell them you appreciate their experience and you'll be looking to them
to help lead let them come up with plans and ideas ask for their input if they
come up with a solid plan let them run with it when the opportunity arises put
them in charge of some tasks projects and missions this shows them that you
trust them and you do do truly appreciate their experience and knowledge and if
they can put their egos in check the situation can be overcome but also be
advised that some people will be hypersensitive and see you putting them in
charge of something as condescending or
as proof that you don't know what you're doing
and that they should have been promoted, not you.
Isn't that an interesting little dynamic
like one end of the spectrum to the other?
Like if I say, hey, Echo, you know,
would you mind running this?
There's one person that goes,
yeah, yeah, now he has put me in charge
of these little projects
because he's promoting.
He thinks he's the man.
So that's one negative attitude.
The other negative attitude is I'm like,
hey, Echo, do you think you can run this project?
You're like, yeah, yeah, I can run it
because you don't know what you're doing.
What are you doing?
Yeah.
So, and by the way,
get this anew.
When their pouting and bad attitude become apparent,
recognize that the likely reason they were not promoted
is because they likely lack the humility
and maturity, maturity to be a leader.
If that's the case, continue to be cordial,
treat them with respect and try and build a relationship,
but don't expect rapid improvement from them.
This will be a long process.
You're going to have to be patient.
Make sure you don't let them distract you from the mission
or the rest of the team.
So there's another classic example.
The person that doesn't get promoted, the reason they don't get promoted, because they lack self-awareness, they don't know how to detach, they've got a giant ego, and all that stuff just feeds into this problem.
And you can barely even discuss it with them.
I think this is this next section I'm skipping to.
Might be my favorite subtitle in the book.
It's called Don't Go Overboard, Rambo.
And here we go.
And this, this, you know, much of the specific subjects to cover in this book are directly
from questions from the podcast.
This is one of those questions that I got asked early on and I was like, oh yeah, I forgot
about that guy.
We all know this.
We all know this John J. Rambo guy.
This leadership guy, right?
Not that John, not the John Jay Rambo.
Didn't they call you Rambo it back in the day for some?
Yeah, yeah.
That story's in this book too.
We might get there.
Don't go overboard, Rambo.
Here we go.
You want to be a leader.
That's great.
But don't be offensive about it.
What does that mean?
It means don't run around saying, I'm the leader.
I'm in charge.
Listen to me.
I'll make all the decisions.
This attitude will offend many people.
It's the equivalent of, look at me.
I'm important and it doesn't go over well.
Rambo might be a cool movie character.
But charging out alone without regard for others doesn't work in a team environment.
saying I'm the leader, follow me, can offend people's egos.
In their minds, perhaps they're thinking you don't deserve to be in charge.
There is a good chance they're even thinking that they're the one who should be in charge.
So you barking at them that you are the leader is not a good idea.
And when you do make some kind of a mistake, which you will, they'll be ready to pounce on it.
Leadership in most cases should be subtle.
I remember seeing these young junior officers in the SEAL teams that like either they would they went through ROTC or they you know the Naval Academy or whatever whatever they came from wherever they got the commission but somewhere along like they like took leadership classes right and they were into it they were into it and so they kind of walked around like they were you know into it and man that was
was offensive to people.
And it's weird because as an instructor, right,
you're as an instructor at the Naval Academy
or at the basic school or at the company command course
in the Army, what you're telling these guys,
hey, you're the leader, you're the leader.
Like leadership is important,
leadership is the most important thing on the battlefield.
We say that all the time at Essela on front.
We're programming everyone.
That leadership is the most important thing
and you're a leader and you just step up and lead.
So it's, it's, it's,
I guess not to be unexpected that someone actually decides they're going to act that way
without realizing that they're going overboard.
They're getting crazy.
Yeah, kind of like they're important, the most important thing on the battlefield.
For sure.
Nicely done, Echo Charles.
Exactly.
Leadership is the most important thing on the battlefield.
You aren't the most important thing.
Excellent work.
That might have topped your last, your last epic contribution.
Oh, right.
The football one, the wide receiver and the quarterback.
Yes, that was the other one.
So, cool.
There's been some times, some moments.
Yeah.
We are all appreciative of.
Right on.
All right.
So we talked about this on the last podcast.
We'll go into a little bit more detail here.
Leadership skills.
This is section two.
When to step up and lead.
There are times.
I'll jump a little bit into it.
There are times when a leadership vacuum occurs.
No one is taking charge of a situation.
Bad circumstances are unfolding, but no one is doing anything about it.
No one is leading.
That is a moment where someone needs to jump in and take charge.
You will see that people are waiting for it.
They are waiting for leadership.
And when you step up with a simple plan and give clear direction,
they will accept that direction and execute.
So that's what you said earlier, Dave.
On the last podcast, you were talking about that.
Like when there's a leadership vacuum, there's a void, and you step in and make a call,
like people will be ready to execute, which is absolutely true.
Going back to the book, but it isn't always that simple.
If you are the only one who has recognized the threat of inaction, if you are the only
one who recognizes the leadership void, then other people on the team might be.
not be waiting for someone to start leading.
They might think everything is okay.
So if you jump up and start barking orders,
they might be taken aback by it.
They might be offended or feel you're stepping on their toes.
So that's a very interesting dynamic.
And when I was writing this part of the book,
and I forget what triggered me,
I think it was probably a question from the podcast,
to really start thinking about all these situations that I've been in
where being detached,
having, you know, stepping back
and watching these things unfold
and then seeing even detached from myself
where I'm watching when I'm going to step in
and then watching when I was running training,
watching platoon commanders, you know,
jump in there and start to take control
when the moment wasn't, they were close,
but the moment wasn't ready for it.
And this is a matter, this could be a matter of seconds.
It could be a matter of seconds.
When the platoon chief and the LPO and the machine gunners
all think they know what's going on,
and then all of a sudden you jump in and say,
Hey, we need to fall back.
The first response you're going to get is, hell no.
And now what we have is confusion and breakdown.
If you give them one, you know, you give it another two seconds where all of a sudden that, that building, people see that that building you're moving towards is occupied.
People go, oh, and they stop and get down.
And now you go, fall back.
Everyone was waiting for that command.
And they execute it.
Continuing on, that's why you might want to hesitate a moment when you see that leadership vacuum
appear. That is a tactic I used as a leader throughout my career. Of course, if there was an immediate
threat that needed to be addressed instantaneously and no one was doing anything, I would step
up immediately and make a call. I would fill the leadership void. However, if there was a problem
unfolding a little more slowly, I wouldn't rush to take charge. I would let the problem develop
a little bit. I would look around detach mentally and truly observe the situation. I would
confirm that what I was seeing was correct, I would allow an opportunity for someone else to
step up and fill the leadership vacuum.
And if someone else did, then I would initially assess their plan and the directions they
were giving.
If they were giving good guidance, I would support them.
If they gave bad guidance, I would continue to consider what a better plan was so I could
give corrections when the time was right.
You said something earlier that actually was true for the entire first part, and it's per me,
It's all throughout this is that leadership almost always is a subtle.
It's a subtle thing, not this loud, overbearing thing.
And one of the things we get asked about a lot when we're talking about dichotomies
is this phrase default aggressive.
So it's the first mindset we talk about being aggressive with solving problems.
But people take that with, I'm being aggressive, so I am doing the right thing.
No matter what it is, if I'm being aggressive, and that's what we have to do.
and the idea of waiting, you know, a couple seconds, whatever the, the idea of waiting to be effective,
the most common pushback was there was a vacuum, there was a void, there was somebody needed to step up and lead.
And the hardest feedback to give people is actually that's not what was happening.
That's what you thought was happening.
But what they were over there doing is they were assessing or they were considering, you even talked about a little bit between those two platoon commanders where you made a call,
people right on that first platoon, and it was the right call.
You kind of did almost the same thing.
Well, in that situation, the vacuum actually wasn't there to be filled.
And this idea of leadership being subtle, it's not as satisfying as people want it to be.
And they want this thing where it's loud and spotlights on you and you jump in.
You mean where your ego gets completely gratified by being the man?
And you want to look around and you're welcome.
The subtlety of that in all the examples.
examples you go through, it's everywhere in leadership is the subtlety of it.
And that really comes from, part of it comes from experience, but it's also recognizing
what are other people going through before you make a decision.
This reminds me of something we talked about early on this podcast, this podcast, was,
you know, I was saying, listen, if you're doing it right, you're winning a battle,
and the other person doesn't even know that there was a battle going on, right?
You won it, and then you have to control your ego enough that you don't,
Don't say, look, I just won, you didn't even know it.
Because then you just threw it out the window.
Same thing here.
If you're really doing leadership well, the team barely even knows that you're leading them.
They can barely even feel it like they, and it's like this unseen force is there.
They kind of know, but they almost feel it's their own force.
And they're making things happen that they think are their own things.
And all you're doing is you're being so subtle that they barely even know that they're being led.
and that is optimal.
Now, you do have to be careful
because people have to,
people have to,
you can't do that so much
that they don't recognize you as the leader
because now there's going to be times
when they look,
turn to someone and they don't turn to you, right?
Which can be a problem.
So we have to be a little bit careful,
but that is so rare
that you could actually pull that off.
And the reason it's rare to pull that off
is because teams and organizations
and people trying to get things done
require leadership.
Yeah.
They require times.
when the leader's known.
And so those times are enough, few and far between.
If it's seven, like we talked about it on the last podcast,
if it's seven times in every three years,
is there anyone that's walking around like,
well, you know what, I doubt Jocco's,
he doesn't even seem like he knows what's going on anymore.
Like there's no one walking around saying that.
But the leadership is subtle.
It's like, hmm, we seem to be, man, we're doing good.
What's going on here?
This is working out nice.
Wow, this is cool.
No one's going like,
well, I'm ready to just, I'm doing all this myself.
Yeah.
And that's the way you want it to be.
You want to win without them knowing you're fighting,
and you want to lead without them barely even know,
knowing that you're leading.
And the biggest, hardest part of that to do in both those cases
is put your ego in check enough that you can win without gloating
and that you can lead without credit.
That's what you want.
I'm going to continue on here.
When someone else wouldn't step up quickly,
it was usually because no one else had noticed
that there was a leadership vacuum.
They wouldn't notice because they were not detached.
Their minds were absorbed in the situation.
Since I practiced being detached,
I wasn't lost in the details of what was going on.
I was mentally in a different place,
looking at the scenario unfold from a virtual distance,
which allowed me to see problems more quickly.
That still doesn't mean I would jump right in.
By letting a little more time passed, by letting that leadership void linger just a little bit longer,
everyone else would begin to notice it.
They would recognize there was a problem.
Since that time passed and now everyone else knew there was a problem,
when I gave orders on how to solve it, people would listen and they would execute.
Another reason to pause before jumping into a leadership vacuum as soon as you see it is to make sure that no one else is jumping in there.
If two people step in to fill a leadership void at the same time,
they usually bump into each other when they get there.
And then while the problem's growing,
they have to take precious time to sort out
which person is actually going to lead
and which one is going to stand down.
And if egos clash at that moment,
we're going to have an even bigger problem.
I would rather avoid that.
If someone else is going to step in with a plan,
it's fine with me.
When I see the void, I pause,
look around, assess if anyone else
is going to step up and lead.
While I do this, the problem grows.
Pretty much very soon,
everyone notices the problem.
I see that and then step up and make a call,
a call that everyone know needs to be made.
Now, this is a real obvious answer,
but it's not so obvious when you're in the heat of the moment.
Something's going on,
and I make a call and Echo makes a call at the same time.
What do I do?
Let me immediately defer.
All right, hey, cool, I got you.
I mean, I assess your plan in a half a second and go, good enough.
All right, cool, I got you.
You're right.
go yeah you gotta be like pretty aggressive with that letting them lead because you know like you know
like you're going to the supermarket right and then you're walking in and you're about to hit the entrance
door boom and someone else is coming with you know they're hating the entrance door at the exact same
time see what's part of your team or unknown unknown or whatever no no unknown yeah i guess unknown
but whatever yeah unknown this is where it would happen the most with a stranger then you're like oh you're
a polite guy right let them go but they're just as polite as you
So they're like, no, no, no, no, you go.
And then you guys both decide, okay, let's not play this game.
I'll go.
But you both decided at the same time.
So you guys both go, now you're step one again.
You see what I'm saying?
So what I would do, I'm not saying under.
You have one good comment today.
Maybe you're rich.
No, no, no, no, no.
But I understand.
It kind of seems like the same thing.
Different level.
That is the same thing.
It is the same thing where both people are going,
I'm going to make a call.
And that is why, yes, you're right.
That's why even when I did this four second role play, I was like, you're right, you got it.
Go all that.
Like I'm going to make it that clear.
Yeah, yeah.
I feel that way too.
Like if someone's like, like, nope, you go.
Like straight up, nope, you go.
If they have like this weird aggressive sort of way, I will be way more compelled to go.
Is you what I'm saying?
Or if it's like a lot of times if it's like with a friend who you're just not quite as close with them.
so there's kind of you're still trying to be polite.
I'll just push them in.
We might want to do a podcast on that.
Like just that, right?
Just supermarket entries.
Maybe.
I got one more little section on this.
There's also an inverse to the leadership vacuum
and that this is one you see a lot as well,
which is too many people try and lead.
Everyone wants to offer their opinion,
give advice and weigh in a decision.
This can.
inhibit the decision-making process and the leader's ability to lead.
And then I go on to talk about dispersion and the way that breaks out tactically,
and how you solve that problem,
what you do when you've got a bunch of people that are all trying to lead at the same time.
Next section.
This is one where I was like,
yeah, do I really need to put this section in here?
Does it really need to be done?
And then I went like and worked with a client.
I'm like, yeah, I'm going to put it in there.
It's called Don't Take Things Personally.
This may seem obvious.
But I see it all the time where people take things personally.
Don't take anything personally.
It's hard to do this.
You have to fight your ego to avoid taking things personally.
Even when people ask for critique points, they often get mad when they actually hear them.
Don't allow yourself to do that.
Don't take criticism personally.
Not about the plan you came up with.
Not about the idea you had.
Not about the presentation you gave.
Not about the decision you made.
Even when your biggest rival, the last person you want to hear from has something to
say listen even when someone you don't think is on your level someone who isn't even close to
having the knowledge position or authority to give you one iota of feedback wants to speak even then
do yourself a favor and just listen detach and listen to what they have to say and from an objective
mindset see if you can learn anything at all from their commentary then apply it and say thank you
I know that stings
and get over yourself
this takes humility
but it'll make you better
dude that last one is huge
because
what is universal
in every company
and every team
I've ever been a part of
even in the military
is experience has a ton of value
so if you and I are both
kind of equal experience
a little pretty senior guys
third to four squadron
third to four platoon
and a brand new guy says something
I'm going to think to myself
you know who's this new guy
and you're going to feed on that
and we're going to feed each other
like yeah this guy
And I'm going to get almost all the reinforcement I'm going to get from the organization is to not listen to him.
The organization is going to reinforce that ego because all those that have experience.
Because all of our egos have been collectively offended.
Yes.
That's exactly right.
Who does this guy think he is?
So it isn't just you thinking, man, you know what?
I got to listen to this guy.
It's that nobody else is going to think you should.
And so if you don't, you're almost going to be rewarded for squash.
that new guy. And so that check of your ego, that part where it stings, it's going to sting even
more, the more experience you get because the people around you are going to expect you to crush
that guy because that's how most organizations are. If you can detach in that situation, now you're
on a path where not only will that junior guy appreciate it, the rest of the people in the organization
are going to go, wow, I'm pretty impressed. Jock was able to listen to that guy. Okay, maybe I need to
reassess a little bit how I view you know that that situation because not almost always that we
feed on each other and push that even more and once again it's the it's the subconscious or
conscious you know when I say hey you know that's a good point you know new guy hey that's a good
point you know maybe we should try that everyone else in the room listens and goes to hey like he's so
confident that he can listen to a new guy and I'm over here all offended and all hurt you know freaked out
because that person said something,
like that's just so money.
Yeah.
You want to talk about being supremely confident
that you listen to anybody?
Give them the proper respect that they deserve.
That's a good point.
Hey, can you expand on that a little bit?
I mean, and to the other thing that you said,
which is no insignificant matter,
what that new guy thinks of you is like.
instead of shutting them down.
You've got a
supporter. You've got a
supporter. You've got someone you can count on.
Next section.
This, who knows,
who knows
who knows why this hasn't
been discussed in the world
at a deep
and profound level?
Because it's such a
an important thing to know and understand.
This little section is called Don't Dig In.
General George S. Patton famously told his troops not to dig in.
He wanted them to advance, advance, advance.
You can't advance if you're dug in.
Patton's idea of not digging in actually translates incredibly well from a leadership perspective,
and it is one that I always kept in the back of my mind.
When you have an idea, thought, or opinion, don't dig in.
And what that means is don't over commit to your ideas.
Keep an open mind and leave yourself an out.
When I was in a leadership position in the SEAL teams,
there were always a lot of different ideas floating around,
how to execute a mission, what plan to use,
which tactics were best.
And like many organizations, no one could ever seem to agree on anything.
But it was always safe to assume that when different people had different ideas,
the idea that people liked the best was almost always their own.
Maybe it's ego, maybe it's pride,
or maybe it's just that people can see their own perspective better than anyone else's.
This is not unique to the SEAL teams.
People in different organizations everywhere all do the same thing.
They tend to think their idea is the best,
and they get hung up arguing about it.
And arguing is generally bad.
It means wasting time without moving forward and what's worse.
People often argue not for the best idea, but for their idea.
And what really makes for a horrible situation
is when people not only think their idea is the best,
but they dig in to protect it.
They aren't going to give any ground.
They cannot concede a single inch
in admitting theirs is not the best idea of all time.
The more they come under attack, the deeper they dig in.
They will not change their minds.
To translate this back to tactical terms,
when people dig in to defend their ideas,
Not only can they not advance them, they also cannot maneuver and change their thoughts.
They're dug in and they can't move.
And I used to see this all the time with some seal leaders inside of a seal platoon.
They would come up with their ideas or plan and then dig in and defend it with zero compromise.
It was awful to see hours of fruitless arguments, which were not ever driving toward the best solution, but driving toward the leader's own solution.
leaders often painted themselves into a corner so that they eventually would be left with no choice
except to order their subordinates to follow their plan.
So, and I go into some more details about this, but, you know, here's how I kind of reflect my tactics around this.
I always avoided this.
I would seldom dig in and get overcommitted to my idea, my plan, or my opinion.
When someone had an opposing point of view, I didn't look for ways to prove my idea was better.
Instead, I looked to see which idea was actually better.
If my idea wasn't good, I conceded and accepted theirs.
If the ideas were relatively equal, I would defer to theirs, so they had ownership.
If my idea was far superior, then the differences were usually obvious enough to convince the person with the opposing view that they were wrong.
and I would never have to admit that I was wrong
because I never claimed that I was right.
That's such a little tricky move.
Yeah, that's almost that tricky movie just talked about.
That question comes up.
We were talking about the last Q&A is,
hey, how often do you think I'm wrong?
And people are like, oh, you're wrong all the time.
You're like, actually, I'm...
This was at the muster.
Yeah, at the muster.
And I asked everyone, I forget what spurred the question.
I said, how often do you all, how often do you guys think I'm wrong?
Yeah, exactly.
But it is.
And so what was, well, the media inclination was like, like, I'm always right because I have,
I have so much experience.
I have, the reason it's, I'm almost never wrong is that I never make the claim in the
beginning to put myself in the position.
And the reason why I think that, that conclusion is so important is when as a leader,
do you think it's beneficial for you to be in a place where you can't,
maneuver. Under what situation would it be good for and if you can't maneuver what does that
mean for your team? You are the leader. And so it's not just about you and your inability to
maneuver to turn to move to whatever is required is what essentially seals your fate and for the
people and the best way to be able to maneuver is is like, well, you say never dig in. But
when people are having those conversations, you want those conversations. If you're the leader,
you should be one of the last people communicating
about what you think we should do
because more than likely,
the minute you talk, nobody else is going to talk
because you're in charge.
People don't want to talk over the leader.
But if you're listening,
not waiting to talk, but actually listening
and you actually have the team
that you think you have, the right answer
will come out long before you have to say anything.
And you never have to be...
99 out of 100.
Totally.
Or 293 times out of 7.
I mean, and it's the inability to maneuver.
If you think about,
this is tactics,
but you were thinking strategically all the time,
all the time,
if I go down the road of what I think we should do,
what will this do to my ability to maneuver down the road?
And almost always,
if the harder you dig in,
the harder will be to move.
And,
you know,
and I cover it in the book,
I'm not going to cover it right now,
but I do talk about when do you dig in?
When are you not going to change?
And there are situations like that, and you've got to be cognizant of that.
But the part that most people screw up is they dig in on the dumbest things, the worst ideas, or even decent ideas, but they don't want to maneuver.
And they just end up in horrible situations because of it.
I do a section on iterative decision making, which is really important for people to understand.
It makes that idea of iterative decision making it that is in this book makes decision making an entirely new
An entirely new process for people yeah to to understand how to iteratively make decisions is is is a tool that people can use and it's not the right tool all the time, but it's a tool a large percentage of the time and if you understand
how to do it, it changes the process and improves the results of your decision making.
Yeah.
And the more you grow as a leader, the more strategic your viewpoint and thinking needs to be,
the more iterative decision making is important.
Yes, there are times that a very small tactical thing.
I don't want to iterate on that.
I'm going to kick in that door and I'm going to go.
Absolutely.
The more you grow, the more strategic you need to think, the more iterative it has to be.
And so, yes, I will never put my hand to.
I don't say always, I won't say that.
But the more you grow, the more experience, the more it shifts towards almost always in that direction, that iterative decision making is right almost all the time.
Not always.
The more you do it, the more that's the way you need to do it.
Helped me so much.
And this is what's interesting about it, right?
So iterative decision making in a nutshell is like we're going to make small decisions based on what we suspect.
and some people consider that to be indecisive, right?
Here's what's funny.
My reputation in the SEAL teams and now is of being extremely decisive.
Like people just think, oh, yeah, he's going to make the call.
And what's funny is I am.
And the reason I got that reputation is because when there was a decision to be made on the battlefield or during training,
I was going to make a decision
and it was going to come and it was going to be there
and everyone was going to know it really quick
when it needed to happen.
But it would be the small decision
that was leading in the direction that I thought
overarching was correct.
But man, it's it's a, it's almost like a trick, you know?
It's a tactic.
That's what it is.
But it's a really nice little tactic
about what we're going to do, how we're going to move forward.
See, that's another one.
This is again, there's a bunch of parts of this book where people go,
people are saying, I didn't really expect that, right?
I didn't expect Jocko to tell me to make small decisions.
Big, bold action, make a decision.
Hey, I'm telling you, make a decision.
Make the smallest decision you can.
That's moving in the direction you think.
And then you can make changes.
You can iterate on that.
It's funny that people don't understand this.
Yeah.
The feedback you're looking for to know if you made the right decision,
is down the road of the decision.
And so you actually need to move in that direction.
But you don't need to move that far
to start getting feedback.
And that's the feedback you need
and see if you're right.
Yeah, that whole section is, it's good to go.
Here's another little section that people will.
This will flank some people.
It's called conform to influence.
Here we go to the book.
As a new guy, I was extremely motivated.
I wanted to train as hard as possible to prepare for war.
But this was 1992.
And there was no war happening.
The first Gulf War ended six months earlier and lasted only 72 hours.
The Vietnam War were seals had earned their fierce reputation that made me want to be a seal had ended 20 years earlier.
This was full-on peacetime Navy, but I was young and figured my war was coming.
So I wanted to be ready for it.
So I did things a little bit differently from most of the other people at SEAL Team 1.
I got to work early.
I did our team conditioning runs with heavy boots on instead of running shoes.
I wore a rucksack with a 40-pound sandbag in it when we ran the obstacle course.
I did night ocean swims alone with my web gear on.
I tried to do everything just a little bit harder than what was normally required.
I thought I was doing the right thing.
After all, I was preparing for war.
Unfortunately, my attitude was not appreciated by some of the older guys in my platoon.
Sure.
The other guys knew me.
Sure.
Some of the other new guys who knew me understood my attitude because they went through buds with me.
They knew I was just fired up.
But for some of the older guys, but some of the older guys thought I was going overboard.
For them, after having been in the SEAL teams for 6, 8, 10, or even a dozen years,
they knew that sustained performance as a SEAL wasn't a sprint.
It was a marathon.
They knew that additional wear and tear on the knees, shoulders, ankles, and back had to be monitored and mitigated.
They knew we were about to start an extensive and arduous work above.
long patrols, parachuting, fastroping, diving, and all kinds of other evolutions that would put
intense physical demands on all of us. Those demands would be even harder on guys who had already
done multiple deployments and workups. But for us, new guys coming straight out of buds, we were healthy
and ready to charge, and in my mind, I was personally trying to take it to the next level.
It didn't take long before I started to hear grumbling from some of those more experienced guys.
Little comments started to let me know they weren't seeing things quite.
the same way I was here comes Rambo or look at this tough guy at first it sounded
like they were joking but the tone got stronger and before long I realized they
did not like what I was doing now it would have been very easy for me to assess the
situation and cast the blame on them I could have said to myself what is wrong
with them I'm the one who's working extra hard they are being weak I'm hard
Much more hardcore than they are.
I am preparing for war.
These guys should be working hard to be ready for combat like I am.
In fact, can I even rely on these guys?
As a young seal, still teeming with confidence
after completing the world's hardest military training,
I could easily rationalize my own behavior
and at the same time denigrate the other members of my platoon,
especially because in my platoon,
some of the older guys weren't in the best physical condition.
Of course they don't want to do extra physical activity.
They are weak.
I am strong.
They must be intimidated by me.
Their egos are too big to handle a new guy like me coming in and getting after it.
But then I thought about it from their perspective.
Who am I?
I am a new guy.
I've never been on deployment before.
I had never been through a workup before.
Who was I to judge them?
What did I know?
Then I thought about it from a team perspective.
We are a platoon.
We are supposed to be a team.
team to work together and here I was alienating myself from the team. There was a rift forming between
some of the older guys in the platoon and me. That was wrong. It was disrupting the unity of the
platoon which negatively impacted our operational readiness. So you know what I did? I backed off.
I did the extra work on my own time but when I was with the platoon I tried to
act like the rest of the guys. To put it bluntly, I conformed. That is something no one wants to hear,
that I simply conformed with the pack. People think, jaco is hardcore. He would never give
into the weakness of the pack. But that would be wrong. If I were to hold my ground on this,
if I were to never give in, it would just mean that I thought my personal feelings were more
important than the team. It would mean that I let my ego, it would mean that my ego couldn't
bear to step down and subordinate itself and conform to what the team was doing. It would announce
to the world that I believed I was more important as an individual than the team. All of that
is obviously the wrong attitude to have. Let there be no doubt. The most important thing in a team
is the team.
Now some people might think this is weak, but it isn't.
The whole reason the team exists is to accomplish the mission.
The more unified the team is, the more capable it is of accomplishing the mission.
If I am causing a rift in the team, I am hurting our mission capability.
Yeah.
And it goes beyond that, right?
It goes beyond just saying, okay, I'm going to conform.
Because what am I trying to do with conform?
It goes on here.
If I have no relationship, I have no influence.
If I have no influence, I can't get them to do anything.
I learned an important lesson.
This is skipping ahead when I go through the kind of details of how it unfolded from there.
I learned an important lesson.
I can't change the group if I am not in the group.
But if I'm in the group, I can move it.
Maybe not as much or as quickly as I want to, but at least I can move it in the right direction.
So that's what this is.
That's why the section is called.
called conform to influence.
Because when you're not part of the team,
you have no influence.
If you're an outsider, that's great.
You held the line for yourself, awesome.
Awesome, great.
Yeah.
Guess what?
The female that asked this question down in Australia.
Really good question at the Mustar in Australia.
You know, she said, hey, I'm trying to get other people on my team to, you know, take care
of themselves with physical fitness.
Yeah, I remember that.
And, you know, no matter what I tell them,
they're not doing it.
And here I am.
I work out every day.
I eat clean foods all day.
I work out after work.
They see me heading to work out.
They see me coming in after I got done working out.
They see the foods that I'm eating.
And they just don't care.
And I kind of had to tell this story,
which is, well, how much influence are you having over these people
to improve their health when they don't like you?
I don't think I said don't like you,
but when you don't have a relationship,
when you're not part of their team.
Yeah.
The way you described that in the book, and we've talked about it a whole bunch, it's actually
kind of intuitive for relatively new guys.
So you're brand new to the Patoon.
You're brand new to the squadron.
When I had my very first squadron, this wasn't that hard of a concept for me.
It was like, all right, hey, I'm the new guy.
I'm going to keep my mouth shut.
And I'm actually, I'm going to conform.
And I'm going to give whatever task.
And when I got to my first squadron, I got the most menial task that you could get.
It was called the coffee mess officer.
So my job was literally to buy coffee, sell T-shirts.
And, you know, it kind of goes cyclical.
It just happened to be my turn.
It is the most menial thing.
And you know what?
I crushed that job.
I just dove in head first.
I just look for any way to get people to think,
Dave's on board the team.
This is equally true in any position.
And when I came back to that same squadron,
eight years later,
post two combat deployments,
post-top gun, post-facture with you guys,
I came back to the same squadron as the X-O.
I was undeniably the most tactically capable, the most well-known.
I had all the attributes you might want.
And when I showed up, I didn't start telling everybody how things are going to.
You being in charge doesn't mean you're on the team.
As a matter of fact, if you're that bad as a leader, you'll get a mutiny.
And so the same idea of conforming is true, whether you're the junior guy or the senior guy.
If there are traditions, if there's things, if there's components of the team that you aren't,
aren't aware of, even if you were the most senior person,
that conforming, that showing everybody you're willing to get on board with that
gives you a mass amount of credibility.
But you don't get to cash that in the more senior you were and go,
well, I'm a senior guy.
We're doing it this way.
It's the same rule applies for the first day in your squadron or the most senior
to include being a squadron commander.
You don't want to walk in to everybody,
we're doing things differently now just because you're in charge.
Because they may nod and go, Roger that boss.
But they're going back and they're not doing anything you're asking them to do.
This idea of being tactically smart about conforming, that never goes away.
Actually, I think we talked about this on the grounded podcast when you were on.
When you got to echelon front, after a few months, you're like, oh, it seems like jujitsu is something that we're doing here.
And you were like, I had no interest in it.
I didn't really understand what it was, but like that seemed like that's what we were doing.
So you said to yourself, okay, well, I guess I'll start doing some of the stuff and figure out what it's about.
So I know what's going on.
I mean, that's a classic example.
You're a, how old were you?
45-year-old retired lieutenant colonel for the United States Marine Corps.
And these knuckleheads are over here doing some random sport that you've never heard of.
Okay, well, let's see what it's about.
Yeah, I'm in.
That's, that's legit.
Hey, so when you were being all, like, fired up and stuff at that, at that time, was there, be honest,
was there a part of your brain that was, like, that you recognize, like, I'm for real, like, actively,
showing off right now like you know like demonstrating like how I'm like you know my my
initial response to that is to say yes so I can show humility and be like yeah I knew but
honestly I really wanted to be a good seal and as far as I could tell there were a couple
people that were around that were super hardcore and I was like hey I want to be super
hardcore too so I didn't really think like I was honestly I was trying to be
hardcore I was trying to be like ready for war that's that's really what my thoughts
were I wasn't I'm trying to think there was other I mean there's a million other things
that I've done that were stupid that I was like hey look at me that really wasn't one of
them that really wasn't one of them and you know what it doesn't matter
because guess how it came across.
It came across like that's what I was doing.
So whether, so that perception is reality.
That was the perception.
The perception was I was showing off, hey, look at me.
And that pissed guys off.
That pissed guys off.
Yeah, it kind of feels like that too.
Like in sports, kind of the same deal where you get a new person who has not proven
themselves at all.
And then they want to go the extra mile, but in this real overt way,
in this like real, like spectacular way.
you know, like in your case, you're like running with these boots.
You're the only one running with your boots on.
Everyone else is doing.
And, you know, so they do it in this real attention getting way.
And it's real obviously like, like, yeah, this person is trying to like show off how hard of a work are there or show off this or that to get kind of recognition or attention or even respect or whatever.
But meanwhile, the people who have proven themselves, whether guys who've been there or been, you know, overseas or been in combat or whatever, they're kind of like, brother that's not landing with us at all.
Yeah.
And I think it's important to say that as I thought through answering your question, you know, again, I want to come off as like being all humble.
And so I'm like, yeah, you know, I want to.
But I honestly wasn't.
I honestly wasn't.
And what's even more important about this is that the fact that my intentions did not matter.
They didn't matter.
Right.
They didn't matter if I was to tell everyone, hey, guys, I just want to be ready for war.
It didn't matter if I was to say that what people perceived was.
Oh, you're out here running with a rucksack on thinking, you know, you think you're cool.
Even though I was thinking, hey, aren't we going to carry weight when we go into combat?
That's what I was thinking.
Hey, I'm not going to go into combat wearing running shoes.
I'm going to go wearing jungle boots.
So I'm wearing my jungle boots.
That was what I was thinking.
Doesn't matter.
Doesn't matter the best intentions.
And then if you take that in a really mature way, which I lacked, but I was, I, this is, again, these are like,
These are like maneuvers that I barely made, you know?
Like when the Terminator responses popped up in my eyes,
when guys started, you know, getting a little bit more straightforward with me.
Like who do you think you are?
Like that kind of thing is, you know, well, I think I'm a seal.
You know what I mean?
Like those kind of things.
Yeah.
And actually now that I say that, you know what?
At this point I didn't even have my Trident.
I didn't have my seal trident.
So I wasn't a seal.
So that's even, that might have been when Dave talks about like, hey, it's pretty straightforward.
You best conform.
I was definitely feeling some of that.
So it wasn't just me being hyper mature and super detached and able to.
Part of it was like, hey, man, I don't want to piss these guys off.
These guys are the guys that give me my trident or not.
Yeah.
But I definitely felt that this was a platoon.
I wanted to be part of the platoon.
And if you're not part of the platoon, you're hurting the team.
You're truly hurting the team.
They need you.
And you need the most powerful thing in a platoon is the glue that holds you all together.
It's the friendship.
It's the trust.
It's the relationships that you have.
That's what makes a platoon awesome.
When one person is outside that bond, that's a detriment to the team.
And I felt that.
And I didn't want to do that.
So it's like, okay, I got to conform.
I got to get on board with what the guys are doing.
As Dave said, it was real obvious for Dave when he checked into a squadron.
Like, hey, I'm, okay, I'm doing my thing here.
I'm doing what people are doing.
You know, when in Rome, do as the Romans.
There is that.
And you know what?
Here, going back to the book,
does this mean you follow mind and conform
no matter what to be the part of the team?
No, absolutely not.
You should maintain your individuality
and unique personality and perspective.
Just make sure your personality doesn't interfere
with your ability to build relationships within the group.
But what if the group is bad?
As I've said before,
and I covered this in another section,
And if the group is doing things that are immoral, illegal, or unethical, you have to stand up.
You have to be smart about, but you have to be smart about how you make your stand,
but participation or passive approval of such behavior makes you culpable.
And then I say I cover this section in another part, a different page.
And then I go into like, hey, what if they're not doing anything illegal, unethical,
but it's going to be pretty bad for the mission?
Well, then what do you do?
Well, once again, is it better for me to have an antagonistic relationship with everyone on the team?
Or is it better for me to have good relationships where I can say, hey, can we talk about what we're doing?
Because right now I'm feeling like we might not be able to accomplish our mission or we're going to.
There's the difference.
Yeah.
I mean, we've all been a part of a team where there's people on the team that aren't part of the team.
And guess who's listening to them, right?
No one's listening to them.
Their opinion means nothing.
And so what you have to do is you have to conform in order to influence.
So when you, uh, when you were being all fired, you know, Rambo or whatever, was there any like superiors, like a boss figure that was like, yeah, good job.
Like kind of, maybe not even like as a direct result of it, but that, that you were trying to kind of impress where I was not trying to impress everyone.
But it's interesting you're asking these questions.
But I did get a vibe from some people that weren't in my platoon that was kind of like
Kind of like yeah and most of those guys were way older
Yeah like way older like they weren't come competing with me right? They weren't in a platoon
They were above they were beyond platoons and so for them it was like oh young blood like I'll tell you what when I go to the teams now
And I see some young blood that are towing the line that gets me so happy right I love it I'll talk
to those guys all night long I'll hang out with them because I like they're not I'm
not competing with them right I'm totally gone I'm literally retired whereas maybe you're
you know if I was a little bit more in the zone with them I might be like who's this guy
think he is right you might have that attitude so there was some people that were way
above me in the chain of command that I could sense you know they were kind of given the
little nod a little nod to a new guy means a lot coming from someone dude from
nom right but didn't really matter inside the platoon I was
the wrong thing right and so in a way it makes it worse so and I'm trying to think about
my scenario my past scenarios so you know like you get a new guy at work and he's
working like extra hard doing the right thing in a way but he's in we get the feeling
whether it's true or not we get the impression strong impression by the way that he's
doing it to impress the boss right so now we hate him yep because not only do we not
want to work that hard you're trying to basically make us look bad to a for a specific
reasons for for two the specific people right so it makes it worth that dynamic makes it
worse yeah so now you're really not part of my team the first job I got work in
construction I showed up I got hired out of Wendy's and the guy I was he had a little
crew and he comes in and he looks at me and I'm the guy with the burgers on the grill
and I'm flipping burgers
and he looks at me and he goes
What do you do?
He's a what are you doing working here?
And I said paying rent
You know?
I was like 16 or 17
And
He says you want to work construction
I'm like oh my god
I'm so I can't even believe
How happy I was
And I go absolutely
And he goes
Because they were doing a project
Across the street
And he goes come by tomorrow morning
Six o'clock in the morning
This was like a customer or something
Yeah he was getting Wendy's
He was getting Wendy's for he had like a five
Man crew and the next day I show up there man I'm so happy man I turned in my Wendy's visor
Bro I was so happy show up and the first thing he tells me was there was a a bunch of concrete blocks had been dropped off
By a dump truck and they were whatever 50 meters away from where they were gonna need to be placed for the foundation of this
building we were building and so he leaves me and this other guy
Lewis and Lewis was a character man he had just gotten out of prison and he was he looked like he
looked like a young Robert De Niro he was Italian and and I mean he really looked like
Robert De Nore like he could have played he could he could have been Robert Deneer he
looked just like him and he just got out of prison and his he was related to the owner
and so it was you know hey can you give can you give Lewis a job yeah okay
So we get tasked.
So they leave me and Lewis there to move these blocks.
And bro, I am so happy to have this job.
I'm running.
I'm running with two blocks at a time, one in each hand.
I'm running back and forth and putting him in the position.
And, I mean, they gave us like three hours to get this done.
And I was done in 45 minutes.
And I'm not even kidding.
Like, I was getting after it.
But yeah, it took like 10 minutes for Lewis to, you know, tell me,
Hey partner.
And actually he talked like to know.
It wasn't a hey partner.
He wasn't like,
this is,
this is,
uh,
the northeast like a time.
He's like,
he's like,
hey,
you need to,
uh,
you need to slow it down,
my friend over there.
And I just,
I told him,
hey,
you don't need to do anything.
I got this.
I mean,
I was,
I was pumped.
And,
um,
but yeah,
same thing,
right?
And like,
like,
like,
but that one I didn't conform to influence.
I just worked so hard.
I said,
you just don't need to worry about me.
I'm happy.
I'm as happy as a person can get to be moving some blocks around and crawling underneath foundations and getting after it.
So, I know no one wants to hear that, right?
Man, conform to influence.
Section 3, jumping ahead here.
Maneuvers.
The whole section here on using leadership to teach and build.
And I talk about fixing when someone has a negative attitude.
How do you fix that?
How do you teach someone humility?
And what we're doing is we're using leadership.
We're using leadership to solve.
So someone has a negative problem.
How do we fix that?
Put them in charge.
We have someone that needs to get humbled that needs to learn some humility.
How do you do that?
Put them in charge.
That's what you do.
You put them in charge of something that they can't barely handle.
And what's interesting is sometimes you get feedback like, wouldn't it be better?
Like let's say Dave.
has big ego and wouldn't it be better just to have a straightforward kind of robust conversation
with Dave and say, listen Dave, I think your ego is a little out of control and I think you need
to humble yourself. Are there instances where that may work? There are. If Dave, in addition to having
a big ego, looks at me as a person that he can learn a lot from and he has a ton of respect for me
and that and we have a good relationship
and I can approach it in a way
that's indirect enough that it doesn't offend him
and I can sit him down
and sometimes you can be direct with someone
some of you have you got a great relationship with someone
if you and I have a great relationship
and I go hey man you'll let in your ego get the best of you
if I think you're trying to help me I'm going to listen to you
yep yep so there are times that that can work
here's the problem there are more times
where the reason that the person,
the reason that we have a problem
is because the person has a big ego in the first place.
That's the whole reason why we have the problem.
So when we just point blank tell them,
well, we're attacking their ego,
they're going to dig in, it's going to get even worse.
Okay, so there's one example.
What about when we got someone that lacks confidence?
And wouldn't it be good if we could just tell them,
hey, look, Dave, have more confidence.
Guess what?
The reason the person doesn't have confidence
because they don't have confidence,
just telling someone to have more confidence,
This is zero effect.
Okay, maybe it has 5% effect.
Maybe it has an 8% effect.
But when I say, hey, Dave, you know what?
You lack confidence.
So I want you to have more confidence.
That's not what we're talking about.
When instead I say, hey, Dave, you know what?
I've been watching you.
And I'm seeing what you're doing.
And it seems to me like you've got some potential here for real leadership.
And what I want to do is I want to assign a couple things to you here.
In fact, we got this project that we're working on.
And I want you to actually take charge of this.
And then Dave, who lacks confidence, says,
boss I'm not really ready for this I go hey look let me let me just show you what the
project consists of it's this and this it's pretty straightforward I know you've
actually already done this you just haven't been the person with the name on it
look at it look at the look at what the oh yeah yeah you see you can do this
cool this is a great place for you to start let's knock this thing out of the park
and all of a sudden Dave does it and his confidence goes up a little bit right
it's real it's real so the idea that we can just use work
Look, it's an it absolutely, hey, can I have a conversation with Dave and say hey Dave? You know what right now? You might not feel like you're ready, but you're ready. Can that boost his confidence? Yes, it can. I'm not saying that it can't. It can. Can I possibly say, hey Dave, your ego is out of control and you need to start being a little bit more humble and that can work. Yes, it can work. But for the reasons I just gave, there's there's the the more powerful tool is using leadership, using leadership to teach people. So,
Got a whole section in here on that building or rebuilding confidence.
And by the way, you don't necessarily need to be correcting a problem to use leadership as a, as an instruction tour.
You don't need that.
You don't need it at all.
You can actually use leadership to teach and build just for your team just to make them better.
Like you don't need to have a problem.
I don't need to go to Dave and think, oh, Dave's got a big ego or lacks confidence or bad attitude.
to say now I'm going to put them in charge.
No, no, I want to have an awesome team.
So what I'm going to do is put people in charge.
I'm going to use leadership to build an awesome team.
These are things that counterintuitive answer to a lot of people.
I mean, when somebody asked me, hey, I got a person with a bad attitude and I say put them in charge.
Someone says, hey, I got a person with a big eagle and I say put him in charge.
Someone says, hey, I've got a person that lacks confidence and I say put them in charge.
Counterintuitive every time, that's what, but it is absolutely the best tool.
Yeah.
to educate.
The difference is
the leader that actually
really cares
that truly cares
about his people
is not,
I'm not doing that,
I'm not going to put
Jacco in George
just so I can crush
his ego.
I'm still actually
doing it to try to help
him out.
That's the difference
there as opposed to
watch this,
and then I just
roll in on Jacco
with the big ego
because what I really want to do
is crush him
and assert my authority
of him.
The leader that actually
cares about his people
that really wants
the team to be successful
will look and then
go, okay,
this guy's got a problem.
It's a totally
understandable problem
that most people have.
I'm going to use this as a tool
to help him be successful.
I would like his ego
to be put in check as a result,
but I still,
what I really want is for him
to grow and develop
and I'm using the best way to do it.
The common denominator amongst
the guy that's just growing
and evolving and needs more responsibility
and the dude that is out of his head
and over, you know,
way huge ego that needs,
is that I still care about both of them.
And so as a leader,
if you're listening to this,
this isn't a punitive tool
to destroy your people
whose egos are out of control.
It's a tool to help crush the biggest hindrance this person have to being individually successful and contribute to your team.
But as a leader, you need to care about that person and really want him to be successful, knowing that the best tool to do that for him is, all right, bro, you got a big ego, hey, let's put you in charge of this.
You're doing a lot of subtle things at end runs.
But if your whole thing is, oh, Jocko told me to just pile on this guy until I break him, that's not what this is about.
And by the way, it doesn't start off.
Hey, you got a big eagle on it'll put you.
in charge of this. It starts off with, hey, Dave, man, you've been, you've been kind of dominating.
And, and you know what? I think, I think you can start stepping up. And I got some stuff here
that I think it's going to be easy pie for you. Here, here's the next project. And Dave grabs it
goes, I got this. Yeah. But as, you know, again, this is all explained in detail to the books
of how much, what, what level of project are you going to give? We want it to be enough that we're
not crushing them with that project. Yeah. Right. Totally. And just for me, it's eager to get wrapped around,
easy to get wrapped around the idea of fixing this person's problem. But what a good leader really does
is looks at all its people, even the ones that are doing all the things that frustrate you is,
hey, I really need to help. It's the same thing with my kids. I got my kids doing things that drive me
nuts that I want to crush, but I'm actually doing it because I want them to be successful over time,
not because I just want to prove the point of overwhelming them with responsibility to their breaking point.
You have to know that what you're actually trying to do is make this person get better.
And you use this word hindrance, which is it's so important to understand that the problem that you're trying to fix the ego is the hindrance to why the direct conversation isn't as effective as real world experience.
Same thing with someone that lacks confidence.
that the problem is the hindrance.
When I lack confidence,
me being told that my confidence,
that I should have more,
isn't enough to propel me past it.
Just like when someone tells me I need to be more humble,
that's not compelling enough for me to actually get humble
because I already think I'm awesome.
And when I lack confidence, I don't think I'm good enough.
So what we need is to actually reinforce
with compelling methods,
how to improve people in this paradigm of problems that they have.
Yeah.
And that's why the direct approach almost never works.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The amount of people, the amount of relationships that are so strong
that this sort of, hey, just going to hit you with the direct feedback is, you know, tiny percentage, tiny percentage of relationships.
Yeah.
And if your relationship actually is that strong, that problem that you're dealing with would never get to an out of control state anyway.
So if you're contemplating the direct approach, it's such a narrow, narrow, narrow times to use that.
Yeah.
Yeah, be subtle once again.
I'm going to jump to this section, leading peers.
Leading peers is one of the most challenging types of leadership.
When rank and position are equivalent, more tact is needed.
And an even better relationship must be built.
Once a relationship is built, you can use influence to lead the team in the right direction.
This is not a bad thing since influence is always the preferred method of leading.
I'll say that again.
Influence is always the preferred method of leading.
Influence is especially critical when leading peers.
Influence can be a challenge to develop with peers because when rank is equivalent,
egos often become more visible, right?
Rank, my superior ranked years has some level of trumping your ear.
of beating down your ego.
When there's no rank, when the ranks are equivalent, all of a sudden, egos becomes the rank
in many cases.
People are always either looking to prop themselves up to get an edge on others.
If you allow your ego to manifest itself when working with peers, you will draw out the
worst of your peers' ego as well.
Egos must be subdued.
Start with subduing your own.
If you fail to subdue your ego, you will develop an antagonistic relationship with
your peers.
That will result in a blue one.
Guambleu, the military problems for friendly fire, which means you will end up destroying your own team.
Don't allow that to happen.
Take the high ground and put your ego in check.
Yeah.
Hey, how do you do that?
Again, here's the tactics of it.
One of the best ways to subdue your own ego is, and start building a relationship with your peers is by supporting their ideas.
They might come up with a plan that's slightly different from yours.
But if it's functional and we'll get the job done, support it.
Let them take the lead.
Don't feel the need to stick your team.
chest out and flex your ideas. Instead, support your peers ideas. Even if you think your idea is
better, if your peers' ideas, close, go with it. Straightforward. And I do talk about the fact that
some people, you know, you might take offense to that. When I say, hey, Dave, why don't you lead this?
You might be thinking, well, you're trying to get me to do all the work. So you have to monitor that
as well. People, people, people are crazy. People are crazy. People are crazy. Well, it's connected to what
you were just talking about the Rambo scenario, too, is you use the word competition. Look, peers,
My assumption is that in the SEAL teams, it's exactly the same with just other things.
When everybody gets to a fighter squadron, everybody wants to go to Top Gun.
It's unspoken.
Nobody walks in and goes, I want to go to Top Gun or I want to go to the Weapon School.
I want to be a senior instructor.
But everybody knows that's what you're competing about.
And you might have nine guys all checked in.
And within the same time, they're all peers.
And don't pretend like there's not competition amongst your team, all vying to have whatever that opportunity is.
It's not Top Gun on the teams.
It's something else.
whatever is relevant.
So that competition is there.
And so that is another component of why leading your peers is so hard because there is a
competition piece of that too that the what got you there is the same thing that
gets you to want to be successful there as well.
I didn't get to my first squadron to say, well, my whole goal was just to be a pilot.
I'm here.
I'm done.
I'm just going to ride this wave to shore.
I got there.
I'm like, okay, what's the next level on this mountain that I'm climbing, which was that
next thing out of the nine guys in my squadron that were there?
nine guys wanted to go to Top Gun.
And so you're competing with them
over things that are hugely important
for them. So it makes that leading your peers thing
even harder.
When done incorrectly,
you can actually torpedo the entire squadron
when those nine guys are fighting against each other
so much so that it undermines the squadron.
And guess what? Nobody's going to Top Gun.
None of those guys are going anywhere to include you.
And that subtle art of leading your peers,
if you can get that down early in your career,
that carries you, that will carry you forever.
Because what you get on top of that is now you get more positional authority, more influence,
makes things a little bit easier if you've got some credibility because you're in charge.
But what you're leveraging is the skill you got at the beginning.
That's part of the reason why those lessons you talked about early in the book are so important
is that the foundation to be a good leader starts way earlier than you think.
You're on the clock the minute you show up to any team, even as a junior guy.
And the right frame of mind gets you to absorb more things early on so you can leverage that
moving down the road, that is hard to do for a young person,
especially when you're competing with the other eight-dos
that want the exact same thing that you want.
You're on the clock.
On the clock, man.
I go on here, skipping for a little bit.
If one of your peers' egos is out of control
and they begin to maneuver to make themselves look good
or even make you look bad, don't fall into the ego trap.
Don't attack them.
Simply continue to do great work and put the mission first.
They might get some initial positive attention
from their selfish actions,
But eventually they will be uncovered
Take the high ground or a high ground.
It'll take you.
That's like the guy that doesn't pass information
about what technique you're using
When you're flying your jet,
just going to keep that to yourself.
It's like, everyone's going to figure that out.
And those traps are so easy to fall into
Because you want to go hard as soon as you see that.
You've talked about truth bombs in the past
And people kind of throw those little subtle lies
Those little kind of indication.
You have to hold the high,
high ground and know that sooner or later that approach that they're taking, that's a losing
approach.
Yeah.
And that instant gratification does not come.
It's not going to happen that day.
It's going to frustrate the hell out of you.
But that, if you get pulled into that, you will lose.
You will lose as well.
You've got to stay on the high ground there.
Yeah.
So easy to get trapped by that.
So easy to just.
And it's like from from the boss's perspective, when you see the guy that's trying to torpedo
know the other people.
And it might take you a minute to realize it, right?
It might take you.
It might take the boss a little bit of time.
And don't be the rat either.
Right.
Oh, God, no.
Yeah, yeah.
You don't want to be the rat either.
But you keep, you focus on the mission.
You focus on doing the right thing.
That rat's going to, that rat's going to, his tail is going to get seen.
It's going to get caught in the trap.
Yeah.
You can't hide.
Yeah.
Got a section, micromanaging, indecisive or weak bosses.
And I talk about what we do.
How do we handle them?
When I talk about the weak boss, because I do a little section for each of those, but the weak boss, there are some bosses who are just plain lackluster.
My boss is weak.
It is horrible.
I've heard this complaint over and over again.
I never looked at a weak boss as horrible.
I always looked at a weak boss as an opportunity.
If my boss doesn't want to come up with a plan, guess what?
I will.
If my boss doesn't want to clarify the mission, guess what?
I will.
If my boss doesn't want to take ownership, guess what?
I will.
And if my boss doesn't want to lead, guess what?
I will.
So that's pretty straightforward.
You can probably imagine there's a butt coming, but...
Be cautious.
As with micromanaging bosses or indecisive bosses,
with a weak boss, you have to be careful when you step up to lead.
Even with the feeblest and weakest of bosses,
Sorry, even the feeblest and weakest of bosses have egos.
And if you offend them, they may lash out at you.
So don't be offensive or overly assertive when you start to make things happen.
Use soft language and frame things in ways that do not diminish the boss's ego but actually boost it.
Here's some examples.
Hey boss, I know you got a lot going on.
So I was thinking it might be helpful if I jumped on this project over here and move
it forward and move forward with it.
Would that be all right?
Or, hey boss, I'm sorry for being slow on the uptake, but I just want to make sure I
fully understand your vision.
Do I have it right when I say, there you go, put the vision in their mouth.
Hey boss, I'm just trying to step up my game.
Would you mind if I took a crack at planning this next project so I can get some experience?
So that's what you do.
You don't violate your relationship.
You don't treat a weak, this is a guarantee.
You know, like a dog, right?
And talking to Mike Rittland, when I was looking to get my dog,
he's given me advice and test to give my dog.
The dog that's like weak, that's the dog that snaps at you, right?
The dog that's scared, that's the dog that snaps at you
and bites your kid or bites someone.
The dog that's confident, the dog that's strong,
that one's comfortable.
Like, they're good.
and this is the same thing.
People think, oh, the boss is weak.
I can walk all over him.
Yeah, try that.
See how it works out.
That guy's going to bite you.
That boss is going to bite you.
So you need to use caution in that scenario.
Jumping forward here to the nearly indefensible leader.
The nearly, and this comes on a, you know, talking about a bunch of things about how, what you do,
how you defend your leader, how you, how you, how you, how you, how you, how you, how you, how you,
take your leader's ideas on board and move forward to them.
Like, we're talking about that, right?
We're supporting our leader.
We're talking about that.
So continuing on here, it's always good to support your leader.
If you undermine a leader, it not only hurts them, it also hurts the morale of the troops
as well as you as a subordinate leader.
You are setting an example.
If the example you set is one of disrespect up the chain of command, you can expect much
the same from the people you're leading.
So think about that.
You're setting the example.
If you're talking smack about your boss, they're going to talk smack about you.
And that's a little trap you can fall into too.
Because Dave and I are working for Echo and Echoes, whatever, got problems, weak, jacked up.
One really easy way for you, for me to bond with you, Dave, is be like, Echo sucks.
And you go, yeah, and we're bonding, but it's not good.
It's not good.
So continuing on when presenting a plan to your troops that you don't necessarily agree with,
you could say, well, I don't agree with this plan, but is what the boss is telling us to do,
so we have to do it anyway.
And everyone always gives an example like that.
Clearly, that is not a good approach.
They will see that you don't believe in the plan.
And if you don't believe in it, why should anyone on your team believe in it?
And if no one believes in it, then why on earth should the team actually execute it?
When a decision is made or a course of action comes down from the chain of command, you must execute it as if it were your own.
Sure, you can debate your boss behind closed doors about what course of action you think is best, but once the decision has been made, you get on board and execute.
to the best of your ability.
You tell the troops, the boss and I talk through this for quite a while.
And when you look at it from all different angles,
especially considering some of the bigger picture effects,
I actually think this is the best solution for how we execute.
So we're going to get it done.
Like, okay, you know, okay, that's cool.
And this stuff is just so nuanced.
And we already talked about somebody on the last podcast.
How do you explain when you're doing something that maybe doesn't make as much sense
as you want it to?
And by the way, the whole belief thing, like if I don't believe in what we're doing, real problem.
And I talk about that as well.
But here we go.
But there are times.
So I'm saying, hey, if the boss is doing like reasonable stuff, borderline reasonable, right?
Or the things that you were talking about, I think it was on the last podcast.
David's like, hey, the chances of me getting ordered to do something that is legitimately catastrophic are so,
small. So we're not talking about that. Most of the time we're talking about somebody like,
hey, I don't 100% agree with this, but we're going to work. We're going to build a relationship.
I'm going to build a relationship enough so that, you know, my boss is never going to tell me,
you're going to let me do whatever I want. That's where I'm going to get to. I promise I'm going
to get there with my boss. I promise that. That's what's going to happen. So we're not talking
about that. Now we start talking about a boss that is nearly indefensible. There are times when
the boss can be nearly indefensible.
Notice I'm saying nearly.
Perhaps she is egotistical or arrogant.
Maybe he is condescending to the troops.
Or maybe the boss makes bad decisions over and over again.
In these cases, blindly defending the boss will put you at odds with the team members.
They see and know the boss is horrible.
And if you blindly defend them, if you blindly defend the boss, your credibility takes a hit.
But that doesn't mean that openly belittal.
or disparaging the boss is a good option.
That behavior from you leads to complete disrespect from the team
and a failure of good order and discipline.
You have to balance defending the boss with connecting with the troops.
Here are some phrases that convey the right message,
that even if you don't have the highest regard for your boss,
you still value the importance of accomplishing the mission.
So that's the scenario.
You got your boss that is like, they're not good.
but you can't openly disparage them
because they're not doing any hanging offenses, right?
They're not doing anything
or ordering catastrophic missions.
So here's the type of language we're going to use to the troops.
Listen, the boss might not be perfect,
but he is driving us toward the same strategic goal
we want to accomplish.
So we're moving.
Another one, look, the boss might not be ideal,
but she still gives us the support we need.
And the better we perform, the more support we will get.
There you go.
Look, you're on that fine line.
Here's another one.
A, the boss has some quirks, but we know where he stands.
So we work with him to the best of our abilities,
which means dealing with those quirks so we can get the job done.
Another one.
Complaining about the boss doesn't get us anywhere,
and it doesn't make our jobs easier.
What we can do is try to form a good relationship with her
so we can influence her in the right direction.
So that's what you do.
And by the way, none of these are, none of these are lies.
These are like the truth.
These are what you should do.
These are what you are doing as a leader.
Dude, I was just thinking about that section earlier of telling the truth.
And there's a common thread in every type of boss.
Do a really good job and support it as best you can.
Good bosses, bad bosses, micromanager, laissez.
Faire, wants all the credit, is afraid of being, if you do that in almost every situation,
you're going to get towards the outcome that you want.
And if you actually have, if you have a hard time with your team, walking back from a meeting
where, okay, setting aside the one in a million catastrophic, just like stupid plan, nobody really
likes it.
They don't really want to do it.
They can't really get behind it.
What does it say about you as a leader to come out of that meeting?
Jocko and I go back and forth for hours.
At the end, this is the plan.
We're moving forward.
Hey, team, hey, listen up.
Here's what we're doing.
Okay, all the grumblings push back.
If I can't go,
guys, listen, I understand,
I understand some of those frustrations,
but listen, here's the deal.
We actually, we have a lot of influence here, a lot of control.
The best thing we can do is get through this
as quickly as it can as effectively can't
and move on to other things.
What does it say about you as a leader
when your people are like, no, we're not going to do it.
The plan is that stupid.
And the last thing you want to do is convey the,
yeah, we shouldn't do this.
This is really stupid.
He's an idiot.
Most of the, almost all the time, when I find myself, and I've, I've implemented really
dumb plans for my boss a million times.
And just about every time I told my guys what we're going to do, you know what they said?
Okay.
Roger that boss.
And you know what?
They just go do it.
The job gets done.
And you move along.
And that's kind of how it happens.
And so if your people are pushing back so hard against the bad boss, the problem probably isn't
your bad boss.
The problem really is with you.
And the solution to that.
is the exact same solution when I work for the best leaders
I've ever worked with in my career.
Do a really good job and support them as best I can
and just move on.
Very good advice.
I go into a section here that's called punishment.
Punishment must be dealt out at times,
but a good leader should need to use it seldomly.
If a leader gives good, clear guidance
about what needs to be done,
how it needs to be done, why it needs to be done,
and what the consequences are if it is not done correctly,
the troops should carry out what has been asked of them.
So I'll just continue.
If for some reason your troops don't execute the plan,
then of course you should first look in the mirror.
Do not assume the troops have simply decided to do what,
decided not to do what was required of them.
Instead, assume you did not give them appropriate direction,
and that is the reason for the transgression.
If you have confirmed that a rule was violated
or direction not followed even though it was understood,
some punishment must be meted out.
Again, this should be rare
because if a leader is doing his or her job correctly,
members of the team will understand what, how, and why they are doing,
what they are doing, and executed appropriately.
The need to punish someone on the team
is almost always a direct reflection
of the leader and the failure to lead appropriately.
This might seem extreme.
And in fact, it is.
It is extreme ownership.
If a team member is late,
perhaps the leader failed to explain the importance of being on time.
If the team member fails to complete their portion of a project,
perhaps the leader didn't give the support required.
If a team member drinks alcohol and gets into trouble with the police,
perhaps the leader failed to set clear parameters around drinking.
The list could go on indefinitely.
A leader is always responsible for the actions of his or her.
subordinates. So punishment, you know, and then I go, look, I get into it, I get into the fact that
sometimes punishments do need to take place, but man, the amount of times that I punished people,
like that I gave legitimate punishment to people that have worked for me is, it's a, it's less
than, I mean, it can count on one hand where this person like knowingly violated something and
It was just you need to pay.
You need to pay the man on that one.
But it should happen so rarely.
Got a section in here called When to Quit.
Again, no one wants to hear that.
No one wants to hear that.
One of the mantras in the SEAL teams has never quit.
That is one of the main refrains utilized during basic SEAL training.
And it makes a lot of sense during that training because that is how you make it through.
You don't quit.
No matter what training evolution comes along, no matter how hard it is, no matter how tired,
sore, frustrated, exhausted, or otherwise broken you are, you don't quit.
That is how you make it through seal training.
And that is how you eventually become a seal.
But when you get to the actual seal teams, that extreme attitude has to be adjusted.
It has to be modulated because if it isn't, it can lead to disaster.
The classic example of this is the young seal leader who has made it through the basic seal
training and shows up at the seal team.
He has heard the mantra, mantra, never quit.
and thousands of times.
He has yelled it to his friends
and whispered it to himself.
It has become ingrained in his head.
And I go through a scenario,
which is one of many where, guess what?
What you just, what you need to do
is actually quit.
You need to stop.
You need to stop what you're doing.
You're going to get your entire platoon killed.
You're going to destroy the situation that you're in.
And you need to be able
detach look around and figure out a different way of course no one wants to hear that but
if you are patrolling towards a target and they open up with multiple bunkered machine guns
with interlocking field of fire on your avenue of approach and you decide you're not going to quit
guess what everyone's going to die so i go through that and i go i go through how we measure that
When is the appropriate time?
Why it's the appropriate thing to do.
So I even talk about some of the classic examples, right?
Dunkirk.
Yeah, Dunkirk.
Guess what?
That was quitting.
General George Washington led the retreat of continental forces out of New York
and escape that was crucial for the ability of the revolutionary army
to continue to fight later engagements.
And win, by the way.
So what are we talking about?
Yeah, we're talking about.
Tactical and I explained this in the book strategic like we're not going to quit on our strategic goals
But a tactical situation we might quit on
Yeah, I mean you said it obviously you're talking about tactics this the tactical decision is actually
Enforcing what matters which is not winning that engagement it's winning the war and if I'm flying around to my airplane and I get engaged with three aircraft and I have 500 pounds of usable gas and my wingman just went home
with an emergency, you know what I should, I need to run away. I need to set, what we call
separating. I need to set up a plan where I can separate and I need to leave this fight. I need to
run away from this fight. I need to quit this engagement and get away. And nothing about that
sounds sexy. None of it sounds rewarding. None of it sounds good in any way. And the story they
want is like, oh, I turn decisively and engage. I will die. I'll be in a parachute. I'll be
dead, whatever it is. Quitting tactics is actually just interdecision making going, oh, you know what,
this isn't working. This isn't getting me towards my goal, and I'm just maneuvering in another
direction. The worst thing you can do is when we decide to fight in an aircraft, you and I've met,
you're a bad guy, I'm a good guy. We decide to get to an engagement and we turn. We call that
anchoring. And there's a reason it's called anchoring, because just like with a ship that has dropped
anchor, guess what? You're not going anywhere. You are going to anchor right there and you can't, and
your decisions have now gone from an infinite number of decisions down to one, which is I'm going
to sit here and turn until one of us dies. And you know what that does to every other person
involved in this engagement, the 50 other airplanes or the Sam? They all know I'm right there.
I have almost no maneuvering room. I have no options. And the likelihood that I'm going to anchor and
survive are very, very small. But people want that satisfying answer. Never, ever, ever quit. We see this
in the FTX all the time. Send me two more. They're dead too. Get the other two. Okay, they're dead.
And now you're saying it so plainly, but it's that mantra in their mind is never quit. And
they don't understand that you're talking about a tactical versus a strategic thing. And that's the
biggest difference. Yeah. Don't anchor is similar, I guess, than to don't dig in. Don't dig in.
Because you're going to give up your ability to maneuver.
It's exactly right.
And is that because once you decide you're going to fight,
you just don't have the aircraft,
doesn't have the capability to just get out of there?
Two reasons.
One, no different than you as a task unit commander
looking down the sights of your rifle.
So I'm now decisively engaged with one of the aircraft.
100% of my attention is on that aircraft.
100%.
I have zero bandwidth for anything else.
And two, those fights 100% of the time,
go from fast speed to slow speed because you're turning.
So all your energy, all you're maneuvering, all the G's slow that your planes down.
So you go from four or 500 knots down to usually about 115 knots.
And you can have the most advanced airplane in the world when you're turning around 115 knots.
You're a SESNA.
You're just sitting there slow compared to another.
And so you don't see anything else is happening and you have no literal maneuver maneuvering speed.
So you're slow and you can't, you're not paying attention to anything else.
Because if I stop looking to you, I look elsewhere.
You're going to kill me.
It's, it's, you have no options.
So anchoring and aviation is the exact same thing as digging in.
And once you do it, you have no options.
And this conversation based around one-on-one fighting, and this was a revelation to me last time,
that the conversation around one-on-one fighting is not very realistic because we're not,
I'm not going to be alone.
No.
Now, you and I might end up in a one-on-one fight, but the other 20 airplanes aren't in that
one-on-one fight, and they're all going to focus on that.
and one of the two of us is going to get picked off by our allies, by our friends.
So you and I might be fighting one against one.
And then you're going to get blasted by Echo Charles from the flight.
That's right.
Even if I beat you, even if I win that fight, that dog fight.
He's already behind you.
Yeah.
If I get maybe a matter of time, but the likelihood, there is no such thing where the enemy takes off.
Let's launch one aircraft.
And then the Americans respond, we're going to launch one aircraft.
It never happens like that.
So you might be in a one-on-one fight, but there's 20 other airplanes out there.
Are you, is our strategy, is the strategy of air combat, hey, we're going to send more planes than you?
It used to be.
We thought, well, that's been a cycle.
That was the Russian strategy in the 80s.
It just built a whole bunch of airplanes, 70s and 80s.
And it turns out that we discovered that with technology, we could build less that were way better.
And I have a system that could take down six years for, you know, for, every, everyone in mine can shoot down six years.
So then the strategy shifted to technology.
and now we leverage that we actually don't think mass in and of itself is what we need to do.
We actually need to have the ability to, guess what?
M maneuver.
Meneuve and no more than you, have more awareness and more information and be able to focus on much more than just one thing.
And so technology isn't just about being high tech.
It's about giving the pilot more information about more different things are going on, which is the exact same thing.
As a pilot, I no longer need to stare down the scope of my rifle.
I don't need to look at my sites.
I actually have a system that lets me look at 15 different things at the same time
and have high fidelity information to decide on,
I can think strategically in a one-man fighter,
which nobody ever thought was possible.
But it actually is possible if you can detach.
And you use a great language in here.
You used to talk about detach, not just physically,
but detaching mentally.
Aircraft now allow pilots to detach mentally in ways they never could before.
And are there aircraft that are,
detached from the situation that are monitoring.
So am I as the Air Mission Commander or whatever the name is?
Am I some guy that's at whatever 30,000 feet or 10 nautical miles away?
And I can see this entire thing on radar and I can be like Dave, hey, everyone, Dave's in a fight.
You know, dash, you know, tack two and tack four.
Go take, go, go support him.
I would, I would still compare it much more to like a platoon commander on a platoon size
operation or a tasium that you're there.
Got it.
But you're physically detached, but not like literally, you know, back away.
So it's not like I'm in a platoon on the ground and someone in a talk way, way, that can barely, doesn't even really know what's happening.
And they're trying to give me directions because that's what that comparison makes.
That's right.
Got it.
Check.
All right.
Skip into another section here.
Rumor control.
If rumors are running rampant in your organization, and you might think, why would I need to put this in here?
because you and I both have seen rumors just decimate companies.
Quickly.
Maybe decimates a strong word.
It is too strong a word.
But rumors get out of control fast.
We have seen rumors get out of control and start to hurt companies where they can be decimated.
That might not be the final blow, isn't the rumor, but it can definitely be a contributing factor to a real significant downfalls.
Yeah.
If rumors are running rampant in your organization,
you have created the environment to allow them to grow.
The environment that rumors grow in is one of which there's lack of information.
If you don't tell people what's going on,
they will make up their own versions,
and their versions will not be pretty ones.
And by the way, I think this whole section right here that we're in
is actually called communication.
Yeah.
So we're in an entire section of the book called communication,
because that's what leadership is.
leadership is communicating with other human beings.
So, yeah, I, man, I think that that idea, which I kind of start this chapter off with,
or this section off with, with explaining what it's like in a patrol and how the word gets
passed back.
And if you're in the back of the patrol, you just have no idea what's happening.
And that's another thing that just left such a mark on me.
I could have put that, I could have put that as one of the fundamental kind of,
Underlying characteristics in the beginning of this book, which is understanding how important communication was in an organization and knowing what it's like to be a frontline trooper and have no idea what's happening
But because it's so directly tied to communication, I led the communication section with that
But man, the idea of keeping the troops informed is
Is right up there with the underlying leadership principles that I learned
as a young seal.
So getting back to the rumor thing, get the word out ahead of rumors.
Just like on patrol, and again, that's referencing the story.
You need to keep the troops informed.
Need to lay some people off?
Explain why.
Have to discontinue a product?
Tell the troops why.
Shutting down an office, communicate the reason to your people.
All of these are tough subjects to cover.
It's easy to find excuses not to talk about them.
And it is certainly more comfortable to keep your mouth shut.
and hope no one notices, but they absolutely will notice.
And they will fill in the reasons with their own ideas.
Need to lay some people off?
The rumor will be, we're going out of business.
Have to discontinue a product?
Same thing.
We are going out of business.
Shutting down an office, now it is absolutely certain.
We are going out of business.
So you have to combat those things.
And the way you do it is by telling the truth, explaining the people think that's happening.
And you know, another good point.
This is an earlier chapter, and you mentioned it, but we didn't cover it.
I have a section on telling the truth.
And that seems like it's really easy, but there are tricky situations.
It's hard to do.
But one of the things that I cover in that section is sometimes you can't tell the truth.
And then you might get someone like Sam Harris that says, no, Jocko, you should always tell the truth.
So, Sam, I'm sorry, you're wrong.
And I can give you some situations.
There's two situations that are really obvious.
You can't tell the truth in a situation.
Well, let me rephrase that.
Well, you'll see what I mean.
If there's a legal battle going on, there are times that we work with companies like this,
they have a legal scenario unfolding and they cannot discuss it, which means they can't tell
people what's going on.
And in the military, it was, oh, we had compartmentalized information that we literally
cannot share.
It is against the law.
You are not need to know, and I cannot tell you.
So therefore does that impede us from telling the truth the answer now we're back supporting Sam Harris
Sam yes we can't tell the truth the truth is hey Dave listen I really want to explain to you what's going on here
But you know that there's a legal a legal suit going on and
We cannot discuss this and I cannot tell you I can tell you these things around it
But I cannot tell you the actual piece of information you want as soon as we are allowed to tell you legally
Believe me I'll fill you in or in the military
Hey, look, Dave, I understand that you want to know where this piece of information is coming from.
It is actually need to know and compartmentalized.
And I cannot, I cannot tell you as soon as this thing becomes declassified or as soon as you get the need to know, believe me, I'll fill you in.
But until then, you know the deal, man.
We got to follow the rules.
And also what the information that you want to know, it's not significant enough that it's going to matter.
It's like, okay.
So we do want to tell the truth.
So Sam, you're back in the game.
The tool you have to have that conversation is they have to trust you.
Yes.
The tool you have is trust.
And the way you cultivate that trust is every other opportunity you have that you're not hamstrung by these things.
You're telling them everything that you can.
Everything you can possibly let them know the big picture.
You've done that so much.
You've made so many leadership capital deposits.
So many.
At the time you go, hey, man, look, there's a.
couple reasons why I can't do this they go got it all right bro I understand no
factor and they just go off and back and do another thing and it's it's it's not an issue
yeah oh having a good relationship with people is just it's so important it solves so
many problems I mean just just whatever you do whenever you do these little
miniature one-man role plays with yourself like on the podcast and you're always like you
know usually conclude through something like I got it bro like and there's been times where
you've said that to me like hey got it you know
know where I've been like yeah well let me get back to you on that I got it you know
it's yeah and like that's just the way it is why because I know you care about me
you know I care about you I trust you you trust me it's like okay hey man got it
you know what I don't even want you to tell me yeah you tell me what you need
to do I got it yeah no factor yeah you know what since we are talking about
delivering the truth I'm gonna actually jump into this little section right here
which is called tactfully delivering the truth
When delivering criticism, it is important to do it with consideration and delicacy.
If you punch someone in the face with criticism, they will become defensive and are unlikely to take the criticism on board.
So a more indirect approach is needed.
And again, that's what we just talked about with the other section, which is, oh, look, I'm just going to tell them what's up.
You need to control your ego.
No, that's going to work out.
Okay.
So how do we do this?
How do we tell the truth tactfully?
Okay, here.
First, care about your people.
That's number one.
Care about your people.
If you truly care about them, they will know that and they will accept your criticism
more easily.
And this is something that I thought about talking with Flynn.
And when I was the OIC of TradeNet, I was actually listening to Flynn at the muster.
And he was talking about.
these savage debriefs that I would give.
And I have some recorded.
I'll play them for you sometime, bro.
They're savage.
Yeah.
I was coming off the top ropes.
I mean, I was coming off the top ropes.
And as I'm sitting there listening to Flynn,
because even at that time,
like Flynn, Cochran,
not hard guy to read, right?
Like, he's not a guy that's like,
like, hey, I'm not sure what he's thinking.
Like, you know, you're looking at Flynn.
You're like, okay, I see where he's at.
Leif, same thing, right?
Leif is like, hey, you know, what is that term?
Where are your emotion on your sleeves, right?
Laif is no stranger.
Laif is not shy about saying, hey, I'm not exactly good.
And he's, I mean, imagine, you know what Laf's like now,
but imagine when Laif was a whatever, a platoon man, right?
Not exactly able to contain his emotions or hide his emotions.
So as I'm listening to Flynn up there
Talking about how I used to give these savage debriefs
And Sorrelli, same thing, right?
How hard is it to tell when Sorrelli's pissed off?
It's like so easy, right?
So when I'm sitting there listening to this, I'm thinking,
man, I used to debrief these guys.
Now all those guys, every one of them,
I gave them debriefs that were scornful, right?
And I'm thinking to myself, what?
How is it that on,
any of their faces, any of their faces,
I never saw that look of like, screw you.
You know what?
Shut up.
You don't know what you're talking about.
Never.
And it was the same with, like, I had one guy that had that, that I could read that on,
that I put through training.
And he's the guy that in podcast number five,
I wrote a counseling letter for, which I very seldom did,
and explained to him that he was not going to make it in the SEAL teams if he didn't,
be more, if he wasn't, didn't become more humble in a bunch of other things.
But that's a guy that I could see on his face.
Like when I was debriefing him, he was pissed.
But every, now think, I mean, I debriefed hundreds of guys.
And yet they would always be like, Roger.
You know, like that kind of, like they disappointed me.
Like it wasn't, they were disappointed.
That's the, that's the feeling I always got from Flynn was like, you know, Roger.
Or from Leif, like, Roger.
You know, like, um,
That's what I always got back.
Why is that?
It's real easy.
The reason is because all those guys knew.
And the guys that I was putting through training knew.
More than anything else in the world, I cared about them.
And I knew that they were going overseas.
And I knew that they're going into combat.
And more than anything else, I wanted them to be able to accomplish the mission.
And I wanted them and their guys to be safe and okay and come home.
And they knew that.
So when it comes to delivering truthful feedback, the number one thing is to care about your people, number one.
And then the next thing is take ownership of the problem itself.
Of course, extreme ownership should be the fundamental principle utilized by any leader.
And there are tactics of employing extreme ownership when trying to critique a subordinate.
Utilizing extreme ownership while providing feedback might sound like this.
Here's some tactical maneuver.
Instead of saying you failed to get the project done on time, use what support or assets
could I have given you so that we could have gotten the project done on time?
Instead of saying you failed to meet the mission objectives, try using, I don't think I did
a good job of explaining the mission objective.
Did you fully understand it?
Instead of saying your lack of professionalism caused this client to go to our competitor,
try saying, I think I allowed things to get too slack around here in terms of our
professionalism, I think that's one of the reasons why we lost that client to one of our competitors.
Now, there's guaranteed to be people listening to this right now that are thinking,
what, you know, that's weak.
You should just tell them.
How are they ever going to understand what you're talking about?
And it goes back to this.
When I attack them, they're not listening.
That's all there is to it.
When I attack them, they're not listening.
Now, if you have a great relationship with you, if they know you care about them, if you know that,
if they know that you have their best interests and that's why you're talking to them yeah you can
you can go harder and also when you get people that you try indirect approaches on and it fails
well then you escalate your directness and over time until you're eventually like listen you failed
this project and this is not acceptable and if it happens like yes you get there totally absolutely
don't start there.
Don't start there.
And by the way, also, this is in the book.
It is important to take note that these are not simply techniques you are utilizing
so your pesky subordinate falls into line.
That is not the point.
The point of all these statements and the whole point of taking ownership is that you must truly believe what you are saying.
And you should because the ownership statements in those examples are not simply lip service, they are true.
If the leader follows up with the team members and make sure that they have all the support and assets they needed to complete the job on time,
then the job will get done on time.
If a leader correctly explains the mission in simple, clear, concise manner,
and then ensures it is understood by the team, the team will accomplish the mission.
If a leader fails to emphasize the importance of professionalism,
then it should come as no surprise that subordinates fail to act professionally.
Yes, it's on you, the leader.
So that escalation.
We wrote about the escalation of counseling in the dichotomy of leadership.
Same thing with direct versus indirect.
Indirect versus direct.
We start off indirect.
And generally that's going to work.
And by the way, if it doesn't work, you have somewhere to go.
You have somewhere to escalate too.
If you go direct and it doesn't work, that's it.
You're out of options.
You're out of options.
Not only is it your only shot, but it is a shot that has less chance of doing the job.
It's got way less chance.
Way less chance.
And if you start with the indirect approach and it doesn't work, what you get to
do simultaneously with this required escalation is to reflect on yourself as, hey, why am I not,
what am I not doing that I can't get through to this person? You can actually start to look at
what you're doing wrong. When you go to the direct approach, you've already come to the
conclusion that 100% of the problem is that other person. And so what you don't get to do
in that same process is go, man, what am I missing here that this more subtle indirect
approach isn't getting through to this person I work with every single day. And that is every bit
is important, if not even more important than that required escalation, which you most certainly
need to do, which is looking at why, what is it you haven't done or what is the problem that
you have created that that isn't working out of the gates? And it's apparently subtlety is
becoming a solid word amongst us right now. Because
Really, that the correction that you give, you give the most subtle correction possible.
And you escalate from there.
Yeah.
And if I do it right, if I do it right, I've put you back on course, Dave, and you didn't even know that I touched your compass.
Totally.
Like, I just nudged your steering wheel.
You didn't even know it.
You looked over your right and you said, wait, wait.
Oh, I'm good.
You don't even know what happened.
Yeah.
And that is what we want.
And you know what?
Sometimes I nudge that and it doesn't course correct.
And now I have to nudge a little bit harder.
And at some point, yes, I may have to take hold of the steering wheel and be really direct.
Yes, it does happen.
You did the demo at the muster and I think we've done it too now.
There's actually sort of an ideal way that we should all aspire to be able to communicate with the closest people on our team that aren't doing the things we want them to do, which is when I can look at you.
or you can look at me and go, bro.
And that is, that is all the correction that is required.
That is all the feedback that I need to hear from you, look at me and go, bro.
And I go, I got it.
And I go solve whatever that problem is, whether it's I came in late to work,
insert whatever the problem is.
That is as a leader, what you're actually aspiring to is to be able to have a type of relationship
and I can look at the people around me and say that one word.
Or no words.
Certainly.
I just like that example when we're looking at it.
Everybody's waiting for this big long speech you're going to give you.
Like, bro.
Yeah.
Roger.
Yeah.
Somebody asked, what if I had decided that this was important and I needed to counsel Laif on this issue?
What if I decided it was the time that I needed to get direct with him?
And I was like, oh, I would have walked into his office with a piece of paper that showed what the problem was.
And I would have said, bro.
And Laif would have gone.
gone, bro, I'm sorry, I got this, don't ever worry about it again.
And that's the way it would have gone down.
Yeah.
And as funny, as kind of as humorous that interaction was on the stage and as funny as it
might sound listening to it, that's totally a real thing.
That's totally legit.
Like you can have a close relationship with everybody in your team by which you can just
look at them or kind of just say that one word.
And it isn't, it's real.
And they'll go, dude, that problem is handled.
You will never have to come back here ever again about.
that thing ever.
Yeah.
And it's done.
And you move on.
That is,
that is,
that is the way
that things are supposed to work,
really.
The escalation of counseling starts with zero words.
Yeah.
Starts with a glance.
Mm-hmm.
And a,
and a,
and a,
and a four millimeter raise of the eyebrow.
Like,
you know,
that's it.
That's,
like,
the response is a,
a shake of the head,
yeah,
signifying no,
or a nod of the head
signifying.
I got it.
And there's not another word spoken because it's a problem solved.
Yeah.
I had to throw this one in, man, ultimatums.
Ultimatums are not optimal leadership tools.
Like digging in, they allow no room to maneuver.
No one likes being trapped and controlled.
But there are extremely rare times when ultimatums can and should be utilized.
When enough is truly enough that an ultimatum can be used.
And when it is used, the leader must hold the line and adhere to it.
Never make an ultimatum you can't keep.
And I've got a few sections in here, making an ultimatum as the boss.
And the reason I had to talk about this, oh, here we go.
If you feel you have to issue an ultimatum to your subordinates,
one of the first things you should ask yourself is,
where did my leadership fail?
Because the fact of the matter is, as a leader,
you should be able to get what you need out of your subordinates
through solid leadership, not ultimatums,
explaining why a task is important to the strategic mission
and how achieving that mission
will ultimately benefit everyone on the team
should be enough to get people to do what they need to do.
That is no easy feat,
and sometimes it takes considerable time and effort
to communicate that information properly.
But sometimes, no matter how hard you try,
you can't get the message through.
In those cases, ultimatums are a tool of last resort.
After all, other efforts
to get an individual to do what they are supposed to do
have failed.
I mean, you should use an ultimatum so rarely.
Once an ultimatum has been to leave,
It can't be reversed, which is one of the biggest problems in giving them.
Ultimatums by their very nature are immovable objects and can't be adjusted.
That makes, this makes the people you delivered them to feel trapped and no one likes feeling trapped.
If you do make an ultimatum and don't keep it, your credibility is going to take a hit.
Yeah.
All that being said, if you have done everything in your power, if you've coached mentor to persuade an individual to do something and they still will not do it, then it might make sense to give them an ultimatum.
Make it explicit, not only in the requirements of what needs to be done,
but also in the consequences of exactly what will happen if the ultimatum is not met.
Use no uncertain terms and ensure that the individual fully understands.
Again, I mean ultimatums are very rare.
I got a section on making ultimatums as a subordinate, which we see, which obviously, you know.
Is there a time?
Yeah, there's a time.
But when it's, you know, very rare, you better have.
your ducks in a row big time and I talk about dealing with an ultimatum that gets
placed on you which this is this happens right this happens so what should you do
when your boss puts an ultimatum on you tell the truth you should start with
telling yourself the truth do a hard honest assessment of the situation and
figure out if what you are being tasked with is actually possible are you
making every possible effort to achieve the task.
Is there anything else you and your team can do to get the job done?
If the answer to these questions indicates that you can do more, then redouble your efforts
and do more.
There you go.
You should also tell your team members the truth.
Let them know the ultimatum has been placed on you and thereby the team and explain why
you are going to all dig in and do your absolute best to get the job done.
Hopefully after pulling out all the stops and getting after it like you have never gotten
after it before, you and the team are able to deliver on the ultimatum.
You got a high five for your boss, tell your team well done, and move on to the next project.
Unfortunately, that doesn't always happen.
Often the reason ultimatums are given is because the task or project was an extremely difficult
one, perhaps even impossible.
Even after you and your team go into hyperproductive mode and put forth maximal effort
to get the job done, sometimes it just isn't enough.
What should you do then?
Again, the answer is to tell the truth, only this time to your boss.
First, figure out if there are any other measures that might help.
you accomplish what you've been tasked to do.
Perhaps you need more people, maybe you need more funding, perhaps you need to let some other
tasks slide while you focus on getting the ultimatum fulfilled.
Once you have all the information you need to explain the situation to your boss, explain
that despite the ultimatum, you will not be able to accomplish what he or she has asked
you to do.
That's if it literally can't be done.
Describe what you would need to get the job done and what will happen if you do not get
what you need.
If you've done a good job communicating with your boss and they have enough humility to listen,
after you detail the situation, they should recognize the truth and withdraw or at least modify their ultimatum.
But that is no guarantee.
Bosses who resort to delivering ultimatums might not be rational enough to listen to reason and could hold the line on it.
If that happens and your leader maintains the course, then simply knuckle down, do your best,
protect your team to the best of your ability, and stand by to suffer the consequences with your head held high.
Don't be spiteful.
Don't have a bad attitude.
Don't disparage the leader and don't give up.
Maintaining your dignity and the morale of the troops is the victory in a case like this.
Boom.
That's awesome.
Got a section in here on reflect and diminish.
We've talked about that on this podcast, but I laid out in some good detail.
Here's something that you talk about earlier.
I'll hit it again.
Getting people to listen.
As you are rising through the ranks, you will need to have your say.
When you speak, you will want people to listen.
But sometimes there will be people who do not listen and they interrupt or talk over you.
How should you handle that?
The answer is fairly simple.
Let them talk.
Let that person jump in and say what they want and let them finish their thoughts.
This works for a multitude of reasons.
If someone wants to talk a lot, then listen.
There's no better cure for a person that wants to talk than let him get their thoughts out of their head.
Let them say what they want to say.
When they have nothing left, you will be able to make your point.
This is also good because as they unload all their ideas, you now know not only everything you know, you also know everything they know.
Armed with this knowledge, you can assess their ideas.
You can formulate counterpoints or recommendations around their thoughts.
This works just as well or even better in a group where you listen to multiple people, break down their own ideas,
argue with one another, and ask questions of one another about the details of their ideas.
Once again, this whole time, you get to more clearly understand the thoughts of others while quietly strutely.
Your own thoughts or ideas around the subject when you finally do find the opportunity to speak
You have the most comprehensive and developed thoughts
So jocco just revealed the secret behind the secret power right there that is definitely one of the major ones
Yeah remember I told you like I didn't really realize how deep that goes that concept right there and then when I sort of
I still probably don't know how deep it goes but now like I see it a lot I'm like ooh and then
When you do it, you're like, oh, man, I should have done this from the beginning.
We had a muster.
And I, the numbers I gave was, hey, as a leader, you should be listening 98% of the time and talking to a percent of the time.
That's the way it is.
Yeah.
What's the depth of that you're talking about?
What's actually required, though, during that time is that you're actually listening, though.
Oh, yeah.
Not just like, I'm going to let it get out of their system or you're being just, you actually need to listen.
with enough humility to go,
there is a good chance
somebody here is going to say something
that I haven't thought about
that I haven't considered.
If you as a leader,
like, I've got it all dialed in,
but I'm going to play this game
to kind of let my people talk
and what you're doing
and just letting it get out of the system
so you can then come in
with the final.
That's not what that 982 is.
That 982 is,
man, they've got a lot of people
have a lot of things to say here.
I'm surrounded by probably a few smart people.
Somebody's going to say something
I haven't thought about
and you need to listen
and actively for what those things are.
And that gets back to a comment from earlier in the book
and a comment we've hit over and over again,
you have to care about your people.
You have to care about them,
and which means you have to trust them
and believe in them and vice versa,
and somebody's going to say something that is right.
And it's not a game to wait till the end,
so you drop in your 2% and win.
It's that you are armed with all what you have
and then what they have to
and actually makes you a better leader.
The caring about your people part
is easy to say.
that's really, that's hard.
That is hard to do.
Yeah, even in a conflict situation.
Yeah, I mean, especially that, right?
Yeah, that's going to show itself a lot, big time, where conflict,
especially when there's more than one person in the conflict, right?
Like a debate or something like that.
It's interesting because you're so compelled,
especially if you got a little knowledge yourself, right?
You know, well, I'm going to jump in and correct you right there.
And, oh, you were wrong about this.
This is actually really what happened, you know, kind of thing.
but yeah if you just sit back let that fly listen let them fly you know let that fly maybe they even
meant something else you know and just like are you're saying like really listen because you'll find out
really what they're talking about because if you interrupt too quick a lot of the time in my experience
anyway you interrupt too quick and then it's like oh they were getting to that you know like you
shouldn't interrupt it then you would have known that without even looking dumb or whatever yeah so yeah
man so at the end then you have like all the information just like oh you're like not only do you know
what you knew and maybe you changed your mind maybe you did it but at least now you know you've
improved your position oh yeah and and this is just one of the one more thing that's counterintuitive
because someone might think hey I want the team to listen to me oh yeah so what I'm going to do is
talk more and talk louder and it is the absolute opposite is what happens
The less you talk, the more people listen.
The less you talk, the more people listen.
Totally counterintuitive and 100% undeniable.
Now, what's interesting too is when you're coming to these conclusions in your head,
which as you're watching or as you're listening to some people talk or discuss or debate or argue, right?
That whole time you're thinking, okay, and at some point you can chime in, right?
And what's interesting is you don't even have to chime in with an answer.
There's times where after 20 minutes of debate, I chime in with one question.
And yet the question is because that all these other, all these other less important questions
and answers have been brought up and discussed.
But there's really one question that hasn't even been brought up.
And no one can see it because they're in the battle.
Right, right, right.
So I can ask, because again, I'm not, to your point, Dave, I'm not sitting there thinking, I'm waiting for everyone because I already know the answer.
I'm actually listening and trying to assemble this entire picture.
So as this picture gets filled in by what everyone's saying, at the end, now it's revealed that there's something that's still missing.
And now, guess who gets to ask this profound question?
That if we as a team can answer this question, we will actually have the solution.
But no one even.
Yes.
To him,
it's all clear.
To us,
we're like,
what about this?
What about that?
Yeah.
So,
genius.
Yeah,
it's the ability to detach to step back to listen
instead of talk
is really powerful for a leader.
Got a little section about that,
about apologizing.
I got a section about how you got to be careful with your words as a leader.
You must be careful not to gossip,
not to become too familiar,
casual or unguarded with your troops gossip sarcasm and flippant remarks all carry too much weight when thrown
around by the leader ribbing comments that might seem harmless among friends can have a real impact on a
subordinate even legitimate criticism needs to be delivered with caution preferably in private so that
dignity is maintained this is not to say that critical mistake should not be reviewed so the whole
team can learn but criticism must be constructive and aim
at not in an individual's potential but at the specific mistakes themselves this is
I'll do this I'll because you know I'll I'll be sitting around joking around with
everyone and we'll be having a good time and I'll throw a zinger at someone and I'll be
like yeah that was an uncool you know and sometimes I'm only even I won't even realize
and I'll have to think about it and I'll say oh yeah I what conversation did you and I
have about being an asshole I was like hey Dave you know like I'm an asshole and I have
to basically muzzle that we've had that
Several times.
Yeah, we've had it several times.
And you have thrown some zingers out where I've given you the look like, well, that was an asshole move right there.
I'm like, yeah, and you're like, yes, it was.
Perhaps worth it, maybe not.
But yeah, that's one of those.
I realize this.
You know, there's two ends to this.
One end is when you're in a leadership position, you don't realize the weight of your compliments and you don't realize the weight of your criticisms.
So you might not think saying, hey, Echo, that video looked great, you know, or whatever.
You might think, I'm not going to tell Echo because I don't care.
Hey, the video is good to go, but he knows that.
No.
It's like, it actually carries weight.
And I will forget that all day long.
And basically, it's a lack of awareness of, like, hey, I'm actually like in an elevated position.
in this team, whatever, I'll make that mistake.
I would make this mistake at trade debt, you know,
when I was, or in tasking a bruiser.
But I would make the mistake,
but as I started to understand,
I realized, hey, you need to be careful with your words.
You need to be careful.
You need to understand the weight of the impact
of the things that you're saying,
both positive and negative,
because they carry weight that you may or may not understand
from that leadership position.
Let's get wrap this into the conclusion.
Conclusion, it's all on you, but not about you.
And I try and sum this up, but I'm going to skip a little bit of it here.
Leadership is all on you, but at the same time, leadership is not about you, not at all.
Leadership is about the team.
The team is more important than you are.
The moment you put your own interests above the team and above the mission is the moment you fail as a leader.
When you think you can get away with it, when you think the team won't notice your self-serving maneuvers, you are wrong.
Your people will see it and they will know it.
The leadership strategies and tactics in this book are to be used not so you can be successful.
These strategies and tactics are to be used so the team can be successful.
If you use them to further your own career or your own agenda,
eventually these strategies and tactics will backfire and bring you down.
You will fail as a leader and as a person.
But if you use these strategies and tactics with the goal of helping others
and of helping the team accomplish its mission,
then the team will succeed.
And if the team succeeds,
you win as a leader and as a person.
But infinitely more important,
your people win.
And that is true leadership.
So, probably a decent enough place
where we tried to get through it.
What are you?
I'm only at two hours.
That's not too bad.
That's not too bad.
there.
Yeah, so obviously we skipped all kinds of stuff in this book.
I like Dave, thanks for pointing out the fact that the details in the book are important.
Obviously the sections we covered, there's sections of it, but even just the sections
that we did cover, but that I didn't read everything.
There's a lot in it.
Yeah.
It's pregnant with information, and that's a term that would get, you know, you know, that's a term
that would get used to describe Shakespeare when I was in college, that these words,
now am I over here trying to imply that Will Shakespeare just wrote leadership strategy and tactics?
No.
Sounded like it.
I don't know.
Danger close.
Danger close.
But what I am saying is what Dave said.
But they're kind of the same.
They're kind of the same.
No, they're not even close.
I'm not even in the same ballpark.
But what Dave said is true.
Lots of the information in there is, it's, there's a lot.
in the words in the chapters in the details in the stories that will add to your
comprehension as a leader the what okay so I have the original PDF of this by
the way I'm not gonna say why but I do what I like all read certain chapters if I'm
thinking of a very specific scenario going down for myself you know like if you
know whatever you know whatever the case me this is not my scenario but let's say
you get into an argument with your co-workers
or something like this or your boss or wife or whatever even like with your kids or whatever
and you say okay I have this scenario how am I going to like navigate through this scenario
because you're still you're mad and you're this and you whatever and then you read that that's one
in my experience that's when that really really helps well working the book is short chapters
it's heavily indexed so you can just look up hey what do I do here what do I do there that helps you
I'm sure people will put tabs all through it like they do with dichotomy leadership like they do with extreme ownership
That they'll be able to well here it is yep I'm making this mistake. Oh here's
Yeah, here's how I should handle this situation. So
Yeah, I'm sure
Yeah, I just I hope it I hope it's able to give people
Information give them strategy tactics they can actually implement that they can use and we covered a bunch of it not all of it
But I wish I had this book
I just wish I had this book 30 years ago when I joined the Navy.
I wish I had this book because it would have made everything so much easier.
It would have made me so much better and so much more effective.
Oh, well, you know, the best time to plant a tree was 30 years ago.
The second best time is right now.
So there you go, leadership strategy and tactics.
So probably a good place to wrap it up.
Echo, Charles.
Yes.
So any final thoughts on the leadership strategy and tactics?
Yeah.
So the field manual, the first field manual.
The discipline equals freedom field manual.
Field manual.
Yes, it's a field manual for getting after it, right?
Yes, true.
This is a field manual for life.
So, and I say, I mean, I have bold statement.
I get it.
But here, this is what is.
Like, let's say hypothetically, I mean, really,
Is this realistic?
Maybe, maybe not.
But let's say you had it in your pocket the whole time,
everywhere you went, right?
Jack.
Any situation where you get into, like, some conflict with someone else,
like, you'll literally find the answer in there for your answer.
And this is why.
So, you know how, like, and let's be realistic, like, in a scenario with a coworker,
you know, when you're in it, when you're not detached, you're emotional.
And, you know, you say how to deal with that where you're like,
you know, take a deep breath and you've got to recognize the signs and like all this stuff, right?
So you got to go kind of through this little process. Some of us do go through this process to kind of calm down or whatever, right?
You just reading it, not necessarily you, but like if you read it for yourself, like you read the solutions, that in and of itself will detach you from it.
Because it's like the words are like, oh, this is what you're going through right now.
And you're like, oh, this is what I'm going through right now.
This is what you do.
Okay.
And then you just do it.
Do you see what I'm saying?
So yeah, man.
And it's so like, what do you call when you chopped it up like pretty, you just said the word.
Indexed, highly indexed.
Yeah, yeah.
Short chapters highly indexed.
I think there's like 80 plus chapters in there.
Whereas, you know, normal book has what, 10, 12, something like that chapters.
Yeah.
So you know what I mean?
So it's going to be a little bit more difficult to apply that kind of concept to like a, let's say a regular book.
And to be quite honest.
honest with you.
Please.
We tried to make, I tried to make the book a little bit smaller so it is more portable.
Yeah.
So there you go.
And by the way, one thing that you need to get credit for is on the cover.
So we'll say that we designed the cover.
But the FM TAC 02 was 100% from Echo Charles.
And when I saw that, I was like, okay, that is legit.
That is totally legit.
And people that are wondering about the cover of the book,
it's got some military symbols on it from operational terms and graphics,
a 101, tack five, tack one.
And what they actually show is one of them is a support by fire position.
One of them is an attack by fire position.
And what that is is cover and move.
So you got one element that's putting down support fire,
the other element that's attacking.
and then the symbol is an enemy headquarters,
and the X through it means destroy.
So there is some...
You know what that is, right?
There's layers.
Lairs.
That's a little something we call layers.
So hopefully, and we do know that you do have a fondness,
a fondness for cargo pants.
So there's a possible...
Oh, cargo shorts, sorry.
Both pants, shorts?
There's a possibility that the cargo shorts or pants
could have a cargo pocket.
That is big enough possibly to enable you to carry this with you at all times.
It's possible, you know, or get the Kindle version, whichever.
Just kidding.
It's not that small.
Oh, good point.
Good point.
Awesome.
All right, Dave.
Any closing thoughts?
I agree with you, Echo.
I think the way you said that is actually pretty good.
You know, I got a chance to read this little advance copy.
And then I also read the final version right before you printed it.
So I've seen it a couple of times.
And we've talked about it.
When you guys out there, when everybody's out there,
When everybody's out there reading this, one of the things I did and I started to think about this is all those little indexes, there is a thread of every single thing in this book, every little index, every little story, whatever the situation is, that goes back to the ultimate strategy for being successful as a leader, which is the threat of extreme ownership.
And so for each one of those things that you're going through it when you're thinking about, we were talking about ultimatums or yelling or all.
every one of those situations, what you can look at is think, what is it that I've done
to be either the recipient of this situation or me acting out this way as a leader or my
behavior?
The connection to the one thing that actually is the most critical strategy in all of this,
which is extreme ownership, is embedded in every one of those things.
And I think that's why I made such a big deal early on about having to read every single
little thing in this book, all the different components.
that we might have skipped over just for time.
They're all in there.
They all circle back to that theme.
Which without it, if that's missing,
if you can't do,
if you can't get over that hurdle,
all like kind of the answers
and the conclusions and solutions,
they won't work.
Yep, they're going to slip.
They won't slip through.
Yeah.
And so for this field manual to work,
what is required is the ultimate strategy,
which is you are responsible for everything.
and if you read it that way,
you will see the connection
and every one of those indexes
back to that one thing.
And those two things
are indelibly connected as a leader
and without that,
none of the other stuff can happen.
So true.
Because it's easy to be like,
oh yeah, my boss,
he really needs to do that,
you know, that whole classic thing.
Like, man, if my boss
would just take some extreme owners,
that's a good book.
That's a good book.
It explains my boss very well.
You see what I'm saying?
Yeah.
But it's no, man.
It's yourself.
And, you know,
inherent in that,
and this is another piece of it that people get wrong.
We all get wrong.
It's a mistake that we all make because we think leading is about us.
We think leading is about us.
And it isn't.
It isn't about us at all.
It is about your people.
It is about the people.
And if you take care of your people,
yes, then those people will take care of you.
And that's what this book is about,
is how do you actually take care of your people?
How do you actually do that?
How do you communicate with those people?
And if you can learn, a huge part of that is, yes,
you are going to take the onus on yourself of communicating correctly.
Because when you're talking,
you're 50% of the solution.
The other person actually has to hear you.
How do you get them to hear you?
How do you become 100% of the solution?
How do you learn to communicate in a way that people actually listen and hear you and understand you?
And then how do you give them that underlying, the underlying thread of what you're doing as a leader,
you need to know that they understand that you care about them, that that's what you're doing.
and when you care about them and when you can communicate with them properly,
then you can lead them.
So leadership strategy and tactics.
Thanks for the feedback, guys.
And speaking of communicating with people,
I am going to go communicate with people.
I'm going on tour.
Yes.
Hell you.
Yes, like a rock band.
Now, there will be no music.
No.
It will be no Yeagermeister.
Okay.
All right.
And there will be no tour bus.
Okay.
But I will be speaking about a myriad of subjects.
I'll be talking about leadership.
I'll be talking about war.
I'll be talking about discipline.
I'll be talking about fear.
I'll be talking about life.
I'll be talking about death.
I'll be answering questions.
I'll be meeting with you.
So if you want to experience that with me,
then come to the live gigs on the road.
January 6th in D.C., January 11th in Austin, January 16th, New York, January 20th, L.A., January 27th, Seattle, January 28th, San Francisco.
Some of the gigs are sold out. Go to joccolive.com to see if you can get tickets for one of the gigs.
Look forward to seeing you there so that we can get after it.
It is something that, let's face it, in my little scenario here, get after it, gets used quite a bit.
And I was searching for the words to explain to people like what I'm going to do at the live shows, what I'm going to do.
And I'm not kidding.
The only thing I could come up with is I'm going to get after it.
And if you know me, you know what that means.
And it means a lot of different things, but I'm going to get after it.
at those live shows.
So hope to see you there.
And beyond that, I know we talked about leadership a lot today.
We talked about taking care of our people.
We talked about taking ownership.
How do we take care of ourselves, Echo Charles,
which in turn will help us to take care?
How do we take ownership of our own lives
and get ourselves on the right path?
Many ways.
I bet there's a lot of people that are wondering
what your answer is going to do right now.
All right.
Well, going to be a little bit different as far as the approach because I read some books,
watched some videos, right?
I'm just saying throughout my life and a common tip bit of advice is exercise, right?
Exercise pretty much the most beneficial step you can take to improve quick, like right away.
University across the board.
University across the board.
Right. So, and I'm, I'm not a stranger to exercise, we'll say. But you know how you get in a routine, right?
Is your exercise routine pretty repetitive? Like it's pretty the same, like week to week, we'll say.
We'd have to have a whole like spin-off conversation about that.
Right.
There's a whole lot of things wrapped around.
Okay. Here's a question then.
Yeah, specify.
Do you switch up your workout so it's more interesting?
Because that's the thing.
not so it's more interesting but so it's more effective okay gotcha so a big part of exercising right is
it gets monotonous so people will be like oh i want something more fun yep you know what i will say
today i was doing a routine so that means there is some and i have a bunch of you know routines
that i do or whatever discipline goes freedom field manual they're in there i was doing i've been
and i'll get focused on one for a while and kind of like you know uh trying to prove that area
and today I had a pull-up day, right?
And so it was weight vest pull-ups.
I was doing L-sit pull-ups, tuck pull-ups,
dead hang pull-ups, chin-ups, and then kipping pull-ups, right?
And I was doing a lot of them.
And I mean four pull-ups into this workout,
which is going to be hundreds of pull-ups.
I was just so bummed out.
I was like, I was scrambling through my brain,
looking for any.
reason that I should not do this workout.
Yeah.
And then I just did it.
But I felt it.
When was this?
This was this morning.
Man, man, that's coincidentally, I went through the same thing yesterday.
Five times throughout the workout, I was doing that.
Like, oh, because I had an AC joint situation.
So when I'm like lifting heavy overhead, it just didn't go.
And I was fired up to do that exercise.
So I wasn't trying to cry.
I was like, no, I'm going to power through it.
It was injured.
It's injured.
So I was like, okay, I can't do that exercise.
So I was like, man, I might as well just make it a rest day.
And I'll pick it back up tomorrow or the next day or whatever, maybe next week, whatever, you know, kind of thing, right?
Nice little excuse was packaged up for you.
Oh, yeah.
It kind of was.
I mean, that's kind of legit, right?
Because it kind of will throw off the holes.
I had no excuses this morning.
I was searching for them.
Well, anyway, so the thing went on and that happened five times throughout the workout.
Five powered through all of them, though, got the workout done.
And actually did a little four extra.
reps at the end.
See, discipline begets discipline.
Yes, sir, it does.
You got fired up.
You got disciplined and you impose more discipline.
Yeah, it's true.
I have no idea why we're talking about this right now.
Oh, well, okay, okay.
Yeah, a little bit of deviation for sure.
But exercise, good for you.
Cross the board universally.
One of the best steps you can take short term and long term, by the way,
for yourself to improve yourself.
Stay on the path.
Be on the path.
Get on the path.
Right.
But here's the thing.
So exercise does get, like my workout routine is the same.
week to week it's the same more or less and you know every time and here's why i don't switch it up
is kind of a weird mindset i guess but it so you know okay okay sometimes i'll switch an exercise to be
and then i'm thinking dang this is like more fun it's more interest because it's interesting it's new
you know it's a new exercise so i don't i don't do that a lot in fact i don't want to do that because
what if i really need to do it then because it'll be boring after a while if i keep doing that
You see what I'm saying?
Like if I do barbell clean and press, right?
And I'm like, let me switch it up to kettlebells.
Then I started doing kettlebells, and that gets boring.
Now, what do I have?
Nothing.
Okay.
I can't do it, you know.
Anyway, it's a weird thing.
But here's the thing, though.
I'm sure there's a point coming somewhere.
There's a point.
There's a point.
And it's critical, critical point, too.
So that's just the fitness part of it.
But here's what I realize.
This is why lifting the same routine and conditioning with the same routine is no problem because I do Jiu-Jitsu.
There's no monotony.
There's no.
repetitiveness in jujitsu.
Well, unless you're getting tapped out by
Jacques Guilatine, then that gets kind of
repetitive and monotonness.
But aside from that, always
different. That's why it never really gets
boring. You ever realize that?
So you recommend jiu-jitsu. Big time.
Kind of like surfing, too, by the way.
Yeah, true. One of the many
benefits. Based on your strong recommendation to
do jiu-jitsu, we start
jiu-jitsu, we're going to need a
ghee. That's true. Origin-ghi, by the way.
Get an origin-gee. In case you were wondering on that.
Origin ghee, not just because they're made in America,
not just because they grow our economy,
not just because they make freedom stronger in the entire world.
Those are all good reasons.
On top of that, you might as well get the best possible ghee
that was designed for Jiu-Jitsu by Jiu-Jitsu players.
Yep, in the world, too, by the way.
Very true.
Also, jeans.
So, jeans, yeah, no, you're not going to work out in the jeans.
I get it.
But...
You can.
You definitely can.
I'm going to.
I'm going to do a squat workout in the jeans just for, just, just because.
Yeah, yeah.
Market, market research.
Yeah.
Something like this.
Anyway, jeans, same deal.
American denim made in America from the cotton all the way to the jeans.
Boom.
Big deal.
Same thing with it.
Did you say T-shirts?
I did not say T-shirts, but.
So basically clothing.
Clothing.
We can cover it.
And then what about supplementation?
Supplements, the most important kind of supplements for you.
joints you can take all the creatine in the world but if your joints not working
you still got problems you're not moving forward not very fast anyway I don't
think so anyway unless joint warfare krill oil super krill oil these are
things for your joints also discipline okay Dave Burke good deal date we started to
have a discussion about your discipline use do we are we prefer in the canned
What do you call them? Ready RTD discipline go cans or the powder
RTD is ready to deploy is that ready to drink ready and it's actually a industry term got it
I know it was a military play on term I like ready to deploy better I have I was
shifted I had I had shifted my bias to the RTD cans because out a bunch of them
they are literally on my way between the house and the car if I'm going somewhere I can
grab it and literally I'm on the gun ready to it's ready to deploy at any moment little curveball in the can scenario which was the jaco palmer powder so the powder showed up and I tried it and I realized what it was and then how good the jacobal was I have now reduced my reliance on the cans and I'm back on the powder a little bit the powder not only is a jacobal palmer look it tastes good look it delivers it delivers what it says it's going to deliver but do we not all
have just steeped in our brain memories of of Arnold Palmer iced teas just in restaurants
in real nice restaurants I was down in South Carolina and I went to this
restaurant they had that Arnold Palmer so good you know what I mean does everyone not
just have that remember remember this too you go to different restaurants and they
they're not all the same Arnold Palmer said well some of them are really good some of
them and some of them you want to you want to you want to you want to uproot the
entire restaurant and move it next to your house so you can get that Arnold Palmer
whenever that whenever you want it that's what that's what this is that's
that good yeah yeah the answer is no I don't think all of us have those thoughts
but yeah man sounds good and it does taste good yeah yeah all good also speaking
it tasting good mok okay now mok the dessert in the form of a protein
Yeah, or the protein
For a dessert
Hey vice of what's good for the goose is good for the
Again, you understand what I'm saying
Anyway
The mint
We have not spoken about mint chocolate in
I would say one month and a half
That's definitely a problem
Because if you think I haven't
That is still my go-to
That is still my go-to
When I need a
A dessert
The top of the pack for me
is still mint.
Mint chocolate chip.
I get it, Dave,
that has abandoned mint.
Days of,
he has.
He's abandoned peanut butter.
And he's gone full strawberry.
Strawberry mulk.
That's good.
It's at the point that,
so we did a muster
where we laid out a single serve pack
of all the mulks
across all the tables.
And I actually considered
taking all the strawberry singles
or impacks.
They're like, this is not happening.
I'm taking all of these.
I didn't do that, but I actually had that thought.
You thought about it.
I didn't happen.
No.
I will say that when you put them on the dessert meter, zero is not dessert.
10 is dessert.
Straight up, yeah.
The strawberry is the is dessert.
I mean, it is dessert.
You have to really think through it to think that you're not eating dessert.
Mint is awesome
I agree fully
Mint is awesome but
Mint is like having chocolate milk
Like old school
You mix up a Nestle's quick
And you're like oh this tastes good
Right now I like it a lot
But that's not dessert level
It's really good
It's a nine
But the strawberry is dessert
Straight up
Yeah agree
That that is true for sure
I mean and I drink the nine all day long
Because even I mean
I'll drink the night
And the peanut butter is the same thing
Yeah.
And I had the chocolate the other day.
Because Be Little, I said, Be Little, how, tell me about the chocolate again.
And he goes, he says, dude, you need to.
He goes, how many times have you had it?
I said twice.
And he goes, have it again right now.
So I went home and I mixed up a chocolate.
And I had to say, this is good.
Oh, yeah.
The darkness.
Yeah, I am sticking with the mint chocolate, but I put peanut butter in it.
Which is just weird.
Why don't you have peanut butter?
Because then you don't have the mint.
Then it's like, man, why even carry on, you know?
I'm not going to make me progress.
Yeah, man, nonetheless.
Hey, this is all good stuff.
Also, Jocko White Tea, by the way, certified organic, very light, very refreshing.
Very delicious.
These are soft words compared to the hardcore persona slash image that we may have of Jocko.
But, hey, these are the facts.
And that's how it's going down.
I thought that you were going to say that we may have, meaning you.
of you.
Okay.
Yeah.
It's true.
Good maneuver.
I think you painted yourself
in a quarter.
You found a way out.
Hey man, I'm just, you know, excuse me.
Anyway, we get all this stuff at orjibane.com.
Yes, indeed.
Good stuff on there.
Also,
Jock was a store.
It's called jocco store.
Jocco store.com.
This is our website.
This is where you can get.
T-shirts, jackets,
hoodies,
hats,
rash guards,
representative of the path.
Discipline equals freedom.
Good, deaf core, to the core.
All that stuff.
Don't forget about this podcast and the fact that you should subscribe to it if you haven't already,
which is entirely up to you.
Completely, yes.
We recommend that you do subscribe to this podcast.
And also, don't forget that we have the grounded podcast, which is about life.
Yes.
And a lot of jiu-jitsu.
Yes.
Which is the same thing in many ways.
Yeah, correct.
And the Warrior Kid podcast.
Have you listened to the new ones yet, Dave?
No.
With the children?
Nope.
I think you're going to like them.
That will happen soon.
I think you're going to like them.
I think the kids are going to like them.
There are some lessons.
I get done recording those.
And I don't know.
I don't know what else in my life gives me the feeling of getting done
recording a Warrior Kid podcast where I felt like I've done something really good.
Like just something.
I'm like, yeah.
I mean, I get done and I go, yep, I passed a good, I did a good deed.
That's good, yeah.
And then this is kind of revealing because it shows you that I don't do a lot of good stuff.
Most of the stuff I'm doing is bad.
So when I get done recording and I'm like, man, I, that was, that was a good thing.
A kid's going to hear that and it's going to help them.
Yeah.
That makes me feel good.
And then speaking of kids, speaking of warrior kids, check out Irish Oaks Ranch.com, where you,
young Aiden is making soap from goat milk on his farm so that you can stay clean.
Yes, sir.
Stay clean.
And we are looking forward to that new one.
Yes.
Right?
That's still a go.
We are making a new soap.
And the soap has anti-bacterial, bacterial, antimicrobial properties to it, antifungal properties.
Digging.
And the soap is going to be called killer soap.
Boom.
Good.
That's simple.
Very much in line.
Yeah, very good.
Also, YouTube.
We have a YouTube channel if you were interested in watching the video version of this podcast.
Also, excerpts on there.
Enhanced excerpts from time to time on there.
If you enjoy.
Explosions and fire.
And music to...
The dramatic cello music.
To help.
deliver the message of the path visually and audibly.
We're four years deep right now.
Yes, sir.
We were talking about videos the other day,
and you were talking about some of the Victory MMA videos early,
and you were saying, hey, these are, you know,
now at the time they were kind of awesome.
Yeah.
And they were.
Thanks.
Now we look back and it's like, well, you know,
they're kind of commonplace.
Yeah, not so awesome.
Are you feeling, how are you feeling about the early jocry?
podcast videos have we have they become dated yet are they timeless they're timeless okay
I don't know if they're not timeless obviously but Charles they're making timeless
videos that's not what I'm saying well like me being Shakespeare well yeah well the
lits fit I mean they're a lot more simple than that you know I mean what you figure the
first enhanced excerpt was more of an incidental situation the one good
Good. I think that will be timeless, not as far as the video production goes, but the message is the frontrunner of that whole situation. Let's face it.
Cool. I thought it was just your enhanced. In my opinion. Making that so popular, right?
Anyway, in my opinion, that message is timeless. Yes. So yes, they do still hold up. And I think they will hold up for a very long time.
Well, I'm glad you feel so good about that.
Anyway, YouTube channel, Jocka Podcasts.
We do have a YouTube channel.
Boom, there it is.
We also have psychological warfare.
Me talking to you directly into your ears when you are about to make a mistake.
And you know what that mistake is?
It looks like a donut.
I'm not going to let you do it.
It looks like skipping workout.
Not going to let you do it.
Looks like sleeping in in the morning.
Not going to do it.
So check out psychological warfare on iTunes, Google Play, whatever MP3 platforms.
And if you need a visual, if you need the visual,
If you need the visual reminder of the path and you need it big on canvas, cool, go to flipside canvas.com, which is my brother, Dakota Meyer, Jocko Podcast 115, by the way, who makes graphic representations of the path so you can hang them on your wall and you'll wake up to him every day.
And then we got some books. Obviously, we spent the last two podcasts reviewing leadership strategy and tactics.
we've got that one out there probably enough time for you to pre-order right now and get a
first a dish or you can also not do that and live the rest of your life in shame with a second
a dish choice is yours i will still sign a second dish sure i'll still like yeah man cool i'll
barely even let you know to be subtle be a subtle are you going to go like are you going to look
at him and go dude no no won't it won't be that because not an issue no not a big issue
I appreciate that's how much.
Makes sense.
Yeah.
So you can give that a try.
Way the Warrior Kid Books, one, two, and three.
Get them for the kids that you know.
Mikey and the Dragons.
Get them for the little kids that you know.
And some of the big kids do.
Learn how to overcome fear.
Discipline equals freedom.
Field manual.
Field manual, zero one.
Now I guess it's predesignated.
So that is the, as Echo just said, the field manual on how to get after it.
Very important as Echoes.
Charles says yes lots of echo Charles quotes over here coming from me the audio version
of that is on iTunes Amazon music Google play and also extreme ownership and the
dichotomy of leadership the two books that I wrote with my brother Leif Babin about
leadership and how to use the leadership principles we used on the battlefield in
your business and in your life and echelon front which is our leadership
consultancy and what we do is solve problems through leadership whatever
You are having in your organization they are leadership problems. They are absolutely leadership problems 100%
And I know that might sound crazy for you to hear right now for me to say that 100% of the problems that you are having in your organization are leadership problems
It is accurate. That's what the problems are. That's where they come from and we will get them fixed go to eschalonfront.com for details on that
EF online Dave. What do you got?
If you are on the leadership path and you're training with us,
EF online is an awesome resource to get additional reps.
And it is a great tool that we use in between working with clients.
However, this is completely dual use that if you are not even remotely engaged with
Echonfront and doing leadership training, this is still a skill that you can develop.
And you can go to EF online and go directly to that as a resource and expose to all the things
that we're teaching, all the things we're teaching clients and customers and all the people
we're working with is actually available for anybody. And it is a easy and guaranteed way to apply
the principles that we teach everywhere directly at any time you want. It's an awesome,
awesome resource. We also have a live event that is the entire echelon front team. It's called
the muster. We're doing three gigs in 2020. We're doing one in Florida, Orlando. We're doing one in
Dallas, Texas, and we are doing one in Phoenix, Arizona.
Go to Extreme Ownership.com for details.
All of our musters have sold out in the past.
These will sell out to.
Don't hesitate.
And then we have EF. Overwatch and EF Legion.
This is our talent acquisition firm where we are taking leaders from the military,
from both special operations, combat aviation, and all forces.
and we are placing them into civilian businesses.
So if you're a business, you can go on there and look for people to hire.
If you're a vet, I'm telling you, go to eFlegion.com and enter yourself, enter your information,
so that you can see what jobs are out there.
You can get information on how to get hired.
We can, you can look at jobs that are posted.
and you can start your next mission of getting after it.
That's EF Overwatch and EFlegion.com.
And if you haven't heard enough from us yet,
which would be surprising,
well, we are available on the interwebs,
on Twitter, on Instagram,
and on that Facebook.
Dave is at David R. Burke, B-E-R-K-E.
Echo is at Echo Charles and I am at Jocko Willinkin to all the military folks out there.
Thanks to you all for protecting our way of life.
We cherish the gift that you give to us and we thank you for it.
And to our police and law enforcement and firefighters and paramedics and EMTs and dispatchers
and correctional officers and Border Patrol and Secret Service and all first responders.
You also protect our way of life here at home.
so thanks to you all as well and to everyone else out there just remember that leadership is all on you
but it isn't about you it's about your team it's about your people it's about taking care of your
people so they will take care of you so be that leader be that leader be that leader be the leader
that elevates your people and elevates your team
by utilizing the right leadership strategies
and by utilizing the right tactics
and by going out there every day
and getting after it.
And until next time,
this is Dave Burke and Echo and Jocko.
Out.
