Jocko Podcast - 240: Your Fight Against Inertia--A Body At Rest Tends To Stay At Rest. Combat Lessons 2, with Dave Berke.
Episode Date: July 29, 20200:00:00 - Opening 0:01:43 - Combat Lessons Book 2. 2:06:20 - Final thoughts and take-aways. 2:08:47 - How to stay on THE PATH. Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/jocko-podcast/exclu...sive-content
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is Jocko podcast number 240 with Echo Charles and me, Jocko Willink.
Good evening, Echo.
Good evening.
And also joining us tonight once again, Dave Burke.
Good evening, Dave.
Good evening.
All right, last podcast, which was podcast 239, in case you couldn't subtract one from 240.
And I suppose we should give out some kind of shout out to the 240 Gulf.
I don't know why, but we should.
shout out to all you machine gunners out there that that that ran that 240 golf last podcast 239 we covered the first
edition of combat lessons rank and file in combat what they do and how they do it that was number one
and you know to be honest when i got done with that one i said yeah that's cool there's but there's
more of them and i kind of thought to myself you know well how many combat lessons are there right
That I remember this is 240 podcast worth of combat lessons.
But I was leaning towards, hey,
probably not going to cover more of these things
because there are more of them.
And then I started reading number two.
And as I read number two,
kind of out of the gate section one,
which is called leadership.
And you just start reading it.
And before I knew it,
I couldn't stop.
And there's more lessons,
more perspectives,
more angles,
more knowledge to make us better.
And I was really coming at this one.
I was really thinking about life a lot, all aspects of life.
And I think it's the opening of this that gave me that sort of mindset going through it.
I was thinking about life.
The parallels are everywhere.
All right.
Let's go to the book.
And I think, Dave, coming out of the gate, you're going to realize where I got so sucked into this thing, just out of the gate.
So the first section, like I said, it's called leadership.
And then the first subsection.
is leaders versus inertia.
I was already, I was, you had me at inertia, as they say.
Lieutenant Colonel R. E. O'Brien Cavalry Observer with the Fifth Army in Italy.
Here's what he says.
In spite of the fact that I observed many interesting things in practice, in the practice of tactics and technique, still the one lesson that stands out in my mind above all others is the one that is so well known by military men that it's stated.
here amounts to a little more than a platitude I mentioned it however because it had such a
profound effect upon me that lesson is the importance of and need for adequate leadership
so cool I got through that fine I wasn't quite there yet and then I read this
the effect on most men of the impact of battle is to cause them to want to do nothing
A determined effort must be exerted to accomplish even simple tasks, and men are likely to neglect duties which they know must be performed.
So think about that.
Right out of the gate right there.
The effect of men in battle is that you're going to want to do nothing.
And again, this is why I was talking about how this started making me think about life a lot.
Think about that when it comes to life.
How many people are just drawn towards the easy path, not doing.
doing what you're supposed to do,
duties that you know must be performed,
but you neglect them.
That's the difference between success and failure
in life, by the way.
Did you guys say in the Marine Corps,
why stand if you can sit,
why sit if you can lay down?
Did you guys say that in the Marine Corps?
Similar.
What did you guys say?
I'm trying to think of the phrase,
but it's the same alignment of like,
why do this when you can just do that?
I didn't remember exactly what we said,
but as soon as you said that,
you were saying,
I was a little thrown off by the title.
because you said leadership versus inertia.
And I was thinking myself,
leadership kind of creates inertia.
And when he's saying the people who follow
like Newtonian physics are going to laugh me out of the building,
but it seems like what he's describing is the opposite of inertia
sitting there doing nothing rather than moving in a direction.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Or it's the you're fighting to keep it going.
Keep the inertia moving.
Yeah.
He says there is no force other than a driving leadership to overcome this inertia.
Yeah.
So he talks about inertia as this static.
being not moving, this tendency to carelessness and to infuse a determination to succeed in the
minds of the individual men.
When this spark of leadership is present, the individual knows that others feel it too and that
his effort is not alone.
However, I was not a leader in this campaign, so I will quote an officer who is a successful
commander in an infantry regiment, the wearer of a silver star, an officer who has a fine
reputation in his division. And here's what this officer says. Tell your people when you
return that the hardest job they will have here is getting things done. My men know their
weapons and tactics thoroughly. My effort is simply to require them to do the things they know
must be done. Posting security, dispatching patrols, seeking a field of fire, retaining their
equipment and making sure that it is in working order. You have to check all the time. I believe it
was Patton that said 90% of your job as a leader is making sure that the orders get executed,
making sure that the things actually get done. So that opening right there is what kind of made me
just say, we need to talk about this. Because it's applicable so directly to us as human beings.
You know, I was talk about the gravitational pull.
You ever seen the chart of the gravitational pull of when the space shuttle
or something launches, I guess it's not the space shuttle.
It's space X.
Sure.
Elon kicking those things up into space.
But they use whatever, some massive amount of their power is to get the first,
whatever, mile up.
That's where they use 50% of it.
I don't know what the percentages are, but it's a massive percentage of the power
is to break free of the gravitational pull of the,
the earth. And once they're free of it, then once they're moving, they're okay. Like so much of
the effort of a leader is just to get things to go, get things to move. And we're going to get
to this. There's definitely some things here and we're about to roll into them where it talks about,
you know, so much reliance on the leadership. And in certain situations, you can see them
leaning towards a micromanagement, you know, a, hey, if I don't make this happen, but in other
parts of this book, they start talking about how the way that you're going to win is through
individual efforts and individual leadership. So you get into decentralized command a little bit later,
but I think it's one of those dichotomies. I think it's one of those dichotomies. As a matter
fact, I know it's a dichotomy that sometimes the phrase I used to use a lot, and I used it a lot
on this podcast was a force of will, right? Hey, well, as a leader, I'm just going to make this happen.
There is going to be a force of will. We are going to win this thing. We're going to go. I'm going to
make this happen. And that's what he's talking about here, this force of will that you have to
exert to make things happen. Even things that people know they should do. Next section, discipline.
So right out of the gate, we're talking leadership and discipline. I was in there. The keys to success
in combat. The key to success in combat, commanding general in a personal letter to lieutenant general
McNair. I would like to mention a few things I consider important in getting any prospective units
ready for duty in Southwest Pacific. The first of all requisites is discipline with a capital D.
I refer to discipline in all its phases, water discipline, malaria discipline, personal appearance,
military courtesy, the wearing of the uniform, personal and collective sanitation,
carrying out orders in general, assumption and proper discharge of responsibility throughout the chain of command, etc.
There is an inclination for men as well as some officers to go native in the tropics,
to let down mentally on material and spiritual values, so discipline is especially needed here.
Needless to say, I consider an aggressive offensive spirit always goes hand in hand with good discipline.
So that's one of those things where, you know, we're talking about imposed discipline in some ways there, right?
You make sure your weapons are clean.
Make sure you're cleaning yourselves.
There's a whole list of things.
Make sure you're drinking water.
Make sure you're cleaning your feet.
Isn't that a weird one?
Have you ever been in the water or in the bush long enough to get like a really bad feet?
No.
I got a minor case of trench foot.
Foot, yeah.
And when the guy who is my swim buddy during this particularly long S&R operation where we were a two-man pair out there, just a training operation, but he got actual trench foot.
He went to medical and they're like, oh, yes, you have trench foot.
It's weird that things like that, you know, when you see, talk to guys about Vietnam, one of the main things that the officers would do is check guys' feet because they wouldn't check on themselves.
So even something that seems so obvious, like you'd want to take care of your feet, people will not make that little extra effort.
The inertia for them is to say, you know what, I'm just going to go to sleep with my boots on and they're wet.
I'm not going to dry out my feet.
And by the way, you can sleep with your boots on.
I did.
We would sleep with our boots on in the field, but we'd take our socks off.
We'd unlace our boots.
So our feet are in they're just kind of loose so they can kind of dry out a little bit.
hang your socks on a little tree or something nearby
but you don't want to get rolled up
Echo's looking puzzle you don't want to get rolled up in the field
without your boots on okay that makes sense
if you get rolled up in the field without your boots on you got some problems to deal with
I can see that and BTF Tony you know you take one boot off
you fix whatever you got to fix then you put that boot back on then you don't take
both of them off you're just sitting there John McLean style
basically naked oh yeah that's a movie die hard
he runs on the glass
Yes, he wound up running over glass and how come he got caught without his boots on
Because when he arrived at Nakatomi Plaza he at
A request not a request a recommendation from a friend take off your shoes and you make fists in the carpet with your toes
It de-stresses you so that's what he was doing in the middle of this hijacking scenario
Interesting you know see there I was thinking that this book had knowledge in it
Next, Lieutenant Colonel Clifton F. Khan, 77th field artillery in Italy.
The great stress placed upon discipline and the chain of command is not an over emphasis and never can be.
We have found again and again that the highest standards of discipline are absolutely necessary in and out of combat.
In no other way can you be assured that the individual soldier will carry out orders without supervision and in,
combat this is essential. So again, we're talking about very stringent discipline and we're talking
about imposed discipline. I mean, we are. Let's call it like it is. Yeah, but the connection he's making
is what I was thinking as you're talking about last passage. It's that connection to the imposed
discipline that I'm going to start with that's going to get you to recognize over time. Yes.
What you need to do, the self-discipline you need to create. And if your plan is like,
I'm just going to make my folks self-disciplined, you're actually going to
skip the part where they learn why you have to do it.
And sometimes that starts with, you're going to do this.
You can explain it.
But you asked me if I ever had immersion foot or trench foot.
I never spent enough time in the environment to have to deal with that.
But I'll tell you, my very first Forrest March, which is a five-mile Force March,
like a very short Forest March at Officer Canada School in 1991.
We stopped 50 minutes into it.
We all changed our socks.
That's what we did.
And so that's one example of, but it was totally imposed on us.
but I was able to make that connection from these other people.
And so you're telling the story about people that were non-combat ready because of that.
But those lessons are all over the place in the military.
And it all starts the same way, which is sit down, take your boots off, change your socks.
And then over time, you make the connection of, oh, I understand what I need to do this.
So, no, I never had it, but I was taught that lesson very early on.
Yeah, there's some sort of obvious religious overtone.
too of, right, of like taking care of your men's feet, right? That's just a powerful thing.
Next, the basis of good discipline. One of our problems has been to get junior officers and young
NCO sufficiently hard-boiled to exact from their subordinates and meticulous obedience to every
order. We must ingrain in all ranks the realization that orders are not to be treated
as suggestions, but as concrete facts calling for the utmost effort until they have the
been carried out. So many people seem to feel that orders which are inconvenient or unpopular are
to be disregarded. And this is one of those things. It's hard for me to read this because we're
always telling people, look, the military is not this thing where just someone barks orders at you
and everyone just obeys, which it's not. This state of mind is a disease and must be eliminated.
So what this section says or what this individual is saying, and I don't know if the
This is the same guy talking because it's not broken out.
But then it says this.
Then it says this.
On the other hand, so we got dichotomy.
And elimination presupposes that all commanding officers and staffs take care that the orders they issue are consistent, correct, and capable of being carried out.
So that's a very, a very discreet way of saying, if you give me an order that's not consistent.
not correct and not capable of being carried out, I'm not going to follow it.
That's what that says.
They do it in a very roundabout way.
They're very cautious about how they said that because they know they had Colonel Pogue in the room.
They were writing this.
And Colonel Pogue said, he's been needing to listen.
Because Colonel Pogue comes up with the best plan every time.
Master your job, Lieutenant General Walter Kruger.
Discipline and the leadership of small units are the things which require constant emphasis.
The enlisted man or officer who does not follow instructions and orders implicitly during training or prior to reaching combat areas and who cannot do everything, every member of his unit might have to do is not properly qualified.
The squad leader must know exactly what each member of his squad should do in each type of operation.
The platoon leader should have the same knowledge concerning his squads and the company commander of his platoons.
Officers must not start worrying about the big picture until they have mastered all the details of the.
little one it's an interesting one I can tell you right now that it would be
impossible to know everything that the sniper knows it would be possible to know
everything that the radio man knows it would be impossible know everything that
the point man knows it would be impossible to know everything that the breacher
knows do you knew to understand them yes should you be able to set up that
breaching charge and clack it off if you have to absolutely should you be able to
pick up that radio and make comms if you have to where it take might take the
communicate, it might take the radio man four seconds to do it. It might take you three minutes.
Should you be able to know how to do it? Yes. At some point, if you're worrying about the details of
the little picture, you might be doing a disservice by thinking too much about the little picture
and not enough about the big picture. So I think officers should start thinking about the big picture
from day one and understanding how things fit together. Now, you can't get lost in that,
but you got to start thinking about it early.
Otherwise, your habit is just worry about the little things.
Your focus becomes looking down and in instead of up and out.
So a little, that one's too strong for me.
Too strong for me.
And I talked about that in leadership strategy and tactics.
You've got to know what to do, but there's a very discreet place in the military
where you go from being tactical.
they call it operational,
where you start being a strategic.
In the Marine Corps,
it's got for being a company-grade officer,
which is like a junior officer,
brand-new lieutenant to a field-grade officer.
Yeah, and all of a sudden,
there's this magical moment
that when you get promoted
from in the Marine Corps,
it's captain-to-major,
and if it's in the Navy,
from lieutenant-to-lil-comander,
well, all of a sudden,
overnight, you are now a field-grade officer
and you're supposed to think strategically.
And this transition point
actually is a big source of friction for a lot of folks,
and the people that struggle the most
going from company-grade and field-grade,
are the ones who have never thought about the big picture before.
And it's not to say that as a second lieutenant,
that I've been in the Marine Corps for six months,
I need to walk into the CEO's office and start talking strategy.
But you have to start thinking very early on
about the impacts of what you do to the big picture
and the sooner you can make the connection,
the easier that transition is.
And the longer you hold on it,
because it's just kind of like this cool bravado of like,
I'm a tactician, and it sounds really cool.
And I just want to fly the airplane.
And I don't only care about the big picture.
Well, when the time comes,
you get promoted and you probably will, it was really clear the ones who never really thought
about what they were doing and how that fit in the larger world when you made that promotion,
then all of a sudden you actually became highly incompetent at being a field of guard officer
because that's when you were starting and you were being out maneuvered by guys who had been doing
it since they were brand new officers. Yeah, you know what's really interesting about that
is there are some people that have a personality and or skill set that is more suited to be a
tactical officer and there's some people that have a personality and skill set that is more suited to be a
field grade officer or a strategic thinker that's and I see this in companies too you know I've worked
with companies where the CEO that got that company from whatever position you know got got them to go
public or got them perched or poised to go public as soon as they're going public that guy's out of there
Or maybe even before they go public because this guy, he's good at making things happy,
he's dynamic, but he's not polished, he's not clean.
He can't brief up the chain of command well.
He doesn't articulate himself at the next level.
Because some people can flow from talking to a platoon.
Like, listen up, hey, what's going on?
You can be in that mode.
And then you can walk, turn around and talk to give the general a brief on what the impact
on the cultural moments or the civilian populace and all those things.
Some people can do both.
some people do one some people do the other and it's very interesting it's very interesting because
You might not make it to field grade officer even though you you might be you might be good at it but you just don't have the
You just don't have it you know you just don't have it
So think about that when you're working with you know when you when you got people subordinates that you're working with you might have somebody that's not maybe the best
tactical leader, are they, can they do the job?
You know what I mean?
Look, they might not be able to do, they might not be the best at it,
but maybe they can get through that job and they can do a good job as at the next level
up.
And some people, they might be incredible at getting after it in the field and you can't
let them brief.
You can't let them brief the boss because they're going to mess it up.
Yep.
So the good thing is if you're if you're one of these humans out there, if you're one of these
potential leaders, think about where you are and think about modulating your personality
depending.
I can promise you.
If you watched me debrief a seal platoon and then you watched me brief the secretary of the
Navy, those two guys like the Venn diagram overlap was pretty small.
all. If you were just to take the words that I said, just a manuscript or whatever, transcript
of what I said, the core things that I said, the, the, I wasn't saying anything different.
I wasn't saying, I wasn't giving, I wasn't lying to the big boss and I wasn't lying to the
troops. But the, the method of delivery was different because I was talking to a different
audience who understands things differently. Good thing to think about. A couple of these here,
trial by fire
trial by fire
there's incredible
stories inside these books
about what men
do and they're definitely
worth look this is another one from
we read one from this last time this is from the
battle of the
at two island which is those
Aleutian islands up in Alaska
fighting the Japanese
this is a citation
the company led by captain
Thomas B. O'Donnell was thrown into confusion
by the strafing of hostile airplanes while it was forming to attack under heavy enemy ground small arms fire.
Seeing the immediate need, Captain O'Donnell moved from squad from squad to squad restoring order and then led his men to the assault,
during which he received a severe wound in the neck and shoulder and was evacuated.
Three days later upon hearing that his company was again scheduled to make an attack,
he insisted upon returning to the fight, although weak and suffering severe pain from his wounds.
He led his company in attacks on the enemy until five days later when he was mortally.
wounded while moving about in advanced positions encouraging his men.
One of the one of the um one of the lessons that I taught specifically I taught it to a
bunch of people but the first time I remember teaching at someone was to was to Seth Stone,
the Delta platoon commander who you know when you're doing immediate action drills
there's there's standard operating procedures and you follow you follow those standard
operating procedures and he would you know he would follow what the rules were.
And if that meant that he was going to, his next position that he was supposed to go to,
according to the standard operating procedures was behind a berm where he couldn't see anything,
that's where he was going.
And, you know, I just said, hey, man, why are you going there?
You know, because this is where we're supposed to go.
I said, can you see anything?
No.
Can you make a call?
No.
Can you lead your men?
No.
Okay, move.
Move around.
Go see what you got to see.
You can move around.
You can't break the SOPs.
There's a difference, right?
You can't break the SOPs, but you don't have to follow them perfectly.
So there's a big difference.
Breaking the SOPs means you get out of your lane and now you can get shot by friendly fire.
Not following the SOPs means you're staying within the confines of the rules,
but you're still moving around and telling people what to do.
And you can imagine this is a perfect example of what this whole thing started off with,
which is, look, this guy, in order to get his troops to go,
he had to personally get out there.
And, you know, why would you risk your life to,
to encourage his men.
Why would you risk your life to encourage your men?
You know why?
Because if you don't do that, your men aren't going anywhere.
That's the breaking, the inertia you talked about at the beginning.
If you don't do that as a leader, you're going to sit there and you're going to, eventually
you're going to get rolled.
You're all going to die in that position.
You cannot stay there.
But the path of least resistance that human nature is, I like this foxhole.
It's going to hang out down here.
This is good for me.
And he's like, no, we can't stay here.
And leadership is the only thing that gets people to see that.
That is, those are the times when you have.
to lead from the front. You got to make things happen. Doubling in brass, and I have no idea.
I don't know if there's some weird 1940s idiom that I don't know about, but the title of section is
doubling in brass. Citation, 37th Division, New Georgia. While private Blair F. Hertz was performing
his duties with the maintenance section in the vicinity of the unit ration dump, they were attacked
by Japs who had surrounded them.
He grabbed a bar and advanced on a Jap machine gun
that was delivering intense, accurate,
and extremely effective fire into the dump.
Private Hertz was able to silence this machine gun
and then continued to aid aggressively
in the defense of the position
until reinforcements arrived.
Just getting after it.
Just in the rear, getting after it.
When a citation starts with a private,
you know this is going to be a good one.
You know he got some.
Yeah, you know, what's too bad is, you know,
in the Navy you have rates where you can tell what the guy's job was.
This guy's just a private, but, you know, his job was probably, you know, well,
he says his duties with the maintenance section.
So this guy was changing oils and vehicles or something.
And then all of a sudden he's grabbing a bar and just getting some.
Here we go.
Dicotomy of leadership.
Oh, no, sorry, this section isn't called that.
It's called something else.
It's called Be Brave intelligently.
This is a weird one.
read lieutenant colonel a r e o'brien cavalry observer with the fifth army in italy a prisoner of war
a german light machine gunner asked an interrogator whether americans took stimulants to make them
foolishly brave when asked to explain what he meant he stated that he and an assistant gunner were in
position with a good field of fire one afternoon when a group of american soldiers was observed approaching
He fired several short bursts and began preparation to displace to the rear when he saw the American soldiers rise to full height and start charging toward his position over 100 yards away.
He reloaded his gun and opened fire, killing 11 men.
He then withdrew because he was sure the charge was made to conceal an envelopment, but none was made.
unit commanders found it necessary to direct their men to make full use of concealment and covered approach
continued emphasis on the necessity for dispersion and the use of covering concealment is essential
so this is what we don't want to have happen we don't want people to be so brave that you charge
over an open area a machine gun nest and the comment here says in the interest of efficiency
bravery must be supplemented by brain work.
Dead heroes are of little further use to their units.
Aggressive fighting men trained to apply the most efficient technique to combat problems,
willing to accept any necessary risks,
and conscientiously avoiding unnecessary risks are the backbone of the army.
Got to be brave, but you've got to be smart.
There's the dichotomy.
What was the original statement on that was brave but not foolhardy?
Brave but not foolhardy.
combat in towns as major campaigns develop in western europe combat in towns assumes increasing
importance cities towns and villages control the established road nets which must be open for the
movement of guns heavy equipment and supplies necessary to support the advance of infantry
combat in towns will often be the key not only to our successful advance but to successful
defensive actions just talking about mount in 1944
Attack of towns.
Captain W.E. Harrison. Harrison, Parachute infantry, Italy.
The theory of attack of a small town or village is to work groups around the flanks.
Cut the retreat and move in with patrols.
In this hilly country, however, we have found that where there is any high ground behind the town,
which dominates both the town and the line of retreat,
the best way is to work the entire force around the town undercover,
seize the high ground in the rear,
and firmly establish ourselves with 60-millimeter mortars on that.
dominating high ground. We take enough food and ammunition for to last us 24 hours and the Germans
usually pull out during this time. From our position, we can prevent reinforcement and inflict
heavy losses on them during their withdrawal. So we're flanking people and we're taking high ground.
I didn't think of anything new. I didn't think of anything new. Lieutenant Colonel L.G. Freeman
parachute infantry battalion commander in Italy. We learned at Altavilla to avoid
the direct attack of towns. It's too costly. We now work around to the rear with a large force and seize the
dominating ground in the rear. We did this at Calo, Machia, Fornelli, and several other places,
the names of which I've forgotten. I like it when you're just forgetting major battles that you've had.
It worked every time. Get yourself within 60 millimeter more to range of the town on dominating terrain
in or near it. The Germans won't stay in it. And then it says this. Here's the comment.
comments. The fact that the Germans have been known to withdraw without a fight from towns in the
rear of which we hold dominating terrain does not necessarily mean that such will invariably be
the rule. However, this possibility plus the fact that the Caesar of such high ground will greatly
facilitate any subsequent attack on the town proper suggests that commanders should give serious
consideration to these tactics where the terrain permits. It also should be remembered that
if such high ground is held by the enemy, our attack on the town proper will invariably be costly
and the town itself untenable.
That's how important high ground is.
Implanning the attack of a town proper, the following considerations should be borne in mind.
One, reduced observation and limited fields of fire in place of heavier stress on close combat.
So you are going to get some.
Two, controlling of attacking troops will be difficult.
and much depends on individual initiative and aggressiveness of small unit leaders.
So there you go.
We opened up talking about how you better follow all these orders.
And now we're on page eight and we're talking about,
hey, you know what?
It depends on the initiative and aggressiveness of small unit leaders,
making things happen.
Where possible town should be bypassed, isolated,
and attacked from the flanks or the rear.
Why are we even attacking this position?
If we don't have to,
roll around it.
Imagine if you made that part of your everyday sort of scheme of maneuver.
I can beat my head against this wall
or I can walk around it.
It seems like a good idea.
At least it seems like a good idea to me.
I don't know, echoes over there shaking his head.
A lot of times when you say every,
you know, you use those, what do you call those words
that are real like.
Real permanent.
Yeah, like do that in everything.
You know, every time you.
You say that I think it gets triggered.
I took some heat off of it by saying it seems like that would be a good thing to do in part of your everyday plan.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Then that's what kind of triggered me, though, to think, like, of all the things that it probably or maybe wouldn't work.
Yeah.
I don't know.
Would you treat your workouts like that?
Let me sidestep this workout.
Maybe flank it.
You're on dangerous ground right now.
Yes.
Going at it.
You're potentially right about that one.
I'm just saying usually when it comes to workouts,
I'm going to smash the workout.
Let's face it,
you know,
I'm going to go ahead on.
You're going full frontal assault.
Yes, sir.
Well,
I would think so.
Anyway,
unless I mean,
guess it depends on what you mean by flank.
Like,
I guess you could flank your initial feelings
about the incoming workout
if you don't feel like doing it,
you know,
you could maybe maneuver that way.
Maybe.
But maybe,
maybe not.
I don't know.
Maybe just direct assault,
workout,
I like it. There are times. There are times. So maybe not everything in life, you know?
Maybe not everything. But maybe if you're dealing with other people, it's a good call.
Yeah, that could be the case. This section here starts talking about like how you actually clear towns and it goes through.
And then it gets to a point where it starts just telling the comments about the story. So I'm not going to dump into the story or not going to go deep into the story here.
But just some of the comments here about the defense.
of a town. The defense of a town must be prepared to meet the methods of attack which may be
employed by the enemy. Since this must include the possibility of flanking attacks and encirclement,
it follows that an all-around defense must be the rule. The following points not covered in the
experience quoted above, which is the one that I didn't read, which is why you should read these things
yourself, should be borne in mind in planning the defense of a town.
one avoid if possible placing principal centers of resistance close to landmarks or at the edge of a town where the enemy adjustment of artillery or mortar fire will be facilitated positions either outside or within the town should be chosen and I read this whole section to read this and it's something that we talked about the other day on eF online and I don't know if you were if you were on the call and I talked about don't give away your position yes yeah totally I went into the
whole a whole explanation of not giving away your position.
And it's weird,
it's a weird thing to talk about because it seems real sneaky, right?
It seems real like, oh, it seems real sneaky,
especially when people love so much to talk about,
like being transparent.
But here's the deal.
If you have an idea, Dave,
and I have my own idea,
if I just put my stake in the ground and say,
My idea is this, I'm giving away my position.
Now, if we were going to go attack an enemy outpost,
I would do everything I possibly could to avoid giving away my position.
Because once I give away my position, well, now you know where to attack me on.
So what I would rather do is listen to what you have to say.
Here, let me understand what your position is because then it allows me to maneuver and change my position.
and also if you're an offensive person and your ego's out of control,
as soon as you see my position, guess what you're going to do?
Attack it.
So I gave you my position.
Now you're going to attack it.
And now what do I do then?
Dig in.
Now what do we have, a standoff?
We have extra casualties we don't need.
So why am I giving away my position when I'm having a conversation?
And this is, it's one of those things.
It sounds so manipulative, right?
But then I took it a little bit further on EF online.
I said, this is the facts.
The reason I don't give away my position is because I don't actually have one.
I'm not rolling in there thinking that I know everything.
I'm thinking I may have some ideas that you might be able to calculate and estimate, approximate where I am.
But I'm not going to go in there and say, Dave, I believe this.
because not just because I want to hide it from you.
That's not why.
It's because I actually question my own beliefs.
I actually am not looking at you thinking I know the best thing to do.
I've got some ideas, but you can't lock down my position because I'm not going to stay there.
I'm not digging in.
Being transparent, this authenticity doesn't have to be in opposition to what we just described either.
being transparent could be
hey I'm gonna
I'm gonna have a conversation
to tell you a whole bunch of things
that I'm thinking about
that are things for you to consider as well
for me maybe thinking out
what I don't want to do is sit here and go
hey you've mentioned three things
that I really feel like I want to give you feedback on
but I don't want to tell you those things
for whatever reason
being transparent is not the same
as digging your heels in
those the authenticity of that
there's this you would know this echo
there's this social media thing
where like somebody says some statement,
it's like a meme, and then it says,
prove me wrong.
It'll say like,
Martians colonize the moon, prove me wrong.
It's a louder with crowd or situation.
Whatever.
I should know more about it.
I know that you probably know enough.
But there's this little,
what kind of underneath that is this idea like,
you're not going to change my mind.
I know that you are not going to change my mind.
I'm being fully transparent here.
This idea of transparency doesn't have to be the opposite
of what you just described,
you can be full of transparent.
And if I actually,
my relationship is strong enough with you,
you know what you're going to do
when I'm being transparent,
you're going to listen to me.
And then you're going to come back
with some things to go,
oh, that's a good point.
And then actually together,
what will happen is we'll come up
with the right plan and then we'll go executed.
It'd be awesome.
Yeah, the idea of not giving away
your position,
you don't give it away,
not because you're hiding it.
It's because you truly don't know.
You don't lock yourself into it.
Yeah.
So I'm not walking into conversations.
I know, I know what to do.
I'm not doing that.
And if you're in a leadership role, if you're in an actual leadership role, how much do you think your people really want to engage with you if you announce your position out of the gate?
Like, what's the chances of them giving you great feedback?
Being transparent.
Yeah.
Yeah.
How does that encourage transparency from the troops?
Answer.
It doesn't.
Well, and if it does, hey, Dave, that sounds like a great idea.
I fully support your idea.
You're so smart.
Yeah.
Which is the last thing you want as a leader to be told how smart you are by your subordinates.
You want to be told, hey, I don't agree with you.
Oh, great.
Tell me why.
Where practicable form salience by organizing outlying buildings to cover perimeter of town with flanking and an enfiladed fire.
I had to look up the word salience because I didn't know what it meant.
It's like a little projection that's sticking out of the battle line.
So in order to get a little better cover, you can take an outlying building and you can set up a kind of a fort there.
The noun, a salient?
Yeah.
Form salience.
Because there's a word salient, right?
Yeah.
It means like significant or what does that mean?
I think it's like a clear point.
Yeah.
Which is the other.
It's the same thing, right?
A clear point?
Well, here I am making this.
It's like a projection.
It's a point that something sticks out.
But that was a salient point.
Yeah.
Meaning, oh, yeah, that was a good point.
I understand what you said.
Oh, we built a salient out there.
Oh, it's a little point where we've got.
a solid coverage.
Kind of like monolithic.
Kind of the same deal.
Yeah, I guess kind of the same deal.
Like there's a monolith, which is the noun version of monolithic kind of thing.
Yes, there are all kinds of words that are based on other words.
Hey, I'm just trying to understand this whole deal.
Every once he says something and then once he says that he writes down a little note and
that means he's going to go back and edit himself out.
I don't know if that made the list.
he's going to hold it. I think he's going strong.
No, hey, it'll probably help
some people as far as salient
and salience goes. Yeah.
And also help people realizing that there are
multiple versions of the same words
in the world. Yes, it's true.
I'm a jerk.
That too is true.
In addition to a central reserve within the town
provide, if possible, for a
concealed mobile reserve, preferably
strong in armor to be held
outside the town to counter
enemy flanking maneuver.
And once again, what is the root of that right there?
Don't give away your position.
The root of it is, hey, hide this element, which is smart.
Keep it mobile.
Wherever adjacent terrain features dominate the town, they should be secured.
Obviously, this use of high ground may be key to successful defense.
That's funny.
They say dominant terrain and then they just call it high ground.
Within the town, the construction of street obstacles or barricades to impede enemy movements
and the organization of groups of buildings into strong points
should be carried out as extensively as time available will permit.
Strengthen your defenses.
In delaying actions, the defensive use of towns
will prevent the attacker from determining the strength
of the forces opposing him.
It is not normally advisable to organize a town
as an isolated strong point except under terrain conditions
which prevent the enemy bypassing it.
So don't stick a town out there on its own.
Don't stick anyone out there on their own unless the terrain allows it.
So then there's a, I didn't cover one of these, one of these sections, but this one,
when I started reading it, and as I read through it, I said to myself, this is such a great
example of simplicity and the way this, this battalion attack happens.
And then the way it gets debriefed is all very interesting.
So I'm going to burn through this real quick.
Mission.
This is a battalion attack in Italy.
Mission, Lieutenant Colonel Earl Taylor, Infantry Battalion Commander in Italy.
On 11 October, my battalion was ordered to make a night march, passed through the second
battalion, which was about three miles east of the Italian town of Gwardia, north of the Kallor River,
and seized the high ground in the vicinity of Gordia.
We were then to continue the advance.
Contact.
As we approach Guardia, our leading company made contact with the enemy.
At A, and there's a sketch that they go through this.
It developed with one platoon,
but a stop by heavy machine gun
and direct 88 millimeter fire from points E, F, and D,
and was unable to advance.
I immediately moved to the high ground.
So basically they get into a big gunfight,
and they can't move forward.
And here's what I like.
I immediately moved to the high ground,
200 yards north,
where I could observe the enemy position.
So right now we have observed happening.
getting on the high ground love that observe what's he doing why is he observing well because he's
got to figure out what to do now he gets up in this observation position and he says the enemy had all
of the high ground to the front and i could see it would be impossible to advance frontally so what does
that mean now he's orienting himself to the situation oh the enemy's got all this high ground up here
i can't advance friendly so then was he to do so i decided
to make a double envelopment sending company eye over the hill to the right and company K on a wide left envelopment.
Contact was to be maintained visually.
So there's the action.
It's actually happening.
So he goes through the Ooloup in like four sentences, which is totally legit.
Base of fire five tanks were available for the attack,
realizing that the tanks could not move down the road to Guardia,
which is the only tank approach due to the streams and high mountains.
And because the enemy had 88s and armored cars at F,
I decided to emplace the tanks along with my eight heavy machine guns and six 81 millimeter mortars as shown in the sketch results
The attack was successful by order the tanks and other supporting weapons open fire five minutes before company L started its advance
That is called cover and move we got tanks in it and supporting weapons
Firing and then company L starts their move after five minutes
15 prisoners were captured 25 enemy killed our casualties were approximately 10 killed and 15 wounded
which when you think about the assault in an urban environment,
you're going to take some casualties,
and those are certainly some casualties,
but those are not as bad as you might imagine
going into a city when you consider the fact
that if you don't know anything about urban combat,
one enemy with a machine gun
can kill dozens and dozens of troops.
The enemy strength, as determined from prisoners,
was two rifle companies, each reinforced,
supported by tanks, armored cars, and 88s along the road.
These prisoners stated that their force was so completely disorganized
and demoralized by our volume of fire and scheme of attack
that it was impossible for them to make a counterattack
and regain their positions.
Planning it took about two hours to make plans for this attack,
which was very carefully studied, planned, and coordinated.
It's funny.
Sometimes the U.S. military spends months making plans
for an attack and he's saying this took two hours,
but it was carefully studied, planned, and coordinated.
That's what he needed was a solid two hours.
It effectively utilized the terrain features.
Every weapon available to the battalion was used in such an attack.
Maps must be prearranged with critical points and phase lines.
Once the attack has started, the basic plan cannot be changed.
It must succeed.
That's an interesting statement.
And the word that I underland was basic.
You're nod in your head, Dave.
like, yeah, my immediate reaction is must not be changed.
I get, like, kind of tense, like, well, that's, that, but yeah, you're right, the basic plan.
The basic plan.
It doesn't say we can't change.
So rather than sort of get all excited that he says he can't change anything is to, he's right.
Yeah.
Especially at night and when you look at this whole situation, you actually want to limit the amount of
replanting and record.
You want to limit a lot of things.
Now, not the individual actions of the teams of maneuvering and things like that and let
them make the adjustments, but you don't want one element to go, you know what, let's cancel
the envelopment and just do something different and abandon your portion of the plane.
You actually can't do that.
So you actually need to keep the basic plan.
That clarity actually made a lot of sense.
Yeah, that one word.
Yeah.
That one word makes a big difference.
When you start thinking about what they're doing, you've got, what is it, eight heavy
machine guns.
Those guys are doing a fire mission on this town for five minutes before you enter the town.
that's coordination.
You can't start thinking, well, you know, I think I'm going to go earlier,
whatever it is.
The basic plan, you got to stick with that basic plan.
Then I, this is something that I lived by.
If I, if it was possible to stick with the basic plan,
I was sticking with the basic plan.
Like, it would have to be something really,
now we would have a contingency plan.
Hey, but if I could avoid using the contingency plan,
I would stick with the basic plan that we rehearsed.
And we would rehearse.
contingency too, but people expect what they're going to be doing.
We had the exact same philosophy.
We had contingency plans, but the part of that that made that possible is our plans were
usually really fluid.
Some key limits, you had some limiting decisions inside there, but our plans weren't
hyper detailed and super down to the, so you could stick to the basic plan.
And we used to have just a joke, stick to the plan.
That was what we always said.
Like, what did you do here?
Just stick to the plan.
That didn't mean you don't think, you don't make changes.
but the idea that what we planned and how we coordinated,
stick to that and then make smart decisions along the way to reinforce that
as opposed to you get halfway there and then, hey, you know what we should do?
We should come up with a new plan.
Like there's no time to come up with a new plan.
Once you cross the line of departure,
you kind of need to stick to the plan, the basic plan,
which also drove our plans to be basic.
We had very basic, big picture plans.
Yeah.
Simple and flexible.
If, you know, if the three of us were going to go and take down a building,
and we say, okay, here's the way it's going to go.
Once we get to the front door, Echo, you're going to open the door.
Dave, you're going to go left.
I'm going to go right.
And then Echo, you're going to go left.
And we rehearse that 10 times.
I promise you that as we approach that building,
there's going to be a civilian in the front yard that Echo is going to have to deal with.
And all of a sudden, the whole plan's out the window.
So you can't go to that level of detail and you definitely need to have flexibility there.
but the basic plan of, hey, we're going to approach the building.
Totally.
That's not going to change because we know where the fire support is, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Estimating the situation in planning should be emphasized in training.
Comment, and this was, I found this interesting too.
This account is a good example of fire and movement on the battalion.
I have no idea.
I guess I got it from Roger Hayden, why I use the term cover and move instead of fire and movement because of the same thing.
But I, same thing.
Cover and move and fire movement are the same thing.
This account, at least as far as I know,
am I missing something?
I don't think so.
We use the term fire and maneuver.
That was the one element moves,
one element covers,
and I think it's synonymous.
Yeah, yeah.
However, it should be pointed out
that a double envelopment
is a rather ambitious scheme of maneuver
for a single battalion
and should be used with caution.
And I loved seeing that because
what you're talking about,
Echo Charles,
is you're talking about a double envelopment,
you're basically surrounding a target,
which means you got good guys on the flanks of bad guys.
And if you start shooting at the bad guys in the middle,
you can shoot yourself, and it's really problematic.
The thing about this,
and there would be occasional seal platoons that would go,
oh, yeah, we're going to just surround the target.
It works when nothing goes wrong.
It works when the enemy doesn't start.
shooting it works if you have on the positive side it works if you have a terrain feature that
prevents friendly fire which is possible you can have a you know a ravine that allows you to be in a
certain position but when you when you do these battalion sized operations you're actually
getting out of the you should be moving outside the range of your own weapons which is what the
goal is right you know we're really far away and and as long as we are shooting our weapons
the enemy there's a very small chance that our weapons are going to hit our friendly forces
so be very careful about double envelopment and same thing with going to a enemy's rear like if
you're going to do that well then you've got to pay attention to how that's going to work out it is a
lot harder than it looks no mention is made of the constitution of a reserve force such a reserve
must be retained under the control of the commander to enable to counter unforeseen enemy reaction
as the attack progresses.
Troops committed to a plan of action cannot be considered as available for this purpose.
The division of the battalion into approximately three equal attack forces is open to criticism,
but it worked in this case.
A scheme of maneuver should include a determination of the direction of the main effort
and the preponderance of the force should be available to support this effort.
Here's an interesting story.
So one of the great tactical lessons learned of my life, which I learned in training,
when you, so we would set up, you know, to do target assaults.
Typical, any Army manual, any Marine Corps manual, how you do a target assault,
you know, you set up a base element and a maneuver element.
So the base element is going to engage the target.
It gets in position and it shoots at the target.
Once it's shot at the target for a certain amount of time,
the assault element then gets up and maneuvers towards the target.
When they get to a certain point,
the people shooting at the target shift fire off the target,
but they keep shooting,
and eventually the assault team moves through the target.
And I was watching a young junior officer.
I was in training at SEAL Team 1,
and he said, okay, what we're going to do is for our base element
that's going to do all the shooting at the target area,
what we're going to do is we're going to take our machine gunners
from the other, from the assault element
who has to move,
we're going to move the machine gunners into the base element.
We're going to take some of the riflemen
and put them in the assault element
so they can move easier and they can get through the target.
And I said, I was thinking to myself,
that's pretty smart.
Smart guy is going to get a really strong base element.
Vietnam vet said, what are you doing?
He said, well, you know, you know, Master Chief,
I'm going to go ahead and put heavier, stronger base over here
in the machine gun element.
and put all my machine guns over in the base element.
And I'm like, I can already tell I'm glad I didn't.
It wasn't coming up in this plan.
But why is that?
You know, he says, well, because I want to have more machine guns.
I want to have more firepower in my base element.
And then the master chief in one question said,
what happens if the assault element gets compromised on the way in?
End of discussion.
Because now we don't have any machine guns.
And by the way, what should happen is if we have machine guns
and the assault element, the assault element just became the base element.
That's what just happened.
And the thing that the other lesson that I learned from that was that what you really
get to do, the other benefit, which I actually would say is an even bigger benefit, is we have unit
integrity, which I love unit integrity.
That squad or that platoon's always working together.
The machine gunners are there.
They can break off.
They can assault things.
They can do all kinds of things, where when you pull those machine gunners out, they're
not they're way less capable so apply that to your business to your team how do we keep the teams
together how do we keep the teams together how do we keep them both how do we keep them most
capable that's what we want to do setting up little specialty moments is a risky call
Factors contributing to the success in this attack were prompt estimate of the situation by the commander, including a study of the terrain based on personal reconnaissance, development of a definite plan of maneuver based on the seizure of key terrain and outflanking enemy positions, detailed planning of specific orders, utilization of maximum firepower where available maintenance of control over the elements.
A little section here on fighting in wooded terrain, Lieutenant Colonel F.L. Walker, Infantry Battalion
Commander, Italy. The area in which my battalion operated was covered in thick scrub trees and
fruit orchards, interspersed with frequent farmhouses, many stone walls, six to eight feet in height,
and numerous sunken roads. Field of fire was greatly restricted. Average observation was only
50 to 100 yards. Enemy delaying groups with machine guns were widely scattered and impossible to locate.
until arrival within 100 yards or less.
It was found necessary to place heavy weapons out in the front line
or very close up to avoid hitting our troops.
After encountering hostile fire,
it was found very effective to spray the entire woods ahead
with a massive concentration of mortar and machine gun fire
for about one minute, followed by a rapid advance of rifle platoons
under assault fire to cover all the trees and house windows
where snipers might be hiding.
In each case, Germans pulled out rapidly,
leaving weapons and ammunition behind, although we had been unable to locate them previously.
However, the tendency of troops is to wait for definitely located targets before they will open fire,
which results in allowing very small groups of enemy to shift position frequently and keep up
a demoralizing rate of machine gun fire to cause a great delay.
The continuous rapid fire delivered by our heavy machine guns had a particularly demoralizing
effect on the Germans.
The remarks of this battalion commander emphasized the importance of barrage covering fire,
the firepower of available weapons in this instance substituted for an artillery barrage,
but the principle remains the same covered move.
Losses will be minimized by following closely the massed fires of available weapons delivered
in areas from which enemy fire is expected.
I think the enemy might be there.
I'm putting rounds into it.
And isn't it interesting how that one,
Think about that lesson learned of
Realizing hey what we need to do is lay down heavy fire wherever we think there might be enemy and push forward as quickly as we can
Think about that lesson like think think about the first time it happens the first time it happens
You're like oh where are they where are they no one shooting and then someone goes hey put down fire and advance
That guy start laying down fire and they start laying down fire whatever they think there's enemy
And then that allows you to get the enemy and then that allows you to get the enemy
enemies heads down because they are somewhere out there and you get their heads down and
now you're maneuvering and when you're maneuvering they're not and now you win but can you
imagine that that's a little bit off of our instinct right as a human if you don't if you don't
get trained that way your instinct is not hey I'm just going to shoot where I think there's
bad guys I'm going to shoot in that little dark corner over there I'm going to shoot in that
window over there I'm going to shoot near that stone wall over there you haven't seen one
enemy but that's where you're shooting and now you have a whole company of soldiers doing
that that's a lot of firepower going down range and it allows you to move because somewhere in one of
those positions there was enemy but think about what it took to learn that lesson and how valuable
that lesson right there is to be able to tell people and it also talks about the importance of
speed which is the next note regimental commander infantry Cicely I believe that the individual
soldier now realizes that a relentless steady advance saves casualties and that he is now imbued with the
knowledge of the importance of speed.
Every man in this regiment is firmly convinced that the speed of our recent operations saved
us from huge losses.
Down to the lowest private, the feeling exists that we would still be at Canisotti if we
had not pushed the enemy off balance and kept them that way.
How often are we sitting there waiting for the perfect plan, the perfect whatever and
what we should be doing is moving?
Right?
You want to just bring this down to working out, Echo Charles,
since that seems to be your main, you know, topic for the day.
Yeah, cool.
Yes.
So let's look at two options.
One, all right, what I'm going to do is I'm going to go research on the internet.
You know, what the max time under load I need to do for this particular workout, right?
Time under tension.
Yeah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, right?
We'll come up with my periodic, periodization.
My periodization for my workouts, right?
All these things that you could spend two hours,
research and then writing and mapping out,
or you could go do a bunch of cleaning jerks.
Just go, yeah.
There is an advantage to doing cleaning jerks.
Look, I'm not saying you've got to be an idiot.
No, no.
But there are some positive things to just going.
Yes.
And keeping moving and firing where you think it might.
Hey, I don't know about the internal bicep head or whatever.
the brachial head of the bicep,
which I know you probably got some little
high tuned exercise.
Long head and short head.
Yeah, there you go.
So you do certain types of curls
with the easy bar to hit that target, right?
Yeah.
Whereas you could just say,
hey, let's face it.
Go do some curls, right.
Yeah.
Yeah, actually you're right.
I actually agree with you 100%.
I agree with that philosophy in working out.
Yeah.
I mean, there's a couple of things you want to know.
Otherwise, you're just kind of, you know,
moving around with no specific direction,
which I, you know, teach their own.
But yeah, I think that actually is a very good analogy.
You know, you sort out, what am I trying to do here,
get a few basic methods on trying to, you know,
how to achieve it and just go.
Especially when you start coupling that attitude
with the fact that we don't want to move in the first place, right?
That inertia is we're just trying to stay still.
And now we can focus on that by just doing a bunch of planning.
Like, hey, I'm just wait.
to see where the bad guys are.
I'm just waiting.
No,
freaking lay down fire.
That's the way you wake up in the morning.
You wake up in the morning saying,
I'm going to put down fire.
That's what I'm going to do.
That's a good plan.
Yeah, very good plan.
Yeah, you're right about that too.
You're like, oh, wait, wait,
let me try to remember what I was going to do today
and be like, well, maybe I should do this
because tomorrow I'm going to do this.
So maybe I shouldn't do this.
You know, I shouldn't do it that hard.
And you know, and you spend all this time
and then it's like, well, shoot,
if I do the whole workout now,
shoot dinner's like in like 45 minutes.
So maybe I should, I don't know.
I'm just saying.
Depends on when you work out, I guess.
You know, not in your case for sure.
Maybe breakfast or whatever.
But yeah, then you're like, oh, that's 45 minutes.
That only gives me like 10 minutes to warm, like or one minute to warm up.
And maybe, man, I might as well just do this tomorrow.
That way I can get the whole thing done.
You see what I'm saying?
Then yeah, all that planning.
Not only did it, not a lot of that not matter.
Meanwhile, weakness is winning in your body.
Meanwhile, weakness is winning.
Man, and then there's that.
Which we're trying to avoid.
Yeah, is that, I think it was you who talked about.
I don't know.
Whatever.
But yeah, when you let the weakness creep in, you give that weakness a precedent.
You know, so the weakness is sort of like, oh, yeah, I kind of approved my, my, my presence kind of thing.
I was talking about this on EF online the other day.
I've been doing this lately in my head.
So, and I haven't quite figured out what this means, but I know it's been very functional.
when you have like an option of doing a bad thing or just not doing the bad thing,
that reaction of just not doing the bad thing isn't strong enough.
I've actually been trying to do something good.
Okay.
Does that make sense?
Let me explain to it again.
So an example, oh, there's a donut over there.
You know what?
I'm not going to eat the donut.
That's not strong enough.
not only am I not going to eat the donut,
I'm actually going to go and do 20 burpees.
Yeah.
And you know,
it doesn't even have to be that extreme because guess what?
You're working or whatever and you're like,
I just like,
I just want to have a donut.
No,
no, no,
I'm not going to eat that donut.
And you know what I'm going to do?
I'm going to go and get my desk cleared off right now.
Yeah, kind of on top of that.
Doing something actually proactive to crush.
Yeah.
To crush.
That weakness.
The weakness that's wanting to grow.
it's just it's like if it's like you know if I says hey echo echo you know you you you want to
come by my house and and and grill up some stakes and let's say you don't really feel like doing it
and so you're like well you know what I mean I'm gonna pressure you but if you're like negative
I'm already doing something I'm like okay that case closed right case closed you already won
so I'm just saying going a little bit harder at the weakness yeah is a little trend I'm in
right now yeah and that and that
And that works.
I mean, it depends on what you mean by works,
but that's a good move.
That's like, yeah, you know, like, yeah, I'm about to, like, okay, I have,
I have burpees.
At the end of this workout, I finish the workout with 100 burpees, we'll say.
I'll be like, man, that workout was pretty solid, you know,
I don't know about those burpees.
You know, we'll do those burpees another time.
We're going to skip the burpees is what we're going to do.
And then it comes time to skip the burpees.
You're like, you know what?
No, 150 or 200 now, now just for thinking that, you know?
Oh, yeah.
You're going hard on weakness.
Yes.
I think that's a positive thing.
I think you're right.
I'm going to start, like this ties in for me.
I'm going to start laying down fire.
If I, now I'm going to start being even more proactive.
I start seeing weakness.
I'm laying down fire.
I'm putting some mortar rounds on that stuff immediately.
What did you write down, Dave?
I think we went so far away from whatever.
I'm not sure I can bring us back.
We're talking about burpees and bicep curls, bro.
You talked about bias before.
So actually it might be a little connection in if we think about it for a second.
You were talking about, well, you actually weren't talking about bias.
I had the word bias in my mind.
When we had a plan, hey, we're going to go to the east or the well.
You're going to go to the west.
And hey, that might not happen.
We might have to do something different.
We used to brief on missions, these general missions, like, hey, all things being equal,
I want you to bias to the south.
And if, you know, we get additional pressure, you're going to be the element that biases to the south.
Now, look, something may come up where you can't do that.
And that's fine.
You may go to the north.
Go ahead and let me know.
but our plan is that all things being equal,
we're going to buy us in this direction,
which allows me to keep my plans like really general.
Yeah, that's about this general.
Yeah, that's great.
And it's,
but it's not completely like out in nowhere
where you don't have some idea,
but it's like,
hey, these are the things we're anticipating
and all things being equal.
You were talking about the inertia thing,
which has kind of bugged me from the beginning.
But I actually was thinking about,
as you were saying it,
is, you know, he's talking about like,
the laws of physics, whereas objects at rest tend to stay at rest, and objects in motion
tend to stay in motion. And the hard part is getting the staying at rest and getting it to the
motion. Like, once you get the motion going, actually it's not that hard to keep it going.
It's the friction of doing nothing. And it's that connection. Like you said, I know you didn't invent it,
but this idea of default aggressive, this bias for doing something is the hardest thing to get,
which is the natural bias of doing something.
And when you made that comment about when I see weakness or I feel weakness,
the natural bias is,
oh, no, I'm not going to give in to that weakness.
I'm going to do nothing, which everybody's like, that's the win.
And you're like, no, actually, that's not the win.
The win is not to do nothing.
Now, is it better than eating a donut?
Yes.
But we're not here to just not eat donuts.
That's not the game we're playing over here.
The game we're playing is just not to eat the donut.
nuts. And he started the very first thing is leadership versus inertia. It's that how hard is it to
get the movement to do something? But once you have that bias, that bias to maneuver and that
starts, it's not that hard. It actually gets easier every single time. So that's my connection
to things you were saying. And yeah, I'm going to let you guys talk about what it is you talk about.
But that's what I was thinking about is that what that bias really means to tie back to the very first thing that I kind of thought about was like, hey, what's he talk about? Because I was thinking inertia is movement.
inertia is not movement. It's just the state that you're in.
inertia could be doing nothing. And that's what he's talking about breaking out of that and the bias to move, which is the most challenging thing.
Yeah, I talk about pushing a train. You know, and I'm always like, hey, if you're going to push your train, the first, getting that thing to start moving is the hardest part. And you start pushing, you push. You push.
you push and it eventually starts to move a little bit and then you get to a point if you keep
pushing that thing where you can actually like grab onto the railing and hang on for a second
it's just going to keep going you started it when you were talking about blasting a rocket ship out of
here exactly you can actually use 90% of your effort to get that in your only you don't need 90%
you can coast the rest of the way once you break free of that gravitational force of like
literally I'm just going to I'm just on the train now yeah
Now, look, if you can just jump on a speeding train, go for it.
But most of us, most people have to actually get that train from a dead stop and move it.
Yeah.
You ever see those guys roll up a frying pan?
Yeah.
Like a piece of paper kind of thing.
I think that's like the method.
Really?
Yeah, like you hit it like real hard at that initial and then it like heats up the molecule so it becomes more.
Yeah.
If I'm not mistaken.
Unless I got tricked or something like that.
And it's one big trick.
But I'm pretty sure that.
Because it's always a strong man, right?
Yeah, for sure.
There's no weak man rolling up a frying pan.
I'll tell you that much.
It's usually like a feat of strength, stunt scenario.
I wonder if it's like you're seeming to bring it to some sort of molecular level, which I'm not sure about.
That was the explanation.
For real.
They're like, this is the trick.
This is how you do it.
You know what?
I do not know if you're right.
And I do not know if you are wrong.
I'm going to just leave it hanging and people will let us know.
And we will get someone with a frying pan posting.
it and telling us, hey, Echo Charles is 100% right.
Or Echo Charles.
Some bros.
The most likely outcome of this is neither of those.
It's, bro, Echo talking about frying pans when we're talking about combat.
That's the most likely outcome.
These concepts are everywhere.
There's only so much I can do to keep us on topic here, Echo.
I'm just saying if you can work with a frying pan, and rocket chips and whatnot, it can work
with like everyday stuff.
And I actually think Echo is the premier.
example in the world, premier example of in the world, in the entire world of, if you know
the way broadly, you see it in all things. You're seeing combat in a frying pan.
These ideas are everywhere. But there was, as far as Feets of Strength go, there's the ripping
the phone book one, right? I think there's a little trick. There's a trick. There's a
trick. You got to like unbunch him or bunch of them or whatever. But I think to your point is that
that initial, the initial break is the hard part. It's a hard part. That's where you use
technique.
Well, okay, how it went was the curling up of the frying pan.
How it's explained is you hit it with that first force of the rolling action,
but you just can't like you can't hit one and then re-grip and hit another one.
It's not like that.
You got to hit it once and just keep, keep going.
Don't let like the momentum stop because the molecules are still heated up for that moment.
It makes it more malleable or whatever.
That's how it was explained to me.
All right, we're going out on the limb.
I like it.
You got no problem taking risk.
I like the way you will.
Next one, the herd instinct major Robert Wilson observer with the X division.
They don't name the division.
In Italy, our troops, Echo's taking a note.
Maybe he's concerned that's getting edited.
Oh, you're going strong today.
All good.
Our troops showed a decided tendency to bunch up under fire.
This was observed on several occasions.
One prisoner wore, a German forward observer for an 88 millimeter battery was interrogated,
concerning his technique of adjustment.
It seems he had been told that American troops congregated went under fire.
When he saw American troops advancing,
he would call for one or two rounds in their vicinity
and observe the area where they congregated.
Fire was then shifted to that area.
The prisoner stated that he conducted very effective fire
in this way in several occasions on Italy.
Don't bunch up.
Not good.
Don't bunch up.
Leadership strategy and tactics talked about
this from my leadership perspective.
Let the leader lead.
You don't need to jump in there.
and crowd the leader.
Everyone, let me tell you my opinion.
It's like, listen to what the Moss has to say.
If he wants some suggestions, give it to him.
Don't crowd.
Don't bunch up.
Base of fire, Lieutenant Colonel, J.M.
Fan infantry battalion commander.
It was found that so long as Japs could keep us ducking from aimed fire,
their position remained secure.
But once the Jap was made to keep his head down and the Americans could get to his feet
and attack, it was merely a matter of walking up to the position
and tossing in grenades.
To make this possible,
require the coordination of fires
down to and including the riflemen.
It is important that commanders and leaders
realize this. Otherwise, troops will remain
down when it is not necessary.
It's so amazing.
It's so amazing.
Cover move.
Teamwork.
Down to the lowest level.
Yeah.
And I just said teamwork and guess is what the next section is called.
And I did not look at this.
The next section of teamwork.
We would have a rifleman point out
a pillbox using tracer and ammunition, then a 37-millimeter gun would take them under fire with high explosives.
Oftentimes, a pillbox would attempt to evacuate to a safer place and the light machine gun would mow them down.
Isn't it interesting when we talk about teamwork and we talk about cover and move?
The reason that it is such an incredible metaphor is because if you don't cover and move, you don't win.
It's as simple as that.
If you don't have one element that's shooting at the Japanese while the other element is walking up and forth.
If you don't do that, you lose.
That's what happens.
You lose.
If you do that, you win.
If you work together as a team, you win.
Here's Lieutenant Colonel T.F. Bogart infantry officer.
Italy, one night in the vicinity of Avalino, the battalion established an outpost line around the high ground to the northeast.
The city patrols were ordered up several roads leading out of the city.
All company commanders were in front.
formed of the dispositions, the patrols went out before the outposts were posted.
A few hours later, firing was heard at the battalion CP, which increased in tempo and kept up
most of the night.
Soon reports were sent in that German patrols were operating in front of the outposts.
I'm sure you all know what's coming.
Next morning, it became apparent that our own patrols had been fired on as they attempted
to return to the outpost line.
Comment, the constant recurrence of such reports.
indicates the necessity for closer coordination of patrol activity with the outpost of with the
outpost system positive steps must be taken to ensure that the roots of returning patrols are
known to the outposts and that recognition signals are arranged blue on blue no one thinks
it's going to happen no one thinks it's going to happen i never never even thought about blue
Wall and Blues. It was like such a, it seemed like such a, I shouldn't say we never thought about
him, but it seemed like such a foreign idea. You think, how could that ever happen?
The way I, no one ever thinks it's going to happen to them. They always know it happens,
but it always happens to somebody else, some other teams, so much, it never happens to them.
I mean, even that comment is like the common occurrence or the common debrief that we got
on this and whatever he said, like how often they heard that same exact story.
notes from other arms.
There's another one about just staying off the skyline, right?
Don't give away your position.
I just had to highlight this.
There's a section about what it was like when they had an anti-aircraft
versus when they didn't have it.
And the title of this section is,
absence makes the heart grow fonder.
And what it was like.
And what he says in here is that rarely would the anti-aircraft actually hit a German
aircraft that was strafing them, it would rarely happen.
But when the anti-aircraft wasn't there, the German aircraft would just come down and just
hammer.
Free rein.
Radio discipline.
First Lieutenant C.E.
Place Air Corps, Sicily.
Flyers coming into the combat zone had no conception of radio discipline, Dave.
New pilots use the radio indiscriminately.
Men returning from missions use the interplane radio,
unnecessarily which jammed up the band for other planes still on a mission.
Comment, failure to observe radio discipline is a major problem for both air and ground units
in combat.
Each individual believes his case is a special one, not bound by established rules.
This tendency must be discouraged by positive action.
Radio discipline is established to facilitate essential communications during combat
and is not a peacetime play thing to be discarded when action is joined.
And this is task unit bruiser.
We were freaking awesome at radio discipline.
We did not talk on the radio.
In fact, there would be operations where some task units might use two or even three separate radio nets to coordinate.
And in task unit bruiser, we would use one.
And it would be almost completely silent.
So, yeah.
And how does this translate?
to regular life, it's talking all the time.
It's not having discipline
and what the hell you say.
Just feeling like you gotta throw in your two cents
all the time.
And yes, for those of you
that aren't seeing this on YouTube,
I'm looking right at my friend,
Echo Charles.
Whatever, I freaking, you know,
when I talk, I think anyway,
I don't know, I could be wrong here.
Maybe I'm trying to just support the point,
you know, bring it down to the everyday level.
Right on.
See what I'm saying?
I think there's a lot of support.
Is out there at least a dozen of them.
Yeah, the radio discipline thing.
Isn't it weird to this idea that everyone in combat,
each individual believes his case is a special one?
That's such a derogatory statement.
And you know what's funny about that derogatory statement?
Everyone that hears it thinks they're talking about someone else.
Like, that's not me, but it is you.
You are talking and no one wants to hear you.
And what you have to say isn't that important.
Is that kind of like talking about your dreams with your friend?
I have no idea. You ever like to, you ever get your friend?
But I guess I tell you what I'm about to have an idea.
No, if I can, you know when your friend is like, hey, I had this dream last night.
And it was about and it's not about you or nothing, but it's like, yeah, it's just the weirdest dream.
Aren't you like, bro, who cares?
You know?
But if you ever find yourself telling whoever about your dream.
Yeah, it seems like it's so interesting.
It was just so bizarre and all this stuff.
Meanwhile the person was like, bro, be quiet, you know, radio silence.
Resounding metaphor complete.
Captured documents, big section about upon searching the bodies, they found a map of the second lieutenant and dispatched immediately to the regiment post by a runner next day.
The translation of this map was returned to First Battalion.
It showed the Japanese defensive plan and proved very effective in eliminating Japanese from that area when they attacked it.
Not only marked maps, but also documents of less apparent importance may furnish the key to enemy plans when combined with other information.
The necessity for prompt forwarding to higher headquarters of all captured documents must be impressed on all ranks.
And I'll tell you why I wanted to bring that up.
Because this is something we get told about Intel all the time is, you know, hey, look, you might find a piece of paper that's got the word purple on it.
And you bring that, you know, hey, this is what I found on target.
that could be some code word that you didn't know about it.
And it's a way, you don't know.
So whenever you think you know, you're wrong.
Whenever you think, oh, that doesn't mean anything, you're wrong.
And so when someone is talking to you and you think you know, you're wrong.
You don't know.
They've got some perspective that you don't know.
So listen to it.
Listen to it.
I have to put myself in check sometimes when I'll get to ask a question.
like working with a client and someone will give me a question and I'm telling you I have
you you have to experience this too Dave someone at someone raised their hand hey I want to
know when it comes to cover move if I'm working with another department and they
don't we already know where that question is going right there's like a 98%
chance that we know that they're gonna say hey this other department doesn't care
about me and they don't really support us so what am I supposed to do that
and just keep support.
We've heard that question.
We hear that question a lot.
I always have to put myself in check.
Because just because I think that's what they're going to say doesn't mean that's what they're going to say.
It doesn't mean that there's not some nuance to it.
It doesn't mean that I can spit out some module about how you do, you know, well, you continue to support.
No, no.
Listen to what they're saying.
Don't stop them from talking.
You know, the minute somewhere, I see this.
group dynamics. You know, there's a discussion going on and someone's talking and someone else,
someone else in the group will cut them off. And this is another thing I talked about on EF online.
Think about how disrespectful it is to cut someone off, right? Like, you might not say anything to me,
but if you're talking and I just jump in, cut you off and just without regard, just start, you know,
cut you off. Think about how, do you consider that disrespectful? Echo, Charles?
Yes, sir, I do.
Most people recognize that that is disrespectful.
And so they try to stop themselves from doing it.
They can't always control their egos.
They can't always like let it continue.
And I'll tell you, I think being on podcasts,
have you ever noticed when two people that have podcasts are on the same podcast?
They'll let the other person talk and it sort of let the person complete thoughts.
Because podcast is sort of an amplified version of if all of a sudden we're talking over each other,
it's just painful to listen to.
But then if you get someone that's not really a podcast type person or hasn't done a lot of podcasts,
they'll be jumping in and wanting to talk and it makes it hard to listen to.
So to me, I think that's enhanced my listening, right?
Because if I have a guest on here and they want to talk, it's like, okay, I'm going to let them complete their sentence.
And what I've realized over the years is that when I let someone do that, there's usually some nuggets in there that I didn't know about.
So I'm actually going to listen to what you have to say and the minute when I hear someone at one at you know at a
We'll be working with the company and you'll hear someone say you know someone's mid-sentence and boom gets cut off and overrun and here's what I was explaining on EF online the other day
We all recognize that as disrespectful
But it's seldom that we recognize the opposite which is when I'm listening to you
I am showing you respect and you subconsciously know that
Like the person that you're talking to when you listen to them, they subconsciously feel respected, which is a good, which is a great thing because we're trying to build a relationship.
We're trying to build trust.
And it's incredible how this tool of listening is so powerful in increasing the trust in relationships that we can work better together as a team.
And yet it's neglected all the time because I think, oh, I already know what Dave is going to say.
So I'm just going to bud in and start to tell them what I think.
Well, I am disrespecting Dave.
Contrary, if Dave is talking and I listen to him and I nod my head and say, yep, I hear what you're saying, and I let him complete his thoughts, not only am I not disrespecting him, I am respecting him.
And damn, if you don't see some just mayhem, go watch the news.
It's insanity.
It's total insanity.
Not just the newscasters themselves or the guests that they have come on for three minutes.
to yell at each other, but go watch some, you know, two people in this day and age or five
people or a hundred people arguing with each other.
No one's listening to anybody.
Why jump into that bar fight, right?
This is a verbal bar fight, which obviously can escalate into real fights and real problems.
Nowadays, we're seeing all kinds of mayhem out in streets.
And that mayhem is being caused by the fact that no one's listening to each other.
And it starts with the disrespect of I'm not going to listen to you.
And by the way, when you, when I, when I.
cut you off and then you try and cut me off back what's my response I get louder yeah and then
you get louder and now we're escalating next thing you know we're throwing punches next thing you
know we're hucking bottles and bricks and shooting tear gas and we got a real freaking
problem because we don't listen to each other yeah the a lot of times though when when I
witness that or see it or whatever I think anyway it comes not necessarily overtly
disrespect, but it's almost like an absence of respect because more like they're just distracted
or maybe just focused on their own, like, what they have to say or their own significance
or whatever, right? So how you said, yeah, because if I think I know what Dave's going to say,
I'm going to cut him off. And that's true. And even if it's subconscious, it's true, you know,
because if I don't know what you're going to say and I'm like kind of curious, I'm going to,
I'm going to wait to hear it, you know? But a lot of times people, they're either,
Think they know what they're gonna say or they're too eager about what they want to say right? So it kind of a lot of times it comes back to like what kind of person you are
You know so if you're like hey everything that comes out of my mouth my mouth is just gold
You'll probably interrupt people more
Like I tend to see that kind of pattern you know for sure and
There's I will say the main time when I jump in on somebody is like I've got something flashing through my brain and I
And I don't want to lose it.
Yeah, you don't want to forget it.
Yeah, there is that to you.
And yeah, that actually seems like a legitimate, like reason to interrupt sometimes.
Yeah.
But it's one of those things that I think, like you said a couple times where it's like, oh, yeah, it must not have been that important or whatever.
You know, if you forget it.
But here's the thing, though.
There's a little dichotomy on that one, too.
What if Dave's over here talking like so much?
He said so many things that, like, straight up required me to interrupt and be like, hey, I got to stop you there.
You know, like that kind?
Or it's like, hey, that's not, I got to stop you there, you know, kind of thing.
But I didn't.
I just let him go.
Meanwhile, he left me with 47 things that require my rebuttal or whatever.
And I didn't interrupt them.
It's kind of like that.
Yeah, that's a challenge.
Yeah.
But at the end of the day, big picture, you might as well just be like, well, at least I listen to Dave and everything he had to say.
Yeah.
I mean, obviously we could break down, start to break down the social dynamics of situations where, you know,
if I have some disagreement with you.
Now, I will tell you, I am much better off.
If Dave is saying something that I disagree with, I am much better off most of the time letting him say what it is that I disagree with.
Rather than just jumping in and being like, look, it's disrespectful.
I'm clearly not listening to you, right?
I'm cutting you off.
So why am I behaving that way?
It's not good.
Look, if Dave wants to talk for seven minutes and rattle off, you know, like you said, 47 points,
maybe at some point I go, you know, maybe at some point I say, hey, can I just, can we, can we kind of address these things one at a time?
Because you've just said three different things and I'm going to, I'm going to get lost in what you're saying.
And I want to talk about that first thing.
I think you could do that respectfully.
Yeah, like you've got to put effort into the respectful part of it.
Like I can respectfully interrupt.
Yeah.
Really.
But if you're just throwing out interruptions, yeah, it's disrespectful.
There's certainly different modalities of interruption that are, that are, you know, wildly
different from.
And you know what's cool.
What's interesting is when you are face to face with somebody, you can tell when the
person wants to say something, right?
You can just look at their face and they get a face and they have a nonverbal communication
telling you, I got something to say right now.
And if Dave's giving me that look,
my respect to him is to go,
he's got something to say.
Time to give him a moment.
Yeah.
And the, I think, well, I'm speaking from experience,
and I don't have much.
Well, actually, no.
I do have a lot of experience listening to people talk.
But if you have a situation where, okay,
the person is talking and they're saying all crazy stuff, right,
that kind of requires some correction
or some interruption, right?
Or some discussion at a minimum.
Yeah.
So unless you guys are actively working on solving a specific problem, which can happen,
like in work or in a family or whatever, but you know how some people they just like
to talk and we're just having a friendly conversation, whatever, and they're just blabbing
at the mouth, saying things that are just, some are true, some are not true, and they're
just going on and on like they're all correct, right?
And they won't be quiet.
You might as well just not say anything.
Because at the end of the day, it does you better to just listen.
listen to everything they said and you know what are you know the old saying like yeah you don't want to
talk you want to listen because now you know everything you already know and then you know what they know
kind of thing you're heard that yeah that's that's uh from this podcast as a matter of fact oh there
you go boom so so it's like that kind of situation you know like you're not you're not tasked
necessarily to to effectively change someone's mind every single time so you might as well
just keep your mouth shut a lot of the time i mean let's face it if you're going to have a
discussion with someone to try and try and consolidate your ideas together to become to come up with a
the strongest idea then you have to converse with them and whether they're a subordinate or a
superior or a peer at some point you know in order to progress ideas you have to converse with
them and just sitting there and remaining silent when people are saying things that you
totally disagree with or to put in a better way you don't fully understand
their perspective, then we have to uncover that perspective a little bit.
And you do that by asking questions and trying to figure out where they are coming from.
Yeah.
You know, I'm totally recalling a very specific situation recently where I was in the middle
of this straight up argument, debate, social situation about political, quasi-political things.
And I just witnessed just mayhem going back and forth.
I didn't say anything.
And I was like, well, yeah, that's just jumping into.
do a bar fight that you're not held in.
But I'm thinking like, hey, either one of you guys could easily just be quiet and listen
and not say anything for the rest of the whole time or whatever.
And this whole, like, we'd all be better off.
It's kind of like one of those situations.
So I'm totally projecting that right now.
Yeah.
Yeah.
What do you write job, Dave?
Dude, there's a lot.
There's a lot in what you just said.
your thing that you're just talking about,
when you're sitting there watching these other two people,
and when you're watching these other two people have
what is kind of like a ridiculous conversation
with it arguing, you're just sort of the news or whatever,
and we're all just sitting there as observers,
and it looks completely ridiculous to us as observers.
You see it escalating, you see it going nowhere,
you see people digging in,
and when you're just watching it,
it's obvious how completely ridiculous it is.
The comment earlier is like that feeling that when we have
something to say, it's different.
And this needs to be said,
remember that when you're about to open your mouth,
somebody else is going to watch it,
and you're going to look every bit as ridiculous to them
as they did to you.
When you're talking about listening,
and I have learned this in my life,
I have learned to have a bias to not talk.
I learned that skill.
I wasn't born with that skill.
I don't think anybody would accuse 20-year-old Dave
of having a bias for listening.
That's a learned thing that I have done.
in my life. The trick there is what you have said a thousand times is you actually have to listen
because of what you said before, which is if I'm talking and you're letting me talk and I think
you're listening to me, I'll talk, I'll keep doing my thing. But the second I catch you,
the eye roll, like the heavy breeze or whatever you're going to do, I'm like, dude, this guy
isn't listening to me. You actually have to listen. And the only way you will truly listen
to what the other person says is if in your mind you believe that you believe that.
that you might get something out of it.
Because if you think, you're like, oh, dude, here goes Echo.
He's going to just go do what he does,
and it's going to be a complete waste of time.
The minute I do that, I'm going to miss something.
And the actual listening part is a lot harder than it sounds.
Because the conversation having your head, which is, I know I'm right.
All these points are wrong.
All these things are saying are just complete waste.
The active listening piece better come from a place of authenticity
or you're going to get found out in a second
because your body language is going to give the whole thing away.
And then you might as well just cut them off right there because they're not listening because he knows you're not listening to me
Yeah, there's a lot with that and as simple as it sounds to listen if it was so easy we wouldn't have to say it over and over again
You're all fighting the urge like to yeah yeah it's hard. Yeah
candy check a little section of here about
Just just fratinization with the prisoners and and they could not do that which is the reason that the reason that I said
that is because here these guys are that are trying to kill you.
For me, this just shows you the predominant spirit of the American servicemen.
It says here, it was necessary repeatedly to warn the troops
against incorrect practice of frattingizing with prisoners
and giving them cigarettes, which interfered with the proper interrogation.
Troops had to be warned not to remove paybooks from the prisoners
because these books furns the check to the interrogation officer of the prisoner's statements
in regard to his organization and previous service.
So there's just these, you wouldn't think that after these guys are trying to kill you,
that you'd want to give him a cigarette, right?
And yet, respect.
Speed marching.
Commanding General, third division, Cicely.
The importance of physical condition cannot be overemphasized.
Speed marching proved of great value in developing physical condition,
eliminating the unfit and instilling confidence and pride in the individual.
as a general training objective, all units prepared for landing on defended beaches and in advance inland of about five miles.
Speed marching continued.
Each unit being required to complete five miles in one hour, eight miles and two hours, and 20 miles and five hours once a week.
This training was largely responsible for the speed with which the assault of this division was executed.
There you go.
Physical conditioning.
He points out this, and this is so obvious,
instilling confidence and pride.
I mean, what a factor.
What a factor.
The way of the warrior kid books, you know?
Get a kid that doesn't, can't do a pull-up, right?
And all of a sudden, you can do a pull-up.
You can lift your own weight.
You can stand up a little straighter.
Man, get your team working out.
That's what I'm saying.
Writing messages.
Reports and messages.
Major Robert Wilson, field artillery, Italy.
The who, what, when, where, and why were often not contained in reports, both oral, and written.
Battalion regimental S-2s and the men themselves indicated that during maneuvers and in-training problems,
they had thought that this subject had been mastered, but that in combat it was ignored or forgotten.
As to clarity, the axiom of a message can be understood, if a message can be misunderstood, it will be misunderstood, was well proven.
The comment here, writing messages during a unit training program is one thing.
Writing clear, specifically worded messages and orders under combat conditions is quite another.
Theoretical training and message writing must be supplemented by constant practice and supervision in the field.
That is why I was an English major, so I could learn how to write.
section here on dirt breeding infection.
Half the evacuations from the battalion was due to infection caused by minor scratches.
And to that, I would say, get yourself some warrior kid soap so you can stay.
Oh, come on.
This is another one of those life ones.
A foxhole in time saves lives.
Lieutenant Colonel Bogart, Infantry, Fifth Army, Italy.
although the average American soldier will dig a foxhole or slit trench when the artillery
or mortar shells are falling in his vicinity, only a few of those I saw would dig them prior to
that time.
When they did dig them, they were usually quite shallow.
It was always very easy to tell a German foxhole from the American.
The former were always much deeper.
Many casualties occurred from shell fire, which I believe would have been avoided, had proper.
foxholes or slit trench been dug in.
And this is, you know, the code, the evaluation, the protocol.
Are you prepared for life emergencies?
Are you prepared for emergency situations?
We as Americans, I totally agree with this.
We don't like to worry about anything until it slaps us in the face.
In fact, in the SEAL teams, I used to tell my leadership, no one worries about anything
until they get slapped in the face with it.
Like, no one's really concerned about that until you get hit with it and all of a sudden
you've got to execute that mission and you don't have the gear that you
need. So let's get the gear we need. Let's get do the rehearsals we're supposed to do.
Be proactive. I can kind of go for little things too. Oh, it 100% goes to little things.
Well, yeah. So these little things kind of change. So the other night I'm at home. It's bedtime.
We go sleep, right? In the middle of the night here, beep. You know what that is, right? No idea.
It's your, uh, perimeter security. Your detector, your fire detector with a nine-volt battery that's dead.
That's dying.
Exactly right.
And bro,
you think you can,
if you don't have
9 volt batteries at what,
3 a.m.
And know where they are.
And know where they are, yeah.
But let's say you don't have them straight out.
I mean,
let's face it,
do you just have random 9 volt batteries
in your house?
Yes.
I know exactly where they are.
I have two for each fire detector in my house.
Here's the thing.
I'm a father now.
So,
so do I.
Oh, yeah,
so do I.
But I'll tell you this,
before I had kids,
before I had a thing.
life whatever I didn't have nine-volt batteries just hanging around straight up didn't have didn't even think about it years oh yeah 100% I guess my wife when she was growing up they they didn't have batteries like you know the her mom and dad just batteries weren't on the list yeah and so my wife is a battery horger and stockpiler you want a 9 volt you want a triple a you want a double a what do you want C C E open up that
It's cabinet.
They're in there.
They're ready.
Bro, I'm with you.
My wife's the exact same way.
She gets a little bit excited when the batteries run out on something.
She gets a refill up.
You know?
It's like, hey, the battery's out on this thing.
She goes, hold on.
And she goes and digs out a C.E.
2325 for my watch.
Actually, I think my watch is a 3232.
Yeah, this was going to say that's the C3.
That one's, I think that's a scale.
You put that in one of those little scales.
It might be that.
Well, I don't know.
Either way.
Yeah, I don't know either.
But I do know that I did have a nine-bolt battery that night.
But I was thinking to myself, bro, what if I didn't have a nine-bolt battery?
Fred, no, we're not sleeping tonight.
You're not sleeping.
Then that, and it doesn't have to do just that night.
Now you've got the whole next day you got to contend with.
You see what I'm saying?
Really very few hours of sleep.
This is because you're paranoid?
No.
A fire?
Or that beep is going to keep you up?
I'm with you, man.
I'm with you, man.
That's, that's, because I'll tell you what happens.
It turns out that that fire detector,
that beeps every 60 seconds can't be destroyed.
Yeah.
You could take a sledgehammer to it and just breaking it without,
it will still beep.
So what you're talking about,
that's the slap in the face,
which is you're totally unprepared for the situation.
Now you're up all night.
You think you solve the problem.
The second you get into bed,
lights out covers,
babe, I got a sort of, beep.
And then you're up again.
So I'm with you.
It's true.
I learned this lesson 30-ish years ago,
so I've got those nine volts at the ready.
Yes, sir.
Yeah.
And one time, you know how I found that out that you can't stop that thing?
I was like, okay, well, I was like, yeah, it's no problem.
Like, I'll just take out the battery.
How can it beep with no power?
Simply can't happen.
It's not like, you know, where does it get the power to beep from?
Where does that come from?
Apparently they thought ahead, you know, in the case of a real emergency.
It's one of those things, you know, a little bit more important than your sleep that night if you're unprepared.
You know, so it made sense when I kind of thought through it.
But nonetheless, I was still faced with this problem like this beeping.
I mean, lucky it wasn't in the middle of the night, but whatever.
So I was like, yeah, I got to do something.
I would have had a real problem that day.
Br, I had to put it in the drawer.
You could still hear it, but it was just way more quiet.
So when it got a battery or whatever later on, found out, yeah, it can't be disabled.
That's the whole reason it can be destroyed.
Cannot.
Cannot be bargained with it either.
But yeah, man, nonetheless, that's the point.
It can go for small things too.
You see what I'm saying?
Bro, just be prepared.
How about this?
How about just keep some nine-volt batteries?
All good.
Problems off.
The thing beeps, 3 a.m., 3 p.m., whenever you go, okay, oh, batteries, battery's low, you know?
We good over there, Equitrals with that?
All right, let's move on.
Section 3, Mountain Operations.
They go through a big battalion attack here, go into a lot of detail.
It's another, from another perspective on the battle on the Atu Island.
And there's some detail of some maps and charts, and you should go check it out online,
so you can kind of get the full benefit of that.
but I just wanted to hit a couple highlights and going back to communications here.
A rather elaborate system of communications was established to enable the battalion commander
to control the fire of supporting weapons in furtherance of tactical plans.
The artillery radio as well as telephone was set up at the battalion commander's op
on top of the hogback, which is one of these little terrain features.
A sound power telephone was run from the mortar OP back to the battalion commander.
Likewise, one from the 75s.
The telephone was also run from the OP to the officer in charge of all 37 millimeter firing.
Radio and telephone control was run to all companies in the battalion.
So the reason I highlight that, that's a lot of communications.
And if we're counting on all those communications, we might not get what we.
We might not get what we want.
Goes into this here.
They get into contact.
We saw the first one at 0 430 in the morning.
He was a century and we were then 50.
yards of him. He stood up against the skyline and was shaking out a grass mat. Lieutenant Brown motioned to
us to get up a little under the ledge to our front and then he shot the Jap. The shot must have
awakened others as we worked up over the ledge. A Jap machine gunner began firing at us. We stayed down
until the first excited bursts had gone over. Then we raised up and returned fire. Several Japs had
holes near the edge of the ledge. We were under and they began to throw grenades over. But the hill below
is so steep that most of the grenades rolled down and exploded out of range below us.
The machine gun was firing again, but several of our men were close enough to the ledge to lob grenades over.
The machine gun itself was out of grenade range, but some of the japs near the edge caught hell from the grenades.
Are you feeling lucky when the people that are throwing grenades at you, they like bounce over your position and don't hurt you?
I think that might have been my whole point there.
The radio fails.
So this is why I get concerned about about communications and as a former radio man.
It definitely freaks me out.
Lieutenant Brown tried again and again to contact battalion headquarters or the artillery,
and I'm fast forwarding a little bit, or the artillery with the radio,
but the set refused to function.
The radio man worked with it and tried again but failed.
The platoon was reorganized and we started up again.
They're assaulting the sill.
We got as high as the ledge once more and had started over the top on the table above
when the Jap opened up with machine guns again.
We needed artillery and needed it bad.
Every time we stuck our noses up, a hailstorm of bullets cracked across them.
The radio man was trying frantically to contact anybody in the valley below us, but the set remained silent.
Several men had crawled around to the left and threw grenades at the Japs near the edge of the table,
but the machine guns remained out of range.
Our men were driven back to the cover of the ledge with several wounds.
Artillery.
If we only had artillery.
We could observe the fire. We knew where the guns were. If we could only get some fire, we'd walk over the damn mountains.
The radio men was desperate. He tried the set again, but it was silent in a rage. He threw it down the hill.
Yeah, so there's a bunch of things to think about there. Just, you know, your communications cannot be relied upon.
You have to have some kind of backup plan. And if you're, if you're expecting, you can be able to make communications when they're really going to be needed. That is the time they're going to
fail. That is Murphy's law. If you say, okay, Dave, here's what's going to happen. We have this
whole complicated plan. And then when you get to this point, radio me, and that's when we'll
execute, that radio call has a 4% chance of making communications. If everything hinges upon
one call, the weight of that hinge just has carmatic. Is that a word?
A carmic? Carmic impact on that communication system. And it's not going to work great.
So their attack gets repulsed.
He said, we heard the guns in the valley begin firing.
The attack was on.
We had failed and we felt bad about it.
They had the drop on us.
They'd go in through the main attack.
The Japs were holding the pass on the high ground on both sides and the front two.
The ones on the right could fire into the backs of the attackers of the left and vice versa.
It was rough going.
Lieutenant Clevesy got me up and we went around the second section.
get them started up the hill the attack was going okay but it was an awfully tough one bullets
were flying all over the hillside just uphill from the second section was a jab 37 millimeter we had
watched them fire from that position several days before and we knew there were japs in that trench the
main attack was moving around to the left as we started up the hill finally the fire got so heavy that
the machine gun squad took cover in a little draw until we could grenade the trench above us to clean it out
Then they were to come on up.
Sergeant Tom Kovic, private first class, William Marshall, and I started up with Lieutenant Clevesy.
We had crawled on our bellies to within 25 yards of the trench when a sniper raised up and shot Marshall in the air.
We shot at the sniper.
We threw grenades into the trench.
We crawled up rapidly then, ready to move in behind our grenades, and another sniper popped his head up out of the hole just above us.
Lieutenant Clevesy fired his carbine just as the Jap fired.
Lieutenant toppled over a little bank and lay still.
He was dead.
I was just bringing up the rifle as the Jap, my rifle as the Jap duct.
Then from across the valley, the Japs spotted us, and they gave us hell.
Machine guns, rifles, and 37mm began pounding the area.
Finally, the intense shelling slowed down and we dashed for the open end of the Jap
trench we had grenaded.
The trench led around to the point of the hill.
We crawled down the trench and found where the Japs were located when we stuck our heads
right up in the face of a burst of machine gun fire.
Some men from Company F had come over to help us, but were stymied.
We couldn't raise up long enough to fire.
We couldn't get close enough to throw grenades.
Finally, we decided to see if we could get some mortar fire on the position in some way.
Corporal Alfred Heyman started back up to check on the mortar possibilities and while we waited
and rested.
The Jap position was slightly below us and about 100 yards further into the pass.
They were firing almost constantly at the troops.
So we could see moving out in the valley and on the opposite side of the pass.
We were quite high up on the side of Cold Mountain.
After nearly two hours of lying in the trench and waiting,
we heard one of the men behind Holler here, Heeman, up here.
Heeman and a man from Company H, the infantry, were crawling up along the little ravine laying wire.
They had found a company H mortar and had a line right to it.
The big fight up on the mountain had almost gotten to the top,
but the forces across the pass were getting hell from the guns below us.
We got the phone all set up and carefully poked a little dirt, a little hole in the dirt side of the trench to week so that one man could see the whole Jap position below.
Then we called mortar and the fun started.
We were only about 100 yards from where the shells were striking and the ground shook.
They fired several rounds close and then they began to drop a right in the position.
Finally, we called and told them we were moving in and not to fire.
The position was like a big wheel like a fair with whole.
All around it and the spokes connecting the trenches with a big center installation in the hub two Japanese machine guns and the 37 millimeter that had fired at us during the previous week were captured and destroyed there
We tossed six dead japs out the hole and brought them brought up our guns up and set them in the jap holes
We there we sat that night just daring the little so-and-so's to come up man what positions they had
one little fight within a battle.
You know, one little tiny fight within a battle.
And think of all those decisions that got made
and all those actions that took place
and the mistakes that had to be covered for
and the initiative that had to be shown
and the bravery and the courage.
I mean, it's just, it's leadership.
That's what it is.
It's leadership.
They go through
a bunch of this information continuing on.
There's another group that takes another point.
And again, look, these guys, I can pretty much guarantee,
are no longer alive, but this is, these are quotes.
These are what these guys are saying happened.
Things like Lieutenant Wolzak saying,
check your bayonets as they get ready to do this assault.
And there's just there's some some other little battles within fights within battles that they cover.
And then it gets into this comment section.
These accounts bring out some of the characteristics of mountain warfare in which success depends more upon proper adaptation of available means to the terrain than upon their power.
So the way you adapt is more important.
It continues.
maneuver of small units and the initiative and leadership of subordinate commanders are of the highest
importance in mountain warfare. The actions of small semi-independent units in seizing or defending
heights or in fighting to seize or block passes become of increasing importance. So once again,
even though this book starts off with the extreme dichotomy of discipline of following orders,
it comes back always to decentralize command,
an individual initiative by subordinate leaders to make things happen.
He's talking about mountain warfare there and getting to this idea of, I mean, that's it.
That's leadership, right?
Its leadership is going to be the deciding factor here because the terrain is so,
It's so impossible to predict.
There's so many different things and places and outcropings that all these different.
And even tell the story what great position they had in that previous example with the Japanese.
Life is more like mountain warfare than it is.
It's going to be these big open fields if your life can just reveal themselves and you're just going to plan your move down the road.
There are so many things that are popping up when we're talking to companies right now.
They're describing that same terrain in their business lives of all these untrue.
predicted and unexpected things.
And it isn't the strength
of their brand and it isn't, you know,
it's the leadership that's navigating
these companies through and we're talking about the terrain
of mountain warfare.
That's what life is.
It's not just this easy,
straight road from A to B and you just march
down and everything is clean.
And how crazy that has to be that
at every single turn, something
comes up and the tool, the
only tool that you have to get past
that is leadership.
And you know what I like also about this analogy and the way it ties into the entire concept of,
yes, of leadership, but really even more specifically to ownership and extreme ownership.
And that is this.
This is what's so beautiful about this.
You can't move those mountains.
You cannot do, you cannot, those mountains are what they are.
And that's what, that's what triggered that thought in my mind was you said, there's all these variables.
But what's interesting is you're looking at them.
You know for days.
You understand.
You can see it on the map.
You can look at it.
There's this mountain.
And you know what?
You can't move that mountain.
And what you have to do is you have to move yourself.
And this is, you know, I talk about this in jihitsu and someone's across the side on you.
I can bench press you an inch, you know, maybe two inches.
I don't care if you have a 500 pound bench press.
When you've got a person that's mobile and they're securing you and they've
got your chest compressed, but you can't bench press them off of you.
You can move them just enough, then you have to move.
It's incumbent upon you.
And so we can't move mountains.
What we have to do is adapt.
What we have to do is figure out how to utilize those things.
And what the important thing is, even though we can't move those mountains, the person that
figures out how to utilize that terrain is the one that's going to win.
you utilize the terrain.
It's something that I have no control over,
but I control how I interact with that mountain,
and I know where I need to be,
and I know I understand the angles,
and I understand what ravine will give me cover,
and I understand where it exposes me.
Even when he was talking about,
hey, this, the way the Japanese were set up,
it was like, oh, they can hit these guys here in the flank,
and they can shoot these guys in the back.
That's the position that they have.
That's a freaking horrible situation to be rolling into.
Horrible situation to be rolling into.
So when you look at things, instead of sitting there and going and saying, I wish the market was different.
I wish the competitor would do something different.
I wish my employees would act in a different way.
These are all things that you can look at and you can wish all day long, just like you can wish that mountain moves, but that mountain's not going anywhere.
So you need to maneuver.
You need to take ownership of that situation and make things happen.
There's a whole bunch of sections here, engineer operations, tanks,
infantry notes and jungle operations.
One section here.
Japanese centers of resistance were bypassed and isolated.
Again, how often do we say, oh, Dave doesn't like this part of my plan, so I'm going to attack him on that.
Instead of saying, okay, Dave's going to dig in right there.
Cool.
I'll maneuver around it, right?
Bypass.
I'm going to start thinking about that a little bit more often in my daily life.
How can I bypass?
Maybe not when it comes to working out because Echo Charles pointed out that might not be the best plan.
But if it's things that I don't want to engage in, why am I engaging in them if I don't have to?
If I can isolate and bypass and not make it part of my gig, that's fine.
Frontal attacks were uniformly successful when assisted by a flank attack.
On many occasions, the flank attack preceded the frontal attack, coming into Japanese positions from the rear and completely disrupting their defense plans.
In almost all cases, the maneuver used by units of all sizes from division to start.
squad was the envelopment of one or both flanks.
Resistance was made by,
resistance was bypassed, encircled, and reduced later.
So the frontal assault works when it's not actually a frontal assault.
That's awesome.
Frontal assault works when you're doing something else as well.
Yes.
That's so legit.
Section on,
section on automatic weapons,
night operations, security measures,
security at night, lines of communication.
Patrol reports in general the distance covered by the patrols was much less than expected of them
The difficulties of terrain caused by many patrol leaders to feel that they had covered two or three times as much ground than they had actually covered
This must be taken to account when evaluating patrol reports
These are people that think that they know like hey, I was there
Isn't that crazy you could be looking at me totally convinced that you went two kilometers and it turns out when we reach
trace your steps you went whatever 700 yards 700 meters one last section to cover here
yeah this last section is very interesting evacuation methods informal report
Solomon Islands evacuation of casualties was by hand carry litter bearers cable litter
slings across jungle gullies improvised sleds or drags down steep inclines and
Improvised litter racks on quarter ton jeeps, small boats on mountain streams or along the coast,
and finally by field ambulances to clearing stations or hospitals.
How's that for a nightmare?
When you were in Fallon, were you ever a downpilot?
Yeah, yeah.
Did you get carried out on litters?
Yeah, you go out in a helicopter, you staged there, and then they come out and get you in like the metal.
It's like a metal basket, basically, the litter.
Did you ever get carried by a seal platoon like eight?
kilometers no okay I know exactly what you're talking about I was never to I was never the
I was never the down air crew that got actually physically pulled right it's not fun when
you're getting carried because you're getting dropped you're getting slammed you're
get all over the place and usually we would stick guys with IVs you know like we
would try and do some medical training on them as well but good Lord I want you to think
about everything that I just said hand carry cable literacy
across jungle gullies, improvised sleds,
drags down steep, so you're wounded.
And what's the method of doing?
Okay, we're going to drag you down a steep incline.
Improvised litter on a quarter-ton jeep.
Imagine that thing bouncing around.
Small boats.
Think about a nightmare.
And this is where you start to realize
what a nightmare I'm talking about.
Evacuation by litter bearers was difficult,
tiring, time-consuming,
and involved distances averaging two or three miles
and five to six miles in some instances.
Many more litter bearers had to be utilized
than under ordinary conditions.
Litter carry in many cases required as high as 16 carriers per patient
over almost impassable terrain and can be counted as least efficient.
So it takes 16 people to evacuate somebody two miles.
or three miles.
Where evacuation by litter was necessary,
bearers worked in relays.
Eight or even 16 men accompanying each litter,
relieving one another in litter carry
and in cutting narrow paths through the dense jungle.
16 people to move a wounded man.
I mean, that's just crazy.
And obviously it wasn't all of them,
but they're saying, hey, sometimes it was eight.
And I'll tell you, the reason I was asking you,
if you'd ever been in that position.
Number one, you get beat up.
But, you know, when we would do desert training,
when I was running desert training, man,
those guys would do some down man carries.
And I'm sure some of the guys that are hearing me
saying that now are smiling with pleasant memories
of going eight kilometers through the Imperial Valley desert,
carrying, and eventually, like the first, you know,
if we had a troop that hadn't been through before
or didn't have any experience,
say oh yeah hey which I you know what your casualty evacuation plan oh we're just gonna put
two guys on them and we're gonna do I forget the day there's some name there's a couple
carries you know there's a standard fireman's carry oh we'll just gonna fireman's carry okay
cool see how that see how that works out for you you can't I mean it's it's you can do
it for a hundred meters 200 meters 300 meters 300 meters 300 meters you're on night vision
you're in the worst freaking terrain rocks shale rocks
all over the place.
And it was great because as we would do these drills
and as guys realized what a traumatic impact it was
when you took casualties
and how you had to adjust what you thought
you'd be able to do.
Because you can't just freaking rambo.
You can rambo somebody up.
I mean, I've done it.
Like, okay, grab a guy and I'm gonna carry them 150 meters, 200 meters.
By the time you get to that 200 meter mark,
like when you get to the spot,
You're just falling down with the guy 300 meters.
You're just falling down and you're exhausted and you've lost your weapon and your night vision and his gear's gone.
It's a disaster until you figure out, okay, when this happens, here's some procedures that we need to do.
Talks about the improvised Jeep ambulances.
Talks about evacuation by water, physical fitness.
The arduous and fatiguing litter carrying demonstrated the need for physical fitness on the
part of medical department personnel, which should correct the impression that physically impaired
individuals can be utilized throughout medical department activities.
So this idea that you can have a bunch of, you know, guy that's injured or hurt and have him
working in medical being a stretcher bearer is completely and utterly wrong.
And that's, well, that's a wrap on the highlights that I had from this.
And, you know, I don't know, when I think about this whole thing,
and we've been referring back to it the whole time,
so many good lessons, but the key takeaway from me
is that whole idea of leader versus inertia.
And, you know, as soon as I said that today, Dave,
I looked at you and I saw you had about a thousand thoughts
going through your mind on what that means
and how many ways that we can apply that.
It's like the world is conspiring against us.
and it's human nature to neglect our duties.
And I know that sounds crazy and sure there's some outliers out there that are proactive,
we're going to make things happen.
But you've got to assess as a leader that human nature is to be lazy and to be careless.
And you need to definitely look in the mirror because it's not always just going to be the people that you lead.
It's going to be you.
in that section where they talk about the hardest job that you have as a leader is getting things done,
getting things done by people who know that they're supposed to do them.
And even in some cases know that those things could cost them in their lives.
Failure to do things.
Failure to take action.
So don't allow that.
Be on the lookout.
How nice is it sometimes when you make the connection between something that's there,
that you've always known was there, but you never PIDD it, and by that echo, I mean,
positively identified.
Like, hey, I know now.
Everyone that's listened to this today now knows that that's a problem.
And look, we all kind of knew it, right?
I mean, I talked about a discipline equals freedom field manual.
Hey, you know, we're walking, want to move.
That's a real thing.
I get it.
We all kind of get it.
But how about the PID on it?
And now when it starts happening, either with you or with your team or with your family
or with your friends, you can P-I-D it and then you can address it properly.
And you can start with yourself.
You can start by making things.
Speaking of making things happen, Echo Charles.
Yes.
How can we do what we're supposed to do?
What we know we should do.
On top of P-I-Ding it?
We P-I-Ded it.
Oh, dear.
Yeah.
Same thing with complaining, right?
Remember we P-I-D that long time ago.
Complaining.
Blaming another one.
Yeah, those are two good things.
once you recognize, once you PID those things, man, that blame one.
Oh, yeah.
Because if you don't PID the blame, it'll like sneak in.
Oh, it's sort of get away with it too.
Really?
It's glad.
Oh, yeah.
You can be like, yeah, yeah, I really shouldn't have done that.
You know, it could have helped, you know, if you would have gave me the heads up or
whatever, but you're right.
I shouldn't have done that.
You see the blame?
That stupid mountain was totally blocking our position.
Yeah, kind of makes it kind of harder, but no, you're right.
I should have done it.
You see what I'm saying?
see me taking ownership but slipping in the blame when you PID the blame you can see it
that's what I'm saying anyway so don't do that when you're working out which okay so I worked
out today actually I thought about working out today but then I got into this deep
conversation with my wife okay about some important stuff the window closed the window
totally closed oh it closed it straight up closed yeah because the conversation went long I had to
come here you see what I'm saying yeah
I had a window closing last night.
It was, I had something, my wife was making dinner.
I was like, I can fit in a run right now before dinner.
Oh, a late workout.
No, just a run.
I already worked out.
The run's not a workout for you.
That's just a run.
So late night, so my wife was cooking dinner.
I had like a 40 minute window.
My wife says, oh, by the way, someone's coming over to grab something.
I'm like, okay, the run's not happening.
Now the windows just I'm kind of I'm kind of shrugging it off like oh well you know window closed you know no run
But then I PID did it and I said you know what I ate dinner which I hate I ate dinner and then I ran just to punish myself
I pulled one of those before Brad that's so true right there so that right there well you just did what you went what you what you experienced
Same deal right you got the 40 minute window for running right because you got it all planned on your head it goes beyond the run it goes like the stuff you did before is in your
mind stuff you're going to do after the run dinner all this other stuff and the stuff after that
in your mind does not include the run because the run is already done that's it this whole formula right
there in your mind so now that little window closed boom where's that run going to fit in I already
know in my mind what I'm going to do after dinner which is after the run which already happened right
what I'm to put the run there no it's already occupied in your brain you see what I'm saying but the thing
is it doesn't work like that you put it there as essentially like an excuse yeah
Yeah. You know what's crazy? So as I was running, so now I'm running 20 minutes after I get done eating.
Yeah, I don't think I've run on a full stomach for 15 years. Think about that. 15 years. I don't think, and I don't think I'll run on a full stomach again for another 15 years because it felt freaking awful.
Yeah. And I don't roll. I don't work out on a full stomach. I don't like doing any of that. I mean, I can get away with like a workout depending on the workout, not squatting on a full stomach.
Because that's just not good.
But maybe I can do some pull-ups on a full.
But yeah, I was running on a full stomach.
I won't do that again.
I would, next time, because I wanted to, you know, like, eat with my family, you know,
like, let's eat time.
I would have eaten one forkful of food and not eaten and put it in the,
and then go for, hang with the family, go for a run, come back and eat.
That would have been the power move.
And that's actually one of many power moves, really.
The other power moves is how about this?
Yeah, good for you.
You don't run in a full stomach in 15.
years.
Freaking run on a full stomach.
Oh, I did.
That's what I'm saying, though.
You know what I'm saying?
Like, there's all kinds of things that you can just push through and still get it in.
That's what I'm saying.
Even all the way down to, hey, who cares if you're there if this person is coming over?
Yeah.
That's the end of the world, huh?
If you're not there, you know?
Not the end of the world, but maybe not the best move at that time.
Okay.
Then we shift to the full stomach situation.
We did it.
Or maybe the half stomach, you know, I'm just saying that.
Opportunity is always there.
This was in line with sort of this evolving attitude that I have now of kind of a going
hard against the weakness.
Yeah.
I was like,
not only am I going to run still.
I'm going to run on a full stomach and just want to puke.
Yep.
Freaking time.
Because that's how,
you know.
So.
But I did the same exact thing.
But it was less complex for sure.
But it was like the window was closing.
Like I can't get my full workout now because dinner time.
Like, you know, I'm going to eat dinner with a problem.
You ever just do something super short and psycho, though, if you let the window close it, but you don't want to let it shut?
So you're like, okay, cool.
Oh, you want to be like that?
Cool.
Yeah.
Just going to go in here and do like mayhem for 18 minutes.
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
Because you can get a freaking good workout in 18 minutes.
Yeah, it's probably not going to be the planned workout in my situation.
But yeah, yeah, I'll do that a few times when I had to like come here somewhere where if I'm late, it kind of affects other people.
You know, it's like, it's my fault anyway, you know.
So, oh, yeah, I'll do that kind of stuff for sure.
But I did it with the dinner thing.
And I did a METCon on a full stomach.
And I even told you about it the next day.
I was like, I was doing it.
Anyway, it's a long story.
But yeah.
Well, speaking of timelines.
Let's rock and roll, man.
Yes, sir.
All right.
Okay, look, we're doing workouts.
We're not doing excuses.
We're what?
Fighting against weakness.
Punishing.
We're weakness thoughts.
We're punishing ourselves for those thoughts or considerations.
But when you do that, you know, your bodies take a beating,
specifically your joints from time to time.
Okay.
Jocco is supplementation.
for that.
So supplements are joccal fuel,
joint warfare for your joints,
super krill oil for your joints,
vitamin D.
Is it super vitamin D?
I'll just say it's pretty good.
I think you could say it's solid.
Yeah, super, super.
It's not called super vitamin D.
Maybe we need your help with branding on that one.
No, man.
Like you helped us with super krill.
I didn't help you.
I know.
Kind of funny.
Either way, it's vitamin D.
nonetheless.
I'm going to change the name too.
Super.
Right.
I'm in the old day.
Yeah, for 100%.
So, you know, get on that one.
Also cold war.
Wasn't it called like some cold killer or something?
Yeah.
You can't say that.
You can't say that.
You can't say that.
You can't say that.
That's a bad advertising.
What's the word?
Like making some kind of medical claim or something like this?
Yeah, medical claim.
So we can't say that, but we can't go to war against colds.
Yes, missile defense, tank.
What is it, David?
The tank.
Cold War missile defense system.
I say that Cold War missile defense.
Yes, sir.
Oh, you say that?
I do.
All day.
I fight the war against colds every day.
See, you know what I sense.
Also, discipline, regular discipline and the supplementation discipline.
Cans, powder, pills, whatever you need.
Yeah.
When you need that little, shh.
Yeah, big time.
Little psychological hitter a little bit.
of a little bit of go jaco Palmer taking the lead sorry is it taking the lead it's leading
right now it's leading I agree yeah I agree it's first flavors go yeah I had the long drive to
Montana 17 hours all one go one go one go no I mean I stop for gas fuel course yes sir but the cool
cool thing was just kind of FYI for your research in the future to
Discipline go cans
Just
I had one at about
One at about
Midnight
Maybe one o'clock in the morning
And I had another one at like
Two
Or three
That's the that's the that's the
That's the once the sun's coming up
You're good
Yeah
Once the sun coming up
A rock and roll
But there's
I guess it's maybe around four o'clock in the morning
Like you don't see as soon as you start seeing sun
Your body goes oh cool
We're awake now
Yeah it's day
It's that 3.30
4.30 where your body
thinks you should be asleep right freaking
now. Get that hitter
boy.
17 hour drive.
So when? What do you time it? Like when do you leave?
Like night time? Essentially.
Yep. Yeah.
Post-dinner departure.
Okay. I dig it.
I don't think I've ever driven 17 hours ever.
Ever.
Cool.
I'm not sure how valuable that information is.
But those are the facts.
I actually do know how valuable it is.
Thank you
Yeah, so mulk, don't forget about mulk
Don't forget about you probably need extra protein
I had a mulk before I came here today
Just because I have doms
Sure
And I was like meaning delayed onset muscle soreness
Sure
Little heavy on squats yesterday
And I have a lot of doms
So I just kicked down some mulk
Little extra protein
Plus I was in the mood for dessert
Even though I didn't have any lunch
So anyways
All this stuff
Jock White T
Kids warrior kid mulk you get all the stuff at the vitamin shop
We also make at or all also you get it at origin main dot com if you want to support this podcast if you want to support America in general
Which if you want to support America in general good on you
Get yourself some quality items
Yeah
Get yourself a ghee for your jiu jih T-jitsu get yourself a rash guard for your jiu-jitsu t-shirts jeans
gines American denim boots
You guys have the Delta 68
Then the what's the regular one called again?
The factory jeans
Factory jeans is there like another what do you call it a model?
No, that's the two models right now
Factory jeans heavier
Delta jeans lighter
Which I know this is a little strange
But you know
No man I dig it
You know Delta 68
Somebody in Montana was wearing a lightweight hoodie
Not you though
No it wasn't me
but they told me, like, to tell you that they supported.
Approved.
There you go.
In Montana, by the way, which is surprising.
You can't argue with the people.
I mean, it's just, you know, it goes against your whole thing, you know.
Anyway, yes, origin, mane.com.
That's where all this stuff exists.
It's something American made fully.
Also, Jocko has a store.
It's called jocco store.com.
This is where you can get.
Discipline equals freedom, deafcore, good, worth all deaf.
core technically technically for sure so yeah just one needs a hoodies shirts hats lightweight
hoodies it's or rash guards for sure got some new stuff new stuff oh you've been
plotting all kinds of stuff over there we have a few new things uh really good stuff utility and
more utility we we have a shirt coming that may become sort of like the
I'm not making any predictions.
Just for me personally, it might become the shirt that I end up wearing a lot.
You literally won't wear anything.
It'll be like, remember back in the day when you still always wear victory, even before
the podcast.
I look at all the old pictures of our stuff.
Victory shirt.
As long as you've known me.
Yeah.
It's like you can't even recognize you if you don't have that victory shirt on if even a picture
like that even exists, which I don't think it does.
It's going to be one of those.
Well, we've had victory for what, 10 years?
11 yeah and so for a long time and we've been doing the podcast for five
something like that coming up on five so that means for five complete years before this
podcast the the one free t-shirt I had which I had a lot of them actually John Dudley asked
me that the we're up in Montana like the the fifth day in a row I posted up in a victory
t-shirt he said do you just wear that or wash it or do you have a thousand of my go
No, I don't have a thousand of them, but I got 10.
Oh, yeah.
We have the light one and the dark one.
Either way, that's why you have the light one and the dark one of this new shirt.
I'll let you make it.
You know, I'll let you, what do you call it?
Roll it out as it were.
Reveal it.
Anyway, it's Jocco's jam.
Big time.
Anyway, jocco store.com.
That's where you can get your, that's where you can get your stuff to represent while you're on the path.
Put it that way.
Some new stuff.
So keep that in mind.
Look, if you want.
to know about new stuff or how should I want to know about new stuff Dave what
shirt is that this is a Def Corps shirt but it's available it's absolutely
available it's called ops you have black ops you're wearing and he has I know
I have a black one declassified version but here's the deal the difference
you know white shirt and a black shirt in the California Sun is extreme yes sir so I
like to wear a white shirt I don't have this one echo Charles yeah
E.C.
Yeah, things.
That must suck, really.
But, hey, man, you know, I know a guy and maybe we'll get you one.
Cool.
Yeah.
So, yes, if you want a DefCore, Black Ops, or Declassified, Triclster.com.
Did you call it declassified?
Yes.
I like it.
I like it when you sort of mingle with military terms.
You have some swings and you have some misses.
Normally, if you're suspect, you contact me.
Yeah.
You say, hey, would this be a correct usage of the word, whatever?
Yeah, or appropriate.
Yeah, oftentimes I say, not really.
Yeah, there was one thing I did.
And I think, yeah, it was you.
Oh, the high speed, low drag.
I was going to use that in some, it wasn't a shirt, but it was in some other stuff I was doing.
And you're like, hey, don't do that.
Don't do that one because it wasn't like appropriate.
Yeah, I forget what it was.
Because high speed, low drag is definitely a term.
Yes.
And it has a meaning.
I forget the way you used it.
I used it in a more serious way than it should be used.
Oh, yeah.
That's not a serious term.
You're not like who that guy is high speed, low drag.
Yeah, like for real.
It's kind of like.
You might say it about a pair of Gucci looking shooting glasses.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, that's what I learned.
Yeah.
So anyway, back to what I was saying, hey, if you want to be in the know,
we have an email list on Jocko store.
If you want to be in the know about some stuff,
I don't abuse this list at all.
In fact, I underutilize it, actually.
I tried my best to save it for important stuff.
Stuff that I think it's important.
So if you want to know about a new product,
some new board shorts that may or may not be on the way
or something like this,
if you're on the email list, you will get notified before everybody.
I'm not saying our stuff sells out.
What if you have important information?
What if you have important information?
You have important information about rolling frying pants.
Well, you know, hey, look.
Does that make the list?
Usually stuff like that, no.
Thank you, Bill, for inquiring.
I mean, we do have to clarify, I guess.
And so that's correct.
But information about Jocko store, sign up for that email list.
Hey, we'll get that info to you and you'll have it before everybody else.
And boom, we'll be all good.
We put the new T-shirt on there?
Yes.
Well, yeah, maybe.
You said that was mine to announce.
Yeah, that might be.
yours to announce or you just send the email how about that okay I'll send an email out when
the new shirt is he least subscribe to the podcast if you haven't already we also have some
other podcasts we have the new podcast which is isn't on its own channel yet it's called the
unraveling it was called the thread we had to change the name we also have the grounded podcast
we also have the warrior kid podcast we have a YouTube channel by the way we have a YouTube
channel that has all these podcasts on them you can see us except for the first seven because
the first seven there was no video involved it's just voice oh yeah even though we did the first
podcast on like some kind of live stream if you tried to yeah oh did you fail is uh if i remember
we were having some trouble technical yeah so anyways or and then also some of these are
there's some excerpts in there as well yeah sure
And there's also some things that Echo Charles experiments with random and very over the top special effects.
There's special.
On just normal videos.
And he'll put 98 special effects into a two-minute video.
But this video right here, which is going to be three hours and 40 minutes long, there will be no excitement other than just watching me crack up at my own jokes at the end of this podcast.
No additional excitement needed, in my opinion, so far.
There could be so many good little extra additions and Easter eggs or whatever you call them in this particular podcast.
I'm talking about flanking people, mortars, 37 millimeters, 88s, grenades.
Just think of all the cool stuff that could be flying around in here.
It's possible.
Blowing up.
Anyway.
Also, Jock has, or we have an album with tracks called Cyclones.
psychological warfare.
You know, if you don't know what this is, don't worry.
This is going to help you.
It helps us.
So we're talking about inertia, right?
Object that is in, rest, stays at rest, tends to stay at rest and if it's in motion.
So anyway, if you're battling to get into motion when you're currently at rest, and it's hard, sometimes it's hard.
I got you.
This will help that is what I'm saying.
Psychological warfare.
Okay.
Jocko telling you what to do.
Not necessarily what to do, but why you should do what you should do.
It's about accurate, right?
Yeah.
That's available wherever you need to MP3s.
Also, if you want a visual representation of those types of messages,
go to flipside canvas.com.
My brother Dakota Myers makes stuff to hang on your wall.
Got a bunch of books, the code, the evaluation, the protocol,
leadership strategy and tactics, field manual,
where the warrior kid one, two, and three,
Mikey and the Dragons, discipline equals freedom field manual, extreme ownership and the dichotomy of leadership.
You can get those books pretty much anywhere.
Books are sold.
We have a consulting agency for leadership.
And what we do is we solve problems through leadership.
Go to echelonfront.com for details.
If you can't get with us live, that's fine.
Go to eFonline.com where we get.
granular with these things on a regular basis where you want to talk to me you want to interact
with me go to efonline.com you will you will ask me questions me on a zoom call you want to talk to
dave you want to ask him something go to efonline.com you will interact with him you will ask him questions
he will give you answers that's what we do on that channel there's a bunch of training on that
channel there's a forum on that channel so go to eFon online dot com
for that we also have the muster coming up in Phoenix Arizona September 16th and 17th
and then Dallas Texas December 3rd and 4th check extremers extremeership.com for details
we've we're going to be doing these looks like with social distancing so there's going to be
less seats available which means they're going to sell out faster we have EF overwatch which is
are placement firm where we're taking people from the military and placing them into businesses.
So if you are a vet looking for work or you are a company looking for leaders to come
to your company that understand the principles that we talk about here, go to eFoverwatch.com.
If you want to help out veterans around the world, service members around the world,
go to America's mighty warriors.org.
that is Mark Lee's mom,
Mama Lee,
helping all service people out.
You can go there and you can either donate
or you can get involved.
And if you just can't get enough
of my interminable tirades,
or you need a little bit more of
Echo Charles' preposterous postulations,
or maybe you just,
just like to hear one more of Dave's jangling juxtapositions.
Then you can find us on the interwebs on Twitter, Instagram, and on Facebook.
Dave is at David Burke.
David R. Burke.
B-E-R-K-E.
Echoes at Echo Charles and I am at Jocka.
Willing.
And, of course, thanks to all the men and women in uniform who allow us to live our lives
the way we want to.
And that is in glorious freedom.
and to the police and law enforcement and firefighters and paramedics and EMTs and dispatchers
and correctional officers and border patrol and secret service, thanks to all of you for
protecting us and for keeping our nation a nation of law and order, not a nation of chaos and
anarchy and to everyone else out there.
Just remember that the effect on most men
The impact of battle is to cause them to want to do nothing and it's the same thing with the slings and arrows of life we get pushed toward inaction and inactivity and indolence
And the solution to that is that a determined effort must be exerted
To accomplish things to accomplish tasks and that is on you and you know what that means it means it means that
get out there and get after it.
And until next time,
this is Dave and Echo and Jocko.
Out.
