Jocko Podcast - Jocko Podcast 7: Where Does Discipline Come From? Project Jaffna, Gains, & BJJ

Episode Date: January 27, 2016

Project Jaffna (Book).  Internet questions:  Gains While Getting Older, BJJ Partners, Where Does Discipline Come From?Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/jocko-podcast/exclusive-content

This is Jocko podcast number seven with Echo Charles and me, Jocko Willink. Ambush of dominating patrol at Niedunkini. Nieduncini is a small village in the midst of the jungles, and its extensive cleared patches were developing as farms. The village had a couple of rice mills closed for a long time, a school, a dispensary, and a small market next to the school. The market was itself a road junction with houses and huts around. Northeast of the market, a couple kilometers away, was the post of the IPKF held in strength.

North of the market was a pond, its rising embankment facing the post. It had become necessary to dominate Niedunkini by day, as well as night at the height of operations in 88 and early 89. Thereafter, dominating the market became a routine and a gospel for the next battalion, since the relieved battalion, in its handing over notes, had mentioned the same. So the new battalion got into the rut and carried on without once asking why this action was necessary. So much so that the new units dominating patrols even occupied the same trenches in the same fashion for the same period and checked the population in the same manner. One change it made was to stop occupying the only double story building in the bazaar

and instead occupy only the ground level trenches in the midst of the market. The second change was to stop searching the nearby school and other buildings where trenches and bunkers were made, thoroughly before occupying them. The third change over a period was to stop being inquisitive about the increase or decrease of public attendance in the market, school, and other buildings. The battalion for months had not been involved in any kind of encounter, not even caught or seen a mouse.

So this is setting the stage, and I'm reading from a book called assignment Jaffna, which is about the war, the long civil war in a small country called Sri Lanka. And it's written by a lieutenant general Sardis Pande, who was a commander there on the ground. And what's interesting about this book, it is a very rare book. In fact, after I picked it up and started reading through it, and I figured other people might want to get it. I looked on Amazon and it's a rare book that you have to buy from individual buyers. And the reason that I have it is because I bought it on the ground in Sri Lanka in the 90s

when I was attached to a seal unit that went to Sri Lanka to help train the Sri Lankan soldiers to fight against the Tamil Tigers, which was an insurgent terrorist group. called the L-T-TE, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam. It is an ethnic group that lived in Sri Lanka and had been mistreated and had now wanted their own state. So this opening of this book or the opening of the chapter that I just read about this ambushes catches a couple things that I think are very important. number one you heard me say that the new battalion got into this rut and carried on with this mission without once asking why it was necessary and i think this is very important for everybody to remember that when you get tasked with something you need to ask why you're doing it you need to understand why you're doing something don't just carry on because it's the way it's always been done ask that question why and one of the things that i learned a very hard level

lesson on on my first deployment to Iraq, we would get, you know, we'd get a target that would come down the chain and, and they'd tell us, hey, there's a bad guy in this building. And we would literally get a map of some area of Iraq or Baghdad or some city in Iraq like Baghdad. And on the map, there would literally like a, like a cheesy movie, there would be a red X on the Target building. And that would be the building and we'd go out and hit it. And I remember one time we did an operation and we went and took down this target, the building that had the big red X on it and got the guy that we thought was a bad guy.

And anyways, to make a long story short, when we got the person back and we interrogated him and went through the intelligence that we had taken from the house, it turned out the guy was not a bad guy. He was just a guy that had been, you know, somehow mixed up with something that ended up giving us this quote unquote intelligence. And so from then on, and as I dug, as I pulled the thread on the red X, I figured out that, you know, just someone had had three houses to choose from and for whatever reason put the X on that house. They had no real intelligence behind it. And so I always would tell the story to the young seals and say, you know, find out who put the X. on the target building and make sure that there's a damn good reason why they put that red x there

so it's also going back to the to the paragraph that i started with is you could see that these guys were occupying the same trenches the same fashion the same period in the same manner so they are definitely locked into a pattern that is going to cost them dearly and it goes on to talk about the only changes, they did make some changes, but all the changes were negative. All the changes were wrong. For instance, they didn't occupy the one double story building. Now, anyone that knows anything about tactics knows that you want to take the high ground. You always want to have the high ground. And here they were in this bizarre and they didn't take the one double story building. So when you're in a two story building and everything else is a one story

building. It gives you, you can see much further. It's a dominating position. You can shoot up, shoot people much easier. And so you, you have to take the high ground. And, and there's a seal that I know that kind of took that thought. And he had a great quote, which was, take the high ground or the high ground will take you. And you know, when I talk to people about moral or ethical issues, I use that very quote, take the high ground or the high ground will take you. So, you know, stay on the straight and narrow path. So going back to this, on a routine round of the day's morning activity, a patrol of about 20, got out of the post at daybreak, ambled along the road to the rice mill, entered the market, dispersed into the different trenches and bunkers, got into them and started

the day's dominating work. And this term dominating basically means they're going to go out and control the area. That's what this term is referring to when they use this term dominating. Majority of the trenches were adjoining the school

premises. The school was closed as it was a holiday. Doors and windows were locked from the outside. Attendance in the market was thin. Some shops had not opened. Normally they should have.

So if you remember earlier, it says the third change over a period was to stop being inquisitive about the increase or decrease of public attendance in the market. So it's like the Scooby-Doo, old Scooby-Doo cartoon where they say, oh, it's quiet,

a little too quiet. And that's exactly what this is. And this is something that we would see in Ramadi, you'd see the streets clear out. Because the local populace would somehow that there was an attack that was imminent. Yeah, yeah. Around breakfast, all hell broke loose. The doors and windows of the school suddenly opened fire and started incoming into the trenches and bunkers in front, almost at point-blank range.

Thereafter, grenades were thrown into the trenches. As those few outside the school tried to react, the militants occupying the double-story building brought murderous fire on them below. Every movement was picked up. The two-inch mortar detachment, which had stayed off and was still behind across the school, was the only element not hit or engaged. It quickly got behind some cover and fired a few bombs. Then they too were picked up. Barely a few managed to get behind some building on the other side and kept a desultory volley of shots. It was all over in the market, but not on its outskirts. So now, You have these guys that had been in these positions, and clearly the insurgents had set up on them completely and just unleashed in moments had them gunned down.

The Post, so the Post is where these guys had patrolled to this market from. The Post reacted quickly and sent a relief patrol directly to the school through open paddy fields. The militants had correctly anticipated it. As you can imagine, the militants knew exactly where the post was. They knew when they hit these guys that they would send reinforcements. Here come the reinforcements. They're ready. They gave a searing welcome to the relief party and pinned it to the ground.

The post mortars had been deployed and fired on the bund of the kalam, which dominating heights of the militants had immobilized the relief column. The militants seemed to be enjoying it as they pumped automatic fire into the post itself from the nearby jungle edge, although this fire was more in the nature of gesture of defiance. So they not only were hitting the market, but they had coordinated

so that when the market, when they started to attack the Indian soldiers in the market, as soon as they started that, then when that reaction force came from the post, they hit the post as well. As quickly as they had, half an hour later, the militants stopped firing

as quickly as they had started. it and melted away with the booty of weapons from more than a dozen killed and wounded soldiers of the dominating patrol. So obviously a horrific situation. And this is where the general asks some questions, some poignant questions. What kind of training had this battalion done? What manner of mental, attitudinal, professional preparation had it achieved before being inducted into the battlefield in Sri Lanka? What attention did its previous brigade and divisional

commanders give to training and attuning it before dispatching it to Sri Lanka? Surely it was forced to keep doing its station duties providing working parties for golf courses, clubs, sports events, and

other peacetime activities senseless. So what he's saying there is that that while this force was back in India, instead of training, what they were doing was, you know, helping with golf events and taking care of the local sporting events that they were doing, helping with the clubs, cleaning up.

They weren't training for war, which is what they should have been doing. And that's the domination squad. That's the domination squad. Yeah. Yeah, this is the guys. They were not ready. Where the CO stood up, resisted peacetime demands made by, selfish peace-oriented brigade and divisional commanders and trained their men,

they and their units did well. They saved on casualties and sought the enemy. So he's saying that the commanding officers back in India that stood up and said, look, we're not going to manage the golf game. We're not going to go clean up the club over there. We're going to train for war. Those guys did well. where newly inducted units failed and senselessly suffered,

the blame must squarely and entirely fall on the unprofessional, indifferent brigade and divisional commanders from whose formations such units came as reliefs in Sri Lanka. It was a breach of faith all along, so very painfully callous and unprofessional, even as late as the beginning of 1989. So you had this, the IPKF, which is the Indian peacekeeping force, who has really fought in all kinds of different wars all over the world.

But they had been sent into Sri Lanka to try and quell the violence between the Sri Lankan government and the LTT. And they, first of all, they thought they were going to be getting, they thought they were going to be on a peacekeeping mission. And they ended up not being, I mean, they ended up being on a peacekeeping mission, but they ended up in serious, combat with the two tigers. So it's these questions that he asks, you know, what kind of training did they have?

What attention was paid? These are things that if you're in a leadership position, you should be asking yourself, what position are you putting your people into and how well have you trained them for it? And if you have not trained them for it, then you need to train them for it. and also assessing where you are going to end up. And this is something that when I was running training in the SEAL teams, I would always training guys for the worst case scenario. In fact, we would set up operations where we'd tell them,

okay, you're just going to go and meet with the local tribal leader, and we'd have actors that were going to play the local tribal leader. And we just want you to go in there and drink tea with them and try and gather some information from them. And so they'd go, okay. and if they didn't prepare properly, they would get destroyed. Because, of course, we lowered them in and say, oh, yes, the tribal leader is ready to meet with you. Oh, great.

Lower him into the room. And then all of a sudden you take that guy hostage, you kill him. And then you start, so we'd cause total mayhem. But the point was you always had to prepare for the worst case scenario. And that's obviously not something that happened here. I'm going into another ambush. It was a good unit, had trained and prepared well. before coming into Sri Lanka in late 1988.

It had well-taped-up drills. The unit and sub-unit commanders planned their operations as innovatively as circumstances permitted and took pains to avoid routine. So these guys were a little bit sharper. One of the biggest things you need to watch out for in a combat situation is routine and doing the same thing over and over again

and giving a pattern, a pattern of life that people can recognize and take advantage of. So these guys were trying to avoid that. Their one slip-up was that they did not take enough pains to detect the setting in of routine and inclination to find comfort in slackness. So that means they did a good job when they were fresh, but once they started feeling tired, they would slip into routine and they'd slip into slackness. Like complacency? Complacency. as a newly inducted unit the men were alert up and about and keen and for a long time nothing happened

and this is something that people try to express about combat but combat is often a lot of waiting and sometimes they picture this sometimes they portray this well and in the better in the better movies about combat they show you know these long periods of waiting and that can be what combat is and what's happening here is this unit is there and for a long time nothing's happening so when nothing happens you start to get more and more complacent in mid-May 1989

on a day when the road to elephant pass had to be opened by the unit one of the posts and route detailed its platoon to ensure security of a stretch of road for a distance of about two close kilometers. The platoon split into four parties of six to seven men each and set out to search the road physically and secure an area astride to it a distance of 300 to 500 meters within its given beat. Having cleared the roads, these parties established squads 300 to 400 meters away from

the road from where they could observe the road stretch and the area astride it. At varying intervals, squad was to move out and relieve the next one and so forth the chain of relief would go sometimes clockwise sometimes anti-clockwise this was to overcome boredom avoid routine and keep mobile at odd times and thus dominate the stretch so what they're doing is they've got their little squad set up and then occasionally one squad would go move to another squad's position and that squad would go to another squad's position so they would just do that to keep moving keep mobile not get complacent The road had been kept open for the whole day for up and down convoy. So they had to keep this road open because they were running convoys to another area.

Adjacent to the road ran the railway line too, over which that day two trains were to run. It would be a long day as all such road rail opening days were. So this is kind of a common mission for them to secure these roads and these railroad tracks to get convoys through to bring logistical supplies to other parts of the, military. The platoon secured the area and saw the convoy and the trains through by about 10.30. So 10.30 the morning, they'd gone by. They would now have to wait for the returning convoy and trains in the afternoon. The sun was well up in the sky and the men were being baked. Humidity added to the discomfort. It was time for the squads to get up and move out to relieve the next one. Number one and number

Number two squads were north of the T-junction about 400 to 5 meters, 500 meters away from it. Number four and three squads were opposite, one and two, respectively, south of the road. Number one squad, however, over a period, had quietly decided to reduce this distance and establish itself next to the T-junction in a thick coconut grove, which had good shade. So there's that opportunity. Instead of baking out in the sun, we're just going to kind of get a little bit closer to the road, get a little bit closer to the T-junction.

We're going to sit in some shade. The squad occupied the grove as it had been doing and relaxed against the trees. It was comprised of six men. They did not feel the necessity of posting sentries. No guards were out. The militants had noticed this routine. So this whole time they're being observed.

And, you know, that's something you've always got to expect. You've always got to expect that you're being watched. About 15 militants with weapons slowly drove a vehicle to the T-junction and went on dropping a few members at four or five places around, or sorry, across the Branch Road, opposite the unalert squad, barely 40 meters away. Then they occupied a few old trenches dug by the IPKF during the, the previous year.

So here are these guys basically asleep and sitting in this coconut grove and 40 meters away. I mean, you played football. 40, that's less than half a football field away. You've got the insurgents getting in position. Is it indicating that they were doing that on purpose? Like that was their tactic to lull them to sleep a little bit? Or is it just kind of just sheer complacency on the part that is taking advantage of?

I don't think they had a way to lure him to sleep. I'm sure that they were watching this area. I'm sure that this was an area that they had done this mission before. And so they probably sat there and watched them do this three or four or five or ten times in the past. And when these guys stayed alert, then they wouldn't attack them. And they just watched and waited. And finally one day they see them. It's a hot day.

They go down and watch. They see them getting complacent. And they move into position. Yeah. So it's not like they were waiting as a tactic. Like let's not do anything and create this feeling of the inaction. activity so so they go to sleep They happen to get complacent and they

Watch them over and over again and every time that that squad was alert They just said okay, we're not gonna hit them Yeah, we used to say that about when we were driving on my first deployment to Iraq and we'd be driving around in our humvies with no armor on them Slick humvies and we we would say look our protection is that we're gonna look alert we're gonna have our guns Scanning we're gonna be everyone's gonna have a gun pointed at the at the You know at a target somewhere wherever you think would be a target so that if an surgeon is going to attack us, they're going to look at us and say,

you know what, let's wait until a little less aggressive convoy came through. And it usually worked. I mean, we only got to ambushed a few times. And so generally, I assumed that that worked well for us, considering how often ambushes were happening. Yeah.

Around 1,100, around 1,100 hours, all of them poured bullets into the resting squad. Not one remained alive. Not one could fire back. Thus, just then, the number four squad, which had upstuck from its location south of the main road and was going to number one's location to relieve it, entered into the inferno. The opening volley of the militants who were watching caught and killed four of this party too and wounded the other two, just as they were entering the grove. out of these two

one succumbed soon but the other who survived froze took no further part perhaps feigning death and survived hearing this firing the number three squad which was about a kilometer away

rushed in very fast and was at the site in less than 10 minutes even as the militants were still firing the number two squad also reached the site a little north simultaneously to engage the retreating militants. This promptness was good, but what was not was that the two groups having connected or having contacted

and exchange fire with the militants at the site did not pursue the militants and allow them a clean break. And they allowed them a clean break. So these other two squads, when the firing started, they rushed in from two different directions and actually were in a good position to do some big damage to the militants, but they didn't. It is all the more regrettable because the two parties had contacted the militants from two directions and were thus in a position of considerable advantage. Instead, all of them converged on the site and started getting hold of the dead and wounded. So instead of attacking, they all just converged on the guys that were dead.

and wounded and started taking care of them. The losses amounted to 10 killed and one wounded. The militants suffered one dead. So again, a horrible situation. The glaring example of crass complacency on the part of our brave soldiers, who neither firmly adhere to the spirit and content of basic tactical teaching, nor thinks it's necessary to use that little brain God is given. Our teaching and officering methods make sure that the

soldier does not use his gray matter and develop guile. I'm going to read that part again. Our teaching and officering methods make sure that the soldier does not use his gray matter and develop guile. So what he's saying is the way that they train these troops and how they treat them, they get them so that they don't use their mind. They don't use their brain. And that's something that we've talked about on this podcast multiple times. Well, just going automatic, like boom, boom. No, to try to make sure that the training that you do expands your brain and makes you think. And I told quite a few stories about how my goal when I was running training was to put these

guys in situations where the only way out was to use their brain, not to use their physical skills, not to use the tactics that they already knew, not to fall back on their training that had been embedded into their brain, but to think of their own solution to a problem. Oh, okay, yeah. You know, when you, it's like in jujitsu,

when you see someone that is really masterful in jujitsu, the person that you consider that is the person that you see get into a position and they do something completely unexpected. That's the kind of training that I want to do for people to put them in positions where they have to do something that's unexpected and new and that they created.

Nobody from the patronage. could be punished. Those who made the mistake were already dead. That's a damn shame. So to talk a little bit about this book, this book, as I said, it's called Assignment Jaffna by Sardish Pande. Lieutenant General Sardish Ponday. And here's his opening to the book. And I think this is one of the most honest openings to a book I've ever heard. This book is an attempt to present to the reader an account of Operation Pawan our considerable endeavor on military diplomatic

political front in Sri Lanka from 1987 to 1989, a period of over two and a half years. And this is where I think this guy is just beautifully honest. I lay no claim to scholarship and research on the subject. Nor have I had

ready at hand documentary backup to substantiate my remarks and conclusions. I have not a attempted to consult others who were closer to the decision makers or even the decision making process itself. I kept no notes, no diaries, not even compared notes with my peers, colleagues, or subordinates. With my seniors, I had the normal, all too human quota of professional animus. I did my job as I understood, perceived it, or sorry, perceived and thought it appropriate. in my post-retirement glow, I simply reminisced.

Memories resurged as I did so, not always with precise contextual precision perhaps, but with sufficient clarity to heat up, illuminate, and see through this effort. And this is something that I, when I've read the books that have always kind of hit me and the books that we've used in this podcast are these books that I find value in,

And that's the books with kind of unaltered thoughts. And it's usually coming from the person itself. And that's one thing that automatically gives me a negative impression, or not a negative impression, but I love hearing it the voice of the person that did it. You know, I want to hear from that person. As soon as you interpret it, as soon as someone else interpret it, you know it's getting spun somewhere or another, intentionally or not. There's a different viewpoint.

And, you know, this is something that I used to, when we were running training or when I was running training and you'd have a guy do something you'd have a guy come into a room and you know this is just a training operation but you'd have a guy come into a room and and there'd be you know a doorway or a prisoner or a hostage and they would do something like like dumb or crazy or wrong but you know some guys would say you know go and do it again you know go and do that again and although we would definitely make them do it again I would always make them deal with what they did because they did whatever their instincts told them to do

and what your instincts told them to do guess what your instincts were wrong now you still have to deal with it so I like these guys that talk about what they did and as you can see from those first two you know stories this guy's talking about what they did wrong what happened bad

and his assessment of why I'm going to continue it is the account of the happenings as seen through the eyes of a divisional commander, who in war, in my opinion and experience, is the main link between strategy and tactics and the main difference between perception and insight.

So he's in a good position. He's kind of seeing what was, you know, how that strategy of what the goal was, how that got interpreted into the ground. There are others who cherish, macro level viewing and tend to underrate ground realities. This is another thing that I always look for. Now, of course, I'm interested in what the generals say.

Absolutely. I'm always interested in what the president say or what the prime minister says and how the generals took that and what they did with it and those broad strategies. I'm very interested in that. I always want to read about that. And what he's saying,

there's others that cherish the macro level viewing, which is what that is, the generals. and tend to underrate the ground realities. And I agree with him. I belong to the former category. Mine was termed a worm's view, and I preferred it that way. Meaning he is the guy that was on the ground, and this is what he saw, as if he was a worm on the ground.

That's how on the ground he was. I knew exactly where I stood. It is this that produced considerably. disillusionment, friction, and differences with superiors, superior headquarters, and planners. Once again, this is something that I always find intriguing. When you get these guys, these soldiers, people like Hackworth, people that are dedicated, you know, lifelong military members, and they get this twist of disillusionment and suspicion against their higher headquarters.

I kept shouting myself hoarse, but the juggernaut rolled on unheeding. So despite this guy's protests and talking and trying to explain, the juggernaut rolled on unheeding. There is a school of thought which says that mistakes were bound to be made in the complex and undertaking of projecting power outside our National Geographic, confines and that these have to be taken in stride.

So yeah, hey look, we're going to have mistakes. They're going to happen. We just have to deal with them and move on. But he goes on. My contention is that if we consider ourselves professional soldiers and experts in concerned fields, then there was no need to and no excuse for committing most of these mistakes. after all it was human lives and limbs

which were being lost we know we have an abundance of manpower even cheap human lives in this country but that does not give us the power of attorney to waste them and I think that's a sediment that anybody that's been on the front lines

can understand is that it's it's easy to write those checks from the government or from the rear echelon or from the safe place. But those checks that you're writing are human lives. And no one should write that check without a heavy burden on their mind. There is a good deal of eye in the narration.

It is not so much because of my ego to show up myself. or to put others always in the dock, but simply because it's a compilation of what I, as a cog in the gigantic wheel, saw, felt, perceived, and got influenced by. I think it's interesting that this guy is saying, look, the book's about me, and I apologize, and I'm not trying to be egotistical. And actually, in reading that right now, I know that on multiple discussions that I've had about the book that Laif and I wrote, we're doing the same thing. We're like, look, hey, it's not, it's, you know, sorry, it's a, we're not, it's not about us. It's about what we learned. And I think he's trying to make the same, the same statement there. Sri Lanka was a fascinating assignment. The most challenging of my life. The most tense, the most rewarding. And I think that anybody that's been in tense combat will tell you that's the most rewarding thing that they will do in their life. I am grateful to my colleagues.

subordinates, peers, and are magnificent men, steady, solid as they are. I have a high regard for the LTTE for its discipline, dedication, determination, motivation, and technical expertise. So there he is. He's talking about the enemy. And you've heard me say it on here is you have to respect your enemy. And there he is. He is high regard for the LTTE and it's discipline and dedication and determination and motivation and their technical expertise. That's everything. But find little justification in its senseless, mullish, destructive insistence on continuation of military means in the search of an honorable

solution to the Tamil problem in Sri Lanka. And he goes on, I thank some of my Ernst Wile subordinates for helping me refresh my memory. Most of them took me seriously in war. and remain two steps ahead of me in their spheres. God bless them. So, like me, looking at the guys that worked with me and for me, I hold them in the highest regard for taking care of me.

Then he's saying the same thing. Fashion apart, I genuinely feel I must dedicate this personal account to the young officer, the young soldiers, and the Jafna Temeals, who made me a good soul. and a better human being in my own eyes. I think that's just an outstanding opening for a book. Now, getting into the tactics, on their arrival, he goes on to say,

our tactics were predetermined, straight-jacketed, predictable, and reactive. These rose only a little above what is known as minor tactics in military terminology, that is, tactical arraignment and drills at section and platoon level. Counterinsurgency operations demanded far more innovative and integrative and integrative formulations at company, battalion, and formation levels.

This is obviously something that we had to deal with in Ramadi, and that was this idea of counterinsurgency. You know, it's so, it's infinitely more complex than a situation where, you know, two uniformed military groups are fighting against each other. Everything is clear. It's very easy to understand. They have a different shaped helmet. They have a different colored uniform.

And we're going to get on our different sides of the lines and we're going to go and destroy them. And an insurgency is just infinitely more complex. People mixed in with the populace. The populace swaying back and forth on who they support, wanting to protect the populace from the insurgents. some of the populists supporting the insurgents and some of the populace supporting the the host nation or the friendlies it's just a it's just an infinitely more complex situation how he explains it counterinsurgency remains essentially a company and platoon commanders battle

task so he's saying that it is those front line guys that are actually going to make it happen however he goes on they're concerted integrated mutually responsive and interoperative interconnected employment demands particularized tactics at battalion and brigade levels. And what that means is that the person who's overall in charge has got to do an outstanding job of explaining what the mission is and explaining how it's connected and explaining how what is going to happen on the front line is going to affect a broad strategy. Getting that commander's intent down to the front lines is critical. And this is something that when I was in Ramadi and I was working for Colonel

Sean McFarland, who's now General McFarland, who is just an unbelievably outstanding leader, but he was able to get his intent, you know, from him to the battalions, to the companies, to the platoons, to the squads, and right down to the frontline leadership. Very, very similar situation that Colonel McFarland was able to execute in a, just an outstanding way. So now we get to beyond the strategy or beyond the tactics. And as we talked about on the last podcast, what always interests me more is the principles of war. And how different people in different situations see those principles. And how those principles of war can be translated into principles of life.

And principles of business and principles of fighting. and principles of relationships and everything that you're doing and really also the principles of the war within and the war that we have within ourselves

to beat back the insurgents that are in our mind you know beat back the emotions that are in our mind that are trying to make us weak and trying to bring us down and trying to keep us from being the best that we can be

so those principles of war war apply to so many different things and that's why I find them so fascinating. And luckily enough, the good general has a section that's called principles of war. Principles of war distilled from conventional warfare are well known, but their degree of relevance in insurgency wars is not the same. Again, we're talking about insurgency much more complex. Insurgency is total war in the sense that involves people too in an intimate and positive manner, employs all sinews of war, political, social, economic, psychological, diplomatic, and military. It exemplifies determination and readiness for great sacrifices

in pursuance of its goals. It, I'm going to read that again, ECHO. I'm not sure you got it. It exemplifies determination and readiness for great sacrifices in pursuance of its goals. So what you're trying to achieve in an insurgency in a counterinsurgency situation is so hard to achieve. It is so difficult to achieve. Insurgency is an unrelenting, low-intensity, long-drawn war with time and opportunity serving the interests of the insurgent. and wherein the insurgent designs to overcome his weakness in one's fear with strength in the others. So in an insurgency, they don't have tanks, but they have time. And they can wait you out and they can just pick away at you.

The death of a thousand cuts. That's what the fear is. That's how the insurgent is going to win is the death of a thousand cuts. and when I think about me or you or us as individuals, it's those little things, it's those little cuts, it's those little times, it's those little situations where you cut yourself a little bit of slack. And that's the insurgent winning.

That's the insurgent beating you. So the principles themselves, relentless pursuance of the aim. The LTTE was clear in its aim, and unrelenting in its pursuit. Elam and political settlement on its terms. Elam was the name that they wanted to give the state for the Timiles. And that was their clear aim with no other possible modifications to that.

They wanted their own state, period. On the other hand, we were not very clear about our aim. Destruction of the LTT or weakening it. If the latter, then to what degree? We had not fought through the eventuality of the Sri Lankan government refusing to fulfill its part of the accord obligations. We did not know what to do with a warring LTT, hostile population, or recalcitrant Sri Lankan government.

And as it finally turned out, we were not even sure of what our national interests were and what military intervention and later military operations were required to achieve. this is when you hear all the time about people saying oh you got to write down your goals so this is what they're talking about you gotta know what your goals are you got to have them clear and then you got to have a relentless pursuance of the aim that's how you get things done it's kind of like when people are like i gotta get in better shape but that's it yeah yeah yeah it needs to be a clear goal what does that mean is that a certain amount of running is that a body weight that you're trying to reach is that a strength goal what is that goal. Do you write it down? Do you know exactly what it is and is it clear? Next. Aggressive spirit. It's an interesting how we keep hearing this word aggression and aggressiveness in all these different principles of war. Aggressiveness is so important. And we talked about on the last podcast and I talked about how it had to be balanced. But it has to be balanced. But man, it has

to be there. That aggressiveness has got to be there. In low intensity, long-drawn conflict, unflagging aggressive spirit is a vital importance, far more than in conventional offensive action. The LTTE had realized it thoroughly and practiced it with great deliberation and to great effect. We were somewhat lacking in it. And I think this insurgency and this talking about an insurgency when we're talking about life and becoming better is because it is a long-term struggle, right? You know, the war, the conventional war is a fast war where you, you know what's going to happen, you know what you're, you know who your enemy is, you go and you fight them and it's done.

It's very easy. The conventional, I mean, the, the, the insurgent war is more like what we go through as humans trying to improve because it's a long, drawn. out struggle and we're we got pieces of our brain that are changing sides just like the local populace might and it's very very challenging and that's why this notion of aggressiveness and knowing what your aim is and then this relentless pursuance of this aim and getting aggressive as you pursue that aim can you see how how important those are obviously in an in a counterinsurgency situation but also as you develop your plan to become a better person and a better

leader. Absolutely critical. Especially, I mean, one of the many things, similar to the insurgent comparison, is the temptations that come up every day, no matter if you're trying to, I don't know, make more money, you know, with your own business or get in shape. Get in shape is a good one, I think. Because it's easy to talk about. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And a lot of parallels that, in my opinion, are really clear. So these temptations, just like the insurgents, they'll pop up, or they won't be a around for a day, two days. And then one day it's your best friend's birthday. And, you know,

he's going to, I don't know, Dunkin' Donuts or something for, you know, his birthday and all of a sudden, yeah. Insurgent attack. Yeah. And they come up every day. Unexpected. Well, sometimes they're expected, but sometimes not expected. It's just so dynamic in that way where all these things are there to kind of get you. And what's good? When those things come to get you, get in the aggressive mindset. Where you get aggressive with that. situation. You get aggressive with those donuts. I don't mean aggressively eating them. I mean aggressively putting them in the garbage. Yeah.

Yeah. And that's so true. And when these things do come up, it's so, it's so much, I don't say, yeah, I would say easier to be like, no, I'm, I'm, I'm on the program right now. It's better to be aggressive. If your approach is, if you're like, you know, I'm going to allow excuses to get in my head or kind of kind of pussyfoot around and be like, well, you know, moderation is all right kind of thing and have that attitude. It's going to get you, man. It's good. Yeah. If you're aggressive, you can take. You know, take a stand, take, in a way, take pride in the fact that, nope, I'm not eating those donuts.

Nope, I'm not drinking. I'm not going out to the club drinking. I got to rest. I got to work out in the morning or whatever. Yeah, that aggression does help, man. That aggression does help. In fact, it's almost like if you don't, if you do kind of just kind of tiptoll your way through it.

It wins. Yeah, it's like you can't even get it done. It's the same thing with this, with a counterinsurgency. You have to be aggressive. You can't let those little things creep in. Yeah. And you've got to keep that relentless pursuance of the aim and you've got to do it aggressively. Yeah.

Next. Surprise. This embraces surprise at tactical, strategic, and political levels. The IPKF, that's the Indian Peacekeeping Force, could not do anything, could not do anything. In the tactical field, it was unable to match the LTTE, mainly because of the lack of innovation and serious application of all our professional. acumen to stymie our to stymie the LTTE our methods largely remained conventional so surprise and how important surprises now how do we surprise ourselves i can tell you you got to surprise yourself if you if you can't surprise yourself it means you lack creativity if you're not coming up with new

ideas and new ways to do things, you're lacking creativity and you're lacking surprise. So, you know, I was, I've been traveling a bunch lately. And guess what? Sometimes I'm in a hotel room. And I got to get creative on how I'm going to aggressively pursue my aims. And that means I got to do, you know, maybe my workout was 300 burpees. That's it. Boom. No squat rack there, no pull-up bar, no rings, no row or nothing, no kettlebells. No. And guess what? I'm, my, soul gets crushed. But that's just being creative and aggressively adapting to the situations that you get put into. So you've got to maintain that adaptability, that creativity all the time.

And I think that's absolutely critical. Man, and it's yet another one of those times where it's so easy to be like, dang, this hotel doesn't have a gym. Oh, yeah. Or, dang, there's no, like, really healthy food. There's the McDonald's right there. Yeah. There's no healthy food.

in this town even. Yeah. So that, that healthy food thing, especially when you start looking at intermittent fasting, you know, oh,

you're in the airport and they don't have, you know, all you can get is those, um, those little hot dogs wrapped in a pretzel. Those things are so tasty.

But, you know, like you should not be eating those, right? And sometimes you, you're like, oh, okay, I'll eat them.

Why? You should be on the intermittent fast when you're in the trap. situation. Yeah. You don't need to be eating. And I'm telling you this right now, and it's fresh in my memory, because I had two

of those bad boys this morning. And they were good. Yeah. The weakness crept in. Yep. And I got some of those pretzel-ropped hot dogs. Dang. Nobody's perfect.

Nobody's perfect. Next one. Mobility and flexibility. The insurgent must develop intelligent and guileful flexibility in planning, conducting, and overseeing actions so as to retain initiative, suffer the least damage, and yet keep the opponent guessing, and in a prolonged state of readiness and uncertainty. So that's what the insurgent has to do. They got to be super flexible.

They got to keep you guessing and keep you in a prolonged state of readiness. That sounds good, right? Prolonged state of readiness, it sounds good, but it's actually not good. When you're constantly on edge, that wears people down. It breaks them down over time. But where we failed was we did not exhibit enough flexibility in our strategic and tactical plans and their guileful execution. We had to seize the initiative and pose challenges to the LTT, which we largely failed to do. So, you know, mobility, flexibility.

Something we talk about all the time on this podcast is having the ability to adapt and be flexible. And, you know, whether it's working out in a hotel room, whether it's, you know, finding something good to eat or not eating because there is nothing good to eat whether it's being in a leadership situation and you're adapting to a personality that you that is awkward or different or you're not ready for or a situation that needs to be overcome that's flexibility and mobility and you have to maintain that motivation and discipline in prolonged slow bleeding low-intensity, people-oriented struggle, motivation, and discipline as ingredients of morale are far more important. The LTTE and the people had both these to a remarkable degree.

The IPKF's discipline was as good as any armies, even the LTTEs. But its motivation was limited to the spirit of professionalism only. We were soldiers. We did as ordered. So the LTTE had this passionate goal that they were going after. And that encouraged their discipline. They understood why they were doing what they were doing.

And they had that clear goal. They understood why are we doing this? Because we were on their own state. Now, did the IPKF know why they were doing what they were doing? No, they didn't. They just, he just talked about that. He just talked about how they could, they didn't know what their goal was. They didn't know how it was going to affect.

They didn't know, they even know what their end state was supposed to be. So when you take that away from them, even though they're disciplined troops, they miss that last level. And that's why. Why are you doing this? And that is why it's so important for you as you try and reach your goals, as you try and get something done. You keep that in mind of why you're doing this. What's the end state going to be? Because it's so easy to lose track of the end state.

I mean, if you're trying to make, you know, you're trying to get, gain 25 pounds of muscle, I mean, that's going to take you a couple years possibly. If you're trying to make a million dollars, that may take you 10 years, might take you six years. That's a long ways. And there's a lot of distractions that can come all along the way. Yeah, and to your point, consider why. Why do you want to gain 25 pounds? We'll say losing weight, right?

So let's say you have a photo shoot where you're going on spring. break or something like that. Let me just think of all the big photoshoops that have to drop a weight for a weight that's never happened. Let's talk about this. Let's talk about you're trying to lose weight because you're trying to be healthy. Right. That's a long-term goal that's realistic. Yes. Yeah. And whatever that means, right, healthy. Or what if you're a healthy person already, but you just want to, I don't know, look better or achieve something. How about you've got a jihitsu tournament coming up and you've got to have some weight. Right. Cut some weight. Right, right. Exactly. So it makes it so much easier.

To cut, I mean, for the most part. When you have a specific goal. Yes. Yeah. So you got a fight coming up. That guy's going to cut that weight way quick. You hear these guys cutting all this weight. Like, oh yeah, he has a fight in a month and a half and he got to cut 40 pounds.

And then he'll do it. Yep. Because, yeah, I mean, obviously they're trained athletes as well, but that goal in understanding it, man, helps so much. Yeah. Especially when I'm going to read this part again. And again, we talk about when you're trying to get stuff done as a person, it's a prolonged slow, bleeding, low intensity,

people-oriented struggle. That's what it is. That's what you're up against. You know, that's what you're up against. It's a low... Anything that's worth achieving as a person, it takes all those. It's long.

It's slow. You know, there's nothing to you go, oh, this is going to be the ultimate achieving me in my life and it's going to take you 15 minutes to do. No. It's going to take you months and months and months and years of effort

of blood, sweat, and tears to get there. Now, continuing with discipline and morale. This goes into a section of the book where he starts talking about their performance and we're going to take a little bit of

a turn here but I think it's important to bring up. In the initial stages of the war in October to December of 1987 there were complaints and reports of rape, looting and wanton destruction

indulged in by the IPKF. When a soldier is pushed and led into a blind alley, like the situation in Jaffna, where it suddenly changed from so well-tom-tombed peacekeeping operations into a full-fledged battlefield. He feels terribly insecure and starts seeing an enemy all over. So we talked about this earlier. These guys thought they were going on a nice peacekeeping mission,

and they put their blue helmets on and, you know, be a referee well the referee gets attacked and this is starting to talk about the psychological effect it has and they start seeing an enemy everywhere

you know and this reminds me of when I was in high school and I was lucky enough to have a bunch of Vietnam vets that were put me through high school and when I was in high school the movie platoon came out and of course I was you know

all into war and whatnot so I went and saw the movie platoon and one of my teachers that was in Vietnam had seen the movie as well and I asked him straight up you know hey what did you think of the movie and he explained to me in a very solemn way that the movie depicted these Americans going in and you know brutalizing these villages and in you know doing horrible things to these villagers but he the way he explained it to me, he said, listen, you know, we'd be in and around a village for three or four weeks. And in that three or four weeks, they, the Americans, would lose seven or eight guys

to booby traps. And meanwhile, the villagers don't hit any booby traps. So they're out walking the same trails and the same areas through the same rice paddies. And the, the villagers aren't Hitting any booby traps. They're not getting blown up. They're not getting killed. So that means they kind of know where they are. And he said that kind of frustration is exactly what this is talking about right here. I'm going back to it.

In an insurgency sparked and sustained by an opponent who is dressed in civilian clothes but shoots and blows him up unseen, suspicion alone takes a vicious turn. When he sees his comrades being killed by innocent-looking civilians, blending again into the civilian population, he gets into a rage and anger against the uncertainty and the unseen. At that point, his pent-up tension,

welling feeling of helplessness, and burning desire to explode into a release of counterviolence, are in frantic search of a tangible object he can master, an object which is weak and helpless itself. What better object than a frightened, weak, cowering woman, an unguarded, wide-open shop, an unresisting defenseless house and its feeble occupants, whose shelter the unseen deceitful opponent had obtained by whatever means. It is madness, the animal in him that rules momentarily. He is wild.

But just for a brief spell, if he can get a hold of himself or if someone controls him in that moment of crisis of cathartic explosion, he might in all probability get over his baser instincts. Where this does not happen, then the explosion manifests in counter-assault, rape, loot, and wanton destruction, seeking release from tension, fear, and rage. Education, motivation, communication, and company are good anecdotes. Antidotes, sorry. Most culprits realize within minutes of their act and repent, weeping like children. I saw an officer with 27 years of service breaking down like this. So that's what happens to people. I think there's so much in that paragraph.

this paragraph about this pent up tension and we've got to remember that it's extreme in a situation you know like this the tension is extreme the fear is extreme the rage is extreme but and obviously for those that are listening that are in combat right now that are deployed overseas these are things that you have to watch out for and especially as a leader you've got to be the person that controls him in the moment of crisis of cathartic explosion. As a leader, that's got to be what your job is. And also, as you work in businesses as a leader, you've got a sense.

Now, the things won't be as dramatic as this, but you can get people that do make mistakes in business. They make ethical mistakes. They make moral mistakes. They feel that pressure, and they want to lash out, and they make mistakes. And you've got to get them through those moments. You've got to pay attention to it.

It is under these circumstances, back to the book, it is under these circumstances of total uncertainty, initial disorientation, sudden violence, inability to communicate because there was language differences, and lack of effective control and education that excesses were committed by a few, by a few. But the command and leadership chain rapidly gathered their brood once again within the warmth of their moral influence

and disciplinary binding. Enquiries were instituted and disciplinary action taken against the defaulters. Warped mines had to be weeded out. But there were not very many. After February to March of 1988, the incident rates dropped to almost zero.

So they were able to get control of the situation, to weed it out, get rid of the sadists and the folks that couldn't control themselves. but this is the the type of pressure that you see military people under and especially in these counterinsurgency

operations like we've had for the last 10 or 15 years in Iraq and Afghanistan where you have local populists, you have IEDs, you have indirect fire mortars and guys are getting killed and where do you place the rage?

Where does it come out? And that is a huge challenge for leadership to try and keep that in check to the best of your ability. And speaking of leadership from the book, what we lacked in many an instance was what I should specifically emphasize inspiring leadership. If the leader, particularly the formation commander, did not inspire his command, then that body of troops would be at half its effectiveness. So Laif and I talk about in extreme ownership, leadership is the most important thing on the battlefield. And here it is another example of saying,

you know, he's saying that if the leader is not inspiring, they're going to be at half their effectiveness. For instance, if he visited a post and the men did not talk warmly, inquisitively, and fondly about the visit for the next week or 10 days, and if they did not perceive a challenge left behind by the commander, did not feel a spontaneous desire to meet it in thinking it hard to solve it and thinking hard to solve it and bracing to present an innovative novelty to the commander on his next visit,

then it is better that this type of commander did not visit at all. So these saying, you know, if you're not inspiring, if you're not inspiring your people, it's better not even to show up. Many formation commanders failed to inspire. Not many of them roughed it out with the troops on patrols, ambushes, staying in their posts at night. on road opening and raid or helilanding missions. And this is an example of kind of a negative example. And this is very clear.

And you actually see this portrayed in movies about Vietnam a lot. And you'll get that very quickly. The brigade commander would land by a helicopter and a post on a helipad, which had to be secured. So I mean, soldiers had to go out and, like, secure this helipad somewhere and set security around it and move the brush and make sure there's no mines on it, et cetera. etc. Then the general would breeze past a few bodies lying in the muck and mud,

beam a flashy smile to affect unconcern for danger, have a hurried chat with the local leader, blurred out directions or orders, sip a cup of tea or coconut juice, showing no concern for the soldiers who labored under those circumstances to prepare it, and offer before you could blink an eye would be off in his chopper what inspiration could his men in the post draw from that it's a stereotypical thing

and it really happens it really does happen and you know you see that with you know not just military leaders but you see that with senior leaders in big companies where you know the the folks on the front lines

on the construction side or on the manufacturing side or on the manufacturing The boss is coming. So what do they have to do? They have to do all this preparation. They got to clean everything. Got to get everything dialed in and then the guy shows up for five minutes and it took you know four hours to get everything ready. The guy shows up for five minutes flashes a quick smile and then leaves. Is anyone inspired by that? No. Absolutely not. We had three types of officers. One category was that which thought acted, moved about was bold. and got down to business fastest, even in totally alien, confusing, unknown environment. Getting down to business. That's the guy. The second one consisted of those who had the brains and moved about as best they could, but lacked boldness and ability to inspire.

The third category consisted of those who simply slogged when prodded and complained about their troops not being trained, orders not being clearly given, and so on. they could do nothing else. Their units suffered. So that's the guy that doesn't take ownership of anything. Did you hear that? Complained about their troops not being trained,

orders not being clearly given, and so on. That guy's not a good leader. Because all he's doing is complaining their orders weren't clear. He's complaining up and down the chain of command. The guys below me aren't trained right. The guys above me aren't giving clear orders. This guy's a disaster.

Don't be that guy. Don't be that leader. And here's a piece on leading from front. There was a big battle and there was a bunch of friendly casualties and now I'm going to the books. Their belongings, dress and equipment lay tattered and strewn all over a huge playground and I went up there on one of my visits. I thought this was disrespectful to the brave souls and asked the escort team accompanying me to help pick up all those items and remove them from public gaze.

To my acute horror, not one of them moved to pick them up. The escort team consisted of all denominations, but none dared. So here we are. He's out on this battlefield. There's all, you know, gear and personal effects of all these guys that were killed, and it's just been sitting there, and no one's moved it. And so he tells the team that he's with, like, okay, sir, go start rounding up the gear, and it won't do it.

it became painful to see such reluctance I spontaneously got down from my open Jeep walked up to a pair of pouches and a belt and picked them up brought them to my Jeep and then the Brigadier General that was with him did it as well was the next to do so

it was only after this that the rest of the escort team got down and gathered the other items a little bit of leadership from the front right there and I think we're going to close with us section right here. Views and visits of senior generals and their interaction with field commanders and troops did little to inspire us subordinates, provided little worthwhile guidance, and clarified little as to what the whole game plan was about. So these guys had no idea of what the why was. Everybody lived and fought from one day to the next. No strategic view. Our weight

for pearls of wisdom remained endless. What increasingly showed up instead was the political eye and bluster of the generals, the tentativeness and uncertainty of the army commander above them and the army chief, which did little to change systemic incongruities and tackle the hidden rot.

Consequently, boldness and experimentation became prominent casualties. So this glaring eye from the senior leadership snuffed out the creativity and the boldness of the troops. They actually made, you know, this intense scrutiny. Like I said, it made the troops not want to do anything. and I think not only should you keep that in consideration as a leader that you make sure that you're not snuffing out creativity from your troops, but also on a personal level, you can't let the fear of failure limit your boldness and your experimentation. And that's something that happens all the time.

people are afraid to step out and try something new. Yeah, and I mentioned this before where a lot of the time the reason for that is when people get punished for making honest mistakes. You definitely should not punish people for making honest mistakes. And when you are going to take risks yourself, you need to cut yourself some slack and realize that things might not go perfect. And I'll tell you, I mean, an example. that's sitting right in front of us right now is this podcast that we're doing. Because, you know, people are asking, you know, hey, you should do a podcast, but there's, you know, okay, well, where's it going to go? Do we really want to do it? What's the, what are people actually going to think of it?

You know, it's one thing to have, do a podcast with a guy like Tim Ferriss or Joe Rogan or Sam Harris where you've got this, you know, famous individual. And of course, people want to listen to them, but who's going to want to listen to Jocko and Echo? So there's some, you know, let's, but, but okay, what's the worst thing that could happen? We fail, no one listens to it, okay, cool. It wasn't going to affect me that bad. You know, we'd move on and figure something else to do. Yeah. But that's the kind of thing that, that experimentation that can lead to good stuff.

Right. And if you don't allow yourself to do that, then you're going to have problems. And the same way, if you don't allow your troopers to make mistakes, like you said, did and try new things, and you don't encourage that, then they're going to be, their morale is going to be crushed, and they're not going to make the progress that they need to make. Yeah, I mean, you can kind of look at that type of scenario in, or from like an expanded point of view, like the big picture where if someone's not raised, I kind of mentioned this before as well, where if someone is raised in a really rigid household, where, you know, the kid who's

taking piano lessons, he makes one wrong key and he gets. whacked with the ruler, right? And let's say someone was just raised like that in life every little mistake, they're going to be so reluctant to start something new. They're going to be so scared, and a lot of times you don't even feel like you know why

you're scared. It's just scary. A lot of anxiety comes when you think about or consider branching out, doing something new. Fear of, like, failure and all this is so embedded in you because of that punishment that you received. So you're trained. You know, you're trained to avoid mistakes or new stuff that you might make mistakes.

And that's something we've dealt with in the military for the last several years, the last probably a couple decades, was this, we call the zero defect mentality. Whereas like, okay, if this guy made any mistakes over his career, he was not going to be advanced. He was not going to be promoted. And they've really tried to move away from that because, like you said, that completely suffocates any type of risk taking, any type of creativity,

any willingness to go outside the box and try something new. it just suffocates it. So I was definitely never a person that would hammer people for making mistakes as long as they were, we'll call them good mistakes. Right. Not just making stupid mistakes. Yeah. We're being careless in general when you know being careless is bad. Yeah.

So that kind of wraps up the book, Assignment Jaffna by Sardisch Panday. Great book. And I don't know if you can get a hold of it. but those are some major lessons that I learned from it. And again, I bought this book while I was in Sri Lanka and read it, and it definitely influenced me. And as I started fighting a counterinsurgency war myself, I would think about what they went through and how difficult it was for them.

And I knew we would be facing some very difficult times as well. Yeah, that's interesting how that is essentially, in a big way, the opposite of your book. where he's he's this is basically a cautionary tale from beginning to end just how not to do it yeah and although and you know from from from from our book our book has a lot of this was a mistake that we made here's what we did wrong now strategically overall it it was a very successful you know what the army did and what the one one a d did and what the two two eight what all these soldiers and marines did over a longer period of time with with with us seals as well well was successful overall, but we definitely point out the errors of our way because there's successful operations outlined in this book as well, but you don't learn as much from them. I picked out a couple of the ones that went wrong because, of course, you learn more from

your mistakes. And, you know, in the book that Laif and I wrote, it's definitely a lot of those stories about the mistakes we made because we learned more from them as brutal as that is. That's the reality. Yeah, that's all. And before we get in the questions, I do want to say if I did mispronouncy incorrectly pronounce anything from assignment Jaffna, I sincerely apologize. So my bust. I'm sorry.

So with that, we'll go into some questions from the inner webs. So first question from Geekin Dad, Jock Willink. how do you deal with fatigue both mental and physical? How do I deal with fatigue mental and physical? I rest. And, you know, when, if I'm feeling like just completely overtrained and weak, I usually tell, well, I tell my fighters, I'd say, hey, you just got your butt kick today. Go eat a big steak tonight, take tomorrow off.

You know, you just need rest. And it's pretty obvious when that happens. And so I do the same thing for myself. If I, if I'm feeling horrible and, you know, you can see occasionally my workouts just consist of like, you know, doing some mobility training, rolling it out, you know, doing a big stretch. That's because I'm just tired and I know it. And so I just give myself some downtime. I think it's very important to know the difference between being lazy and being overtrained. And it's very easy to make that excuse for yourself

And that's why I always err on the side of I'm working out I'm training Because and usually then the next day So if I feel like exhausted today I won't take today off But I will take the next day But I'll work out today just to make sure That I'm not just being lazy

So I'll do another workout Get another training session in or whatever the case may be So I make sure that's not just that moment Because sometimes the next day you're like, you know, I'm not that bad. Right. I'm going to get, I'm back in the game. Yay. Back on the program.

The other thing people ask me all the time, I've probably written this a dozen times or more on Twitter, is do I take naps? And the answer is yes. In fact, I slept on the, I flew today, and I slept probably two hours on the plane. And that's a little bit more than a nap, and I'm not on a plane every day. So what do I do for naps? Yes, I do take naps. what I do for naps and this is something that I learned from a high school teacher that I had was I walked into his office one day and he had his feet up on the desk above his heart and I said

what are you doing? And he said oh this is really good for you. You put your feet above your heart and it allows the blood to circulate out of your feet and gives you know lets your your veins and your one-way valves and your veins rest a little bit and gets the little pools of blood out of random places and it's getting good and so i tried it and it felt really good and so when i was going through ceil training i used to when i come in we we have a couple minutes between evolutions and i just go in and put my feet up set my arm and sleep for a few minutes you know nowadays if i can i'll try and sleep for like six to eight minutes set my timer on my iPhone and you look like distressed when i said six to eight minutes yeah you don't consider anything under

the three hours to be in. Yeah, that's not a legitimate nap. If I sleep for like an hour, then I'm up for too long at night. I won't be able to go to sleep because I get too much rest. Gotcha. Yeah. Under what circumstances are you going to take a nap though? Like how do how do you just tired? I'm just tired. I'm just tired. I feel myself like no. Oh yes. Like sleepy tired. And that's the thing is I can do if I'm if my mind is engaged in something or especially if my body's engaged in something. That's what's cool about working out. You can work out when you're exhausted. Because once you start moving it, it's not like you're going to fall asleep. while you're doing squats.

It's like you can fall asleep while you're doing pull-ups. You're just going to do the pull-ups. You're just going to do the squats. And when you get done, you'll be tired, you go to sleep. Right. What's hard to do, and this is when we were writing the book, when I was writing my section of the books, I'd be writing at night, 11 o'clock at night, 12 o'clock at night, be trying to hammer through it. And sometimes I'd be falling asleep.

Oh, man. But that feeling of, hey, I'm just falling asleep, that's not good. Right. So when I'm feeling that tired, I'll power out. But it's like one of those things where I also like to push. through it. So sometimes I was just trying power through it. Because honestly, even a short nap for me will kind of make me stay up too late at night

and all of a sudden it'll be 1 o'clock in the morning. Even at 6 to 8 minutes. 6 to 8 minutes. A 6 to 8 minutes, a power nap can make you feel amazing. Oh yeah. It can make you feel amazing. Don't underestimate the power nap. It is a legit fool right there.

Yeah. I actually used to take like 15 minute. Not like 10 to 15 minutes. I know that's overkill for you. Little much. Going into laziness. No, seriously, 15 minutes is, yeah, you probably felt like outstanding. But it only helps with that sleepy type.

Because let's say I'm used to a certain amount of sleep. Let's say I get two and a half hours less sleep than I'm used to. It goes way beyond me feeling just sleepy tired. It's like physically tired. Oh, really? Yeah. Yeah, I don't have that issue. Yeah.

Yeah, you're different. So if I take a 10-minute power nap, when I am lacking two and a half hours of my quote unquote. Oh, we don't make up for it, right? No, no, no, no, no. It helps me when I get my normal sleep, give or take, but I've been doing a lot of stuff during the day, you know? And you're like, dang, I did a lot.

My brain was kind of used a lot. And dang, I have this, whatever I got to do now. Then you take the 10, 15 minute nap, then it brings you right back. Yeah. And it typically will not mess with my sleep. I wonder how much of this is just you just not. just powering through stuff.

Yeah, probably all of it. But nonetheless, that's how it is for me, for sure. It'd be interesting to, at some point, for you to experiment with, like, lack of sleep and sleep deprivation and see how well you can perform. Like, I've been noticing that where, if I don't get a lot of sleep, I can still perform really well at some physical activities. And then after a few days, though, I do. I get, feel like garbage.

Right. And there'll be some physical activities that'll feel as a week. at but yeah and and you're right well there the i mean as long as it's like one time or even two times or so if i film or something and let's say i film in the morning but then i've been up you know working late the night before when i go into film i'm like charged up i'm sure there's all kinds of factors in there a lot of it's like adrenaline not like it's like this huge adrenaline rush but there's that little bit of adrenaline because of the task you know so that helps and a lot of times just like how you said if I made the decision like no I'm not going to miss

this workout at all under any circumstances then I happen to get two and a half hours less sleep and I and I go in and how you say power through it you can you can totally do it yeah but I'm seeking comfort fully yeah for sure but it still does help though but to answer the question yes if you're tired sleep if you need rest rest and don't try and overtrain yourself you probably are overtraining and and just need some rest. Yeah. Next. We don't have an author on this one, but what are your thoughts on freakishly strong guys in BJJ who go too hard, get hurt, and paint it as if it's your fault?

Because this guy rolled with a maniac tonight. The guy that rolled with a maniac. So we've all been there. We're rolling with a maniac. Okay, so this is a, this seems like a pretty straightforward question at first. But then all of a sudden it gets really complicated. It really does.

Who is at fault here? Right. So you're rolling with the guy, guy's super strong. You catch him in the submission. And guess what? He doesn't want to tap. And so the next thing you know, there's a little pop, there's a little crack, whatever. And you got an injury.

And the big guy that was going all crazy, he's like, I can't believe you did this. So the question is, who's at fault? And there's actually two sides. to that story in a lot of ways because in one way the higher belt right or a more experienced guy should never really hurt a lower belt right i mean if if i'm a black belt and i'm going against a purple belt i really shouldn't hurt that person because if i do i probably meant to do it i mean of course there's you know mistakes happen and i'm not talking i'm talking about submission right i'm not talking about, hey, I went over and it made you roll your ankle or you caught your wrist as you were

falling out or something like that. Those are just incidental, you know, things that happen in Jiu-Jitsu. But, you know, so the higher belt generally shouldn't be like putting someone in a submission and hurting them because experienced guys in Jiu-Jitsu, they know when the tension is there on the arm or the foot or the knee. They know that that tension means the next amount of pressure is going to take this beyond the limit of the joint, and you're going to have an injury. So you're the big guy, he's going psycho, and he's got a big ego.

And that's why he's not tapping. So that must be his fault, right? Well, at the same time, if someone doesn't tap and then you hurt them, well, that's kind of jacked up too, because you shouldn't be getting someone's foot and cranking it or getting their arm and cranking it when you know,

I mean, maybe they couldn't tap. Maybe they were arm was stuck or whatever. And now a sudden you hurt them. So I really do think it's both. I think both people are at fault. Yeah. And I think that part of the dual safety mechanisms in Jiu-Jitsu is that there's two people

that can control the situation. The one that's getting submitted should tap and the one that's doing the submission. should, you know, should know to stop before the injury occurs. Again, there's about a million little things that can happen where you get injured in Jiu-Jitsu. There's arm locks that get thrown on and it's a little tweak and that stuff does happen. You know, but when I look at Dean and I, Dean Lister, who's my main training partner, I've been training with for 20 years, we've put, you know, thousands, literally thousands and

thousands of submissions on each other. And neither one of us has ever hurt the other one. And neither one of us had ever gotten hurt from a submission. And I'm talking thousands of submission. Of course, most of those, you know, many of those, most of those are him submitting me. But, I mean, I've submitted him many, many times as well. And never have one of us got a submission on the other one and hurt the other person. And I can tell you, he's left.

go of hundreds of submissions on me and I've let go on many submissions on him because I go, you know what? Oh, I've got this. He's, you know, he's not tapping for whatever reason. We go to the next move. Or he gets me in some weird position. He, you know, he's got it, but he's let's go and goes to the next move. And what's really cool about this is what you end up with is you end up with ego-free training because the truth of the matter is I don't care if Dean taps me and I don't care if I tap Dean. And he doesn't care if he taps me and he doesn't care if he gets the tap from me. So what we are able to do then is take all kinds of risks and do all kinds of crazy flow drills and where we're really trying to get each other.

But at the same time, we really don't care. And the biggest dichotomy of that is I'm sitting here saying I don't want to get tapped or I don't care if I get tapped by Dean, but it tries me crazy when I get tapped by Dean. And it drives me crazy. You can hear you. Like, sometimes in the gym, I'll be like, ah, you know, I get frustrated because I got tapped. But it's frustrated at myself and it's frustration in the game and whatever. But it's not my ego being like, I didn't want to tap. It's just a frustration that I made a mistake or whatever.

So that allows you to really learn more. Now, all this being said, if someone's just a big maniac, that goes crazy the whole time, And they're going to hurt you. Well, then you've got to make a decision that you're not going to roll with them. Right. I mean, clearly, you want to not get hurt. You want to continue training. So someone that goes crazy and is super strong, you don't want to roll with them.

That being said, and this whole thing has been a non-answer, isn't it? That being said, because when you do that, you've got to understand that you're avoiding a real issue. You're avoiding a big, strong guy, and how are you going to deal with that guy? And you will get better dealing with the big, strong guy. That's what makes you, that's one of the key things to get you better at Jiu-jitsu. So, you know, you, you, you want to train with the big strong guys, but that being said, once again, is if you train with a big guy and you get hurt, then you can't train anymore. So you got to be smart. You got to use your judgment. You got to check your

ego. You got to roll with people that have their egos checked. And I think that's, that's the best way to answer. That's a long answer. It's probably not. the most complete answer, but there is no clear cut answer because there's a lot of little nuances to every little role in the jujitsu. Yeah, it seems like there's so many exceptions to all these situations. Even when you say a higher belt should never hurt a lower belt, a lot of times that can just depend. Like what if you're not that much higher and he's bigger than you and more athletic and when

you go for a submission really controlled or whatever? He's spazzing the whole time. Yeah. So even in your transitions, he's spazzing, he spazzing. So really the only way you can get that submission is if you go fast and hard to get it. To get it. Slap it right on, right? And let's say you do it.

And in the midst of your arm bar, you had in the midst of you slapping it on, you can't extend it too much when you hurt them. Yeah. So it's really just the nature of the role. And a lot of times it's nobody's fault. That's just how two guys going crazy who care about the submissions they're getting. it happens. But yeah, you shouldn't care about so much about the submissions you're getting. That's the bottom line.

Well, unless, and Greg brought this up, where he said, you should care. You should care about the submissions you get and you should care about being able to resist submissions as well because it's kind of your response. And this was, this would understand the context we're talking. We're talking about me and him. And the guys that I was talking about, I was rolling with. He said, it's your job to give them an accurate look. If you're a big guy who's, you know, you come in and you're, you know, however big and athletic, you have to give them that look.

And you have a certain skill level in Jiu-Sci, you've got to give them that look. So you provide an accurate experience of rolling with a guy who's, you know, 250 pounds brown belt. You have to give him that look. Yeah, no, that's true. So he's saying you can't go easy? You can't go easy. You can't.

He's not saying you can't. He's saying that. but if you put on a submission and that guy's not tapping, he's just giving you an accurate look that your submission isn't submitting him. You're not submitting him. You're not tapping him out. And if he's tough and likes the pain

or is not scared of the pain, well, that's the look he's giving you. So you have to complete the move. If you're not going to break his arm if you have that mindset, that's good too. But then you have to work on other situations that you would do in that situation. So if you want to just control the fight more

or something like that, then that's what you've got to do. But it is his job to give you. that look. That is something that Dean and I will do that I think is awesome is let's say Dean puts a heel hook on me and instead of cranking it and making me tap he'll hold it. And when he holds it, it gives me an opportunity to work some kind of escape. Now, sometimes he'll hold it and while he's holding it, he's adjusting his legs and he's actually getting me deeper and deeper into it where I can't get out anymore. And eventually I realize I can't

move and tap, not because of the pressure, not because the pain, because I realize it's checkmate in the game over. The same token is, as he's holding it, if I can figure out, I have time to think and consider and go, oh, what if I put my foot here? What if I grab this arm here? What if I spin this way or that way? And all of a sudden, a real escape opens up, but I had time to think about it. Well, maybe next time I do it, I don't have to think.

And now we actually have figured out an escape from the position. Yeah. And or either I figured out an escape or maybe he figured out the way. to finish it with 100% reliability. Right. So we actually have advanced the, that's probably the original advancement in the leglock game for, for Dean and me was, and really for Dean more than me was him holding a submission and not, and allowing me to try different things to escape and shutting them down.

And then eventually where I was like, okay, now I've got you in position where there is no escape. And that's how things like, we end up with like the 4-11 and Ultimate Game over, all that stuff came from holding those positions because if he just locked him on and cranked it, well then I tap and then we start again but he didn't have to adjust anything and now you start building technique on top of technique on top

of technique. Next question and I'm quoting this here please can I have some advice with dealing or please can I have some advice for dealing with poor leaders at work they have little respect for and the question

as a suburb. As a subordinate, how do you handle a leader who leads from a place of ego and isn't transparent with information? Yeah, so these are a couple questions actually that I got. And I just kind of bunched them together because my answer is going to be very similar for each of them. And it's actually very similar to a situation that I'm dealing with right now, the kind that I'm helping out.

and I wrote something to him recently. And what happened was he's in a situation where a leader had come in that didn't have the knowledge inside the industry they were working in. So he came from another industry, got put into a leadership position. And that guy, that new leader, was resisting change and not giving support to the new procedures that the guy I was coaching was trying to implement. So he was kind of, you know, at a loss for what to do. You know, you got this new manager that's coming in that's inexperienced. And the guy I'm coaching obviously doesn't respect him because he doesn't have a lot of knowledge in this industry. And so here's the advice I gave him.

I said, you need to set this up to make the new manager look good. Make some adjustments to the words you are choosing. the tact you are taking and the focus you are using to ensure that your changes make him look good, not bad. Now this is so counterintuitive for people. It's so counterintuitive because they get that person that's above them in the chain of command that doesn't know as much as them, that's not as smart as them, and what do they want to do? They want to bring them down.

They want to prove to everybody that they're better. I'm better than that guy. I deserve his job. I deserve that guy's job. That's what everybody's instinct is to do. And it's wrong. It's wrong. Somehow let the ideas come from him or make him the approver or the driver of some of the aspects that he can handle.

So I'm actually saying go out of your way to make this easier for this guy. Make him look good. Give him credit. It's your ego that wants to pull him down. Put your ego in check. Help him without being condescending or acting. like you know more than him. He shouldn't even know you are helping him.

Have you ever been, this is so fun to do is when, you know, Echo doesn't know this section of the equipment. So I don't say, hey, since you don't know this, I'll teach it to you, right? This condescending tone of, you know, but instead of like, hey, have you ever seen the way this one works? I know you, have you ever seen this specific equipment before? because the way it works,

it's a little bit different than some of the other ones is you got to do this, this, and this. And you can sit back and you can accept that knowledge without feeling like you don't know it. So I'm teaching you, but I'm doing it in a clandestine manner.

And that's what we're trying to do because we're trying to build what we're trying to do. We're trying to build a relationship here. That's what we're trying to do. We're trying to build a relationship. And if I go, since you don't know how to use this,

I'll show you now, what does that do? Put you on the defensive, makes you considered me to be a threat. Now I'm threatening. And that's not good. He should even know you are helping him.

Respect what he does and show him that you respect it. So, hey, you know, I know this is, you probably haven't been down in the weeds on this type of gear in a while. But hey, this is the way, you know what I'm saying? Like, you actually, I actually respect the fact that you're up top in charge. And I'm just a frontline guy, but here's how you do this if you ever had to. Right, right. You know what I mean? Just downplay what he doesn't know.

and subtly help him to learn it. Right? You know, you probably would never have to do this. This new equipment over here, I mean, I know it's a little bit below your level. Here's how it works if you ever needed it. Boom. You know what I mean? Not like, you don't know how to do this.

Right. I do. Yeah. You don't want an adversarial relationship with this new leader. You want him to support and help you. He will do that if you are making him look good. This is so easy, man. This is so easy and so hard.

Because everybody's ego will get in the way. Everybody's ego will get in the way. Extreme ownership often requires covert and clandestine indirect actions. So all these things that I'm talking about helping the guy without him knowing, letting him take credit for ideas without him knowing. All these little aspects, they're indirect. actions. They're not going head to head. It's like Jiu-Jitsu. It's Jiu-Jitsu all the time.

Everything's Jiu-Jitsu. You don't want to, if you know I'm going to do an arm bar, I'm not going to get the arm bar, right? You're going to defend that. So I have to go take indirect actions and set things up and take my time and be clandestine and covert. This is chess, not checkers. This is where you need to master your ability to influence,

which, as we talked about a couple of podcasts ago, is actually manipulation. I'm manipulating this guy to think that he's got something over me. I'm inflating his ego. While I'm putting my ego in check, I'm making him feel like he's even better. And that makes him feel good. It makes him want to support me because I make him look good. This is just basic.

If you do this wrong, the new manager will resist you at every turn. If you do this right, he will be your best. biggest supporter. Now, this is the same thing with leaders that you quote unquote don't respect. First of all, there should be something that you respect about everybody. Everybody that you meet, you should have some kind of respect for them. And by the way, if you don't respect someone, what is making you not respect them? It's your ego. It's your ego that makes you not respect people because you think, oh, I'm better than them. I should have their job. They don't know what they're talking about. And I do.

That's all ego. So put your ego in check and just be like, okay, this person's above me. They seem really inexperienced, but what can I learn from them? How did they get there? If they're so dumb and bad at this job, how come they outrank me? Let me learn something from them. Let me learn something from them. Put your ego in check.

And this is the key point. And anytime I talk about, quote, unquote, leading up the chain of command, I will talk about this, that no matter what boss I work for, and I work for every different kind of boss, egomaniac, psychopaths, wonderful guys, intelligent guys, brilliant guys, tacticians. I worked for every different kind of boss, and I always had the same relationship with all of them. That was my job was to build that relationship, and that was a relationship of high trust. So they trusted me, they were to stay out of my way and let me do what I wanted.

And that's how you win, which, by the way, when you win, when you were, win. They should never know you win. They shouldn't even know that there was a competition happening. And that way you can do what you want. And so that is how you deal with people above you in the chain of command that you have little respect for

or that lead from a place of ego. You build a relationship with them. You don't go head to head with them. You're not going to win. Going head to head with your boss. They're your boss. They have rank on you. If they're an egomaniac, they're going to use that rank. if there's someone that you don't respect you've got to build a relationship with them if there's someone that's an egomaniac you got to build really regardless of the situation the solution is the same build the relationship of trust help them build them up take a back seat let them get credit it's all those things and once you do that you're going to have you're going to have much better results than if you try and bang heads with them overcome them defeat them have an antagonistic relationship

relationship with them, it's never going to work. So play the game. You've been lifting heavy weights for many years. Indeed, sir. Now that you're in your mid-40s, are you still seeing

gains in strength and muscle? Well, yes, I am. And as a matter of fact, I think one of the key kind of measurements of this is only a couple years ago, I set my personal, all-time record for pull-ups a couple years ago.

Okay. Maybe a year or two ago. How many did you do? 63. Yeah. So, but that being said, obviously, you know, you're going to go up and down. So, so, and you don't, you can't continually set records on a daily basis. So, so what do I do and what's driving me?

So what I do is I'm constantly kind of going from goal to goal to goal. and I get on a path where I'm trying to do something and I'll get into something I'll read an article or I'll see something and I'll go, that looks cool, that looks hard, that looks like a challenge, or I don't think I could do that, but I'm going to try.

You know, so I'll say, okay, you know what? Man, I haven't deadlift heavy in a while. I'm going to get my 500 pound deadlift on. And so I'll just start focusing on the deadlift. And that doesn't mean I'm deadlifted every day, but I'm deadlift starting to go heavy. Right. I'm really working it.

I'm starting to all my, you know, maybe I'll be deadlifting a little more often. I'll throw it in another day. And I'll, maybe I'll stop a little bit of that sprinting or a little bit of that high rep stuff. Right. And I just start, you know, spending more time deadlifting. And after a while, you know, maybe a month goes by, month and a half, and I get to where I want to be. Now, so I get to, let's say I get to 500. get my 500 deadlift, feeling good.

Now, I could say, you know what? I want to get 525, right? I could say that. Yeah. But if you think about what I'm going to have to do, and anybody that lifts weights at all knows that the difference, like, the higher you go, the harder it is to increase a little bit more.

And really, what are you getting out of that? Like in the real world, big picture, what are you getting out of an extra? You got 500 pounds you can deadlift. What are you getting out of it? an extra 25 pounds. Yeah. The answer is,

the answer is not a lot. You know, the answer is no one will ever know the difference between you at 500 pound deadlift and you at 520 or 525. No one's going to know that difference. When they roll with you, when they look at you, they're not going to know. And you will have to sacrifice other parts of your physicality in order to get there. You're going to be slower at sprinting.

You're probably going to be heavier. So you're going to be able to do less calisthenic workouts or less, less repetitions in calisthenics. So I'll get there. And then once I get to like that good goal that I'm looking for, then I'll just shift to another goal. And I'll start looking at something else. And, you know, whatever it's going to be a certain number of, you know, a 20 rep squat routine at a certain weight, I'll start heading towards that or a certain number of muscle ups and a certain number of time. Whatever the case may be, I'll do that.

And that's what I've been doing for many, many years. And I never go so far down one path and become so specific that it takes away a bunch from the other areas. Because at the end of the day, you know, I want to be well-rounded. Yeah, I think that's a mature, I would say that's a mature pursuit right there. Because when you're young, you want to, I mean, not. not like everyone, but I'm just saying it's pretty general, pretty typical, that when you're young, you want to get, you said these not want to bench the most I can possibly bench, and you'll go or the deadlift, for example, if you get 500 when you're younger, you want to get that $5.25. Yeah. You want to get that $5.35.

And you don't really see the big picture. You don't see that not only, yeah, you're going to have to spend so much effort just to get that little gains, which no one's going to be able to tell unless you're in a competition or something like that. different, but not only are you spending that much time, you're avoiding time you could be spending developing other aspects of your fitness if you're talking about working out. So I fell into the same thing about a year ago when I was never really into like conditioning in the gym, you know, like muscular conditioning and metabolic condition, never into that. But once you do that, dang, there's so many gains I can achieve doing this type of stuff when, you know, I achieved the gains when I was young, lifting weights and getting this big bench or big muscles or whatever.

But when you're talking about your physical body and fitness and stuff, gains in strength and muscle, there's almost endless ways you can develop strength and muscle. Or physical conditioning, you mean? Physical conditioning as a whole. Yeah. Yeah. And strength is, I mean, I know strength is defined, but really when you kind of talk about strength, that's like a general term. You can even say his distance running is strong. Like he has a strong aspect of his game or whatever.

That's not true. Distance runners are usually not strong. Yeah, yeah. But we'll just say his game is strong. Just say his conditioning. Yeah, it's good. Strengthing conditioning is I guess what you'd call it. But either way, gains just in general.

You know, and the more elements of physicality you have developed, the better off you're going to be. Absolutely. So, yeah, if you, if you, so a lot of times when they talk about gains in strength and muscle, that means the numbers, yeah, 500 and now I'm getting five, you know, I'm mid-40s now. Am I still getting gains in strength and muscle? But there's so many other gains to get in all kinds of different physical activities. And like I said, that's the mature way to pursue it, is to pursue all those things and set a cool goal. And when the diminishing returns start to come about, then you shift your goal. again and then at the end of the day you're going to not at the day but the big picture what you're

going to end up with is this fully developed physicality that applies to way more things in life than they would if you're just trying to get that bench up or that deadlift up so yeah you're your pursuit that's that's that's a very eye-opening thing i think i fell into it but the way you put it i think that's very important especially when you start to get older you know when functioning overall. This is not something that I just started doing when I got older.

When we were young in the SEAL teams, we would do this. We'd be like, all right, we're going to get to bench 300. Once we were benching 300, we'd say, all right, we're going to go and we'd be doing things like, hey, we're going to do the six-mile run

an X amount of time. And then we get that. We'd say, oh, we're going to do 50 pull-ups, and then we get to that. So we've been doing this for a while. Yeah, and I think that, yeah, I'm sure there's a lot of people that actually conduct themselves like that.

Yeah. Like, I know Tim Ferriss kind of does that and just even more than just in exercise, just in a lot of, in life. You know, he'll do that. He'll set a goal. He'll experience it. Or, and then he'll shift it and do something else. And there's guys who they kind of devote their life as almost like a hobby, but just a part of their life.

Well, they'll, every year, they'll take on something new. They'll be like, I'm going to learn the guitar, just this whole year. And then next year it's something else or whatever. Yeah, and more so than, I'm not necessarily saying that I think it comes with age. I'm just saying that's a mature way to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, gains. It's a smart way to run your life. Yes, yes, very smart. So next question. Okay, you talk about people becoming aware as a leader. When did you become aware as a leader? I think I've actually told this story before, but it was, it is pretty clear memory to me. I was doing, I was a young

seal probably in my first or second, it was actually my second platoon. And we were taking down an oil rig and oil rigs are very complicated. There's a lot of, there's different levels to the oil rigs and there,

you can see through all the levels because the floors are just made of greats, basically. So you can see multiple different directions, 360 degrees, and there's all kinds of gear and equipment all over the, the different levels.

So it can be pretty complicated. Anyways, we came up onto this level, so I'm going to seal a platoon and we got 15 or 20 guys and we come up onto this level and everyone everyone spreads out in a line and we're looking at the level and there's all kinds of complex stuff in front of us and we're trying to clear it you know you're looking for bad guys or whatever again this is just training and as we're looking at everyone kind of freezes because there's so much complexity out there that everyone just kind of freezes

just because of the physical layout just the physical layout it's just confusing and it looked you know confusing yeah and complex and so as I stood there everyone froze And as everyone froze, I basically came offline and put my gun to Highport and I said, hold left, move right. So I was able to step back, look around, assess a good solution for the situation. And once I assessed a situation, I just called out what to do. I said, hold left, move right, which basically mean the guys on the left, stay where you're at. The guys in the right, we're going to move and do the clearance.

And the guys did it. And I realized right then, you know, like, wow, I can, I can kind of. I think I got this. I think I got this. And it wasn't, then I didn't all of a sudden start trying to take charge of everything because in the SEAL teams you can't just as a new guy step up and start taking charge stuff. You'll get put in your place. But I had that vision.

And the vision that I actually had was that vision of detachment, the vision of coming offline and stepping out of the tactical situation and realizing that when you step back, you can see everything. And that was like a miracle to me. Right. And once I realized that, it was always easy for me to do that from then on. And not only that, but it became easy for me to do that in regular life and in other things that I'm doing and having conversations and dealing with relationships and making sure I'm not getting dragged down into these crazy relationship situations or, you know, business situations where there's a lot of emotion going on and saying, you know what? I just got to just got to step back and observe.

this from a better vantage point that's more unbiased. Next question. What if you don't have a good mentor? So we talk about mentorship and how mentorship is important and it's good to have mentors. And I would agree it's good to have mentors if you can find them and you can't always find them. And so I think this individual that asks this question, what if you don't have a good mentor? What do you do? and for me it actually brings back my memories of when I first got to the SEAL teams because when I first got to the SEAL teams

it was actually pretty hard to find a good mentor that I looked at and said you know I want to be like that person and they were going to invest in you so it was one thing to say hey that guy looks like a badass and I want to be like them that was easy but to have someone that says hey Listen, new guy, I'm going to invest in you and make you into a great seal. That really wasn't happening. You know, we had, first of all, some of the reasons it wasn't happening was because there was guys that were, you were on constant going on deployments. And so it wasn't like someone would grab you and pull you aside. And when you got in a seal platoon, it became a little bit easier and you'd usually find somebody that's going to at least take some interest in you.

But the, like the Vietnam guys, they were around, but. They were, you know, instructors or working in the training department. So they didn't, you weren't going to see them on a daily basis. They weren't going to mentor you. They weren't going to be there for you. And I'll tell you, not only that, but the guys that I went through training with and the guys that I ended up going to my first team with, we actually wanted to be more hardcore than what we saw.

You know, we actually wanted to take it to an. another level. And so, to be honest with you, we kind of mentored ourselves. And we set the standard of what we thought a seal was supposed to be like

in our minds, and we started to act upon it. I mean, I remember we were doing the runs and the swims at the seal team with our full gear. So like the guys that the team would be wearing, you know, sneakers and

pair of shorts and we'd be wearing boots and a rucksack and they would be looking at us like we were kind of crazy you know but that was us kind of mentoring ourselves and and we did that with everything you know we were spending time at the team on the weekends we would inspect each other's gear over and over again and modify it and make sure it's squared away and we were constantly trying to learn and teach each other different things I remember trying to teach each other about the different radios that they had and different kind of knots that we had And so we were always just kind of mentoring ourselves. And so I think, you know, that's the point is that if you can't find a good mentor, then you've got to become your own.

And I think with the way the world is now, it's actually relatively easy to do that. I mean, first of all, you can research what you want to be like. You can figure out who you want to be like. Or maybe it's not who you want to be like. but what aspects of other humans you can take and bring on board. Now, that is something I did with all kinds of seals. There was all kinds of badass seals that I said, that guy's really good at this,

and I'm going to try and get good at that too. Or the way that guy acts in this situation is awesome, and I'm going to try and act that way, too. So it wasn't like I was trying to be like them, but I was at least trying to emulate the best aspects of these different individuals. And I think there's a lot of examples out there today where you can do that. You can look for people to emulate. You can, I mean, on YouTube, you can basically find out how to do anything.

In fact, you need to be careful that you're, that you sanity check some of the people that you look into on, on that. But I think the key, really, to mentoring yourself, it goes back to what we just talked about with detachment. Because you need to, if you want to mentor yourself, you've got to be able to look at yourself and you've got to be able to look at yourself in an honest way. And that means you need to be able to detach yourself and observe yourself from that distant place. By distant, I mean three feet. I mean just from just outside of inside your own brain. And if you detach, you can see where you're making mistakes. And you can see what the long range you that you're striving for, you can see what it's going to take to get there.

and I think that's that's what that's what I've done when I haven't had a mentor is I've figured out a way to mentor myself and I think the goals that you set and the path that you draw out

and you detach yourself so that you can give yourself an honest observation of who you are and how you're doing and I think that is a good way to handle it legit all right

um I think we'll do one more. All right. Last question. Any thoughts on how to crank up the discipline? And where does discipline even come from? Where does discipline come from? Just a classic question. And whoever asked that question, I would say, thank you for asking that question. Where does discipline come from? And the answer is actually pretty simple. and pretty obvious. Discipline comes from within.

It's an internal force. Now, sure, of course, you can have discipline imposed on you by some person, like a drill instructor, or like that self-help guru on TV. But the reality is that type of discipline isn't the real. real type of discipline that we're talking about that discipline isn't as strong it won't survive that imposed a discipline that someone else is putting on you what you're looking for and what you're talking about and what you need is self-discipline now self-discipline as the very term implies comes from the self it comes from you it comes from when you make a decision to be disciplined when you make a decision to be better when you make a decision to do more and to be

more self-discipline comes when you decide that you're going to make a mark on the world and if you think that you're not disciplined or you can't be disciplined it's because you haven't yet decided to be disciplined. It's because you haven't created that discipline yet. It's because you haven't become that discipline yet. So where does discipline come from? It comes from you. So make the decision,

make the commitment, become the discipline, the discipline, the root quality. that will improve every aspect of your life. And it'll make you better and stronger and smarter and faster and healthier. And most importantly, it'll make you free. And that's pretty much all I've got for tonight. And if you want to continue this conversation or engage in a conversation,

you can find us on Twitter. I'm at Jocko Willink and Echo is at Echo Charles. So thanks to everybody. Thank you for listening. Thank you for subscribing. Thank you for leaving reviews. Thanks for spreading the word. And most of all, thanks for getting after it.

This is Jocko and Echo. And until next time,