Jocko Podcast - The Debrief w/ Jocko and Dave Berke #21: How You See People Outside Of Work Effects How You Work With Them At Work.

Episode Date: February 1, 2022

Mind your persona outside of work.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/jocko-podcast/exclusive-content

This is the Jocko debrief podcast, episode 21 with Dave Burke and me, Jocko Willink. Dave Burke. Let's debrief. What do you got? How you look at people outside of your organization makes a huge difference in how you work with them inside of your organization. So here's the situation. We've got an L-Dap client we've been working with for a while. I was doing actually a full-day workshop with them.

So it's their leadership and management team. It's like me and 15 of their folks. And this company, they do post. production for a small aircraft builder. So this company builds aircraft, people buy the aircraft from the company, but they have six or seven companies around the country that do some sort of aftermarket updates and some upgrades and make some modifications and stuff. So the work that these smaller companies do, this company that we are working with is one of these companies has to do a really precise job meeting the specifications of this larger aircraft company. So when the clients,

the customers get their product, it's exactly how it's supposed to be. It's an airplane. So very tight tolerances. Check. So this parent company to make sure that these other smaller companies doing this after production work, to make sure it's done correctly, they sent out an inspector. So the inspector goes around in these smaller companies and make sure that all the setups and all the works that are being done meets that specification so they know the customers are really happy. So this company we're working with is having a problem with this inspector because as they describe him, he's super condescending and hard to get along with. So the question is, how do we deal with this guy? So the way they described the situation,

this guy shows up and he's kind of got like a checklist and a clipboard and all these things that he's looking for. He's a freaking inspector. He's an inspector. If I was an inspector, I would have clipboards all over the place and checklists. Totally, man. And I'd have a small steel ruler. You know what I'm saying? Like a small steel ruler because I'm going to be measuring some stuff. That's what this guy does, man. So he goes around. He's looking at their shop and how their tools are set up, is it marked correctly? How is all the safety procedures? And he's also got this publication, this manual that's really used as sort of the guidelines. And this manual is maybe doesn't cover all the details so they have the sense that he applies them subjectivity. If it's not

the manual, he's got to come up with how it should be. And he'll come in one month and say, hey, this is what I need. He'll come back the next month. And even though it's not on the manual, he'll make a change to it. They call it moving the goalpost. So they say every time he comes in, he moves the goalposts. And they describe it as if this guy goes out of his way to find things wrong. And at the end of his two-day trip, he'll bring the whole leadership team in here into his office and then he'll lecture them on how they need to do a better job. And there's a single rep at this company that's sort of the liaison for this guy. And he's the one that asked a question. He said, this relationship is a nightmare. How can I get this guy to stop being a jerk?

That's the direct quote. So that's the situation. This inspector, this guy, and how do we make this guy stopped being such a jerk. And of course, the solution of the answer is you actually can't make this guy do anything. But what you can do is actually we can change our viewpoint. We can change our perspective. We can take some ownership of what he has to say and actually try to make this guy part of the team. So when we started talking about the way to solve this, the most important thing I wanted to start with was how does our team view this outcome? outside guy from this other company.

What is their view of that? And so I even asked, I said, hey, what do you think this guy's number one, deep down? What do you think this guy's number one real goal is when he comes to? What is he really trying to do? And so they went around in the room, this is some of the things they said. He's here to find problems. He's here to make us look bad. He wants to show us that he is in charge.

He wants to talk down to us. And they could tell, and I think what you're doing is probably what I was doing, they could tell from the look on my face and my race. reaction that their answers probably weren't exactly right until someone on the team finally said something that I thought was pretty awesome. And I remember even where she was sitting, she sit in the back corner. So she had to stand up to be heard and she said, he's here to help us. And everybody stopped.

Turned around and I'm like, hey, say that again. She goes, he's here to help us. And that was it. That was the line that sort of made. everybody realized that we can change our view of him. And so listen, if you've got outside inspectors, like in this case, if you've got subcontractors, people outside of your team that have to come in and work with you, you can't necessarily control how they are, how they act, how they talk, but you can 100% control how you look at them, how you view them, and how you perceive them.

And so that led us into doing some role play. And we kind of walk through some scenarios. And the first scenario was, hey, instead of pushing back against all the things that he said, what if we took ownership of his criticism and feedback for us? What if we took ownership of the things he said and said, yeah, you're right, we can fix those things. And instead of moving the goalpost or accusing him of moving the goalpost, what if we thanked him for digging deeper than what the manual said and exposing some places where we could actually get better, even if it's not written down? And then we talked about, hey, what if every single time he showed up here, we thanked him for the work that he did and took his inputs on board and try to correct them. And what if we

listened to his condescending rants? And instead of like sitting there with our chairs or the arms folded kicking back, what if we took notes and wrote them down? And what would happen to the relationship if we did all those things? Would the relationship get better or would it get worse? And there was an argument up at this publication how that we want to make inputs to this publication and we should be able to influence this publication and make it more clear. Would having a good relationship with him make it easier or harder to change that publication. And if we had a better relationship, would we do better or would we do worse on these inspections? And then I kind of asked this other question too. I said, what do you think this guy's life, this day-to-day life for this guy is?

This guy gets in a plane, flies at seven different locations once a month all around the country, and what do you think he's met with? And I asked him that, and I said, his life is, this guy's life is a nightmare. This guy works for the parent company. He's given a checklist and a list of things each other fly around the country to make sure these other companies do exactly what they're supposed to do. And more than likely, none of these companies are building relationships with him. They're pushing back. They're arguing. There's friction. And it's probably understandable why he is the way that he is. So why don't we check our ego? Why don't we take some ownership? Why don't we build a good relationship? And why don't we make it our goal that of those seven companies he works with?

He actually likes ours the best. That we're his favorite place to be. We're the people who wanted to work with. what would happen to us and what would happen to that relationship if that's the viewpoint that we took rather than try to get him to stop being the way that he was, what if we took ownership of how we were and try to improve the relationship there and apply that solution to the problem? Make sense?

Oh, yeah. It makes perfect sense. You've seen this before? It makes perfect sense and it's just so funny. One thing that I've done before that you didn't mention it is you got close, but sometimes I would gamify things. So that's like the next level.

And maybe it's because you're dealing with professionals. When I would gamify things, I was probably dealing with like my platoon. Not that my platoon wasn't professional, but they're younger and they're just more abrasive. So you can have some fun with it. The other interesting thing is when you rattled off a list of, you know,

when someone is, quote, showing us, trying to show us he's in charge or, quote, talking down to us or, quote, make us look bad, those, those, when, when you feel those feelings about someone else, that is such a obvious indicator that your ego is being offended. And you just need, look, is there a 0.04% chance that this guy is legitimately just a jerk? There is, there, that, there, that That possibility does exist in the world. And I don't even like to say that because, well, the chances are they aren't. And here's the thing. Even if they were that person, what's the best way to handle that?

It's by being cool. It's by doing what you said. Like, hey, imagine when somebody is going to tell you something and you take out a notebook and write down what they said. That is such a powerful tool on 19 different levels. the number one and two levels. Number one, you actually are taking the information and you're going to be able to hold on to it and take action on it.

Number two, you're telling them, I really care about what you're saying, enough to put it in eternal documentation. Because I'm going to write this down, which is awesome. And then thank you. What a incredible jujitsu tool that is to take someone to two,

to maneuver and make someone, make someone's attitude, someone who's coming at you and someone who's hostile, to say, thank you. I appreciate that feedback. I'm writing it down. Such an incredible tool. People don't use it. Yeah.

And to your point, those tools work everywhere. And I think part of this problem initially is they had this sense of, oh, this guy doesn't work for us. So we don't have the normal, tools available. But to your point is that actually doesn't matter. You don't have to use that technique because it's not really a technique. It's how you should be, whether it's an outside guy, an inside guy, your boss, you're subordinate, your peers, whatever it might be. So the cool thing about

that was it also sort of dispelled the idea that, well, we have to interact differently when they're outside the company because we don't have these traditional mechanisms to get people to stop being the way that they are. Listen to people, treat them with respect, you go and check, all those same things apply. And the other cool thing about that is that I'm sitting there sort of facilitating this discussion. The feedback actually came from inside. It's that girl saying, hey, he's here to help us.

He's here to help us find mistakes so we don't deliver something to a customer who's paying a ton of money and that they end up unhappy because we didn't do these things. And that perspective alone. And so the other part of that was cool is there's about a month in between my on-site visits with them. And inside those two visits, they had this guy come out. and I'm not to say like oh there's a full 180 but I enjoyed listening to them talk about he was kind of startled at how nice they were and even this liaison sort of apologized and just how easy it was to get moving in the right direction with God just by doing exactly what you said you hey man thanks for being here appreciate these inputs this is what we wrote down this is we're going to fix when you come back we're going to get this thing taken care of and he's like oh that's okay great see in a month so we're on the path to solving this one right on Good stuff.

All right. What's the next one? Right on. Kind of similar in the vein of relationships. Just because you're in charge, it doesn't mean that everybody's going to be on board with your plan. You still need to build relationships up and down the chain and you still need to pay attention of what's going on around you. So I'm going to set this one up and talk a little bit about it.

But I also want to talk to you about some things that I've heard you discuss in the past. And I think it was when you were working for the Admiral. I'll get to in just a minute. But this is a situation here where we're working directly for a small company. and the president of this company brought us in. So there's this big international company that owns, I don't know, probably seven or eight smaller companies. He's the president of one of those smaller companies here in the United States.

We work with him. We haven't been with him for too long. He's relatively new to the company, but he's kind of put in charge and has what he feels like is a lot of free reign to run this smaller company that he's in charge of. And as soon as he gets into the seat as the president, he starts making some fairly big changes.

He's making a lot of personnel changes. and they were mostly well received, but they were expensive. He was off-boarding a bunch of people, bringing in new people, making a lot of internal changes inside of the organization. And he wasn't quite aware of it. It was starting to create some friction. And in a few months, basically because of the cost of what was happening, is the board of directors, so this parent company kind of came in and shut him down, shut down his plans. And the hardest part for him about this was that they did it publicly. And so what happened was, as he's making these changes, a letter comes down from the parent company board of directors that says hiring freeze and all lateral movements are frozen.

And so, and he's on this email. So it's the email to the whole company. It's like 120 people. All of them get this email. So rather than him get a letter from his boss in, hey, man, we need you to stop doing this. When you say the whole company, you just mean his whole company. Yeah, yeah. This one small company of 120 people.

So it's a pretty public thing. It comes straight from the board of directors. and it's a hit. It's a big hit for this guy. It kind of shuts down his agenda, cause some real friction up and down the chain. And he had the sense of he had a lot less influence and a lot less power to do what he wanted

than he thought. And he was blindsided by this. He didn't see this thing coming. A couple things to think about here. One is, hey, listen, and I saw this in the military. I saw this in my time in the military a lot is you can be in charge,

but you always have a boss. And maybe that boss isn't there with you. Maybe that boss isn't there with you. Maybe that boss is in another country. Maybe that boss is at another company. Maybe that boss is at a different location. But you're the president of this company. You aren't completely autonomous.

You've got some leadership that you have to maintain a good relationship with. And it's not a license to operate on your own. And I saw this especially when I was in the F-35 as I was running this F-35 squadron. And nobody knew what was going on. Nobody knew about the airplane. Nobody knew what I was doing. Nobody had any perspective or insight because they didn't know about the airplane. But that didn't mean I just ignored my leadership.

And my boss was on a whole other, whole different base. And you've talked a little bit about this even when you're in Tasking or Bruiser. Your boss wasn't there with you at Shark Base or Camp Mark Lee. Your boss was, I think, in Fallujah. And my boss was in Al-Assad, 60, 70 miles away. And obviously there's some things about that that are important. Of course, you've got to keep your leadership in the loop. You've got to keep them aware.

You've got to keep them on board with your plan. And you've got to work up as much as you have to work down. But there's something I wanted to talk to you about a little bit, too, is even sometimes when you're doing the right thing, when you were making the right moves doing the right thing and you have an agenda that is actually what's in the best interest of the company, that doesn't always mean that everybody else is on board. Other people have their own agendas. Other people have their own plans. And I think you called it the little brother of alignment was agenda. Something along those lines. And an agenda by itself isn't a bad thing.

Having an agenda isn't a bad thing, but sometimes agendas can actually be a problem if they are moving in different directions, if they are somewhat self-serving or not aligned with your particular agenda. And you have to be aware of the people around you have an agenda. And my intent here isn't to reveal that somehow his boss had a negative agenda. It's to recognize that what makes sense to you, what seems right, what seems to the best interests of the team, other people don't always have that same perspective. You have to be aware that even when you are in charge, Even say that even you could be the CEO, you still have to recognize that the people around. You may not be on board with your plan. You have to be aware of that.

And I think I'm right, but I remember you talking about having to think strategically for your admiral on what other leadership had what's in the best interest of their teams. Because, yeah, the military is all one big thing, but the services kind of want things for themselves. The Navy wants the Navy to be in charge. The Marine Corps wants the Marine Corps to be in charge. And these relationships at high levels, you had to be aware of other people's agendas and how they were. maneuvering here's a here's a cool thing to do and it's a smart thing to do in you got your little agenda whatever it may be and then your boss has his agenda whatever that may be guess what the best thing to do is support your boss's agenda that that's now is there

a chance that your boss's agenda is so far removed in the direction where you believe you should be going with your team that it makes no sense whatsoever. There is a chance. But generally speaking, in any organization, the subordinate organizations are trying to move in the same direction as the elevated parts of the organization. You know, there's no division in a company that's like,

oh, we're over here trying to lose money. There's no division in a company saying, hey, we're trying to treat our people badly. That's not happening. So if my boss has agenda that's a little bit different, I might make adjustments to my agenda so that we come in a little bit cleaner. So here's an example. When we got to Ramadi, we weren't working for my commanding officer at first. We were working for another commanding officer for like two weeks.

So that's the way they do, big, what do they call it, relief in place. The subordinate units replace the other subordinates leader. the other subordinate units before the senior leaders get replaced. So I roll in there and I'm working for the CEO, the commanding officer of SEAL Team 1. And I know them, but I don't know them well. And one of one of my guys who I was friends with who's a SEAL who had been there with SEAL team 1 and working for that commanding officer, he gives me this piece of intel. He says, hey, this commanding officer at SEAL Team 1, he loves the he loves interpreters. He loves Arabic culture.

He thinks our interpreters are so important. And so you might want to talk about the interpreters a little bit. So I said, cool. My commanding officer from SEAL Team 3 and the commanding officer from SEAL Team 1 came out for a brief from me when I turned over. I gave probably a 10 slide brief. I think six of the slides were individually profiling each one of the interpreters that we had and talking about the importance of interpreters and talking about how they bring this dynamic capability to the battlefield and all this stuff.

And it was all true. It was all true. It was really smart. It was also the most full support for the commanding officer from SEAL Team One's agenda. Yeah. And so he literally was like,

you get it. What's going on here? And I was like, well, thank you, sir. And when we submitted that night to do operations to go out and do a direct action mission, what do you think he said? Approved, yeah.

Approved. He didn't need to see. anything else for me. I aligned with what he was doing. It made sense. It wasn't like he was saying, hey, what we should do is, you know, go out and wear freaking orange strobe lights on our heads. He wasn't saying that. He wouldn't say that. He noticed a particular capability that we had. He realized the power of it. And I said, oh, that's a great capability. I agree. Boom. Here's what I'm going to brief you on. Sure, I'm going to tell you our capabilities. I'm going to tell you how many snipers we have. But you know what else we have? We've got the interpreters.

We did a great turnover from your guys. They gave us a great turnover. And that meant we were aligned. And that meant we did a bunch of operations for that commanding officer. So by the time my commanding officer took over, we had already done a bunch of ops. And he felt comfortable with what we were doing. And boom, we continued. There was no lag.

There was no gap. So I think that's an important thing. Like you said, you want to understand other people's agendas. The common example I give with this is, you know, you got Laif and you got Seth in Charlie Petun and Delta Patoon. And if we only had 10 sets of night vision, both Laf and Seth are going to want all that night vision. They're going to want them all of them. And they're going to be pulling for all of them. Each of them will come to me separately and be like, hey, jock, you know, I think my platoon would really be better with the night vision.

And, you know, Seth comes in, hey, bro, I didn't really think we'd be better. And that's what they're going to set. And so you're going to have a. natural positive tension in your organization of people that are fighting for their own departments, divisions, platoons, whatever, teams. And that's okay. As long as they don't undermine backstab lie in order to improve their own position. Yeah. If Leifcamp comes and makes a case and says, hey, John, you know what? The types of operations we're doing here in Charlotte Petun, we're doing mostly night operations. We're going out on these direct action missions at night. Seth's doing

overwatches during the day. It just doesn't make sense. Okay, that's a legitimate case. If Seth comes to me and says, hey, you know what? When we maneuver into our Overwatch positions, if we can be blacked out, we're going to be way more clandestine. Once you're doing a direct, we're doing direct actions, but guess what? Direct action's loud and they're making noise anyway, so they might as well use the white. Let's see it. These are, by the way, false arguments, this didn't happen. But if it happened, they're just presenting cases. Yeah.

And that's okay. Now, if Leif comes to me and says, you know, Seth's guys didn't even cite in their lasers, they don't deserve it. And that was a lie. Then we got a problem. He's undermining. It's a lie. So what I have to do is sort through the natural tension that is going to exist. And then I have to get, I have to present alignment to the team and say, hey, here's the decision I made.

What we're going to do is we're going to do a month of night ops, a month of day ops. And you guys are going to flip-flop. And that's what we're doing. Whatever. But I've got to align those agendas because those agendas are going to exist. And agendas are okay. You mentioned this that agendas can start going off course. They can only go so far off course if you're ultimately aligned.

If we're not ultimately aligned, cool. Now they will go off course and they won't. They will never touch again. Yeah. What else? I think I'm missing whatever you were talking about when I was working for the Admiral and the teams. My recollection was is, is there's like, there's almost a sense sometimes of competition amongst teams that, that, and probably the best example I can come up with.

And maybe I'm misplacing that it was something you saw when you were in the, you were the Admiral, but you would go into these meetings, at least I thought you did, or I've seen them where each of the services there is represented. You know, the Navy is there to advocate for the Navy. And the Army is there to advocate for the Army. And the Marines there to advocate for the Marines. And yeah, and the big picture, yes, we're all in the same team. you would see sometimes that and sabotage is too strong of a word, but that they would manipulate the discussion to make sure their agenda, which was to support their own team,

ended up being supported. And coming in with this altruistic idea of like, hey, here's the assets I have, here's the experience I have, here's the training. I am in the best interest to do this. And it is actually the right thing. Doesn't mean everybody else is going to go, oh, yeah, hey, Jocko, you're right. You'll see people maneuvering to go,

yeah, Jocco's a little bit better suited than I am for this. this, but, exactly. And more than anything, it's just the awareness of that is you don't want to walk in blind to the idea that other people are going to push for their agenda. That doesn't mean they're trying to sabotage you. It doesn't mean you're trying to submarine you, but you got to be aware of that. You can't go in there thinking, oh, that guy would never do that. And in fact, like, actually, you should be prepared for him to do that. And so just that awareness of people maneuvering for their agendas, you can rub up against the, you can get close to like, we're getting close to.

This actually isn't what's the best interest for the team. But just because your plan is the best plan doesn't mean everybody else can go, oh, yeah, hey, hey, boss, we should do it the Navy way. The Army is just going to kind of roll over and give you what you want. Yeah. It's not going to happen. I didn't know you were talking about that big picture. Yes, because there was times where I was in the Pentagon and I was sitting in meetings.

Yeah. And listening. It's the ultimate fly on the wall job is being, uh, is being an aid. So yeah, I would be in meetings and you could see those things happening where clearly the army would be the best for this or the Marine Corps. would be the best for that or the Navy would be the best for this. And you could see that. Sometimes, I don't know if I'm saying occasionally.

Sometimes there would be, you know what, that makes the most sense. Sometimes that would happen. Yeah. Sometimes it was well, but. Yeah. So that is a good warning. It's a good thing to think about being right has its limits. Yeah.

I like that. Being right has its limits. So this was a lesson for him that kind of close out was this one hurt. You know, this set him back a little bit, but the lesson of, hey, you got to pay attention to that we described. And when you elevate to that ultimate position that you want where you're in charge, it doesn't change the dynamic of relationships and alignment still are critical for you. Yeah, it'd be interesting. And I don't know if you got to this level of detail with him, but why did the, why did the bod stop this? And what it could have been was, here's this president, comes on board,

starts going, okay, I'm going to make some investment here, I'm going to spend some money. There might have been some of these other guys that one of these peer companies, these sister companies that was like, what are you giving him all this money for? And it might have been totally legitimate that, well, you know, he's just taking over. They got to go into this market area, but this other guy's going negative. I should get that money. You shouldn't let him hire more people. You're not letting me hire more people.

I need those NVGs. He doesn't need those MVGs. Exactly. And so, and then what does the board do? instead of they just shut it down. Yep. It might have been the easiest move for them. Freaking doesn't make sense.

Doesn't make sense. Unfortunately, is not a closing argument. Were you a case closed on that one? Yeah. How many times it doesn't make sense, Roger, we're going forward. We're still doing it. So I got a tagline for you.

You want a tagline? My tagline is don't believe everything you believe. Don't believe everything you believe. I was, I've been reading a bunch of NOM. I guess that's nothing new. I've been reading a bunch of NOM. I've been reading a bunch of McNamara and about McNamara and JFK and LBJ. And one thing I was focused on a little bit lately was just the events. I was, I was reading some stuff and listening some interviews with McNamara about some of the events that led to the Vietnam War. Or at least, least events that led to this escalation in the Vietnam War.

One of those events that led greatly to the escalation of the war in Vietnam was the Gulf of Tonkin events. These attacks, air quotes around attacks that happened by the North Vietnamese Navy against American ships. And look, I'm not going to do a Jocko podcast right now and give like the full rendition of what happened. attacks on August 2nd. There was attacks on August 4th.

This was 1964. The first attack that took place, in hindsight, was an actual legitimate attack. These Navy or these North Vietnamese Navy boats, they attacked. They shot torpedoes. They were actually torpedo boats, little torpedo boats. I actually read about them. They could travel 50 knots. And the American ships that they could attack were bigger ships that could only travel like

20, 22, 25 knots or something like this. Anyways, they fired torpedoes. They fired machine guns at these, at this American ship, the USS Maddox, and then kind of broke contact. And James Stockdale was overhead and attacked the vessels as they were going away. So it was, and it was the whole engagement was about 22 minutes. So a 22 minute naval battle between a small, the U.S. Navy ship and three North Vietnamese ships.

So that happens. But it was sort of unexpected. And because it was unexpected, it was like, wait a second. What just happened? It's like when somebody slaps you in the face for no reason. You don't immediately, you might not immediately punch them back because you're like, wait, what just happened? Or somebody that you do not expect comes up and, you know, verbally starts going off about something.

And you're not prepared for that. that. So you sort of don't even believe that happened. And you can hear people say that. People's like, I can't believe he just said that. Like Dave comes in here, yells at me, walks out. I look at Leif, I'm like, I can't believe he just did that. Right. I mean, if you came in and you said, this sucks, I can't believe you're going to do this. I got, you went berserk, totally out of character for you. You'd walk out and I go, dude, I can't believe he just did that. I can't believe he just did that. And guess what? Basically, we didn't really believe it happened. It happened, but we didn't really believe it happened. And then we

start wrapping our minds again around this, what had happened on August 2nd and on August 4th, there's another air quotes attack. And this attack, it has Navy, U.S. Navy vessels firing at targets on radar for a couple hours, for two hours. The U.S. Navy is engaging targets at sea. Well, there was no targets out there. There was weather. There was bad weather. There was storms.

The way radar works, it can pick up things. Strangely, these guys were hyped up about what had gone down a couple days before. Admiral Herrick, who was a guy that was over there on scene, reported back that the event Eventually reported back that all this firing was due to, quote, freak weather and, quote, over-eager sonar men. So you're a sonar guy and you're a nom. And two days ago, you get like, hey, there wasn't, we think there was an attack. There was an attack. There was an attack.

So now you're watching that radar a lot closer. And you start to believe like there's going to be someone attacking us. And you believe that, wait a second, there's a movement over there. on my radar. Hey, we need to send launch freaking bombs at that thing. So, so that's what they did. They had a two-hour C battle. And by the way, also Stockdale was up in the air again. I was like, there's nothing out there. I'm laughing, but it's not funny because guess what? Within 30 minutes of this gun, this fake battle, LBJ, President Johnson orders retaliatory attacks. against Vietnam, against North Vietnam.

And they were big attacks. And that was the sort of the beginning, because now we were going to bomb. Next thing you know, the Marines were landing. And so why did this happen? Why did this happen? Why did these two cases? Why were these cases different?

One, they didn't believe that this was going to happen, or this could be happening. And therefore they didn't react. And the next one, they believed that this could happen. And so they just imposed their belief on it and started to, a freaking war. Started a war that, you know, was billions of dollars and 150,000 wounded Americans and over 58,000 Americans killed. So it's sort of like your first topic today,

the way you perceive the people that you're working with. Well, what you believe about a situation, it literally impacts what you see and how you react. So just because you believe something, thing doesn't mean you should believe it keep yourself in check anything I have the the benefit I think two twofold one is having spent a lot of time in the military and you know some school I got to unpack a little bit of Macdemair and just the frustration in retrospect you know you and obviously you've seen the stuff in hindsight and then you just did a podcast not too long ago about it and as you're drawing the connection between this like you could probably make the argument this totally

innocuous borderline meaningless event this fake attack or hey I misread the radar I didn't interpret this correctly I was a little amped up because of what happened two days ago so I reacted a particular way and I'm not a big slippery slope guy I'm not a big you know overreaction guy but but you're drawing a straight line from those things to that that escalation to what happened over the next, you know, eight years and how powerful and how influential ego is going back to McNamara, going back to LBJ, when you care so much about how you are perceived and how you are looked at and what your image to the world looks like, what you'll be willing to do to preserve that image and the power that has, yes, we don't need to be talking about full scale war every

time, but it affects all of us. How easy it is to fall into that trap. And even the phrase, don't believe everything you believe. I mean, think about how hard that is to go, wait a second, I believe this. And I have to recognize that I sometimes shouldn't. And that's a hard thing. And there's catastrophe hidden inside that if you can't do that. Or there's potential catastrophe hidden inside that if you can't do that. Yeah, because belief exists unto itself.

Yes, yes. It's not like you choose to believe. you just believe. Yes. You can't, a matter of fact, fact, you can't choose to believe. You can't will yourself to believe.

You believe. Yeah. That's what's going on. So to question that belief is a very important tool. Yeah. It's a very important tool. And the other thing, I think I talked about this.

I've talked about this a couple times on the underground podcast, which is just the idea of first reports and how the first reports are wrong and why the first reports are wrong. First reports are wrong because they're one person's perspective. There's a bunch of them,

motion tied up and when when Dave when you get mm when there's a shooting and you see it from your you know brick wall that you're hiding behind and there's a machine gun fire you get you have one perspective and it's your perspective and when those rounds hit close to you believe me that's the freaking that's a that's a that's D day yeah I said that on the podcast when it's that feels like one round headed towards you it's World War III in your mind that's what's going on and So when you get a report, that's what you're receiving. You're receiving a first report filled with emotions and it's one perspective and you have to watch out for it.

And part of the report, part of the report, part of the calculus of the report that's in your head is what you believe. So don't always believe what you believe. All right. Good place to stop. If you want to dig deeper into all aspects of leadership, check out Extreme Motorship Academy where we solve problems through leadership. It's at extreme ownership.com. We also have a leadership consultancy called Eschalonfront. You can check that at Eshlonfront.com.

The clients that we talked about today, we change the names, we change the organizations, we change the industries. They are unrecognizable, but they exist. So if you work with us, don't worry. We won't air your dirty laundry. That's not what we do. And we've written a bunch of books on leadership. Check them out. Also have some other podcast, Jocko podcast, Jockenravelling, Grounded, and the Warrior Kid podcast.

You can check out joccostore.com. OriginMain. Actually, check out Origin USA. Check out originusa.com. Check out joccofuel.com. That's where we're at. All right. Thanks for listening to the debrief.

Now go lead. This is Dave and Jocko. Out.