Judge John Hodgman - Anecdontal Evidence

Episode Date: March 31, 2016

With expert witness Teresa McElroy of Shmanners! Bob brings the case against his fiancee Alessandra. They have a "no boring stories" policy when they are at home together. Now Alessandra wants an exce...ption for stories about the workplace. Should they change the rules? Only one man can decide.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Welcome to the Judge John Hodgman podcast. I'm bailiff Jesse Thorne. This week, anecdotal evidence. Bob brings the case against his fiancée, Alessandra. They have a no-boring-stories policy in their home. Now Alessandra wants an exception for stories about the workplace. Should they change the rules? Only one man can decide.
Starting point is 00:00:23 Please rise as Judge John Hodgman enters the courtroom. When that Aprilis with his showers swoot the drought of March hath pierced to the root and bathed every vein in such liquor, of which virtue engendered is the flower. When Zephyrus eke with his swoot breath, inspired hath in every holt and heath the tender crops, and the young son hath in the ram his half-course run, and noble Baeliff's melodie, and shuttin' all the holes of pie. Baeliff Jesse, swear them in.
Starting point is 00:00:59 Please rise, raise your right hands. Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God, or whatever? I do. I do. Do you swear to abide by Judge John Hodgman's ruling, despite the fact that in the one case that someone dared to attempt to present to him a boring anecdote at a social gathering, he killed them using mind power? I do very well judge hodgman bob and alessandra you may be seated for an immediate summary judgment in one of yours favor i'm going to ask you now to guess the origin of the cultural reference that i made as i entered the courtroom alessandra you are the defendant you are responding to the complaint of Bob,
Starting point is 00:01:46 your fiance, who says you are boring. As you are in the defending position, you may choose to guess or make Bob guess first. Which will you do? Hold on, Judge Hodgman. What? I have a guess, and I'm going first this week. But this is unprecedented, Bailiff Jesse.
Starting point is 00:02:06 How do you justify it? I'm just excited. I know the answer. Well, it's Porky's. Is it not Porky's? No, it's not Porky's. Nor is it Porky's 2. Back to Porky's.
Starting point is 00:02:21 I can't remember what the tagline for Porky's 2 was. Those are loathsome films. I think it was Porky's 2, can't remember what the tagline for Porky's 2 was. Those are loathsome films. I think it was Porky's 2, The Search for Curly's Gold. That might have been it. But you're giving information to the litigants that they should not have. Sorry. Bailiff Jesse. Sorry. Bailiff, bailiff thyself.
Starting point is 00:02:43 I just got so excited because I knew the answer, but it turns out I didn't know the answer. Alessandra, do you want to take a guess first, or do you want to make Bob guess first? I'll guess first. All right. Okay, I think it's from The Canterbury Tales. Bob, that is Alessandra's guess. What guess do you guess? I really have no clue. I feel like there's some sort of Porky's hint. I can't decipher it. I'll say it's from the book of Genesis. Okay.
Starting point is 00:03:15 You've deciphered my hint. I don't get it. One guesses is wrong. And one guesses is correct. infuriatingly to me i had a feeling one or both of you might get a good guess on this one because you both have masters of fine arts and creative writing is that not so alessandra that is yeah that's true right Right. And Alessandra, you guessed correctly. Yay!
Starting point is 00:03:52 I was quoting Chaucer's Canterbury's Tales. Can you tell me what part? The beginning. That's right, the beginning, the general prologue. Alessandra, you've got this thing down. There's no way I can weasel out of this one. Judge Hodgman, I don't mean to interrupt here, but I have to interrupt again. All right. Alessandra had her toe on the line. It's a fault. No, no, I will not. I will not. I will not back off this one. I will not weasel out of it. The last time I did, someone on the internet got very mad at me. And you know how that makes me feel.
Starting point is 00:04:24 someone on the internet got very mad at me and you know how that makes me feel was it john mackinrow it wasn't it was a listener who said stop when people guess they should just win the case because it feels like you are robbing them of their victory when you say no i wasn't actually quoting chaucer's canterbury's tales the general prologue i was quoting garrison keeler quoting it from a prairie home companion in 1986 which was my planned weasel out because i read that on wikipedia that garrison keeler opened a show in 1986 by quoting that same part i'm not gonna i'm not gonna do it i'm gonna listen to the listener for once and say, Alessandra, immediate summary judgment in your favor. Teresa from Schmanners, our expert witness, I'm sorry you didn't get a chance to speak because the podcast is over. Goodbye.
Starting point is 00:05:13 Truth is, we drug poor Teresa all the way over to MaxFunHQ. I've moved from my chambers in Park Slope over to some weird part of Brooklyn called, I think, Clinton Hill. Is that right, Josh? Yeah. Here in the studios of Angry Lamb Studios with Josh at all the pedals and dials. And I guess we'll have to hear this case and see if the summary judgment holds. Is that fair to you guys, Bob and Alessandra? Yeah, it is for me.
Starting point is 00:05:48 Yeah, right? Allie actually has the beginning of Canterbury Tales memorized in Middle English, so she could have done all the technicalities if she needed to. How is my pronunciation of the weird words? It was beautiful. Thank you.
Starting point is 00:06:06 You win the case again. How much Beowulf can you do? No, I'm not a huge nerd. I promise it was an assignment. Not just sitting around. Do you have... You're one of those jocks that's always memorizing the Canterbury Tales. Do you
Starting point is 00:06:26 actually have the general prologue memorized, Alessandra? Yeah. Let's hear it. Give me some. Von that awful with the showers through day. Keep going. That's all I can do.
Starting point is 00:06:41 Yeah, no. Just that first line? You can't do the second line? I can do more, but you might have to pay me some to put it on the air. Well, you know what? I'm going to revoke the immediate summary judgment because you won't do what I said. And that will give us license to go forward. Sorry, person on the internet who gets upset when I do that. So, Bob, you bring Alessandra to court because you have a policy in your home that
Starting point is 00:07:06 you share. Is that correct? You share? Yes. Right. And the policy is no boring conversation. Is that correct? Yep, that's correct. Right. If someone starts telling a story and the other person finds it boring, that person just says, boring, and that's the end? Is that how it works? Yeah, that's pretty much it. The other person can continue to tell the story and then person B will just keep saying boring, boring until they stop or they'll just stop paying attention, basically. Well, this sounds like fun. Alessandra,
Starting point is 00:07:39 you wish to change the terms of this contract to admit stories from your work. Is that correct? Yeah. All right. And what is your work? I work in insurance. In insurance. And I'm sure you have some thrilling stories from your office of insurance.
Starting point is 00:08:01 Oh, yeah. I have some really great ones. What's your, like, number one actuarial table? I want to get to Teresa, so we can't do any actuarial tables at the moment. I will want to hear some of your office stories in the future, but we do have a very special expert witness. Very apt witness for this particular case, because she is the co-host of the terrific Maximum Fun podcast known as Schmanners.
Starting point is 00:08:31 And her name is Teresa McElroy. Hello. Hello, John. How are you? I am well. How are you? I'm well also. Now, before we go further, will you explain to the few listeners who are not familiar with your podcast, what is Schmanners all about? Certainly. My husband, Travis, and I, we discuss and deliberate extraordinary etiquette for ordinary occasions. Right.
Starting point is 00:08:55 So I will – we choose a topic often suggested by our listeners, and I will research the historical and cultural significance of the etiquette associated with that topic. And then we discuss how that applies to our daily lives today. Now, and then you'll tell Travis why he shouldn't eat with his hands like a pig in a trough. Travis often confides that there are several areas where I have helped him already with his manners. So you are the co-host. Travis is the other host. He is not here, correct? Correct.
Starting point is 00:09:34 And is that considered rude to blow off a friend's podcast like that? If I might be quite honest, he is allowing me to shine in this area. Well, you do not need his permission to shine. Go eat garbage with your hands, Travis. But to be given the opportunity, I really appreciate it. Anyone who doesn't listen to this podcast is a fool. That's what I'm saying. And anyone who does listen to this podcast knows who the star of it is.
Starting point is 00:10:05 Go eat garbage with your hands, Travis. I'm talking to your wife now. Sorry if that's rude. Well, I appreciate it. You've heard Bob and Alessandra. Just as a baseline, let's set a baseline. What is good manners? What is the point of good manners so that we can use that to guide our conversation today?
Starting point is 00:10:24 of good manners and how so that we can use that to guide our conversation today? Well, as far as manners in general go, it's about everyone getting along in a way that is agreed upon by everyone. So it's a set of social constructs that we follow to make our lives better. Now, Bob and Alessandra have created a construct. It is called Shut Up, you're boring. Do you consider their policy to be good manners? Well, as long as both of them agree on this construct, then yes, this is how they've set their conversation up. But at this point where Alessandra does not agree, then it becomes bad manners.
Starting point is 00:11:07 Yeah, but what if her stories are really boring? They may be boring to someone else, but if she needs to tell them, they're very important to her. Yeah, but, well, see, this is the thing, because Bob. Yes. Bob, why is the thing, because Bob. Yes. Bob, why is your fiance so boring? She's not boring. I'm actually the way more boring storyteller. Only in the area of work,
Starting point is 00:11:37 I feel like you lose a little objectivity sometimes and what's interesting in work, and that's where sometimes some of those stories are a little rough. In general, I find her fascinating. Give me an example of one of these dull tales she tried to foist on you from the office. Yeah, sure. One story she was very excited about was this mystery of the time zone at work where she could not figure out why there was a different time on all the stamped emails. And then she realized that it was in central time
Starting point is 00:12:14 zone and not Eastern time zone. Alessandra, you solved a little mystery. I know. It was a big day for me. What exactly? I mean, the way Bob told it was boring, but maybe you can li a big day for me. What exactly? I mean, the way Bob told it was boring, but maybe you can liven it up for me because I'm not sure I understand. What exactly was the mystery of the timestamp on the emails? So we recently had a lot of changes in my company and the emails was one of them. And I couldn't figure out why an email that I knew I sent at three, when I looked at it again, it said it was sent at two. And I was like, am I going crazy? Like what is going on? And then I realized that my company is based in Illinois, not Massachusetts. So all the emails are stamped
Starting point is 00:12:57 central time. And it was really exciting for me to figure it out. I mean, I can't imagine it was half as exciting for you as it was for me to hear you recount the tale. I know, you got to hear it twice. My heart is pounding, I have to say. And so are you in my home commonwealth of Massachusetts? Is that where I find you guys? And you guys live together, is that correct? Yes.
Starting point is 00:13:21 Are you comfortable with the overall contract? If someone starts telling a boring story, you just go boring and then shut it down? Oh, yeah. Definitely. So, how did this come about? I don't think either of us really remembers exactly how it started. It was pretty organic. But I think it started when we when we moved in together because we already spent a lot of time together and then obviously when you live with boring sorry no go ahead i was just trying it out it's satisfying right yeah
Starting point is 00:14:00 is that how is that how the boring ripcord is pulled? Just saying boring, or is there another Q word? It's usually that. Ali's method is usually going boring, boring. Oh, my God, this is so boring. Well, why should she ever have to say it more than once, Bob, if you have agreed on the policy? Once someone says boring, that should
Starting point is 00:14:25 be it, right? Why don't you shut up at that point? I think I basically am, as I am trying to wrap it up or just stop. Sometimes the story might be so boring that she continues to tell me it was boring after I've stopped. Alessandra, give me an example. Oh, so go ahead. Please go ahead. Oh, no. I was Please go ahead. I apologize. Oh, no. I was just going to say sometimes it's also because he wants to finish telling the story. So he tries to tell it faster than he was going to, even though I keep calling boring. What is a story?
Starting point is 00:14:56 What is one of his dumb, boring stories that he's tried to shove down your attention span? Bob really likes board games. down your attention span? Bob really likes board games. And he really enjoys telling me the rules of board games as if they were a story. So even though it's not a story... Wait, do you play board games? I mean, when I have to.
Starting point is 00:15:21 No, I like board games, but I mean, every once in a while. But I don't enjoy hearing the rules to board games I've never played told as if it's a thrilling story. Is this how this whole thing started? Sometime in your relationship, you're like, I cannot hear. You're not going to sneak the rules to Settlers of Catan by me again. Yeah, it's possible. You don't understand there's resource management. Teresa, what do you think about this couple yelling boring at each other over and over
Starting point is 00:15:57 again? Well, I don't think that that method is inherently very mannerly. There are certainly other ways that one can suggest that you're not into the story that's being told. What would be an example of a way to gently, more gently steer Bob out of telling another snoozer about board games? board games um well one way can be to just feign general disinterest that usually makes people just stop saying whatever oh yeah oh okay great something like that um but never in my life worked never in your life never um never ever worked. Next suggestion. Maybe suggest a more of a safe word type situation where instead of saying the word boring, there might be an instance where I could say, I think I've heard this before or something like that. That's a little more.
Starting point is 00:17:03 It could be anything arbitrary at all could you it could just be like orange orange soda or moving on yes right or how about this good story stop that is a little more in the affirmative i do i do like that one good story and you just do this with yourselves right i mean, like if you go out to dinner with friends or whatever, or with your parents or whatever, you're not like boring mom. We have a new policy. Shut up. We don't do that.
Starting point is 00:17:35 I maybe should because I come from a long legacy of boring storytellers. Is that so? My dad has a legendary 90 minute story on how he got a free bag of potato chips at a grocery store. That's a legend among my family. I really, I wonder if we could
Starting point is 00:17:55 get him to record it and we can release it as a special. He would be thrilled. Did you hear Bob's dad's new hour on getting free potato chips? It's even better. It's 90 minutes now. We got the extra materials in. Now, you both have storytelling backgrounds, though, right?
Starting point is 00:18:14 I mean, Alessandra, you work in insurance. And where in Massachusetts are you? Boston. Boston, the capital of Massachusetts. Yeah. And you work in insurance in an unnamed company. And Bob, you have a job as well. What is your job?
Starting point is 00:18:31 I'm a digital marketing manager. Digital marketing manager. But you both have, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I read in the brief, you both have Masters of Fine Arts in creative writing. Yes, that's why we're both in Insurance and Marketing. Why? Because that's a worthless degree? Yes. It turns out you're terrible storytellers. Turns out.
Starting point is 00:18:59 Where did you get your degree? Did you enjoy getting your degree? Do you want to name the university? Yeah. Oh, yeah. It was a a good experience it was at emerson college emerson college right there in the heart of kenmore square in boston what kind of stuff do you write novels about board games way to not sound pretentious saying this but but magic realism usually, you know, surrealism, one of those genres. Oh, okay. So, when you talk about magic realism, that's how you say, I write fantasy novels, but I want them to be taken seriously as literature. Yeah, exactly.
Starting point is 00:19:39 And Alessandra, you also, did you guys meet in the MFA program? Yes. Yeah. How adorable. That's a meet relatively cute. I like it. What kind of writing do you do? I do fiction also. More like, I don't even know what genre, just realistic, like short fiction.
Starting point is 00:19:59 About people with feelings? Yeah. And you say short fiction, like you like short fiction like you like short stories literary short stories yeah and do you want to write a novel someday i tried and crashed and burned at that one so probably not it was very good what what was what was the give me a little plot synopsis of her novel, Bob. See if you actually read it. I did. It's about a young man who lives in a small resort town that has a pretty severe obsessive compulsive disorder and has really dark thoughts. Oh, yeah. And he's balancing the rest of his life with these increasingly invasive thoughts.
Starting point is 00:20:48 How old is he? I'd say he's probably early 20s, late 20s. Alessandra, is that an accurate synopsis? Yeah, that was good. Yeah, that sounds like a good book. I'd read that. Why did you crash and burn it? Did you actually burn it?
Starting point is 00:21:06 No. Okay. I'm just, I'm trying to assess whether or not the idea of being fiction writers is still a reality in your life or something that at the, uh, at the tender age of 26 and 27, you have given up on in your lives.
Starting point is 00:21:21 What's the quick answer. Yes or no. I, you are still a fiction writer or you're not, Bob? I think yes, just maybe less so thinking of it as a career and more so as like we still submit to literary magazines and the like, but aren't planning on quitting our day jobs. Alessandro, you love all the excitement of working in the insurance office and solving email puzzles. Do you think you might ever move to a small town and become a writer slash detective like Angela Lansbury?
Starting point is 00:21:53 Yes, I think that's the path my life is on. A small town in Maine. Bob, what is your particular beef with work stories? I don't know. I just find that work stories tend to be a little more boring and Allie's work is highly technical. So I don't often understand a lot of the, the details or the specifics. So it's easy to get confused. And even if I did, even if you did, even if you could follow it, you don't care.
Starting point is 00:22:21 Oh yeah, I guess so. And, um, my other, beef with the work stories case is work stories are really the only boring stories that Allie tells. So if we got rid of work stories, it would basically just be a Bob boring rule. Teresa, you suggested that Alessandra might be telling her work stories to her life partner for a different reason other than entertaining him. Yes. I mean, perhaps Alessandra, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is telling these stories for her more to share her experience and less to impress Bob. Or keep him entertained laughing all the time. Correct. Is it really for you to say whether or not the story is important to tell? I mean, it may be that Alessandra feels that it's important to tell it or doesn't know for sure. It's in her for some reason and she's got to get it out.
Starting point is 00:23:28 And by the end of it, it may have grave importance, even though it took a rather boring course to get there. You know, we tell stories for a lot of different reasons. Sometimes we don't know why we're telling a story or why we feel compelled to talk about the story. And it's only when it's out of us that we realize, oh, it really bothered me that my job changed the time zone on the emails. Because it's confusing, and also it means there's change going on at work and i'm not sure where i fit in or something so i just made that story interesting yeah that's i think that's fair alessandra so do you guys have like a like a flag that you pull out when it's like you're gonna find this boring this boring, but I'm, but I'm waving the important flag. Not really.
Starting point is 00:24:07 We kind of just tell it. I think, I think we like say, uh, like this, you know, wait, like,
Starting point is 00:24:17 wait for this is important. Or usually I think we preface it or something before we even start telling it. Like, uh, like I'm going to like throw myself out the window. This happened today or something. Yeah. Something like that.
Starting point is 00:24:30 Right. Cause you're really upset or whatever. Yeah. All right. Oh, Sandra, does Bob find all of your work stories boring? Um,
Starting point is 00:24:38 yeah, I think so. And why is it important for you to start being able and allowed to tell these work stories? Explain to Bob and this court why it's important to you. Well, I think there are a few reasons. One is that work is a huge part of my life. I mean, it's nine to five, so I'm there like all the time.
Starting point is 00:25:01 So if I can't talk about work, like what I'm doing during the day, there's, you know, that's a big part of what I do. And I also think I would like to be able to talk to him about work because some of the stuff I do at work, I need to explain in order to kind of understand how it's important to me. So like, for example, I work in insurance, which is boring, but my specialty is clinical trials. So, to me, it, like, kind of validates what I do to talk about something that's important, like a clinical trial that might help someone. And do you enjoy your work? Yeah. But talking about it helps you to understand how it is important even to you yeah
Starting point is 00:25:47 right theresa you should jump in at any time i hope you're not holding back because oh no out of politeness or anything not at all i'm i'm actually enjoying listening to both of them tell in pretty succinct manner what it is that they do during the day and how they interact. And personally, if someone were to tell me a story as succinctly as they've been telling these stories now, I probably wouldn't have time to say if they were boring. Perhaps they're just taking too long to tell a story. Yeah, see, it's interesting. I have a very different reaction to both of them. And I say this with great affection to my fellow Commonwealthians of Massachusetts, Bob and Alessandra.
Starting point is 00:26:33 But I find them incredibly boring. Oh, no. We both agree. Yeah, we're pretty boring. But Bob was very good at telling a very short summary of Alessandra's book. And perhaps if all of his stories were, you know, one sentence, then it wouldn't matter as much. It's accurate to describe his description as short. Succinctness is a good and important part of being interesting when it's possible.
Starting point is 00:27:08 a good and important part of being interesting when it's possible. But I would say that Bob left out a lot that would have really intrigued me to know. For example, it is a young person, young man, I believe, if I remember correctly, who lives, I think Bob said, it's about a young person who lives in a place and suffers with OCD or struggles with OCD. And now we have a saying on this podcast that specificity is the soul of narrative. I want to know what resort town this kid lives in. I want to know what this kid's name is. I want to know if he's a kid or not. I want to know a little sentence of, you know, what's the incident that gets the story going? I want to know if he's a kid or not i want to know a a little sentence of you know what's what's the incident that gets the story going i want to be able to read some copy on the back of that paperback do you know what i'm saying and and and i've i found myself glossing over because it was just and i and i say this again with great affection for you bob Bob, just as kind of dull, non-specific mush.
Starting point is 00:28:09 We've got to get to the crux of these things a little bit. But please fight back if you disagree with me. No, I don't disagree. I do think that the details is what makes a story interesting. But if you don't already have inherent interest, for example, you asked to know what the plot of the short story was. Whereas Bob may not ask Alexandra how her day went. Right. Two-way street.
Starting point is 00:28:39 That's what conversation is, correct? Correct. So it might be that Alessandra has nothing to work against, and Bob is incurious, and therefore not probing for the details that would help it become more interesting to both of them, as she talks about her email history. Yeah. Hmm, interesting.
Starting point is 00:29:03 Bob, what story is it that you want to tell that you feel you can't? I think for me, I get the boring card pulled on me a lot more than I pull it. And I think it's because I'm a pretty bad storyteller and I ramble a lot. So I think I would like maybe if we had like dinner time and she's allowed to tell boring stories, then on me, the boring card is pulled off at dinner while we're talking so I can be free of having to be succinct. This sounds terrible. I already lost the case. I'm not sure. I'm not sure I understand what you're saying, which goes to the point of the matter, I suppose. But I think what you're...
Starting point is 00:29:50 And correct me if this is... Correct me if I'm wrong in my interpretation. Right now, you have a policy where either one of you can throw the boring card down and shut down the conversation, unless the other person throws the it's important card down which trumps the boring card now it sounds like i'm trying to regale instructions of tabletop games this is terrible uh so again i'm not not to belabor it if you are now to allow into your conversation game work talk as a playable non-boring card gambit then you should be allowed equal time to ramble on about whatever is going on in your head or happened to you that day or whatever right that's my case yeah well you want to have a you should have a timer
Starting point is 00:30:45 at the table maybe so if alessandra says i have a work story and you're like oh i want to pull the boring card but i can't because judge john hodgman ruled in her favor i'll hit this timer and for the entirety of the as much time as she takes up with her insurance story, then you can just talk about tabletop games for equal time. I understand that that's not feasible, but we do have a giant sand timer. What's that?
Starting point is 00:31:15 Do you have a timer? We have a giant sand glass. Oh, an hourglass. It goes with the game. Yeah, that's right. I'm sure you have an hourglass. I'm sure you have a whole bunch of different kinds of dice. I have a thought as to the crux of this.
Starting point is 00:31:36 And you know that I'm usually a pretty good crux finder, but I just have a crux theory at the moment. I'm going to share it with you guys, and I'm going to leave this courtroom and go into my chambers where I can listen to my own dumb stories that I tell in my head. And here's my theory, that there might be something a little bit more loaded about Alessandra's work stories that make them harder to bear now i admit she may simply they may simply be boring stories and and sometimes work stories are just sort of dull and sometimes it's hard you'd be surprised but it's hard to make stories
Starting point is 00:32:20 of your day-to-day life at the insurance office interesting but what you know when bob when you say we we try to celebrate when someone gets a promotion is it not true that when you celebrate say that alessandra gets a promotion or you do part of what you're celebrating is you're getting further and further away from your dream of being fiction writers. I'm going to go into chambers. You can talk about this with these other people because I'm bored of both of you. But I wonder, and this is again, crux theory for you to explore in your minds and your lives. I'll rule on the timer and everything else. Crux theory. Perhaps when Alessandra is telling you stories about her work life it is reminding you that you guys are not doing what you went to university to train yourselves to do
Starting point is 00:33:13 and as you get older and more entrenched in these jobs maybe they become more unbearable to hear about I think I've heard and said everything I need to in order to form my decision. I am now going to go into my chambers and I will be back in a moment with my ruling. Please rise as Judge John Hodgman exits the courtroom. Bob, how do you feel about your chances in the case? Not too great. Why not? I feel like there were pretty valid points made on Alessandra's side and for Alessandra.
Starting point is 00:33:55 And I want to be there for her and not make her feel neglected in any way. And yeah, so I feel like my chances aren't too good. Alessandra, are you so boring that you're unmarriageable? I'm pretty boring, but I make pretty good cookies, so I think I'm pretty marriageable. She does. How do you feel about your chances in the case? I think the point that Bob should also be able to tell boring things is a pretty good one. Well, we'll see what Judge John Hodgman has to say about all of this when we come back in just a minute.
Starting point is 00:34:39 Hello, I'm your Judge John Hodgman. The Judge John Hodgman podcast is brought to you every week by you, our members, of course. Thank you so much for your support of this podcast and all of your favorite podcasts at MaximumFun.org. And they are all your favorites. If you want to join the many member supporters of this podcast and this network, boy, oh boy, that would be fantastic. Just go to MaximumFun.org slash join. The Judge John Hodgman podcast is also brought to you this week by the folks over there at Babbel. Did you know that learning, the experience of learning causes a sound to happen? Let's hear the sound.
Starting point is 00:35:21 Yep. That's the sound of you learning a new language with Babbel. We're talking about quick 10-minute lessons crafted by over 200 language experts that can help you start speaking a new language in as little as one, two, three weeks. Let's hear that sound. Babbel's tips and tools are approachable, accessible, rooted in real-life situations, and delivered with conversation-based teaching. So you're ready to practice what you've learned in the real world and you get to hear the sound. It's not just like a game that pretends to teach you a language. It's also not a rigid, weird, hyper-academic chore. It is an actually productive app that actually teaches you while you are actually having a nice time. And you get to hear this sound. Here's a special limited time deal for our listeners right now.
Starting point is 00:36:11 Get up to 60% off your Babbel subscription, but only for our listeners at babbel.com slash Hodgman. Get up to 60% off at babbel.com slash Hodgman spelled B-A-B-B-E-L dot com slash Hodgman. Rules and restrictions apply. The Judge John Hodgman podcast is also brought to you this week by our pals over at Made In. Jesse, you've heard of Tom Colicchio, the famous chef, right? Yeah, from the restaurant Kraft. And did you know that most of the dishes at that very same restaurant are made with made-in pots and pans? Really?
Starting point is 00:36:48 What's an example? The braised short ribs. They're made-in, made-in. The Rohan duck. Made-in, made-in. Riders of Rohan. Duck. What about the Heritage Pork Shop?
Starting point is 00:36:59 You got it. Made-in, made-in. Made-in has been supplying top chefs and restaurants with high-end cookware for years. They make the stuff that chefs need. Their carbon steel cookware is the best of cast iron, the best of stainless clad. It gets super hot. It's rugged enough for grills or an open flame. One of the most useful pans you can own.
Starting point is 00:37:23 And like we said, good enough for real professional chefs, the best professional chefs. Oh, so I have to go all the way down to the restaurant district in restaurant town? Just buy it online. This is professional grade cookware that is available online directly to you, the consumer, at a very reasonable price. Yeah. If you want to take your cooking to the next level, remember what so many great dishes on menus all around the world have in common. They're made in Made In. Save up to 25% this Memorial Day
Starting point is 00:37:53 from the 18th until the 27th. Visit madeincookware.com. That's M-A-D-E-I-N cookware.com. Please rise as Judge John Hodgman re-enters the courtroom. You may be seated. It's a very tricky thing with spouses and having an obligation to listen to stories because storytelling is obviously therapeutic. That's what talk therapy is, right?
Starting point is 00:38:27 You're just sitting there giving yourself permission to talk about yourself for a while. And the fact that that other person is there apparently is worth hundreds of dollars an hour. Seems like a racket, but that's okay. It's cool. Sometimes you really need someone else in your life to pull the stories out of you that you are not willing to tell or that you don't know you're telling in a different way. Like, for example, Bob, when I said that my whole psychological gobbledygook about maybe you have a bad reaction to work stories because they remind you that both alessandra and you are on different paths from where you started as artists does that have any resonance with you it doesn't matter if it doesn't um i think it maybe a a little bit with me but not really with ali at all because she
Starting point is 00:39:19 like she's proud of what she does and i'm proud proud of, you know, my job and I like it. But I definitely, I think, have those creative aspirations still that I don't want to give up on. Right. And Alessandra, what do you think about Bob's assessment that he's still holding on to some creative aspirations and you've kind of moved on to some degree? Yeah, I think that's accurate. I mean, I think we're both still creatively charged, but not in a career sense, more like a hobby. And you wrote almost a whole novel. What's he ever done? He wrote a novel too. Oh, okay, good. What's his novel about? I guess we got to give you
Starting point is 00:39:58 equal time, quick. His novel is about a mayonnaise competition in the small town. Sold. Sold. Sold. I'm buying it. It was really good. You do have an affinity for mayonnaise, don't you, Judge John Hodgson? I really do. Magical Realist Mayonnaise Competition in a small town. Specificity of soul and narrative.
Starting point is 00:40:18 What's the town? Altoona, Pennsylvania. No good. I don't like it. Like F. Murray Abraham. Like Jesus. Like F. Murray Abraham in Inside Llewyn Davis. I don't hear money.
Starting point is 00:40:34 Altoona, Pennsylvania, no good. I love your guys' system. The idea that you can play a card and just trump a conversation because it's like, we both know this is boring. Stop. That is in many ways the soul of etiquette as rude as it may seem.
Starting point is 00:40:56 Because you have a personal contract with each other, and I think that the purpose of etiquette is not to follow arbitrary rules of politeness, but to follow them because it has been established that it helps make other people feel comfortable as a kindness to other people. Thank you.
Starting point is 00:41:14 Thank you very much, Teresa, from the expert, no less. But I mean, that's the point, right? So everyone knows what to do and no one feels weird or uncomfortable or awkward if it can be avoided right and you know you guys have created a contract that is uh that i think is kind of novel and and really interesting and maybe one that i might want to institute in my own marriage it will never happen never be allowed but you know i think that you violate the contract routinely, it sounds like, because truthfully, if you chose a safe word to say, hmm, I'm going to pull a ripcord on this one, moving on, or boring, or whatever it is, that should be it, right? Unless the other person plays another card, saying, no, you need to hear this, and here's why. where i think you guys are going wrong if i may say is in the crucial part of storytelling which is no you need to hear this and here is why which is implicit in any story that you ever tell because one thing that is true in life about your children, your spouses, your girlfriends,
Starting point is 00:42:27 your parents, your friends, your best friends, your colleagues at work, no one cares what you are thinking about, because they are thinking about their own things. All storytelling is, to some degree, an imposition on someone else. And so it is imperative. I mean, you guys know this. You guys both wrote whole novels that maybe the world won't ever see. And you're daunted because there are so many both published novels out there, never mind the unpublished ones, that it feels ridiculously hubristic to suggest that you've got the definitive 300 pages on a mayonnaise competition in Altoona
Starting point is 00:43:10 or an OCD kid with dark thoughts in unnamed resort town. Which one is it again? What's the town? Dixville Notch. Dixville Notch. That's up in New Hampshire? Yeah. Yeah. New England. That's where it's at. Altoonaville Notch. That's up in New Hampshire? Yeah. Yeah. New England.
Starting point is 00:43:26 That's where it's at. Altoona, Pennsylvania, for heaven's sake. You put that mayonnaise competition in Maine, then you got something. That's where they love mayonnaise, I'll tell you right now. It's almost wildly hubristic to imagine that you should foist your words onto someone else, like a reader or a spouse or whatever. And that's why writers take jobs, both to make money, but also because they kind of feel like, why am I even doing this? And when the whole world is putting up a boring card in front of you, as it often does, it
Starting point is 00:44:01 becomes imperative as a storyteller to be able to take a step back, look at the story and say, no, you need to hear this. This is interesting. And here's why. And maybe the problem in your lives isn't that you are violating some code of conduct that you set up, but that you are not appreciating all the time why even among your closest confidant in life, your soon-to-be spouse, you still need to make it interesting for them too. Look, it is part of the spousal contract that you guys are going to have jobs that you are going to need to vent about at the end of the day, and the other person just has to listen to it. That's part of it. That's just the way it goes. And so obviously, because there was a summary judgment at the beginning, and also the facts of the case bore it out, Alessandra wins on that one. Work stories have to be an automatic
Starting point is 00:45:00 allow in your tabletop game of conversation, because that's how you got to get that stuff out. Do you know what I mean? In order to work out what's going on during the day. But that doesn't mean that any spouse has the right to be boring to the other spouse. And I think that there are ways to make sure that the story is more interesting. I have said, this is whether you're talking to your friend or whether you're writing out a story. I've always said many, many, many, many times to the point of annoyance that specificity is at the heart of every story. It's the soul of
Starting point is 00:45:36 narrative. So that's why I always ask people, where do you live? Where do you come from? Where'd you grow up? As much as I can figure out about them specifically. So we don't just have rando weird dad and rando ungrateful child or rando, you know, husband and rando wife or whatever it is. But we know who we are here. Do you know what I mean? So naming the town, telling me in the description of your wife to be's novel, you know, give me as much specific stuff as you can. That brings me into that world to some degree.
Starting point is 00:46:07 Teresa is under the impression, Bob, that you are succinct. With great respect to my guest, I disagree. It was one sentence, John. That's true. It was. It was. But there's a lot of umming and awing. And a lot of, you said yourself,
Starting point is 00:46:26 you rambled. And you're the son of ramblers. You're the son of a guy who could tell 90 minutes on how he got a free pack of Lays. So, you know, read your strunk and white. Figure out how to tighten it up a little bit.
Starting point is 00:46:42 That's another way to make it interesting. But the most, I think, important way to make it interesting is before you tell your story, or if the person out there gives you the red card, stop and go, wait a minute, why am I telling this story? What is it that's interesting about this? Because we often have the desire to tell a story before we know why we need to tell it.
Starting point is 00:47:04 And if you can figure that out for yourself, then you can bring the other person in. That's just general me talking at you because I'm a narcissist and I believe everything I say is interesting, so I don't have to go through the work you have to go through in order to make it interesting for other people legitimately. I don't care. But in terms of the ruling, work stories are allowed. The system is still in place, but I'm going to refine it for you precisely the way that I outlined in order to create fairness. precisely the way that I outlined in order to create fairness. Red cards. I want you to make red cards. And I want you to make yellow cards. And I want you to have a timer at the dinner table.
Starting point is 00:48:02 If a story is boring, you throw down the red card. The yellow card means, no, it's important you listen to this. It's interesting. And now the person who's played that yellow card now has doubled the stakes because it actually has to be interesting. And maybe because you have to stop and think about it for a minute, you'll find out why it's interesting to you in a way that makes it interesting to the other person, right? Work story cannot get an automatic red card. Work story, just say, this is a work story. And you have to vent it. You have to vent it.
Starting point is 00:48:34 And maybe you don't know yet why it's not interesting. But because of the ruling, work stories, automatic, green, go for work stories. But time it. I really want you to have a timer. I really want Bob to have that time to talk about his favorite board games or whatever, because he needs to get those things out of himself too. So I think I just described the rules of the game pretty well.
Starting point is 00:49:02 If you have any questions, consult the manual. I want to see pictures of the physical red and yellow cards and the Tiber at your dinner table. Or I will send the bailiff around to impound all your belongings. This is the sound of a gavel.
Starting point is 00:49:23 Judge John Hodgman rules that is all. Please rise as Judge John Hodgman rules, that is all. Please rise as Judge John Hodgman exits the courtroom. Alessandra, are you satisfied with the decision? Yeah, I think that was pretty fair. Are you excited about making these manipulatives, as they call them in educational circles? Yes, so excited. Bob, how about you? Are you excited that there are new rules?
Starting point is 00:49:50 Yeah, I can explain the rules of the Judge John Hodgman boring story game to Allie at dinner. No. Do you feel that you've learned a lesson? You know, I actually do. I think it was a fair ruling, and I agree with it. I just realized, I'm sorry to jump back out of my chambers, but I just realized that we need a card for work stories. What color should the work story card be? Alessandra, do you know?
Starting point is 00:50:10 Pink. Pink. All right. She was ready with that. Yeah, she knows how this game is played. Bob, Alessandra, thank you for joining us on the Judge John Hodgman podcast. Thank you. And Teresa McElroy, thank you.
Starting point is 00:50:26 Thank you for having me. I guess if people enjoyed your performance, they could hear you on Schmanners Weekly here on the MaximumFun.org network. Absolutely. No RSVP required. Hello, teachers and faculty. This is Janet Varney. I'm here to remind you that listening to my podcast, The JV Club with Janet Varney, is part of the curriculum for the school year. Learning about the teenage years of such guests as Alison Brie, Vicki Peterson, John Hodgman, and so many more is a valuable and enriching experience one you have no choice but to embrace because yes listening is mandatory the jv club with janet varney is available every thursday on maximum fun or wherever you get your podcasts thank you and remember no running in the halls
Starting point is 00:51:19 if you need a laugh and you're on the go try s-t-o-p-p-o-d-c-a-s-t-i hmm are you trying to put the name of the podcast there yeah i'm trying to spell it but it's tricky let me give it a try okay if you need a laugh and you're on the go call s-t-o-p-p-p-a-d-i it'll never fit no it will let me try if you need a laugh and you're on the go try s-t-o-p-p-p-d-c-D-I. It'll never fit. No, it will. Let me try. If you need a laugh and you're on the go, try S-T-O-P-P-P-D-C-O-O. Ugh, we are so close. Stop podcasting yourself. A podcast from MaximumFun.org. If you need a laugh and you're on the go.
Starting point is 00:52:08 Well, that's it for another Judge John Hodgman podcast. I don't want to bore anybody by listing a bunch of stuff, but I do want to thank Jesse Houston for naming this week's case. Thanks, Jesse. You held my interest. Absolutely. If you want to name a future case on Judge John Hodgman, it's easy. Just follow us on Twitter, at Jesse Thorne and at Hodgman. And like Judge John Hodgman on Facebook, where you will find the thread wherein we ask for those very things. Above all else this week, we want to thank everyone who contributed to the Maximum Fun
Starting point is 00:52:36 Drive. Thank you, guys. It's because of you and your efforts that we're able to do this, like, for reals. So thank you so much to every single one of you. We really, truly appreciate it. And the rest of you, there's always next year or right now. And may I also say personally, Jesse, it just means so much that there was such an outpouring of support this year. I hope you know by now that we weren't asking and bothering you for funds. We were doing it out of genuine need for your support, and you showed it.
Starting point is 00:53:08 And I just want to say thank you. Yeah. Thanks, everybody. It's a great honor to work for you. Okay. We'll talk to you next time on the Judge John Hodgman podcast. Wait a minute. I don't work for them.
Starting point is 00:53:18 What is that? Is that what's happening? I work for them now? Yeah, that's the whole point. When do I get my break? You're going to have to bring that up in the union negotiations. I get a seven-minute break every 19 hours. Get back to work, Hodgman.
Starting point is 00:53:37 Bye. Bye.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.