Judge John Hodgman - I Was Dreaming When I Wrote This, So Sue Me if I Judge Too Fast LIVE in Portland, ME!
Episode Date: September 10, 2025Should dream sequences be banned from fiction? Is it ok to work on needle crafts in bed? What is the human eye actually capable of seeing? Can one sit nude on the sofa? All of these cases and more fun..., recorded LIVE at The State Theater in Portland, Maine on the JJHO Road Court tour! With Joel Mann and his jazz group, The Night and Day Jazz Trio!Please consider donating to Al Otro Lado. Al Otro Lado provides legal assistance and humanitarian aid to refugees, deportees, and other migrants trapped at the US-MX border. Donate at alotrolado.org/letsdosomething.We are on TikTok and YouTube! Follow us on both @judgejohnhodgmanpod! Follow us on Instagram @judgejohnhodgman!Thanks to reddit user u/TurduckenEverest for naming this week’s case! To suggest a title for a future episode, keep an eye on the Maximum Fun subreddit at reddit.com/r/maximumfun! Judge John Hodgman is member-supported! Join at $5 a month at maximumfun.org/join!
Transcript
Discussion (0)
It's the Judge John Hodgman podcast.
I'm Bailiff, Jesse Thorne.
With me is the great Judge John Hodgman.
Hello.
We've got a brand new episode recorded live on stage in your neck of the woods, John, Portland, Maine.
We talked about being necked at home, glasses, both drinking and wearing, doing needlecrafts in bed, and writing dream sequences in your short stories.
And we were joined by our.
friends Joel Mann and the night and day jazz trio right Joel you were there i was there and it was a good
time right wonderful time thank you let's go to the stage at the state theater in portland main
people of portland maine you asked us for live justice and we are here to deliver it the court of
judge john hodgeman is now in session
Let's start our first case.
Please welcome to the stage, Emily and Nikki.
Emily brings the case against her husband, Nikki.
Emily likes to embroider in bed, but Nikki wants to keep needles as far away from their bed as possible.
Who's right, who's wrong, only one can decide.
Please rise as Judge John Hodgman enters the courtroom.
Emily and Nikki, you may be seated.
Thank you for joining us.
Who seeks justice in my fake court?
I do, Your Honor.
You would be Emily?
That is I.
Tell me about your hobby.
It's embroidery, right?
Yes, I embroider.
I knit.
I quilt.
I mend.
I also sell some of the work I make,
so it's more than a hobby.
Okay.
Do you have a website you want to buzz market?
My business is Bell.
I don't know what that was, an audio problem.
Try it again.
Bell earth studio.
Say it again?
Beller.
No, honestly, I do want to know what.
Bell earth studio.
Bell earth?
My last name is Belhurth.
It's German, it's hard to pronounce, and that's always how I...
That's great for a URL.
Yeah.
So, Bell Earth is how I teach people to pronounce my last name.
Well, I have a question.
Nikki, you can probably take a walk.
Embroidery versus cross-stitching.
What's the difference?
Super different.
Yeah, go on.
Cross stitching comes with a sort of interface with a grid on it.
You can sort of work within that grid.
Embroideries.
Oh, right.
It's got a picture on the thing, and so you're filling it in with little, okay.
It's a little paint by numbers.
A little paint by numbers.
You should tell that to my wife as a whole in her own right.
Yeah, embroidery more freeform.
What kind of things do you embroider?
I do Sashiko embroidering, so it's a Japanese style of embroidering.
I use it to create.
Is that when you smash the pottery and put it together with gold vein?
Exactly, with the needle.
No, it's like quilting together different things.
I naturally dye fabric, and then I do these patterns on it that I make into pillows
or I will use to like mend a quilt in this case.
That's very impressive.
Nikki, I can see why you don't want to share a bed with this person.
Nikki, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to malign you.
You haven't had a chance to speak for yourself.
What is your side of the story?
I mean, I just fundamentally don't think that there should be super sharp things in the bed
in case that they escape from her and end up in me.
I see.
An embroidery, you use a sharp needle?
Well, specifically, the actual incident that led me to bring this case is that I've been mending a quilt that we have.
We have a puppy who would sometimes make holes in our quilt.
And I do the sashiko embroidering patches over these holes,
and I was using pins to hold the patches down before I would embroider.
Okay.
The pins are sharp, is what you're saying?
The pins and the needle were sharp.
Right.
Yes.
And what style of pin are you using?
Safety pin or danger pin?
Danger pin.
But with the big, colorful circle on top.
So I came up to bed one evening.
and I was about to get in the bed
and Emily was like, oh wait, hold on, hold on, hold on.
I lost a needle, like, let's find it together.
Sure.
And do you sleep in a haystack, yes or no?
What did you say?
Do you sleep in a haystack, yes or no?
Indeed, no.
All right.
Regular, regular bed.
Yeah, probably a mattress you got from a podcast ad.
Probably good, yeah.
I mean, it's a mattress, so you probably did.
Has it happened that you've been stuck then?
Not in bed, but yes, on the couch.
in life.
I sat on a pin, actually.
You sat on a pin, one of your pins?
This was many years ago, and I don't have a distinct memory of it.
That's convenient, isn't it?
But for a larger context, I have suffered a traumatic brain injury in the last five years.
It's caused me to be most, to have a lot of bed rest.
So a lot of my crafts.
How can I get some of that?
Yeah.
Hit your head super hard.
No, I do not recommend.
I'm sorry.
And I couldn't, I'm still rehabbing, I'm much better, but I was multiple years stuck at home, not allowed to read, not allowed to watch TV.
Nikki wouldn't allow you to read or watch TV.
Nikki also my doctor.
And so I was stuck in bed and doing handcrafts was like super important to me, and I still have times where that's important to me.
So I really want to be able to do my crafts in bed, and I knew I'd lost the pin, we communicated, and no one got hurt.
Did, Nikki, did you ban needles in bed formally?
I did.
Unfortunately, she has, without my knowledge, been using them in bed since this incident.
And no one's been hurt.
This is why we need to eliminate the civil service.
When you banned the needles in bed, what, did you go to the town office or something?
Did you let Emily know that you had banned needles in bed?
I think I asked her, yeah.
Well, okay, that's different than banning.
Yeah.
You said, please don't use needles in bed.
Yeah.
And Emily, did you agree at that time?
I did, but I also used some needles to make this sweater,
which I would argue is not only benefiting him, but all of us, because it's so beautiful.
Nikki, do I have, may I touch your sweater?
Yes, you may.
Ow!
It's full of needles.
No, it's a beautiful sweater.
If you were to judge in my favor, I would not ask you to ban knitting needles.
They are not very sharp.
Sure.
That's true.
But they gouge pretty good.
Don't ask how I know.
But they're probably less dangerous, right?
Indeed.
So how did you feel when you learned that Emily had gone against your ban?
Or shall we put it more nicely at your request?
I was surprised, but also happy to know that, you know, she hadn't lost another one.
Emily, is there anywhere else you can work on these projects other than bed?
Sometimes I work on the couch.
That's a danger zone, too.
Yeah, also a danger zone.
And sometimes I have a small little studio space that I work in.
But specifically, this quilt project, it's the only space on the house I can get the quilt flat on and work on it.
So you're not using the bed for bed rest in this case.
You're using it as a work station.
It is my mending station.
All right.
I'll tell you what.
I've got to keep this justice swift because we're in bulk justice mode.
I will not deny you your right to work on projects in bed so long as you patrol the needles.
I will say that your bed is for your marital companionship, not for your arts and crafts.
And I will also say that if your husband asks you not to use needles and you agree,
you actually have to agree and not do it.
So I'm going to fine you $1,000.
Oh, dear.
Sent and suspended, of course.
You're on probation.
You can work on your crafts in bed, but you absolutely have to patrol those needles.
And what I ask you to do, and no longer put the quilt on the bed,
You've got to find another work area for that.
Maybe go to someone else's house or something like that.
Someone else's bed.
Yeah, exactly.
Go to someone else's bed.
You've driven her into another person's bed, Nikki.
I hope you're happy.
And I order that your next craft be a little doll of Nicky
so you have a place to put your needles when you're done for the night.
This is the sound of a gavel.
Thank you.
Thank you, Emily and Nicky.
Please welcome to the stage,
Sam and Charlotte.
Sam thinks his wife, Charlotte, needs glasses.
But Charlotte says she has perfect vision.
The eye doctor told her so eight years ago.
Sam wants a second opinion.
Judge Hodgman.
Welcome to the Court of Judge John Hodgman.
You may be seated Sam and Charlotte.
And you bring this case.
I do.
You think that Charlotte needs glasses.
I definitely do.
What is your career, sir?
So when we started living...
What is your career, sir?
Sorry?
What is your...
Maybe you need a hearing aid.
Maybe.
Is this getting through to you?
Much better.
Do you have an occupation or a vocation?
I do.
I work in politics.
I see.
Yes.
What fun for you.
Yes.
Are you perhaps a part-time ophthalmologist?
I am not.
Can you spell that word?
Probably.
If you can, I will rule in your favor right now.
O-P-T-H-A-...
Wrong!
O-P-H-T-H-A-L.
Wow.
M-O-L.
O-G-I-S-D.
It's a tricky one.
That is.
It's a stumper.
Surprising.
All right.
So you are not medically licensed to diagnose your wife's vision, and yet,
you have made observations, that her division might be declining, correct?
That is correct.
And I wear glasses for the podcast listeners,
so I have a lot of personal experience with how big a difference they make.
Not when listening to podcasts, I'm sure, but good.
For the people who can't see me, I'm saying.
No, no, I understand.
When he says he wears glasses for the podcast listener,
what he means is that he wears glasses so that the four-eyed nerd
who listens to podcasts can relate to him.
That's exactly.
Exactly.
What have you observed in Charlotte's vision or lack thereof?
What is it giving you concern suggesting that she needs vision?
Correction.
Yeah, so what originated all of this was that when we moved in together around eight years ago,
it became quickly apparent that Charlotte could not read things on the TV.
Not just the, not the subtitles, those were okay.
But when we were looking at what to watch and there are the different menus and descriptions
of things, she couldn't read.
them at all. Is that true? Do you have difficulty
reading, not subtitles, but
other captions and stuff? Yeah, the little
Netflix blurbs. I couldn't read
those on the TV. Right. You're really
missing out. They're really beautiful writing.
It says here that you also have difficulty
reading the oven clock. Is that true?
Yeah, digital clock. Sometimes she'll ask
me what it says when we're both in the kitchen
standing next to each other. That's just
laziness. Okay.
I'll allow that. We'll dismiss that
evidence right away. You should be lazy.
Have you ever worn glasses?
I had a pair of glasses when I was a teenager.
And then you stopped wearing them.
You saw this eye doctor eight years ago.
What did they say?
The eye doctor, when I told him that I couldn't read the descriptions on Netflix,
told him that I had, quote,
unreasonable expectations for what the human eye can accomplish.
And...
Wow.
Imagine if your cardiologist told you that.
Totally.
I would love to hear that from my personal trainer.
If I were paying an eye doctor for that,
I might want a bit of a refund.
But you bought this, right?
Well, he also told me to get a bigger TV.
So we got a bigger TV,
and the problem is solved, in my opinion.
Did there's something here about bagging your glasses?
Yeah, I had a very old pair of glasses,
and I showed them to him, and he said, bag them.
Bag them.
That is, throw them away.
Throw them away.
And you've never worn glasses since.
Never, never.
Did you go to an eye doctor, or did you go to a character on a police procedural?
When you first heard this story about this eye doctor, Sam, what did you think?
I definitely think he was a quack.
I don't know how qualified he was.
Should we do the buzz market for him, too?
I don't remember his name.
It was a long time ago.
Eight years, that's true.
It's a lifetime.
I mean, it really is.
Charlotte, have you noticed a difference in your vision
since you stopped wearing your glasses?
Not particularly.
Really?
I mean, I don't know what your prescription was.
Are you near-sided, far-sighted?
Well, I have one eye that can see really good distance
and one that can see pretty good close-up,
so I solve most problems by closing one of them.
May I recommend an incredible eye patch that you move from eye to eye?
I would love that, yes.
Sam, Charlotte's the one who has to tolerate the discomfort of not reading these things.
How does this affect you?
Why don't you just let her enjoy her vanity eye patch or whatever she's trying to do?
Well, for the record, I would be happy with an order for an eye patch as well.
So ordered.
But I do think it impacts her quality of life.
It is partly that she asks me to read.
things and I'd like her to be able to read them for myself. But recently we went to see Book
of Mormon and she was unable to see a lot of the people on stage and I could see them very clearly.
And so I was thinking that she would enjoy things like plays and also a lot of other things in
life better if she could see better. Could I suggest have you thought about getting a bigger
Book of Mormon?
Does seem like it would be a solution.
Just to be clear, I just couldn't see their faces very well,
so I think we should have gotten better seats.
Wow.
Did you see Book of Mormon in New York, or were you watching it from Portsmouth, New Hampshire?
It was here in Portland, Maine.
Oh, in Portland, Maine, I said.
Look, I am not an ophthalmologist of any kind, never mind a quack, and yet I am going to, I do want to evaluate your vision.
So, Charlotte, could you turn to the screen and take a look at this chart?
Oh, no.
Could you read the lines, the letters above the green bar?
You see the green bar?
I can see the green bar, yes.
You're not colorblind?
No, I'm not, but he is, actually.
Okay.
Well, luckily he's not on trial.
Yes, I can see those letters.
Would you read them out for me, please?
P-S-W-U...
From the top, please.
Oh, A-G-A-L-L-O-N-O-F-S-C-A-L-O-P-S-W-E-R-U.
And what does that spell?
All right.
I don't know.
Do you not...
Okay.
That's fine.
Can you read the line?
Oh, a gallon of, uh, calyp.
Scallops.
Scallops.
W-E-R-U are co-sponsors for the evening.
There we go, yes.
Took me a minute there.
Can you, can you read the letters below the green bar,
the two lines there?
Bring back Scrapple.
At the Hannafords.
At the Hannafords.
Yes, that's...
Sure.
Joel, they used to have Scrapple at the Hannaford's near my house.
Then they just took it away for some reason.
Used to have it in the freezer case.
Bring back Scrapple.
Does anyone in the audience have a brick of Scrapple or an eyepatch?
I'll take either one.
Just bring it to the foot of the stake.
Well, Sam, I'm sorry to say that Charlotte nailed that exam pretty well.
Not only did she see all the letters,
but she was able to put them together and read my secret messages.
I would say, however, though, Charlotte, you should go and see an eye doctor for real.
It's up to you whether you want to wear glasses, but I would ask you to consult a doctor who actually wants to do their job
and make sure that your eye health is good because there have been people in my life who have had detached retinas all of a sudden,
and you just want to keep on top of that because it's a part of your body that you rely upon.
In that case, I find in Sam's favor.
Thank you, Sam and Charlotte.
Please welcome to the stage, Sophia and Shira.
Shira loves to be naked in the privacy of her own home.
Her girlfriend, Sophia, has no problem with this except for one thing.
Sophia can't stand it when Shira sits naked on the couch.
Shira just wants to be free.
Sophia and Shira welcome. You may be seated. May I ask, who here is Shira and who is Sophia?
I'm Sophia. You are Sophia. And you are the non-naked one. I mean, you're both clothed for the listeners
right now. We are. We are clothed. Shira, you like to lounge in the nude.
Who doesn't? I think I've heard everything I need to.
Oh, that's true. Jesse, you do enjoy wearing clothes.
and knowing about clothes.
Yeah, yeah.
Clothes can be wonderful.
So Sophia, you have an issue with Shira's nakedness.
Tell me how this started.
Well, it really starts when Shira comes home
from a long, sweaty bike ride.
And she comes in the house,
and she strips off her bike shorts,
and she sits right down on the couch.
And I just think about all the absorption happening,
and I don't love it.
What, uh, what kind of couch are we talking about here?
What is the surface?
Is it plush?
It's like, spongy?
A upholstery, like a...
It's not leather, for example.
It's not leather.
It's not, no, definitely not.
Right, okay.
It's also a second-hand couch.
Oh.
So it's full of secretions already, so who cares?
It's true.
Much more intimate secretions than near bike sweats
Yeah.
Possible.
Shira, tell us about the pleasure that you get sitting naked on the couch.
It's a summertime pleasure.
Yeah, go on.
I don't know.
You go on a bike ride and it's like, the bike shorts, you got to get them off.
And then what do you...
I sit on like the uncomfortable wooden kitchen chair when you get home.
He's like, no, you...
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'll say this.
I don't exercise very much.
But I do sweat a lot.
I'm not the party who sweats a lot.
Oh.
This is true.
You sweat more than Shira does.
Way more.
Well, what I was going to say is that when I am very sweaty,
me personally, I don't find it refreshing to get as close to upholstery as possible.
Is there something about, maybe you don't see it this way, but is there something about the transgression?
of being naked in furniture in your own home that just feels fun and empowering to you?
Or is there something else at work?
Definitely wouldn't have been acceptable in my childhood home, too.
Yeah, so maybe there's a freedom there.
Now that you're an adult, you just want to do whatever you want.
Yeah, sure.
And you don't need mommy, Sophia, telling you what to do.
Okay, well, it should be said that when this first came up months ago,
and we had this discussion, and then I haven't sat on the couch without any clothes on ever since.
Yeah, but it's wintertime now.
No, it started in the summer.
Oh, okay.
It started in the summer, and we had this conversation,
and I've been at least underweared ever since.
She's been abstaining.
So it sounds like the whole thing has been resolved.
Well, no, I was hoping you'd rule in my favor.
Oh.
All right.
Sophia, the couch is secondhand.
It's not pristine.
I don't, I'm sure it's a lovely piece of,
furniture, but it's also a piece of junk at this point.
Why not let your partner
just enjoy themselves?
Oh, it just aches me out.
Excuse me.
And think about anybody else who comes over,
they don't know that Shira's been sitting.
But that's part of the fun, is it?
And they have clothes on.
Just like you didn't know about
all the juices that had been placed
in the couch before you obtained it.
If Shira were freshly showered, would that make a difference?
It's a really good question.
Thank you.
I think it's better.
Someone wrote it down for me.
Thanks, Jennifer Marmer. Great question.
I think it's better and like less offensive, but I still would wish that Shira would have
underwear on. That's my bare minimum for clothing on the couch.
Is this compromise acceptable to you, Shira?
I can live with it.
Can I just share one other piece of evidence?
Yes, of course, please.
Sophia has shared her deep desire to sit on the couch
after a bike ride naked with me before.
Is this so?
Yes, it's so.
Sophia, how do you respond to that?
Is that true?
It's true.
I admit, I have felt the urge, and I have held myself back.
I've sat on the rug instead.
We're going to, Judge Hodgman,
we're going to need that ophthalmologist from the crime procedural to bring a black light over to their house.
Absolutely.
Was that exciting to sit on the rug nude?
Maybe a little.
Not so much.
Do you resent Sheriff, her freedom of, of, uh,
and imagination and just going for it.
I'll let that sound speak.
One last question before I make my verdict.
Do you have a dog or a cat?
Cat. Desdemona.
Fantastic.
Does Desdemona wear diapers when hanging on the couch?
She does not.
I think it's pretty clear that anyone can be nude on this couch if they want.
Out of consideration for your beloved, Shira, I would suggest that you put a towel down on the couch
just because you don't want your partner being skeved.
And by the way, Shira, you should sit naked on that couch.
But here's the thing, even if you want to and you don't do it, don't let Shira call you a hypocrite.
Because the truth is, we're all fucking hypocrites.
Doesn't prove anything.
I find in Shira's favor plus towel.
Thank you, Sophia and Shira.
Portland, Maine.
Are you ready for mega justice?
Let's bring out our litigants.
Please welcome to the stage, Emily and Judd.
Tonight's case, I was drawn.
Dreaming when I wrote this, so sue me if I judge too fast.
Emily was previously a litigant at our live show here in Portland in 2016.
Now she's back for more justice.
She and her friend Judd are in a local writing group.
Emily likes to write fiction that includes dream sequences.
Judd thinks dream sequences are cheating.
He wants to ban dream sequences from all writing.
Who's right, who's wrong, only one can decide.
Please rise as Judge John Hodgman enters the courtroom
and delivers an obscure cultural reference.
Never talk about how you slept.
Nobody cares.
Don't talk about your health either.
Nobody cares.
Root talk.
Root talk is when people tell you how they arrived
or how they came, how they got on.
the road, which road, how long it took.
That is the top of my list for what you don't talk about.
And also your dreams.
Nobody cares about your dreams.
Bail of Jesse Thorne, please swear the litigants in.
Emily and Judd, please rise and raise your right hands.
Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
So help you, God, or whatever?
Yes.
I do.
Do you swear to abide by Judge John
Hodgman's ruling, despite the fact that he dreams of electric sheep.
I do.
What does it even mean?
Judge Hodgman, you may proceed.
Emily and Judd, you may be seated for an immediate summary judgment.
In one of yours favors, can either of you name the piece of culture that I referenced as I entered
this courtroom, Emily, nice to see you again.
Welcome back to the court.
I'll let Judd guess first, because he's new here.
Judd, what's your guess?
That's someone's mother on an episode of This American Life, talking about the seven
or eight things she doesn't want to hear.
hear about. That's an interesting guess, Judd. Do you have a guess, Emily? I think it was
Andy Rooney. No. And Judd, I have to say, you got it exactly right.
Almost. It was specifically seven things, not seven or eight. And you did not name the
year in which this episode came out, which was 2013, a year that I'm feeling very nostalgic
for.
You did not mention that it was Maria Matheson, as told to her daughter, this American
life and serial producer Sarah Koenig in the episode entitled The Seven Things You're
Not Supposed You're Not Supposed. These are the topics, as you identified, in Sarah's mom's
world should be avoided at all cost because they are boring and nobody cares. You can talk
about them among families, perhaps, such as when Sarah asked her mom, well, what if I get sick
and I want to talk about my health? Do you not care? And she replied, the mom replied, no, I care.
And I'd say, well, I'm terribly sorry, you poor thing. And then I'd forget about it and go on with my
life as most people would. That's a, by the way, spot on, great guess. I wish I could give it to
you, but we got a show to do. So you will forgive me for not offering you a summary judgment,
but I'm going to give you a bit of a head start to make your case.
What's going on here?
Well, dreams are boring, and no one wants to hear about them.
They're tedious and non-narrative, but I think my real objection is that...
All the goodwill you built up just died in my heart.
Let me turn to Emily for a second here, and then I'll give you a chance to make your case.
Emily, last time you were here, you had your friend Danny.
Yeah.
Danny seemed really nice.
What was that case that was involved?
Not a writing group, but a...
A reading series. A reading series called...
Word Portland.
And that was Go Set a Tip Jar, right?
It was about whether or not to charge for the reading series.
Yes.
And I said, your work is worth money and compensation.
You should charge for it.
Ultimately, yes.
And you won, didn't you?
I won live.
You won live, but not in life?
There was a recorded episode where Danny
and you overturned it for in my favor, in the live.
Well, I don't remember these things.
That's why I'm telling you.
Thank you. I appreciate it.
So now you're back again with Judd, who's very much a smarty pants.
A little intimidated, frankly.
Emily, tell me about this writing group that you and Judder in.
So we have been meeting roughly monthly with some gaps, but roughly monthly.
for about seven years.
Group of about how many people?
Four to five.
It's been four consistently for the past couple years.
And are you writing novels, short stories?
It started out as novel writing,
and we've drifted a little,
so sometimes it's short stories,
sometimes essays, but fiction.
Mostly narrative fiction.
Okay, right.
And are you working on something now?
I am.
And does it involve a dream sequence?
The current project does not involve dreams.
I don't always write about dreams.
No, no, of course. You have a wide repertoire.
But in some of your work, you have...
Dreams, roots, what are the other thing?
Fruit talk, dreams, health. Right, exactly.
But in some of your work, you do have dream sequences.
Yes.
And Judd, why do you hate Emily's dreams?
Fiction's job is to represent life, to take our reality and skew it somehow,
to make it more visible, more real, more...
to help us understand the human condition.
And so you have all the tools available to you.
You're saying humans don't dream.
I'm saying humans in real life do dream,
but on the page, you don't need dreams
to do something dream like or otherworldly.
Indeed, your whole project is to do something dream like
or otherworldly.
Well, wait a minute, if you have a character
and a piece of fiction and that character has a dream
and the character talks about the dream,
maybe it's a first person narration.
Is that not real life?
The existence of dreams is different
than the portrayal of a gene,
dream sequence on the page.
What specifically...
I'll give you an example.
John,
your wife, who of course is a whole human being
in her own right is an English teacher.
That's true.
Has she ever taught the famous short story
the public life of Walter Middy?
Yeah, so no dreams sequence.
No dreams whatsoever.
No inner life at all.
That's right.
What specifically,
what piece of writing of Emmys
did you have an issue with?
Well, I mean, look, this is writing group, right?
Yeah, it is a writing group.
It is a writing group.
In Judge Defense, this is a long-standing argument,
so it's been a few years since the initial
Dream Sync sequence pieces.
Oh, he didn't think that he had to do his homework
before he came to class today.
I have a blanket stance.
Emily is a wonderful writer.
I have no, I'm taking no, I take no objection to her work
other than the inclusion of dream sequences,
which are unnecessary and pointless.
But you're not answering the question,
is there a specific dream sequence that Emily wrote?
For example, that illustrates bad writing.
No, there's not a specific dream sequence.
It's the existence of any dream sequence.
Would you say that you are in the majority
in the writing group of people who feel this right?
It's a group of four, we're divided right down the middle.
Right down the middle.
So today we're going to decide.
That's it.
whether to ban dreams from writing group forever.
Well, from all fiction, I think, written by anybody anywhere.
That's my understanding.
I'm not sure that that's my remit, but I'll do what I can.
I do have George R. Martin's telephone number.
I don't know if there are any dreams.
I mean, I'm sure not.
Okay.
Truly, your assurance is making me very nice.
nervous, so.
But I do take your point
in the sense that, you know,
I do dream, and all of my dreams
are boring and dumb.
In fiction and in film, I presume you are against
dream sequences in film as well for the same reason.
Yes.
Those dream sequences often have heavy portent
and are highly symbolic of something that's going
on in their life, whereas my dreams are mostly like,
Yeah, I was walking down 7th Avenue, and then I went home.
And that's the end of my dream.
But, Jesse, you know what I'm talking about, right?
Dreams are rarely representational in the way they are in fiction and so forth.
Exactly, yeah.
I think often they're just sort of like transactional or just processing little things that you're worried about, whatever.
Yeah, like I'm going to have a terrible nightmare about you tonight, Judd.
Yeah.
Do not write about it.
Not even in my dream journal.
That is the appropriate place.
Honestly, what blessed relief it would be
if all our nightmares tonight were about Judd.
Yes, it's true.
You're the villain Gotham needs.
No, I'm sorry, Judd, I don't mean to pick on you.
Emily, when this comes up in writing group,
it's divided.
Judd, when you read a dream sequence, do you offer critique on it or do you just skip over it?
Oh, no, I offer a critique.
I think my point is that there's always some other way to do whatever you're trying to accomplish in the dream.
You have all the tools of fiction available to you.
Go on.
Well, again, reality on the page does not have to mirror our reality.
If you want to create something dream-like or surreal...
You're saying the work itself is a dream.
Exactly.
that's what we're doing we're trying to create an illusion on the page so why needlessly bring in this
other illusory element emily have you ever had a dream within a dream have you ever woken up
or thought you woken up you had woken up and it's still a dream yes yeah me too pretty cool
was nathan lamont in your dream i don't i don't know who that is so maybe he's a someone i knew
in high school i think i was in high school and i woke up and nathan lamont was standing
ominously in my bedroom.
And I said, what are you doing here?
And then I woke up again and he wasn't there.
Now, that's a dream within a dream.
Or a cover memory for alien abduction.
I don't know.
I'm sorry.
I was just going to say, not great story material.
I wouldn't write it down.
I wouldn't write it down.
This is good.
This is good.
When you're a writer, you need.
You need thick skin. You need to be able to take critiques, even on your own show. All right.
Didn't like the Nathan Lamont part, didn't work for Judge.
Nathan Lamont's going to be thrilled, but I guess I'm not just writing for him. I guess I'm writing
to describe the human condition.
Emily, how would you defend the use of dream sequence, not only in your work, but in fiction overall?
for one thing
humans dream so why not
have that as an option for something to write
about I don't think all dreams should be
written about or that it's always interesting
but I think it should be on the table
of
options that we could write about
yeah
and
this is Judge John Hodgman
crowd, first crowd ever to be horny
for writing options
And second, I think if you're doing a good job at writing,
you can use a dream as a tool to show something that's happening in the story.
It's not just a way to show something weird happening,
but it can add to the story in various ways.
Is there an example of that that you're thinking of?
Thanks for asking.
I've thought of a few examples of
widely celebrated.
You did your homework and brought some examples?
I did.
Thank you.
Appreciate that.
There's a story that a lot of people have heard of called the Christmas Carol.
Largely dream focus.
Okay, easy.
Easy does it.
It is a Christmas Carol.
You're right.
We're about to have a librarian revolt in here.
A couple examples.
But we're the ones on stage and we've all been shaken up by Judd.
So just give us a...
Give us a little grace here.
A couple of...
Shud's remarkable self-assurance.
Examples of movies that a lot of people have liked.
Inception.
That's a movie about dreams and dreams within dreams.
Nightmare on Elm Street.
That's a movie about dreams, nightmares in particular, yeah.
There's a comic book series called The Sandman.
Moving on.
Yeah.
That's right, Inception.
And the other one you mentioned are the only two.
I can think of as well.
Yeah, Judd.
What about if you're, what about
if your character and then
there's a fucking river of blood
shoots into the air out of that bed
in that movie. That's nuts.
Nightmare on Elm Street. Yeah. That's right.
Holy cow. It's awesome.
Do you think... I don't even like that kind of thing.
Judd, do you feel that...
My daughter made me watch that. It was bananas.
It's a scary.
people like it. It's wild. It's a scary movie. It's like medium scary. But you're just
like, how do you think of all this different shit to do? You're talking about West Craven or
Freddie Crook? West Craven. Yeah, no, he had like a list of like, if I get to make a movie,
I'm going to put this wild shit in it. Then he's just like, well, if there's like a dream
scissor guy, I could probably fit all this stuff into my movie. That's a little something called
storytelling.
Would you think culture would be better
if there was no nightmare on Elm Street, Judd?
Well, certainly not.
I think in all those examples, actually,
it's fairly important
that we believe the dream is actually
the reality of the fictional world.
So in a Christmas carol,
we need to kind of believe
this is real.
He's actually being visited by these ghosts.
We can't dismiss it as just a dream.
That's part of the problem is dreams are so easy to dismiss.
If any of the experts out there on
a Christmas Carol.
No, it never occurred to me
that that was a dream that Scrooge was having.
Is that true? Does he wake up?
Oh, he wakes up at the end, but isn't it plausible that he...
He goes to bed and then sees a ghost and then wakes up.
Yeah, because that's when the ghosts come out.
Think how much less interesting the story would be
if it was just a dream.
There are a lot like freaks in that scene.
Who's going to say?
The ghosts and the freaks come out at night.
We all know this.
What I like about ghosts is that they're really good lovers.
It's another thing from the freaks come out at night, John.
Oh, alright.
Yeah.
Judd, is there an example of a dream sequence in a movie or a book that you find particularly offensive?
All of them.
All right.
So no.
Okay, everybody relax.
Remember, we're all having a good time.
Judd is clearly used to just
traipsing his way through life
on his B-grade Hugh Grant charm.
And he thinks he can do a Hugh Grant
heel turn like in that horror movie
Hugh Grant's in right now.
Oh, that one, yeah.
Is there dreams he comes in that?
You're getting real close to Umpa Lumpa territory.
How do you feel about dream sequences in movies, Judd?
Do you find them to be a cheat?
Sometimes they feel that way, right?
I think it is always a kind of cheating, yeah.
Movies at least have the visual...
I am struck by the Big Loboski's dream sequence.
I will admit that.
You are struck by it?
Yeah.
Oh, it's a...
Turns out there's a guy who likes the Big Lobowski.
All right, all right.
I'm going to go a little easier.
Emily, are you working on something right now that has a dream in it?
I'm not currently working on something with the dream in it,
but I do have an example of a dream from the first time this came up.
Would you be willing to share it with us?
Yes.
Wonderful.
Before we do that, I'd like to ask,
If I were to rule in your favor, Judd, what would you have me rule?
Oh, to ban all dream sequences from all fiction for all time.
Thank you.
You're welcome?
Emily, if I were to rule in your favor, what would you have me rule?
I think that any dream sequence
and a piece of writing should be considered as something that should be read and taken in
just as any other part of the writing and be it good or bad critiqued appropriately.
But I mean, writing groups are about critiques.
Has anything that Judd has said or other members of the anti-dream coalition within your
writing group made you rethink the way you use dreams and fiction?
Has it been helpful at all?
There is another member of the writing group who had just announced
that she skims the dream sequences.
And Judd does read them,
but I think generally agrees with her
that they are less important.
And so just, and how does it feel
when you learn that the writing group just skims over your dreams?
Well, it feels like maybe my dreams will be
less well written because no one has given me
critique on them.
Got it.
Well, we're going to hear from you
and I will listen carefully.
And Judd, you will as well.
and Jesse you will as well
so this is from a novel
so I have to explain what happened first
great
so this is from the beginning of chapter four
and the main character Patrick has been taking
a mind-altering drug
and erasing his memories
and so
his dreams come into play
because
of the memory erasing
he's recovering memories in his
he hasn't properly erased the
memories and some of them are reappearing in the dream.
Is there a science fiction element to this?
Yeah, the memory erasing drug.
The memory erasing drug is your own invention.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
It's something you dreamed up.
If you will.
I will.
And by the way, thank you for practicing willingness and sharing.
It's very vulnerable of you and I appreciate it.
So I look forward to hearing.
So there are a few short dreams.
I'm just going to share the one where he realized that he's erased the memory of
his mother.
Pretty much everyone's dream.
About a paragraph before this, he acknowledges that he dreamed about being on the beach.
So it was the beach again along the tideline.
Patrick was young, a boy in yellow swim trunks that he pulled all the way tight around
his lean frame.
He stood just in the water back to the ocean, letting the waves pass over his feet,
pushing at his calves, petering out a footer.
two on and then receding. It's a game someone taught him, a mother. The big waves almost knock
him over. When they recede, they pull a little bit of the beach back with them, muddying the water
and burying his feet in a wave made hole that gets a little deeper with every swell. Or at least
that's what's meant to happen. He watches as each wave passes and leave his feet still on top
of the sand as solid as hardwood. He looks up to see where the mother is and sees only a growing
vastness that scratches at his brain and makes his skin crawl, a blankness, a painting painted over
smooth before it's dried, no brushstrokes. But he's only young. He hasn't erased a memory
yet. How can these ones be gone? He's never erased his mother. That's her there. And he
woke up with a small shout. And then it continues.
Do you find if I reveal how it continues?
Basically, the bed, like, turns into like a puckered,
like the stuff goes, and then a freaking geyser of blood comes up out of the bed.
It's amazing. It's wild.
True.
Emily?
Sorry, that was terrible.
No, it was great.
I enjoyed that quite a bit.
Any critiques, Judd?
Judd.
I love the device of this book,
The Memory Erasing Drug.
I like recovering the memories,
trying to hold on to that memory of the mother.
I'm for all of that.
The, I don't think it needs to be buried in a dream necessarily.
How would he recover the memory if not going into a subconscious via dreaming?
Well, now I guess we're getting into sort of semantics about what a dream is, but a memory is not necessarily a dream.
You're saying that if he was like gazing out the window of a bus and in an idol of some kind, that would be an okay way for him to sort of recover these memories.
Yeah, Judd, you're not against idols, are you?
What about referees?
Frights of fancy.
I never rolled my tongue that way in my life.
Let's say, for example, your dream came true,
and I had the power to ban dreaming and dream sequences
from all narrative fiction.
What way would you suggest that your writing group partner,
Emily, portray the recovery of these memories,
if not a trip into the nightly unconscious?
What mechanism would you use, plot-wise, or otherwise?
I actually don't think it has to be that different.
That's kind of my point.
I think some sort of fragmented mosaic-like structure
where these memories are intruding on this guy
as he's trying to live his life,
and he doesn't know what they are
or where they're coming from,
these flashes of this other reality
could be quite effective.
Okay, I see what you mean.
Like, you see someone in the corner,
oh, it's my mom, but I don't remember my mom,
that kind of thing.
All right.
Fragmented mosaic.
Do you write experimental fiction?
Yes.
I've heard everything I need to
in order to make my decision.
Please rise as Judge John Hodgman exits the courtroom.
Emily, how are you feeling about your chances?
I'm feeling great.
Why is that?
I came in knowing that I was correct, and I continue to feel that way.
What's giving you that feeling?
The fact that this entire time, the crowd's just been chanting,
Emily, Emily.
That's out.
This is really getting into a Lord of the Flies thing here.
Anyway, Judd, or should I say the pig, why should we not kill you and spill your blood?
That's what they say in Lord of the Flies.
How are you feeling about your chances, Judd?
Great.
Now seems like a good time to stake out really absolute positions and just dig in.
Everyone's feeling really receptive to that.
Well, we'll see what Judge Hodgman has to say about all this when he returns.
Judge John Hodgman, we're taking a quick break from the stage of the state theater.
What's going on with you?
Well, Jesse, I'm headed back to New York City where I live in September.
And while it's bittersweet to leave, Maine, I am looking forward to seeing perhaps you and all
your wonderful faces when I host a special screening of the John Carpenter film,
they live at the Nighthawk Prospect Park on September 18th.
That's right.
It's rowdy, Roddy Piper and Keith David having a fist fight in an alleyway for almost 40 minutes over whether one of them is going to put on magic glasses that allow them to see that our world is controlled by an oligarchical alien culture.
That's the best description I have of They Live that I can offer you.
And it's pretty accurate.
If you want to learn more, and you should, come and see the movie.
I'm hosting it.
I'll be introducing the screening and hanging around at the bar afterward.
go get your tickets now at bit.lee slash obey hodgeman.
That's b.it.l y slash obey hodgeman.
Obey hodgeman is all one word, all capital letters,
to grab your seats now for a fun night in the early fall at the Nighthawk.
Jesse, what's going on with you?
John, you know when I first saw they live?
Yeah.
When I saw it in high school in Mr. Crawford's English class.
Sure.
That's the same English class where Teresa Thorn,
And then Teresa Hossfeld decided she had a crush on me.
And that led to us making out and then becoming boyfriend and girlfriend, which we still are to this day.
That's, and even in a legal sense, I believe, you're married to one another.
That's correct.
And it's all thanks to Rowdy, Roddy Piper.
Unfortunately, I was unable to attend your wedding, but I know that Rowdy Roddy Piper was there, at least in spirit, wearing special glasses.
I have so much new stuff in the put this on shop.
You know, the autumn is right around the corner.
The autumn is time for cozy clothes.
No, not only do we have a huge new, let's say, shipment of scarves.
I'm a big fan of a colorful rayon scarf from the 1940s, 1950s.
We have a bunch of those in the shop.
We also have a lot of vintage flight jackets.
So you can find those.
If you like a leather jacket, if you're looking for something to just wear all autumn, all spring, all winter with a sweater underneath, hit the Put This On Shop, plus a lot of various tweeds. If you just want to knock around tweedsport coat, go to the Put This On Shop.com. That's in addition to all of the many beautiful ladies clothing and jewelry that we've added to the shop. And of course, all of the incredible vintage and antique decor items that we are famous for.
You can find all that online in the Put This On Shop at Put This On Shop.com.
What could be more autumnal than a Cooperstown, Oakland Oaks, fitted baseball cap size 7,
that beautiful red cap with an oak leaf on it?
Jesse Thorne, I'm going to get it.
Where do I go?
Put this on shop.com.
Where do you go?
Same place.
Put this on shop.com.
Go do it.
I got this, we got this T-shirt that I really like.
And it says, I can't be over.
drawn. I still have checks left.
That's I put this on shop.com.
Find that there. That one got a chuckle from
Joel even, right, Joel?
Let's get back to the stage of the state
theater.
Please rise as Judge
John Hodgman reenters the courtroom
and presents his verdict.
Once upon a time.
I left my work at the Coolidge Corner Theater in Brookline.
And I went to get my hair cut.
I went to go see the stylist that my mom saw.
His name was Renault.
I was cutting my hair.
And I said, oh, damn.
I think I left my wallet at the movie theater.
I called up the movie theater.
And he said, we don't have it.
And then I realized it was in my best.
it was in my back pocket
and the hairdresser
said, John
you are a dreamer
keep dreaming
true story, not a dream
sequence.
Care to offer a critique, Judd?
There is part of me that wants your approval.
You come in to my courtroom
dressing like a sexy
creative writing professor
from a movie or something.
Let's be honest, a B-level Hugh Grant is still like an A-plus-plus-level us.
It's true. True.
I mean, the way you're jauntily sitting on that stool.
I feel like you might be hosting a PBS woodworking program or something.
I mean, I know you're sitting on a stool right now,
But in my mind's eye, you definitely are sitting in a chair backwards.
You got that obscure cultural reference correct?
Really cut me off at the knees there.
My own courtroom.
You were very brave, actually, to come here, I must say.
Because your position is unpopular.
and you, and it is basically indefensible,
and nor did you really defend it.
The supreme confidence of Judd comes in
and says, I think dream sequences are dumb,
and when I ask, do you have any examples?
You say, no.
They're just dumb.
And the thing that gets me, Judd, is
you're not entirely wrong
because, a nightmare in Elm Street aside,
dream sequence is particularly in film, in my experience.
I don't actually read a lot of them in fiction,
but then again, well, I don't read a lot of books.
Surprise.
But they are often cheats.
They are often cheap feeling.
They feel a little too on the nose.
they often feel and are deployed as trickery
when you think something's actually happening to a character
and then they go,
oh, I'm glad that didn't happen.
And then sometimes they do it again
and wake up from that dream
within a dream, within a dream, or whatever it is.
They can be a little mawkish,
they can be a little cliché.
And as a point that I made, not you, I did,
they often in film and fiction
have big portent and obvious meaning
that our actual dreams don't tend to have
because our actual dreams are a little bit of a mishmash
of memory and anxiety and desire
or whatever it is and weird combinations
and anyone who's ever woken up
and tried to explain their dream to even their own mother
that person turns to them and says nobody cares
and they sound dumb the moment you describe them
They can feel really, really magical in that moment.
And when you wake up, they're often very mundane
and kind of don't connect and everything like that.
So when they have meaning within fiction
in the way that they often do,
and I'm talking about all narrative here,
it often feels a little bit phony and fake.
And I appreciate that you're trying to stand up
for a kind of honest fiction writing that is true.
And that's a good impulse to have.
And I would also say that, while
you know, that any writer should take that as a warning
before deploying the tool of dream sequence
and make sure that it is really serving the story
in the most honest way and also a way that is honest to your own voice.
So you're brave to take that position
and to take the ridicule that went with it.
And you did so very good-naturedly, and I thank you for that.
But you are not as brave as Emily,
who actually read her work,
which takes enormous bravery.
Okay, okay, okay.
You don't have the conch.
Mob justice is the next segment.
Makes very, very, three-part chance like that.
Make me nervous.
But first of all, I just want to thank you for your bravery,
and I really liked the work that you shared.
And it did not feel cheap to me.
It did not, I mean, I don't know the whole context of the,
story, but it didn't have the hallmarks of a bad dream sequence. It seemed like a perfectly
reasonable dream sequence. I mean, I hate to offer you this counsel, but, you know, when you're
in a writer's group and people say stuff that really bites at your core, and especially if it's
coming from an overconfident dude, you want to reject it. Lord knows I do, God or whatever knows I do,
but usually it's the criticism that bites the hardest that you kind of want to listen to a little bit
before you reject it.
Now, I've offered you both a lot of praise,
and now, Jud, I'm going to destroy you.
Because it's dialectic.
It can be both things.
It's not one or the other.
You deserve praise.
But I mean, I also caution you.
I mean, four reasons that should be very obvious.
One should not be out there in a writer's group or in society.
advocating the banning of a certain kind of expression.
And even if we just keep it right within the realm of storytelling and creative writing,
you know, the truth is that you've got to be able to use all of the tools,
even tools that you have devised that no one else understands.
Yes, you need to learn the rules of the rules.
storytelling before you can break them and bend them and so forth but the rule can
never be you must never do this if at best you should do it with caution or with
care whatever it is but you always have to have all of the tools to your at your
disposal because otherwise we never get anything new we never get anything
new and we need we need new stuff in this world we need a lot of new viewpoints
and we can't be shutting down just, even if the dream sequence is dumb,
you've got to be able to use it in order to express yourself.
And that's where I land on this.
So perhaps it's obvious.
You're not dreaming.
I find an Emily's favor.
Judd, thank you for your good humor and your winning demeanor.
Though perhaps you deserved a summary judge.
in your favor, I find in Emily's favor all the same. This is the sound of a gabble.
Judge John Hodgman rules that is. Emily, Judd, thanks for joining us on the Judge John Hodgman
podcast. That's it for this episode of the Judge John Hodgman podcast. Thank you to
Reddit user Terduckin Everest for naming the case in this episode. Make sure to follow us on
Instagram at Judge John Hodgman. We're on YouTube and TikTok at Judge John Hodgman pod. The
John Hodgman podcast was created by John Hodgman and Jesse Thorne. This episode was recorded by
Matthew Barnhart. A.J. McKeon is our podcast editor. Daniel Spear is our video editor. Our producer's
Jennifer Marmer. We'll talk to you next time on the Judge John Hodgman podcast.
Maximum Fun. A worker-owned network. Of artists-owned shows. Supported directly by you.