Judging Freedom - Aaron Maté : Americans Murdering Gazans.

Episode Date: July 8, 2025

Aaron Maté : Americans Murdering Gazans.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

you Hi everyone, Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Tuesday, July 8, 2025. Aaron Maté is with us. Are you ready for this? Are Americans killing Palestinians in Gaza? But first this. Why do so many financial experts call silver the most undervalued asset today? Because silver is essential to the future. From solar tech and electric vehicles to the explosive growth of artificial intelligence. Demand is rising fast and yet silver is still trading at a bargain. With billions pouring into AI, silver prices have only one place to go. Up. Robert Kiyosaki, the author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, says silver may be the most overlooked

opportunity on the market and could double or triple by 2026. I believe in hard assets like this bar of silver. You can hold it in your hand or put it in your 401k or IRA. That's why I urge you to call my friends at Lear Capital and get their free report. The AI revolution and see why silver prices are set to soar. Call 800-511-4620, 800-511-4620 or go to learjudsnap.com. Don't wait, the government can print dollars, but it can't print silver. Aaron Mate, welcome here, my dear friend. I do want to talk to you about what you posted and wrote about recently,

American soldiers of fortune murdering Palestinians on film and boasting about it. I think I have that corrected. But before we get to that, another subject about which you have written extensively and is now back in the news and that is the CIA's involvement in the Russiagate scandals of 2017. Apparently a new CIA report is out critical of John Brennan and what he did and didn't do when he was running the CIA. Can you bring us up to speed on that? For those who are not familiar with all the details or who may have forgotten, because some time has passed

and there's so much to keep track of, Russiagate was when the Hillary Clinton campaign teamed up with elements of the national security state, including John Brennan, who was then the director of the CIA, and framed Trump as a Russian asset, and also framed Russia, I believe, for launching a sweeping so-called interference plot to put Trump in office.

Those are the main planks of Russia gate and both of them I think are equally fraudulent. So we know by now that the collusion conspiracy aspect was a scam. There'd be multiple investigations showing that was baseless. But the other component, this Russian interference allegation on behalf of Trump, that one is still standing. And so the CIA had just put out a review, supposedly looking at a very foundational Russiagate document that advanced these allegations of Trump-Russia collusion and Russian interference, which was the so-called Intelligence Community Assessment of January 2017. This is released in the last days of the Obama administration.

It was hurried for production on a very unusual schedule and was put out right before Trump took office. And the impact of it was, was basically to portray Trump as the product of a Russian interference plot. And this engulfed his ensuing administration. It set the tone for the Russia mania that was to come. So the CIA now, so many years later, has put out a review of the CIA's role in that January 2017 intelligence document. And yes, it's critical of John Brennan. It notes what we've already known before, which is that John Brennan excluded key actors. He excluded the Defense Intelligence Agency of the Pentagon. He excluded the State Department's intelligence agency. He put this on a very rushed timeline. He oversaw the process himself. At the time, everybody said this was the consensus of the intelligence community that Russia

interfered. No, it wasn't. It was the consensus of a small group of people overseen by John Brennan, who was a key person in this plot to frame Trump as a Russian agent. And so this new review from under John Ratcliffe's watch, Trump's current director of the CIA, it faults Brennan and the CIA for what it calls some procedural anomalies. And it raises some interesting points and some new detail we didn't know about just how all this fraud was perpetrated, but it leaves unscathed.

And this is the fundamental point. John Ratcliffe is still leaving unscathed the fundamental fraud, which was that the US intelligence community under John Brennan's watch accused Russia of a massive interference plot to elect Trump. And Ratcliffe's review takes issue with only one small component of that. It doesn't address the underlying fraud. So the bottom line here is Trump's CIA is still covering up the Obama administration's

CIA's role in framing Trump and Russia as being in cahoots in their This is a head-scratcher and it's beyond Ridiculous and and it is not just of historical importance. It's relevant today Yeah, here's the bottom line who would believe a damn thing the CIA says It's a great question and and people have ample reasons to be skeptical given how much deception the CIA has been involved in, not only on this issue, but on so many others. But look, it's striking that even under Trump partisans like John Ratcliffe, it's so hard to get the truth out.

We still, so many years later, as the public can't access the reports written by CrowdStrike, which was the firm hired by Hillary Clinton, which launched Russiagate by accusing Russia of hacking the DNC. And we know now that the FBI relied on CrowdStrike's work. CrowdStrike refused to let the FBI look at the DNC servers themselves, and that could have helped determine who actually hacked the DNC, whether it was Russia or whether it was a leak from the inside. The FBI was barred from looking at the service themselves and instead had to rely on a contractor

hired by Hillary Clinton, who was simultaneously enlisting Christopher Steele to feed propaganda into the FBI. So still so many years later, we had the intelligence community protecting its own reputation rather than getting to the truth, even despite Trump's many promises for accountability. And it's interesting to speculate as to why. It speaks to the entrenched power of the national security state, that even when it's led now by a president who was attacked by the FBI and the CIA, we still can't get accountability. And also, because Russiagate fueled a narrative that helped drive the proxy war in Ukraine, I think that's also a major reason why the CIA won't own up to the fraud, because we need to manufacture scandals like this. Russia attacked our democracy. They interfered. They tried to sow chaos in order to sow tension and war with Russia abroad.

Is Tulsi Gabbard on the outs and John Ratcliffe ascendant. I think John Ratcliffe has definitely ascended. I know you've talked to Max Blumenthal, my colleague at the Grey Zone, about his reporting where he spoke to somebody inside the Trump administration who told him that John Ratcliffe was acting as essentially Mossad, the Israeli intelligence services stenographer inside the White House, feeding Trump with Israeli propaganda about Iran's non-existent nuclear weapons program. And so Radcliffe has played an instrumental role to the point where an Israeli intelligence official thanked John Radcliffe personally for all of his efforts. Tulsi Gabbard, we know who's been reporting, she was excluded from a very key meeting on

the Trump administration's deliberations over Iran. Tulsi has since played ball. She put out a very misleading statement that claimed that the U.S. had intelligence that supported Israeli claims about Iran, even though, as I've written about, the intelligence was simply Israel passing on its claims. It wasn't actual evidence because there is no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program, as Tulsi Gabbard affirmed back in March So I haven't heard anything recently

But I think it's fair to say that people like John Radcliffe have a lot more stock inside the White House than Tulsi Gabbard does I didn't see her in the views of the dinner with Benjamin Netanyahu last night. She was not at that table, Radcliffe was. It was a small dinner. There were only, appeared to be 12 or 14 people there, but she did not appear to be among the max. As you know, I'm sure you've discussed this with him, has told us that Mossad agents have actually briefed Trump and in so doing defied or gave a different version of what American intelligence purported to give him, whether they gave it to him through Radcliffe, probably

not. They probably gave it to him through a gabber. Radcliffe's not going to tell him anything to contradict his masters in Mossad. I'm being a little snarky calling them masters, but it's a fair characterization. What I got from Max's reporting was that basically Radcliffe was getting his disinformation fed to him by Israel and then he was conveying that to Trump directly. That's what I gleaned from what Max did at the Gray Zone. That speaks to what I've heard as well from a source I have inside government, which is basically the Israeli claims about Iran being months or weeks away. There was no intelligence consensus

at all behind that whatsoever. There was no U.S. intelligence product that endorsed that claim because it's simply not true. The U.S. intelligence view was what Tulsi Gabbard made clear back in March, was that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. It could be closer to nuclear weapons if it wanted to, but it does not have an active nuclear weapons program. What is your view as to why the ostentatious Netanyahu visit yesterday? Was it for domestic Israeli political purposes or is he still trying to propagandize Trump's brain? For Netanyahu, the Iran conflict is not over.

He wants regime change, as do many influential people inside the US, including some people inside the Trump White House. So that's what Netanyahu- Including some people at that dinner with Trump. Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely. So that's what he's pushing for. And he also wants to get Trump's endorsement for continuing to ethnically cleanse Palestinians

from Gaza, which he already has. They talked last night about what Netanyahu called the freedom of choice, which means the forced expulsion from Gaza. And of course, not expulsion back to Palestinians' homes and what is now Israel, which was stolen from them, but expelled somewhere else. And I think that's the next phase of their plan.

And they've already talked about this before. Recall a few months ago, Trump released that horrendous AI video of his vision for Gaza, where it's all resorts and there's no more Palestinians there. That's essentially what Netanyahu is pushing now. And also, Trump also said that Netanyahu asked him to remove sanctions on Syria because now Syria is ruled by people that the U.S. and Israel perceive that they can control because

they helped put them in power through the dirty war. And Trump last night at that dinner personally said Netanyahu also wanted sanctions lifted on Syria, and that's why Netanyahu's visit coincided with the U.S. officially taking the ruling al-Qaeda group in Syria, Hayat al-Rasham, which now rules over Syria, taking them off of the terrorist list. These people are monsters who slaughter innocents, Christians, Alawites, anybody that gets in the way, these are the people that Trump is embracing and off of whom he's removing American sanctions.

Yes, and it's another case where Trump is contradicting previous truths that he's put out there. Before, like when he first came to office in his first term, he shut down actually the CIA program in Syria. One of the things he said was, and I've written about this in an article called Al-Qaeda is on our side, quoting Jake Sullivan's famous line in Hillary Clinton. But Trump said, it turns out a lot of the weapons that we were sending to Syria ended up

in the hands of Al-Qaeda. He was critical of that. And if you call back in 2016, he was critical of the dirty war in Syria. Now he's back in office, he's surrounded by neocons who he's totally empowered. He's doing their bidding, he's adopting their policy of empowering al-Qaeda in Syria. Have the risk of getting too deep into the weeds of American politics,

have the Tucker Carlson's and Steve Bannon's just been shunted aside? Because it does seem as though this administration's foreign policy is as directed by neoconsest was Joe Biden's. I agree with that. And I'd love to know what Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon think about the role of their wing of the movement right now, which continues to be marginalized. And Steve Bannon recently met with Trump at the White House and Bannon's been openly critical of bombing Iran,

but yet it just doesn't seem to register with Trump, who keeps redefining what America first is. I mean, America first was supposed to be, I thought, and certainly people like Steve Bannon and Chuck Carlson promoted this idea that we focus on U.S. issues and stop meddling abroad. Trump keeps redefining America first to be Israel first. Those are what his policies are.

He's continuing to show that. So yeah, I think that wing of the MAGA movement has totally been marginalized. And people like Lindsey Graham, who also claimed the MAGA mantle, they're the ones who are ascended. I would imagine, although, thank you, Lord, we haven't heard from him in about a week or so.

I would imagine Lindsey Graham is ecstatic about what's going on. I want to play for you a clip. I don't know if you know this fellow, Zivka Fogel. He's an Israeli member of parliament in the Likud party. This is horrific what he's saying, but the Netanyahu government put this out on Sunday afternoon Chris cut number one the war we are fighting today Which we embarked on the 7th of October is a war against a Nazi enemy that threatened the existence of the Jewish people in the land of Israel That is the whole truth

So the Prime Minister decided the prime minister decided to do it sequentially. I'm with him. No problem. Let's do it sequentially. You eliminate it has been lying. You dealt a severe blow maybe even more than that to Iran. Now the time has come to deal with the Gaza Strip. How do we do that? You take off the glove, stop the humanitarian aid, cut off electricity, cut off water, start destroying and expel voluntarily, so to speak, voluntary migration of Gazans. There are no uninvolved people there, no innocents, no one who isn't guilty. As far as I'm concerned, they're all Hamas members.

At the end of the war, there should be two images in the Gaza Strip. First not a single Gaza remains and all 50 of our hostages, 49 male hostages and one female hostage both living in deceased air return to the state of Israel. I mean this guy is the SS reincarnated. Yes, he is. And all these tactics from Israel, not just their rhetoric, their tactics, echo that of the German Nazis. Gaza is a concentration camp. And now the plan is to push all of the people of Gaza into the south.

And what Israel is calling a humanitarian city, which just means a death trap, where they'll either be killed or they'll be pushed for ethnic cleansing. That's what they're pushing now. And then the plan is to fulfill Trump's vision of turning Gaza into this playground for Israel and Gulf kingdoms and their allies around the world to basically bring in migrant laborers to serve the region, to serve the wealthy of that region with resorts and tech hubs and all that. It's dystopian, but it's happening before our eyes. And one of the mechanisms for this has been the, you know, kicking out UNRWA, the UN, the main UN agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza and replacing it with the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is essentially an Israeli intelligence front funded by the US and staffed with US

mercenaries. So all this is proceeding and there's no force right now in the world that is able to stop it. Before we get to those US mercenaries and what they're doing, Chris, can you put up those two full screens from the two Israeli newspaper headlines? Here's Haaretz. Defense minister says Israel plans to concentrate all Gaza's population in humanitarian zone built on Rafa's ruins.

This is what you just said, Aaron. The Times of Israel plan said to outline humanitarian transit camps population in humanitarian zone built on Rafa's ruins. This is what you just said, Aaron. The Times of Israel plan said to outline humanitarian transit camps, concentration camps, to house Gazans before possible relocation. You're telling us that this is an accurate description of what the Netanyahu regime plans to do with Donald Trump's blessings. You see it there in those two headlines and thank you for pointing that out. Concentration camp, that's what this is. That's exactly what this is. I wouldn't be surprised if Israeli officials studied Nazi Germany, honestly, at this

point, given the similarities of their tactics, certainly the results. That's exactly what is happening. And it's been, by the way, the plan from the start. The Biden administration knew that this was Israel's plan all along. The Biden administration lobbied Arab countries to take Palestinian refugees from Gaza. No one, of course, ever thought about letting Palestinians return to their stolen homes on what is now Israel,

where most of the people of Gaza come from, them and their predecessors, it's all to facilitate ethnic cleansing. And that is the phase of the plan we're entering now. That's why Trump is so optimistic now about a ceasefire, because they're moving on to the next phase of simply just permanently emptying out Gaza after making it unlivable. have American mercenaries then filmed murdering Palestinians and rejoicing over it? Yes, they have. And ironically, the evidence is contained in a video that was put out by these US mercenaries to try to do damage control. And there's an article at the Gray Zone by my colleagues, Mack Flumenthal and Wyatt Reed, which points out that the footage released by these U.S. mercenaries, they're called UG Solutions, which works for the so-called

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, it shows them firing on people in Gaza. So their attempts to exonerate themselves are actually incriminating. And basically who these are are US mercenaries making a lot of money to help guard the officials of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation as they distribute aid, which Israel has used to actually trap Palestinians and then shoot them. There have been so many now killings at these so-called A-distributions. And so what the footage shows is simply these US mercenaries firing on crowds despite not being under threat. And the company, UG Solutions, had claimed publicly that they didn't fire on crowds.

So their own footage undermines their own public claims. What is that company doing there and who has hired them? How do Americans get to Gaza armed like American soldiers? So UG Solutions is a mercenary firm which works for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is basically a front for Israeli intelligence. It's funded by the US government, including via USAID after so much hype was made about Trump's attempt to shut down USAID, it turns out the exact same problems with USAID basically funding covert operations under the guise of humanitarianism.

That's exactly the same playbook now, including with this dystopian so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. So UG Solutions was one of two mercenary firms, I believe, that have been hired to deploy alongside the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. And these are some Americans, a lot of them veterans making a lot of money to go and do some ethnic cleansing.

This is not a protected act, by which I mean a future Department of Justice could indict them for murder. There's no statute of limitations on murder. This is not the government. This is not a declared war. They're not deployed by the United States government. They have no legal basis to justify their murder and they've exposed themselves, as I said, to the wrath of a more rationally thinking and more rule of law dedicated future Department of Justice.

Yes, I imagine though, knowing that this was part of the plan, which is to use this fake aid scheme to kill people, I imagine that they've already set up some legal protections for themselves, that everyone already has immunity. I wouldn't be surprised, especially after so many previous deadly mercenary operations by the U.S. around the world, including Blackwater in Iraq, which I'm sure this whole scheme is modeled after. But yes, so you have UG Solutions, you have another mercenary firm. It's founded by a former CIA official. It's called Safe Reach Solutions. And so they've deployed alongside the Israeli military to push the operations of the Trump-funded Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which itself, again, is tied to Israeli intelligence as well.

And then you also have, and this article in the Grazum points this out, these gangs linked to ISIS in Gaza that have essentially been acting as mercenaries on behalf of Israel. So you have a constellation of these forces all coming together to be responsible for giving out aid to the people of Gaza, which leads to looting and it leads to killing, which is part of the plan. Aaron Monte, thank you, my dear friend. Thanks for the background on all the Russiagate and thanks for exposing Americans killing Palestinians. This only seems before we say goodbye, this only seems to get worse. Every time we talk about this

it's worse. More murder, more bloodshed, more Nazi like threats and terminology and plans from people in the Israeli government. I guess there'll be no end to this until we have a new president in three and a half years. I agree with you. Trump promised to bring peace to the Middle East. He courted the Arab American vote. People wanted to believe it, understandably, because the Biden administration was so horrible and Kamala Harris refused to distance herself at all from Biden. So the Democrats own a large share of responsibility, but this is Trump's policy now. And he's been just as genocidal as Genocide Joe was. And I share your sentiments.

And in terms of this story, all the credit goes to my colleagues at the gray zone, Max Blumenthal and Wyatt Reid. They did this reporting. I'm just relaying it to you today. Thank you, Aaron. We'll talk to you again soon just relaying it to you today. Thank you, Aaron. We'll talk to you again soon. All the best, my friend. Thank you, Judge. Sure.

Coming up later today at three o'clock this afternoon on all of this, in fact, our piece asks, is the American empire finally collapsing? Who else? Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, Justin Appalachian for Judging Freedom. MUSIC