Judging Freedom - Aaron Maté : How the Ukraine War Started.

Episode Date: August 27, 2025

Aaron Maté : How the Ukraine War Started.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

You know what doesn't belong in your epic summer plans? Getting burned by your old wireless bill. While you're planning beach trips, BBQs, and three-day weekends, your wireless bill should be the last thing holding you back. That's why millions have made the switch to MidMobil. With Mint, you can get the coverage and speed you're used to, but for way less money.

And for a limited time, MittMobile's offering three months of unlimited premium wireless service for $15 a month. So while your friends are sweating over data overages and surprise charges, you'll be chilling, literally, and financially. All plans come with high-speed, data and unlimited talk and text delivered on the nation's largest 5G network.

This year, skip breaking the sweat and breaking the bank. Get this new customer offer and your three-month unlimited wireless plan for just $15 a month at mintmobile.com slash john. That's mintmobile.com slash john. Use your own phone with any mint mobile plan and bring your phone number along with all of your existing contacts. Up front payment of $45 required equivalent to $15 a month. Limited time new customer offer for first three months only.

Speeds may slow above 35 gigabyte on unlimited plan. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. Thank you. Thank you. Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for judging freedom. Today is Wednesday, August 27, 2025. Aaron Mote, my dear friend, joins us now. Aaron, thank you very much for your time. Thanks for accommodating my schedule. I know you've been doing some writing and research on the origins of the war in Ukraine. So if I may, a couple of questions about that. When the CIA and MI6 topple, of President Yanukovych in 2014. Why did the new government begin shelling, killing Russian-speaking Ukrainians in the eastern

part of the country? Well, because the people that propelled the coup that overthrew Yanukovych were ultra-nationalists. Recall that the Maidan, when it began in November 2013, this was the protest against Yanukovych because he delayed. signing a trade deal with the EU, there wasn't a clear goal of regime change. It was mostly people upset that Yanukovych was in their eyes turning away from the West and aligning closer with Russia, when in reality it was actually more complex. Yenikovych had read the fine print

of the deal that the European Union was putting before him. And the European Union was asking him to basically cut off people's pensions, cut off subsidies for energy and basically make the cost of living higher for Yanukovych's constituency, especially in the east of the country, where it also was saying you have to cut off ties to Russia. And Yanukovych recognized that for him this would be a political disaster. So he delayed signing that deal, which led to protests, which the U.S. and their allies then exploited by trying to push for regime change in the process, siding with a small faction of hardline made on elements, people like this Fabota Party, which were founded with neo-Nazi

inspirations. And so after the coup, which was pushed by elements like Svibboda, the ultra-nationalists got a lot of senior cabinet posts in the new government, and they took up their movement's top priorities, which included essentially wiping out Russian culture in the country. The first parliamentary act that was seriously taken up was to essentially ban Russia as an official state language. And in response to this, you had people in the East rising up in prison. protest. And the ultra-nationalist, rather than trying to, you know, broker a compromise, took

this as an opportunity to escalate their attacks. And you had things happen like the Odessa massacre, which was in early May 2014, where dozens of people who were protesting the May Don and calling for their rights as ethnic Russians, they were burned alive in a trade union building by a fascist mob. So events like that helped galvanize this protest. And then you also had the CIA coming over. John Brennan slipped into Kiev in mid-April. And according to a source that I spoke to who was there at the meeting, told his counterparts, who he had helped put in office, that you should launch an attack on the

Donbos. You should, forget them and we'll help you out. And lo and behold, two days later, that's exactly what the Ukrainian government did. Is there a meaning to the word, a meaning with significance to the word, my Don? well made on is simply the square where the protest began okay and and this is the event orchestrated in part or at least promoted by victoria newland and and her colleagues absolutely i mean if you go back to that period you look at the media outlets that uh were promoting the made on protest promoting the coup so many of them have ties to u.s funding in fact there was one

Ukrainian outlet that to spontaneously emerged right as the Maidan began, like out of nowhere. All of a sudden there was a brand new Ukrainian outlet and it was funded by the U.S. government. And Newland bragged about this, that the U.S. had invested billions of dollars in promoting what you called Ukrainian civil society, which in real life means fronts for U.S. interests, fronts that the U.S. can use to promote its regime change agenda. to the point where, you know, after Zelensky got elected, he was elected on a mandate of peace. And in the first stages of his term, he did take some genuine steps towards trying to make peace

and towards implementing the Minsk Accords, which was the European Brokered Pact, endorsed by the UN Security Council, to end the war that began with the Maydan coup. And as Zelensky took steps, there was a really famous document put out by a group of so-called Ukrainian civil society members. It's a bunch of groups. And Ivan Kachanowski, who was a Ukrainian Canadian professor at University of Ottawa, he pointed out that if you look at the list of signatories,

the vast majority are all funded by the U.S. and their allies. And what did this letter say, the statement, say to Zelensky, do not implement the Minsk Accords, that recognizing that ethnic Russians in the East have legitimate grievances, that would be a red line for us, and allowing the Russian Orthodox Church to operate in Ukraine, that's a red line. So at every turn, the U.S. through its funded organizations in Ukraine, its proxies, promoted confrontation. All right. So President Obama leaves office and President

Trump comes in and Trump begins arming Zelensky's government to the teeth. Is there any articulable reason for that? Well, the reason why Trump armed Ukraine was because of Russia gate. This was at the time when there was this all-consuming frenzy of allegations that Russia had waged a massive interference campaign to install Trump in office. And the Trump's campaign was possibly complicit.

And it seems so funny to look back on now, but this was the dominant story of the first Trump years. And nobody challenged it in establishment media. Unfortunately, a lot of progressive media too. And so with that consensus solidified that Trump was the product of Russia and then he might even be a Russian conspirator,

the hawks in Trump's white House took advantage of this and to dispel the notion he was a Russian agent, encouraged him to authorize hawkett steps that Obama hadn't even taken, including arming Ukraine. And so many accounts have come out since the New York Times recently reported that all while Trump's opponents were, you know, just hyperventilating about him possibly being a Russian asset. U.S. intelligence officials thought this was great because it meant that people, that this was whole thing about Trump being a Russian asset was a good cover for Trump's administration.

to undertake hakish policies against Russia and Ukraine, including building up, we learned from the New York Times, a number of secret bases and expanding their training and intelligence operations with Ukraine, basically turning Ukraine into even more of a CIA proxy. So Russia Gate was the perfect storm because it encouraged Trump to escalate tensions with Russia all while incentivizing the media and the political establishment to ignore what Trump was doing because they were so beholden to the conspiracy theory that he was actually doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin. I mean, you can't make this up.

The same deep state that was trying to ruin his presidency was encouraging him to arm the Ukrainians to wage the eventual proxy war against Putin. That's right. And this is what so much what so much of my forthcoming book is all about. It's about how contrary to the view that were ruled by elected leaders, when it comes to matters of war and peace, it's the entrenched foreign policy bureaucracy that gets its way. And that's true as much about Trump as it. is under Obama. Obama, if you read all the accounts, he didn't want to arm Ukraine. He was very worried about weapons, U.S. weapons going to neo-Nazis, and he was very worried that this would provoke Russia. And he also was worried that if we keep arming Ukraine, it's going to give Ukraine the false

impression that they can win if we ultimately provoke Russia into invading. So Barack Obama foresaw all of this, but ultimately, if you look at the record of his administration, it didn't matter what he really thought, because Victoria Newland, as a senior state department official, took it upon herself, along with others like Daniel Fried, who was serving in the State Department, to basically undermine Obama's own professed policy of giving the Minsk courts a chance. And so Newland encouraged an escalation. And finally, when Obama left office, the same foreign policy bureaucracy that Newland was a part of, took advantage of Russia gate to push Trump even more than Obama had been pushed.

And that's why they got the weapon sent. That's why in Trump's first year, Congress also passed a measure. solidifying Newland sanctions that she had designed and making it impossible for Trump to undo them. And Trump signed that bill. He signed it. He didn't want to, but he signed it because, you know, under the storm of Trump, Russia allegations, he had no choice. So there's a recurring theme here that no matter what the elected president wants, it's the hawkish entrenched voices that have their say.

And by the way, that's also true in Ukraine. Because what happened in Ukraine after Zelensky was elected, the ultra-nationalist, far right, which was very small numerically, but very large in power in the swear of the government, which had been empowered by the Medan coup with the help of the U.S. They told Zelensky, forget it. Like, no matter what you want, it doesn't matter. And if you make peace with Russia, we'll kill you. Multiple people in Ukraine's far right threatened Zelensky's life.

We've talked about a few of them before. And in fact, one more just came this week. The Times of London interviewed a guy named Sergei Sterneko of Right Sector. Okay. And this is what he said just recently. If Zelensky were to give any on-conquered land away, he would be a corpse politically and then for real. It would be a bomb under our sovereignty.

People would never accept it. And you can go back and see similar statements made to Zelensky right after he took office. Another member of right sector said that Zelensky will hang from a tree if he betrays the made-on revolution. So this is a recurring theme in both the U.S. and Ukraine. whatever the elected president wants is always undermined by the entrenched talks in both countries. So when Trump complains that Zelensky is being unrealistic by not ceding the territories that Russia occupies, is it fair to say Zelensky has no choice?

Well, Zelensky, look, if Zelensky, I think, had more integrity, and more courage, he could resign and say, look, I'm in an impossible situation where the far right won't let me make peace and the U.S. up to this point hasn't given me any help, but he doesn't have that integrity. He's chosen to be a tool of the far right. I just wonder, and it's a counterfactual now, had there not been this convergent pressure from the ultra-nationalist in Ukraine, coupled with Hawks in Washington, who encouraged Lensky at every single turn to ignore Minsk, William Taylor, who was a top U.S. diplomat under Trump and Ukraine in Trump's first term, William Taylor went to Zelensky personally and told him to ignore German efforts to save the Minska courts, told him it was a terrible

idea. So in a different world, had there not been this converging pressure on Zelensky, I don't know what Zelensky would have done. I don't know who he really is. But all I know is since then, he's turned into a complete tool of both ultra-nationalists and the U.S. Who is the international monitor about which you have spoken recently now blaming the war on both NATO and these nationalist fanatics? His name is Benoit Parre. He's a French national, and he spent seven years deployed in Ukraine with the OSCE, which is a European-dominated monitoring group that was trying to impose a ceasefire. in Ukraine and see about the implementation of the Minsk Accords, which was the aforementioned pact to end the Donbos War that began with the 2014 Medan coup. And speaking to Palais, what he told me was that basically, in his view, Russia was provoked in Ukraine that the majority of atrocities

in the Donbass war were committed by the Ukrainian government. Not that the Russian-back rebels were scot-free. I mean, they committed atrocities of their own, but that he says there's so many junctures at which there were provocations of the rebels, that Ukraine was the main obstacle to implementing the Minsk Accords because Ukraine's parliament refused to pass a law that would have allowed for greater autonomy for the Donbos, which was the key requirement of Minsk. And the reason why Ukrainian parliament didn't pass that law is because in August 2015, when they tried, again, the alternationalist extremist held a deadly protest outside parliament at which security forces were killed and many were injured.

So this was a policy of what the Ukrainian American journalist Lev Galenkin calls veto through violence. That whenever there were steps towards peace, Ukraine's ultra-nationalists with the tacit or direct backing of the U.S. imposed a policy of veto through violence. And Parais, being on the ground with the OSCE,

he saw this up close. And he reports and confirms, you know, what was previously known, then in the days leading up to Russia's invasion in February 2020, there was a massive escalation of shelling coming from the Ukrainian government side onto the rebel controlled side. And that was taken by Russia and its allies that Ukraine was preparing for a major assault on the Donbos. So, you know, it speaks to Russian claims that essentially

the people of the Donbos were at risk unless Russia took action. When Joe Biden was in the White House, he kept saying there are no. boots on the ground, meaning American troops on the ground in Ukraine, which a lot of us interpreted to mean, okay, they're out of uniform. So the phrase boots on the ground is technically accurate, but highly misleading. Do we know if there are American troops there now in uniform or out in Ukraine? And do we know if American military from Germany is still directing Ukraine military in Ukraine? On the issue of the Ukrainian military being directed from Germany, from U.S. base, yes, that's still happening. Although there was a recent report in the Wall Street Journal saying that Trump has rolled back the Biden policy of letting Ukraine use long-range U.S. weapons to strike inside Russia.

So militarily, that's been the one significant change from Biden to Trump, is that Trump is not letting Ukraine strike inside Russia with U.S. weapons. As for U.S. military forces, yeah, there are some there on the ground as advisors. How many? I don't know. But even before Russia invaded, saying there were no boots on the ground is misleading because there were boots on the ground to train Ukrainian forces. There was a massive training operation by the U.S. in Ukraine, starting with the 2014 Maidon coup. Thousands of Ukrainian soldiers were trained by the U.S. and the goal, as the U.S. Army admitted, was to increase interoperability between Ukraine and NATO. to turn Ukraine into a NATO proxy force. Well, surely CIA and MI6 are still on the ground. Well, if you believe in the New York Times account that the U.S. after the

made on coup established at least 12 secret bases, yes, there's ever reason to believe that those bases are still operational. Wow. What's going on with Cy Hirsch? Is this documentary coming out about him critical or accurate or laudatory or what? Sy Hirsch sat down with Laura Poitris, who's an acclaimed documentary filmmaker. She's the one who sat down with Edward Snowden. Did she not?

Yes. Okay. She did it and she won the Oscar for it. So she, along with a colleague, have made a documentary about Cy Hirsch going through his extraordinary career. And it comes out this fall. And it's not a hack job on Cy Hirsch. No, no, no, no. He cooperated with it.

It's done with his full cooperation, and I'm really looking forward to it. I haven't seen it yet, but I'm looking forward to seeing it. But it has his full blessing. He's happy with it. Okay, I apologize for turning your stomach, but I have to play for you the latest from Minister Smotrich, speaking in Hebrew with the translation about what the plans are in Gaza. I think it's number 15. We are destroying everything that is still left of the strip,

simply because everything there is just one big terror city. As part of the war, the IDF is moving the population out of the combat zones and not leaving one stone upon another. I'm telling you, just look at the videos of what's happening in the Gaza Strip. The population will move to the south of the strip, and from there, God willing, to third countries, as part of President Trump's plan. This is a change in the course of history, nothing less. The bare minimum will reach the population simply so that the world won't stop us and accuse us of war crimes.

The IDF is finally conducting a campaign against Hamas' civil administration and not just focusing on the military infrastructure. We are eliminating ministers, officials, money changers, and figures in Hamas's economic and governmental apparatus. For two and a half months, we did not allow humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip. This created tremendous pressure on Hamas and that's a good thing. But even pressure needs to be regulated so it doesn't blow up in our faces. When the IDF recently resumed maneuvering with full force to conquer the Gaza Strip, when the IDF is moving the population from the last places where they still had a bit of food and our greatest friends in the world, those who support us,

those who understand that we cannot stop just short of total victory in destroying Hamas, when they ask us to help them, to help us, and to refute the lives of the region, we need to... Wow. There's a lot to unpack there. We'll start with moving the Palestinians out of Gaza, according to President Trump's plan, as Trump told Netanyahu, the U.S. will help them find a place to force the Gossans to go to? He apparently has. I mean, certainly Trump endorsed that idea in recent months.

We talked about turning Gaza into a coastal, you know, like rebuilding Gaza and giving people the free choice to leave, essentially calling for ethnic cleansing. We all recall his horrible AI video of Trump, Gaza. And so, yeah, and so there have been ongoing reports of Israel talking to different countries, including South Sudan, of expelling Palestinians to South Sudan. Recall Gaza's trip is itself a refugee camp. The vast majority of its residents are either direct refugees or the descendants of refugees from people who were ethnically cleansed by Israel in 1948. So most people in Gaza have a home that is theirs and what is now Israel that was stolen from them. And now Israel as part of that decades-old ethnic cleansing project, which they began in 1947, 1948.

I want to continue that. That's been the main goal of this entire Gaza operation, this whole notion that Israel is defending itself, which so many people, including critics of Israel, like Bernie Sanders endorsed, saying that Israel is the right responsibility to prevent another October 7th. The real goal, the only goal, was to destroy Gaza and continue the ethnic cleansing project upon which Israel is based. And people like to say, oh, Smotrik, he's, even though he's a minister, he doesn't represent the government. He's just a fringe example. No, this is the face of Israel.

This is what it always has been. He's just being honest about it. Are you surprised that he was not only honest? He was open about it. I mean, the Nazis tried to hide their genocide. These people are openly flaunting it. There's something about the Israeli mentality that it's just uniquely entitled. You know, Benjamin Ninahou felt comfortable coming to the U.S.

and speaking before Congress and openly trying to stop the elected U.S. President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran. What other head of state would ever do that? Come to a foreign country and try to stop their leader, especially a leader that provides their government with so much financial support as the U.S. does to Israel. What other head of state would do that? So this is a fanatical state that has been given impunity by its U.S. patron for decades to commit evil. That's what we're seeing now every single day in Gaza, as we're seeing in the West Bank, where Trump has just let Israel move forward with a settlement project known as E1 that will complete the cutting off of the West Bank, cutting off Palestinians in the north of the West Bank from the south of West Bank,

and also cutting everybody off from East Jerusalem, which is the center of Palestine. life. And so Netanyahu right now was full impunity from Trump. We just had Steve Wyckoff say that essentially forget all the ceasefires on brokering Trump's, Trump endorses Netanyahu's plan to continue attacking Gaza until Hamas is completely destroyed, by which he means Gaza is completely destroyed. And there will be nothing left for any Palestinians to live for, and they'll all have to leave. And only Donald Trump can stop this. As far as I know, I wish there was another solution, but yeah, Israel's so reliant on U.S. support that a change in U.S. policy would make a very big difference.

It's what makes the Biden administration so criminal. They adopted a policy of bear hugging Netanyahu, as Biden put it, rather than telling them to knock it off. And Trump has taken that policy and continued it. In fact, you can argue it's even more sadistic because now we have a full-blown famine in Gaza as a result of the Trump endorsed. months-long Israeli starvation siege on the entire territory. Aaron, thanks very much for your time.

Thank you for letting me go across the board on all these topics. It was great being with you and Max and Anya and the others on Saturday, and look forward to seeing you again next week. Have a nice holiday weekend. You as well, Judge. Thank you. Thank you. Coming up at three this afternoon, Phil Girale,

tomorrow, Colonel McGregor, Pepe Escobar, Colonel Wilkerson, Professor Mirosheimer, Judge Napolitano for judging free. them. Thank you.