Judging Freedom - Anya Parampil : Death in Venezuela; Trickery in Colombia
Episode Date: June 26, 2026Anya Parampil : Death in Venezuela; Trickery in ColombiaSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info. ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Undeclared wars are commonplace.
Fragically, our government engages in preemptive war,
otherwise known as aggression with no complaints from the American people.
Sadly, we have become accustomed to living with the illegitimate use of force by government.
To develop a truly free society, the issue of initiating force must be understood and rejected.
What if sometimes to love your country you had to alter or abolish the government?
Jefferson was right? What if that government is best, which governs least? What if it is
dangerous to be right when the government is wrong? What if it is better to perish
fighting for freedom than to live as a slave? What if freedom's greatest hour of danger is now?
Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for judging freedom. Today is Friday, June 26th,
2006. Anya Parampill, who has not been with us since she recently gave birth to a beautiful baby boy,
joins us now. Anya, congratulations on the new addition to your family. Anything that occupies
Max's time is probably a good thing for the world. But welcome here, my dear friend.
Thank you, Judge. It's good to be back.
Okay. So I want to talk to you about events in Latin America, both Venezuela and Colombia. We'll start with Venezuela. Do we know the magnitude of the deaths, the deaths, the injuries, and the destruction caused by these two earthquakes in Venezuela in the past 96 hours?
We absolutely do not. We just have initial estimates of starting out with roughly 600 dead. Now estimates are putting that closer to nine, though official government statistics, 900. Official government statistics still are around 600 and they say thousands are missing. Other independent groups have touted this number 50,000 missing. That's because at this moment in the epicenter of the destruction, which is LaGuard on.
the capital of LaGuardia State, which is near the capital district of Caracas in Venezuela,
there are reports of hundreds of buildings completely collapsed since these two earthquakes hit
the country seconds apart. I mean, you had apparently one registering about a 7.2 on the Richter scale,
the other a 7.5 coming immediately after. These are earthquakes that haven't been seen in Venezuela for
over a century. Though I will know that La Guira, the city that we are discussing right now is under
the rubble, was the site of another horrific event in 1999 when a massive storm poured so much
water onto the coast that there was a huge landslide, just the mountains pushed tens of thousands
of people into the sea in that moment in 1999. So this is a place that is dealt with tragedy,
natural disasters before, but nothing on the destruction of this scale in terms of the building
collapse and the widespread infrastructure catastrophe. And the issue right now is that because
U.S. sanctions have prevented Venezuela from purchasing the heavy lifting equipment needed
for this kind of disaster response, for days, people were trapped under the rubble. Venezuela actually
did not have the trucks and the equipment needed to rescue people. And so those early hours are so
important in missions like this, because there may still be people that are alive that could be
saved if rubble is properly moved. And unfortunately, that couldn't happen. It's only today
that we see these trucks coming in from El Salvador, from Mexico, from Colombia, and Ecuador,
that this real work of cleanup has begun.
It's pretty much been stalled up to now
with rescue workers complaining
that they don't have the ability
to move the rubble.
And again, this is U.S. sanctions
clearly cut off Venezuela
from purchasing these trucks.
Now you have people in the opposition
in the United States saying
that this is proof of the incompetence
of the government,
as if this government is just so ridiculous
that they wouldn't have.
have these kinds of truck and supplies on demand.
There are plenty of independent experts in studies that demonstrate the sanctions are
responsible for cutting Venezuela off from these supplies.
So how many people died simply because we didn't allow them to have the trucks that are now
arriving at this point?
All right.
So you took the next question out of my mouth, which is the geopolitical dimension to this.
There's a map showing the epicenter of the earthquake.
you can see the blue is the ocean and the green is the land,
and you can see where the earthquake struck.
You can also see, if you look carefully,
to the right of that epicenter is Caracas.
You can see it if you look carefully.
That, of course, is the capital.
So after the United States kidnapped President Maduro
and his wife from their bedroom in the middle of the night,
this is months ago, this is January,
now. They still didn't lift the sanctions?
They have lifted some specialized sanctions to allow for business contracts and oil deals
the way the U.S. government sees fit, but there wasn't a blanket lifting of sanctions.
No. On top of that, there are billions of dollars, I think roughly $30 billion of just
Venezuelan assets frozen in accounts in the United States and abroad that we've basically
stolen since recognizing a shadow government there that we haven't given back to the government.
The IMF has announced a plan to release some frozen Venezuelan assets in order to go toward
disaster relief.
You can assume that that, I mean, with the history of foreign aid groups in Venezuela, it is
usually a pretty corrupt game.
And that's just, I think, what we could expect to come from the contracts that the
US is dictating or going to the players in the United States that our government would like to see
happen. You have already an expose at the gray zone recently published by my husband, where we
discussed how Maricio Claver Carone, a figure who's not even in the Trump administration,
is pretty much acting as a private business negotiator, what he just calls himself the Jared Kushner
of Latin America, pretty much cutting these deals. I'm sure he's going to step in and have a big role to
play in this kind of aid response if the U.S. and its allies are going to be managing it and
releasing assets under those. I would argue that a sanction that prevents a country from buying
life-saving equipment is a war crime. I mean, it's a little late to buy trucks and bulldozers now
three days after the earthquake hit. They should have existed and been possessed by the government
But before that, according to President Trump, the United States was going to take care of Venezuela after we kidnapped its president.
And in some ways, I would say that we are in not in a way that the Venezuelan people have necessarily a say in.
And that is now we're seeing the U.S. consolidating the advances its own military has made in terms of its presence in Venezuela since Maduro was ousted on January 23rd.
Southcom and U.S. military forces have announced that they will be leading the aid response on the ground in Venezuela.
So what you have is a de facto collapse of the state.
The state is unable to respond to the crisis because it's paralyzed, because it doesn't even have control of its international assets, hasn't been allowed to buy proper machinery and equipment.
And now the U.S. military comes in and sets up its aid and distribution.
It's a de facto regime change on the basis of a Chivista government in power.
And what we have to remember, Judge, is that this line was already crossed following the ouster of Maduro on January 3rd.
Since then, the United States conducted a U.S. military strike on sovereign Venezuelan territory,
killing Niño Guerrero, the man that they claim is head of this group, Trenda, Aragua, which you've covered.
we've discussed on this show was a U.S. backed group that wasn't really functioning as a legitimate
narco group, but for some reason became the favored bogeyman of the Trump administration and Marco
Rubio in order to justify continued intervention in Venezuela and bombings off the coast of Venezuela
that led up to Maduro's arrest. And so now the U.S., having conducted that strike, already
clearly a flagrant violation of Venezuelan sovereignty, is using this earthquake.
to increase its presence in Venezuela.
And this is happening at a time, as you mentioned,
when neighboring countries are also suddenly changing course
from acting as independent Latin American nations
to saying, look, we're just going to have our policies
dictated by the State Department.
And I'm talking about Colombia.
I'm talking about Ecuador.
These are countries, Ecuador as well.
that have already begun coordinating with U.S. military operations in their own territory.
So this is something that is set, I think, to expand in the region beyond Venezuela's borders,
perhaps even all the way up to Mexico.
All right. Before we talk about Colombia and the presidential election,
the outcome of which President Trump applauded,
how crippled is or how well is the post-Moduro government,
of Venezuela? Well, no one can deny that Delsi Rodriguez's Maduro's successor is a capable
woman. She's gone on international trips. Her main one to Venezuela, or I'm sorry,
excuse me, India. Her main international first trip was to India, which was kind of an
interesting choice because it's a BRICS nation, but it's pretty much the most pro-US member
of BRICS. And so she went there to basically,
meet with Marco Rubio, the U.S. Secretary of State, Sergio Gore, the U.S. ambassador to India,
because a U.S. visit would have maybe been too shocking at this stage in her presidency.
And in some ways, through this relationship that she has forged with the United States,
in which she had forged prior to Maduro's Alster, she's able to make alliances with business
leaders and apparently even now start making deals with the IMF, which is something that
Nicholas Maduro and the Chavez governments before her weren't necessarily trying to do.
So she in some ways by liberalizing opening up Venezuela's economy might actually experience a temporary
or even a long-term economic boost because Venezuela has been under sanctions all these years
if the U.S. is now saying, okay, we're going to play ball and invest. At this point,
maybe Delci Rodriguez is the person to negotiate and cut those deals.
But there are also people, obviously, that are very upset with the fact that she has opened up to the U.S.
is forging these relationships that seem to be, well, you know, forging ties with the very people who kidnapped her predecessor.
So it's a tricky time for her.
And personally, I'm waiting to see.
But it's definitely fascinating.
Are the Venezuelan people in lockstep with her, or is there a bitterness over the demise of President Maduro?
I shouldn't say demise.
The case against him is nonsense and could very well be dismissed, and he lucked out in the choice of a federal judge
because of any federal judge, I know most of them in that courthouse in Lower Manhattan,
would dismiss this case.
It would be this judge.
But aside from that, we're not here to talk about the defects and the charges against him.
But how is she received by the Venezuelan people as a holdover or as a legitimate president?
I think she's definitely seen as a legitimate president.
There's nobody else that could fulfill her role at this point.
I think that...
What about this crazy lady that got the Nobel Peace Prize that purported...
Oh, she's out of the picture.
Or did they give it to Trump?
Yeah, I think that she's out of the picture.
Maduro's removal pretty much killed the Venezuelan opposition in many ways because now you
have the Chivista government under Delsey doing a lot of the things that maybe the U.S.
would have liked the opposition figures to do, but under the stewardship of Chivismo,
which is the popular political project in the country, they can't get rid of it.
And that is because, to answer your question, are the people with Deli?
Look, I haven't been in Venezuela this time, so I can't say.
What I do know is that the movement of the Venezuelan people, the base of Chavismo, is independent from the state and the government.
There are so many projects, namely their commune movement, which is, you know, the Venezuelan government has a judiciary branch, an executive branch, a legislative branch, and this communal government branch that has actually worked to fund farms that work independent.
and are focused on revitalizing agriculture and food sovereignty in the country,
that as long as the government is able to make money and able to support itself
and maybe even open up and benefit more from this relationship with the U.S.,
those projects will still, as far as we can see right now, function and be maintained,
as well as many of the government projects that make Chavezmo popular.
Let me just interrupt you for a minute.
if you look at your screen, CNN is reporting over 900 dead as rescuers race to find quake victims.
Rescuers without modern construction equipment due to the sanctions not removed imposed by Marco Rubio and company.
Precisely.
And so whether the people are with Delci will be determined by future,
elections or the situation on the ground. I do see a lot of people that are outside of Venezuela
online rushing to denounce her as a traitor and wanting to get passionate and call names at this point.
But I think that the reality of states that are functioning under these conditions, it's far more
complex than people like us on the outside could believe. And I do see reporters in Venezuela who are
are drawing attention to the fact that despite what some people might see as
questionable decisions being made by the government in Caracas, there is still a very
strong movement in support of Chavismo and the projects that it actually provides on the
ground.
Okay.
And so to answer your question, I don't think the overall political project.
Yesterday, as I was ending, as her husband, Max and I were ending our interview because
of another commitment I had, he said on the show,
that there was massive cheating in Colombia, Colombia, by supporters of the person who claims
he's the newly elected president, who of course had the endorsement of President Trump.
What can you tell us about this, Anya?
I was just watching a clip of President Trump before joining your show where he was discussing
the victory of the Colombian presidential candidate, Adelardo de la Esperia.
he goes by Abdelardo, but he was basically this unknown candidate that wasn't registering much in the polls.
And then Trump endorsed him. And he won miraculously. And Gustavo Petro, the incumbent, has alleged massive voter fraud, says that Israel meddled in the elections.
And for some reason, this president-elect is bowing to deepen ties with Israel, perhaps even visit Israel, I believe.
And this follows another pattern in the region where whenever the far right in Latin America takes over, for example, in Argentina, they immediately run and go kiss the wall in Jerusalem.
And, you know, why that happens?
What is the logic there?
What is the connection?
Is it financial?
What could it be?
It is absolutely financial.
In Argentina, there is a history.
of a Jewish group supporting Malay. I mean, the Habad, Lubavich cult there is pretty strong,
influential. They owe, and some of these very Zionist groups own land and mining rights all
throughout the country. So there is that base in Argentina. In Colombia, it also comes down to
the warped ideals of Christian Zionism and evangelical Christianity that have spread throughout Latin
America. That's what drives it in places like Brazil as well. But it really comes down to what
appears to be some sort of odd political, international political alliance. Even in the last
two or three days, Israel has announced that they are sending medical and aid teams to Venezuela,
which is a country that under Chavez broke relations with Israel. So this is a catastrophe. This is a
difficult moment in Venezuela's history. It's hard to sit here and say that Chavez or Maduro absolutely would
have not accepted aid from Israel at this time because we don't know. But it's an interesting question
to ask. Absolutely. I think it is. Back to Columbia and Chris just put a picture of him up. He looks like a very
young man. Is he qualified by intellect, temperament, or experience to be the president of a country?
Is it just some unknown that Trump plucked from out of nowhere?
I'm sure that he didn't come from nowhere.
I would like to know the true story of how he rose to such prominence overnight.
But I can just say based on the fact that he bragged about lighting firecrackers to kittens
and watching them scream, he's not someone that I would elect to run.
Does the Colombian government, the incumbent Colombian government,
recognize him as the legitimate victor, or does the government itself say this election was pulled
off by fraud? Petro is refusing to acknowledge the vote, the vote, the results. Where it goes from here,
I don't know just simply because I don't follow Colombia as closely as Venezuela, but I would assume
that even if there was some massive fraud, that it won't match.
matter and that this figure will take over in Columbia. We've seen this happen so many times before in
Latin America in Honduras, in Bolivia, where fraudulent votes, blatantly fraudulent votes come in
and put in these pro-U.S. candidates and it usually takes prolonged popular action on behalf of the people
protests and organizing. In Honduras, they organized an entirely new political party to challenge a
fraudulent regime in Bolivia, the peasant and farmers actually took up arms and threatened
an armed military revolt and strike against the military dictatorship in Bolivia in order to
defeat that regime. So in Colombia, I assume that it will actually just, you know, power will
change and that the U.S. will increase its militarism and presence in the country, just like it's
doing in Venezuela as we speak.
Wow.
So the United States, one last question, back to Venezuela, if I might on you.
The United States under Donald Trump will use this tragedy of two earthquakes in two minutes
with no construction equipment around to save the lives of those buried as an instrument
to plant American troops permanently on the ground in that country.
without question. And when the state is as incapacitated as it is, again, this provides the U.S.
military with an opportunity to start building its own infrastructure to operate on the ground
in Venezuela. This happened to an extent in Turkey and Syria, actually. You may remember in
23, there was a double earthquake that struck Syria, very similar to the one that we just saw
in Venezuela. And because by then after years of civil war, the Syrian state was so weak and incapacitated
and unable to respond all of these shadow infrastructure, government infrastructure, regime change groups
that the U.S. and its allies had established in the region, such as the white helmets, which we've
covered extensively at the gray zone, stepped in. And so by the time the government fell months later
And Damascus, it was as if the slow regime change takeover had already, it was like a cancer,
kind of took over part of the country and because of this earthquake kicked the state out.
And so I think they, considering the U.S. military was already, again, striking, killing people
on Venezuelan sovereign soil that this will only escalate from here.
And, you know, I've always argued, and one of the main points that I argue in my book about Venezuela, corporate coup, is that it makes sense for the U.S. and Venezuela to be allies.
From the Venezuelan perspective, it doesn't make sense for your allies, your best allies, your best friends to be China, Russia, and Iran, and Turkey.
It should be the United States.
It should just be, it shouldn't have happened like this is what I would say.
It shouldn't have happened under the threat of.
of a gun with the kidnapping of the president,
now with this crisis of the earthquake,
we could have just gotten along,
had some sort of shared vision of development,
but maybe that's a fantasy, I don't know.
Anya, Parenthill, a pleasure to chat with you.
As I said before we came on air,
I was ecstatic when you reached out
and said you wanted to come on and discuss this.
I hope you'll come back and visit with us
on a regular basis.
Sure, my pleasure, Judge.
Nice to talk to you again.
Thank you. All the best.
And coming up later today, if you're watching us live in 34 minutes at 4 o'clock Eastern,
the Intelligence Community Roundtable with Larry Johnson and Ray McGovern.
Judge the Palatano for Judging Freedom.
