Judging Freedom - [BREAKING NEWS EXCLUSIVE ] - Max Blumenthal Reports: : Charlie Kirk and the Israel Lobby!
Episode Date: September 15, 2025[BREAKING NEWS EXCLUSIVE ] - Max Blumenthal Reports: : Charlie Kirk and the Israel Lobby!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/pri...vacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Don't let an expensive wireless bill disrupt your summer plans.
As you map out beach getaways, backyard gatherings, and long weekends,
your wireless bill shouldn't be a source of stress.
With Mint Mobile, you get the reliable coverage and high-speed performance you're used to
at a significantly lower cost.
For a limited time, Mint is offering three months of unlimited premium wireless service
for just $15 a month, while others are dealing.
with overage fees and surprise charges, you can enjoy peace of mind and more money in your
pocket. Say goodbye to overpriced plans and hello to simple, straightforward wireless service.
Every Mint mobile plan includes high-speed data, unlimited talk and text, and access to the
nation's largest 5G network. Plus, you can keep your current phone number and contacts.
Make the switch and get three months of unlimited service for just $15 a month.
This year, skip breaking a sweat and breaking the bank.
Get this new customer offer and your three-month unlimited wireless plan for just $15 a month at mintmobile.com slash freedom.
That's mintmobile.com slash freedom.
Up front payment of $45 required.
That's an equivalent to $15 a month.
Limited time new customer offer for first three months only.
Speeds may slow above 35 gigabytes on unlimited.
plan. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details.
Hi, everyone, Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom.
Today is Monday, September 15, 2025. Max Blumenthal is here with the report of his latest
investigations on the events leading up to the murder of Charlie Kirk. Max, you've been doing
unbelievable investigative reporting. What have you learned? Well, following my September 12th report,
which provided background about the pressure, the mounting pressure that Charlie Kirk was under
from pro-Israel forces, from Netanyahu's cutouts in the United States, I gathered more details.
The piece, it hit like a sledgehammer. It really caused a lot of
lot of, I think it spoke for a lot of people, particularly within the conservative movement,
which is changing among the youth on the question of Israel. And more people started coming out,
and more people started talking, and people were talking to me. And these were people who
had knowledge of a tumultuous, stormy meeting held in the Hamptons during the first week of August,
convened, according to multiple sources, with knowledge of this meeting, intimate knowledge of
this meeting, by the billionaire ultra-Zionist financier Bill Ackman, who is close to Netanyahu
and his kind of network in the United States. Charlie Kirk was summoned, along with
an array of young, sort of vapid, very avaricious conservative influencers who,
seem to be sort of in Israel's back pocket, to set a very pro-Israel tone for this meeting.
And Charlie Kirk was, according to one source, hammered by Ackman and others,
for allowing Israel critics very prominent conservative voices like Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson,
or the anti-Zionist Jewish comedian Dave Smith, to appear at his events.
And actually, Charlie Kirk was.
planning to host many of these same figures again in December. And he had just added to his
TPSA major, I think it's called America Fest in December, the premier critic of Israel in Congress.
I didn't say Republican critic. I just said premier critic, because that's what she is now,
Marjorie Taylor Green, which really reflected his shifting views. And Ackman, according to multiple
sources had this meeting to basically bully Charlie Kirk into submission. Charlie Kirk walked
away, according to one person, feeling like there was an attempt to blackmail him. He refused
any offers of funding and also refused the offer to travel to Israel and meet with Netanyahu,
which Netanyahu disclosed in the wake, the immediate wake of Netanyahu's death. He talked about
this letter, but he didn't say whether Charlie Kirk refused or accepted. I've learned since
that he refused. And then beyond that, he was becoming so alienated by this crowd of pro-Israel
enforcers that he was moving away from the Protestant church. This is what I've been told.
Candice Owens just disclosed this on her live stream. And he, he,
You know, he was a Protestant who has a young conservative voice.
And, you know, I believe in evangelical Christian.
He was a Christian nationalist by his own words.
Yes.
And he was pushing the idea of this Judeo-Christian alliance.
And that was like music to the ears of the pro-Israel funders.
But now he was starting to attend Catholic Mass with his wife, Erica,
and moving in a different direction, what Candice Owens called a spiritual transformation,
And the Catholics just don't have that same conceptualization of American Christian nationalism
and the Judeo-Christian alliance.
Correct.
This has never been, I don't think it's been reported before.
So he was undergoing a transformation, a singular figure in the Trump world, unreplaceable,
sort of a unique figure in that world.
And he was moving on this question.
And there really wasn't anything they could do.
to stop him because you couldn't just, I mean, I'm sure there would have been an attempt
and there already was through figures like Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin at Fox News to attack him
and sort of suggest maybe he should be removed. But you can't really just remove someone like that
who's built this entire gigantic infrastructure around himself. So we really don't know where
things would have gone. But these two stories together, I think paint a picture of a, it's
It's a wider history of where the conservative movement itself is going.
And the astroturfing from pro-Israel 1 percenters to prevent that.
This will undermine Trump's support on this issue substantially.
So his good buddy, the vice president of the United States, is a Catholic convert.
Candice Owens is a Catholic convert.
Mrs. Kirk is a born and raised Roman Catholic.
like this probably terrified the Christian nationalists, the Mike Huckabee types,
and their wealthy American, mainly New York, Zionist financiers.
Do we know from your sources what Kirk himself thought of Netanyahu?
Did he feel intimidated by Netanyahu?
Yes, absolutely.
And I think the reason that people,
initially anyone initially started talking to me was that Netanyahu came out while Charlie Kirk's
body was still warm and started lying about him and trying to recast him as his best friend. Now,
it's true. Charlie Kirk was until fairly recently, certainly before October 7, 2023, the most
important Gentile asset that Israel might have had today, possibly more important than Trump,
because Charlie Kirk was preaching the pro-Israel gospel to young people,
and he was potentially on his way to becoming president or senator,
someone very important to Israel.
So he, as soon as he starts to make some noises after October 7th about Israel's misdeeds,
but particularly about Israel's malign influence in Washington.
and then he experienced the pressure from pro-Israel donors like Bill Ackman, Netanyahu enters the picture.
And Charlie Kirk, according to a longtime friend of his, who I spoke to, considered Netanyahu a disgusting bully who is a manipulator and was fundamentally dishonest.
And this stands at complete odds with the picture Netanyahu has tried to paint in not just one, but I think five or maybe six tweets since Charlie Kirk.
was killed. And additionally, I mean, I think it's important to recognize what Netanyahu was doing.
He was trying to do the same thing he did after 9-11 when the Israeli publication Ma'ariv reported
in 2008 that Netanyahu said 9-11 is good for Israel. And he thought that Charlie,
he wanted to exploit Charlie Kirk's killing in a way that benefited Israel by pushing a narrative of
religious warfare and Islamophobia inside the U.S., and he blamed Islam and radical Muslims
and the left for killing Charlie Kirk before the suspect was even known, before anyone had even
been caught. And so the truth and the reality about Charlie Kirk's relationship with Netanyahu
turns Netanyahu's whole sectarian militaristic narrative on its head.
here's uh charlie kirk in august talking to mgan kelly my friend and former colleague uh about the people that are
attacking him chris cut number 14 i think i have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of
israel both on campus on social media to to great you know let's just say mockery and
scorn at times where I, because I believe it. However, Megan, you're hitting on something very
potent and important. Now, let me first say, I don't want to judge an entire group because there's
been many people in the per Israel world that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced,
very Charlie. You know, you're with us. You don't have to agree all the time. However, and I will
say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me
away. My moral character is now being put into question, Megan.
Not my decisions, not like, hey, are you doing this?
Is it smart or is it dumb?
But no, I am a bad person if I do this.
And I could go.
I mean, you saw it, Megan, it was trending on Twitter, thousands of tweets and text messages.
And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say, the people that are attacking me are in a hyper paranoid state because they're at war.
And war tends to make things black and white.
And you're a hammer looking for a nail.
So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan.
Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can, right?
I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do.
And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan?
That's not right.
Personality types, like you, myself and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated, right?
Megan, it would be one thing if it was one text or two texts.
It is dozens of texts.
When the hostile reaction is that now Megan and Charlie are enemies,
boy, I'll tell you, like, you're not going to, you're not going to,
I wouldn't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues.
Right about the time that he was summoned to the Hamptons by.
Ackman then company.
Yeah, I believe that was August 6th when he said that.
I struggled to pinpoint the precise date of the meeting, but it was right around
that time because I managed to dredge up Instagram photos from some of the influencers
who I confirmed to be at the meeting, especially photos by someone named Xavier de Rousseau,
who I'd say very few people watching this have probably heard of.
No, I've never heard of him.
I hadn't heard much about him before.
I reached him on the phone.
Like everyone else who attended this meeting that I reached,
he was flustered, freaked out by my call,
immediately went silent.
He was kind of in a state of panic.
They're all nervous about being identified with this meeting.
Xavier de Rousseau is a employee of Prager-Ur,
which is this conservative indoctrination
outlet that focuses on youth, including young people.
This is another Christian nationalist gaggle.
Run by Marissa Strait, who is a Jewish Zionist who served in Israel's Unit 8200
cyber spying division.
And Xavier de Rousseau was sent with Israeli government money to a Gaza humanitarian foundation
site two weeks after that meeting in the Hamptons where he mocked the famine.
in Gaza, in very disgusting fashion, said Hamas leaders are on Ozmpic because they're getting
so fat off all the food they're getting. And that's his role. That's the role of many of the
other influencers who are sent there and kind of like, that's what Charlie Kirk was surrounded
by there, along with Bill Ackman, who apparently organized this entire thing, who has been
just since October 7th, strong arming his way through institutions across this country to bully them
into pro-Israel submission, and apparently his next target was Charlie Kirk because of what
Charlie Kirk was doing at TPUSA, specifically allowing Tucker Carlson to come on stage and referring to
Bill Ackman as a Jeffrey Epstein associate who was a scam artist and a charlatan who had made his
money through nebulous means. And so it all kind of fits together.
Why do you think Netanyahu felt the need to go?
go on national television and expressly deny Israel assassinated, Kirk? I mean, who does that?
Yeah. Why do millions of people? I mean, you see it all over social media. They think Israel had
some involvement because of the way they've been conducting themselves around the world and the region.
Netanyahu's not just waging a seven front war. He's carrying out an assassination spree in broad daylight all across
the region, including inside a U.S. ally. And you have this record of Charlie Kirk, which backs up
everything I heard on background, going out in public. And you can see he's anguished. He's angry.
He's almost like on the verge of going crazy because he's under so much pressure from Netanyahu's
cutouts in the United States. So, you know, people are taking the reality and to another level
where it's an unsubstantiated theory.
I have no evidence that Israel had any role in Charlie Kirk's assassination,
but they're taking it there because of what they know about Israel
and its capabilities and its ruthlessness.
And along with the fact that the official story just keeps collapsing
and is so murky and filled with contradictions
that no one knows really what to make of any of this.
Did you learn from your sources?
if Kirk believed that President Trump
was frightened of Benjamin Netanyahu?
Well, I didn't, I don't know what Kirk thought,
and I've never met him even though I've been following him
for about 10 years.
One of my sources knows people in the White House.
I mean, the Trump White House is very accessible, I should say.
I mean, I've gotten sources in there, like very good sources.
And I can tell you some of the things that they've been saying, but this one particular source
set has said that, and this is something I've been hearing around Trump's circle for years.
Trump was always afraid of assassination because of all the attacks that he was under
because he was always compared to Hitler and so on.
Then he faces a real assassination attempt.
So, of course, he's afraid of that.
He's very afraid of Netanyahu and his capabilities.
And during one of Netanyahu's many trips to Washington this year,
Israeli agents placed electronic devices on Secret Service emergency response vehicles on two separate occasions.
This is what the source told me with very good.
Did the Secret Service arrest these Israeli agents?
They found the devices.
And this is what I was told by a Trump insider.
So I can't call up, if I called up the Secret Service and asked them to confirm this, they just wouldn't even acknowledge it.
It's not something that's going to happen.
But there's a precedent there.
The precedent is in 2019, three high-ranking former U.S. officials told Politico that Israel had done the exact same thing, placing stingray cell phone surveillance devices around the White House and in sensitive locations throughout Washington to surveil Donald Trump's phone communication.
Now, who would get access to those locations, first of all? You can't just send, you know,
Shlomo Mossad up in there. He's not going to get access. But Benjamin Netanyahu has access and his own
security team. And actually in 2017, Boris Johnson, the former Israeli prime minister, wrote in his
memoir that Netanyahu went into his personal toilet and left a surveillance device, a listening device,
that British security, his personal security, found a listening device after Netanyahu used his
personal toilet. This was reported in the telegraph, the British telegraph, which is a pro-Israel
publication. So I would just, I would have just dismissed this, but there's just such a strong
precedent there. And it frightens people inside the White House when you have this foreign
intelligence agency, which is carrying out a genocide, which basically funds your campaigns
through cutouts like Miriam Adelson.
Netanyahu was calling it into the White House
demanding personnel changes all the time.
That's what I've heard.
And you think you can defy them
and not provide them weapons.
When they are in this war that they think
is the most important existential war
in the history of Israel,
no, you can't just do that.
So it stands to reason that Trump is afraid,
and that's what I was told by an insider
with access to Trump.
You think more is going to come out on all this?
I mean, you've been researching this since Charlie was murdered for four days now.
Well, it's not just, it's after I put out the first story,
I just started getting more information that I never expected to have
that dovetailed with rumors that I was seeing on social media and provided detail to
them. And this, I think, is kind of just, it's a history about this U.S. Israel special
relationship that's being uncovered right now that shows just how it's collapsed,
is completely collapsed. Because I think when you lose Charlie Kirk, I don't mean physically,
but when they lost him politically, or if they lost him politically and he starts refusing
your funding, refusing Netanyahu's offer to fund his organization to the Hilt, which was
what I told he did, then you've lost the game. Did he refuse to fly to Israel and meet with
Netanyahu? That's what I was told. And that's what Candice Owens, who was a lot closer to Charlie
Kirk than me, just said on her live stream that he rejected that offer. So Netanyahu delivered
a video eulogy to Charlie Kirk and held this.
letter that he said he sent him, inviting him to Israel to Jerusalem two weeks before his death,
why would you do that if Charlie Kirk refused? Like how much of a sick sociopath do you have to be?
But then again, Bill Ackman, the day after Charlie Kirk was killed, took to Twitter X to declare
that he had a meal this summer with Charlie Kirk and spent time with him and he was a giant of a man.
I mean, how deranged do you have to be to say that when the reality was,
that this was described as an intervention in which Charlie Kirk was hammered by Bill Ackman
and put under all this pressure, which poured out into that Megan Kelly interview.
I mean, we're not dealing, we're dealing with real sociopaths here.
Max, you are second to none when it comes to the skullduggery you go through,
your personal courage and your understanding of all of these profound issues
and interrelated factors here.
I can't thank you enough.
I know you're going to be doing some other things for a day or so,
but if more of this comes out and you want this audience,
please let us know you have it at your disposal.
Let me just say one thing that I've been hearing
from a Trump administration source,
like someone who's in the white,
a Trump administration official,
and I've heard this from other areas close to the Trump administration,
which is that they don't really feel like they're hearing enough from the FBI.
The FBI is not being transparent.
And that's the way that the American people feel about this.
And so the longer that goes on...
Oh, transparent over what?
They're not sharing information.
They're not like they want to see like video of the muzzle flash from the roof
and see where the shot came from.
And since that's not forthcoming, even at the highest level, the public is becoming more,
I hate to say it, but conspiratorial.
And this is just going to fester until we get some answers.
So what we need are answers and we need a real investigation into this.
And we need a real investigation into the Ryan Ruth assassination attempt since he was connected to Ukraine and its International Legion and was having
meetings on Capitol Hill. It's very strange how that one was buried, as well as the
Butler Pennsylvania shooting. That one just kind of went away. Do the people in the White
House fear that Robinson did not pull the trigger that propelled the fatal shot?
I think that anyone who's not getting answers who's in the administration has a lot of
suspicion and questions about what's going on. But let me again say, I'm totally content to
believe the official story if it's proven, if it's demonstrated, if we get some evidence.
But where is that? And additionally, I have no evidence that Israel played any role. I'm not here
saying that. But consider how the public is going to react here when we live in this digital
panopticon where everything around us is filmed through active or
passive surveillance, cell phones were everywhere filming Charlie Kirk along with real cameras
and we still have missing angles.
So about two hours ago, Dan Bongino told Fox News that they're looking for an accomplice.
I don't even know who to trust.
I mean, do we trust this podcaster guy?
But yeah, he's a podcaster guy, but he's number two in the FBI.
Yeah, I mean, he's certainly.
unhappy, but he's there. And Cash Patel said that there was a manifesto left by Tyler Robinson,
but it has disappeared or destroyed, and they're going to try to forensically reconstruct it.
Look, everything could come together by tomorrow. But right now, it's not, there, there isn't,
there isn't enough there to clearly convict a lone wolf shooter. And therefore, the public
is going to develop its own theories.
Thank you, Max.
Thanks for all your work.
Thanks for the privilege of having you break this news right here,
a forum that is always available to you,
even though you have your own enormous forum.
My best view and your family.
Thanks a lot, Judge.
Of course.
Well, coming up tomorrow on all of this at 8 in the morning,
Ambassador Chaz Freeman at 11 in the morning,
Max's wonderful colleague,
Aaron Mate at three in the afternoon, Colonel Karen Koukowski, and all of your judging freedom
favorites by the end of the week. Judge Napolitano for judging freedom.
Thank you.