Judging Freedom - Durham Report Filing - How Far Up the Chain Does This Conspiracy Go?

Episode Date: February 16, 2022

Special Counsel John Durham latest filing contains information that the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign effort to discover dirt on Donald Trump reached into protected White House communications and to a Trump NYC apartment. Mr. Trump & President Trump Was Indeed Spied On. This is my appearance on InfoWars 2/15/22.#Trump #Durhamreport #HillarySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Well, I don't know about the indictments because some of these crimes have a five-year statute of limitations, and much of this happened in 2016. So do the math. We're beyond the five years, which means Hillary herself may skate. However, if this was a conspiracy, and apparently it was, and if John Durham can report it, the five years is measured when the crime is completed, not when the crime started. So it would depend how far into the Trump administration the conspiracy extended. If the conspiracy ended on election day, it's too late to do anything about it. But it appears from the documents that John Durham filed on Friday afternoon, that the conspiracy did not end on election day. It appears that there was a conversation in the Oval Office after Trump was elected, in which President Obama himself participated, and discussions were had about using federal

assets to spy on him. And there are two very interesting people present there besides President Obama. One is Jake Sullivan, who was Mrs. Clinton's chief intelligence advisor on spying and intelligence matters. He's now President Joe Biden's National Security Director. He has the highest national security clearance in the country. It's the same as the president's. The other interesting person there was Vice President Joe Biden. Now, this, of course, was four years ago. Was he part, Alex, was he part of the conspiracy to undermine Donald Trump's presidency by using federal assets?

But what Durham is saying is this continued on into the White House. And if you look at this and the things they said and did, I mean, I think I think that's where Durham's going. What do you think's happening? I think that's where he's going as well. And he very well, very well may be targeting the former president, Barack Obama. I mean, if Barack Obama convened a group of people, if he convened a group of people in the Oval Office, which included Jack Brennan, whom you see there, then the head of the CIA, Jim Comey, the head of the FBI, Mrs. Clinton, Joe Biden, Jake Sullivan and himself. And they agreed to use the assets of the federal government to spy on and thus undermine the president elect who was about to become the president of the United States. Then we have a very, very serious problem on our hands in terms of the vaccines. I've been campaigning against them for a long time. It's not a vaccine, as serious problem on our hands. In terms of the vaccines, I've been campaigning

against them for a long time. It's not a vaccine, as you have said. A vaccine gives you a small dose of the disease. Your body fights it off. You have the immunity and the antibodies forever. This is a chemical cocktail, which is an experiment at lessening the effects of the disease. It doesn't prevent you from getting it. It doesn't prevent you from getting it. It doesn't prevent you from transmitting it. The Supreme Court has ruled several times, you control your own body. You decide what goes into it. The government of the United States of America signed a treaty called the Nuremberg Protocols, which prohibit the use of government compulsion to take experimental chemicals into the body. So we are on very solid ground legally and morally, but big government, big pharma,

and big medicine have persuaded the public that they are right and we are wrong. So again, it takes courage. The truck drivers in Canada have to be courageous. People like you need to be courageous. People listening to us now need to recognize that they decide what goes in their bodies, not Dr. Fauci and not the government. today ladies and gentlemen is one of the last days you've got we've been able to extend it till wednesday and then 100 it's going to end and that's 25 off last night was the last day they extended it three days nobody else since their distributors gets this deal 25 off on the entire MyPatriotSupply catalog

exclusively at preparewithalex.com. That's a subdomain of infowarsstore.com. So follow preparewithalex.com that takes you right to the special page

with the full raft of hundreds and hundreds of different types of great quality food with the best packaging ready to store, ready to save, ready to ship,

ready to eat. Infowarsstore.com or preparewithalex.com or 888-253-3139. And it will end on Wednesday evening. X3 is already halfway sold out. It will stay on sale for another week at 50% off. That's so good for your immune system and everything else. And it funds the Infowar. And a bunch of other sales end Wednesday as well at Infow infowarestore.com all right we've got him for

the rest of the hour and i'm really really excited former judge former top fox news host completely vindicated on spying on trump got suspended at fox for saying this four plus years ago and then that was the slow decline they kind of locked him up and we didn't hear much from him then i predicted when it happened they would wait till people forgot about him by shutting him down and then get rid of him. Totally vindicated a real hero. The Durham investigation will be able to lay it all out on the other side or here in just a moment. But I wanted to play a short compilation of him back in the time, 2017, doing what no other mainstream media person would do. Tell the truth. Here it is.

Former judge and frequent Fox News contributor Andrew Napolitano has reportedly been taken off the air for now. Multiple outlets say Napolitano has been sidelined at Fox for repeating on-air unverified claims that former President Obama asked UK intelligence to spy on Trump Tower. Did Barack Obama spy on Donald Trump when President Obama was in the White House and President Trump was Mr. Trump running for office? Well, we don't really know the answer to that. Sources have told Fox News that President Obama could very easily have and probably did use a foreign intelligence service to gather this information for him. Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He used GCHQ. What the heck is GCHQ? That's the initials for the British

spying agency. Both White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer and President Trump defended accusations against Obama by pointing to Napolitano. Fox News' Shepard Smith walked back Napolitano's claim shortly thereafter. Shepard Smith, Fox News, cannot confirm Judge Napolitano's commentary. Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now President of the United States was surveilled at any time, in any way, full stop. All right, so four plus years later, Judge Napolitano totally vindicated.

We're about two minutes from break. But, sir, I know you're not about vindicating yourself, but we could see you getting penalized, shut down, and then removed from air for telling the truth and going after Obama, Hillary, the whole deep state. Now you, I mean, you are like going to be the image of the dictionary next to the word vindication now. Thanks for joining us on short notice, Judge. You're very kind to say that, Alex. And thank you for running those old clips when my hair was a little darker.

Look, I mean, I woke up yesterday morning like everybody else did. I hadn't paid attention to what durham had filed over the weekend but we now know that a significant arm of the federal government armed with fbi agents and cia agents used federal assets to spy on mr donald trump during his presidential campaign and on president don Donald Trump after he was already the president of the United States. We now know that and the federal government of the United States acknowledges it. And if it has to, is prepared to prove it in court in the case against Michael Sussman. Is that the craziest thing in your career? I mean, in my life, I've never seen anything like this. This is crazy. Well, it was crazy because nobody would accept it.

Nobody wanted to accept it. People came to me and begged to me, you owe President Obama an apology. For what? Three months later, five GCHQ, that's British intelligence agents, went to the Guardian of London, a left-wing publication, and said, that judge in New York is correct. We didn't personally do it, but we know who did. So there was somewhat of a vindication then. The United States government, the Obamaama administration still didn't accept it but uh the filing from john uh durham on friday afternoon is so definitive there's no way he could have made that filing unless he has the absolute proof uh to substantiate it and of course it gets deeper and i was about to say it gets deeper sir please stay there we're right back you're gonna have the floor

we're so honored to have you because this is so big of the future of our country to expose this bureaucratic coup. We'll be right back. Well, I got to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I am starstruck right now because I've always loved Judge Knapp, watching him decades on TV. I got to interview him before and hang out with him some in New York. But now that he's vindicated and been punished and basically taken off the air for telling the truth, he was suspended and then phased out for exposing illegal deep state spying. And now we know it wasn't just the British. It wasn't just these private corporations. But then

the government was involved and the wheels are coming off this. And we're just blessed to have him here to lay this all out. Be sure and bookmark his site and find his weekday show judgenap.com judgenap.com uh judge i wonder i'm not going to criticize fox news or others but are they going to have you on for a victory lap now that you're so incredibly vindicated uh i mean that's probably a tongue-in-cheek question but you were saying this is a huge deal it certainly is explain to us why this is so definitive and what this Durham investigation means. And now the former head of national intelligence and all these folks say dozens of more indictments are coming out because they, quote, gave Durham the documents. What does all this mean?

Well, I don't know about the indictments because some of these crimes have a five-year statute of limitations, and much of this happened in 2016. So do the math. We're beyond the five years, which means Hillary herself may skate. However, if this was a conspiracy, and apparently it was, and if John Durham can report it, the five years is measured when the crime is completed, not when the crime started. So it would depend how far into the Trump administration the conspiracy extended. If the conspiracy ended on election day, it's too late to do anything about it. But it appears from the documents that John Durham filed on Friday afternoon that the conspiracy did not end on Election Day. It appears that there was a conversation in the Oval Office after Trump was elected, in which President Obama himself participated, and discussions were had about using federal

assets to spy on him. And there are two very interesting people present there besides President Obama. One is Jake Sullivan, who was Mrs. Clinton's chief intelligence advisor on spying and intelligence matters. He's now President Joe Biden's national security director. He has the highest national security clearance in the country. It's the same as the president's. The other interesting person there was Vice President Joe Biden. Now, this, of course, was four years ago. Was he part, Alex, was he part of the conspiracy to undermine Donald Trump's presidency by using federal assets. You know, you can compare this to Watergate. Watergate was the use of private assets paid for by the Republican National Committee to break into

an office and seize proof of who was having sex with whom and who was paying who off. This is the use of federal assets. Jim Comey, all the way on the left there, John Brennan, head of the FBI at the time, John Brennan, all the way on the right there, head of the CIA at the time. So this is, according to Durham, the use of federal assets to undermine a presidency. Now, that is a half dozen different crimes there. It would just depend upon when these crimes were committed or when this conspiracy ended or how much fortitude Durham has and who he goes after. So there's been a lot of criticism of Durham taking years and years. But to me,

I'm not a famous judge like you or a legal scholar, but this is like a super big, ballsy move to do this with Merrick Garland as the attorney general and all this. I mean, this is like the hydrogen bomb effect because we knew it was going on. I should ask you how you knew from your sources, but we had our sources. We were talking about it, too. But this is just such a big deal. This has got a really concern, as you said, not just Hillary, but clearly this goes above that. Well, you know, it does. And i know you want to talk about this eventually why why isn't the media covering this why are why is infowars and newsmax and fox news and the wall street journal exactly i should have said that

first no one's covering the i mean this makes watergate look like a child's play. I mean, this is huge. It does. Yes, it does. This should be, never mind my allegations against the Obama administration, this is proof from a federal prosecutor. This should be on the front page, top of the fold of the same Washington Post that brought Richard Nixon down and the same New York Times that claims it's the standard in American journalism, but you haven't heard a peep about them. You haven't heard it on CNN or MSNBC or CNBC or any of the networks. They think and hope that by ignoring this, it will go away. Now, it could go away if Michaelael sussman pleads guilty that's the lawyer accused of lying to the fbi who was a lawyer for hillary clinton's campaign because he pleaded not guilty and

there will be a trial this stuff will come out at the trial now i gotta say a word about the crime that sussman's charged with i don't believe it should be a crime to lie to the FBI. Why? Because the Supreme Court has said the FBI can lie to you. Well, if the FBI can lie to you, you should be able to lie to them. They're not morally superior to you. But I am wrong. The law is what it is. If you lie to the FBI in an official inquiry, you can be indicted and prosecuted. That's what happened to Sussman. And Judge, let me interrupt you because I indicted and prosecuted. That's what happened to Sussman. And Judge, let me interrupt you because I'm always interested about this. That's why I won't talk to the FBI. I won't talk to the Jan 6th Committee. It's not that I'm going to lie. It's that they're

going to say I'm a liar and indict me. So it's not just that you can't lie to them. They then say you're lying and play little split hairs games. When did that become the law that you can't lie to the FBI? Oh, I don't know, but it's been the law for a long time, and the FBI will use it to the hilt. In the Martha Stewart case, in the same conversation in which she lied to them, they lied to her. The FBI agent who lied to her got a promotion. She went to jail. She was convicted of lying. This is considered a low-level crime. The maximum penalty is just a year in jail. To a lawyer, it's devastating because you'll lose your license to practice. But the committee that you talk about sought you. In the Sussman case, he sought the FBI.

He knocked on the door and said, I have to come to you. I have devastating information about this guy, Donald Trump, and his connections to Russia. Question, are you representing the Hillary Clinton campaign? Oh, no, no, no, no. I have this from he lied. And he had the conversation with his now former friend, Peter Baker, who was the general counsel of the FBI. Normally, you don't get to talk to the general counsel about this evidence. But when you're a high ranking, big shot Washington, D.C. lawyer, and the general counsel is your friend and you want to feed him some nonsense, that's the guy you go to. Wow. We're going to go to break and come back. This is just riveting. Judge Andrew Napolitano, I know you want to make this about yourself, but just in 50 seconds here, I mean, how did you know all this stuff? I guess sources?

Because you've been proven right. Well, yes, I had sources. One of my sources outed himself, and the New York Times went for his jugular. But something of this magnitude, you have to verify it to three levels. So in addition to the source who outed himself, I had two other sources who were able to verify what I said before I said it. Wow. Judge Andrew Napolitano is with us. You've got to bookmark his site and watch his show.

I watch it all the time, judgenap.com. And, man, I just thought of him instantly this weekend when this all broke. I was like, oh, my gosh. Because, I mean, he was one of the top guys at Fox. As soon as he covered this, bloop, they phased his ass out. And that's what people pay for to tell the truth. We'll be right back. He's a hero. Well, completely vindicated, the capital V, Judge Andrew Napolitano joins us.

The minute in 2017, he covered illegal spying against the Trump campaign and President Trump from his sources. They suspended him and then basically pulled him off TV until he was finally let go. And that was the reason for that. We could all see it. And he's a tough guy. He's not whining about it. He wants to just talk about the current news and how big this is. But wow, Clinton campaign paid to infiltrate Judge Napolitano broke all this.

Again, Trump campaign paid to infiltrate Trump Tower. White House servers to link Trump to Russia, Durham fines. And he's got the evidence. And he's indicted the Clinton lawyer. And we know all this went on. And as you said, they outed themselves. They had a New York Times article on January 20, 2017, where they bragged that they had wiretapped Trump and claimed that was the evidence he was a Russian, but there was no evidence. So that was the first outing.

Then Napolitano dug into it and found out more. So I could ask a thousand questions, Judge, but in the 25 minutes we've got left, I'd like to just give you the floor, just the run of this show, as the guy that tried to stop this deep state coup against America on what's currently happening,

how you think they're going to respond back to this, what does Hillary? What does Obama do? Because what do you call this? That's my first question in this segment. Do we call it Obama spygate, Hillary spygate? Do we call this a deep state coup against America? What do we call this scandal of scandals? You know, that's a good question. Somebody who's good at this stuff will put a handle on it and that handle will last. But the law will call this a conspiracy and an agreement to break laws. And that's really the danger to Mrs. Clinton, because if this conspiracy continued on into 2017, probably up to the time that President Trump fired Jim Comey, which is May of 17, well, that's fewer than five years ago. Five years is the statute of limitations. So the statute begins to run when the crime is committed. If you pull a

trigger and kill somebody, that's when the crime is committed. But if it takes that person two or three months to die, the statute of limitations doesn't start to run until they die. If you have a conspiracy to interfere with a valid election of a president of the United States, I'm talking about the election of Donald Trump in 2016, and that conspiracy continues into 2017, even after he's the president. Well, that is fewer than five years ago, because the statute of limitations is five years. So those who are breathing a sigh of relief probably have more to worry about than they think they do. When John Ratcliffe, the former congressman from Texas and former director of national intelligence under Donald Trump, told my former colleagues at Fox News just this past weekend that there may be some indictments coming, I'm pretty sure. That's Ratcliffe. I'm pretty sure that's what he was talking about.

So if Mrs. Clinton and Jake Sullivan and John Brennan and Jim Comey entered into an agreement in the fall of 2016, and that agreement carried into the presidency of Donald Trump until Comey was fired in May of 2017. Well, May of 2017 is fewer than five years ago. So Durham then has time to present all of this to a grand jury and ask them to indict. On the other hand, if the conspiracy ended at the election of Donald Trump in November of 16, well, then those who want to see these characters prosecuted are out of luck. But what Durham is saying is this continued on into the White House. And if you look at this and the things they said and did, I mean, I think

that's where Durham's going. What do you think is happening? I think that's where he's going as well. And he very well may be targeting the former president, Barack Obama. I mean, if Barack Obama convened a group of people, if he convened a group of people in the Oval Office, which included Jack Brennan, whom you see there, then the head of the CIA, Jim Comey, the head of the FBI, Mrs. Clinton, Joe Biden, Jake Sullivan, and himself, and they agreed to use the assets of the federal government to spy on and thus undermine the president-elect, who was about to become the president of the United States, then we have a very, very serious problem on our hands. Now, let me suggest this to you. We know the spying was going on at least up until the time of the inauguration, because two days after the inauguration is the

FBI's infamous visit to General Flynn in his office in the White House. And they were able to ask him questions and get him to contradict what they knew he had said on the phone to the Russian ambassador just a week or so before. So were they spying on the Russian ambassador or spying on General Flynn after he was announced he was going to be the national security advisor to then-President-elect Trump? Or were they spying on both? I know you don't like to speculate, but just as a guy that's been around the block a few times, gut level, where do you think this goes? Who do you think is most concerned? Because I remember things like Jim Comey testifyingifying to congress i never talked to the press i'm not involved in leaking

and later well i did call the head of a major university so he could tell the press well that's the same thing if i'm a mafia boss and i tell my underling to go have somebody killed i'm just as guilty so i don't get out comey tells Congress, I never leaked. I just leaked through somebody else. That doesn't make sense. Well, look, John Durham would have been unwise to have filed the document that he did last Friday laying all this out. A, if he couldn't prove it, and B, if he wasn't prepared to prove it, because he doesn't really need to go through this just to prove that this fellow Michael Sussman told a lie to the then general counsel of the FBI. You know, there's one thing about prosecutors, and this is good and bad. They always like to

prove their worth. I mean, it is the rare prosecutor that spends a fortune that's durham that spends a fortune in government money to investigate and then doesn't indict because then he's got to justify what the hell did you spend all that money on so you're saying they have their case and just like a mafia case they're going after the clinton lawyer and then to clinton and then to obama you know brennan all the deep state players i think there there's a rational argument to support that, Alex. You said it better than I could. Look, just in those days when I made these allegations about the Brits spying on Trump. Well, there's Jim Clapper in the middle.

Now, he skated. He lied under oath when he was asked by a liberal Democratic Senator Wyden from Oregon, does the government spy on Americans? And he said no. And then he said not wittingly. And then about a month or so later, he in a letter apologized and admitted he had lied under oath and they decided not to prosecute him that event was well more than five years ago but that was public perjury over information that we all knew he was lying about the questioner senator wyden knew he was lying about it anybody that followed edward snowden knew that he was lying about it. But here's what I was saying before your producers put up the photograph of Jim Clapper. The concept that prosecutors need to justify their worth is well known in the legal community.

Durham is a lifelong prosecutor. I don't think he would have put that stuff out there last Friday if he didn't intend to demonstrate it. And if Sussman pleads guilty, then Durham's only forum in which to demonstrate this will be a trial against somebody else whom he has yet to indict. And the whole question is statute of limitations. But if you get into ongoing, you know they were spying after that. That will lead to the later spying during the four years of Trump. And then now it's a bunch of other investigations. Judge Andrew Napolitano is on fire and is the Phoenix vindicated.

I mean, wow. I remember when he came out and said they were spying on Trump with evidence. I said, that guy's not going to be on air very long. And he wasn't. But he is still on air and regrowing his show. We really support him and appreciate him. We'll be right back. Stay with us.

Well, you know, I admire people that are male, female, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, old, young. You know who they are? They're the trailblazers. They're the mavericks. They're the people that time and time again I watch and listen to or observe in life who are being truthful, that are being honest, and that really know what they're talking about. That's who I admire. More and more, though, the corporate media is dying. Even Fox's ratings are down, but nothing compared to CNN with 100,000 viewers on average, MSNBC, because people know that's not genuine. It's okay if we make mistakes

sometimes, but the people know we're trying to tell them the truth because we respect them, because we respect ourselves. And Judge Andrew Napolitano got phased out because that was the move he made. Telling the truth when everybody else knew Trump was being spied on. They bragged they were spying on him. Oh, we know he's a Russian. We're spying on him. Napolitano's like, boom, I got you. Goes and looks it up.

Goes after him. They come after him. So people want men and women to do the right things. But then when we do the right things, some people don't back us. So I know you don't want to talk about yourself all day, Judge Napolitano, but any other points about the Durham investigation, how big this is, other key angles? And then I just want to ask you in closing in the 10 minutes we have left or nine minutes we have left, just in general, your view on vaccine mandates and open borders and Biden's low approval rating and just any other. I mean, because I can talk to you for 10 hours about things happening in the world and just your view of where humanity is right now, Judge.

Well, Alex, you know, you and I have been friends for years and I have admired your work for years. And you also have suffered at the hands of people who press buttons in the world because you have not hesitated to tell the truth. And I think the overwhelming majority of the people watching and listening to us now would agree with what I just said about you. You are a hero to many, many, many people. Your ratings are astronomical. And that's because you always say what you believe to be the truth and you have the means with which to back it up. You know, other than what I said about knowing the prosecutorial mindset and knowing that John Durham has that mindset, he needs to justify himself. I really don't think he's going to stop at the indictment of Michael Sussman,

Hillary Clinton's former campaign lawyer, for what's considered a low-level crime, because the punishment is often not even incarceration, lying to the FBI. If you lie to the FBI and send them on a wild goose chase and they spent a fortune chasing down your lie, well, then they're going to come after you very aggressively. But if the FBI knows at the moment you lied to them that it was a lie, then they're not going to come after you aggressively unless they have nothing else to come after you for.

So during the Reagan administration, there's a famous arrest on a brooklyn street corner uh in the years and the days and we used to have phone booths the fbi had cornered a major colombian drug dealer uh but they had no evidence they knew in their hearts who he was but they had no evidence with which to arrest him he got out of the phone booth and an fbi agent went up to him and said hey buddy what's your name and he said nancy reagan and they arrested him for lying to the fbi that led to the acquisition of evidence against him and a prosecution and a lifetime sentence but without some hook on which to hang their hats uh which came out of his own mouth, they wouldn't have been able to do it. On the other hand, if they want to frame you, as you know they can and have done, as they did to Martha Stewart, as they would try to do to you,

then your best bet is not to talk to them. Okay, I'm glad you raised that because that's a question I meant to ask you and I'd forgotten. What do you make of January 6th? I've been subpoenaed. We offered them, hey, you want my emails with all my text messages? I'll give you written statement answers, but I'm not going to have you twist this into a perjury trap. And they just didn't do that, so now they may give me immunity. I don't even know anything. I mean, we tried to have peaceful demonstrations.

What do you make of this january 6th and now that they've got the new terrorism directive by the president saying questioning elections or questioning lockdowns is terror and then trudeau's declared a civil emergency uh they're going to grab bank accounts without court orders what do you make of this client of this climate well the climate is reprehensible it's totalitarianism uh on steroids you and our mutual friend and colleague in my case a boyhood friend uh roger stone did the right thing when the committee summons you don't play footsie with them uh the way mark meadows was a decent decent human being i've known mark since his early days in congress. Don't play footsie with him. Don't give them some things and then decide to throw up your hands if you don't like the

questions they're answering you. Don't answer a single question except who you are and how they can reach you. That's the way you and Roger Stone dealt with it. In terms of Trudeau, he's just as bad as his father. There's no national emergency. The statute itself defines national emergency as one where the government is unable to protect the security and freedom of Canada, not one in which the roads are clogged. But that statute, which he has triggered, gives him tremendous power, as you say, to arrest without warrant or evidence and without preferring charges against the people arrested, to confiscate bank accounts, to confiscate trucks, to confiscate insurance policies on the trucks, which, of course,

is insane, because then you've got a 16-wheeler on the highway without insurance on it. So he's just reprehensible. In terms of the vaccines, I've been campaigning against them for a long time. It's not a vaccine, as you have said. A vaccine gives you a small dose of the disease. Your body fights it off. You have the immunity and the antibodies forever. This is a chemical cocktail, which is an experiment at lessening the effects of the disease. It doesn't prevent you from getting

it. It doesn't prevent you from transmitting it. The Supreme Court has ruled several times, you control your own body. You decide what goes into it. The government of the United States of America signed a treaty called the Nuremberg Protocols, which prohibit the use of government compulsion to take experimental chemicals into the body. So we are on very solid ground legally and morally, but big government, big pharma, and big medicine have persuaded the public that they are right and we are wrong. So again, it takes courage. The truck drivers in Canada have to be courageous. People like you need to be courageous. People listening to us now need to recognize that they decide what goes in their bodies, not Dr. Fauci and not the government. Beautifully said. I see your clips on YouTube, watch them all the time.

I've also tuned into your amazing podcast because you're not just, you know, handicapped by 10 minutes a day on Fox on a few shows. You can really get into deep thought. It's amazing. Judging freedom. Everybody should search that on the different platforms and follow it. Judge nap.com. You can find it all there as well.

Judging freedom available on YouTube. Judge Andrew Napolitano. Judge, thank you so much for the time. judgenap.com you can find it all there as well judging freedom available on youtube judge andrew napolitano judge thank you so much for the time and again i know you've been through a lot for telling the truth and i just appreciate you for myself my crew and my family thank you so much for being a great american uh thank you alex it's a pleasure anytime i'm available for you god bless you god bless you thank you wow that's a real American right there, folks. That's the real deal. He didn't back down when the attacks were going on. He was put through hell and now he's been vindicated. Wow. Our best-selling powerful brain pill or nootropic, Brain Force Plus, has been sold out for months, but now it's back in stock. Now, listen, there are other nootropics you can buy at the gas station for, you know,

$10 for two pills that will light you up like a Christmas tree, but are very, very toxic and will give you a hangover. Everything we sell and promote is the healthiest, cleanest, best things you're going to find. That's why I love Brain Force. It's got a lot of known natural compounds in it that are documented to give the brain a supercharged, clean focus. And so, yeah, if you want some stuff that's basically like speed, we're not selling. But if you want something that is good for your brain and good for the connections in your mind and that doesn't kill brain cells and that is based on things God gave us, you want Brain Force Plus. So it's already

a best-selling product. A lot of you already use it and love it. That helps fund the InfoWars. Thank you for supporting us. But for people who are on the fence, who haven't taken Brain Force Plus, you need to go to InfoWarsStore.com. You need to order it. You need to experience it. Now, it's also sold out. We're trying to get more in. We have Brain Force Ultra. Totally different formula.

Whereas Brain Force Plus lasts about five, six hours. Brain Force Ultra lasts about two, three hours in my experience. But it hits you really quick and it is amazing. It's sold out right now, but it's totally different. It's not in competition with Brain Force Plus. And then there's Turbo Force that I personally, when I need it, only take half a package because it is a whole bunch of different types of natural energy, and it's super strong and, again, over the top.

So they're all three different things. One's like a machine gun, one's like a shotgun, and then one is like a sniper rifle. They're all amazing. The bottom line is this, Brain Force Plus is back in stock, 40% off at InfoWarsStore.com, and I want you to try it.