Judging Freedom - INTEL Roundtable w/ Johnson & McGovern : Weekly Wrap 11-July-25

Episode Date: July 11, 2025

INTEL Roundtable w/ Johnson & McGovern : Weekly Wrap 11-July-25See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-in...fo.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Agent Nate Russo returns in Oracle III, Murder at the Grandview, the latest installment of the gripping Audible original series. When a reunion at an abandoned island hotel turns deadly, Russo must untangle accident from murder. But beware, something sinister lurks in the Grandview shadows. Joshua Jackson delivers a bone-chilling performance in the supernatural thriller that will keep you on the edge of your seat. Don't let your fears take hold of you as you dive into this addictive series.
Starting point is 00:00:30 Love thrillers with a paranormal twist? The entire Oracle trilogy is available on Audible. Listen now on Audible. MUSIC Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Friday, July 11th, 2025. It's the end of the week, the end of the day. It's our favorite time, our Intelligence Community Roundtable with Larry Johnson and Ray McGovern. Ray has been traveling in Europe and is kind enough to break away from his lecture schedule to join us. Guys, it's always a pleasure. Thank you for the double duty.
Starting point is 00:01:34 Thank you for the information you provide me during the week and thank you for letting me pick your brains now. Larry, to you first, why do you think Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has visited the White House and Capitol Hill three times in the past six months during the presidency of Donald Trump? Well, this time is to lock down more aid because they were devastated by what Iran did to them over the course of those 12 days. That's number one. Number two, to try to see, you know, take the temperature of Trump face to face and see if he can get him convinced to make another go at Iran. I don't think they're finished at all. Trump, for his part, maybe one explanation
Starting point is 00:02:26 for why he's going so hard after the judges in Israel who are hearing the case involving Netanyahu's corruption is that if he can get Netanyahu off, so to speak, and then get Netanyahu convinced to move forward with the ceasefire because Trump is, you know, he's keen, man, he wants that Nobel Prize, so he's going to do anything he can. And so maybe to that extent, there's some additional negotiation. But listening to Netanyahu at the end of the trip, I think Netanyahu got everything he
Starting point is 00:03:03 wanted out of Trump. Ray, I think Larry's correct. Netanyahu was as tenacious as ever, and I think as manipulative as ever. What is your take as to how to justify three meetings? Actually more than three meetings, it's three trips. This trip alone had three meetings with Trump, only two of which were partially on television. I think, Judge, it has to do with internal politics in Tel Aviv or West Jerusalem.
Starting point is 00:03:37 Netanyahu needs every chance to show that Trump is backing him 100 percent. And these trucks help that to the degree that Trump sort of ratifies that. And this is, let's face it, this is Netanyahu's strongest hand. He has the backing of the President of the United States. And I think that was mostly why he came. The serving of the, or giving him a copy of the Nobel Prize,
Starting point is 00:04:03 well, my God, one war criminal giving a Nobel Prize nomination to another one. I mean, that was a little bit too much to take. We have to laugh these things off. Otherwise we die crying. Right. Larry, is there any analysis you can share Is there any analysis you can share about the timing of Netanyahu's trip and the decision of the Justice Department, both occurred on the same day, to do a 180 on the Epstein files? The Justice Department, the Attorney General said they were on her desk while Netanyahu's here. Maybe I'm reading more on this than there is. I don't know. That's why I want your thoughts. She and Cash Patel and Dan Bongino announced there's no there's no enemies. There's no client list. We never had one. There's nothing to reveal. Yeah. You mean you don't believe in coincidence?
Starting point is 00:05:01 God Almighty. You know, look, the client list does exist. It's been admitted to by others. Ryan Dawson has compiled it, not by just sitting down and coming up with names out of his own mind, but he actually read through all the court transcripts, all the witness statements, all the charging documents, and he was able to come up with a list of 78 people that include folks like Jamie Dimon, Robert Kraft.
Starting point is 00:05:29 Now, you published that list on your website, did you? Yeah, yeah. So in our 21. Now, I'd note there are billionaires on that list. If Ryan was putting their names out and said, hey, they're on the Epstein list. And he'd be sued if it was false. So that's why he hasn't been sued by one of them. That tells you a lot right there. I also learned this week from my business partner who has brought a tax case
Starting point is 00:05:58 against the Clinton Foundation that he received from one of the Scandinavian countries, a flight manifest from Mr. Epstein. And on that plane, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, and James Comey. They flew from the island up into one of the Scandinavian countries. Now, what were they doing? I don't know, maybe attending a chess tournament, who knows? But the point is, this administration, they're not protecting Donald Trump.
Starting point is 00:06:36 Because I tell you, if Trump was on that list, do you think the Biden crew would have let that, kept him protected that? Absolutely not. They would have destroyed him with it. But two things are going on. One, protecting this Israeli intelligent asset. And number two, there are friends of Donald Trump on that list.
Starting point is 00:06:58 He may not have even paid attention to it before, but once he saw his friends on that list, he's, I'm not gonna let him be ratted out. But I think it had more to do with as a Mossad asset with some CIA involvement, very likely. Ray, was Epstein a Mossad asset and would the Mossad use sexual blackmail to control public policy of a country? Yes, and certainly yes. It's done it in the past. The Nunu was captured, or sort of a honeypot
Starting point is 00:07:34 sort of operation, the fellow who revealed with photos what the Israelis were doing with respect to working on another atomic bomb. So yeah, it's part of the trade craft. I'm not sure I would have to say that not only Israelis do this sort of thing, but this is done by virtually all intelligence services. What do you know the extent of, uh, from your friends in intelligence,
Starting point is 00:08:04 Epstein's activities with Mossad. Was he an agent? Was he an asset? Was he paid? Did they have damaging information on him to the point where he was forced to work for them? Well, obviously someone paid him big bucks. Right. Now, I don't know who exactly that was, but if you put in perspective all the people that profited from his operations, the Israelis in the first instance, and all those fellows that had this great time on that island in the second one, they never
Starting point is 00:08:38 thought that they would be blackmailable. That's really really stupid why else would they be given this these these favors but you know somebody paid and somebody got him killed i mean it's pretty clear huh it's pretty clear somebody somebody got him killed in that prison so will this come out uh well hopefully it will maybe cash patel is going to pursue this like a bulldog, but maybe not. We'll just have to see. It doesn't seem like it. Dr. Michael Baden, who's the world's foremost pathologist and a friend of mine from testifying before me and used by the government over and over again, has testified under oath that
Starting point is 00:09:23 there's no way under the laws of physics that Epstein could have broken his own neck in the manner in which it was broken. Larry, will Israel ever be at peace with its neighbors until they're all reduced, unless they're all reduced to the status of Libya or Syria. No, it's impossible because the entire premise of Zionism, which emerged in the late 19th century, it wasn't a religious... Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, Larry. Ted Cruz told Tucker Carlson that the references to Israel in the Old Testament were to the country governed
Starting point is 00:10:09 by Benjamin Netanyahu today. I had to get that in there. I know you know this. Go ahead. Yeah, he forgot to understand that that first promise was to Abraham and to all nations. And gee, if that promise is Abraham, that means the Arabs, the Muslims as well, are blessed. Correct, correct. Islam is an Abrahamic religion. Go ahead. So he just doesn't know his Bible very well. But that's what's the absurdity of all of this. That this political movement that came out of basically Europe, and with Theodore Hercel as the big advocate, who was not a religious, you know, he wasn't a religious Jew. They they they they premised this entire thing that God gave this land to us but we don't believe in God. So I'm going yeah how does that work? That's like that's like being a secular Christian, you know. Well, so there's never going to be peace there and they're never going to be self-sufficient.
Starting point is 00:11:13 They are counting on Donald Trump and subsequent Donald Trump's to continue to provide them with aid at the expense of the American government. Did you know that Netanyahu flew home with two jets that Trump gave him from the Air Force? I didn't know the President could just give away Air Force jets, Ray McGovern, did you? Well, did he have a foot on each one? Was he astride the two jets? Netanyahu is pretty, pretty agile. No, I think it's ridiculous. And it really is a matter of time, I think. The latest polls show that a lot of Americans don't like genocide.
Starting point is 00:11:57 A lot of Americans are seeing the photos coming from Gaza. A lot of Americans, much fewer than 80%, that Netanyahu bragged about having 80%, he said, 80% of Americans will support us no matter what. That is absurd, end quote. Well, it was absurd then when he said it 25 years ago. It's even more absurd now. He's below 50% in my view, if you take a nationwide poll of those who know what's going on in the world. So that's the change. That's a salutary change. It's just as coming so damn slow that hundreds of thousands of more Palestinians are likely to be killed in the interim.
Starting point is 00:12:39 Larry, and I forgot to run this, so we're going to back up to Epstein for a minute. And I know you're of the belief, and rightly rightly so that Trump's name is on it or the Biden DOJ would have revealed it. But when Pam Bondi, the attorney general was asked by a reporter at a cabinet meeting, what became of the client list before she could answer. The president said this, are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years. That is unbelievable.
Starting point is 00:13:12 You want to waste the time and do you feel like answering? I don't mind answering. I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein. In February, I did an interview on Fox and it's been getting a lot of attention because I said I was asked a question about the client list and my response was it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed also to the tens of thousands of video never going to be released never going to see the light of day to him being an agent I have no knowledge about that we can get back to you on that. And that's it on Epstein.
Starting point is 00:13:47 Well, Marco Rubio like he's watching a tennis match between the two of them. I couldn't help but noting that. Let's move on. Larry, how do you explain, just think about tennis match or ping pong. How do you explain aid to Ukraine on again, off again, on again, increased again? That's what we've seen in the past two weeks with Trump. This kind of erratic behavior.
Starting point is 00:14:16 I actually I think there's something mentally wrong with Trump. In fact, I've spoken to, I, without revealing my source, somebody who has had frequent meetings with Trump over the last 18 months, said that in these last meetings, he's noticed a noticeable change related to age. And when you listen to Trump talk, he talks in this monotone, like he Rain Man You know with some sort of autistic disease But but to to to play these kinds of games with with with the weapons and with war in Ukraine Ukraine Russia's just laughing at him because they recognize They're not gonna get a serious deal. So they know the game.
Starting point is 00:15:06 Praising, telling me he's wonderful, say, hey man, we think you too should get the Nobel Peace Prize. But the Russians are going to keep doing what the Russians are doing. They're going to defeat the Ukrainians. But did you see the other day that there were four Iskander missiles that hit Kiev? These Trump sending 10 Patriot missiles. Each, you have to fire two of those Patriot missiles to try to take out one Iskander, which they can't do.
Starting point is 00:15:34 But the point is, in that one minute with four rockets coming in, you would have used up 80% of what Donald Trump is sending. So I mean, this is ridiculous. It's just absurd theater. Ray, before you jump in on this, and of course, I want you to watch this. Chris, cut number 11. Are you planning to send more weapons to Ukraine? We're going to send some more weapons. They have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now.
Starting point is 00:16:07 They're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons. Your defensive weapons, primarily. Mr. President, you have sent real weapons to Ukraine, as you said last night. Last week the Pentagon paused some shipments of weapons to Ukraine. Did you approve of that pause? We wanted to put defensive weapons because Putin is not treating human beings right, he's killing too many people. So we're sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine and I've approved that. So who ordered the pause last week?
Starting point is 00:16:39 I don't know, why don't you tell me? Sir, yesterday you said that you were not sure who ordered the munitions halted to Ukraine. Have you since been able to figure that out? Well, I haven't thought about it because we're looking at Ukraine right now and munitions, but I have no, I have not gone into it. What does it say that such a big decision could be made inside your government without you knowing? I would know. If a decision was made. I will know I'll be the first to know in fact, most likely i'd give the order, but I haven't done that yet Does the kremlin think ray mcgovern?
Starting point is 00:17:21 When they see the american president speaking like that. I mean this is this is Beyond what larry Larry's colleague has described. Well, Judge, I'm sure that the Kremlin has its own equivalent to what we used to have in the CIA, at a distance psychological profiles. And I'm sure they've come up with results similar to what that Larry mentioned before. before the man is erratic the man may be sick But he's the guy that they can deal with The only guy they can deal with for the next three years and they've said oh, yeah I'm going when Trump says oh, I am not happy. I am not happy with Russian I'm not happy with miss but I'm not happy with this. But well, the reaction from Putin's spokesperson is,
Starting point is 00:18:06 yeah, well, you know, the person in the United States is erratic and not always consistent. But, you know, we were operating on a tougher plane, on an overseer plane. We want to develop relations. Now, what's the proof I would induce? Well, just yesterday, Rubio meeting with Lavrov in Kuala Lumpur Maybe for an hour and what was the readout? It said well, you know Rubio
Starting point is 00:18:34 Here's what Rubio says, you know, the Russians have a new and different kind of suggestion on Ukraine I'm gonna bring that back to the person. It. Something like a step-by-step approach, like a roadmap, says Rubio, okay? And the whole thing is described by the Russians as a mutually respectful dialogue on a growing range of issues of mutual interest. So all I can say here is that the Russians are aware that this guy may be a little bit deranged.
Starting point is 00:19:06 He's the only fellow they can work with. The Russians have the upper hand in Ukraine. They don't need to rush. They need to see what Trump is willing to do in terms of getting Ukraine behind him so he can move on to bigger and better things, my God, in East and in China With respect to China. So all I'm saying here is it's become increasingly clear that even though Trump says every other day I'm really not happy with those Russians. The Russians just dusted off and say look we think the guy is serious We're gonna test that out But in any case we're winning and we'll get us to see how much of a deal we can
Starting point is 00:19:46 cut so that we're going to have to take over the whole country. Larry, are the neocons in his administration finally triumphant? Yeah, I'd say so. They're getting everything that they want at this point. It is, it's unfortunate that Trump, you know, Trump likes to think of himself as being Reagan-esque. Reagan, with all of his faults and flaws, he actually did a good job of selecting good people in positions, whether you got Casper Weinberger as Secretary of Defense, George Shultz, the Secretary of State. I mean, you know, I'm not saying that you agree with their policies, but at least they were intelligent, thoughtful men.
Starting point is 00:20:31 Shultz was a giant. But, you know, Trump's got a clown show going on. He doesn't, you know, he made his money, part of his money on television, pretending that he knew how to hire and fire people. And yet, you know, look at what he's done. Just the lack of quality between the likes of Hegseth and Marco Rubio. You know, they're just, they're not even in the same league. But he is, I'm afraid, continuing to follow their line.
Starting point is 00:21:01 If he had a clear vision about being Mr. Peace, he would have cut off all the weapons flows. He would have cut off the intelligence cooperation and would have brought an end to this war there as well as in Palestine. But instead he enables the genocide in Palestine and he allows this war to continue. Ray, if Rubio said that Lavrov gave him a new version of things, Rubio was naive.
Starting point is 00:21:26 The Russians have had the same five or six conditions, beginning with no NATO and ending with no military, from the beginning. What could Lavrov possibly have said that Rubio thinks is newsworthy or different and worthy of transmitting to the president, unless Rubio, who's not been part of the negotiations because Witkov has, is first now exposed to this. Well, Judge, we'll have to see, won't we? Rubio's got a new set of suggestions from the Russians. He thinks it's interesting enough to mention to the press
Starting point is 00:22:05 that he's gonna take them back to the president. And he says, you know, it's really kind of funny. It's a step-by-step kind of a roadmap. Well, hello, that may be naive. That's the way you do these negotiations. Now, I'm not saying that the Russian terms have changed. They haven't, and they won't, because the Russians are winning.
Starting point is 00:22:24 What I am saying is that if the neocons were completely in control, there would be no talks with the Russians. There would be no Trump reaching out to say, oh, I'd like to meet her and talk to Putin again. There would be no hope on the Russian side that they could make a deal. The deal is there in the offing. It's going to be heavily favored in Russia's favor, of course, and it's going to take another month before the Ukrainian
Starting point is 00:22:53 army collapses. But the deal is there for the making. And I have to make sure that people realize that at least I differentiate between the Dr. Jekyll and the mr. Hyde the dr. Jekyll on Ukraine Trump I'm talking about of course and the mr. Hyde that enables genocide for God's sake and worse in joining a war aggression against Iran, so You know, I'll take the dr. Jekyll and I think that's the attitude that Putin has. He's the only guy we have. We're talking to him. Rubio talks to Lavrov. And Rubio says, well, wait a second, here's some good suggestions. I'm going to take that.
Starting point is 00:23:31 So let's not prejudge this. Let's see what Rubio comes up with or what the president says. Well, that's not a bad idea. I hadn't thought of that step by step. Oh, well, that's interesting. Before we prejudge the thing and say that the president is really not realistic or he's dumb or he's hemmed in completely by the neocons. But Larry, the neocons will never accept anything less than a Russian military
Starting point is 00:23:58 evacuation from Eastern Ukraine. That is not only unrealistic, it's impossible. Yeah, it's not gonna happen. Look, Lavrov had an interview last week with Magyar Nemzet, Hungarian news outlet, and he gave the strongest, clearest outline of what Russia's position is. The only thing that's changed from what Vladimir Putin presented on June 14, 2024, is that the West has got to recognize that Crimea, Sevastopol, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson are, and in fact this is what he said, he said, there must be international legal recognition of the new territorial realities following the accession of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Donetsk and the Khansk People's Republics,
Starting point is 00:24:52 as well as the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions into the Russian Federation. So, and on the agenda are the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine lifting of anti-russian sanctions Withdrawal of lawsuits against Russia and return of the legally frozen assets in the West He you know, that's what that's what Rubio heard. That's well, we're saying Larry Larry what's the date of what love it off said that you quoted? What's the date? It was last week. It was like, okay Well, I'm talking about yesterday. I'm talking about yesterday. Ray, Ray.
Starting point is 00:25:28 He talked to Lavrov yesterday. No, no, no, absolutely not. I spoke with Lavrov, judge and I both spoke with Lavrov. These not, he doesn't go out and say this and then come around and say something different from that, are you kidding? Of course he does, in private he tells us. Oh no, no, no.
Starting point is 00:25:44 Rubio, exactly what Rubio said Yeah, look now when you rubio when you entertain the possibility that Rubio's lying Why would he lie about this He wants to put the He'll put the spin on it Ray Larry. What's it when you talk to to Lavrov, what exactly did he tell you? He didn't say, he said exactly what's in this message. He said exactly what's in this message. He told us the same six conditions that President Putin said in 2022, which Larry just articulated. Yeah, I'm not talking about when you and Larry were together in Moscow. What I'm talking about when you and Larry were together in Moscow what I'm talking about was Larry was there alone and he reported that Lavrov said something to
Starting point is 00:26:28 him three times and where there's no justification for that because the video was on all that time and Lavrov said no such thing so if we're talking about what love says what he said what he said eight eight days ago you're wrong on this right okay then show me the proof ago. No, I say what you're wrong on this ray Okay, then show me the proof. Tell me the video I just showed you the proof right here with the three paragraphs that love Ross said to the Hungarians and he repeated it at bricks You've been traveling you haven't had a chance to read or read this or watch it That's their going in position Larry what he said to Rubio yesterday is What Rubio is reporting
Starting point is 00:27:05 back that that's different. You know, he can't go with the old thing. Of course they're going to go with the maximum position. What I'm saying here is that Lof said something different to Rubio yesterday. Rubio and the readout from the Russian side said this is a very respectful. Let me jump in. I'm watching two of my closest friends,
Starting point is 00:27:28 comrades, colleagues who have advised me over the years and each of whom appears twice a week or more on this show disagree with each other. The audience respectfully disagree. Yes, yes, as JFK said, we will disagree agreeably. So on that we will finish, gentlemen. Have a great weekend. We'll see you both on Monday. Thank you for your time. Thanks for the double duty. Thanks for still loving each other while you're throwing the punches. Have a great weekend. You too, Judge. Thank you. All the best to both of you guys. Thank you. Thank you. And Monday is a very busy day for us. At eight in the morning, Alistair Crook. At ten in the morning, Ray McGovern. At ten forty-five in the morning, Professor Jeffrey Sachs.
Starting point is 00:28:17 At eleven thirty in the morning, Larry Johnson. At one in the afternoon, Colonel Douglas McGregor. At two in the afternoon, Scott Ritter. Hang on to your seat belts. Have a great weekend, everybody. Judge Napolitano for Judging Freedom. You

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.