Judging Freedom - Phil Giraldi : CIA Unleashed on Venezuela.
Episode Date: October 22, 2025Phil Giraldi : CIA Unleashed on Venezuela.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info. ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The proceeding was brought to you by ZEPA.
With over half a million sold, ZEPA is the only FDA-approved mouthpiece
that has a 91% success rate in silencing snoring.
For a limited time, go to ZEPA.com and use the code, happy, or text, happy, to 511, 511,
and get the absolute best solution guarantee to stop your snoring with the Happy Z-Pack
and save over 24% off.
Plus Zipa will donate $10 to breast cancer research.
Visit ZYP-P-P-A-H.com, use code happy or text Happy to 511-1-1-1 and save over 24% off with
the Happy Z-Pack and start improving your sleep health.
Remember, Zipa is HappyZ spelled backwards.
Save over 24% off by going to Zipa.com and using the code Happy.
Today, text fees may apply.
Your first great love story is free when you sign up for a free 30-day trial at audible.ca.ca.
Slash Wondery. That's audible.ca. slash Wondery.
If you're overpaying for wireless, it's time to say yes to saying no.
At Mint Mobile, their favorite word is no, no contracts, no monthly bills, no BS.
Here's why you should say yes to the switch and getting premium wireless for $15 a month.
ditch overpriced wireless and their jaw-dropping monthly bills and unexpected overages
and get the reliable coverage on high-speed performance that you're used to at a significantly lower cost.
Plans start at $15 a month at Mint.
All plans come with high-speed data and unlimited talk and text delivered on the nation's largest 5G network.
Use your own phone with any Mint mobile plan and bring your phone number along with all your existing contacts.
Ready to say yes to saying no, make the switch at mintmobile.com slash freedom.
That's mintmobile.com slash freedom.
Up front payment of $45 required, that's the equivalent to $15 a month.
Limited time, new customer offer for the first three months only.
Speeds may slow above 35 gigabytes on the unlimited plan, taxes and fees extra.
See Mint Mobile for details.
Hi.
everyone, Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Wednesday, October 22, 2025. My dear
friend, Phil Giraldi, joins us. Phil, welcome here. Thank you for accommodating my schedule.
I missed you last week. Of course, I was on the other side of the globe, as you know. I want to talk to you
about a terrific piece you just wrote about President Trump unleashing the CIA in Venezuela.
but before we get there, do we know if Russia or the United States canceled the Trump-Puton meeting in Budapest?
Well, from what I've seen, I've been reading a lot in the European media, which essentially must be picking up stuff from the Russians.
it seems that this was a Russian initiative.
The Russians just decided there was no point discussing this
after having had, I guess, a phone chat with our esteemed Secretary of State
which seemed to indicate that there was no common ground
in terms of discussing the redline issues
that the Russians have been talking about since this conflict began.
Sergei Lavrov keeps saying we must address the root issues.
We all know what those root issues are.
Ukraine's neutrality, long-range missiles, and Ukraine's application for NATO.
Here's an interesting comment that he made harshly critical of the Europeans attempting to lobby, quote,
our American colleagues.
I'll let you analyze it after you hear it.
Chris, number 16.
Let me reiterate, an immediate ceasefire, suddenly back on the agenda as opposed to addressing the root causes of the conflict, would mean only one thing, that a vast portion of Ukraine remains under Nazi rule.
It would be the only place on earth where an entire language is banned by law, a language that, incidentally, is one of the UN's official tongues in the native language of Ukraine's majority population.
Those now lobbying our American colleagues to abandon their stance on long-term sustainable
settlement, to simply stop and let history judge, are the same forces behind this push.
We know who is handling this, Zelensky's European patrons and masters.
But such an approach runs entirely counter to what President's Vladimir Putin and Donald
Trump agreed upon in Anchorage, focusing on root causes, rejecting Ukraine's NATO integration,
fully securing the lawful rights of russian and russian speaking populations we remain ready to
continue this work no they agreed on anything in anchorage uh so it seems i mean basically i mean
all they came to a common understanding was that the that is something that they want to call
or don't want to call depending how they look at it a cease fighter which of course is a non-step
right as has been demonstrated also in gaza and the fact is that this goes nowhere
when the root causes as laverroff correctly describes them are in dispute the uh the fact is that
Russia started this war because a considerable hunk of land,
which traditionally, historically, prior to 1956,
when Khrushchev changed the borders for some reason,
prior to that time, this was part of Russia.
These are Russian speakers, these are ethnic Russians,
and they were being attacked by malicious from the Ukrainian side.
And Ukraine was, the Ukraine was not interested in discussing the issue.
And so that's, in a way, the trigger, and that's what Lavros was just referring to.
And, of course, since that time, it's been a question of the U.S., destabilizing the entire area,
going back to when the U.S. and Victoria Newland and Company interfered in an Ukrainian election
to bring in the party that was hostile to Russia.
and since then it's been unstable all the time.
And this is what the outcome of that kind of interference is.
Russian and Western media have been reporting the Russians who are a day ahead on this,
claiming that President Putin told President Trump during their 90-minute telephone conversation last week,
that Zelensky better give up the ghost or quote.
Now, this is the English translation of what he allegedly said.
said obviously i don't know the russian words ukraine will be destroyed and apparently this is what
trump told Putin in private when they met the day in person the day after the trump Putin phone
call what's your take on this my take on that we would i would like to see what the russian word
allegedly was uh the one that's translated as destroyed yeah but there are a lot of of
symptoms, I'm sure in Russia, for what that word was. And I would, I would suspect it maybe it was
more something like defeated or something similar. And certainly Trump is not a reliable
resource for repeating anything that he hears or is told or what he thinks he understands.
I mean, do you honestly think that Zelensky can negotiate for, let's say, a standstill, a peaceful settlement, Russia keeps what it has, and expect to stay alive?
I think that's one of the big issues.
It's kind of like Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel, if the war there ever ends, he's going to be in jail.
Well, I think Zelensky won't be in jail, but he will be.
dead, dead, because he has plenty of people lined up who are dissatisfied with what he has
been doing and how he's been doing it. And there are plenty of people who are willing to come
to some kind of accommodation inside Ukraine within the bureaucracy.
Wow. Are these likely the people that Sergei Lavrov referred to as Nazis?
Some of them certainly are. Yeah.
You're talking about the Stefan Banderas folks.
Yeah, those people, obviously, for reasons that would be somewhat incomprehensible for people like us,
are very interested in keeping this war going for ethnic and various sociological reasons.
And I think that's what we're looking at.
Wow.
You mentioned Gaza.
What are the Israelis likely to be doing as excuses for the reintroduction of the bombing campaign in Gaza?
Well, the Israelis have discovered or discovered a long time ago that they don't really have to come up with any credible reasons.
In this case, they're claiming that what Hamas was doing in terms of rounding up people that they thought were informing the Israelis and using this as a pretext to say that Hamas and the Ghazans had broken the phase one cease fire.
But of course, that in a way misrepresents what was taking place and why it was taking place and why it was taken.
taking place. And everyone who I know certainly everyone virtually on your program who has looked
at the issue has been expecting that Israel would use some kind of excuse, any kind of excuse,
or no excuse at all to resume the killing in Gaza, and that's what we're seeing.
Wow. Let's talk about Venezuela. I mean, this may sound ridiculous and almost sophomore.
my question, but it has to be asked. Aren't covert operations supposed to be
covert? It's just absurd, but I have to ask it in light of what happened. Yeah, they're
referred to in the trade as covert action. So, in other words, you're doing something, but you're
hiding it. And the basic reason why an organization was like the CIA was even created back
in 1947 was to be able to carry out intelligence, meaning collecting information operations,
without exposing your hand, without making it clear that that's what you were doing.
And there was a good reason to be able to do that, because you don't immediately want to put
these potential adversaries up on high alert.
So you try to do it in a covert fashion.
Donald Trump does not seem to understand the meaning of the word covert.
And I was totally shocked when I was reading how he was openly discussing how he was going to turn the CIA loose on Venezuela.
And he also modified it by saying, yes, and they will have a lethal mission.
Does he understand what lethal means?
apparently not. And all he's doing, you know, I was a CIA officer undercover for something like 20 years
overseas and Middle East and Europe. And I was undercover of various kinds. I was a diplomat which
provides you certain protections. I was in military missions, which again provides you with certain
protections under the bilateral laws that govern that kind of thing. And I was also, well, you know,
pretending to be a businessman from various countries with passports and fake passports and things so suit.
So now all that Donald Trump has done, he's tipped off the Venezuelans, that the CIA people are going to be around.
They're going to be looking for them.
And if they catch them, they're going to kill them.
So because we have no diplomat, let me make sure I understand this, because we have no diplomatic relations with,
Venezuela. There are no CIA guys who can work in the embassy under official cover. So they work
under, and I'm using your terminology that you taught me, if I have this incorrect, please correct me,
Phil. They work under non-official cover, which is really no cover at all. They can be summarily
executed or worse, if caught. Yeah, that's exactly the distinction.
Trump put targets on these people, effectively put
targets on these people's backs?
Well, he's basically raised
the flag and told him, look, we're
coming after you people. And, of course,
the implication will be that
whatever CIA people
are using these non-official
covers where
they have no protection,
these people are targeting
the government. They might, for example,
be,
I suggest
advising Maria Machado,
the woman who just got the
Nobel Peace Prize
because she's one that's interested
in bringing down
the current government in
Venezuela and she's interested in doing
it with the assistance of the United
States. She admires Donald
Trump very much.
And who does she admire?
Benjamin Netanyahu.
Yes. Isn't she a Mossad asset?
She's probably a Mossad
asset. And I believe the
Israelis have an embassy
in Caracas.
which means that their people probably have more protection than the CIA people
that Mr. Trump has just exposed.
Phil, I love you, and I don't want to give you heartburn.
But here's one of President Maduro's fiercest opponents in the United States Senate.
You may have seen this, but Chris just dug it up for you.
What about setting the CIA into Venezuela?
That's not putting America first.
It's not ending wars.
It's starting them.
No, it's protecting America greatly.
Narco-terrorism is a huge threat to our country.
More people die from drug overdoses than die from any terrorist activity.
Venezuela's that's centered the storm.
The guy's indicted, and there's more coming.
We're not going to sit on the sideline.
It's going to potentially put American lives at risk.
No, you know what you're doing, you're saving American lives.
Every time you blow up one of these drug votes, you're saving.
You know, Maduro's on barred time, I hope.
I hope the.
Wow.
So here's a lawyer who took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, and he defends execution before indictment, trial, conviction, even for crimes for which the government does not prescribe execution.
Yeah, and there was another killing yesterday.
but in the Pacific Ocean.
Obviously, these would appear would have been Ecuadorians or Colombians.
And as usual, our dear senator from South Carolina doesn't even have its facts right.
Most of the drugs coming into the United States do not come in from Venezuela.
Venezuela is not the source.
The people in the Food and Drug Administration have long said that the stuff that comes in by water comes primarily from Colombia and Ecuador.
That's one on the Atlantic side, one on the Pacific side, and most of the stuff actually comes in over land.
Wow.
Why do you think Trump truly wants to either capture or kill President?
is it to give his oligarch buddies access to Venezuelan oil?
Well, it would seem that the only clear incentive, well, let's take it back a step.
I mean, if countries go to war, it's usually because one country is threatening the other
or doing something to destabilize the other.
Now, if you're looking for what Venezuela can do to damage the United States,
you come up with nothing.
So there's no reason why the United States should have this hatred for Venezuela.
Does Venezuela pose any threat to American national security?
It doesn't at all.
And the only thing I can see is we have the usual brain dead Donald Trump,
who in 2019 his first permanent office, tried to claim or sought to claim
that there had been an illegal election in Venezuela and Maduro had cooked the books.
And there was a long kind of back and forth going on, how the U.S. was supporting the Speaker of
their National Assembly and so on and so forth. And this obviously went nowhere. I just think
Trump is, you know, Trump, one of the interesting things about Trump for someone who's as ignorant as he is,
is that he never forgets his enemies.
And so Maduro is on the enemy list.
He wants to get rid of him, and he's got enough Republican support
to keep this kind of thing going.
And we're going to wind up in a war.
There are 10,000 U.S. troops in the Caribbean region right now,
eight warships at the last count I saw.
And, you know, this is going in a wrong,
direction. And this past week, we've also managed to offend Colombia, which protested about
some of these at sea interdiction, killing people without any due process and without any evidence
that they were doing anything. Can I modify slightly what you said? I'm just going to add
one word in front of the word war. Undeclared. Is there going to be a great debate on the floor of
the House of Representatives and the Senate in which somebody will outline the dangers to American national security
and why under the Constitution under international law we should attack another sovereign country? Of course not.
Well, they didn't do it over Iran. They didn't do it over Yemen. So I guess they feel that he can do it. He has said that he as president should be able to do whatever he wants.
That's obviously something he believes.
I want to go back to Israel for a minute.
Again, this is going to give you heartburn.
This is the latest from something called DropSight News about Jared Kushner confirming what parts of Gaza will be reconstructed,
presumably by one of his construction companies.
I think we have this on a clip.
Chris?
No reconstruction aid.
no reconstruction funds will be going into areas that Hamas still controls.
And as far as the demilitarization goes, once the ISF is up,
there needs to be a security force that they can feel safe from
that in order for it to be the transition to be complete.
So that needs to happen.
There are considerations being happening now in the area that the IDF controls,
as long as that can be secured to start the construction as a new Gaza
in order to give the Palestinians living in Gaza a place to go,
a place to get jobs, a place to live.
So that's one of the many things being considered.
Right now, again, there's been several work streams that have occurred over the last years.
Those are all being synthesized and updated here at the center.
And then they'll go before President Trump and the Board of Peace to get recommendations on what to build, how to phase it.
But that's definitely something now that's being very strongly considered.
And of the United States has designated his son-in-law to be the official spokesperson for the U.S. government and the developer of the areas of Gaza under Israeli control.
But Gaza is part of Palestine. How could any of it be under Israeli control? And isn't there some sort of an agreement that was just flamboyantly signed? No Israelis and no Hamas there, but flamboyantly signed by many countries, either in Cairo or in Charmels Sheikh last week, and didn't that provide for the Israelis getting the hell out?
Yeah, that was one of the key points of the agreement, such as it was, was that the Israelis would
would be basically evacuating.
Now, the situation has changed somewhat, and the U.S. obviously is clearly accepting it,
which is the Israelis are, at this point, they've drawn what they call a yellow line inside Gaza,
which they initially were calling a security zone.
You know, you always say security when you're at a loss for anything to say.
And this is 53% of the Gaza Strip.
as it is right now and of course when you control that you control the rest of it too right
it's it's an easy rifle shot from there to the rest of it and uh so it's this is an atrocity and i saw
him and his buddy uh steve uh yeah and they were they were denying that there was a genocide
oh yeah you know we played that and then that was comic yeah we played it and it's
CBS complained to YouTube that we took their product and we appealed,
and we'll probably win the appeal because it's very newsworthy what they said.
But they both said no genocide.
It's enough to make your stomach crawl.
I'm going to play the Kushner clip again because Chris has enhanced the volume,
particularly important for our friends who come to judging freedom on audio only.
So, Chris, let's play it again.
No reconstruction funds will be going into areas that Hamas still controls.
And as far as the demilitarization goes, once the ISF is up, there needs to be a security force that they can feel safe from in order for it to be the transition to be complete.
So that needs to happen.
There are considerations being happening now in the area that the IDF controls, as long as that could be secured to start the construction as a new Gaza in order to give the Palestinians living in Gaza a place to go, a place to get jobs, a place to live.
So that's one of the many things being considered.
Right now, again, there's been several work streams that have occurred over the last years.
Those are all being synthesized and updated here at the center.
And then they'll go before President Trump and the Board of Peace to get recommendations on what to build, how to phase it.
But that's definitely something now that's being very strongly.
And I suppose once the reconstruction starts, the genocide will resume.
They're not going to build beautiful roads and bridges and high rises for the Palestinians to live in.
They're going to build them for a Kushner to sell to wealthy Israelis.
Absolutely.
I mean, and this whole idea that he's spouting there,
that essentially the IDF will provide the security for this reconstruction to take place is insanity.
They're the ones who destroyed it.
Correct.
Oh, Phil, this is just utter madness.
whatever we're talking about, Ukraine, Rubio, and Venezuela, Kushner, and Gaza,
and I'm deeply grateful for your intellectual honesty and courage
and the strength with which you make these arguments.
Here's a full screen from today's New York Times.
Nations hesitate to send troops to Gaza fearing clashes with Hamas.
Representatives from several countries, seen as likely participants, have said privately that they will not commit troops until there is more clarity about what the force will be expected to do once it arrives in Gaza.
Okay, I get it.
So the Turks or the Egyptians or the Jordanians are going to send troops into Gaza, to do what?
To shoot at the IDF, to prevent it from killing Gaza?
Is that what those troops are going to do, Phil Giraldi?
Well, I think you have to realize, since this is an article in the New York Times, it's going to be Israel-centric.
So I think a lot of these countries will have concerns about sending troops into Gaza because the IDF is there.
And the IDF is inclined to do crazy things under orders from Mr. Netanyahu to provoke incidents that will then be twisted.
and distorted to make it look like it was the Palestinians who'd done it, and the U.S.
will back them 100%.
Which countries poses a greater threat to the national security of the United States?
Venezuela or Israel?
Oh, there's no question.
The United States controls a large slice, or Israel controls a large slice of U.S. foreign policy
and domestic policy, and you have to ask that question.
Israel is destroying us from within.
I wanted to get a big, broad smile on your face
after this gloomy stuff we've been talking about.
Phil Geraldi, you're the best of your friend, Gerald Salenti.
I'm on his show every Wednesday, and every Wednesday he says,
who do you have on?
And every Wednesday, after going to the list and I go,
the great Phil Giraldi, and he roars his approval as only Solanti can do.
But thank you, great, Uncle Phil.
It's always a pleasure, and we'll look forward to seeing you.
I missed you last week.
We'll look forward to seeing you next week.
Yeah, I look forward to it.
Thank you.
Thank you, my dear friend.
Coming up later today at 5.30 this afternoon, what is Israel's next move?
Who else?
Professor Jeffrey Sachs.
Judge Napolitano for judging free.
freedom.
