Judging Freedom - Prof. Gilbert Doctorow : Are Russians Losing Patience?

Episode Date: October 1, 2025

Prof. Gilbert Doctorow : Are Russians Losing Patience?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The proceeding was brought to you by ZEPA. With over half a million sold, ZEPA is the only FDA-approved mouthpiece that has a 91% success rate in silencing snoring. For a limited time, go to ZEPA.com and use the code, happy, or text, happy, to 511, 511, and get the absolute best solution guarantee to stop your snoring with the Happy Z-Pack and save over 24% off. Plus Zipa will donate $10 to breast cancer research. Visit ZYP-P-P-A-H.com, use code happy or text Happy to 511-to-5-11 and save over 24% off with

the Happy Z-Pack and start improving your sleep health. Remember, Zipa is HappyZ spelled backwards. Save over 24% off by going to Zipa.com and using the code Happy. Today, text fees may apply. Hi, everyone, Judge Andrew Napolitano here for judging freedom. Today is Wednesday, October 1st, 2005. Professor Gilbert Docterro will be with us in just a moment. Are the Russians losing patience with President Putin? But first this.

While the markets are giving us whiplash, have you seen the price of gold? It's soaring. In the past 12 months, gold has risen to more than $3,000. an ounce. I'm so glad I bought my gold that's not too late for you to buy yours. The same experts that predicted gold at $3,200 an ounce now predict gold at 4,500 or more in the next year. What's driving the price higher? Paper currencies. All around the world, they are falling in value. Big money is in panic as falling currencies shrink the value of their paper wealth. That's why big banks and billionaires are buying gold in record amounts. As long as paper money keeps falling, they'll keep buying, and gold will keep rising.

So do what I did. Call my friends at Lear Capital. You'll have a great conversation, and they'll send you very helpful information. Learn how you can store gold in your IRA tax and penalty-free, or have it sent directly to your doorstep. There's zero pressure to buy. and you have a 100% risk-free purchase guarantee. It's time to see if gold is right for you.

Call 800, 511, 460, 800, 511, 4620, or go to Learjudgeonap.com and tell them your friend the judge sent you. Professor Doctor, welcome here, my dear friend. Thank you, excuse me, for accommodating my schedule, as you always do. are you detecting rumblings of criticism of President Putin either for the failure to address NATO crossing of Russian red lines aggressively or the lethargic pace of the war in Ukraine? What I'm about to say comes out of my observation his last few days of Russian state television, which normally is very respectful of Mr. Putin, where someone like Vladimir Sala,

the offer, as one of the most popular talk shows and commentary shows, said, you said repeatedly, we do not pretend to offer advice on how to conduct the war to our Supreme Commander. Well, now he is. Well, his panelists are, they don't mention Mr. Putin as such, but they do speak about, as you just did a moment ago, the consequences of his very restrained and turn the other cheek policies with respect to NATO crossing Russia's lines. And in particular, Russia, they are wild up by Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance and Mr. Kellogg. My point is that this is not happening spontaneously of Russia. The open presentation of extensive presentation of criticism, damaging criticism

of Russia by Trump, by Vance, by Kellogg, is aired extensively on programs that are quite loyal to Putin or have been, like 60 Minutes, which is hosted by a Duma member, Yvgeny Papua. who happens to be the protege of the head of Russia's state television news in general. And the missile of your program, panelists who are speaking with great irritation about the lack of respect for Russia, the misinformation coming out, particularly, for example, remarks by Trump during his talk to the 800 assembled generals in Virginia, that the nuclear submarine,

which the America dispatched as a kind of warning to Russia, was 25 years ahead of anything Russia has in technology. This type of demeaning remark is stirred up discussion in Russia, which was

going on at a very low level for some time, for months and perhaps more than a year, but was not as intense and as focused as what I've heard in the last two days. Well, let me just ask you about the submarine. That statement is inaccurate, isn't it? Well, a lot of things that have been said by the administration are completely inaccurate.

For example, Vance's remarks to a journalist in an interview yesterday, I think it was Fox News, that Russia's economy is crumbling, that the advances, of just a few hundred square kilometers in a month of fierce fighting demonstrate that the war is a kind of stalemate, the Russia cannot win, and so forth. These statements, which we would typically expect to hear from Kellogg and still do, we're now coming from Vance. And I understand Vance is a very clever and well-informed man who reads everything. So it is not because the information he's receiving is incorrect. It is a taunt. to Putin, just as his boss, Donald Trump, is taunting Putin, and there's a reason for it.

And it's not the reason that the major media believe that Trump is pushing Putin to come into the negotiations which Trump wants to mediate negotiations with Zelensky. No, no, I see the contrary. If that were the case, if he were trying to, to pressure Putin to exceed the demand of negotiating the peace settlement, then they wouldn't be insulting the Russians, as they are. The insult is to rile them, and it's having the effect they desire, open discussion of whether the go slow, a war of attrition, is working or is not working. And now we hear people saying, more or less, that's not working. Do you believe that Trump, Vance, Kellogg, Gorka, and company are trying to get President Putin to accelerate the war so that it will be over so Trump can, in some perverse way, take credit for its ending? Because he's looking for a peace settlement, but by Russia's total destruction of Ukraine. that is not what most people think about

No, no, that's not what most people would think as a peace settlement, but let's get back, let's go down to basics. Can Trump intimidate Putin? I don't think so. I agree with you. He cannot intimidate Putin, but he can upset the elites

by this embarrassing and accurate description of the way the war is conducted. And there you have it. But don't the police understand the war is being conducted with methodical patience. The goal, one of the goals is to degrade the Ukrainian military for the next generation so that the next generation doesn't have to deal with this. Yes and no. I think they are tired of this and they are watching the Western reaction, which looks like a new escalatory phase, so that instead of ending in this culmination

that so many of us have seen, myself included, in a matter of months, they are now seeing the possibility that's going on a year or more. You know, we haven't heard from a former Russian president, I'm not sure what his title is today, Dmitri Medvedev, who has our attention. articulated rather ferocious views in the past. I guess we should expect to hear from him soon. Oh, I think so, but I doubt that he will be in the leading the charge against the Vladimir Putin.

I don't know, but I'm speaking as a former Sovietologist, what I'm seeing on Russian media suggests that a palace coup is being prepared against Vladimir Putin. That is almost unthinkable for a man who was elected with 82% of the vote and who, in your experience and mine, at least up till this point, has enjoyed enormous popularity.

Agreed. But the popularity polls, which are accurate, I'm sure, which saw him dropping from 80% to 79% approval ratings in the last week or so, they're only asking, do you believe that Putin is trustworthy, is a good leader and so forth? They are not asking, is he conducting the war correctly? And I believe that if that question were put to the political classes, they would say no. I'd say specifically the political classes, because if you look at the working man in Russia,

he doesn't think about in those terms. He sees that his salary went up by three times in the last year or two. He sees that he gets subsidized mortgages, that he gets a lot of assistance for families with children. And so the war has not had any detrimental effect on his way of living and found the contrary. He's made him much wealthier. But they think in classes, the political classes are another story. And I think they're very disturbed by the, what they see on television, but the Americans in particular are speaking of them as a paper tiger.

What do the political classes want President Putin to do, destroy people with the Reschniks in a couple of hours? I think you just put your finger on it. That's exactly what they'd like to see him do. And he's reluctant to do that. By the way, does anyone in Russia still call this series of events in Ukraine a special military operation or does everybody call it all-out war? No, nobody says specifically it's all-out war. But they have, initially, it was forebought to speak of it as a war at all. Now, for some time, more than a year, it's, it is called by some people a war. Officially, it is still a special military operation. And in, state television, that's what it's called.

So the special military operation is slowly and methodically achieving its goals. I know that General Kellogg who has very little standing over here, in my view, has argued that if he were winning, meaning President Putin, he'd be moving much faster. but he is slowly achieving his goals on the Ukrainian military is slowly being degraded. Is there any question but that Ukraine is destined to lose this, even in the minds of the most skeptical members of the political class? I think the skeptical members of the political class are worried about what's going on in Europe right now. That is the remilitarization, the preparation for a war with Russia.

And the longer this special military operation goes on, the more threatening that is to Russia in a three-year time frame, which is like tomorrow. I gave one explanation as a Sovietologist, so to speak, of what has happened. That is that Mr. Putin is being prepared to be shoved out of office. The other explanation, which I also see as possible,

is that Putin himself is preparing the public for changing his strategy from a war of attrition to a decapitation strike. How would Putin be removed from office legally? Is there some procedure, or would it just be an illegal coup? And if the latter, I would imagine whoever's plotting it, would be arrested for treason. If it succeeds... Right, right, right, right. Remember that. Look at that famous one line, treason never prospers. And what's the reason for if it prosper, none dare to call it treason? Stated differently when you strike at the king, you must kill him.

I don't think legality is an issue here. If it happens, it will probably be proclaimed as essential, a necessary change, maybe they'll be given some honorific post the way Medvedev was pushed upstairs. I don't think that he's going to face any personal physical risk or whatever. Nonetheless, it was formerly inconceivable, but now I changed my mind. It is not possible that what I see on television is happening without approval from people on life. Have you seen this consistently and systematically or just recently? The hints of this had been going on for a long time, but it never was so intense.

And they didn't, well, there was no need to show the full statement by Vance, which more or less trashed Russia. There was no need to do that. And the fact that it was done was a statement. The fact that it was allowed to happen was a statement. Where is the senior military leadership on this? Do they understand the slow, methodical, a pace, which is costly to them? Or are they saying, hey, boss, let's get this over within a week. This has been going on long enough.

Do they talk to him that directly? I can't say. Let me just go back a bit a year or so ago, and someone like John Helmer was saying with the military conspiring, the people and the general staff were conspiring against Vladimir Putin because they don't like the way the war is going. And I dismissed that out of hand. As far as the military goes, I would dismiss it out of hand today. But as regards the civilian elites, I think it's entirely possible. There's something like that is occurring in the minds of people around Vladimir Putin.

Does the Kremlin control Russian television to the point where this stuff wouldn't be hinted at without the Kremlin's consent? That's my point exactly. Kremlin being Mr. Putin's office or the Kremlin in a wider sense of the ruling elite, I think that in general Russian television is under very tight crime. control. There are a few trusted people. This is Kikisilov, the general manager of all Russian news broadcasting. He does not act with whispers coming from above. And so that they would show these things. It didn't have to. There's no obligation to give so much coverage. to these very damaging insulting remarks coming from the States. How about my friend Dimitri Symes?

I appear on that program quite a bit. And I am often questioned by his other guests when he represents as being senior members of the Duma and in one case, a very senior general. Where is he on this? Oh, I don't know. I haven't listened to Dimitri Siams for some time. It's not easy to, frankly speaking.

It's very difficult for me here in Brussels to catch this program, the great game. A year ago, it was quite easy. Right now it isn't. Why is that? Are there sanctions making it difficult for you to watch certain Russian television programs? Oh, definitely. The normal Russian broadcasting is not accessible. here in Western Europe. There are exceptions made and some and some programs get around it

by playing tricks on YouTube. That is the program has been carried by some unknown person who has his own channel. But generally speaking, their coverage, Russian news, Russian programs are difficult to access. But I'd want to take a step back and look at somebody else in the constellation of the top, which leads me wondering what is going on. Sergei Lov, who you respect greatly and who has an enormous group of admirers, but not only in Russia, but outside Russia. Sergei Lavrov said, in answer to a question a day ago, ah, if the Americans supply the, the, what is it that we're going to supply now?

Tomahawks. Yes, the Tomahawks. Now won't change the situation on the battlefield. I couldn't believe my ears. I could not believe that he was saying something so utterly foolish. Something is going on there as well around Love Roth. All right, so where do you see all of this going? Should we wake up some morning and find out that the government buildings in Kyiv are gone?

Or that Vladimir Putin is taking a vacation? I don't know. They can go out. The tea leaves suggest either eventuality as possible. We'll have to see how this progresses. But there are a lot of people in Russia who have been calling for some time. Mr. Karaghanov, a year and a half ago,

this is the political scientist who has a very large reputation in Russia and abroad. We're saying that Russia should strike using tactical nuclear weapons somewhere in Western Europe, to demonstrate that it is a serious power. Well, these people certainly are behind, would be behind the kind of palace coup

that I'm suggesting. But there's no way to know at this point. We have to wait a little bit. Fascinating conversation, Professor Dr. Owen. If something happens in one direction or another, I trust you will reach us and we'll discuss it as close to real-taxious. time as possible.

Your observations to me are rather startling, and I've heard them nowhere else. I hope to investigate this more seriously and with better access to all sorts of information. Three weeks from now, on the 20th of this month, I'll be going to Petersburg for three weeks. And this kind of question I tend to pursue. Thank you, Professor Doctor. All the best, my friend. We'll see again next week or sooner if the situation warrants.

Thank you. Of course. Coming up today, a full day for you at 1 o'clock this afternoon, Professor Glenn Deeson at 2 o'clock, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson at 3 o'clock, Phil Giraldi at 4 o'clock, Professor Jeffrey Sachs. Professor Sachs will analyze Prime Minister Netanyahu's in Jerusalem and on his plane, repudiation of the agreement he claimed he joined in with President Trump in the Oval Office. Judge Napolitano for judging freedom. Thank you.