Judging Freedom - Prof. Gilbert Doctorow : Is Moscow Optimistic?

Episode Date: August 6, 2025

Prof. Gilbert Doctorow : Is Moscow Optimistic?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

You know what doesn't belong in your epic summer plans? Getting burned by your old wireless bill. While you're planning beach trips, BBQs, and three-day weekends, your wireless bill should be the last thing holding you back. That's why millions have made the switch to MidMobil. With Mint, you can get the coverage and speed you're used to, but for way less money.

And for a limited time, MittMobil is offering three months of unlimited premium wireless service for $15 a month. So while your friends are sweating over data overages and surprise charges, you'll be chilling, literally, and financially. All plans come with high-speed, data and unlimited talk and text delivered on the nation's largest 5G network. This year, skip breaking the sweat and breaking the bank.

Get this new customer offer and your three-month unlimited wireless plan for just $15 a month at mintmobile.com slash john. That's mintmobile.com slash john. Use your own phone with any mint mobile plan and bring your phone number along with all of your existing contacts. Up front payment of $45 required equivalent to $15 a month. Limited time new customer offer for first three months only. Speeds may slow about 35 gigabyte on unlimited plan.

Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. Thank you. Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for judging freedom. Today is Wednesday, August 6th, 2025. Professor Gilbert Doctor will be here with us in just a moment on. Is Moscow optimistic? But first, this. We all know how devastating war is. Lives lost, communities destroyed, but war can also threaten your financial freedom. That's where America's heading, our growing involvement in global conflicts. It means more spending, more debt, and a weaker dollar. That's a direct hit to your wallet.

So here are three things to keep your eyes on. Exploding debt, declining dollar, rising prices of gold and silver. These things are already happening. Golden Sachs predicts gold could hit $4,500 in ounce by 2026. Why? because central banks and smart investors are buying gold hand over fist. They know what's coming and they're hedging against it. Currency collapse, inflation, and market volatility.

Gold has been a trusted store of value for thousands of years and today we need that protection more than ever. Call Lear Capital now at 8005114620 or visit Learjudsonap.com. No one is going to protect your wealth for you. you need to do it yourself and now is the Professor Dr. O, good day to you, my friend. Welcome here. Thank you for accommodating my schedule. It's always a pleasure to chat with you on these Wednesdays.

In the past couple of weeks, the United States has delivered nuclear armed weaponry to Great Britain and other allies. And last Friday, President Trump, famously issued a statement on his own social media in response to some taunting that went back and forth between him and former Russian President Medvedev to the effect that President Trump had ordered American nuclear-powered and capable submarines to an appropriate place, meaning somewhere closer to Russia. Are you able to get your thumb on the poll?

of the Kremlin? Are you able to assess how the Kremlin feels from and after these events? Well, I'm going to do that indirectly, of course. I don't have a microphone under President Putin's pillow. So what we have to do is use the entourage, those who speak for official Russia. And one of these programs, which I follow closely, is 60 Minutes, that is, has two co-hosts, One is Mr. Popov, who is a Duma member today, and his wife, August Kabyeva. And I believe it was Monday. They had a program which encouraged me to believe that the Kremlin is very confident that they are not alarmed, they are not looking to escalate the conflict with the United States and with NATO

over these various peculiar things that the United States has done in the last week or so. So by peculiar, of course, you mentioned the outstanding case of the dispatch of these two nuclear carry, nuclear arms carrying submarines closer to Russia. And the other thing, which has been in the news as well, General Donahue's statements about capturing Kaliningrad in blightening speed, Donoghue being the senior U.S. military officer in Europe. These could be alarming, but they're not alarming to Mosker. And why is that so? First, because they understand very well the context in which Mr. Trump works. They understand that he has in his own party a certain Lindsey Graham, who is a rabbit nationalist and rabidly anti-Russian

and who makes all kinds of weird proposals that Mr. Trump can not ignore. And so to keep Graham happy and quiet, he pretends to do things which are, shall we say, bizarre, shall we say chest thumping like these two that I mentioned. From the standpoint of the Russians, the idea of the dispatch of these nuclear submarines was meaningless. As they said, as they said in this program, panelists who know military affairs, the range of the missiles on board those. those American submarines is 15,000 kilometers. In other words, even if they stayed at their home courts in the West East Coast and the East Coast of the United States, they could hit any target they would want in Russia anywhere.

So the idea of moving them so-called closer to Russia doesn't change the threat of these weapons from what they were before they were moved one inch. The other point, it's something by Donahue. It's well known what the Russian response will be. be to any attempt to capture Kaliningrad. However many kilometers wider it is and how many assets the United States and NATO have all around Kaliningrad. So they take it. Let's say they take it. And the next day, the United States will cease to exist. That is clear. The Russians said any

threat to their territory will bring a nuclear response. So then we'll take seriously what talking to say. I want to follow up on that in just a minute, but first, a little breaking news. Russia Today reports President Putin's meeting with U.S. presidents, I'm quoting, special envoy Steve Whitkoff, just wrapped up. It lasted nearly three hours. Can you extrapolate at all from the duration, well, the fact of the meeting and the duration of the meeting, what was likely discussed? The length of the meeting confirms what the panelists were saying on the 60 Minutes program that they had a lot to discuss, and the Ukraine directly is a lesser part of, shall we say.

One thing that was noted by the panelists, which is underlined by Mr. Wittkoff's arrangements on his visit to Moscow, he came in yesterday, and he was taken around by Kiril Demetrov. who is the head of the Russian direct investment cooperation. And so he is a man with great business experience in the United States, and he is a partner for Mr. Ritkoff to talk business. And what could they talk about? Well, this panel was speculating. They would talk about rare earth.

The United States is in its final negotiations with China over tariffs, And the biggest threat that China has, which mitigates all of the alarming plans of Mr. Trump to impose tariffs on and other restrictions on China, is that they're near monopoly on global supplies of rare earth metals, which are essential for military production and most minor electronics. Now, the Russians have it also. And so it's not, it's quite possible that Demetriov and Wittkov were discussing precisely these rare earth metals, which the United States would like to know position on Russia before they go into a final talks with China. That's what we are watching. Forgive my interruption. We're watching live, Mr. Wittkoff's entourage leaving the, leaving the Kremlin. All right, back to where we were before we learned about this meeting, and thank you for your thoughts on it. What would the reaction in the Kremlin be, or what has been the reaction in the Kremlin to the delivery, the rather quiet delivery of nuclear weapons to Great Britain and other allies?

I don't know where they were delivered. The Guardian keeps reporting six of them. Can you enlighten us on this? Well, this is posturing, just like moving those submarines was posturing. It doesn't change anything. The United States has complete control over the use of those weapons. So whether they are nominally sitting on British soil or German soil or whatever, it's the United States that will give instructions to use them or not to use it.

In that sense, the responsibility remains with the United States and its direct relationship with Russia. with Russia and the European allies whoever are hosting these weapons are just bit players the same way that Lukashenko in Belarus is a bit player when we speak about the irishnik being the nuclear

armed erishniks being dispatched to Belarus that's fine but without the say so from Putin Lukashenko could do nothing with those weapons so that these are these are theatrics they are show

They are posturing. They don't change the reality. The reality is that the Ukraine is badly losing the war, and that this drama that Trump and company are creating on the world stage is to cover up that fact and to pretend that they are in control of events when they absolutely are not in control of events. The Russians are. How, I mean, the reports out of Ukraine are indicative of the end of empire, conscripting males over the age of 60, sending young men from bars and dance holes directly to the front line with literally no training whatsoever, barely trying to put a uniform on and a weapon in their hands. How a continent is the Kremlin that this will be over soon when the Ukrainian military collapses? Or will these drones, these Ukrainian drones, keep the special military operation going on and on and on. Well, the drones, of course, are a factory. They can be produced and they can be supplied from Britain and other countries to keep the war going on and on loan.

But the reality is that there is politics in Ukraine. it's not a dead country and at a certain point those political opposition to the war and to the suffering will take hold i have mentioned in our last discussion the speculation that the united states would be is looking to to evict uh mr zelenski from office and to replace him possibly with umairov who is the head of the of the negotiating team other people have spoken about his his replacement, Zillusely. But today I was reading in Russian news that there are

Duma members, sorry, there are the Ukrainian parliament members. They call their parliament, they call Nevada, who are considered to be real potential replacements for Zelensky. And one of them is a certain 35-year-old parliamentarian

who was formerly in his party, the servants of the people, before she was evicted for opposing various policy. elements. This is an Anas Kalaford, who's made as her main point to the public and to gain support precisely to stop these, the strong arm recruitment from the streets and from the bars and what else, that the Ukrainian government is now practicing, who says to the press that there are 400,000 deserters from the Russian army, from the Ukrainian army, that is, and that she

supports desertion because these poor soldiers have had no rotation, have had no chance to return to their families, and are being maintained in the state of suspense before their bond. Is that dangerous publicly to support desertion? Is that a potential crime under Ukrainian law? I mean, I can understand the deserters, but for a government official to say, I support the desertion? Leave the law out of it. They also mention. in the same article that she happens to have U.S. support and that she has support from an unnamed businessman who is a close friend of Trump. Gee, I wonder who that is. Did we just watch him leaving the Kremlin in a Mercedes?

I want to play for you. It's a little long. It's a minute and a half, but it will give you much to comment on a series of questions to President Trump yesterday in which he repeats three times Ukraine is Biden's war. Nobody believes that here in the West anymore. But I'd like your thoughts on it. He also addresses the conscripts. He said he never heard of the 60-year-old men. But, you know, it's Trump rambling on and on and on. But there's a basis in here for you and I to talk about it. Chris, cut number four. President Zelensky just signed a law allowing for citizens age 60 and above to serve in the military. We've seen dozens of videos of young men. being hauled into vans and dragged to the front lines against their will.

And we've even seen videos of a young man with down syndromes serving on the front line. You, when you campaigned, you said you wanted to see the people stop dying. A lot of people admired that statement. Now the people dying are elderly, mentally handicapped, and conscripts. So even if a ceasefire doesn't work out, why should Americans continue to fund a foreign military that's scrapping the bottom of the barrel of its population like this? Well, you have to understand very importantly, this is. Biden's war. This is not my war. I'm here to get us out of it. It's a mess and I'm here to get

us out. I haven't heard that when you say about 60-year-old men and, you know, et cetera. But this is Biden's war and we're working very hard to get us out. I stopped five wars in the last five months, actually. And I'd like this to be the sixth, frankly. And that doesn't even include Iran with, you know, obliterating their nuclear haul because they would have had nuclear weapons within two months, but stopped a lot of wars. You just take a look at the ones just over the last two or three months. It's been amazing. This is the one I'm trying to stop. This is the one we're working hardest on. The other ones I stopped within a matter of days, almost every one of them, including India and Pakistan, and I could go over the whole list, but you know the list as well

as I do. But this is the one we'd like to see. I haven't not heard of that, but this is Biden's war, and it's a war that he got us into or indirectly got us into. It should have never happened. It would have never happened had I been president. Yeah. Who can take that seriously? What does the Kremlin think when they hear this rambling and disingenuous efforts to blame everything on Joe Biden? They agree with it. They are saying that this is Biden's war. And let me turn things around and look beyond the obvious. Mr. Trump is trying to end the war, but not in the way

that most people think. The more extravagant his intentions to impose sanctions on Russia, the faster the Russians are accelerating their destruction of Ukraine. Do you see my point? I do see your point. It is moving faster and faster.

When they say that they are going to penalize in a way as yet not used, penalized the shadow fleet carrying Russian oil around the world. Well, you can bet that that is taken the length of this war down by several months because the Russians are not going to sit around on their hands waiting to lose their exports because of these crazy new restrictions that we put on their fleet. The fleet will in any case go out.

It will be defended by Russian warships, who will, frighten away everybody from doing anything to those ships. But it will be a nerve-wracking period. And I think for this reason, the moves to reach the Dnieper are going faster and faster. The territory captured each week is greater than square kilometers than it was at any former point in this war. And the likelihood of capture of all of the Danesk, meaning the eastern part of Ukraine from east of the NEPA river, is entirely doable within the next month or two, not the next year or two. That we can thank Mr. Trump. He is really helping to end this war.

Very, very interesting observation, which I will surely run past Scott Ritter and the others, with whom I'll be speaking later today. Before we go, I want to switch to Gaza. I don't usually ask you about Gaza, but do you, does the Kremlin see the line? between the slaughter and the starvation and the genocide in Gaza and another attack on Iran. Does the Kremlin care about what's happening in Gaza because surely they care about whether or not Trump bombs Iran again

and apparently Prime Minister, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has begun to beat those drums with Trump's inner circle? Well, Putin has been speaking to Netanyahu two weeks consecutively by phone. I think the Russians are very interested in ending this Gaza nightmare as soon as possible without military intervention on their part. Of course, they could do it, but it would complicate the situation in the Middle East vastly, and so they're holding back. The connection between the Gaza genocide and a possible attack on Iran, well, I don't believe

there will be any attack on Iran simply because Iran is capable of annihilating Israel in a day or two if they want to use those several thousand ballistic missiles that are safely stored underground and which the Israelis were unable to damage. Therefore, it's a lot of talk about attack on Iran. It by the Israelis by themselves, unless they use nuclear weapon, will achieve nothing. And if they do use the nuclear weapon, they probably will have a nuclear weapon coming back at them. Because there is a lot of talk that Iran actually has the bomb. Well, Ted Postal, Professor Postal, who's arguably the foremost physicist in the United States, emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology has articulated to friends of yours and mine

that not only did the United States not set back the Iran nuclear program, but they effectively have a nuclear weapon as we speak and had it before the Americans attacked. Does the Kremlin recognize that? Does the Kremlin agree with Professor Postal? I mentioned they do. And it is another example of the perverse effects of what looks like America's saber rattling and chest beating. The achievements are precisely the opposite of what they're supposed to be. Right. Professor, Dr. Roth, thank you very much, a fascinating, fascinating conversation.

I can't wait to run past Scott Ritter this afternoon because sometimes you guys agree and sometimes you disagree on your. theory about secondary tariffs accelerating the special military operation. It's a brilliant observation on your part, and I'm grateful for your having articulated it here on our show. Thank you, Professor. We'll look forward to seeing you next week. Goodbye. Of course, all the best. And the aforementioned Scott Ritter will be here today at 1 o'clock, followed by Max Blumenthal at 2, followed by Phil Giraldi at 3. A great afternoon line for you. Thank you for watching. Just Napolitano for Judging Freedom.

Thank you.