Julian Dorey Podcast - #345 - Scott Horton WARNS about Nuclear War, Netanyahu & Iran

Episode Date: October 14, 2025

SPONSORS: 1) STOPBOX: For a limited time, our listeners get 15% off at StopBox when you use code JULIAN at checkout. Head to https://stopboxusa.com and use code JULIAN for 15% off your entire order.2) PRIZEPICKS: Visit https://prizepicks.onelink.me/LME0/JULIAN and use code JULIAN and get $50 in lineups when you play your first $5 lineup! WATCH PART 1 W/ SCOTT HORTON: https://youtu.be/ON6hz-HvjE8 PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/JulianDorey (***TIMESTAMPS in description below) ~ Scott Horton is the director of The Libertarian Institute and editorial director of Antiwar.com. He’s the author of Enough Already: Time to End the War on Terror and Fool’s Errand, and one of the leading voices challenging America’s endless wars. SCOTT's LINKS: X: https://x.com/scotthortonshow YT: https://www.youtube.com/@scotthortonshow SUBSTACK: https://scotthortonshow.com/ WEBSITE: https://scotthorton.org/ BOOKS: https://amzn.to/3T9Qg7y Antiwar.com: https://antiwar.com/ FOLLOW JULIAN DOREY INSTAGRAM (Podcast): https://www.instagram.com/juliandoreypodcast/ INSTAGRAM (Personal): https://www.instagram.com/julianddorey/ X: https://twitter.com/julianddorey ****TIMESTAMPS**** 00:00 – Intro 01:15 — Just War Criteria, Republic vs Power, Constitution, National Debt, Paying the Interest 10:45 — Austrian Economics, Sound Money, Classic Liberalism, Murray Rothbard, Ron Paul 19:12 — How Ron Paul Always Nails It 39:04 — Iran Situation, Historical Context, Israel Lobby, Iraq War Propaganda 53:07 — Iranian Posture under H.W. Bush, Candlelight Vigils, Cooperation with U.S. 01:02:58 — 9/11, Netanyahu, Obama & Bibi, Iran Nuclear Deal Joke, 60% Nuclear Rule 01:17:40 — History of the 60%, Nuclear War Poking, Israel Attack in June 01:31:42 — Netanyahu, Ending Intervention, T3rrorism Blowback, American Foreign Policy 01:38:51 — Israel–Palestine Conflict, U.S. Benefit Question 01:50:33 — Israel Narrative, “They’re All Bad,” Fifteen Years of Misinformation 02:02:58 — Ukraine–Russia, Bill Clinton’s Fault, NATO Expansion, Scott Horton Book Provoked CREDITS: - Host, Editor & Producer: Julian Dorey - COO, Producer & Editor: Alessi Allaman - https://www.youtube.com/@UCyLKzv5fKxGmVQg3cMJJzyQ - In-Studio Producer: Joey Deef - https://www.instagram.com/joeydeef/ Julian Dorey Podcast Episode 345 - Scott Horton Part 2 Music by Artlist.io Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Imagine you are elected President of the United States of America. Two months after Benjamin Netanyahu comes back to power's prime minister, Israel. In fact, the first time that Clinton met with Netanyahu, he came out of their preface and said, who the F does this guy think he is? And I think Obama was legitimately worried that Israel was going to do what they did last June and just go ahead and start the war. And he spent the entire rest of his presidency to get the Iran nuclear game.

And he said, we're not going to do a two-state solution. and did nothing for the Palestinians. So Netanyahu, he's kicked that crap out of Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. They've been severely weak in Gaza. Then Iran is the big one. So it's definitely increased risk that now they're making news. It was always a bluff. Trump can really escalate.

The only real card he has to play is it. I couldn't bet against it either at this point. After all, it's only consistent with what I've been warning this whole time is that... Hey, guys, if you're not following me on Spotify, please hit that follow button and leave a five-star review. They're both a huge huge help. Thank you. Are you happy that we, we, the founding fathers, I guess, declared war on Britain and fought a war there.

Do you think that's a justified war? Now, at this point, I probably should go back and reread and learn a lot more about it. but yeah no overall i support republicanism over uh monarchy thank you very much okay yes fair answer this so that kind of answers the second question here but what i guess more in a modern day scenario seeing as that war already happened and you know we created this country as it is what would it take what would you need to see for an act for any type of war regardless of where it is or who it is to be justified. Oh, well, I mean, there are clear-cut invasions across borders

where people got the right to defend themselves and things like that, you know? Usually it's somewhat complicated. I mean, my whole thing, I'm not a pacifist. I'm just, I'm a patriot, so I'm anti-government. Got it. And I just, the thing is, is, and this goes back to your earlier question,

your first question, I guess, about me and why I'm like this. because I figured out what other people had pointed out that I agreed with, that American foreign policy is the most important determining factor in our government's relationship with us here. As long as we have a world empire, we have to have a domestic empire.

Our Constitution doesn't describe that, right? The general government in our Constitution barely knows we exist. This is supposed to be a union of 50 states. We're supposed to have extremely minimal foreign policy coordinated by the government way back east in Washington. But otherwise, we are supposed to have a highly decentralized and limited republic. And so that, of course, is impossible if the goal of the government every day is to maintain its dominance in Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia

at all times, take control rig elections, do coup d'etas, launch wars, take control of every last thing spy on every government put their fingers in every single thing you can't do that with a limited government you need inflationary money you need income taxation you need um states that are essentially have has surrendered so much power to the national government already that they can't resist any of what's happening now right like you don't see coalitions of states saying we're not going to stand for these wars anymore right like this is all they don't they have way too much to lose in terms of the revenue that the national government can cut off to them right it's just impossible now the states are what they're like oblasts in ukraine they're big counties they're not states at all right other than like

in a legendary sense right from the old days in a and a mythical way like it's like naming your lake after an indian tribe or something right it's like some old thing some kind of memory yeah yeah um so um but so the thing is though is like i'm not giving up on this constitution though like we need the the next one's going to be worse than this it's going to have a lot greater powers you know uh rights and responsibilities delineated right there and like yeah it'd be worse it's far worse so i think um you know i'm not any kind of revolutionary uh as i've often said our current the constitution we had now if we could figure out how to to implement it. I don't mean go back to it, but implement it as the rule of law that it's supposed to be in the first place. It's the charter that created this national government. If we could do that, we'd be about 85, 90% of the way toward anarcho-capitalist libertarianism anyway, right there. Compared to where we are now, we're spending what, $7 trillion a year on all of this? It's insane. And so that's the thing of it is if we can get rid of the part of the most

expensive part of our national government that people care the least about and want the least. You know, we could have even a continental defense for fine. All right, is my weakest libertarian moment. I'm even willing to defend Canada and Mexico from invasion. Okay. But that ain't going to happen. Paul's like, lost them. Damn it. That isn't going to happen anyway, right? But we could just completely cut all of that off. I mean, I saw on Tucker Carlson's show, Matt Walsh, who works for Ben Shapiro, say to Tucker, well, geez, if any country needs the United States of America to support them in order to exist, well, then forget them, man. Yeah, well, there you go. Let's call that consensus. I think we're done, right? We even got a guy at the daily wire. I was like, well, I don't know, man.

Maybe you should make a country somewhere where you can keep it your damn self and leave me out of it. Keep your hand out of my pocket. And again, we're bankrupt now for that one. I'm sure he did. But look, and we are $37 trillion in debt. Already we're going to have to just repudiate it at some point.

Already interest on the debt every year is more than we pay for even the empire, Medicare, or Social Security. So, and this to me is just such an affront. Like, I really hate the way. welfare state. I don't think it's fair that people are forced to pay other people's bills up or down or left or right or whatever. Old young, it ain't right. But even worse than that is like helping the Israelis blow up some Palestinian kid. But to me, even worse than that in a

way, I'm sorry, I mean this in a sick, weird, disgusting way. You understand the irony part thing that I make that, like, at least there's something's happening. I don't know. when when my money that they take straight out of my pocket is just going to pay interest on the debt to the central bank of South Korea I mean that's real money to me man and to the and look I'm I'm old and doing okay right now but I mean there are a lot of people out in this country that make a hell of a lot less money than I do and they got to pay these income taxes when that's the margin of whether their kids got orange juice or not. That's the margin of everything for them.

And they got to pay everything they pay in those payroll taxes and everything they pay through inflation and all of their lost standard of living just to pay interest on the debt to another national government central bank that bought that debt with money that they printed out of nothing too. You see how I'm going into a homicidal rage right now?

It's not fair. It's not right. And so, like, that's the deal. You got to abolish the empire, hang the central bankers so that they don't come back again. I'm going to bring in Jerome Powell with the fucking Bill's machine. Like, okay, I like this guy. Just make it rain over here, and I might look the other way. I got a non-profit institute, by the way, everyone.

We'll link it down in the description for your not-profit. No, we're hard money guys. In fact, this is not my institute, but I love these guys, and they're hard money guys, too. This is the Mises. Mises. Mises. Ludevig von Mises. It's named after him. They're at Mises.org, and they are the best of the hard money guys.

Why? Because the Austrian school, Ludwig van Mises, and Frederick Hayek, and Marianne Rothbart, and then, of course, the great Robert Murphy and Hans Herman Hoppa and other Joe Salerno and Hans Sennholz and all these other economists who've come since then. are they're basically the gold standard guys, no inflationary money. And so now they are also the, particularly Murray Rothbard and his ears, are the major theorists of anarcho-capitalism, which says that we don't need a national,

we don't need a government for national security or for a court system or for anything. The last excuses for why you definitely need a monopoly state for at least one thing or another, those they argue that no and I'm pretty much sold on that just because I got no use for these bastards but these guys are real economists Murray Rothbard of course is the greatest of them and he was the founder of the Mises Institute with Lou Rockwell now my institute is called the Libertarian Institute and it's also really great but I'm just not wearing that sweatshirt right now

well I like that you support multiple teams for the same oh hell yeah yeah these guys are all my friends that's great and and we also are hard money guys and we also have Austrian school economists even though i am not one uh we have a handful over there and a bunch of great writers and podcasters and authors we publish 17 books now including five of my own but wow 12 others and we got more coming all the time i think that's a piece of history that most of us do not in any way properly appreciate because let's just whether it's tacky or not it's true everything's downstream from money and when you look at how money has been manipulated particularly over the last 100 years oh it's so evil man yeah it's very evil yeah hey you want to know some fun murray rothbard

articles to read of course left and right the prospects for liberty that's my favorite anatomy of the state war peace in the state hmm the case against the fed what has government done to our money wall street banks and american foreign policy that's a rabbit hole yeah that's a good list if I went too fast rewind it oh no thief got them all down

we're good we're loaded and seriously man I've left and right the prospects for liberty is my favorite and I have blown a lot of minds with that one that's the one people read it and they go wow okay now I understand

things differently than before because okay well on the basic level on the left you got the social on the right you got, the conservatives, right? But Rothbard says, look, man, before the socialists, the left was the liberals, meaning the capitalists, the pro-property rights, capitalists.

And the right was the conservatives, meaning the landed gentry and the old order and the church and the state who kept land, you know intact in the largest parcels and away from regular people and so he's saying the revolution was the american revolution the property rights revolution we're now and nobody can own things and can own property and improve it and exchange it and improve his station in life and have a social mobility that had not existed before it was private property that just destroyed feudalism and this was you know what has you know was dynamic as has improved the standard of living for everyone is everyone's ability to improve their own standard of living and to

specialize in different things and trade on the open market and all of these great things and then the idiot socialists come and they want all the rewards of liberalism without the work they want government to just make it happen somehow and skip the hard part when i went to north carolina earlier this year to shoot some guns in the mountains, I was with some real trained professionals. I'm talking guys who served in Afghanistan, Iraq, and you name it. One of the things I noticed, day one, when we were going through the entire arsenal that they had right there, there were a lot of stopboxes. Let's be real.

Owning a handgun for self-defense comes with serious responsibility. You need it secure, but also accessible when it matters most. Too often, that means choosing between locking it away or leaving it out, which makes it vulnerable to kids, guests, and intruders. That's the problem Stopbox USA set out to solve, and they nailed it with the Stopbox Pro. It's a 100% mechanical, keyless, battery-free lockbox that gives you instant controlled access to your firearm. No electronics, keys, or codes required. What makes Stopbox different is they have a patented five-button locking system that responds only to your unique input.

It's fast, intuitive, and built for muscle memory, so you're not thinking you're reacting. And when seconds matter, that makes all the difference. With the Stopbox Pro, you don't have to trade safety for speed. or peace of mind for readiness. Your firearm stays secure and always within reach. For a limited time, our listeners are going to get 15% off at Stopbox when you use the code Julian at checkout. Head to StopboxUSA.com, link in my description below,

and use code Julian for 15% off your entire order. After you purchase, they're going to ask you where you heard about them. Please support our show and tell them I sent you. And so then what happens is the conservatives become less. less statist than the left. By comparison, now that the left are the socialists instead of the free marketers, now the conservatives are more free market than them at least. And that leaves libertarian free market types as allies with conservatives against the left. But then always in this uneasy relationship because the conservatives never really were libertarians in the first place. They were still, they are and still are the conservatives who want to use the power of state to keep things the same way but then it leaves libertarians in the uncomfortable position isn't that we're radicals but as brian doherty put in his book we're radicals for capitalism we want private property rights and the wild and dynamic society that changes because of freedom

not because of government waging horrible uh social engineering campaigns against us all the time the way it is under the liberals right what an interesting concept and this is And there's just so much more to it than that, but it's just, it's really great stuff. And he talks about how this is one thing I love about Murray Rothbard, too, is the progressive era of a hundred years ago. He says, this was a right-wing plot, a right-wing corporate plot. The progressive era was? Yeah, because as, well, first of all, the liberals had stopped being liberals at all and had

become socialists and Marxists, right, already. So from big business's point of view, how. How do you neutralize the Marxists? And the answer is, you don't just crush them, you buy them off, right? You bribe them and you make them good, center-left, Hillary Clintonites, right? So right, you move them to the right, from socialist to progressive. And then meanwhile, because big business doesn't want free market economics either anyway. So they say to the progress is, oh, you guys want to cartelize the economy?

You want to centralize all economic power in Washington, D.C.? That makes sense to us, too. You've got a deal. Trojan horse. That's right, yeah. Because they don't want a free market because that's a risk to their power, a wild dynamic economy. Once you're a billionaire, you want to go ahead and get you some congressmen

and some regulators and make sure that you can stay one if you can. And so that's the deal. And so there, progressivism is a right-wing plot by these evil corporate chiefans. So says the greatest champion of capitalism in world history, Murray Rothbard, right? No greater champion of free market, private property rights and capitalism than him. Natural rights theory. This is the point on the, on the shiniest part of the diamond here. This is the guy. And he's saying, ah, see how it's all corrupt. And that's always what's wrong with capitalism is the state is there for the capitalist to bribe. And that ruins the game.

Yeah. And that's the thing. There's no perfect system because there's going to be some sort of loopholes that powerful, power-hungry people, I should say, use in those systems. And this is why people become anarcho-capitalist, right? It's because they go, we got to repeal the Federal Reserve Act. And then somebody finally, you know, pipes up as we should just repeal Article 1. Then there's no Congress to create a Federal Reserve in the first place. And then we can be free. Let's just not have a national government. Then we won't have a national bank. Yeah. It's like that meme where the guy's like, yeah, yeah, you're catching on to me now. that's right so what made what made ron paul such a you know even in the modern day like a hero to the

movement you know he seems to be the guy that when you talk to a pure libertarian is the most cited and the most in many ways i would say in on some stances seemingly vindicated on on things he said in the past years ago oh yeah well first of all everybody can go and read his archives at antiwar.com slash paul we've been publishing them there since 1999 and he went back to the congress he had been in the congress in the 70s and 80s and then went back to medicine and then went back to the congress in 1997 and so antiwar dot com has all of his foreign policy archives anyway um during that time you can also find he's um uh runs the ron paul institute for foreign policy and freedom no no the rump paul institute for peace and prosperity i'm such an idiot that's my thing

the Scott Horton Academy for Foreign Policy and Freedom that I'm working on. He has a book, which the title of my academy is a homage to his first book, which is a collection of speeches, which is called A Foreign Policy of Freedom. It's not his first book. It's one of his books.

A foreign policy of freedom. So my thing is called the Scott Horton Academy of Foreign Policy and Freedom because I love Ron so much. His thing is called the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity. And it's run by him and Daniel McAdams, who is his long-time.

foreign policy advisor and co-host of the Liberty Report together and they still do the Liberty Report every day and Ron was 90 years old we just went and celebrated his birthday down in Houston in August it was really fantastic everybody from the Ron Paul Revolution only now we're all old and wrinkling and stuff and it was really great but anyway so look the reason I mean first all the reason why everybody loves him so much is just because of his character like he really is a doctor not a lawyer and he's just a really sweet guy and and there's it matters a lot when you actually mean what you say and not just say the right thing absolutely so um you know he's a baby doctor he delivered 4,000 babies he's been with his wife since they started

dating at her sweet 16 party and then you know he's been married to her this whole time he's got 99 grandchildren great great great great great grandchildren or whatever you know what i mean he's one of those guys um they got busy captain of the baseball team right you know great guy just yeah heroic guy then it's just libertarianism right he's a rothbartia he's a ludovamese's guy on economics so he's hardcore for gold he came from kind of a conservative background so he was like you know a fiercely anti-communist and all that but he knew about gold money he was really smart about gold money and so he knew that the austrian school was right that the breton woods agreement was flawed and was going to lead to it was going to break essentially and they'd have to throw it out redo it and which is exactly

what happened when nixon broke the gold standard took us off the gold standard of 1972 right yeah and so dr paul was one of the ones who like oh my god there's like a seminal moment in his life like oh my god see what they're doing because he really understood what that meant for the taking the limit off a government money creation means taking the limit off of government spending and government's ability to stick their nose into every damn thing you know so that was when he ran for congress um you read his early speeches you can tell he's much more wary of the soviet union in china because they are commies and they were powerful um especially the soviet union um but you can tell at he he kind of like gets over it where he could

tell like not that he's any less anti-communist but he's less concerned about their power as he like gets, you know, better and better on, more and more informed, I think. What made them less concerned about their power? Well, I mean, the Soviet Union was just falling apart. But I think, I think he just saw, you know, especially, you know, in the late Clinton years and into the W. Bush years when he came back to Congress is, you know, when I'm most familiar with him. During that time, it's just so obvious.

America is the world superpower, not anyone else. And so there's kind of a, it's more popular now and more justifiable now, but there's always been kind of a very kind of afraid of China sentiment on the right that he could have been like one of those guys, but he wasn't. He was more like, nah, we should celebrate them getting rich. He was not for bringing them into the WTO, he wasn't for like a bunch of government programs to help influence offshore, you know, increase offshoring to China and like all these crazy things that Congress is up to. But I don't think, you know, certainly by the time the Soviet Union was gone,

he would have been, and I don't think he was much of a supporter of the Cold War, even in the Reagan years, quite frankly. I think he was just more wary of them, like in spirit. But like, by the 90s, you know, China's flag is still red, but they'd abandoned communism and they were trying to be our friends. And he's just a realistic guy. You know what I mean? And he's never a emigog. So I think he was rightfully concerned about the Soviet Union at the height of their power and then less so as it waned. You know what I mean? He's just always, yeah, he's very realistic about that. But then, so in the Clinton years, when I first started, well, I first saw him on TV in the spring of 97 and he was holding up some papers it's like that i'm watching c span in the middle of the

night i'm the only guy in austin he's the only guy in the house chamber except you're like 20 years old watching c span tough um a girlfriend um but uh so there's mr speaker whoever is filling in for the speaker and ron paul and he's holds up a piece of some papers and he says it's in the british press today that George H.W. Bush, or they didn't call them H.W. Bush, but President Bush was selling chemical weapons to Iraq right up until the invasion of Kuwait. What the hell is that? And then I look at the bottom of the screen that says, Ron Paul, R. Texas. I'm from Texas. And I know that the Bush is, you know, they're from Connecticut and whatever, but they lived in Texas, and they're very influential in Texas politics. The son,

was the governor at the time yeah the father had been very influential um and that funny how the bushes went from connecticut to texas and the clinton's went from arkansas to new york funny how the uh followed the money yeah how the lines work there yeah um but so for ron paul to say that about texas republicans and the most powerful ones the former president and the next president was pretty courageous to me it was shocking and then I started paying more attention to him through what all avenues I don't really remember I know the new American magazine covered him a lot my friend Will Grigg was the editor of the new American and so they would cover him and then when I started doing radio he had his weekly update I bet it

still works 888 3221414 and on my pirate radio show I would call up and then play that over the air and he would do like read his weekly essay uh into his voicemail machine yeah and then so i would call that put that on the air i would print out copies of his speeches and give them to people in my cap hey do you know there's one good congressman yeah no the rest of them are all absolutely devils but this guy yeah and and he had a couple of great speeches um a republic if you can keep it and sorry mr franklin we're all democrats now and they're really good so i would give those to people in my cab and uh this is before they had five-star ratings yeah and they didn't have social media wasn't we didn't have my space like all you kids now um so yeah and then look and he's just

good on everything um like i said he's why i knew there was a dot-com bubble he's why i knew that there was a common war on terrorism he uh was absolutely fantastic on opposed in iraq war two he introduced a declaration of war against Iraq and the Foreign Affairs Committee and then gave a speech that I'm voting against it but those of you who want to support this war and are going to vote for the authorization I demand that you go ahead and vote for this declaration of war

and send it to the House floor and go ahead and take responsibility and stand for your action right and they wouldn't do it poison pill yep and then well no not poison pill just challenge to them right no that like yeah yeah you have to take responsibility Yeah. And then, so Henry Hyde was the chair of the committee. And he's more famous for being one of the impeachment managers during Clinton's impeachment in 98. But he was the head of the committee. And I don't know if he could find this video anymore. I couldn't find it actually the last time I looked. But Henry Hyde said to Ron Paul, he goes, we don't go by that part of the Constitution anymore. It's an anachronism. And so just, just.

Just pipe down. Imagine you. God damn. And that was, you know, and that would have been in October of 2002. That's the quiet part out loud. Voting for the authorization to launch that war. So, and he was just fantastic. You could find, and I quote him in my book in 1997. And in 1998, he wrote a letter to Bill Clinton, said, you've got to stop bombing Iraq from bases in Saudi. He said, you've got to stop bombing Iraq from bases in Saudi. He said that 97 and 98. Nailed it. dude he's also he's the reason i used to tell people in my cap because i'm from austin that this dot com thing is a giant inflationary bubble and it's going to pop so get your cash your stock options out now pal and then of course i was right about that not because i'm an austrian economist just because i listened to ron that's it and then dr paul um and and then same thing of course for the housing bubble which he said then He goes, now all you're going to do is inflate the housing bubble,

the substitute for the dot-com bubble you just inflated. You guys suck at this. He was much more polite at that, but absolutely right. And so that was why when he ran for president in 07, and it was unfortunate, the crash happened in September of 08 right before the election. Yeah. But if the crash had happened September of 07,

he'd have been the president, dude. Oh, Barack Obama can stand there and smile, But Ron Paul can explain to you the boom and the bus business cycle, Austrian business cycle theory. He's the only one who's right about that. And it would have been a whole different world. And look, he had kids and he didn't, they did it. Kids were burning dollar bills chanting and the Fed in 2007, starting at the University of Michigan there. And that was during the inflationary bubble still.

That was before the crash. Yeah. But it was still prices rising, not anything like what we're dealing with now. But prices were rising. these kids understood, he had taught them well enough by the time of that speech that they knew that, yeah, it's inflationary times now, which just means the coming bust is going to really hit hard, which is, of course, exactly what happened in the fall of 08. And then everybody said, well, now what exactly did Ron Paul say about the economy? And then they go back and look

what he said. And he didn't just say, well, I think the economy is on like shaky fundamentals or whatever. No, he explained exactly what the hell was going on and why and whose fault it was the Federal Reserve. I've seen some of those speeches. And Ben Bernacki. Yeah, dude, for real. There's some of them that are like, whoa. And so look, he's, he's the anti-war Republican way before it was cool, making it, you know, making them crazy, but doing the right thing. I mean, he quoted Jesus Christ and the Golden Rule and they booed him off this, well, they booed him at a Republican debate. This is W. Bush days. And he's just saying, listen, guys, we should not be doing this. We should not be doing this. That could be, you know, his overall, his theme. And he's just so right

about all of it. And it's famous, if you're not familiar, you may be familiar, but your audience should be familiar with what's called the Giuliani moment from May 2007 when Ron Paul got in a big argument with Rudy Giuliani at the Republican debate. And Ron Paul says it's American intervention in the Middle East that caused September 11th. And Rudy Giuliani tries to bully him and say, I demand you retract that and take that back. I can't believe that you said that America deserve September 11, which is not what he said. And then Wendell Goller from Fox News says, oh, Dr. Paul, you're saying we invited the attack? And he sticks to his guns.

And he says, yes, I'm saying the CIA is right. when they teach, they coined the phrase and teach about blowback. And that means the consequences of our foreign policies. So when we did the coup in Iran in 53, that resulted in our hostage crisis since 79. That's how this kind of thing works. When we look at on September 11, 2001, we'd been bombing Iraq for 10 years before that. And that was what did it. And the whole place goes, oh, rabble, roble.

and gets all upset and then the next day oh wait immediately after the show the poll the phone poll says that rom paul wins nobody wants to hear from rudy juliani the mayor 9-11 up there demagoguing everybody he he won by a huge margin because people like hey that old man respects me enough to tell me the truth which by the way is feeding people a pretty bitter pill oh very September 11th didn't happen because you're so good to your mama and evil can't stand that. No, it was Bill Clinton killing people with your money and let's get real, your blessing, that got those towers knocked down. And people went, you know what? That sounds true to me.

I remember Bill Clinton mass murdering people every chance he got from the moment he was sworn in. now that I think about it. So, sounds right. And so he won over 20 million people overnight with that. There's a great documentary about it called it's a somewhat redundant title,

but you can find it. It's called For Liberty, how Ron Paul watered the Withered Tree of Liberty. All right, I know. I'm coming off two straight bad beats. What was looking like a four and O defending Super Bowl champion, Eagles team that was going to run over

the entire league has been quite humbled over the last two weeks. There's no doubt about that. That said, despite the woes my Eagles are going through, I can still have fun each week of the NFL season playing along on prize picks. Now, we haven't been able to get the running game going this year, despite the fact that we have the number one player in the NFL as voted in the NFL top 100 by his fellow players, Sequin Barclay. That aside, I still have faith that Kevin Petulow can get this offense going. And I can put that faith to the test if I decide to pick more than one rushing touchdown for Sequan Barkley this weekend. But it's not just the Eagles. either. You can play along with every single team. Looking out on the West Coast, will Justin Herbert

throw for more than 255 yards this weekend? Or down in the ATL, Bejohn Robinson, is he good for 75 or more on the ground? You can make all these picks and more on prize picks. Prize picks is simple to play. Just pick more or less on at least two player stats. If you get your picks right, you could cash in. Prize picks is also the only app that offers stacks, meaning you can pick the same player up to three times in the same lineup. Want to pick more on Josh Allen's pass yards, rush yards, and touchdowns? Well, you can do that now only on prize picks. So download the prize picks app today and use code Julian to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup. You can download the prize picks app on Apple iOS or Google and the link is down in my description below. So once

again, use code Julian to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup. Prize picks, it's good to be right. Hit pause on whatever you're listening to and hit play on your next adventure. This fall get double points on every qualified stay. Life's the trip. Make the most of it at BestWestern. Visit bestwestern.com for complete terms and conditions. Whatever. But it's like there's a director's cut that's like three hours long or something and it's so good. It just gets better and better and better and better the whole time. And it's all of these Americans who were like anti-war Republicans, man. They were just waiting for someone who is not Akami, not Michael Moore, the big bat millionaire, communist, hypocrite,

whose movies don't make any sense. Like, what is even the point of Fahrenheit 9-11 anyway? He couldn't tell you, nobody knows. And people had just not wanted to have to be like Michael Moore. Here, Ron Paul goes... He wants something reasonable. Yeah, Ron Paul goes, I'm a Texas Republican. And I'm telling you, you don't have to believe in this.

You don't have to go along with W. Bush. And people are like, great. It's just passing out Hall Passes, right? He's just giving you a permission. If you like your identity, you can keep it. I'm not asking you to move left. I'm just telling you that you don't have to believe in this stupid crap anymore. You felt all this pressure to go along with this stuff.

Forget that. It's a bunch of crap. And then, like, that was it. Blinders off and people just tens of millions of people. And then it was great because it was leading with peace. And then also with the pure free market capitalist doctrine and economic theory and whatever like that and revisionist history and all the great.

stuff that comes with libertarianism. It's just the best way to do it. Yeah, it's been interesting watching him, like, kind of have his legacy formed after the fact, though. He was kind of a victim of being around. It's weird. He was around simultaneously the perfect time and also the wrong time because he was on the wrong side, you know, just by party when an administration went totally south, but was righteously not standing with them and was actually pointing out all the problems from a place of like kind of standing above everyone because all the Democrats and Republicans voted for the wreck war and everything obviously so people all had all had fault in it and he was like the one guy going what the fuck here and now people are kind of waking up to that like oh shit

and you do wonder it's a great point you make if that crash happens in September 07 which if you look at the charts now in hindsight it absolutely could have oh yeah right if that had happened it's an enormous trajectory change in history because he he he is the one guy. Like, I always say Jesus couldn't beat Barack Obama in 08 because of everything that happened right there. But like, he's the one guy that if he had had enough time to be able to say, look at all the tapes of me talking about how this was going to happen. He could have ran to the, you know, center of Bush and totally away from him and won that election. Yeah, and with eight months before the convention. Yep. Right? He'd have been unstoppable. Yeah, I think you're

right. And then I'm sorry. There was one thing I was going to say. about Dr. Paul, oh, yes, about just, I guess, the fact that W. Bush was still in the chair when he ran against what was going on in 08. So it just made it so hard to do that, to separate from the current president that hard at that time. And it was so ironic that the American people at that time were, like, really rebelling against all of W. Bushism. And I think there There's quite a few indications at the time that one of the reasons that people wanted to nominate and vote for Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton was because on the surface he was so much different than Bush. And it was in a way, it was like an attempt to apologize to the world

for re-electing Bush. Right. That like, hey, innocent mistake in 2000, anyone could have made it. but after he lied us into war then we re-elected him come on man and then by 08 and after Katrina had drowned in 2000 drowned New Orleans in 2005 and all of that people are so over it and so

Barack Obama comes in and on the surface like if we're just talking about action figures on the rack or whatever like this one is tall dark and handsome and from the other party and the other part of the country right a thousand miles away from north of the thing so like yeah

where Ron Paul is, uh, he's like, yeah, he's like literally a six foot tall German stock, Texas Methodist, right? He looks like he, he came out of the claim same cloning booth as W. Bush. Now, pardon me, we all know that W. Bush is the cousin of the queen of England and has all this blue blood and all of this stuff. And Dr. Paul is a son of a dairy farmer. So that's very different. Right, but that's not the exterior. the surface, right? On the surface, the average goofball couldn't tell these two apart when this is the real opposite of that that you're looking for, where Barack Obama is just W. Bush in blackface and brings the exact same priorities and agenda, you know, into practice

when he gets sworn in. Yeah, it's a whole rabbit hole right there if we go down that, but it's a tragedy, man. Yeah, I do, I do want to get to the Iran thing. Maybe another time we talk about the Obama Bush overlaps. But I had I had said the first the first time I'd seen you was you talking about this on on Pierce Morgan as it was going down. And like this is an active situation. Like right now there hasn't been this enormous boots on the ground war that's happened in Iran yet. But effectively in June when you see these attacks coming from Israel into Iran that, you know, were backed by the United States, it's effectively creating a, in my opinion, a totally unnecessary risk of starting another one of these Middle Eastern conflicts.

And it's the exact kind of thing that Donald Trump specifically promised on the campaign trail that he wouldn't do. So what the fuck, Scott Horton? I'm with you, man. All right. Here's the deal. America started helping Iran develop their nuclear program in the 70s when it was still the Shaw's regime.

Right. The CIA Shah regime. Yeah. Then it was mothballed more or less through the Iran-Iraq war. I think they started developing it. I need to go back and re-research because I forget. exactly when they started construction on Boucher. I know that Bill Clinton had the opportunity to stay out of the way when China was trying to sell Iran light water reactors in the 1990s.

Now, a light water reactor produces waste that can't be refined into weapons fuel. So unlike a heavy water reactor produces plutonium waste that with some effort can be refined, get the impurities out and you can use that as plutonium 239 for fizzol material for a nuclear bomb and so um clinton could have just let the chinese sell him the light water reactor so we probably wouldn't even be having any of this conversation right now but he intervened there and so they went to the black market and they bought nuclear materials and designs or nuclear equipment materials and designs from AQ Khan, the Pakistani nuclear scientist and arms dealer, who had stolen all of his stuff from Yerenko, which was a Dutch company that the CIA, by the way, let him steal all this stuff because

they want to see where he went with it all. They let him steal it? Yeah. And then he went—oh, I didn't know that part. And then he was the father, one of the fathers of the Pakistani bomb. And then he proliferated the equipment to North Korea, Libya, and Iran as well. I think he also literally, like, had a meeting with Osama bin Laden at one point, if I'm thinking to the same guy.

I don't know about that. I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm not saying you're wrong. There's a lot I have not read. But, so in 2002, well, I don't know. I'll go back. In 1979, in 1979, there was a popular revolution there that overthrew the Shah,

the American supported dictator since 1953 in the coup of 53. Now, he was dying of cancer anyway, and his regime was falling apart. The Americans knew he was dying. So he fled and went to South America first, and they're trying to figure out what to do. And the CIA and State Department recommended to Jimmy Carter that he sent the Ayatollah Khomeini home from France. He had been in exile in Iraq and then in France. And they said, we should send him back and let him.

him inherit the revolution he has major factions of the revolutionaries support him and we know this guy he was part of a group of conservative clerics that helped agitate against mosa deck back in 1953 who by the way they had also supported mosa decays to power before they decided to betray him was not like kermit roosevelt kermit roosevelt that did the coup in 53 yeah um and so but comani had been part of a group that had helped agitate against mosedek then so they said we we know this guy, we think we can work with him. So the CIA encouraged Carter to let the French put the Ayatollah back on a plane and send him home to inherit the revolution. Ten months later, the hostage crisis breaks out when David Rockefeller convinced Jimmy Carter to let the shot

into the United States for cancer treatment. And that caused the riot to break out and the seizure of the hostages at the embassy and all that so that was not all one thing the original revolution was in february the hostage crisis was in november right anyway i don't want to get too bogged down but so the ayatollah is yeah america supports saddam hussein in the iran iran iraq war then hw bush bombs the crap out of iraq in iraq war one and then the israelis insists that America stay in Saudi Arabia to balance against Iraq and Iran, since Iraq isn't powerful enough to balance against Iran anymore. So at this time, the Clinton administration was considering proposals by Zabinabritsky,

who had been the National Security Advisor under Jimmy Carter, who had egg all over his face from the revolution and the failed rescue mission, Eagle Claw, and all this. and Ronald Reagan's secretary of state, Alexander Hague, who had been a Kissinger protege, and Kissinger, meaning Rockefeller guy, and even Dick Cheney from Halliburton. Dale wanted to, who had been the Secretary of Defense under Bush Sr., of course, and then was the CEO of Halliburton,

they all wanted to build pipelines out of the Caspian Basin across Iran to the Persian Gulf. as a way to one make money but also find a way to begin to integrate Iran back into the system let bygones be bygones and figure out a way to get along. Dick Cheney said famously at the time that God did not see fit to put all the oil under friendly Western democracies and we're just going to have to do business with these people and after all we're the USA we can deal with diatola and so um they were all overruled by the israel lobby who said absolutely not and insisted that instead america which they did build the what's called the btc pipeline that goes from

uh baku azurbaijan through tablisi georgia to jayan turkey on the mediterranean and then shit the oil to europe that way that way we cut out the russians and the iranians and get that old a lot of there. That was also why they supported the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan in 1996 was because they wanted to build a pipeline across from Tajikistan, from, yeah, from Tajikistan or Turkmenistan, sorry, across Afghanistan to the Port of Karachi in, on the Indian ocean, in Pakistan, which was abandoned by 98, but that was why they supported the rise of the Taliban in 96. Anyway.

So, point being, despite everything, all other things being equal from all the aftermath of the ugly Iranian revolution and failed rescue mission in 1979 and the Iran-Iraq war and all of that, even, see my confirmation by us, even Zabigna Brazinski and Alexander Haig and Dick Cheney said, we can go ahead and get. get along with the ayatollah now everybody but they were told no business but they were told no by israel said no we're not doing that why they say yes sir clinton went along well clinton had hired a guy named martin indick who had worked for yitzhak shimir as a p r agent as a p r agent yeah and he was

yitzhak shmere was a hardcore lakud party terrorist murderer and and prime minister and indick was an an Australian dash Israeli and had worked as a PR advisor for Yitzhak Shemir. Then he comes to work for Bill Clinton and ended up becoming Bill Clinton's ambassador to Israel, although was he Israel's ambassadors to the United States or the other way around or what? How does that happen? Like, how do you let that happen? And so, well, here's how they let this happen.

Remember, when we were talking about the neo-conservatives earlier, I mentioned the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Winnep. Well, it's literally a spinoff of APEC. They put up the money, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. That's not true of every neocon think tank. That is the case with Winup. That is literally a spinoff of APEC. And he's the founder of it.

And he had been pressuring Clinton to adopt what they called, the Israeli, the Rabin government called the dual containment policy. And Clinton was resisting until the Kuwaitis cooked up. up a fake assassination attempt against Bush senior. Remember the lie that Saddam Hussein tried to assassinate Bush Sr. with a truck bomb in Kuwait in 1993. Based on that lie, Bill Clinton launched a massive cruise missile attack against Baghdad and told Martin Indic, okay, go ahead. We'll do the, we'll do the dual containment policy. And Martin Indic gave a speech at Winep announcing the inauguration of the policy. And it was the Kuwaites. I don't think the Israelis were involved in that as far as I know. But it was just a whiskey smuggling ring that they just embellished into this plot against Bush

because Clinton had idiotically announced, hmm, I'm considering bringing Saddam Hussein in from the cold. When like, no, dude, you should have played those cards way closer to your chest. Right. And made that guess what, everybody, we're friends with Mao now kind of moment like Nixon did, right? And so instead, the Kuwaitis, and guess what, from, everybody knows this story from Iraq War I in 1990, during Desert Shield, it was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador who testified to Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers take babies and premature babies and throw them out of their incubators and leave, of the Kuwait City Hospital, and leave them on the coal floor to die just to steal their incubators. and this was a major propaganda point that they used to get us into a rock war one as this crying young girl oh they took the incubators and threw the babies on the floor not only was it not true she was never even a nurse and wasn't even in Kuwait at the time of the invasion it was 100% and you know fake there was not even a kernel of truth to it didn't stop amnesty international

from saying that it was true too though and it became a major piece of the propaganda to launch the war and to get people's acquiescence to build up for the war in 1990. Well, it was her father, was the one who put her up to that. He was the same guy who told the story of the fake truck bomb assassination plot against Bush Sr. in 1993. Oh, they don't even hide it. They don't even hide. It's all in case not closed by Seymour Hirsch and the New Yorker.

And which, by the way, I was paying attention for us. I was still a high school kid, but I was paying a lot of attention at that time. And I have to tell you that story that the assassination attempt had been debunked did not get around. And in fact, I think Bill Hicks knew about it because Bill Hicks did emphasize in his joke, he says, the alleged assassination attempt against Bush Sr. You know, and he did refer to the Iraqgate scandal and stuff. I think he may very well have known, you know, how fake that was. By the way, they murdered a famous Iraqi artist named Layla Al-Atar in the striking. Oh, that was an accident.

But people wondered about that because she had decorated the floor of a hotel lobby with a tile mosaic of George Bush so that you could walk all over his face when he walked into the lobby. Probably wasn't her brightest moment. Yeah, and then they accidentally killed her with a tomahawk missile for it. Yeah. Those accidents tend to happen when you do things. this is like a month after waco and bill's like man i haven't had any blood to drink in a while kill me some woman for doing a mosaic i don't like pull that number up um anyway so so then that was how

the israelis did their their coup over american policy and forced the dual containment policy which was again number one on the list of motive for turning america's own terrorist mercenaries against the American people and then prevented, of course, the warming up of relations with Iran this whole time. Then when W. Bush comes to power, the bin Ladenites hit us, right? The absolute inverse anti-matter of the Iranian Shiite regime. And they hit us and the Ayatollah says, great, now's our chance to get along with America better than before. You hate the Taliban, you hate Saddam Hussein, you hate Osama bin Laden, let's do business. And I know, told us said that yes i mean this is not an exact quote but that was the posture of the iranian government

they held a million man vigil on september the 12th in tehran which was yes orchestrated by the regime hey everybody come out this is our chance to suck up to the u.s a brand new president horrible crisis our enemies are their enemies let's do this huh can we google that i didn't yeah pull that a million man vigil on september 12th 2001 and In Tehran. In Tehran. Yep. Whoa.

And see, there's... I don't make you think. There's former National Security Council and State Department officials named Flint Leverett and Hillary Mann, who ended up becoming his wife, Hillary Mann, Leverett. And they both worked for W. Bush, and they told me this story themselves, so I know that this stuff is true. That after September 11th, they wanted to suck up to the United States and do whatever they could to to give us intelligence to help us fight in Afghanistan,

to turn over bin Ladenites that they captured, and to negotiate at least to trade intelligence about them and possibly trade custody with members of the Mujahideen-e-Kalk. And then in 2003, right after we... No, don't look at Google AI. It does not know anything. it does not know anything dude i hate that goddamn thing you know i asked it i saw this documentary all about libya and it had dewy clarege in it and i wanted to write in the youtube comments about

oh that's funny dewy clarege is in the libya documentary huh because here's a conflict of interest about him and then i wanted to google the conflict of interest and make sure i know what i'm talking about before i say this and but i dude i know this stuff from when it happened so i asked Google, I typed in, Dwayne Clarege, Blue Mountain Security, Benghazi, Libya. And Google AI told me, Dwayne Clarege and has nothing to do with Benghazi. Like, its job is to debunk me, not to help me find it. Not, well, he owned a company called Clearview that nine different sources say help Blue Mountain security get the contract to protect the Benghazi consulate who then outsourced it to the February

17th brigade who did not do their job that day, remember. Google AI is not here to tell me, oh, I know what you must be thinking of there, Horton. Let me help you find that. Instead, no, its job is telling me, no, Dwayne Clarege would never do something like that. He would He has nothing to do it. His company hired the company that didn't do the job that day. That is something to do with it. Thank you very much. Like, who programmed this thing where its job is making sure to prevent me from going overboard here?

They would never do that at Google, Scott. Come on. I don't like it. Google is a bum. I've seen pictures of them Iranians with their candles, man. I've seen them. Google is the greatest company of all time. Before deep fakes.

They've never lied about anything. They've, they, all they have is seeking the truth. Now, but in all seriousness, Deep and I, we're, we're going to come back to the Iran thing. We're talking about the buildup to that. Oh, yeah, Iran. Deep and I had some of this happen live, there's a real I have on my Instagram from June with the Bezos thing. I don't remember what it was, but we were like talking about Bezos. I'm on airplane mode, so I can't buy it.

But we were talking about Bezos. and Epstein or something and Google AI spit out like this one line answer said all ties of Jeff Bezos and Jeffrey Epstein are completely fabricated and have been debunked like one sentence you see usually it's like paragraphs

and then we were on a Patreon episode so we start talking about it like here with the fucking computer listening and we're citing all the evidence and so like two minutes later Dief goes and pulls it up and types it in and this time it gives us some information

and completely different answer because it's like, oh, fuck, all right, we got caught. You know what I mean? And I'm like, oh, my God. Like, we caught it in real time. There's a bubble that's going to pop. I hate this AI crap. Wait, here it is.

On September 18, 2001, so it was the 18th, not the 12th, but close enough. Just a week after the terrorist attacks, Iranians gathered in Tehran's Moseni Square. They were holding a candlelight vigil for the victims of 9-11. Security forces shut down the vigil shortly after it began. I don't think that's right. Who's she? Holly, can we check that out?

Holly DeGress? I don't think that's right. I think it was a lot bigger than that. Iranian American senior fellow. Yeah, from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Martin Indyx Group that we're just talking about.

Yeah, the war party, your enemy. Anyway, no, that's not true. It was the regime that held the vigil that had everybody to do it. Because I've seen pictures where it's like, you know, see a candlelight and whatever.

It should be able to. Yeah. But we basically, didn't accept them sucking up at the time. Right. So what happened was right after the invasion of Iraq, remember now, Ahmed Chalabi, who sold all the lies

about the weapons of mass destruction, he was being backed by Iran. Now, he was his own agent. I'm not saying he was just an Iranian front. But Iran knew what he was doing. INC headquarters was in Tehran. This guy's job, this Iraqi Shiite exile's job, was telling American Jewish Zionists, neoconservatives, that if only you get rid of Saddam Hussein,

it's going to really stick it to that Ayatollah. Oh, yeah. That's, that is the group there. Benjamin Netanyahu was telling us in Congress in 2002, too. You must have made a ruck. You must have made a run. But that's what I'm saying is. Fuck you. The Ayatollah is upstream, because the Ayatollah told Chalabi to tell Richard Pearl to tell Netanyahu that. That's why Netanyahu believes. that. He got it. He was fooled by these guys who promised him an oil pipeline to Haifa and the rest. Defe, Defe, can we pull up the chart of every time since the 1990s Benjamin Netanyahu has claimed Iran as close to a nuke? Have you seen this? I haven't seen the chart. I know there's a great article by a guy named Nima Shirazi called The Phantom Menace that has quotes going back to at least 1993. It's a great article.

I don't, I'm not sure the chart that you're talking about. Yes, fuck. I wish I had it. And by the way, I do not mean in any way to spin for Netanyahu. I'm not acquitting Netanyahu by saying that he was duped by Chalabi. No, I understand. You know what I mean? I understand.

Yeah. Basically, he said since the 90s, like repeatedly, Iran is two months away. Iran is six months away. Iran is a year away. Iran is nine months away. Iran is nine days away. Even here when he attacked them, he said they could have one as soon as a year. He said to Brett Bear.

It was like, in other words, he's admitting no emergency. Yes, and Tulsi Gabbard got shut down on her opinion on this, and it's looking like three months later. I'm taking too long to answer your question is what you're saying. Let me get to the nukes here. No, no, there's important. Okay, so Rock War II happens. And my point about Chalabi is the Ayatollah hated Saddam

and wanted rid of the guy. And the Ayatollah helped use these Iraqi exiles to use the neoconservatives to use the United States to get rid of him for them. by making these promises about how they'll suck up to Israel now. And so, hey, that's a good one. Deaf's got it up here. Netanyahu's Iran.

Are there links for all those? Is there, is there one that has it? This one's just from X. There's a one I'm thinking of that has like a direct source, but this is a screenshot from what I saw. Yeah. Hot links or it ain't real. Yep.

But that's still true anyway. Nima Shirazi in the Phantom Menaces, the article by Nima Shirazi has proof for all of his claims in there. I can recommend you that. But so, anyway, the Ayatollah wanted rid of Saddam. America got rid of Saddam for him. And then not only that, W. Bush took the Iranian-backed parties,

the Supreme Islamic Council and the Dawa Party, to power in Baghdad. They were doing exactly what Iran wanted. So America's post-9-11 foreign policy is right up the Ayatollah's alley. He has every reason to want to cooperate with us. Then what happens is there's an al-Qaeda terrorist attack in Saudi Arabia and then neoconservatives

convinced W. Bush that Iran did it and that Iran was that the attack was organized by al-Qaeda in Iran backed by the Ayatollah's regime. So who did it? So now it was the bin Ladenites that did it. So but they convinced him that so that and he bought it because he's an idiot. And so that then that completely destroyed the cooperation, the spirit of cooperation between the United States and Iran on our joint goals. Again, they have. hated the Taliban, they hated Saddam, they hated Osama. There's every reason in the world that we can use them to help with our goals and vice versa here, as from the administration's point of view, except for the neo-conservatives, in other words, the Likud, the American Likud. And so

Iraq War II ends up benefiting Iran immensely. But anyway, so we'll skip Syria and all that because it's part of that story but um on the nuclear program because this is the major conflict between Israel and Iran in 2002 in the state of the union bush declared that Iran was part of the axis of evil now this term was written up by david from who was the licksbittle of richard pearl co-author of the clean break with david worms and they said Iran Iraq and North Korea represent an axis of evil and heavily implying that they're all tied

to Osama bin Laden and the terrorists who hit us on September 11th as well. Now, first of all, just think of how absurd it is. Of course. That they want us to believe that Osama bin Laden is in an alliance with Saddam Hussein

and the Ayatollah and Kim Jong-il. No, that's like the Cowboys, Giants, and Eagles being in the war. makes no sense so um but the thing is also it's obvious too isn't it that the only reason they didn't put syria in there was because then it'd be too obvious that this is ariel sharon and benjamin net and yahoo talking so that was why they put north korea in there just because it's bar away but that also really throws your whole axis thing into doubt to when north korea had sold some missiles

to iran before but they had no real alliance they're not part of anything anyway so that's a major step back in our relations with Iran and with everybody else at that time. Now, Saddam Hussein said, man, I'm unarmed. Here's my 12,000 page dossier. Don't shoot. And America just bulldozed right in there anyway. Kim, I'll skip the story. Kim said, screw you guys, I'm making nukes. And he made nukes in North Korea. We ain't mess with him since or his son. The Ayatollah said, especially as long as you're busy in Iraq. I'm getting going on my nuclear program. But it's a civilian program protected by the non-proliferation treaty

and our safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency. So we're making a civilian program to produce electricity. Our books are wide open. You have no excuse to invade because we're not making a nuclear bomb. The previous Ayatollah said we're not making a nuclear bomb. It's Haram, forbidden by God. and the new iatollus says the same thing too we're not doing it on the other hand though let's not anybody be by be naive they are mastering the fuel cycle and they're proving that they

had the capability to make nuclear weapons they're making what you call a latent nuclear deterrent and they did that legally that's part of the nonproliferation treaty is that any country that signs any non-nuclear weapon state that signs that treaty has a right to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. And so it's they were essentially attempting to achieve the capability what you would call as a threshold state, which is the same as Japan, Germany, and Brazil. Everybody knows they've mastered the fuel cycle. They could make an atom bomb, but so don't push them into making an atom bomb. And that was essentially the nature of America's standoff and, you know, on Israel's behalf mostly yeah but america's and israel standoff with iran for the last 25 years since

early w bush years or well let's say 20 years really because 2005 was when they revealed the natanz facility they didn't really begin spinning centrifuges till i think the end of that year maybe beginning of o six um and then so w bush put maximum pressure and and got sanctions got the europeans to add sanctions and do all these things to try to force them to just completely abandoned the thing, refused to negotiate with them in good faith through the end of his presidency. Barack Obama comes in and he's got Netanyahu has sworn in his prime minister again right before he's sworn in. The poor son of a bitch. And I hate Barack Obama. I hate to have any sympathy for the guy whatsoever. But for this, imagine you are elected president of the United States

of America two months after Benjamin Netanyahu comes back to powers prime minister of Israel. Have you ever? God, what a bump. No matter who you are. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I would even sympathize with William Jefferson Clinton over that. And I, in fact, the first time that Clinton met with Netanyahu. He met with him for half an hour, 96.

Yeah. And then the story was that he came out of their breathless and said, who does this guy think he is? Who's the superpower and who's the client state? Right. Right, because Netanyahu just talked to Clinton like he was the butler. the butler look bitch shine my shoes and give me a nuclear whatever just to do that anything dude god that guy yeah um clinton also spent a lot of that he he ran he had like political action

committees i don't know if that's the official term you want to use for it but there were basically like shadow committees working against electing that nahu in the first place and then i believe he worked against it again in 99 it was successful really what book do i read about that i like that i didn't want to know you want to know what book you i hate bill clinton so much and you're like telling me a reason to actually like book you should read that in benjamin netanyahu's autobiography dope i can't wait to read that dude i finished benjamin netanyahu's autobiography which is like fucking 1200 pages oh my god i finished it in september 23 i'm not reading that you should read it because he the great thing about someone writing a book like that is they think they're the

guy in the story and they reveal themselves unknowingly throughout the pages. I've learned everything I need to know about the guy and what a sociopath he is reading that book. It's funny you bring up the Barack Obama thing though because Barack Obama, I'm not a fan of his presidency and he was particularly awful on pretty much all things foreign policy. That said, he was the best president we have ever had by a mile on managing the Israel relationship in so many ways. And, and he was the best president. And oh boy i gotta disagree with that but i'm willing to listen if you don't believe me read netanyahu's book yeah and see the fucking thorn in his side the only reason israel got some things done is because netting yahoo had a back door to his old buddy joe biden and even though they had political

disagreements they got along yeah that is why some things got done but barraq obama the very first meeting he ever had with netin yahoo netting yahoo was like all excited to meet him he walked in wagged his finger in netting yahoo's face and said no more settlements bibi those were the first words out of his mouth. And it's like, that's like a breath of fresh air. Like, when the fuck is a president never done that? Yeah, but the history of Obama's presidency is he gave his big Cairo speech and he said, we're going to do a two-state solution. We're going to do a two-state solution. We're going to do it. Oh, we're actually, we're not going to do a two-state solution. What we're going to do is we're going to do an Iran nuclear deal. We're going to do an Iran nuclear

deal. And he spent the entire rest of his presidency to get the Iran nuclear deal. Which was what? And he completely screwed it. And he completely screwed the Palestinians and did nothing for the Palestinians whatsoever, completely backed down from that. And then on the nuclear deal, he got a deal that was easy enough for Trump to simply withdraw from with the stroke of a pen a couple of years later. The deal was terrible. It was a joke. It wasn't that bad, but he had his fucking speech writer write it, which tells you all you need to know. No, that's not true. Ben Rhodes wrote the fucking nuclear deal. Who else wrote it? Well, John Kerry and his guys and plus what's his name? What's his name?

the funny hair from the energy department, you know, was the, do you remember his name, the guy with a really bad comb over? There was a huge team of people who worked on that. I'm sure other people contributed, but I'm saying like... And Ben Rose was the Deputy National Security Advisor. I don't mean to give the guy credit for anybody. That was where he came from, yeah. Yeah, let's call it is. But the deal, if you read the deal, what the deal actually did was it severely rolled back Iran's program. It made it where Fordo was a research facility only, no productive. They poured concrete in the rock heavy water reactor. They shut down like two-thirds of the centrifuges spinning at Natanz.

And the only thing about it, and they expanded the inspections regime, so that the Americans and the IAEA could inspect even sites where everyone agreed there were no nuclear materials or any overt proof that there were nuclear materials or nuclear machines that could accept nuclear materials in any of those places. and military bases where and then the deal was on the UN Security Council America and their friends the American government and its friends outvote the Russians and the Chinese right is we got America France and Britain versus Russia and China and so and there was no veto power on this so if America Britain and France agreed that there was something in Iran they wanted to search

There was nothing Russian China could do about that, and the Iranians, as long as they had a good reason to show, then the Iranians had to let them inspect even military sites, which is far beyond any inspections regime that any country has ever had by a million miles. And all the hype about, oh, yeah, but explain these molecules here and explain this sample there, all of that has been bullshit. All of it has been debunked over and over again. from the implosion testing at Parchin and all of this stuff. I mean, I spent years on this stuff. And every one of those, oh, the IAEA is raising very serious questions

about a sample that seems to reveal an isotope of this or that. None of that is meaningful. None of that has traced back to any illicit or secret parallel nuclear weapons program of any kind. And so what happened was at the time that they did the deal, it was as though the nonproliferation tree, never existed. It was as though no one had ever heard of the Safeguards Agreement or the IAEA

inspections regime there. It's like we're all just pretending that none of that is going on. And as far as we know, Iran is making nuclear bombs right now. And so Israel might just have to bomb them. And I think Obama was legitimately worried that Israel was going to do what they did last June and just go ahead and start the war. And in fact, you can find this if you want. Zabigna-Brasinski said that if Israel tries to fly over Iraq to bomb Iran, Obama should shoot him down. Yeah, he wasn't exactly tight with the neocons, only on Russia, not on Iran and Israel policy.

What I'm saying is, it's a low bar, Scott, but comparatively speaking, obviously with the Cairo speech and saying he would get the two states, he didn't do that, to be clear. Like, he's not even close. He backed down on that. Not even close. But, like, he's the only guy. the only fucking president I can point to in modern history

who actually was willing to be like, fuck you. No, that's not true. When something didn't make sense. Why do you think Bush Sr. was a one-term president? Let's force them to do this thing right now. The two-state solution, this is our chance. And then they were gone. I'm unaware of that.

Yeah, and they blamed Bush himself blamed the Israel lobby for his defeat. In 1992, George W. Bush and Colin Powell tried to do the two-state solution after September 11th until Tom DeLay came to town and said, we'll turn the entire evangelical Christian right against you. And you'll be a one-term president just like you're old day. Yeah, so he started all the wars. And so he backed down. And so Barack Obama, he went a bit further. But yes, it's true that the deal, it wasn't a treaty. He wasn't able to get a treaty through. Israel has too much control of this country for that. And so it was an agreement that Donald Trump was able to simply tear right up in 2018, which set us on the path for the current conflict, even though there's so much hype about this. It drives me crazy.

We go, like Mike Baker went on a certain major podcast and said, well, what do you think 60% might mean or something? Like, why are we doing hypotheticals here? What are we talking about? He and Marco Rubio both said, like, well, the only countries with 60% enriched uranium have nuclear bombs. That doesn't mean anything. What are you talking about? Can you explain that?

We all know, yes. A nuclear, an atom bomb made with uranium has to be approximately 90% uranium 235. That's the sweet stuff, not the 238. That's why you spin it in centrifuges. You take the ore, you refine it, you convert it to uranium. hexafluoride gas, then you spin it in the cascades of centrifuges until you get all the 238 goes to the outside and the 235 stays to the inside. And that's the stuff that at 3.6% uranium 235, oh, and then you convert it back to a metal for introduction into your reactors.

So at 3.6%, you use that for your electricity. At 20%, you can use those for targets for your medical isotope reactors. Above that, you're getting toward nuclear weapons grade material, right? But so then Mike Baker goes, huh, huh, 60%? Huh, huh? What are you talking about, Mike? They stopped at 60. They didn't go to 90. They're not making weapons fuel. What, in fact, are they doing? They are making bargaining. chips for negotiations, they're trying to build up something to give away. And what's the history of the 60%. The history of 60% is that Donald Trump tore up the deal in 2018. Then in December 2020, in Trump's lame duck period, the Israelis, through the M.E.K. Mujadini cult,

communist terrorist cult, did this machine gun attack and killed Fakhrake Razzata, who is the leader of the Iranian nuclear program. And then Iran decided that they're going to start enriching up to 20% again. Then in April of 2021, they did a sabotage attack at Natanz, which they took credit for and said that they did it, the Israelis. And it was after they did the sabotage attack at Natanz that the Iranians started enriching up to 60%, which they announced that they were going to do. At no point did they kick the IAEA inspectors out of the country,

withdraw from the Safeguards Agreement, and they're not even in violation necessarily of their safeguards agreement. Now, they are in violation of the JCPOA that America completely withdrew from. Right. And that they are technically still within. Because it says in the treaty that if America stops abiding by, not the treaty, the deal.

If America stops abiding by the deal, Iran can stop abiding by the deal. by parts of the deal. They don't have to implement all of the strictures of the deal without breaking the deal. They can stay in the deal. It says in there, if America starts not doing what they're supposed to do, then you don't have to do what you're supposed to do again. So now all that's happening here is they're trying to get America back into negotiations so they can either get back into the JCPOA or something like it. The devil's advocate question I would have, because I mean, I'm on your side.

with this, I did not support striking them. I just want to see where people could be coming from potentially. If a regime like that, which regardless of some paths where maybe they wanted to try to cozy up to us a couple times, if a regime like that that does say death to America, that is totalitarian that is not controlled by our CIA, is going to, you know, enrich uranium and get up to a 60% level, who's to say that they won't, as a bargaining chip, who's to say they won't try to make the bargaining chip to 90%. Well, that's the whole point. Negotiate now before they do. As I said, this has been a latent deterrent all the time. Since 2005, they're saying, look at me. I know how to enrich uranium. Right? That's like, look at me. I have a bullet factory in my backyard.

I also own firearms. So far, I haven't loaded any of my weapons. So you can have your inspectors hang around. But at some point, the point is you understand, I'm asking you to not push me so far that I go ahead and start loading my guns and pointing them at you. Right? That's the whole point. All of this is diplomacy from the beginning. So who's to say that they won't? I'm warning you, they might. They're warning you, they might. That's the whole point. Listen, guys, I was enriching up to 3.6%, then I went up to 20, and I got a plausible deniability that that's just for my cancer isotopes, and everybody needs, everybody knows we need that, but like, now here I am at 60. Would you please come and sit at the table and talk? That was what it was. If they wanted to

go to 90 and make bombs, they could. If they wanted to make 90% and hold it and say, you know, I could make a bomb out of this. They could have done that. They did not do that. So the question is why stop at 60? What's the point of having 60% U-235 at all? Because it's a bargaining chip. It's simply a card to play in negotiations so they can negotiate it away. So why did we attack them? Why did Israel attack them? Israel attack them because right now everything's coming up, Benjamin Netanyahu and Lakshu. But we did support the attack with dropping bombs on Ford us and all that. Well, that was two weeks into the thing. And I I believe that Donald Trump knew good and well that they were going to attack and gave them the green light to do it.

Okay. So that counts. And which was a real betrayal of diplomacy at the time. Yeah. Now, Tucker Carlson's sources in the White House told him that's not true. They were in the middle of negotiations. They had a scheduled meeting on Sunday and the Israelis just did this and forced it on the administration. Forced it.

Like, why did we back it up? That's what I want to know. why if if they're breaking red lines why is there no like they're Trump looks weak Trump looks weak of course if Netanyahu's dragging them around if he can deny he's dragging around by saying of course I told him to do it then he saves more face that way or he gets to publicly excoriate him and say you broke the red line I'm going to go deal with Iran myself now and negotiate with them fuck you why does he do that's a strong move why does he do that he and the Republican Party still got to do with the Israel lobby from here

here on out it's a lot of money he doesn't have to win another election this is what i don't understand why is a billionaire he could finance the republican party himself with a new endowment for the next 50 years right he i mean the new york times said digging through their things that they said he had at least four billion dollars we know his children and great great-grandchildren are set for all time he's in his late 70s the whole point when he ran in in 15 and 16 he said he's stop saying this. I really wish he'd stuck with it. It sure made a great line in a debate. It was like, he said something very close to look, guys. I'm retired. I already won at life. That's why I'm here is like as a charitable thing for my country. So take control of this thing

away from these cooks. And at my own, I don't have anything to gain from this. I don't care. So why does he care? And so what he should have done right then was just started writing checks because I think what happened was he even said to A-PAC. I don't need your. I don't need your money. He was like, they said, oh my God, he's anti-Semitic because he's saying these Jews have money when he's like at a meeting of the Republican Jewish coalition or whatever it was. He's going, I don't need your stinking money. But then he realized real quick, the Republican Party does. You know, you got 435 House districts, 100 Senate seats to fight over. And you've got all the state houses and state senatorships and all of that. That's a lot of money. And you can't

just make that big of a break. he's not willing to. And look, I'm the one who just said he's got billions. If anybody could or should, it would be him. But then Miriam Adelson, Sheldon Adelson, they go, look, man, we got hundreds of millions of dollars for you here. We'll write you a check for a hundred million right now. We'll write you another check for $100 million in two years. And another check for a hundred million in three years. And you'll put the embassy, you'll put the embassy in Jerusalem. You'll send Jonathan Pollard back to kiss the ground and shake Netanyahu's hand. And by the way, pardon scour. I didn't even know that was part of it. Recognize the seizure of the Golan Heights. And then also, by the way, you know, the rumor from the May 28th, the reports from the May 28th, $2,400 million that Mary Madelson gave him was that it was in exchange for eventually supporting the settlement of the West Bank for Israel. Now, I will give Donald Trump this credit as of the recording of this podcast five days ago. He said that's not going to happen. Let's see if he sticks to that.

But I'm saying, like, he's giving them everything else they want. Jonathan Pollard's running for Knesset now on the platform of nuking Gaza. by the way, I don't know if you've seen that, but it's like, I see shit like that and I'm like, what the fuck are you doing? Well, you saw where Smotrich said Gaza is going to be a real estate bonanza. I just love that man. Like, go ahead, dude. Like, you have to look at this. Like, a lot of the Israeli people, of course, don't support this government. It wins with the minority because they have multiple, they have multiple parties and then the hardcore, hardline, like, orthodox communities support it. But you have to take them at their word when they say this

out loud. When Ben Gavir says out loud over and over again, we're going to ethnically cleanse Gaza, get them out, bomb them till they're gone, total war. This is a guy who has a picture of Baruch Goldstein over his dining room table. I think he's fucking serious about it. Like, that doesn't mean that fucking Jews in the diaspora support this. None of my Jewish friends support this. But it is now making a bad name for everyone around the world because of the actions of like this group of people who is wanted by the ICC. It doesn't make sense to me then when the president of my country is fucking risking enormous Middle Eastern wars again at their behest when they have no international support right now. All the leverage should be on this end. I understand that

there's money flowing and whatever, but you don't have another election to win, man. But see, these are all Donald Trump's friends and no Arabs are, not really. You know what I mean? Like the Saudis flatter him and stuff. But like in New York City where he's done business, his whole life and all these things, all his friends in California too, on his, you know, TV business and whatever. everywhere he goes. And look, Donald Trump is from Queens. He's not a Brooks brother's waspy wasp. He hangs out with Jews. He always has. You know what I mean? So, like, he just doesn't see the mileage and being on the other side of that. It just doesn't make sense at all. Yeah, but he's picking out the ones right now who are hardliners. A lot of them aren't hardliners. A lot of them don't like

Netanyahu. Well, Netanyahu needs the hardliners, right? He was, he had formed so many different coalitions. The last time, I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, I believe it was in December of 2020 when he formed his latest coalition, he had to go ahead and go this far right to Ben Gavir and Smochurch. Where before he hadn't brought in guys this far to the right. But at this point, he needed them to stay out of jail. By the way, I would do the war real quick in just a sec, but I want to point out real quick that there is, it's available on the Pirate Bay. If anybody has a VPN and still uses that thing, I do. It's called the BB files. This great documentary. And essentially all it is is its surveillance footage, basically,

from interrogations of Netanyahu and his wife and their friends. And Netanyahu tells Shinbet, National Police, on video. Why did I support Hamas? Because that's how you thwart a Palestinian state. But don't worry, we control the hide of the flames. Now, this is the same thing that he said in a meeting of the Lakud,

where one of the ministers came right out and told a reporter and that reporter went and got it immediately verified with someone else who was in the meeting and then a different guy published a book saying the same thing and then they denied it and said he never said that well here he is in Hebrew in this video and verified by other Hebrew speakers that's the translation all right and he's saying this directly to the shinbet

while being interrogated they go how can you support these terrorists And his answer is, I know what I'm doing. That's crazy. That's the guy. And then their violence is the excuse for him to do anything since then. But now, so fast-forwarding because we can't spend, I don't think we've got time to spend too much on, well, we'll see how it works, but let's fast forward through the horrific

Gaza genocide that's happening now to just where we were in June. So Netanyahu is looking at it like everything's coming up, Lakut, right? He's kicked that crap out of Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Nasrallah is dead. He bombed the crap out of them with airstrikes and with the pager attack and just severely crippled their power, destroyed, I guess, you know, vast amounts of their weapon stocks and exhausted their missiles and whatever. So I don't know how you gauge it on a percentage chart, but Hezbollah's power has been severely diminished. then their ally Bashar al-Assad in Syria is gone

replaced by Osama bin Laden's stepson crazy Abu Mohammed Adjolani that's only the slightest exaggeration but he's like on stage with Petraeus doing like Q&As now are you fucking kidding me and this is a guy who

who openly admitted to American government television frontline PBS that he fought Americans in Mosul and Ramadi in Iraq War II by the way fully support you know people in the U.N. walking out from a speech from Netanyahu, the fact that they didn't walk out

from that guy's speech is fucking embarrassing. Seriously. And why does anybody support him? Because he kills Shiites for Israel. That's it. That's the only reason, you know. Well, the Saudis and the Turks, I guess, feel the same way. I have all the quotes in the book where the Saudis say, Prince Turkey, or I forgot which Turkey, Saudi prince says, dash, that is ISIS, is our response to your support for the dawa in other words america put the sheites in power in bagdad so that's why we're supporting the caliphate now you know um so anyway that's basically the policy so in june no um so in june so now the the humas has been severely weakened they're going to survive but they have been severely weakened in gaza his bala is crushed um well severely set back let's say in southern lebanon

the Ba'athist regime in Syria, allies with Iran and Hezbollah no longer exists. And nobody can do nothing about the Houthis, as we talked about, bomb them for years and they're still there, but they can still bomb them and weaken them somewhat, I guess. The Iraqis seem to, even though they're friends with Iran, they seem to be mostly staying out of Israel's business, although they have attacked American positions in Syria. They're Shiite militias and stuff have. But then Iran is the big one. So the question is, if you're Benjamin Netanyahu, do you leave Iran there?

Because Iran is a good way to try to rally the Sunni kingdoms and join in all the Abraham Accords and everything and a lie with Israel against the Shiite Persian enemy. Or what the hell? Go ahead and go for the coup de gra, man. You've already done this and this and this and this. You got all of these things going for you. Go ahead, one, destroy their nuclear program as much as possible, and two, get America in there so that now it's our problem, too. And now, I don't know if Netanyahu's playing chess here at all.

Forget three and four D chess. Just how about regular chess? It could be even checkers. Hell, I don't know how to play chess. it could be that what he's saying is what he's really doing is setting America on a path of more and more conflict with Iran

until it goes all the way to regime change or it could be that he's just hoping for the best we'll just bomb him as much as we can we'll sit back their program as much as we can and I don't know see what happens then they act on very kind of like high time preferences the Israeli government a lot of the time so I really don't know what they're thinking there but I can tell you that they have not obliterated Iran's nuclear

program we know that they have yes we know that they have destroyed I think they may have made fordo the com facility essentially inoperable but Natanz has survived much of the the Isfahan conversion facility has revived, although I think maybe not the major, most important building there, but I think the infrastructure there has survived. They bomb like surface targets at Natanz, but the majority, I think, of the centrifuges are still there,

and the Iranians claimed at least that they were already working on a new secret facility deeper under a taller mountain, and they're continuing their program. They're absolutely, at least their state of position is that one, they're still not going to make nukes. And I'm not saying we can believe that. I'm saying it used to always be verified by the IAEA.

They weren't diverting any of their uranium. Now they've had a big break in their IAEA inspections for months. So we don't know what's happened in the country since then. As all the anti-war people have said for years, they're more likely to make a nuke now than ever before. At least officially, they say, nothing has changed. They have no intention to get a nuke. No ambition to get a nuke. The Ayatollah says that God says no nukes. Forget it. And so we're not doing that. However, we are going to

keep enriching uranium and we are going to have a civilian nuclear program. It's a matter of our sovereignty and independence and you're not going to take it from us and we won't even talk to you until you acknowledge that. Now, I don't know if that's really right. I guess I would have to say it's like a 51% chance at least, maybe more. Shit, I don't know. It's definitely increased risk that now they're making nukes. It was always a bluff that don't make me begin to make nukes. We would always say, if you start making nukes, we'll attack you.

And they would go, if you attack us, then we might make a nuk, don't attack us, and we won't. So it's a perfect standoff. Now Israel has called their bluff on our behalf. So, and Trump has adopted Israel's point of view that for Iran to have a nuclear program at all is the same thing as them having a nuclear weapons program. Oh no, they're a year from a nuke if they tried to make one

is not good enough for Trump. He's willing to bomb over that. He's willing to accept Israel's parameters for that. So what does that mean when they prove that, hey, we're still spinning centrifuges, we're still making uranium and we're still going to have a nuclear program, then we bomb them again.

And then they say, go to hell. We're still going to do it, and you can't stop us. Then we got to send in the 82nd Airborne. And then what? You got to kill every Shiite cleric in the country till there's nobody left to call himself Supreme Leader. You're going to parachute in the Shah's grandson? And the whole thing gets completely absurd.

Who's lived in Washington, D.C. for 46 years, by the way. And look, Iran is three times a size of Iraq with four times the population and all mountains. Yeah, geographically. And they haven't been at war since 1989. And so, look, I admit, I was surprised at how well the Israeli Air Force did against Iran's anti-aircraft. They had a lot of guys infiltrated in there who did sabotage missions. Plus, they hit them with cruise missiles from standoff range, you know, with, I guess they had local guys,

lays in them are just excellent satellite coverage. the Iranians were doing a piss poor job. Hey, security's a government program, man. So they did a piss poor job of protecting their anti-aircraft and Israel almost immediately had total air dominance over the country and America's well. Nobody even took a shot at the B-2s when they flew them in there. So Iran did much more poorly than I thought there. On the other hand, they were very wise to fire only 14 missiles, which that's how many bombs America dropped. So they fired 14 missiles in response at bases in Iraq and in Qatar, and they called ahead of time.

Like they had done before, after the killing of Soleimani. They called ahead of time, and they fired at empty corners of bases, said, make sure you shoot this down. We're not going to do nothing. But we're talking about saving the barest of face and not doing what all the propaganda would have said,

which is launch a war against America. It's a madman Ayatollah. The moment this guy has a nuke, he's going to nuke Tel Aviv, even if it gets every last Iranian killed. He doesn't care because that he's so religiously motivated with his end times 12er theology and things. Yet here he is, America bombs the hell out of his country

and in a highly symbolic way too, right? Like destroying this important symbol of their independence in this way. And he does the minimum. And all he can tell Trump is, look, man, I don't want to fight you. Because after all, what card says he really had to play? That's what I'm saying.

And Trump can really escalate. The only real card he has to play is a secret weapons program now, which I'm not betting on that. But man, I couldn't bet against it either at this point. After all, it's only consistent with what I've been warning this whole time is that if we bomb them, then they're much more likely to make a new. And it's like, dude, this is where I'm always careful how I say this. I'm never going to in any way do anything except shred terrorism and talk about how bad it is. What I do try to do is plan for a better future. And one of the ways to do that is to determine what caused this?

Why did this happen? Why did someone, why did someone that was a baby at one point become a murderous terrorist when they were 20 years old or something? And unfortunately, when I see people blowing up buildings 20 years from now, 20-year-olds, 25-year-olds, I'm going to hate them for it, I'm going to call it out, I'm not going to like it, it's going to be very sad, I'm going to completely understand how it happened. Right. And I've seen this movie over and over again and no one's ever given me a good answer as to how to prevent the. Well, we just have to stop the intervention. I mean, that's it. and look at all the, there's been a lot of FBI entrapments,

but there have been some real ass terrorist attacks in this country since September 11th, and they've all been motivated by American foreign policy. Hell, even when the FBI entrap some idiot, they don't say, don't you hate freedom? They say, don't you hate America bomb in this country back home that you care so much about? That's how they get them every time.

And then same for the actual terrorists. And if you look at Zazi, who tried to do the New York Subways, um the guy and his wife that did the san bernadino attack the boston bombing fort hood orlando this is all blowback man there's this huge propaganda campaign about orlando that said that omar matine was a repressed homosexual whose religion hates gay people and since he was so gay and yet so devoted to his religion he decided to go crazy and massacre a bunch of helpless gay people partying out of a club, the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida. And so gay people unite against Islam. Guess what? That was 100% a lie. It was? All of it. He wasn't gay at all. He'd never been there at

all. His first target was Disney World. And then he decided they had too much security. So he Googled Nightclub. And Pulse was the first one that came. up. When he got there, he said, where are the women? And then he shot the place up anyway. And the only reason that all of this came to light was because they tried to falsely prosecute his old lady. And in her defense, she was able to get all these materials to prove and was able to testify and demonstrate all about this. There was nothing that was true like that. And as I quote, thoroughly in the book, people who knew him said he hated gay people. It was like he hated everybody else, especially America and Israel and England and whatever, like, yeah.

And then most crucially and importantly, while he was in there, oh, this is a part of the story too. There were two heroic cops who were following him right into the bathroom. He had killed a bunch of people and then had herded a bunch of people in the bathroom, was holding the hostages in there. And these two heroic cops were closing on him ready to get his ass and ready to risk their lives, to bust in there and shoot them in the head. And their superiors called them back and forced them to pull out of there.

Then they laid siege to the place for like four hours or maybe two, but I think it was longer than that. For hours, the cops hid in cowardly terror outside. And then they finally breached a hole in the wall of the building. And when the innocent captives started coming out, the cops blew them away. Anyway, so while he was,

was in there for hours safely protected by the security force who was supposed to be protecting the people from him. He wrote a giant message on Facebook and he called 911. And we have the transcript of the 911 call and we have the entire Facebook message. And it is 100% bin Ladenite grievances against American foreign policy. Particularly Barack Obama had built the caliphate in eastern Syria and Western Iraq, and then he launched at Rock War III to destroy it again. So at this time, he was bombing the crap out of Iraq and Syria. And Omar Mateen is telling the 911 operator, you have to stop bombing Syria. You're killing women and children.

You're killing women and children. You're killing women and children. You have to stop the airstrikes. You have to stop the airstrikes. That's it. It's the same thing since Ramsey Yousef wrote his letters to the New York Papers in 1993. You have to stop bombing Iraq from bases in Saudi Arabia. You have to stop helping the Israelis, murder the Palestinians and the Lebanese.

This whole time. That's what it's always been. Let's ask the difficult question here then, because right now, obviously, the actions of the current Israeli government are, you just can't defend them at this point. But I do always say this, and it's fair to say this also considering a minority voted for them within that country. country, you know, I would not have want to have been defined as Bush Cheney, right? So I try to separate people from their governments. I always do that as much as best as I can around the world. My friend Eric Zooliger has an amazing quote where he literally says people are not their governments. And it puts things in perspective. So that said, and this gets a little weird with like the anti-interventionist stuff, but let's see what you do with this. Outside of what is going on now, which is wrong, and I think should be dealt. within a legal manner and hopefully that something like that does happen the actual existence though in the middle east of a country like israel which is the one country that is not like the other it's not collegi culture it's not you know like arab regimes stuff like that if israel were not there and it were just sucked up and the entire middle eastern region from head to toe

were, you know, I'm generalizing here, but mostly like collegi Arab culture, the separation of that culture, quite literally and figuratively separating east from west, would that be a pretty big problem? No, what difference does that mean? You don't think it would make a difference. Tell me what advantage Israel gives the United States there. The Hulu original series Murdoch Death and the Family dives into secret. secrets, deception, murder, and the fall of a powerful dynasty.

Inspired by shocking actual events and drawing from the hit podcast, this series brings the drama to the screen like never before. Starring Academy Award winner Patricia Arquette and Jason Clark. Watch the Hulu original series Murdoch Death in the Family, streaming October 15th on Disney Plus. TD Bank knows that running a small business is a journey, from startup to growing and managing your business. That's why they have a dedicated small business advice hub on their website to provide tips and insights on business banking to entrepreneurs.

No matter the stage of business you're in, visit td.com slash small business advice to find out more or to match with a TD small business banking account manager. The only one I can think of is they help Barack Obama back al-Qaeda in Syria, but that was him committing treason for them, wasn't it? So I'm not saying that they're right in doing. this however i would say israel is highly uh what's the word they go on offense a lot when they spot a problem and i disagree with a lot of their offense to be clear not against our enemies when we

fight their enemies for them they don't even come with us when we and that's also a problem i agree yes i'm sorry hang on we got to stop here i got to take a leak so bad all right all right we'll be right we're back go ahead scott i think um you know i'm not the greatest expert on the ins and outs of all this stuff but i think overall uh israel is an obstacle to even the empire achieving its goals over there which would without israel's interference would simply be about securing petroleum resources for that matter lowered in control over them right to screw the russians on the price or or the chinese on access or whatever but any and all of those relationships would all be so much easier if we didn't have the

headache of having to deal with the Israelis and they don't even have any petroleum or hydrocarbons at all until they finished stealing all the natural gas from the Palestinians off the coast of gaza so you know they're like i was saying about there's that one example of um harold road the neocon taken over the office of net assessment and purging all the arabists in the pentagon think tank in the lead up to a rock war two um but like that's a routine thing that's like almost a cliche like all the arabists getting fired from the pentagon or getting fired from the state department all the people who actually know what they're doing have to make way for the people with the israeli agenda to come in and do their job instead and so um that's a mess man it's a mess

over there right now for sure and it does seem like there are so many actions especially when you look in the micro of the last 20 years in particular last 20 25 years in particular there's so many actions that were sold as like hey this is really good for us or really important for us and it's like is it yeah i don't think so dude and even when you look at like who are the biggest proponents in america pushing for rock war one you know man i recognize a lot of those names charles krauthammer and william sapphire and bill crystal and it's the whole gang man yeah so you know i don't know what's the best book about that and you know uh if anybody has ever done a deep time i should ask jim lobe i bet he would know because you know there's a lot more going on in iraq war one

than just israel but then it's like boy you look at that list of pro rock one hawks and it's like there's sure a lot of neocons who write for a living what can you say but like they sure do agree on war against Israel's enemies a lot. Mm-hmm. You know? Yeah, it gets strange. I, you know, and it's one of those things. The more it goes on, the harder it is to look at it objectively, just because, like, I don't

understand why you can't just stop the bombing right now at this point. Like, I mean, it shouldn't have started it. But, like. Well, that's the new, what Trump is doing with this. supposed peace plan is trying, I think, to give Netanyahu a lifeline. The fact is, as we all already knew, for an insurgency to win, they just have to not lose. Right. And so that's what's happened here. And I wrote an article as soon as the war began for anti-war.com saying, look, the only way to really eradicate Hamas would be to inflict a level of violence that this population that they are

embedded within absolutely cannot stand. So no, there has to be a better way, cut this off, do it differently. And they, Shimbab and Mossad and IDF have all the ability in the world to pinprick and kill one guy at a time when they want to. And they demonstrate that all the time. Yeah, they did it in Iran. And they've done it in Gaza, right? And they took out some of the leaders of Hamas. They got, you know, one guy flies a drone in one window to get the one guy that they're looking for and shoot some pretty dystopian crazy nightmare thing but then why are you carpet bombing the that's right doing the whole dia doctrine against these people when you can you know they could shoot these people with poison darts one at time with no collateral damage whatsoever if that

was what they wanted to do um and so um yeah it is it's the sickest thing in the world it's the most criminal regime in the world and it was funny i accidentally i don't know what i was searching but I found something else. And it was a tweet that I had said in last December where I said Donald Trump might be the most Zionist president of the United States in history, but he might be the last one. He is. Because Israel is going to be permanently controversialized now. They are a dead letter, name is mud on the left and more and more on the right all the time. It's something like 50-50 on the right right now. People are sick and tired of being lied to and condescended to and used and abused in this way. I mean, for all the people listening,

to this or watching this, I think Benjamin Netanyahu respects you. And this is a guy who has said on multiple occasions. In fact, on September 11th, he told the New York Times, Good for Israel. This is very good. I mean, not very good, but, you know, good for the relationship between America and Israel. But the original sentence ended with good, period. And then at another time, he said, we are truly benefiting from America's

from the September 11th attack and America's struggle in Iraq. Our struggle in Iraq? That's what you're benefiting from? He's not, he's not, he's not, he is not defensible. And again, I'll say this, I highly recommend people read his autobiography. He tells you exactly who he is. He doesn't realize he does. By the way, one more important point here.

You know, Tucker Carlson has recently called for Netanyahu to step down or to be made to step aside by Trump kind of thing. And others are repeating that. And then I've seen other people criticizing, understandably, saying, oh, man, you know what you don't want to do is just narrow everything down to Netanyahu. And if only we could get rid of this one guy,

things would be so much better. When in fact, the problem is the Zionist project itself. Public opinion in Israel right now is completely insanely behind Netanyahu beyond what you would want to believe could be true. And so these questions all still remain. Well, that's true. However, he is by light years. How many parsecs is a light year?

Is it the other way around? By diameters of galaxies, Netanyahu is the most savvy and capable prime minister that Israel could possibly have. There is no one in the lineup. who has the political levels of control and sophistication that this man can wield throughout the United States and Europe. Forget it. Naftali Bennett is nothing.

Yarlapid, all these guys, I could deal with Yarlapid, okay? Give me Benny Gantz, any one of these blood-soaked killers, because none of them measure up to his capability. in being the head of state of that nation and getting what he needs done. And I don't know what it is, but it's like, I remember you ever read The Rise and Fall, the Third Reich? Yes.

Where Shearer, he describes Hitler as just like the most fanatical person on any issue who ever lived. Like no one has ever been as excited about anything as this guy was excited about getting up in the morning and getting power. And I was like, that's Netanyahu, dude. This guy is just. just, there's a lot more Hitler comparisons that are also apt for him.

But just the absolute doggedness of the guy? Do you think he cares about anything else than wielding this power? You know, that's all he cares about. I agree completely, Scott. The one place I would push back is I think he's completely lost his fastball, and I'll tell you why. Well, I don't disagree with that, but he's still the baddest guy on the field by a mile, by forever but he has completely isolated the world he has completely lot like that's the that's the thing i would say about but nettingahu prior to 23 netting yahoo regardless of what you think of him as a

person this is just an objective statement as a skillful whatever yeah he was a politician on the level of a william jefferson clinton the guy was absolutely masterful in being able to what time you say i need to leave here uh about 15 minutes okay the guy was absolutely masterful on a Machiavellian level of acquiring power, holding on to it and expanding it, regardless of what uses he was using that for. However, I think he has completely lost the ability to read a room at this point. I think that he has absolutely no clue that literally him showing his face anywhere is continuing to down the pole points of people supporting his nation. And the fact that after all this, he would come here and go to the Israeli consulate in New York and openly

bring cameras in to capture him talking with American influencers about how to influence the public on social media for Israel's gains. How to wage war against us, in fact. Bro. Like the complete in a... You're right. No, no, no, you're totally right about that. However, though, that's still the public.

and that's important but that's longer term in terms of picking up the phone and making things happen in Washington yeah he's as dialed in as as as linked in to power and and with the instincts and the insight to know who whose phone he has to ring what he has to do to get what he wants and i just think yes it's true israel would would serve it would do itself a great hasbarra benefit it by getting rid of him and giving us a nicer prime minister to look at or whatever. But the other edge of that sword is he would be, you know, that footage of Zelensky at the UN meeting where everybody turns their back on him and he's just kind of standing around, you know what I mean, doesn't know what to do.

That's Naphtali Bennett, which by the way, Nautali Bennett caused September 11th, just in case you don't know. He was part of Operation Grapes of Wrath in Lebanon, and he's the one who called in the UN, pardon me, called in the artillery airstrike against the UN shelter, then killed 106 women and children. And that was what, it was, well, first of all, it was Mohammed Atta and Ramsey bin al-Shib signed their last will in testament and decided they wanted to join the jihad because of the fight. Because of the invasion of Lebanon, three days before, I think this was three or four days into the invasion. So they had signed the last one testament. Then the Kana mask happened is the first Kahn of Masker because they did it again in 2006, actually.

But in 1996, they did this. And then a couple of months later, Bin Laden put out his first declaration of war called Declaration of War Against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places. Pretty subtle, right? And then on the first page, it says, it goes on and on about the Kana massacre. And he says, we'll never forget the severed heads and arms and legs of the children who were massacred in Kana. It was literally an Aftali Bennett that pulled that trigger that ordered that strike and killed those people. And then that was Muhammad Attau was the lead hijacker on September 11th.

And Ramsey bin al-Sheb was his buddy who helped organize the thing from Europe, but wasn't a lot in the country. It's just no one to root for. It's just, it's like, it's just a bunch of people to root against. I mean, it's just all evil. Yeah. The yin and the yang. It's all evil. But you're right, though.

So there's the two sides of the coin, right? Is Netanyahu is so violent and murderous and horrible. that he's undermined support for the project itself overall, seemingly, and whatever, he's made people very angry at least. But if he's gone and replaced by somebody seemingly less psychopathic, that could be a PR boost for Israel, but then again, they would have a less capable leader getting their business done. And so combined with the actual consequences of the immediate consequences of the murderousness,

I've got to go with a weaker other guy to do it. Even if it makes Israel look better overall, we're talking about looking better because we're killing fewer than a Waco mask or worth of people every day than under the new guy, right? So that's the difference in the PR is whether they're mass murdering children every day, which you look at anti-war.com,

keep track of this every day, and it's always between like 50 and 130 or 50 and 100 and something, but it's usually right around like 80 to 90 hundred people so roughly a large waco masker every single day over there every single day and like it's it's got it's got to stop period in a story before i get you out of here you just wrote a book on russia ukraine yes and everything that happened there also all bill clinton's fault yes all but was it all bel clinton's fault NATO expansion and the Balkan wars.

So that then... And then lots of other things, but yeah. And that was his role. And the shock therapy as well. The shock therapy? Yeah, the rigging in the election in 1996 and the destruction of their economy. In the name of free market capitalism,

they installed corrupt cronyism that ran the thing. I mean, they were already screwed, transforming from communism to capitalism, but the Clintonite liberals made the very worst of it, basically, is what happened there. then w bush tore up all the treaties continue nato expansion over through you know did all the color code of revolutions clinton started that bush continued it um bush and obama built the anti-ballistic missile systems in romanian poland that dual-use launchers that can host tomahawk missiles and they

continued to push toward integration of ukraine into nato obama overthrew the government of ukraine again in 2014 and used a bunch of hitler-leven nazis to do it and then launched a civil war John Brennan went to Kiev and insisted that they launched the war in the East, which started the Civil War. And then, of course, they all framed Donald Trump for treason with Russia Gates, so he was unable to solve any of this conflict in his first term and instead gave in and escalated and gave weapons to Ukraine that helped make matters worse. And then Joe Biden, of course, is absolutely belligerent on the issue.

And instead of negotiating in good faith, he tried to simply just act tough and they thought they'd be cute and they would do like America did to the Soviet Union and Afghanistan in the 80s just like the bin Ladenites did to America and America did George Bush and Barack Obama and Donald Trump did to America in Afghanistan in our era is to bog them down and bleed them to bankruptcy force them out the hard way inflict a strategic defeat that's why at the start of the war even before the war and after the start of the war there was no big diplomatic push to stop the thing. And as we know now, America and Britain intervened to prevent negotiations that were ending the war early. They could have ended the war in April of 2022. And America and Britain went in

there and prevented them from ending the war because they wanted to keep it going because they don't kill it. God damn about Ukraine. But they like seeing Russians killed. And they said it over and over and over again. We're killing Russians. No American soldiers are being killed, but we're killing Russians. We're sending them home in coffins. We're sending them home in body bags, we're destroying the Russian economy, we're bringing them their knees at the height of their excitement in 22. They said, this is going to bring about the fall of the Putin regime. We're going to stick it to them, Ruski's good.

That was their motivation for deliberately even provoking the war, or at least refusing to engage in the barest, honest diplomacy to try to prevent it. I think their plan A was to warn them, you better not. But plan B was not negotiate. plan b was he he we're gonna and this is by the way three months after they america's absolute humiliating disgraceful withdrawal and defeat in afghanistan and they got the word afghanistan in their mouths for why we need to do this change the narrative again yep yep and then but replicate what we did to the soviet union in the 80s in afghanistan never you mind

what we just did to ourselves there again um or the consequence the fact that we were dealing with the consequences of the blowback from the last time we've been over there and so what do we expect to happen here they told the new york times they said you know what honestly we don't know the first thing about defeating an insurgency but we sure know how to back one and so that's what we're going to do and so yeah they think they're smart but they're really not and and so yes the book is um provoked this one is called enough already time to end the war on terrorism we'll have the links to both of them down below yeah a note of that thief if we can And forgive me for my shameless plugs, but I got to get rid of those things.

And I busted my ass to put them together for you. I think you'll really get something out of it, honestly. So that was enough. It's Jimmy Carter through Donald Trump in the Middle East. And then provoked is H.W. Bush through Joe Biden in Eastern Europe. Love it. And the neocons throughout Russia Gate, Ukrainian Nazis, Balkan Wars, and all the color code of revolutions and everything you need to know. Scott Horton, you are fun to talk to, man.

You know, you're an encyclopedia of a lot of things. I appreciate you going back and forth on some hard topics today. We will have to do this again. Thank you very much for having me. All right, everyone check out those books. We'll have those link down below. You know what? One more thing.

Very soon after this comes out, within a few weeks at least, we'll be launching the Scott Horton Academy of Foreign Policy and Freedom, which I mentioned earlier. It's like Tom Woods Liberty Classroom, and he built it for me, and it's courses by me walking you through. the Middle East wars, essentially the extremely long version of a lot of what we've talked about here today, as well as provoked and all of the Eastern Europe thing and the lead up to Ukraine and the Ukraine war. And then plus, it's a bunch of other great experts on a lot of other great

stuff. And so if you go to Scottwardenacademy.com, you can put your email address in there. And if you put your email address in there, then you'll be the first to know when we're ready to launch. And it's really going to be something cool. So all right, we're going to link that down below. If you like what you heard today, enjoy hearing Scott speak. That sounds like that's for you. So we will have that link in description. And until next time, sir. Thank you. All right, everybody else, you know what it is? Give it a thought. Get back to me. Peace. Thank you guys for watching the episode. If you haven't already, please hit that subscribe button and smash that like button on the video. They're both a huge help. And if you would like to follow me on Instagram and

X, those links are in my description below.