Julian Dorey Podcast - Julian Dorey EXPLODES on Lindsay Clancy & NEW Leon Black Coverup They HID from You

Episode Date: September 5, 2026

WATCH PREVIOUS SOLO EPISODES: https://youtu.be/MGkQG78NTNI JOIN PATREON FOR EARLY UNCENSORED EPISODE RELEASES: https://www.patreon.com/JulianDorey CLIPPERS DISCORD: https://discord.gg/8QmWEKJ3BT F...OLLOW JULIAN DOREY IG: https://www.instagram.com/julianddorey/ X: https://x.com/juliandorey FOLLOW JOEY DEEF IG: https://www.instagram.com/joeydeef/ X: https://x.com/TokeMalone JULIAN YT CHANNELS - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Clips YT: https://www.youtube.com/@juliandoreyclips - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Daily YT: https://www.youtube.com/@JulianDoreyDaily - SUBSCRIBE to Best of JDP: https://www.youtube.com/@bestofJDP ****TIMESTAMPS**** 00:00 - Julian is ON ONE today 1:00 - Epstein Buddy & disgusting human being Leon Black’s NEW Coverup 3:34 - The promise we made to you 4:48 - The promises Leon Black broke (NDAs & Testimony) 7:33 - Leon Black SUES Congress & makes INSANE Claims (he’s LYING allegedly) 9:54 - Congress refuses to CHARGE Black w/ Contempt of Congress 13:11 - Leon Blacks DISGUSTING reason for suing Congress 15:56 - Leon Black’s Lawsuit’s Filing is Long & Sits on a Throne of Disgusting Lies allegedly 17:44 - Joey Deef called the Leon Black Debacle 18:48 - Julian will never stop going at Leon Black 20:06 - Thomas Massie still going for Epstein 20:55 - Congress Cancels end of Session to AVOID Epstein Vote 22:55 - Thomas Massie names 14 Epstein Co-Conspirators on Congressional Floor 25:44 - Julian on the 1 Great Silver Lining to all the Chaos of 2026 30:18 - How this show even started (STORY) 32:51 - Julian on his “Wawa Theory” & how it is now happening in real life 36:06 - How Lindsay Clancy k*lled her children 38:01 - Lindsay Clancy’s husband’s 9-1-1 Call 43:09 - Julian on how the Postpartum Depression Precedent is DISASTROUS for women 46:25 - “Something is really broken in society” 47:14 - The Andrea Yates case & cases of men who k*lled their kids; “Expert Witnesses” 49:33 - Lindsay Clancy’s supporters 51:25 - The Jury (DETAILS) 53:49 - Lindsay Clancy’s Eyes 54:17 - 11 Jurors didn’t think she was guilty & the courtroom antics 56:05 - Clancy Defense Attorney (Kevin Reddington) INTIMIDATING JUROR?!? 57:40 - Clancy Attorney moves to have Juror REMOVED & “The Boston THOWDOWN” 1:02:56 - How the Mistrial & Emergency Supreme Court Appeal went down 1:04:42 - The Judge’s final address to Jury was a subliminal message… 1:07:00 - The Tinfoil Hat Truman Show Theory on Clancy & Leon 1:08:08 - The one Clancy Juror who held out 1:09:36 - Eyes Wide Shut 1:12:01 - Stanley Kubrick’s Daughter Responds to our “Eyes Wide Shut” SPEC from last week 1:13:16 - Vivian Kubrick & Scientology, Julian’s latest Scientology coverage 1:16:54 - Vivian Kubrick’s Response Tweet to our Eyes Wide Shut SPEC 1:23:53 - Julian on the “Eyes Wide Shut” Letter Theory 1:28:48 - Why the Eyes Wide Shut “Missing 20 Minutes” might NOT actually even matter 1:32:50 - Flock Cameras in Florida Fight 1:35:06 - The other Surveillance Companies are on notice CREDITS: - Host, Editor & Producer: Julian Dorey - COO, Producer & Editor: Alessi Allaman - https://www.youtube.com/@UCyLKzv5fKxGmVQg3cMJJzyQ - In-Studio Producer: Joey Deef Julian Dorey Podcast Episode 472 - Julian Dorey Music by Artlist.io Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 In Toronto, every arrival is a statement, and nothing says it better than this. Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025. Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19-speaker AKG surround audio system. This city demands agility, and Optic delivers with precision to make every drive extraordinary. Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at Cadillac Canada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on S&P Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. What's up, everybody, and welcome back to another episode of the Julian Dory podcast.
Starting point is 00:00:36 I am Julian Dory. And I'm Joey Dief. How you doing? How you doing? Dief, I'm the one that's on one today. It's not you. Just let the record reflect I'm on one today. So I thought I was...
Starting point is 00:00:47 Listen, it sometimes has to happen. Yeah. I thought until about 30 minutes ago, we were going to be opening up this show going through that psycho bitch who killed her kids. Don't worry. We'll come back to Lindsay Clancy. That is the story. everyone's paying attention to and I have a lot of thoughts there obviously many of you have asked me to
Starting point is 00:01:03 comment on that I finally did comment on a bit with Danny Jones but I wanted to make it clear and lay out the case and in all seriousness look at it through each point and some of the things that people are saying that I think are brilliant arguments about why a lot of people seem to have this one very very backwards and it's it's really just disappointing to me because the woman killed three of her kids and it should be that simple. I think this is a huge, huge step back for women. But before we get there, and I'll leave you on that little cliffhanger right there with that, there was a little story that happened yesterday, Joey Deef, that thank God because I said we
Starting point is 00:01:43 weren't going to forget it, and we actually did. Well, I'll speak for me. I actually did by accident. I did too. All right. Well, the both of us did, and chances are most people out there forgot about it because I warned you ahead of time. This is exactly how it's done by design with news cycles. But there was a little hearing that was supposed to happen on video on Capitol Hill yesterday. Yes, by yesterday, I mean
Starting point is 00:02:09 Thursday, September 3rd. We are recording this Friday evening. Episodes coming out Saturday. And this hearing was supposed to involve one slimy fat fuck named Leon Black. Hello, Leon. Good to see you, my friend. You're not my friend. Leon. We're going to talk about this because D.5, I want you to actually pull up. I put an article right there. It's the July article that we already went through on this show. So let me just review the timeline for you guys because the last time we talked about this, I believe was four weeks ago, three or four weeks ago.
Starting point is 00:02:41 And it was in relation to what had happened after Leon's initial June hearing that ended with him walking out after an hour and Congress subpoenaing him to come back this time actually on video on the record. And if you remember at the time, that was scheduled for July 16th, that second hearing. On July 14th, very quietly, as we laid out, there was an announcement that it had been postponed. Yep. To September 3rd. And we talked about it in the context of how September 3rd is the Thursday of Labor Day week.
Starting point is 00:03:19 It's a long weekend. A lot of people are off Friday. Everyone's off Monday for Labor Day. They're, you know, you're finishing your last blowout of the summer. You go out to the bar. That's right. School's coming back. So you drink away your sorrows on Saturday night.
Starting point is 00:03:34 That girl you were trying to hook up with it at the bar all fucking summer that you struck out with. You take one more swing at it. You wake up Sunday morning with a lot of regrets and you don't remember what happened the week before. And next thing you know, you're sitting at the office desk on Tuesday questioning everything. And that's the whole point because that has been the entire case as it relates to Jeffrey Epps. and since the beginning of how these big happenings in the stories are always tucked away somehow on a Friday or a Saturday or a Thursday before Labor Day weekend. Nonetheless, nonetheless, we made a promise to you that we almost forgot, as I said at the outset,
Starting point is 00:04:11 where we told you we would not ignore this and we would not forget about it. The problem is the hearing didn't happen. I mean, well, technically it happened, but it was they were talking to an empty chair. Yeah. If I understand James Comer, the committee, head correctly. They did conduct it and there was just no one sitting in the chair. Yeah. So that, I mean, that's like an SNL skit. It's like, well, Leon, how are you? Yeah. They basically did what we did with Mitch McConnell without the mask. Yeah. Essentially. So you ask, well, why was there an empty chair? This July article is going to lay out why Leon Black refused to do this, but it's also going to lay out how Leon Black and his team completely reneged on their entire word. So let's start
Starting point is 00:04:56 there. Hey guys, if you're not following me on Spotify, please hit that follow button and leave a five-star review. They're both a huge huge help. Thank you. This was the one we read a few weeks ago. Let's go down. Deep. So billionaire investor Leon Black is scheduled for a September 3rd deposition in front the House Oversight lawmakers who want to press him under oath about his ties to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A spokesman for the House Oversight Republicans said Tuesday attorneys for the co-founder of Apollo Global Management had confirmed his appearance date. July 14th where they're scheduling a postponement of the July 16th hearing and say, you know what, we've got to postpone, but we're going to do it. We're confirming who's
Starting point is 00:05:34 going to be there. They say, Black's Legal's team will also transfer at the end of the week non-disclosure agreements the investor allegedly had with women tied to Epstein, the spokesperson said, which he had previously told the committee he will not discuss. So they had agreed. They said, hey guys, I need you to do us this favor. I need you to delay, but we're going to give you those NDAs because in the June hearing, the big holdup was Congress wanted access to the NDAs that Leon Black had signed with a bunch of women who had made claims about him that he then paid off with hush money, a lot of money, to stay quiet. And they said, those nondisclosure agreements are pertinent to our investigation in Jeffrey Epstein and we want to see them. And his lawyer said,
Starting point is 00:06:21 you can't see those agreements. And he huffed and puffed and puffed. And, you know, if he could have blown the house down. He would have, but he walked out of there because he can't blow the house down. And he just walked away and said, this is not how it's supposed to go. Friend of Donald Trump's, by the way, this guy, obviously, friend of apparently every politician in Washington, D.C. over the last, like, three, four decades. But it's just funny how all these guys end up around somehow the sitting U.S. President every single time we have them, whether it's Trump, Biden, Obama, Bush, all the way back. Of course Clinton, obviously. But, you know, he makes these promises, though, somehow after the fact they're in these little fucking, you know, secret meetings behind closed doors. All right, listen, all right,
Starting point is 00:06:57 Liam's obviously Mr. Black is going to come in and testify, but we got to massage this. We're going to make sure we kind of slide this away from the public interests. Obviously, he's paid a lot of you, a lot of money. So this is just a lot of years of favors here. Obviously, he's very disappointed that he knew this guy. Totally regrets it. He wasn't friends with him. He insists that, even though he went to his house every fucking morning for breakfast all the time and paid him hundreds of million of dollars to manage this estate, neither here nor there. But like, you know, will you scratch our back? We'll scratch yours. You delay the hearing. You do it before Labor Day. No one talks about it by Tuesday. And, you know, we'll give you some of those NDAs.
Starting point is 00:07:35 And you just won't talk about it, okay? Like, you ask us some questions on it, but you keep the names out of it. You keep some of the specific details out of it. But at least you have it for your cute little investigation. Kabish. And they go, all right, cool. We'll do that. Delayed. Now let's go to the article from CNN, of all places. Can't believe these words are coming out on my mouth, but shout out, shout out, CNN. I can't even get them outright. It's all right. You can say it.
Starting point is 00:08:02 But billionaire investor Leon Black sues and declines. He didn't just decline. He sued. I'll leave that one there. Sues and declines. What's the rest of the headline, do you, sir? To testify in House committees, Epstein and investigation. Now let's go. Look at this dude's just like, oh shit. He's like, here we go again.
Starting point is 00:08:24 That's right. Man, come on. They're not paying me enough of this shit, boy. All right. Billionaire investor Leon Black is suing the House Committee investigating Jeffrey Epstein to try and block the panel from obtaining his non-disclosure agreements and testimony. Black's refusal to turn over the documents and appear for his deposition in front of the House Oversight Committee on Thursday marks a major escalation in the behind-the-scenes back and forth that has been brewing between the two sides for months. I thought they had this figured out. If you read that article in July, they had, everything was tied together. Everyone's on the same page. We're going to do this nice kumbaya session. Share the NDAs. We've come to an agreement. See you September 3rd. Apparently not.
Starting point is 00:09:00 In a letter to the committee obtained by CNN, Black's attorneys argued that the non-disclosure agreements the panel was seeking were too broad, had no connection to Epstein. I mean, how can we know that if we're not seeing them, by the way, and disregarded the privacy interests of third parties. I'm going to come back to that in a second. You did hear that correctly. Congress is not entitled to subpoena documents from a private citizen on the inchoate, an inchoate hope. I don't even know that fucking word. That something useful might show up, his attorneys wrote. As a result of the impasse, Black's team made clear that the billionaire would not be appearing for his scheduled deposition and would be pursuing legal actions. So they try to take the leverage and flip it back
Starting point is 00:09:42 around by punching. So instead of just not appearing and then, you know, being held in contempt, like a normal American who's not a fucking billionaire and can't pay off these people would be held in contempt and fucking jailed for that, they say, no, no, we're going to sue you. You guys looking into this, you are in the wrong. The onus is on you to prove why I need to be here to testify for this. By the way, he hasn't been charged with any crimes. Don't you wish you could just hit Skip on the worst parts of your life? You know the same way you can skip an ad? I get it.
Starting point is 00:10:17 I'm Siaia and I live in Ice Cove. I've made some questionable decisions that didn't end up the way I planned. And today I'm still figuring it out. Somehow things usually get worse before they get better. Apparently, that's how I roll. So bundle up and come along for the bumpy ride. Stream a new episode of North of North Tuesdays on CBC Gem. Spotify, it's Jay Shetty.
Starting point is 00:10:41 Are you one of those media strategy people? scrolling through spreadsheets, searching for an audience that pays twice as much attention to your ads than they do on social, let me introduce you to fans. And they're here with me on Spotify. Trust me, I know fans. They don't skip, they stay for hours. They don't move on, they manifest. They're not a demographic group. They're fans.
Starting point is 00:11:07 Spotify advertising. You're among fans. Black's attorneys argue in the lawsuit that the congressional subpoenas of him are, quote, invalid. It's a shame Leon Black is hiding behind litigation rather than provide answers to the American People House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer said in a statement, our deposition is moving forward this morning for the record and there will be an empty chair for Mr. Black. I was not lying about this part. I will speak with our members about next steps. Comer, who said that Black also file a lawsuit against him individually as the chair of that committee told reporters he supports
Starting point is 00:11:39 holding Black in contempt of Congress, but wants to discuss how to approach the under unprecedented situation with House counsel first because his ultimate goal is securing Black's testimony and obtaining the multiple NDAs. Listen, Jimmy, I'm no fucking lawyer here. The guy didn't show up for a scheduled congressional subpoena. You can worry about getting the NDAs later. If you want them, you can go fucking get them, buddy. You're the government. Like, apparently, I don't care about our freedoms anymore. We got fucking cameras watching us everywhere. But you're telling me you can't fucking charge this guy right now. Charge him. If this were any other American, They're getting charged. Charge them. But Rep Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Panel, said in a statement that the panel should not want to hold Black in contempt for refusing to appear for his deposition and comply with Congress's subpoenas.
Starting point is 00:12:30 By refusing to testify today, Leon Black is now defying two congressional subpoenas. Black gave Epstein over $180 million over six years. He funded Epstein's abuse in trafficking of women. Multiple women have also accused Black a sexual assault. his connections to Epstein his unwillingness to cooperate or unacceptable we must hold him in contempt immediately I see nothing wrong with that statement right there
Starting point is 00:12:51 that is exactly what it should be you shouldn't be playing politics over this it's very simple hold the guy in contempt like everyone else so I think I have something after that thief on the dock with links because I think I have a direct link to the comment that Comer made publicly after that so let let's you heard what I said about the empty chair part which I mean the jokes write themselves but this is Comer
Starting point is 00:13:13 coming out after they finished, I guess, cross-examining the empty chair to discuss publicly some of his initial thoughts. Well, as you have heard by now, Leon Black failed to show up for his duly issued subpoena. This was a bipartisan subpoena. I'm very disappointed. Not only did Mr. Black not show up for the subpoena, he filed suit against both the Oversack Committee and myself. individually as the chairman of the committee.
Starting point is 00:13:46 This is unacceptable. We're very disappointed. I don't think I need to tell anyone in here how important of a witness Mr. Black is to this investigation. All right. So Leon Black, the official filing was released as well. And I want to pull that up. But before I get into some of the things that he wrote right there, which we're not going
Starting point is 00:14:12 to get too deep on that because it's a bunch of fucking. legal minutia, just a lot of words. Basically, exactly what you expect. Fucking for every one word, they put 50 words just to fill it up with a bunch of shit and make it seem confusing and, you know, do whatever it is that lawyers do. But Black said in this federal court filing, this is the detail I had said a couple minutes ago I was going to come back to. He said in the federal court filing that the committee is requesting private information that, quote, bears no legitimate connection, unquote, to his investigation. Okay. And that's from the Wall Street Journal.
Starting point is 00:14:47 He is, again, he is making that determination. This has nothing to do with your investigation. Don't worry about it. I mean, that's just straight up. That's like a mob boss. Just saying, listen, you like your wife, you like your dog. Okay. Fuck off.
Starting point is 00:15:02 In his lawsuit, Black argued that releasing the agreements could expose women, quote, is my favorite part of the whole thing, who value their privacy, have no known or public connection to Epstein, who bargained for confidentiality and have refused to release it, and who have no ability to protect themselves and their privacy before this committee, unquote, according to the Wall Street Journal. I want to dig into how sick of a comment this is. Who bargained for confidentiality and have refused to release it.
Starting point is 00:15:41 Let me walk you through what. happens and when I walk you through this, you can realize we already all know this. When someone accuses you of, oh, I don't know, rape, allegedly, I have to say that, or sexual assault, allegedly, I have to say that, or insert terrible thing done upon them by you here, the onus is now on you, Leon Black, to want to settle, not on them. The reason that you are signing an NDA is so that you make sure that they stay confidential and don't speak about it so you don't get articles written about you and God forbid investigations into your misdoings. I don't even know if that's a word. Whatever, I'm pissed off like I said. Yeah, that's a word. We'll go
Starting point is 00:16:29 with it. We'll go with it. It's a word. It's a word. Moodings is a word. He's the language guy over here. Yeah, it is. That's what the confidentiality is. This jerk off and his fucking bag attorneys Mark that spot thief, sorry. Are sitting here making it as if the fucking witnesses wanted the confidentiality. How fucking stupid do you think we are? I mean, this is what they think of you and me. They're like, yeah, they'll buy this. In fact, they won't even read it because we'll get this delayed to September 3rd
Starting point is 00:17:00 and no one will be talking about it because it's Labor Day weekend after that. And we're so busy talking about Lindsay Clancy fucking choking out our three kids. this is where we're at people now let's open up the filing the first page of that filing dave can we zoom in on that real quick yeah let me um i want to get it on my desktop so that we don't have to adhere to twitter okay yeah we'll make sure we make it nice and clear for you all but this is just the proof of
Starting point is 00:17:31 what we've been explaining that this was a literal lawsuit the united states district court for the district of Columbia. Leon Black, and I'm reading a public address here. This is on a publicly available document. I'm not doxing anyone here. Would be a real shame if this address got some fan mail. Yeah, no, go back to the first one, Dief? Yeah, right there. That's where I want it. Leon Black 5-2-suite 1, New York, New York, 100-0 for everyone writing that one down out there. Obviously, public information. I'm fully allowed to say that. You know, I'm sure. he doesn't live there, but someone will be pissed off.
Starting point is 00:18:11 All right, like I said, I found out about this whole story, like right before we got on air. Got a little carried away with that. I think that's fair to say. That's why I bleeped out the address, even though that is public information. Don't send the guy fan mail or anything. It's definitely not Leon Black's address anyway. Back to the show. Anyway, so this is a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief.
Starting point is 00:18:34 And I think, Dief, if we go to the last one, it's like, 59 pages or something. Did I see that right? Like, if you look at that, does that say... Yeah, it was... Or like 59... 59 sections, maybe it was? Yeah, there's 29 pages. Yeah, 59 sections, 29 pages.
Starting point is 00:18:52 28 pages. Like I said, never saw a lawyer who couldn't invent a lot of fucking words to sound smart. Shout out to all my lawyers. I know there's a lot of good ones too. But like, this... This just happens again and again and again. And Joey Deef called this.
Starting point is 00:19:05 Joey Defe is even, you know, it's the Darnel Thomas fucking calling the cynicism over there. The fucking alter ego on it every time. I'm cynical about shit. Joey Deef is next level cynical about shit. And you said this shit ain't going to happen. Yeah, well, I think that's why I'm not fired up, you know? I mean, I listen. I'm just like, oh, I'm like, I'm not surprised.
Starting point is 00:19:32 I was just so, like, like, I'm not surprised. I was just so, like, I. I had links ready to go of all the video from like the courtroom, which we're going to talk about in a few minutes with Clancy today. And then I was going to write a bunch of like fun sections too. Like, oh, we're going to look at this video right here. There's a new investigation right here on this other thing. I'm like ready to roll. And then I just said, oh, real quick, let me just double check.
Starting point is 00:19:55 Boom. CNN pops up and I see this. So it just caught me off guard and pissed me off. And I was pissed that I forgot about it. So I'm glad at least we got it. in there, but I'm going to keep hitting that because I fucking hate this guy. And you don't hate people like this enough. And this is also a good moment to say like you got to look at the people where there is good evidence where you at least have places to be like there are great questions to ask there.
Starting point is 00:20:26 The easy thing to do is say they all suck, burn them all down, all that. I know that's fun. It's a lot of fun. Trust me. I've fallen into that trap a few times. But, But like when you see someone like this who is openly insulting your intelligence again and again and again and laughing, laughing in his fucking townhouse or penthouse or wherever the fuck he so unfortunately still breathes, you got to call it out. And I'm fucking done with people. I've been done with people like this. But when I say I'm done with you, it doesn't mean I'm done talking about you, bitch. speaking of bitch actually before I get to
Starting point is 00:21:06 Lindsay Clancy Thomas Massey's on it's your country yes yeah apparently today today in my mind in my delusional mind at the moment but all I can do is talk about it anyway
Starting point is 00:21:21 Thomas Massey who is on his way out of Congress because he was voted out when you know you get $32 million against you in a close primary by a bunch of fucking interesting sources that put a bunch of fake AI videos out there about you so all the boomers say like oh i got to vote against him because that's a vote for god like obviously that's what happens but what i do admire i i've said
Starting point is 00:21:44 this about massey and rocana from the republican and democrat sides consistently what i do admire is how ardent the two of them have been continually pressing this issue and now thomas massey who's like in his lame duck period on his way out is going out with an I salute in a ball of flames and I appreciate that. So there is now that before I get to that, Defe, the one before that, because Congress does a bunch of shit all the time, not that this is breaking news in any way. They do a bunch of shit all the time where, you know, they have like these formalities of how they vote and when they vote and when they're in session and when they're not in session.
Starting point is 00:22:29 And I don't know how it works. I'm not going to sit here and lie to you and be like, I know exactly what this process. is, but through the majority speaker, you know, the Speaker of the House and things like that, they can suddenly be like, you know what? Yeah, you know those two weeks we were going to work right there? Because we are getting paid 175 grand a year to fucking serve the American people, big our quote, star. Yeah, we're not going to work because, you know, there also might be some votes that aren't very useful for us if they come up, especially if we're going to lose them. And, you know, we wouldn't want that to happen. So the House Republicans have canceled the final two
Starting point is 00:23:02 weeks of September and plan to stop voting after September 14th. Now, what date is Tuesday after Labor Day? What's that? September 7th? September 8th? Something like that? So they already have like the whole weekend off. No one's voting right now. Right. And that leaves. So it's 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th. So that's Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, 12th, 13th is Saturday. So four days and then the 14th would be Monday. So they're leaving five days of work. left so that they don't have to vote on maybe a certain bill. And the timing of that, this is a tweet from Brian Allen at Allen Analysis by the way on Twitter, shout out Brian. The timing, Thomas Massey's bipartisan push to force action on millions of unreleased Epstein files is gaining
Starting point is 00:23:51 signatures. They were elected to govern, not run from accountability, stay in Washington, release the files. Now Thomas Massey's only one guy and he's doing it. his part to try to push this stuff again in his unfortunately lame duck time period as he's leaving office i guess like january 5th or whatever that is but this was thomas massey on the floor the other day listing off 14 co-conspirators a lot of names that we've heard many times some that maybe we haven't heard a ton 14 co-conspirators in the epstein case and i'll just let him take it from here because I could get as fired up as I want. This was a pretty good shit right here.
Starting point is 00:24:36 Mr. Speaker, he's been a year since the president signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and the government continues to withhold over 3 million files. That's why we've introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act 2, to bring the fight to the state courts, accountability, to the Department of Justice and closure for survivors. We want perpetrators of these crimes to be investigated and prosecuted. Men like Jess Staley, Leon Black, Les Wexner, David Copperfield, Lapo Elkham, Tom Pritzker, Glenn Dubin, Frederick Fekai, Eduardo Tiodorani, John Luke Brunel, conveniently dead by suicide in prison. Daniel Ciyod recently discovered dead in Paris, Ramsey Alcoli, and Prince Andrew, who committed sex crimes in the United States too.
Starting point is 00:25:24 And women like Leslie Groff, not a victim, who conspired with Epstein to traffic other women. Is it says? Perhaps hearing these names will shame the Department of Justice into delivering justice. You know, Thomas, it won't, but I appreciate the effort. I mean that that seriously. Like he's doing whatever he can do. One of those guys inherited, I gotta do a deeper work on him. Lapo Elcon, I think his name is, is that how you spell it?
Starting point is 00:25:51 Lapo. He inherited Fiat or bought Fiat. Oh yeah, Ferrari? I think it was Fiat. Maybe it was for our, I forget. I got to do more, I got to do more work on him. He's the great grandson of the Fiat founder. Yeah, that's what it is.
Starting point is 00:26:07 Founder Giovanni Agnelli. Yeah, that's him. Who was a former controlling CEO and controlling shareholder of Fiat automobiles. So I started to look at some of this. This deserves a stronger, deeper dive. So we will do that. But a lot of the names on that list, you're very familiar with. Some that don't get talked about enough.
Starting point is 00:26:27 Glenn Dubin's a guy that stands out on that, pure spec. But, you know, some of these guys that were notably very, very close to Epstein, Epstein used to date Glenn Dubin's wife. And there are some crazy pure spec allegations against Glenn Dubin and his wife as it pertains to their child, which is kind of interesting. Damn. You know, considering who we're talking about here. But, you know, it is.
Starting point is 00:27:01 It has been such an awful year for the type of exposures that we've seen. But there's one silver lining we should all look at right now. We just went through at least a decade, but I could really argue back to when the Iraq war started going bad and then the financial crisis happened. Over these past decade or two, we have seen political unrest and disdemeanor. disagreement, get to a fever pitch that hasn't been seen in a very long time. Some of it probably always existed, but it was now exacerbated and brought out into the open by social media and all of us being able to, you know, type on the keyboard and say whatever we want and fight from behind those keyboards where sometimes we are more inclined in human nature to say things that
Starting point is 00:27:52 we wouldn't say to people's faces, which makes the situation worse. And it's divided us tremendously. Furthermore, algorithms everywhere have also curated exactly what we see. They are also self-fulfilling prophecies in the sense that you start looking at something and start showing you a lot more of it and it can literally train your mind to believe whatever you see. It's something we all have to look out for. Everyone in this room, everyone listening right now, like that's just a reality of the modern world. But during COVID, we saw I would argue the worst of this to where people de-peopled, dehumanized other people, because they disagreed on various things about the pandemic.
Starting point is 00:28:40 And that then translated into because you had these top line beliefs in the more extreme groups, right? Or the more, I won't even say extreme. And the more like opposite opinion left and right groups, like firmly left and right, had these opinions. therefore they also all needed to have all of these opinions down here and they needed to fight about each of these things at the same level of decibels with which they fought about the top line issues which is totally unhealthy for the human psyche the reason i say there's somewhat of a silver lining this year is because we have seen four things happen that for the first time in a while are some of the most bipartisan fucking every average person can look at it calmly and be like, yeah, I think I agree on that.
Starting point is 00:29:28 Four bipartisan issues have come up. Rape, genocide, endless wars, and mass surveillance. Okay? We've seen the Epstein files. Anyone who's actually looked at that can agree. That's pretty goddamn bad. We've seen another endless war start in Iran. Anyone on the left and right who's been looking at this for years
Starting point is 00:29:47 and has been complaining about all of our endless wars can agree. That's pretty goddamn bad. We've seen genocide. happened in the Middle East. Anyone who's looking at that situation and seeing it in multiple countries now can agree that's pretty goddamn bad and it's pretty goddamn bad when we're also fucking funding it. And then we've seen mass surveillance pop up, which is not a new phenomenon. Obviously I've said we all have these fucking phones in our hands and have for a long time. That's a separate issue right there. But we are seeing it all out on our streets with a massive
Starting point is 00:30:17 increase in fucking flock cameras everywhere, AI popping up with a bunch of companies that have not done anything to earn our trust. And now we are entering a new potentially dystopian world if that trend were to continue that was warned about in books like the ones that George Orwell wrote. So I say all that because, yeah, that's all pretty goddamn bad. But we all now have some common ground issues that we can agree on and band together. And I'm speaking to the people on the left and the right. Obviously, part of the reason my show works is because I don't appeal to either of those audiences individually. I have very moderate thoughts on stuff and very strong thoughts, clearly, on the things that we all seem to agree on, which are basic humanity. And so in my little corner of the
Starting point is 00:31:03 internet here, I think a part of what can be, I don't know, helping to try to solve some problems is to show where the fences are actually down and people are standing on the same lawn. And we're in a moment like that right now, and I think we should recognize that. I have a lot of people in the audience who are on the left, a lot of people in the audience who are on the right, and a lot of people who are kind of like, fuck all this. Appreciate all of it. Let's all fucking come together in kumbaya on the common sense shit.
Starting point is 00:31:29 Don't you wish you could just hit skip on the worst parts of your life? You know, the same way you can skip an ad? I get it. I'm Siaiaa and I live in Ice Cove. I've made some questionable decisions that didn't end up the way I planned. And today, I'm still figuring it out.
Starting point is 00:31:46 Somehow things usually get worse before they get better. Apparently, that's how I roll. So bundle up and come along for the bumpy ride. Stream a new episode of North of North Tuesdays on CBC Gem. And that's why we're going to continue in here covering these stories just like we have all year. That's why we added this show. You know, it happened by accident back in February for people who maybe weren't there.
Starting point is 00:32:09 From the jump, obviously I've been doing two three-hour guest episodes a week for a long time. That's been the podcast. That's what I really enjoy to do, bringing people in here on all different topics. having a good time. But when we started this, what is right now the Saturday show, where it's Dief and I for 90 to 95 minutes, that was something we had done for like two or 300 people on Patreon. I still have a very small Patreon, but I really had a small one for a lot of years. And, you know, we would just do this like weekly or biweekly, just kind of respond to some news. And we had done one when the second charge of the Epstein files came out. A few days later,
Starting point is 00:32:46 we recorded one. Thief came in here, tripping balls on a gummy. And he was like, like, hey, tripping balls. I have Constitution, folks. I was fine. That's right. He was fine. He just looked like demolition men. But anyway, he comes in here and Defe had been locked in on finishing his script for the movie that we are
Starting point is 00:33:08 now making, well, we, Defe is making it. No, we. I happen to be in it, which is kind of cool. Yeah, and producing. Yeah. Thanks for the cast. But Deve is writing and starring in this movie. and was obviously finishing the film script or the base of it back in January.
Starting point is 00:33:25 So there was what, like a two or three week period where you were off the internet? Like a month. It's like a month. So he comes in like four or five days after the Epstein file, Trance gets released. Yep. And says, all right, what are we talking about for Patreon? I'm like, I don't know. He's like, well, why don't you teach me the Epstein files because I haven't looked at it yet?
Starting point is 00:33:43 I said, okay. So we just hopped on what happened to happen. I put it out on Patreon and every patron was like, you. You must make this public. And we were like, all right, bet. So we made it public and then it went crazy. And then we're like, all right, we'll do this again next week. And very quickly we were like, you know what?
Starting point is 00:34:00 This is kind of like another piece of the show and we're going to do it. And I say that because I think a big part of the reason is we saw the cultural moment that this was where there were things that were being exposed that in the past never would have been able to be exposed. And there are the kinds of things that every good and decent American should want to get justice for. and also help avoid in the future. And I know all of you out there listening right now, you agree with me on that. And so we've continued that and we do that through the lens of all these stories that pop up now every week. It's obviously far more than just the Epstein thing to where we keep seeing themes of stuff where everyone's flipping out.
Starting point is 00:34:40 You know, I've always told that story. This is another one. But I've told the story over the years about the first few years I was doing this podcast. The first three and a half years, I was in my parents' house. And I experienced the pandemic very differently from many of you. What I mean by that is they lived like, I always joked, it was like two to five minutes outside of civilization, pretty much. Like back in the woods, you drove two to five minutes and you're back in regular South Jersey. But I worked every day.
Starting point is 00:35:13 And I worked in a blacked out studio, you know, the curtains, all the windows blacked out and everything. And that was it. I had a social life because people came over because I was talking to people on camera for three hours. And I did this at least once a week. And so I'd usually like spend the afternoon with those people. Joey Deef was one of them. He rolled through a couple times for episode 103 and 132. But like for three and a half years, that was my life.
Starting point is 00:35:40 And so this whole, you know, I didn't go places. I wasn't really out and about. The whole like pandemic and the effects that had on people I was following. that from the outside. I was aware of it, but I was not experiencing it. And so the one thing I would do is when I'd go as when I'd go to pick up guests from the airport, which started, I think the first time I did that was episode 96, no, 92 with David Satter. I picked him up from the train station. But then 96 with Matt Cox. I picked him up from the airport. So I started flying people in. And I'd, on the way back, I'd stop by Wawa to put some gas in my mom's car and
Starting point is 00:36:19 like, you know, grab any food for the guests before we recorded. And when I go to Wawa, you'd literally see, like one time I saw it, but I'd see many examples that are parallel to this, to where, you know, the girl in the fucking purple hair with the nose ring would hold the door for the guy in the nom hat and he'd smile and she'd smile and he'd say thank you and they'd go about their day. Now, you and I both know that especially at that time, if those two people were on Twitter, and they fucking might have been. They'd be dehumanizing each other and hating each other and the whole bit.
Starting point is 00:36:54 But when they're in person and a simple human act happens, everyone's happy, they smile and they go about their day, which is how it's supposed to be. And so now we actually can take some of those issues that, you know, in the past, maybe would have divided people that are on Twitter.
Starting point is 00:37:10 And we can see that we have a lot of issues where those people not only are holding the door for each other at Wawa, they're holding the door for each other on Twitter too. X. I'm never going to. I call it X sometimes, but like it's Twitter, right? Twitter, Instagram, you name it, on social media. And we got to focus on that. I'm not saying that to be preachy. I just, I feel very, very strongly about that. So, Leon Black, we will continue on you, my friend. We will continue on you. And I want to see those NDAs. I want to see you testify as well.
Starting point is 00:37:42 hopefully these fucking congressmen don't bitch you out but you know someone's got to talk about this and and i hope a lot more creators are paying attention to that because we even fucking almost missed it so anyway let's get to this clancy thing clans you ready yeah let's do it dude all right let's do it this was something that a month ago people were asking me to talk on a bunch and like i said i was going to get to it when i got to it sometimes when there's like a huge case, I'm really, really following it. And it's like, all right, let's go. Other times, there might be a lot of the shit going on, which in this case there has been. And so I've kind of been like, all right, I'll kind of get to that. In the last couple weeks, I've really dug into that
Starting point is 00:38:29 case. And I don't know, it's really shocking to me how many people don't see the common sense in this. Lindsay Clancy, took one of these. This is an exercise ban. All right. I have a, this is a harder one to pull. All right? This is a, I think blue, what's blue, Dave? That's like a little less, right? Yeah. I mean, it depends on your brand. Yeah, it depends, depends. But then green is usually like pretty light to pool. Doesn't matter how hard it is to pool. She took one of these things when her husband went out to pick up medication for one of her kids on errands that she sent him on. And I believe Geotract is location to see where he was. was, she took these and choked out her three kids. How old was the oldest kid, thief? Let's start the oldest. One of them was like an infant. He was five. Yeah, he's about five. She choked out her
Starting point is 00:39:31 three kids. And then, you know, she cut herself and threw herself out the window to try to off herself and was unsuccessful. And her husband comes home and finds her. And the court, because this has obviously been a tape trial. It's a state trial, so it's taped on TV. But when they went to play the 911 call in court, they turned the public cameras off. So the public couldn't hear it. Now, my friend Brian Enton did talk to someone
Starting point is 00:40:08 who was in the courtroom who heard it. So I'm going to play that in a minute so you can get the reaction. But I want to read some of this transcript of the call. So this is, this is, this. is Patrick Clancy, Lindsay Clancy's husband, calling 911 when he gets home and initially finds his wife on the ground, she ended up being paralyzed from the waist down, with severe injuries. And I'm going to skip the whole first half because the whole first half he comes home and he just finds her and he calls 911 and he is trying to attend to her.
Starting point is 00:40:45 And he's following directions from the dispatcher. They're telling him not to move her, check her eyes. He's like, Lindsay, will you open your eyes? Yada, yada, keeps going on. He's clearly worried about his wife. Because I do have to say, this is a guy who has been villainized by some people in the media, which that's just crazy to me. But, you know, no one's perfect. I'm not saying, like, they had a perfect marriage or anything like that.
Starting point is 00:41:12 Or there weren't some things. Maybe he would have done differently. But, like, this is a human being who lost his three kids tragically because his wife, and killed them. But let's get to the second part of this. So he's saying, no, Lindsay, wake up. They're coming. Look at me. Sirens. First responders arrive. So he is still with his wife. He's been talking with 911 this whole time. He has no idea that his kids are gone effectively. And Patrick goes, I need you to stay with her to the first responders. I have to go check with my kids. It then says inside the house, you can hear basement footsteps. And then Patrick.
Starting point is 00:41:48 guys guys cora cora dawson those are the names of his children oh no oh no wake up then they're screaming and gasping for a tremendous stretch the dispatcher says what's going on hello patrick yells basement basement oh my god i need help in the basement right now dispatcher again hello hello Patrick, now he's over his first son's body, Dawson, his oldest son. He says, Dawson, my buddy, my little boy, my buddy. And then he screams out guttarily, ah, she killed the kids. Oh, my God. Now, can you play the video of Brian Enten talking to one of the women who heard it? Because she's going to describe it better than I can. But I want people to hear how she described the human gutteral calls. Because that can't be faked. I asked you about the Patrick Clancy 9-1-1 call. Because when Patrick Clancy arrived at the house,
Starting point is 00:42:54 found his wife outside, had jumped from the window, and then found the kids inside. There was this awful 911 call that has not been played publicly. But you have heard the call. You are one of the few people who has heard the call. What did it sound like? Yeah. I mean, as you say, that call won't be released.
Starting point is 00:43:14 It was the live stream was shut off at that moment. So only people who were inside the courtroom heard that. And it was one of the worst, the worst thing I've ever heard. Worst things she's ever heard. The screams coming out of Patrick were just unearthly and guttural. And unlike anything I've ever heard, really. And, you know, it's, I think it's important to note that, you know, the beginning, as you say, that he went, he found Lindsay and he was panicked. You could hear the panic in his voice, but he was still very coherent.
Starting point is 00:43:51 And he was able to talk to the dispatcher about getting emergency responders there. He was able to reassure Lindsay. And then when emergency responders arrived, he was heard saying, I'm just going to go check on the kids. And obviously, he had no idea what was, what had happened at that point. point, you could hear him running down the stairs and then just these unearthly screams. And yeah, and then he was unable to speak. His words were indiscernible until he screamed out. She killed the kids.
Starting point is 00:44:24 And I mean, the whole courtroom was just torn apart by it, you know? It was jury members were crying. Lindsay's parents were crying. Members of the media, the public. Lindsay herself hunched over the defense table, quietly sobbing, but then when the judge immediately called the recess, the second that stopped playing, he cleared the courtroom and she broke down in loud and controllable sobs. I mean, it was...
Starting point is 00:44:52 Sobs of guilt. That sobs of guilt. Okay. So I'm not a woman. I can't know what postpartum depression is like, nor would I ever claim to. I know it's a very real thing. I've known women that have that and I do not want to in any way take away from the real effects of that and some of the stigma that's been around it before that is people are trying to live from that. What I will say is that this case will do all of that if this woman is found not guilty because we are sitting here on Friday evening after a mistrial has been declared.
Starting point is 00:45:36 I'll explain the details of that in a minute. I'm sure the state is going to retry this case at some point, but as of right now, there was no guilty verdict that came through. And also, some of the semantics behind that are crazy. We'll get to that in a minute. But if you claim that this woman had a psychosis from postpartum depression, because if we're going to report the facts here, she was put on a bunch of SSRIs and drugs, she had approached, I believe, a psychiatrist, a doctor for help with this. And this was where some of the hate on her husband
Starting point is 00:46:14 was coming in. She had talked to him about help for some things and maybe felt like she didn't get it. Again, nobody's perfect. But if you set the precedent of a woman being able to massacre her children, very planned and coordinated, very planned and coordinated. And you also can't, like she said, she heard a voice in her head that one time and it was telling her what to do. You can't prove that or disprove that. The only person knows the truth on that is her, and I'm not so sure I believe her. But if you acquit her on those grounds, you are setting the precedent that, as Nancy Mace put it, brilliantly, in fact, I'll read what she said because this is better than I could have ever put it.
Starting point is 00:46:58 She said, if postpartum mental illness becomes a get-out-of-jail-free card for murdering your children, then by that logic, anyone diagnosed with it should lose custody of their kids. kids. Do you not see the problem there? And by the way, how about now people talking about, like, if we're looking at a world where a hundred years ago women couldn't vote and they had to get that legally passed for them to do that. They had to get equal rights and be able to work in the workforce and have a chance to make money like men do, like all these things that happen to progress in society. If you now set a precedent like this, you are also opening up the Pandora's box of then being able to say every stereotype in the book. Well, a woman shouldn't be president because she's hormonal
Starting point is 00:47:43 and can do all these fucking things. You know what I mean? Like men have their problems too. But you are now putting a moving, not even moving target on that to be able to save some lady, some paralyzed lady who all these people that stand with her, she can't even stand with her, big air quotes. She can't even stand with them because she's in a fucking wheelchair. You know, it's just a dangerous dangerous precedent to set but something is really broken in society as I said a week or two ago
Starting point is 00:48:16 when I made one quick comment on this case when you had that woman who went into a fire and saved like five or six of her children 90% of her body burned her go fund me raised like 40 grand Lindsay's raised at that time like 1.2 million yeah like something is broken and backwards in a segment of society when that is the case.
Starting point is 00:48:38 I really wonder all these women wearing pink in the court and showing up with all the signs outside. Like, you know, how's your marriage at home? How's your life? How are your kids? Do you have kids? Like, who are you? And if there's people out there listening right now
Starting point is 00:48:55 who I'm offending, so be it. Like, this is just so fucking simple for me. I remember when I was a really little kid, there was a case, this woman, Andrea Yates. She drowned five of her kids in a bathtub. She was found guilty, sentenced to life in prison. Five years later, the guilty verdict, I would guess somewhat quietly, because there was a lot less fanfare on it, got thrown out, and she was declared, I guess, we, Defe can check it, but not guilty by reason of insanity. And she does, luckily, remain in a mental institution to this day.
Starting point is 00:49:32 the issue here is that if this were a man that's never an excuse every serial killer ever has had mental issues and mental problems you think these people are like fucking balanced people you think their brain functions at the same way you think they weren't doing drugs sometimes of course they were of course their brains didn't work right they still got the fucking chair there was a guy in texas who killed like two of his kids i i don't know know, did I put that link in there? Timothy Ray Jones. Yeah, all right. Thieves already got it up.
Starting point is 00:50:07 He strangled five of his kids. I'm sorry. The jury deliberated for two hours and he got the death penalty. Yeah, it's Texas. Yeah, I'm not even a death penalty guy myself, but like good fucking riddance. You know, and I think that guy had claimed schizophrenia or something like that. There was another one. There was another one in Texas as well that I saw where he killed two of his kids.
Starting point is 00:50:31 they deliberated for 19 minutes, and he had documented bipolar disorder. Because what happens is, and we've all seen these cases, so most of you guys know this, but the defense, they constitutionally have to put on defense for the clients. So what they do is they get expert witnesses. So they'll pay expert witnesses like psychiatrists to say, is it possible that this type of disorder that I looked up could have been happening? Can you assess her for this? Okay, yes. You think that could happen? Would you be willing to get on a stand and say that? Okay, yes. All right, well, let's get you on the stand and say that. That's how it works. So they made this whole postpartum defense and then spun it up into this whole thing.
Starting point is 00:51:07 Clearly, the prosecutors are, you know, fucking a dollar short and a day late. You know, very OJ vibes prosecution-wise. Like not the brightest bulbs in the room. But like the crazy support for her does really bother me. And by the way, let's even take this a step. down below. If you have so little going on in your life, like so little going on in your life, but somehow the luxury of time, meaning you, I would assume, have a roof over your head and can watch Netflix at night and aren't on the street fucking starving like some other people in this
Starting point is 00:51:52 country are, if you have a roof and time and you choose to spend that by going to a courtroom in Massachusetts, in many cases people traveling from foreign watch. from across state lines to wear a pink shirt in solidarity and hold up some signs that were written straight out of a fucking George Soros textbook and make that your cause in life?
Starting point is 00:52:17 What's that line from Kanye? Find God! Do something. You played yourself. You played yourself. Like, I don't get it. I don't get it. I'm happy to have people try to explain this in the comments
Starting point is 00:52:34 if I'm really missing something here. here. But this is just so black and white to me. She's a bitch who killed her kids. End of story. And let the husband go about living his life. He found a new woman. I believe she's pregnant. You know, he's moving on with his life. I don't know the guy. Best of luck, dude. I'm really sorry. This happened. Like, this is horrible. I don't even know what you say to someone like that. I've seen some bad ones. Luckily, I've never known someone who had to. to go through something like that, let alone also have to find them. But, you know, there's also, there's no better example of how asked backwards this is than the jury. Because what became
Starting point is 00:53:20 clear as the deliberations went on this week that led into the mistrial is that it was not, so a jury has to reach unanimous conclusion, all 12 have to agree, which is an interesting system, that could be a good sidebar because it's like it creates, you have to create a group think in one direction or another eventually because usually in cases that, I mean, I think this one should have been pretty cut and dry, but like cases that are really cut and dry, sometimes they'll all walk in there and be like guilty, I'm not guilty and it's quick. But a lot of times you'll at least start with some people who are like, I don't know. Yeah, 12 angry men.
Starting point is 00:53:58 Yeah, exactly, exactly. It made a good movie. Classic. But you would have thought that this would have been a situation. where if the jury were deadlocked 11 to 1, meaning one person couldn't agree, it would be because 11 people on the jury believed that she was guilty and one person somehow believed that she was not guilty here or at least, you know, the argument is that she's not guilty by reason of insanity. That's not the case, though. It was actually the other way around. This jury of nine women and three
Starting point is 00:54:28 men had 11 people who believed that this woman was not guilty by reason of insanity. I also want to say, I mentioned the Andrea Yates case. There was another case. I forget her name. 1953. Woman kills three of her kids found guilty by reason of insanity. Husband sticks by her, stays with her, believes it, believes she was insane. Constance Fisher. Constance Fisher. goes to a mental, she goes to a mental hospital. She's released in the 60s. Oh, wow. Apparently better.
Starting point is 00:55:02 She then has three more kids with the same husband. Oh, wow. Did something just happen? Did we lose them? No, no, I'm just, I'm reading it as you're saying. Right, but did we lose something over here? No, no, we're good. Okay, we're good.
Starting point is 00:55:14 Yeah, we're chilling. She goes and has three more kids with the same husband and kills them all. Now, does that mean every woman out there, or every killer out there or someone who's done that is going to end up doing that the same as her? No, technically it doesn't, but it's really an interesting pattern, you know? So when I see someone like Lindsay Clancy who, I mean, the eyes,
Starting point is 00:55:40 they never lie, Chico, there's nothing. She has some of the biggest irises I've ever seen in my life. I can't even see her pupils. Her irises look like they're straight out of the movie fucking alien. and that's someone who should never be in society ever. Ever. Back to the jury, though. 11 people, and we know the one holdout was a man.
Starting point is 00:56:08 So nine women and two men wanted to give this woman effectively maybe another chance at life by declaring her not guilty by reason of insanity and letting the mental system deal with her. Again, I don't think they would have even paid two minutes of mind if it were a man in that situation. But neither here nor are there. So as the deliberations went on throughout the week, these very weird semantics started to go on where the jury would come back to the judge and say and give him more and more details that the judge would then have to release to the court about their inability to come to a conclusion. and at one point the jury foreman who clearly
Starting point is 00:56:56 was not the holdout said I am so sorry to report or something like that your honor but we can't come to a conclusion and he said it's because one of the jurors the lone holdout juror I forget what the exact language was Joey Deave but he was saying like he refuses
Starting point is 00:57:14 to follow the legal orders from the judge as it pertains to reasonable doubt so what I mean is the jury foreman speaking for the jury was color commentating not that this hasn't happened before
Starting point is 00:57:29 but they were color commentating the jury room and alienating this juror to the point that the defense attorney for Lindsay Reddington kept coming back and asking the judge to no no send them back we want a
Starting point is 00:57:47 we want a result here because he's like if they can just get this guy we're going to be good. Don't you wish you could just hit skip on the worst parts of your life? You know the same way you can skip an ad? I get it. I'm Siyaya and I live in Ice Cove. I've made some questionable decisions that didn't end up the way I planned.
Starting point is 00:58:07 And today I'm still figuring it out. Somehow things usually get worse before they get better. Apparently, that's how I roll. So bundle up and come along for the bumpy ride. Stream a new episode of North of North Tuesdays on CBC. Jim. Once it got to the end and the judge was ready to declare a mistrial, so that would have been by Thursday night when it was looking like that was going to be the case. Reddington goes out publicly. Do we have that video? It's where I have lawyer intimidating the jury. Juror. Yeah, right here.
Starting point is 00:58:42 Yeah, so we're going to pull this one out. So he comes out publicly while the case is in deliberations and start speaking specifically about this juror and wants them to be identified, which like again, maybe my lawyers can help me out in the comments here. Not a lawyer, obviously, here. Look at me. Intimidation. Let's hear it from his words, not mine.
Starting point is 00:59:09 The juror has been identified. By the note from the court person. And there will be an inquiry by the judge tomorrow at 9 o'clock. don't know what his question is going to be yet we'll have an argument about it i don't think it'll be at the sidebar i think it will be an open court which is my concern that we have our arguments in open court not at the sidebar i again maybe my lawyers can fill me in there that seems a little bit off that seems a little bit wrong and he then what so he was referring to the hearing that was then going to be happening friday morning which did happen today and redington kept fighting it throughout
Starting point is 00:59:53 the day trying to say no please he actually asked them at one point i think you have that video up deep he asked the judge to remove the juror like he wanted to play like fantasy football with the jurors to get a new juror in there so he could get this thing across the finish line which again my understanding is that's not unprecedented that has been asked for before but like it's highly unusual and pretty overtly like trying to subvert the process right here But this was Reddington talking to the judge about this, which before you play it, Joey Deef, we're going to play another clip in a minute. Shout out to all my Boston people out there. But listening to this Boston lawyer, talk with the Boston judge.
Starting point is 01:00:39 And it's like one step below, what's your fucking problem? Like they're literally like shit talking. There's another clip we're going to play in a minute. They're shit talking each other in court in Boston accents. It feels like a fucking reality TV show. I'll let you guys hear this. All right. All right.
Starting point is 01:00:59 Thank you, Your Honor. I appreciate that. I appreciate the fact, Your Honor, that you're allowing us to be heard in public rather than at the sidebar. The jury. The court has an instruction from the foreperson of that juror that's been working for a week now saying that there's one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt. And I suggest respectfully that the soft instruction. that you gave them saying at the sidebar, can you listen to the law as I instruct you, does not focus on the issue.
Starting point is 01:01:33 It is the question is not sufficient enough. It does not allow any foundation for a motion to remove the juror who refuses to accept your instructions on the law, on reasonable. And if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurn the instructions of this court it's a shame it's a real shame and that's why I object to the courts rolling I request that we have
Starting point is 01:02:03 further inquiry I request that my motion is to remove this juror that refuses to listen to your instruction on reasonable doubt okay cut that right there because then it gets to the prosecutor's talking let's before I go to what the judge ended up saying on this can we play
Starting point is 01:02:21 the clip of the two of them going back and forth so the lawyer is who By the way, like, when I watch a lot lawyers in court, they're always, like, overly, and I shouldn't say always. In many cases, especially during high-octane moments where they know they're going to have to be, like, kind of yelling at a judge to make their case. Their body language will be, like, more overtly respectful to get up there, even if they're coming up aggressive.
Starting point is 01:02:46 Like, you see different styles, but, like, you'll see people at least, like, try to put on the, hello, Your Honor, thank you for the opportunity, and then fucking slam into it. This guy just kind of saunters up there, like, almost like my cousin Vinny. Just like, yeah, everything that guy just said bullshit, but in a fucking Boston accent. So this is him going at the judge who just, God love him, looks like he is thinking about five o'clock cocktails at Martha's Vineyard and he's going to be fucking late if this trial doesn't get itself figured out. So I'm sick of fucking listening to this lawyer and just state your case and I'm declaring
Starting point is 01:03:18 a mistrial, my friend. But the lawyer comes up and starts asking for this stuff. while calling the judge soft, only in Boston. Might feel that your honor is kind of coming down on her not to do that. And I think it's too delicate right now with situation. And in addition, and finally, I would ask that you not just give them, as I described it yesterday, a soft inquiry where you listen to my instructions. I would ask specifically direct their attention to proof beyond a reasonable doubt
Starting point is 01:03:50 and re-instruct them on that forcefully. I think I did it yesterday, didn't I? You did it yesterday, you did it soft. He comes back. What do you want me to do? I want to get a brass band. I read the instruction as written by the SJC. The fact that I perhaps didn't give it my full inflection.
Starting point is 01:04:12 He's not even saying. I'm sorry about that. I'm not an actor. I'm not acting. Well, my point, Judge, simply, is that you're, kind of glossing over the issue. The issue is this juror will not, according to that note, apply the law of reasonable doubt. And that's why I've requested, you know what I've requested. But just in case the record's, I am specifically not glossing over this issue. I have thought
Starting point is 01:04:43 about this issue long enough. I know the defendant objects, but the characterization that I'm glossing over it, uh, trust me. That's not the situation. I've been thinking about this, uh, for quite a while. So that's my, that's what I'm going to do. Uh, I'm going to just give that instruction. As I said, that they have to follow, follow my instructions. I'm not going to. Well, it's, it, it's just it, it screams reality TV in a lot of ways. Now, what happened was the judge went to declare a mistrial around, I want to say like 12.15 p.m. And then when he did, Redington, the defense lawyer got up and said, Your Honor, I want to file this emergency injunction, motion, whatever, before the Massachusetts Supreme Court and try to get a stay of your mistrial. And the judge is like, a what? Like, this is live,
Starting point is 01:05:42 like, while it's going on, he just declared it. And I guess to the judge's credit, that's what I assumed, again, I don't, not totally familiar with these legal processes. I know that's not normal that they do it live in court right there and he wouldn't just do it later and appeal. But the judge was like, all right, I'll give you an hour. So they bring them back at two. They actually live streamed the other defense attorney. So the associate defense attorney went in and did the hearing with the Supreme Court justice in Massachusetts, some separate judge on Zoom and then the prosecutor was there and they were arguing back and forth and they're like, listen, we're trying to get to the weekend here, let's go. And the justice then ruled on it very quickly. They come back to court and it was denied. It was officially denied,
Starting point is 01:06:35 right? That is what happened? I think so. Because then the main judge, our guy right here, Boston guy trying to get to the vineyard, he was like, all right, missed trial. And now it is going to hearings where they're going to get a status hearing within the next two weeks and try to, so I'm right the year. Yeah, yeah. And they'll get the status hearing and then try to get, you know, figured out when the next trial's going to be. But one of the things the judge did was all this is happening when the jury's not in the room. And then he declares the mistrial, brings him back in the room. And you don't see the jury, obviously. That's against the rules to be able to see it. Obviously, the fucking Reddington wants everyone to know who this other juror is, which just feels totally
Starting point is 01:07:18 illegal to me. But the judge addresses the jury. And what he said, we're not going to play it because it was like a long kind of rambling, whatever. But he started off, he's like, I'm a real student of history. And I study a lot of World War II. And me and Dief are looking at this, like right before we're coming on air. Like, all right, where the fuck is he? Like, Dief's like, is he going to say Churchill was the bad guy? He started mentioning Churchill? I'm like, oh no, here we go. Strapping, folks. He's like, here we go.
Starting point is 01:07:49 And I don't know what the fuck you meant about Churchill. I never really put the two together. Yeah, me neither. It was kind of just like a thing. Yeah, and we're just in Churchill. Anyway, like, okay. Like, big fan. Your Honor.
Starting point is 01:08:01 But anyway, what's it? What's it? Talk a little Chinese to him, dare. Yeah, yeah. You're trying to do the Don King thing, you know? Yeah, I was trying to do the Nickmore. Speak a little Chinese for him, Derek. Speak a little Chinese to him, dare.
Starting point is 01:08:13 If you know, you know. Shout out Nick Mullen. But anyway, so he addresses the jury and he's facing them. Reddington's obviously over here sitting back in his chair pissed off. But he kept emphasizing, I want to, and he did it, I don't know, 10 times, 11 times. I want to thank all of you. Every single one of you and commend you for the job you did. And I actually have, he's like, I have one more.
Starting point is 01:08:43 request, if you all wouldn't mind staying back for like an extra 10 minutes, I want to thank each and every one of you individually personally. And I was, this is a shitty Boston accent, but like that's what he said. And it was in my opinion, pure spec, but it was a real fucking lean the shoulder in to Reddington like, yo, just because you're not getting the result from one of these guys doesn't mean he didn't do his job. as I think he did did his job correctly under the Constitution. Your argument's bullshit. And it's just the whole thing smells.
Starting point is 01:09:21 And not to put on the tin foil hat for a minute, but let's stick it on, Joey Deef. We're all screaming about this case this week. We were going to lead off the whole show with it. Yeah, and Leon. And Leon. And Leon. And you got to, listen, I'm not saying that's what it is, but you got to ask that question.
Starting point is 01:09:39 Are they like, all right, you know, the dude in the Truman show? All right, hit him with the Clancy Murder. trial now. All right, activate Lindsay, please. And then NK is like, they say the word and she's like blub-b-bo-bo-boo. Remember that case from 2023 that no one's talked about for three years? Make it the thing now. Leon, you're on. Like, you have to wonder these things. Because again, shout out CNN. They were like the only major outlet. There were some other outlets, but the only major one that I saw, if other people can find some other major outlets, put it up. Because again, it was right before we went on air, but like, at least they reported some of it. You know, it's just, yeah, yeah, it's sad.
Starting point is 01:10:19 It's very sad that we have to ask those questions, but we do. Yeah. I just kept imagining the one juror is like, he got onto this trial and he's like, I'm going to 12 angry men this shit. And they're like, all right, you got to get on board with us. And he takes out the switchblade, stabs it into the table and like hits his hand. Ah, he fucks him. up. I'm still not switching and they're like, fuck. That's right. I'm not fucking leaving. Except he couldn't convince them like the guy and 12 angry men. He failed. Well, he failed on that part, but they'll get, they'll get her in a retrial. Somebody said on Twitter, I don't know who it was. I saw it very quickly. I'm sorry, I can't give creds on this, but they're like,
Starting point is 01:11:03 I'm really glad that there was one really autistic. Or no, they said, I really hope he's an autistic guy who just doesn't like get bothered by the outside noise and it's just bravely holding on because that might be the only explanation here this guy's getting attacked from every single angle and won't give in yeah he's just like i was like i don't care what he is shout out for holding your ground on that and they even said they even said with him he was he was they even described how he was arguing for it as expressing doubt not like no i think she's guilty so they were trying to say that's not the law. Expressing doubt is not the law. They have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. It's just, I don't know. It all smells. He held the line. He held the line. Someone had to do it. But we talked
Starting point is 01:11:54 last week about a little sidebar in there about the movie Eyes Wide Shut by Stanley Kubrick. And you're going to see why I'm bringing this up again in a second. But as a refresher for people who didn't see that episode. It's a 1999 movie that was released in 99, filmed in like 96, 97, the great Stanley Kubrick, legendary director put it together. He unfortunately died conveniently before it came out. And six days specifically after he showed the cut to the studio executives and when they came out of the theater where they showed it, he was screaming, this is my movie. God damn it. You can't take it from me. And then, you know, ends up dead. Now, he was like 71 or something like that. It's possible for a guy like that to have a heart attack, especially if he's under
Starting point is 01:12:39 a lot of stress about his movie, but certainly worth noting. And the reason it's fascinating is because eyes wide shut, obviously was a movie way ahead of its time that people did not appreciate artistically or for what it said at the time. And it aged better and better over the years. Fortunately, fortunately, artistically, unfortunately, unfortunately, realistically I know you're going to say unfortunately autistic
Starting point is 01:13:13 no no no no no no no no let's not put that on the edge of the tongue you're killing me but you know the reason I say that is because the parallels of what he showed to the things that we are discovering now about the people like Epstein's
Starting point is 01:13:31 of the world are you can't ignore them And that film works around an elite sex cult strongly insinuates child trafficking everywhere among many other, you know, little hidden Easter eggs in there that he put. I mean, you could watch documentaries on this for days breaking down every frame that he did
Starting point is 01:13:56 because Kubrick was so famously, I mean, there was not one detail in one pixel of the screen that this guy did not frame fuck. and it was that's why he was such a master that's why he had so many legendary films over the years and this was like his you know going to be one of his crowning achievements and then he passed away but one of the big controversies is that because he died and then the film came out four months later people were saying that it was edited and it wasn't really his cut and he was actually going to go farther with some things and they may have changed some things and that's all very possible.
Starting point is 01:14:35 And I still believe that that is probably the case. But I do have to point out what it, because we were tagged in it, so it sounds like it was also a response to what we did. I do have to point out the fact that Stanley Kubrick's daughter, Vivian, put out a long tweet about this with a different narrative. Now before I read this and we go through it, I don't know Vivian personally, she's from what I've seen online, you know, she's someone who has actually been at the forefront of calling a lot of things out, be it Epstein, surveillance, stuff like that. Like this is a person who is very against a lot of the same things that a lot of you out there are obviously against as well. So it's actually against the grain for her to maybe say it actually isn't a cover up or something like that, if that makes sense.
Starting point is 01:15:33 I should also say, again, I haven't talked about this with her personally, but apparently she and her father towards the end of his life did not have the same relationship. That's how I'll say it. And, you know, some of that, I think, involved the fact that Vivian went into Scientology, which is interesting because Tom Cruise was the star of this movie as well. It was very much in Scientology. but there were some disagreements on that. And obviously on my show, we have done,
Starting point is 01:16:06 we actually just put it out an episode today. Once I think we've done a lot of content on Scientology and safe to say I'm not a fan of that stuff at all. And I think it's an awful cult. And the shit they do to people is disgusting and illegal and they pull a lot of people into it. And obviously there's a lot of people who are held captive in it. And I don't think are bad people,
Starting point is 01:16:26 but they're either brainwashed or they're locked into it once they did get brainwashed to get in. into it and you know we've covered that with the headlies who we just had on obviously were in the sea org in scientology they were born into it and you know ended up escaping it they didn't know any other reality and they were brave and and it's that's that's that's one the most insane stories i've ever done that was actually we we put out the last four hours today episode four 71 and we had put out the first three hours a couple months ago, which I told him when we recorded it, we kind of spread it out because it's an amazing story.
Starting point is 01:17:05 But yeah, we were recording for about seven hours with them. And it was a Saturday. We recorded it like 1 o'clock. Yep. And when we were six hours in, I was looking at Dief. Again, it was at this point past 7 o'clock on a Saturday. And it was the first time. I've done a lot of long recordings over the years.
Starting point is 01:17:22 I've done a lot of six and a half, sometimes seven hour stuff where I know it's going to be two episodes. I have never been sitting in a recording where I'm legitimately tracking it and going, okay, I need to make a decision. Is this going to be two or three? Because when we were coming into that last hour, like when I'm doing a podcast, I can always chart out in my head, like patternize things within about 35, 40 minutes, especially when it's someone's story as to what the length of this is going to be with the details that I really want to let them be able to dig into.
Starting point is 01:17:55 I don't know. Like it's just been a weird feel that I've had really since the beginning of doing this. And that was the first time where I had had it charted out during the first three hours where I'm like, okay, yeah, this is this is going to go six and a half, seven. But when we got to six, I was like, okay, it'd been a long day, but I'm like, I could either do like the next four hour version of their story or I could just touch the surfaces of the important parts and get another. one hour and I was looking at Dief and I'm like fuck I don't want him getting knocked out at the board but he was telling me after he's like I would be a fucking in for it you you were locked on dude it was fun but they were awesome they were awesome but when you hear stories like that and I've heard a lot of stories about that I've had Jenna moscavage the niece of david moscavage
Starting point is 01:18:43 the leader of Scientology on the podcast when you hear all those things over the years and you see the details of this and and what they do it is impossible in my opinion to not feel the way I feel. I've even had, you know, helped out my friend Tommy G. be able to go down there and do an investigation on it and, you know, he started really looking into it and then some other creators got into it. And it's like, I can't even believe this is real. But it's a lot of dark stuff there. So I do have to put that asterisk on this. Again, I've never talked with Vivian, which are all the best. But let's read her response and then we can talk about it. But this is from Vivian Kubrick. And I believe it's going to be two tweets, Steve. I think she replied to it,
Starting point is 01:19:21 if I remember correctly. So she headlines this, eyes wide shut, the missing 20 minutes. You know, this is as good a time as any to finally address the missing 20 minutes from eyes wide shut. It's a story that has been circulating for many years, so let me tell you what I actually know and don't know. For contacts, my father always had his outtakes incinerated once a film was finished. My kind of guy.
Starting point is 01:19:48 Really? Specifically to prevent the studio from later re-editing his work or creating alternative versions. There were flies on this motherfucker. They were playing penthouse rent. Yeah, I respect that. There has been a lot of speculation that some 20 minutes were removed from eyes wide shut after he died. This will be very disappointing to many people, but I certainly did not hear anything about a missing 20 minutes at the time,
Starting point is 01:20:11 nor have I heard anything since that would confirm such a section ever existed. I guess you could stop reading right there, but if you're interested in the details, please read on. Now, I also should add this context. It's not like Vivian Kubrick was not heavily involved in her father's work while they did have a relationship. She wrote the score. She did the score to full metal jacket, Stanley Kubrick's 1987 movie. So she, you know, she was a talent in her own right and worked.
Starting point is 01:20:39 And making of the Shining documentary. That's right. And worked with her father. Wasn't she in The Shining, too? Didn't she have a good family up? I might have made that up. But like spent a lot of time around her father. So she did, I'm not saying obviously she spent time with him on this particular edit,
Starting point is 01:20:54 but she knew his process very well. And I'll keep reading while Diva's doing that. Of course, she said I was not in a position to know everything that may have happened before or immediately after my father's death. At the time, I was living in Los Angeles writing the score for a different movie. I flew to England where he was from. Not from. That's where he lived since 1961 because he got out of Hollywood.
Starting point is 01:21:16 Kind of interesting. utterly traumatized to be there for the preparations for my father's funeral and burial. But I had to return to L.A. the day after his burial, stricken with grief and exhaustion, to complete the score I was contractually obligated to finish, which I barely managed. So I wasn't there in more ways than one for whatever discussions may have followed. The only alteration I heard about at the time was the use of CGI, computer-generated figures to obscure some of the nudity in the or-s-scene where Warner Brothers wanted where Warner Brothers wanted in order to,
Starting point is 01:21:49 which Warner Brothers wanted in order to secure an R rating for the film. It was going to be rated NC17 if they kept the footage exactly as is because, you know, there's basically like a... At the cult, it was like a porno kind of in there. But I did not hear that any shots or scenes were removed. When my father died, eyes wide shut, had reached picture lock and was moving through the final stages
Starting point is 01:22:13 of post-production. It had just been shown to the studio heads. assume with the temporary music track, while the final sound mix and some of the music work were still to be completed. This was 1999 in the era of physical film distribution. The film was edited on Avid, but that should not be confused with the kind of permanent digital archive people imagine today. The Avid material consisted of standard definition video transfers made from the rushes, 720 by 576 pixels, and used for editing. Obviously, this is like Premiere Da Vinci, Adobe Premiere Pro.
Starting point is 01:22:47 And I've used avid. And like heavy tools. It's real dinosaur shit. Old dinosaur shit. They were working copies, not a high resolution digital preservation of the original negative. There wasn't a high resolution digital version of every take sitting on a server somewhere
Starting point is 01:23:00 as people might reasonably imagine today. There were, of course, all the 35 millimeter rush prints as well as the original camera negative containing the outtakes. Eventually, long after the film was finished and released, the 35 millimeter rush prints and the original negative of outtakes were incinerated. The original
Starting point is 01:23:19 master negative of the finished film and the immediate film elements made from it were of course kept in storage. Once the picture was locked, the original camera negative would have been physically cut to match the avid edit. Once the negative itself had been cut you couldn't simply undo those cuts
Starting point is 01:23:35 and rearrange the film. Each cut destroyed a frame at both the head and tail of the shot. This is clocking you? Yeah, yeah. Okay. Yeah. The master negative of the finished film was then used to make interpositives from which the inner negatives were made and those internegatives would have been used to make the 35 millimeter theatrical release prints. The original negative, and she bolds this, the original negative of the outtakes never went through that process because, of course, those shots were not part of the finished film. Someone might say, quote, but then if the missing 20 minute edit exists, it would be preserved on the avid, unquote. But editing the film on avid does not mean all. of the material was presented indefinitely. This was not an era in which every piece of editorial media was automatically retained on servers for decades, and I have no knowledge of whether any of the avid editorial material from the production still exists. That's a question for,
Starting point is 01:24:28 we're going to go the next week, the University of Arts London. They hold the official archive of my father's surviving papers, production materials, and other records spanning his entire career, including eyes wide shut. But to my knowledge, there is no surviving cashieres, of avid rushes from the film. So even if 20 minutes had in fact been removed after his death, I seriously doubt we should expect a surviving video or digital copy, unused negative, or other obvious physical record of it to be sitting somewhere today. But the absence of such material cuts both ways. It does not prove that those 20 minutes ever existed in the first place. That is as far as I can honestly go. I never heard of the missing 20 minutes of time. I have never
Starting point is 01:25:08 subsequently seen or been shown any evidence that such a section existed, and I know of no surviving material that establishes that it did. I cannot tell you what may or may not have happened during the 30-some hours immediately after my father's death. 30-some hours immediately, that's interesting. I was not there. But unless substantive evidence emerges, and I do not regard stories from certain people who, in my opinion, are inventing them after the fact as evidence, people often want to sensationalize their part in a story. If indeed they even had a part, the story that 20 minutes was removed from eyes wide shut after his death remains to my mind and actual conspiracy theory not an established fact. Finally, this much I'm certain of. If indeed 20 minutes had been removed, I definitely would have found out about it eventually. Once the fog of agony had lifted, I involved myself very closely in protecting my father's work and took that responsibly extremely seriously.
Starting point is 01:26:03 And then she tagged Joe Rogan, Alex Jones, and me. Interesting combo right there. But anyway, all right, I have a couple thoughts here. First of all, the last paragraph there, I don't know, per spec, I don't know how much involvement Vivian's had in protecting her father's work because I understand there were some sibling issues there as well because, again, I think it comes back to the Scientology thing and some other stuff. So I don't know about that part. It is interesting that she's going out of her way to talk about a potential misconduct. cut here. But the more I thought about that film this week, because after we did the episode last week, I was just really thinking about it even more. The more I thought to myself, I don't
Starting point is 01:26:55 know how much it matters if there's a missing cut. And let me start by saying, if they had changed one or two details, it could really matter. Meaning if there's not a missing cut, but they CGI to detail. It could matter. And specifically, I'm thinking of a scene. There was a great video made on this on YouTube. I forget who did it. Maybe Defe can find it.
Starting point is 01:27:21 But it's called like the letter theory. I want to shout out that creator who came up with this. There's a scene after the cult meet up when Tom Cruise is going through his existential crisis and wondering what the fuck just happened and kind of panicking. There's a scene where he returns to the house that he had. gone to where he discovered came upon this cult and when he gets there the gate is closed and it's a really long driveway and this this create deep just pulled it up this is jacob de sio reviews on youtube so shout out jacob he did a great little series called the letter theory about eyes
Starting point is 01:27:59 wide shut so everyone go check that out it's really good stuff but when tom cruise comes up to this gate and it's closed a car drives up and an old man in a suit with a very very good stuff and a very very serious look on his face, gets out, and hands him a letter silently and then walks back to the car. And when Tom Cruise opens it up, it says something like, I forget, because it's not in front of me, it says something like this is your second, this is the second time you have tried to look into this. We are telling you you need to make no further inquiries or there will be a punishment. or there will be a consequence, something like that. And what Jacob, the YouTube creator, posits,
Starting point is 01:28:47 is that they could have changed that letter on the text because you see the shot of Tom Cruise holding in his hand. You could have either reshot the hand that would have been very easy because you don't see anything else or they could have CGIed the letter because maybe the letter actually said something explicit. Maybe it said, for example, and I think Jacob said this in his video.
Starting point is 01:29:09 I hope I'm giving this to the right creator who said this. But maybe it said something like you are in violation of our code of standards in this fucking sick-ass cult, fucking horrible, disgusting, whatever. And if you and your wife want to live, you have to give us your daughter. Because what I talked about last week on our episode we did last week is, specifically that last scene in the film where Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman are in the toy store in New York City with their daughter
Starting point is 01:29:47 they got their eyes all over her they're talking about the situation and how they're going to handle it and then out of nowhere they stop they look at each other they let their daughter walk through them they look at her once I think and then turn back around and never look back and as the daughter turns away she is walking possibly
Starting point is 01:30:05 with two men and there was the two men theory throughout the movie where you constantly see or hear about two men as fixers, cleaning things up or leading people around as it relates to the cult. And the theory is that that may have been Kubrick's eyes wide shut wink, if you will, to the fact that to save their own lives, they gave their daughter away. So the letter theory could also be that, you know, maybe it said something more explicit on that. and the studio could have edited that. Certainly something worth considering, for sure.
Starting point is 01:30:44 But interesting to see Vivian seemingly respond directly to that. Because that was, you know, she tagged this in and it was right afterwards. So I'm kind of assuming there was some sort of response there. If there wasn't, Vivian, please correct the record on Twitter. but I the reason I thought about this a lot this week besides those details is that I don't think they're needed to be a missing 20 minutes and there really might be this might have been way worse and even way more explicit and way more like no this is what it is who knows maybe he used the word Epstein in there I don't know but like probably not but you get my point like it may
Starting point is 01:31:25 have been a lot more but the extra 20 minutes for all it could have shown if you remove that from the record and just look at the film as we saw it. And let's even assume for a minute it wasn't edited together. Like the frames weren't as perfect as Kubrick would have done it if he had had his finishing touches on it. But like the base is very close to her exactly what he would have done if he lived all the way through the final edit. I think it says enough. I really do. I don't even think that the conspiracy is necessary.
Starting point is 01:32:00 I think if you watch this film, and I said last week, watch it multiple times. Watch it three or four times. In one sitting. In one, yeah. Yeah, take a Saturday and watch it on repeat for educational purposes. I'm saying that unsarcastically. I think it tells you all you need to know. It is a story about an elite sex cult that operates.
Starting point is 01:32:24 In this case, they're out in New York City. and they all fucking go to rich people's places where, as I said last week, Kubrick chose to film it at a formerly rough child mansion in the UK, which is quite interesting. And, you know, they go there and they, let's call it what it is. They sexually assault women that are trafficked there and minors. which they as far as we can tell they didn't depict any assaults actual assaults in the mansion of minors all the women that appear there i you assume appear to be of age but the like i said the intonations are there throughout the
Starting point is 01:33:10 film when he goes to when he goes to the costume store and there's the fucking that girl was like 14 when they filmed that movie and she's back there being assaulted and then it's clearly showing the next night that he acted like the the shop owner was offended when when and upset when he saw guys potentially assaulting this girl and then the next night he was like offering up her services I think it was yeah I just blanked out for a second so it was like insinuated actually he was in on it and that he also knew maybe where Tom Cruise was going so it's a part of this whole network so it obviously discusses all these things and you just have to like listen to the messaging of it
Starting point is 01:33:50 I think it, I forget artistically for a second. I think from a plot scenario, it unfortunately aged like fine wine. And it was Kubrick's way of saying, like I don't even liken it to Hollywood. I liken it to him saying there are elite groups that do this shit. And they come from every level of society. And if it makes them feel better in certain places, they go in there and they wear mass and act all satanic about it on the already very satanic act. But this is,
Starting point is 01:34:24 this happens. And maybe it's not everyone for sure. But like, it's more than one. It's not like one sick, lone bad apple. And you can run the tape. I think it's pretty hard to disagree with that.
Starting point is 01:34:45 Yeah. You got anything to add on that, Joey Duce? No, you did it, uh, justice. Fine wine. Well, let's see if Vivian has some more to say on that. Again, there's a little bit of an awkward disconnect there on the Scientology thing. But it's interesting that she talked about it. I do want to say before we go, we'll talk about some more flock stuff next week and some axon stuff, by the way, because like we said, there are companies replacing and looking to replace flock.
Starting point is 01:35:21 So this is not just like this one company little fucking fall into a sciop battle here. You got to focus on these cameras going up everywhere and stopping it no matter who it is because they all have stupid technology that's going in. We'll talk about some Palantir stuff with that next week too. I got some things on that. But down in Florida where Alessi Alamon, who's been with me for a really long time and has a great channel, Alessi Alamon, it's named that on YouTube. you know he he he in his community down in florida they've had all kinds of flock cameras and he actually went i think i said this last week but he went and talked to the city council and it wasn't really getting across so when we reported last week about the santis declaring that all flock cameras
Starting point is 01:36:07 need to be decommissioned on state roads and stuff like that the way he's and i didn't say this last week the way he said it was he was referring specifically to state roads so when the florida Transportation Commission came out with the directive at his order. That's what it said. And now you have communities like Alessis in Marion County doing workarounds on this and saying, okay, well, that said state roads. So we'll comply with that. But we're going to keep flat cameras everywhere else because it fights crime.
Starting point is 01:36:34 So I would call on, you know, what DeSanta started with is great. And I appreciate that. I hadn't seen something that direct from any governor in the country. Maybe if I miss something, people can put that in the country. comments but I think a couple other governors now are starting to follow suit that said if you're going to do this do it all the way don't do it halfway because now you're now you're going to create like a district I don't know chain of command that can make decisions based on the language that you're giving them and I the lessee was showing me some of the fall out of this on social
Starting point is 01:37:08 media with Ocala and a lot of people are fucking flipping out about it yeah I mean as they should flipping out about it and he's been all over over this man and he's been pushing this issue and getting interviewed on the news stories down there and stuff so shout out to a lessee doing a really nice job but we will be focusing on these other companies as well like i said because you have to but that said it is labor day weekend when i'm putting this out so i hope everyone has a great rest of our weekend and enjoys the end of summer and went by really fast yeah that said though you know what it is give it a thought give back to me. Peace. Peace. What's up guys? Thanks so much for watching the video. If you have not
Starting point is 01:37:51 subscribe, please hit that subscribe button before you leave as well as leaving the like on the video. It's a huge huge help. You can join my Patreon via the link in the description. And you can also join my clipping community via the Discord link down below. See you for the next episode. Don't you wish you could just hit skip on the worst parts of your life? You know the same way you can skip an ad? I get it. I'm Siaia and I live in Ice Cove. I've made some questionable decisions that didn't end up the way I planned. And today, I'm still figuring it out. Somehow, things usually get worse before they get better. Apparently, that's how I roll. So bundle up and come along for the bumpy ride. Stream a new episode of North of North Tuesdays on CBC Gem.
Starting point is 01:38:34 Reaching your audience on Spotify with display ads is easy. Use your existing creative and launch your first campaign in minutes with Spotify Ads Manager.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.