Kermode & Mayo’s Take - THE END OF OAK STREET: “Why does it exist?” + SIAN CLIFFORD on LADY
Episode Date: August 13, 2026The Take is now on Patreon: www.patreon.com/kermodeandmayo Become a Vanguardista or an Ultra Vanguardista to get video episodes of Take Two every week, plus member-only chat rooms, polls and submi...ssions to influence the show, behind-the-scenes photos and videos, the monthly Redactor’s Roundup newsletter, and access to a new fortnightly LIVE show - a raucous, unfiltered lunchtime special with the Good Doctors, new features, and live chat so you can heckle, vote, and have your questions read out in real time. You can contact the show by emailing correspondence@kermodeandmayo.com or you can find us on social media, @KermodeandMayo. Supersub Sanjeev is sitting in for Simon on this week’s Take, and he and Mark will be bringing you three brand spanking new reviews of the coming cinematic attractions. The End of Oak Street has got dinosaurs, mysterious teleportation, and… kids with bows and arrows - which is the most unbelievable of those things, according to Sanjeev. But is this 80s-set adventure pleasantly Spielbergian, or just prehistoric? Then there’s Tony, the Anthony Bourdain origin story starring Dominic Sessa as the young rockstar chef to be. It might have Mark salivating - or maybe it’s just an odd mixture of ingredients… And finally we have Lady, starring this week’s special guest, Sian Clifford. In this madcap comedy the BAFTA-winning Fleabag actress plays a self-obsessed aristocrat who looks in the mirror for so long that she starts to see herself disappearing. She talks to Sanjeev about the role and why she hates being on camera as an actor. All that plus the Laughter Lift - this week at least delivered by an actual comedian - the box office top 10, and of course your top correspondence. A Sony Music Entertainment production. Find more great podcasts from Sony Music Entertainment at sonymusic.com/podcasts and follow us @sonypodcasts To advertise on this show contact: podcastadsales@sonymusic.com EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/take Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee! Our Christmas Movie Spectacular is back! It’s in Bristol this year on Sunday 6th December. Don’t miss it! Here’s the link for tickets: https://www.fane.co.uk/kermode-and-mayo Timecodes: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:10:13 The End of Oak Street review 00:22:52 Box Office Top Ten 00:36:57 Sian Clifford interview 00:51:02 Lady review 01:03:28 Laughter Lift 01:07:25 Tony review Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Get your tickets now for the dog stars.
It's no surprise how fast civilization can disappear.
Go!
Out there, just kill or be killed.
Jacob Alluredi.
There are people out there?
They need our help.
Josh Boulin.
Shoot first and inquire afterwards.
Margaret Qualley.
Okay, tough guy.
And Guy Pearce.
Arm up!
The Dog Stars, directed by Ridley Scott.
In theaters, August 28th.
Get tickets now.
Ever wonder how people actually get rid of?
Like, actually?
I'm Molly Sims, and on my show, Lipsick on the Rim, I sat down with Haley Sacks,
aka Mrs. Dow Jones.
To talk money, mindset, and why getting rich actually starts with how you think about yourself.
We get into the money habits nobody wants to talk about, the mindset shifts that actually
stick, and how to stop feeling weird about wanting more.
Listen to Lipsick on the Rim on Spotify and Apple Music or wherever you get your podcast or
watch on YouTube.
Before we begin, a quick reminder that you can become a Vanguard Easter and get an
extra episode every Thursday.
Including bonus reviews.
Extra viewing suggestions.
Viewing recommendations at home and in cinemas.
Plus your film and non-film questions answered as best we can in questions,
Schmestians. You can get all that extra stuff via Apple podcasts or head to
extra takes.com for non-fruit-related devices.
There's never been a better time to become a Vanguard Easter.
Free offer, now available wherever you get your podcasts.
And if you're already a Vanguard Easter, we salute.
You.
Hello, Mark.
Hello, Sanj.
I'm fine, thank you.
I was just looking at the script here.
Oh, don't do that.
Oh, it's too late.
I've seen it.
And it just says Bonhamie ensues.
Yeah.
Do I start the Bonoamie?
Yeah, yeah, that's your job, Sanj.
As guest presenter, regular returning guest presenter, your job is to ensure that BonoMe ensues.
Off you go.
okay well okay
pat on the back
Mark have you been
you've been abroad haven't you
I have but you know how I've been
because we've seen each other
more in the last two days than we have
because we've been in screening rooms together
it was like we went on a date
because we went to see two of the movies
that are out this week and one of them
because A-24
aren't signed up to the FDA
they don't do normal press shows
so we went to a preview screening
at the Every Man in Belsize Park.
We did.
And we sat on it, we sat on adjoining sofas, which was really.
Yeah, we've had a sofa each.
We did.
I suppose if we were looking at it in date terms,
I think it's interesting that we didn't choose the same sofa.
No.
Well, they chose it for us.
They decided that we were both one separate sofas.
No screening room, though, wasn't it?
It was really, I haven't been there in ages and ages.
Certainly not since it had sofas in it.
Oh, that's the first time I'd be.
I mean, that's kind of weird, isn't it?
When you think about as a kid going to the cinema,
the idea of a sofa was just so far from,
these were the days, of course,
when you had a smoking section.
I remember kind of the Odeon in Hounslow West,
the right-hand side of the screen was smoking.
Yes, yeah.
The left-hand side was strictly no smoking.
Yeah, which is just hilarious.
Everyone was smoking.
Yeah, exactly, because as I've always said,
having a smoking lane in a cinema
is like having a weeing lane in a swimming pool.
You all end up swimming in it.
It doesn't matter where it's happening.
Yes, but also what we didn't cover in our kind of two dates was you being away.
You were in France, weren't you?
I was in France.
I was in Provence doing the Provence Arts Film Festival,
which is where the previous show had come from because we had,
because of the weird way in which we do this.
Last week's show was actually recorded before the show that went out the week before.
But yes, I was out in, it was the Provence Arts Film Festival, which is a documentary film festival.
Last year, the subject was documentaries about artists.
This year was documentaries about music.
So it was great.
I introduced Epic, the Elvis Presley in concert film, which I know you and I both love.
Ian and Jane, who made the Marianne Faithful Broken English doc were there.
Kevin McDonnell was there with one-to-one, the John and Yoko film.
It was really good.
It was really, really good.
And then drove around for a little bit afterwards.
Which is why I have sort of the vague hint.
of a suntan because I was
in the south of all I suppose actually if you've been here
it's been scorchio anyway isn't it so
yes I mean you know a hint of a suntan
having been away means nothing anymore
at the time really currency
the moment
and as I said just
just as we're about to start recording this I've just
turned off Radio 4 which had warnings
that today is going to be
37 degree I mean it's like
the day the earth caught fire
I expect Michael Kane to make a brief early
early role you know early career
cameo appearance as a policeman.
It's bloody hot.
It's bloody hot.
You're only supposed to blow the bloody planet up.
I think this is the hottest summer on record now, I think, in the UK.
Wow.
How are you managing with that?
Have you got air conditioning?
No.
No, I haven't got air conditioning.
I mean, it's, you know, I looked at various kind of hacks that came up on Instagram,
which was, you know, you put iced bottles of water in front of a fan.
Somebody else said, you point the fan out of your window.
What?
I don't know.
That's maybe to call the pigeons or whatever.
Oh, no, I'll tell you why that would be, because that would be the theory is that it's drawing the air.
That's it, yeah.
From your boom.
Yeah.
I don't, I wouldn't do that.
No, I didn't, I didn't bother with that.
Just seemed so kind of counterintuitive.
I couldn't be bothered with that.
But yeah, it's kind of, yeah, especially at night, it's horrible when you kind of, you can't sleep.
It's too hot.
And, yeah, you just get a toss and turn, really.
My version of air conditioning is walking around in a Jonathan Richmond t-shirt and complaining loudly.
And incidentally, Jonathan Richmond will come up in our discussions because one of the films that you and I went on a date together for involves Jonathan Richmond's girlfriend, the song, Girlfriend, which was a great moment.
Cool. Okay. Well, we'll work our way towards that moment, I think, from now. So what are we going to be looking at this week?
Well, we're going to be talking about Tony, which is the new, well, I suppose it's described
as an origins film for Anthony Bourdain. We'll talk about that. The end of Oak Street,
dinosaurs in suburbia. And incidentally, we were discussing whether or not saying dinosaurs was a plot
spoiler until we saw both the poster and the trailer, which are full of dinosaurs. So I think
we're safe. And Lady, which is a very anarchic, low-budget comedy.
with our special guest.
John Clifford, the style of that film,
we'll be talking to her later on.
And in take two, Mark?
With the ongoing Ardman reissues,
The Pirates, exclamation mark,
in an adventure with scientist, exclamation mark,
or as it was called in America,
Pirates Band of Misfits,
and Sunny Dancer,
which is actually really, really interesting.
It's, again, a low-budget Brit pick,
but a really terrific movie.
So if you're not already subscribed to Take Two,
you don't want to miss that.
So sign up now.
Absolutely.
You can get take to ad free by heading to our Patreon page.
Just search Kermodeo Mayo, Patreon, and you'll find us.
Mark, let's kick off with some emails.
Dear Peter 2 and Peter 3, I smiled when you mentioned the Orpheus Cinema in Bristol.
I worked there as a teenager more than 25 years ago.
Around the time I started listening to you both.
So it's an underdog in your competition I'd like to go to Bat 4.
Okay, go ahead.
The place was ruled by the wonderfully eccentric Mrs. Miles and her husband Harold.
Harold ripped tickets, muttered obscenities, and joked with customers,
while Mrs. Miles ran the box office with military precision.
They resisted every attempt to modernize the cinema.
I still remember the disgust on her face when I built an Excel spreadsheet
that cut the nightly stock take from 30 minutes to three.
We were forever running out of letters for the marquee.
Harry Potter became HP.
the Lord of the Rings became L-O-T-R,
and eventually things descended into nonsense.
I distinctly remember trying to fit
the Englishman who went up a hill
and came down a mountain onto the sign
and ended up with something resembling
E-N-G-L-15-H-M-A-N-A-S.
It does look vaguely like Englishmen
when you read it.
The projection booth was run by a succession of characters,
including one projectionist who regularly fell asleep
and forgot to start films.
on more than one occasion
we'd have to wake him up
or fix the wrong film being shown.
One of my favorite perks
was controlling the foyer music
and subjecting unsuspecting customers
to whatever I was listening to at the time,
mostly Black Sabbath.
We've got a few complaints,
but more people asking what the music was.
For all the chaos,
what I remember most is the love of cinema,
children spilling out of spirited away,
audiences cheering the return of the king,
and even quietly holding the hand
of an elderly woman
who had had to leave,
a screening of the pianist.
25 years later, the Orpheus is still there, still independent, still half the price of many
multiplexes, and still worth visiting.
I'll be at the Bristol show in December.
If the Orpheus somehow pulls off the impossible, I'll be a very happy man.
And then a bunch of letters, hello to Jason, Isaac, etc.
That's from Steve.
Fantastic.
So that sort of suggests you're going to be in Bristol as well, this December month.
Yeah, because we're doing the Christmas show, which we have traditionally.
traditionally done in showbiz London, but we're going to Bristol, which is great,
which of course is where the good lady professor her indoors is from,
and big fan of Bristol.
Obviously, we've been talking about Ardman for the last few weeks because of all the
Ardman reissues, one of Bristol's finest.
So yes, come along to see our Christmas show, which is going to be in Bristol,
and we are really, really looking forward to doing it.
Do I need to, oh, I'm supposed to read you this special stuff.
Christmas movie spectacular is back.
Sunday the 6th at the Beacon Hall ticket information can be found in the show notes.
Can I just say on the subject of,
the running out of letters to do the film titles.
I've told this story before, but it's a formative story from my childhood.
When we used to get the bus to school, the bus used to go through Elstree,
and there was a cinema with a huge big hoarding, and I think it was called the Elstree
Studio 17, a massive, massive hoarding.
And every Monday morning, the bus would go past the cinema, and for weeks,
letters were disappearing off the hoarding.
So you'd get, like, the titles of movies, but with letters missing.
And we just thought they were falling off, but they weren't.
They were being stolen by local rapscallions so that in a follow-up move,
they could then replace letters in an actual title of a film.
And their greatest triumph was the Monday morning about 7.30,
when the bus went past the studio 70, which appeared to be showing a Beatles documentary
called I Want to Hold Your Rear.
I don't know, it's always a tricky thing, isn't it, with kind of petty crime,
because if it's witty, there's a part of you that goes, oh, go on, then.
You're rap scallions.
That's what you are.
You're not little thieves.
No, you're ragged muffins.
Shall we have our first film, Mark?
Yeah, and it's the one that we saw together, not at the Everyman,
but in what used to be Warner's in Theobles Road, which is actually now, of course,
home of the very podcast which we're doing. So the end of Oak Street. This is written, co-producing
directed by David Robert Mitchell, who made a splash with Myth of the American Sleepover,
made a name for himself in horror with It Follows, which I loved. And then, in my opinion,
at least, torched his career with Under the Silver Lake, which I think is a kind of fall down
as terrible as what happened to Richard Kelly after Donnie Darko. So the end of Oak
Street stars Anne Hathaway, Ewan McGregor, as a suburban couple, Greg and Denise Platt. Their marriage
is going through a rocky patch. He keeps ducking out family activities because he needs to pick up
some extra shifts delivering pizza and he's secretly sipping whiskey down in the basement. She, meanwhile,
has written a book that she has not told any of her family about. She's talking to a kindly neighbor
about. And the book is clearly autobiographical. It's a story about a young woman or a woman who
clutches a suitcase of stuff to her chest ready to make an escape whenever she can.
It's basically a way of her saying she wants to escape from her life, even though she says
it absolutely isn't.
As for the kids, they appear to be living in a Steven Spielberg movie.
They ride their bikes around the neighborhood.
They get into scrapes with, you know, the other local kids who chase them on their bikes.
And then there's a family dog which keeps digging into the neighbor's garden and then getting
into his lawn and pooing on his lawn.
And it's all playing out in the 1980s, which of course is thought by many people to be the
kind of, you know, the classic Spielberg raid.
Then one night, something happens.
There is a huge booming sound, a big flash of white light,
and when the family wake up, they discover, and as I said,
this isn't a plot spoiler because it is all over all the trailers and all the posters,
that their neighborhood has been overrun by dinosaurs.
What's happened? How has it happened?
How will they survive?
Here's a clip from the trailer.
I think that our neighborhood,
our house, our whole street has moved.
Now the hell is that even possible.
Run!
God's not going to let us die here.
Rick!
You only go to church at Christmas and now you're telling the kids God's looking out for us?
What about the people who are out there getting eaten?
Precisely so.
So, faced with imminent dinosaur danger,
the family have to do the thing that we know they have to do,
which is they have to learn to put aside their differences
and work together in order to avoid becoming,
dino food. So we watch this film together in the same cinema, although we were seated quite
far apart from each other because you sort of sneaked in and I didn't see you. And you so we, you know,
so I couldn't actually tell your reactions during the film. But it's a mishmash of different elements.
I mean, the most obvious one is, of course, Spielberg. It's produced by JJ Abrams, who in many ways
is a kind of, you know, modern day Spielberg tribute act. There are the bikes, the suburban
streets, the dysfunctional families beloved of Spielberg. There's the rampaging dinosaurs of Jurassic
Park. There's a chase sequence in which you don't see the dinosaur. You just see the things it's knocking
over behind a fence, which is very reminiscent of some of the sequences from Jaws in which you don't
see the shark, but you see the barrels or you see the things that it's knocking over. And as I said,
the whole thing plays out in the early 80s, which is kind of key Spielberg thing. And there's a,
score by Michael Jekino, which is absolutely channeling John Williams. You know, lots of kind of triumphant
harrumphing and then sprinkly, sprinkly, dinkly, a little bit of magic.
The main difference between this and Spielberg is that the whole thing has got a slightly
less wholesome feeling. I mean, even amid the dismemberments of Jaws and Jurassic Park,
the Spielberg stuff all kind of felt family friendly, which this doesn't.
I mean, it feels a little, I don't mean this as a criticism, it feels a little scusia.
I mean, it costs 85 million, which is a little bit more than the original Jurassic Park
cost back in 1990.
whatever it was, but it's a third of what Jurassic World Rebirth costs. So it is comparatively
cheap for a dinosaur movie. I mean, unless, of course, you're talking about Roger Coleman's
carnosaur, which famously cost less than a million, but then had rubbish dinosaur effect.
I'm going to ask you what you think of it in a minute, but I'm just going to, before I do,
I'm going to say, I thought there was a touch of Donnie Darko in the explanation of what actually
happened. And of course, it's an explanation that makes no sense at all, but that doesn't
matter. I mean, it makes more sense than under the Silver Lake in which the explanation
was just, sorry, what? Some of the script is almost perodically shonky. I think Ewan
McGregor's performance as a troubled American dad borders on parody. And I think Anne Hathaway appears
to be in a different film because she gives it 110%. She does the grief, the angstice.
She does that thing about looking genuinely horrified, which of course is a great.
Spielberg trope before you show the audience something terrifying, show them somebody looking
absolutely terrified and then they'll buy into it. And I think she does that brilliantly.
At times it felt to me, as I mean, I mentioned Carnas, so it felt like a bit of a kind of big
budget Roger Corman movie as opposed to a smaller budget Spielberg movie. There's the cats
and dogs who survives rule that obviously gets invoked. And it's also got a bit of a nasty
streak, which I'm quite light. I mean, it's 12.
It is top end 12, despite the fact that the BBFC description of it is, it's 12 for moderate
threat, violence, injury, detail, infrequent, strong, age, moderate threat.
There's dinosaurs running around biting people's legs off.
I mean, I think that goes above moderate threat.
I kind of, I mean, it's sort of all over the place.
and the fact that it's, I found bits of it genuinely thrilling.
I found bits of it kind of genuinely alarming in a sort of Larry Cohen,
cue the winged serpent kind of way.
And I did find myself feeling genuinely uncertain as to who would survive,
particularly after one key moment in which it's like,
okay, well, all the gloves are off.
But as I said, it is, I think it is intentionally sort of trashy.
and then we came out of the film
and you said I have one question,
why does it exist?
So give me your take.
Well, a little bit, yeah,
because I think, you know,
there are a couple of shock moments.
There are.
And that's fine,
but then that's like a jump scare equivalent for me
is the, you know,
there's the thing you go,
oh, but beyond that,
I didn't know who it was aimed for.
I mean, I really like Ewan McGregor,
and I like Anne-Han,
pathway. And they are in different films, though, aren't they, they're in different movies?
They are in different films, yeah. But also, you know, it was things that, you know, things that perhaps
bothered me, wouldn't bother anyone else. I mean, I kind of go, fine, it's the 1980s.
But, you know, was that, in the 1980s, was it kind of normal for kids to wander around with bows and arrows?
I mean, it was things, did they, you couldn't, you couldn't wander around with a bow and arrow.
Actually, who? Who wandered around with a bow and arrow in the air?
He's a kid.
He's a kid.
Didn't you have like a sheriff's holster or something when you were a kid?
That was just a thing.
When I was about four, yeah.
Oh, I see, okay, fine.
Not when I was kind of early teens or whatever age you're supposed to be.
Okay.
And so there were loads of things like that which just felt really, I don't know,
it's not quite, you know, AI has written this, but it was a little bit.
Okay.
It's a bit like you'd put it through sort of, you know.
Just to be clear, Sange, in a movie in which an entire suburban town is,
transported somehow and overrun by dinosaurs.
Your problem is that one of the kids has got a bow and arrow.
That is the main problem I have.
But it is kind of like, I just feel that if you put,
if you inputted all this into some sort of weird algorithm,
it would give you what,
what you have in the film?
What do you think you would have asked the algorithm to give you?
I mean,
what would you have asked AI to create this?
What's the question?
It would be, could you give me something that's quite,
Bilberg, give me something that's got a couple of shocks in it, give me some family problems,
and I'm not too bothered about how this came about and how they get away.
And then it would go, yeah, about that then.
And this may be a conditioning thing as well, because I think it's very difficult now to
think about dinosaurs without referencing Jurassic Park.
Of course.
Obviously such a game changer.
And I thought that even the dinosaurs in this looked a bit weird.
Oh, really?
As if they kind of said, yeah.
I mean, some of them were kind of furry.
And I thought, I'm just not used to that.
I'm used to kind of like scaly-skinned dinosaurs.
Right.
But you don't mean they look bad as in the special effects were bad.
What you mean is that the design of the dinners,
that they were rendered perfectly fine, but they were just a bit weird dinosaurs.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay.
And again, I would put that, if I was writing it, I'd put it into an algorithm.
them saying, I don't want them to exactly like Spielberg's dinosaurs as well. But just to be clear,
you know, how that happened and how they get out of it, don't worry about that.
Did you not have a good time watching it?
I sort of enjoyed it, but it's other than the things that, I mean, it just felt very pedestrian.
It just didn't, I mean, all of those things that are set up, like, you know, Anne Hathaway's
problem and Ewan McGregor's problem and the kid's problem, you know, all.
None of them felt real.
They all felt a bit sure.
I absolutely agree with that.
I agree with the,
he's got a problem.
How do we know?
Oh, look, he's drinking whiskey.
She's got a problem.
How do you know?
Oh, she's written a book about a woman
who wants to escape from her life
with the yellow suitcase.
Yes, that I agree with.
But I did think it was also,
it was like the kind of thing
that the film really wasn't interested
in those things.
It was just, it was like,
he woke up in the morning,
went suburban dinosaurs.
All right, fine.
Let's do suburban.
Oh, you know, I've got to write some,
stuff about why the characters are important, because of course they're not. With the exception
of Anne Hathaway, who despite the fact that she is reading a frankly shonky script, is giving it some,
you know, it's like Meryl Streep in Mamma Mia. She plays it like Hamlet, even when it isn't.
And I think Anne Hathaway's performance is the thing that keeps it grounded. I did think,
I mean, I love you, Emna Greger, but it was slightly perodic his performance, wasn't it?
It was a bit. And I agree. I think Anne Hathaway was great. And I, as I said, I like them,
both as actors.
But yeah, I mean, it's not one that I'd watch again.
Would you?
I don't know.
I mean, I enjoyed it a lot more than you.
I mean, I think it's essentially rubbish.
But, you know, and I know there is a difference between Roger Coleman making $1 million
rubbish and somebody making $85 million rubbish.
But I would be lying if I said I didn't enjoy it and I didn't find certain sequences in it
genuinely kind of exciting.
And there is at least one moment in it,
which isn't just a jump scare,
there is at least one moment in it
in which I went,
blimey,
I didn't expect them to do that,
although it has to be said
that they then do work towards undoing it.
So, you know, blah, blah, blah, blah,
which is kind of, you know,
Spielbbing it.
I was sort of surprised it was a 12.
I thought, it looked 15 to me,
but then, you know, kids today don't know.
They're born, do they?
Well, that's the end of Oak Street.
That's not a great title, by the way.
No, although it is funny.
that the title appears at the end of the film.
Yeah, that was quite funny.
The End of Oak Street.
And it's like, oh, that's quite well done.
Yeah.
Oh, you rapscallions.
Okay, still to come after the break, Mark.
Still to come after the break, we have the box office top ten.
And we have our very, very special guest.
And that is Sean Clifford, who plays the titular character in Lady.
Ever wonder how people actually get rich?
Like, actually?
I'm Molly Sims, and on my show, Lipsick on the Rim,
I sat down with Haley Sacks, aka Mrs. Dow Jones,
to talk money, mindset, and why getting rich
actually starts with how you think about yourself.
We get into the money habits nobody wants to talk about,
the mindset shifts that actually stick,
and how to stop feeling weird about wanting more.
Listen to lipstick on the rim on Spotify and Apple Music
or wherever you get your podcast or watch on YouTube.
Now it's time for the box office top 10.
At number 10, US number 13, is,
obsession. And this is currently, it's 13 weeks on release, Sanj. This is its 13th week of release,
and it is still in the UK box office top 10. That is extraordinary. For a really, really small,
really thoughtful, smart horror movie. Incidentally, this subject will come up again in take two.
It's just, it's terrific that it's done as well as it has. I'm really, really pleased.
At number nine, US number eight is the invite. The kind of film they just don't make.
anymore, sort of adult comedy
like they used to do in the 1970s.
And I really enjoyed it.
I thought the script was sharp.
I thought the performances were really well done.
I thought it was terrific.
Yeah, I've seen this one.
Oh, tell me, tell me.
Yeah, no, I enjoyed it.
It kind of reminded me of, I don't know,
sort of Witt Stillman, those kind of films that he made.
That's a very high bar,
Witt Dillman.
Yeah, yeah, Barcelona, Metropolitan, all those kind of things.
You know, there's a love of language and words.
It felt like a play.
So Carnage was the other thing it reminded me of.
But I enjoyed it.
The play of God of Carnage, as opposed to the film of Carnage, which is terrible.
The play is brilliant, isn't it?
Absolutely brilliant.
Film is awful.
That's the invite.
At number eight in the UK is Ice Cream Man.
And I have an email here.
Go ahead.
Dear Mint, Chalk, Chip and Bubblegump.
Child 2, partner and I saw Eli Roth's cinematic masterpiece Ice Cream Man as a scream unseen at Odian.
Yes, I'm obviously joking. It was a mess, a complete shambles.
Truthfully told, my initial reaction was to, for the first time ever, walk out when the title card showed.
However, Mark's words of always go in with an open mind echoed in my mind.
And Lordy, did I regret it?
This was a few, well, that's reasonably squishy clips, extended to a movie length that greatly outstayed its welcome.
The use of AI was apparent. I suspect Eli used it to generate the script.
write a script that's weapons mixed with Elm Street, mixed with Halloween 3, then edit it, then create effect.
A joke about autism and one about Dad, played by Eli, wanting to leer at high school girls in bikinis, both make an appearance.
Garsely in every way.
Avoid, avoid, avoid, tinkety-tong, and down with this kind of thing.
That's from Gerard.
It's interesting.
I mean, this has been probably Eli Roth's worst-received film, although it is by no means his worst film.
I think it's very much mid-Ely Roth.
It has all those things that you've just cited.
The AI thing, some people had said,
why didn't we comment on the AI thing in our review?
At the point at which we recorded the review,
Eli Roth hadn't done the interview in which he said there was no AI,
and then he said there was AI, and then he walked it back,
and then he said later that the AI may have been involved in the animation sequences.
So that was while, though.
To me, it's interesting that people have disliked it as much as they have.
I just thought it was very middle of the road, bad taste, squishy, horror,
and it's not in the same level of awful as Green Inferno.
And I think that when Eli Roth is awful, he is really, really awful.
And I just thought this was, you know, meh, is very, very vanilla.
There's a very, very good and balanced review of it by Kim Newman in Sight and Sand,
which I was glad to read after I had done, after I recorded my review,
in which I think we sort of both feel on the same page, but I think he enjoyed it more than I did.
But yeah, no, it is, it is interestingly enough, probably Eli Roth's most critically maligned film.
And people are saying things like worst film of the year.
I don't think it is that.
But it's interesting that people absolutely detest it.
At number seven, US number six is Moana.
Again, an awful lot of really hostile responses to Moana.
And again, my feeling was, well, of all the completely unnecessary live action remakes,
this is the one I disliked the least.
But that's probably because I like the sort of.
material so much. I mean, I like Moana. And the live action, Moana, of course, we didn't need it.
We already had the, we already had the cartoon, but it's got the same plot. It's got the same
stories. And of course, in the form of Dwayne the Rock Johnson, it's the same. But I guess,
again, people very, very hostile towards it. Maybe people have just finally got fed up with the
Disney remaking their animated back catalog in inverted commas, live action.
At number five, US number five as well is minions and monsters.
I loved minions and monsters.
And whilst I was in Provence, one of the things that we did was we went to the train station at La Ciotat, which is where the Lummias filmed train arrivetum, whatever it is, you know, de la Cietat.
And the good lady professor of her indoors and I, her outdoors, as it was in this case, did a little film of us standing on that platform as a train came in behind us.
And there is a joke about that film in minions and monsters,
which I think is the most sinne literate film I've seen this year
and is definitely, definitely, definitely one of my top films of the year.
At number four, US number three is Toy Story 5.
Done terrifically well, I kind of, I mean, I didn't like it.
It's the first one of the Toy Story movies in which I actually thought,
okay, I've had enough of this now.
I thought four was a step too far, but they got away with it.
but we have had many people write in and say that they went,
they went with their kids, they enjoyed it,
and that, you know, the message about, hey, maybe physical toys are, you know,
there was a new story just this morning about how, you know,
it's important to get people off screens and get them back to playing with real toys
and using their imagination.
I agree with that.
I just didn't think the film was particularly good.
At number three, US, no entry so far, is Portrait,
the Dino movie.
Now, I confess, this is,
the one that I missed because when I was away in France, this was one I didn't catch up with.
However, it is Paul Patrol.
We all know Paul Patrol, so then the other ones, and it's got dinosaurs in it.
So two dinosaur movies you're going to have to choose from, either the one that Sange's question was, why does this exist?
Or Paul Patrol, the Dino movie?
Yeah, well, if Paul Patrol Dino movie has a kid with a bow and arrow in it, that's a lot of
things for me.
At number two, US number two is The Odyssey.
Obviously we've talked a lot on the show about The Odyssey, so including a spoiler-tastic discussion in last week's Take 2.
So still lots of correspondence coming in, some of which you can hear in the Overflow Car Park in this week's Take 2.
And a very number one is Spider-Man brand-new day.
Well, you leap in with an email because I know that I can see from my script that there is a blank.
I have just to explain to people.
When they're emails, they put them on my script, but they blank them out so that I can't read them.
them in advance. That's literally, they treat me like a child. Proper redaction. Yeah. Gosh.
Spider-Man Brand New Day is number one here and in America. Here is an email. Dear Mark and Simon,
very, very LTL third-time emailer. On Sunday, my family saw Spider-Man brand new day at our local
view. Enthusiasm for the film became clear when we had to book seats in Roe C, further forward
than I'd usually choose. But this position, let me do something I'd never done before when the BBF
see card came up, to look backwards at the audience. I saw 300 excited faces of all ages,
lit in silver, sharing a moment of anticipation. When my son asked what I was looking at,
I wasn't able to answer immediately. Spider-Man had made me cry before the Marvel logo had even
appeared. All four of us loved the film, but my main joy was feeling cinemas going to be okay.
2026 has been the year movies really needed, big films hitting big again, and smaller films
from young voices, like obsession and backrooms, returning 500 times their budget.
And if one of those young voices wants to make anything non-horror, I'll be right there in Roe C.
I'm more hopeful than ever that years from now, my kids will be taking their own kids to
explore new worlds through cinema.
Hello to Jason, Toby, and everyone else who's still buying tickets.
And that's from Tim, Tim Gommasol.
Not Tim, nice, but dim.
Nice for Dim. That's what you're thinking, yeah.
Happy movie going dad.
Here's another one.
Time and a Mark, long-time listener,
first-time writer coming to you from Dublin.
I went to see Spider-Man brand-new day twice during its opening weekend.
The film seems to be generating a lot of positive reception from fans,
and I'm glad that people are enjoying it.
But much like its predecessor, 2021's No Way Home,
I believe that this film will later be scrutinized.
So to beat the hype train,
I will say that it may be up there with homecoming for the best MCU Spidey flick.
But even on a second viewing,
the final act is a drag.
The first issue is that, much like Mark I, too,
found the more character-driven moments
to be the most impactful and entertaining,
and when it devolves into Wham-Bam,
thank-you-ma, action set pieces, I clock out.
On my first viewing, I went by myself,
and on the second with friends,
and I was kind of dreading getting to that part,
as it takes up so much time in the final act.
The fight with the ninjas in particular is a dread to re-watch.
The second is that the mawkishly saccharine speeches
that are supposed to deter the main villain
are simply badly written platitudes
that aren't convincing as a motivator.
Generally, I think the final act
is driven by outdated and overused cliches
that you have guessing what will be said
before it's said, and have you
rolling your eyes when you're correct.
I did enjoy the film,
and it's the most cinematic feeling
MCU Spidey film thus far,
but I think it's far from a masterpiece.
Spider-Man 2 is yet to be dethroned,
and that's from Aaron Kavanaugh.
It's interesting,
with the amount of criticism and very detailed criticism that Aaron had,
that he went back to see it again.
Yeah, absolutely.
On the same weekend.
Yes, and he will have added to the fact that as of a few hours ago,
Spider-Man Brand New Day has crossed the $1.7 billion worldwide.
It's on course for $2 billion.
It is going to be one of the biggest selling movies of all time.
You said, when you said it's number one, it's very number one.
I mean, the box office figures are astronomically.
and that is to be celebrated.
I mean, I have many reservations about the film.
I enjoyed it, but I, you know, I think there are things,
things about it that weren't things about it that don't work,
and I generally kind of liked it, you know, with, I said, with reservations.
But the level of success it's had is breathtaking.
And when you look at a box office chart with the Odyssey at two
and Spider-Man Brand New Day at one,
taking this kind of money.
I mean, it is,
Simon always says this.
Anything that gets people into cinemas is to be celebrated.
Have you seen this, Sange?
Yes, I have, yeah.
I kind of enjoyed it.
I don't think it's my favorite Spider-Man film,
but I kind of, I did enjoy it.
And I think it's something I said to you
when we came out of our date night movie,
which is that, you know,
the last time we had a Christopher Nolan film,
we had the summer of Barbihimer.
We did.
And nobody's kind of done a similar thing this time.
And so I did suggest Toy Oddie Man Five
as the three films that have absolutely kind of dominated
the summer so far.
Toy Oddie Man Five is very, very good.
But it doesn't quite roll off the tongue like Barbenheimer, does it?
No, it doesn't.
Well, because there's an extra film in there.
So that's the problem.
Yeah, that's the problem.
Okay, right, do that construction with just
the Odyssey and Spider-Man.
So what would that be?
That would just be the Odi-Man.
Oddie-Man.
The Odie Man.
And that works quite well.
I think that since the kind of money
that Odyssey and Spider-Man doing,
I think it's just the Odie Man.
So last year it was Barbenheimer,
and this year it's Odie Man.
Although, of course, they didn't have the same opening day,
and they didn't have the same, you know,
go and see them both together.
But, I mean, I feel the same way as you did.
It's okay.
It's okay.
It's better than okay.
I mean, as a cinematic experience,
I thought it's good.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, but it's not perfect.
It's not Spider-Man, too, by any means, which I agree with the emailer still remains the high point.
But it has taken a staggering amount of money.
Yeah.
Well, that's your top 10 for this week.
After the break, we are going to be joining and chatting to Sean Clifford,
who plays the title character in Lady.
Ever wonder how people actually get rich?
Like, actually?
I'm Molly Sims.
and on my show, Lipsick on the Rim, I sat down with Haley Sacks, aka Mrs. Dow Jones.
To talk money, mindset, and why getting rich actually starts with how you think about yourself.
We get into the money habits nobody wants to talk about, the mindset shifts that actually stick,
and how to stop feeling weird about wanting more.
Listen to Lipsick on the Rim on Spotify and Apple Music or wherever you get your podcast or watch on YouTube.
Our guest this week is one of the UK's most compelling and versatile screen performance.
performers, Shan Clifford, from her unforgettable BAFTA-winning Turner's Claire in Fleabag
to a series of highly acclaimed roles across television film and stage,
Sean has built a reputation for bringing intelligence, wit, and emotional depth to every character she plays.
She stars in a new film, Lady, and you can hear a conversation with her after this clip.
I'm Lady Isabella.
Welcome to Raven Hyde Hall.
Everyone's saying I'm the aristocracy's answer to the Kardashians.
Hat. I did do a bit of team modelling.
I have so many friends.
I'm going.
Sam's here with his crew.
I'm directing the film.
Boo.
Jesus Christ.
Action.
It's better when we do it together.
Filming me as I embark on a journey of artistic discovery.
Who is Lady Isabella?
Why did you pick me?
No, you look so pretty.
Alright, come on, guys.
But if you leave, then who's going to film all of it?
Did you just lock the door? That's really creepy.
Isabela, what's happened to your...
I can see through my hand!
That was a clip from Lady, and I'm delighted to say we're joined by it's our Sean Clifford.
Hi, Sean.
Hello.
How are you? And where do we find you this morning? Somewhere exotic?
London, so yes.
Oh, yeah, it is exotic.
I mean, it is going to be 35 degrees or something today, and we've got an eclipse, so...
Oh, gosh, it's all happening, isn't it today?
It's all happening out there, yeah.
Okay.
Right, well, something to look forward to tonight.
So please tell us about the film, Lady,
and a little bit about Lady Isabella Ravenhide.
So the film is a, here's some documentary.
That takes a very surreal turn.
It's sort of centred around this character, Lady Isabella,
who dupes a film crew into her home
to film her every move under the guise
that she's struck a deal with Netflix.
But it comes clear pretty quickly.
that, well, her plan unravels, basically.
And she's pretty lonely.
She's pretty narcissistic.
And we find her literally, as the film crew, are arriving,
and she welcomes them into her home.
It's interesting you said narcissistic.
She kind of refers to herself with some justification as self-centered at one point,
which is kind of subtle difference.
Yeah, I was thinking about this yesterday,
because in relation to her and, you know,
what is the difference?
And basically I'm doing an interview in character as her.
And so I was coming up with responses along with our brilliant writers.
So she gets accused of being self-obsessed, which I think her argument would be that if
you're self-obsessed, you don't think about anyone but yourself.
But if you're self-centered, then you're choosing yourself for the benefit of all others.
So it's like putting the oxygen mask on yourself first.
In terms of the feel of it, it did feel like there was a lot of improvisation.
Was that the case or was it very tightly scripted?
There is improvisation in there.
I mean, I'd have to look back at the script.
But, yeah, I got bolder with that as the film went on.
But it also really, really helped me sort of become more confident
and find her to just commit to that and go for it.
So there's improvisation even in the very first things that we shot.
Because, you know, you're still finding your voice, aren't you, at the beginning of any project.
And, I mean, the script was absolutely incredible.
But Sam, our director, and who co-wrote the script with his partner, Miranda,
they really encouraged me to just let it fly.
And because she's a character that she does have verbal diarrhea, I mean, she does not stop talking.
I sort of knew that in order to have a real purchase on her,
I just had to have so much in my back pocket to come up with.
So it's part of the illusion of a mockumentary,
having access to that and having that freedom to use that.
But also I think it's, and this is testimony to your performance,
a wonderful performance in the film,
but it's that, as you said, she does have a sort of verbal diarrhea.
So the moments in the film when she goes quiet are actually really powerful.
Really?
Yeah, they are because the thing is that you get used to a certain sound and a tone and you go,
there's an assumption that goes with that.
And then there are various revelations in the film that make you feel possibly otherwise.
But also the fact that she then can't find the words or doesn't have the words.
And she's gone internally.
I thought we're really well handled, I think both in terms of script and performance.
Thank you.
I suppose it's also the advantage of having a director who has co-wrote it.
They can make those decisions on the spot.
Exactly.
And also they can be made in the edit, you know, the things that they can do to sort of stretch those moments.
Yeah.
And again, because we would shoot in quite long sequences, it was a bit like doing a play.
The discovery that would happen whilst we were doing things was so helpful.
And then you could sort of pick and choose what was.
what was working and then we would we would rejig and then go again and run the full sequence.
So I just wanted to say because also part of Lady Isabella's charm is her affinity with
performance art and there's lots of different bits of performance art in it, which are very
funny. So does that mean that we've got probably kind of, you know, another film's worth of
performance art somewhere? Oh, I wonder. I feel like the most of them have made it in there.
There is one that we did with eggs, where I say an egg is not a period, which was born from a
discussion at lunch, would you believe? I mean, I don't know why it didn't make it. And maybe there's
others actually that I've forgotten. It was such a sort of intense 15-day shoot. We did live and
eats together for that entire period. It was such a compact little unit that it is all a bit of a
blur. May I leap in here with the nerdy film question, how it is Sean? So in talking about
influences for the films, the two things that were cited was the figure of Daphne Guinness,
whose father was the eldest, they was connected to the Mitford family and maritly connected to
Mosley and a whole bunch of weird stuff like that.
And the other thing is the Maisel's documentary Grey Gardens,
which is about these upper class,
it's a mother and daughter,
upper class women living in this very run-down mansion
because they have fallen upon hard time.
So those two things were cited as possible stylistic influences.
The other thing is the elephant in the room,
which is in the trailer and is in the clip that we played at the beginning.
So I think we do have to address it is,
it's a mockumentary in which the central character starts to disappear,
not metaphorically, but literally.
So just contextualize all that.
On the one hand, you've got the mazes and you've got Nafne Guinness,
and on the other hand, you've got the incredible disappearing woman.
Yeah, I think it was really important for Sam that it wasn't just a straight-up documentary.
Like he really wanted it to have something that made it different
and also went deeper into the character
and there was sort of all sorts of layers going on,
some of which get revealed much later in the film,
which I won't spoil.
But I think from what I've heard him, the way he talks about it,
that's where that came from is he didn't just want it to be
her bouncing around her house.
he wanted
to go much deeper than that
and to
he was like how can we
get under the skin of this woman
I mean there's an irony
you know
this person that is desperate
to be seen
and driven by that
sort of real cultural need
that's in the ether
to I don't know
connect in some way
with the world around her
well it was that was the choice
was to make her invisible.
And how did, when you were first reading the script,
when you got to the bit which went,
and her hand is disappearing,
did you just go, oh yeah, no, it's fine, of course,
because I would have thought that that's the moment
of which you go, okay, hang on, this is not going to work.
I leaned in.
I was like, what?
Yes, you did.
It was one of those moments in the script
where you just think,
okay, this is,
And I think I maybe spoke to you about this before Mark,
but initially what came to me was actually this sort of incredible summary breakdown,
not only of what the film was, what it was about, and who was going to make it.
They sent me a full breakdown of how they were going to do it.
So they, like, right from the off,
it was the most sort of organized, like, document I've ever.
received on any projects. I now know why. It's because their resources were so limited that the
planning had to be. I mean, it was watertight. But that also made me feel safe. So I was like,
oh, they absolutely know what they're doing. And they'd already done VFX testing. All of those
things were sort of in place before I even came on board. And they showed me footage prior to my
signing on, all of that stuff. So I
sort of knew that that
visually it would work.
I knew that there were
certain limitations that we had
to, you had to basically create a
really clean line around
the skin in order to do that.
But so
I just, I was so game for that.
And also as an actor
who would rather
not be on camera, I know that's
absolutely preposterous thing to say
But I absolutely, I think where Isabella and I differ is that she is a performer and I am an actor and I hide behind my characters and I'm an introvert and I've been told by every director I've ever worked with that I physically turn my body away from camera involuntarily. I don't know I'm doing it. I mean, it drove the last director I worked with to absolute madness. Because we were, you know, we're running out of time.
And he said, I just need you to just face the camera.
Which you think is kind of a fairly basic requirement.
It's a fairly basic requirement.
I mean, I genuinely do not know I'm doing it.
I don't think anyone since the Lumier brothers have been given that note.
But I think with her, she's the opposite of that.
That's all that she wants.
And in some ways, the invisibility actually, that kind of drew me.
towards the park
because there was
again a safety
in that.
I'm like,
oh, I can perform
and not be seen.
That was like,
the freedom in that
for me was
extraordinary.
Yeah.
Just saying also,
I mean,
there were lots of themes
within the film,
actually.
I mean, it is very funny,
but one of the ones
for me certainly
was this fear of being
irrelevant and finding
a reason,
finding a purpose,
and finding a value.
And I wanted to ask you,
This is just one actor to another.
I mean, it's easy to feel relevant when you're working.
And so, you know, how do you cope with the fallow periods now,
especially when, you know, especially with social media now playing a much bigger part in people,
I don't know, assessing actors?
Yeah.
Well, I stay offline.
I came off during COVID.
I sort of deleted everything.
It's changed my life, is the truth.
It's if you remove yourself from that noise,
it's a legitimate and very speedy way to protect yourself.
That's really helped.
I also, you know, I have a strong meditation practice and yoga and all of that.
I'm really deep into kind of self-inquiry myself.
You know, before free bag happened, I was ready to walk away from acting
and I was getting into producing
and it was going pretty well, actually.
And I was also running a side hustle
of teaching meditation and stuff like that.
And I thought, you know what?
I could have quite a nice life doing this.
And I'd kind of made my peace with it.
And I think I'd seen acting destroy friends of mine
in a way where the whole identity was caught up in it.
And I think I learn fairly early.
And maybe it's because the second I graduated, I got a temp job.
And I just was like, you know, and I didn't grow up with a lot of money.
So I think my attitude was always to just work and make sure that you can, you know, feed and clothe yourself and keep a shelter over your head.
So I sort of went straight into the workforce and that also keeps you busy.
I think for me it's finding all the things in your life that nourish you beyond your job when your job is sort of a vacation.
All of which is a really useful way in to, I suppose for you as the actor kind of accessing Isabella.
The things that you're avoiding are the things that she's drawn to.
Yeah.
You know, for her reasons.
Yeah.
And I empathise.
I can, I totally see.
this sort of the
Melstrom that we're caught up in.
The last two things I just wanted to mention was
it's great that in the credits
that Ricky the Raven
gets credited as Walter De Niro.
Walter De Niro.
Walter De Niro.
And can I say that this was unexpected.
I always love these moments actually
when I'm watching a film.
Is your delivery simply
of the word Spielberg
absolutely made me hoot.
So congratulations on that.
Thank you.
Oh gosh, I have to watch it back.
So thank you.
Sean Clifford, thank you for your time.
Really appreciate it.
Thank you.
Have a great rest of the day.
So, so lovely speaking to you.
You too.
Thank you.
And that was Sean Clifford and now Mark's review of Lady.
Yes, I feel I have space to speak.
It was really great hearing two actors having that conversation,
which is the kind of conversation that a critic can walk.
involved in. But, okay, so just to recap, in case you're just jumping straight into the
review. So, Lady a mockumentary, written directed by Samuel Abrams making their feature debut.
Sean Clifford, as we heard there, is Lady Isabella, the aristocracy's answer to the Kardashians,
being interviewed or profiled at her home by Laurie Kinston, Sam, who's this wannabe filmmaker
who believes that he is making this film for Netflix. I bet you can't believe how large
while making this film for Netflix. It's going to be filming Lady Isabella as she embarks on this
journey of artistic discovery to turn my suffering into spectacle. So the aim is to discover
who is Lady Isabella and the answer appears to be that she's a posh fantasist with no friends
who is in the process of get this, organizing a talent competition that she wants to enter and
win. So that is how absolutely ecocentric she is. And Sam soon really, really
realizes that he's been taken for a ride, that this thing isn't backed by Netflix.
And then, as we've said, it's in the clip and it's in the trailer, something happens,
which is that she starts to disappear, like literally disappear.
Her hand starts to become invisible in the clip you heard I can see through my hand.
And then suddenly the whole project becomes interesting genuinely because it's something
that's genuinely out of the ordinary.
So the whole thing about what's the film about.
On the one hand, yes, it's this mockumentary about this character.
Are they self-obsessed or are they self-interested?
And it's something into which Sean Clifford throws herself with abandon.
I mean, the early scenes, when you're first meeting, Lady Isabella,
it's just like, wow, that is really, really going for it,
because she's just talking, blah, blah, blah, blah, just talking, talking all the time.
It's absolute nonsense.
But then when the disappearing starts to happen, she becomes kind of introspective.
She says, this has happened for a reason.
I've been leading a shallow, meaningless existence.
I deserve to disappear.
There's a very funny conversation in which she tells something.
I'm disappearing.
And they said, well, there's many people of your age think that they're not seeing.
No, no, I'm literally, literally disappearing.
But of course, what that tells you is that the disappearing is about something.
I mean, the thing that it put me in mind of is, well, if you think about Lily Tomlin and the Incredible Shrinking Woman, which is itself, you know, a parody of the credible shrinking man, or that whole idea about the invisible shrinking man, there's the whole thing about I realized that I was still part of God's creation, no matter how small I was, or the invisibility thing, you can't, people don't see you. People literally are just looking straight through you. So it's a metaphorical thing about,
something that is happening to that person.
But it's amplified by the fact that that person is not just somebody who wants to be seen,
somebody who wants to be seen on television and on film.
In the same ways, do you remember that film to die for with Nicole Kidman,
in which there's the line about, if no one's watching, what's the point of doing anything?
So it's particularly sharp because it's got a very modern edge to it.
So it's not just about, you know, a person of a certain age,
realizing that they're no longer the center of everyone's gaze,
but it's also to do with that happening in a media-obsessed age
in which everybody apparently wants to be on camera all the time.
And I think, you know, on that level,
it is a film about being lonely and isolated in this particular age.
And the most important things say, therefore, is it's also a comedy,
and it is quite often laugh out loud, funny.
I mean, I think her performance is just one of the most out-there performances
I've seen and she leans into all the, you know, the eccentricities of it.
It was funny because she's talked about the US office and parks and recreations being
two of the greatest shows ever made.
She obviously played a role in Fleabag.
She has a role in Ballad of Wallace Island.
Here, she's absolutely centre.
She's front and centre all the way through.
I thought it was lovely in the interview.
When you were asking her about that thing about, you know, how you deal with all the social
media and everything, and I'm saying, well, as an actor, I actually don't like to be seen on
camera. So the idea of playing somebody who's literally invisible was actually really funny.
So I think the thing about this is, it's phenomenally ambitious. For a film made in
shot in 15 days, pardon me, I'm obviously the editing, everything else would take a lot longer.
It's really, really ambitious. And it's aiming very, very high. And bits of it don't work.
Bits of it are kind of, it's sort of ramshackle and messy. But I would always rather see something
take a big sweep and hit some of its targets and occasionally fall over, then see something
play it safe. And whatever you think about, lady, it does not play it safe. I think that since I
saw it, I thought about it quite a lot. I saw it a while ago because I did an onstage with
Sean at the BFI. And the more I think about it, the more impressed by it I am. When I saw it,
I was laughing at it and thinking, this film is mad. This film is completely mad. I'm not quite sure how
they, you know, how they got to this point. But the more I think about it, the more I think that
there is, there is real method in that, in that madness. I think hats off to the filmmakers for,
for, you know, for, for that level of ambition. I should say the screenplay is by, um,
Sam Abrams and Miranda Campbell bowling, bowling, bowling. Um, and it's, it is very, very well
written. And I get the impression that anything that looks like it's completely improvised is always
better written than you thought it was because it takes very good writing to make something
look like you're making it up on the spot. And I think it's got ideas in its head. And I think it is
all over the place. But in a way that, I mean, End of Oak Street is all over the place. The difference
is end of Oak Street is all over the place at $85 million. You know, and with enough resources for
people to have fixed all the issues. With this, it's small and scrappy and made on the fly. And it's
ramshackle and kind of just a little bit genuinely crazy.
And some bits of it don't quite work,
but the bits of it that do work more than justify the bits that don't.
And like I said, I'm trying to think what else is out there like it.
And I'm struggling to think of anything because obviously you can make the comparison
to other mockumentary.
We've had loads and loads of documentaries.
That's fine.
But I'm struggling to think of one which does that and then so seamlessly melds it
with a science fiction idea about somebody disappearing.
What did you think of the film?
I really enjoyed it.
I mean, I do think it's bonkers.
And I think what you were saying in terms of the chaos of it
sort of made sense in terms of the chaos that Isabella brings to the entire.
She is chaotic.
Yes.
An agent of chaos.
Agent of chaos.
And as I said in the interview, you know, for me, it was about being relevant.
it's about aging, it's about having a purpose.
And that you begin to realize is true of both characters,
is both of them coming from this desperation to feel relevant.
You know, somebody who wants to be seen as a great filmmaker
because then it'll be relevant.
And for her as well, given all the things that she's gone through,
that lack of focus that she has around her is kind of,
am I relevant anymore?
And so that I kind of enjoyed.
And I do think that it's always tricky actually as a performance when you're when you've got to play a caricature in effect someone larger than life.
It's always a really tricky thing in terms of getting that tonally right.
Yeah.
Because if you simply exist as a caricature, I think, you know, that works.
There's a reason why TV comedies are half hours.
It's because beyond a half an hour, it can't support caricature.
Yeah, yeah.
It's very difficult to.
and the examples that there are of ones who've made films
started off in a half-out format in Mr. Bean and stuff like that.
And so I think that she was very deft in the way
that she played that caricature at the beginning.
It was kind of slightly unlikable, I think, for me.
Deeply unlikable.
Deeply unlikable.
A rich aristro who is setting up a talent competition
that she wants to win.
Yeah, it's kids.
talent competition, incidentally, that she wants to win, that she's going to enter and win.
But all of that thing, you know, lying about, you know, it being a Netflix deal and all the
rest of it.
So it's really kind of, it is testament to the writing and to Sean's performance that the moment
when that begins to shift, when you start to see what's under her skin or not see
her skin at all.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
actually does work quite well.
So, yeah, in the end, you reminded me of something else when you said out of focus.
Do you remember deconstructing Harry, in which Robin Williams plays a character who has lost focus and literally,
and literally becomes out of focus.
And there is a similar metaphor thing happening.
I mean, there it's played entirely as a gag about being out of focus.
But that thing about, I think I'm out of focus, I think I'm invisible, I think I'm shrinking,
all those ideas that cause science fiction films have reveled in and horror films for years and years and years,
because they mean something.
There is a similar thing here, isn't it,
that her being invisible is like him being out of focus
in deconstructing Harry.
Yeah, absolutely.
And I think that the, also, you know,
documentaries where the filmmakers are involved in the story.
Yeah.
Because I was trying to think of what,
it was Nick Broomfield did a lot of that.
He was always.
He was always there with his boom.
With his boom.
And also the other one I could think,
I thought was Man Byts Doc.
Yes, where the kind of crew get involved.
And that's always, again, another tricky thing,
but you go, who is the subject of this now?
And if I've got one minor gripe with the film,
which I did really, really enjoy,
and I definitely watch it again,
was that when you do a mockumentary,
I think you have to follow the rules of the documentary.
And in the rules of a documentary,
you can't preempt the action.
You have to follow the action.
Right.
And so one of the things in the...
this that happens.
And this was my gripe between spinal taps one and two.
Did you know what?
In this film, someone with the bow and arrow, I would have absolutely bought.
Go on, go on.
It's the fact that, and this was the difference between the two spinal taps,
is the first one absolutely followed the rules of the documentary.
The second one, once you start having reverses, you start going, okay, that's not
a documentary anymore.
And so the only point in this, and it is a very minor grope, was that.
there was a point at which I started to think,
how many camera crews are there?
Right, right.
There's one with her in the room.
There's one with him outside.
Yeah, yeah.
They're both following each other to the...
And so that was the one thing where I kind of thought,
okay, that's not quite the documentary kind of law.
I get that, but I would say that if that was your one minor gripe
about a film about an unlikable, initially unlikable posh,
Aristo, who wants to enter a kid's talent competition and then discovers it.
she's going invisible. If your main criticism is how many documentary crews they meant to have there,
I think that means it's worked a lot better than anyone would have expected. I mean, my assessment
of it is none of this should work. And the fact that it does is quite remarkable.
I'm in complete agreement. There you go. That was the lady. Okay, so now it's that time where I feel
like my esteemed career in comedy has all been leading to this point, where I demonstrate my performance,
prowess in delivering the very best in over-her-dad jokes.
So, skipping merrily without a care in the world before tripping over a sleeping,
dashed and face-planting in front of your boss, yes, it's time for the laughter lift.
Oh dear.
Hey, Mark.
Hello, Simon.
What's the difference?
You did.
I know.
It's okay.
Fine.
That's a compliment.
It's a compliment where I come from.
Sage.
Go on.
Hey, Mark.
What's the difference between a.
bad hunter and a constipated owl.
I don't know, Sange, what is the difference between a bad hunter and a constipated owl?
A bad hunter can shoot but can't hit.
Hey!
Hey, thank goodness I didn't have to spell that out.
Mark, did you hear that the famous singer, Sting, has been kidnapped?
No.
Yeah, I mean, the police have no lead.
Hey!
Hey!
This is actually quite high quality, that joke.
Hey, Mark, I watched a BBC documentary.
on how ships are kept together.
Did you?
Rivoting.
Okay, less good.
Less good.
You kind of peaked with Sting.
The runway was the shoots but can't hit.
And then Sting was the high point, and then the riveting was like that.
Everyone's a critic.
Yeah, literally in this case.
So, what's to come, Mark?
Well, our date night, Tony.
Okay, we'll talk about our date night after this.
Ever wonder how people actually get rich?
Like, actually?
I'm Molly Sims, and on my show, Lipsick on the Rim,
I sat down with Haley Sacks, aka Mrs. Dow Jones,
to talk money, mindset, and why getting rich
actually starts with how you think about yourself.
We get into the money habits nobody wants to talk about
the mindset shifts that actually stick,
and how to stop feeling weird about wanting more.
Listen to lipstick on the rim on Spotify and Apple Music or wherever you get your podcast or watch on YouTube.
And we're back or didn't go anywhere, depending on who you are.
Okay, so we have an email here.
Dear Barabrith and Menin, Menin, Menin, Welsh fruit loaf and butter.
Long-time listener, first time emailer, B-A-Ons and M-A-R-C-A in illustration five-meter swing badge.
Five-meter?
I mean, that's a dive.
That's a dive.
That's three splashes, isn't it?
You can jump back.
Oh, you're a child, like a baby.
I started listening to your witterings in the mid-90s
when we could put Radio One on during double A-level art on Fridays.
I've followed you in your different forms ever since.
Something seismic has prompted me to get in touch,
and it's particularly good news to at least one fellow listener.
Okay.
This week at the National Estefoth.
Isstedfod.
it? I steadfod.
I steadfod.
I steadfod.
I steadfod.
Is it the th?
I think technically be like that.
But, you know, the goodies said I steadfod and I'm sticking with that.
Don't you remember?
It was the old goodies joke about it comes from two Welsh words.
I steadfied meaning bored, fod, meaning stiff.
Aesteadfod.
Of Wales held in Clantud in Pembrokeshire, it was announced that an official version of Star
Wars A New Hope dubbed in the Welsh language for the first time will be broadcast on the Welsh
language channel S4C at Christmas.
Wow! As a Welsh-speaking Star Wars fan, I am giddy with excitement, and upon hearing
about it, I immediately thought of your Danish correspondent who is learning Welsh, and how this
will be fantastic learning material for him. Please pass on this news. So long, and thanks for all
the Jason. P.S., I haven't seen it myself yet, but please don't forget the Christopher's.
And that is from Sean. Very good. So, Diochenfar and Bodhida.
Very good.
And can I just say to just to stave off the inevitable wave of criticism,
the good lady professor, her indoors his family are Welsh.
So I'm making the goodies I steadford joke with love, not with malice.
Just the very idea that anyone could make a nice steadford joke with malice.
No.
It's just such a strange kind of like conception.
Okay, well, thanks again, Sean.
And what, should we have another new motion picture?
Dr. Kermode?
Yes.
So this is the one
that you and I
went to see together
at the Every Man
in Belsize Park
in which we both had
our own sofas
and it was
like it was an early evening date
wasn't it?
We would have gone out
for a meal afterwards
but I had to go
and do a meeting
and you were
and you were
I said you're going to go
for the train
you went no
I'm just parked outside
because you are so showbiz
North London
it's like no I've just
I've just
I was only 15 minutes
from my house
I know
I know
but also yes
in classic date kind of terms
You know, it's kind of how about a dinner and a movie?
And so we just did the movie.
Did the movie, yeah.
Then you left me.
I left you.
Yes, I'm sorry, I abandoned you.
Anyway, okay, so Tony.
So Tony is a, what is described as a biographical comedy drama,
directed by Matt Johnson, who directed, co-wrote, and starred in, well, most recently,
Nirvana, the band, The Show, The Movie, which we had reviewed on the show,
just a few weeks ago.
Original script by Todd Bartels and New Howe,
which was featured on the 2024 Blacklist.
The Blacklist is the list of the best
as yet unproduced screenplays,
which has become actually a kind of fast track
for screenplays to get produced.
The finished script is currently co-credited
alongside Johnson and Matthew Miller
with that original script.
So 70-set story follows a young man
known variously as Tony,
only his mum calls him Anthony,
or Flacco, which is Spanish for Skinny, apparently,
although we hear in the movie that it's Spanish
for a bunch of other things that they're making up.
He's played by Dominic Sessa,
who played the central, gangly, awkward student
in the similarly 70s set, the holdovers,
which I really, really like.
So this seems like a strange thing to say,
and I don't know whether you agree with this as an actor.
I think that he has,
I think Dominic Sessa has a very 70s face.
Do you know what I mean by that?
I do, yeah.
And do you agree with it?
Seventies, early 80s.
Yeah. There's just something of that era about his face. It's not a criticism. It's actually, it's, it's just something about the quality of him. So, we meet him, Tony, apparently aasing an interview for a writing scholarship. He's got a dumb idea for a coming of age novel, which he pitches to a panel who he thinks he has super impressed. He thinks this so much that he tells his parents that he's got the grant already. And he tells this girl that he's trying to impress that he's got the grant. And when it turns out of it. And when it turns out, he's
He hasn't. He skips town and heads off to Provincetown on Cape Cod, where the girl of his dreams,
to whom he lied about the scholarship and played by Amelia Jones, Nancy, is spending the summer.
So he gets there. The place is basically, well, it's Amity, isn't it? And Jaws is playing in the local cinema.
So that's, you know, that's the time setting. He's got no plan. He's got a lot of front.
And somehow he convinces the girl of his dreams that he's a writer. And then he also very,
visits and gets thrown out of and then gets taken into a restaurant run by local restaurateur,
a chef, played by Antonio Banderas. Here is a clip from the trailer. Okay, so I'm just going to walk
you through the basic vision. It's a coming of age story. Excuse me, I need to speak with you.
Didn't you punt a hole in the principal's door? You know, a lot to change since high school. We're a writer now.
The truth is, I'm about to get this huge writing fellowship.
Hello?
Oh.
Mr. Bourdain, the committee has decided to go with another student for the fellowship.
I need a job.
You work in a kitchen before?
Sorry.
Yeah.
We open Wednesday to Sunday.
Start 11 a.m.
What time is it?
That means that you're here at 10.45.
11 is late.
Anyone late is fire.
You know I can cook too?
The kids say he's a cook, chef.
It's not a cook.
I'm a writer, but I said,
but I said I know how to cook.
And that's the central thing.
I'm not a cook. I'm a writer, but I know how to cook.
Incidentally, that trailer features Ceno Evil by television from the Markey Moon album.
And I don't remember that being in the film, do you?
No.
No.
I don't.
What is in the film is Jonathan Richmond's girlfriend.
If I were to go out to the museum, find out in Boston.
First I would go to the place where they keep the stays.
And I don't know whether you notice, but when that happened, I let out a little squeal of delight
because I was just so thrilled that that was in there.
So along with being taken in the bad way,
taken looked after by Antonio Banderas' chef,
he's also taken under the wing of Leo Woodall's womanizing,
more accurately, I think, predatory Sal.
He was a young man who literally cuts notches on the door frames
of the young women he beds.
And there's a gag about him knowing,
the state regulations for statutory rape.
So, you know, he's a predatory and unpleasant character.
And that's basically it.
It's the story of the summer that changed everything,
the summer in which this young man discovers his true passion,
which will turn out to be cooking.
He learns to love and respect his fellow man and woman.
You know, he's obnoxious for most of the movie.
But by the time we get to the third act,
he has a kind of, you know, a sort of a coming of age revelation.
And most importantly, he discovers who he really is.
So it is on one level.
It is a non-superhero origin story, which literally, and this is not a plot spoiler,
the last line of the movie is name Anthony Bourdain.
And he might as well have said, Batman or I'm Spider-Man.
I mean, it's laugh out loud funny that, isn't it, Sange?
It was kind of the name is Bond.
Anthony Bond.
So the whole thing leads up to the point that he becomes Anthony Bourdain.
Now, the plot is inspired by Bordane's own account of working in Provincettington,
Massachusetts, which he recounted in Kitchen Confidential, which is a very celebrated memoir,
which I have not read.
And the reason I say this is because I knew very, very little about Antony Borda.
before seeing the film.
In fact, just before the film began,
I said to you,
what do you know about Anthony Bourdain?
And you said, well, you know,
he was very famous, very celebrated,
took his own life,
you know, and that was it.
And that was pretty much all I knew.
If I hadn't been told that
just before the film began,
I think that the one of the real chubby hum moments,
in the film might have looked a bit different,
which is there is a moment in it
in which Antonio Banderas' character,
he says, what's that picture?
And he says, oh, well, that's a picture of this chef
who had to prepare a really, really splendid meal.
And when the fish that he had ordered
didn't turn up on time, he took his own life.
Yes, he was preparing it for Louis XIV.
Yes, yeah.
He says, sorry, but why?
Well, because the fish didn't turn up.
Now, if you now know,
which I know everybody else knows this about Anthony Bordane,
but I didn't because I know I'm culturally quite stupid.
That did seem like a very, very obvious kind of, you know, big moment in the film.
Would I have noticed it if I hadn't known before?
And in a way, it doesn't matter because the thing is,
I think everybody else who's going to see this film will know.
They will know about Anthony Bordane and they will know about his story.
So I think it's safe to assume that those alarm bells are not just clanging for me.
As for the rest of it, and I'm really interested to hear what you think
about this. I thought it was an odd mix of ingredients. There is, there's a bit of the bear in there
in the kind of, you know, the pressure cooker environment of working in the, it's not just pressure
cook, it's kind of existential pressure cooker world of the kitchen, isn't it? Which we,
which we have seen in, it's something that's become part of the cultural landscape. You know,
when you're working in a kitchen, everything is completely manic. And also it's, it's a matter
of life and death. It's like the joke of, you know, football is not a matter of life
and death is much more important than that.
There's a bit of burnt.
Do you remember that film with Bradley Cooper,
which starts with Bradley Cooper,
getting to the end of shucking a million oysters
to pay penance for his single or 10,000,
how many oysters it is?
So shucking oysters has become a bit of a trope
for the coming of age thing in Sheffing.
And there's a whole bunch of stuff here
about him learning to shuck oysters.
And at the beginning he can't do it.
And then he does do it.
And then he stabs himself.
You know, it becomes a self-harm thing.
but then it's something that you that you learn to do.
There's also a bit of Elvis' clam bake in it,
which I think I'm sitting next to you,
I was not alone in noticing that when they were talking about having a clam bake,
I did think I was going to need to turn to you and go,
don't sing, don't sing, Sanchez.
I was very close to bursting out.
You can dance in your seat, you can dance in your seat, but don't sing.
There's also casual mistreatment of marine life,
including shooting tuna fish with a gun,
like that scene in jaws in which they try to shoot the shark
and the lobster stuff,
for all of it, which is kind of, you know, authentically unremarkable in a very 70s way.
It is, here's what I think.
I think it's impressive to see a film in which so many of the characters are unlikable for a lot of the movie.
I mean, whether they're mopey, whiny, fantasists or raving, misogynist, chauvinists,
it is a reminder that the ethos of a film is not the ethos of the characters in the film.
A character's, a film's morality or a film's approach to life is not different.
by its characters. It is defined by how it approaches its characters. There are some very good
needle drops, as I just mentioned, which endeared me very early on. There are some terrific
problems. I think Antonio Banderas has never been better. I thought he was amazing. And I think
his English language career best performance. For one thing, I could have just drowned in his
voice. I mean, there's just something about the way that he's got, he's like Morgan Freeman. He's
got one of those voices. You just think, just talk to me. Just keep talking to me because the sound
of your voice is amazing. And I think his character is the real beating heart of the film. I think
his character is the moral voice of the film. I think his character is what the film is really
centered upon. I also think it's ultimately insubstantial, but maybe that's the point.
I did laugh out loud at the final line, at the origins thing. I don't think you were meant to.
But it is funny, isn't it?
It is.
Go on.
Tell me what you think.
I kind of largely agree with you.
I mean, I think, you know, as a standard coming of age story, which is what it is, I guess.
It's one, you know, small chapter in Antoine's life.
Yeah.
It kind of worked fine.
It was fine.
And I think that what made it compelling were the performances.
I did think, I think Dominic Sess is really watchable.
but also I completely agree with you
Antonio Banderas
he's just
this guy
but also it was very difficult for me not to think
any moment he's going to go
bus in boots
it's the same voice
that's a very good impression
do that again
I don't know it'll never come back
it'll never come back
but yeah he is the beating heart of the film
and in a way
just within the confines of this
story.
I didn't, at least for me, I didn't sort of see why
Antiborna fell in love with food.
Is it Bordane, not Bordane?
Oh, Bordane?
Bordane.
Bordane, you're probably right.
I don't know, but as I said, I'm sure you're right.
I think I'm sure he said,
whatever.
Anthony Bordane.
Batman.
I'm sure you it's Bordain.
But it was, yeah, you know, so there wasn't that,
the food wasn't shot in that kind of way that even in the bear.
that you get a sense of the food being a character in some sort of way,
you know, Babette's Feast or any of those things.
Anything which, you know, where you go, the love of food is essential to it.
And I wasn't absolutely sure what it was about the relationship between him and chef.
I don't think he's given a name in the film.
He's just chef, isn't he?
Why that kind of becomes an inspiration to him.
I wasn't quite clear about that.
And something I read that in Kitchen Confidential, Anthony Bourdain described what appealed to him about that first kitchen,
because there were a series of kitchens in real life, which they're condensed into one,
is that they were like a band of pirates.
And that's what he loved about it.
Suddenly there was order in that.
And so I didn't get quite the clear sense of that.
I mean, you know, afterwards when I read pirates, I thought, oh, okay, well, you've got.
the kind of, you know, scallywag pirate and you've got the dutiful one and you've got, you know,
somebody who's a bit foul-mouthed or, do you know what I mean? It's kind of that band of
pirate's thing. I kind of went, oh, okay, afterwards, but it wasn't clear purely from the
film for me that that was the appeal because he gets stuck there, as opposed to him being, I don't know,
mesmerized by it. But otherwise, you know, overall, I did enjoy it. I have to say, just going back to
something you said.
Yeah.
Which was that if I hear a squeal of delight in a darken cinema, it's not something
I'm going to investigate.
Just saying.
But as far as the film itself is concerned, do you agree with my, it's kind of incidental?
Is there something oddly about it?
Yeah.
Honestly, I think for me, the most compelling thing, most compelling reason to see it.
are the performances.
Yeah, which are very good.
You know, which are fine, yeah. Good.
Okay, well, that was Tony. That was Tony.
There's just time for a quick,
what's on where we ask you to tell us
what we should go and check out. Here's Steve from,
apparently, the UK's most easterly film festival.
Hi, Simon and Mark. This is Steve,
inviting you to join us for the Sunrise Film Festival,
which takes place from the 20th to the 23rd of August
in Loestoft's Suffolm.
Discover 263 films across 52 separate screenings curated from over 1,100 international submissions,
including shorts, feature films, music videos and virtual reality.
For more details, visit sunrisefilmfestival.co.com.uk.
See you there.
Thank you very much, Steve.
And that's it for this week.
This has been a Sony Music Entertainment Production.
This week's team was Jen, Eric, Josh and Heather.
The producer was Dom and the Redoubt.
actor was Simon Paul, who is having a lovely time in Sicily. In Take 2, we're directing you to
the Overflow Car Park for more chat about current film releases. And if you've enjoyed what
you've heard so far, there is plenty more waiting for you over in Take 2, such as five-question
film club. Three questions, Your Majesty. Three questions. And questions smessions, in which this week
we're asked, why is it that low-budget indie or indie-esque films that break through into
surprise mega hits are almost always horror films? Perfect one.
Mark. And don't forget, people of Bristol and beyond. Simon and Mark will be at the Bristol Beacon
on December the 6th. Tickets are on sale by the link in the show notes. You can get both takes,
ad free, just search Kermodin, Bascar, Patreon. Yes. And join the church. Mark, what is your
film of the week? I genuinely have no idea what you're going to say? No, no, what is the thing?
Firstly, firstly, that Bristol accent was terrible. I'm just flagging enough. I'm just saying, I'm not from Bristol,
but...
No.
But...
But, okay.
You were absolutely...
Honestly, your...
Your Anthony Bourdain was...
Your Antonio Banderas was perfect.
Everything else was fine.
And then he just dropped it with the Bristol thing.
So, film of the week.
It's a difficult one.
I mean, I enjoyed End of Oak Street
much more than you did.
And I think, therefore, since I'm being even-handed,
that's not going to be film of the week.
And I think, as far as Tony's concerned,
we both thought,
Hmm, man.
So my film of the week, because I think for the fact that it takes such a big swing,
and Sean Clifford really gives it some wellie, let's go for Lady.
I am in complete agreement without a squeal of delight being involved.
Simon, Ray, and Mark, we'll be back next week.
Hooray!
