Lateral with Tom Scott - 135: Thumbs down? Good!

Episode Date: May 9, 2025

Hannah Crosbie, Katie Steckles and Geoff Marshall face questions about airline advertising, alphabetic adverts and album alternatives. LATERAL is a comedy panel game podcast about weird questions wit...h wonderful answers, hosted by Tom Scott. For business enquiries, contestant appearances or question submissions, visit https://lateralcast.com. HOST: Tom Scott. QUESTION PRODUCER: David Bodycombe. EDITED BY: Julie Hassett at The Podcast Studios, Dublin. MUSIC: Karl-Ola Kjellholm ('Private Detective'/'Agrumes', courtesy of epidemicsound.com). ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS: Kieran John Littlewood, Steve Barnes, Louis Haeck, Akiva Weinberger, Mersco, Anschel, Ed Lucas. FORMAT: Pad 26 Limited/Labyrinth Games Ltd. EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS: David Bodycombe and Tom Scott. © Pad 26 Limited (https://www.pad26.com) / Labyrinth Games Ltd. 2025. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 In 2017, why did the budget airline K-Air rebrand itself as Aero-K? The answer to that at the end of the show. My name's Tom Scott, and this is Lateral. Forgive me if I seem a little bit unprepared for today's show. I was only sent this script just before recording. Yesterday, I did ask our producer what was going on, and he replied with a screenshot of level 310 of Candy Crush. Which is understandable, because the licorice there is pretty tricky.
Starting point is 00:00:30 Hoping for some delicious questions today, we start with returning to the show Transport Nerd? You said that the other day, I think? And Transport Documentarian, Jeff Marshall. Welcome back. Thanks, Tom. Nice to be here again. It's always so much fun to be on Lateral. It is, I love it. I love it so much. Hannah was saying off air a minute ago that she binge-watched, and yeah, last night in bed I watched like two hours straight of Lateral because it was just so much fun.
Starting point is 00:00:54 I couldn't read whether you were being sarcastic or not. It was so deadpan at the start there. I'm sorry. I couldn't quite work it out. Genuine. No, I love it. You watch one and you watch twenty. It's great. Every time that you're on, I ask you what you're working on or something like that,
Starting point is 00:01:09 I'm going to just give you a route one ridiculous question. Favourite train? Go. I don't have one. I have a favourite station. I like Sudbury Town. I'm a Piccadilly lion. If you've never been to Sudbury Town, that would be my hot pick for looking just at sort of classic 1930s Charles Holden architecture. There we go. Alright, very best of luck on the show today.
Starting point is 00:01:31 You are joined by mathematician from the Finite Group, Katie Steckles. Welcome back to the show. Hello. Alright, I'm going to go with the boring Route 1 question for you as well. Give me a good maths fact. A good maths fact? 2025, which is the year we're now in, is an incredible number for lots and lots of different reasons, but it's the sum of the first nine cubes and it's the square of the sum of the first nine squares, I think. There's a whole bunch of different
Starting point is 00:01:59 ways you can make 2025 and it's also 20 plus 25 squared. There's so many things, it's great. And presumably that sum of all the cubes so far isn't going to happen for another thousand years because 10 cubed is- Oh yeah, the next cubed is massive, so yeah. I have no idea if that fact is going to come in useful today. I suspect it's not, but good luck on the show. Rounding out the panel today,
Starting point is 00:02:24 having made frankly a spectacular debut appearance last time, Hannah Crosby, welcome back to Lateral. Hello, thanks for having me back. I'm so excited to be here again. You are listed as wine columnist for The Guardian, wine expert, in my notes. I'm going to go for the boring Route 1 question again. How do you become wine expert? Like, what's the path that gets you to being the person that writes for a national newspaper about wine?
Starting point is 00:02:48 I said I know, because I thought you were going to ask me what's your favourite wine, which again, is like asking what's your favourite train, like what's your favourite piece of music. How do you become a wine writer? Just by drinking a lot. And then monetising it. Why do we do anything we love?
Starting point is 00:03:03 Yeah, I work really hard. Ha, I mean that's basically how I ended up doing YouTube stuff. So there we go. It was infrastructure and not alcohol, but it feels like a vaguely similar path. Yes, same thing, yeah. Well, good luck to all three players today. And while the producer is trying to manoeuvre a wrapped candy next to a colour bomb, let's skittle our way to question one. Thank you to Mersko for this question.
Starting point is 00:03:27 In what activity does thumbs down mean it's okay to continue, and thumbs up mean there's a problem? One more time. In what activity does thumbs down mean it's okay to continue, and thumbs up mean there's a problem? Is it a train thing? Ooh, I think I might know an answer to this. All right, Katie, you sit out of this one.
Starting point is 00:03:49 Geoff, why might it be a train thing? Sometimes, I don't know, my brain has just gone sometimes a negative is a positive, as in, there isn't a thing, so that it's okay for you to carry on doing something where there might be danger. That's just when my brain is gone. Is that... is that anywhere correct? It doesn't feel like a thumbs-down to continue would be a good, like, slang thing to work out for trains there. I feel like they're very big on safety and on ambiguity. Sure.
Starting point is 00:04:19 But why do I just feel like somebody going like that, you take it as a negative. The negative would be no, as in no, there isn't a thing, so therefore you're okay to continue doing what you're doing. There is no train coming, you are absolutely safe to pass this. I feel like indicating that with a thumbs down is not a safe way round to do that. No, it's not, is it? Okay. Railways famously known for being just a little bit lax with safety. Apart from that, all I gladiator where the emperor would be like,
Starting point is 00:04:49 thumb up or thumb down, wouldn't he, to save someone's life or not. Okay, to continue killing. Yes. Yeah. Keep killing! Keep killing! Keep killing, guys, you're doing great. I'm wondering whether it's to do with direction of travel. So if you're going down, it's like up, or you're travelling downwards, if you go down, it's like, yes you're traveling downwards if you go down It's like yes keep going down Is it scuba diving? Yeah
Starting point is 00:05:09 Yeah, this is the thing that I knew that in scuba diving if you if you do that It means let's carry on going down and if you do that, it means we need to get to the surface quick You are absolutely right. Katie you got it straight away and sat out. That is correct It is direction of travel in scuba diving thumbs down the dive, indicates you're ready to go further down, thumbs up indicates going up, either as planned or when there's an emergency. Hey! Brilliant. There is also a gesture for go up as quickly as possible, which is waggling the hand and
Starting point is 00:05:39 then giving a thumbs up. But obviously it's diving, so you have to be careful about how quickly you're surfacing. I realise this won't particularly work in audio, but Hannah is clearly using a Macbook webcam here, because you gave a thumbs down gesture, and on my video stream a little thumbs down bubble just kind of popped up. Brilliant. Brilliant. Geoff, we are going to go to you for the next question. All right, this has been sent in by Louis Hark, thank you.
Starting point is 00:06:10 Until sliding poles were invented in the 1870s, why did US fire stations prefer to use spiral staircases over regular ones? That question again. Sliding poles were invented in the 1870s, but in US fire stations they preferred to use spiral staircases instead of regular ones. Why was that? I love that someone had to invent the sliding pole. I just...
Starting point is 00:06:36 Of course someone had to invent that, someone had to come up with the idea. But I kind of assumed that that was some historical thing. Sorry, I feel like I'm blustering, but my brain has just been really surprised by, first of all, someone had to invent the pole. Then someone had to invent the vertical pole. And then at some point in history, someone was like, hold on, hold on folks, I've got an idea.
Starting point is 00:07:01 What if? I mean, I guess the innovation was this idea of it being used for one-way travel. Right. You know, the concept of a pole existed, but everyone who put a pole in their house was like, well, I put this in so I can go upstairs, but it's absolutely useless. Like, I've been trying for an hour and it's still only halfway up. Like, I guess when you've got that situation where you need to get down quickly,
Starting point is 00:07:23 it suddenly becomes a useful thing. I mean, they'll have seen trees. They'll have the concept of a pole, but I guess maybe not one you can slide down. Will Barron What if tree, but smoother? Sarah Bates Smooth tree. Will Barron It's a really shiny tree. Sarah Bates So the question is, why did they prefer a spiral staircase as opposed to a regular one before the sliding pole? Okay.
Starting point is 00:07:46 Yeah. I think this is really hard, by the way, so I'll be impressed if you get it. They're more compact as an architectural feature. They take up less floor space. One of my clues here says saving space wasn't a concern. So no, not space. Oh, what? Flexing how big their fire station is.
Starting point is 00:08:03 What is it something to do with how it's made? I'm sort of imagining if you have, because the spiral staircase is like a central thing with the stairs coming off it and then presumably a banister. And like, you can use that to get upstairs because it's a staircase. But if you want to get downstairs, you could do the cool thing where you sit on the banister and slide down. And like that's almost as quick as going down a pole. But that's true with regular stairs as well. Well, yeah, but in a straight line, whereas in the spiral, it's cooler.
Starting point is 00:08:31 Yeah. Oh, no, because I feel like centrifugal force — don't peddle me on that — is more likely to throw you out and off the banister there. Going down a straight banister is better than going down a spiral, surely. What's more annoying about going down stairs than a spiral staircase? So the firefighters are going to have to carry a load of equipment or heavy clothing or something. So is it easier to descend when you're turning or something like that? It is nothing to do with saving time,
Starting point is 00:09:05 Tom. Sorry. Oh, okay. Is it to do with stuff that they have on their person? Because I was thinking about, I don't know, for some reason, I was thinking about a comical scene of people running downstairs, like with a massive hose behind them. And I'm like, well, maybe it's easier for the hose to kind of wrap around. I can sit with that. But then I think they keep that on the truck. Yeah. Yeah. They're not like, quick, grab everything in the room and run downstairs,
Starting point is 00:09:27 like all the stuff is already loaded, right? And then some guy's like, we should put the hose in the car. Yeah. Yeah, that was the first innovation, then poles. I know we're talking about America here, Geoff, but like, old-timey firefighters in London sometimes just had to get their water from the river or something nearby. They didn't always carry it with them. That's still true now, that's why we have fire hydrants, but I'm wondering if there's any similar thing about equipment they had to carry or something they...
Starting point is 00:09:56 You can drop stuff down a spiral staircase in a way that you can't with a straight staircase, but you said it wasn't about saving time, so that doesn't... Mmm. I'm wondering, because the main task is to get a bunch of people, right? It's a whole squadron of people — I don't know if that's the right word — but, you know, a group of firefighters need to get from upstairs to downstairs as quickly as possible. Why is that easier with a spiral staircase than with a straight staircase? Yeah, not necessarily faster, just easier.
Starting point is 00:10:27 I mean, I guess you have to go across the room and then you have to come back to where the vehicle is, where it's the spiral staircase just drops you straight down. Like, you know, there's like a vertical, there's a horizontal movement implied that you either have to do upstairs or downstairs in order to get downstairs. Would you like a clue? Shall I go with a clue? Yeah, please. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:10:44 Yes. The next clue simply says just think about what were fire engines like at the time. Think of a— They were horse-drawn. I don't know what to do with that information. But you get a point for that, Tom. You get—ding! You get a point.
Starting point is 00:11:02 You get a lateral point. I was thinking like old-timey firefighters, and I forgot that the car had not been invented. The internal combustion engine is not a thing. It's easier to drop onto a horse. If you run down a normal staircase, it sounds too much like other horses and freaks out the horse. How could that be easier to...
Starting point is 00:11:24 Because, wait, no, surely they're getting in a carriage, they're not getting on the horse. It's a different problem to that, it's not saving time. It is preventing a problem or it's looking... I'm guessing it's preventing a problem. To do with the thing you just said? Oh my god, horses can't climb spiral staircases. Go on, there's more, there's more, that's half of it.
Starting point is 00:11:46 Okay, okay, but if you put a regular staircase in your fire station, the horses are going to climb it. Yes, yes, but... If you put a spiral staircase, the horses can't? It's much more difficult, right. You've got 50% of the answer, the two part answer tick. And did they store all the food upstairs? There we go!
Starting point is 00:12:06 Yay! Brilliant. I like how I said, horses can't climb spiral staircases, as if I knew it as a fact. I didn't. Just to be clear, I did not know that. That was a complete guess.
Starting point is 00:12:20 Alright, here's the lowdown. Fire stations were split into two levels. The crew were typically on the upper floor. The horses that pulled the engines were on the lower floor, the use of a spiral staircase or even a chute slide prevented the horses from climbing upstairs in search of food. Bonus, bonus facts, I love this. The fire pole wasn't invented until 1878 by a Captain David B. Kenyon of Chicago's engine number 21. The original was made from pine with coats of varnish and paraffin applied to it. And this is the most intriguing thing, like all sort of breakthrough inventions, they were originally thought a bit of a stupid
Starting point is 00:12:54 thing and they were laughed at, they were a laughing stock until other crews noticed that company 21 was often first on the scene of a fire and copied the idea. Proofs in the pudding. And these are private firefighters, I think. Yeah, you've done a video on this, Tom. I have. I don't know if it's the right era for this, particularly in the US, but certainly there were sometimes competitive fire engine companies
Starting point is 00:13:18 who were all privatised and the first one to get there would get the money. Don't know if that's still true for 1870s in whichever part of America, but there would certainly just be competition and cachet of being the first there. Isn't that great? But your hungry horses would get the whiff of dinner and think, hmm, and try and climb the stairs. That's so good. I'm just enjoying imagining a horse trying to climb a spiral staircase now. It's like, there's a thing about, like, cows can't go downstairs, right? I was just thinking this. Is it up or down?
Starting point is 00:13:46 Like Darnix. They can go up but they can't go up. Yeah, like Darnix. No, they can go up and go—they can go up but not go down, which is why there was a rash, I think in the 70s or 80s, of pranks in American universities where someone would just steal a cow and lead it upstairs in some dorm or some uni—or to the administrator's office. I'm gonna Google that. That had better be true.
Starting point is 00:14:06 Oh, it's probably apocryphal. It's probably apocryphal. But the prank was, yeah, it's really easy to get the cow upstairs. Good luck getting it back down. Yeah, I mainly know this because I've seen companies that advertise themselves as bovine descenders, and it's a service that they offer. What? Ow! If you've got a cow that's climbed up onto a thing and can't get down, they will come and descend your cow back down to...
Starting point is 00:14:28 I think I saw them open for someone at Glastonbury once. Hey! Ha ha ha ha ha! Thank you to Onshul for this next question. An advert on a subway train consists of two capital letters, side by side, with a third letter directly above the first. What is it promoting? I'll say that again. An advert on a subway train consists of two capital letters side by side with a third letter directly above the first. What is it promoting?
Starting point is 00:14:57 Oh, no, I know, I know, surely I know this. I can't just say it. What? It's obvious what it is. Everyone knows that. Is it not? I can't just say it. What? It's obvious what it is. Everyone knows that. Is it not? Hmm. Can I say-
Starting point is 00:15:05 Geoff, I think... I think you might have got the first half of this question. And you know what? We'll go for it. What do you think it's promoting? Just put it- Is it the I heart NY symbol? That is the first half of the question.
Starting point is 00:15:20 Geoff? I was thinking that. It is based on that. But that is not the full story. So somebody's copied that idea or design? So as it's been described, there's no heart? As it's been described, there's no heart. So it's just I and Y? Correct.
Starting point is 00:15:37 So what goes in the space? Is it nothing? This is not the question that I thought was going to fall first in this episode. Jeff, I thought this one was incredibly difficult just like you thought yours was, but you've got a lot of the way there. I mean, the main reason that I'm thinking about it in this way is because one of my friends has a mug that used to say, "'I heart spreadsheets'," and the heart is made out of a different ink to the rest of the text,
Starting point is 00:16:00 and the heart has dishwashed off. So now it just says, "'I spreadshe sheets, which is the best mug ever. Ooh, love it. That is why this has occurred to me, because you didn't mention that there was a heart there, so it's just the I and the NY underneath. Is that a euphemism for something, or is that just I, spreadsheets, like I Claudius?
Starting point is 00:16:19 I now use that as like, if I'm going to go and do some stuff in spreadsheets, I'm like, right, let's spread some sheets. Yeah. It may also be a euphemism for something I don't know. So is it that the heart is completely gone, or has it been replaced with something else? It is just completely gone. You're right, Geoff, you identified what this is based on.
Starting point is 00:16:38 This is I, New York. I, NY. The famous logo. Hmm. Which is in Korea font, isn't it? For some reason I remember. I wonder if it's typewriter-esque. Is there no heart? Is it for organ donors? Spot on! Oh! Yes! Nice. Nice.
Starting point is 00:16:57 Absolutely right. Amazing! This is a poster for organ donation. It is the I Heart New York logo, without a heart on. Oh, great. The question also said subway train. Specifically, this is in New York, and the catch underneath says, New York needs organ donors.
Starting point is 00:17:14 Oh, brilliant. Oh, I'm having a very good drink tonight. I'm very proud of myself. You did say, Hannah, that after wine, quizzing is an interest here. Mmm, yeah, that after wine, quizzing is an interest here. Mmm, yeah, exactly. I mean, I would say it's the second love of my life, so there we go. This is the I Heart New York logo, designed by Milton Glaser in—not Malcolm Glaser,
Starting point is 00:17:36 I nearly read Malcolm Glaser there. That's a football manager, isn't it? Pretty sure that's a football manager, yeah. Designed by Milton Glaser in 1976 in the back of a taxi. I mean, it feels pretty obvious as a logo, right? Yeah. It's not a lot, too, it. And yet no one else had done it.
Starting point is 00:17:52 Somehow he just kind of put all that together and made it work. And now everyone else has done it for everything else. Yes. Yeah, he just really loved NY. Like the subway roundel that's sitting behind you, Jeff, it's just a symbol of the city. They removed the heart and they made that eye blank New York for organ donation. If you'd like to support the show and get an ad-free feed, some behind-the-scenes stuff,
Starting point is 00:18:16 and frankly quite a lot of bonuses, you can join the Lateral Producers Club. And here is Producer David to tell you about it. Thanks, Tom. The Producers Club is for anyone who wants a bit more lateral in their lives. There's ad-free episodes in both audio and video. We've got a great companion podcast called A Sideways Look where we discuss favourite questions, extra trivia, listener feedback and behind-the-scenes shenanigans. Every week there's an exclusive shiny bonus question just for members,
Starting point is 00:18:45 plus there's downloadable question packs, newsletters, early access to live shows. Look, frankly there's a bit too much, but what can I say? I like offering good value. Go to members.lateralcast.com to join in the fun, or just go to the main lateralcast.com website and click on the link. Hope to see you there. Hannah, it is over to you for the next question. Sure. This question has been sent in by Kieran John Littlewood. On occasion, customers ask baristas to prepare their drink in a way that is impossible to achieve. What is the request and what protocol does the barista use to keep their customer happy? I'll say it again. On occasion, customers ask baristas
Starting point is 00:19:30 to prepare their drink in a way that is impossible to achieve. What is the request and what protocol does the barista use to keep their customer happy? This is tickling something in the back of my head. I have definitely heard of, like, impossible requests and I cannot remember any more details other than thinking, oh, that's really clever. Have you ever made coffee before, Tom, for a Saturday job or...? No, I haven't. I'm not much of one for coffee. Um... Ah!
Starting point is 00:19:59 If you think it's something really clever, then my idea, which was asking for so many extra things to be added to the drink that it no longer fits into a cup, doesn't sound particularly clever, and it's probably not that. Oh, but some folks who have the Starbucks app do that. I've seen baristas complaining about that online. There was a Starbucks thing for a while where every drink you ordered gave you tokens towards a free drink.
Starting point is 00:20:26 But it didn't matter if you just ordered a cheap filter coffee, it gave you the token, or something like that. And eventually, it would just give you a free drink of basically any description, and people would just add so much into it just for quote-unquote comedy value, and not worrying about angering the food service employee, that you literally couldn't fit all the sugar into a cup. Talking of comedy value, a lot of people don't like when Starbucks asks for your name, so people then came up with the joke of creating a name of a realistic sounding but fake drink.
Starting point is 00:20:59 So they'd ask for a drink which doesn't exist, and they had to make them a drink anyway. Is it not a fake name drink? I know, that's a thing, apparently. I really hope this isn't a people being rude to employees question. This is an employees getting the better of someone question, I hope. Yeah, so, I mean, I will say that this is something that I used to make coffee in restaurants and various coffee shops, and it is quite an annoying request.
Starting point is 00:21:23 It is not specific to a particular chain. It's annoying everywhere that this request is made. And it's not to do steer yourself away from the idea of apps or loyalty cards. Is it to do with secret things that don't appear on the menu, like Starbucks have a secret size cup, which they don't advertise? It's to do with it. It's a very common request. Is it to make a drink for, like, your baby or your dog or something?
Starting point is 00:21:53 Despite never being a barista, I have weird barista knowledge in the back of my head, it turns out, and there's definitely a thing where, like, again, this is big corporate chains who have policies for such things. You are not allowed to order caffeine for kids, or extra hot stuff for kids because it might burn them. Or someone orders a child's drink in order to get it cheaper, and the barista is not allowed to heat it beyond a certain temperature, so it's not that good a drink. There's something in that, yeah.
Starting point is 00:22:27 There's a lot of stuff in the back of my head that keeps being dug out despite never having coffee experience and barista experience. I have definitely seen a barista complain about this somewhere. When you say something that is impossible, is it impossible within the rules, or is it physically impossible? It is. It would break the laws of physics if this request was achieved. Okay. Literally, yeah.
Starting point is 00:22:49 Okay. So like something that's hot and cold at the same time, or...? We require a four-dimensional coffee served in a euler jug. All the time, all the time, yeah. Is it something like a hot iced coffee, or something like that? Because I... okay, let me explain. There's a thing I found in New Zealand which is like an iced chocolate, which is like you make cocoa as if it's going to be hot cocoa, and then you pour it over ice. And outside New Zealand, that is just a confusing request to people.
Starting point is 00:23:22 It is. I will say that you can do it to several different kinds of drinks, but you're kind of probing around the right area. Well, it feels like we keep going around, like, temperature. You're so nearly there, yeah. We keep going on this, and you said laws of physics. So is there... It's not like they're asking for an iced hot drink or something.
Starting point is 00:23:46 It's like a hot coffee with an ice cube in it, which would not survive. I think that, yeah, it's a lot more simple and really, really common. Are they asking for it, like... Can you make it extra hot? And what they mean by that is they're, like, above 100 degrees Celsius. Right. Can you boil it? Is that it? Yes, that's it.
Starting point is 00:24:09 So the first part, you've got your 50% of the way there, it's asking for an extra hot drink because things are served boiling, it's physically impossible to make anything hotter. So yeah, so you've got the first half right, so that's the request. But what protocol does the barista use to keep the customer happy? How do you convince someone the drink is extra hot without actually breaking the laws of physics? This is a real bone of contention for me because coffee is made in a different way to tea, believe it or not.
Starting point is 00:24:37 And I was at an event at a science festival several years ago with someone from, like, Taylor's of Harrogate who make Yorkshire tea, like an expert tea brewer, who explained that when you make coffee you need the water to be 90 degrees, not 100 degrees, but when you make tea you need it to be 100 degrees. And it's why so often if you go to a coffee place and they just use the coffee machine to make the tea, the tea is less good because it doesn't brew as well and this is a thing that I'm frequently angry about for no reason. But yeah, so the coffee is usually not quite 100 degrees, but I guess if people want it to be hotter than 100 degrees, they're not going to get that.
Starting point is 00:25:11 They serve it in the form of a gas, just like, here's your plasma, your vaporised coffee. Here's your suggestion of coffee, yes. But doesn't that mean they normally serve coffee at 90 degrees, and if you ask for extra hot, you get 95, so they can never max out at 100? No, the way that question's phrased, it feels like the barista is doing a trick or something that convinces the customer. They put a label on saying, this is definitely extra hot. Or a little sticker on the side.
Starting point is 00:25:40 Yeah, I can confirm the barista doesn't treat the drink any differently to usual. The drink is unchanged. But they offer it to them, like, with the lid off so you can see the steam so it looks hotter or...? They put two of the cardboard things round the cup just to really convince people that it... you can't... or they don't use the cardboard thing so they just burn themselves. You're almost there. You're almost there. You're dancing around. They deliberately spill a bit. No.
Starting point is 00:26:10 Oh my gosh, it's so hot. That's how to get yourself sued, isn't it? Yeah. I was going to say, McDonald's had a lawsuit about that. Yeah, did they just have to hand it over going, oof, oof, this is hot. And just like really act like they're holding a hot object. Is it really not like not put the cardboard sleeve on? Because that would be incredible if it, if that was sufficient
Starting point is 00:26:31 that people take it and they're like, oh, it's really hot. Oh, do you want a cardboard sleeve? Yes, I'll give you a cardboard sleeve. It's not the answer I have here, but I would say it's this very similar psychological trick. The size of the cup or the shape of the cup or a cup without a lid or... You guys are thinking about it being a takeaway. If you were to have the coffee in... They make you sit in a warmer part of the coffee shop. Can we heat the mug first?
Starting point is 00:27:01 Yes! Yes, it is. Well done, Katie. Yeah, so customers sometimes ask for an extra hot tea or coffee. Since it's already made with boiling water, it physically can't be made any hotter without turning it into steam. So to keep the customer happy, they use a psychological trick. They will heat up the mug handle by placing it in boiling water so that the customer believes that the drink is hotter than it is. Kieran, the sender of this question, says, I am regularly asked this in my job as a bartender barista.
Starting point is 00:27:30 This is the protocol at all the places I have worked. This question has been sent in by Ed Lucas. The Electric Light Orchestra's self-titled debut album came out in 1971. In the US, it was released under the title No Answer. Why? The Electric Light Orchestra's self-titled debut album came out in 1971. In the US it was released under the title No Answer. Why? So ELO must have stood for something else in America. There's a few bands that have done that, aren't there? Alabama 3 is A3 in the US,
Starting point is 00:28:05 because Alabama, the band, complained. Hmm. E-L-O. Everyone loves... Oregon? Oregon. And then all the other states were mad. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:28:19 Oh, yeah. I was gonna let that one go until someone threw in a suggestion for what E-L-O might stand for. Thank you. I can now tell you it's not that at all, but I wanted someone to in a suggestion for what ELO might stand for. Thank you. I can now tell you it's not that at all. But I wanted someone to guess what ELO might stand for. Okay, so it's not that it's an acronym? No. I mean, it sort of sounds like LO.
Starting point is 00:28:33 Like, it's like you're phoning someone. Is ELO a word or slang or something rude in American English? Well, I guess the band still called that. It's just the name of the album. Yeah. This was a self-titled debut album in the US, the album name was no answer. ELO was still ELO. Surely it can't be something like US law decrees that you can't have an album titled the same as the band name or something, is it? I mean, I feel like that's a First Amendment thing that should win out, but that doesn't
Starting point is 00:29:01 sound like a US law. Like there must have been self-titled albums by other bands in America. No, but there's that thing in America where if you have a product, a product can't be named after the... I can't think of an example, I know you asked me for example. That's why they have letters K for coffee instead of coffee. You can't have a product named after the thing. Does that make sense? You know that rule? Is that not a rule? I don't know. It is not a legal restriction. I'll tell you that much.
Starting point is 00:29:26 It is not that the US government came in and said, "'Thou shalt not have self-titled albums.'" This happened for the films, doesn't it? Wasn't it the madness of King George III here, had the three dropped off in America? Because people might think, well, I missed the first two. I'm pretty sure that that was... OK? I don't know, that might be apocryphal. It's a really nice story though. Yeah, definitely, definitely, definitely the film Pirate Radio,
Starting point is 00:29:49 they changed to the name The Boat That Rocked when it was released in the USA, because pirate radio isn't an expression that's used in the USA apparently. That's a cool little fact. I hear a lot of these stories and I do wonder how many of them are true, because most of them are just like, oh, Americans are stupid and I'm sure that can't be how it works. Like I used to play a computer game called Little Big Adventure, which was absolutely adorable. And apparently it was released in a different under a different name in America because something couldn't
Starting point is 00:30:14 be little and big at the same time and it would confuse Americans. I think there was another thing with the same name. So things things have their name changed, but why that? Well, is the name important? So no answer sounds like the reply to something or the response to some kind of question. That I think is more the way to attack this question. Did they get in touch with someone in the US? Okay, did someone from ELO try to call his girlfriend in America and she didn't reply and so passive aggressively just called the album no answer?
Starting point is 00:30:52 I just wonder if it's one of these sort of Welsh translation things where you see this signage that says on it, the translation department is closed this weekend, please get back in touch on Monday, because that's what they got back when they sent through the thing. Now between the two of you, you've got this. Put the story together here. What happened? Because the band did not know about this change.
Starting point is 00:31:13 Right, they asked the band what the album was going to be called, and nobody answered. And that was recorded as no answer, and then that's what they called the album. Yes, that is absolutely right. No! Amazing. Someone from ELO's American record label tried to phone the band's manager
Starting point is 00:31:30 because they didn't quite know what the album title was. Is it self-titled? Has there been a mistake? Someone put that call through. They couldn't get through. They wrote down no answer on the release schedule, and that was mistaken for the album's title and the US version. Without the band's knowledge became no answer.
Starting point is 00:31:49 Incredible. That's so funny. This is 1971, so Transatlantic calls are not cheap and not easy. Bev Bevan, the drummer of Iolo, confirmed the story and said, it was quite a good title though, wasn't it? That's great. I like it. That was so good. The next question is from Katie, whenever you're ready.
Starting point is 00:32:13 OK, so this question has been sent in by Steve Barnes. Ricardo Pietretzko, from Berlin, has the name Pikachu on the darts circuit. Just before taking his turn, he will look down at the darts in his non-throwing hand. Why? So once more, Ricardo Piatracko from Berlin has the name Pikachu on the dart circuit. Just before taking his turn, he will look down at the darts in his non-throwing hand. Why? Is he having a Pikachu... three ducks? I was just thinking that.
Starting point is 00:32:48 Were you trying to foresee how you could formulate it as well? Um... hmm. You got there just slightly before me while I was trying to assemble the pun. Well done. What does Pikachu do? Why would you be called Pikachu? He's an electric mouse. I actually have some video game knowledge here. I did play the original Pokémon, so... I have no Pokémon knowledge, so I'm just going to say nothing.
Starting point is 00:33:12 It's a little yellow mouse that shocks people. Well, shocks other Pokémon. And people. And anything, frankly. He lives in a Pokeball. He says, Pika, Pika. His trainer's Ash. Is this guy's trainer's Ash? I'm kind of wondering how long to let you continue going down the Pikachu line. Has it got nothing to do with Pikachu? On the basis that that is not actually relevant to the answer. Although I'm wondering if it's to do with his surname,
Starting point is 00:33:47 because it sounds a bit like it, or... Oh yeah, the question is not, why is he called Pikachu? That's just his nickname. It's why does he look down at the darts in his non-throwing hand? He's very bad, he has a very bad memory, and doesn't remember how many darts he has and has to check every time? Because that is a thing that darts players have to do. It's not just always hit the highest number.
Starting point is 00:34:13 There's a rule in darts that your last throw, to get down to zero, has to hit a double on the outside ring. So if you are in a position where you're on, like, I don't know, 23 points, that's impossible. You can't hit a double 11 and a half to end the round. So you've got to do the maths to work out a number you can hit to then hit a double. So you've got to know how many darts you have remaining, but given the maximum is three, I feel like you don't need to look down every time. I would also argue you could probably tell from looking at the dart board how many darts you've thrown.
Starting point is 00:34:49 You could! No, that's fair. No, that's in your eye line, isn't it? That's, in hindsight, kind of obvious. But he will look at them before even throwing a dart. Is it to do with how he's going to select which one to throw first? Like, for, it's like when you have, like, cigarettes and you flick the bottom to see which one, and the one that comes out first is the one that you smoked the last.
Starting point is 00:35:11 So it's like a similar thing with the darts, like whichever is closest to his fingers he throws first, I don't know. He is looking down to determine which dart to throw first. Oh, brilliant. Okay. Oh, so this is not before every throw, it's before, like, the throw of the three? I think it would be before every throw, yeah. Okay. To determine which one's next.
Starting point is 00:35:34 I mean, not the last one. No. Because that's just the one dart that you're still holding. Okay, it can't be a superstition. Lateral doesn't end up with... Ah, it's because he feels like it. There's got to be some reason for this. Does he have a tattoo on his palm with an arrow,
Starting point is 00:35:49 and the dart that the arrow is pointing at is the one that he uses next? No. Oh, really? Are you sure? It was a good guess. The tattoo just says, remember, hit the board, not the ref. Hit the board, not the ref. Hit the board, not the ref. I'm completely stunned.
Starting point is 00:36:07 Gosh, I got nothing. I don't know enough about darts to know if the three darts can be different. I think you just have regulation darts. They've all got to be the same. But maybe they have different flights, maybe they have different sizes or something like that. Does he have custom darts? Has he got the Pikachu logo sort of on the feathers of the d sizes or something like that. Does he have custom darts? Has he got the Pikachu logo sort of on the feathers of the darts or something? Is he trying to spell out things on the dartboard by the order in which he's hitting them?
Starting point is 00:36:33 So the darts that he has are not... They are a custom... Yeah, they're not standard darts. They're his own type that he uses for darts. But surely all three darts by the regulation should be the same, or you're now to have different weighted darts? They, I guess, well, continue that train of thought. Different design? Is it because he has different weighted darts and he,
Starting point is 00:36:55 because they have a sort of, on the barrel, that's the word, there's a weight, so he has three different weights and he makes sure he wants to pick the right weight to get the certain number. Hannah's just come in with a suggestion there. So the weights are not the thing that's different. But the suggestion that Hannah had... So I said, is it to do with the design? So they're kind of like regulation in terms of like weight and size,
Starting point is 00:37:16 but the way that they're coloured is different. That is part of it, yeah. Could this be an accessibility thing? Is this a darts player who has some sort of adaptation for something medical, something physical? That would be a wonderful thing. It is not that in this case. Oh, okay, okay. Is it to do with where is he from again? Berlin.
Starting point is 00:37:41 Is it black, yellow and red? And then if it doesn't assert... Oh, it's the German flag and they've always got to land in order. They've always got to land in order? It is the German flag. So it pulls his black, red and yellow darts in the order black, red, yellow, because it's the German flag. And it's mainly just like a little fun Easter egg for the fans, like it obviously doesn't
Starting point is 00:38:04 affect his darts game. But he is very patriotic and he likes to throw his darts, so he always has to check which one's which to make sure he throws the black one first, then the red one, then the yellow one. Wow. Oh, I'm well... I've got no words, I'm just... I'm going to have another very strong drink tonight. We have solved some questions quickly, which means we have unlocked the shiny bonus question.
Starting point is 00:38:28 Good luck, folks. On an episode of the ITV Quiz Show The Chase, three of the contestants were called Liz, Anya, and Ravi. Who was the fourth? And I'll say that again. On an episode of the ITV Quiz Show The Chase, three of the contestants were called Liz, Anya, and Ravi. Who was the fourth?
Starting point is 00:38:45 So that's L, A and R. Does it spell a word, is the obvious? I think Hannah's got this. I think I might have already got this one. Yeah, I think I've got it pretty quickly. I didn't know it but... Don't make me solve it by myself! I will tell you that Katie and Hannah have pretty much teed it up for you. Yes, it is spelling out something. That's what I said, so LAR, so what's the next... I mean, the thing I'm thinking of doesn't just involve the first letters.
Starting point is 00:39:13 Like how it's like set out when you know when they're all standing next to each other. I'm looking down because I've written it down on a bit of paper down here. Liz, Anya and Robbie, LAR, what is... I feel like writing it down is less helpful because it's better read out. For anyone listening in audio only, Geoff's face now is incredible. You can see cogs turning in his head. The thing is, and we are ganging up on you slightly here, Geoff, but in my defense, it's funny.
Starting point is 00:39:39 This is a podcast that's meant to work in both audio and video, and you are just muttering the words quietly to yourself. Oh, you want me to say it out loud? This is a podcast that's meant to work in both audio and video, and you are just muttering the words quietly to yourself. Oh, you want me to say it out loud? I'm just, I'm fearful I'm going to get the pronunciation wrong. So, Tom, I'm going to get you to say the names again. Yep. Liz, Anya, Ravi. Liz, Anya, Ravi? I also feel like the contestants, there's four contestants,
Starting point is 00:39:59 I feel like they could team up into two pairs. They could. Oh! Oh! Liz, Anya, Ravioli. Hang on. So the last name is? Oli. two pairs. They could. Oh, oh, Lizzania Ravioli. Hang on. So the last name is? Ollie. Ollie. Absolutely right. Yay!
Starting point is 00:40:10 I got it! The casting producers on The Chase are pulling their block of contestants and then, if they can, will try and match up names so that when they have the four names in a row, there is an Easter egg there. That's the thing! Oh, great! Every... Not every episode, but enough that I do have some extra lines up here.
Starting point is 00:40:32 Oh my god. They had Jerry, Emma and Mel along with... Mel? The other... Victoria. But yes, they found the Spice Girls in there. They also had Lily, Alan, Craig and David. David? Incredible.
Starting point is 00:40:51 The question writers on the chase office, they have a great sense of humour, because there's all kinds of brilliant clips of the time when the answer to one of the questions was pass. And the person just said pass. Yes, which I think at some point we have had that as a question on Lateral as well. They are... Honestly, they're about a thousand episodes in now, they get their jokes where they can. Which brings us to the question from the very start of the show, which was sent in by Akiva Weinberger, thank you very much.
Starting point is 00:41:20 In 2017, why did the budget airline K-Air rebrand itself as Aero-K? Anyone want to take... Oh, Jeff, you know this one immediately? I thought it was to do with an alphabetical sorting thing. Sometimes companies like their companies to start with an A, because they're at the start of alphabetical listings. It's not... that would be a really good idea, but in this case, no. Also obviously Aardvark Airways would always beat them.
Starting point is 00:41:42 Obviously. Aaron A. Anderson Airways. Is K Air somehow, like, does it sound like something rude in the language of the countries that they were flying to? Is it Korea? It is Korea. This is K Air becoming Air OK. But it's not to do with alphabetisation and it's not to do with being rude.
Starting point is 00:42:04 I'm thinking it reads K Air. Was there like a hyphen or a slash in between? They used to be in K-air, yes, but no, Aero-K is just A-E-R-O-K. Oh wait, so it's why did you choose Aero-K as opposed to why did you not choose Aero-K? Yes. I mean, I wonder about, because Aero-K sounds like R-O-K, which is Republic of Korea. — Now you're getting— — Like, in French you would pronounce it R-O-K. Now you're getting closer. It's sort of almost a valid alternate reason there,
Starting point is 00:42:37 but you're not quite looking at the pronunciation. It is a word thing, though. Is it OK? It sounds like A-O-K. I'm writing it down. What was it? A-E? That's probably going to help. A-E.
Starting point is 00:42:48 R-O-K. And it is a Korean airline. K-R-E-O-K. Is it... No, not Korean. Oh, is it? It's an anagram of... It's not an anagram of Korea, is it?
Starting point is 00:42:57 Korea, no. I mean, it is an anagram of... Oh, it's Korea backwards! It is an anagram, in the sense, yes. It is Korea backwards, yes. Technically true. Technically a correct answer, but I think I have to give that one to Geoff. Yes, this is Aero-K, which spells Korea backwards. You could also have Ae-Egla in Algeria if you wanted to,
Starting point is 00:43:16 you could have Ae-Sua for Austria, there's Ae-Egin in Nigeria, Ae-Eglob in Bulgaria, Ae-Ebil in Liberia. All of those are theoretically possible, but the only one that's actually done it is Aerok in Korea. I learned so much from this, it's great. Congratulations to all three of our players. What's going on in your lives? Where can people find you?
Starting point is 00:43:38 We will start with Hannah. Continue to read my Guardian Wine column. I'm also on Sunday Brunch, which I forgot to mention last time. Hey! I usually announce on social media when I'm doing that. So if you want to see me do live TV and trying not to swear, it's a great place to do that. Katie!
Starting point is 00:43:54 I've done loads of stuff. As always, I've recently appeared in some new videos for BBC GCSE Byte Size Maths. So if you or anyone you know needs to revise for a GCSE in maths, you can hear my voice desperately struggling to read out, like, literally how to do GCSE maths questions. It's incredibly complex and quite fun to listen to. Can I also just say hi to the woman who recognized me on a train platform from being on this show?
Starting point is 00:44:20 I literally got recognized by someone and it was fantastic because she couldn't work out where she recognized me from. She was like, I'm sure I've seen you on something and I was fantastic because she couldn't work out where she recognised me from. She was like, I'm sure I've seen you on something and I was saying stuff I'd been doing and she was like, no, it's not that, it's not that. We eventually worked out it was this. So hello, if you are still listening slash watching. That was an incredible moment for me. And also regularly recognised on train platforms,
Starting point is 00:44:39 Geoff. No, true story. Geoff Marshall, Geoff of the G YouTube channel with transport and travel documentaries. So thank you. Yeah, have a go at the look. And if you want to know more about this show you can do that at lateralcast.com where you can also send in your own ideas for questions. We are at Lateral Cast basically everywhere and there are regular video highlights at youtube.com slash Lateral Cast and I think I just set a speed record for saying those words. Thank you very much to Jeff Marshall. Thank you Tom.
Starting point is 00:45:02 Katie Steckles. Yuki. Hannah Crosby. Thanks for having me. My name's Tom Scott and that's Bean Lateral.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.