Lateral with Tom Scott - 187: The lion and the poet

Episode Date: May 8, 2026

Matt Gray, Rowan Ellis and Verity Babbs face questions about pervasive players, biscuit barrels and foreign flags. LATERAL is a comedy panel game podcast about weird questions with wonderful answers,... hosted by Tom Scott. For business enquiries, contestant appearances or question submissions, visit https://lateralcast.com. HOST: Tom Scott. QUESTION PRODUCER: David Bodycombe. EDITED BY: Julie Hassett at The Podcast Studios, Dublin. MUSIC: Karl-Ola Kjellholm ('Private Detective'/'Agrumes', courtesy of epidemicsound.com). ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS: Jimmy Dailey, Frank Fabrizio, Joel Haydon, Nico, Jordan Cook-Irwin, Charlie Brodersen, Ben W.. FORMAT: Pad 26 Limited/Labyrinth Games Ltd. EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS: David Bodycombe and Tom Scott. © Pad 26 Limited (https://www.pad26.com) / Labyrinth Games Ltd. 2026. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Although he retired in 1974, Hall of Famer Jerry West has appeared on every NBA team since 1969. How? The answer to that, at the end of the show. My name's Tom Scott, and this is Lateral. Welcome to Lateral, which your podcast app has very confidently categorized under comedy. This feels bold. Yes, there are jokes, but there are also long pauses, confused guessing, and the occasional moment where someone earnestly explains,
Starting point is 00:00:35 explains a fact about pigeons. So if you came here, expecting tight punchlines and perfectly structured humour, I fear the comedy label may count as false advertising, but we're gonna do our best, and today's guests have agreed to help maintain the illusion that this is, in fact, intentional comedy. First, we have...
Starting point is 00:00:52 I have to go to you first, Verity, because I know... This is not what you're on here for, but I know you are in an improv group with previous lateral contestant Sophie Ward. So, please welcome to the show for the very first time, Verity Babs. Hello!
Starting point is 00:01:05 Thanks for having me. As you're here for the first time, we should do the blatant plug. Tell me about the book. The book is about being friends with Sophie Ward and a lifelong obsession with her. No, the book came out in October. It's called The History of Art in One Sentence. So I'm an art historian who I hope is at least mildly amusing. So it's a sort of funny whistle-stop tour through 500 years of art history of artists behaving badly, basically.
Starting point is 00:01:33 And I have to ask, because I have to ask, because every time we get a new player on, have you heard Lateral before? You know what you're in for today. I've done my revision. I've done my revision. Well, very best of luck to you on the show today. We're joined by two returning players.
Starting point is 00:01:47 First of all, video essayist on, I think it was Sociology and Society. I can't remember how you phrased it last time. Rowan Ellis, welcome back to the show. Hello, it's so exciting to be back. Thank you for having me again. What have you been working on recently? What a great question.
Starting point is 00:02:01 I'm currently, I just worked on a video essay about the ethics of like AI and empathy, that was tentatively titled, Would You Kick a Robot Dog? Which is a question that I now love to ask everyone that I ever encounter because the answers are very, very fun. And currently working on a video about moral panics, which is, you know, just two real gut punches to the psyche in a row. Would you kick a robot dog? Yeah, 100%. After working on this video, as I think I say in the video, I would have punt that hound right into the sun is what I concluded.
Starting point is 00:02:40 Also, joining us today. Nope. Good. We've got the comedy label going. This is fine because collapsing out of their chair, please welcome to the show, Matt Gray. Hello, I would also be a robot hound punter. Wait, punters, to mean a crowd, means people that kick.
Starting point is 00:02:59 But the people that kick are on the pitch. Oh, yeah. I mean, punter also means someone who bets on. something. Oh. I think it'll be really fun if every single question this episode was accidentally about the like etymology of punts and things like that. It just became crazily relevant throughout the episode. There are a lot of meanings of that word, and I only just realised that. Matt, the last time I saw you, you were plugging a kettle into a public car charger. Yes. I've just had a video go up this week where I convert an electric car charger into something I can use with my electric bike. That way,
Starting point is 00:03:36 when I've cycled to the end of my battery, I don't have to lug it on a train home. But to test it, I couldn't be asked to carry my bike the whole way to a lamp post charger. So I did try it with a kettle, which was intriguing. Very best of luck to all three of you on the show today. It's time to start today's comedy of errors. We'll test the show. genre classification immediately with question one. Thank you to Jordan Cook-Uk-Ukwin for this question. What is the similarity between the Big Bang, the Tories, Cubism and the Quakers? I'll give you that one more time.
Starting point is 00:04:12 What is the similarity between the Big Bang, the Tories, Cubism and the Quakers? This is almost the ideal question for me as an art historian and a Quaker, but not a Tory and not involved in the Big Bang. but almost half, two out four ain't bad. Well, I am aware of the Big Bang of Tories, of Cubism and of Quakers. Oh, that's it, that's the answer. Matt's aware of them. Thank you. All right, we'll move on to question two.
Starting point is 00:04:42 I know there's a whole thing about Quakers not speaking much, but I'd have to say that the Tories are certified yappers. That's a difference. Very Gen Z little slang going in there, Matt. Yes. What, hang on, remind me again, it's the big. Big Bang, Tories, Quakers and... Cubism.
Starting point is 00:05:01 Cubism. Which is an art style where everything looks a bit odd and mixed up sometimes. And with perspectives, as I understand it. I mean, I'm going to ask the art historian for a definition there. What is the Cubism? So Cubism was invented by Picasso and Georgesse Brack. And they were basically like super besties. and then they fell out and never spoke about it again.
Starting point is 00:05:29 So maybe there's something here about lovers tiffs. But fundamentally with Cubism, you can see the same thing from multiple perspectives at one time, which is why it all looks a bit blobby. But cubism. Maybe they all started in France. Notoriousy, the Big Bang. It's got punch energy.
Starting point is 00:05:54 It's the centre of everything. Technically, it should be called Le Grande Bang. Let alone, poof. Thank you. I was really hoping that someone would come up with the translation because I started that sentence and by the time I got to the end of it, I didn't have the French word for bang.
Starting point is 00:06:12 So I know, obviously, the Tories is not... I'm interested in that phrase as opposed to conservatives because technically it's kind of the same as saying, like, the GOP for the Republicans. Like, it's a nickname or it's another name for it. And so I'm wondering if this is kind of like a suffragette style thing where it's not like the original name for the thing. It got named by someone who was in opposition to it or named as like a nickname that wasn't meant to be good. And then they were like, I guess this is us now.
Starting point is 00:06:40 Yes. Yes. Do you want to talk more about the, we start with the Tories there? I'm not going to lie to you, Tom. I truly don't know. This wasn't like I knew that that was true for one of them and so I extrapolation. I truly didn't know that was true for any of them, but I was like, I just know that this is maybe something that wasn't,
Starting point is 00:07:00 because the Big Bang also is not necessarily like an officious sounding thing for quite an important theory. So yeah, that was just a guess into the darkness that turned out to be correct. The Big Bang was popularised by astronomer Fred Hoyle on BBC Radio in 1949. He was skeptical about it. He thought it sounded ridiculous.
Starting point is 00:07:18 Thank you, producer David. The Big Bang in French is Le Big Bang. Thank you. Never. Or alternatively, Le Grande Explosion, but Le Big Bang is what people use. You mentioned George Brack, Verity, who is in my notes here. Yeah. I also have Louis Vossel.
Starting point is 00:07:37 Yeah, so he basically, he was a writer, and then he basically named loads of art movements being like, I think this is no good, and then they were like, I like the name No Good, we'll use that. So he's all over the place. Yeah, and that's what happened with Cubism. Tori was originally, I mean, it says in my notes it's a slur, which I feel is a strong term to use, but it comes from the Irish Toride, which I'm probably mispronouncing for Outlaw or Robber. Oh, it's quite accurate then.
Starting point is 00:08:11 And Quaker, I'm going to ask the Quaker, do you know where that name came from? Well, it used to, like, back in the, it's a 17th century when the Quakers were founded by George Fox, and the idea is that you're having a think, and then maybe you'll sort of have some sort of revelation about the way we live and the world we live in, which can cause you to basically have a bit of a flutter. So I imagine it was a slightly eye-rolly. All of this quaking they're doing.
Starting point is 00:08:39 Yep, quaking or trembling in a religious context. Absolutely right. Rowan, out of nowhere, congratulations, they all came from derisive nicknames. Each of our guests has brought a question along with them. Rowan, after that's solved, I think it's got to be over to you. This question has been sent in by Joel Hayden. In 2012, a token is taken out of a biscuit tin near the beehive in Wellington, New Zealand.
Starting point is 00:09:05 The following year, Lindley and Ali get married. How are these events connected? I'll read it again. In 2012, a token is taken out of a biscuit tin near the beehive in Wellington, New Zealand. The following year, Lindley and Ali get married. How are these events connected? Is that Lily and Ali? Linley.
Starting point is 00:09:25 Linley. Lily Allen. Just trying to think of what kind of, a token out of a biscuit tin. So is it a token that was meant to be there? Like a winner, find a golden biscuit in a biscuit tin kind of situation. But why was the biscuit tin in or near a beehive? That bit I can clue you in for, because I've been to the beehive in New Zealand. Is it not a beehive?
Starting point is 00:09:52 It is the nickname for the Parliament building in Wellington. Ooh. So is it a sort of lucky find an engagement ring in a pack of biscuits vibe? I can say no to that one. I think the idea of, you know, this wasn't a surprise to be finding something in the biscuit tin. I'm wondering, let's say, it sounds like these two events are connected tenuously, let's say laterally, but not necessarily directly related. Now, do all biscuit tins in New Zealand have tokens?
Starting point is 00:10:24 I've got this vague memory of... I never did the tour of the Parliament building. I was in Wellington for a good few days, didn't do the tourism. I didn't go... And I just have this vague memory of biscuit tin being something important
Starting point is 00:10:39 to, like, legal stuff in New Zealand. Like, it's... But I... No, it's flailing around somewhere in my head. Is that how they do... like all marriages in New Zealand have to be like, it's like a, it's like a draw a wife from a, like they, oh, it's Lindsay, you know,
Starting point is 00:10:57 like they find, they find out through the, is it some kind of like a marriage tombollah? Yeah, oh, that was so nice. Imagine if it was yes. Imagine if I was like, yeah, no, that's exactly right. Every single one is like I married at first sight lottery. Ever since same sex marriage came in, it's become really awkward because now people are getting matched up in all sorts of ways with the tombole.
Starting point is 00:11:18 It's complete married. That's what people who were against gay marriage were like, it'll ruin the tombollah. We can't do it. Won't somebody please think of the biscuits? Come on. So here's an interesting thing, Tom, is that through your A plus first grade comedy, you have actually stumbled upon a relevant element to this question. Okay, so, what were the names again?
Starting point is 00:11:43 Linley and Ali. And you said this was 2012. Ah, okay. So I'm wondering if tokens and biscuit tins are something to do with approval of laws and bills, and Linley and Ali might have been the first gay marriage. That is exactly, exactly correct. Yay. So good.
Starting point is 00:12:07 So the biscuit tin is something that is used a lot in that it is the method through which private member bills are drawn randomly. And the bill that was drawn was to let kind of gay marriage law. be legalised. And so Lindley Bendel and Ali Wanakow made their vows on a plane, a special flight between Queenstown and Wellington in a ceremony that my favourite thing about some of these questions is truly the context that gets given for the answers by the wonderful people who send them in. And the piece of context that they've given is that it was attended by modern family actor Jesse Tyler Ferguson. And I just think that's so perfect. So there were actually 30 other couples got marriage on the same day. It was the 19th of August.
Starting point is 00:12:49 2013. It's this biscuit tin, an ordinary biscuit tin, but it's filled with numbered bingo tokens. And when there's a time for a member's bill to be debated in the New Zealand Parliament, that associated bill gets a first reading in the House, like they get picked out of the biscuit tin. And I bet that's not the first time a relationship started withdrawing a private member and ended in marriage. Wow. Wow. Snaps for you, wow. Thank you to Charlie Broderson for this next question. Jason visits an international event. Upon arriving, he changes his clothes
Starting point is 00:13:27 so that people can understand him more easily. Why? One more time, Jason visits an international event. Upon arriving, he changes his clothes so that people can understand him more easily. Why? Okay. So my first instinct is international event
Starting point is 00:13:43 is a language thing and potentially it's to do with the clothes are like some kind of cultural clothes or have some indicator of like language that he might be speaking or dialect that he might be speaking in order for people to clock on like exactly what's going on. But I don't know if that would make them understand him better. It might just immediately make the language like more apparent.
Starting point is 00:14:04 So it's, I mean, that doesn't necessarily make sense. I was thinking similar because like English and Dutch can sound very similar if you don't know which one you're listening to. So if you're going to somewhere that isn't, either than if he was to dress in a top hat, people know to listen for English, if he was to dress in, I think of a stereotype here. Bright orange, Matt. Bright orange, there we go.
Starting point is 00:14:28 I was trying to think of the name of the flower, actually. Some tulips. Tulips, that's the one, yeah, tulips and bright orange, then they would assume it was Dutch. Not my joke, but, you know, thank you to the Netherlands for being obvious in every international competition. Like, red, white and blue, is it, is it the US, the UK, Slovenia, Russia? It's the Netherlands, they're in bright. orange.
Starting point is 00:14:48 I wonder whether it might be noisy clothes. Like if he's at a... Like, is he a Morris dancer? Like, if he's covered in bells and just has to take him off. Yes, so understanding would mean, oh God, it's one of them
Starting point is 00:15:03 and everyone could run away. Maybe the clothes have printed on it like his diary entries so that people can understand him better that they get what's like in his... soul and they're like, wow, okay, that's really beautiful. I can I get you now? I did once meet someone who went to a conference with a write-on t-shirt. So just for the
Starting point is 00:15:29 initial questions that were like, who are you, what do you do, everything? He just scrolled it on. Could he have given out business cards? Yes, but that was a talking point and that's what he was trying to do. The other day, I was doing a tour around a gallery with Mr. Doodle, who's the guy online who doodles all the things and he was stopped near constantly and I was telling people that or he's being stopped all the time by fans and they're like how do they know it's him it's because he's wearing a head to toe doodle outfit like he's not he's not shying away from the attention you know isn't it like a full suit with shirt and everything doodled and a hat that's doodled or something it was like it was like a windbreaker and and trousers and shoes it was um it was a look that's good
Starting point is 00:16:09 though like he's not going to get recognized out of costume is he but how but how but how can to have a brand that works on clothes. You know, that it's like, I do drawings, I'll draw on the clothes. It's harder for like a mathematician, I guess. I suppose it's like when you're invisible, when you're not wearing red, Tom. Ah, if only, if only. So another option, if he's changing his clothes, is it to understand the situation? Is it one of those I'm with stupid t-shirts?
Starting point is 00:16:35 Rowan, actually going along the right lines quite early there, it's definitely to do with language. So is it traditional clothes? Is you wearing like a dish doucher or? or like Norwegian Sami dress or something cultural so then they can tell which of a varied but similar region he's from. He's called Jason. He's called Jason.
Starting point is 00:16:59 Is he wearing Argonauts merch? Not relevant. I believe this is a specific Jason, but in this case, it's not one you'd know. So he's taking his clothes off? No, he's just changing his clout. Oh, so I was like, he's just taking him off to be better understood. In which case I thought maybe it was tattoos.
Starting point is 00:17:20 Oh. And then it might have been Jason Momoa. Yeah. Who I have actually seen at a conference, not on purpose. The YA conference happens at the same time it's Comic Con in London. And they use the YA conference to get celebrities through. And Jason Momoa had to interrupt a bunch of panels just to go through a back door. And every time, like the first time it was like, oh my God, Jason Momo.
Starting point is 00:17:41 And by the end, everyone was like, Jason, come and be on the panel. Don't be shy. You're always here. Come and join us. And he was like, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry. He was very cute. Y is young adult literature? Yeah, young adult literature is he out. Yeah. I was wondering whether is this, okay, first question, clarifying question. Is this that he swaps one time? Or is it like, is having to swap multiple times? No, just when he arrives. Okay. And my second thing is international event. Does that, is that just that it's somewhere where he isn't native to,
Starting point is 00:18:13 or is it that it's an event where there's going to be multiple languages being spoken? Weirdly, the international part isn't actually that relevant to the answer. It didn't have to be international for this, but it did help you clue in very early on languages. I think that's why it was in the question.
Starting point is 00:18:29 Okay, so the dress is a language signifier. Signifier is probably not the right word there. It could be less that it's like a cultural dress and more that it's something, kind of like the Mr. Doodle thing, where it's like a t-shirt that has QR codes that you scan to get to like a English to whatever your language is translator app or something.
Starting point is 00:18:47 Like it's something that's like a technology or something that isn't like the cultural dress isn't the thing, but it's written on where it's like, you know, hello in different languages or how to ask questions or something that like indicates or makes it easier for someone to conduct the conversation. Or along those lines, a T-shirt that just says like a disability, like I'm deaf or I'm blind. Very close there, Matt. I was thinking about whether there was any kind of sign language
Starting point is 00:19:15 like indicators on there. Rowan, keep going. I was indicators on... Which sign language? B-S-L versus ASL versus... Wouldn't matter for this. Oh, it's blind. You know what?
Starting point is 00:19:32 I think I'm going to give it to you between all of you there, I think you've got close enough. Jason is a deaf presenter visiting a European deafblind youth camp for a documentary. Many deafblind people are not completely blind. They still rely on visual signing. So what is Jason changing about his clothes?
Starting point is 00:19:50 Oh, is it so that they can see his hands easier, like the contrast between the T-shirt and his hands is clearer? Yes, spot on. It is changing into a dark shirt because he has light skin. It would be the other way around if he had dark skin to contrast between his hands and his clothing so that a deaf-blind audience
Starting point is 00:20:09 has better chance of making out what he's saying. I love that you said that you were going to share the points among us for having worked together, whereas all I got was he's a tattooed Morris dancer. So well done Matt and Rowan, because I'm really sticking to tattooed Morris dancer. We don't know that he isn't. I was going to say, like, it turns out Jason rings in his like,
Starting point is 00:20:30 hey, just point of information, I am, all of those things. Also. Jason Momoa doing Morris dancing. I paid to see it. Matt, we will go to you for the next question, please. This question has been sent in by Nico. France's flag is the familiar blue, white, red tricolor. Yet when the French president is photographed or filmed,
Starting point is 00:20:54 the flag behind them often looks slightly different. What is the difference and why is it used? France's flag is the familiar blue, white, red tricolor. Yet when the French president is photographed or filmed, the flag behind them often looks slightly different. What is the difference and why is it used? Is it because sometimes if you take a picture or you film stuff, it can get reverse? So they have to make sure it doesn't look like the flag that's the other way,
Starting point is 00:21:22 the same like three, but the colours the other way around, which I'm sure they're just knowing the amount of flags that are blue, white and red, as Tom pointed out earlier, it seems like there will be at least one flag that could be like different reverse and versions of it. So it has like a something in the corner or something to show that it's, that's the way it's meant to be. if it's the other way around it is reversed. It isn't that.
Starting point is 00:21:44 Though you are thinking along the right lines vaguely there. Surely they're not going old school and using like the Fleur de Lee they used before the revolution and they're like, bring back the monarchy. They're like going old school. No, and it's not like an official presidential flag or anything like that.
Starting point is 00:22:01 I've got a vague memory that the width of the three stripes on the French flag is not officially one third, one third, one third, or something like that, or it changes for some reason. I don't know how that relates to filming or why it would just be the president,
Starting point is 00:22:24 but I feel like they're gonna tweak the columns on the flag or the thirds of the flag somehow. Keep going. That's where my brain runs out. I don't know why you do that. You're right. Do they make the white column
Starting point is 00:22:39 really broad because it goes better with outfits if you're still in front of it. Because it's slimming. Yeah, because it's slimming. It's that the white band is really thin. Why would they want that? Oh, is it something to do, is it something to do like a green screen,
Starting point is 00:22:59 green screen style thing nowadays where if he's in front of just one single colour, it's way easier to edit it into an embarrassing situation in the background. Yeah, that's the only, That's the only reason Libya changed its flag a few years ago. It used to be completely green. Used to be really embarrassing every single time.
Starting point is 00:23:15 I can't tell if that's true or if you're just being funny. Sorry, I use my authoritative voice. Libya did change its flag from a completely green band. I'm pretty sure that wasn't the reason. I'm also realizing, I don't know whether it's coming up or anything for anyone else, but it does look like Tom is in front of a reverse French flag right now on that left side of you.
Starting point is 00:23:37 Yeah, the studio just has a load of... a load of stripes in our colours. It's just a very, it's a very strange flag this one. So, Roman, you were actually quite close at the beginning when you were saying about being photographed or filmed. Is it like when David Attenborough made the tennis balls bright yellow because it looks better on TV, like does white fundamentally film badly? So David Attenborough?
Starting point is 00:24:01 David Attenborough, when he was in charge of the BBC, was like, everyone used white tennis balls and he was like, this is going to look terrible on telly, Let's make them neon yellow, and that's why tennis balls are yellow. Wow. Would that have been Richard Attenborough? Yeah, David Attenborough ran, I think BBC 2 for a while. Yeah, so does white fundamentally film badly?
Starting point is 00:24:23 No. All of the colours and the order are the same. It's just the proportions that change. Bleed. If I say the word bleed, does that make sense to you, Matt? Not immediately. If you're framing up a shot of the French president... and you have a camera.
Starting point is 00:24:41 And what he has is the French flag behind him. If you just put a normal French flag behind him, every single camera operator... Right, you see my background here. You look, you points at my background, the flag behind me. There's two orange bars on the outside. Those orange bars keep going for a while, because I won't always frame the camera up the same way.
Starting point is 00:25:05 Do they make the blue and the red wider so that the camera operator doesn't have to... risk getting what's behind the flag out of shot, in shot. I'm explaining this really badly, Matt. Help me. Yes, you are correct. You are correct. Yes. Although the official flag of France has three equal vertical bands, the version often placed behind the sitting president uses a slimmer central white stripe, typically about one-fifth of the total width instead of one-third. During speeches and photo-ops, cameras naturally centre on the president's face. with a standard trickleau
Starting point is 00:25:39 that framing would frequently land almost entirely on the white middle band making the flag look washed out or even monochrome on screen. By narrowing the white stripe, both the blue and the red edges remain visible in tight shots and they've been using that design
Starting point is 00:25:53 since the 1990s. Which means they were ready for vertical video way before everyone else. Oh yeah, now it's all done vertical. Unfortunately, the French flag is now just blue and red with a single white line down the middle. I really enjoyed the fact that there is a clippable moment in that answer
Starting point is 00:26:14 where Tom just goes, bleed, Matt. Does that mean? When you bleed, Manuel? Despite the fact that I work with video, my brain went to print first. Yeah. To explain that, the term in printing is bleed. You also push the colours outside the margin just in case it doesn't line up. That's because everything you get printed ends up getting chopped,
Starting point is 00:26:34 so then the ink goes to the edge of the paper, rather than printing to the edge of the paper. Thank you to Ben W for this next question. The poem, Lion-eating poet in the Stone Den, begins, Living in a Stone Den is a poet scholar named She, addicted to pork. Having lost his official post, he vowed to eat ten lions. Why is it amusing? I'll say that again.
Starting point is 00:26:59 The poem, Lion-eating Poet in the Stone Den begins, Living in a Stone Den is a poet scholar named she, addicted to pork. Having lost his official post, he vowed to eat ten lions. Why is it amusing? So normally, I will write down all the key information from a question. I cannot write down an entire poem. No. And the good news is you don't need to.
Starting point is 00:27:22 Yeah. I've got an idea. Does it, is it about, does it sound like audibly amusing, rather than the words being funny? Like, is it not in, is it not written in English? Yes, and I think you can probably guess which language from some of the context clues in there. Is it in Mandarin? It is, yes.
Starting point is 00:27:47 And so are all the words the same word? Yes, they are. Do you want to try and guess which word? She. Yes! Complete solve out of nowhere! I just need to come back from Morris' answers. I just need a win so badly.
Starting point is 00:28:07 Is it the same word, exactly the same word, with the same tones each time? Or is it different tones on the top of the word? And Matt comes in just to kick the ball back in the goal after it's bounced out. Absolutely right. Tell me about tones, Matt. The way you say a word changes the meaning of a word in Chinese. I do not know Chinese, but it would be like the difference between Xi and Xi. Yes.
Starting point is 00:28:32 Would be two different words. But there are like four of them, five of them? Four plus a neutral tone. So you can pronounce the same word four different ways to get four different words, which could also be even more words based on context. Yes, spot on. This was written in 1916 to demonstrate the limitations of writing Mandarin Chinese in Romanized form. I'm so pleased we went into more detail because otherwise it makes it sound like I said. Does it sound funny because it's not in English? It's foreign noises. So why is it showing off the limitations of Roman?
Starting point is 00:29:07 of changing it to English. Because it's probably just written as X-I with no indication of tone. S-H-I in that method, yes. And there are tone markers, sure, but what would it look like in the original language? Is it more like visually nice?
Starting point is 00:29:23 Well, sort of. Or the same word pronounced the same way is written with different characters in Mandarin. Because it's not phonetic. Yes, Mandarin uses different glyphs, if you like, for different words. and there isn't much...
Starting point is 00:29:38 I don't think there's actually a relation. There's certainly not much of a relation between how a word is written down or how a character is written down and how it sounds. Verity, take it away. This question has been sent in by Frank Fabrizio. In 1986, Margaret Keane
Starting point is 00:29:57 won a paint-off in which she was the only participant. As a result, she was given $4 million, but this didn't matter to her. What was happening? In 1986, Margaret Kean won a paint off, in which she was the only participant. As a result, she was given $4 million,
Starting point is 00:30:19 but this didn't matter to her. What was happening? Is that like the Great British make-off? It was a competition. Okay. A graffiti clearing competition? Aw. You're taking the paint off a wall?
Starting point is 00:30:31 Oh. Yeah, was it just a council contract and she was just cleaning for fun? I think technically that would be a paint-off off. But... It's the councils are spending huge amounts on these paint-offs. So $4 million. That's where all the money's gone.
Starting point is 00:30:45 Oh, yeah. Here's... Okay. So here's... I... There's so many... There's so many baffling parts of this. The most baffling to me personally
Starting point is 00:30:54 is the fact that she didn't care about $4 million. Which means that... Okay, which means in my head, here are the options. The four million... dollars were like monopoly money and they didn't count but that doesn't that seems like she'd actually care more because you'd be like i was promised four million dollars and you've given me nonsense uh two she was extremely rich anyway which means maybe she was a famous painter but even then you think that four million dollars made a lot my third option is that she's a she's a petty
Starting point is 00:31:22 woman and that the painter there was like some other reason why the paint off was a big deal and that that was that was like a thing where the four million dollars are like that's great but i won and i shows you all that I won because the doubt was for doubting me. And that I think is, I don't, I imagine that's not the actual answer, but I like that that's a part of it, that it's actually not relevant to the question, but her being petty is, um, is the reason for not caring about the money. Option four, she's dead. Oh. That feels a bit dark for a lateral question. Run, run with petty woman.
Starting point is 00:32:02 Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Okay, okay, okay, okay, can I ask you, Beretti, is this the kind of competition that would be, that is to do with, like, her being a woman is significant to this? Because historically and artistically, kind of the vibes of like, of woman doing a thing or being, being involved in, in art or writing or whatever, and someone else getting the credit or like science or things like that. And this was a way of her proving that she was actually involved in the art or like she was someone who was, was she'd I don't know what it is but there's something I feel like there's like this would make sense if it was the idea of like she was trying to prove like people doubted her because they thought that she wasn't actually the person who painted this or she couldn't wasn't capable of doing it and then she was like look at me and then it was like the satisfaction of them being like
Starting point is 00:32:51 oh yeah no you did actually you were able to like paint that specific technique that we didn't think you were capable of doing bingo there is oppression written in okay oppression written so the there are two different things that I was thinking. One of them was, do I recognise that name? And the second one being, like, 1986 feels a little too late for it to be a patriarchal, well, I'm not entering if a woman's entered, but she could have been the only one to enter, and everyone else didn't enter because there was a woman involved. There was another participant who decided not to partake. Oh, is it racial?
Starting point is 00:33:31 it's not racial. Excellent. It's where Rachel is joined in. And she's not doing it. Margaret Keane. You may have heard the name. I feel like I know that name as well. You may very well have heard the name.
Starting point is 00:33:45 So what do we know so far? She's petty, but in a fun way where she's petty against oppression. And she's American. Those interesting clues. Okay, she didn't care about the form of, million, but maybe it was already her four million and she was putting it up as the prize if anyone could beat her and no one tried? A clue for you is that this is not happening in a traditional
Starting point is 00:34:13 art-making arena. A four million prize is not going to be on a kids competition, is it? I love it. All the kids were like, we can't go up against Margaret. She's so good. We back out. We're so embarrassed. Well, you get the thing where you get like a design competition that's intended for kids, but like an adult will... Oh, yeah. So that someone else entered but decided not to compete, to which me would be a, well, she seems like the rightful winner anyway,
Starting point is 00:34:43 so there's no point me taking that away from her. Entered might be the wrong phrase. There was another person there who was also meant to paint. Were they hired? Was it like to paint a painting of the president? They were both hired and went, well, I'm not going to do it if she's doing it. She'll be way better.
Starting point is 00:35:00 The other participant did essentially wimp out knowing that she would be better. Was it like a legal thing? Follow that, follow that. Oh! Oh! Is she the most prolific court artist and she's the reason why court artists
Starting point is 00:35:13 look like court artists? No, but I love that. Paint off. Was she proving that she was the artist of something in court? Yep, she was there to prove that she had made the artworks. And then the person who was also brought in to, give it a go when, well, there's no point me even trying she did it.
Starting point is 00:35:34 Oh, four million prize must be like the settlement or something like that. Or she's awarded the terms of the contract that wasn't fulfilled. Exactly. And people might recognise the name because in 2014, the story was turned into Tim Burton's Big Eyes. Big Eyes! So Margaret Keene painted figures with great big eyes, which is what she was known for and her husband at the time started to sell them and told her that he was selling them
Starting point is 00:36:06 under her name but actually he'd been taking the credit for years so after they divorced she took him to court for defamation the judge ordered them both to do a painting Margaret finished hers in less than an hour and he said that he couldn't because he had a bad shoulder
Starting point is 00:36:23 so the jury ruled in her favour and awarded her four million dollars in damages. It was reduced on appeal, but Margaret said, you know, I don't need the money. I just wanted the legal victory. She still took the money anyway, I suppose. It would have been nice. Yeah. I don't need it. I'm having, I'm having it, but I don't need it. Yeah. That's not why I'm here. One last order of business then. The question right at the start of the show, thank you to Jimmy Daly for sending this in. Although he retired in 1974, Hall of Famer Jerry West has appeared on every NBA team since 1969. How?
Starting point is 00:37:01 Any quick guesses from the panel? Matt? Is it the person batting icon of the NBA? Is that his silhouette? Ah, so you are so correct and also so wrong. Wrong sport. I thought baseball. Basketball.
Starting point is 00:37:20 The person doing a dance. Yes, that logo of the NBA. the blue and red logo with the silhouette of the basketball player on it is based on a photo of Jerry West taken by Wen Roberts. The NBA has never officially acknowledged it as him largely to avoid licensing issues. Thank you very much to all of our players. Where can people find you?
Starting point is 00:37:42 What's going on your lives? We will start with Verity. So if you search Verity Babs, I'll come up, summoned in a mirror online, Verity Babs art online, and yes, my book, The History of Art in One Centauri. is available in all sorts of places and please buy it. Rowan.
Starting point is 00:38:00 If you search Rowan Ellis, similarly, I will appear but only online. And if you are particularly interested in hearing me and not seeing me, I co-host the Queer Movie Podcast, which is a podcast about queer films. And Matt. I am no longer the top result for Matt Gray on most platforms. So you need to type in Matt Gray, yes, or go to matg.com for links to everywhere where you'll find me. And if you want to know more about this show, you can do that at lateralcass.com,
Starting point is 00:38:26 which is hopefully still the top result for Lateralcast. We can also send in your own ideas for questions. We are at Lateralcast, basically everywhere, and you can get full video episodes on Spotify. Thank you very much to Matt Gray. Yeah. Rowan Ellis. Hello, bye-bye.
Starting point is 00:38:42 Verity Babs. Thanks. I've been Tom Scott, and that's been Lateral.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.