Law&Crime Sidebar - FBI Hung Up on Jeffrey Epstein Victim Trying to Report Sex Trafficking: Lawsuit
Episode Date: June 2, 2025In a new lawsuit against the US government, Maria Farmer claims that after Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell sexually assaulted her in the 1990s, she tried to report the assault. When she... tried to recount what happened to her, as well as provide first-hand knowledge of a sex trafficking ring, the FBI agent allegedly hung up on her. These new allegations come as the FBI’s deputy director has indicated the agency will release video of the moments leading up to Epstein’s death. Law&Crime’s Jesse Weber discusses it all with civil sex abuse attorney and former prosecutor John Clune.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW: Check out americanfinancing.net/onthecase or call 866-891-3262 to learn how homeowners are saving $800 a month on average. NMLS 182334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org HOST:Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweberLAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokeVideo Editing - Michael Deininger, Christina O'Shea & Jay CruzScript Writing & Producing - Savannah Williamson & Juliana BattagliaGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Wondery Plus subscribers can binge all episodes of this Law and Crimes series ad-free right now.
Join Wondry Plus in the Wondery app Apple Podcasts or Spotify.
Agent Nate Russo returns in Oracle 3, Murder at the Grandview,
the latest installment of the gripping Audible Original series.
When a reunion at an abandoned island hotel turns deadly,
Russo must untangle accident from murder.
But beware, something sinister lurks in the grand.
views shadows. Joshua Jackson delivers a bone-chilling performance in this supernatural thriller that
will keep you on the edge of your seat. Don't let your fears take hold of you as you dive into this
addictive series. Love thrillers with a paranormal twist? The entire Oracle trilogy is available on
Audible. Listen now on Audible. Could we soon see video of the moments leading up to convicted pedophile
Jeffrey Epstein's death in his jail cell? Seems to be the promise from the FBI and at the same time that the
administration is trying to release any information about Epstein that's still hidden, the government
is now facing a scathing lawsuit from one of the first known reported victims. Welcome to Sidebar.
Presented by law and crime, I'm Jesse Weber. Well, as we know, infamous sex offender and millionaire
financier Jeffrey Epstein died in 2019 at the Metropolitan Correction Center in New York City, right?
Prison guards found him dead in his cell after he reportedly fashioned a noose out of a bed sheet,
was found kneeling with a makeshift rope around his neck.
But we also know that Epstein had been arrested for allegedly trafficking minor girls for sex
and apparently been getting away with it for decades.
That's what the allegations were.
And that is where a new lawsuit against the U.S. government comes in.
This is what you might not be familiar with.
Maria Farmer, now in her 50s, claims that she was sexually assaulted by Epstein
and his so-called Madame Galane Maxwell in the 90s.
And Farmer claims when she contacted the FBI about the assault and all of these other
sex crimes that she believed Epstein was collecting, they hung up on her. Now, this is a major
lawsuit, major allegations. I want to bring on right now, John Kloom, civil sex abuse attorney
and former prosecutor, John, thanks so much for taking the time. We will get into the specifics
of the suit. Generally speaking, is it unusual to go after the government for what is essentially
failure to do their jobs? We told you about this crime. We told you this was going on,
and you did nothing about it or you ignored our claims.
Have you seen something like this before?
We've seen it, but it is also what I would say unusual.
I mean, historically, those cases have not been very successful,
but we may have had a little bit of a turning point with the Larry Nasser case,
you know, the former doctor with the U.S. Olympic gymnastics team.
That was a successful lawsuit using the same claims that are being used here.
So it may be something that we're going to see more and more of.
We've got to talk about these recent comments by the FBI leadership.
that they want to release video from inside the MCC, showing essentially the moments before Epstein's death.
So the death has been, as you know, fodder for conspiracy theories for years.
And honestly, for good reason, the details surrounding it have always been a little bit squirrelly.
According to the BOP, Bureau of Prisons, Epstein tried to harm himself in July of 2019, was found
semi-conscious in his cell with injuries to his neck.
He was put on suicide watch.
He was held in an observation cell.
but after six days, was given the all-clear by a doctor to go back to a special housing unit
where he was supposed to have a roommate.
But in August of 2019, Epstein's cellmate was transferred.
No new cellmate was apparently put in his room.
Guards were supposed to check on him every 30 minutes throughout the night,
but the two guards assigned to watch him on August 10th apparently fell asleep.
An investigation found that the two later falsified prison records, okay?
So you can see how there's some questions here.
There was also a lack of cameras.
Two cameras in front of Epstein's cell malfunction.
functioned, according to the BOP, and a third had footage that was reportedly unusable.
Guards found him dead in his cell when they distributed breakfast.
His body was removed from the scene against BOP policy, and photos of his body, as it was found,
were never taken.
So that led to widespread theories over the years that Epstein didn't take his own life, but was instead
murdered to keep him from revealing the secrets of powerful people as he went to trial.
That was the main claim, the main allegation, that has circulated for years.
The Trump administration has promised to release any further file.
associated with Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged sex trafficking ring.
But thus far, most of what's been released was already out in the public domain,
like the phone contact book, flight logs for Epstein's private plane.
But just a few weeks ago, FBI director Cash Patel told a congressional committee that it was
confirmed that Epstein died by suicide.
And then you had FBI deputy director Dan Bongino, who reiterated this on an episode of
Fox and Friends with co-host Lawrence Jones when he questioned him about whether
a video exists showing Epstein's death. And Bonjina replied, no, no, not the actual act,
but the entire MCC Bay. It was only one camera. There's video that when you look at the video
and we will release, that's what's taken a while on this. We're working on cleaning it up to make
sure you have it enhanced and we're going to give the original so you don't think there were
any shenanigans. You're going to see there's no one there but him. John, what's your reaction
to all this? Well, I think like you said, Jesse, there's unlimited reason to be suspicious of exactly
what went down that night and I think there's also a reason to be suspicious of what information
we're actually going to get. You know, the actual video itself, what it depicts, it's obviously
not going to depict the actual act of suicide or homicide, whatever you believe the case to be
about what went down. But it sounds like it's going to be of some limited value. I'm not sure
it's going to really answer our questions. I don't know. It might. I mean, if people see the video,
maybe it'll quash some theories. I'm sure there will be other people who might say, yeah,
but I don't really know.
Was he pressured to do it?
Did someone force him to do it?
It was like Godfather Part 2.
I don't know.
It's going to be very interesting to see.
By the way, no indication from Dan Bongino or the FBI
and whether that video will actually be released and if so, when it will be released.
But people will even dedicate a sidebar to it if it when it happens.
By the way, totally off topic.
I'm just a warning here.
Totally off topic.
But very, very serious issue.
Can we talk for a second about debt?
Yeah, debt doesn't just show up one day.
It builds little by little.
There's credit cards, car loans, medical bills.
Suddenly, you are juggling all of these payments.
You're feeling stuck, but here's the good news.
We got American financing as our sponsor,
and they help homeowners like you every day.
They use your home's equity and roll that high-interest debt
into one simple, affordable payment.
They are saving homeowners an average of $800 a month.
There's no judgment.
There's no pressure, just real solutions that put you back in control.
It starts with one call.
Only takes 10 minutes to get started.
And there are no upfront fees.
So it costs you nothing to find out how much.
you can save. And if you start today, you may be able to delay your next two mortgage payments.
American financing salary-based consultants. They are ready to listen. They are ready to help.
Take back your peace of mind with American financing. Call American financing today at 866
8991 2821. That's 866 896891 2821 or head over to Americanfinancing.net slash
sidebar. But anyway, talk about this new lawsuit. This is why we wanted to have Janjohn.
So this new lawsuit from Maria Farmer who says that she was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, which she filed
in Washington, D.C.'s Federal District Court on May 29th, she's bringing two causes of action
against the United States of America, negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
And the scathing opening paragraph gives you an idea of what exactly Farmer accuses the government
of. Quote, for nearly a quarter of a century, Jeffrey Epstein, the infamous sex trafficker
and abuser of minors and young women, along with his co-conspirators, was able to engage in a
wine-ranging sex trafficking venture because the Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States
Department of Justice, and United States Attorney's offices failed to listen to or protect his sex
trafficked, sexually abused, and sexually exploited victims. And the lawsuit goes on to explain that
she reported Epstein and Maxwell to the FBI in 1996 saying that the two had not only assaulted her,
but also had committed crimes against her younger siblings. So you might be asking, by the way,
who is Maria Farmer? Well, going to jump ahead in the suit.
to where Maria talks about her interactions with the millionaire and his madam.
The complaint reads, in the mid-1990s, Maria, then in her mid-20s, was a burgeoning artist,
having recently graduated from the New York Academy of Art and a master of fine art degree.
With the encouragement and insistence of Peggy Guggenheim, then head of the New York Academy of Art,
Maria met Epstein and sold him one of her paintings for half the amount she had already been offered for the price.
And this is allegedly the piece purchased by Epstein.
It's a depiction of a woman in a dress lying on a couch with a man.
man in white shorts standing in the doorway looking at her.
Maria told the outlet ArtNet News in 2019 that she'd already sold the painting to a buyer in
Germany for $12,000, but she said Guggenheim insisted she sold to Epstein at a discount
because he was, quote, such a great benefactor.
Now, Guggenheim later told ArtNet that she didn't remember that happening.
But going back to the complaint, quote, Epstein and Maxwell bragged to Maria that they were
connected to important, wealthy, influential people who assisted, supported, and protected
them in their endeavors. Epstein hired Maria initially as an art scout for his collection.
The position expanded to receptionist, clerk, and other duties in Epstein's New York City
mansion, an apartment building on East 66th Street where Epstein housed many young girls
along with his office. The complaint talks about the different things in the house that pointed
to allegedly nefarious activities, some of them secrets, some of them out in the open.
Quote, Epstein informerie about the video cameras recording activities at the New York City
mansion. He showed her a media room filled with such recording devices and monitoring
systems. Epstein noted his sophisticated computer equipment, which was in continuous use.
Epstein and Maxwell also bragged about a modeling book that was so valuable, important,
and private that they kept it locked in Epstein safe. This modeling book, which they shared
with others occasionally, contained images of what appeared to be children explicitly
posed in various stages of undress. Maria also saw binders with images of new teens and
young women at Epstein's Palm Beach Mansion. In the summer of 1996, Epstein encouraged Maria to leave
New York City, where she lived, and become a summer artist in residence at his home in New Albany, Ohio.
That residence was part of or adjacent to Les Wexner's estate.
Lex Wexner is the owner of several major retail companies, including Victoria's Secret.
He was close friends with Epstein for years, employed him as his financial advisor.
In recent years, he said he had no idea about Epstein's alleged illicit activities,
claim that Epstein had scammed him out of money.
Go back to the complaint, quote, in or about late July or early August, 1996, during a visit to the Ohio property,
Epstein and Maxwell sexually assaulted Maria.
Maria was stunned and devastated.
Maria also discovered that during their visit,
Epstein and Maxwell had stolen images that Maria maintained and cataloged by number
in her personal private collection for her personal use in her artwork, including nude images
of two minor siblings.
By the way, one of those siblings, Annie Farmer, has spoken publicly in the past about what
she says Epstein did to her and testified during Galane Maxwell's federal trial.
Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking, currently serving a 20-year prison sentence.
Epstein and Maxwell reminded Maria that they were connected to important and influential people.
They warned her that bad things would happen to her if she did or said anything.
Maxwell directed Maria to keep quiet and threaten to torture artwork, the building where she was living, and all the people in it.
Maxwell told Maria that she and Epstein could and would destroy her career.
Maria believed that they had the power to do so and much more.
John, talk to me about this.
Talk to me about these recordings, this apparent modeling book, you know, the FBI searched the man.
mansion in New York after Epstein's arrest.
Obviously, none of that evidence has been released to the public, although Attorney
General Pam Bondi did say recently that the FBI is making its way through thousands
of alleged child sexual abuse videos found in Epstein's possession.
What are you taking away from this?
I mean, from what the complaint says, there's a tremendous amount of what should be evidence
of the sexual abuse of the plaintiff in this case.
And so for the actual lawsuit itself, it's going to depend on what do the FBI do and what
they not do with this information to determine whether or not they're going to have liability.
But at least from what we were in the complaint, there should be a substantial amount of evidence
and what the FBI did with that is going to be the core of the case.
But the first part of a trial would have to be that she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein
and was facilitated by Galane Maxwell, right? Like that, if this goes to trial, that's got to be
the first half of this case, right? That's right. And, you know, in these types of cases
where you have, like, potential institutional liability, like against the FBI, it is kind of
kind of a hard defense for the FBI to mount to suggest that Maria was not a victim of sexual
assault. So although it is required that they show that she was a victim of this kind of abuse,
I don't know that that's where the FBI is going to play their cards. Do they stipulate? Do they
stipulate and say, listen, we are stipulating she was sexually abused and then you move on to
the second part of the trial. And, you know, in openings at a trial, you know, both sides say,
yes, she was sexually abused by Elaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, even though, right, there wasn't
a trial with respect to that specific incident regarding Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, I guess they
could do that. They could stipulate. They could do that. And one of the benefits to doing that
is you cut off at least some of the really sympathetic evidence that might otherwise be presented to
a jury. So unless they had a particularly good defense on that point or they wanted to at least
cast some shade, which you'd hope the FBI and Department of Justice wouldn't do, but some shade
on the plaintiff, it might make some sense to at least consider stipulating and then there'd be
less of a focus on the horrific of abuse. So let's talk about the FBI for a second. So Maria claims
that she tried to report her assault to the FBI in 1996. And according to the lawsuit, she told them
what had happened to her, as well as what she knew about his alleged sexual abuse and trafficking
of young girls. She claimed she told them about his possession, production, distribution of child
sexual abuse material, including nude photos of her two siblings. The lawsuit states, the FBI,
in violation of its mandatory obligations under regulations and DOJ policies, chose to do
absolutely nothing. In fact, an FBI agent taking Maria's call hung up on her, and no one at the
FBI attempted to follow up with her or pursue her valid and serious allegations, most of which
continued for many years, if not decades, with wide-ranging tragic consequences. As a result,
Epstein and others working with him were able to threaten bodily
harmed to Maria and her family for decades, forcing her to relocate many times and even change
her name. In the meantime, Epstein exponentially multiplied his sexual abuse, exploitation, and
trafficking of girls and young women. To date, federal authorities have refused or ignored
Maria's request to commence an investigation of these serious unresolved allegations. They have also
flatly denied Maria's efforts to address the issues outside of litigation. In so doing,
defendant left Maria with no choice but to commence this lawsuit. Had the United States
states paid attention to Maria in 1996 and 2006 and to innumerable other victims over the years
and complied with their mandatory duties rather than succumb to the dictates of a well-connected
billionaire sex trafficker and his high-powered legal team. Epstein's sex trafficking,
sexual abuse, and child pornography crimes could have been stopped soon after they began,
and countless young women and girls would have been spared more than a quarter of a century
of unchecked sexual abuse and exploitation. So, John, a lot of questions I have here. What could
a defense from the government here. What could they say either this didn't happen? This is totally
not true or there's a reason for why we didn't follow up. There's a couple of things that they'll
probably want to focus on. One of them is, you know, you see in the complaint these constant
references to a non-discretionary duty. Generally speaking, the law enforcement is not liable just
because they did a bad job. And when it comes to the federal courts claim act, it has to be
some sort of duty that they violated that they were required to do. If they're
They just didn't do their job well enough, that's not going to be a basis for liability.
So that's one thing that they can say is, look, maybe we didn't do everything we could have,
but this was not a mandatory duty that we had.
This was just discretionary, and you can disagree with us or agree with us,
but that makes us not liable.
So that's one of the key things that they'll initially focus on.
And then the other thing they'll do is they will have a laundry list of things that they did in fact do
and come up with reasons why their investigation stalled out.
Maybe they'll be legitimate.
Maybe they won't be legitimate, but I would fully expect them to have a long list of the history of the investigation to try to show that they did do the things that they were required to do, but the investigation was just frustrated for one reason or another.
They can't settle this, right? If they settle this, does that look like acknowledgement of the validity of her claims?
It does look like that, but they absolutely can settle it. I mean, they settled the Larry Nassar case for $139 million.
It's unclear what happened to the previous lawsuit against them that was dismissed.
Was it last year involving the Epstein other victims?
They certainly can settle it, but it does have that implication that they are responsible.
Well, I'll tell you this.
This lawsuit lays out the various laws that Maria claims the FBI broke by not taking her seriously,
including its own rules from the manual for investigative operations and guidelines.
So the suit points out that the FBI had put particular emphasis.
on catching child predators and saving children, especially when they're allegations of a trafficking
ring. But Maria says the FBI completely dropped the ball when it came to Epstein.
The lawsuit actually provides kind of relevant information connected to the FBI's mission
to investigate crimes and protect victims of violent crimes. The FBI's requirement to investigate
obscene matter cases and recognition that such cases often involve child sexual abuse.
The United States prioritization of reporting, investigation, and prosecution of sex crimes
against children, the FBI's mandatory reporting obligation to report child sex abuse and
exploitation to law enforcement as per statute and guidelines, and the FBI requirements to
notify victims regarding criminal investigations and the availability of victim services,
including protection from intimidation and harassment. So John, you also wonder, like,
is it a no-brainer that if someone called saying not only did they have inside information
about a trafficking scheme, but they themselves had been a victim of sexual assault by the
ringleader, you have to investigate. I mean, citing these different positions,
they're getting very, very specific and very granular about what the FBI allegedly failed to do.
Yeah, it's interesting.
It's such a strongly worded complaint in regards to the nondiscretionary factor that it almost borders between negligence and conspiracy at times when you read some of the language in the complaint.
But all that language goes back to the same issue, that they need to be able to establish that the agency of the FBI was required by law,
by their policy to do this investigation, not just that they did a bad job.
Lawsuit even provides a snippet of this old journal entry, ledgely written by Maria, and it appears
to back up her claims.
It reads, quote, the evil Jay Epstein and Maxwell tried to ruin my life, Annie's life, and redacted.
They molested all of us in various ways and made us all feel defiled, redacted.
I had to turn them into the FBI.
Now, according to Maria, she first contacted the New York City Police Department to lay
out her allegations, including that Epstein had allegedly terrorized her, threatened to burn down
her apartment building. And she claims the NYPD told her they could only help with the potential
arson aspects of the case and told her to contact the FBI. So she says she tried to explain
this to the FBI, but they hung up on her. John, does this all make sense to you about what would have
happened? I mean, the NYPD saying you got to go to the FBI and, you know, FBI not taking her
allegations seriously? I mean, would a call like this have been taken more seriously in 2025 if
true? I'll tell you what's odd about that is it is unusual that you call a law enforcement
agency and they're going to they're going to take some piece of the investigation and then say,
well, if you want the rest that's investigated, you've got to call somebody else. Law enforcement
works together. NYPD works with the FBI all day long every day. So that part is a little
unusual to me that they would just refer her to the FBI instead of actually making the contact
and have some sort of joint investigation into the situation. So that part, I think,
think is unusual. But other than that, it's that, you know, the way this is laid out in the
complaint that that journal entry that you mentioned, it's a very well laid out complaint and
does not look good for the FBI. You know, it's interesting, nearly a decade after Maria
says she reported Epstein and Maxwell. This woman calls the Palm Beach Police Department to report
that her 14-year-old stepdaughter had been taken to Epstein's mansion by an older girl. And the
woman claims that this team was told to strip, give Epstein a massage. And at the end of the encounter,
she was given $300. The police started an investigation. And despite uncovering details about
Epstein's alleged crimes from multiple victims, only two testified before a grand jury.
And Epstein was indicted for solicitation of a prostitute and procuring a minor for prostitution.
He ended up pleading guilty in what's been called this sweetheart deal where he spent some time
in prison but was given daily work release. In exchange, he wasn't charged at a federal level.
The Palm Beach police unhappy with the prosecution's handling of the case that contacted the FBI.
The agency started an investigation.
federally indicted in 2007. Again, an even sweeter deal, the U.S. attorney for the Southern
District of Florida agreed to a secret non-prosecution agreement, also called an MPA, and it granted
Epstein potentially co-conspirators immunity from prosecution in Florida. And that puts the breaks
on the FBI investigation. But Maria says when the investigation was still ongoing, FBI
agents showed up unannounced to her home to follow up on her initial report. And she says,
that confirms that there was some kind of report on the books that identified her as a prior
complainant. So why were they just now looking into it 10 years later? If that timeline's
accurate, that helps her claims, right, John? Yeah, it absolutely does. And the complaint does a good
job laying that out. I mean, I think that, you know, with what we know now, with the benefit of
hindsight, you know, we can look back at that the non-prosecution agreement and the way that
whole initial criminal case was handled. It seems pretty outrageous. It would,
be good to know exactly what U.S. Attorney's Office had at that time, but certainly read the
complaint and go by what's in the complaint. It looks pretty bad. Yeah, and the lawsuit says Maria
reached out again to the FBI, the U.S. Attorney's Office, Inspector General, asking for an
investigation into all of these apparent failures. It reads, quote, in a letter dated May 11,
23, the Office of the Inspector General advised Maria that while the allegations raised were
concerning, they had other priorities right now, so could not further assess Maria's allegations
until later on December 2nd, 2024, some 18 months after Maria's May 2nd,
2023 letter raising her concerns and asking for an investigation.
DOJ explained in a letter that the FBI's internal affairs section initial processing unit
had carefully reviewed Maria's allegations, did not initiate investigation, and could not reveal
specifics, but IAS mandated action be taken to address the concerns raised in your complaint.
The FBI concluded the United States Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General
IAS slash IPU considers your complaint addressed. What does that mean, John?
That's a great question.
And these more information from the FBI.
It doesn't make a lot of sense to say that they have other priorities.
You know, if child sex trafficking is not high up on the list of priorities,
what is on their list of priorities.
But what they mean, what they mean, I can only guess at it.
So we have to see what would they say when we get into the discovery phase of this case.
Yeah, and Maria says she's exhausted all the.
options to her grievances out of court. She's filed the lawsuit to get answers, and at the
end of the lawsuit reads, Maria respectfully requests that the court enter judgment in her favor
and against the United States, awarding the following to Maria, compensatory, consequential,
general, and nominal damages, as well as all other available damages against the United States
in an amount to be determined at trial. The costs and disbursements of the action, along with
reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, pre- and post-judgment interest at the maximum
legal rate and such other and further relief as it deems just and proper john two questions for you
what exactly could she receive at a trial if she gets a favorable verdict or maybe even a settlement
what she could be looking at and two you think she's got a solid case so taking me in reverse
order i do think she has a solid case i mean if if her attorneys can prove half of what they put in
the complaint and i know these lawyers they're good lawyers then she's going to have a very solid
case uh in regards to what she could actually recover i mean you're looking at something
that is easily in the multiple seven figures
as a potential settlement claim.
And if this were to get to a jury,
there's really two things that we look at for damages.
What is the actual impact of this to the individual,
to Maria?
And it's going to be a large, large number.
But the second thing is how outrage is the jury going to be
at the FBI based on what facts come out in discovery?
So that second part will have to wait and see.
But if they've got the goods that they've put in the complaint,
this could easily be something in a large eight-figure jury verdict.
And look, Maria Farmer, she's still making art.
2020 started working on a series of paintings and drawings called the Survivors Project,
which consists of portraits of survivors of Epstein's abuse.
Just a really, really sad set of allegations.
We'll keep a careful eye on it, see how it develops.
And again, if there's any video that releases of Epstein in the MCC,
maybe we'll dedicate a sidebar to this.
Maybe we'll get John Clune back and talk more about it.
John Clune, thanks so much for taking the time.
Appreciate it.
You bad, Jesse. Thanks.
And that's all we have for you right now here on Sidebar.
everybody. Thank you so much for joining us. And as always, please subscribe on YouTube,
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you should get your podcasts. I'm Jesse Weber. I'll speak to you next time.