Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Chief Justice Throws Entire SCOTUS Under Bus in Report

Episode Date: January 5, 2026

A feckless Chief Justice who is obviously trying to avoid being attacked by his favorite president Trump, issued a worthless “Final Report” on this past year at the Judiciary, filled with misstatements, omissions and misleading “statistics”. Missing from the report? Any mention of Trump’s attacks on the Judiciary, Judges, Lawyers and Law Firms, the violence threatened against them, the use of rogue US Attorneys to go after Trump’s political enemies, the corruption of the DOJ, the lack of ethics at the Supreme Court, and the battle that has spilled into the open between the lower federal trial courts and the Supreme Court, or the Court being complicit with Trump through the use of the “shadow docket” to allow back door appeals to side with Trump 86% of the time. Michael Popok blows apart the Report and its attempt to wrap Roberts and judges in a flag to fool the American people into believing that the Third Branch hasn’t been captured by MAGA and Trump. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast⁠ Legal AF: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af⁠ MissTrial: ⁠https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial⁠ The PoliticsGirl Podcast: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast⁠ Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan⁠ Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen⁠ The Weekend Show: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show⁠ Burn the Boats: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats⁠ Majority 54: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54⁠ Political Beatdown: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown⁠ On Democracy with FP Wellman: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman⁠ Uncovered: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Imagine if today was the day your idea changed someone's life. Imagine if you could help someone pay for college. Help your community build a new playground or help a child make it to that dream competition. With GoFundMe, it's all possible. GoFundMe is the world's number one fundraising platform trusted by over 190 million people. Every week, ordinary people meet their goals and do extraordinary things.

Your ideas matter. GoFundMe isn't just for emergencies. Want to raise money for your kids' soccer team or raise funds for a small business, a creative project or event? GoFundMe helps you turn ideas into reality. And help adds up. Fundraisers you start for someone else? Raise up to five times more.

So think right now. Who could use your help? Change rarely comes from waiting. It comes from someone deciding, today I'll start. Don't wait for someone else to bring change. Today, start your fundraiser in just minutes at gofundme.com. That's gofund me.com to start your fundraiser.

Gofund me.com. This is a commercial message brought to you I go fund me. Fresh off the press, as we've got Chief Justice Roberts' final retort to Donald Trump to end the year, his final report about the third branch, the judiciary. And boy, does he take on Donald Trump. Just what you would expect, folks, he goes after Donald Trump for his lawlessness, for his capture of the Department of Justice, for his corruption, his defiance of judges, his attack on individual judges leading to their getting death threats, the attack on the rule of law, the attack The attack on lawyers and law firms and unpopular causes to try to rein him in.

Yeah, it does nothing of the sort. It's seven pages of complete and utter pablum. It could have been written by ChatGBT. If your seventh grade social studies student in your life had written this, you would tell him or her to go back to the drawing board. I'm Michael Popak with the final report by John Roberts. You know you're in trouble when half of the first page, is just a photo of the Independence Hall where the Declaration of Independence and

other things were signed. And that's how we kick it off. Like he's some sort of Ken Burns documentarian giving you a fourth grade version of how the Declaration and the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and how they're different, wrapping himself in a flag devoting one paragraph, this sounds familiar, to actually talking about the third branch. it's only a pep talk, get in there, you've got an oath, do your job. Are we ready, everybody? Everything else that you would want and expect in a reasonable, authentic report is missing.

No mention on the attack of the judiciary. No mention about the open warfare between the district courts and the Supreme Court, between the appellate court and the appellate court and the Supreme Court about the use of the shadow docket. There's no mention of the shadow docket or emergency docket at all. In fact, he cooks the books on his statistics that are put in the back of his report to prove the old saying, you know, there's three types of lies, lies, damn lies, and statistics. I pull it all together for you right here. Happy New Year, Midas Touch, network. We're bigger, stronger with you than ever in 2020. 26, we're going to need to be, because you see what the feckless, weak judiciary is doing about it. 2025, year-end report on the federal judiciary comes out.

I'm one of the first readers of it on Jan 1. Can't wait to get my hands on it. In the past, John Roberts was at least a bit more robust, a bit more willing to take on Donald Trump. A couple of veiled references to something that Donald Trump had did or a case before the court. not this time. Now it's about Thomas Payne and common sense and the Declaration of Independence versus the Constitution. That's it. And I got news for him. You obviously haven't read common sense, probably the most influential pamphlet in history written at or around the time of our founding by Thomas Payne. Because what Thomas Payne would say about John Roberts and the Supreme

Court would go something like this. The Supreme Court, like the monarchists that we left, believe through title, they have superior knowledge and intellect to be able to tell the rest of us what to do, and they are wrong. He would be a critic of John Roberts, not a fan, and of this United States Supreme Court. And this goes on for most of the seven pages. That's it, of John Roberts. We get that. We get pictures of Thomas Paine. We get pictures of the Declaration of Independence. This is called make-weight. Again, if your seventh grade or younger social studies or history student gave you this to turn in as a report as a parent to review, you tell them to start all over again. All right, we go through the whole and then things that he just misses the irony

of like the irony that he's relying so heavily on Thomas Payne and Thomas Payne would hate John Roberts and what the Maga Supreme Court has done. He says on page 5, for instance, that the concrete provisions of the 1787 Constitution fell short of honoring the abstract principles set forth in the 1776 Declaration regarding liberty and equality. Well, you're doing a good job at screwing up liberty and equality and your rulings, why don't you try to actually move towards the aspirations of the Declaration of Independence in the way that you rule? But of course, that's lost on him. Here's the one, all right, one and a half paragraphs on page seven. And I'll tell you what's missing. Those of us in the third branch must continue to decide the cases before us according to our oath,

doing equal right to the poor and the rich. Is that what we're watching? Equality before the court, poor and rich, and performing all of our duties faithfully and impartially under the Constitution and the laws of the United States. Then he quotes Calvin Coolidge with the following quote, amid all the clash of conflicting interests, amid all the welter of partisan politics, every American can turn for solace and consolation to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States with the assurance and confidence that those two great charters of freedom and justice

remain firm and unshaken. And this is how he ends it. This is commentary. True then, true now. True, well, just write true dat. I have an honor of being a judge. I mean, this is just, you know, you just want to throw up in your mouth.

What's missing? All right, let's cap off this year. Open warfare between the district court judges. who are ruling in favor of democracy and justice and the rule of law more than 95% of the time in the more than 400 cases before them brought to rein in a lawless Department of Justice in Donald Trump. At war with the United States Supreme Court, who is not backing the district court judges

and is ruling in favor of Donald Trump on the emergency docket 86% of the time. The appellate courts caught in the middle, also at war with the United States Supreme Court in a way I've never seen in 35 years of practice. and probably in our history. How about that? How about Donald Trump's destabilization of the rule of law and his flouting the rules

and undermining our justice system and the third branch through his frequent and constant open defiance of court orders? He's already been found in criminal improbable. The Justice Department has been found, pardon me. The Justice Department has been found improbable criminal contempt and the administration by one judge. They're about to get another case tossed this year for vindictive prosecution in Tennessee. You've got the attacks on individual judges.

You have a violence against judges, death threats, doxing. Where's that in the report? Where is Donald Trump's capture of the independence of the Department of Justice and corruption of the Department of Justice and what it does to our justice system. The fact that grand juries are rejecting this justice system, this Department of Justice, because they have no faith in it and is not returning indictments. Juries are doing the same thing. Judges who do not give the Department of Justice the assumption or presumption of regularity because nothing is normal the Department of Justice. Where is that? Where is a discussion about ethics at the United States Supreme Court level? as Clarence Thomas and the MAGA-6 continue to line their pockets with money from their donors and trips from their donors.

Where is that? Nowhere. How about the use of, not just the use of the emergency shadow docket to bring on dozens and dozens of cases, which he conveniently leaves out, John Roberts, in this report from his statistics. But the fact that the Supreme Court MAGASIX is complicit in empowering, over-imbinger, empowering the presidency under Donald Trump to defeat the other two branches through the use of the shadow docket, no mention. Instead, I got to be subjected to a sophomoric, immature, third grader, fourth grader interpretation of American history like he fell asleep during Ken Burns' American

Revolution on PBS recently. Or maybe he left his chat GBT on and that's what came out. Maybe. Let me go to the statistics that he puts to the back. Again, without any commentary and he leaves out big parts of it, let's start with his overview of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court filings. He starts with sort of bragging about the lower amount of cases that have been filed at the court.

So here on page 8 of 10, he puts up a chart about Supreme Court cases argued by term. When I graduated law school, they were doing about 100 cases a year out of tens of thousands of cases that are filed every year. Now he says it's down to 73 cases this past year. It's a decrease of 9% everybody. Okay, that's because you took 20 cases,

on the emergency docket that are not reflected in the stats. These are just Supreme Court cases argued. That means oral argument. That's code word for actual proper writ of certiorari appeals. You know what I mean? Three briefs, oral argument, deliberation, and an opinion. You know, the old-fashioned way, the way we expect our decisions. and then a 50 or 100-page opinion with dissents and concurrences that can guide the lower courts

instead of one paragraph coming out of a shadow docket and then claiming that that is precedent to go bash district court judges. You didn't follow our precedent. And district court judges like Judge Young in Massachusetts are saying, that one paragraph was your precedent? What kind of guidance is that? But because he slyly uses the word Supreme Court cases argued, he gets to cut off all the shadow docket. Doesn't mention the shadow docket, doesn't mention it at all, or their complicity in working with the Trump administration effectively to do an end run around and come in the back door to the Supreme Court on a short track,

short circuit, no oral argument, you know, just go to your political corners and make a vote. No mention. He then talks about the increase in certain courts, of course, under the Trump administration. We have over 400 cases filed against the Trump administration. Is there any wonder that cases about administrative agencies and all other, like constitutions, is up 12% and 16%. That's the Trump effect, don't you think? No mention of it. On criminal cases, listen to this. Listen to this. that in criminal cases immigration criminal immigration up 30 almost 30 percent drugs are down firearms are flat violent crime is flat justice system attacks down 9 percent but 27 percent up on immigration who paid for this who's paying for this who voted for this but this

this um pablum issued by Roberts tells you everything you need to know that he's completely, it's not only that he's given up, because that suggests that he's been in opposition to Donald Trump. He's not an opposition to Donald Trump. He has been, since the moment he got on to that court and then got the numbers with the additional, bought and paid for members of the Supreme Court

by lobby groups like the gun lobby and the abortion lobby, anti-abortion lobby, he finally got the numbers to reshape the court in his image. And all he's wanted to do is, power, the presidency, and put it above the other branches, including the judiciary. And that if any other branch is going to get empowered, it's going to be his branch, and Congress is going to be a doormat. That's the legacy, among other things, of John Roberts, the worst chief justice in our history. He will go down that way. The destruction of precedent and stare decisis,

the destruction of a woman's right to choose, ripping out a constitutional right, first time in our history that a constitutional right once given by the Supreme Court was taken away in the Dobbs decision about a woman's right to choose. The complete destruction of the separation between church and state in ruling after ruling after ruling, the allowing the completely unauthorized, unconstitutional reshaping of the relationship between the executive branch, the presidency, the federal government, and the U.S. people, I mean, I could go on. All that conveniently missed. Instead, I've got to hear, this is how he starts his thing. I'll end it this way. I'll end where he starts. Page 1. 250 years ago this week, a recent immigrant to Britain's North American colonies put the finishing touches on a manuscript in which he hoped to express plain truths about his newly adopted home. This is the third grader's version of Thomas Maine Common Sense. Oh, I'm Michael Pope. I'm glad you're here. Take a minute. Come over to LegalAF Substack. Hit the free subscribe button. And thank you all for helping us build our LegalAF Substack. We ran a sale over the holidays.

Almost 2,000 people joined us. Come over to LegalAF Substack. That's where independent media is living. That's where you can support us. Become a paid member for about seven bucks a month. That keeps us on the air. So until my next report, I'm Michael Popak. Can't get your fill of Legal AF. Me neither. That's why we formed the legal AF substack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or an oral argument, come over to the substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there, including a daily roundup that I do call, wait for it, morning A.F. What else?

All the other contributors from legal A.F are there as well. We got some new reporting. We got interviews. We got ad-free versions of the podcast and hot takes where legal A.F on substack. Come over now to free subscribe.