Legal AF by MeidasTouch - DONALD TRUMP INDICTED IN WASHINGTON D.C. (Legal AF x Political Beatdown Crossover Episode)

Episode Date: August 2, 2023

On this special live coverage, Michael Cohen and Ben Meiselas are joined by Karen Friendman Angifilo and Michael Popok for live coverage of Donald Trump's indictment by a federal grand jury in Washington D.C.   Remember to subscribe to ALL the Meidas Media Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://pod.link/1510240831 Legal AF: https://pod.link/1580828595 The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://pod.link/1595408601 The Influence Continuum: https://pod.link/1603773245 Kremlin File: https://pod.link/1575837599 Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://pod.link/1530639447 The Weekend Show: https://pod.link/1612691018 The Tony Michaels Podcast: https://pod.link/1561049560 American Psyop: https://pod.link/1652143101 Burn the Boats: https://pod.link/1485464343 Majority 54: https://pod.link/1309354521 Political Beatdown: https://pod.link/1669634407 Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://pod.link/1676844320 MAGA Uncovered: https://pod.link/1690214260 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

an indictment was just handed up before the magistrate judge by assistant United States attorney Molly Gaston, the grand jury four person connected to the January 6th grand jury was in court when it was handed up the indictment will be filed and sealed we believe this is the indictment. That special counsel Jack Smith Smith, has just filed that a grand jury has just voted on. The indictment we believe has just been secure just moments ago, the four-person handing it to the judge. This would be another indictment of Donald Trump

for engaging in criminal conduct regarding the 2020 election and the January 6th insurrection. Also, potential criminal conduct regarding the 2020 election and the January 6th insurrection, also potential criminal conduct regarding his political action organizations as well. As soon as this indictment is unsealed, we will bring that to you. But I got chills talking about that, Michael Cohen, sharing this historic moment with you, with the brigators and we're're gonna bring in some legal analyst and just a bit and keep the coverage going, but no better person to get an immediate reaction

from than you, Michael Cohen, who has endured years and years of this. What is your immediate reaction to hearing this live on political beatdown? Well, again, it goes right back to what I was saying that I'm saddened for the country, hearing this live on political beatdown. Well, again, it goes right back to what I was saying that I'm saddened for the country and it's for that reason that the two fingers salute

goes to the former president and fuck you for putting the country through this. Really, fuck you for doing the things that you continue to do day in and day out. Take the responsibility on it, right? Instead of having your minions come out there, stop attacking people like Jack Smith, the guy that guy is doing his job. And the fact that you don't like the job that he's doing doesn't mean that he's deranged or corrupt in the Biden, you know, family, you know, and so on. There has not been a single shred of evidence

that anyone of your people have produced. And remember, the guy who was looking into the Biden scenario happens to be a holdover from the Trump administration. So you gotta stop this shit. It is damaging our country. It is making neighbor, feud with neighbor. It is making neighbor, feud with neighbor. It's making state, feud with state. We're allowing their country to, you know,

to run them up simply so that they can follow into the nonsensical statements of Donald Trump, the Alina Habas, and all of these sycophantic lawyers, right? Who said that they're doing good, right? But they're not. What they're doing is they're just regurgitating Donald's bullshit so that they keep the money flowing. Look, one of the things that's crazy is right after Trump made the, again, announcement

that he was going through and died, or that he got the target letter. What goes out? 50 different text messages to everybody, whether it's from his kids, whether it's from staff, whether it's from him, dear Patriot, dear American, you know, dear Maga, all of a sudden, you know, he's again, grifting for the money, and he's not grifting for the money in order to defend them.

It's where he lies, and he just lies to them and say, oh, I'm doing this for you. I'm putting my biggest body in front of the Democrats to protect you. That's not true, right? In fact, he's only looking out to protect one person and one person only. And that is himself and you, you fools, are out there doing what?

You are paying for his defense of himself. So it's time that we smarten up as a country. And again, it's why how many times in every single one of these episodes on political beat down, I say to our brigators, it is essential that we ensure that we are fully registered to vote come 2024, that I cannot wait for us to have this rally together for all of us to have one unified voice against autocracy in favor of democracy. Let's try to take not just the House and the Senate and the White House, I've been fully democratic so that we can actually get things done that benefit all Americans, not just Democrats, all Americans.

Want to give the Brigadier's all the breaking news as we learn about it, we will be learning about it together. Here is what we are learning. First, this comes from Josh Gerstein, breaking a grand jury, just returned an indictment against a defendant who was not identified publicly even by initials or grand jury number was put under seal. A prosecutor who handles the January 6th matter, criminally investigating Donald Trump before that grand jury, Molly Gaston submitted what is believed to be a Trump indictment.

Here is an update, Molly Gaston, this from Kyle Chania, Politico. Molly Gaston, a prosecutor, detailed to the Special Counsel, handed up a single sealed indictment and received permission to issue a summons that just happened moments ago, no names or initials provided Kyle Cheney also reports. Court is now closed. We may have to wait for Trump to get the summons and hop on his social media platform to learn what happened. This from Jim Acosta at CNN, the federal grand jury hearing evidence and special counsel, Jack Smith's investigation

into efforts to overturn the 2020 election, handed up an indictment in the federal courthouse in Washington, DC. And here's the post that Donald Trump made moments ago. Let's pull this up, salty what Donald Trump said when we have it. But Donald Trump said that he is expecting to be indicted at 5 p.m. Eastern. That is what is coming from Donald Trump's social media platform. So that is all of the information.

We have, if there is a press conference, there it is right there by salty pulling it up. I hear Jack Smith is going to indict me at 5 p.m. I'm just going to take away all the other stupid and idiotic stuff that he writes on that social media post. Want to remind everybody as well about the new MidasTouch website, Midasestouch.com. We're going to be announcing in the coming week some of the top editors, some of the top reporters who are going to be working for Midestouch.com. And that's all made possible thanks to you, the Brigators, thanks to the Midest Mighty,

everybody who's contributed memberships to the Midest Touch Network has allowed us to expand. Midestouch.com for all breaking news. It's going to complement what we're doing here on YouTube, Michael Cohen, as we're learning more. And again, we'll break to a press conference the moment we hear about it, the moment we learn more. But from all indications, the indictment has been handed down

against Donald Trump for trying to overthrow the 2020 election. This is a day of accountability, but to your point, Cohen, as well. It is also very, very, very distressing that this even exists and that the Republican party has done this. Sure, but then one of the bigger problems that's here is this is only one part of the corrupt behavior that occurred during the Trump administration. You know, I talk about my book Revenge and I ask everyone to please go to Amazon by the book. Why? I want you to understand what Revenge is all about. Revenge is Donald Trump weaponizing.

And let me say this again because it's a word that Donald Trump throws out every single day, multiple times a day in posts on television and wherever else any of his accolades are in itself, you know, are in a position to spew it. My book Revenge, How Donald Trump Weaponized, the United States Department of Justice against his critics.

Do I have to go any further than go back to the term that we talked about, you know, 45 minutes or so ago? Deflection. Donald Trump knew exactly what he was doing when he was, when it was his administration and he believes that he's going to be able to deflect away from his culpability so that, you know, it's now on the Biden administration,

despite the fact that the Biden administration is not weaponized. Jack Smith doesn't work for Joe Biden. You know who worked for Donald Trump? Bill Barr. And if you see the most corrupt prosecution against the United States citizen in the history of our country and why I tell people, it is so imperative that you read this book. It is imperative because I don't want to see it happen to another American. This never should have happened to any American. In fact, and I say this often,

they made me the very first political prisoner held by my own country because I refused to waive my first amendment constitutional right. Well, what country are we living? This isn't North Korea, this isn't Saudi Arabia, this isn't Russia, like where they jailed Navalny because he's a critic of the President Putin. This is the United States of America.

You have your God-given constitutional right well not under a Trump administration. And Donald Trump, as I have said over and over and over again, and these indictments are proving it, Donald Trump is the single greatest threat to America's democracy that has ever existed. And we cannot, not for a split second, let our guard down because this cockroach will end up infesting our entire country with the ideology of fascism and autocracy. And we just can't allow it to happen.

As we wait. As we wait for more information about what we believe to have been the new indictment that was just brought against Donald Trump, I will point out that there was another indictment handed down in Michigan, where the former MAGA Attorney General candidate, Matt DePierno, and the ex-state MAGA representative, Dare Rendon, are now facing criminal charges for their alleged roles in an effort to access Michigan voting machines after the 2020 presidential election. This is being reported by the Detroit News support local news.

A special prosecutor confirmed in a statement earlier that the continued criminal investigation into the tampering of vote tabulators is ongoing and not over quote. The charging decision was the result of a thorough decision making process by an independent citizens grand jury. It should not shock you, Michael Cohen, that this was the MAGA Republican candidate. Matt Deperno was being pushed by Donald Trump, by all of the kind of MAGA leadership, and he was going to then attack all of the people in the pro-democracy community. And so it is a good day for justice there in Michigan. Now all eyes turn to Washington, DC, as the political beat down live broadcast right now

is one of the top news broadcasts in all of America. That is not special counsel, Jack Smith, on the screen for those confused. That is not special counsel Jack Smith on the screen for those confused. That is what C. Span is playing right now. But as soon as the press conference occurs, we will take you live. Salty, you want to do one more sound check right there just to make sure that everything sounds perfect. They are employed, but they beautiful salty. Everybody throw those salty emojis. Also, I got a Ben emoji yesterday, thanks to the Midas Mighty,

hitting 400 memberships by hitting that dollar sign on the YouTube page. Thank you everybody for unlocking the Ben emoji. It was funny. I certainly appreciate it as well. So that's big news coming out for Michigan. You mentioned before we went to break, and as we wait for this indictment, you mentioned the cult followers who showed up at this Trump event.

And this is what it means to be a modern day Republican. That is so shocking to say, Michael Cohen, these are the people that Donald Trump is grifting off of to pay his legal bills, $1, $5, $10. But it's a salty. You got to prepare. Oh, man. But these are the people that that was genius. But here, I want to show, I want to show you this one. I want to show you this one, Cohen. This is a woman who was at the Trump rally saying that, hey, she's proud to be in a, she's, she's proud to be in a cult. Here, play this, play this, play this.

I am the huge Trump supporter. And I was just told yesterday that I was part of a cult and I'm damn proud of it. I am. But like does he, he's part of us. He's part of us. He truly is. And the things that the

liberals are putting his family through is horrendous. Oh, yeah. Oh, yes. He's part of you. Right. Why don't you invite Donald over for a beer to sit at your, you know, to sit outside of your of your double wide?

I mean, so stupid. Does she not understand that Donald wouldn't cross the street to piss on her if she was on fire? I mean, they create this image of him like these fake NFTs of Donald as a superhero, as a cowboy, as a special secret agent or something like that. I mean, that's not who he is. And the funny thing is none of them know him.

Zero. All they hear is when he gets up there or when he sends him a text message, I'm protecting you. Really? What they're putting Donald and his family through? What do you think Donald has put me in my family through? What do you think he's going to put you and your family through if God forbid a million times that he somehow manages to recapture the White House?

There is a list of thousands, I don't even know how many thousands of people on his hit list on his enemies list, and he will spend four years, if not more, trying to figure out two things. The first is how to remain president for the rest of his natural life, and how to get back it, each and every person, seriously, times ten, that's on that list. That's what this country is going to end up becoming. Michael Cohen, we're going to be joined shortly by Karen Friedman, AgniFalo, a co-host

of Legal AF. She used to be the number two in the Manhattan District Attorney's office. So she's going to come with incredible insight. We also have Michael Popak, who's going to be joining us soon. This just in former president Donald Trump has been informed. He has been indicted by a federal grand jury regarding the special counsel's probe into Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Sources with direct knowledge tell ABC news. Let me repeat that one more time. Former President Trump has been informed just moments ago

that he has been indicted by a federal grand jury regarding the special counsel's probe into Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election. As we shift to the second hour of this historic broadcast and we said when we went live, we get good information here. We said it could be happening in minutes when no one else was saying that it was going

to be happening in minutes. We have our very, very reliable sources. We will be joined in the second hour by top legal analyst, Michael Popock, Karen Friedman, Agnifalo, and others. But as we hit this second hour of our broadcast, people want to hear from you, Michael Cohen, about this historic news.

Donald Trump has been informed. He has been indicted again this time in Washington, D.C. for his efforts to overthrow our democracy, Cohen. Which, by the way, is going to create for a very interesting September 6th deposition where Donald will be under oath, of course, it'll be videotaped and transcribed. It's going to make for a very, not just interesting,

but a potentially very dangerous deposition for Donald. And again, thanks to all of you who have donated and helped to bring us to where we're at, I can assure you, the lawyers, Danyaperi and Benjamin Brodsky are fighting in order to prevent it from being sealed. We believe in transparency. We want transparency.

We want transparency. We want the public to be able to see Donald, as he responds to the various questions that are going to be asked, and to basically expose him for the fraudster that he is, the user of our legal system in order to intimidate and retaliate against, again, critics, people that he doesn't like, like me. Now, you know, it's crazy. I want to just go back for two seconds and talk about the server that was in that alleged small audio room. One of the things that has not been discussed, and you can hear it from me first, is that this server is the local server for Mar-a-Lago. Each and every one of the Trump properties has its own server on site. And those servers, of course, site. And those servers, of course, is the hub where all of the video that comes in gets fed through. But all of that then goes to a program, a mainframe, which is also then simultaneously sent to Trump Tower, where it sits for, you know, until they end up deleting it there as well.

So just by deleting it at the audio room level would not have gotten rid of the tape. So there is more here than meets the eye. And that, again, you know, that's basically controlled by the COO. And Michael Cohen, I want to interrupt right here as more breaking news becomes available. We have the docket right now. Let's pull up the docket in the new case, United States versus Trump. You can see right here that the case has been unsealed as to Donald Trump. You see the indictment and there's a motion to seal the case that was filed. And here it is, folks, this looks to be the cover page of the new indictment filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, United States of America versus Donald Trump,

18 USC Section 371, conspiracy to defraud the United States. Count to 18 USC Section 1512K, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding. Count three, 18 USC Section 1512C2, obstruction of an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding. Count four, 18 USC Section 241, conspiracy against rights. This is coming out from Reuters legal right here. And again, as we learn more, as we see more,

we will make sure that we are posting that right here. Want to mention to everyone as well, who is joining us, that Cohen has a legal defense fund that we all help put together in connection with the frivolous lawsuit filed against him by Donald Trump in the Southern District of Florida, where Trump is seeking $500 million unlike Donald Trump and how Donald Trump does things. All of the funds here go to Cohen's legal defense in the Southern District of Florida and

big news that Michael Cohen broke earlier in this broadcast that he is seeking Donald Trump's deposition. He is getting Donald Trump's deposition on September 6th in Florida. That's certainly going to be very interesting as well. And we're hearing now from multiple reports. Again, more confirmation that Trump was just indicted. We will be bringing this information to you as we learn more here on the Midas Touch Network. We will soon be joined by legal analysts,

Karen Friedman, AgniFlo and Michael Popok. We're actually joined right now by Karen Friedman, AgniFlo. Karen Friedman, AgniFlo, co-host of Legal AF. Thanks for joining the political beatdown crossover episode that's now become the breaking news. Karen Friedman, I want to get your thoughts on this breaking news. No one better to hear from than you and Cohen as well for different reasons, but very important reasons. Karen Friedman, Ignifala. Hi, so yeah, I mean, we haven't seen the indictment yet, but you know, it was always a question about whether this is going to be a sweeping 100 count indictment with multiple multiple defendants because after all there are so many people who were colluding with Donald Trump regarding trying to steal the election. And so we were wondering

is this going to be a big huge indictment like that or is this going to be a more limited discrete indictment? I've always predicted it's going to be a limited discrete indictment just charging Donald Trump maybe one or two others, you know, kind of along the lines of Walt Nata and Carlos Diole of Viera. adjustment just against him and just a few charges because Jack Smith wants to get this case to trial before the election. And that's the best chance he has at doing that, keeping it limited and short and small. You don't need a thousand charges, right? That's just more charges that you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. You just need the ones that you can prove limited clear streamlined and There's less motions to make less defense attorneys who can ask for time and ask for delay

Keep it short keep it's being a small keep it streamlined, but tell your story I anticipate this will be a speaking indictment that will have a Lot of information in there the way Jackson did with Mar-a-Lago, right? He explained what the charges were, what the evidence was, and how it, what kind of information he had, really told a story. You don't have to be a lawyer to read the Mar-a-Lago indictment, right? You can understand it just from the way he wrote it. I anticipate that this indictment is going to be very similar. The news reporting has been that there are four counts on the indictment wrote it, my anticipate that this indictment is going to be very similar.

The news reporting has been that there are four counts on the indictment, which is along the lines of what I was just saying that they're going to be. We have the indictment right here, Karen, as well. There you go. So four counts. You don't even have any. You know, why don't we go over it? Oh my God, and it's one defendant.

And it's one defendant. It's exactly what I just said. Oh my God, okay. Jack Smith, you know, Jack and Smith and I used to work together. We were trained together. We were trained in the exact same place by the exact same person. So that's, you know, I would have done exactly what he did. One defendant, a few charges.

That's exactly what he did. So great, 18 United States Code Section 371 is conspiracy to defraud the United States. That's two or more people who conspire to defraud the United States by impairing, obstructing, or some other way defeating a governmental function with deceptive practices. You need an overt act. I think that's going to be with respect to the Pence vote, you know, to stop Pence from certifying the election. I think that could be that. And it also could be the fake slates of electors. I think that could, those two could very nicely, those two fact patterns could fit very nicely in section 371.

The standard there is that he knowingly and willfully knew that it was false, that he defrauded the United States. He knew he lost the election. And they're going to say, look, there's more than 60 legal challenges that said that. Bill Barr said that. And it will require an over-dack, which means just an act. It doesn't have to be an illegal act in and of itself to have been done by the with the co-conspirators. So it has to be him and another person.

So you'll see co-conspirator number one, co-conspirator number two, co-conspirator number three, or unindicted co-conspirators, what it will say. Oh, the defendant's co-conspirators, there you go. We actually do have the indictment. Yeah, there you go, co-conspirator one. See, I haven't even seen the indictment, and I'm telling you what it says, because that's exactly what it would do.

So these are going to be the facts that they're going to talk about regarding this charge. The other charge that he's charged with is 18 United States Code, 1512 and two separate subsections. That is a scheme to obstruct, I say, the counting of the presidential electors on January 6. Again, the pressure campaign against, against Pence. And this one requires that you corruply obstruct or impede or attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, the official proceeding

being the counting of the votes and certifying the election. On January 6, you have to act corruply to be guilty of this crime. And clearly, the Trump here, they're going to prove that he was self-interested, right? He didn't have the best interest of the American people when he tried to steal the election. So I think that's going to be how they prove that he acted corruptly. And then the final charge is 18 United States Code Section 241, conspiracy against rights. This is a civil war era statute that was enacted when KKK used to try to not allow, you know, to take away people's votes and disenfranchise black people who had just gotten

and earned the right to vote. And that's a charge here. Basically, it's unlawful for two or more people. It's a conspiracy also to threaten or intimidate a person in their free exercise or enjoyment of their rights. Somebody acting under the color of law, what does that mean? So like a police officer or a government official, they're acting as if they're

allowed to commit this, you know, to do the act, which is what Trump was doing as president, right? And so he was, you know, interfering with the electors, putting in the fake slates of electors, et cetera, what I find. And so, you know, take away people's right to vote. And that's what that charges. What I find surprising in this, although it was expected because it wasn't in the target letter, what I find surprising here is that Jack Smith stayed away from seditious conspiracy. Now there was going to be a question of will he charge either the Insta-Action Act, which is 18 United States Code 2383, or seditious conspiracy, which is 18 United States Code 2383 or Siddish

Conspiracy, which is 18 United States Code 2384. Now, if you recall, the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys and Stewart Roads, etc., the guys who violently tried to overthrow the government, those guys were charged with Siddish Cons and they were convicted, and that's been upheld so far. The Insurrection Act has not been charged, I think, ever, or in a really, really long time. Like, I think it was since the Civil War. It was the last time it was used. So many people didn't think that Jack Smith would charge it here for the first time.

But seditious conspiracy is something that the Justice Department has charged these other individuals who've reached the Capitol and violently did what they did on January 6. And look, there's a lot of evidence. And we saw it during the select committee's hearings. There's a lot of evidence to show that Donald Trump, you know, basically could also be charged with that. So I was hoping he would be. He was, you know, he's just as responsible if not more than them since they were doing it at his behest. But Jackson Smith chose not to go there. So, look, I'm talking about all of this. I haven't read the indictment. I'm just telling you what I think it would be.

Then hopefully you'll send it to me so I can read it. And if there's anyone who is interested, we're going to post it on. We go through point by point so people can see it. But for those joining a historic event, just taking place, Donald Trump indicted again in Washington, DC for his criminal conduct relating to the 2020 election. Michael Cohen, I'm going to get your reaction right now. Sure. So the very first thing that I saw is on Fox News, they're on their digital. They then turn around and Karen, I wanted to sort of put this in your lab. They make a statement that President Trump has always followed the law and the Constitution with advice from many highly accomplished attorneys.

These un-American witch hunts will fail and President Trump will be re-elected to the White House so he can save our country from the abuse, incompetence, and corruption that is running through the veins of our country at levels never seen before. The question, Karen, that I really have for you on this one, of course, knowing Donald as well as I do, he's already deflecting his responsibility or his accountability for the charges that you just enumerated in this indictment. He looks to me like he's going to try to shift the responsibility and the blame onto his highly competent, well-respected

overpaid by the fund, by the Super PAC, by the lawyers. How does that work in his favor? Yeah, so, so there's a defense called the advice of counsel defense, right? So, and we've had that in some in prosecutions before where somebody commits a crime, but they say, look, you know, like a tax crime, for example, he says, look, I didn't mean to commit this crime. I went to a tax lawyer, the tax lawyer said I could do this. a tax lawyer, the tax lawyer said I could do this. And, you know, if the tax lawyers in good faith thought that was the interpretation of the, if they thought that was the statute and gave that advice, that is okay, right? And so you won't be guilty because you didn't intend to commit the crime. You were acting on the advice of counsel. That is some, what some people use, you know, as a shield, but you also, you know, and it works sometimes, but he's trying to use it, acting on the advice of counsel. That is what some people use as a shield. But you also, and it works sometimes, but he's trying to use it as a sword, not just a shield, right?

He's trying to say that, look, you know, he was given advice by multiple lawyers, including his attorney general, who conducted investigations into the voter fraud, including the 60 plus legal cases that he tried to bring, but didn't rule in his favor. He was told by many lawyers in the Justice Department in the White House Council's office who said,

you cannot do this. You cannot steal the election. You cannot put forth fake slates of electors. He didn't like that answer. So he kept looking for other lawyers who would basically go and say what he wanted to say. So they weren't giving him advice. He was looking for lawyers who would go along with what he said. Now he's going to say, well, John Eastman is the one who came up with this scheme.

And he's the one who gave me the advice. But a federal judge in California has already ruled that the advice that John Eastman gave regarding this whole scheme was actually a crime, and it wasn't legitimate attorney client advice, and therefore the thing called the crime fraud exception, which pierces the attorney client advice and therefore the crime fraud exception which pierces the attorney client privilege and that is and that is not going to fly if that's his defense but that clearly what they're setting up here is that was going to be his defense. That is going to say my

wife and I also think by the way that the say, Eastman, we're also looking at Rudy Caludy, Drunken Giuliani, who I think will ultimately be one of several fall guys in this specific journey. And as many times as I've tried to warn them about how Donald is going to handle the indictment that would emanate from Jack Smith's investigation of this. It's always somebody else. And who knows whether or not Rudy has already spoken, whether or not he's provided any pertinent information to Jack Smith, which could be the basis of this indictment.

Yeah, you're right. You're 100% right. It's all these lawyers. He's going to try to hide behind and he's going to attempt to invoke this advice of council defense. And that's what he's setting up. I'm sure he'll come up with other defenses that he's going to try to utilize here. But, you know, look, as I said, you can't seek out a lawyer who is willing to commit a crime with you and do something that is clearly not in keeping with any interpretation of the law. You can't hide behind that. You can't, basically, you and your lawyer get together and say, well, I'm a lawyer.

So let's go rob a bank together. And I told you that it was OK. So you'll be OK with that, right? That's not OK. There has to be some good faith basis. Look, half his lawyers have been disparaged anyway, because they give such terrible advice. And like I said, he's gotten so many lawyers

about what the law actually is, but he didn't like it. And so he looked and sought out these lawyers. And I agree with you, Giuliani is definitely one of them. He said in a kind of an odd video that he was taping that he's not cooperating, and he told the truth, and there's no crime, etc. But I wonder whether he is cooperating, but he's just saying that he's not along the, you know, there's, there's this weird playbook in Trump world that maybe Michael, you can help explain where they will just say things that they want to be true that are 100% false and Rudy seems to be along those same lines.

And I think a stark example of that is, you know, there are multiple people who are at a meeting that I'm sure is gonna be in this part of this indictment between Donald Trump and Mike Pence, where Donald Trump asked Mike Pence, will you not certify the election? And Mike Pence says, no, I'm not gonna do that. I don't have the power to do it.

And what does Donald Trump do? He goes out and tweets, Mike Pence is on board. Mike Pence is gonna do this. And I look at that and I'm like, it's just an outright lie. Like it's not even like a philosophical difference. It's not like I believe in, you know, lower taxes. I believe in higher taxes, right? This is an outright lie. And they just say things that are outright lies. And that's what, so anyway, I don't know it. Rudy Giuliani saying I'm not cooperating. I don't know if that's true or not Do you remember during his administration when they were having the lie counter and after like 35,000 lies that Donald had told to the American people

That they decided that they were going to just stop with it because it was so absurd. It was like six lies per day. So the fact that he is now lying about Mike Pence being on board or any of the other things, to me it's not shocking. What Donald does is, it's very stylistic, whereby, if there's something that you want people to believe and you know it's a lie, the way that you get them to believe it is you repeat the lie over and over and over again.

And then you get your surrogates to go on and to lie and to say the same misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, and you keep doing this over and over and over again until the lie becomes the truth. And Donald Trump has perfected that technique. He's just perfected it. He manages to have enough people, whether it's because of his relationship to folks like a Sean Hannity or in the past Tucker Carlson or any of the other hosts of whether it's Fox Newsmax or whatnot, right?

They would go out, they would regurgitate the lie again and again and again, and then they would get members of Congress to do the same thing. Ultimately, again, the lie becomes the truth and that's Donald Trump's superpower. I want to say this, we are number one on all of YouTube in the world across all genres, all news networks right now. Thanks to the brigade, thanks to the Midas mighty. I want to bring on to this superstar panel, Michael Popat, co-host of Legal AF. We're bringing the whole network together. We got Michael Cohen, Karen Friedman, AgniFollow, Michael Popak, the gang is here. Michael Popak, I want to get your reaction, Michael Popak, to what we are learning right now.

Yeah, and you can hear me in the back. I'm sort of printing out the 45 page indictment. Karen Friedman, AgniFollow, our colleague, was dead right when she said last week that the most perfect indictment she could envision would be a very simple indictment, one defendant, Donald Trump, and a small set of counts where you can't get any smaller than the four counts or so of this president indictment. And while there is a list of other co-conspirators, six in total, Karen was so right about Jack Smith, putting together in an elegant fashion, an indictment that is both sweeping in its approach,

yet surgical in its attack, and doesn't delay justice. He'll add other people. There is no doubt that one or more of the six co-conspirators that's unindicted for now will be indicted before things are over. But not now, that's for a different time and a different place. Let's get a surrender, a reingment of Donald Trump.

To keep, I know you've already started the conversation. So let me contribute on the co-Conspirator part. Co-Conspirator number one is an attorney, it's Rudy Giuliani. Co-Conspirator number two is an attorney, it's John Eastman. Co-Conspirator number three is an attorney, it's Sydney Powell. Co-Conspirator number four,

a department of justice official is Jeffrey Clark. Co-Conspirator number five, I wanna hear from Ben, I think it may be Ken Cheeseboro and Co-Coking spiritor number six could be a political operative for the fake electors, which I think is Peter Navarro. I'm open, I'm open to other comments on five and six, I think I'm dead right on one through four. And then from there, having now laid out the cast of characters in this sorted play, Jack Smith then goes in a speaking indictment to talk about, well, what was the multiple conspiracies of which

he says there are four conspiracies all led by one Donald Trump to attack the function of the federal government in the counting and proper certification of a presidential election, particularly, particularly he let off right where we think he should have with attacking any argument by Donald Trump that he lacked criminal intent or mens rea. Look, Jack Spitz, no dummy, he knows that Donald Trump has been floating the, I just relied on attorneys. He started it with Michael Cohen, our colleague here, about what happened with Stormy Daniels, relied on Michael Cohen. And you see Steven Chung and all the

rest have been trying to float in the last couple of days. Many, many attorneys, Donald Trump, relied on many, many attorneys because he's going to try for this sort of narrow defense of I relied on attorneys and hope that a judge a jury buys it. Of course, indicting the future in turn is kind of plays into their hand, but the men's rea attack, I thought was brilliant in the indictment, particularly, um, Jack Smith said that the president, former president Trump was notified repeatedly that the lie was a lie, that he lost the election, and then they list in the indictment all the people that told Donald Trump and any reasonable person that he lost the election.

It says it starts with the vice president, Pence told him, senior leadership of the Department of Justice told him, that would have been Bill Barr, Jeff Rosen, Richard Donahue, his national intelligence director told him. His cybersecurity head, Chris Krebs told him, his senior elected officials in other states told him, members of the state legislature on the GOP, told him federal and state judges told him and his own in-house counsel, general counsel or White House counsel, that would have been Pat Sipalone and Eric Hirschman told him. And therefore, you cannot continue to maintain the fallacy that I didn't know nobody told me when you have a list like that of so many

people. And then lastly, for my initial comments, as this printer is still printing the indictment, is, uh, Jack Smith was also smart to anticipate arguments by Donald Trump. He said, it is okay at the top of the indictment. It is okay to use lawful means to object if you're the loser of an election. It's okay to say with proper First Amendment rights to go use the legal system properly, to object, to use an audit process properly, to do all the things you're allowed to do under our system of election law.

It is not OK to enter into a criminal conspiracy, to misuse all of those things, the weaponized Department of Justice, to create fake electors, to deny everything that's happening before you're very eyes, despite the weight of the evidence by people and senior leadership around you. That is not okay. Let's take a look at the room where special counsel,

Jack Smith is expected to be giving a press conference shortly, salty, if we can pull that up when you have a moment and see the crowd starting to come into that room, look, I assume that we'll know this is ready to go when everybody takes their chairs, there's still some empty chairs, that's going to be a packed house. I could kind of guarantee you of that.

Popoq, I agree with your list right there, like this four boxes of the crew right here. I agree with who you have as even one through six, including chest, throw as five and six as Navarro, but we will, I'd love to hear from the Midas Mighty, the Legal Aephors and the Brigators in the YouTube chat below if they believe that those co-conspirators for now, unindicted co-conspirators who may be receiving or have already received target letters, who those individuals are.

Karen Friedman, Agniphala, as we go back to you and then we'll hear from Cohen any additional reflections that you have on this historic news that Donald Trump has been indicted this time in Washington, DC for his conduct regarding the 2020 election and the January 6th insurrection. I think, look, we got to see now who the judge is going to be, right? And how that will, you know, this is going to be an indictment in Washington, this is an indictment in Washington, DC. So it's going to be a judge and DC. And let's see, you know, this is going to be an indictment in Washington, this is an indictment in Washington, DC.

So it's going to be a judge and DC. And like see, you know, whether we can get this and Karen, I want to interrupt you right there. I hate to interrupt you, but I want to say we do know who the judge is right now. Judge Chutkin, we believe to be presiding over this case in DC, a Barack Obama appointee federal judge. God in heaven. in DC, a Barack Obama appointee federal judge. There's a God in heaven. Federal judge, chucking. So pretty much the exact opposite of Judge Eileen Cannon.

We see the initials on the filing and that's how we're able to surmise. That's what everyone is reporting. That's who I believe it to be sorry to interrupt you, Karen, but I didn't. No, it's great. Judge, chucking. No, that's great. It's very much. It's very much. No, that's fantastic. So look, I think where I think Jack Smith is going to focus on the clear, what's very clear about this is this is the case he's going to try to get to trial before the election.

And he will, he needed to get this out there before Fannie Willis brings her case. And that's going to be in the coming weeks, right? Her's, I think, is going to be the sweeping indictment with a thousand counts and a million for Fannie Willis brings her case, and that's gonna be in the coming weeks, right? Hers, I think, is going to be the sweeping indictment with a thousand counts and a million defendants and a big sweeping rego conspiracy, which is the other way this can be done. And that is an important case to bring to.

And hopefully what will happen is she'll get a trial there and a conviction it will not happen before the election, because it'll be so big and Jack Smith's going to wanna go first first but don't forget hers will be pardon proof because it's in the state right and and the if Donald Trump wins or anybody wins right they can't pardon him or or stop that investigation so I think it's I think this is the case that Jack Smith is going to push to trial. You know, like he superseded Mar-a-Lago

when he saw that Eileen Cannon wasn't going to have that one go in December, which is what Jack Smith asked for. And she put it over until May 2024. And so look, that case probably won't go before the election because that's why he superseded and added it more counts and another defendant. It's like, okay, we're just not going to get that one done, but he made this one streamlined, short, sweet, just a few charges. He put all the issues in there that addressing what the potential defenses are going to be

to defuse them and hopefully Judge Chuck Chuck will push this case to trial one more thing. This case does not have classified documents like the Mar-a-Lago case, so there's no top secret clearance that they need. They don't have to have a secured, you know, the skiff where you can, where you look at those documents. They don't have to, you know, have a SEPA, the Classified Information Procedures Act, hearing, you know, those are all things that delay a case, right? It's very complicated. This is a simple case, a streamlined case. And so this case will go to trial before the election, and that's what Jackson Smith's goal was. The only other case that might go to trial before the election,

I think, is your case, Michael Cohen, with Alvin Gratis. We're going to bring you the press conference of special, thiske the press conference of special count this the press conference special counsel jack smith when that goes live uh... in a few moments want to show you right now some of the responses by magga republicans uh... this is marjorie taylor green responding to the news and then michael kohen i want to get your reaction to what marjorie taylor green has to say play the clip going to be soon and doting president trump and was in Washington, DC, and it's going to be something

like we've never seen before. I think it's going to truly put not only President Trump and his family, all of his staff put them to a test. They've never been tested on, but it's also going to test our nation. And it's something that I've prayed about a test. They've never been tested on, but it's also going to test our nation. And it's something that I've prayed about a lot, and I'm just sad to me. Jack Smith, he's a terrible attorney. He has a lot of failures in his career, but he is abusing his power, the power of the special counsel, and the Department of Justice. And he will. Cohen, I want to get your response in just a moment. I want to remind everybody that we've just launched mightestouch.com.

If you want to follow along with the full indictment, if you want to follow along and read it for yourself, we just launched mightestouch.com. It has breaking news stories. It's going to be one of the top destinations in the world I think the top for pro democracy news, but it's a way when we talk about documents You can follow along with what we are saying so go to MidasTouch.com We just posted the story. We posted the full indictment read along with us while we talk about it. Now your reaction, Michael Cohen.

So one of the things that I often say is that the only way to shut somebody like Marjorie Toilet Greenup is not to give her the oxygen that she so desperately craves. Why are we even putting her on? There's nothing that she says that is truthful. So why are we helping to promote the law? Now of course we do need to understand that this is happening on the other side. But when Marjorie Taylor-Green turns around and starts talking about Jack Smith is a terrible lawyer, really? Really?

Why don't you tell me one lawyer that Donald has right now in his crew that holds a candle to Jack Smith? She's only angry at him because Donald is angry at him because they're holding Donald accountable for his own actions. She, listen, if he would have turned around and said that there is no indictment, we didn't find enough evidence in order to, you know, to bring forth the case She would be praising him as the smartest attorney that ever existed So there is no truth and what we need to do is we need to stop giving these lying pieces of shit We need to stop giving them oxygen to promote their lies. Let them do it on Newsmax, on OAN, or even Fox right now is not putting up with the lies that they curb them every single time that they start. So, you know, we are making a dent in stopping it, but she is one of the most despicable, despicable members of Congress that exists.

And it's again, why I keep saying to our brigators, when we get together for the rally, and I hope everybody's going to be there, one of the things that we want to do is ensure that our brigade is so large and our position is so strong that we're successful in ensuring that people like Marjorie Toilet Green, people like the Macaties, the Josh Hawley's, the Ted Cruz's and so on, the Lindsey Grims, that they get voted out of office because they are doing nothing to promote democracy. All that they're doing is looking to, you know, to kiss Donald's ass so that when our country becomes an autocracy, that they are one of the commanders

like in the television show, the handmaid's tale. That's all that they're looking for is power and money for themselves. Let me tell you all, I'm gonna go to you power and money for themselves. Let me tell you all, I'm gonna go to you Karen, and just a moment. So the judge who's been assigned to this case, Judge Tanya Chutkin and Obama appointee, the only federal judge in Washington, DC,

who has sentenced January six defendants to sentences longer than the government had requested just some background on Judge Chutkin she's a Jamaican American lawyer born in Kingston She's a graduate of George Washington law. I went to George Washington undergrad She went to Penn undergrad a lawyer at Hogan and Donovan a public defender a partner at boys at Hogan and Donovan, a public defender, a partner at boys, Schiller, her husband was a DC superior court judge. Just want to give everyone the background of the judge who's been assigned.

Let me just emphasize again, an Obama appointee. So this is a pro democracy judge here. Karen Friedman, I know that you've got a very busy schedule ahead of you and we appreciate you sharing your thoughts. First here on the Midas Touch Network. I know you're very sought after right now, but please, if you can, give us some of your thoughts and then we'll go to Michael Popak who's been anxiously waiting right here. He's got his notes. He's ready to go.

Yeah. I mean, look, you know, Jack Smith is a highly respected attorney that has been a lifelong public servant and career prosecutor. He started at the Manhattan D.A.'s office in 1994 with me and we worked in the same small group and he was trained with the highest ethics. He's an excellent lawyer. He left and went to the Department of Justice where he worked his way up and became, you know, the AUSA and then a U.S. attorney down in Tennessee and then he went to the Hague to prosecute war times. I mean war crimes. And, you know, look, this is, I couldn't tell you if he's a Democrat or a Republican politics has never played any part in his life or in his consciousness. He's all about ethics,

public service, and doing the right thing. He's never gone out for the money or the glory or the fame. This is really truly just a guy who's trying to do the right thing. So for Marjorie Taylor and Green to say the things he's saying, and Donald Trump to call him a crackhead, it's just absolutely baseless and outrageous. He's truly a public servant in the best way, in the best tradition. So those are my final parting words on Jack Smith and this indictment. I was just looking up at a television because it looks like the press conference is going to happen soon. Someone appeared at the podium. There he is. Let's turn on the volume as well.

See if we can hear salty what's going on. There. Okay, I can confirm that in the feed. We will be, there is sound. It's just right now. It's a two minute warning. So what I suggest we do. It's just right now. You know, it's it's a two-minute warning. So what I suggest we do is let's keep it here. There's a two-minute warning. I want to bring you the moment special counsel, Jack Smith does come on screen. You know, we will be reading through the indictment. So

here is what I suggest that we do right now. I'm gonna read one portion of the indictment that's getting a lot of attention. Salty, I want you to turn on the sound as soon as C-SPAN has its sound on as well from this press conference. There is a line in this indictment as we come through it where Trump told Pence on January first, quote, you're too honest.

And again, make sure you go to mitestouch.com. You can follow along with what's going on here, with the complaint, the indictment, rather we have it posted on our new website, mitestouch.com, follow along with the indictment. And here's the allegation in the indictment. On January 1st, the defendant, Trump, called the vice president and berated him defendant, Trump, called the vice president berated him

because he had learned that the vice president had opposed a lawsuit seeking a judicial decision and at the certification, the vice president had the authority to reject or return votes to the state under the Constitution. The vice president responded that he thought there was no constitutional basis for such authority in that it was improper.

In response, the defendant told the vice president, quote, you're Good evening. Today, an indictment was unsealed, charging Donald J. Trump with conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding. The indictment was issued by a grand jury of citizens here in the district of Columbia, and it sets forth

the crimes charged in detail. I encourage everyone to read it in full. The attack on our nation's capital on January 6, 2021 was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy. It's described in the indictment it was fueled by lies. It's described in the indictment, it was fueled by lies. Lies by the defendant targeted at obstructing a bedrock function of the US government, the nation's process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election. The men and women of law enforcement who defended the US Capitol on January 6th are heroes. They are patriots and they are the very best of us.

They did not just defend a building or the people sheltering in it. They put their lives in the line to defend who we are as a country and as a people. They defended the very institutions and principles that define the United States. Since the attack on our capital, the Department of Justice has remained committed to ensuring accountability for those criminally responsible for what happened that day. This case is brought consistent with that commitment, and our investigation of other individuals continues. In this case, my office will seek a speedy trial so that our evidence can be tested in court and judged by a jury of citizens.

In the meantime, I must emphasize that the indictment is only an allegation and that the defendant must be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. I would like to thank the members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who are working on this investigation with my office, as well as the many career prosecutors

and law enforcement agents from around the country who have worked on previous January 6th investigations. These women and men are public servants of the very highest order and it is a privilege to work alongside them. Thank you. Why didn't you charge any other public here? Folks, that's Special Counsel Jack Smith holding a press conference, a historic day indeed, and Special Counsel Jack Smith informed everybody that they should go and read the indictment

for themselves, and you can read the full indictment at MidasTouch.com. We just launched the new MidasTouch.com. We just launched the new mitestouch.com website. We've posted the indictment as we talk about it here over the next few hours and we break it down. You could read along for yourself, the mitestouch.com new website is going to be the number one source of pro democracy news. I wanna get everybody's reaction

from Karen Friedman Agniplow to Michael Cohen, to Michael Popak who's been waiting anxiously. The whole crew here, Karen Friedman, Agnifalo to Michael Cohen, to Michael Popak, who's been waiting anxiously. The whole crew here, Karen Friedman, Agnifalo, I know you've got to go soon. So I want to throw it to you first before you leave. Cohen and Popak are patiently waiting here as well, but I got to get your reaction, Karen Friedman, Agnifalo.

Yeah, I mean, like he had to make a statement, right, Jack Smith, because Donald Trump is now going to start his misinformation campaign the way he does, and he's going to try to spin it, how he spins it. And so Jackson Smith wanted to tell us all what this is and what this isn't, right? And he basically, I think, summarized it perfectly. I got the chills when he said, you know,

the thing about the men and women, the heroes who are not just defending the building and the people but our institutions and our democracy and just our very being as a country because that is true. That is what this document, what this indictment is about. It's not about the four charges or the technical elements of the crime. The reason this is so serious, Donald Trump tries to make false equivalency with, whether it's Hillary Clinton or emails, or Pence and Biden, they had classified documents too, or Hunter Biden or Joe Biden.

He tries to make these false equivalencies, like they're just, this is a witch hunt, and people are just coming after me. There is no equivalency between even if those individuals technically committed, which they did not crimes, although whatever, you know, that's just not equivalent to trying to literally rip up our constitution and take away our democracy in who we are as a country, because that's what Donald Trump did, right? That's what he was trying to do here. And so I think just reminding everybody that that's really what this is about and that that the law enforcement who defended the capital that day, that's what they were defending

as much as they were defending the individuals there or the building that were really trying to defend our country as a democracy and what our beliefs are. So I thought that was beautifully said. And I'm just so proud that this indictment has been brought. And, you know, Jack Smith asked for a speedy trial to try to get this to, I mean, like he wants a trial before the election. And this is the one he's going to push. And he's, and hopefully Judge Chukkin, who

seems to be an excellent judge. We'll do that, so hopefully we'll get a trial before the election. This is just a great day. Ben, I think you're muted. Ben, you're on mute. So, anyway, one of the things, like Karen like you said, I agree, I mean, it was short, it was concise, it was brilliantly said. But the part that looked like you, that really touched me, I've had on my podcast, all the Brigadiers that also follow

me, my head is touched network with, as well with the May of Culpa podcast, we're actually number 37 in the top shows and we've always remained a top podcast. I've had Harry Dunn on the, you know, on one of the segments and I can only say that he really takes your breath away when they speak about the trauma that they experienced in protecting the people's house and protecting American democracy. So kudos to Jack Smith for acknowledging that.

The one thing that we have to remember, yes, there is an indictment out. And one of the things Jack Smith also said is that there is a presumption of innocence right now. Now I know that so many of us are sitting there and saying innocence, my ass. All right. At the end of the day, we all know what Donald was up to. We all know what he was trying to accomplish, right? The destruction of our democracy for an autocracy where he is the king, the Supreme Leader, the monarch, the ruler, the führer. But you actually need a jury to come back with that determination. And rest assured, you know, if Jack Smith handles this case,

the way he just handled that press conference, the way he's handled this indictment from inception to indictment, rest assured, I think that we're going to get the response that's going to hold Donald Trump accountable for his improper behavior. Michael Popack, I want to get your reaction now. I want to tell everybody too. We are now number one in YouTube in the entire world across all genres across news. This show is number one, thanks to the Brigators, the Legal A-Effers, the Midas mighty out there. You can read the full indictment. If you've got the media culpa fanatics.

And may a culpa fanatics, you can read the full indictment at MidasTouch.com, the new website launched by the MidasTouch Network. It's posted there right now. Oh, and make sure you subscribe to our YouTube channel. This is the fastest growing media channel right now in the world, period, and it's great that it's pro-democracy content.

So if you're not subscribed, make sure you are subscribed. Michael Popak, you've been waiting more patiently than I've ever seen you wait before. What are your thoughts when you were mute? I should have jumped in. Look, we're unpacking a 45 page indictment, but the some of the things that I was able to do while while we were while we were here, kind of talking about listening to checks, myth intently.

And I want to put a little meat on the bones of what we're talking about. And we'll do it more on the different podcasts on the Midas Touch Network. Karen and I will do it tomorrow during the midweek edition of Legal AF. You and I will do it on Saturday during the Saturday edition of Legal AF. And then we'll jump in with hot takes here and there to unpack different parts of this real estate that is the indictment, but it is beautiful and its simplicity. There are, as we expected, from a week or two ago, four counts. There could have been a hundred counts. There could have been a thousand counts.

So it's not an accident. It is by prosecutorial expertise by Jack Smith that there are four counts. And then he was able to fit, you know, 100 pounds of potatoes into a five pound sack. So eloquently, eloquently, count one conspiracy to defraud the United States, count to another conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding. We know what that is. That's the Jan 6 certification count three obstruction of an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding. And then the third conspiracy listed here conspiracy against rights, that's the section 241. I did a hot take on it, came out of the civil rights. It's a era that came out of the reconstruction era of our nation when

the Ku Klux Klan was stopping freed slaves, now freed citizens from voting. It has to do with vote fraud, like the fake electors. And then you've got not six indicted conspirators, but six currently unindicted co-conspirators. Because as we said in prior podcast, Ben, this is where Jack Smith now has another meeting tomorrow with Rudy Giuliani's lawyers, Sydney Powell's lawyers, John Eastman's lawyers, Ken Cheese Burrows lawyers, Peter Navarro's lawyers, and say, we had another draft of this that had your name in it. Currently you're an unindicted co-conspirator.

You want to keep rolling into dice and play in Russian roulette? Or do you want to flip? It's up to you. We don't care. But the next superseding indictment and you saw what we did last week in Mar-a-Lago is going to have your name written on it above the caption, above the line in the caption, because you're going to be a defendant. And this is how Jack Smith is going to squeeze, just as he did in Mar-a-Lago.

Got a few insiders to flip on Donald Trump to come up with that superseding indictment. Let's talk about Tanya Chutkin for a minute. I don't know if you remember this, Ben. But when the Jan 6th sentence things first started happening, the first several were in front of Tanya Chutkin. And we liked her approach so much that you and I called her, at least I did, hang him high Chutkin.

And if this is now the person, because she gave out such, you know, Department of Justice asked for X, she gave like X plus 10, 10 years, you know, so she threw the book literally at the Jan 6, at the Jan 6, defendants. And so if you could think of one person that Donald Trump would not want to see the wheel, the random wheels spin and land on for a judge.

It would be Obama appointee Jamaican American, Tonya Chukkin, who already denied his attempt to stop his tax returns from being turned over to the House Select Committee, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court ultimately. So they like her. And she knows everything she needs to know about the Jan 6th. Now, lastly, we're not going to be able on this, of course, on this live show to read every paragraph

of this indictment, but let me, there's 128 of them. Well, let me just give, it's been two minutes to give the headers, because the headers alone, like chapters in a book, tell the story. Here's, I'm just going to read five or six headers. The defendant, every time I say defendant, that's Donald Trump. Trump's use of deceit to get officials to subvert the illegitimate election results and change electoral votes.

We know what that is. Next. And then he goes on in every state, all the battleground states, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and the like to talk about what happened there. Next header, the defendants use of dishonesty frauded to see, to organize fraudulent slates of electors and cause them to transmit false certificates to Congress. And then he goes in detail, paragraph after paragraph, including all the co-conspirators and their role,

the defendant's attempt to leverage the justice department to use the seat to get state officials to replace legitimate electors and electoral votes with the defendants. That's Jeffrey Clark and the weaponization of the Department of Justice in the waning days of his administration. The defendants attempts to enlist the vice president to fraudulently alter the election results at the Jan 6th certification proceeding. That's the

pressure campaign on Mike Pence, concocted by Eastman and Trump, and then others tried to try to do it. And then finally, in the last major header, the defendants exploitation of the violence and chaos at the Capitol, when all else fails, let's roll out a good old fashioned insurrection to attack the seat of our democracy. That's the indictment in seven chapters or less that we'll be unpacking over the next week or two.

And when you mention Tanya Chutkin, you're referring to federal judge Tanya Chutkin, who has been assigned to this case, the exact opposite of Judge Eileen Cannon, Michael Cohen, as we're learning more about the indictment. Yeah, but before we jump into that, Mike, you know, one of the things that we also have to remember is I don't want to see the judge, you know, acting in any way, which she will not, right? She's not I lean cannon acting in a way where Trump can now turn around and make allegations that this is partisan, right? is partisan, right? That takes away from the seriousness of the document that you just so eloquently read from. My goal, my hope, is that whatever it is that he did, rest assured, Jack Smith will be able to know different than the Alvin break case and being as close to it as I am. They will be using testimony from others. They will be using documentary evidence within which to put on the case and to prove

the truth of the allegations that are raised. Plain and simple. She's just a no-nonsense judge. She's not gonna put up with the bullshit that I lean canon is. I said, oh, yeah, yeah, let's kick it off for another three, four months or entertain the frivolous motions that he has

his lawyers do. She's not going to accept that any more than the judge in the case against me, the civil case that Trump brought down in the Southern District of Miami. He's not going to accept it either. So fortunately, the wheels spun correctly, not correctly, Fadonald, but correctly for democracy. Totally law and order judge all the way. Let's take a look at some of the paragraphs that we're learning about in Popeyes. You highlighted these. You could read along by the way everybody

watching this by going to mitestouch.com that is the new website launched by the mitest touch network. There's thousands of people who are there live right now following along as we read this. But this is a, I think, very, very powerful paragraph from the indictment. And it talks about how on January 1st, the defendant, Trump, called the vice president and berated him because he had learned that vice president pens had opposed a lawsuit seeking a judicial decision that at the certification the vice president had the authority to reject or return

votes to the states under the Constitution. The vice president responded that he thought there was no constitutional basis for such authority and that it was improper. In response, the defendant Donald Trump told former Vice President Pence, quote, you're too honest. Within hours of the conversation, the defendant Trump reminded his supporters to meet in Washington before the certification proceeding, tweeting, the big protest rally in Washington, D.C. will take place at 11 a.m. on January 6th. Locational details to follow stop the steel Cohen. What that goes to in my view is

Intent right here that Donald Trump knew Donald Trump was telling Pence you are being too honest Then you know where that testimony almost certainly came from? Pence Pence spoke before the grand jury, and that's something that Pence and others in the room would have confirmed to the grand jury that just returned this indictment. So that is going to be, and Pence is going to be

a fact witness, in this case, he already is a fact witness. But think about it, the historic nature of this indictment, but within the indictment, you've got a former vice president providing key testimony Against Donald Trump your thoughts Michael Cohen Well, they could also be Mark Meadows. It could also be you know Ivanka or Jared it could be anyone that was in the room at the time that he was engaging in the conversation Rest assured, again, this

is how much confidence that I have in Jack Smith and based upon the indictment, you can see why we all should have a lot of faith and a lot of confidence in him. Because what will, but will ultimately be demonstrated at trial is a plethora of individuals that will be paraded to the stand in order to give testimony regarding Donald Trump's intent. Now, I want to be very clear again, something Jack Smith said, which is, he's innocent until proven guilty. That is a attendant of our law. Unless of course you're Michael Cohen, right?

And you have a Donald Trump administration with a bill bar as your attorney general, right? That's a whole nother story. But here Donald is presumed innocent. What we're going to see is a multitude of people paraded out to testify Exactly Donald Trump's intent But like I said earlier one of the things that Donald is going to do and he does it all the time

He's going to look to find who the scapegoat could be He's going to try to argue or at least his counsel will that he relied upon legal advice and therefore He did not have the intent to commit a crime or to break the law Now we get to obviously Jack Smith and we get to additional testimony additional documents that will ultimately Refuted or the goal of course would be to refute it or the goal, of course, would be to refute it. And this is the way I see this case, ultimately panning out.

Michael Pope, your thoughts as we learn more, a statement also being issued by Donald Trump, the Trump campaign. Is this the pack that paid the $40 million to cover the legal defense? I mean, who's even issuing this thing? They're all financially and morally bankrupt, including pensioning. And I take personal offense to the mentioning of Nazi Germany in the 1930s, because Donald Trump got indicted for bad, misconduct, criminal misconduct that he did before he was in office while he ran for office, while he was in office and after he left office. I mean, the fact that he blames everyone but himself and wants personal, wants a personal exception and a past because he's also a candidate for office, which of course is a, a maniacal attempt by him to avoid responsibility and to ultimately

try to win this thing to part in himself for the federal counts. But to blame Joe Biden. And Hope Rock before though getting your reaction, let me just read it to the forgator who hasn't seen the statement first, and I know you've read it. This is what it says. This is nothing more than the latest corrupt chapter and the continued pathetic attempt by the Biden crime family and their weaponized Department of Justice to interfere with the 2024 presidential election in which President Trump is the undisputed front runner and leading by substantial margins. But why did they wait two and a half years to bring these fake charges right in the middle of President Trump's winning campaign for 2024?

Why was it announced the day after the big crooked Joe Biden scandal broke out from the halls of Congress? It's even hard to read this pop-up because it's so deranged. The answer is election interference, the lawlessness of these persecutions of President Trump and his supporters is reminiscent of Nazi Germany in the 1930s, the former Soviet Union, and other authoritarian dictatorial regimes. President Trump has always followed the law in the Constitution with advice from many highly accomplished attorneys. These un-American witch hunts will fail and President Trump will be

re-elected to the White House so he can save our country from the abuse and competence and corruption that is running through the veins of our country. A level's never seen before. Three years ago, we had strong borders, energy, independence, no inflation and a great economy. Today, we are a nation in decline. President Trump will not be deterred by disgraceful and unprecedented political targeting. It's all projection and confession and calling himself president. I was just reading the statement. I want you to break it down, Popoac, though now, because this is a horrific, disgusting statement by a trader and a criminal in Donald Trump.

And for those tuning into the Midas Touch Network, that's what we call him, a trader and a criminal. We don't sugar code it here. He is a fascist criminal trader Michael Popeye Yeah, we don't blow smoke or sunshine on the network or an anaryv our individual podcasts are when we're lucky enough to get together Automomentis and historic day like this one when a Former president is now indicted for the third time for only one reason because he committed criminal acts as alleged, presumed innocent, but he has no one to blame for himself but himself. And he already started this earlier today, and in the weeks preceding this mantra of, why didn't they indict me two and a half years ago?

Well, I don't think you understand how criminal investigations work. You mean, why didn't, why didn't Jack Smith indict you before he was even appointed nine months ago? Why didn't Merrick Garland? I mean, when on Jan 7 of 2020, that's when you were supposed to be indicted. It takes a minute to develop a criminal case and to have every one of your lawyers, I'm talking about Donald Trump now, have every one of your lawyers turn on you either voluntarily or have your attorney client privilege stripped away because at least three federal judges have said that you are, there's more likely than not that you committed a crime or fraud related to various aspects of how you interact with the justice

system. And so it takes a minute to get your form of vice president to testify against you and have his immunity stripped away. It takes a minute to have all of your lawyers and co-conspirators cell phones and text messages and what's app messages picked up and reviewed and analyzed. It takes a minute to go to each of the seven battleground states and to get all the fake electors to either cooperate with you or to obtain their cell phone records and their emails and interviews and state legislatures. I mean, all of this takes an incredible amount of time in order not just to get an indictment.

That is not Jack Smith's goal. Jack Smith's goal is not to walk out with an indictment. If that were his goal, he could have gotten this indictment or something close to it several months ago. His goal is to win a conviction of Donald Trump because he's going to back up the equivalent of two tractor trailers worth of documents, you know, 100 terabytes of information. And he's going to dump it on Donald Trump and his defendants because he's ready for trial, because that's what he was waiting for. Just as we're waiting for Fonney Willis to do the same thing in about two or three weeks. And for Donald Trump to say that there is a mass, that doesn't sound familiar, there

is a mass conspiracy against him led by Joe Biden that stitches together, get this list from an earlier social media posting by Donald Trump. Letitia James, Fawney Willis, Jack Smith and Alvin Bragg are all working together in a conspiracy. Okay, I guess it's like this is the black helicopter thing, you know, that he plays into the conspiracy theory of America, that led to the big lie, that led to the entire thing, and they're all working against them without any proof or evidence. Donald, take some time. Take a minute.

Okay. We're practicing lawyers and podcasters, and we haven't even gotten through the indictment. Yet I can't imagine that you, with your kind of learning disabilities, has gotten through the indictment yet. Take a minute. Let your lawyers, you got a couple of them. Let Todd Lanch and let John Loro read it and let them come back and tell you how big of a mess that you're in because it doesn't, it's not just words

on a piece of paper. Every fact that is alleged in this indictment, every one of them is backed by a number of either cooperating witnesses or ones that information was pulled out of them in a root canal in front of a grand jury or backed by a document or a text or all of that for every fact in there. Okay, this isn't like a reporter who needs two cooperating sources to say, you know, you wore a blue tie one day.

This is a fact-based intensive, that is, in every fact in here, he's got a truckload of information and either insiders, outsiders, or otherwise cooperating with them to establish it. And so all this stuff, this campaign that got launched this morning by Donald Trump and all of his henchmen and all the talking points that we're seeing now all in coordinated effort, blame the attorneys. Let's blame Giuliani, Powell and Eastman. They're the bad guy.

They misled Donald Trump. Donald Trump wasn't the center of the conspiracy. They were. Okay, that's already started. And you're going to see, I mean, might as touch, I'm sure will generate the talking points, the palm cards that each of these people that are that are representatives, proxies for Donald Trump are going to be using. And we can then line them up in video after video. And they will be almost identical. And the other thing that will be true is none of this. And I'm going to, I'm going to say this as a 32 year practice of a lawyer, trial lawyer in courtrooms, like the ones that we're talking about. None of this is going to work

in front of a judge in a black robe when the wooden door shuts and the lawyers get into that well, that court room. None of these defenses are going to work ultimately if this is his best set of defenses. And you can see the fire hose of evidence that is coming out at Donald Trump. This is the tip of the iceberg. This isn't everything that Jack Smith has. This is all that he's shared at this moment in the indictment. The trial is gonna be multiples of this

in terms of evidence and information. And lastly, woe be these co-conspirators who don't find God and don't come forward and tell the truth to Jack Smith because their name is going to be on the next indictment. And I'm talking to you Rudy Giuliani. I'm talking to you Johnny Smith. And I'm certainly talking to you, Cindy Powell. Moments ago, special counsel Jack Smith gave a press conference, making the historic announcement that Donald Trump has been indicted again in connection with Trump's attempt to overthrow the 2020 election for those just tuning in.

We're going to show you the press conference that just took place. That special counsel, Jackson Smith, made this historic announcement. And I wanted to point out as well that the judge assigned to this case is federal judge, Tanya Chutkin, who is an Obama appointee. That is the judge who has been assigned to this matter. If you wanna follow along with the indictment,

go to the new MidasTouch website. That's MidasTouch.com soon to be the number one pro democracy website in the world what we built on YouTube. We're now building on the web and it's just going to be complementing our YouTube with like the actual documents that you could read along while we're doing these broadcast. Let's play special counsel Jack Smith's press conference and then let's hear from none other than Michael Cohen. Let's play this press conference Good evening Today, an indictment was unsealed

charging Donald J. Trump with conspiring to defraud the United States conspiring to disenfranchise voters and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding. The indictment was issued by a grand jury of citizens here in the district of Columbia, and it sets forth the crimes charged in detail. I encourage everyone to read it in full. The attack on our nation's capital on January 6, 2021 was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy. It's described in the indictment it was fueled by lies.

Lies by the defendant targeted at obstructing a bedrock function of the U.S. government, the nation's process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election. The men and women of law enforcement who defended the U.S. Capitol on January 6th are heroes. They are patriots and they are the very best of us. They did not just defend a building or the people sheltering in it. They put their lives in the line to defend who we are as a country and as a people. They defended the very institutions and principles that define the United States. Since the attack on our capital, the Department of Justice has remained committed to ensuring accountability for those criminally responsible for what happened that day.

This case is brought consistent with that commitment, and our investigation of other individuals continues. In this case, my office will seek a speedy trial so that our evidence can be tested in court and judged by jury of citizens. In the meantime, I must emphasize that the indictment is only an allegation and that the defendant must be presumed innocent until proving guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. Michael Cohen, not just the host of political beat down, but also the host of the May of Culpa podcast here on the Midas Touch Network.

Also the author of Revenge, Wherever Books are Sold, gets your copy of Revenge, which really breaks down how Donald Trump weaponized the Justice Department against you and others. What is your reaction, though, when you see law and order actually in action right here? You know, I like to, at this time, sort of, parrot Michael Phannon, who is a hero and should be considered a hero in everyone's heart. He, Harry Dunn, in all of the Capitol police officers,

not just the ones that have received notoriety, but all of them that defended the Capitol, that defended democracy. And it's something that I talk about in revenge. It's something obviously that Ben you with various different podcasts and Micah on his and me on May a culpo. We try to bring out because,

unfortunately, the other networks that are out there, they don't invest enough time in terms of getting to the nitty gritty. And that's sort of what Revenge does. It breaks down into how Donald Trump weaponized the United States Department of Justice. And instead of being a president for all, it was really to be a president for himself.

What can he obtain from the presidency? Well, we all know Jared got a couple billion dollars from the Saudis. Yvonne can Jared made over $600 million during that time. He ended up doing some business with the Saudis after he left office. You know, the Ivanko also got a couple dozen Chinese patents on our trademarks on her various different companies. I mean this is all one big

gigantic grift. And you know what? As Michael Phenone said, I'd like to think that we played some small part in what's happening today. And I can tell you emphatically that he did, and you did Ben, and Pupik you did, and I believe that I did as well. And I believe that all of those that follow us on our various different podcasts or read the books or follow us here on political beatdown.

Thanks to all of us, thanks to you. This is exactly what Donald is getting because enough of us have spoken up and enough of us have kept this thing alive. Because rest assured, one of the things that Donald wants to do is to put this thing to bed once and for all. And that will also be, since of course, he lost out in the earlier stage.

He'll try to do it by wind back the White House and think about it, pardoning himself from the federal crimes. Now, of course, I hear a lot of pundits talk about, well, yeah, but there's still Alvin Bregg's case, that's a state case, when Fanny Willis brings the Fulton County Georgia case, that will be also a state case

and he cannot pardon himself from a state case. Yeah, sure. Just imagine the marshals showing up to the White House or anywhere in order to take the president who is being protected by the Secret Service. You're going to end up in a massive battle between various different governmental agencies like this country has never, forget about experience before, has never contemplated before.

This will create a constitutional crisis that none of us have ever anticipated and truthfully have no idea how it will ultimately resolve itself. Appreciate that commentary, Michael Cohen. Everybody can follow along with this indictment by going to MidasTouch.com. That's the new MidasTouch website. Everybody make sure you're subscribed as well to our YouTube channel. This is currently number one Most watched YouTube channel in the world across all genres thanks to this unapologetically pro democracy content right here and our great commentators like Michael Cohen Michael Popok Karen Friedman Agnifola. Let's just go through and Don't forget about yourself my you, my co-host in this political beat down, all right? Though, though, you know, you certainly have all the documents in front of you, and I'm

loving the fact that you're taking the lead on it. But let's not, let's not forget about Ben and let's make sure that you smack that Ben might sell this emoji. I don't know. A lot of people complain that there's no Michael Conan emoji. You and I are going to have a conversation after this. But let's all smack the Ben Myceles emoji, because Ben, you did a great job in analyzing and breaking down

and bringing us all together today on political beat down so that we can give you the raw and the unfiltered facts, something that you don't bet anywhere else. And it's exactly why right now we are number one. And you know what, we're going to continue to be number one with your help. And I am so excited and anxious to come up with the date with Ben where we're going to have this rally where we're all going to get together and make sure that our voices are heard,

not just in DC, but the press will be out there and rest assured our voices will be heard, not just here in this country, but around the world. So for that, again, I am eternally grateful for everybody that follows me, you know, on social media for all of you who have donated to the OFUN me so that we can hold Donald accountable for that as well. The purchasing, re-venge, following me on May of Culp of Podcast, and most importantly, joining Ben and I in the political beatdown as the brigade as we continue this journey of truth, raw unfiltered truth. So thank you from the bottom of our hearts. Salty, a few points I want to make before we, let's pull up this indictment that you can find at mightestouch.com. Let's show the section where it deals with the co conspirators. I'll hit 81 in just a moment,

but if you go up in the complaint, you'll see where it talks about the six co-conspirators. We believe co-conspirator one. There you have it right there to be Rudy Giuliani, co-conspirator two, to be John Eastman, both Trump lawyers. We believe co-conspirator three, and again, this is just based on the data

that we're analyzing right now to be Sydney Powell We believe co-conspirator four to be Jeff Clark who tried to become the acting United States attorney. We believe five and six to be Ken Chesbroon perhaps Peter Navarro But we are trying to confirm that as we speak, which brings me to paragraph 81. So when they're talking about co-conspirator 4, that's Jeff Clark, unindicted at this point, where it says, on the afternoon of January 3, co-conspirator 4, spoke with a deputy White House counsel, the previous month, the deputy White House counsel, had informed defendant Trump that, quote, there is no world, there is no option

in which you do not leave the White House on January 20th. Now the same deputy White House Council tried to dissuade co-conspirator for Jeff Clark from assuming the role of acting attorney general. The deputy White House Council reiterated to co-conspirator for that there had not been outcome-determinive fraud in the election, and that if the defendant remained in office nonetheless, there would be, quote, riots in every major city in the United States. Co-conspirator for responded, quote, well, Deputy White House Council, that's why there's an insurrection act. I want you to think about that. Here's another paragraph.

I don't have the paragraph number yet, but this is the one that Donald Trump told former Vice President Pence, you are too honest, where it says on January 1, defendant Trump called the Vice President and berated him because he had learned that the Vice President had opposed the lawsuit,

seeking a judicial decision. That at the certification, the Vice President had the authority lawsuit, seeking a judicial decision. That at the certification, the Vice President had the authority to reject or return votes to the states under the Constitution. Vice President Pence responded that he thought there was no constitutional basis for such authority and that it was improper and response, defendant Trump told the Vice President, quote,

you're too honest. Within hours of the conversation, the defendant Trump reminded his supporters to meet in Washington before the certification proceeded to proceeding, tweeting quote, the big protest rally in Washington, DC will take place at 11 a.m. on January 6, location of details to follow, stop the skill.

Just wanted to go show you how detailed this indictment is. Go to mightestouch.com now. Read the full indictment though. Read the this indictment is. Go to MidasTouch.com now. Read the full indictment though. Read the full indictment. That's what Special Counsel Jack Smith also implored people to do so you can see the level of detail here as well. I want to thank everybody for joining our coverage here on this historic episode of political beatdown.

And in the second hour, we covered the breaking news that Donald Trump has been indicted, again, in connection with trying to overthrow the 2020 election. We played the press conference, historic press conference by special counsel Jack Smith. This historic day were honored, and everybody shared this with us here, making the Midas Touch Network and political beat down the number one most watched show on YouTube in the world. And I'm talking about ahead of all other news networks and all other genres that is thanks to all of your support. Again, go to mitestouch.com. Make sure you're subscribed to this YouTube channel. If you want to get the mitestouch gear, go to store.mitestouch.com.

We've got the best pro-democracy gear, 100% union made, 100% made in the USA. That's store.mitestouch.com. Also, if you want to support the network, go to patreon.com slash might as touch. You could become an honorary producer as Cohen and I say probably smarter business models out there because we don't have outside investors, but this is a community, a pro democracy community that's fueled by you. And that's how we've grown this brick by brick. And I was so honored to announce here the new website might as touch.com as you're subscribed to the Midas Touch podcast, Legal AF, political beatdown, wherever audio podcasts are available.

And we're gonna close this show out again, at number one in the world, we're gonna go through this indictment more, we'll have more breaking news stories here. Make sure you share the Midas Touch Network YouTube within the MidasTouch.com site, with all friends, family, co-workers, colleagues, neighbors, whoever tell them about this pro-democracy community, unapologetically pro-democracy. And from the bottom of my heart, thank you,

thank you, thank you, Brigators, thank you, Legal A.F.ers, thank you to all the Midas mighty out there who support this network. It's because of you, this is number one in the world. And it is an honor for us. It's because of you this is number one in the world and it is an honor for us to be a part of this pro-democracy community. Thank you so much. Finally, a community that's compassionate and intelligent and that truly, truly defends our constitution. Thank you so much. We'll see you next time on political stay tuned for more breaking news here on the MidasTouch YouTube channel and a special shout out on this historic day to the Midas Mighty. The next one is the B-neck exclusively at store.mitustouch.com.