Legal AF by MeidasTouch - FED UP NY Judge CHECKMATES Trump in BRILLIANT ORDER
Episode Date: July 10, 2024Judge Engoron just told Trump’s lawyers their motion to disqualify him as a means to vacate the $465 million New York civil fraud judgment DOES NOT SCARE HIM IN THE LEAST, and has set a trap for the...m instead in a new ruling. Michael Popok of Legal AF explains that the Judge just granted Trump’s request to obtain documents from a lawyer who chatted up the judge about the case before the judge entered his order because HE KNOWS THERE ARE NO UNETHICAL COMMUNICATIONS between them. Checkmate, Judge Engoron. Head to https://Rhone.com/LEGALAF and use code LEGALAF to save 20% off your entire order! Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Join the Legal AF Patreon: https://Patreon.com/LegalAF Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
 Transcript
 Discussion  (0)
    
                                         Picture this, you finally get to the party and it's the usual drinks and small talk.
                                         
                                         Suddenly you spot something different.
                                         
                                         The BOLD Seagram 13, a 13% cosmopolitan cocktail.
                                         
                                         You grab a can and take a sip.
                                         
                                         Suddenly you're on a fresh adventure, becoming the hero of your own night.
                                         
                                         Unapologetically full flavored cocktails with a 13% punch.
                                         
                                         Seagram 13, dare to make your own luck.
                                         
                                         Must be legal drinking age.
                                         
    
                                         Please enjoy responsibly.
                                         
                                         Available at the LCBO.
                                         
                                         Make your nights unforgettable with American Express.
                                         
                                         Unmissable show coming up?
                                         
                                         Good news.
                                         
                                         We've got access to pre-sale tickets so you don't miss it.
                                         
                                         Meeting with friends before the show?
                                         
                                         We can book your reservation.
                                         
    
                                         And when you get to the main event,
                                         
                                         skip to the good bit using the Card member entrance.
                                         
                                         Let's go seize the night.
                                         
                                         That's the powerful backing of American Express.
                                         
                                         Visit amex.ca slash y amex.
                                         
                                         Benefits vary by card, other conditions apply.
                                         
                                         Imagine you're in Ottawa strolling through artistic landscapes at the National Gallery of Canada.
                                         
                                         Oh.
                                         
    
                                         Then cycling past Parliament Hill.
                                         
                                         Ah.
                                         
                                         Before unwinding on an outdoor patio.
                                         
                                         Oh.
                                         
                                         Then spending an evening on a cruise along the historic Rideau Canal.
                                         
                                         Ah.
                                         
                                         Exploration awaits in Ottawa.
                                         
                                         From oh to ah.
                                         
    
                                         Plan your Ottawa itinerary at OttawaTourism.ca.
                                         
                                         Pandora. Be Love. What does Be Love mean to you?
                                         
                                         I definitely would say my Be Love role model is for sure my sister.
                                         
                                         Unconditional, infinite love.
                                         
                                         Something that is never-ending, that you know is always there.
                                         
                                         Never questioned.
                                         
                                         Never questioned.
                                         
                                         No matter if you fall off a cliff, she's there to catch you, you know is always there. Never questioned. Never questioned. No matter if you fall off a cliff,
                                         
    
                                         she's there to catch you, you know?
                                         
                                         Be love.
                                         
                                         Shop now at pandora.net.
                                         
                                         This is Michael Popak, Legal AF.
                                         
                                         Will Donald Trump and his lawyers better be sitting down
                                         
                                         because they just got an order from Judge Angoron
                                         
                                         that's actually in their favor
                                         
                                         and an effort by them to disqualify Judge Angoran that's actually in their favor in an effort by them to disqualify Judge Angoran
                                         
    
                                         as the judge who rendered the decision
                                         
                                         after six weeks of trial against Trump
                                         
                                         and all of the little Trumpers for $465 million
                                         
                                         in the New York Attorney General's civil fraud case.
                                         
                                         Let me bring everybody up to speed.
                                         
                                         Couple of weeks ago, the other side found out
                                         
                                         that a lawyer who regularly
                                         
                                         appears in front of Judge Angoran, in this case a guy by the name of Adam Leitman Bailey
                                         
    
                                         at a law firm, got into a conversation with the judge before he entered his decision and
                                         
                                         order against Donald Trump,
                                         
                                         and gave his unsolicited two cents opinion
                                         
                                         that the judge should not rule against Donald Trump
                                         
                                         and should not find for Letitia James.
                                         
                                         In words to that effect, the judge didn't credit it.
                                         
                                         Mr. Littman Bailey was not representing Donald Trump.
                                         
                                         It was not an ex parte communication
                                         
    
                                         the way lawyers know that to be
                                         
                                         because it wasn't one
                                         
                                         of the sides in the case making contact with the judge. And so he didn't have to disclose it
                                         
                                         to the parties. But they made a big deal out of it and said, oh, it shows Anguaron should be
                                         
                                         disqualified. He was taking unsolicited advice from somebody. By the way, the unsolicited advice
                                         
                                         was pro Donald Trump, not against Donald Trump. Put that aside for a minute.
                                         
                                         As part of their motion to disqualify, which goes to Judge Anguaron, all judges decide
                                         
                                         their own motions to disqualify in the first instance before it goes off to an appellate
                                         
    
                                         court.
                                         
                                         May seem counterintuitive, may seem strange to have the judge that you think did something
                                         
                                         bad handle the disqualification or recusal motion, but that's the way it works in our
                                         
                                         American justice system.
                                         
                                         And so as part of that,
                                         
                                         they wanted a full blown evidentiary hearing,
                                         
                                         they wanted witness testimony,
                                         
                                         and they wanted this lawyer who stuck his big fat nose
                                         
    
                                         and big fat thumb right into this case for no reason,
                                         
                                         maybe public glory, maybe his 15 minutes of fame,
                                         
                                         but Adam Littman or Lietman Bailey got a subpoena
                                         
                                         and his law firm got a subpoena
                                         
                                         asking for everything under the sun.
                                         
                                         All communications he's ever had in any of his cases
                                         
                                         with the judge.
                                         
                                         He represents dozens and dozens of clients
                                         
    
                                         that have been before the court
                                         
                                         having nothing to do with Donald Trump.
                                         
                                         They wanted all conversations or communications.
                                         
                                         This guy who's not involved with the case
                                         
                                         has had with other third parties about Donald Trump.
                                         
                                         What does that have to do with anything?
                                         
                                         So this is a classic fishing expedition.
                                         
                                         And on that ground alone, the judge could quash it,
                                         
    
                                         but are you sitting down, Donald?
                                         
                                         Are you sitting down, lawyers?
                                         
                                         You got part of what you were looking for
                                         
                                         because the judge isn't scared by your motion practice or by your discovery.
                                         
                                         Here's what he said.
                                         
                                         He said, generally, when you do a fishing expedition
                                         
                                         for a subpoena and you're looking for things
                                         
                                         that are completely irrelevant to the matters at hand,
                                         
    
                                         that's gonna be quashed.
                                         
                                         And the judge could have done that.
                                         
                                         But on page two of the order,
                                         
                                         the decision and order I have right here,
                                         
                                         it says in the third paragraph,
                                         
                                         however, the subpoena directed to Mr. Bailey
                                         
                                         and his firm is not wholly without merit.
                                         
                                         Mr. Bailey has opened the door
                                         
    
                                         by making his extraordinary claims to the media,
                                         
                                         in which he, by his own admission,
                                         
                                         stated that he attempted to offer unsolicited legal advice
                                         
                                         to this court.
                                         
                                         Right, he cornered the judge
                                         
                                         and started to tell the judge why he shouldn't rule against Donald Trump. By the way, he ruled
                                         
                                         against Donald Trump, if those of you who don't know current history, to the tune of $465 million
                                         
                                         running with interest. Accordingly, the judge went on, defendants are entitled to any communications
                                         
    
                                         or documents in Mr. Bailey's possession that involve, discuss, or in any way refer to the case
                                         
                                         that the judge has entered the decision of order about Donald Trump as defined in the subpoena.
                                         
                                         So the motion to quash is granted in part solely to the extent of quashing any communications
                                         
                                         sought that are unrelated, not relevant, to the Trump case. Mr. Bailey is directed to furnish all responsive documents
                                         
                                         to the subpoena as here modified within seven days
                                         
                                         from the date of this order.
                                         
                                         That is a confident judge who's basically saying, bring it.
                                         
                                         I didn't do anything wrong.
                                         
    
                                         It's not an ex parte communication
                                         
                                         under the judicial ethics rules or the cannons.
                                         
                                         It was just an unsolicited, almost set up by Bailey
                                         
                                         to pull the judge aside and then go to the media
                                         
                                         for his 15 minutes of fame.
                                         
                                         Has nothing to do with the proper,
                                         
                                         it's not a miscarriage of justice.
                                         
                                         It's not something that was improper.
                                         
    
                                         And the judge is saying,
                                         
                                         you wanna go rooting around the filing cabinets
                                         
                                         of Mr. Bailey?
                                         
                                         You wanna find out whatever communications he had about this action with the court cabinets of Mr. Bailey. You want to find out whatever communications he had
                                         
                                         about this action with the court, go ahead.
                                         
                                         Judge knows it's going to be none.
                                         
                                         He searched his own emails.
                                         
                                         He's made sure in his own text messages,
                                         
    
                                         there aren't going to be any.
                                         
                                         And so it's at best a Pyrrhic victory for Donald Trump,
                                         
                                         but it just shows you how confident Judge Angoran is that he's
                                         
                                         properly administrating justice in that courtroom.
                                         
                                         He doesn't have to hide anything.
                                         
                                         You want to go get Mr. Bailey's documents?
                                         
                                         Fine.
                                         
                                         They may even, next, after they get the documents, they may ask Bailey, they might ask the court
                                         
    
                                         for a deposition.
                                         
                                         We want a deposition of Mr. Bailey to get to the bottom of what went down.
                                         
                                         The judge will probably grant it within limits.
                                         
                                         Most clothes are uncomfortable or too tight,
                                         
                                         or never actually the size you really are,
                                         
                                         not to mention the annoyance of trying
                                         
                                         to put a good outfit together.
                                         
                                         Everyone wants to dress their best
                                         
    
                                         and look good at all times, because frankly,
                                         
                                         it's a confidence booster.
                                         
                                         I regularly wear Rome when I do the podcast or on hot takes.
                                         
                                         So here's the deal. Men's closets were due for a radical
                                         
                                         reinvention and Roan stepped up to the challenge. Roan's
                                         
                                         commuter collection is the most comfortable, breathable and
                                         
                                         flexible set of products known to men. And here's why. Roan
                                         
                                         helps you get ready for any occasion with the commuter
                                         
    
                                         collection, which offers the world's most comfortable pants,
                                         
                                         for any occasion with the Commuter Collection, which offers the world's most comfortable pants, dress shirts, one-quarter zips, and polos.
                                         
                                         Roan's comfortable four-way stretch fabric provides breathability and flexibility that
                                         
                                         leaves you free to enjoy what life throws your way, from your commute to work to your
                                         
                                         18 holes of golf.
                                         
                                         It's time to feel confident without the hassle.
                                         
                                         With Roan's Wrinkle Release Technology, wrinkles disappear as to feel confident without the hassle. With Rhone's wrinkle release technology,
                                         
                                         wrinkles disappear as you stretch and wear the products.
                                         
    
                                         It's that easy.
                                         
                                         With Gold Fusion anti-odor technology,
                                         
                                         you'll be smelling fresh and clean all day long.
                                         
                                         And on top of that, Rhone is 100% machine washable,
                                         
                                         so you can ditch the dry cleaner altogether.
                                         
                                         Rhone has truly become my favorite clothes.
                                         
                                         We're on the move a lot, whether it's jumping
                                         
                                         from meeting to meeting or catching a flight
                                         
    
                                         or a dinner out, the Roan Commuter Collection
                                         
                                         has never let me down.
                                         
                                         Even after I wear it all day, I still feel super fresh
                                         
                                         because of that Gold Fusion anti-odor technology.
                                         
                                         Head to roan.com slash Legal AF
                                         
                                         and use promo code Legal AF to save 20% off your entire order.
                                         
                                         That's 20% off your entire order
                                         
                                         when you head to rhone.com slash LegalAF
                                         
    
                                         and use code LegalAF.
                                         
                                         It's time to find your corner office.
                                         
                                         And then if they want to have an evidentiary hearing
                                         
                                         about this, the judge is going to then take
                                         
                                         all of the evidences before him, including the Bailey subpoena
                                         
                                         as modified by the judge.
                                         
                                         And they're going to say, he's going to say the following.
                                         
                                         Let me just project what Judge Angoran is going to say.
                                         
    
                                         Okay, let's go through the checklist of things
                                         
                                         that would require my disqualification or recusal.
                                         
                                         Ex parte communication on a substantive matter
                                         
                                         with parties involved in this case or their lawyers
                                         
                                         without me having disclosed to the parties that it happened.
                                         
                                         That didn't happen here.
                                         
                                         Mr. Bailey doesn't represent Mr. Trump,
                                         
                                         is not a lobbyist for Mr. Trump,
                                         
    
                                         he's not a party to this case,
                                         
                                         and I don't have to disclose I had a contact
                                         
                                         with a general member of the public
                                         
                                         who regularly appears in front of my court
                                         
                                         to kibitz about the Trump case.
                                         
                                         This is New York. New Yorkers of court to kibitz about the Trump case. This is New York.
                                         
                                         New Yorkers of various stripes kibitz about legal proceedings
                                         
                                         like they're talking about baseball or sports.
                                         
    
                                         Happens on the subway,
                                         
                                         happens over lunch at a sandwich in the park,
                                         
                                         and sometimes it happens when you see the judge
                                         
                                         presiding over the case.
                                         
                                         And so the judge did nothing wrong.
                                         
                                         Secondly, appearance of impropriety.
                                         
                                         There can be no appearance of impropriety since I didn't ask for the advice,
                                         
                                         I didn't use the advice, none of his legal advice,
                                         
    
                                         if you wanna call it that, ended up in my decision
                                         
                                         or influenced my decision.
                                         
                                         In fact, it went the other way.
                                         
                                         He talked about Donald Trump in a way
                                         
                                         that suggested that I should rule against Donald Trump
                                         
                                         and the court did not rule against Donald Trump
                                         
                                         or rule for Donald Trump, if you will.
                                         
                                         So there's no grounds for that.
                                         
    
                                         And in terms of ex parte or improper lobbying
                                         
                                         or communication between my office, my chambers,
                                         
                                         and Mr. Bailey's law firm, you got the subpoena,
                                         
                                         I gave you the subpoena, there is none, denied.
                                         
                                         And that will set the proper framework and foundation
                                         
                                         and a record for Donald Trump when he takes
                                         
                                         this inevitably to the Manhattan Appellate Court, the first department, for the first
                                         
                                         department to also reaffirm Judge Anguaron's status as the presiding judge and do not do
                                         
    
                                         anything to vacate the decision and order?
                                         
                                         If Donald Trump's going to get that decision and order reversed, he's going to have to
                                         
                                         do it on other grounds.
                                         
                                         He's got other appeal grounds.
                                         
                                         He's arguing that the appellate court
                                         
                                         gave direction to the trial court
                                         
                                         before the trial started about which transactions
                                         
                                         were inside or outside a statute of limitations.
                                         
    
                                         In other words, were too old or stale
                                         
                                         to be considered as part of the evidence.
                                         
                                         And they're gonna argue the judge did it wrong.
                                         
                                         The judge included on the continuum of transactions certain things that were wrong.
                                         
                                         Okay, that's an argument that you can have in good faith in front of an appellate court.
                                         
                                         That the trial judge didn't properly apply the mandates and the rules and the rulings
                                         
                                         by the appellate court.
                                         
                                         Okay, but this other stuff, Judge Angoran is corrupt.
                                         
    
                                         Judge Angoran is disqualified. Judge Angoran has an appearance of impropriety. Judge Angoran is corrupt. Judge Angoran is disqualified.
                                         
                                         Judge Angoran has an appearance of impropriety.
                                         
                                         Judge Angoran's wife is a Trump hater.
                                         
                                         Judge Angoran's law clerk is dating an elected official,
                                         
                                         which is a lie.
                                         
                                         Judge Angoran is co-judging the case with his law clerk.
                                         
                                         Good luck.
                                         
                                         Those are all loser arguments at the appellate level.
                                         
    
                                         The judge, as we know, listened to dozens and dozens of hours of testimony, hundreds
                                         
                                         of hours of testimony, by dozens and dozens of witnesses, including those who had the
                                         
                                         last name Trump, including Donald Trump himself, and evaluated thousands and thousands and
                                         
                                         thousands of exhibits provided and admitted into evidence, both on the Trump side and
                                         
                                         on the New York attorney general side.
                                         
                                         He weighed that evidence as the only trial or effect because there was no jury, because
                                         
                                         the statute that is applicable for discouragement of persistent fraud in New York doesn't allow for a jury trial.
                                         
                                         They could have argued for a jury trial, but they would have lost.
                                         
    
                                         And the judge, it rises and falls with the judge as it has since the 1950s.
                                         
                                         And since case law amplifying the power of the attorney general under this executive order,
                                         
                                         executive law that I'm talking about, that was established in a case that had Donald Trump's name in it. This is all a
                                         
                                         distraction because when bad things happen, Donald Trump lives by the adage,
                                         
                                         make them happen slower. That's all we're watching. At the end of the day, that
                                         
                                         judgment is going to stand just like E. Jean Carroll's judgment for over a
                                         
                                         hundred million dollars for punitive damages and sex abuse and defamation is going to stand. Donald Trump is going to have to
                                         
                                         take a lot of that money that he's grifted from his followers on true social stock purchases.
                                         
    
                                         He's going to have to use that to pay the people of the state of New York back for his persistent
                                         
                                         fraud over 10 years and pay E. Jean Carroll and others. That's just the way it's going to come down.
                                         
                                         But I love the confidence, the machismo, if you will, of the judge to say,
                                         
                                         you want to talk to Mr. Bailey, you want to see all of his documents, go ahead,
                                         
                                         because you don't have grounds to disqualify me, so I'm not afraid of anything. Go ahead.
                                         
                                         And we're going to continue to follow
                                         
                                         how the criminal justice system is trying, trying its best, at least in the hands of
                                         
                                         competent judges like Judge Angkoran, Judge Mershon, Judge Chutkin, the DC Court of Appeals,
                                         
    
                                         to restrain an out of control rogue criminal candidate for the presidency. That's what we're watching.
                                         
                                         And that groaning you hear is the groaning of our criminal justice system devised by our founding
                                         
                                         fathers fundamentally straining under the weight and the pressure and the attacks of Donald Trump
                                         
                                         and his MAGA legion. That's all we're listening to. And we'll call it out right here. We'll amplify
                                         
                                         it for you and explain it to you on the Minus Touch Network and on YouTube on a show, on a podcast we call, wait for it,
                                         
                                         Legal AF. Now you know why Ben and I named it that four years ago. We sit at the intersection of law
                                         
                                         and politics. We bring you a show that curates the top four or five stories at that intersection
                                         
                                         every Wednesday and Saturday at 8 p.m. Eastern time, right here on the Midas Touch YouTube channel,
                                         
    
                                         and then on every major podcast platform you can think of.
                                         
                                         So until my next hot take, until my next Legal AF,
                                         
                                         this is Michael Popak reporting.
                                         
                                         Heary, heary, Legal AF Law Breakdown is now in session.
                                         
                                         Go beyond the headlines and get a deep dive
                                         
                                         into the important legal concepts you need to know,
                                         
                                         and we discuss every day
                                         
                                         on Legal AF. Exclusive content you won't find anywhere else all for the price of
                                         
    
                                         a couple of cups of coffee. Join us at patreon.com legalaf that's patreon.com
                                         
                                         legalaf
                                         
