Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Legal AF Full Episode 12/10/2025

Episode Date: December 11, 2025

A federal judge throws the National Guard out of California. Federal Judges protect the Epstein Survivors from further abuse by the Trump Administration. A federal judge may block any attempts to re-indict Former FBI Director James Comey. A federal judge sets a hearing to possibly refer Trump Officials for criminal prosecution. And that’s just the midweek! Only on Legal AF Podcast, with Michael Popok and Karen Friedman Agnifilo. Support Our Sponsors: Armra: Head to https://tryarmra.com/legalaf or enter promo code: LEGALAF to receive 15% off your first order! Delete Me: Get 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to join https://deleteme.com/LEGALAF and use promo code LEGALAF at checkout. Magic Spoon: Save $5 OFF your next order when you go to http://magicspoon.com/LEGALAF Lola Blankets: Get 40% off your entire order at https://lolablankets.com by using code LEGALAF at checkout. Experience the world’s #1 blanket with Lola Blankets. Learn more about the Popok Firm: https://thepopokfirm.com Subscribe to Legal AF Substack: https://substack.com/@legalaf Check out the Popok Firm: https://thepopokfirm.com Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's the midweek, which means it's Legal A-F, the podcast. Karen Freeman, Ignifalo, and Michael Popock. Oh, Karen, so good to see you. It just gives me such instant sanity and calmness when you and I do the podcast together. Same. And listen to these topics, Karen, you and I came up with for today. Judges now not only releasing more Epstein files than we know what's to do with but taking time to chastise the Trump administration and how they continue to victimize

the survivors and the victims in the same breath and also reminding the world what a diabolically bad person galane maxwell is in case anybody had forgotten it but there's been developments about what we think are the epstein files including all of the exhibits that were used against galane Maxwell that got her convicted of five felony counts of child sex trafficking and sentenced to a 20-year prison sentence. So that should be interesting. Then we have Judge Breyer, Chief Judge, sorry, senior Judge Breyer up in San Francisco, who issued an order today to instruct the Trump administration to take the Federalized National Guard out of California, to return the National Guard to Gavin Newsom and get the effort.

out, although he's giving them until Monday to file their inevitable appeal to the Ninth Circuit, but some powerful, powerful language in Judge Breyer's order about Donald Trump, that effectively that the founding fathers and framers would be shocked by what Donald Trump's attempting to do to create a national standing army out of state militia. Judge Boasberg, I was shocked when he said in an order in the last couple of days. We're going to hold a hearing on contempt on December 15th against the Trump administration. I want to hear from several people.

And I haven't yet made up my mind who's going to jail. And I'm looking at you, Christy Noem. I mean, I'm giving you the summary. But that's effectively what he said in his order. So, Jeff Bozberg, he's back and talking criminal contempt against the Trump administration and effectively, Christy Noem. He wants to hear from a whistleblower.

You got an appellate court judge that had a file an affidavit. What cats and dogs are sleeping together? What is happening in these cases? And then finally, there's developments in the attempt by the Trump administration to re-indict former FBI director James Comey. I want to hear from former prosecutor Karen Freeman Niflo. I don't see this happening. And the statute that they're relying on to give themselves an extra sick.

months, I don't think is applicable to what happened when Lindsay Halligan found herself on the wrong end of an order that said she was illegally appointed. But this is why you come to legal AF so that we can work it out in front of you all of these very complicated issues and make sense of them all. So I'm so glad that you're here and I'm very, very thrilled to have my colleague Karen Friedman McNifalo right out of court. I know. I know. I feel so bad I had to miss last week, but I'm in the middle of what's turning out to be, it was supposed to be a several-day hearing is now a several-week hearing. It's about three weeks long. So it's good to be back in court, though. It's going to be back in the well and fighting the good fight. Yeah. Tell us more.

I'm sorry. So let's talk about Epstein. So a month or so ago, or less than that, the Donald Trump seeing the writing on the wall finally got behind the Epstein Transparency Act. which requires everything that's in the possession of the Department of Justice, like the trial files for the indictment of prosecution of Galane Maxwell that just happened a couple of years ago and whatever they had left over in Epstein to have it released. And they have all of it. They must have all of it.

But they've been running around to courts, Karen, trying to get grand jury transcripts, and they try that in the summer, and to try to get files. and protective orders that were in place to have them modified so they can make releases and all that. So in the last week, they went in front of Judge Rodney Smith in Fort Lauderdale, Florida about

the original prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein down in the Southern District of Florida. They went before Judge Engelmeyer, who's presiding over all things, Galane Maxwell, and they went to Judge Berman, who's presiding over all things Jeffrey Epstein in New York. And

this is the same, well, two out of the three or the same group they went to in July. And at the time, without the Epstein law being signed by Trump, the judges were like, no, we're bound by Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We can't give you the grand jury transcripts. And by the way, there's nothing really in the grand jury transcripts. Go release the files that are with the executive branch. But now there's been a change because of that act.

So why don't you update our audience as to what happened with Judge Engelmeyer and now with Judge Berman today and why this is another statement. towards dignity for the survivors and the victims of the child sex trafficking ring run by Jeffrey Epstein and Colleen Maxwell and covered up by Donald Trump. Well, I think what's great is we're finally going to get

to see the grand jury minutes from the two grand jury presentations that happened, the one in Florida, the original one, where Jeffrey Epstein was indicted and was supposed to be prosecuted, supposed to be prosecuted for sex trafficking, but then was given this sweetheart deal and barely served any time at all. And I think he was like a misdemeanor even that he, that he was able to plead to. It was just this ridiculous deal. And I think we're going to finally get to see what was in that,

as well as the, I think, was going to be a much more sweeping grand jury presentation of Galane Maxwell that happened many years later, the case where she was ultimately prosecuted. prosecuted and convicted and where she's serving time. Interestingly, though, in federal grand jury's hearsay is allowed, which means you don't have to hear from the original speaker of the witness. You don't have to have the victims don't testify. Like in state court, in New York, you would have to have the actual victims would have to testify, and you get a lot more information in that type of grand jury presentation,

but in federal court hearsay is allowed. And so typically, they only have one witness come in and testify. just the case agent who comes in and describes and summarizes the whole thing. So the grand jury minutes, I think, being released is a big step forward because we will see what the prosecutors relied on, what their theory was, what the evidence was, and what the nature of everything that happened was. Now, with Gleine Maxwell, I think it's going to be a lot less of a surprise because, as I said, she was ultimately tried, there was a trial.

And so we know what all that evidence is. So this is just going to be the transcripts of the agent that indicted her originally. But the Jeffrey Epstein case, I think, will be interesting. And the two together, I think, will paint a picture of what the investigation was. The prosecutors, though, are going to have a lot more information than just what are in those two grand jury presentations. Because, as I said, those are just one witness, the case agent that comes in and summarizes it. What they don't do is give you all of the investigatory steps that they took. And they don't talk about the cases, for example, or the victims where they couldn't,

where they decided not to bring charges against Jeffrey Epstein or Gillane Maxwell, or the other individuals that they investigated that were also predators who were also sexually assaulting these young girls. That's all going to be in the files of the prosecutors, as well as the backup material. Any emails that they have, phone records, anything that they were covered in search warrants, the computers belonging to Gillane Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, ICloud warrants, if they backed anything up into ICloud, everything they've ever written, texted about, all of that. That's all going to be in these case files. Things like anything recovered in a search warrant.

So if there was any evidence that they were covered in the search warrant, again, all that stuff is going to be in the case files. The grand jury, by its definition, is a bare bones presentation that just gives you enough to get an indictment. It is certainly not the full evidence that is going to be used at trial. And the full evidence used at trial is, again, only the tip of the iceberg of the investigation. And so the investigation, all the things that they did do, and frankly, the things they didn't do, the people they talked to, the people they gave deals to, the people that they chose not to prosecute, et cetera. All of that is going to be in the files that the Justice Department has, the prosecutor's files. So although we're going to see grand jury materials, yes, that's definitely a good thing. it's really not the, it's not the big thing.

What we really need to see is the full investigatory case file, and the Department of Justice hopefully will release it, but the problem is this Epstein law gives them a huge, a huge, yes, but if there's an investigation, we can hold some stuff back, and then they suddenly, they announced these investigations. First, Pam Bondi says, I've looked at the list. Well, first she says there's a list sitting on my desk, And that's all referring to all the people who were on Epstein's list, right, the other predators.

Then she says, oh, there's no list. And then she says, well, I've looked at all of, I've studied the files, and there's no one else to prosecute. And now suddenly, right before they passed this Epstein's law, they announce investigations into certain Democrats only who they say, oh, we have to investigate them because they might be guilty. in the Epstein scandal. And I fear they're going to use that as an excuse to withhold certain documents saying, well, there's a pending criminal investigation. We can't possibly release this without hurting the investigation.

So they really talk about, they really are not consistent, is putting it mildly. And they're going to look for any excuse to withhold certain information. It's just a matter of how they're going to do it or what they're going to call it. But for anyone, if anyone says, well, they really the grand jury minutes. Oh, so Trump is transparent. He's released all this information. The grand jury

minutes are really not that much. And so that's not going to be really what people want to see or what's going to give transparency to this case and put this to bed finally. Yeah, I agree with you. I think I like to see the trial file that was used by Maureen Comey to prosecute Galane Maxwell. They've always had it at the Department of Justice, they didn't need, maybe they needed a modification of the protective order that Judge Nathan had put in place. But most of what we're going to see, we've seen publicly already. The trial was reported on, including by legal AF, every day. Anything that came out of it that was interesting, we talked about. So if anybody's thinking there's going to be some secret trove of information that we've never seen before, that's not going to happen. And I do

appreciate Judge Engelmeyer, who spent a considerable amount of time, unlike Judge Smith and even Judge Berman, and said, you know what, I want to do a couple things with my order. Yes, I'm going to release the files, because I do believe that the act sort of takes precedent over Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. But let's remind everybody how we got here with Colleen Maxwell, shall we? And he walked through the five counts, what they were, when the trial was, the dozens of witnesses, the types of evidence that were used against her, the conviction, the sentencing, her appeal to the Second Circuit, her attempt at a rehearing at the Second Circuit denied, and her attempt at an appeal to the United States Supreme Court denied. And child sex

trafficker all over his recitation of the facts related to Galane Maxwell. He's speaking to many audiences, but one is if anybody has been buying any of this horse shit that Galane Maxwell and her, I think, former lawyer, because she filed something in this particular case we're talking about in which the lawyer said that his client or former client is going to be filing a pro se writ of habeas corpus to get out of jail in Texas. Pro se means no lawyer. She's going to be our own jailhouse lawyer now. Maybe because he watched again the transcript or listen to the transcript of his client testifying to Todd Blanche under oath and realized that she perjured herself, maybe, maybe a little bit of that. We'll find out over time. But Judge

Engelmeyer also used his order to excoriate and scorn and reprimand the Trump administration about the victims and protecting their identities. He's not concerned about, he doesn't want anything redacted related to Donald Trump, but he said, you know, the victims who have written letters to the court through their lawyers have a right to believe that they could be harmed again by a lackadaisical approach to blocking out their names and identifying information by the Department of Justice. So I'm going to make this easy. He said, and he says, and the government has misled in their filings. They filed motions in the summer to get these documents, and they never told the victims or the survivors that they were going to file the motion.

And that's wrong. And they told the world that all the truth about Epstein was going to be revealed in the disclosure of the grand jury materials. And as you pointed out, Karen, that was wrong. So the judge said, here's what we're going to do. I'm going to name a human being to be personally responsible for redacting the names of these victims. So I can hold somebody responsible. And he said, that person is Jay Clayton, who's the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. The same guy who may stand at a podium one day and say, well, we haven't. investigation ongoing, so I can't release any of these documents. But this judge is saying you sign this motion, you're going to be personally responsible to make sure that it's done

correctly and run it past the victims before you release this stuff. And I understand you've got less than 20 days left to get all this stuff out the door. But we'll have to see just because we haven't heard leaks from the Department of Justice about whether they're going to hold back any documents based on investigations, active investigations or not, doesn't mean that they're not. So we'll have to just get closer in time to the actual date or deadline.

And also, the date or deadline, like, so what? I mean, there was a date or deadline that was set by Congress to sell TikTok. Donald Trump kept extending it. Don't be surprised if this Trump administration, Department of Justice, says, oh, oops, we missed the deadline. Then what are you going to do about it?

Then we've got to file motions. Then we've got to file lawsuits. Then we, I mean, you know, this is a, Congress isn't going to go after the presidency. They're not, Congress isn't going to file a lawsuit to make him comply with their deadline. So somebody in the American people is going to do it, one of the public interest groups. And it's going to be months and more time and more time and more time. So I'm not buying that the Trump administration thinks there's a drop dead deadline and they have to comply because what's the penalty if they don't? So we'll continue to follow all that.

We also, Karen, I want to touch base on what happened with Judge Breyer when we come back from our break and his new ruling, Chief Charles Breyer, the brother of former Supreme Court Justice Breyer, Stephen Breyer, about the not just about the federalization of the California National Guard, but about what he's been talking about in several of his decisions, the attempt by a president to abuse power by creating. creating a standing army out of the state militia in violation of the 10th Amendment. He also ruled, and it has not been overturned, that Donald Trump violated the Posse Cometatis Act in the past. And now he's basically said, there is no rationale to extend the time by new order proclamation by the Secretary of Defense, the beleaguered Pete Heggsath, to keep troops on the ground in California. There's nothing going on in California that stops the ability of the president to execute on the laws with regular forces and support. He doesn't need the backup of the state militia.

You know, he can't point to things that happened a year ago. This is what Judge Breyer is saying. So we're going to come back and talk about that new decision and what it means at the Ninth Circuit and the rest. Jeb Bosberg, Chief Judge of the D.C. Circuit Court, Gearing back up this contempt proceeding. And I want to talk with you, Karen, in our audience, about what's going on the attempt to re-indict James Comey, and if Judge Colar Contelli is going to block it by denying

the prosecution the ability to use the Daniel Richmond files, there's a cliffhanger, in their next attempt at indictment, and whether they can indict it all based on the statute of limitations. But it's time to pay the bills. I guess that's the way to put it. We have many ways to support what we do on Legal IF here on the Midas Touch Network where we exclusively are hit the subscribe button, help Midas. But then come over to LegalAF, the YouTube channel. We are 19,000 subscribers, which in our world is not that

that we should be able to get there in the next week or two, away from a million. And I'll be frank, the bigger we are, the more muscular and robust we are, before 2026, the better off we all are going to be. And you can help. You may have forgotten. You think you subscribed.

Maybe you did. Maybe you didn't. It's all free. Go over and check. You'll know right away. Hit the subscribe button there. And then we've got a legal AF substack where we do live reporting. We do commercial-free versions of things. We do a written reporting. We're up to 110,000 or more subscribers there.

And that and a paid membership, which unlocks a whole. treasure trove of other material for about seven bucks a month is a second way to support what we do on legal a f and then you've got the you know just the podcast itself um apple spotify on the audio side youtube on the video side we're regularly in the top 100 of youtube podcast i think last week we were of number 56 we bounce around in the audio side depending upon how many audio listens we have and some other work that I do for legal AF, but we're usually in the top 200, 100, and that's all a testament to you and your fervent support of what we do.

And then the last thing is our sponsors, and we're in the holiday season now and all of that. And we've curated these sponsors in collaboration with the Midas Touch Brothers and Jordy. And these, what's special about the sponsors is that, you know, we're not an easy pill to swallow from a content perspective in the YouTube. universe what i mean by that is we don't we don't blow smoke or sunshine and we have a point of view you know uh you used to you know i don't want to be say this the wrong way we're opinionated in a good way we get into good trouble on an hourly basis on legal a f and here on the podcast and that's not for every that's not for every sponsor you know uh the free exercise of the first

amendment but it is for this group and so if you can spare some extra coin and i know it's difficult in this economy. These are products that we liked, that we try, that we take for a spin, and that we appreciate. And we appreciate our sponsors because they help pay the bills and keep the lights on. People say, how do you, who does this work? The editing of this lower third Cairo here and this thing over, I'm sure I'm butchering everything. And this thing over, how do we, who, what? I say, yeah, there's people behind the scenes. Yeah, there's, I roll off, as we get closer to Christmas and holidays, we'll roll off all their names. We'll do like a thing, like at the end of a movie, about all the people that help us here on Legal

A-F in the Midas Touch, but that's it. So here now is our first break with a word from our sponsors. I got a secret. I'm genuinely obsessed with my Lola blanket. I'm a blanket person, and this has officially taken over my entire wind-down routine. When I sit down at night to relax and put on whatever I'm watching, this is the blanket I reach for. My first reaction, pulling it out of the box was honestly, wow. The ultra-soft faux fur and and that four-way stretch feel, totally different from any blanket I've had. The design I chose fits perfectly with my space.

And now I'm looking at my old blankets like, why do I still own these? The quality is next level, luxury, vegan, faux fur, machine washable, double hem, no pilling or shedding even after repeated washes. It makes your whole space feel cozier instantly. For a limited time, our listeners are getting a huge, 35% off their entire order

at lolablankets.com by using code legal a.f at checkout, just head to lolablankets.com and use code legal i.f for 35% off. After you purchase, they'll ask you where you heard about them. Please support our show and tell them we sent you. Wrap yourself in luxury with Lola Blankets. One last time, head to lolablankets.com and use code legal AF for 35% off. You know that nostalgic feeling of sitting at the breakfast table as a kid and pouring a giant bowl of cereal that just tasted amazing? Well, Magic Spoon has reinvented that feeling

with cereal and treats that bring back the flavors you love, but in a way that actually fuels your day. Every serving of Magic Spoons, high-protein cereal, packs 13 grams of protein, zero sugar, and four grams of net carbs, and the flavors straight out of your childhood, fruity, cocoa, and frosted.

And then there are the Magic Spoon treats. Crispy, crunchy, airy, and ridiculously satisfied with 12 grams of protein at every bar they come in mouth-watering flavors like marshmallow, chocolate peanut butter, and dark chocolate. Perfect on the go pre-or post-workout or even as late-night snack. Here's how you try them. Get $5 off your next order at magic spoon.com slash legal a.F or look for magic spoon on Amazon or in your nearest grocery store. That's magic spoon.com slash legal a.f for $5 off. Welcome back and thank you to our audience first for supporting all that we do on Legal AF for over five years and to support

our pro-democracy sponsors. Let's dive in to Judge Charles Breyer, Breyer the lesser known, who sits in San Francisco, senior status probably on the edge of retirement. I think he's 81, but he's been cranking out some orders. It's the revenge of the senior status judges, as I like to joke, protecting our democracy, protecting our rule of law. He was the first one that ruled that Donald Trump had unconstitutionally and illegally under a narrow delegation statute from Congress who has the power to the president under unique circumstances to take over the national guard. It's a congressional power.

It's a war power. It's not a war power under the commander of chief. It's a power of Congress delegated to the president by statute. we call 12406 and they have to be certain circumstances rebellion invasion and i can't execute the laws like that you know and by the i can't execute the laws that means i'm trying my hardest to execute the laws congress has created because remember congress creates laws but i can't do it using regular forces now we can have a debate about regular forces what are they are they the local security forces? Are they law enforcement? Are they both? Are they the armed forces? We're going to get

all that resolved soon with the Supreme Court. But he was the first judge that said, you can't take over the state militia, cut out the governor, and start roaming around with a national, you know, standing army in blue states. And you can't keep reupping it and reauthorizing it because our fear, and I think it's legitimate, is that Trump's going to keep troops on the ground in blue states through the midterms to scare the crap out of voters. Not that that's working very well for him. We flipped a seat in Georgia yesterday. We have the first female and the first Democrat mayor of the city of Miami,

my hometown now, Eileen Higgins. We're flipping, you know, we flip 20 seats three weeks ago. We're going to flip another 12 seats yesterday. This is not working for him. And no matter how many rallies in casinos in Pennsylvania, he has, when he's supposed to be talking about affordability, and Trump starts talking about transgender people again, and Somalis, and I guess transgender Somalis that are taking over the world,

and why don't we let more Swedish and Norwegian people in instead of black people? I mean, he just says such crazy shit out loud that if your grandfather did that, he'd be kicked out of the home. you'd be like I just got a call from the assistant living facility dad you're going to have to come live with us because you're staying crazy shit and yet he's the he's the he's the president of the united states so briar was the first one he had a couple one of his orders reversed on appeal by the ninth circuit one that hasn't been and now he's issued another preliminary injunction to kick out the national guard under Donald trump's control shout out to gavin newsom governor of california

shout out to A.G. Rob Banta, the Attorney General. I'm going to be interviewing him on Friday about this case. Karen, you got a chance to look at the order, hit the shock that he has, the quotation, citations to James Madison and the Federalist papers. What did you make of this order and what he's trying to accomplish? Well, I have to say, Popak, when you suggested this topic as something we could talk about today, my first reaction was, what?

The National Guard, there still have the National Guard in California. Nothing's going on in California. I mean, it's ridiculous. I mean, the fact that this is still an issue that Trump still wants to have them, they're not that it was ever justified because it wasn't. But if it ever was justified, it's certainly not justified now. Nothing is happening, nothing. And so this is just a big power play.

Trump just wants to know, and that he's going to appeal this order, because he just wants to say, I can do it. I can do it if I want to. And I want to have this up my sleeve, whether he keeps them on the ground now or not. He wants to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court so that the Supreme Court can say the president can call up the National Guards and federalize it whenever he sees fit, whenever he thinks he needs it. And you're not allowed to question his judgment. If he says he needs it, then he

needs it. And that's what this is about. This is a giant power play. But, you know, it can't be that way. You can't just say, oh, I absolutely, you know, just because I say I want it, I want, I get to have it. You know, it's like he wants to, you know, they're my toys. I get to keep them. And it's just interesting because what Judge Breyer basically said was, look, no crisis lasts forever. And so even if it were justified at the time, not saying it was, you no longer can do that. You no longer have the authority. But this is going to be, this is a big power play that's going to play out on who gets to do this and when and whether Trump can actually continue

to keep them federalized for as long as he wants and that only he gets to say when the crisis is over. But it's just the judges who live in these, Trump doesn't live in California, obviously, and he doesn't go to California hardly. The judges do. They drive to work every day. They drive to court.

They know they can see with their own eyes what's happening. And they also see the record that's in front of them. They can't show any proof or any justification for this. So it'll just be interesting to see where the appellate courts is heading in this. But it's great to see judges like Judge Breyer really call out. And I think as they get older, they get a little less, they don't hold their words back. And so they say how they feel and they make it very clear exactly how they feel. And so this decision didn't disappoint for sure.

Yeah. In fact, let me read from a certain aspect of the order. It's really powerful and eloquent. Here's how it starts, first page. The founders designed our government to be a system of checks and balances. Defendants, however, make clear that the only check they want is a blank one. Six months after they first federalized the California National Guard, guard defendants still retain control of approximately 300 guardsmen, despite no evidence,

that execution of federal law is impeded in any way, let alone significantly. What's more, defendants have set California guardsmen into other states, creating a national police force made up of state troops. In response to plaintiff's motion to enjoin this conduct, defendants take the position that after a valid initial federalization, all subsequent re-federalizations are completely and forever, unreviewable by the courts. It's contrary to the law. And therefore, the court enjoins the federalization of the California National Guard troops.

He cites in the first footnote, James Madison in the Federalist Paper No. 51, talking about how our system of government reflected in the Constitution creates three co-equal branches of government that are supposed to grind against each other to ensure that we have the checks and balances that are required. On page 10, he lays it straight out, talking truth. Here's what Judge Breyer says.

He says, defendants nevertheless attempt to circumvent the scope of this law that I talked about, delegating the authority to the president under certain unique circumstances to take over the National Guard by characterizing the orders as extensions of federalizations, which they argue are outside the statute's reach. Indeed, at the motion hearing itself, defendants confirm their position that after an initial federalization, all extensions of orders of the federalization orders

are utterly unreviewable forever. And the judge says that is shocking. Adopting defendant's interpretation of Section 12406, would permit a president to create a perpetual police force comprised of state troops so long as they were first federalized lawfully. Such a scenario would validate the founders, quote, widespread fear of a national standing army, which they believed, quote, posed an intolerable threat to individual liberty

and to the sovereignty of the separate states citing a United States Supreme Court decision, perpich versus Department of Defense from 19. And he's used that language before, Karen, in his first order, and in his order about martial law, about calling out and ripping the mask off of what Donald Trump is trying to do, which is to have at his beck and call a national standing army. I mean, was there any doubt when he addressed the troops, the military brass that they pulled together at Quantico when he walked around on the stage, like he was some sort of demented George C. Scott in a remake of patent? telling them, here's a good idea. You can go practice your craft and go practice on U.S. citizens when you go into these s-hole cities like Detroit and Illinois and blah, blah, blah. It's just mind-boggling. So what's going to happen? Judge said,

I'm going to stay my order on my own initiative until Monday, get to the Ninth Circuit. I'll have Rob Bonta on on Friday, the Attorney General of California to talk about some of what he can reveal about their strategy and tactics. They're going to have to wait to see who the three-judge panel is that's going to be assigned. One-third of the Ninth Circuit is comprised of Trump appointees. And, you know, my old joke, how many Trump appointees on an appellate panel does it take to screw up the Constitution, too? And, you know, we just had, in the last 24 hours, they got the band back together again, Judge Katzis and Judge Rayo on the D.C. Circuit Court, two Trumpers, got together and said, no, we think it's okay with Pete

had accepted to drum out of the core and all of the military transgender soldiers and chastised the federal judge who had blocked it after finding bias and animus in the decision-making. That would have not been the case had there been two, you know, normal judges having been appointed. But this is what we're up against. Now we've got to sit around and wait to see what judges come in. And then whether the Ninth Circuit on Bonk, the entirety of the Ninth Circuit, well, at least the 11 people that make up the en banc panel, what they're going to do about it as we wait for the United States Supreme Court to get off their ass or whatever they sit on and generate their final order about this particular

provision. We're still waiting for the Supreme Court to rule on something that came out of the Illinois court a couple of months ago. TikTok, TikTok, TikTok, TikTok, you know, just and judges, but this just shows you that federal judges and appellate judges just have to chop wood and do their job. can't wait around like, well, we'd love to get guides from the Supreme Court on this issue, and we know there's a case there, but no, they have to do their job. And if they have to change it and modify it after the Supreme Court rules, okay, so be it.

Some people might be wondering, why should we care about this? There's only 100 National Guards left in California. Or they're drawing them down to 100, right? But still, even so. It's not that many. Some people might say, who cares? Nothing's going on. So there's soldiers there.

It matters. And it matters for the reasons you said earlier. Popak. It matters because if he has the ability to federalize them and keep them federalized, he can call them up any time. And as you said, you know, for the midterm elections, they can do it for election security and scare people off from the votes, from the voting booths. I mean, it's really, there are so many reasons why this is such an important battle to fight at this time, even if they draw it down to 100, even if they draw it down to zero. The fact that, of the matter is he shouldn't be allowed to do this whenever he wants and keep it for as long as he

wants because then he can call anything an emergency or he can call anything something that he needs to be done and have this military, frankly, that he can then turn on U.S. citizens. So it's a really important issue. It's a great fight and I'm glad that California is fighting it. And, you know, I just, I can't help but think that don't you wish that Trump's cabinet was actually focusing on things that the American people cared about and doing things that people cared about. I mean, when you look at Pete Hegeseth who is complaining about how people in the military

are dressing, or you look at, you know, the guy in charge of the FAA, yeah, saying people shouldn't wear pajamas on airplanes. Or did you see that Marco Rubio wants to spending time changing the typeface of letters going out because he doesn't like the typeface you know he wants to go back to times new roman i mean it's just the the fact the font you know like we're literally wasting time on fonts because he doesn't like the the font he thinks the font

that was that was used that they that they used is it's it was made more accessible for people who have dyslexia and things like that it's just he doesn't like the font so he's turning it back and i'm just thinking there's just they're not substantive they're not substantive they're not taking care of the American people and they're not spending our tax dollars doing things that matter. Yeah, it's like the last season of succession, you know, where the patriarch looks at his kids and

says, you're just not serious people. I could never turn over this company to you. Yeah, I love you, but you're not serious people. We have a whole series of not serious people that are in charge under this administration. And the electorate has woken up with a vengeance. I just read an article that there is Democratic groups that are going to try to flip 600 seats at statehouse races come the midterms in 2028s.

They're targeting. Now, people think that's a huge number. How are they ever going to do that? The Democrats lost 800 seats in the last 15 or 20 years, no, last 15 years in statehouse races. This is just getting back what we lost and flipping the back. And they think it's worth it now. because the momentum and advantage is so in favor of the Democrats. I mean, every time there's a special election, a runoff election,

an election night in America in the last month, two months, it's always gone in favor of the Democrat. Even if they don't win, they bring the gap down to single digits in districts or in states or in areas where Donald Trump won by double digits. You have Eileen Higgins, the commissioner Higgins, who's now the mayor elect of the city of Miami, it was a double-digit win for Donald Trump, first time ever in Miami-Dade County against Kamala Harris

and in the city of Miami, you know, and never had a woman, a woman mayor, let alone. And I thought it was very interesting because it shows you how diverse the Democratic Party is. Or as Jamie Raskin reminded an audience that I co-hosted, including Eileen Higgins a couple of weeks ago, we've got to reclaim the brand of the Democratic Party. We've got to do what FDR used to call the Democratic Party.

We've got to do what Andrew Jackson used to call the Democratic Party. It wasn't the Democratic Party. It was the democracy. We were the democracy, and they were the Republic or the plutocrats. And instead of saying, well, the Democratic Party believes this, you would say instead, the democracy demands the following. And that meant the brand, the party, and the democracy. of letting the Republicans clip our name, clip the Democrats' name to say, the Democrat Party.

It's the Democrat. It's not the Democrat Party. It's the Democratic Party. Just like we don't call you the Republic Party. And I say skip all that. Let's go back to the vocabulary, as Jamie Raskin pointed out at this rally, of what we used to, of what the Democrats used to say. It's like they, meaning the soon-to-be trillionaires like Elon Musk, they, they, want this level of corruption and abuse but the democracy demands that's the vocabulary that we need to be using forget typefaces forget fonts that's the we have to read we have to grab that back claw that back and it and it shows I mean look at the flip flip flipping that's going on in these races because people have a pent-up demand to vote you know

protesting in the street is great all right and getting a phone call or an internet you know tag about a polling, a poll that's going on, I guess it's awesome. But there's nothing like showing up at a poll and pulling a lever, electronic or otherwise. And Donald Trump's, he's out and where's the safest place I can go? Is there a casino in Pennsylvania? 3,000 people. Can I go there? And they wheel him out. And if they think the Republican Party thinks that's going to help campaigner-in-chief Donald Trump at midterms, rambling on again. another version of Somalis and other black people from other countries eating pets is going to win the midterms as we focus on affordability.

I mean, all Eileen Higgins talked about was public transportation and affordable housing and affordability. That was her entire campaign as a technocrat. She's really a technocrat. She's not a democratic socialist. She's a proficient leader who can get things accomplished. And she didn't want to get sucked into the Trump by proxy debate, you know, that she's sort of Democrat.

She's taking on Donald Trump, just wants to help the Miami people with affordability and with transportation, just like she did when she was a county commissioner. And so you have the Democratic Socialist in New York, who won on affordability, affordability, affordability. You have the moderates in Mikey Sherrill in New Jersey, Governor-elect, and Governor-elect Spamberger in Virginia, who were part of the mod squad when they were in the house. And then you've got, you know, taken back the city of Miami. And a city that's 70% Hispanic, we just had a white woman.

She's known as La Gringa, affectionately, in her community. She also speaks Spanish. But this is remarkable. And then we just got to have the federal judges continue to hold the line. You know, like they're like the metro police at the capital. hold the line, hold the line, hold the line, you know, and most justice happens in the trial court level, in the first level appeal level. Sure, it burns our ass every time we watch something at the Supreme Court, 80% of the time go Donald Trump's way, and they are important things that go Donald Trump's way. but most justice that matters happens at the courts below the Supreme Court

and we just have to keep supporting those people that run into the burning building of our democracy and the rule of law and are the lawyers and the trial judges and the appellate judges and I'll just leave it on this Karen and I'll turn it back to you the one thing that I picked up from doing interviews like I did an interview today with Senator White House did an interview with the all the 11 attorneys general for the Democratic attorneys general

is that they have told me to express here that they appreciate and need the support of our audience might as touch and legal a.F. Because it's that crowd funding and sourcing that they need. They need the energy. They need the support. They need the momentum. They need the momentum. they need the mandate that comes from people like our community supporting them, focused on them,

wanting to be debrief by them. And they pull me aside, or some of them said it on the air, they pull me aside and say, what we're doing here on Midas and LegalAF is so important to what they're trying to accomplish in the courtrooms. Keep it up, don't let up. And we're all, we're all gas, no breaks here on LegalAF for sure, right, Karen? Yeah, no, it's very, very, very important work.

And I think the American people are starting to fight back. You know, they're fighting back by voting and voting a counterweight to Donald Trump. I think that was a big part of why Mondami won in New York City, because people see how he's going way too far in the other direction. And he's a counterweight to Donald Trump. And I think it's all starting to matter and it's all starting to blow back on him, thankfully. And the more people continue to hit the streets. and speak on podcasts like Legal A-F and on the Midas Touch Network and all the interviews you're doing, Popok.

I think it's just a great thing. People have to stay informed and don't get discouraged. Don't get deflated and vote for the right people because it's just it's not okay what's happening. Absolutely. Let's do a brief one on Jeb Bosberg, who's been fighting hard against this administration, not because he wants to, but because these are the facts that have been

laid at his feet, laid in his courtroom about an out-of-control, rogue lawless, to paraphrase Katanji Brown-Jackson, Department of Justice, and Presidency. And so he's going to get to the bottom. This is like a who-done-it

movie that just keeps going on and on. We know who did it. It's just now up to him to go through the process, the due process that's required to figure out what he's going to do about the fact that Christy Noem allowed and agreed she put it in her own declaration and said yeah I don't care what the temporary restraining order was to ground the planes we're going to continue to fly the planes under the alien enemies act because my lawyers told me to or

based on privilege conversations with them I'm not going to tell you about so the judge as expected said all right let's do it let's do it your way you want to send in affidavits which are written statements under oath, I'll read them. Maybe I'll get to the bottom of the facts here based on those, or maybe I won't. But let me take a look. So they sent in three, go F yourself, my paraphrase, F yourself affidavits. We may, I made the decision and I'm not going to tell you why. And the other one was like, I gave her the advice, but I'm not going to tell you why. And the other was like, and then they're all like the three main declarants, Christy Nome, Todd Blanche, number two in the Department of Justice and Joe, Joe Mazzara, the acting general counsel, whatever,

for the homeland, whatever's title is, for Homeland Security. They couldn't even get their facts straight, even though, you know, one guy typed it, one person typed it. It was like, well, there was an oral, there was an oral pronouncement, but then there was an order, but then I only found out about the earlier afternoon in the evening, but then I'm like, are you effing kidding me? So what the judge did? Exactly what you and I said he was going to do? No, I don't like, judges went like this, metaphorically. Okay, I don't like any of that. So let's get live witnesses into my courtroom starting next week.

Let's start with who I said I wanted to hear from. Erez Ruvani, who famously went on 60 Minutes and said and declared in a whistleblower statement that Emil Bovi, now on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, got a group of people together on the very... On the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, but then went to like a Trump rally yesterday, there. Trump, like, I mean, judges are supposed to remain neutral, and he's showing up a Trump event. Political rally in Pennsylvania. Right. It's crazy. And who, by the way, I'm sure as we're on the air tonight, there's already a bar violation, a judicial, a judicial ethics violation that's been filed against him. It should be. Why do I want to look up and see a judge where justice is supposed to

be blind at a raw partisan political rally? I mean, do you remember the shit that Donald Trump gave the judge that was overseeing his criminal trial. For the 50 bucks? 20, it was 20 bucks. Do you remember? Yeah, he donated $20 to some random... Act Blue. Yeah, Act Blue, exactly.

It wasn't even a person. It was to, you know, a political party, you know, act blue. Not even a party. It's just a, you know, whatever. It's a pack. Democratic fundraising. Yeah, exactly. $20 he donated. And do you remember what we had to hear about? He's political. He's not, he's partisan. He's unethical. He's, you know, biased, all that kind of stuff. And now we have a judge on the Third Circuit, Emil Bovey, who that is such a powerful position. And he is at a Trump rally. I mean, why don't we just go around the room and Trump should say, let me first introduce all the judges that are in my pocket. Stand up when I call your name. Emil Bovey, are you here?

Marsh, how about John Roberts? Are you here, Kavanaugh? I mean, taking it to its extreme, every time you watch the state of the union, right? It happens in Congress. You've got the Democrats and on one side, you've got the Republicans on another side, and then you've got the Supreme Court justices sitting there.

And then some people applaud, some people don't, depending on who's speaking, the justices sit there and remain neutral. Some don't go. Some have made a decision that it's too partisan and too political. Usually the Republican not confirmed ones when there's a Democratic president. And they go, oh, Alito, I feel I should stay home on this one. And then Bov is fucking party, pardon me, is legal a effing, partying with in Pennsylvania at the casino. I mean, it's just, and on Air Force one, so if I'm Judge Bozberg, he says,

look i want to hear from amel bov i want to hear from eras rivenny who said that amel bovi told them that if the judges asked tell them to go f off we're sending these people which now explains why the planes continued to fly even after the oral temporary restraining order so arrows rivenny's coming in okay he now works for democracy forward he's coming in to testify he wants to hear from uh and i've said this from the beginning that drew ensign is in big trouble because drew ensign the lawyer and the boss Amel Ares Rivetti lied, my opinion, to Judge Bozberg by telling him, I really don't know what's going on with the planes, Your Honor, but I did tell them about your order, and I think he never showed up again

in front of Judge Bosberg's courtroom. They sent them out to Judge Zinnis's courtroom with a Brigo Garcia. They sent them over here. He, like, never showed up again. He lied. Eras Rivetti said he lied on 60 minutes in his whistleblower letter. And the judge is like, I want to hear. from Drew Ensign, who was the head of the immigration litigation division of the Department of Justice.

That's the guy, if you remember, Karen, we reported on that the judge said, you know, you only have your reputation, you know, and your ethics. That's all you have. Don't sacrifice them by not, you know, not being candid with the tribunal. And he warned him early on. I think I was, whatever. Yeah. Well, now he's going to be under oath.

and the judge is going to go first. He said the parties can ask questions is my exam about criminal contempt. So he's going to have those people. And then from there, he said in his order and it should scare the shit out of Christyneau, but she's too stupid to realize it. He said, it's too early for me now

to determine whether there should be a criminal referral or not. Not that it's not going to happen. I just haven't made the decision yet. And then some people might be thinking, well, who cares, Popak? It's in the comments. It'll just be the department. of justice, ignoring the criminal referral, uh-uh. You'll see Chief Judge Boseberg appoint his own

special counsel because he'll find that the Justice Department is conflicted and they've indicated that there's no contempt here and they're not going to go after it. And that, so now we're going to have a battle about whether Boseberg can appoint his own special prosecutor to go after people like Christy Noem. I mean, seriously, this, people wonder, why I say, help us get to 1 million subscribers on legal layoff before 2026. Look at all of this stuff happening in one generation. I used to sit as a person interested in history. I used to read about the days of Andrew Jackson, bloody, bloody Andrew Jackson, and all, you know, and then senators taking out canes and beating other senators on the floor of the Senate. I'm like, those were the

days. We don't have that anymore. We do. We do. You know what? I would take those days of getting hit with canes compared to what we're doing, blowing up boats and indiscriminately and the stuff that's going on here, arresting U.S. citizens and deporting them and putting people in torturous prisons. I mean, I'll take that. I'll take the canes. Here's a new one. Did you hear that the transport, your lovely transportation department, Sean Duffy, Department of Transportation, is taking, is making people who have green cars. who are here legally, who don't speak maybe English as well as on a snap test. They're pulling them out of trucks and grounding the trucks, which is part of our economy

and long-haul transportation. And they're from Eastern Europe, a lot of them. And like, nope, you don't speak English well enough. Sorry, buddy. And just the truck just stays there. The cargo just rots and the companies have to pay for it because Donald Trump is, there's no requirement under the Constitution. that you speak English properly to live in America

or to drive a truck. But this is what he's doing. This is, who voted for this? I said this literally out loud when I was in line to board a plane to come to New York yesterday out of Miami. And of course, we had the regular delay, which is, you know, equipment,

and we had your plane's late, and then the other delay, which is who the fuck knows. And then the last delay is we gotta wait for border patrol, right? And the tattooed border patrol guy to come you know, scare the shit out of everybody because he's checking IDs or whatever he's doing. And I literally said out loud, who voted for this? You ever see those movies where they're the futuristic movies and the people are kind of being led somewhere

and there's like a TV screen with this creepy woman on the screen talking with like a fake smile? You are about to enter that, you know, those types of things. Last time I was at the airport, there was a TV screen. and a creepy woman on there speaking like that. It was Christy Knoem. Of course. Insane. I thought, oh, my God, what are we in?

Like some, you know, I can't even think of one of the movies now, but like... Are you watching Pluribus on Apple TV? No, is it good? Oh, I'll leave it at that. But yes, and it's right to your point. I'll just leave it at that. So, Bozberg, December 15th, contempt hearing, a whole bunch of witnesses starting the eighth, or actually, no, not the eighth,

starting on the 12th and then a hearing on the 15th and then he's going to issue another ruling and at the rate he's going, I am telling you, I would be shocked if he doesn't find someone in the Trump administration in criminal contempt and then we're often running about

judges appointing special counsel. But isn't Christine Nome just going to say I was relying on advice of counsel and that's a defense? I'm just saying, will it get to the point of a criminal referral if she says I was relying on advice of counsel, which is a defense, right? And then you can't jail the lawyers?

I mean, you can't. I mean, they're allowed to give wrong legal advice. I mean, that's, I just, I wonder if that's the, if that was the chance match they're playing. Yeah, that's definitely, that's definitely the long game, the long game that they're playing. But, well, listen, Jet Bosberg is a very smart judge. Let's see how he plays that out. When we come back, we're going to talk about whether James Comey is going to be re-indicted or not, and what's standing in the way?

Right now, a judge named Judge Colar Cotelli, senior judge, back to the revenge of the senior judges, folks in the District of Columbia, standing in the way of a possible re-indictment. It looks like that's all they got on James Comey, which is this bullshit, we're cursing a lot tonight. You're very salty today. I think it's the holidays. It's the holidays.

Holiday had a glass of wine at lunch. That's what it is. That's probably it. So about whether they admitted, Karen, the Department of Justice. They got nothing else on James Comey other than a one-line statement that he stood by in response to a question by Ted Cruz. I stand by my prior testimony. I stand by my prior testimony in September of 2020.

That's it, folks. And in order to connect all those dots, they need what I call the Richmond files. We're talking about the Epstein files. Daniel Richmond, professor at Columbia, turned over lots of his material under a warrant, having nothing to do with this case, having to do with Hillary Clinton in her emails, but it was a box sitting around on the shelf

and the FBI, Lindsay Halligan, because she's very talented and experienced. And she said to the FBI, go rummage around that box. You don't need a warrant, which we call in the business a warrantless search under the Fourth Amendment and unconstitutional. I'll go rummage around the Richmond box,

even if it has communication between his client and himself, just go use that and then go testify to the grand jury. We're going to talk about Judge Kuller-Katelli when we come back, but now it's another time to support what we do here with our sponsors, with supporting the podcast, as always, as you do. If you watch us, some people don't even know we're on YouTube. I have people say, I just found out you're on YouTube. We're on YouTube.

And you can just send this clip off, you know, or when we're done, send it off to people in your life and ask them to join us there. Audio versions, leave a five-star review and comments, continue to grow that audience. That all helps. And then you've got LegalAF YouTube. Let's do it, folks, together. Let's get to the 1 million subscribers. We're about 18,000 short, which in our world, we should be able to get there in about two weeks

and before the holidays if we can do it together. And then LegalAF substack as well. But now a word from our sponsors. Delete me makes it easy, quick, and safe. to remove your personal data online at a time when surveillance and data breaches are common enough to make everyone vulnerable. What do data brokers do? Your name, contact info, social security number, home address, even information about your family members could all be compiled by data brokers and sold online. Have you ever been a victim of identity theft, harassment, doxing? I have.

If you haven't, you probably know someone who has. Delete me can help. help take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me. Now at a special discount for our listeners, get 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to join DeleteMe.com slash LegalAF and use promo code LegalAF at checkout. The only way to get 20% off is to go to JoinDeletMe.com slash LegalAF and enter code LegalAF at checkout. One more time, that's Join DeleteMe.com slash LegalEF. C.A.F. Code legal A.F. Are you feeling sluggish? Bloaded. Not like yourself. Life bombards us with silent threats. Process foods, artificial light, and modern stressors that disrupt your gut,

drain your energy, and weaken your immune health. Your body isn't broken. It just needs the right inputs. That's where Armora colostrum comes in. It's nature's original blueprint for health. Packed with over 400 bioactive nutrients that fortify gut health. fuel fitness recovery and strengthen immune health, supporting your best performance every day. I love armor. I've been using it myself. I'm on it right now, and I can tell you it's made a real difference. I feel more energized, less bloated, and just sharper throughout the day. It's not just another supplement. It's a bioactive whole food, pure, potent, natural, and clean, sustainably sourced with a cath-first commitment. Take back control of your health. We've worked out a special offer

from my audience. Receive 30% off your first subscription order. Go to armbra.com slash legal AF or enter legal AF to get 30% off your first subscription order. That's A-R-M-R-A.com slash legal A-F. Support your gut. Strengthen your immune health. Feel the difference with Armra colostrum. Welcome back. You're on LegalAF, the podcast. All right, Karen, let's bring it home. We're in the home stretch. You've got, let's turn it over to you from the prosecutor perspective. You've got James Comey, former FBI director. His indictment gets tossed along with Lindsay Halligan by Judge Curry a couple of three weeks ago, finding her to be illegally appointed of me, Lindsay Halligan. There's a whole other sub-story, which will do

another time that I've done on hot takes about the government is refusing to acknowledge that Lindsay Halligan's been fired, and she still signs pleadings as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Judge Curry is going to have to do something about that. The judges of the Eastern District of Virginia are going to have to do something about that. But what's on the agenda right now is the indictment, a re-indictment process around James Comey. So there was a motion that was filed a day or so before Thanksgiving. by Daniel Richmond, who has been identified subsequently in the original indictment

as somebody that they're using as evidence against his client, effectively, because he's a lawyer in Comey. But after Judge Fitzpatrick, the magistrate judge in the case issued a scathing ruling about what he saw in the grand jury transcript and what he saw about the use of the documents and the warrantless search, basically inviting Daniel Richmond to file a motion to vindicate his Fourth Amendment rights against warrantless search or search and seizure and to ask for the return of all of his documents and that they not be used by the government. And we have filings since then. Why don't you catch our audience up on it from your former prosecutor experience?

Well, this is a major blow to the DOJ's effort to re-indict Jim Comey because the judge blocked prosecutors from getting this evidence, right? This email accounts, the computer, all the stuff that they searched without a warrant and granted a temporary restraining order. So the judge basically said the evidence has to be sequestered while she, pending her ruling. and she's going to decide whether the government illegally retained these emails and the other data. So, you know, look, the judge said the court concludes Richmond is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim that the government has violated his fourth amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures by retaining a complete copy of all files of his personal computer and searching it without a warrant. So it's a huge blow, and it's kind of a big deal. Look, when you, when you, as a process,

prosecutor, if you execute a search warrant and you get someone's computer, if there's no case, you have to get rid of it or give it back, right? Or if you retain it for some reason, you're not allowed to just go back and search it in another unrelated case later without a warrant. It's not like you have it and therefore you can access it any time you want. You have to go back in and you have to get a warrant. It can't be stale. You have to show probable reasonable or probable cause as to why you believe a crime was committed and why you think the evidence of the crime would be located in that location, in this case, the computer. And they didn't do that. And on top of that, a lot of that information is going to be attorney-client privileged because Richmond

represented Comey during part of this. And so that's another layer of you have to put a filter team in place. If you do execute a search warrant and you do get that stuff, you get a separate team of prosecutors who go through that and separate out the attorney-client privileged information from the non-privileged information, and you're not allowed to use the attorney-client privilege information. So this is kind of a big deal, and the fact that the judge ruled that they think that Richmond's going to likely to succeed on the merits, I think that just deals a huge blow to their effort to re-indict the case. And frankly, now putting on my defense attorney had, If they do re-indite the case, if I were Abby Lull, who's representing, not Abby Lull, Pat Fitzgerald, who's

representing Jim Comey, the first thing I would do is I would just add another line to my vindictive prosecution claim, look at, look how vindictive this is. They won't stop. They keep going, keep going. They'll stop at nothing. They're fighting the Richmond thing. They're re-inditing me. Hopefully the grand jury will do what they did in the Tish James matter and not vote. an indictment because grand jurors read the paper too and they see what's happening and hopefully they'll smack this down for what it is because he this is this is clear a clear case of vindictive prosecution i like that grand juries read the paper too and now they're standing up and voting against these types of things uh one update uh in a new filing it looks like the department of justice

is going to try to block having jeb bowsberg the judge take certain testimony next week arguing that it violates oh, now they love the separation of powers, except when it's not in their favor. So they're going to try to block this evidentiary hearing from happening, and we'll follow up with that as well. But I agree with you. I think that Judge Kolar Kitelli is going to rule that the Fourth Amendment rights of Gerald of Richmond were violated, and that the only remedy that she can come up with, that's the appropriate one for that, is that the government is that.

denied the ability to use the Richmond files against James Comey. And if that's the case, their case is dead. Now, they're arguing that they can re-indite, but they've never said they can re-indite without the Richmond files. In fact, they said they need the Richmond files in order to re-indict. So this is where the battle, the rubber is meeting the road. In addition to that, they've said that they're going to use a statute that gives them an additional six months to fix an infirm indictment. But that statute's not for that. And Judge Curry even pointed that out in her own order. That statute is for a defective indictment, technical defect in the indictment. They act like they left, they misparagraphed it,

they didn't sign it, they left out an element of the crime by accident. Okay, then you get six more months to fix your indictment. That's not the defect. The defect is Lindsay Halligan. The defect is in the process of selecting the U.S. attorney. And the Judge Curry ruled, and I think properly so, that if you have an illegal, this is based on Supreme Court precedent as well, if you have an improperly appointed officer, federal officer, everything that they've done after that is void ab initio. It is void as it's coming out of their pen. And if that's the case, then there is no indictment here. There is an imposter masquerading as a U.S. attorney in Lindsay Halligan, who's writing counterfeit indictments and counterfeit indictments, so to speak, can't be used to stop the clock.

And that's not the defect that the statute they're trying to use is talking about. I think caller could tell I don't know if it's going to be Friday, because she's already got the full briefing now. I think soon she's going to be making a ruling, and it could be devastating to the Department of Justice. It's of their own making. I'm not empathetic about any of this. But I think it's going to stop the re-indictment process in its tracks, require aid appeal to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals because that's where Judge Colar Kitelli is. And then as they run around and try to get a grand jury eventually to indict maybe

on some other grounds. But you can see they, the Trump administration and its Department of Justice either openly defy federal judges, tell them to go pound sand, don't file when they're supposed to file, file things to block hearings, hoping that they'll get a trumper on their appellate court to help them out. This is what a lawless, rogue presidency and the most corrupt Department of Justice in history headed by the chief law enforcement officer in America, Donald Trump, self-refest, and his meat puppet of a deal of attorney general in Pan Bondi. and that's what we're that's what we can do is what we're doing get together weekly hourly at the intersection of law and politics and hold them accountable some people i see get frustrated in the

comments i read the comments and they're like oh but who cares nothing'll happen you keep saying something's going to happen pope pop you keep saying it's a collapse of something when is when when when it will it has things have gone right under our system of justice there are hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of orders that we've detailed here on Legal A.F. That have not been overturned, that have not been defied, that have not been appealed. That's where we live. We live there. Sure, we can be upset.

Sure, we can wring our hands about the handful of ones that didn't go our way. The Trump judges that went a different way. The Supreme Court ruling on a major, major issue, we'll talk about them more next week, that on fundamental constitutional issues that did not go our way, And then we've got to talk about what to do about that after from an electorate standpoint, from a court standpoint, and from a legislative standpoint. But so many things are going our way in the federal courts, even in the state courts that we talk about on a daily basis. Just hang in there. We are a line of defense.

The federal courts are holding the line. We need them up on that wall. We want them up on that wall, and they are up on that wall. and we have to do our level best to understand what's going on. That's what we try to do on legal layoff. Understand the complexity of these issues. Talk truth to each other so we can be able to take it out to the streets and into the polls and beyond. And things are working in the electorate standpoint.

Crowds, courage, and courts. I used to attribute that to A.G. Banta from California, but he told me during a panel discussion that I was really, really the Attorney General, Chris Mays, of Arizona, who came up with that, and he stole it, and I stole it. So it's crowds, courts, and courage. And we're demonstrating all of those things right here on Legal IF. I'm so glad you're here. I'm so glad Karen Freeman. McNifalo is here, as she is religiously every Wednesday for the last five years. And you know how to support what we do. Legal AF YouTube, Legal AF Substack, LegalAF, the podcast, and of course our pro-democracy

sponsors. It's Karen, last word as we roll into the holidays. Yeah, just adding, picking up to the really, really important message that you were just saying, it's all about staying informed. It's all about not putting your head in the sand and just saying, oh, it's too hard or it's too depressing. I don't want to know. You have to stay informed because if you stay informed, you'll fight back. And let us read the filings for you. Let us study the laws for you. And we can translate them and call them out and tell you the boat strikes are illegal, his justification because they're bringing drugs in, means we're at war, and therefore I can do it. We can tell you that that's BS. And how do we know that's BS? Because he's also pardoning the ex-president of Honduras, who has got 45 years in prison

for trafficking 400 tons of cocaine through Honduras to the U.S. So these are, he just is lying. He's making stuff up and he's saying he cares about something and at the same time in the same week doing something different. So stay informed, know the facts over the holidays when don't avoid having these conversations with your family members because it gets difficult. Know the facts and talk to people try to win over their hearts and minds so we can flip seats and bring this country back to something that we can all recognize and be proud of because it's worth fighting for. So those are my last words. I love our people and I love our community and we have to stay together. Absolutely. Thank you for being here. Midweek edition of Legal AF. Hit the free subscribe button

every place you can. Until our next report on Saturday with Ben My Salas and then hourly on Midas Toucher Legal AF. I'm Michael Popok. Join of course with our co-anchor Karen Friedman, Nick Diffalo. Shout out to the Midas Mighty and the Legal AFers. Thank you.