Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Trump Blindsided as Criminal J6 Case Returns

Episode Date: November 22, 2025

In breaking news, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has moved to revive her state criminal case against 18 Trump allies — including current Homeland Security official Christina Bobb and coup-plott...ing attorneys Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, and Boris Epshteyn. Michael Popok reports and interviews AG Mayes on the explosive developments. For 40% off your order, head to https://Udacity.com/LEGALAF and use code LEGALAF. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast⁠ Legal AF: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af⁠ MissTrial: ⁠https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial⁠ The PoliticsGirl Podcast: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast⁠ Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan⁠ Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen⁠ The Weekend Show: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show⁠ Burn the Boats: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats⁠ Majority 54: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54⁠ Political Beatdown: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown⁠ On Democracy with FP Wellman: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman⁠ Uncovered: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 At Desjardin, we speak business. We speak equipment modernization. We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets. And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes. Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do. Business. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us. And contact Desjardin today.
Starting point is 00:00:25 We'd love to talk, business. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.
Starting point is 00:00:53 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Gambling problem call Connects Ontario 1866531-260. 19 and over, physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply. See Golden Nuggett Casino.com for details. Please play responsibly. Snap up Ancestry DNA's lowest price ever in our incredible cyber sale.
Starting point is 00:01:35 With 50% off Ancestry DNA kits, it's the perfect time to help a loved one unwrap the past. And with their latest update, they'll discover their family origins like never before, with even more precise regions and new and exclusive features. Their best gift, our lowest price. 50% off Ancestry DNA, only until December 2nd. Visit Ancestry.ca for more detail.
Starting point is 00:01:58 terms apply. I think Donald Trump pardoning 18 people in Arizona for their role in the fake elector scheme, including someone, Christina Bob, that's in his Department of Homeland Security, all of which had mugshots like Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, only pissed off the attorneys general like Chris Mays, the Arizona Attorney General, once a Republican, now a Democrat, who believes that a coup is in progress by Donald Trump and his administration. She's not laying down for the indictment. The indictment was dismissed by an appellate court because they said she had to go back to a grand jury to try to re-indict the 11 fake electors in Arizona from 2020 and the seven people in Donald Trump's inner circle, including his lawyers and his chief of staff like Mark Meadows,
Starting point is 00:02:45 and she said nothing of the kind is necessary and has now taken an appeal up to the Arizona Supreme Court. Yes, the aftermath of 2020 is still going on. It's lived every day. It's a lived experience by the attorneys general, the 23 Democratic ones, who have bound together and talk every other day about the way to defeat Donald Trump. And this is just the latest example. Some people might have thought, wasn't there a fake elector prosecution in places like Arizona and Wisconsin? Yes. And this one is going to be revived based on what my reading is of the new Supreme Court petition that was just filed by Chris Mays's office. I also, spoiler alert, I also had the great honor and pleasure of briefing and debriefing.
Starting point is 00:03:34 Chris Mays, the Attorney General of Arizona in the last 72 hours about this particular case. Now, I didn't want to put her on the spot because she had not yet publicly made the decision, but she is very, very definitive about why she feels it's necessary from the moment she gets up in the morning and brushes her teeth till her head hits the pillow at night to fight back against this law. rogue president. I'm Michael Popak. You're on Midas Touch and legal AF over the weekend. Let's get to the new filing that just happened in the last 24 hours by Chris Mays's office.
Starting point is 00:04:09 You may recall that while Jack Smith as special counsel went after the head of the conspiracy and brought a case against just Donald Trump and then a couple of people at Mar-a-Lago while having a whole bunch of unindicted co-conspirators mentioned in the indictment, it was left to the attorneys general once they saw that Jack Smith was done with his indictments to pick up the pieces. And people like Chris Mays were very public about having to stand up for the American people and the people of Arizona and indict people who tried to overthrow democracy. In fact, you may recall her press conference when she announced the indictment.
Starting point is 00:04:52 Here's a clip. general election on November 3, 2020, the defendants and other unindicted co-conspirators raised false claims of widespread voter fraud in Arizona to pressure elections officials to change the outcome of a transparent, free, and fair democratic election. Those efforts ultimately failed when officials stood firm, followed their statutory duties, and officially certified Arizona's election on November 30th, 2020. The defendant Republican presidential electors, allegedly plotting with additional defendants, then voted for Mr. Trump and Vice President Pence on December 14th, 2020, falsely claiming to be the duly elected and qualified electors for president and vice
Starting point is 00:05:42 president of the United States from the state of Arizona. These defendants deceived the citizens of Arizona by falsely claiming that those votes were contingent only on a legal challenge that would change the outcome of the election. In reality, the defendants intended that the false votes for Trump and Pence would encourage Vice President Pence to reject the certified Biden-Harris elector's votes, regardless of the result of any legal challenge. So that case got up and running. The federal pardon that Donald Trump just did of these 18 people, including Christina Bob, that is now a senior leader, if you can believe it, in his Department of Homeland Security. Her title is Executive Secretary for the Department of Homeland Security,
Starting point is 00:06:34 overseeing the management of written communication intended for and originated by the Secretary and Department of Homeland Security. So anything you hate about Christine Nome's public statements were probably written by Christina Bob. Christina Bob was a lawyer working alongside Rudy Giuliani on Team Crazy, as it was referred to during the Jan 6th committee. She was sort of that year's Lindsay Halligan, if you know what I mean. And she's in the government.
Starting point is 00:07:00 Yet she was indicted by a state prosecutor. Federal presidential pardons don't help her or any of the rest of them. You know, for just a quick teachable moment, the pardon power. under Article 2 of the Constitution is absolute. I know that because the Supreme Court has recently said it. But that's only for federal crime. Donald Trump or any president has as much pardon power when it comes to state cases, state criminal cases,
Starting point is 00:07:33 or even civil cases that he has the same power that you and I have, meaning none. Only the governor, or in some states, a commission, can grant a pardon of a state offense. And so forget the pardons. just theatrics. That was just performative in order to give these people something to write in their obituaries that they got pardoned for the crimes that they committed. Doesn't mean they didn't commit the crimes. It just means that they got a pardon. Now, a lower level appellate court in Arizona
Starting point is 00:08:02 ruled that, and it's a very Republican heavy state at the judiciary. I was just in Arizona. You'll see my interview with Chris Mays in a moment. It's a blue-purple state when you talk to people and you see the politics, but the governors have been Republican lately, and the judiciary is heavy Republican. So an appellate court ruled that because Chris Mays' office did not present to the grand jury as they were rendering the indictment, the text of the Electoral Count Act of 1887 that rendered the indictment invalid. I don't see it. Chris Mays' office doesn't see it. prosecutors have to present the statutes, the criminal statutes that are being implicated by the conduct with the clear language and instruction and legal instruction around the elements of a crime
Starting point is 00:08:55 in the state. They have to present the evidence to show that there's probable cause in order to gain the indictment on a probable cause standard. Indictment, probable cause. Conviction beyond a Unable doubt. Completely different burden of proof. No one's in the grand jury except the lawyers for the prosecution team and occasionally witnesses. The defense can ask to participate, but there's no obligation to let them speak as a witness to the grand jury, and mostly they don't. So you have an obligation to give fair, but frankly, one-sided information to the grand jury if there's some evidence that's obvious that is exculpatory, meaning tends to prove innocence of the defendant, then I think you have to present that or you may have to present that,
Starting point is 00:09:44 but you don't have to present these alternate theories. See, the theory that the defense has, which would be their defense in front of a judge after being indicted, not grounds to dismiss an indictment, is that they were just contingency fake electors. They were alternate electors. They don't like to call themselves fake electors. And that they were only to spring into action if a federal court or some court called into question the election. Of course, in 80 lawsuits, no court called into question the election, including the United States Supreme Court. But that plan sort of morphed into something else. It was originally created by a combination of Ken Chesboro, a lawyer and John Eastman, a half-bake constitutional lawyer.
Starting point is 00:10:32 And they put up this plan, and they said, oh, if there's a challenge, we'll have the fake electors, we'll have the alternate electors ready. But there was never a successful challenge. But that didn't matter because at the end, people like Mike Roman, who's also indicted, the election day coordinator for Donald Trump said, F, in a famous email to Ken Chesbrough, said, F, the electors, get me a copy. I needed to give it to Mike Pence. He was like the mule for the certificates. But, and Chesbrough was like, but there's no lawsuit that declares the election invalid. So I don't care. So it went from alternate. electors in their scheme to effectively fake electors, where Mike Pence would be forced to recognize
Starting point is 00:11:13 the slate of actual electors certified by the state, the governor, the secretary of state, attorney general of each state, and then the slate of, you know, wacko fake electors. And then the goal was for Mike Pence as President Tempore of the Senate to throw it over and say, I can't figure it out. There's all these competing slates of electors, and I'm going to throw it to the Congress to pick the president. Forget the electoral college. It would have gone to each delegation within the House. And there's more red delegations than there are blue delegations. So it would have been Donald Trump all over again. That was the scheme. So the argument in the new filing, I'm going to read it to you now, is that there is no obligation to provide to the grand jury
Starting point is 00:12:04 the Electoral Count Act of 1887, because it is a federal statute. We're talking about state crimes, and it's a non-criminal statute. So it doesn't need to be provided to them at all. Everyone acts like they fully understand AI. And meanwhile, I'm over here arguing with my smart fridge. If you feel that way, too, that's where Udacity comes in. This podcast is sponsored by Udacity. Want to learn skills that command high salaries?
Starting point is 00:12:32 Udacity is an online learning platform with courses in AI and tech, including generative AI, agentic AI, Python, data science, and much more. Instead of wasting time on random YouTube videos or prompting chat GPT, Udacity cuts the guesswork so you learn exactly what matters. And you're actually doing real hands-on projects.
Starting point is 00:12:56 That's why 90% of Udacity graduates say that they achieve their enrollment goal. Last week, I tried Udacity's course on boosting my data skills. Yes, in my sweats, and it felt great to learn something valuable without leaving the couch. There are tons of places to learn tech, but only Udacity is consistently ranked as the top skill development platform. Real projects, human experts grading your work, it actually works. Plus, Udacity just launched a master's degree in AI for under 5,000. You can get a Master of Science in AI, a fraction of the cost of traditional degrees with way more flexibility.
Starting point is 00:13:39 What I love most is that with Udacity, you're learning AI, but with real human support. Whenever I need help, there's someone there. And having a certification from Udacity really gets recruiters' attention. The tech field is always evolving, and you should be too. You can try Udacity risk-free for seven days. Head to Udacity.com slash legal a.F and use code legal a.f for 40% off your order. Once again, that's Udacity.com backslash legal a.F for 40% off. And make sure you use my promo code legal AF so they know I sent you.
Starting point is 00:14:21 Now, I asked Chris Mays as a lead-up to her decision-making. She was about to make the decision in about 48 hours after I asked her these questions. But I wanted you to see my interview with Chris Mays in case you missed it. Here's the interview of Chris Mays And the other thing that's on our on the minds of our audience, you know, especially coming off of a big election night in America a couple of weeks ago, is the elections at midterm and your office very publicly prosecuted 18 people related to the last election a presidential election 11 electors Fake electors we refer to them in shorthand and seven people in the inner circle for Donald Trump including many of his lawyers Many of those people have now received a federal pardon, although that doesn't help them with your case. I don't want to focus so much on what's happening with your particular case.
Starting point is 00:15:08 But what does it mean for the future? What is your attorney general office going to do to ensure people that their vote is going to count, that we're not going to have another certification problem, or, God forbid, Donald Trump makes good on his attempts or his people around him to try to get on the ballot for a third term. What are you prepared to do? Look, I mean, we are prepared to, you know, protect our elections and we are prepared to enforce the law. And that is what we did when we took the fake elector's case to the grand jury, which was, you know, we decided that it was important to present this case, let a grand jury decide.
Starting point is 00:15:56 they decided to charge 18 individuals with an attempt in 2020 to essentially overthrow an election. And so what are we prepared to do? We will continue to uphold election law and to make sure that no one tries to overthrow an election. That's your message to the next fake elector? Yeah, I mean, in a sense, and it's an interesting question because, you know, this, this, this, this,
Starting point is 00:16:26 This issue has come up in terms of the fake elector's case, you know, there's an anti-SLAP motion. We won't get too far into it, but basically we have these, we are the only state in the country that has a criminal anti-SLAP law that allows defendants to claim that they were engaging in free speech, in speech when they engaged in allegedly criminal acts. and there are civil anti-slap laws across the country as well. What I worry about these anti-SLAPP laws is that they are, you know, get out of jail-free card or people are trying to use them that way. But, you know, criminal law, as you know, is used as a deterrent.
Starting point is 00:17:13 We want to deter illegal activity in the future. Arizona has, for instance, a death penalty. We have the death penalty in Arizona, and I think I'm the only Democratic AG carrying out the death penalty in this country right now because it is the law of the land. The death penalty is a deterrent against people committing murder. That is what criminal law is by and large.
Starting point is 00:17:39 It's not just punitive, but it also is designed to be a deterrent against future crime. So yes, do I want to send a message to future bad actors who might try to undermine American democracy. You bet I do, because that's what the law is about. You know, I am out there saying, I'm an attorney general who will enforce the law. That's my job.
Starting point is 00:18:03 Yeah. And, A.G. Mays, when you said in one of your early statements and speeches about against the Trump administration back in February and so right, you said what we're watching is an ongoing coup and an assault against the Constitution. Let's talk about that. Yeah, I think I was one of the first people to say that
Starting point is 00:18:25 and to use that word, but I, you know, I believe strongly that we have to call it what it is, and it still is. You know, this is a president who is trying to overthrow American democracy and who on a daily and weekly basis, Michael, is violating our Constitution. That is why I have sued him 30 times.
Starting point is 00:18:49 Because when any president, any president, and I would be doing this if it was a Democrat in power as well, violates our Constitution, violates the law, it is the job of the state AGs to push back on that. Okay. Now, she's walking into a buzzsaw, but she's fighting for our democracy because most, the vast majority of the Supreme Court in Arizona is Republican. But I don't think she has a choice. She has to stand up and make a principled position. As you heard her say, she's going to enforce the law. There has to be repercussions.
Starting point is 00:19:27 There has to be holding people accountable. She's worried about the next slate of fake electors if they get away with it. If she just threw up her hands and said, well, I'm going to walk away. It's too hard. They got federal pardons and, you know, it's 2025 already. She can't do that and she didn't do that. That's why I'm so glad to have met her. be regularly having her on Legal A.F. with you here in order to brief our audience at the
Starting point is 00:19:54 intersection of law and politics. Take a minute and help us on Midas Touch, hit the subscribe button there. But where we really need the help is on LegalAF YouTube, because check to see if you are a subscriber. We're going to cross 970,000 subscribers this weekend. I think we're going to hit a million before Christmas and Hanukkah, but only with your help. And the bigger we get as an audience, the more street cred we have at the intersection of law and politics, to be all things law and politics with our contributors. That's how we're able to bring on the American Civil Liberties Union regularly to give interviews. That's how we're able to bring on democracy forward in Sky Parryman.
Starting point is 00:20:32 That's how we're able to have our resident historians, Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz, or bring on, you know, Shan Wu, the former Attorney General, the former General Counsel for the Attorney General, or the pragmatic optimists, or court accountability action, where people like Dina Dahl and civil action and my own commentary and bring you the lawyers that are in the courtrooms
Starting point is 00:20:56 fighting it out with Donald Trump every day so that you can get briefed by them. Take a minute, come over to LegalAF YouTube, hit the subscribe button, no outside investors, no paywall. Come over to LegalAF substack where I post the brief that was just filed by Chris Mays, Arizona Attorney General, for you to read for yourself. So until my next report, I'm Michael Popak.
Starting point is 00:21:15 I'm Michael Popock, and I got some big, news for our audience. Most of you know me as the co-founder of Midas Touch's Legal AF and the Legal AF YouTube channel or as a 35-year national trial lawyer. Now building a what we started together on Legal AF, I've launched a new law firm, the Popak firm, dedicated to obtaining justice through compassionate and zealous legal representation. At the Popak firm, we are focused on obtaining justice for those who have been injured or damaged by a life-altering event, by securing the highest dollar recoveries. I've been tirelessly fighting for justice for the last 35 years, so my own law firm organically building on my legal AF work just feels right. And I've handpicked
Starting point is 00:21:59 a team of top-tier trial fighters and settlement experts throughout all 50 states known as Big Auto injury attorneys who have the know-how to beat heartless insurance companies, corporations, government entities, and their attorneys. Big Auto's attorneys working with my firm are rock stars in their respective states. collectively responsible for billions of dollars in recoveries. So if you were a loved one, but on the wrong side of a catastrophic auto, motor vehicle, ride share, or truck accident, suffered a personal injury, or been the victim of medical malpractice, employment, harassment, or discrimination,
Starting point is 00:22:34 or suffered a violation of your civil and constitutional rights, then contact the Popok Firm today at 1-877 Popak AF, or by visiting my website at www.w thepopfirm.com. and fill out a free case evaluation form. And if we determine that you have a case and you sign with us, we don't get paid unless you do. The Popak firm fighting for your justice every step of the way.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.