Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Trump DOJ Destroys Evidence in Pretti Murder

Episode Date: January 27, 2026

In a shocking turn of events in the Alex Pretti shooting investigation, the Trump DOJ in sworn filings to a Federal Judge,  from the FBI, Border Patrol and Homeland Security, not only OPPOSE the Judge’s order for them NOT to destroy evidence, but they admit to: (a) trampling the crime scene; (b) destroying the chain of custody about evidence collected from the scene of the shooting; and c) can’t tell the Court where Mr. Pretti’s own handgun is, the alleged impetus for him being shot 10 x by Border Patrol. Popok explains that based on today’s hearing and these filings, Judge Tostrud is unlikely to lift his injunction, especially since most of the agents refused to tell the court that they had NOT already destroyed evidence! Check out the Popok Firm: https://thepopokfirm.com Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Where is the gun? Where is Alex Preti's gun? Which, according to Border Patrol, was the impetus for him to be restrained and eventually shot. Where's the gun? Three new filings by the Department of Justice on behalf of Homeland Security, FBI, and Border Patrol. When you read them, they are contradictory. They demonstrate a complete lack of respect for the crime scene that was not preserved and a trampling of the chain of custody with various offices not taking responsibility. And from what I can see, we have a missing gun. I don't know where it is based on the filings. And only two, sorry, only one out of the three sworn declarations, look the judge in the eye, Judge Tolstead and told him, don't worry, Judge, we're not deleting or altering any evidence in violation of your temporary restraining order about the Alex Preddy crime scene. Only one out of the three actually told the judge that.

The rest, who knows? This all started when the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension ran to the judge to ask for a temporary restraining order, which he granted them immediately to preserve the evidence collected by the feds so that the state investigators can get their hands on it to do their own investigation to see if state law was violated. State criminal law was violated by federal officers. Okay. So you'd think that the Department of Justice and the various Trump. administration bureaus would take the position, Judge, you don't have to order us not to destroy evidence. We would never destroy evidence. We'll sign whatever you write, Judge, do a consent decree. We'll do an agreed order. No, they fought it. Yes, sit down, everybody. The Department of Justice

fought the federal judge in court today about whether he should extend his temporary restraining order, arguing he didn't have the power or the jurisdiction to order them not to delete and destroy evidence. Yes, you heard me right. Then I said, well, let's check out their declarations under oath. This is testimony to the judge and see if that solves it. Nope. What I picked up was three things. We'll go over on this particular hot tick on Midas Touch and Legal AF.

One, the chain of custody has been completely destroyed by the various federal offices. Right? And so who was handling what and handed off to who, including the gun. The crime scene was left completely trampled on. and not secured by the feds for about 38 minutes. That's a problem. And only one of the three declarants told the judge, don't worry, Judge, we didn't delete anything or destroy it,

and we won't in the future. That's bad. Let's start where it all began with the first declaration filed in order by the government. Mark Zito, I'm like, okay, who are you? He says, I am the special agent in charge of Homeland Security's investigations, H-S-I-St. Paul office. all right and what do you do well he says later in his filing that it is hsi that is responsible for as the lead investigator of the crime scene and of the evidence he says in paragraph 11

hSI is the lead investigatory entity he says hSI is leading the investigation into the shooting okay so you must have the chain of custody pretty well under control you must have secured the crime scene and you must be willing to tell a federal judge that you're complying with this temporary restraining order, right? And that you're not going to destroy your delete evidence, right? Not so fast. So Zito says that they got a copy of the temporary restraining order on the 25th of January from one of their officers. I'm like, okay, are you complying with it? No, doesn't say he's complying with it in paragraph 6, just says they got a copy of it. All right? that that opens up the door to more questions than it answers.

He says he's aware of the shooting, okay? He said ICE officials were not involved in the shooting, but assisted in securing the scene. So now we already have a chain of custody problem and a crime scene control problem because now you've got HSI and ICE showing up 38 minutes late. He says in paragraph 9, they showed up at 942 a.m. The shooting took place.

according to the records at 903 or 904 a.m. So for 38 minutes, this crime scene was just trampled on because they didn't think to preserve it after shooting 10 times Mr. Pretty. So then they say, after saying they're the lead investigatory entity, they talk about the FBI's role. Paragraph 12. This is where the gun goes missing.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation initially responded to the scene of the shooting to collect evidence. Why? Why didn't HSI show up to collect evidence? Okay, including a mobile phone and a firearm belonging to the deceased. So the mobile phone and firearm are collected by the FBI, according to Mr. Zito's representation. And then as of this filing, the mobile phone collected by the FBI was turned over to HSI. Where's the gun? Two things are collected by the FBI. One, is turned over to the lead investigator, chain of custody problem, missing gun problem. Let's continue.

The HSI will continue to collect evidence. They are trained because over his training never says before he signs the declaration that he's going to comply with the temporary restraining order and he's not going to destroy evidence. That's special agent in charge. Okay. So then I said, let me go to the next declarant. Now we go to Jeffrey Eggerton. What's he do?

He works for Border Patrol. He's the executive director, acting executive director. Everybody's in acting something in the Trump administration. Nobody wants the full-time job. He's the acting executive director for the investigative operations directorate of the Customs and Border Patrol. Okay. Talks about what he did as a patrol agent, what he's familiar with.

I'm like, okay, this guy seems to be interesting. What else he got? So then I said, well, let's get to the crime scene. He says they got a hold notice on January 25th, but he didn't get the temporary restraining quarter, about all personnel currently assigned to Operation Metro Surge to preserve information. Doesn't talk about the shooting.

I said, okay. He said he's aware of the shooting on paragraph 8. Yep. But then says in paragraph 11 that Border Patrol was not involved in gathering the evidence. Okay. Yet in the next paragraph, he says that the body cam footage, which, by the way, Mr. Egerton, is evidence, was, has been preserved. Doesn't say by whom? Chain of custody problem. Doesn't say by whom? Who preserved it? The officers who wore it, okay? And that it's going to be preserved for 75 years. By whom? So an agency that's not received. for the investigation and not involved with gathering evidence has a key piece of evidence still apparently maybe with them that hasn't been turned over to the investigators at HSI.

Hey, everybody, Ben Myceles here from the Midas Touch Network. I wanted to let you know about my podcast partner, Michael Popak's new law firm. It's called the Popak firm. Michael Popock's pursuing his dream of starting his own law firm, really based on the popular demand by all the Myx Midas mighty and legal A. Fers who were approaching Michael Popak with their cases and saying, can you help us? And at that time, Popak was not able to. So he went out on his own. He started the Popak firm where he is now handling catastrophic injury cases like car accident cases, trucking cases, malpractice cases, big negligence cases, wrongful death cases. So if you or someone you know, have a case like this, the consultation with Popock's firm,

is free. Give him a call. See if you have a case. It's the Popockfirm.com. The Popock firm.com. Or you can call 877 Popok A.F, P-O-P-O-K-A-F. So 1-877 P-O-P-O-K-A-F. Give Michael P-P-P-Pok a call. And I'm really proud of you, Popak. Thanks for all the hard work you're putting in. So we got body cam footage sort of out there. And the gun still missing. No answer to the query, where is the gun? All right? And again, just like Mr. Zito, Mr. Egerton never says to the judge, don't worry, I won't destroy evidence. Let's move to the last affidavit. That of no name, redacted FBI agent. The judge knows whose it is, whose name it is. One day, maybe we will too. And I'm like, all right, well, we know from Mr. Zito's affidavit that the FBI was involved with

collection, right? I just read that to you. They're involved with collection. So I'm like, all right, well, let's go to the guy that was responsible for collection. Maybe he'll be able to tell me something. We also know from Mr. Zito that the FBI turned over the phone. I'm like, all right, well, let's find out where the gun is, shall we? Okay. Remember in paragraph 12 of Mr. Zito, we'll put it up on the screen, that the FBI initially responded to collect evidence, including the mobile phone and the firearm. And the mobile phone has been turned over to the lead investigator.

So let's find out where the phone is, shall we, in the FBI filing. He says that he is assigned to the Minneapolis field office and that he oversees the evidence response team, Ert, okay, about processing a crime scenes. That on January 24th, he was sent to collect evidence relating to the shooting. Okay. So far, I understand. He says there's a 12-step process for collecting evidence, okay?

However, due to the scene, paragraph four, becoming volatile, when? When did it become volatile? How? The 12-step process was adapted. Sounds like you didn't follow it for the safety of personnel. So it sounds like the chain of custody has been destroyed, so has the crime scene. Then it was, per all evidence that was collected, he doesn't tell me what it was, or the judge, was transported back to the Minneapolis FBI field office. And then it was packaged.

Like, what evidence? He doesn't say the phone. He doesn't say the gun. He doesn't say that he turned the phone over to the Homeland Security lead investigator. He doesn't say that he turned the gun over to it. He says that the FBI has not altered or destroyed the collected evidence, whatever that's it. Again, I present to you the declaration of the FBI that doesn't talk about the gun, nor the phone, nor where the gun is. And that's it, folks.

No more declaration. So what's the takeaway? We have three different entities of the administration, border patrol, Homeland Security, and the FBI, who allowed the crime scene collectively to be trampled on and wasted, allowed protesters and others to destroy potential evidence. They sent the FBI in, apparently, to collect the evidence, even though they're not leading the investigation. They sent border patrol in, even though they're not leading the investigation.

Border Patrol says it doesn't have any evidence about the shooting, except they have the body cam footage, which they don't acknowledge as evidence, and they're holding that evidence and have not turned it over to the lead investigator Homeland Security investigations. The FBI collected, Homeland Security says, they collected a gun and a mobile phone, but that only the mobile phone was turned over to HSI.

FBI says they collected, but don't tell me what, don't tell me when, don't tell me how, said they had to alter their policies and procedures because of the situation on the ground. They don't talk about a phone or a gun, and they certainly don't turn anything over to HSI, the lead investigator. Do you see why the judge in this case is likely not to lift the temporary restraining order about the preservation of evidence and why there is so much, so many problems with the crime scene, the collection of evidence, the chain of custody, and the rest? Where's the gun?

Now, it may be somewhere else. Like alcohol, tobacco, and firearm. Maybe it's being evaluated. Was it returned? Is it given back to Border Patrol agents? Where is it? I just know, as if now, I can't tell from the filings, and I don't know what the judge knows,

and I can tell it hasn't been bagged and tagged to be reviewed. And this is all about the Minnesota Criminal Apprehension Bureau trying to get their hands on the evidence of the crime scene and the witnesses and the shell casings and the rest in order to decide whether state crimes have been violated. And the judge is trying to help them there.

The fact that a judge even had to enter an order to order the Trump administration not to destroy evidence. And only one out of the three declarants thought it was a good thing to tell the judge they haven't destroyed any evidence. The other two ignored it. That out of the third.

three, none of them said they're complying with the temporary restraining order and a Trump administration who's fighting not to comply with an order that just makes them not destroy evidence. I'm Michael Popock. We've got to cover it just this way here on the Midas Touch Network in Legal AF. Thanks for being here. Hit the free subscribe button here. Hit it over on Legal AF YouTube channel where you'll get my updates when this judge makes his ruling in the next, I would say, 24 to 48 hours about the temporary restraining order.

And when he does, I'll be back at it here. and on Legal AF, YouTube, and Substack. Until my next report, I'm Michael Popak. Can't get your fill of LegalAF. Me neither. That's why we form the LegalAF substack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a oral argument,

come over to the substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there, including a daily roundup that I do call, wait for it, morning AF. What else? All the other contributors from LegalAF are there as well. We got some new reporting. We got interviews.

We got ad-free versions of the podcast and hot takes where legal a F on substack. Come over now to free subscribe.