Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Trump DOJ Torpedoes their Own Case with Desperate Filing

Episode Date: November 22, 2025

The DOJ and Lindsey Halligan just found a new way to destroy their criminal case against Former FBI Dir. James Comey— by filing 7 minutes of a grand jury transcript that not only proves they lied to another federal judge last week in a sworn filing, but also constitutes a “waiver” of any argument they had against having the entirety of the grand jury transcript turned over asap to the defense. Michael Popok closely examines the new last-minute filing and proves how it may not only kill off the indictment but may also lead to Halligan’s disqualification as prosecutor. Subscribe:  @LegalAFMTN  PDS Debt: PDS DEBT is offering free debt analysis to our listeners just for completing the quick and easy debt assessment at https://www.PDSDebt.com/LegalAF Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

At Desjardin, we speak business. We speak equipment modernization. We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets. And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes. Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do. Business. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us. And contact Desjardin today.

We'd love to talk, business. We know you love the thought of a vacation to Europe, but this time, why not look a little further? To Dubai, a city that everyone talks about and has absolutely everything you could want from a vacation destination. From world-class hotels, record-breaking skyscrapers, and epic desert adventures, to museums that showcase the future, not just the past.

Choose from 14 flights per week between Canada and Dubai. Book on emirates.ca. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget Online Casino is live. Bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.

Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a gold. opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Gambling Problem Call Connects Ontario 1866531-260. 19 and over, physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply.

See Golden Nuggett Casino.com for details. Please play responsibly. It's the Nissan Black Friday event where you can... Wait, wait. Isn't it like a month long now? Nissan Black Friday Month? Does that work? It's the Nissan Black Friday Month event.

On remaining 2025 Rogan Centra, get 0% financing. Plus, get $1,000 Nissan bonus on kicks models. This Black Friday, you've got a whole month to catch all the exclusive offers waiting for you. See your local Nissan dealer or nison.ca for details. Conditions apply. The interim U.S. attorney Lindsey Halligan, novice prosecutor that she is, is added again, another major screw-up that probably kills her in not one but two different courtrooms. She has suddenly filed seven minutes of a grand jury transcript that she told

another federal judge, Judge Curry, didn't exist. Now she's filing it in Judge Nachmanoff's courtroom because when Judge Nakmanoff asked her questions in the last 24 hours, she effectively either lied to the judge, couldn't remember or recall, and is now trying to fix it with a grand jury transcript about whether the entirety of the grand jury against the former FBI director James Comey saw the actual indictment that was signed by the foreperson or not. She can't even get the basics straight. And then she filed a seven-minute grand jury transcript. I thought I was watching something about Mary's seven-minute abs. And in the seven-minute grand jury transcript, she thinks it helps her.

But for me, it waives any argument by the Department of Justice to stop the grand jury transcripts in their entirety from going to the defense. You can't use them as a sword and a shield, as we like to say in the law. So you got that problem. And then when I matched up the grand jury transcript that she did supply Judge Nakmanoff for seven minutes

with an earlier sworn statement that she made to Judge Curry, she's in big trouble. And I found it. I'm going to report it to you right here. I'm Midas Touch Networking on LegalAF on Michael Popock. Take a minute, hit the free subscribe button here on Midas. Come over to Legal AF and the YouTube channel and help us crack the one million subscriber barrier.

We hope to do it by Thanksgiving. Let's get into Lindsay Halligan and what's going on with her inability to do her job properly. She is woefully incompetent and it shows in every one of her filings. It begs the question. Is no one who is competent in the Department of Justice

like a Todd Blanche, the number two. Are they reviewing anything that she's doing? Any procedure that she's employing? I don't think so. So the other day I reported that during a hearing in front of Judge Nakmanoff, he called Lindsay Halligan up to the podium. He said, your counsel of record,

you're signing everything as the U.S. attorney, you could be heard by the court. So what happened with the, why are there two indictments, and what happened to them? and she had to admit, along with Tyler Lemons, her other novice U.S. attorney that were in the room that, and this is on the record, she's a sworn, she's an officer of the court, that the jury never saw the second indictment, because there were two of them, because she's terrible, in which it only had two counts. The original indictment that she had under her arm when she went into the grand jury on September 25th had three counts. the grand jury purportedly only returned a true bill on two,

but we can't figure that out. Somebody cut and pasted and edited, like a grand jury coordinator or something, and then had the four person alone, but without the other 13 that would have approved the indictment, a sign off on the indictment. So the entirety of the grand jury that voted to indict, never saw the document that we now call the indictment.

We knew there was something wrong. because we had the reporting back in September that the magistrate judge in charge of the grand jury proceedings said, why do I have two pieces of paper both signed by Lindsey Halligan and both signed by the four person? One with two counts and one says that they have not reached a true bill

and one with three counts. And Halligan at the time said, I don't know because I only signed one. Well, we got the transcript now and it's even worse for Lindsay Halligan. But let's just hold this point here. Halligan in the last 24 hours tells the federal judge Judge Nachmanoff

that the grand jury never saw the entirety of the indictment before it was signed by the foreperson that's a big problem for the indictment surviving and Tyler Lemons who's her novice prosecutor handling the case day to day

admitted the same they then decided they needed to clean that up so miraculously a seven-minute transcript, grand jury transcript, right here, which we will post in Substack, appeared and got filed. And what they tried to say is that this clears up everything, that this demonstrates that the grand jury return a true bill on two counts.

I don't think so. I also think this is a problem. Let's start with the fact that they found the, of the 6.47 p.m. till 6.54 p.m. transcript. The magistrate judge already questioned. What happened to the gap? Why is there a two-hour gap between the end of the presentation and the deliberation? And Lindsay Halligan said, well, I didn't have any more interaction with the grand jury at any other time and during their deliberation. That's not true. Because after the deliberation, she and the foreperson came into court and here, is the transcript of that proceeding.

So already, she's in big trouble with Judge Curry about whether she should remain as the U.S. attorney. Here's what she said in what she filed on the 14th of November to Judge Curry. She said at the November 13th hearing, Judge Cameron Curry expressed concern regarding an alleged gap in the grand jury record, referring specifically to the period beginning

at approximately 428, when the transcript reflects that I, Lindsay Halligan, and the court reporter exited the grand jury. The judge says the entirety, from the end of that till the indictment was returned, where's the transcript? And Halligan has the balls to tell the judge there is no transcript when she filed on the 14th.

She said, I submit this declaration to clarify that and to confirm that the grand jury transcript accurately reflects the full extent of my appearance before the grand jury and to explain that the period in question consists solely of the grand jury's private deliberations. I presented the case and she says there was no additional presentation, interaction, or discussion with the grand jury outside of what is reflected in the transcript. That's a lie. Look at what, look at the 647 to 654 transcript. This is part of the missing transcript that Judge Curry wanted in her courtroom. She also questioned how could Pam Bondi have ratified as the Department of Justice

Attorney General the actions of Lindsay Halligan if she didn't have access to the transcript that's now miraculously appeared? Big problems for Lindsay Halligan. At first, the clues don't seem connected. A bill here, a fee there, but step back and the pattern is clear. Credit card debt is the suspect hiding in plain sight. It doesn't kick down the door. It follows you like a shadow. And just when you think you're safe, it strikes. The evidence is everywhere, locked accounts, wages gone, futures, rewritten. PDS debt has already helped hundreds of thousands escape, and they can help you too. Whether you're struggling with credit cards, personal loans, collections, or medical bills,

PDS debt has customized options to help you get out of debt. They go beyond the numbers to understand your specific scenario and create a plan, designed just for you. There's no minimum credit score required. And they're here to help you save more, pay off debt faster, and start putting money back where it belongs in your pocket. PDS debt is A plus rated by the Better Business Bureau with thousands of five-star reviews on Google and a five-star rating on Trust Pilot because they've helped hundreds of thousands of people get out of debt. If I ever needed this product, it's what I'd use. Don't wait for debt to make its next move, you're 30 seconds away from being debt-free. Get your free assessment and find the best

option for you right now at PDSdebt.com slash legal AF. That's PDSDet.com slash legal AF. PDSdet.com slash legal AF. And then I read the actual transcript. And I'm thinking, well, they must think this really helps them fix the problem that they had in court with admitting that the grand jury in its entirety did not see the full indictment that the four person signed. And so I'm reading it like, all right, this is going to help her, right? I don't think so. Here's where it starts. They bring the four person in to meet with a magistrate judge because she's presiding over the matter. And the judge says, I got a problem. I got two pieces of paper. They're both signed by Lindsay Halle They're both signed by you.

They both can't be the indictment. Which is it? So you already have a problem. So she calls up Halligan on page four of the transcript. And she said, who's here for the government this evening? Ms. Halligan. Lindsay Halligan. Notice she doesn't say interim, U.S. attorney, Lindsay Halligan.

Lindsay Halligan, like she just came off the street. Okay, please come to the podium, please. this has never happened before, the match straight judge says, and she's handled thousands of these. I've been handed two documents that are in the Mr. Comey case that are inconsistent with one another. There seems to be a discrepancy. They're both signed by the four person. The one that says it's a failure to concur in an indictment, it doesn't say with respect to one count. It looks like they failed to concur across all three counts. So I'm a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent.

We're all waiting for the answer. Miss Halligan. So I only reviewed the one with the two counts that our office redrafted when we found out about the two. Two counts that were true-billed, and I signed that one. I did not see the other one. I don't know where that came from. Let's stop right there.

She had a three-count indictment. She doesn't know where that came from? That's what she presented to the grand jury. They rejected the three-count indictment. They then cut and pasted and created a two-count indictment outside the presence of the full grand jury and had the four-person signed it. That's the problem, Lindsay.

The court said, you didn't see it? I didn't see that one. That's already a lie. It's already a lie or just gross negligence on behalf of Lindsay Halligan. She, her procedure, her people hand in to the judge through the court deputy, two documents,

and she doesn't know where the one came from? Ms. Halligan, no, no, no. I prepared the three counts. So now she flip-flops and says, I prepared the larger indictment. I only signed the one, though, with the two count. I don't know which one with three counts you have in your hand. Court says, okay, it has your signature on it. Stop right there.

She signed both. She signed both the one that was not apparently true billed because it was rejected by the grand jury because they didn't agree on count one. And she signed the one that is the actual indictment. It's not a clerical error. It's a fundamental erroring procedure related to the grand jury. And then Ms. Halligan, when she's told that both have her signature on it, including the one that she says she never saw, says, okay, well, the court says, so I think to clean up the record here,

what needs to happen, Madam, four person, and then they go through the order of operation. Since you provided this court, this is what the court says in the bottom of page six, to Ms. Halligan. With respect to this case, Ms. Halligan, and since you've provided to this court, I assume you intend to make it public. So both of the indictments will go on the docket.

I just want to make sure that you understand that, and that is your intention. Okay, understood. All right, we're adjourned. This doesn't help her. First of all, as I said, it's completely inconsistent with the declaration under oath that she filed with Judge Curry.

It's completely inconsistent with what she told Judge Nachmanoff that had happened on the fly, but she can't remember. And she's even confused inside of the September 25 hearing for just seven minutes. And on top of that, filing just a few spoon-fed pages of this now disclosed grand jury transcript is a waiver, as far as I'm concerned by the government,

because they're fighting over whether the grand jury transcript in its entirety should be turned over to the defense. James Comey just filed his final brief saying that, We got a lot of problems. First of all, Judge Fitzpatrick, the magistrate judge, already said that he reviewed the grand jury transcript and that Lindsay Halligan committed two fundamental errors of constitutional law in making her presentation to the grand jury,

let alone the evidence that she left out, let alone the misstatement of evidence that she did in order to get the grand jury to agree. She violated the Fifth Amendment right of James Comey, suggesting to the grand jury that he needed to testify in violation of his right against self-incrimination, and also effectively said that the burden was on the defense, not on the prosecution, to prove the case.

I don't see how Judge Nachmanoff doesn't turn over the grand jury transcript as recommended by the magistrate judge immediately to the defense. He's considering whether to dismiss the indictment for vindictive prosecution, for sure. But he also will ultimately have to decide, if he agrees, if he keeps the prosecution alive, he has to determine whether the indictment survives

or whether it should be dismissed for these constitutional infirmities. While Judge Curry has to decide whether Lindsay Halligan lives or dies as a federal prosecutor at all. Fast-moving case, you're going to want to be on legal AF for all of the updates, including legal AF substack

where I post all of these filings so that you can read them for yourself. Glad you're here. We're going to crash through that one million subscriber barrier for Legal AF, so we're the home of all things, law and politics. Come over and be a part of that. We're probably going to break it by just after Thanksgiving with your help. So until my next report, I'm Michael Popak. Can't get your fill of Legal A.F. Me neither. That's why we formed the Legal A.F. Substack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a oral argument,

come over to the substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there. including a daily roundup that I do call, wait for it, morning a.F. What else? All the other contributors from LegalAF are there as well. We got some new reporting. We got interviews. We got ad-free versions of the podcast and hot takes. Where legal A.F. On Substack. Come over now to free subscribe.