Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Trump Faces Dismissal as Comey Goes Nuclear on Him
Episode Date: October 20, 2025In breaking news, Former FBI Director Comey has gone nuclear, filing today his motion to disqualify prosecutor and Trump pet Lindsey Halligan as US Attorney and to have his indictment dismissed foreve...r, and wait until you find out what MAGA US Supreme Court Justice secret memo from 1984 now leaked is being used to help out Comey’s motion now! Michael Popok brings the receipts on his latest hot take Delete Me: Get 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to join https://deleteme.com/LEGALAF and use promo code LEGALAF at checkout. Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
When you're with Amex Platinum,
you get access to exclusive dining experiences and an annual travel credit.
So the best tapas in town might be in a new town altogether.
That's the powerful backing of Amex.
Terms and conditions apply.
Learn more at Amex.ca.
This episode is brought to you by Peloton.
A new era of fitness is here.
Introducing the new Peloton Cross Training Tread Plus, powered by Peloton IQ, built for breakthroughs
with personalized workout plans, real-time insights, and endless ways to move.
Lift with confidence, while Peloton IQ counts reps, corrects form, and tracks your progress.
Let yourself run, lift, flow, and go.
Explore the new Peloton cross-draining tread plus at one peloton.ca.
Is it the matcha, or am I this energized from scoring three Sephora holiday gift sets?
Definitely the sets.
Full size and minis bundled together, what a steal.
And that packaging, so cute, it practically wraps itself.
And I know I should be giving them away, but I'm keeping the summer Fridays and rare beauty by Selena Gomez.
I don't blame you.
The best holiday beauty sets are only at Sephora.
Gift sets from Summer Fridays, Rare Beauty, Way, and more are going fast.
Get full-sized favorites and must have minis.
Fundled for more value.
Shop before they're gone.
In store online at Sephora.ca.
Whether you own a bustling hair salon
or a hot new bakery,
you need business insurance
that can keep up with your evolving needs.
With flexible coverage options from TV insurance,
you only pay for what you need.
TD, ready for you.
Grab a coffee and discover Vegas-level excitement
with BEDMGM Casino.
Now introducing our hottest exclusive,
friends, the one with Mold.
Your favorite classic television show is being reimagined in your new favorite casino game,
featuring iconic images from the show.
Spin our new exclusive, because we are not on a break.
Play Friends, the one with Multidrop, exclusively at BetMGM Casino.
Want even more options?
Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games from Blackjack to poker.
Or head over to the arcade for nostalgic casino thrills.
Download the BetMGM Ontario app today.
You don't want to miss out.
19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-260 to speak to an advisor free of charge. Bed MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
We got the roundhouse punch, the knockout punch by James Comey and his lawyers that we were expecting going after Lindsay Halligan to knock her out as the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.
not just because she's not qualified,
but because she was illegally and unconstitutionally
and in violation of a statute appointed by Donald Trump.
And they cited what we expected,
what I was waiting for.
They cited as partial grounds to support their motion,
a memo, a memo written by a certain Supreme Court justice
named Sam Alito when he was a lawyer working
in the White House counsel's office for Ronald Reagan.
And he, not knowing that 40 or 50 years later,
he was going to have to deal with this issue,
he supports James Comey's position.
Yes, it's going to be great when Alito gets this case
and he tries to backpedal his way away from a memo
that Sam Alito wrote.
I'm Michael Popock.
I brought the receipts.
I got the motion.
I've got the memo from Sam Alito.
We're going to tie it all together here.
I might as touch an unlegal A.F.
And I'm excited, as you can tell,
from my finger symbols there.
All right, let's get into it.
Lindsay Halligan, remember her?
You never should have ever heard about her in history.
She should have stayed the insurance.
defense lawyer, fender bender lawyer that she was. But no, she got into MAGA and she ended up
becoming Donald Trump's favorite, you know, and teacher's pet, and she got sucked into the White
House. And then when there was an opening in the Eastern District of Virginia, she, Donald Trump
attempted to appoint her into that opening, except they violated a statute. It's called the Vacancy Reform
Act. It's 28 U.S.C. 546. And it says, and it's very simple. It's elegant and its simplicity.
It says if there is an opening for the U.S. attorney position while the president is trying to get his permanent pick confirmed by the Senate, the president gets one pick, and then that person serves for 120 days, which should be enough under normal circumstances, to get your pick confirmed by the Senate.
But it didn't happen in Eastern District of Virginia because they didn't put up anybody.
They fired or the person resigned in the Eastern District of Virginia.
They try to stick in one.
Now, this is a single-use statute.
You get your ticket punch once.
You get one bite at the apple.
And Pam Bondi had her bite.
It was called Eric Seabert.
And Eric Seabert was a Republican.
But he refused to bend the knee to Donald Trump.
He refused to prosecute Letitia James and James Comey.
And so he got fired.
That means the next position, that position gets filled by the judges of the Eastern District of Virginia.
That's why James Comey said in his motion,
Judge Namakov, who's the judge presiding,
you can't decide this case.
You're going to have to send it over this motion.
You're going to have to send this motion up to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Let them send it to a different judge outside the Eastern District of Virginia
because they're all conflicted like you are because you may end up picking the next U.S. attorney.
And so they went through the entirety of 546 and how Lindsay Halligan got selected.
It's very easy.
This is in contrast to the Alina Haba Third Circuit Court of Appeals case today that went terrible for Alina Haba.
There's no way that Third Circuit, two Bush appointees and an Obama appointee are going to let Alina Haba stay as the U.S. attorney for New Jersey.
Because her path to getting the job was even worse than Lindsay Halligans.
Now, Lindsay Halligans is all under 546.
How do I know that?
Because they call her the interim U.S. attorney for the act, sorry, the U.
Yeah, the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Now, once they fired Eric Siebert because he couldn't, he wouldn't do the job that Donald Trump wanted him to do,
that vacancy gets filled by the judges of the Eastern District of Virginia, not by Donald Trump again, not by Pam Bondi again, putting in Lindsay Halligan.
Donald Trump thinks through a social media direct message or tweet to Pam Bondi, he can get Lindsay Halligan.
Remember that post?
Hurry up, Pam!
you know, you need to indict my enemies.
You need to indict Comey and Smith.
You don't have a lot of time.
And Lindsay Allegan really likes you.
I thought I was in middle school.
Lindsay Allegan really likes you.
She'd be perfect.
Even Pam Bondi didn't think Lindsay Halligan would be perfect
because for about 24 hours,
she appointed Meg Cleary,
who's now been fired to take the job.
And it's already come out that Pam Bondi
and Todd Blanche to number one and number two
in the Department of Justice
did not want to prosecute Comey or litigious.
James. But Donald Trump found his shadow U.S. attorney in the form of Ed Martin, who's the
pardon lawyer slash head of the weaponization committee of the Department of Justice, and then he
conscripted and grabbed Lindsay Halligan and they indicted. Isn't that great? Except it violated
546. Once they appointed Siebert, it's very simple. They didn't have the ability to appoint
anybody else. They can't ride the roller coaster again. Their ticket is already
punched. Now, Sam Alito wrote a memo. Kind of let off this hot take with that. And in that
memo, he wrote while he was in the Reagan administration. By the way, this explains why he's so
into the power of the presidency and giving the executive branch unitary power that is
superior to that of the other two branches because he worked for Reagan. Like Reagan was any great
president at the time. I mean, he makes Donald Trump. I mean, Reagan makes Donald Trump. I mean, Reagan makes
Donald Trump makes Reagan, sorry, look like he should be on Mount Rushmore. Remember, he was
half out of it and in the bag the last two years of his administration. I ran Contra scandal.
You can look it up. But Alito worked in the Office of Legal Counsel, which is the advisor,
the official advisor to the office of the presidency. And he wrote a memo, which we could put up
on the screen in 1986, in which he said that Congress designed Section 2546 to be a single
statute that once you appoint, there's no more appointment. You can't appoint a second and keep
extending the 120 days, another 120 days, another 120 days. You get one. Then it goes to the district
court judges until you get the permanent appointment. See, the problem that Donald Trump is having
and he's had this problem five or six times is that he won't nominate people that are credible
or with experience or that aren't partisan MAGA hacks and they're getting rejected by his own
party and getting rejected by the senators of each state where this person comes up because they
have something called blue slip privilege. Senators have to approve both after turn in their blue slips
to approve the nominee. That's why Alina Haba had to have her nomination withdrawn. Lindsay
Halligan's never going to be nominated. Her job wasn't to nominate. Her job was to be some sort of
acting interim and get indictments that Donald Trump wanted and then slither away under the rock she crawled out from
under. Donald Trump doesn't even care about these indictments. He just wanted the headline in for
history. So their obituaries read, they were indicted for mortgage fraud or they were indicted for
perjury or whatever the frame job is. So Lindsay Halligan, the blind ambition puppet of Donald
Trump, who's got her bar license in jeopardy, should be removed by whatever judge is assigned
this motion because it's not going to be Judge Namakov in Virginia. It's going to be in
another part of Virginia or maybe in North Carolina, it's going to be another judge.
It's where, because by rule, motions to disqualify that impact the judges, including the judge
presiding, it's got to go. So Judge Diaz is going to make this ultimate decision and we'll report
on it here on the Midas Touch Network. Delete me makes it easy, quick, and safe to remove your
personal data online at a time when surveillance and data breaches are common enough to make everyone
vulnerable. As someone with an active online presence, privacy is really important to me.
Every week, we're covering stories about data leaks and hacks, people's personal information
being exposed, and it really hit home. I've seen how easily your private details can end up
all over the internet, and that's why I use Delete Me. Delete Me does all the work of wiping
your and your family's personal information from hundreds of data broker websites. And it's not
just a one-time thing. Delete Me is always working for you.
constantly monitoring and removing the personal information you don't want on the internet.
Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me.
Now at a special discount for our listeners.
Get 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to join DeleteMe.com slash LegalAF and use promo
code LegalAF at checkout.
The only way to get 20% off is to go to join DeleteMe.com slash LegalAF and enter code
legalAF at checkout.
That's Join DeleteMe.com.
slash legal AF, code legal AF.
Let me read to you, now that you got the overview,
let me read to you from the motion,
and we'll post this on legal AF substack,
where I put under, yeah, under filings AF.
This is what the Comey's lawyers, Pat Fitzgerald, says to the court.
The indictment in this case is fatally flawed
because it resulted directly from a paradigmatic violation
of the Constitution's Appointments Clause,
a core element of the separation of powers that defines
when and how officers of the United States acquire their authority to act.
Here are the officials who signed the indictment.
And from all indications, the sole official who presented the case to the grand jury,
which she had never done before,
she'd only been a federal prosecutor for hours,
was defectively appointed to her office as interim U.S. attorney.
Rather than conform to constitutional and statutory requirements for such appointments,
her purported appointment violated the congressionally designed
and constitutionally compelled means for the,
the Attorney General to appoint an official as interim U.S. attorney.
The remedy for this violation is clear.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the effect of this fundamental violation of the
Appointments Clause is that the defectively appointed officers' actions are a nullity.
The indictment is a nullity.
It shouldn't exist.
It is a, it's action should be voided ab initio from the beginning and the indictment
should be dismissed with prejudice.
which is what they're asking for.
Now, when you get into it, they get to the Alito memo.
Let's turn to page 15.
This is where Sam Alito is going to have a problem
when this case lands on the doorstep of the Supreme Court.
Just three days after Congress enacted the 1986 law,
the Vacancy Reform Act,
the Office of Legal Counsel within the Department of Justice
issued a memorandum,
authored by then Deputy Assistant Attorney General Samuel Alito,
interpreting the provision
in precisely the same manner as Mr. Comey here.
And I'll put up that memo for you to read on LegalAF Substack.
Specifically, OLC concluded that while a, quote,
vacancy exists when the 120-day period expires
under the amended Section 546 and the president has either not made an appointment
or the appointment has not been confirmed,
it does not follow that the Attorney General may make another appointment
pursuant to 546 after the expiration of the 120 days.
The Office of Legal Counsel, there written by Sam Alito, reasoned that, quote,
the statutory plan discloses a congressional purpose that after the expiration of the 120-day period,
further interim appointments are to be made by the court rather than by the attorney general.
That contemporaneous executive branch interpretation provides persuasive evidence of statutory meaning,
and then he shoves it up, Sam Alito's backside, along with the MAGA 6 on the Supreme Court, by citing to the Loper Bright Enterprises case, which set a new standard that MAGA always wanted about statutory interpretation of an agency's findings.
And so I love the fact, it's like I'm nerding out on the two cases that they cite Loper Bright and Casa de Maryland for that proposition.
What's going to happen next?
I'm sure there's going to be an opposition paper in two weeks.
They're going to argue something like, oh, this impinges on the executive powers under Article 2 of the president.
Even if Congress wrote that in the statute, it should be knocked out.
They're going to cite all these line of cases about inferior officers like at the National Labor Relations Board, the SEC, the Merit Systems Protection Board, and all the rulings on an emergency basis by the Supreme Court and say, you should do the same thing here.
if you're going to interpret 546, you've got to interpret it consistent with presidential power,
and you shouldn't, and the president gets to appoint as many as he wants,
because it's an inferior office of the president, and the judicial branch shouldn't get involved.
That's going to be the argument.
We'll follow it here.
I'm also going to give you a report about the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution.
But this goes to the heart.
If this gets granted, this is a dismissal of the indictment with prejudice.
If the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution gets granted,
That's the same.
Two bites at the apple for James Comey,
even though Donald Trump
and the Department of Justice
only get one.
I'll follow it all again.
Midas touch, hit the subscribe button.
Legal AF, YouTube.
Now is the time you need to defend
our First Amendment rights.
Your First Amendment rights.
We're under attack, folks.
Hit the subscribe button.
Come over to LegalAF substack,
and you'll get to read all these motions,
including the Alito's secret memo.
Only a legal AF substack.
So until my next report, I'm Michael Popuck.
Can't get you.
Phil of legal A.F. Me neither. That's why we formed the legal A.F. Substack. Every time we mention
something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a oral argument, come over to the
substack. You'll find the court filing in the oral argument there, including a daily roundup that I do
call, wait for it, morning A.F. What else? All the other contributors from legal A.F are there
as well. We got some new reporting. We got interviews. We got ad-free versions of the podcast and
hot takes wear legal a f on substack come over now to free subscribe
