Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Trump Faces Humiliating Defeat by Reporter in Lawsuit
Episode Date: July 21, 2025Journalists and Media Companies --not named CBS or ABC-- are starting to fight back against Trump and win. Michael Popok reports in a win this week for award winning investigative journalist Bob Woo...dward and his publisher against Trump in NY in a money fight over the ownership of the "Trump Tapes". A NY Federal Judge just found that Trump can't sue for $50 million because, as alleged, he is not the "co-author" of his own interview audio tapes with Woodward, and that he will have difficulty ever successfully suing the reporter and the publisher. Go to http://mackweldon.com/?utm_source=streaming&utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=podcastlaunch&utm_content=LEGALAFutm_term=LEGALAF and get 20% off your first order with promo code LEGALAF Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
No Frills delivers. Get groceries delivered to your door from No Frills with PC Express.
Shop online and get $15 in PC Optimum Points on your first five orders.
Shop now at NoFrills.ca.
FanDuel Casino's exclusive live dealer studio has your chance at the number one feeling.
Winning. Which beats even the 27th best feeling saying, I do.
Who wants this last parachute?
I do.
Enjoy the number one feeling.
Winning, in an exciting live dealer studio, exclusively on FanDuel Casino, where winning is undefeated.
19 plus and physically located in Ontario.
Gambling problem? Call 1-866-531-2600 or visit connectsontario.ca. Please play responsibly.
Finally, we've got a win in favor of journalists, media outlets reporting against Donald Trump
in the form of a new order by Judge Gardafia in New York in favor of Simon and Schuster,
the publishing house, in favor of Bob Woodward, the investigative reporter who together published over 20 different audio
interviews of Donald Trump that Bob Woodward obtained when he was writing the book Rage,
and they published it and repackaged it as audio interviews in the Trump tapes. Donald Trump hated
that. They made $50 million selling the Trump tapes. Donald Trump wanted all the $50 million claiming
he was a co-author under the copyright statutes.
I'm gonna tell you what Judge Gardafy said.
And with one twist here,
I'll put you on the edge of your seat
at the top of this hot tick.
Simon & Schuster used to be owned by the Redstone family
and Paramount until right before this case was filed.
Then it was sold to a private equity firm.
If it were still owned by,
if Simon & Schuster, Woodward's publisher,
was still owned by the Redstone family,
I assure you, I would be reporting on a settlement
being paid money to Donald Trump
by Simon & Schuster being forced by its corporate parent.
Just as we just saw in the CBS Tiffany network,
throwing its reputation down the sewer
and flushing it down the toilet
in order to appease Donald Trump,
while Paramount was trying to get a regulatory approval
for a sale of its own business,
where Stephen Colbert was apparently the late night host
to be named later and was sacrificed in order to appease
Donald Trump in that bribery scheme. So if Simon and Schuster
this is just fortuitous that right before the suit was filed
Simon and Schuster was sold by the Redstone family to KKR a
private equity firm. Otherwise, this would be a much different
report. But I'm here to tell you what Judge Gardafie said.
It's against Donald Trump.
It's in favor of Bob Woodward and journalism
and the Copyright Act.
And I'm gonna report on it here on Midas Touch and Legal AF.
All right, let's get to it.
In 2023, Donald Trump files a lawsuit,
starts it in Pensacola, Florida.
It gets transferred, of course,
because it doesn't belong in Pensacola, Florida,
to New York and gets assigned to Judge Gardafie. Judge Gardafie, of course, because it doesn't belong in Pensacola, Florida, to New York and gets assigned to Judge Gardafy.
Judge Gardafy, side note, one of the slowest,
he's a great judge, but one of the slowest judges around.
The New York Post actually wrote an article
about five years ago shaming, trying to shame Judge Gardafy
as having the slowest turnaround time for his orders ever,
which would explain why we sort of lost track
in this case, because this motion to dismiss was filed a long time ago. We now have the 81 page
order. It was well worth the wait, Judge Gardathy, about Donald Trump. Here's what happened. Trump
agrees on the record. This is no dispute. Trump agrees to be interviewed, because he's vainglorious, by Woodward to write a book.
And they have 20 different sessions
between 2016 and then 2019 and 2020.
Lots of different people attend based on the,
I'm getting this from the complaint,
not the original complaint,
the third version of the complaint.
That's how many times it's been dismissed.
So they talk about, oh, there were
these interviews and hundreds of hours and lots of people attended. Kellyanne Conway and Vice
President Pence was there and the Chief of Staff for Donald Trump was there. Okay. Trump asked,
according to the complaint, Trump asked one question of Woodward, you're just using these tapes
for the book, right? He said, yeah. Like I'm not doing reporting,
like I'm not writing articles about this, I'm doing a book.
He said, okay, there was no discussion
about whether the audio tapes were gonna be
separately packaged or who was gonna own them.
And the way the law works is that in interviews,
when you have question and answer,
Trump tried to argue, well, I gave the answer,
so it's my copyright.
No, that's not how that works.
There's a lot of different factors,
but the main factor is whoever fixes it,
F-I-X, it's a term of art in the world of copyright,
whoever fixes it in a defined permanent medium
is the author for copyright purposes.
So two people could have participated in the project,
but whoever reduced it to writing or video or digital
or audio, they're the copyright holder.
And that's what led Judge Gardafy to say,
I know you're arguing that you're the joint owner
of the copyright, but you don't have a contract.
You have no facts to support it.
Even your own complaint,
because we're here on a motion to dismiss.
So the judge has to accept this true,
whatever is alleged in the four corners of the complaint,
the pleading that was filed by Trump
to get the case off the ground,
but can't look outside of it.
So even if you interpret it in the light most favorable
to the non-moving party, which is Trump,
Cardiff, he was like,
you don't have appropriate allegations
that you could have reasonably believed
that you were the joint owner of the copyright.
Now Trump says in his complaint,
I ran down and the copyright office
recognizes me as a co-owner.
Well, what happened is in February
of the year that the last interview was done,
or February of 2021, Simon and Schuster ran down
to the copyright office and registered,
February, actually 2023, February 23, 2023,
Woodward obtained from the copyright office
the registration, the copyright registration
for the Trump tapes.
Five days later, Trump waltzes in
and tries to register as well.
Copyright office doesn't resolve competing claims.
Courts do that.
So they both are recognized until a court sorts it out.
And that's what the courts are sorting out here.
That's what Gardafy is trying to sort out.
So Gardafy in his 81 pages goes through the whole analysis
and says, look, I'm looking
at your complaint, Trump.
You have to allege facts to support that you are a joint author to own the copyright.
And I don't see that anywhere in your complaint.
In fact, I see counter evidence in your own allegations that undermine your argument that
you are a joint owner.
And under the copyright law, that's going to kill all your other claims
for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and the rest,
because copyright law is sacrosanct in this area
and ousts all common law or state claims
that are contrary to the Copyright Act.
And they've got you dead, you know, effectively,
the judge is telling him Simon & Schuster
has you dead to rights on copyright law.
You don't own it.
This is all about money, by the way.
This is not defamation.
This is about Donald Trump wants a major piece
or all of the $50 million that was made on the Trump tapes.
You know what summer memory always sticks with me?
It was that spontaneous weekend trip, no plans,
just good friends, cold drinks and sun for days.
I didn't overthink it and it turned out to be
one of the best times of my life.
That's my summer vibe now.
Cool, effortless and ready for anything.
From the gym to work to a night out or summer adventures,
you want clothes that feel comfortable anywhere.
Mack Weldon has breathable clothes that keep you cool,
comfortable and stylish, perfect for summer.
Their new tech linen line combines the easy charm
of classic linen with cool max technology.
I've got the tech linen button-up and shorts,
super lightweight, the fit is on point,
and I stay dry even when it's blazing out.
It's the kind of look that feels chill,
but polished like you put in effort without actually trying.
That's the Mack Weldon difference.
They've nailed that mix of modern comfort
with timeless style.
Get breathable clothes you can feel comfortable in all summer.
Go to mackweldon.com and get 25% off your first order
of $125 or more with promo code LegalAF.
That's M-A-C-K-W-E-L-D-O-N.com, promo code LegalAF.
So at the end of this process,
now that Woodward has won,
the judge has given,
and he's bending over backwards here
because after the second amended complaint,
which is the, you know, you have the complaint,
your first amended complaint, your second amended complaint.
So it's been three opportunities
that's been given already to Trump's side
to get their pleading straight
and to survive a motion to dismiss, all failed.
Most federal judges would be like three times you're out.
And I see any attempt at you alleging something different
to get around the copyright statute
or to allege a tort or some sort of contract claim
that's independent of Copyright Act,
it won't be preempted by it, is futile.
The judge said, I'm not gonna find futility yet,
which is another doctrine in pleading practice,
because the judge will give you leave to amend a few times
unless you could never state a claim
under pleading standards and the standards
for the particular claims that you're bringing.
Then we call that futility or amendment futility
and the judges will deny it because they'll be like,
I could give you another shot,
but you're never gonna get it.
You're never gonna be able to get over that hurdle.
So here's what the judge says on page 58,
which sort of comes to the end of his order.
While it appears unlikely that plaintiff can adequately
plead a plausible copyright interest in the Trump tapes
or any non-preempted state law claim,
this court cannot find at this stage
that any amendment would be futile.
Accordingly, leave to move to amend is granted.
Any motion for leave to file a third amended complaint,
that would be the fourth try for a complaint to survive,
must be filed on August 18th, 2025.
So we gave him a month and we'll explain
how the new pleading addresses the deficiencies
or defects that are cited in this opinion.
Because in other words, they've laid out,
he's laid out the blueprint
of what the complaint has to look like.
And then you have to, so he's going to have to file a motion for leave to amend, attach
the proposed third amendment complaint as an exhibit, and then the judge will take a look
at it and see if this resolves the problem.
I think that Trump is going to lose.
I think Trump's best world scenario
is if Simon and Schuster had stayed connected
and owned by Sherry Redstone and Paramount.
So when they wrapped up the whole 15 million
slash 30 million slash Colbert's head on a Pike settlement,
they would have included the Simon and Schuster
as a subsidiary and this particular lawsuit.
Yeah, so that's the good news here.
It also goes to show you how important
independent commentary and channels
and YouTube channels like this one are.
Because you see what's happening
in the world of corporate-owned media.
They're throwing the Tiffany Network,
Edward R. Murrow's network, Walter Cronkite's network,
journalism, the integrity of journalism, down the drain.
Washington Post owned by Bezos.
That Washington Post isn't worth the paper
it's written on any longer. It's not the Washington Post when Bob
Woodward wrote for it in the 70s with Carl Bernstein and the
Pulitzer Prize winning exposés about the Nixon administration.
LA Times. Throw that into the put that at the bottom of your
birdcage owned by a billionaire who doesn't care about the First Amendment
or American values.
Then you have Colbert being fired, obviously,
it's obvious, I mean, come on, let's be frank,
just days after he does a scathing rebuke
of his corporate parent, Paramount.
It's obvious that there was a requirement
for him to get canned. And then you got people like people like on our own network like Katie Fang. We will
never get canned. I will never get canned by Midas Touch for something that I say.
I'm not told what to say. They don't speak to me afterwards about what I say.
I'm not censored. They rely on my professionalism, my professional maturity, my
reputation, my brand to do quality commentary that's based
on truth and appropriate commentary around that without
blowing smoke or sunshine, that's it. But we need
protection. And we need to stay on the air at this critical
moment in our democracy to be the firewall.
So the way to do that is hit the subscribe button
for the Midas Touch Network.
Come on over to Legal AF, the YouTube channel,
do the exact same thing.
No paywall, no outside investors.
We just need thumbs hitting subscription buttons.
I mean, I hate to put it that way, but that's what it is.
And I'm honored, of course, to be on this network,
running the channel with the Minus Touch brothers
and bringing you the Legal AF podcast as well.
So until my next report, I'm Michael Popock.
Can't get your fill of Legal AF?
Me neither.
That's why we formed the Legal AF Substack.
Every time we mention something in a hot take,
whether it's a court filing or a oral argument,
come over to the Substack, you'll's a court filing or a oral argument come over to the
sub stack you'll find the court filing and the oral argument there including a daily roundup that
i do call wait for it morning af what else all the other contributors from legal af are there as well
we got some new reporting we got interviews we got ad free versions of the podcast and hot takes where legal AF on sub stack.
Come over now to free subscribe.