Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Trump Makes Last-Ditch Move to Hide Illegal Acts in Court
Episode Date: May 12, 2025We have major developments in the Abrego Garcia illegal removal to El Salvador case before Federal Judge Xinis, as 14 members of the media press the court to let us see all the secret filings the Trum...p Administration has made; as Trump tries to hide his illegal acts by asserting the State Secrets Privilege. Michael Popok pulls it all together for his latest hot take. Get started today at https://OneSkin.co and receive 15% Off using code: LEGALAF Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What's better than a well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue?
A well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue that was carefully selected by an Instacart
shopper and delivered to your door.
A well-marbled ribeye you ordered without even leaving the kiddie pool.
Whatever groceries your summer calls for, Instacart has you covered.
Download the Instacart app and enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders.
Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply.
Instacart, groceries that over-deliver.
Judge Zinnas in Maryland, she's cracking her knuckles and she's issuing new orders in
the Abrego Garcia matter and it spells bad news for the Trump administration and the
Department of Justice.
I'm going to put it in context of some recent rulings, all in the, in the
immigration and deportation civil rights violation by Donald Trump, you're here
on the Midas Touch Network and Legal AF.
I'm Michael Popak.
Let me dive in.
Judge Zinnis has been in a masterful way, been presiding over the administration
of justice in Maryland for the Armando Abrego Garcia case.
She's been affirmed by the Supreme Court 9-0.
She's been affirmed by two different panels of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals 3-0,
a piece. There is no more powerful federal judge than that and she's taking it seriously. The
Supreme Court told her she was right to order the Trump administration to facilitate the release,
not the return, the release from
an El Salvadoran prison of Abrego Garcia, who was illegally sent there.
That is an undisputed fact.
The due process that he's entitled to can only be administered to him, of course, under
the Constitution in the United States.
And so we have this constant friction and two things burst out into the open just in the
last 48 hours in her courtroom. One, you've got the media, which is sort of fed up with all of the
attempts by the Trump administration primarily to seal, redact, black out their filings. I mean,
there are just about a dozen sealed filings on the docket.
Now, this is the way the public justice system works.
You and I and everybody else, we have a seat at the table.
It's the criminally accused who's innocent unless proven guilty.
It's the prosecution team.
It's the judge, but it's also the public.
And that's why our court system is done in the open, in the sunshine.
We don't have star chambers on purpose, at least currently. And so as part of being a
stakeholder in the public justice system, where somebody is both accused and either
cleared or convicted in the public domain, we have to be able to look at documents that
are filed. That's how I can have
a show like Legal AF with all these court docs. Can't be in every courtroom at all at the same
time. And so there are certain ways and very limited narrow exceptions to the rule that all
documents are public. And we allow under certain limited circumstances for a party to assert some sort of privilege or secrecy
around the filing even for a short time
and allow it to be filed under seal.
So then when I click the button, I can't get it.
So there's just been a series of under sealed things.
I'll tell you the one that kicked this off
and I'm sure got the media who have now filed a motion
to intervene in the case for the purposes
of getting the docket and those docket entries unsealed
so they can do the reporting,
so they can do their part in our democracy.
I think what kicked it off was about two weeks ago,
the judge had ordered very fast paced discovery in the case
that the government would have to provide depositions,
a question and answers under oath
in live testimony before a court reporter, and answer questions and provide documents.
And then there was right on the eve of when that was supposed to start, the parties both filed
sealed papers and the judge says, I'll give you a week. Now, I thought it was related to,
you know, trying to look under the wrap here. I thought it was related to a filing
that was made by the Trump administration
to the Abrego Garcia side,
in which they said they were engaged in diplomatic channels
to try to get his return.
And maybe the plaintiff's side believed that,
and they asked for a break,
so, you know, the prying eyes wouldn't help the process.
So the judge saw the sealed motions. The court always sees them, but we didn't so we were you know
We're speculating, but I think I got a pretty good guess why she
Postponed the discovery for a week then they asked the Trump side asked for more time. She said no and
Now we've got another set of filings by the Trump administration in which they're exercising or trying to exercise state secrets privilege to prevent
They're answering any questions about what they're doing to facilitate
so the judges ordered them to facilitate the Supreme Court has confirmed her order affirmed her order and
Their response is we can't tell you
Originally was we're never gonna get him back. Let's go through the iterations of the Trump administration
About their flip-flopping on these positions first. It was we're never gonna get him back. Let's go through the iterations of the Trump administration about their flip-flopping on these positions.
First it was, we're never getting him back,
literally, ha ha, he's there forever
and we don't have to give him due process.
Then the order came out, it's confirmed by the Supreme Court,
which said you must facilitate his release from prison.
Then they took the position for another week or two
that they only had to facilitateator on the domestic side.
Oh, we'll just open the gates.
If he shows up at a port or at an airport, we'll let him in.
And the Fourth Circuit, led by Judge Wilkinson,
took a look at that ridiculous position and said,
that's not a good faith interpretation
of the Supreme Court's ruling, so that's wrong.
Moms know the hustle's real.
With work, kids, errands, and everything in between,
there's rarely time to slow
down, let alone figure out a 10-step skincare routine. But no matter how busy life gets,
your skin still deserves just more than just the basics. That's why I love today's sponsors so much.
It's one skin. Their product is truly multitaskers. They hydrate, they protect and support your skin's
long-term health. And it's all thanks to their OS1 peptide, which targets the cells
that accelerate the visible signs
of aging like wrinkles, thinning
skin and a dry, dull complexion.
One skin supports the skin
at a deeper cellular level.
So even if I'm running on fumes,
at least my skin gets what it needs.
I try their cleanser,
their moisturizer, their sunscreens
or my new favorite product
is their new peptide scalp serum
because you know scalp health is skin help
and hair thinning is something
that happens to some of us with age.
So you can get 15% off
with the code LEGALAF
at Oneskin.co
for moms or grandmoms
who do it all.
And now there's a skin care routine
that does too.
Oneskin is the world's first skin
longevity company. And by focusing on the cellular aspects of aging, one skin keeps your skin looking
and acting younger for longer. For a limited time only you can try one skin with 15% off using code
legal AF and one skin.co that's one skin.co that's 15% off one skin.co, that's Oneskin.co.
That's 15% off Oneskin.co with code Legal AF.
And after you purchase, tell them we sent you.
Thanks for supporting the show, Oneskin.
And then after that, the Trump administration
then told effectively the world
that they were working on the diplomacy
around the return of Abrego Garcia.
Now appears they're back to go pound sand judge.
We're not telling you what we're doing because we're exercising or
invoking the state secrets privilege.
She wants full briefing on that by early, by next week.
She's then going to make a ruling about it.
I'm sure it's going to be against the Trump administration, but we'll
see if she'll be affirmed or not.
In the meantime, she's also set a briefing schedule for the media who wants basically the parties to stop filing everything under seal and
let them be able to do their reporting and she set a full briefing schedule on
that. Let me just show you what a version of what redaction or sealing looks like.
The plaintiffs also filed a motion for in the last 48 hours, a motion for
additional depositions,
more questions and answers under oath because the first round was insufficient.
The judge had told her, if you need more time, if you need more depositions, come back to
me.
Why are they doing discovery at all?
It is to support a pending motion for contempt that the Braynill-Garcia lawyers have brought
against the Trump administration.
And the judge is probably on the five yard line
of declaring contempt.
She just wants to have the record complete
with this discovery, which is now ongoing.
So in this motion to take additional,
you'll note here's the page in the back.
All that black is what I can't tell you what it says.
It says, for instance, as, and this is the part
I probably want to hear so I can analyze it for you.
On page four of their motion, it says,
as to the steps taken in the past
to facilitate a Braco-Garcia's return.
I was like, yes, what are they?
Blackout.
Similarly, I was, I thought is this is my second favorite page. This
is what the media is trying to lift the veil if you will. This one's all it says
on this entire page is as to the steps anticipated in the future to facilitate
a Briego-Garcia return. I was yes. All right. So that's my world of sealing and redaction. That's your lesson for today.
And we're going to see. Here's my prediction. I think the judge is going to let the media
in for the sole purpose of her going through methodically the already sealed documents,
putting the pressure back on the parties
to justify the sealing,
and then she's gonna lift the seal,
and we'll be able to do more reporting.
That's what happens in a case.
Sometimes a year into the case,
they start kind of backfilling and releasing documents
that were filed originally,
and then we can do reporting on it.
It sounds like it's old reporting.
I'll say something like, four months ago,
and you know, in October, whatever, Popeye, what kind of
hot take is this?
But it just got released and that's why we're doing it.
So she's doing that.
I think she'll rule that way.
She'll start ripping the black tape off on a lot of these filings.
And on the state secrets privilege, I mean, I'll have to see the briefing, but I would
be shocked.
I mean, Jeb Boasberg, the chief judge in Maryland,
in DC, had a very, very similar issue
and he pretty quickly rejected the assertion
of the state secrets privilege in that regard as well.
So that's the backdrop of sort of where we are right now.
I'll do another hot take.
Four different judges have ruled against Donald Trump
in the last four days on his invocation of the Alien Enemies
Act to begin with.
All of them saying it was unconstitutional and improper, Texas, Colorado, New York, Maryland,
the whole gamut.
So, he's really on a losing streak, Trump, and trying to bring the country down with
him and he's pressing his losing hand with his various appeals related to these issues.
But we'll follow it.
The only way we know how without blowing smoke or sunshine right here on the Midas Touch
Network and on Legal AF.
Come on over to the Legal AF YouTube channel as well as we continue to grow that pro-democracy
channel.
And all you got to do is hit the subscribe button.
Boom, you'll get all the reminders for our almost hourly updates at the intersection
of law politics.
And of course, Legal AF of a podcast, which is on
Wednesdays and Saturdays at 8 p.m. Eastern time here on the Midas Touch Network. So until my next
report, I'm Michael Popock. Can't get your fill of Legal AF? Me neither. That's why we formed the
Legal AF sub stack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a
oral argument, come over to the sub stack, you'll find the court filing and the oral argument there,
including a daily roundup that I do call, wait for it, Morning AF.
What else? All the other contributors from Legal AF are there as well. We've got some new reporting,
we got interviews, we got ad-free versions of the podcast and hot takes. Where? Legal AF on
Substack. Come over now to free subscribe.