Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Trump Name Removed from Kennedy Center
Episode Date: June 24, 2026Judge Cooper has laid a delicate trap for the Trump-controlled Kennedy Center Board of Trustees, nudging them to drop the Tarp off the building voluntarily and stop chocking off funding in a petulant ...response to the Judge’s order, or he will order them too. Popok explains what a new last minute Order from the Judge’s chambers really means. Over 2 million butts love TUSHY. Get 10% off Tushy with the code LEGALAF at https://hellotushy.com/legalaf! #tushypod Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Visit BetMGM casino and check out the newest exclusive.
The Price is Right Fortune Pick.
BetMDM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly.
19 plus to wager.
Ontario only.
Please play responsibly.
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor,
free of charge.
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario.
tear down that tarp, Mr. Trump.
That's not what Judge Cooper has said yet, but he's about to.
He's laid a delicate trap for Donald Trump, and we know Trump and his Department of Justice
and his controlled Trump trustees for the Kennedy Center.
They're going to step into it.
And he's going to allow them to do that, particularly about the tarp, about the programming,
about lies that may have been told to the court.
I'm going to cover the new order coming out of Judge Cooper.
Cooper's Chambers, how it relates to his 96-page order a couple of weeks ago,
and the Joint Status Report filed by Representative Joyce Beattie,
who has sued the Kennedy Center as a board member in order for them to do their fiduciary duties.
I'm Michael Popak. You're on the Midas Dutch Network in Legal IF. Let's get to it.
I spotted this filing on the 19th of June, and I said at the time that this is going to be the
beginning of the end for the Trump board and their attempts to control
the Kennedy Center out of existence. That they're going to have to take down that tarp and that they're
going to have to explain why they're continuing to violate the judge's order. They're going to have
to continue with the programming and the like. Brought to the attention by Judge Beatty's lawyers.
Here's what they said on page eight about the renaming. It says over to plaintiffs brings the
court's attention to pertinent developments, that the plaintiff requested the defendants provide
information as the developments in the status report, and it was refused, and they want to know
particularly why there is a tarp on June 12, 26, page 9, before taking down President Trump's
name from the Kennedy Center facade, defendants constructed scaffolding and hung a tarp to shield
the work from public view. Today, the tarp inexplicably remains. It's even more inexplicable
since we know what happened behind the tarp. Here's some photos from the Washington Post showing you what
the wall looks like without Donald Trump's name on it. In any event, according to the filing by
Representative Beattie, it appears that the tarp will be there will be there for the long term.
There's actually two doorways in the structure that permit pedestrian access underneath the
structure, and the entire assemblage appears to be semi-permanent. As a result, this tarp
largely obscures John F. Kennedy's name on the front portico. And what do you do when you've got two
large black doors on a tarp?
Well, you project the Epstein-Trump documentary
about Trump's involvement with a child sex predator
and international child sex trafficking ring.
As you can see here.
Now, they continue in their filing
that the defendants are effectively lying to the public.
They're saying that the tarp was necessary
because the scaffolding and tarp will remain in place
so crews can address maintenance
needs of the marble and the soffat panels, except the soffat panels are 20 feet above the tarp.
But they make more serious accusations of the Trump administration lying to federal judges.
On the top of page 10, they say, but there is additional context that heightens plaintiff's concerns.
When defendants requested an extension from the court on the evening of June 12 to comply with
the preliminary injunction, they did so based on their representation that thunderststrand.
storm has presented safety concerns to workers. It now appears that the purpose of the extension
may have been to gain additional time to construct the tarp to shield the work from public scrutiny.
Indeed, when defendants finally got around to removing the letters on June 13th, the letters
came off by hand. So it seems as least plausible that defendants not been focused on constructing
their bizarre and unnecessary privacy screen, the letters could have been removed before the court
order deadline. In other words, they didn't need a cherry picker or a machine to take down the sign.
In their stay motion, defendants stated the following. Without the name Trump on the building,
our fundraising will come to a halt. And according to the bylaws of a new Trump Kennedy Center
for the Performing Arts Foundation, using the Trump name again, the corporation may make donations
However, in doing so, the board of directors shall condition such donations upon the name remaining unchanged.
So they're going to create a poison pill.
They created a foundation to raise money for the Kennedy Center, but they're going to choke off the funds, also controlled by Donald Trump's people, unless the Trump name stays on.
That's a breach of fiduciary duty all over again by both the board and this foundation.
And why does the foundation get to put Trump's name on the foundation?
That's a violation of the judge's order as well.
Summer is here.
And one of the best upgrades I've made at home recently is installing a tushy bidet.
It took about 10 minutes to set up.
Attaches right to your existing toilet.
And honestly, just makes you feel cleaner and more comfortable than using toilet paper alone.
I also like that it modernizes the bathroom a bit.
Warm water, adjustable settings.
and way less wasted toilet paper.
It's one of those products that feels luxurious,
but is actually practical too.
Stop guessing you're clean.
Start feeling it for a limited time.
Our listeners get 10% off their first bidet order
when you use code legal AF at checkout.
That's 10% off your first bidet order at hellotushy.com
with promo code legal AF.
One more time, our listeners get 10% off their first bidet order
when you use code legal AF at checkout.
That's 10% off your first but day order at.
Wait for it.
Hellotushy.com with promo code legal A.F.
They say on page 11,
defendants never raised the existence of a foundation
at any point in the litigation.
These asserted bylaws may not even exist.
But to the extent that this is not puffery,
the continued maintenance of a legal entity named
the Trump Kennedy Center violates the court's injunction.
Moreover, defendants are threatening to sabotage.
the Kennedy Center by invoking a poison pill, apparently of their own making, that would directly
rob the center of funding if they are not permitted to continue to violate the law. This is a breach
of fiduciary duty. Now, the judge has come back with his order based on his read of those papers,
and here's what Judge Cooper has to say. In light of the party's status report, which I just read to you,
the court orders the following that the trump's the trump side's request to extend the deadline
to file a response is denied they shall answer by june 29 the court will promptly set an initial
scheduling conference when he gets the answer as to the plaintiff's motion for miscellaneous relief
where they're seeking relief already about the what's going on with the tarp the foundation the
funding and all of that, defendants have represented by sworn declaration that they have halted
steps to effectuate the decision to wind down programming and fully close the facility and have committed
to maintaining operational mode past July 5. If these representations do not bear out, then the plaintiff
may renew her motion for an order requiring proof of compliance at that time. Finally, the parties
are hereby ordered to file a joint status report seven days.
from the mid-July trustee meeting,
the Joint Status Report shall apprise the court
of any pertinent factual developments
as the plans for future construction
and operations at the Kennedy Center.
The report shall also indicate the purpose
and status of the tarp and scaffolding
to the extent they remain at that time.
In other words, you want to probably get the tarp down
before you fill out your next joint status report.
That is just such a proper way
for a federal judge who wants to build a record to protect himself on appeal to operate.
It's exactly what you would expect.
It's not like bombastic and how dare you.
And if you don't get it off in a day, you guys get together.
You guys file another report.
Tell me in that report what the status of the tarp is if it's still up and why it's still up.
And we'll address all of these other issues.
Now, it doesn't mean that Representative Beattie's,
side, can't file another emergency motion or application. They can. But this is the orderly way the
judge is going to build a record about the Kennedy Center. So we're going to continue to follow
it. You're going to want to be on Legal AF, on Legal AF substack for live reports. And in the meantime,
I'm Michael Popock. Come over to Legal AF on YouTube. Hit the free subscribe button. Always a great
idea to help us to continue to grow our audience. I mean, we're looking at the reflecting pool.
And I'll be doing reporting about a new filing that has been demanded by a federal judge appointed by Donald Trump,
for Trump to answer about what more he's doing to desecrate and ruin the reflecting pool.
We're still following the ballroom as it sits with an appellate panel.
And now, of course, we're following closely this case about the Kennedy Center.
As Donald Trump tries to remake the face of Washington in his own image, federal judges are fighting back, and we're here for it.
Until my next report, I'm Michael Popock.
Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscribers for our substack at Midasplus.com. You'll get daily
recaps from Ron Philikowski, add three episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content
only available at Midasplus.com.
